►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - 05/22/2019
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - 05/22/2019
https://www.slc.gov
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
If
you
want
just
a
couple
of
notes,
housekeeping
wise,
if
you're
an
applicant
we'll
invite
you
up
to
speak,
be
sure
to
say
your
name
for
the
record
and
you'll
have
ten
minutes
to
speak
and
if,
when
we
open
the
public
hearing
and
you're
just
going
to
be
a
member
of
the
public
speaking,
then
you'll
have
two
minutes
again
state
your
name
for
the
record
and
let's
try
to
be
courteous
of
other
people
who
are
speaking
no
comments
from
the
audience.
Please
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
C
A
A
D
It's
on
the
corner
of
9th
South
and
15th
West
50th
west's
is
a
dead-end
street
at
dens
ends
about
a
block
south
of
this
side
into
the
old
railroad
line.
Indiana
is
the
next
Street
to
the
north
is
sort
of
the
major
east-west
street
through
the
west
side,
they've
applied
basically
for
a
lot
split
and
here's
a
closer
photo
provided
by
the
applicant.
As
you
can
see
the
the
center
lot,
there
is
about
twice
the
size
of
most
other
Lots
in
the
neighborhood.
What
are
they?
D
What
they're
asking
for
is
to
divide
it
so
that
they
can
leave
the
existing
home,
which
was
built
in
1893
on
one
lot
and
then
built
a
new
home
on
the
lot,
which
is
now
just
lawn
space
on
the
corner
of
1500
West
and
ninth
South
I
put
this
up
there
because
it
gives
an
example
of
just
how
much
bigger
this
lot
is
and
then
the
other
in
the
neighborhood,
and
you
can
also
see
from
this
one.
This
would
just
be
a
simple
over-the-counter
item.
D
The
reason
you
are
seeing
it
is
because
new
Lots
in
the
r15
thousand
zone
are
required
to
have
50
feet
of
frontage
on
a
deeded
Street
1500
West
at
this
point,
their
frontage
that
they
have
is
97
feet
and
there's.
Even
though
I
took
calculus
in
college,
I
can't
divide
that
in
half
and
get
50
twice.
So
that
is
the
only
thing
they're
asking
you
to
modify
the
minimum
lot
size
in
this
zone
is
five
thousand
square
feet.
D
There
is
a
maximum
light
slot
size
of
7,500
square
feet
that
maximum
is
a
soft
upper
end
because
things
larger
can
be
approved.
The
reason
we
have
a
maximum
is
so
that
in
part
to
keep
the
scale
of
homes
sin
in
neighborhood,
so
that
we
don't
have
one
big
lot
in
one
super
house,
that's
completely
out
of
scale
with
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
This
lot
is
just
under
15
thousand
square
feet.
D
So
we
took
I
sent
this
community
council,
both
community
councils,
because
it's
near
the
border,
neither
of
them
decided
to
hear
it.
I
also
did
a
mailing
to
all
the
adjacent
property
owners
and
really
have
had
basically
no
feedback
whatsoever.
So
the
bottom
line
is
staff
has
recommended
approval
because
we
think,
in
the
long
run,
having
an
extra
home
on
this
lot
provides
infill
housing,
it's
at
the
scale
similar
to
the
neighborhood.
The
new
lot
is
actually
more
in
keeping
with
neighborhood
than
the
existing
law.
Diaz.
D
It's
a
paper
alley:
I,
don't
know
the
details,
it's
just
it
exists
on
paper,
but
it's
not
improved
in
any
way
shape
or
form.
It's
sort
of
got
trees
and
other
things
over
it.
I
initially
had
a
conversation
of
you
know.
Can
that
be
used.
The
reality
is
the
garage
that
the
existing
home
already
has
its
own
driveway.
That
doesn't
use
the
alley
and
you
know.
E
C
C
A
F
F
Yeah,
so
we
bought
the
house
a
couple
years
ago.
The
house
is
in
very
bad
shape.
We've
halfway,
remodeled
it
we'll
take
the
funds
from
the
new
house
spent
buying
a
lot
to
recite
it
and
finish
fixing
it
up.
It's
cool
at
house
the
alley,
it's
totally
full
of
three
different
garages
and
there's
a
fence
right
down
the
middle
of
it.
So
it
is
pretty
well
toast
and
yeah.
It
will
build
a
similar
style
house,
two
stories
about
the
same
height,
but
you
know
800
square
foot
footprint.
We.
F
A
C
Like
to
make
a
motion,
thank
you.
Based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved,
petition,
PLN
PCM,
2000,
1900
109,
a
residential
planned
development
to
construct
two
single-family
detached
homes,
with
modifications
to
zoning
ordinance
regulations
regarding
minimum
Street
frontage
are.
A
F
A
C
G
A
H
D
A
B
Npc
n
20
19
0
0
1
1
0
for
the
subdivision,
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report.
The
information
presented
in
the
input
received
during
public
hearing
I
move
that
Planning
Commission
approved,
petition,
29
PLN
PCM,
20,
1900
110,
a
request
to
create
2
individual
Lots
for
the
two
associated
single-family
detached
homes
in.
A
J
J
This
is
a
vicinity
map
showing
the
property
as
it
currently
exists.
It's
outlined
in
red
and
then
this
is
a
map
showing
the
area
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
amend.
So
on
the
left-hand
side,
you
have
the
proposed
rezoning
and
then
on
the
right-hand
side.
Should
it
be
rezone,
it
would
be
that
purple
are.
Oh,
that's
just
to
illustrate
what
portion
of
that
property
would
be
amended.
I
just
want
to
bring
up
a
couple
points:
I'm
not
going
to
talk
real
long
in
your
staff
report.
J
On
page
six
I
have
made
a
list
of
uses
that
are
allowed
in
the
RO
zone.
A
lot
of
those
uses
have
an
asterisk
next
to
them.
Those
that
ask
Turkish
day
indicate
that
those
uses
are
also
allowed
in
the
institutional
zone,
and
the
point
I
want
to
make
here
with
that
illustration
is
that
the
major
difference
between
the
institutional
zone
and
the
residential
office
zone
in
terms
of
land
uses
is
the
fact
that
institutional
zone
only
allows
limited
dwelling
uses.
In
fact,
it's
only
assisted
living.
J
Should
this
property
be
rezone,
dit
would
allow
for
variety
of
different
type
of
dwelling
uses.
It
would
also
accommodate
some
limited
commercial,
some
office
more
of
a
mixed-use
type
nature.
The
second
point
I'd
like
to
make
is
in
terms
of
some
of
the
zoning
ordinance
standards
for
the
the
two
zones
in
the
institutional
zone
in
terms
of
maximum
building
height.
J
What
is
allowed
now
is
35
feet
so
that
portion
of
the
property
that
is
zoned
institutional
somebody
could
potentially
build
something
up
to
35
feet.
They
could
go
through
a
process
to
get
more
height,
but
you
know
just
base
height
is
35
feet
in
the
RO,
the
the
building
height
would
be
60
feet
and,
if
you'll
notice
on
this
map,
the
the
properties
that
front
on
600
East
are
already
zoned
ro
and
the
Masonic
Temple
owns
four
parcels
that
front
on
608
adjacent
to
the
property
that
they
are
requesting
to
rezone.
J
J
J
J
The
landmark
Commission
heard
this
proposal
on
May
2nd.
They
had
a
very
favorable
reaction
to
what
was
being
requested.
I've
included
the
minutes
from
that
meeting
in
your
packet
for
your
review
in
terms
of
public
contact,
I've
had
a
few
phone
calls.
Most
of
them
were
just
general
information
wanting
to
know
more
specifically
like
what
the
proposal,
if
it
included
any
sort
of
actual
physical
development
which,
at
this
point
it
doesn't
I,
had
a
concern
about
any
sort
of
if
the
actual
temple
itself
was
going
to
be
modified,
and
that's
that's
not
on
the
table.
J
J
J
J
J
J
F
Think
my
only
question
it
might
not
even
be
for
this
at
this
time,
but
it
seems
like
an
opportunity
here
to
just
continue
to
break
up
our
blocks
with
like
mid-block
crossings
and
pathways
and
stuff,
just
because
you
have
that
large
parking
lot.
That
goes
the
whole
way.
That's
almost
exactly
the
center
does
that
go
that
conversation
come
up
in
a
future
development
conversation
or.
J
G
You
Bryce
Baker,
co-founder
D
V
urban
communities,
as
you
can
hear,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work,
and
so
we
appreciate
Lex
and
all
of
the
process
has
gone
on.
We've
had
community
council
open
house
here
we
had
landmarks
earlier
this
month.
We
appreciate
your
time
as
you
hear
this.
We
were
engaged
by
the
Masonic
Temple
to
look
at
what
options
there
are
for
long-term
economic
viability
for
the
the
temple
itself.
G
They
take
a
they
take
a
great
pride
in
maintaining
the
structure
and
having
a
stewardship
over
the
building,
and
so
a
lot
of
their
income
comes
in
from
endowments,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
opportunities
for
additional
income
that
comes
through
as
we
looked
at
the
land
use,
the
adjacent
uses
are
ro
so
surrounding
the
property.
It's
it's
ro
zone
predominant
zone
along
South
temple
is
ro.
G
The
zoning
on
both
sides
of
600
East
at
this
point
is
ro,
and
so
we
looked
through
what
is
a
permitted
use
within
the
within
that
zone
and
there
wasn't
anything
that
we
saw
that
would
preclude
future
development
that
would
allow
for
the
viability.
There's
there's
not
an
interest
at
this
point
to
expand
the
campus,
which
is
the
intent
of
the
institutional
zone,
and
so
usually
it's
used
for
multi
building
campuses
and
and
additional
facilities
within
a
particular
use.
G
So
at
this
point
that's
not
the
desire
going
forward
and
so
putting
the
parking
lot
into
a
a
usable
function.
I
required
some
of
the
the
boundary
that
we're
looking
at
I
know
that
Landmarks
Commission.
They
asked
why
we
weren't
doing
the
entire
site
and
I'm
glad
that
Lex
brought
up
the
fact
that
there
is
concern
about
whether
or
not
the
structure
itself
is
being
modified,
which
is
not
the
case
where
the
intent
of
this
of
this
proposal.
So
we
were
really
looking
at
cleaning
up
the
west
side
of
the
parking
lot.
G
There
is
a
need
for
parking
for
ongoing
operations
at
the
lodge
at
certain
times
throughout
the
year
and
and
so
the
parking
lot
that
remains
was
quantified
based
on
the
number
of
stalls
that
are
required.
So
we
really
have
tried
to
maximize
the
amount
of
land
that
could
go
into
a
development.
At
this
point,
the
zone
in
meeting
with
zoning
and
zone
administrator
to
get
some
interpretation.
The
reason
why
the
zone
has
a
tail
is
and
I
can't
really.
G
So.
The
reason
why
the
tail
out
to
South
temple
is
within
the
zone
we're
not
allowed
to
have
ingress
egress
that
would
serve
another
zone,
I
believe
they
refer
to
that
as
the
shopping
center
clause,
where
you
can't
have
a
commercially
zoned
and
have
a
ingress
egress
point
through
a
residential
neighborhood.
The
same
condition
exists
here
with
institution,
even
though
most
of
the
uses
are
permitted
within
both
of
the
zones,
it's
a
different
zone,
that's
being
accessed
the
other
issue
that
we
have,
as
we
have
discussed.
G
Other
developments
within
the
city
with
Salt
Lake
Fire
is
that
with
the
beautiful
street
lines
streetscape
on
600
East
and
the
on
street
parking,
we
would
not
be
able
to
meet
a
fire,
an
aerial
fire
apparatus,
access
for
the
fire
department.
If
we
were
to
use
600
East
as
the
as
the
point
of
connection
there's
just
too
far
from
the
setbacks
from
the
property
line
and
out
into
the
street
and.
G
G
G
G
We
are
now
squaring
off,
I,
guess
the
ro
zone
on
that
quadrant
of
the
block
and
so
we're
surrounded
by
ourselves,
which
is
an
institutional
use
and
then
the
RO
to
the
north
and
to
the
south
of
us,
and
it's
ro
directly
across
the
street,
to
the
west
of
us,
and
so
we
felt
that
was
the
appropriate
zone
as
opposed
to
trying
to
spot
zone
something
else
and
shoehorn
it
into
the
block.
It
made
more
sense.
This
way.
G
What
it
also
allows
is,
as
we
met
with
landmarks,
because
the
three
parcels
out
on
600
East
are
already
ro,
there's
already
the
the
granted
height
within
those
zones.
We
thought
it
was
probably
more
appropriate,
given
the
residential
nature
of
600
East,
to
allow
for
density,
to
be
shifted
further
in
block
than
out
on
the
street
and
so
to
try
to
maintain
some
sort
of
pedestrian
scale
along
600,
East
and
so
squaring
up.
The
ro
zone
allows
us
that
opportunity
as
well
so
with
that
I
am
gay
I'm
grateful
for
you
to
be
here
tonight.
A
A
C
A
C
A
E
J
J
E
B
B
A
E
J
H
Thank
you
good
evening.
This
is
a
request
by
le
plat,
representing
the
property
owner
of
the
property
at
approximately
2:30
three
East
Williams
Avenue,
for
a
conditional
use,
approval
to
construct
a
detached
accessory
dwelling
unit
or
ad
you
to
the
rear
of
the
property
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
project
with
conditions.
H
So
the
project
is
before
the
Commission,
because
the
proposed
a
to
you
is
located
in
the
r15
thousand
single-family
residential
district.
All
ad
you
proposals
in
a
single-family
zoning
district
require
conditional
use
process.
This
process
looks
at
the
compatibility,
location,
configuration
and
potential
impacts
of
the
request.
H
So
this
next
slide
will
just
go
over
a
little
bit
of
the
details
of
the
ad
you,
the
proposed
ad.
You
is
approximately
four
hundred
and
thirty-two
square
feet.
It
will
have
a
flat
roof
and
a
height
of
approximately
13
feet.
The
primary
exterior
material
will
be
a
six-inch
tongue-and-groove
cedar,
siding
with
birch
wood
decorative
inlays
there.
There
will
be
one
parking
space
provided
for
the
ad
you
as
well
as
two
that
are
provided
for
the
primary
residence.
So
there
will
be
a
three
parking
spaces
total
the
entrance
for
the
ad.
H
You
will
be
oriented
towards
Williams
Avenue
and
also
the
rear
facade
of
the
primary
residence.
The
closest
house
to
the
proposed
ad.
You
is
approximately
25
feet
away
to
review
a
chart
of
the
development
regulations
for
the
ad
use
and
what
is
allowed
versus
what
is
being
proposed.
You
can
see
attachment
II
of
the
staff
report.
H
These
slides
show
some
pictures
of
the
primary
house
on
the
residence.
You
can
see
the
driveway
entrance
on
the
picture
on
the
right.
That
will
be
the
entrance
that
will
be
used
to
access
the
accessory
dwelling
unit,
as
well
as
the
location
for
all
of
the
off
street
parking
transportation
did
approve
three
parking
spaces
in
a
tandem
parking
style
on
the
side
of
the
primary
residence.
H
H
H
You
can
see
the
six-foot
tall
cedar
fence
that
is
currently
on
the
property
that
will
be
used
as
a
means
of
privacy
for
both
the
accessory
dwelling
unit
on
the
property,
as
well
as
the
surrounding
properties
to
comply
with
the
conditional,
stent
or
conditional
use
standards
that
relate
to
the
character
of
the
site
and
compatibility
with
adjacent
uses.
Staff
is
recommending
a
condition
of
approval
that
the
existing
privacy
fence
on
the
subject,
property
along
the
interior
side
and
rear
yards
will
remain.
H
One
thing
to
note
is
that
in
an
accessory
structure
such
as
a
detached
garage
or
a
shed
could
be
constructed
one
foot
away
from
the
property
line,
so
I'm.
Looking
at
this
proposal.
It
is
not
the
accessory
building
itself,
but
because
there
may
be
increased
activity
on
the
site
due
to
the
accessory
dwelling
unit,
and
that
is
why
staff
is
recommending
that
condition
to
this.
H
Next
slide
we'll
go
over
the
public
process
that
took
place
for
this.
Early
notification
was
sent
out
to
property
owners
and
residents
within
300
feet
of
the
proposal,
as
well
as
to
the
applicable
city
or
community
councils,
which
in
this
case
was
the
Liberty
Wells
and
central
city
community
councils.
H
There
was
no
or
staff
and
the
applicant
attended
a
small
neighborhood
community
meeting,
hosted
by
the
Liberty
Wells
Community
Council,
to
discuss
the
project.
There
were
no
comments
that
were
were
provided
by
either
community
councils
staff
also
held
an
open
house
for
this
project.
Where
no
comments
were
received
at
the
open
house
as
well.
C
Have
a
question
about
the
parking?
Yes,
there
was
no
discussion
when
this
Adu
policy
was
adopted
about
like
I.
Don't
think
it's
that
big
of
a
deal
ultimately
but
like
I
doubt
that
those
three
tantum
spots
when
you're
talking
about
two
households,
those
are
I-
doubt
that
they
would
be
utilized
in
that
way.
But
I
guess
that's!
Okay,
with
the
policy
that
they
are
tandem
spots
and
they're.
Gonna
have
to
ask
each
other
to
move
all
the
time.
It
sounds
like
a
nightmare.
Yeah.
H
And
that
will
be
kind
of
an
unfortunate
side
effect,
but
one
thing
to
know
that
I
didn't
bring
up
is.
It
is
also
within
a
quarter
mile
of
a
bus
station
Otis.
It's
the
State
Street
and
approximately
tenth
south
bus
station.
I
can't
remember
the
exact
address,
but
is
within
a
quarter-mile
as
well.
How
does.
H
C
E
B
B
A
K
My
name
is
Dallin
jolly.
This
is
my
property
in
Williams,
Avenue
I'm,
going
to
be
using
it
in
the
purpose.
I'm
actually
gonna
be
living
in
in
the
Adu
and
I'm,
just
single,
so
I
found
it
a
really
good
opportunity.
So
I
was
really
excited
when
the
ad
ordinance
passed,
because
I
found
the
opportunity
I
could
live
in
a
smaller
space
and
like
an
edu
and
then
rent
out
my
home
for
quite
a
bit
more
than
I
could
rent
the
edu
out
so
decided
to
go
that
route.
K
Just
a
few,
a
few
small
items
of
business
about
this
specific
ad
you
that
we're
building
I'm
actually
part
of
a
development
group
or
we're
building
these
a
to
use
and
doing
them
prefab
and
off-site
which
it
was
a
really
important.
Part
of
this
process,
which
I
think
is
an
important
part
of
the
Adu
ordinance
is,
is
that
it
eliminates
the
construction
that
is
going
to
happen
in
these
residential
areas,
and
that
was
a
big
feedback
and
a
lot
of
thing
is
I'm.
K
H
K
You
know
so
they're
100%
built
prefab
off-site,
and
so
they
come
finished.
The
only
work
that
happens
on-site
is
just
the
utility
poles,
so
it
be
the
water
super
power
that
gets
pulled
up,
there's
no
gas
in
the
unit,
it's
all
electric
heated
and
run,
and
so
those
all
get
stubbed
in
after
the
permit
had
been
issued.
They
stub
it
in
and
the
beauty
is
that
we
can
submit
for
a
manufacturer
order.
K
K
It's
it's
built
on
a
continuous
steel
I-beam
base.
The
actual
structure
is
and
then
it'll
be
anchored
in
as
a
footing
foundation,
that'll
be
a
helical
screw
pile
so
know
if
you've
seen
those
concrete
screw,
piles
or
metal
screw
piles
that
go
down
instead
of
having
continuous
footing
in
foundation
they're.
Just
those
six
pillar
points,
it's
a
lot
less
evasive
and
a
lot
less
money,
and
it
can
do
that
because
of
the
continuous
steel
I-beam
base
that
the
unit
is
actually
built
on
it
can
let
carry
those
load
spins,
okay,.
A
K
There's
actually
so
the
unit
that
that
is
proposed
is
we
have
one
on
display
at
City
Creek
Mall.
So
if
you
guys
have
a
chance
to
go
and
walk
through
there,
we
have
a
collaboration
with
City,
Creek
Mall
right
now,
and
that's
one
of
the.
It
was
a
prototype
unit
that
we
had
built
for
the
project.
So
if
you're
curious
of
what's
actually
going
to
go
in
the
backyard
it'll
look
just
like
that.
So.
K
K
A
I
A
H
To
enter
a
question
regarding
the
living
on
the
property
and
kind
of
what
happens?
How
do
they
regulate
that?
So,
when
you
do
an
ad
you,
you
do
have
to
record,
what's
called
the
deed
of
restriction
with
the
property.
Basically,
what
that's
going
to
state
is
that
you
essentially
are
restricting
your
deed
to
adhere
to
the
Adu
standards,
and
if
you
are
to
ever
sell
it,
those
standards
would
have
to
be
met
or
the
ad
you
would
have
to
be
removed.
Is
that
correct.
F
Yeah,
as
you
say,
the
deed
restriction
runs
with
the
land,
so
it
it's
permanent
and
it
goes
with
it
and
if
they
were
to
violate
the
terms
of
the
deed
restriction
or
the
conditional
use,
permit,
the
Planning,
Commission
or
the
mayor
can
revoke
the
conditional
use
permit,
and
then
they
got
a
real
big
problem
on
their
hands.
Okay,.
H
A
F
Basically,
information,
listen,
the
staff
report
and
information
presented,
the
input
received
and
the
public
hearing
of
the
Commission
approved
the
requests
really
conditional
use
exist
for
dwelling
the
unit
ATU
at
233,
East
Williams
have
presented
the
petition
PL
and
PCM
2019
zero
zero
one,
one
eight,
where
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report
well.
Second
mark.