►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 6/11/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
welcome
you
all
to
the
work
session
of
the
salt
lake
city
council
for
june
11
2019.
A
We
have
some
people
yeah,
so
we
still
said
james
will
be
joining
us
shortly.
Council
members
on
your
agenda.
There
is
a
written
briefing
which
is
a
response
from
t-mobile.
B
No,
I
appreciate
the
written
response
from
t-mobile.
We've
talked
previously
about
this.
I
am
gonna
hold
on
to
the
written
response
in
the
future.
The
difficulty
is
it's
a
10-year
agreement,
so
I
may
not
be
around
well
I'll,
be
alive,
I
hope,
but
to
follow
up
on
this.
B
No,
I
I
just
it's
it's
one
of
those.
This
is
one
of
those
issues
where
we
have
to
take
it
on
faith.
To
some
extent,
I
don't
know
we're
gonna
have
the
ability
to
monitor
the
city
as
close
as
we'd
like
there's,
federal
and
state
laws
that
really
are
pretty
rigid
about
what
we
can
and
can't
do
so.
I
appreciate
the
response
I
hope
to
live
up
to
it
and
other
carriers
as
well.
A
A
Now
that
we've
had
a
few
days
to
look
at,
you
know
some
of
those
straw
polls
and
decisions.
There's
also
some
very
good
news
that
came
last
night,
which
is
the
new
growth
number
is
much
higher
than
than
we
were
originally
proposing,
which
allows
the
council
to
continue
along
the
path
that
we
charted
out
this
year
to
build
a
stronger,
more
vibrant
city
and
a
much
more
efficient
government.
A
A
I'm
grateful
to
see
that
the
mayor
now
supports
the
council's
push
to
hire
more
firefighters.
One
of
the
things
that
that
we've
talked
about
with
this
is
you
know
with
this
new
growth
is,
is
how
best
to
how
best
to
do
that?
How
best
to
shore
up
funding
our
future
and
and
some
of
those
other
things,
and
so
it's
great
to
see
her
finally
agree
that
we
do
need
more
firefighters.
So,
as
we
go
through
this
budget,
we'll
talk
about
that.
A
There
is
also
another
another
item
that
I
think
we'll
we'll
want
to
talk
about.
The
mayor
proposed
in
her
recommended
budget,
a
50
cent
parking
increase
in
her
press
release
this
afternoon.
She
changed.
She
now
recommends
halfing
that
that
was
an
issue
that
we
straw
pulled
last
week.
It
was,
it
was
actually
our
closest
straw
poll.
It
was
a
4-3
that
we
continue
forward
with
the
recommended
mayor's
recommended
fee
increase,
and
I
think
this
you
know
opens
the
door
for
some
more
discussion
as
to
how
best
to
how
best
to
deal
with
that.
A
So
those
are
some
of
the
items
lehua
is
from
our
council
staff
is
going
to
be
shepherding
us
through
this
process
so
or
yeah
she's,
well,
she's
lifting
us
she's,
she's
lifting
us
through
this
process
or
shepherding
us
through
this
process.
So
so
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
jennifer
bruno
to
lead.
The
discussion
and
lehua
will
keep
us
on
task.
D
The
first
place
that
we'd
like
to
start
that,
I
think,
will
filter
into
all
of
those.
Other
documents
is
a
new.
What
we're
calling
the
short
track
short
tracking
sheet.
We
have
the
long.
C
D
D
Yeah
and
jennifer
will
walk
through
that.
That
is
basically
looking
at
the
new
growth
in
property
tax
revenue
and
also
listing
all
of
the
items
that
council
members
have
straw
polled
before
and
some
other
items
that
we
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention
and
get
your
direction
on.
So
if
it's,
okay,
I'll
just
turn
that
time,
thank
you
and
jennifer
will
tell
you
it's
the
one
with
green
one.
C
It's
labeled
number
three.
We
realized
we
realized.
We
had.
You
know
lots
of
paper
at
your
places,
so
we
started
a
numbering
system,
but
we
didn't
think
about
the
order.
So
now
it's
number
three
with
the
green
and
the
yellow.
The
green
is
just
there
to
signify
things
that
are
still
points
of
discussion,
also
I'll
just
ask
for
apologies
in
advance,
as
we
put
this
together
in
the
middle
of
the
day.
C
Today,
while
we
were
in
meetings,
we
used
abbreviated
terms,
and
so
any
typos
just
please
know
that
it's
a
draft,
but
it
was
meant
for
discussion
purposes.
So
this
all
started
with
receiving
news
late
last
night
that
we
do
have
extra
new
growth
with
which
to
fund
the
general
fund
budget,
and
so
that
caused
us
to
need
to
rebalance
the
general
fund
budget.
So
all
of
the
straw
polls
that
you
guys
went
through
you
guys
start
a
handful
of
items.
C
There
were
a
few
items
that
were
raised
since
last
thursday's
discussion,
so
we've
just
put
them
all
in
here
and
they're,
organized
by
revenues
and
expenditures
and
one-time
and
ongoing
funds
so
that
we
can
kind
of
keep
track
of
of
using
one-time
funds
for
one-time
sources.
Using
one-time
sources
for
one-time
needs
to
the
extent
possible.
A
And
jennifer
to
that
point,
that's
so
with
the
with
the
new
growth
numbers.
I
I'd,
you
know
want
to
state
again
how
important
it
is
that
that
we
did
receive
those
numbers
to
be
much
higher
than
anticipated.
One
of
the
things
is,
we
were
balancing
and
staff.
You
know
to
their
credit,
has
done
a
phenomenal
job
of
of
tracking
all
of
our
interests
and
and
ensuring
that
you
know
our
our
objective
of
creating.
A
You
know
a
more
efficient
salt
lake
city
government
can
work
one
of
the
things
that
we
ended
up
having
to
do
as
we
were
straw
polling
is
there
were
a
number
of
items
that
were
ongoing
items
that
we
didn't
have
any
choice
but
to
fi
or
to
to
place
one-time
money
with
this
new
growth
allows
us
to
fix
that
it
allows
us
to
go
back
on
some
of
those
areas
and
fund
ongoing
needs
with
ongoing
revenue.
You
know
there
still
may
be.
You
know
as
we
as
we
work
through
there.
There
may
be.
A
You
know
some
things
that
that
we
will
still
have
to
fund
with
with
one-time
money
what
that
means
for
those
listening
at
home.
If
you
haven't
followed
a
budget
process
before
you
know,
there
are
certain
municipal
needs
that
are
ongoing.
Salaries
are
a
good
example
at
things
that
you
have
your
your
recurring
costs
year
after
year.
A
One
time
you
know
money
is
just
that
it's
one
time.
So
typically,
we
like
to
use
one
time
money
for
projects,
cip,
construction
projects
that
are
truly
just
one-time
projects
if
there
are
additional
ongoing
needs
that
that
do
have
to
be
funded
with
one
time.
What
that
does
is
it
creates
the
the
necessity
for
the
council
next
year
to
come
back
and
address
those
address,
those
things.
So
it
is,
you
know,
even
if
there
are
okay,
you
know
some
ongoing
things.
A
It
just
means
that
we
will
have
to
address
those
next
year
and.
C
And
I'll
just
point
out,
one
other
orientation
I
didn't
give
to
the
table
is
that
I
filled
out
a
number
of
these
items
with
numbers,
and
that
was
a
for
discussion
purposes.
Only
to
figure
out
sort
of
what
the
new
growth
could
essentially
take,
but
the
reason
that
lihua
has
the
spreadsheet
up
is
that
these
can
all
be
changed.
So
I
filled
out
the
yellow
numbers.
C
Those
are
items
that
the
council
has
not
yet
straw
polled,
but
just
to
get
get
a
sense
of
where
the
discussion
could
go
great.
So
new
growth
do
you
want
to
accept
it?
I
guess
is
the
first
question:
that's
an
easy
one
right.
A
We
will
strap
this
for
a
formality,
but
pretty
yeah
thumbs
up
that
we
would
accept
the
100
plus
thousand
dollars
actually.
C
A
A
million
a
million-
a
million
sorry,
yes,
okay-
and
that
is
unanimous-
with
council
members,
johnston
and
rogers-
not
here
so
maybe
they
are
truly
one
person.
C
The
next
item
would
be
in
the
revenue
or
sources
category,
but
would
technically
be
booked
in
the
expense.
Category
is
to
capture
additional
months
of
vacancy
savings
from
the
ada
and
or
ada
and
equity
manager.
Positions
in
the
can
administration,
and
I
believe
council
member
mendenhall
may
have
more
information
on
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
she
wants
to
talk
about
it
or.
E
We
worked
over
the
weekend
to
try
to
identify
some
funds
that
were
not
from
that
pool,
and
my
proposal
is
that
we
take
the
it's
a
I'm
not
looking
at
it,
but
I
think
it's
106
000
each
for
the
ada
administrator
and
equity
positions.
We
delay
the
hiring
of
those
until
march,
which
allows
four
months
of
funding,
and
we
capture
five
months
of
funding
from
those
two
positions.
That'll
allow
the
next
administration
to
decide,
as
these
are
shifts
into,
can
that
were
not
previously
located
in.
E
How
many
blocks
surrounding
those
hrcs.
We
should
consider
these
grants
for
and
that
the
grants
would
be
administered
similar
to
or
along
the
same
standards,
really
as
the
hud
building
facade
improvement
program,
just
like
council
member
voldemort
suggested
and
that,
but
that
the
funds
would
be
available
either
to
businesses
or
to
residents.
In
those
areas.
E
Did
I
miss
anything
there,
council,
member
baldomoros
and
that,
oh,
yes,
I
did
miss
something
which
is
that
we
put
an
intent
with
that
money
that
we
are
able
to
analyze
with,
can
how
the
funding
is
utilized
in
those
areas
and
what
the
impact
is
so
that
we
can
decide
going
forward
if
we'd
like
to
expand
that
kind
of
a
program
city-wide
or
deploy
it,
as
other
projects
happen
throughout
the
city
in
more
of
a
measured
way,
but
that
we
come
back
to
the
table.
E
F
Mr
chair,
yes,
I
appreciate,
I
had
a
conversation
with
aaron
about
this
yesterday
and
appreciate
the
the
council
members
sort
of
working
with
me
on
the
idea
of
how
to
make
it
perhaps
citywide
so
that
other
areas
that
may
be
affected
by
things
that
the
city
does
could
take
advantage
of
a
program
if
it's,
if
it's,
if
it's
successful
if
it
works,
if
that's
what
is
necessary,
the
one
thing
I
would
ask,
and
it's
just
more
of
we-
we
talked
about
it
in
the
chair
vice
chair,
chair
meeting
earlier
of
putting
that
money
in
the
one-time
column
instead
of
the
ongoing
column,
so
we
can
balance
that
out
and
since
it's
sort
of
a
or
try
try
to
balance
it
out
anyway.
F
E
E
A
D
A
Okay
before
so,
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
we'll
straw
poll.
You
know
whether
to
move
forward
with
council
member
mendenhall's
suggestion
and
then
we'll
also
strap
the
legislative
intent
just
to
be
to
be
clear
council
member
valdamoros.
I.
G
Just
wanted
to
thank
staff
from
ken
and
also
my
peer
council
members
for
working.
You
know
collaboratively
and
very
creatively
on
a
common
goal,
which
is
help
the
constituents
of
district
foreign
district,
five,
where
these
new
hrc's
are
coming.
So
I'm
excited
to
see
where
it
goes
and
work
closely
for
for
the
success
of
this
project.
So
thank
you.
Jennifer
mcgrath,
for
working
with
us.
A
Council
member
johnston,
I
know
that
you've
had
some
thoughts
on
this
as
well.
B
Yeah,
I
was
concerned
about
only
funding
them
for
four
months.
If
it
wasn't
an
ongoing
peace
bless
you,
it
sort
of
made
it
inoperable
in
a
lot
of
ways
for
the
new
administration.
B
At
this
point,
if
we're
going
to
delay
it
for
six
months
it
it
does
make
it
up
to
the
new
administration
even
to
even
implement
it
whatsoever.
So
I'm
a
little
split
about
it.
I
love
the
idea
of
after
seeing
more
information
about
the
equity
position.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me,
but
as
a
pilot,
because
I'm
not
sure
for
sure
the
exact
scope
what
it
would
entail,
so
I'm
still
supportive
of
that
position
in
some
capacity.
A
Okay,
so,
let's
straw
poll,
if
we
could
go
back
to
the.
A
Is
that
clear
thumbs
up
that
we
support
that
thumbs
down,
that
we
pose
it
and
that
struggle
passes
unanimously
now,
if
you
could
bring
up
the
intent
language
so
that
we
can
see
that,
I
won't
read
it
because
you
can
all
read
thumbs
up
that
we
support
having
that
intent
language
in
the
budget
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it
or
any
discussion.
E
A
C
C
Get
to
it
in
the
motion
g.
So
the
next
item
is
a
proposal
to
reduce
the
proposed
50
cent
parking
meter
rate
increase
to
25
cents.
That
would
cut
the
revenue
in
half,
so
it
would
be
a
revenue
increase
in
half.
I
should
say
than
that,
so
that
would
be
a
393
000,
ongoing
reduction.
A
First
off
first
off-
and
you
know,
I
think
I
think
it's
important-
that
we
clarify
what
this
is.
This
is
not
a
reduction.
This
is
a
instead
of
the
mayor
recommending
a
50
increase.
Now
the
mayor
is
recommending
a
25
cent
increase
for
that
fee.
F
H
So,
as
you
know
when,
when
the
mayor
put
her
budget
recommendation
together,
we're
working
with
different
revenue
numbers
as
we
we
do
every
year,
and
so
the
initial
recommendation
of
a
50
cent
increase
was
based
on
the
numbers
we
had
then,
and
the
shortfall
that
we
are
experiencing
regarding
parking
revenue
which
impacts
compliance,
and
so
when
the
new
numbers
came
out,
the
mayor
was
just
expressing
her
opinion.
Her.
H
H
General
fund
revenue
dollars
the
new
growth
dollars
for
the
firefighters,
which
again
we
did
not
have
the
funding
for
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
A
Okay-
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification,
I
will
say
that
this
is
the.
This
is
not
standard
practice
to
have
the
mayor,
recommend
a
budget
and
then
continue
making
recommendations
that
change
her
initial
recommendation.
A
That
is
once
you
submit
a
recommended
budget.
That
is
it
so
we
appreciate
the
feedback.
We
were
already
moving
in
that
direction
anyway
right,
so
this
isn't
anything
great,
so
you
know
I
think
it's
important
not
to
spend
that
more
than
you
already
are
trying
to,
but
the
recommended
budget
was
the
recommended
budget.
The
rest
of
it
is
up
to
up
to
the
council.
So
absolutely
we
thank
you.
H
A
E
I
think
it's
consistent
with
some
of
the
conversation
that
we've
been
having
over
these
the
increase
and
other
increases,
and
I
think
you're
right,
but
once
that
budget
sailed
out
of
that
end
of
the
hall
it's
squarely
in
this
end
of
the
hall.
But
anyway,
I
think
this
new
revenue
is
an
exciting
opportunity.
A
G
Just
have
questions
for
stuff,
maybe
when
this
is
the
first
thing
parking
rate
increase.
We
have,
since
the
installation
of
the.
C
G
One
time
and
another
question
is
what
what
were
the
the
goals
with
this
increase?
Where
will
these
funds
go
to?
I
don't
remember
right.
C
The
way
that
the
administration
described
it
and
I
think
david
kind
of
just
described
it
also
was
to
kind
of
compensate
help.
The
administration
help
the
city
compensate
for
some
revenue
shortfalls
experienced
in
okay
parking
revenue
collections.
Is
that
right.
H
Yeah
so
we
were
and
have
been
experiencing,
a
reduction
is
despite
our
best
efforts
to
be
very
conservative
in
forecasting
on
parking
revenue.
We
haven't
been
experiencing
some
reductions,
it's
kind
of
a
somewhat
of
a
vicious
cycle
in
terms
of
the
ability
to
support
compliance,
and
the
worry
that
then
individuals
stop.
B
H
And
so
because
it
had
been
many
years
since
there
was
an
increase
in
the
in
the
rate.
That
is
where
the
recommendation
came
from.
B
A
Okay,
so
questions
about
the
recommendation
to
increase
the
parking
rate
25
cents
instead
of
the
original
50
cents,
okay,
councilmember
mendenhall.
I.
E
Think
we
should
hold
it
and
go
through
the
other
priorities
that
we
looked
at
as
a.
A
A
B
Johnston
yeah
mr
chair,
I
would
I
would
agree,
but
I
am
in
support
of
that
decrease
at
this
point
pending
further
discussion,
though,
okay.
C
A
Highlight
it
yeah
just
highlight
it
and
then
we'll
you
know
before
we.
So
what
we'll
do-
and
let
me
just
make
sure,
I'm
understanding
your
intent,
councilmember
mendenhall
we'll
go
through
this
sheet
right
here
and
as
soon
as
we
get
through
the
other
items,
we'll
come
back
to
that
one.
At
the
end,
okay,.
C
Okay,
so
then
the
next
item
that
was
excuse
me
previously
discussed
by
the
council
but
flagged
for
future
discussion
if
there
were
additional
funds,
was
to
reinstate
the
training
and
travel.
Sorry
for
the
typo
there
budget
in
economic
development.
C
E
When
we
met
with
economic
development
and
asked
how
impactful
training
is
in
terms
of
recruitment
for
new
businesses
coming
in,
it
seemed
to
be
quite
important
and
a
really
strong
tool.
This
is
a
small,
relatively
small
amount
of
money,
for
I
think
the
benefit
that
our
economic
development
department
is
able
to
gain.
So
I'm
supportive
of
this.
H
A
Yeah
thumbs
up
that
you
support
that
thumbs
down
that
you
pose.
That
is
unanimous.
C
Then
the
next
item
was
a
general
idea
raised
by
two
council
members
to
add
staff
to
the
one
fte
to
the
economic
development
department.
There
were
slightly
different
ideas
for
that,
and
so
one
idea
is
to
grant
the
fte
at
a
certain
level
that
gives
the
department
flexibility
to
decide
either
how
to
split
it
into
two
or
deploy
the
resource
in
another
way.
A
F
I
think
that
anna
and
I
were
the
two
that
kind
of
brought
this
up
and
I
think
we
did
kind
of
have
some
different
ideas
of
where
that
could
go,
but
in
talking
with
staff
today
I
was
thinking
I
guess
the
department
probably
knows
best
where
they
need
some
help
and
where
they
would
need
and
utilize
another
ft
and
that's
why
we
in
talking
with
staff,
we
kind
of
decided,
maybe
putting
that
department
discretion
in
there
not
dictating
for
the
department
what
they
need,
but
rather
just
you
know,
empowering
them
to
have
the
money
to
do
what
they
need.
F
So
that
was
kind
of
where
my
thought
was
with,
with
that
discretion,
stuff.
A
Okay,
so
it'd
be
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
economic
development
staff
position.
That
has
yet
to
be
fully
decided
on
on
what
exactly
that
is,
and.
C
This
was
just
a
placeholder
amount
that
staff
has
seen
as
typical
for
salary
and
benefits.
The
council
could
adjust
it
if
you
felt
like
it.
Okay.
C
C
H
F
Would
there
be
a
way
in
the
future
to
maybe
recapture
any
of
that
savings
if
there
was
the
vacancy
savings
in
either
a
budget
amendment
like
at
the
end
of
the
year
or
throughout
the
year
right
so
yep?
I
mean
at
least
we're
we're,
like,
I
said,
sort
of
empowering
the
we
heard
that
there
was
a
need
empowering
that
that
department
to
go
and
do
what
they
need
to
do.
But
then,
if,
if
it
doesn't
happen,
then
we
kind
of
get
to
get
some
of
it
back
at
least
right.
A
Okay,
so
as
long
as
we
are,
you
know
we're
we're
pretty
clear
that
that
money
is
for
that
position,
and
I
so
I
think
you
know.
However,
we
we
do
this.
We
just
need
to
ensure
that
you
know
that's
the
case
so
that
it's
not
just.
A
You
know
that
if
there
is,
you
know
vacancies
if
there
are
vacancy
savings
that
that
it's
not
used
by
the
department,
but
it
does
come
back
per
the
intent
of
the
council.
Okay.
So
with
that
with
that
intent
in
there
thumbs
up
that
we
support
that
hundred
thousand
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollar
amount
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it.
C
C
The
next
item
that
was
starred
for
additional
funding-
if
it
was
available,
was
the
traffic
calming
sort
of
catch-all
program.
It
could
be
an
fte,
it
could
be
cip
programs.
I
believe
you
asked
the
administration
to
take
the
amount
and
come
back
with
a
proposal
for
the
council
to
consider
right
now,
there's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
there.
So
we
just
wanted
to
report
back.
B
Unfortunately,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
talk
much
to
can
I
apologize
about
it
about
the
traffic
calming
concept.
One
time
funding
could
be
helpful
if
it
gets
us
to
understanding
of
what
could
be
used
long
term.
I
think
for
me
this
would
enco
and
well
two
things.
One
was
fifth
north.
The
death
on
fifth
north
has
taken
us
a
year
just
to
try
to
get
to
because
of
funding
staff
levels.
B
I
think
that
all
sort
of
that's
my
intent
of
this,
but
I
haven't,
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
anybody
about
it,
so
I'm
willing
to
go
forward
with
it.
If
there's
an
idea,
you
might
have
to
utilize
it
effectively
on
a
one-time
basis.
Otherwise,
I'm
not
sure
one
time
is
helpful
there,
not
that
you'll
turn
down
money.
I'm
sure.
A
John
larson
and
jennifer
mcgrath
are
here
from
can
and
transportation.
I.
C
B
I
Well,
yeah,
I
think
that's
that's
part
of
the
problem
and
then
you
know
the
challenge.
Is
you
know
if
we
get
an
fte
without
money
for
projects
now
granted?
You
know
we
do
have
additional
funding
that
is
coming
in,
and
so
you
know
if
we
did
have
an
extra
fte
that
was
able
to
focus
on
traffic
calming
particularly
you
know,
pedestrian
safety
near
schools.
I
What
we
would
do
is
have
that
person
really
focus
on
coordinating
with
other
projects
that
are
already
happening
and,
seeing
often
you
you
can
work
in
traffic
calming
elements
for
a
small
incremental.
I
You
know
addition
and
then
the
the
biggest
thing
is
the
community
outreach
working
with
you
know:
community
groups
and
the
schools
and
the
and
the
parents.
That's
a
that's
a
really
big
lift
on
staff
time
as
far
as
you
know,
so,
even
if
we
do
have
money
available
that
that's
just
something
that
it's
really
time
intensive.
B
So,
mr
chair
out,
if
we
do
this
on
one
time
basis,
I
would
ask
it
be
a
pilot
project
in
a
sense
that
have
we
come
back
with
some
measurables
about
what
it
accomplished
and
did
it
increase
our
capacity
or
our
outreach
or
whatever
it
was.
So
we
could
reevaluate
next
year,
for
instance,
and
see
if
it's
something
worthy
to
look
at
as
a
greater
piece
of
the
budget.
Councilmember.
A
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
so
with
that,
if
there
is
no
further
discussion
thumbs
up
that,
you
support
a
pilot
project
for
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
one-time
money
to
be
to
go
to
transportation
for
the
use
in
traffic
calming
the
council
member.
F
E
I
think
I
have
similar
concerns
to
andrew
of
funding
this
fte
with
one-time
funding
and
also
an
interest
in
focusing
it
on
areas
around
schools
and
other
sensitive
crossings
that
I
just
hear
so
much
about
with
a
frustration
about
planters
in
the
road
and
wanting
more
of
like
pedestrian
safety
and-
and
I
know,
slowing
vehicles
down,
gets
to
pedestrian
safety.
But
I'm
more
interested
in
the
pedestrian
component
than
the
planter
component.
H
May
I
offer
maybe
a
suggestion,
a
thought,
because
it
is
hard
to
have
an
fte
with
no
funding
and
then
it's
hard
to
have
funding
with
no
fte
as
part
of
our
budget.
We
have
asked
for
the
line
item
to
cover
the
costs
for
the
improvements
that
we
want
to
do
on
fifth
north.
H
What
the
impact
of
that
was,
what
the
burden
of
that
was
on
staff
and
able
to
be
able
to
deploy
those
funds
or
what
the
challenges
were
for
us.
Regarding
that
and
then
we
can
have
a
larger
discussion
about
whether
or
not
we're
ready
to
move
forward
with
an
additional
fte
and
ongoing
funding.
A
A
Rather
than
an
fte,
but
just
just
having
that
funding
available
to
figure,
you
know
just
so
that
you
can
figure
it
out
and
then
hopefully
that
could
give
you
a
better
idea.
You
know
for
next
year's
budget,
if
you
you
know
if,
when
you
do
come
forward
with
an
fte,
if
there
are
additional
things
that
worked
or
things
didn't
work
that
you
can
also
include
in
that
budget,
so.
H
Yeah,
I
guess
the
one
thing
that
I
would
add
is
understanding
which
of
the
ftes
that
we've
put
forward
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
are
getting
funded
through.
Those
other
mechanisms
will
help
us
determine
what
our
capacity
is
for
being
able
to
deploy.
Another
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
of
funds.
Great.
B
I'm
just
trying
to
get
out.
I've
got
a.
I
live
in
a
residential
area.
I
have
a
lot
of
kids
and
I
get
a
lot
of
concerns
about
residential
streets,
sometimes
around
parks,
sometimes
around
schools.
Just
in
the
last
month,
redwood
road
and
indiana
avenue,
seven,
south
and
concord
and
rap
arapahoe.
I
believe
clearly
around
franklin
elementary
on
third
side.
I've
had
numerous
of
these
issues
with
usually
kids
or
in
kid-friendly
areas
where
cars
accidents,
those
things
are
happening.
B
I
Yeah,
I
think
that's
great,
and
I
think
you
know
we're
really
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
weave
this
into
everything
else.
We
do
so
like.
For
example,
we
have
some
two
citizen,
cip
requests
that
have
were
funded
in
previous
years,
one
for
poplar,
grove
and
once
for
rose
park,
and
so
these
are
kind
of
north
south
connectors,
but
we're
also
adding
bus
routes
that
need
first
last
mile
enhancements
to
make
it
safer
to
walk
and
bike
there.
I
What
we're
looking
at
and
working
towards,
recognizing
there's
still
going
to
be
stand-alone
projects
that
are
for
traffic
calming
or
as
we're
preferring
to
call
it
neighborhood
street
livability.
You
know
so
we're
meeting
with
you
know.
Community
group,
you
know
near
like
up
on
23rd
east
there's
a
kind
of
a
growing
group
where
we're
looking
at
a
variety
of
crosswalk
enhancements
that
will
probably
just
be
a
standalone
project.
I
We
haven't
identified
funding
for
it
yet,
but
that's
you
know
something
that
we're
continuing
to
look
at,
but
I
I
I
guess
I
see
this
as
something
where
it's
going
to
have
to
be
an
ongoing
dialogue,
but
we
really
look
forward.
I
think
there's
going
to
be
some
exciting
stuff
happening
in
the
next
year
and
you
know:
we've
requested
four
other
ftes.
I
That
are
in
the
the
mayor's
budget.
So
yes,
of
course
we
would
want
more
staff,
I'm
not
gonna,
say
I've
done,
but
I
I'm
comfortable
working
this
out
over
the
next
year
to
see
kind
of
where
things
go.
A
Great
thumbs
up
that
we
support
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
pilot
program
and
transportation
for
traffic
calming
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it.
C
Great
thanks
so
the
next
items,
the
intention
wasn't
to
have
you
straw
poll
each
of
these
things
so
I'll
skip
over
the
ones
that
you
didn't
star
unless
you
want
to
revisit
them,
but
it
was
more
of
a
sense
of
trying
to
track
ongoing
expenses,
ongoing
revenues.
Things
like
that,
so
you've
treated
the
green
team,
restoration
and
the
place
for
your
stuff
and
portland
lou
restoration
as
ongoing
revenue,
or
is
ongoing
expense
editions
rather
than
one
time
expense.
Editions.
Just
correct
me:
if
that's
not
the
right
thing.
C
The
next
item
is
a
new
item
that
was
raised
since
thursdays,
48
thousand
dollars
for
the
road
home.
I
believe
councilmember
johnston
can
speak
to
that.
B
Mr
chair
councilmember
johnston
in
the
past,
we've
funded
92
000
for
the
midvale
family,
shelter
as
an
emergency
winter,
shelter
to
decrease
burden
downtown
on
our
rio
grande
area,
so
a
direct
benefit
to
the
city
to
help
fund
that
murray's
location,
that's
gone
full
time
now.
So
it's
really
not
the
city's
jurisdiction
or
sort
of
our
responsibility
in
some
ways.
However,
for
a
one-time
deal
this
year,
because
the
transition
from
the
the
rio
grande
area
to
the
three
new
resource
centers
is
happening
but
might
be
slightly
delayed
or
there's
some.
B
The
road
home
is
going
to
have
to
sort
of
open
up
a
new
facility
and
keep
the
same
one
open
temporarily
for
a
bit.
It's
going
to
strain
them.
I
think
quite
a
bit
with
the
limited
funding
in
the
state,
so
I'm
requesting
to
put
half
of
what
we
generally
put
into
the
midvale
on
a
one-time
basis
this
year
for
that
transition
to
help
them
operationally.
B
A
Any
discussion
to
council
member
johnston's
request
seeing
none
thumbs
up,
that
we
support
the
one-time
use
of
48
thousand
dollars
to
the
road
home
in
midvale.
B
C
Great
the
next
item
we
added
already
the
92
000
for
we'll
clarify
the
language
there,
because
I
don't
believe
it's
a
housing,
rehab
program
well
work.
C
Building
building-
let's
just
say,
buildings
great,
then
skipping
down
to
fire,
shifting
the
six
ftes
and
the
training
and
paramedic
incentives
funding
which
had
previously
been
funded
from
one
time.
Savings
through
the
funding.
Our
future
category,
through
the
savings
experienced
by
the
fact
that
the
police
officers
weren't
going
to
be
hired
until
october,
rather
than
funding
them
through
that
source
funding
them
through
the
ongoing
revenue
source
of.
C
A
A
Way
and
the
training
and
paramedic
incentives,
one
of
the
difficulties
that
the
department
has
had
is
incentivizing
current
firefighters
to
go
through
the
process
of
receiving
their
paramedic
certification.
This
is
a
program
that
the
the
depart
that
would
allow
the
department
to
to
help
with
that.
So,
let's
drop
all
these
three
things
together
thumbs
up
that
we
support
these
three
items
thumbs
down
that
we
pose
them.
F
Can
I
just
say
something
real
quick.
I
know
I
just
I
appre
I'm
I'm
so
grateful
that
we
had
new
funding
a
new
growth
so
that
we
were
able
to
fund
this
with
ongoing
money.
But
I
also
want
to
say
thanks
to
the
council
members
here,
for
recognizing
that
public
safety
does
include
all
three
of
our
departments
and
being
willing
to
kind
of
scrape
together
what
we
could
to
make
sure
that
we
were
getting
our
fire
department.
What
what
they
needed.
F
It
kind
of.
We
knew
what
we
were
doing
with
one
time
kind
of
funding,
but
hoping
that
we
would
be
able
to
find
it
in
the
in
the
future.
No
pun
intended
funding
our
future,
but
I'm
just
really
grateful
that
we
were
able
to
have
this
new
growth
and
continue
this.
So
thanks,
council
members
for
taking
that
chance
and
then
yea
that
we
don't
have
to
not
support
it
right.
So.
A
Okay,
so
that
sorry.
C
C
So
that
brings
us
actually
related
to
that
item
now
that
the
fire
ftes
are
funded
through
general
fund
dollars.
That
leaves
the
question
of
the
one-time
savings
that
was
captured
from
the
police
positions
not
being
hired
until
october.
The
council
could
reverse
that
decision.
C
However,
it
would
likely
fund
fall
to
fund
balance
anyway
at
the
end
of
the
year,
because
the
police
department
has
indicated
the
soonest
they
could
hire.
Those
officers
would
be
october
1st,
so
you
could
take
those
one-time
dollars
and
reprogram
them
within
the
funding.
C
Our
future
categories,
one
of
the
funding
or
future
categories
for
a
one-time
need,
the
obvious
one-time
need
that
staff
thought
of
was
infrastructure
because
that's
always
there's
always
infrastructure
needs
and
it's
one
time
it's
just
streets,
so
that
was
just
a
placeholder,
but
you
know
there
are
other,
probably
other
considerations
that
the
council.
A
And
I
would
I
will
speak
to
this
place
holder.
You
know.
One
of
the
hopes
was
that
you
know
with
some
of
the
new
growth
revenue
that
that
we
would
be
able
to
put
money
to
infrastructure
and
cip.
A
That
is
always
difficult
because,
as
we
go
through
this
process,
especially
you
know
where
we
are
right
now.
Money
gets
spent
on
a
lot
of
very
worthwhile
things,
and
so
I
would
I
would
strongly
encourage
us
to
stick
with
the
you
know
with
that
remaining
amount:
the
289
thousand
dollars
367
to
streets.
It
still
stays
within
funding
our
future
and
it
helps
us
as
we
when
we
start
having
the
the
conversation
about
cip
in
a
few
months.
H
H
H
C
But
I
I
want
to
say
that
certain
local
street
reconstruction
projects
are
often
in
the
250.
I
mean
you
know:
transportation.
Inflation
never
helps
us
right.
I
mean
it's
probably
a
lot
shorter
section
of
road
than
it
used
to
be
potential
city
street
right
or
ada
ramps
or
sidewalks.
So
it
would
be
a
small
project
for
sure
or.
H
A
A
C
It
would
be
sorry,
go
ahead,
just.
J
A
E
C
Well
and
while
they're
on
their
way
up,
maybe
what
staff
could
clarify
is
that
what
we
would
likely
do
is
add
it
to
the
total
in
your
cip
budget
deliberations
and
see
if
there
were
projects
that
are
on
the
log
that
are
not
currently
funded,
that
are
eligible
for
that
sort
of
infrastructure.
Category
of
funding
our
future
and
then
that
way
more
projects
could
get
funded
from
existing
project
applications.
F
Lisa's
coming
up
just
real
quick
didn't
we
have.
Maybe
staff
can
remind
me
of
this,
but
I
remember-
and
I
think
I
saw
it
somewhere
in
one
of
these
things-
that
we
get
that
we
last
year
when
we
were
doing
funding
our
future.
We
had
a
legislative
intent
that
any
new
growth
would
go
to
infrastructure
and
streets
right.
Did
you
say
that,
and
I
was
not
listening
to
you.
I
did.
A
A
J
J
C
A
C
H
Know
where
it's
relevant
is
that
if
it
were
intended
or
if,
if
the
best
use
of
the
money
would
be
in
reconstruction,
then
I
could
work
with
community
and
neighborhoods
to
add
that
to
a
contract,
perhaps
like
ben
mentioned.
That
is
that
does
equate
to
about
one
lane
mile.
We
are
currently
on
track
to
do
100
lane
miles
in
this
fiscal
year
and
in
next
fiscal
year
we're
on
track
to
do
about
155
lane
miles.
H
If
we
were
to
say
156,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
we
could
accommodate
that,
but
that
is
also
weather
dependent.
So
just.
A
One
word
of
caution,
and
with
that
we
will,
you
know
we're
doing
something
that
we
don't
always
do,
which
is
giving
you
the
discretion
on
how
to
sure
extend
it
so
right
now.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay.
Thank
you,
sorry,
thumbs
up
that.
We
support
that
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it.
Okay,
that
is
unanimous.
C
In
this
case
it
would
be
one-time
revenue
to
put
in
fund
balance
in
case
some
things
you
know
are
worked
out
over
the
next
few
weeks
that
result
in
a
need
to.
C
A
Okay,
do
we
I
don't
do
we
need
to
strap
yeah?
Let's
drop
all
that
one
just
to
be
safe
thumbs
up
that
we
put
the
119
000
into
fund
balance
just
in
case
there's
anything
else
that
comes
up
thumbs
down,
that
we
oppose
that
okay
great,
and
that
is
unanimous.
That's
it
so
now
we'll
go
back
to
per
councilmember
mendenhall's
suggestion
that
we
pushed
the
parking
increase,
the
parking
fee
increase
of
25
cents
to
the
end,
we've
now
gone
through
everything.
We
know
what
the
money
is:
councilmember,
mendenhall.
A
Okay,
so
the
the
poll
would
be
25
increase
thumbs
up
that
we
support
that
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it.
Councilmember
rogers,
just
a
quick
reminder.
H
C
Yeah,
probably
not
this
minute,
but
we
can
do
a
little
research
see
how
quickly
we
can
get
you
some
comparables.
H
A
Well,
and-
and
I
will
be-
I
will
be
supporting
I'll
support
it,
but
I
still
want
to
I'll
be
supporting
it.
I
have
my
concerns
not
just
because
it's
a
fee
increase,
but
because
it's
a
fee
increase
with
zero
public
process.
There
is
no
discussion
leading
up
to
this.
We've
we've
had
the
same
issue
with
another
department
that
we've
been
talking
about,
and
I
think
any
time
you
increase
fees
without
having
any
sort
of
public
dialogue.
It
is,
it
is
less
than
transparent
and
you
know
is
something
that
we
need
to.
A
We
need
to
avoid.
Unfortunately,
in
this
one,
you
know
where
we
are
right
now
we're
stuck
so,
mr,
I
will
be
supporting
it,
but
I
am
not
thrilled
with
the
process.
Councilmember
mendenhall.
E
While
I
agree
with
you
about
public
process
around
fee
and
rate
increases,
this
one
in
particular
for
me
is
unique,
because
we
know
when
we
have
a
recent
parking
study,
that
there
are
a
lot
of
parking
options
downtown.
Our
meters
are
one
of
those
parking
options.
There
are
some
free
parking
options.
There
are
some
privately
owned
parking
options,
so,
while
our
garbage
pickup,
you
know
our.
A
H
A
Little
bit
more
nimble
thumbs
up
that
we
support
that
thumbs
down
that
we
oppose
it.
The
25
cent
increase
on
parking.
Okay,
that
is
unanimous,
great.
C
D
That
was
helpful
to
get
us
through
several
of
these
items,
but
I'll
just
touch
on
them
to
make
sure
that
everyone
agrees
under
the
council.
Straphold
items
that
we
wanted
to
get
back
to
is
the
rehab
program,
which
was
done.
The
discussion
on
traffic
calming
which
was
done
additional
discussion
on
these
two
economic
development
budget
items
that
was
done.
D
D
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
to
prompt
a
conversation
about
the
housing
funding
and,
what's
changing,
to
make
sure
that
we
have
council
direction
and
agreement
on
how
the
budget
documents
are
written.
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
either
cindy
or
jennifer
want
to
do
an
intro
on
and
then
probably
the
best.
One
of
the
things
that
we
should
do
is
go
through
the
ordinance
and
make
sure
that
that
language
is
consistent
with
what
the
council
is
telling
us
to
do.
C
The
council
had
indicated
a
desire
to
add
a
number
of
contingent
appropriations
relating
to
your
understanding
about
housing,
and
they
appear
in
mostly
in
the
budget
ordinance,
although
they're
also
in
the
rda
budget.
Adoption
ordinance,
which
is
item
number,
let's
see
the
salt
lake
city
budget.
Adoption
ordinance
is
one.
The
rda
is
two
thank
you.
C
Oh,
we
switched
the
order
anyway,
there's
some
housing
language
in
both
of
those
ordinances
that
lays
out
the
council's
intent
of
what
moving
funding
is
and
is
not
in
housing
and
clarifying
that
intent
and
cindy.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
to
add
there.
K
One
of
the
things
that
the
council
has
had
us
working
on
for
a
while
and
stop
me
if
I'm
belaboring
it,
but
the
whole
concept
of
creating
a
one-stop
location
and
there's
been
discussion
with
the
council
with
the
administration
about
it
there.
K
I
think
that
the
administration
had
their
reasons
for
thinking
that
things
shouldn't
be
combined,
but
from
a
from
a
budget
oversight,
budget
perspective,
oversight,
perspective
and
policy
perspective,
the
council
had
instructed
us
to
try
to
look
for
a
way
to
combine
the
processes
so
that
there
is
one
time
one.
Every
housing
developer
that
wants
city
assistance
comes
in
and
applies
one
time
for
each
project.
They
com
they
go
through
one
due
diligence
process.
They
go
through
one
public
board
process;
they
go
through
one
negotiation
process
and
one
approval
process.
K
So
the
and
people
have
asked.
Why
does
the
council
keep
referring
to
this
being
faster,
a
faster
way
to
get
money
out
into
housing,
and-
and
that
is
because
you
would
reduce
the
processing
by
up
to
50
percent.
K
Sometimes
it
would
be
more
than
that,
and
that
is
because
there's
a
lot
of
rework
that
we've
observed
happens
because
there
are
two
separate
departments
that
are
working
on
it.
So
that's
that's
what
we
were
working
on
here
in
this
ordinance,
trying
to
articulate
that
and
and
then
the
other.
K
K
Also
yeah,
okay,
so
this
piece
so
I'll
just
skip
to
this
other
one
too.
The
the
funding
our
future
funding
is
is
in
the
block.
You
guys
are
tracking
it
carefully.
The
administration
is
tracking
it
carefully,
and
one
of
the
things
that
the
council
asked
us
to
do
is
to
look
at
whether
it's
an
administrative
function
or
a
legislative
function
to
actually
allocate
the
the
funds
to
the
specific
areas,
and
you
could
probably
argue
it
either
way.
K
The
administration
could
put
out
what
you
know
what
they
perceive
as
the
needs
also,
and
then
there's
an
opportunity
for
any
organization
to
apply
there's
at
least
a
14-day
time
period,
and
then
the
mayor
makes
recommendations
to
the
council.
So
it's
all
in
a
public
process,
including
a
public
hearing
so
again
not
to
delay
it
but
to
give
the
opportunity
to
all
organizations
to
participate
in
that
if
they
feel
like
they
can
provide
a
service
that
the
administration
has
identified.
K
We
had
several
questions
from
people
who
said
well.
Why
did
why
did
the
administration
choose
this
organization
or
that
organization,
and
it's
pretty
easy?
Why
they
it's
pretty
easy
to
see
why
they
chose
particular
organizations
because
that's
what
they
do,
but
it
turns
out.
There
are
others
who
might
have
been
interested
in
applying
so
so
the
idea
would
be
that
the
council
would
consider
an
ordinance
that
would
spell
out
that
process.
C
And
just
as
a
suggestion,
if
it's
too,
if
it's
too
much
in
the
weeds
to
go
through
the
actual
ordinance
language,
the
council
can
take
a
look
at
it.
Our
challenge
is
that,
because
it's
actually
in
the
ordinance
language,
we
need
any
edits
before
well
before
seven,
so
so
that
you
guys
can
adopt
the
budget
since
the
contingent
appropriation
language
is
actually
going
to
be
in
the
budget.
Adoption
ordinance
itself
so.
A
A
A
Let's
do
this,
let's
take
a
break
right
now,
right,
30
minutes,
let's
come
back
at
is
10
minutes.
Okay,.
A
B
Yeah
council
members,
given
to
the
administration
of
this.
K
A
We
are
in
the
middle
of
our
in
the
middle
of
our
unfunded
or
unresolved
issues
discussion
there
we
took
a
break
to
review
the
housing
document
that
was
out
and
so
jennifer
do
you
wanna
walk
us
through
that?
I
know
that
council
member
fowler
has
a
suggestion
to
that
document.
C
F
Yeah,
so
thank
you
for
taking
a
break
right
when
I
was
sort
of
getting
into
this.
F
I
realized
something
that
I
wanted
to
to
clarify,
and
I
appreciate
staff
for
working
really
hard
on
getting
some
added
language
to
this
ordinance
in
order
to
make
a
couple
of
those
clarifications
and
that's
if,
on
this
ordinance
on
page
five,
subsections,
subsection
b
on
that
that
page
talks
about
the
housing
trust
fund
and
the
the
sort
of
move
that
we're
doing
from
moving
that
to
from
hand
into
rda
and
we're
adding
some
language
of
on
a
trial
basis.
F
I
was
there
for
the
the
ribbon
cutting
on
that.
The
programming
that
hand
does
and
have
have
created
is
really
quite
impressive
and
I'm
hoping
as
again
this
is
a
trial
basis.
We're
going
to
add
that
language
that
it
frees
up
a
little
of
their
time
to
kind
of
do
more
of
that
good
programming
and
then
the
development
we've
seen
today.
F
You
know
I
certainly
did
not
intend
to
put
to
feel
good
projects
at
the
end
of
our
rda
agenda,
but,
like
I
said,
I'm
glad,
I
did
because
it's
a
real
example
of
the
work
that
that
we're
doing
in
the
development
side
of
things
the
brinshore
piece,
the
the
oh,
the
distillery
was
just
fun,
but
the
print
short
piece,
particularly
where
we're
really
looking
at
how
we
have
mixed
income
development
in
the
city
and
we're
able
to
to
fund
that
and
and
to
have
all
of
these
different
resources
in
these
tools
and
and
provide
the
things
that
we
need
to
provide
and
so
the
again
going
back.
F
The
idea
is
to,
as
cindy
stated
kind
of
a
one-stop
shopping
center,
where
it
makes
things
easier
for
developers.
We
have
a
couple
of
tools
for
our
housing
needs
and
and
really
figuring
out.
Where
is
those
tools
are
best
placed,
I
think,
is
the
the
what
we're
kind
of
striving
for.
So
with
that
language?
Sorry,
there's
a
lot
of
background
there
with
the
subsection
b.
It
would
be
on
a
trial
basis.
F
We'd
then
ask
for
just
a
review
of
how
things
are
going
at
the
sixth
month
and
the
12-month
mark-
and
I
know
six
months
seems
like
a
little
too
soon,
but
if
people
come
back
and
say
it's
a
little
too
soon
to
evaluate
it,
that's
okay,
at
least
we're
starting
that
conversation
to
to
make
sure
it.
It
stays
on
our
radar.
F
We're
also
going
I'm
I've
suggested
anyway
to
add
some
language
about
the
things
that
we
had
talked
about
and
the
concerns
that
council
member
johnston
brought
up,
which
is
having
an
real
and
continuing
our
in-depth
policy
discussion
on
all
aspects
of
housing,
programming
funding
developing
all
of
it,
so
that
we're
really
maximizing
our
assets
and
we're
maximizing
our
dollars
and
we're
maximizing
our
efforts
for
housing
in
the
most
efficient
and
effective
way.
So
those
were
my
suggestions
just
that
that
ordinance
again,
I
wanted
to
be
clear
that
it
was
just
a
year
trial
basis.
F
That's
what
we've
all
talked
about!
That's
what
the
concerns
were
and
kind
of
how
how
we
all
came
together
on
that
and
I
didn't
when
I
read
that
I
was
you
might
have
seen.
I
sort
of
stalled
and
said:
wait.
We
need
to
fix
that
because
I
didn't
want
anyone
to
think
there
was
a
fast
one
going
on
here,
but
but
that
it
really
is
just
something
to
evaluate
and
see
if
we're
meeting
our
housing
needs.
The
way
that
that
we
should
be.
E
I
would
support
that
recommendation
by
councilmember
fowler
and
down
lehua.
If
we
could,
on
this
point
two,
I
guess
it's
point
b
in
our
yeah
that
we
add
a
little
word
of
development
so
that
it's
the
council
intends
to
establish
a
housing
development,
trust
fund
and-
and
part
of
I
just
want
to
give
some
clarity,
not
that
it's
different
or
would
be
administrated
differently,
but
the
administered
rather
differently.
E
K
Sorry,
I
was,
I
just
stepped
out
working
on
this.
I
have
some
suggestions
from
council
member
fowler
and
from
council
member
mendenhall.
If
you
can
skip
to
another
section,
I
can
start
getting
that
together,
so
you
don't
have
to
do
it
on
the
fly.
Okay
is
that,
okay
to
the
with
the
council,
yeah
yeah,
I.
A
A
E
Have
one
little
piece
on
the
ordinance,
but
are
you
staying
in
the
ordinance
or
moving
no.
C
C
C
A
Any
other
comments
on
on
this
ordinance:
yeah
council,
member
baltimore.
I.
G
Just
wanted
to
add
at
the
public
so
at
point
b,
the
fourth
avenue
well
so
to
reduce
the
building
size
and
address
noise
concerns
and
also
address
health
hazards.
G
Can
we
add
that
to
that
language
that
that
we
get
to
know
mitigation
if
something
happens,
or
if
there's
going
to
be
a
health
hazard
with
this
chlorine
at
the
yeah
building
size,
address
noise
concerns
and
address
health
hazards.
F
L
C
A
Remember
mendenhall:
do
you
have
any
anything
else?
Okay,
so
we'll
come
back
to
that
to
deal
with
the
the
housing
piece
right.
C
D
Just
as
an
fyi,
and
we
can
go
through
the
motion
sheet
in
more
detail,
but
we
have
listed
oh,
this
is
for
the
holding
account
items.
The
motion
sheet
includes,
as
one
of
the
legislative
intents
a
list
of
each
of
the
holding
accounts
that
the
council
has
set
up
in
your
discussion,
so
that
will
be
just
a
one
place
where
there's
an
inventory
of
those
projects
that
have
been
placed
into
a
holding
account.
D
We
also
just
wanted
to
confirm
with
the
council
that
the
mayor's
office
sent
additional
information
on
the
plans
for
building
an
equitable
city,
those
both
the
positions
and
the
initiative
funding
that
was
included
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
and
so
we
are
confirming
with
the
council
that
we
would
place
that
on
for
a
briefing
sometime
in
july.
After
conferring
with
the
chair
vice
chair
on
the
schedule,
and
then
our
next
larger
item
of
discussion
would
be
sustainability.
A
Okay,
so,
council,
on
on
sustainability,
we
straw
polled
on
thursday
to
hold
a
number
of
items
that
were
there.
A
Yes,
so
they're
with
those
projects,
I
think
there
was
the
the
you
know
perception
that
that
we
had
unfunded
those
those
were
not
unfunded,
they
were
funded,
but
they
were
held
until
you
know,
we
received
some
information
back
from
sustainability
that
clarified
some
of
the
some
of
the
questions
that
we
had.
A
Requesting
or
basically
making
funding
contingent,
making
funding
contingent
upon
the
department
providing
quarterly
written
briefings
to
the
council
on
programs
and
budget
and
progress
on
public
engagement
for
a
possible
rate
increase,
etc.
So
we
will
not
be
doing
the
rate
increase
this
year,
but
hearing
back
you
know
in
a
quarterly
fashion,
written
briefings
from
sustainability,
about
these
projects
and
how
that
money
is
going
to
be
spent.
A
D
Sorry,
I
think
it
would
actually
be
released
to
hold
on
380
000
of
that,
because
there
was
50
000
in
that
amount
that
related
to
the
building
in
an
equitable
city.
Okay,.
A
So,
okay,
so
yeah.
So
so,
basically,
not
the
not
the
you
know:
building
an
equitable
city
piece
but
the
rest
of
it.
The
the
hold
would
be
lifted
and
we
would
but
but
the
funding
contingency
would
be
dependent
upon
the
quarterly
written
briefings
to
the
council
and.
K
Cindy,
the
only
thing
that
would
happen
with
the
equity
piece
is
that
that
would
be
combined
into
a
conversation
with
the
council
so
that
the
council
can
understand
how
to
it
relates
to
the
two
sets
of
funding
that
are
in
the
community
and
neighborhood
department,
and
also
the
current
role
of
human
resources
in
the
training.
So
that
was
that
that's
why
that
piece
was
set
apart.
A
Great
one
other
point
that
I
that
I
want
to
make
about
this
the
whole
the
council's
hold
on
these
sustainability
programs
had
nothing
to
do
with
the
merit
of
those
programs.
A
It
had
to
do
with
the
fact
that
there
was
specific
information
that
the
council
was
requesting
and
that
we
needed
to
have
in
order
to
make
a.
You
know
well
thought
out
decision,
and
that
is
our
responsibility.
We
are
the
budgetary
body
of
the
city
and
it
is
important
for
us
to
take
that
seriously,
and
so,
when
we
ask
departments
for
information,
it's
important
that
we
get
that
information.
A
We
were
having
a
tough
time
getting
some
of
that
information.
We
feel
now
that
we're
in
a
much
better
spot
with
the
the
way
that
sustainability
is,
has
been
able
to
react
in
the
past
week,
and
so
with
that
we're
willing
to
you
know,
I
would
recommend
that
we
that
we
lift
that.
But
again
you
know
for
the
public
listening.
This
is
this.
You
know
that
decision
last
week
wasn't
because
we
don't
like
sustainability,
because
we
don't
love
our
mother
earth.
A
So
with
that,
I
would
let
straw
poll
that
we
add
the
contingency
language
to
the
ordinance
and
release
the
hold
on
the
projects
totaling.
Three
hundred,
who
will
help
me
with
180.
D
A
Okay,
and
so
with
that
we'll
say
that
passes
six
two,
oh
seven,
that's
unanimous!
So.
D
Great.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
relates
to
the
35
000
that
would
be
set
aside
for
hrc
related
improvements
that
the
city's
consultant
suggested
and
community
and
neighborhood
staff
is
asking
whether
you
would
authorize
their
staff
to
engage
now
with
businesses
so
that
that
program
can
get
up
and
running.
D
The
additional
funding
that
community
neighborhoods
will
be
finding
for
the
hrc
related
improvement
program.
This
is
what
the
city's
consultant
had
recommended
for
that
area.
Whether
can
is
wondering
if
they
could,
if
their
staff
could
begin
engaging
with
the
businesses
on
those
projects
just
to
get
a
little
bit
of
a
head
start
before
july.
1St.
A
That
thumbs
up-
and
that
is
unanimous.
D
Great
so
I
think
we're
still
waiting
on
the
budget
ordinance,
but
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
switch
to
the
motion
sheet.
Okay
and
you
have
that
that's
the
big
one,
yeah
number
five,
if
that
helps,
but
it's
on
the
biggest
paper.
D
J
The
first
motion
adopts
the
budget,
except
for
the
library
fund
and
cip,
which
are
separate
motions,
and
there
is
a
submotion
1a
for
council
member
johnston,
since
he
needs
to
recuse
himself
on
the
500
000
for
the
voa
mitigation
staff
is
not
aware
of
any
other
recusals.
So
please,
let
us
know
if
we've
missed
one.
J
J
Motion
four
is
adopting
cip
and
debt
service.
The
council
approves
all
of
the
funding
going
into
cip
as
part
of
the
annual
budget.
You
also
approve
all
of
the
money
to
pay
the
debt
service
as
part
of
the
annual
budget,
and
the
remaining
funds
are
addressed
over
the
summer
on
a
project
specific
basis.
J
J
And
then
the
last
motion
on
the
last
page,
six
is
adopting
the
other
ordinances,
most
of
which
are
done
annually,
such
as
appropriating
necessary
funds
for
the
three
bargaining
units.
The
three
unions,
as
well
as
the
changes
for
the
parking
meter
increase
that
was
just
discussed
and
the
compensation
plan
for
all
non-represented
employees.
J
L
D
I
could
go
through
them
quickly
because
I've
done
them
here
on
track
changes.
I
just
wanted
to
note
here,
item
d
under
motion
six,
just
so
that
the
council
is
aware,
the
administration
is
working
with
us
to
update
the
consolidated
fee
schedule
to
reflect
a
lower
parking
meter
rate
increase
and
to
also
back
out
the
proposed
rate
increase
in
the
sustainability
department.
So
those
the
the
file
that
you'll
be
adopting
tonight
reflects
those
updates.
D
Based
on
your
conversation,
most
of
the
changes
that
we've
made
are
in
motion
five
with
the
legislative
intent
so
I'll
just
scroll
to
those
we.
A
Sorry,
thank
you.
So
on
motion
number
five,
which
is
the
legislative
intent
statements,
I've
received
a
number
of
ques.
You
know
some
questions
from
council
members
who
would
like
to
you
know
specifically
read
out
some
of
these
points,
instead
of
just
adopting
all
the
motions
in
a
lump,
and
so
that
is
something
that
that
will
do
so.
J
A
All
right,
so
is
that
clear,
so
look
through
look
through
these
legislative
intents,
if
you
want
to
read
something,
let
me
know
and
unless
somebody
else
has
already
claimed
it,
it's
yours.
A
D
Is
it
okay?
If
I
highlight
what
we've
changed
in
the
briefing
the
item
on
traffic
calming,
which
is
item
h,
we
changed
that
to
reflect
that
it
would
not
be
an
fte,
but
it
would
be
a
pilot
program
to
do
traffic
calming
initiatives
in
addition
to
500
north
and
then
also
added
a
note
about
the
administration
reporting
back
to
the
council
on
outcomes
and
a
recommendation
for
future
opportunities.
B
Mr
chair,
I'm
sorry
councilmember
johnston
if
I
could
go
back
to
the
cro
h
crossing
guards
for
a
second.
B
I'm
not
picking
to
read
it.
What
I'm
I'm
going
for
is,
if
there's
an
option
from
the
administration,
perhaps
to
use,
say
a
private
company
or
something
along
those
lines
for
that
purpose.
It's
not
reflected
in
here.
This
is
sort
of.
We
said
a
lot
of
specific
things
last
time
about
options.
That's
not
included
in
here.
Do
we
want
to
generalize
it
a
little
more
to
allow
other
things
we
haven't
talked
about
yet.
H
B
I
think
the
it
says
the
intent
of
the
council
excuse
me
is
to
provider,
ask
the
administration
to
provide
a
briefing.
That's
fine,
I
think
that's
true
program,
staffing
challenges
relating
to
staffing
cities.
Responsibility,
go
further,
the
goal
of
further
discussion
to
identify
any
other
opportunities
to
for
coordination
or
funding
that
would
improve.
So
I
think
that
probably
covers
it.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
here
that.
B
H
A
Okay,
david
litvak,
has
has
come
to
the
table.
Do
you
have
some
specifics.
H
Yeah,
mr
chair,
I
appreciate
that
I
appreciate
the
council
member
johnson's
catch
on
that,
as
we
were,
putting
together
the
budget,
recognizing
that
the
crosswalk
issue
is
much
deeper
than
just
trying
to
throw
more
money
at
it.
B
D
So
I
changed
the
sec,
the
sentence
that
begins
with
the
goal
of
further
discussion
that
it
would
now
read
the
goal
of
further
discussion
is
to
identify
future
steps
for
coordination
or
funding.
That
would
improve
the
number
of
crosswalks
staffing
and
student
safety,
which
may
include
an
rfp
and
outside
contract
to
provide
this
service.
D
B
D
D
A
C
Just
going
to
say,
the
key
changes
is
the
next
thing
on
the
outline,
but
that
we're
still
updating
well
that
we're
still
updating
it's
looking
good,
but
we're
going
to
need
a
little
more
time.
So
we'll
have
that
printed
and
ready
for
your
places
and
with
the
recorder's
office
and
then
publicly
available
copies,
just
as
a
comprehensive
line.
By
line
of
every
change
that
the
council's
made
to
the
budget.
D
Just
as
a
reminder
that
something
that
is
attached
as
an
exhibit
to
your
budget
ordinance
so
that
it's
clear
that
whatever
was
adopted
as
the
tentative
budget
earlier
in
may
it's
a
formal
step
required
when
the
city,
when
the
council
receives
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
the
key
changes
is
adopted
as
an
attachment
to
this
ordinance
so
that
it's
clear
that
those
are
the
changes.
The
council's
made
to
the
annual
budget.
D
Go
back
to
the
oh
sorry,
we
added
I
I
did
it
before
we
put.
This
is
what
the
council
straw
pulled
during
your
building
rehab
program
discussion
earlier
this
afternoon,
and
so
we
just
we
put
it
in
here.
I
didn't
have
it
in
track
changes
because
you
already
straw
polled
it.
Sorry,
yes
thank
you,
and
so
it
won't
be
in
the
other
ordinance,
because
it's
just
here
as
a
legislative,
intent.
C
A
And
then
so
one
request
that
I
have
if
we
can
get
a
hard
copy
of
this
to
review
during
our
dinner
break
before
the
formal
meeting.
Just
I'd
like
us
all
to
just
go
back
over
it.
Real,
quick
and.
A
C
D
A
C
So
in
the
rda
budget
adoption
resolution,
because
the
board
adopts
things
by
resolution
in
the
rda,
not
the
not
by
ordinance,
there
is
reference-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
scroll
down
to
the
housing
funding.
C
And
this
this
funding
was
put
together
to
sort
of
reflect
what
the
intent
some
council
members
expressed.
Intent
was,
but
I'm
seeing
now
it's
very
integrated
with
the
housing
discussion
in
the
city.
So
I
don't
know
if
it
makes
sense
to
pause
one
while
we
do
the
other.
D
The
this
section
of
the
rda
resolution
related
to
housing
will
be
affected
by
the
work.
That's
done
on
the
city
ordinance.
That
right
now
is
the
a
large
section.
D
A
So,
council,
if
you're,
okay
with
this-
let's
let's
move
on
in
our
budget,
because
I
know
that
we
do
have
some
other
issues
to
cover
so
we'll
we'll
go
through
that
and
then
we'll
take
our
we'll,
have
our
dinner
break
and
then,
after
our
dinner
break,
we'll
come
back
and
re
and
go
over
the
housing
and
the
rda
piece
right
before
our
formal
meeting.
C
I
think
the
challenge
is
going
to
be
if
edits
are
made
on
the
fly
all
right,
so
I
don't
know
how
to
communicate
those.
A
Scratch
that
we'll
stay
here
and
then
hopefully
we
won't
have
to
delay
the
formal
meeting
too
long,
okay,
okay,
so
moving
on
to
the
agenda.
Let's
go
to
item
number
three,
which
is
an
ordinance
budget.
Amendment
number
six
for
fiscal
year:
2018-19
follow-up,
mary
beth,
thompson
and
john
vike
are
here
and
they
will
be
at
the
table
with
ben.
J
J
The
council
asked
at
the
last
meeting
what
the
administration's
plan
is
to
avoid
refunding
impact
fees
for
transportation
and
police.
They
report
2.2
million
dollars,
is
expected
to
be
encumbered
before
august
for
the
700
south
phase
6
project.
There
are
also
a
few
smaller
projects
that
are
partially
eligible
for
transportation
impact
fees.
If
these
are
encumbered
before
august,
it
would
push
back
the
date
of
the
next
expiration
to
june
2020.
J
Regarding
police
impact
fees,
there
are
two
challenges
to
create
an
east
side
police
precinct.
The
first
is
a
shortage
of
available
land
on
the
east
side
of
the
city,
and
the
second
is
current
market
conditions,
favor
sellers
and
the
administration
reports.
Some
lands
that
have
been
looked
at
are
being
asked
with
premium
prices
which
are
more
than
they
want
to
pay.
J
The
budget
amendment
number
two
of
fiscal
year
19.
As
a
reminder,
the
council
did
appropriate
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
an
east
side
police
precinct,
and
this
was
split:
2.3
million
with
police
impact
fees
and
1.3
million
from
the
surplus
land
fund,
so
there's
currently
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
for
an
eastside
police
precinct,
but
the
administration
is
having
difficulty
finding
land
on
the
east
side.
With
this
funding
level,
188
000
of
police
impact
fees
are
scheduled
to
expire
over
the
next
12
months.
J
J
Seventy
six
hundred
for
parks
and
just
over
59
000
for
transportation
updates
to
the
impact
fee
facility
plan
are
a
hundred
percent
eligible
for
impact
fees.
You
don't
need
to
rely
on
the
general
fund
to
pay
for
any
of
these
updates
attachment.
One
to
the
staff
report
provides
a
breakdown
of
how
these
cost
estimates
were
calculated
and
what
steps
the
impact
v
consultant
would
take
to
update
the
plan.
J
J
There
is
a
policy
question
for
the
council
about
a
potential
funding
contingency.
The
council
previously
discussed
having
the
impactv
consultant
work
for
salt
lake
city
corporation,
the
entity
as
well
as
being
available
to
both
branches
of
government
and
including
the
council
early
in
the
process
to
provide
policy
direction.
I
think
cindy
might
have
information
on
this
item.
J
K
And
we
will
just
do
our
best
to
work
with
the
administration
on
getting
that
information.
They
have
made
some
changes
in
the
contract
already,
but
we
we
can't
get
language
cleaned
up
for
tonight.
J
K
K
There
was
time
to
work
on
it,
it's
been
delayed.
I
don't.
I
wouldn't
suggest
that
the
council
hold
off
on
the
appropriation.
I
I
think
we
are
where
we
are.
We
just
don't
have
time
to
get
it
figured
out
and
we
and
you,
as
far
as
I
know,
the
councils
wanted
to
expedite
this
as
opposed
to
taking
more
time.
A
J
J
J
It
can
be
fully
funded
using
transportation
impact
fees,
and
the
motion
sheet
will
clearly
state
that,
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
the
reason.
The
transportation
section
is
so
much
more
expensive
to
update
than
the
other.
Three
is
because
it
involves
more
steps
of
analysis
as
well
as
two
contracts,
one
with
the
impactv
consultant
and
one
with
a
transportation
consultant.
E
E
A
Okay,
any
questions
or
comments
about
this
all
right.
Thank
you.
All
item
number,
four
on
our
agenda:
an
ordinance,
revised
fbun2
building
height
zoning
text,
amendment
nick
tarbet,
our
council
office
policy,
analyst,
and
he
will
join
us,
be
joined
at
the
table
by
casey
stewart,
the
senior
planner
and
then
I
did
see
the
applicant
in
the
audience.
James
alfondre.
H
The
council
may
remember
this.
This
is
an
item
that
the
council
discussed
last
fall:
it's
a
request
to
amend
the
fbu
fbun2
zoning
district
to
allow
a
greater
height
at
the
corner
of
900,
south
and
washington
street.
When
the
council
discussed
this
last
year,
the
original
proposal
was
for
the
cornell
corner
parcel
at
231
throughout.
B
B
H
H
N
N
Initially
this.
This
started
with
a
corner
parcel
up
on
the
the
far
left
corner
right
here
and
is
expanded
to
be
now.
What's
in,
yellow
the
planning
commission
considered
this
request
and
initial
and
ultimately
voted
in
favor
of
recommending
approval,
primarily
based
on
the
old
henry's
dry,
cleaner
site
that
had
a
contamination
that
extended
over
to
other
properties.
B
Thank
you.
I
do
understand
the
planning
commission
for
deposit
and
recommendation.
One
concern
that
was
brought
up
from
the
public
was
a
lack
or
not
enough
public
input
on
this
particular
issue.
Can
you
talk
to
that
a
little
about
what
was
the
public
outreach
on
this
particular
change
in
this
process?.
N
H
D
A
Okay,
so
is
derek
here:
diet,
okay,
derek!
If
you
want
to
join
us
up
at
the
table.
Item
number
five
is
a
board
appointment
for
the
business
advisory
board,
derek
deach.
A
Derek
thank
you
for
your
interest
in
serving
on
the
business
advisory
board.
Tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
why
you
are
interested
in
that
board.
H
J
I
helped
to
facilitate
the
downtown
merchants
association
and
I
was
asked
by
the
economic
development
department
to
represent
the
downtown
merch
association
and
the
downtown
alliance
and
and
the
businesses
that
are
located
within
the
within
that
those
boundaries
on
the
business
advisory
board.
H
G
A
Thank
you
and
derek
deutsch.
I
need
to
apologize
for
butchering
the
germanic
pronunciation
of
your
name.
It's
not
the
first
time.
Please
forgive
me
for
that.
J
A
A
That's
all
it's
a
hard
one
to
describe
you
are.
You
are
welcome,
and-
and
thank
you
for
your
interest
in
doing
this,
your
name
will
be
on
the
consent
agenda
across
the
hall,
and
so
when
you
you
you're,
welcome
to
stay
through
the
meeting
you
don't
need
to,
though
we
appreciate
your
willingness
to
serve
great.
Thank
you
thanks
and
staff
knows
I
love
them
and
I've
been
and
I've
been,
you
know,
dishing
out
a
lot
of
accolades.
So
the
next
item
is
the
little
cottonwood
canyon,
environmental
impact
statement,
study.
A
So,
while
you're
working
on
that
welcome
mayor,
it's
good
to
have
you
back
and
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
about
the
study.
L
Sure,
maybe,
while
while
we're
getting
set
up
here,
first,
it's
very
nice
to
see
you
and
to
be
with
you
and
to
be
in
this
fine
place.
So
about
a
year
ago
I
took
on
it
was
almost
exactly
a
year
ago.
Actually,
I
took
on
a
position
with
a
new
governmental
entity.
The
central
wasatch
commission,
which
salt
lake
city
is
a
proud
participant
and
has
contributed
in
many
ways,
including
financially
and
the
central
wasatch
commission
grew
out
of
mountain
accord.
L
Among
the
things
that
were
recommended
from
mountain
accord
was
that
a
a
new
governmental
entity
be
established
to
coordinate
the
work
being
done
in
the
central
wasatch
mountains,
which
is
basically
from
parley's
canyon,
south
through
little
cottonwood
canyon
and
then
over
on
the
wasatch
back
with
summon
county
in
park
city
and
and
as
part
of
that,
they
really
had
a
mission
to
implement
mountain
accord.
L
Two
of
the
main
thrusts
of
mountain
accord
were
to
pursue
congressional
legislation
and
to
solve,
or
at
least
help
solve,
the
transportation
issues
which
reached
a
breaking
point.
As
we
all
know
this
last
winter,
with
the
heavy
snows
and
everyone
wanted
to
get
up
there.
On
powder
days,
for
some
reason,
so
udot
during
this
same
time
frame
was
received
an
appropriation
from
the
legislature
to
make
improvements
in
little
cottonwood
canyon
among
other
recreational
areas
around
the
state.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
the
time
over
to
to
john
thomas.
L
L
Solutions,
oriented
udot
person
for
years
and
he's
been
assigned
the
little
cottonwood
canyon,
eis,
and
it
has
now
kind
of
morphed
into
a
dual
effort
with
the
central
wasatch
commission.
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
you,
john.
M
Thank
you,
chair
council.
My
name
is
john
thomas
project
manager
for
udot
and
today
I
would
just
like
to
overview
the
two
activities
that
we're
doing
in
the
cottonwood
canyons,
and
also
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
as
we
go
on
a
little
background
since
1989
an
author
sitting.
Next
to
me,
did
a
study
in
the
cottonwood
canyons
for
the
first
county
general
plan
and
identified
some
issues
associated
with
the
canyons
that
we're
still
facing
today.
M
Since
then,
there
have
been
numerous
studies
trying
to
understand
the
different
transportation
issues
and
solutions
that
has
continued
to
this
day
and,
most
recently,
the
mountain
accord
process
concluded
in
2015
and
offered
us
some
newer
information
and
insights
to
transportation
solutions,
so
we're
building
on
all
of
those
efforts,
we're
not
starting
from
scratch.
Those
are
well
defined,
well
understood
and
with
in
2017,
when
the
legislature
approved
senate
bill
277,
they
did
something
unique
in
the
country.
They
asked
the
utah
department
translation
to
take
a
hundred
million
dollars
and
start
to
address
congestion.
M
Around
recreation
areas
and
udot
went
through
a
process
identified
16
areas
around
the
state.
The
utah
transportation
commission
prioritized
four
of
those
for
funding,
one
of
them
being
little
cottonwood
canyon
for
66
million
the
rest
of
the
money.
15
million
went
to
st
george
to
help
with
a
st
george
to
springdale
transit
system.
To
get
one
up
and
running
there,
10
million
went
to
moab
to
help
him
with
some
downtown
parking
and
then
bear
light,
got
a
0.3
million
for
some
roadway
improvements.
Trail
improvements,
some
sidewalks
things
like
that
that
they've
needed
up
there.
M
So
that's
that's
how
this
came
about,
and
so
we
started
la
in
2018,
a
environmental
impact
statement
for
lower
cottonwood
canyon
and
where
we
are
today
with
that
is
we're
looking
at
these
issues-
and
these
has
been
discussed
in
maybe
singular
issues,
but
we're
trying
to
bring
all
these
different
topics
together
into
one
common
environmental
impact
statement
to
see
how
they
impact
transportation.
One
is
avalanche
mitigation.
Low
cottonwood
canyon
is
the
highest
risk
for
avalanche
in
the
whole
nation.
It's
got
the
highest
risk.
M
We
had
an
independent
group
from
canada
come
in
help
work
with
our
local
avalanche
crews,
both
from
the
ski
areas,
forest
service
and
udot,
and
they
made
some
findings
and
so
we're
using
that
in
the
eis
things
like
berms
berms.
That
would
redirect
avalanches
moving
the
road
onto
bridge
piers,
so
the
avalanche
could
come
under
it.
Also
more
traditionally
snowsheds
have
been
evaluated
and
looked
at,
and
so
we
have
a
pretty
good
sense
of
those
different
alternatives
and
we'll
be
evaluating
those
more
detail.
M
Wasatch
boulevard
from
fort
union
boulevard
by
the
711
at
the
mouth
of
big
cottonwood
south,
towards
where
it
turns
off
to
look
higher.
You
go
up
to
low
cottonwood,
is
a
section
of
roadway
that
we'll
be
also
evaluating
in
this
eis,
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
very
different
than
what
we
see
in
the
canyon
in
in
this
area.
It
goes
to
the
town
city
of
cottonwood
heights.
M
It's
a
crucial
could
be
a
crucial
gateway
to
both
canyons,
but
it's
also
a
community
road
and
the
folks
who
live
on
either
side
of
that
have
some
distinct
serious
challenges
to
getting
in
and
out
of
their
homes,
and
they
also
see
it
as
a.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
evaluate
how
do
we
make
this
more
of
a
neighborhood
roadway
for
cottonwood
heights
and
that's
going
to
be
a
real
challenge,
because
currently
right
now,
it's
designated
as
one
of
the
highest
classifications
of
roads
below
a
freeway
just
below
freeway.
M
So
it
serves
a
pretty
high
purpose
and
because
that
has
a
50
mile,
an
hour
speed
limit
other
things
that
you
know
challenge
the
neighborhood,
so
we'll
be
looking
at
some
things
to
help
cottonwood
heights
out
with
that
transit's
a
big
deal.
This
is
something
that
we've
has
been
reported
in
all
16.
Well,
not
all
16,
but
many
of
those
studies
from
1989
very
consistent
in
reducing
the
number
of
vehicles
going
up
the
canyon
and
putting
more
people
in
the
fewer
vehicles.
And
so
that's
not
a
new
topic.
M
We
have
4
300
spots
to
park
cars
at
the
top
of
the
canyon.
We
have
about
seven
thousand
cars
trying
to
go
up
the
canyons
on
a
busy
day.
You
can
imagine
what
happens
first
time.
Big
cottonwood
can
first
time
ever
big
cottonwood
canyon
was
closed
uphill
traffic
because
there
was
no
more
parking.
There
was
one
lane
at
the
top
and
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
that's
an
unsafe
condition.
Road
had
to
be
closed,
so
we're
trying
to
address
these
things
and
transit
becomes
a
big
part
of
that.
M
One
of
the
things
we're
thinking
about
is
and
change
from,
and
this
this
is
kind
of
pivotal
thinking.
Think
about
the
legislature
approving
100
million
to
look
at
recreation
areas.
Now
in
2019,
the
legislature
approved
13
million
for
purchase
some
land
at
the
mouth
of
big
cottonwood,
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
a
mobility
center.
What
can
we
do
to
help
transit
and
so
we're
going
to
go
through
a
process?
M
Looking
with
looking
at
the
gravel
pit
area
with
cottonwood
heights,
the
landowner
various
stakeholders
as
to
which
could
should
that
all
look
like
and
probably
isn't
just
going
to
be
a
parking
structure.
It's
probably
going
to
be
a
transit-oriented
development
with
public-private
partnerships
associated
with
that
gondola
rail
are
also
part
of
that.
Gondolas
have
been
discussed
in
the
past
and
you
may
have
heard
of
those
and
as
well
trailhead
parking
in
the
summer.
M
If
you've
been
up
white
pine
on
a
saturday,
you
probably
you
might
have
parked
half
a
mile
or
more
away
from
the
trailhead
causes
some
challenges
on
a
40
mile,
an
hour
road
trying
to
navigate
that,
and
so
what
we're
trying
to
look
at
is
how
do
we
take
the
amount
of
cars
that
are
parking
on
the
road,
put
them
into
a
parking
lot
and
limit
not
allow
parking
on
the
road
anymore?
So
not
increasing
parking,
but
actually
we'd
be
decreasing
parking
in
the
canyon,
with
these
alternatives
and
generally
just
low
cottonwood
mobility.
M
We're
doing
some
things.
Looking
at
the
intersection
where
209
comes
into
or
94
south
comes
into
low
cottonwood
road.
Looking
at
a
merge
lane
in
a
couple
of
years
to
put
in
there
all
it
is,
is
a
minor
fix
to
help
people
move
a
little
smoother
through
that
area.
This
summer
we'll
be
looking
at
constructing
some.
We
call
them
high
t
intersections
it's
putting
a
barrier
in
the
middle
of
the
road.
So
as
you're
coming
out
of
one
of
the
parking
lots,
you
don't
have
to
worry
about,
the
downhill
can
canyon
traffic.
M
You
can
come
out
into
the
traffic
stream
and
merge
into
that.
So
just
mobility
efforts
there
that's
cis
and
the
second
one
is
around
what
we
call
transportation
action
plan,
cottonwood,
canyon's
transportation
action
plan
and
the
tolling
is
something
that's
different
on
this,
because
we
couldn't
look
at
tolling
in
little
cottonwood
canyon
alone,
so
we're,
including
both
of
them
tolling,
has
a
very
good
potential
to
help
achieve
the
goal
of
getting
fewer
vehicles
up
the
canyon
and
more
people
in
those
fewer
vehicles
talked
about
the
parking
structures.
M
Also,
mobility
is
the
same
and
both
canyons
transit.
The
things
that
we
look
at
in
little
cottonwood
that
become
applicable,
you
can
imagine
gondola
as
an
alternative,
could
be
identified
in
little
cottonwood,
but
what,
if
it
made
sense
to
at
least
evaluate
it
going
over
in
the
big
cottonwood?
What
would
that
process
be?
We
would
do
it
in
this
transportation
action
plan
also.
A
So
that
question
I
mean,
I
know
that
one
of
the
concerns
about
that
is
the
concern
that
we
had
initially
with
the
expansion
of
the
ski
resorts.
What
would
that
do
to
I
mean,
especially
if
we're
talking
about
you,
know
the
connection
between
the
two
canyons.
What
does
that
do,
potentially
to
the
watershed.
M
And
so
those
impacts
definitely
need
to
be
addressed.
One
of
the
things
we're
trying
to
understand
is
do
those?
What
are
what
are
the
benefits
of
something
like
that
do
if
we
have
travel
in
between
the
canyons
that
we
could
now
take
off
of
the
road
in
one
canyon
and
put
it
on
a
gondola
that
has
three
times
the
capacity
of
our
road?
M
L
L
Just
in
this,
in
the
simplest
way
park,
city
and
summit
county,
viewed
it
as
completely
unacceptable,
you
can
imagine
going
down
sweet
alley
with
the
volume
of
cars
that
would
be
coming
through.
M
So
this
this
would
be
in
little
cottonwood
canyon
running
somewhere
from
the
base
of
little
could
be
down
at
94th
and
highland,
where
ut
has
a
big
park
and
ride
lot.
We
don't
know
that
right
now
we
do
know
that
any
base
is
a
significant
impact
and
we
need
to
evaluate
that's
part
of
the
evaluation,
so
it's
run
little
cottonwood
canyon.
M
We
may
evaluate
it
going
over
into
big
because
there
may
be
a
benefit
of
having
that
capacity
in
a
gondola
versus
in
big
cottonwood
canyon
road.
So
there
are
trade-offs
that
we
need
to
evaluate.
M
L
Yeah
one
of
the
other
outcomes
of
mountain
accord
was
it
it's.
The
agreement
called
for
no
expansion
of
ski
areas
with
a
few
minor
exceptions.
It
also
said
that,
in
terms
of
connecting
big
and
little
cottonwood
canyon,
that
chairlifts,
in
other
words,
ski
area
expansion,
would
not
be
considered.
Transportation
systems
could
be.
So
if
a
gondola
was
used
purely
for
transportation,
it
could
be
considered,
but
not
as
a
way
to
provide
additional
skiing.
M
L
M
M
So
the
schedule
that
we're
looking
at
for
both
of
these
we're
just
starting
the
process
going
through
the
different
steps,
and
we
see
significant
point
when
we
come
up
with
the
draft
alternatives
about
a
year
from
now,
and
I
think
between
now
and
that
year,
time
frame
we'll
be
doing
a
lot
of
outreach
with
a
variety
of
different
stakeholder
groups.
A
M
A
Other
questions:
okay,
ralph.
L
Yeah,
I
might
say
that
you
brought
up
public
utilities
in
watershed
and
obviously,
for
some
of
us
that's
a
top
priority,
and
I
think
people
recognize
that
across
the
valley
and
really
everybody
involved
with
the
with
the
west
hatch
mountains.
L
They
have
been
a
I'd,
say,
a
critical
player
all
the
way
through
not
just
during
the
mountain
accord
days,
but
all
the
way
through
with
the
central
wasatch
commission
and
in
virtually
every
meeting
where
we
are
discussing
anything
laura
briefer,
carly
castle
and
others
are
part
of
those
discussions
and
they
are
playing
a
I'd
say
a
prominent
role.
They
wrote
very
detailed
comments
both
on
the
little
canyon
eis,
during
the
scoping
process
and
on
the
cottonwood
canyons
transportation
action
plan.
So
they
are,
as
john
said,
pretty
much
at
the
forefront
at
the
table.
L
In
terms
of
what
may
happen
up
there.
They
also
have
played
a
huge
role,
saying
assisting
the
commission
from
a
staffing
point
of
view
and
and
are
playing
a
very
large
role
in
the
congressional
legislation
and
in
the
development
of
that
congressional
legislation.
A
All
right,
so
thank
you
for
that
and
and
I'll
just.
I
just
want
to
tell
you
that
you
know
when
you
were
hired
on
in
that
position.
That's
one
of
the
that
is
one
of
the
watershed
issue
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
really
concerned
about,
especially
with
the
creation
of
a
new
governmental
entity.
Your
staffing
that
position
has
has
made
me
feel
much
much
better
about
my
watershed
concerns.
So
I
just
want
to
share
that
with
you,
and
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you.
B
B
It
sounds
like
trying
to
maximize
exposure
for
for
the
public
and
minimize
environmental
impact
might
be
one
way
to
put
it,
but
are
there?
Are
you
to
the
point
of
defined
metrics
right
now,
because
everything
I've
read
says
you're
in
the
middle
of
it?
Perhaps
gold
needs
assessment
right
now.
Is
there
a
sense
of
that,
like
the
detail
level
of
that.
M
What
we
talked
about
this
morning
was
how
do
you
compare
gondola,
train
bus,
private,
auto
and
the
associated
impacts
with
that,
and
so
one
of
the
things
we're
trying
to
understand
is
is
what
is
going
up
there
now
and
how
many
people
does
that
equate
to,
because
we've
done
studies
to
understand
how
many
people
are
in
the
cars
it's
about
one
and
three
as
a
private
as
a
single
occupant
vehicle,
and
in
that
we're
trying
to
address.
Should
it
be
travel
time
comparisons
between
those
different
modes?
M
Should
it
be
throughput
how
many
people
go
through,
so
we're
not
there
at
that
at
that
we
don't
know
for
sure
what
those
metrics
are
but
we're.
Those
are
a
couple
of
areas
we're
trying
to
understand
because
imagine
with
these
transit
hubs-
and
we
have
one
at
the
gravel
pit,
one
at
94th
and
highland.
We
go
to
just
one
stop
at
snowbird
on
the
highway
and
a
transit
center
has
lockers
restrooms
heated
space,
one
at
snowbird,
one
at
alta,
one
at
solitude.
One
at
brighton
and
we've
had
preliminary
discussions
on
that.
M
B
That's
my
question:
I
guess
is
that
it
sounds
like
there's
an
idea
of
how
to
maximize
exposure
to
the
canyons
with
the
smallest
environmental
footprint.
At
some
point,
though,
five
thousand
moves
to
ten
thousand
people
on
five
to
ten
trail
heads
in
the
summer
or
two
ski
resorts
in
the
winter
time.
Is
there
a
scent
of
a
threshold?
At
this
point.
M
So
it's
it's
it's
to
be
determined,
but
I
think
what
I
think
the
takeaway
we're
going
on
right
now
is
from
1989
to
now.
We've
got
numerous
studies
that
point
to
the
same
things.
Over
and
over
again
we're
not
reinventing
the
wheel.
We
see
some
things
that
we
can
maybe
help
with
we're
not
going
to
solve
the
problem
by
any
stretch,
but
we
can
help
some
things
and
what
are
reasonable
things
to
do
to
address
that?
Okay,
and
so
are
we
going
to
fix
it?
Are
we
going
to
create
something
completely
different
than
today?
B
L
You
know:
how
do
we
deal
with
this
crush
of
people?
I
mean
there
are
more
visitors
to
this
part
of
these
mountains
than
all
the
national
parks
in
utah
combined.
This
is
a
small
area.
It
is
remarkable
that
the
watersheds
have
been
able
to
be
maintained
and
that
the
quality
of
experiences
have
been
able
to
maintain,
and
I
think
the
challenge
that
the
central
wasatch
commission
is
focused
on
and
includes
in
its
participation
in
these
transportation
and
this
transportation
work
is
how
do
we?
L
How
do
we
preserve
the
quality
of
the
environment
up
there,
especially
the
watersheds?
How
do
we
also
preserve
the
quality?
The
experiences
for
different
users
seeking
different
kinds
of
experiences
and
we've
got
a
lot
to
learn.
There's
been
a
lot
of
studies
like
that,
and
they
they
can
be
a
quagmire,
but
they
can
also
really
lend
a
lot
of
good
information
for
decision
making.
So
we're
working
in
that
realm
as
well.
That's
you
know
running
in
a
parallel
way
with
with
the
transportation
work.
E
John
and
ralph,
thanks
for
being
here,
my
question's
about
the
parking
structure,
evaluation
and-
and
I
I'm
trying
to
follow
along
with
the
packet
we
have
and
I'm
not
yeah.
Sorry,
they
don't
look
the
same.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
you've
already
passed
that
part
but
talk
to
us
about
the
the
fees
associated.
E
Who
will
be
getting
the
revenue
from
these
parking
structures,
I'm
assuming
they
will
not
be
free
but
tell
me
if
they
will
and
then
how
do
we?
If
the
I,
I
see
the
pictures
of
the
existing
private
parking
potential.
M
Okay,
so
I
think
there's
a
variety
of
ways
that
the
parking
fees
can
be
addressed.
One
is
to
have
a
straight
fee
for
you
go
into
a
garage.
You
pay
fee,
we're
working
with
cottonwood
heights
on.
Can
we
do
a
transit,
oriented
development
to
where
the
developer
has
some
role
in
that
in
operating
and
maintaining
that
we'll
also
be
creating
a
revenue
stream?
Potentially,
if
we
do
tolling
and
the
tolling
could
help
offset
the
transit
use
and
parking,
but
these
decisions
have
yet
to
still
need
to
be
made.
M
M
M
Yes,
that
would
support
the
best
behavior
shift
to
transit
and
that's
what
we're
that's
ever.
That's
the
levers,
we're
trying
to
use
here
just
to
get
more
people
in
transit,
so
that
of
those
seven
thousand
cars
with
three
people
per
car.
That's
twenty
one
thousand
people,
five
thousand
of
them
are
on
a
bus
that
would
be
success.
M
E
And
I
think
you're
aware
that
of
the
some
of
the
state
funding,
that's
going
toward
that
regionally
significant
transportation
development
at
big
cottonwood
canyon.
The
majority
of
that
grant
fund
is
coming
or
is
directed
to
come
toward
block
67
here
in
salt
lake
city.
So
and
that's
a
parking
structure,
development
that
you
don't
have
to
know
about.
But
what
the
we're
in
a
similar
conversation
in
terms
of.
E
And
operated
and
the
reality
is
that
in
in
our
experience
so
far,
we
don't
have
any
lever
on
how
much
that
developer
is
going
to
charge
to
operate
and
for
admittance
to
that
parking
structure.
So
I
think
this
like
the
public-private
partnership.
It
makes
sense
in
a
lot
of
ways.
I
think.
Ultimately,
we
don't
have
any
teeth
in
what
it's
going
to
cost
to
park
and
I
think
it's
a
conversation,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
a
contractual
conversation.
L
L
L
I
don't
think
we'll
see
legislation
introduced
for
a
few
months,
there's
time,
but
there's
been
enough
controversy,
as
you
know
around
what
may
happen
or
should
happen
in
the
mountains
and
about
a
new
designation
and
additional
protections
in
these
mountains
and
congressman
curtis
is
looking
for
support
from
each
of
the
jurisdictions
that
he
can
carry
with
him
as
he
runs
legislation.
L
A
Get
them
to
counsel
staff
and
will.
L
And
the
last
two
weeks,
sandy
city
and
mill,
creek,
have
both
passed
resolutions
and
the
other
jurisdictions
are
kind
of
in
progress.
Yeah.
A
Okay,
so
yeah
get
us
that
and
then
we'll
I'll
make
sure
that
we
get
it
on
the
agenda
this
summer
or
fall
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
We
are
now
ready
to
go
back
to
the
budget.
We
have
the
two
ordinances
in
front
of
us
right
now.
We
have
the
regular
salt
lake
city
budget
ordinance
and
then
the
rda
ordinance
as
well.
A
We
don't
handle
rda
issues
in
the
council,
but
because
these
ordinances
are
so
close,
a
lot
of
the
changes
are
parallel.
So
you
know
chair
fowler,
if
you're,
okay
with
us
going
through
that
we'll
we'll
do
that
right
now,
once
we
get
it
up
on
the
board
jennifer,
are
you
gonna
walk
us
through
that
or
is
lehua
gonna
walk
us
through
it
or.
C
H
D
Okay,
so
if
everyone
sorry.
D
Thank
you
and
I'll
just
go
through
all
of
the
changes
that
we've
made
since.
D
Was
placed
in
your
red
folders
today
at
the
time.
A
D
Then,
down
on
page
four
in
the
middle
beginning
with
item
three
sub
item,
a
the
we
added
language
there
to
just
be
clear
that
the
council
intends
to
continue
its
in-depth
policy
discussion
surrounding
all
aspects
of
housing.
D
H
I
D
H
M
I
I
M
A
A
It
just
reads:
the
council
expresses
its
intent
to
evaluate
the
approach
after
both
six
months
and
one
year
to
determine
whether
it
is
functioning
in
a
matter
that
maximizes
the
positive
community
impact
of
the
city's
housing
development
investment.
It
is
further
the
intent
of
the
council
that
the
city's
housing
program
funds
will
continue
to
be
funded
and
managed
in
the
department
of
community
and
neighborhoods
housing
and
neighborhood
development
division.
D
Okay
and
then
the
point
of
section
four
was
to
address
any
budget
contingencies
that
were
related
to
other
parts
or
the
whole
funding
our
future
funding,
and
so
my
suggestion
is
to
remove
this
first
item,
a
the
council,
approval
of
the
downtown
payment
assistance
program,
details
prior
to
funding,
availability
and
that's
also
covered
in
the
fact
that
those
funds
have
been
put
into
a
holding
account.
D
And
then
that's
it
for
those
the
ordinance
adopting
the
city
budget
and
if
I
could
just
refer
you
to
the
rda
agenda
or
resolution
as
well,
that
had
sections
related
to
the
housing
funding
and
the
transfer
to
rda,
and
so
we've
gone
through
and
added
all
of
these
pieces
to
this
section
as
well.
It
refers
to
a
trial
basis,
we'll
add
for
the.
A
So
what
will
what
we'll
want
to
do
if,
if
everyone's
okay
with
this,
rather
than
walking
through
the
language
that
lin
just
mentioned,
I
mean
we're
gonna
have
to
change
that
here,
because
you
know
it
says
here:
it's
council's
intent,
july,
29
19.,
so
any
any
changes
that
we
just
made
in
that.
If
we
can
make
those
in
this
and
then
do
any
of
you
have
any
other
thoughts
on
these
okay,
so
we
can
do
you
don't
need
to
do
that
perfect
right,
I
mean
you
need
to
do
it
now,
because.
A
Okay,
any
other
issues
or
concerns
on
these
two
ordinances
and
the
resolution
all
right.
Okay,
I
want
to
before
we
break.
I
just
want
to
thank
all
my
council
colleagues
for
your
help
during
this
budget
process.
A
This
has
been
in
the
this
is
my
eighth
budget,
and
this
is
the
toughest
budget
that
we've
had,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
your
hard
work
and
long
hours
that
you
put
into
this,
and
now
I
really
really
want
to
thank
staff,
because,
as
always,
they
there
is
no
way
that
we
could
have
gone
through
and-
and
you
know,
made
the
the
changes
and
adjustments
without
the
the
quality
staff
that
we
have
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
lucky
enough
to
watch
as
we've
gone
through
this,
it
seems
messy,
but
it
really.
A
It
really
is
not
you
know
we
what
we've
been
able
to
do
today,
the
stuff
that
seems
to
be
you
know,
being
done
on
the
fly
is
not
there
is
so
much.
You
know
institutional
knowledge
with
the
staff,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
all
of
them
for
the
the
time
effort
energy.
I
know
that
many
of
us
have
texted
at
you
know
crazy,
crazy,
late
hours
and
staff
are
up
working
on
this,
so
we
couldn't
have
done
it
without
you.
A
Thank
you
and,
let's,
let's
take
a
break
for
dinner
and
then
we'll
reconvene
across
the
hall
for
the
formal
meeting
at
seven
o'clock.
Thank
you.