►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 7/09/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Salt
Lake
City
Council
for
July
9th
2019.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
not
going
to
be
the
first
item
that
we
take
up
today.
The
first
item
that
we
take
up
will
be
an
ordinance
regarding
zoning
text,
amendment
for
restaurants
with
drive-through
windows
and
the
TSA
Emme.
We
see
tees
zoning
district,
so
Nick
Tarbert
is
going
to
introduce
and
lay
this
issue
out
for
us,
Doug
Dancy
who's,
the
can
senior
planner
is
here
as
well,
and
once
we
work
through
this
issue,
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
we
did
have.
A
Our
first
item
was
a
written
briefing.
I
just
encourage
all
of
you
to
look
at
that
and
if
you
have
questions
or
any
comments
that
needed
to
be
made
about
that.
Just
let
me
know
if
not
after
the
zoning
text,
amendment
we'll
go
back
to
number
two
and
then
jump
to
number
four
clear
as
mud,
okay,
Nick,
it's
all
you
so.
B
C
Okay,
so
this
petition
is
to
allow
drive-throughs
in
a
very
specific
portion
of
the
TSA
zones.
Tsa
is
transit
station
area,
so
this
doesn't
apply
to
all
TSA
zones.
It
only
applies
to
the
mixed
use:
economic
center
transitional
area.
So
just
for
reference
on
the
map
you
see
up
there.
The
mixed
use
economic
center
is
the
sort
of
turquoise
area
and
they
it's
broken
down
into
core
and
transitional,
and
the
transitional
is
basically
just
the
slashed
area.
C
Get
that
big
question
that
elephant
in
the
room
out
of
the
the
way?
First
of
why
in
the
world
would
we
allow
drive-throughs
in
a
tsa
zone
because
it's
supposed
to
be
pedestrian,
oriented,
transit,
oriented
and
all
that
and
when
we
started
this
process?
That
was
quite
bluntly,
the
bias
we
went
into
it
of
this
is
supposed
to
be
walkable
oriented
transit.
C
One
thing
that
hasn't
changed
is
forced
south
is
even
though
it's
transit,
even
though
we're
trying
to
encourage
pedestrians
de-facto,
it's
kind
of
the
northeast
quadrant
of
i2
15.
It
still
carries
a
lot
of
cars.
It's
us
40,
so
the
whole
car
component
hasn't
gone
away
just
because
transits
there,
it's
kind
of
the
same
with
North
temple
and
how
that
plays
out
is
many
of
the
former
uses
that
had
drive
through
is
the
restaurants.
They've
become
sort
of
entrenched,
because
now
there
are
rare
commodity
that
enjoys
a
non-conforming
status.
C
So
you
see
a
lot
of
redevelopment
of
sites
that
were
stripped
commercial
or
offices
and
that,
but
some
of
the
drive
throughs
have
become
more
entrenched
and
I.
Think
this
really
became
obvious
when
we
had
a
development
opposed
it
forth,
East
and
forth
south,
where
there
was
a
non-conforming,
Taco,
Bell
or
something,
and
when
the
new
apartment
building
came
in
because
that
they
wanted
to
hang
on
to
that
drives
you.
They
designed
the
whole
apartment.
C
Building
around
the
little
drive-through
doesn't
look
like
a
Taco
Bell
anymore,
but
everything
was
built
around
that
that
very
valuable
thing
on
an
auto
corridor.
So
that's
where
we
started
thinking
well,
maybe
having
a
little
bit
of
latitude
who
wouldn't
be
so
bad,
because
if
you
remember
the
old
bank,
it
was
at
trolley
corners
that
actually
was
designed
very
urban
and
the
drive-thru
went
through
the
building
there.
C
C
Again,
it's
back
to
the
corner
of
Redwood,
Road
and
North
temple,
and
we
began
looking
at
the
master
plan
for
that
corridor
and
there's
a
lot
of
policies
in
that
master
plan
that
pretty
much
acknowledge
that
that's
always
going
to
have
a
heavy,
auto
orientation
to
that
particular
corner.
And
if
you
go
out
and
you
look
at
the
land
uses.
C
Yes,
there's
new
apartments
being
built
in
this
zone,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
fast-food
drive-throughs
gas
stations
and
Bank
drive-throughs
in
the
TSA
ambu
EC
transitional.
We
already
allow
drive
throughs
for
banks,
so
part
of
the
thing
was
well
where
this
is
particularly
mapped
is
the
furthest
away.
You
can
get
from
transit
on
North
Temple,
it's
not
in
the
courts.
In
the
transitional
area,
we
already
allow
drive
throughs
for
banks,
so
what
the
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
did
say:
okay,
we'll
consider
drive-throughs
for
restaurants,
but
we'll
put
right
in
the
zoning.
C
No,
you
can't
do
it
in
the
front
yard
and
I
don't
mean
to
shame
anybody
here,
but
an
example
would
be
like
McDonald's
on
four
south
or
fifth
and
second
West.
That
has
turn
around
and
drive
through
on
the
street,
whereas
the
design
guidelines
put
in
here
would
for
something
more
like
the
chick-fil-a
in
sugarhouse,
which
on
the
street,
has
dining
and
everything
and
the
drive-thru
takes
place
in
the
rear.
So
that
was
sort
of
the
compromise
of
okay.
We
allow
Drive
thrus
banks.
This
is
the
least
transit
oriented
of
all
the
transit
zones.
C
D
It
was
awesome,
great
presentation
and
when
I
was
in
the
Planning
Division,
we
worked
on
this
TSA
with
Nick,
Norris
and
and
Nick
Britain,
which
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
so
I
like
this
reasonable
approach
about
the
flexibility
that
we
need
to
have.
Sometimes
because,
as
plan
you
know
as
planners,
we
we
do
our
best
but
sometimes
might
miss
something
or
circumstances
change.
And
so
we
need
to
have
this
kind
of
flexibility
so
I'm
for
this
project
and
for
this
amendment.
So
thank
you
so
much
doc
for
explaining
really
well
what's
going
on
on
that
corner.
D
C
E
C
Most
there's
a
bunch
of
subcategories
of
you
know:
mixed
use,
economic
center,
I
can't
remember
all
the
names
and
each
each
subcategory
has
a
core
and
a
transitional
so
right
now
this
is
the
only
place
in
the
city
that
it's
owned.
That
now
in
the
future,
somebody
could
ask
for
a
rezoning,
okay,
consider
all
these
things,
but
but.
F
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
I'm
Laurie,
Hendricks
and
I
work
with
Gaddis
investments
and
I
just
did
a
quick
timeline
of
how
we
ended
up
with
this.
In
this
position
it's
actually
been
a
great
opportunity
to
go
through
this
and
to
gain
a
little
bit
of
insight
on
what
you
guys
do
here.
A
sliver
of
an
insight.
F
F
Our
initial
marketing
efforts
were
focused
on
the
theme
of
the
North
temple
master
plan.
We
wanted
to
encourage
a
more
walkable
and
transit
authority,
oriented
neighborhood
by
December
of
that
year.
It
was
clear
that
the
market
was
dictating
a
different
direction
and
we
had
reached
out
to
normal
ice
cream,
penguin
brothers,
rock
taco
and
explored
food
trucks
staging
on
our
location,
just
to
name
a
few
of
our
efforts.
Local
tenants
just
didn't
seem
to
want,
have
any
interest
in
this
space.
F
Gas
stations
felt
it
was
too
much
competition
in
the
area
and
banks
and
credit
unions
were
interested,
but
a
lot
proved
proved
too
small
to
accommodate
their
needs.
Beans
and
brews
Starbucks
porta
subs
mark
Marco's,
Pizza
Costa,
Vita,
kebab,
Panda
swig
are
a
few
of
the
many
vendors
that
want
to
despite
this
base,
but
they
require
the
drive-through
which
we
can't
provide
and
the
despite
aggressive
efforts
in
a
robust
market
we
weren't
able
to
fill
our
space
with
a
tenant
that
met
those
own
requirements.
F
F
F
And
then,
as
Doug
showed
you,
we
worked
with
Angela
Dean
and
she
was
a
city
planner
and
worked
on
the
North
Temple
master
plan,
and
we
feel
that
she
helped
us
come
up
with
an
idea
that
would
enhance
our
corner
with
the
flavor
of
the
master
plan
and
work
with
the
reality
of
the
market.
This
is
not
the
exact
plan
we're
proposing
it's
just
an
idea
of
how
we
want
to
include
the
neighborhood
and
be
an
opening
I'm
open
to
more
of
a
walkable
area.
A
You
very
much
for
your
proposal.
I
think
it
looks
great
and
you
know,
while
that's
not
that
corner
is
not
my
district
I'm
familiar
with
that
area
and
the
lack
of
you
know
viable
options
for
both
residents
and
visitors.
So
I
really
like
this,
and
and
thank
you
for
your
persistence
and
and
not
giving
up
on
this.
You
know
what
I.
What
I
often
worry
about
is
that
you
know
we
have
you
know,
ordinances
and
requirements
that
are
there,
for
you
know
all
you
know
all
matters,
not
just
easy
ones.
A
This
is
one
that
I
think
you
know
was
was
caught
up.
You
know
now
that
said,
I'm
not
saying
that
we
should
redo
our
zoning
and-
and
you
know,
forget
our
ordinances,
but
sometimes
you
know
the
ordinances,
don't
match
reality
and
and
I
think
this.
This
may
be
one
of
those
one
of
those
times.
Sorry,
if
I'm
offending
you
Nick,
no,
no
offense,
it's
not.
A
But,
but
thank
you
for
your
persistence,
I
think
a
lot
of
times:
property
owners
when
they're
in
situations
like
this
just
get
fed
up
and
and
give
up
and
move
on
you've
you've
kept
the
issue
hot
and
in
government.
That's
sometimes
what
you
have
to
do.
So.
Thank
you
for
your
willingness
to
do
that.
I
think
this
looks
great
if
there
are
no
further
comments,
we'll
move
to
the
next
item
but
queue.
Thank
you.
D
Just
I,
just
I
just
have
one
last
comment
for
this
developer:
I've
known
them
for
a
little
bit
from
my
previous
work
in
the
Westside
and
they've,
been
very
involved
with
the
community,
asking
them
what
they
would
like
to
see
and
not
giving
up
and
and
being
really
open
to
some
ideas.
So
I'm
I'm,
really
favor
of
this
right.
A
D
G
A
I
Thank
you
and
thanks
everyone,
Thank
You
chairman
Luke,
three
years
ago,
James
Rogers,
who
was
the
chairman
of
the
City
Council
at
that
point,
had
sent
a
letter
to
the
mayor,
sharing
thoughts
of
the
council
as
to
what
economic
development
should
potentially
prioritize
in
their
first
in
a
few
years
of
operation,
and
one
of
the
items
on
that
list
was
to
participate
in
a
life
science
corridor.
You
know
and
it's
something
that
we
we
thought
about
and
we
kicked
around
internally
and
we
kept
sort
of
thinking.
I
Well,
what
does
that
mean
and
how
does
it
work
and
what
should
we
do
with
it?
And
then
it
was
like
everything
all
the
stars
aligned
and
we
came
up
with
what
we
think
is
a
really
interesting
idea
and
it
really
stemmed
from
the
opportunity
zones,
and
so
this
our
prospectus.
You
may
remember
that
our
federal
lobbyist,
Simon
Group
came
in
and
had
talked
about
how
cities
can
best
capture
opportunities.
I
Own
funding
was
through
creating
these
perspectives,
and
so
we
started
to
work
on
a
prospectus
and
really
realize
that
there
was
a
lot
of
overlap
between
life
sciences
and
opportunity
zones,
and
so
you
could
really
change
the
word
life
science
into
innovation.
You
could
change
it
into
technology,
but
for
today's
purpose,
we're
going
to
talk
about
it
as
part
of
a
life
science
idea,
and
when
we
started
to
look
at
a
prospectus,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
capturing
some
really
important
items
that
the
areas
were
primed
for
growth.
I
There
was
a
capital
demand
for
these
areas
that
we
were
going
to
nominate
for
opportunities
on
funding
and
life
sciences.
We
felt
was
this
opportunity
to
build
a
corridor
from
Research
Park
to
the
northwest
quadrant,
where
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
manufacturing
happen
and
how
do
we
connect
the
two
and
then
you
know
institutional
capacity?
Did
we
have
the
ability
to
support
this
industry
and
fortunately
with
Salt
Lake,
Community
College
and
our
Career
Pathways
programs
and
the
university?
We
did
have
a
lot
of
institutional
capacity.
Some
of
these
slides.
I
I
As
you
know,
we've
been
able
to
facilitate
more
than
a
billion
dollars
in
the
last
three
years
and
we
think
that
the
opportunity
zones
are
just
another
way
for
us
to
be
able
to
see
investment
occur
in
our
city
and
we
really
chose
the
opportunity
zones
to
maximize
impact
and
I'll
talk
about
that.
A
little
bit
more.
I
In
just
a
moment
when
we
nominated
these
zones,
we
nominated
12
of
them
and
I'm
really
happy
to
say
that
we
received
seven
technically
eight,
because
a
surrounding
city
may
have
nominated
one
of
our
census,
tracts
which
was
Mill
Creek,
and
so
technically
we
have
eight
and
one
of
the
things
about
life.
Science
that
were
really
fascinated
about
is
that
of
383
metro
areas
that
have
a
life
science
cluster
we
rank
26,
which
is
good,
but
I
always
want
to
be
great
right.
I
I
I
Okay,
yeah,
it's
really
interesting,
and
so
how
do
we
make?
How
do
we
get
to
closer
to
number
one
right,
and
that
for
us
is
how
do
we
help
facilitate
development
in
Salt,
Lake
City
for
life
science?
You
know
we're
ranked
number
four
in
STEM
careers,
we
are
home
to
amazing
companies
like
a
RUP
and
biome
Eric
Stryker
Varian.
I
Of
course,
you
know
Salt
Lake,
City's
information,
but
one
of
the
really
interesting
things
for
the
state
of
Utah
is
they've,
also
identified
medical
pathways
as
a
great
opportunity,
and
so
they've
started
programs
to
make
sure
that
we're
pipelining
talent
into
medical
careers
and
some
of
the
projects
that
can
be
funded
through
talent,
ready
marketing
campaigns
to
encourage
people
to
go
into
the
careers
building,
makerspace
or
a
lab.
So
people
can
try
out
these
career
fields
and
then
also
enhancing
diversity
of
the
medical
innovation.
I
Wanting
to
continue
to
grow
here,
but
are
looking
for.
The
talent
and
Utah
has
also
done
a
great
job
in
making
sure
that
our
credentials
are
stackable
that
you
can
start
out
with
a
certificate
program,
go
to
an
associates,
go
to
a
bachelor's
degree
all
through
the
continuum
and
again,
that
is
really
a
magnificent
opportunity
for
our
students
who
want
to
come
out
and
have
careers.
I
So
knowing
that
we
had
this
amazing
cluster
and
it
was
a
cluster
that
was
growing
and
we
saw
the
opportunity
zones
as
an
opportunity
to
capture
those
companies.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
better
understood
what
the
opportunity
zones
were,
and
so
there
really
are
a
funding
vehicle
that
are
organized
as
corporations
or
partnerships
that
can
make
investments
into
opportunities
zones,
and
these
are
was
this
program
was
created
through
the
job,
the
tax
cuts
and
job
act
of
2017.
I
I
The
program
also
allows
you
to
invest
in
three
things:
property
partnership,
interest
in
stock.
So
that
essentially
means
you
could
invest
in
two
things.
You
can
invest
in
the
real
estate
side,
but
you
can
also
invest
in
the
business
side,
who
needs
most
capital
life.
Science,
companies
really
capital
intensive
so
again
for
us,
it
just
seemed
like
that
was
a
good
match.
I
When
we
put
together
the
opportunity
zones,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
dispersing
them
across
the
city,
and
so
you
can
see
that
the
map
really
does
disperse
it
throughout
the
city
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
maximizing
existing
programs
that
we
weren't
recreating
the
wheel.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
was
in
an
RDA
project
area.
We
were
gonna
nominate
that
census
tract
to
the
governor.
Did
it
wasn't
an
RDA
project
area?
I
I
Ultimately,
there
were
two
exceptions
to
that
rule,
the
first
being
the
northwest
quadrant.
The
northwest
quadrant
is
not
CDBG
eligible.
However,
we
knew
that
the
governor
was
going
to
nominate
it.
We
figured
if
he
was
gonna
nominate
it.
We
probably
should
put
it
in
and
then
last
was
the
census
tract
that
Mill
Creek
put
in
that
one
is
was
not
selected
by
us,
so
we
don't
know
the
criteria
that
they
followed
to
make
that
census
tract
selection.
I
I
So
when
we
started
down
this
path
of
thinking
about
a
corridor,
I
asked
one
of
our
talented
staff
to
show
me
where
the
talent
was.
Where
are
the
companies
in
Salt
Lake
City
of
over
100
employees
or
more?
And
you
can
see
there
were
these
two
clusters
that
started
to
form
one
was
here
at
research
Park.
You
can
see
little
square
box
with
an
arrow
pointing
to
it,
but
there
is
also
this
healthcare
around
the
University.
I
But
then,
as
you
looked
over
by
the
airport
and
just
south
and
west
of
it,
you
can
see
all
those
blue
dots
start
to
show
up
and
that's
where
the
manufacturing
was
happening.
And
so
it
became
really
obvious
that
between
research
park
and
northwest
quadrant,
there
was
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
accelerate
technology.
And
if
you
look,
there's
this
random
blue
dot,
it
census
track.
102
500,
where
recursion
pharmaceuticals
is
here's
a
company
that
graduated
from
research
park
was
getting
wasn't
quite
to
a
manufacturing
stage,
but
still
needed
office
space.
I
I
And
then
we
talked
about
how
we
think
the
top
transformation
strategies
should
play
out
in
terms
of
life
sciences,
and
then
we
also
wanted
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
were
talking
to
investors
and
developers
that
they
understood
that
there
was
a
demand,
our
vacancy
rates
are
really
low
in
each
one
of
these
census
tracts
and
so
showcasing
that
for
an
investor
and
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
each
one
of
these.
But
then
you
know.
I
Last
but
not
least,
we
really
did
talk
a
lot
about
how
we
layer-cake
these
incentives,
and
so
the
RDA
tools
for
investors
is
just
one
other
tool
that
we
can
put
in
the
toolbox
to
maximize
how
those
opportunity
funds
get
deployed,
and
then
you
can
see
we
go
into
greater
detail
into
the
zoning
categories
for
each
one
of
the
areas
to
showcase
that.
Well,
you
know
if
you
drive
down
north
temple
today,
you
may
not
think
of
this
as
a
life
science
area,
but
it
is
zoned.
It
is
ready.
I
I
I
J
I
I
There
is
a
lot
of
industrial
space
being
converted
over
to
office
today,
but
really
for
the
tech
industry,
maybe
not
so
much
for
life
science,
but
I
really
do
see
sort
of
north
temple
area
and
going
up
third
West,
fourth
west
being
an
incredible
opportunity,
because
there
are
smaller
office
buildings
there
that
could
easily
be
purchased
converted
and
invested
in,
and
so
I
really
do
see
that
as
an
opportunity
and
then
the
northwest
quadrant.
You
know,
as
we
continue
to
look
at
the
growth
of
the
companies
when
they
get
to
a
manufacturing
stage.
I
Hopefully
they'll
utilize,
a
program
like
Opportunity
Zones
to
help
facilitate
their
capital
investment,
but
right
now
the
first
few
deals
that
we've
seen
done
in
opportunity
zones
have
been
in
housing
and
we
really
want
to
start
changing
that
narrative,
because
we
think
that
there's
an
office
demand
here
too.
So.
J
I
I
I
Okay,
it's
been
a
national
conversation,
we
within
the
International
Economic
Development
Council,
which
was
a
congratulations
by
the
way.
Thank
you.
We
we
have
this
amazing
professional
group
and
we've
done
a
number
of
sort
of
information
sessions
about
opportunity
zones,
and
we
recently
did
one
where
the
goldman
sachs
urban
investment
group
came
here
to
Salt
Lake
City
to
our
conference
that
we
just
held
and
for
the
first
time
ever
I
think
economic
developers
went
oh
now
we
get
it
because
it
was
somebody
who
could
really
talk
about
how
they
get
invested.
I
What
they're,
looking
for
in
terms
of
investments
and
so
I
think
you
know
hidden
here.
That
was
what
a
month
ago,
not
even
so.
The
fact
that
there's
still
a
lot
of
uncertainty
and
unknown
about
them
is
a
little
bit
of
a
challenge,
but
you
know
those
that
are
doing.
Investment
are
on
it
and
are
starting
to
use
it.
Hey.
H
I
There's
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
done
at
the
state
and
county
level
to
look
at
sort
of
more
regional
conversation
about
opportunity
zones
and,
in
fact
the
sword.
Ins
and
impact
Institute
is
looking
for
some
of
the
best
practices
and
is
also
helping
with
doing
some
initial
mapping
to
help
investors
understand
where
the
opportunity
zones
are.
What
are
some
of
the
basic
background
information
on
each
one
of
the
sentences
tracks?
I
What
we've
done
is
we've
now
taken
that
one
step
further
to
say:
that's
really
good,
broad
information,
but
as
we
bring
it
down
to
the
local
level,
how
a
developer
is
going
to
use
it
for
housing
either
way.
But
how
do
we
get
them
to
think
about
opportunities
zones
and
maybe
a
way
that
they
hadn't
been
thinking
about
it?
And
so
that's
really
why
we
sort
of
pushed
towards
being
much
more
detailed
and
Industry
specific
in
the
prospectus
that
we
put
together.
We've
also
talked
about
doing
multiple,
that
we
have
a
life
science
prospectus.
I
I
H
Okay,
I
didn't
yeah,
I,
guess:
I
didn't
see
the
kind
of
that
context
of
the
uniqueness
of
Salt
Lake
City
government,
the
uniqueness
of
our
affordable
housing
investments,
the
dynamicism
of
our
RDA,
which
is
really
I,
think
quite
unique
compared
to
the
any
other
city
in
the
county
or
even
in
the
state.
So
anyway,
I
am
I.
H
E
I
Hangs,
that's
a
great
question
and
I've
been
wanting
to
sit
down
with
some
of
the
developers
that
are
utilizing
it
peg
development
I
think
did
it
as
part
of
paper
box
lofts,
you
put
opportunity's
own
funds
in
CW.
Urban
just
announced
that
they're
using
opportunity's
own
funds
for
one
of
their
projects
and
now
because
they're
all
women's
names
they're
all
going
to
run
together.
I
E
You
do
believe
based
on
the
delay
and
the
clarification
of
how
this
is
gonna
work
that
they'll
extend
the
deadline.
At
some
point,
do
you
imagine
it'll
still
be
forecasting,
it's
meant
to
be
a
time
limit
thing.
Obviously
they
want
a
10-year
cap
on
this.
For
various
reasons,
it's
not
likely
to
stay.
The
same
word
you.
I
I
You
know
try
to
guess,
but
I
really
do
think
that
there
is
been
enough
conversation
about
it,
not
just
at
the
local
levels,
but
also
from
the
investor
levels,
and
those
are
really
the
ones
that
the
federal
government
want
to
see
making
those
investments.
And
so,
if
they're,
getting
enough
pushback
they'll.
E
E
I
Love
that
question,
so
we
have
worked
very
closely
with
the
university.
You
know
when
I
first
read
this
idea
of
the
life
science
corridor
in
this
letter
three
years
ago,
one
of
the
first
meetings
I
had
was
with
Jonathan
Bates
at
the
University,
and
we
are
now
through
the
Redevelopment
Agency
working
with
them
on
the
master
plan
for
Research
Park.
How
do
you
free
up
that
hundred
acres
of
surface
parking
and
actually
develop
additional
early
stage
spaces?
I
Of
course
you
know
what
we're
seeing
happen
out
by
the
northwest
quadrant.
The
university
is
starting
to
say
well,
wait
a
minute
you're
right
there
is
this
whole
cluster
happening,
maybe
there's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
have
a
conversation
and
then
we've
really
sort
of
opened
their
eyes
to
how
do
you
connect
them
right?
How
do
you
create
those
accelerator
spaces,
and
so
the
university
has
been
a
great
partner,
excellent.
I
H
A
A
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
item
number
four:
an
ordinance
regarding
D
to
downtown
support,
district
design,
standard
zoning
text.
Amendment
Russell
weeks
is
going
to
join
us
at
the
table
from
the
council
staff,
and
then
john
anderson
will
join
us
from
Kent
and
Nick
Norris
is
going
to
join,
join
with
is
with
his
new
hair.
J
A
J
K
The
the
proposed
ordinance
fulfills,
some
of
the
requirements
or
some
of
the
of
the
goals
in
the
downtown
master
plan
are
two
small
policy
discussion.
Questions
that
the
staff
prepared.
One
is
whether
the
the
term,
affordable
housing
is
sufficient
for
the
City
Council
or
what
the
council
be
more
interested
in
using
a
percentage
of
area
median
income
to
further
to
find
affordable
housing.
The
caveat
there
is
once
you
define
what
affordable
housing
is,
then
you
might
either
balkanize
the
thing
or
or
have
competing
areas.
K
J
Sure
I'll
keep
it
fairly
brief.
The
d2
zone
is
mostly
located
south
of
downtown
and
it
does
cover
that
most
of
the
southern
gateways
and
Western
gateways
into
the
downtown
area.
So
a
lot
of
highly
visible
sites.
There's
a
lot
of
development
pressure
in
the
area.
I
think
the
biggest
most
obvious
examples:
the
Sears
property
on
State
Street,
which
really
that
vacancy
became
a
real
catalyst
for
reviewing
the
current
design
standards
in
the
district.
J
Absolute
now,
the
d2
zone
has
no
design
standards
whatsoever,
except
for
height,
so
there's
really
no
way
for
the
city
to
really
influence
the
design
of
any
structures
and
how
it
impacts
the
streets
and
neighborhoods
we're
gonna
we're
proposing
that
several
design
standards
of
zone.
So
this
would
look
at
how
you
play
some
of
the
building.
J
Exterior
exterior
building
materials
ground
floor,
uses
doors
glass,
pushing
building
towards
the
street,
putting
parking
in
the
rear,
of
course,
just
ways
to
actually
activate
the
streets
with
Windows
Active
ground
floor
uses
and
then
just
better
materials
with
requiring
durable
building
materials
and
a
signet
or
a
specific
amount
of
glazing.
On
the
bottom
floor
on
the
ground
floor
and
also
on
upper
floors,
which
is
actually
a
design
standard
that
we
haven't
used
in
other
zones,
most
of
the
standards
were
based
on
existing
zones
a
similar
scale.
J
So
we
looked
at
ESA
and
sugar,
ass
business,
district
and
kind
of
compared
those
with
that
the
public
engagement
period
we
met
with
stakeholders,
community
councils,
the
mainstream
America
group.
Anybody
could
get
to
talk
to
us
in
the
d2
zone.
The
support
for
the
changes
were
almost
generally
an
animus.
Even
architects
and
builders
were
kind
of
shocked
to
find
out.
You
could
build
a
60
foot
tall,
metal,
building
anywhere
south
of
downtown
plenty
Commission
review
changes
and
also
recommended
the
council
support
the
new
design
standards.
So
that's
just
a
brief
over
you.
E
The
first
policy
question
is
a
interesting
one:
I'm,
not
sure
we're
ready
to
define
affordable
housing.
But
if
we're
out
in
the
statute
that
says
you
can
get
I
got
I
remember
now,
yeah
the
review
would
be
waived
if
you
have
a
minimum
of
40%,
affordable
housing.
We
haven't
defined.
That
is
that
gonna
cause
problems
immediately.
Yeah.
L
E
E
J
Just
to
respond
to
that,
we
agree
with
you.
We
don't
want
a
bunch
of
giant
stucco
box
was
either
so
this
wouldn't
it's.
This
is
not
a
way
to
waive
the
design
requirements.
All
the
design
requirements
would
be
still
in
place,
it's
just
you
could
request
additional
height
and
and
instead
of
normally
going
through
the
Hyatt
exception
or
to
request
just
no
hide.
J
You
have
to
go
through
the
design
review
process,
so
there's
an
additional
level,
a
review
with
the
Planning
Commission
that
has
additional
standards,
but
all
the
other
things
about
building
materials
and
glass
and
putting
all
of
that
would
still
be
required
of
any
building,
whether
it's
affordable
or
not.
Okay,.
A
A
A
D
J
Chair
and
Nick,
maybe
you
can
help
me
out
with
this
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
why
any
developer
would
look
at?
This
is
an
incentive
to
say
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
go
from
market
rate,
to
get
myself
some
extra
height
and
just
say,
and
then
convert
it
to
40%
I,
don't
see
that
there
gonna
be
a
lot
of
developers
that
are
gonna
bite
on
this
and.
L
And
that
may
be
one
of
the
things
that
some
projects
you
have
who
have
sought
various
lending
sources
for
affordable
housing
projects
when
they
have
to
go
through
a
process,
and
they
don't
have
that
that
entitlement
in
place
it
delays
their
application,
and
so
this
would
the
incentive
his
time.
So
it
means
that
they
could
go
through.
They
could
apply
for
those
funds,
and
these
are
things
that
are
outside
of
funding
stories
outside
of
the
city's
control.
It
means
that
it
takes
at
that
period
of
time
out
in
that
period
of
time.
L
K
H
L
It's
the
height
that
a
fire
truck
can
reach,
but
so
we
haven't
had
a
lot
of
those
projects
because
the
that
threshold
was
put
at
60
feet,
and
so
it
would
have
granted
an
additional
story
if
somebody
did
affordable.
But
what
we've?
What
we've
seen
and
we
I
think
we
kind
of
knew
this-
is
that
most
of
the
properties
along
the
S
line
were
probably
longer
term
development
sites
than
rapid
development
sites.
H
Is
really
a
discussion
for
us
on
inclusionary
zoning
if
we
ever
want
to
go
there,
because
that
those
properties
that
haven't
been
developed
and
the
possibility
that
there
are
some
affordability
in
there,
we
could
make
it
a
reality
if
we
go
there,
but
that's
another
discussion.
So
my
question
is
and
I
wanted
to
mention
that
the
the
policy
question
Russell
brings
up
with
the
minimum
of
10%
did
where
it
is
that
part
of
what
Andrew
was
talking
about.
I
think
that
we
should
increase
that
to
20%
affordability
and
I.
Don't
know
mr.
J
H
We
box
it
in
in
that
regard,
my
my
apologies
I
see
that
that
was
a
form-based
number,
but
so
my
question
is:
are
there
other
policy
adjustments
that
we
could
make
to
expedite
the
development
process
to
really
further
incentivize
the
creation
of
affordability?
Besides
just
waiving
the
additional
design
review
process,
because
not.
L
But
we
still
aren't
necessarily
seeing
that
in
our
market
yet,
and
so
when
we're
talking
the
type
1
construction,
the
steel
construction,
you
know
the
the
projects
that
we've
talked
to
developers
about
that
or
either
on
the
table
or
moving
forward
are
going
to
be
market
rate
because
the
costs
are
still
pretty
high.
Yeah.
G
It's
more
of
a
it
I,
don't
know
who
has
the
best
answer
to
this,
but
a
timeline
issue
like
when?
Would
we
be
potentially
taking
taking
action
on
this,
and
when
do
we
need
to
have
that?
What
what
does
affordable
housing
mean
discussion
so
I
guess
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
who
can
best
answer
that?
Well,.
E
I'm
mr.
chair
I
think
it's
gonna
be
that's
a
good
term.
Arbitraries
are
bad
term,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
information
about
where
the
gaps
are.
As
far
as
ami
goes,
we
know
that
below
40%
is
our
biggest
need.
We
know
that
60%
is
probably
next
and
then
80.
So
we
have
some
thresholds.
We
could
look
at
I.
Think
it's
sort
of
we
could
discuss
with
hand
about
what
they
feel
the
gap
is
in
the
city.
A
K
A
A
Great
all
right,
thank
you
both.
Thank
you
very
much.
Russell.
Thank
you.
Item
number
5
on
our
agenda,
an
ordinance
zoning
map,
amendment
for
properties
at
868,
2700,
south
and
2716,
south
900
east.
These
are
referred
to
as
the
27th
Street
cottages
Nick
Tarbert
is
gonna,
join
us
at
the
table
as
well
as
Lex
traver
Nick
the
times
Council
Nick
times
over
Dan
times
up
for
you,
yeah
we're,
not
man.
Nick
Norris
is
gonna
stay
again,
so
alright
to
say.
Harold
you're
always
welcome.
B
A
A
M
A
A
M
So
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
couple
parcels
located
at
basically
ninety
East
and
2700
South.
These.
This
was
a
reasonable
request
that
was
submitted
in
conjunction
with
a
plan
development
in
a
subdivision.
The
Planning
Commission
heard
this
they've
actually
approved
it
twice
now,
the
first
time
this
reasonable
request
was
forwarded
to
your
office
and
their
planned
development
of
subdivision
requests.
They
came
in
with
this
rezone
were
they
expired
because
of
an
issue
with
an
access,
so
they
went
back.
They
redesigned
this.
M
M
M
A
H
H
Just
so
you're
it's
clear
I
like
tiny
houses
and
I'd,
be
really
excited.
If
you
were
talking
to
us
about
how
to
make
tiny
house
was
available
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
so
talk
to
us
about,
can
we
go
to
the
page
two
on
the
Planning
Commission,
the
three
issues
that
the
staff
report
identified
there,
so
the
I
get
about
the
street
frontage
adjustment
and
then
issued
to
is
about
the
reduced
front
yard
setback
to
four
feet.
But
let's
talk
about
issue
three.
H
M
G
M
L
So,
within
a
plan
development,
the
Planning
Commission
has
the
ability
to
modify
lot
sizes
as
long
as
it
doesn't
result
in
an
overall
increase
in
density
and
the
density
is
based
on
the
total
lot
area
of
the
development,
and
so
some
lots
may
be
larger
and
some
may
be
smaller
as
long
as
they
all
average
to
at
least
5,000
square
feet.
Thank.
M
M
J
H
What
kind
of
assurances
well
you're?
Looking
that
up?
What
kind
of
assurances
do
we
have
when
it
comes
to
a
shared
system
like
that,
especially
in
a
Planned
Unit
development
that
they
aren't
going
to
come
back
to
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
say:
look
it's
crumbling
and
we
can't
we
don't
have
enough
money
and
make
this
an
alleyway,
so
you
can
fill
it
for
us.
So.
L
N
L
So
I
can't
remember
the
exact
years,
but
I
think
that's
what
the
ordinance
says,
and
so
we
we
keep
that
on
file
so
that
thirty
years
down
the
road,
if
somebody
comes
in
we
can,
we
can
show
them
that
what
it's
anticipated
costs
and
things
like
that.
Obviously
there's
no
guarantee
someone
isn't
going
to
ask
the
city
to
do
something,
but
we
do
have
the
private
street
dedication
process
where
those,
probably
in
order
for
the
city
to
accept
private
infrastructure,
has
to
be
built.
This
is
a
certain
city,
construction
standards,
maybe
not
with.
L
K
A
G
Just
real,
quick
and
I'm
kind
of
looking
through
the
staff
report
now,
but
what
was
comments
by
the
community
because
it's
literally
four
houses
away
from
where
I
live
and
I
walked
by
that
area
every
day
and
I
that
house
I
mean
there's
something
needs
to
be
done,
however,
putting
four
houses
on
there
I'm.
Okay
with
it
I,
don't
mind,
I'm
good
with
density,
but
I
know
some
neighbors
may
not
be
so.
Do
you
what?
What
kind
of
comments
did
we
hear
from
the
community
if
any
we.
M
Heard
the
community
council
first
of
all,
is
in
in
support.
We
really
didn't
hear
comments
concerning
the
density
in
the
previous
iteration.
There
was
an
access
from
27
South.
It
will
a
walking
access,
pedestrian
access
from
27th
south
through
to
Claiborne
circle,
which
is
to
the
south.
This
iteration
did
not
include
that,
and
there
were
people
that
were
still
concerned
about
that
and
and
and
now
that
that
had
been
eliminated.
You
know
a
lot
of
those
concerns
had
also
gone
by
the
wayside.
Those
were
the
major
issues
that
we
heard.
B
B
Don't
know
a
few
months,
so
I'm
excited
to
get
this
process
here
to
this
point
and
get
some
single-family
houses
built
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
yeah,
so
I
miss
kind
of
most
of
the
conversation,
but
it
you
know
we
do
have
an
iteration
that
I
don't
think
anybody
is
have
found.
There's
been
zero,
pushback
I
guess
from
neighbors,
and
everybody
is
pretty
much
on
the
same
boat
that
they
want
to
see
something
going
here
and
for
single-family
houses
and
rehabbing.
B
A
B
Driveway,
yes,
we
are
we're,
gonna,
be
running
water
and
possibly
a
sewer
line
underneath
which
driveway,
though
the.
B
So
it's
on
the
side.
There
is
the
one
that
we
kind
of
share
with
it.
Maybe
people
that
are
outside
of
the
subdivision
and
the
duplex
on
the
Richardson
I've
spoken
with
them.
A
ton
we've
got,
we've
got
a
shared
maintenance
agreement,
set
up
to
manage
that
and
they're
excited
for
the
potential
of
putting
four
houses
there.
That
can
share
that
so
that
he
doesn't
have
that
full
cost
burden
of
that
access,
and
so
we
worked
it
out
that
we're
kind
of
split
everything
one
out
one
one.
B
Four
five
cost
basis
on
any
of
the
prepares
going
forward
and
he's
excited
to
have
that
replaced
and
made
nice
from
its
current
status
as
kind
of
being
something
that
probably
needs
to
be
replaced
over
the
next
ten
years.
So
when
we
replace
it
we'll
put
something
there
that
it
probably
should
last
at
least
twenty
years
without
needing
much
much
maintenance.
So
that's
that
was
kind
of
our
fix
on
that.
That
was
to
replace
it.
C
G
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
what
goes
on
there,
I
know
that
neighborhood
pretty
well
and
I'm
also
excited
to
hear
cuz.
I
was
wondering
about
that
access
way
by
the
duplex,
because
there's
that
ugly
fence
right
there
and
all
of
that
and
so
it'll
be
nice
to
have
a
little
update
in
that
corner.
Then
we
have
a
new
project
across
the
kitty-corner
from
from
you,
so
that
whole
corner
is
changing
a
lot
right.
G
G
A
A
A
A
Well,
let's,
let's
go
ahead
and
let's
yeah,
let's,
let's
talk
about
it
now
we'll
do
CIP
after
so
thanks,
Dan,
okay,
so
we're
gonna
be
dude.
We're
gonna
do
number
seven
on
our
agenda,
which
is
funding
our
future
transit.
The
second
of
denim
to
the
interlocal
agreement
with
Utah
Transit,
Authority
and
Kyra,
is
at
the
table
and
she's
gonna
be
joined
by
John
and
Julian.
P
All
right
so
I'll
just
get
us
oriented
to
where
we
are
real,
quick
I
think
most
of
us
are
familiar
with
funding
our
future.
At
this
point,
we're
here
to
discuss
the
second
addendum
to
the
interlocal
agreement
with
UTA
implementing
enhanced
bus
service
is
one
of
the
major
goals
that
serves
the
critical
needs
that
were
identified
in
the
funding
our
future
initiative.
So
this
addendum
is
funded
by
the
sales
tax
revenue
raised
during
the
funding.
P
Our
future,
the
interlocal
agreement,
which
the
council
adopted
in
February
of
this
year,
governs
the
overall
details
of
the
service
partnership
between
UTA
in
the
city
and
how
costs
are
calculated
and
will
be
updated.
The
addenda
to
the
interlocal
agreement
governed,
specific
aspects
of
the
service,
so
the
first
addendum
that
the
council
adopted,
in
tandem
with
the
interlocal
agreement
back
in
February,
covered
the
mobilization
costs
for
service.
That's
beginning
this
year.
This
addendum
that
the
council
is
considering
today
authorizes
funding
for
a
year
of
the
enhanced
service
on
routes
and
21,
which
begin
this
August.
P
The
budget
impact
has
actually
been
reduced
by
nearly
a
million
dollars
from
five
million
three
hundred
thousand
to
about
four
million
three
hundred
thousand.
We
understand
that
this
is
due
to
refinements.
Since
the
original
estimates,
the
decrease
is
the
topic
of
the
first
two
policy
questions.
So
if
the
council
wants
to
explore
that
there
is
some
questions
outlined
that
may
help
with
that
discussion,
the
addendum
refers
service
to
the
details
of
the
service
to
the
phase
one
service
improvement
map
that
reflects
the
routes
for
these
three
routes.
P
We
have
just
become
aware,
though,
that
one
of
the
routes
plan
for
implementation
is
August
and
does
have
a
significant
change
from
the
exhibits
in
the
addendum.
The
service
map
in
the
contract
indicates
that
route
9
extends
to
north
temple
along
redwood
road,
but
for
the
August
deployment
of
the
route,
it's
planned
to
stop
at
4th.
South
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
that
over
to
the
administration,
who
can
speak
to
this
in
some
more
depth
and
then
I'll
defer
the
rest
of
the
discussion
to
any
questions
that
the
council
has.
Q
Nice
to
see
you
all
again,
it's
exciting
for
us
to
be
here
about
a
month
away.
What
is
today,
the
9th
so
a
month
and
a
couple
days
away
from
actually
implementing
this
service
and
seeing
it
out
on
the
street.
It's
one
of
the
most
exciting
things.
I
think
I've
personally
worked
on
in
my
professional
career
and
I.
Think
it's
amazing
for
all
all
of
us
who
have
been
a
part
of
this
I
know
that
you
team
folks
are
trying
to
get
here.
Q
This
has
moved
up
a
bit
on
the
agenda,
so
there
they're
trying
to
get
here
quickly,
but
I
think
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
did
not
acknowledge
UTA
and
and
say
how
much.
We
appreciate
the
hard
work
that
they
did
not
only
to
make
this
happen,
but
to
to
give
us
almost
a
million
dollars
in
savings
right
out
of
the
gate
is
no
small
feat.
Their
teams
worked
really
hard,
just
structure
these
routes
and
block
them
in
a
way
that
was
very
efficient
and
cost-effective
and
I.
Q
Think
that
that's
a
really
sign
of
the
partnership
that
we
have
with
UTA
and
their
willingness
to
help
us
be
successful
in
this
endeavor,
and
you
know
any
money
that
we
can
save.
You
know
portion
of
that.
We
want
to
set
aside
for
when
they're
able
to
complete
that
last
small
portion
of
Route
nine,
but
any
additional
savings,
that's
just
money
that
we
can
put
towards
planning
for
and
getting
ready
for,
6th
and
10th
north
with,
which
will
be
our
next
implementation.
And
so
again.
Q
I
just
want
to
thank
this
team,
the
administration
and
the
council
for
all
the
work.
That's
been
done
to
get
us
to
this
point,
we're
so
close
to
seeing
that
service
come
out
on
the
street
and
it
took
a
lot
of
people
coming
together
and
working
extremely
fast
and
hard
to
make
sure
that
that
happened
and
again
to
UTA
for
working
hard
to
save
us
money
that
we
can
reinvest
back
into
the
system
for
our
residents
to
give
them
amazing
service.
J
J
Q
B
That
was
something
really
had
to
fight
for
and
I.
Think.
We've
brought
that
up
earlier
in
the
year
that
someone
high
up
at
the
Medical
Center
up
there
didn't
like
all
the
buses
getting
in
the
way
of
the
parking
lot,
and
we
made
a
kind
of
a
stink
about
that
and
I'm
glad
we
did
and
they
listened
to
their
credit.
So
we're
grateful.
Q
Q
Nicole
is
actually
here:
I
just
saw
her
walk
in
I
know.
You
taste
scrambled
to
get
her
to
be
here
for
the
earlier
timeframe
for
us
to
set
the
table
so
I
think
it's
really
important.
That
UTA
comes
and
talks
to
you
about
the
modifications
that
were
necessary
for
route
9,
why
those
changes
needed
to
be
made
and
the
temporary
Ness
of
those
changes
and
the
lengths
that
we're
going
to
to
make
sure
that
we're
working
hard
to
get
that
implemented
as
soon
as
possible
and
then
from
our
side.
Q
I
think
it's
important
for
for
you
all
to
know
that
we
are
making
changes.
We've
made
adjustments
to
the
trips
to
transit
area
so
that
we
can
cover
that
small
area
for
the
short
time
where
that
route
will
be
shortened.
So
we
have
our
eyes
on
it.
The
community
matters
to
us
we're
filling
that
gap
and
we'll
continue
to
work
with
UTA.
Q
J
G
G
H
R
G
Yeah,
my
questions
would
be
in
relation
to
just
that
shortage
that
the
change
on
9th
South
route
of,
maybe
why
that
had
to
occur
and
when
or
how
long
we
think
it
will
be
temporary
and
I
know
that
may
be
kind
of
a
guesstimate,
but
I
think
those
would
be
my
questions
related
to
that,
and
probably
the
majority
of
us
are
questions
related
to
that.
Well,.
R
First,
let's
say
that
a
Salt
Lake
City
UT
a
and
the
customer-
this
isn't
the
best
ending
spot
for
us
to
date.
So
we
agree
that
you
know
this
is
a
temporary
solution
for
us
and
how
we
got
to
the
situation
is
as
we
are
planning-
and
this
is
new
situation
for
us
as
a
whole.
We
had
some
issues
with
the
University
of
Utah,
but
really
on
north
temple.
R
We
were
looking
at
a
temporary
solution
there
with
the
RDA
with
the
city
and
how
we
program
that
as
a
hub
long
term,
we
were
also
looking
at
how
we
align
this
going
forward.
Excuse
me
in
relation
to
what
changes
were
being
done
at
the
University,
so
it's
not
where
we'd
like
to
end
up,
but
due
to
timing
starting
the
service
as
soon
as
August
and
some
of
the
conditions
that
were
came
to
light
at
the
last
minute,
like
finding
asbestos
in
the
Rocky
Mountain
Power.
K
R
Lot
we
came
to
the
conclusion
that
we
had
to
find
a
location
to
make
sure
that
we
could
do
the
9:00
service
long
term
immediately
by
next
year.
We
need
to
find
another
solution
on
North
Temple.
The
University
threw
us
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
there
was
also
the
North
Temple
spot
through
us
as
finding
a
location
in
the
small
amount
of
time.
So
I
think
those
are
the
conditions
that
put
us
where
we
are
today,
but
I
think
we
as
UTA
need
recognized
with
the
city
that
this
is
an
optimal
for
this
line.
R
G
That's
great
Thank,
You,
Nicole
and
I
appreciate
that
information
a
lot
and
also
again,
thank
you
for
rushing
to
be
here,
but
I
also
really
appreciate
Montes.
They
kind
of
follow
Jen's
comments.
You
want
to
necessarily
hear
for
them
yet,
but
of
how
great
it
is
that
you,
this
relationship
that
Salt
Lake
City,
has
been
able
to
form
with
UTA
in
such
a
different
way
than
what
we've
heard
in
years
past
and
so
really
kudos
to
Jen
mcgrath
kudos
to
ken
kudos
to
the
transportation,
John
and
everyone
here
and
to
you.
G
I
know
that
you
were
really
instrumental
in
kind
of
forging
that
relationship,
because
it
is
a
collaborative
effort
and
I
am
glad
that
we're
working
together
and
finding
solutions
for
this
on
that
temporary
basis
and
look
forward
to
furthering
this
relationship.
So,
thanks
to
all
of
you
right
there,
your.
R
E
Thank
you
all
and
I
had
a
discussion
off
offline
with
gen
McGrath
and
some
issues.
There
I
appreciate
the
compensation
piece
about
the
trips
to
transit.
I'd,
be
intrigued
to
hear
more
about
that
specific
piece.
I
have
a
concern,
I
guess
about
public
awareness
of
this
change.
Everything
we've
done
so
far
has
been
actually
the
last
part
of
that
to
North
temple
the
ride-along
day.
Everything
was
about
that
particular
section
and
I'm
concerned
about
information
getting
out
and
undermining
sort
of
use
of
that
route
quickly.
S
Yes,
so
actually,
we
just
came
from
a
meeting
with
we've
hired
studio,
six
out
of
Colorado
and
they
are
in
town
today,
tomorrow
and
Thursday
and
where
we
met
with
Andrea
Packer
from
UTA
that
works
in
Nicole's
group
and
are
forming
our
marketing
plan
for
that.
So
getting
all
of
the
information
out
there,
bringing
together
the
trips
to
transit
with
the
new
service
and
the
other
elements,
hive
Pass
green
bike,
all
the
first
last
mile
solution.
So
how
we
get
that
messaging
out
as
a
comprehensive
system
is
what
we're
working
on
as
we
speak.
S
R
I
can
tell
you
where
we
are
today.
August
change
day
for
us
is
huge
for
UTA,
specifically
around
these
routes,
but
also
in
addition
to
what
we're
doing
regional
service
wide.
So
we
do
have
a
plan
that
identifies
these
routes
with
Salt
Lake
City,
specifically
using
some
of
the
admin
money
that
was
given
to
us
through
this
process
that
will
allocate
to
identify
new
routes.
9
is
a
new
route
for
is
a
new
route
and
really
helping
our
customers
align
what
that
means
to
their
trips.
R
So
as
the
team
works
through
this
branding
piece,
we're
also
working
through
a
customer
kind
of
experience,
piece
of
how
we
message
that
so
today,
if
you
go
online
right
now,
the
new
lines
are
up
there
on
our
website.
So
we've
brought
you
a
map
when
Laura
gets
here.
She's
working
on
I
haven't
a
map
of
that,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
the
star
and
the
stop
and
they're
being
updated.
As
we
speak
online,
that's.
R
E
Mr.
chair
I
think
following
up
mr.
Rogers
statement
earlier,
I,
don't
disagree
with
investing
in
the
implementation
of
these
six
north
and
10th
north
routes.
I
would
like
to
have
a
discussion
about
the
high
pass
or
fares
in
general
for
these
routes
and
if
there's
a
way,
we
could
I
think
we're
waiting
for
the
study
to
come
back
that
we
funded
last
year.
I
think.
E
A
E
G
This
is
again
follow
up
on
the
addendum
itself,
and
this
is
more
of
a
legal
question
and
I
don't
want
to
delay
anything
but
I'm
I,
don't
know
if,
because
this
is
an
addenda,
we've
had
an
attachment
with
the
master
plan
in
there.
If
we
need
to
change
that
change
that
that
routes
not
coming
in
on
in
the
addendum
part
of
it
right,
I,
don't
know
if
there
is
Rusty's
back
that
are
looking
at
me.
G
But
hopefully
you
under
this
understand
my
question,
because
this
is,
you
know,
a
binding
document,
and
it
says
that
it
describes
that
route
that
isn't
all
the
way
there
and
again
I,
don't
want
to
delay
anything
at
all.
I
know
we
need
to
take
action
on
this
sooner
rather
than
later,
because
it's
an
August
deadline
or
if
we
need
to
somehow
add
another
addendum
saying
that
I'm
not
sure
what
needs
to
happen
or
if
anything
needs
happen.
S
I
have
a
non
legal
opinion
since
I'm,
not
an
attorney.
My
opinion
on
that
is
that
we
all
agree
that
we
want
to
get
to
the
end
of
line
identified
in
the
map
in
the
current
addendum
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
so
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
risk
in
including
it
now
with
the
idea
that
we're
going
to
get
there
as
fast
as
we
can
I.
R
I
will
say
that,
because
we
knew
we
had
some
operational
efficiencies,
that
we
would
change,
that
we
talked
about
alignment,
not
route
starts
and
ends.
So
the
way
I
read
it
on
you,
TAS
behalf
and
I,
will
look
to
legal.
Is
that
there
is
no
beginning.
There
is
no
end
that
that
we
are
obligated
to
just
for
this
point
if
we
had
to
change
an
AOL
or
if
things
change
due
to
operation
cuts,
but
I
would
I
would
defer
to
the
attorneys.
But
from
our
standpoint
we
feel
like
we
have.
R
G
R
H
R
H
R
I
I
don't
want
to
steal
the
thunder
of
Julie
Ann
and
my
staff,
but
I
I
do
know
that
they
have
about
a
three
phase
process.
Around
I
heard
some
cool
things,
but
I'm
not
going
to
bring
them
up,
but
they
have
a
lot
of
events
around
specific
Salt,
Lake
City
service
and
then
how
we
integrate
it
throughout.
So
I
would
say.
Yes,
we
have
phases
before
from
now
to
changed
a
phase
that's
directly
after
and
then
ongoing,
so
that
people
get
used
to
this,
but
I.
R
H
R
Q
A
Q
A
E
E
R
A
O
That's
exactly
what
I
was
gonna
ask
is,
since
the
council
is
scheduled
to
vote
next.
Tuesday
on
this
staff
will
be
that
pairing
the
motion
sheet.
Our
understanding
is
councilmember.
Johnston
is
interested
in
looking
at
hive
pass
and
other
potential
uses,
but
the
full
amount
could
be
placed
in
a
holding
account
pending
that
information
for.
E
A
B
Forward
can
I
do
a
15
second
timeline
for
the
coming
year,
just
that
will
help
with
your
decision-making.
So
in
the
next
two
months
or
so
we'll
have
you
know
the
report
for
the
fair
pass
analysis
and
then
we're
also
going
to
be
kicking
off
and
getting
rolling
on
a
variety
of
studies,
ii,
south
transit,
mall,
slash
hub
the
westside
hub
and
then
600
north,
as
well,
so
by
next
spring.
B
K
O
This
is
the
first
of
four
briefings
on
the
fiscal
year:
2020
capital
improvement
program.
Since
the
annual
budget
there
is
a
public
hearing
scheduled
next
Tuesday.
The
council
is
scheduled
to
take
action
on
August
20th,
there's
a
new
deadline
for
adopting
project
specific
allocations,
which
is
September
1st
I
just
want
to
highlight
a
couple
main
points.
O
Some
of
the
significant
changes
coming
to
the
CIP
process
include.
This
is
the
first
year
with
a
CIP
book.
As
we
discussed
during
the
RDA
Capitol
projects.
It
includes
the
general
fund,
as
well
as
the
capital
projects
for
all
of
the
enterprise
funds.
We
received
it
on
July,
2nd
and
if
there
are
any
specific
questions
on
the
CIP
book,
Mary
Beth
is
here.
O
O
The
administration
is
also
working
on
the
capital
facilities
plan.
This
is
the
10-year
CIP
plan.
There
was
a
briefing
back
in
January
about
this
and
recently
in
budgeting
them.
At
number,
six
of
last
fiscal
year,
the
council
appropriated
all
the
funding
necessary
to
update
the
impact
fee
facilities
plan,
all
four
sections:
the
fire,
Parks
police
and
streets.
O
O
There
is
a
summary
chart
of
all
of
the
funding
sources,
it's
also
up
on
the
big
screen
and
it
compares
funding
for
CIP
from
fiscal
year
16
to
the
proposed
fiscal
year,
2020
budget,
the
council
added
two
hundred
and
eighty
nine
thousand
dollars
in
one-time
funding,
using
vacancy
savings
from
the
delayed
hiring
of
the
twenty-three
new
police
officers.
So
this
is
in
addition
to
what
the
mayor
had
recommended
so
there's
currently
two
hundred
and
eighty
nine
thousand
dollars
that
does
not
have
a
recommendation
for
use.
O
O
The
general
fund
transfer,
which
is
the
ongoing,
is
twenty-one
point
four
million
dollars,
which
is
about
seven
percent,
and
this
is
what
this
is.
What
the
council
has
aimed
for
that
there
was
an
audit
that
said,
8%
or
9%
would
be
even
better,
but
I,
don't
think.
We've
ever
reached
nine
percent
in
the
last
decade
or
two.
O
The
unrestricted
funds
available
to
go
to
any
project-
these
are
general
fund
dollars,
the
most
flexible
you
can
put
them
to
any
project.
You
want
they're,
just
under
eight
and
a
half
million
dollars
total,
and
this
is
a
increase
of
six
and
a
half
percent
about
five
hundred
thousand
more
than
last
year.
O
There
is
a
split
you'll
notice
in
the
far
left
column
on
the
funding
log.
There
is
a
C
for
capital
or
an
M
for
maintenance.
The
funding
log
is
organized
by
maintenance
projects
first
in
capital
projects.
Second,
most
of
the
projects
proposed
are
capital
projects
which
is
six
and
a
half
million
dollars,
and
just
under
two
million
are
maintenance
projects.
O
In
previous
years
we
have
reviewed
the
general
policy
questions
first
and
then
dived
into
each
of
the
individual
projects.
Given
the
four
briefings
one
today
and
one
next
week.
It
would
be
helpful
if
we
could
get
through
all
of
the
CIP
projects
today
and
next
week
to
gather
all
of
your
questions
and
I
the
areas
you'd
like
to
look
at
funding
so
that
we
have
time
over
the
three
week
break
to
gather
feedback
and
have
it
ready
for
you
at
the
August
six
briefing.
H
At
the
beginning
of
the
book,
where
we
get
a
little
snapshot
of
our
of
our
bonds
on
page
v4,
that's
the
the
taxable
sales
tax
revenue
refunding
bond
series
201
for
a
that
seems
to
be
our
next
bond
to
mature
in
October
of
next
year.
It
looks
like
it
was
originally
just
over
26
million,
and
this
is
going
to
provide
some
capacity
or
another
bonding
opportunity
and
our
sales
tax,
assuming
we
don't
see
a
decrease
in
sales
tax
revenue.
N
You
know
it's
always
changing
as
a
matter
of
fact,
marina
and
I
were
just
talking
bonding
sales,
tax
bonds,
refund
of
self
tax
bonds,
because
the
economy
is
changing.
So
you
know,
as
things
happen
and
change
right
now.
Bonding
at
this
very
moment
is
a
good
option
because
what's
happening
with
the
economy,
is
it's
going
up
and
down,
and
so
bonding
rates
right
now
are
going
down?
So
it's
hard
to
predict
all
the
way
out
to
October
of
2020
of
next
year,
especially
when
we're
in
such
an
influx.
D
H
N
H
Mean
we
took
what
was
really
an
expedited
timeline
with
funding
our
future,
but
it
was
still
a
pretty
extensive
public
process
that
we
went
through
last
year
and
having
conversation
leading
up
not
only
to
the
sales
tax
but
to
putting
that
87
million
on
the
ballot
through
a
geo
bond,
but
I
think
like
October
of
next
year.
Isn't
that
far
away
and
I
just
want
to
call
it
to
my
peers
attention
that
this
is
the
next
bond
to
mature
in
our
portfolio.
H
And
it's
not
it's
not
an
enormous
amount
of
money
relative
to
some
of
the
other
bonds
that
we've
talked
about
in
the
order
that
we,
rather
that
we
have
on
our
books
right
now.
But
this
is
a
big
chunk
of
change
and
we
should
start
thinking
about
this
and
I'm
sure.
Whoever
the
next
mayor
is
will
be
thinking
about
this.
But
the
council
should
have
this
in
our
sights.
Yep.
S
Just
quick
things
I
think
that
the
CFP,
the
capital
facilities
plan
that
the
administration
is
undertaking
will
probably
inform
you
know
how
that
money
could
most
efficiently
be
used.
So
that's
that's
one
thing
that
will
help
I
think
the
other
thing
is
just
that's
helpful
to
know
is
that
the
last
time
there
was
a
massive
contraction
in
the
economy,
CIP
really
provided
the
city
with
a
mechanism
for
essentially
writing
it
out
without
having
to
lay
off
large
numbers
of
employees.
So
capital
projects
were
essentially
frozen
for
a
year
and
it
you
know.
E
E
E
N
Other
thing
that
I
wanted
you
to
wanted
to
note
is
that,
as
we
were
developing
this
book,
we
did
go
through
resolution,
29
or
I
went
through
resolution
29
and
was
like
oh
we're
missing
this
we're
missing
this.
This
is
a
real
work
in
progress.
I
mean
I
want
to
thank
my
staff
and
dan-and-jenn
staff
for
putting
this
together.
We
put
it
together
in
a
month
so
for
them
to
put
this
together.
N
The
initial
book
in
a
month
is
pretty
spectacular,
but
you
know
I
already
know
that
there
are
certain
things
that
I
want
to
change
and
want
to
do
and
new
it
from
the
time
I
printed
this
book,
but
you
know
I,
couldn't
do
it
at
that
point
in
time
so
going
forward.
We
really
want
to
align
this
with
resolution
29.
N
Q
To
add
on
to
what
Mary
Beth
said
more
we're
aware,
but
we're
also
already
moving
in
that
direction.
So,
for
example,
one
of
the
questions
was
about
you
know
identifying
which
projects
are
within
an
RDA
area
and
we've
added
that
to
the
application,
so
that
when
people
fill
out,
the
application
for
this
coming
years
of
projects
they'll
be
able
to
take
a
box
and
then
that
information
will
be
available
to
us
to
put
into
the
book.
Q
So,
in
addition
to
us
identifying
that
there
are
things
that
are
missing,
we
are
putting
mechanisms
into
place
to
make
sure
that
we
are
able
to
gather
that
information
over
the
course
of
the
next
year
to
be
able
to
get
it
into
the
next
book.
We
didn't
have
that
opportunity
this
time
for
some
of
those
things,
but
we're
looking
to
working
towards
that
now
and
making
strides
in
that
direction.
Q
D
O
O
That
being
said,
there
are
special
circumstances
with
the
three
and
a
half
million
for
a
new
downtown
park
or
proposed
for
improvements
to
Pioneer
Park.
It's
entirely
parks,
impact
fees
and
parks,
impact
fees
will
start
expiring,
September
next
year,
and
so
there's
no
longer
time
for
it
to
go
through
the
normal
CIP
process.
O
Q
A
E
A
Okay,
okay,
so
as
Ben
mentioned,
this
is
the
first
of
four
or
hearings
that
we're
gonna
be
or
work
sessions.
Discussions
we're
gonna
be
having
I
would
encourage
all
of
you
to
just
continue.
You
know
making
notes
ideas
with
your
with
your
recommendations
and
wants
through
the
booklet,
and
then
you
know
we
will
be
able
to
take
those
as
we'd
as
we
move
forward
so
and.
G
A
Okay,
so
on
the
reason
that
this
is
on
the
agenda
for
those
for
you
wondering
there
have
been
a
number
of
social
media
requests
and
issues
related
to
both
the
council
Facebook
page,
our
personal
Facebook
pages
are
prior
somewhat
public
Facebook
pages,
so
we
figured
it's
best
just
to
talk
about
this
in
public
and
just
to
move
forward.
So
that's
what
we're
doing
so.
Cindy
Lou
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
you.
So.
S
Basically,
we
want
to
put
the
policy,
that's
been,
that's
a
draft
form
in
your
packets,
we'd
like
to
put
it
into
the
policy
manual
as
two
separate
sections,
a
fifty
one
and
a
fifty
two
for
internal
use
of
social
media,
and
we
just
have
our
standard
resolution
format
for
updating
the
policy
manual.
That
will
have
those
two
sections
attached.
S
H
A
T
S
T
It's
consistent
with
all
the
other
court
decisions
in
terms
of
blinding
the
interactive
comment:
space
as
a
public
forum
based
on
the
way
that
public
official
was
was
using
the
social
media
account.
In
that
case
it
was
Twitter,
but
it's
completely
consistent
with
how
the
law
has
been
developing
and
simply
affirms
the
advice
that
we've
been
giving
you
all
of
you.
Okay,.
J
T
And
so
right
now,
the
only
individual,
that's
being
blocked
by
the
council
unless
that's
changed.
The
last
time
I
checked
was
was
Aaron
Jones
and
our
advice
is
going
to
be,
and
I
can
certainly
speak
more
about
this
in
closed
session
to
when
this
policy
goes
into
place.
To
simply
start,
the
clock
can
do
on
everything
and
unblock
everybody
if
there
are
any
users,
so
that
then
violate
the
policy.
This
will
give
us
a
good
foundation
to
address
those
violations
and.
T
Correct
again,
although
this
policy
is
adopted
is
not
mandatory
as
to
individual
council
members,
it's
something
that
we
are
recommending.
You
take
a
look
at
and
we
can
certainly
advise
you
further
on
that
application.
As
you
know,
it
is
a
fact-specific
inquiry
and
it
can
be
tricky
to
make
sure
you're
saying
in
compliance,
I
guess
with
First
Amendment
principles.
Okay,.
T
J
R
E
E
T
E
E
A
Okay,
so
you
know
for
the
comments
I
am
now,
since
there
are
a
few
questions
about
the
lawsuit
and
where
things
are
with
the
lawsuit.
My
recommendation
is
that
we
go
into
a
closed
session
to
talk
about
strategies,
this
strategy
session,
to
discuss
or
reasonably
eminent
led
to
litigation,
and
also,
let's
see
discussion
regarding
deployment
of
security,
personnel
devices
or
systems.
So
it's
someone
be
willing
to
make
those
two
motions
for
a
closed
session
or
just
to
move.
My
motion
also.