►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - December 02, 2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - December 02, 2020
There were technical issues with the original live stream meeting. This is the archived full version of the meeting.
A
Of
the
planning
commission
of
december
2nd
2020,
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
a
guest,
we
welcome
you
to
this
evening
and
if
you
are
joining
us
in
the
video,
you
can
observe
the
slide.
That's
on
the
screen
right
now.
That
will
tell
you
how
to
actually
get
into
the
meeting
itself.
If
you
would
like
to
do
so,
I'm
going
to
start
by
actually
giving
you
a
a
declaration
about
this
meeting
being
online.
A
A
global
pandemic
exists
related
to
the
new
strain
of
the
coronavirus
sars
cov-2,
due
to
the
state
of
emergency
caused
by
the
global
pandemic.
I
find
that
conducting
a
meeting
at
an
anchor
location
under
the
current
state
of
health
emergency
constitutes
a
substantial
risk
to
the
health
and
safety
of
those
who
may
be
present
at
this
location.
A
A
C
C
C
C
It
was
tabled
by
the
planning
commission
to
allow
the
applicant
some
more
time
to
investigate
increasing
the
setbacks
of
the
building
from
the
rear
property
line
to
further
articulate
the
neighbor
space
or
the
quasi-public
quasi-private
space.
That
is
the
front
patios
along
2100
south,
and
to
increase
the
architectural
treatment
of
the
western
and
eastern
facades
of
the
building.
C
So
the
applicant
has
returned
with
some
further
setbacks
from
the
rear
property
line.
The
the
second
and
third
floors
used
to
be
set
at
the
same
step.
Back
from
that
rear
property
line,
the
applicants
have
increased
that
in
sections
of
the
building
so
as
to
increase
the
modulation
of
the
structure
at
the
rear
of
the
property
and
hopefully
to
increase
the
the
sense
of
privacy
of
the
backyards
of
those
neighbors
at
the
south
end
of
the
project
boundary.
C
The
applicant
has
also
responded
to
the
planning
commission's
feedback
regarding
the
articulation
of
that
semi-public
semi-private
space.
That
is
the
front
patios
for
the
units
along
2100
south.
As
you
can
see,
they
have
added
some
landscaping
at
the
back
of
the
property
line
and
have
added
some
three
and
a
half
foot
tall,
landscaped
planters
to
sort
of
delineate
where
that
public
space
ends
and
where
the
private
property
begins.
C
The
applicant
has
worked
with
a
landscape
architect
in
order
to
ensure
that
all
of
the
landscaping
materials
that
are
to
be
planted
in
these
boxes
are
kind
of
used
or
bred
to
be
used
in
confined
spaces
so
that
they
will
thrive
and
they
will
not.
Just
kind
of
I
guess
die
out
as
time
goes
on,
so
those
plantings
are
expected
to
survive
and
thrive.
Well
in
those
planter
boxes,.
C
C
The
applicant
has
returned
with
the
images
on
the
bottom,
so
you
can
see
the
renderings
of
both
of
those
ends
of
the
building
with
the
surrounding
buildings
along
2100
south,
and
the
additional
increase
of
a
variety
of
materials
on
each
of
those
ends.
That
was
just
to
increase
the
visual
interest
of
this
project,
as
it
will
be
one
of
the
tallest
buildings
in
the
area
for
some
time
until
the
rest
of
the
block
develops.
C
I
A
I
We
are
also
excited
to
show
you
the
effect
that
the
step
back
added
that
we
added
to
the
rear
of
the
property
line
has
increasing
the
presence
or
the
reducing
the
presence
of
the
building
against
the
south
property
line.
There's
also
going
to
be,
I
believe,
continued
pushback
against
parking
on
the
project,
and
I
just
want
to
state
very
clearly
that
we
are
not
asking
for
any
exceptions.
I
As
part
of
this
process
to
the
parking
requirements
and
the
zoning
code,
the
project
meets
all
of
the
parking
requirements
in
the
zoning
code.
Nothing
is
being
asked
for
as
part
of
this
process.
This
is
a
design
review
process
where
we
are
being
evaluated
against
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
code
and
our
compliance
and
consistency
with
master
plans
in
the
city
and
just
state
that
we
very
clearly
feel
that
not
only
we
are
meeting
the
parking
requirements
of
the
city
code,
but
we
are
exceeding
them.
I
I
You
see
on
the
east
side
of
the
block
face,
there's
the
uinta
golf
with
the
parking
lot
that
backs
against
three
homes.
The
unit
golf
is
then
very
present
for
about
two
sites.
Then
we
have
the
existing
building,
which
is
basically
an
auto
repair
collection
of
buildings,
with
the
parking
lot
that
faces
2100
that
has
a
very
commercial
boundary
against
the
crappie
lines
to
the
south.
A
single-family
home
is
to
the
west
of
our
site
with
a
parking
lot
in
back
and
then
the
gas
station
with
a
car
wash.
I
That
is
actually
a
pretty
good
nuisance
on
itself,
probably
line.
So
this
is
very
much
and
has
been
a
commercial
street,
and
so
we
feel
that
not
only
are
we
bettering
that
by
developing
the
site
as
a
multi-family
site,
but
in
putting
the
parking
underneath
the
building
we're
actually
greatly
going
above
and
beyond.
You
know
the
possibilities
of
other
future
commercial
uses
on
this
site.
I
Then
we
were
asked
to
really
drill
into
and
explain
better
how
the
project
has
human
scale
that
connects
both
to
the
public
way
along
2100
south
and
to
the
properties
to
the
rear
of
the
site,
the
single
family
homes
and
the
backyards
on
the
2100
south
side.
The
project
has
been
reasonably
well
received.
I
We
got
a
lot
of
positive
comments
in
the
last
meeting
and
had
very
few
if
any
negative
criticism,
but
but
we
work
to
address
human
skill
on
this
side
by
providing
a
building
that
steps
back
in
and
out
both
vertically
and
horizontally,
and
has
opportunities
for
connection
to
the
sidewalk,
both
at
all
the
stoops
along
the
sidewalk
and
up
above
at
the
third
story.
Balconies
that
happen
between
in
between
building
forms
and
then
we
were
given
the
challenge
of.
I
I
I
I
want
to
emphasize
that
the
architectural
gables
tie
into
the
existing
neighborhood
and
community.
You
know
play
and
blend
well
with
the
architectural
character.
We
just
these
several
images
that
I'll
flip
through
shows
how
we're
providing
that
separation
between
public
and
private
along
the
sidewalk.
I
There
was
a
a
lot
of
public
comments
at
the
meeting.
Last
time
were
about
the
intrusive
nature
of
the
parking
lot.
We
believe
we're
going
above
and
beyond
by
putting
it
under
the
building,
providing
screening
from
landscapes
and
then
just
stepping
back
against
the
property
line.
You
can
see
how
less
imposing
we
are
than
the
existing
commercial.
I
That
is,
you
win
a
golf
in
the
in
the
gas
station,
a
view
from
the
back
parking
or
from
one
of
the
backyards
down
west
east
on
2100
south
again
from
one
of
the
backyards
looking
at
how
we've
stepped
that
back,
so
we're
not
as
present
on
those
elevations
and
then,
when
the
landscape.
Matures
you
see
over
time
that
those
trees
will
grow
to
be
a
very,
very
good
screen.
I
And
then
another
thing
we
were
asked
about
is
to
look
at
what
was
entitled
on
our
property
versus
what
could
be
done
on
the
southern
properties.
They
could
all
go
in
and
ask
for
an
adu
and
those
properties,
and
this
is
about
the
scale
they'd
be
allowed
to
ask
for
which
gives
you
some
context.
That
is
these
build
out
over
time.
That
may
be
something
that
is
added
to
the
rear
yards
like
to
wrap
up
with
just
a
statement
again.
I
I
feel
like
we've
gone
above
and
beyond
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
code,
which
are
under
review
in
the
design
review
and
asking
for
a
breakdown
in
the
scale
of
the
building
asking
for
connection
to
the
community,
asking
us
to
relate
to
create
architecture
that
relates
to
the
neighbors,
and
we
believe
that
we
have
and
are
presenting
a
project
that
is
compliant
with
the
code
and
then
asks
that
for
the
planning
commission's
approval
tonight.
Thank
you.
A
A
B
D
D
We've
had
the
developers
at
our
community
council
meetings
now
on
three
separate
occasions,
and
the
community
has
been
largely
supportive
of
the
project.
They
did
have
some
questions
and
concerns
that
were
similar
to
the
ones
that
have
already
been
addressed
by
the
planning,
commission
and
otherwise,
are
largely
supportive
of
this
project.
We
appreciate
all
the
design
elements
the
developer
has
planned.
We
appreciate
the
size
and
the
scale
of
the
project
we
like
that
they
have
a
commercial
space
involved.
D
B
F
F
The
number
of
cars
that
are
showing
up
in
the
adjacent
neighbor
are
the
comparable
apartments
and
condos,
and
everything
else
around
the
average
place
has
one
and
three-quarters
cars
based
on
the
proximity,
you're,
not
addressing
the
adverse
effects
and
how
it's
going
to
impact
everybody,
and
it
also
says
that
the
director
should
check
that
and
shall
be
granted
only
if
the
following
findings
are
determined
and
will
satisfy
via
parking
demands.
The
proposed
the
proposed
parking
plan
does
not
have
a
material
adverse
impact
on
the
adjacent
or
neighboring
properties.
F
F
If
we
were
down
by
winco
and
we
had
open
spaces
that
takes
into
consideration
parking,
availability
and
spaces
that
are
there
in
this
neighborhood,
you
are
definitely
adversely
impacting
the
neighborhood
and
we're
not
considering
that
when
you
have
that,
just
because
you
have
the
50
you're
looking
for
exceptions,
if
you're
looking
for
that,
you
need
to
be
a
partner
with
a
neighborhood.
You
need
to
not
become
a
tyrant
to
the
neighborhood
and
make
the
neighborhoods
be
sacrificed,
because
you
want
the
bottom
line
dollar.
B
K
On
commonwealth,
I
appreciate
the
effort
of
the
architects
giving
a
little
bit
more
buffer
on
the
south
side
of
the
street
on
the
north
side
of
the
street.
I
should
say-
and
I
concur
with
joe-
I
mean
just
because
you
can
doesn't
mean
that
you
should
the
building's
way
too
big
and
to
my
comment
with
the
liberty
weld
person.
The
other
side
is
completely
different
and
you
have
a
huge
back
set
compared
to
what
we
have
on
our
side.
K
K
Four
feet
they're
still
in
your
face,
and
I
just
think
that
you
guys
instead
of
you,
know
cushioning
your
pocketbooks
should
work
with
the
with
the
neighbors
a
hard
working
class.
Neighborhood.
That's
been
here
forever
and
also
we're
going
to
have
this
big
big,
huge
thing
behind
us.
That's
all.
I
have.
B
K
K
K
You
can
accommodate
parking,
you
have
the
money
to
do
it,
you
haven't
and
that
hasn't
even
been
addressed
in
the
staff
report.
I
was
talking
with
judy
short
about.
It,
hasn't
even
been
addressed
by
the
planning,
commission
or
the
developers.
Just
so
to
just
say
you
can
do
it
and
and
that
you've
complied.
K
E
E
E
E
E
L
L
L
A
L
You
know
those
apartments
there
actually
have
some
parking
available
for
residents,
whereas
I
understand
the
izzy
is
not
going
to
have
any
and
with
that
well
yeah
you're,
going
to
charge
people
so
they're
going
to
be
parking
in
our
neighborhood
and
so
what
I
would
add,
the
brixton.
We
have
steady
parking
violations
here.
I
know
personally,
I
have
submitted
it
had
several
hundred
people
ticketed
from
the
brixton
apartments
just
over
the
summer
and
fall,
and
you
know
it's
dangerous.
L
The
neighborhood,
the
handicap
and
fire
hydrants
are
almost
constantly
blocked
and
that's
with
much
more
parking
than
the
izzy
is
looking
to
provide.
So
I
just
see
a
a
real
safety
problem
by
adding
more
developments
into
this
neighborhood
without
any
parking,
and
it
impacts
us
homeowners
here
and
decreases
the
safety
of
the
neighborhood,
and
you
know
I'd
welcome
if
that
data
could
be
pulled
to
show
that
literally
you
know
if
I've
submitted
hundreds
of
parking
tickets
there.
I
wonder
if
there's
thousands
overall
that
have
been
ticketed
this
year.
J
I
think,
generally
is
a
good
thing.
I'm
certainly
mindful
of
a
lot
of
the
issues
with
parking
and
we're
having,
although
I
live
much
further
east
on
21st
south
and
we're
having
similar
conversations
around
21st
and
21st
business
district,
the
real
comment
that
I
want
to
make
is
one
that's
probably
directed
more
towards.
L
Hi,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
taking
my
question.
I
live
right
behind
izzy's
south
and
I
my
concern
is
the
fact
that
the
underneath
is
going
to
be
the
parking
and
that
parking
is
going
to
be
so
close
to
my
back
fence
that
I'm
going
to
be,
and
my
back
bedroom
is
back
there.
Where
we
sleep,
I'm
going
to
see
lights
coming
through
their
fences,
I'm
gonna
hear
noise
pollution.
I'm
gonna,
hear
cars,
people
all
kinds
of
stuff.
L
In
my
backyard
which,
before
I
had
this,
not
that
you
guys
like
this,
but
I
had
this
ugly
glorious
building
behind
me
that
had
nobody
there
staring
into
my
yard,
nobody
there
polluting
my
stuff,
albeit
the
the
the
jiffy
lube,
did
pollute
when
they
with
the
oil
and
stuff,
but
that
is
my
biggest
concern,
plus
the
parking
as
well.
Just
my
privacy,
my
privacy
is
going
to
be
completely
gone,
and
I
know
that
you
guys
have
all
those
trees
back
there,
but
also
the
fact
is,
with
those
trees,
there's
power
lines
are
back
there.
L
I
mean
there's
power
lines,
I
mean
it's
just
not
enough
room.
You
guys
have
such
a
big
project
in
such
a
tiny
space.
I
just
think
just
because
you
can
does
not
mean
that
you
guys
should
and
if
you're
gonna
have
a
bear.
Our
barriers
between
the
two
properties
need
to
be
solid,
not
chain
link,
not
anything
that
stuff
and
the
pollution
and
stuff
can
get
through.
That's
what
that's
what
I
would
like
to
see,
which
I
don't
see
in
this.
B
C
N
B
N
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
yes,
I
am
commenting
to
say
that
I
do
have
residence
in
salt
lake
city
and
in
rose
park
and
family
in
this
area,
and
the
planning
needs
not
to
just
need
to
think
not
about
how
who
is
defining
community
and
if
that's,
only
defined,
it's
far
more
than
a
parking
lot.
N
But
how
that
that
is
accessible
to
working
class
families
that
my
family
does
live
here
and
what
will
that
take
away
from
our
community
and
rents
and
going
higher
and
who
was
going
to
be
kicked
out
and
who
was
going
to
stay
and
there
have
been
that's.
We
are
the
communities
that
have
built
this
community
in
which
people
want
to
come
here
that
have
much
more
money
and
just
because,
just
like
everyone
has
said
just
because
you
can
doesn't
mean
you
should
money
does
not
make
a
community.
N
B
J
J
The
lack
of
parking
makes
no
sense.
People
are
not
riding
the
s
line
and
the
neighborhood
is
over
parked
as
it
is.
The
city
has
not
moved
the
needle
in
terms
of
providing
a
reliable
frequent
transit
system
for
the
city,
much
less
this
neighborhood.
I
hope
there
is
room
to
park
several
bikes
in
each
unit,
because
that
will
become
the
most
complete
way
to
travel.
For
these
tenants,
the
outdoor
space
for
the
south
building
is
across
2100
south.
How
fabulous
is
that
a
real
draw
to
live
in
this
building
the
triple
house?
J
A
B
It
appears
that
everybody
whose
hand
was
up
or
who
indicated
in
the
q
a
or
the
chat
that
they
wanted
to
speak
have
have
has
spoken.
So
all
right,
I
guess
we
could
give
it
one
last
call
for
anybody
who
hasn't
who
hasn't
had
that
opportunity.
Yet
if
you
want
to
please
let
us
know
and
we'll
go
from
there.
I
I
would
thank
you
brenda
again,
thank
you
to
the
planning
commission
and
to
the
public
who's
continued
to
be
for
this
project.
We
have
had
an
ongoing
conversation
with
the
community
councils
we
were
reaching
out
to
them
before
we
were
even
officially
part
of
the
planning
commission
process
asking
to
meet
and-
and
we
believe
the
project
has
been
reasonably
and
fairly
well
received.
Architecturally
by
the
community
councils.
The
liberty
wells
are
yeah
the
liberty
wells.
I
It
was
a
great
opportunity
to
have
a
dialogue.
The
sugar
house,
community
council
generally
was
complimentary
of
the
architecture,
but
had
some
concerns
about
the
building's
presence
against
the
south
side
and
wanted
to
continually
have
a
dialogue
about
parking.
So
I'd
like
to
address
parking
first,
even
though
it's
not
under
review
today,
the
unit
mix
of
the
project
is
very
high
on
studios.
It's
not
they
we're
continually
compared
to
another
project.
That
is
a
new
project
to
the
south.
I
We
believe
that
we
have
a
leasing
strategy
that
is
going
to
manage
that
that's
for
the
client
or
the
property
owner
to
to
manage
as
long
as
we're
compliant
with
parking,
and
I
just
want
to
state
that
we
are
again
compliant
with
the
city's
parking
requirements.
In
fact,
we
exceed
them,
and
we
believe
that
we
can
successfully
manage
that
on
this
site
and
max
is
welcome
to
say
anything
more
in
that
that
he'd
like
to
say,
but
we've
taken
a
very
close
look
at
it
and
we
have
treated
it
very
seriously.
I
That
does
not
take
away
from
the
fact
that
we
are
in
very
close
proximity
to
the
s
line,
and
we
believe
that
we
are
very
consistent
with
master
plans
that
have
been
out
there
in
the
community
for
quite
a
while
that
have
encouraged
density
and
housing
density
and
and
less
parking
on
projects
that
are
near
and
adjacent
to
in
close
proximity
to
transit
lines.
We
also
are
very
close
to
bus
lines
and
to
bike
pathways
that
also
provide
additional
connectivity
to
the
neighborhood.
I
Another
point
that
I
want
to
make
is
someone
stated
that
we
don't
have
parking.
That's
just
not
correct,
and
I
know
they
kind
of
corrected
themselves,
but
we
have
ample
parking
for,
we
believe
for
our
project
on
site
and
it
will
be
managed
by
the
the
project
manager
and
then
the
community
is
asked
and
mentioned
in
both
the
community
councils
and
again
tonight
that
they
would
like
a
taller
fence.
L
A
Thank
you
yeah.
You
didn't
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
or
for
staff
or
any
comments
regarding
this.
This
proposal.
I
would
like
to
point
out
to
all
of
the
people
who
are
here
to
visit
with
the
commission
and
testify
before
the
commission
that
what
is
that?
What
is
being
discussed
here
are
design
review
elements
and
a
special
exception
to
allow
three
feet
of
additional
building
height
elements.
A
H
H
So
it's
not
a
place
that
we
can
make
a
thing
around
a
decision
around.
So
I
I
was
a
big
voice
when
that's
probably
before
about
making
sure
we
mitigate
that
rear,
and
I
think
they've
probably
done
what
they
could
to
meet
the
kind
of
standards
that
are
laid
out
in
the
design
standards.
And
so
I
guess
I'm
generally
supportive
at
this
point
in
time,
based
on
the
standards
of
before
us,
for
the
project.
D
P
H
Do
want
to
respond,
I
mean
I
do
feel
you
know
that
we
I
do.
I
do
symbolize
with
with
some
of
the
comments
about
feeling
the
pressures
of
development
in
these
neighborhoods,
but
I
do
also
think
that
you
know
this
body
does
work
very
hard
to
try
to
listen
to
the
concerns
and
accommodate
what
we
can
from
the
neighborhood
and
reflect
what
communities
are
there,
but
also,
you
know,
respect
the
property
rights
and
development
rights
and
the
zoning
overlays
that
are
there.
H
So
I
probably
I
do
disagree
with
some
of
the
at
least
one
of
the
comments
from
the
public.
To
mention
that
we,
I
don't
don't
try
to
do
that,
because
I
do
think
we
work
very
hard
and
particularly
we've
addressed
this
project.
The
last
meeting
was
one
one
which
we
you
know
shows
that
we
are
trying
to
accommodate
these
within
the
standards
that
are
before
us.
D
We'll
make
a
motion:
okay,
it's
based
on
the
information
and
the
staff
reports,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
petition
numbers
pln
ccpm,
2020-0022
and
pln
pcm
2020-00655,
the
design
review
and
special
exception
request,
respectively
for
izzy
south
located
at
approximately
534
east
2100
south,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
Q
R
A
D
A
O
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
a
quick
comment
to
the
commenters
that
we
do.
You
know
we
do
read
your
comments.
We
do
listen,
and
I
agree
with
commissioner
lyon
that
we
do
try
and
address
the
things
that
are
actually
impaired.
Purview
we
legally
cannot
require
an
applicant
to
provide
more
parking
than
the
code.
I've
said
that
in
other
meetings,
the
code
is
set
by
the
city
council.
I
L
A
O
A
B
A
A
C
C
The
item
was
tabled
by
the
planning
commission
following
discussion
about
the
location
of
the
break
in
the
building.
The
planning
commission
suggested
that
that
break
be
relocated
closer
to
the
intersection
of
the
street,
so
it
is
more
visible
and
more
viable
for
people
as
they're
walking
up
and
down
600
west.
C
The
planning
commission
also
recommended
some
additional
treatment
of
the
building
at
the
intersection
in
order
to
facilitate
more
pedestrian
usage
and
then
a
greater
ground
floor
retail
area
articulation.
The
funding
commission
at
the
october
meeting
felt
that
there
was
a
large
amount
of
glass
and
it
was
just
a
curtain
wall
of
glass.
So
the
planning
commission
recommended
some
additional
architectural
materials
there
to
break
up
that
level.
C
So
since
that
meeting
in
october,
the
project
itself
has
undergone
a
few
changes
following
some
further
research
done
by
the
applicants,
seven
units
have
been
added
so
instead
of
the
original
312
units
that
were
requested
in
october,
they
are
requesting
well
not
requesting,
but
the
the
project
includes
319
units.
Now
the
lower
level
of
parking
has
been
removed.
C
C
The
applicant
has
also
added
a
corner
plaza
with
some
seating
and
fireplaces
at
the
intersection
of
600
west
and
200
north
to
accommodate
some
of
the
planning
commission's
feedback
and,
additionally,
the
second
drive
access
has
been
removed.
So
there
is
no
longer
parking
access
from
600
west.
All
of
the
access
for
all
131
stall
was
now
located
off
of
200
more
so
those
are
some
of
the
project
changes
that
have
occurred
since
the
last
meeting,
as
you
can
see
here
is
the
original
concept
plan.
C
As
you
can
see,
there
are
two
still
the
two
drive
accesses
and
the
break
in
the
building
is
located
farther
to
the
west,
almost
immediately
adjacent
to
that
drive.
Access
on
200
north
here
is
the
updated
concept
plan,
so
you
still
have
that
drive
access
on
200
north,
however,
the
break
in
the
building
and
those
amphitheater-like
steps
have
been
relocated
about
40
feet
farther
to
the
to
the
east.
C
M
S
M
M
The
public,
slash
neighborhood
second
comment
that
we
took
was
break
up
the
ground
floor,
glazing
and
introduce
more
materials
a
better
way,
finding
an
articulation
on
the
retail
facing
elements
on
the
ground
floor
of
both
600
west
and
200
north
another
comment
was
to
create
more
activated
corner
on
600,
west
and
200
north
for
better
applied
public
use.
Another
comment
was
to
create
more
articulation
in
the
building's
facade
to
achieve
a
look
that
is
more
multi-family
and
less
office
looking
and
one
was
to
create
more
available
parking.
M
So
I
will
address
those
comments
as
we
move
forward
here,
as
caitlyn
showed
in
in
one
of
those
images,
the
the
architectural
break,
we
had
moved
it
closer
42
feet
closer
to
the
corner.
That
was
a
comment
that
I
think
amy
had
had
originally
requested.
Is
that
the
break
was
too
far
down
on
the
dead
end
street
and
to
move
that
a
little
bit
closer
to
the
corner,
so
it
serves
the
public
a
little
bit
better
being
a
public
space.
M
M
M
This
again
shows
an
overhead
view
of
the
where
that,
basically,
where
the
dead
end
street
is
looking
out
to
show
where
how
that
break
had
been
again
moved
closer
to
the
corner
of
600
west,
the
second
comment
was
to
break
up
the
ground
floor,
glazing
and
introduce
more
materials
better
way,
finding
an
articulation
on
the
retail
facing
elements
on
the
ground
floor
on
both
600
west
and
200
north.
Our
resolution
to
this
was
removed,
glazing
on
the
corner
to
open
it
up,
which
we'll
go
over
in
in
just
a
minute.
M
M
Wayfinding
and
signage
would
be
accomplished
by
blade
it's
kind
of
blade,
signage
that
actually
protrudes
out.
So
it
creates
more
of
a
visual
interest
as
you're
walking
down
the
street.
If
you're
on
the
corner,
you
can
see
wayfinding
to
those
commercial
accesses,
and
then
we
also
have
a
large
metal
canopy
that
we
introduced
like
a
gabled
canopy
on
the
corner.
That
introduces
a
little
bit
more
depth
for
the
building,
but
I
wanted
to
just
point
out
in
this
specifically
on
200
north.
M
So
this
would
be
looking
at
the
very
south
portion
of
the
building
walking
up
there
used
to
be
an
entrance
to
a
garage
on
600
west
that
had
now
become
a
restaurant.
We
had
a
restaurant
that
was
a
lower
level
that
got
removed.
That
was
a
tavern.
It
was
a
concern
that
one
of
the
comments
brought
up
and-
and
we
listened
to
that
and
and
are
just
going
to
do,
a
more
nighttime
restaurant
in
that
space,
and
this
shows
you
know
it.
M
This
is
taking
a
look.
This
is
on
200
north
side,
looking
at
this
space
here,
how
it
kind
of
articulates
through
that
break
and
the
amphitheater
style
seating
that
also
engages
into
what
we
would
be
imagining
as
a
coffee
shop
in
that
location
that
has
some
outdoor
seating
in
the
park
strip
and
kind
of
articulates
around,
but
again
showing
how
that
that
break
of
of
the
glazing
happens
in
and
it
kind
of
joins
up
to
the
the
break
that
was
created.
M
M
Our
response
was
to
design
an
outdoor
living
room
on
the
corner,
to
be
used
as
public
ass
access
for
dining
gathering,
working
in
coordination
with
all
the
commercial
tenants
and
patrons.
What's
that
the
public,
oh
and
and
and
use
of
public
art
on
that
back
wall.
But
what
we
really
wanted
to
do
is
break
up
the
mass
of
glazing
that
was
happening.
M
There
is
a
requirement
of
glazing
and
a
requirement
of
retail
that's
happening,
but
we
thought
that
it
would
be
a
more
appropriate
use
for
the
space
to
allow
the
neighborhood
and
the
rest
of
the
community
to
actually
access
that
corner
instead
of
just
having
it
be.
A
massive
glazing:
we
reduced
our
retail
quite
a
bit
for
this,
but
we
think
it's
a
good
use
of
public
space.
M
M
One
of
the
comments
also
was
to
create
more
articulation
in
the
building's
facade
to
achieve
a
look
that
is
more,
that
is
more
multi-family
quote-unquote
and
less
office
quote-unquote.
The
resolution
was
to
we
before
we
had
just
a
mass
of
of
those
bevels
with
the
wooden
insets
and
glass
balconies,
which
which
there
was
a
comment
that
made
it
feel
very
office-y.
M
M
We
wanted
those
retail
spaces
to
be
able
to
be
used,
potentially
by
the
kind
of
as
live
work
spaces
for
the
residents
above
to
have
smaller,
more
affordable
retail
spaces,
and
so,
instead
of
having
one
mass
of
glazing,
as
as
was
mentioned,
we
we
really
thought
about
breaking
those
spaces
into
smaller
retail
spaces,
to
engage
the
community
and
have
a
little
bit
more
retail
tenancy
that
was
appropriate.
This
also
shows
the
break
in
the
building
there.
M
M
We
went
to
to
caitlin
and
the
rest
of
the
transportation
department
in
engineering,
and
we
requested
to
be
able
to
have
a
study
done
that
we
did
at
our
expense
on
the
civil
engineering
side
to
see
if
we
could
allow
more
parking
on
the
street
and
the
parking
strip
on
both
sides
of
the
building
are
massive,
and
we
thought
that
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
to
use
those
for
parking.
So
we
could
isolate
the
parking
closer
to
our
development
instead
of
having
to
be
widespread
throughout
throughout
the
neighborhood.
M
M
The
one
on
200
north
would
just
be
painted
the
lines
because
there
was
there's,
there's
a
big
push
back
with
engineering,
city,
engineering
and
transportation
of
actually
using
departure
and
urban
forestry
to
keep
the
park
strips
maintained.
So
on
200,
north
there's,
those
streets
are
actually
really
wide,
and
so
we
were
able
to
do
that
without
protruding
into
the
park
strips.
M
We
then
suggested,
but
on
600
west
to
actually
protrude
into
the
park
strip
and
put
diagonal
parking
urban
forestry,
and
I
think
transportation
didn't
totally
love
that
idea
and
there
was
there
were
some
issues
with
that.
But
that
is
something
that
we
are
interested
in
doing,
if
at
all
possible
to
to
add
parking
there.
And
that
was
the
comment
on
that.
M
I
think
the
last
slide
is
just
our
another
kind
of
updated
rendering
of
showing
that
corner
showing
that
that
break
in
the
building
and
on
on
both
the
ground
floor
level
and
also
the
articulation
of
the
facade
break
and
some
of
the
retail.
So
that
is
my
presentation
and
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
you
guys.
M
Yeah
there's
132
stalls
and
I
can
address
that
really
quickly.
We,
after
doing
a
deep
dive
into
our
engineering
study
in
our
geotech
study.
The
groundwater
at
this
site
is
five
feet
deep,
and
we
had
wanted
to
use
underground
an
entire
underground
level
of
parking
and
it's
just
not
feasible.
There's
there's
no
way
construction-wise
that
we
that
we
can
do
it.
It
would
be
constant
water
mitigation
and
it
would
be
it
would
it's
just
not
possible
to
go
to
go
a
full
story
down.
M
We
have
we'd,
have
to
go
14
feet
down
and
we'd
basically
be
in
a
tub
which
makes
the
project
infeasible.
So
we
decided
that
we,
because
of
that,
we
had
to
reinvest
into
the
city
lift
system
to
be
able
to
get
our
parking
to
try
to
get
it
exactly
where
we
had
it
before
before.
It
was
at
142,
but
with
the
city
lift
system
that
we're
now
investing
over
two
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
to
complete.
M
R
A
For
the
public-
and
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
this
is
a
design
review
of
this
project-
it
does
follow
the
parking
guidelines
for
the
city
zoning
requirements.
So
that
is
not
at
issue
here
and
also.
I
want
to
say
that
we
have
received
several
extremely
interesting
and
well-worded
comments
in
our
packet
that
were
given
to
you.
We
were
given,
we
were
given
in
advance,
so
those
are
those
are
being
under
consideration.
T
Okay,
I
apologize
that
my
comments,
don't
seem
very
polished,
but
can
you
give
your
name
please?
Yes,
this
is
pamela
starley
and
I'm
gonna
hurry
through
this.
I've
tried
to
type
it
up.
I
didn't
have
much
time
so
I
hate
the
feeling
that
I'm
such
a
little
person
in
the
world
that
my
opinion
and
the
opinions
of
other
people
cannot
make
a
difference
that
we
can't
be
heard
or
listened
to.
T
Mr
lyon
said
a
few
minutes
ago
that
you
do
try
to
work
on
things,
but
the
end
of
those
public
comments
on
the
izzy
project.
Were
the
developers
saying
he
just
didn't
agree
and
compare,
and
he
simply
thinks
that
the
parking
is
adequate
and
it
seems
so
often
that
different
committees
or
agencies
cite
reasons
why
their
hands
are
tied,
such
as
zoning
allowances
that
enable
a
developer
to
build
in
maximum
parameters
or
requirements.
T
I
know
that
changing
those
things
require
efforts
in
other
directions,
but
the
person
whose
hands
are
least
tied
seems
to
be
the
developer
himself.
His
hands
are
not
so
tied
within
the
height
and
breadth
and
depth
of
space.
Given
him,
he
can
do
what
he
wants
to,
but
just
because
he
can
do
something
doesn't
mean
he
should
do
it
and
that's
it's
the
right
or
the
best
thing,
and
so,
while
I'm
a
little
bit
confused
about
the
procedures
of
things,
my
comments
are
mostly
directed
to
dallin
jolly.
T
Mr
jolly,
I
know
you
received
at
least
three
letters
from
neighbors
here.
One
of
them
was
mine.
I
was
not
rude
or
strident.
I
politely
asked
you
to
consider
reducing
the
building
height
and
gave
you
reasons
why
I
creatively
suggested
a
method
for
increasing
parking
and
solving
some
car
problems,
citing
something
that
was
done
elsewhere.
I
never
got
a
reply
from
you.
Did
you
reply
to
any
of
us?
You
have
even
reduced
the
parking
and
increased.
The
units.
Amazing
certainly
didn't
consider
just
eliminating
an
entire
floor.
T
Did
you
seriously
consider
our
concerns,
objections
and
suggestions
through
your
website
and
some
interactions
with
others?
You
fancy
yourself,
an
approachable,
caring
man
and
your
partner.
Yet,
did
you
even
read
our
letters?
Why
have
you
not
modified
your
idea
much
in
those
directions,
except
for
tweaking
the
facade
of
this
building?
A
building
that
created
some
outcry.
D
D
There
are
parking
issues
and
I'm
another
one
of
the
three
who
wrote
the
email
to
the
developer,
and
I
never
heard
back
and
it's
amazing.
In
the
last
meeting
on
october
14th,
we
voiced
our
concerns
about
parking
and
the
height,
and
so
the
developer
increased
the
units
and
decreased
parking
stalls.
That's
just
amazing,
and
also
according
to
the
north
temple
master
plan.
D
D
So
this
is
some
good
news,
bad
news,
and
this
is
mostly
directed
developer
dallin.
I
think
that
for
planning
commission's
feedback
in
regards
to
the
architecture,
the
overall
look
and
feel
the
reducing
the
200
feet
and
adding
some
of
the
public
space,
so
it
livens
it
up
and
it
makes
it
look
much
cleaner
and
nicer
so
good
job
on
that.
D
D
D
My
next
comment
is
directed
at
the
planning
commission,
and
perhaps
someone
can
tell
me
the
correct
person
to
talk
to,
because
what
I
understand
from
the
previous
october
meeting
is
that
any
change
to
the
tsa
zoning
is
left
to
the
city
council.
However,
my
comments
to
chris
wharton
came
back
to
me
as
that
any
changes
to
the
to
the
zoning
is
resting
rest
solely
on
the
planning
commission's
shoulders.
So
it
seems
like
there's
a
little
bit
of
like
one
hand,
doesn't
know
what
the
other
hand
is
doing.
A
G
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
we
can't
thank
you.
My
name
is
antonio
fierro,
I'm
with
the
rose
park
brown
berets.
I
was
at
the
last
meeting
about
this,
and
so
this
is
directly
toward
developers
and
the
planning
commission.
So
to
balance
ali
and
david
kin,
you
know
what
we,
what
you
are
doing
to
this
neighborhood
is
is
harmful.
G
This
is
exactly
what
gentrification
is
darling.
You
said
that
you
moved
into
the
guadalupe
neighborhood
four
years
ago,
and
you
said
that
you
cared
about
it,
but
by
demolishing
seven
houses
that
people
are
currently
living
in,
shows
you
that
you
don't
care
at
all.
You
say
that
these
homes
are
in
bad
condition.
It's
not
true.
You
are
just
using
that
as
an
excuse
to
make
a
profit
and
because
you
have
the
money
to
upgrade
and
fix
these
homes
for
families
in
the
neighborhood.
G
You
directly
said
that
you
would
do
your
best
to
make
this
affordable,
but
they
are
not
affordable
at
all
percent
ami
is
not
affordable.
That's
only
affordable
to
families
that
make
sixty
thousand
dollars
a
year
versus
a
family
that
makes
eighteen
thousand
dollars
a
year
or
twenty
thousand
dollars
a
year,
which
is
which
is
bs
of
what
you
are
telling
us.
So
you
kept
using
that
70
ami
as
an
excuse,
so
so
planning
commission.
G
You
also
said
that
you
cannot
do
anything
about
this,
but
you
can,
because
you
guys
are
being
bystanders
if
you
guys
are
not
speaking
with
people.
You
work
for
us.
Okay,
so
please
oppose
the
causal
apartments.
It
does
not
fit
in
the
neighborhood.
It
is
racist.
It
is
classes.
Please
stop
it.
Thank
you.
Gracias.
N
N
And
all
the
other
languages
that
you
developers
and
commission
have
not
taken
the
time
to
get
to
know
when
you
come
into
a
neighborhood,
there's
a
difference
between
development
and
neighborhood.
When
you
come
into
a
neighborhood,
you
come
and
speak
to
the
neighbors.
You
come
in
and
bring
a
dish,
a
casserole,
some
tamales,
some
food.
You
come
and
break
bread
with
them.
You
do
not
absolutely
not
come
during
the
holidays
at
a
sacred
time
and
buy
people
out.
You
do
not
make
promises,
and
this
is
also
to
you
katelyn
miller.
N
Many
people
have
tried
to
call
you,
but
your
phone
you're
you're
not
accessible
and
please
commission.
When,
when
you
say
to
us,
yes,
we
will
have
the
developers
answer
afterwards.
Please
do
have
them
and
have
them
answer
these
questions.
Why
are
they
not
answering
these
questions
do
not
be
bought
out
by
money
and
to
you,
mr
david
clinton.
You
look
like
a
young
gentleman
who
please
go
and
have
some
experiences
in
life
to
to
know
and
get
to
know,
people
that
do
not
cannot
afford.
N
Nor
do
we
want
to
live
in
a
place
like
that,
get
to
know
the
neighborhood
and
stop
gentrifying.
This
neighborhood
gentrification
is
violence
and
at
a
time
of
cover
19
when
people
are
dying,
left
and
right
in
our
neighborhoods
brown
and
black
people
know
what
you
are
coming
to
and
stop
sitting
back
planning
commission,
because
there
are
people,
young
people
rising
up,
and
if
you
will
not
do
it,
we
will
do
it.
So
you
are
in
there
to
serve
the
people
not
serve
the
developers
there
are.
N
The
people's
lives
are
much
more
because
you
serve
someone.
If
you
have
you
you,
if
you
have
a
faithful
religion,
there's
someone
higher
than
that
dollar,
that
you're
being
promised
underneath
the
table
and
for
the
love
of
the
children
and
the
love
of
the
land,
do
not
adhere
and
be
have
your
souls
be
sold
for
just
a
dollar
or
just
owe
that
house
do
not
do
that
on
our
behalf,
and
if
you
do
that,
please
do
not
have
that
job.
N
A
A
B
L
K
K
Oh
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
Yes,
I
would
love
to
speak
of
the
situation.
That's
going
on.
I
know
that
rose
park
is
a
really
heavy
samoan
populated
community.
I'm
someone-
and
I
I've
seen
the
community
grow
like
tremendously
over
there
in
that
neighborhood,
and
not
only
just
the
same
one,
but
also
like
you
have
african-american
brothers
and
sisters,
and
you
have
our
latinx
brothers
and
sisters
as
well
and
other
folks
as
well.
K
How
like
it
it's
hard
for
a
lot
of
us
out
here,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
that
that
please
do
not
build
this
in
our
community,
I
mean
just
for
the
love
of
our
community.
We
just
ask
that
you
just
think
about
the
people
think
about
the
community
and
also
just
think
about
the
children,
the
ones
that
you'll
you
will
affect
all
over
in
the
city.
So
thank
you
very
much.
G
Yes,
I'd
like
to
first
thank
the
planning
commission
for
all
the
hard
work
they
do
again.
My
name
is
jason
walker.
I
live
in
the
neighborhood.
I've
been
here
for
over
20
years.
I
first
sort
of
have
a
question
to
the
planning
commission
and
then
a
comment.
My
question
is
these
units
are
referred
to
as
multi-family,
but
over
90
of
them
are
378
square
feet.
G
G
Have
already
addressed
that
in
the
sense
that
they
meet
all
the
requirements
for
the
master
plan.
So
if
we
had
a
thousand
comments
or
even
a
hundred
thousand
comments
dealing
with
the
effect
of
the
neighborhood
since
they've
met
the
requirements
of
the
master
plan,
the
comments
are
therefore
mostly
meaningless.
Is
that
correct.
G
G
I
cannot
believe
that
this
is
happening
throughout
the
city
and
20
years
from
now
when
these
places
begin
to
fall
apart
and
the
population
of
the
city
might
not
be
what
we
project
it
to
be.
Just
like
those
pipelines
done
in
the
1980s
supposedly
to
drain
the
great
salt
lake,
we
spent
65
million
dollars
and
they're
useless.
G
M
M
I
appreciate
all
the
comments
and-
and
I
am
sensitive
to
them-
we
have-
you
know-
really
thought
about
this
neighborhood
and
I
and
I
have
lived
in
this
neighborhood
for
a
number
of
time
over
four
years
and
what
we
were
trying
to
do
and
what
I
thought
the
area
really
needed
was
to
add
affordable
units
and
not
affordable
housing
units.
To
this
neighborhood
is
this
downtown
core
neighborhood
and
it's
a
supportive
neighborhood,
that's
what
the
tsa
uct
zone
does.
M
Is
it
supports
residents
and
tenants
that
are
transit
oriented,
and
we
want
to
do
that
with
an
affordable
rate
unit
that
also
allows
them
to
to
use
the
transit
appropriately
and
that's
what
this
building
was
designed
to
do
the
density.
That's
there
is
designed
to
accommodate
that.
It's
a
it's
a
common.
The
density
allows
us
to
have
affordability,
so
I
hear
the
comments,
but
we
are
building
this
building
in
a
coordination
in
accordance
with
the
master
plan
of
the
city.
We
are
not
asking
for
additional
building
height.
M
We
are
not
asking
for
any
exceptions
to
parking.
We
are
not
asking
for
any
setback
reductions.
All
we
are
asking
for
is
to
make
sure
the
articulation
of
the
architecture
meets
well
with
the
neighborhood
and
that
it
is
well
represented
and
that
we
will
be
adding
really
fabulous
tenants
to
the
neighbors
to
the
neighborhood.
I
have
many
many
many
people
that
I've
chatted
with
the
neighbors
within
the
neighborhood
and
I've
tried
my
best
to
communicate
with
a
lot
of
these
people
and
address
to
address
some
of
the
letters
that
I've
received.
M
M
We
do
think
that
we
are
providing
adequate
articulation
and
and
and
the
design
review
itself
should
be
approved,
based
on
the
fact
that
we
listened
to
the
planning
commission's
comments
and
that
we're
doing
everything
that
we
can
to
to
build
a
really
great
building
here.
One
of
the
comments
that
address
the
homes
we
currently
own,
all
seven
of
those
homes
and
five
out
of
the
seven,
are
unrentable
because,
because
of
methamphetamine
use
and
or
poor
conditions,
they
are
not
thriving
families
that
are
living
there.
M
M
O
A
M
Yeah,
so
just
based
on
the
pro
forma
rate,
so
we
could
have
luxury
units
that
rent
for
quite
a
bit
more,
that
are
larger
square
footage.
But
what
that
really
does
add
to
gentrification-
and
I
hear
those
comments
but
putting
units
in
here
that
are
larger
square
footage
and
that
rent
for
you
know
two
to
twenty
five
to
three
thousand
dollars
a
month.
M
That
has
a
vast
impact
on
the
neighborhood
much
more
than
the
smaller
affordable
units
that
meet
the
master
plan
of
the
zone,
which
is
to
have
affordable
units
and
that's
also
a
transit
oriented
tenant.
So
that's
that
was
that
was
our
whole
goal
is
to
have
workforce
and
affordable
housing
here
and
we're
able
to
do
that
by
a
density
to
get
the
density
out.
Basically
to
get
there
instead
of
having
large
luxury
units.
A
B
So
yeah
I'm
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
I'm
apologize
for
any
sort
of
miscommunication
or
errors.
Frankly
in
that,
but
basically
under
state
law,
a
zoning
change
has
to
go
through
the
planning
commission
first
for
a
recommendation
and
then
ultimately
to
the
city
council
for
a
decision
and
that's
the
simplest
way
to
put
it
in
salt
lake.
There's
a
certain
early
engagement
period.
That's
required
as
part
of
that
that
happens
before
the
planning
commission
process,
but
that's
that's
basically
it
so
so
the
ultimate
decision
maker
on
zoning
is
the
city
council.
B
B
B
A
B
That
that's
correct,
if
there's
a
process
that
the
zoning
ordinance
authorizes
and
somebody
submits
an
application
and
it's
a
complete
application
under
well
state
under
state
law.
They
are
what's
called
an
entitled
to
that
process,
so
they
have
a
right
to
the
process
and
the
regulations
that
are
in
place
at
the
time
their
application
is
a
complete
application
is
submitted.
A
A
H
H
C
Absolutely
so
this
is
in
the
tsa
zone
and
the
tsa
zone
is
broken
up
into
a
cro,
a
core
area
and
a
transition
area.
So
the
core
area
allows
for
taller
buildings,
whereas
the
transition
area
allows,
for
you
know,
still
fairly
tall
buildings,
although
not
quite
as
tall
as
the
core,
and
this
zone
is
intended
to
serve
as
a
transition
between
the
the
more
high-rise,
high-intensity
urban,
core
transit
area
developments
and
the
single
family
and
and
two
family
residential
zones
around
it.
H
C
Yep
67
feet
and
and
change.
So
the
reason
for
that
is
that
the
applicant,
in
conjunction
with
their
design,
review
application
also
submitted
for
a
tsa
score
and
in
the
tsa
score
application.
If
a
project
scores
high
enough,
it
qualifies
for
staff
level
approval
and
if
it's
another
bonus
for
it,
if
it
scores
this
highly,
is
that
they're
entitled
to
an
additional
habitable
story?
C
H
C
H
You
know,
I
do
recognize
that
just
right
across
the
street
from
you
is
the
neighborhood
is
sr1,
I'm
trying
to
actually
pull
the
height
what's
on
those
areas.
But
maybe
you
just
talk
to
me
real,
quick
on
how
you
tried
to
mask
this
building
in
ways
that
would
relate
to
the
people
across
the
street
across
200
north.
M
Yeah
yeah
happy
to
answer
so
I
think
some
context
of
the
neighborhood
is
appropriate
as
well.
We're
just
right
off
the
north
temple,
which
is
a
majority
of
you,
know,
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
six
story,
developments
that
is
happening
on
north
temple.
This
the
apartment
building
right
directly
to
the
south
of
us,
I
think
is-
is
about
45
or
50
feet.
So
it's
not
completely
out
of
whack
for
the
neighborhood
there's.
Also
the
boys
and
girls
club,
which
was
just
completed
directly
south
of
us
as
a
commercial
use.
M
There
is,
I
think,
it's
a
senior
living
directly
across
the
street
that
is
probably
40
feet
tall.
There's
a
couple
duplexes
and
triplexes
across
the
street
on
600
west
side,
where
this
camera
angle,
if
you
can
still
see,
is
basically
in
front
of,
is
that
that
multi-family,
I
think
it's
senior
living,
but
this
is
the
transition
course,
so
it
does.
Transition
from
all
these
areas,
from
200
north
down
to
north
temple
is
the
transition
area
and
then
there's
the
core
area
from
north
temple
all
the
way
down
into
the
gateway
mixed
use
area.
M
M
This
is
a
this
is
a
new
project
and
there's
going
to
be
more
projects
like
this
in
the
future,
so
it
it
is
a
large
project
for
this
corner,
but
it's
not
completely
out
of
whack
for
what
is
happening
in
the
neighborhood
and
especially
along
the
north
temple
transit
corps
area.
But
it
will,
it
will
continue
to
happen.
This
is
you're
you're,
quite
literally
two
or
three
blocks
from
downtown
core,
and
this
is
a
supporting
downtown
core
neighborhood,
and
that's
why
the
master
plan
is
zoned
this
this
neighborhood
as
such.
M
Now,
if
it
was
me,
I
totally
sympathize
and
I
agree
there
should
not
be
an
sr1
area
directly
across
the
street
on
200
north.
I
think
the
reason
it
was
permitted
is
because
the
link
and
the
the
dimension
from
where
the
tsa
uct
our
zone
to
the
neighbor
is
quite
some
distance.
I'd
have
to
do
a
measurement,
but
it's
it's
probably
well
over
150
to
200
feet
to
those
sr1
zones
and
it's
the
only
area,
but
it's
not
directly
neighboring
any
of
the
zones.
M
H
M
Quick,
I
I
think
sr
1a
is
around
25
feet:
it's
a
residential
zone.
It
allows
you
know
some
different
mix
of
uses
with
some
multi-family
duplexes
and
such,
but
it
is
a
smaller
residential
zone.
I
think
that
what
would
be
more
appropriate
is
actually
allow
that
transition
to
happen
to
where
it
would
be.
You
know
an
rmf,
30
or
rmf
35
on
that
side
of
the
street
to
follow
the
master
plan,
but
that
would
be,
I
think,
as
of
right
now.
Sra
is
what
it
is.
Yeah.
A
O
Yeah
I
have
one
for
caitlyn
in
the
in
the
standards
listed
in
aged
parking
and
on-site
circulation,
your
analysis
wasn't
updated
for
the
new
one
entrance
on
second
north.
Can
you
provide
an
updated
analysis
for
why
you
think
that
it
still
complies
given
now
that
we
only
have
one
parking
garage
entrance.
C
O
And
I
do
want
to
just
take
a
moment
to
the
applicant
and
say
that
I
think
this
building
looks
a
lot
better
and
I
do
appreciate
all
of
the
stuff
you've
done
it
it,
and
I
think
I
said
this
the
last
time
you
there.
I
thought
you
could
do
better
and
I
think
that
you
went
back
and
you
did
do
better.
So
I
appreciate
those
changes
that
you've
made
and
it
really
did
address
my
concerns
regarding
that.
O
How
do
you
work
with
transportation
to
perhaps
institute
certain
traffic
measures
on
that
intersection
of
second
north
and
sixth
west,
given
the
load
you're
proposing
to
add
to
it?
What
are
what
are
the
conversations
you've
had
with
transportation
regarding
that
traffic
flow,
or
have
you
only
talked
to
them
about
parking
on
street.
O
Amy
yeah,
I
mean
I'd
like
to
hear
if
they,
if
the
applicant,
because
they've
mentioned
they've
talked
with
transportation,
have
you
discussed
what
type
of
measures
that
they'll
just
load
this
increased
load
may
present
to
that
intersection
because
it's
transportation
that
institutes
all
the
traffic
calming
measures
that
we
see
in
the
city?
Again,
that
is
out
of
our
purview
and-
and
I
am
definitely
not
a
transportation
engineer,
but
I
want
to
know
if
you
as
the
applicant
have
talked
to
them
about
that
increased
load.
O
M
Yeah,
I
mean
I'll,
be
the
first
to
say:
I'm
not
a
traffic
expert
as
well.
We
went
and
proposed
we
had
our
civil
engineer.
We
had
talked
to
our
civil
engineering
and
we
talked
about
proposing
the
diagonal
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
street
to
add
more
on
street
parking
because
of
the
width
of
the
the
width
of
the
street.
There
was
the
bicycle
lane
I
think
was.
M
As
far
as
a
full
traffic
study
amy,
I
I
have
not
done
that
and-
and
we
have
we've
talked
to
to
transportation
and
engineering,
but
there
has
not
been
a
full
study
done
on
what
that
would
do
other
other
than
us
providing
to
transportation
a
recommendation
of
what
we
thought
would
be
a
little
bit
more
appropriate
to
have
some
diagonal
stalls
that
has
not
been
approved,
but
it's
something
we
we
thought
would
be.
We
would
recommend
to
them
and
they're
still
kind
of
deliberating
caitlin
was
also
in
those
conversations.
S
Do-
and
I
just
want
to-
I
just
want
to
reiterate-
you
know-
add
to
that-
that
concerning
traffic
studies,
I
know
that
in
some
other
localities
the
cities
actually
do
require
projects
like
this
to
to
go
through
a
traffic
study.
Salt
lake
city
at
this
time,
to
my
knowledge,
does
not
require
traffic
studies
on
projects
like
this,
and,
if
that's
a
concern
for
for
people,
that's
something
they
might
want
to
take
up
with
the
city
council.
S
S
And-
and
I
guess
we
should
also
add
200
north-
it
is
a
dead-end
street,
and
so
we
don't
suspect
that
there's
going
to
be
much
of
any
traffic
impact
other
than
like
you
said
amy
at
the
intersection
where
those
132
cars
in
the
parking
garage
plus
any
that
are
on
the
street,
may
be
going
through
there,
but
most
likely
they
would
be
going
through
at
different
times
of
the
day.
But
obviously
I'm
not
a
traffic
engineer,
I'm
an
architect.
So
I
want
to
be
able
to
speak
to
that
issue.
G
M
So
we
we
had
a
zoom
conversation
with
chris
wharton.
I
think
who
is
the
community
council
chair
our
city
council
care?
We
also
talked
to
I've
talked
to
a
number
of
the
neighbors.
You
know,
previous
to
the
first
planning
commission,
and
also
after
we
have
we.
We
actually
have
a
meeting
tomorrow
night
with
with
community
with
one
of
the
community
council
leaders.
M
We,
we
really
have
tried
to
engage
as
much
as
we
can
with
some
with
some
of
the
community
councils,
but
there
hasn't
been
a
whole
bunch
of
you
know:
discussion
that's
been
had
other
than
we
talk
about
our
project.
We
propose,
they
say,
thank
you
and,
and
that's
kind
of
that,
and
as
far
as
the
neighbors
go,
I've
talked
to
a
number
of
them.
A
lot
of
the
neighbors
are
supportive.
M
The
ones
directly
across
the
street
on
200
north
are
understandably
not
supportive,
because
they're
the
ones
most
directly
impacted
both
by
parking
and
also
kind
of
visually
on
the
street,
but
a
lot
of
the
the
neighbors
and
the
community,
people
that
I
know
I've.
I've
had
lunch
with.
I've
talked
to
them
talked
to
them
about
the
impacts
of
retail.
C
C
C
C
So
these
are
based
off
of
the
original
proposal.
The
transportation
division
did
indicate
that
egress
from
the
parking
structure
does
need
to
provide
a
10-foot
sight
distance
to
avoid
pedestrian
conflicts
with
the
driveway.
However,
no
additional
concerns
were
brought
up
at
the
time
of
the
original
consideration.
O
So
it's
hard
to
just
say
yeah,
you
did
a
good
job
with
what
we
were
concerned
about
before,
because
now
we're
reviewing
a
very
different
project
and
I
feel
like
I-
I
am
interested
in
in
hearing
more
about
what
transportation's
thoughts
are
on
its
new
design
in
terms
of
standard
age
and
the
circulation
with
this
increased
load
that
is
now
solely
directed
on
200.
I'm
not
saying
it's
a
deal
breaker,
but
I
don't
think
that
the
and
oftentimes
I
think
the
department
review
from
the
other
departments
in
the
staff
reports.
O
I
mean
they
don't
always
even
respond
at
all,
so
having
transportation,
maybe
understand
a
little
bit
better
of
what
we
would
like.
What
I
would
like
to
hear
from
them
on
is
warranted
for
me.
So
I'm
not
I'm
not
happy
with
passing
this
on
without
getting
a
better
feedback
from
transportation.
On
that
specific
question,.
S
S
O
So
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
tabling
this
to
hear
a
better
response
from
transportation.
I
feel
like
this
was
a
a
not
great.
You
know
the
applicant
has
been
fine.
I
feel
like
that.
The
staff
report
should
have
been
updated
and
new
responses
from
the
city
departments,
given
that
this
design
is
so
different
from
what
we
previously
heard.
H
I
guess
I'm
weighing,
I
think
the
project
has
come
a
long
way
and
looks
they
respond
to
a
lot
of
comments
if
there's
a
clear
need
for
affordable
housing.
Even
though
that's
not
one
of
the
standards
that
we
have
before
us,
but
there's
a
clear
need.
I
I
think
if
it
would
would
have
scored,
as
part
of
that
would
have
been
helpful
and
I'm
just
trying
to
weigh
whether
or
not
this
transitions
sufficiently
enough
and
whether
or
not
what
what
the
master
plan
kind
of
looks
for
for
the
area.
H
H
L
M
Yeah
I
mean
I
want
to
speak
to
that,
but
I
also
want
to
just
just
say
I
I
think
tabling
it
to
another
recommendation
designer
and
the
item
that
amy
has
brought
up
is
a
conditional
thing,
and
I
I
would.
I
would
say
that
I'm
happy
to
have
the
traffic
study
done
and
have
transportation
involved,
but
it
seems
like
that
could
be
a
conditional
use
on
approval,
but
not.
F
O
Can
I
get
some
clarification
from
nick
on
what,
if,
if
we
did
put
this
as
a
condition
to
approval,
I
I'm
nick,
do
you
think
it
would?
It
would
end
up
giving
us
information
that
we
need
to
address
this
increased
load,
because
sometimes,
I
feel
like
what
we
see
from
transportation
is
like
yeah,
it's
good
yeah
and
they
don't
it
doesn't
follow
through
unless
they
have
very
specific
verbage
to
ask
them
what
we
want.
What
are
what
are
your
feelings
on
that.
B
So
what
it's
getting
at
is
what
impact
is.
Does
the
building
itself
the
use
itself
have
on
those
three
things:
the
sidewalk,
the
the
connections
to
the
sidewalk,
the
connections
to
the
transit
station,
which
is
off-site?
I
think
that's
a
key
thing
is
that
that's
to
another
location,
and
so
if,
if
there
is
a
concern
about
what
it
does
to
crosswalks
and
sidewalks,
and
things
like
that,
then
that's
something
that
that
we
could.
We
could
take
a
look
at
and
figure
that
out.
O
Okay,
so
because
yeah
I
mean
I
am
concerned
with
the
load
of
that
intersection
and
how
that
plays
out,
then
with
how
not
only
vehicles,
but
when
I
talk
about
that
is
how
people
are
going
to
move
through
that
set
because
it
has
big
vehicle
traffic.
Since
I
live
right
off,
21st
south,
I
know
how
that
does
affect
pedestrian
movement
and
safety.
B
L
O
B
It's
probably
not
going
to
deal
with
the
with
the
number
of
cars
and
the
reason
why
I
say
that
is
because
it
is
typically
safer
to
deal
with
vehicles
at
controlled
intersections
like
that
at
600,
west
and
in
200
north
and
by
controlled
I
mean
there's,
stop
signs
and
things
like
that
versus
where
vehicles
are
entering
and
exiting
a
building
where
you
don't
have
those
same
controls,
even
though,
technically
and
legally,
every
car,
that's
leaving.
Private
property
is
supposed
to
stop
before
it
crosses
the
sidewalk.
B
We
all
know
very
few
actually
do
that
and
there's
you
can't
really
sign
it.
Just
I
mean
you
could
put
some
stop
signs
at
the
drive
exit,
but
they're
not
enforceable
by
the
city,
because
it's
on
private
property.
So
I
think
that
my
hunch
is
that
would
be
the
the
if
there
is
an
outcome
that
includes
any
sort
of
change.
It
would
be
something
along
those
lines.
O
Okay,
so
if
I,
if
I
want
to
just
add
a
condition,
do
I
can
I
just
go
with
the
first
motion
or
do
I
need
to
go
with
the
second
motion
and
just
say
all
of
the
above
and
then
add
a
condition
because
it's
broken
out
into
like
motion
to
approve
with
conditions
modified.
I
don't
really
want
to
modify
any
of
the
proposed
eight
conditions
in
their
original
motion.
I
just
want
to
add
one.
O
Then
I'll
read
that
one
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
design
review
request,
including
modifications
to
the
maximum
distance
between
building
entrances,
maximum
length
of
a
blank
wall
and
maximum
length
of
a
street-facing
facade,
pln
tcm
2020-00258
or
the
commodore
house
apartments
project
located
approximately
175
north
600
west.
O
The
recommendation
is
based
on
the
conditions
of
approval
listed
below,
with
the
addition
of
a
condition
designed
that
a
traffic
study
be
conducted
with
transportation,
specifically
looking
at
the
circulation
of
this
increased
traffic
load
and
the
pedestrian
connectivity
and
safety.
Regarding
that
intersection
on
200,
north
and
600
west
final
details
regarding
these
conditions
of
approval
are
delegated
to
planning
staff.
L
A
D
A
A
O
A
O
B
Madam
chair,
before
before
we
move
on,
can
I
make
a
statement?
We've
heard
a
lot
of
comments
about
displacement,
gentrification,
affordable
housing
and
things
like
that,
and
I
want
to
let
everybody
know
that
yesterday
we
had
a
briefing
with
the
city
council
where
we
talked
about
these
very
things,
and
the
city
is
working
on
a
couple
of
key
changes
to
the
development
regulations
in
the
city
that
will
hopefully
help
address
those
issues
and
concerns.
B
Particularly
one
thing
that
we're
seeing
is
in
the
west
side,
neighborhoods,
where
home
values
are
rapidly
increasing
and
pricing
people
out
at
a
rate.
That
is
very
alarming,
and
so
I
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
They
can
go
to.
Hopefully,
information
will
be
up
on
our
website,
but
you're
happy
to
contact
me
if
you
want
to
be
involved
with
that
and
I'll
start.
Creating
a
list
and
making
sure
everybody
that
wants
to
be
involved
is
the
best
way
to
contact
me
is
through
my
email,
nic.norris
at
slc
gov.
A
K
My
computer
is
not
moving
there
and
it
runs
east
to
west
parallel
to
learned
avenue
in
north
temple
from
the
adjacent
north
south
alley
to
a
dead
end.
As
far
back
as
we
know,
the
alley
has
functioned
as
an
extension
of
the
parking
lot
serving
the
adjacent
restaurant
and
does
not
provide
access
to
required
parking
and
it
does
provide
access
for
one
of
the
single-family
homes
facing
london
avenue.
There
is
no
signage
or
other
indication
that
clearly
demarcates
public
property.
Additionally,
the
alley
yes.
K
K
K
Put
them
into
multi-family
residential
buildings
with
some
ground
floor
commercial
uses
facing
north
temple.
The
applicant
has
argued
that
this
vacation
request
is
necessary
for
proposed
development.
One
issue
that
comes
up
with
proposal
to
vacate
alleys
are
questions
about
the
alley
serving
other
potentially
beneficial
uses
in
the
area.
For
instance,
alleys
often
serve
as
mid-block
walkways
for
pedestrians
as
a
positive
urban
design
element.
This
alley
runs
east
to
west
intersecting,
with
the
adjacent
north-south
alley
to
a
dead
end.
K
As
such,
this
alley
does
not
connect
any
street
to
another,
thus
not
significantly
improving
pedestrian
accessibility,
the
subject
ali
about
four
existing
single-family
houses-
and
this
goes
back
to
that
conversation-
we've
had
in
the
past
two
items.
Redeveloping
this
block
and
demolishing
existing
single
family
houses
oldest
place
their
current
residents,
while
their
plans
are
preliminary.
The
applicant
has
not
made
any
indication
that
an
affordable
housing
component
will
be
incorporated
into
the
proposed
project.
Recent
housing-related
conversations
with
city
council
members
have
indicated
that
alleviating
displacement
of
existing
housing
is
a
priority
of
the
city.
K
Just
this
corner
property-
I'm
sorry
right
here,
the
all
the
other
homes
there's
a
garage
access,
but
all
the
required
parking
for,
except
for
this
home
on
the
corner.
Let
me
rephrase
that
only
this
home
on
the
corner
has
required
parking
access
from
this
alley
and
they
can
access
that
parking
from
the
adjacent
north-south
alley.
B
So
this
is
this
is
a
little
bit
of
an
interesting
thing,
because
this
is
a
legislative
function,
you're
making
a
recommendation
to
the
city
council
to
consider
that.
So
it's
something
that
that
they
they
might
be
able
to
do
and
we'll
will
deal
with
with
that
as
we
get
to
the
city
council.
But
you
can
condition
alley
vacations
that
further
the
when
they
may
have
an
impact
on
the
public
interest.
B
K
H
H
H
H
H
H
D
H
D
L
A
B
G
So
he
so
I'm
not
really
aware
of
this
project.
Are
you
guys
going
to
be
destroying
the
the
the
panda
buffet
and
and
the
asadero
restaurant
just
to
put
these
up,
and
I
want
to
a
question
too
like
how
what
are
the
are
these
apartments
going
to
be
affordable
to
the
people
in
the
neighborhood
in
rose
park
in
popular
grove.
A
L
L
A
D
I'll
make
the
motion
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report,
the
policy
considerations
for
alley
vacation
and
the
input
received
planning
commission
forward.
A
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
for
the
athlete
vacation
proposed
in
pln
pcm
2020-005,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
A
L
A
H
A
A
H
L
A
A
A
F
F
Okay,
so,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
design
review
and
plan
development,
it's
for
a
proposed
150
unit
apartment
building,
which
includes
a
mix
of
micro
and
studio
apartment
units,
a
type
that
isn't
generally
found
in
the
gateway
district.
It's
in
the
gmu
zoning
district,
it's
three
pieces
of
property
or
three
parcels.
F
So
here's
a
an
overview
of
the
site.
Again
I
mentioned
it's
three
parcels
they've
also
filed
a
lot
consolidation
application,
which
will
be
reviewed
by
staff.
Administratively,
here's
a
rendering
looking
towards
the
southwest
corner
of
proposed
building.
Again
it
has
frontage
on
both
200,
south
600,
west
and
we'll
let
the
applicant
talk
about.
It
is
more
but
there's
two
commercial
spaces
that
will
front
on
200
south
and
the
one
will
also
look
onto
600
less.
F
The
applicant
has
been
working
with
staff
changed
several
aspects
of
the
original
design
to
better
meet
the
standards.
I
only
mentioned
that
because
sometimes,
when
he's
by
the
time
he's
come
to
the
planning
commission,
we've
been
working
with
an
applicant
and
several
iterations
have
already
gone
on
just
to
their
credit,
they've
been
willing
to
work
with
staff
on
this
they're
requesting
modification
of
the
following
items
to
the
design
review
process.
F
They
have
the
the
use
of
hardy
board
on
the
side
of
the
buildings.
Their
party
is
not
listed
as
a
durable
material
in
the
gmu
zoning
district,
although
it
has
been
used
on
a
number
of
other
projects,
including
the
beverly
in
recent
times
in
the
nearby
area
and
also
they're
looking
at
they
have
a
blank
wall
section
on
the
600
west
street,
facing
facade
that
is
approximately
27
feet
in
length,
so
they're
exceeding
the
maximum
15
foot.
F
F
F
Again,
a
little
bit
more
context.
This
is
on
600
west,
looking
kind
of
south
easterly,
and
you
see
the
central
station
apartments
being
built
on
that
side
of
200
cells.
So
there's
a
lot
of
development
in
the
area,
given
the
transit
accessibility
street
view
along
200
cell,
the
existing
street
trees
on
that
side
of
the
property
would
be
retrained
retained.
F
Key
considerations
was
that
neighborhood
compatibility
and
context
how
this
fits
into
the
area.
The
master
plan,
compliance,
also,
the
deep
design
details
and
public
realm
experience
and
the
things
that
are
being
modified
are
those
material
choices
and
the
length
of
blank
wall
sections
allowed
and
that
would
be
broken
up
with
public
art
would
be
the
proposal,
and
then
there
are
a
couple
of
design
standards
outlined
in
the
report
that
were
not
met
or
undetermined.
F
One
of
the
design
standards
we
look
for
in
design
review
is
the
building
having
a
base
middle
and
top
some
cornice
details,
and
that
those
are
not
included
in
this
building.
So
again,
that
is
one
standard
that
wasn't
met
and
was
unable
to
determine
the
window
recesses.
There
are
some
how
those
windows
are
recessed
into
the
building
and
again,
a
little
bit
of
discussion
on
that
parking
lot.
Landscaper
buffing
buffer,
that's
required
on
the
north
side
of
the
lot.
F
It's
a
seven
foot,
landscaping
buffer
that
could
be
reduced
through
the
plan
development
process
and
the
applicant
will
be
prepared
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
scott
felt.
It
generally
met
the
designer
view
and
playing
development
standards
and
where
the
standards
are
not
being
met.
Modification
has
been
requested
through
the
design
review
process
and
that
landscaping
buffer
on
the
north
side
of
the
surface
parking
could
be
modified
through
the
plan
development
process.
A
D
F
R
R
Let
me
just
speak
briefly
to
the
two
items
mentioned:
first,
the
cementitious
siding
or
hardy
siding
being
considered
as
a
durable
material.
I
found
it
instructive.
As
I
was
reading
the
zone.
The
ordinance
itself
lists
the
following
as
approved
brick,
masonry,
textured
or
patterned,
concrete
and
or
cut
stone,
and
then
it
essentially
lists
the
following
as
the
materials
they're
trying
to
avoid.
R
It
actually
breaks
up
some
pretty
large
horizontal
planes
along
the
facades
and
are
doing
that
not
only
for
color
but
also
for
the
texture
in
the
building,
and
so
we
would
respectfully
request
that
party
as
it
has
been
previously,
be
considered,
compatible
and
can
be
considered.
Then
a
portion
of
that
70
requirement.
R
The
the
second
part
talks
to
the
the
15
foot
maximum
length
of
a
blank
wall
and
along
the
600
west
facade
on
the
ground
floor.
There's
a
section
in
between
the
retail
storefront
glass,
more
toward
the
corner
of
second
and
sixth
and
then
the
other
glass
that's
sort
of
up
the
street
from
along
600.
There's
this
center
section,
that's
recessed,
even
at
the
ground
floor
level
that
does
measure
in
distance
greater
than
15
feet.
R
The
concept
there
in
that
recessed
portion
is
for
us
to
install
art
in
that
area
as
we've
sort
of
driven
around
the
area,
we've
seen
a
lot
of
murals
painted
murals
along
the
sides
of
buildings,
but
we
want
to
bring
something
down
to
that
ground,
floor
level
and
engage
the
pedestrians
there
a
little
bit
differently
again.
Just
by
way
of
reference.
The
ordinance
says
the
maximum
length
of
any
blank
wall
uninterrupted
by
doors,
art
or
architectural
detailing
at
the
first
floor
level
shall
be
15
feet.
R
R
That
will
be
installed,
it'll
sort
of
climb
up
the
wall
there
in
that
recessed
area
and
it'll
break
up
the
plane
sufficiently,
and
so
we
would
request
based
upon
that
recessed
portion
being
designated
as
our
art
area
that
we
would
be
considered
sufficient
to
break
break
up
that
plane
and
david.
I
saw
your
chat,
your
texts
that
you
could
show
that
again,
if
you
don't
mind,
sharing
just
that
portion
sort
of
point
out
what
we're
talking
about.
R
I'll
just
briefly
mention
this
is
a
good
view.
Actually
to
talk
about
it,
you
see
that
that
there
isn't
a
cornice.
As
david
mentioned,
there
are
some
we've
included
some
vertical
or
I'm
sorry,
some
horizontal
along
the
top
of
those
units
over
the
balconies
and
overhang
there
to
break
up
the
weather
and
to
make
those
spaces
a
little
bit
more
habitable
and
nice.
R
A
A
A
Okay,
the
west
elevation,
unlike
the
other
elevations
I'm
assuming
the
east
elevation,
also
has
the
same
issue.
Actually
it
doesn't.
The
west
elevation
is
particularly
plain
and
above
the
level
of
the
street
and
has
really
no
windows
and
and
very
or
very
few
smattering
windows
and
extremely
plain
and
which
would
be
pretty
acceptable
if
this
were
a
building
where
we
anticipated
that
you
know,
another
building
was
going
to
be
built
next
door
to
it
or
close
to
it.
R
Yes,
yeah.
I
appreciate
that
question
I'll,
tell
you
the
reason
if,
if
we
could
go
behind
that
wall
and
into
those
studio,
apartments
that
are
right
along
or
that
share
that
wall,
what
you
see
when
you're
on
the
inside
of
it
is
the
kitchen
that
sort
of
runs
along
part
of
that
and
then
really
the
only
blank
wall,
space
for
hanging
a
tv
or
backing
a
bed
into,
because,
as
you
come
around
the
corner,
you
see
the
the
balconies
along
the
other
side,
and
so
we
actually
reduced
the
size
of
the
windows.
R
There's
still
windows
and
natural
light
that
are
coming
in
through
those
smaller
windows
on
the
corner.
But
everything
you
basically
see
to
the
north
of
that
small
window
on
the
corner
is:
is
room
for
use
on
the
interior
to
not
break
up
that
interior
space.
Both
a
similar
project
on
west
temple
and
ninth
south
145
units
there,
and
one
of
the
key
pieces
of
feedback
we
got
from
our
tenants
as
we
were
leasing
up,
was
that
there
was
almost
nowhere
to
pay
anything
on
the
inside,
and
so
that
is
the
practical
reason.
R
A
R
A
R
We're
fencing
in
the
surface
parking
in
that
area
to
create
some
separation
from
the
street
and
the
landscape
buffer.
Does
that
as
well?
And
there
is
some
some
buffer
there,
but
also
for
security
purposes,
because
then
you
access
the
underground
parking
which
comes
out
of
that
same
location,
which
obviously
leads
them
into
the
building
itself
and
so
you'll
see.
As
you
come
off
the
sidewalk
on.
R
Sixth,
there
will
be
a
large
landscape
buffer
prior
to
the
gate,
and
then
the
gate
will
lead
into
the
surface
parking
area
which
will
also
have
its
islands
as
required
inside
of
the
you
know,
certain
number
of
stalls
as
designated
there.
So
can
you
see
that
there
does
that
help
to
answer
the
question.
D
R
B
Q
Q
The
other
thing
that
I
also
wanted
to
bring
up
is
the
three
inch
recess
we
we
did
address
that
and
I'm
not
sure
why
it
didn't
make
it
in,
but
basically
what
we've
done
and
this
this
is
not
a
finalized
detail.
Please
understand
that,
but
what
we've
done
is
we've
popped
out.
We
put
the
windows
in
and
then
we're
going
to
pop
out,
like
a
stucco
trim
around.
Q
A
R
L
Q
So
this
kind
of
gray
gray
portion
well,
let
me
start
the
base.
The
base
is
gonna,
be
concrete,
we're
gonna
have
board
formed
concrete,
and
then
this
kind
of
inverted?
U
will
be
brick,
brick
material
right
here
this
this
bluish
color
and
the
orange
color
would
be
a
horizontal,
heidi
board
party
board.
Excuse
me
and
then
the
white
is.
C
Q
Q
L
D
Based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
of
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
vote
to
approve
the
proposed
client
development
and
design
review
applications
for
the
green
print
gateway
apartments
located
at
approximately
592
west
200,
south
files,
plm
pcm.
F
L
A
A
O
Q
A
H
H
I
I'm
really
struggling
with
seeing
this
type
of
building
and,
although
I'm
my
mind,
is
not
in
a
place
right
now,
really
with
a
great
narrative
or
so
I'll
vote,
yes
for
now,
but
I
do
think
we
we're
seeing
this
like
three
color
sort
of
blocky
sort
of
thing
all
over
salt
lake
and
they
don't
look
great
so
I'll
vote.
Yes,
this
time.
A
A
D
B
L
E
The
purpose
of
the
result
is
to
allow
for
multi-family
development,
as
shown
on
the
conceptual
plan
above,
and
this
plan
shows
the
applicant's
intent.
The
applicant's
intent
is
to
demolish
the
commercial
structures
and
maintain
the
single
family
dwelling,
combine
the
two
lots
and
build
a
town
home
development.
E
While
the
applicant,
the
applicant,
has
provided
a
conceptual
development
plan,
this
result
is
not
associated
with
a
specific
development.
The
conceptual
plan
serves
as
an
indication
of
the
applicant's
intent,
but
the
result
should
be
considered
on
its
own.
The
existing
structures
are
considered
non-complying
to
the
current
zoning
standards,
which
means
that
they
were,
they
don't
meet
all
the
standards
because
they
were
built
prior
to
this
standards
being
put
in
place.
E
E
The
form
of
a
new
development
is
also
more
relevant
than
the
number
of
units.
The
form
is
what
guarantees
compatible
development
and
hlc
will
review
the
form
of
the
building
of
a
new
building
and
a
required
landscape
buffer
that
will
be
required
in
a
new
development
will
could
help
mitigate
potential
impacts
to
abiding
properties.
E
The
second
consideration
was
the
possible
loss
of
commercial
use
in
this
node.
The
property
at
860
eastern
east
third
avenue
has
had
commercial
uses
for
over
a
century.
The
san
mar
san
bar
maps
and
historical
areas
show
that
a
store
was
located
on
the
intersection
of
third
avenue
and
n
street
since
at
least
1911.
E
So
this
commercial
corner
is
pretty
established.
The
avenues
master
plan
offers
limited
opportunities
to
add
future
commercial
zones
in
the
neighborhood.
So
the
loss
of
this
already
designated
commercial
property
could
mean
a
reduction
of
services
at
the
community
level
and
could
alter
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
E
The
neighborhood
node
offers
not
only
commercial
support,
immediate
residents,
but
also
enhances
the
area
in
terms
of
urban
design,
which
includes
providing
a
place
to
gather,
support,
walkability
and
give
life
to
the
street.
So
staff
is
recommending
that
the
result
be
conditioned
on
maintaining
a
commercial
component
on
that
corner.
E
Lastly,
the
rezone
would
allow
for
the
conversion
of
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
into
a
non-residential
use,
which
would
be
essentially
an
expansion
of
commercial
uses
into
an
established
residential
area.
The
future
land
use
map
which
is
shown
on
the
screen
of
the
avenues
master
plan
is
not
clear
on
the
vision
for
the
specific
property,
because
the
map
is
not
intended
to
be
a
rule
of
law
serve
as
a
guidance,
so
it
doesn't
show
any
property
boundaries.
E
E
As
listed
on
the
screen,
we
did
not
receive
a
comment
from
the
community
council,
but
we
received
multiple
emails
from
the
public
regarding
the
request
mostly
are
in
support,
and
these
public
comments
were
either
included
in
the
staff
report
or
in
the
dropbox
for
your
consideration.
That
is
the
end
of
my
presentation.
I'm
happy
to
take
expressions.
H
E
So
that
the
sr1as
23
and
the
cn
is
25.,
because
this
house
is
considered
contributing
the
height
is
not
so
much
of
an
issue,
at
least
for
staff,
because
that
will
be
reviewed
for
compliance
with
hlc
and
we
we
don't
usually
approve
second
story
additions
to
existing
contributing
structures,
in
addition
to
the
back
or
to
the
side.
But
we
usually
don't
approve,
but.
H
H
E
E
D
So
much
considering
the
commercial
component,
I
mean
I
just
wonder
whether
that's
actually
truly
viable.
It's
been
used
as
a
gas
station
and
an
auto
repair
shop
for
decades.
It's
it's
useful.
It's.
It
provides
a
service,
that's
needed
in
the
area,
but
I
wouldn't
say
it's
it's
something
that
contributes
to
like
an
engaging
streetscape
or
a
gathering
place
for
the
community,
and
you
have
other
locations
in
the
avenues
where
commercial
properties
are
still
vacant.
D
You
know
10
years,
I'm
thinking
of
the
space
right
next
to
kachina,
that's
been
released
for
eight
to
ten
years
with
no
tenant.
I
just
wonder
whether
we're
imposing
an
obligation
there
that
won't
actually
be
practical
in
the
long
term
and
then
my
second
question
is
is
why
is
the
house
being
included
in
the
rezone
if
it's
going
to
remain
as
a
house?
E
The
first
one
didn't
seem
to
be
much
of
a
question,
but
I'll
try
to
cover
that.
We
feel
like
because
this
is
zoned
commercial.
The
loss
of
that
would
could
be
something
we
can't
go
back
to,
because
the
at
least
the
master
plan
right
now
is
offer
limited
opportunities
to
create
commercial
in
this
neighborhood
because
the
area
is
so
established
as
residential
already.
E
E
The
applicant
has
shown
interest
in
doing
live
work
units
and
that
could
meet
that
standard
or
that
condition
it
could
also
be
a
place
just
a
convertible
space.
So
they
would
build
this
development
per
building
code
and
fire
code
that
could
accommodate
some
commercial
space
and
that
could
be
converted
later
in
the
future.
E
E
E
But
the
zoning
would
remain
the
same,
so
they
would
have
to
change
the
sr1a,
and
the
other
thing
is
the
sr1a
for
a
single
family
requires
5000
square
feet
of
a
lot,
so
we
couldn't
adjust
that
lot
too
much,
because
the
lot
has
I
can't
remember
now,
but
over
over
5000,
but
not
it
didn't
reach
the
six
thousand.
So
there's
a
lot
of
space
that
they
could
use.
If
this
is
combined,
if
that
makes
sense,.
D
A
A
Q
Q
Hey
guys,
marcus
is
now
unmuted
thanks
for
I
appreciate
it.
You
guys
are
okay
with
all
I'll
jump
in
here,
really
quick
and
and
do
a
quick
intro
again,
I'm
marcus
robinson
with
with
remark
investments
or,
although
my
partner
obviously
is
also
in
attendance
and
architect,
kevin
blaylock
of
whitlock
and
partners
design.
Q
We're
definitely
very
excited
to
be
in
front
of
the
planning,
commission
and
the
community
tonight
to
discuss
our
our
zoning
map
amendment
application
at
860,
east
third,
as
as,
as
the
previous
applicant
said
before
us,
we
know
it's
late.
You
guys
have
been
on
for
a
while.
We
will
definitely
do
our
best
to
to
be
informative,
but
but
also
brief,
so
you
guys
can
get
on
with
your
night,
but
again
very
much
appreciate
you
guys
being
on
with
us
first
off
we.
Q
We
definitely
wanted
to
thank
mayara
for
all
of
her
hard
work
and
the
help
she's
she's
put
in
on
this
application.
We've
we've
had
a
really
nice
time
working
with
her.
We
also
wanted
to
thank
the
greater
avenues
community
council
jcc
for
allowing
us
to
to
attend
and
present
at
two
of
their
their
their
recent
meetings.
Q
You
know
to
work
with
the
different
stakeholders
there
around
those
properties
and
and
really
re-envision
something
better
for
those
sites.
Our
architect
on
the
project
again
is
kevin.
Blaylock
he's
a
long
time
avenues
resident,
and
here
shortly
he
will
be
presenting
a
few.
A
few
site
plans
that
we've
discussed
with
with
with
the
gacc
and
and
the
planning
department
in
regards
to
adrian's
comment.
Q
We
we
we
definitely
understand
that
that
that
there's
been
a
condition
proposed
to
maintain
the
commercial
component
on
the
corner
of
of
urban
and
third
avenue.
We've
we've
spent
a
considerable
amount
of
time
with,
with
our
design
team
working
through
a
design
solution
that
we
felt
would
be
would
be
viable
to
that
corner.
To
be
honest,
it's
it's!
G
N
A
P
Yeah
hi
everybody
I'm
kevin
blaylock.
Can
you
hear
me
okay
and
see
my
screen?
Yes,
okay,
great,
I
actually
had
to
jump
off
when
marcus
was
talking,
so
I
missed
some
of
that.
I
apologize,
but,
as
mayar
indicated,
our
hope
and
intent
is
to
obtain
approval
for
the
rezone
and
combining
these
two
parcels
allows
us
that
the
flexibility
to
achieve
this
six
single-family
unit
for
sale
development.
Basically,
I
think
that
the
last
question
I
heard
was
relative
to
the
existing
house.
P
So
this
was
in
our
planning
application
submittal.
We
reviewed
this
with
mayara
just
a
at
kind
of
a
high
level
kind
of
the
intent
of
activating
the
street,
both
third
avenue
and
end
street,
by
varying
the
facade
for
these
single-family
homes
and
kind
of
creating
these
entry
porch-like
elements
to
make
it
more
kind
of
consistent
with
the
the
language
in
the
lower
lower
avenues.
District
included
in
our
application
are
a
number
of
responses
or
criteria
that
we
went
through
for
salt
lake
city's.
P
And
we
we
definitely
appreciate
engaging
with
mayara
she's,
been
fantastic
kind
of
guiding
us
through
the
process.
We
understand
and
fully
embrace
that
this
is
the
first
step.
We've
got
to
go
through
city
council.
We've
got
to
go
through
a
design
exercise
with
the
community
council
and
obviously
with
the
hlc
group.
P
Our
request
is,
is
really
to
get
to
be
granted
the
rezone
without
the
condition
of
the
commercial
components
on
the
corner
and
and
really
the
you
know,
every
time
that
we
do
these,
I'm
I'm
an
architect
in
salt
lake
city.
We
do
a
lot
of
residential
projects,
commercial
retail
projects,
mixed
use
for
sale
for
rent
and
then,
of
course,
marcus
and
oren.
That's.
P
I
know
that
that
is
not
what
this
is
totally
about,
but
that
is
always
the
first
question
that
we
get
asked
in
any
discussion,
including
the
discussions
we've
had
in
the
past.
With
the
with
the
greater
avenues
community,
council,
I
don't,
I
don't
want
to
take
a
lot
of
time.
I
don't
want
to
kind
of
read
these
line
by
line.
We
really
want
to
introduce
to
you
the
project
and
our
intent
so
that
you
had
an
understanding
of
what
we
were
asking
for
again.
P
We
appreciate
mayara's
flexibility
and
not
kind
of
pigeoning
pigeonholing,
the
commercial
component
with
the
size.
However,
our
request
really
is
to
let
go
of
that
conditional
conditional
requirement
with
the
rezone
request,
for
really
also
for
all
of
the
reasons
that
adrian
had
just
identified
with
her
concern
about
the
the
fate
of
of
small
commercial
right
now,.
P
P
P
P
Q
No
kevin,
I
think
that
was
great.
Thank
you
and
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
that
last
point.
Where
that
you
know
our
intention
is
to
propose
a
site
plan
and
move
forward
and
that's
sensitive
to
the
community,
and
that
fits
in
with
with
the
neighborhood,
and
we
hope
you
guys
agree
with
us
on.
You
know
kind
of
our
vision
here
does
just
that,
so
that
that's
really
yeah
we're
looking
forward
to
kind
of
hearing
from
you
all
and
we'll
leave
it
at
that.
A
Q
Q
J
We
already
have
parking
and
traffic
issues
on
third
avenue,
especially
when
it
snows
many
residents
in
the
neighborhood
do
not
have
off
street
parking.
I
understand
that
parking
will
be
provided
for
residents
of
the
project,
but
for
households
with
more
than
two
cars
or
have
guests
overflow
would
require
street
parking.
J
J
The
next
is
from
brandy
dominguez
I'd
like
to
comment
on
the
parking
for
this
property.
We
already
have
little
to
no
parking
on
our
street.
The
homes
along
the
street
largely
do
not
have
garages
or
driveways.
I
understand
that
there
are
currently
no
development
proposals
submitted,
but
this
streets
are
far
too
small
to
fit
multi-family
developments.
J
I'd
also
like
to
comment
on
the
process
for
joining
these
meetings.
Choir
sent
out
were
dishonest
and
misleading.
They
did
not
see
up
front
that
you
would
need
to
register
prior
to
this
meeting,
these
should
be
accessible
to
the
public.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration
that
was
from
brandy
dominguez.
J
J
J
J
This
development
is
yet
another
step
towards
eroding
the
identity,
identity
or
identity
of
our
city
and
our
communities.
Market
rate
proposal
is
completely
unaligned
with
the
financial
reality.
The
majority
of
more
salt
lake
city
residents,
an
economic
disaster,
has
displaced
more
people
than
ever
before.
It
will
be
years
before
these
people
financially
recover
and
make
sure
this
is
the
right.
J
J
J
Q
P
P
P
E
I
can
I
can
offer
my
planning
perspective
as
well,
so
from
the
planning
stand
view
stand
point
of
view
this.
The
the
future
land
use
map
has.
This
is
commercial,
so
appropriate
for
the
avenues
area.
It
would
be
the
cn
if
it's
commercial
and
then
another
option
would
be
a
mixed
use,
which
this
one
is
and
then
anything
mixed
use
would
other
than
the
35
would
be
even
higher
in
height.
So
the
only
things
that
we
considered
as
far
as
staff
was
a
cn
and
the
rmu35
thank.
L
P
I
think
the
other
aspect
to
the
rmu
35,
that
the
height
restriction
is
35,
but
that
is
a
that
is
a
flat
35.
So
because
we've
got
about
three
or
four
feet
of
fall
across
the
grave.
The
actual
front
of
the
building
along
third
avenue
will
only
be
about
32
feet
tall,
whereas
the
back
edge.
The
south
side
is
where
the
35
would
be
measured
from.
Q
P
This
is
through
third
avenue
looking
east.
This
shows
the
the
slope
of
the
grade
at
the
proposed
property,
and
this
is
a
large
house-
that's
across
the
street,
that
I
don't
know
for
how
long.
But
it's
been
subdivided
into
ford.
It
has
four
separate
entrances.
We
believe
that
that's
a
like
a
four
plex
and
then
to
the
south.
D
D
So
I'm
in
in
favor
of
recommending
approval,
I'm
not
in
favor
of
the
the
restriction,
the
condition
that
planning
staff
has
recommended
just
because
I
think
it
hampers
opportunity
for
a
successful
development
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
small-scale
commercial
is
actually
viable,
even
though
this
property
was
used
historically
for
commercial
uses.
So
I
don't
know
how
others
feel,
but
that's
that's
where
I'm
leaning.
D
A
So
I
think
I
agree
with
that
as
well.
My
actual
concern
is
a
little
different,
which
is
what,
if
one
of
the
units
in
the
middle
decided
to
become
a
commercial
establishment
later
on
and
those
folks
who
have
spent
you
know
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
their
brand
new
townhouse
found
themselves
right
next
to
something
in
the
middle.
That's
a
coffee
shop.
P
A
A
A
D
A
P
And
we,
these
obviously
will
be
constructed
with
2l
rated
walls
and
given
the
size
of
the
ground
floor,
there
wouldn't
be
an
additional
requirement
for
a
fire
protection
system
even
for
a
small
restaurant
cafe
or
coffee
shop.
So
you
know
short
of
a
of
a
welder
moving
in
there
and
wanting
to
do
welding.
That
shouldn't
be
an
issue
in
terms
of
building
code.
Today,.
K
Q
D
Sure
I'll
make
a
motion
based
on
the
information
listed
in
the
stock
report.
The
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
now
moves
at
the
planning
commission
recommend
that
the
city
council
approved
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
as
presented
in
the
petition
pln
pcm
2020-00703.