►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 4/14/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
Perfect,
thank
you.
Welcome
to
everybody.
We
met
earlier
today
at
2:00
p.m.
wearing
fur
hats
as
the
Redevelopment
Agency
board,
and
now
we're
changing
hats
to
our
City
Council
and
roles
for
our
work
session
and
to
discuss
some
further
briefing
items
at
7
o'clock
tonight
will
be
only
a
limited,
formal
meeting,
which
means
it's
not
a
standard
for
meeting
agenda
and
the
council
will
consider
only
one
business
item,
a
resolution
that
would
extend
the
mayor's
March
18th
proclamation,
declaring
a
local
emergency
relating
to
a
magnitude,
5.7
earthquake.
C
C
Following
the
meeting
for
instructions
to
guide
you
on
how
to
participate
electronically
in
any
of
our
WebEx
meetings,
you
can
visit
SLC
council
comm
or
call
eight.
Oh
one,
five,
three,
five,
seven,
six,
zero
zero
will
now
begin.
Our
work
session
meeting
with
item
number
one,
which
is
an
informational
update
related
to
the
mayor's
proclamations
declaring
local
agencies
for
Kovan
19
and
the
recent
earthquake.
Updating
us
will
have
an
Salt
Lake,
City
barrier
in
Mendenhall
and
Rachael
Otto,
chief
of
staff
and
Lisa
Schaeffer,
deputy
chief
staff
and
then
also
Katy
Lewis,
City
Attorney,.
D
It's
mr.
chair,
hey
everybody
kind
of
getting
into
this,
is
our
Tuesday
format
now
and
I
just
want
to
give
my
compliments
to
the
council
staff
for
how
wonderfully
you
were
on
these
meetings,
particularly
the
cut
public
comment
section
during
the
formal
with
such
grace
and
care,
and
it
really
comes
through
I
know
that
the
public
feels
that
and
I
appreciate
the
way
that
you're
continuing
to
create
an
opportunity
for
us
to
hear
from
our
residents
and
the
businesses
in
the
city.
So
today
is
my
100th
day
in
office.
C
D
Think
I
made
it,
you
know
I
just
want
to
make
it
another
day
and
it's
it's
different
than
we
were
yesterday.
So
today
we
announced
that
we
are
accepting
donations
of
homemade
masks
for
our
employees
and
hopefully
that
will
get
enough
that
we'll
have
enough
for
members
vulnerable
members
of
the
community.
This
city
white,
mask
donation
is
there's
information
on
our
website
and
we're
linking
people
to
this
CDC
website.
That
gives
guidance
on
how
to
make
a
mask.
There's
no
sew
options.
D
They
can
be
made
from
all
sorts
of
fabric,
even
t-shirts
and
hopefully
I,
think
I,
know
I,
feel
safe
and
guessing
that
you,
as
council
members
are
hearing
from
constituents
like
I,
am
that
our
home,
but
really
want
to
help,
and
they
want
to
know
how
they
can
help.
So
I
hope
that
this
will
be
something
that
people
can
do
and
they
can
donate
those
masks
at
any
of
the
Salt
Lake
City
fire
departments.
D
We're
hoping
to
have
two
masks
per
frontline
employee,
one
that
they
can
wear
another,
that
they
could
be
laundering
and
then,
as
I
said,
hopefully
enough
that
as
our
frontline
employees,
even
police
and
fire
come
into
contact
with
vulnerable
members
of
the
community
that
they
can
give
them
a
mask
as
well.
So
that
started
today
and
Ivan
I've
approved
employees,
Salt
Lake,
City
employees
being
paid
their
normal
rates
for
the
jobs
that
they
or
what
they
would
normally
be
paid
for
their
job
to
sew,
masks.
So
people
who
have
those
skills
that
are
city
employees.
D
We
are
helping
the
county
and
the
state
with
some
staffing
requests
as
well.
There's
some
county
quarantine
and
isolation,
centers
that
need
staff
and
need
drivers.
Also,
the
airport
needs
people
to
hand
out
the
information
cards
that
help
to
identify
and
trace
people
coming
into
the
state.
So
we've
put
the
call
out
to
our
3,000
plus
employees,
with
Salt
Lake
City.
Anyone
who
can
step
up
to
come
on
and
help
our
county
state
and
Airport
do
these
extended
jobs
or
we're
looking
to
give
that
support.
D
We've
also
expand
the
emergency
food
program
with
Salt
Lake
City
School
District.
As
you
know,
they
are
providing
meals
for
any
person,
age,
zero
to
18
and
food
boxes,
for
families
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
One
thing
that
we've
that
I've
learned
and
that
we're
hearing
from
communities
particularly
diverse
communities
that
some
food
banks
require
people
to
present
identification
in
order
to
receive
food
for
entire
families.
D
D
These
are
teams
of
six
that
work
at
a
distance
from
one
another
receive
the
load
of
food
that
is
through
the
Utah
Food
Bank
and
the
school
district,
and
have
the
instructions
on
how
to
pack
that
up
so
we're
working
to
amplify
the
work
that
the
school
district
is
doing
to
helping
feed
our
communities
with
our
own
employees.
Time
and
those
projected
needs
right
now-
are
around
Bryant
middle
school,
Bennion
and
Washington
elementary
school
areas.
We're
hoping
to
be
able
to
implement
this
on
Monday
April
20th,
so
those
are
the
updates
today.
D
C
C
D
The
proclamation
seven
was
issued
on
April
10th.
It
goes
through
a
few
things.
Any
residential
or
commercial
landlord
will
be
eligible
for
a
one-year
deferment
of
all
Salt
Lake
City
based
business
licensing
fees
if
a
base
fee
is
applicable
to
the
property
owner
and
upon
their
providing
the
city's
division
of
business
licensing
with
certain
documentation,
which
basically
is
documentation
that
shows
with
a
signature
of
their
tenants
and
from
the
landlord
that
they
did
not
displace
people
due
to
the
impacts
of
kovat
19
during
this
time
period.
D
Second,
is
to
the
extent
that
salt
lake
city
employees
are
asked
to
assist
with
residential
eviction
activities
such
as
we're
prohibiting
such
assistance,
unless
the
assistance
is
necessary
to
protect
public
health
and
safety,
so
city
law
enforcement
doesn't
carry
out
in
Vixen
enforcement.
The
county
sheriff's
office
typically
does
that,
but
occasionally
they're
called
to
assist,
and
this
Proclamation
is
prohibiting
that
assistance
unless
it's
health
and
safety
related.
D
Next
is
any
medical,
professional
or
first
responder
or
other
resident
of
Salt
Lake
City,
whose
employment
includes
potential
exposure
to
kovat
19
may
park
an
RV
on
city
street
adjacent
to
their
primary
residence.
For
just
so,
they
can
sleep
near
home
and
at
the
same
time
avoid
family
members
so
as
not
to
expose
them
potentially
took
ovid
19.
D
So,
even
though
we've
already
excused
parking
limits
in
the
city
with
previous
proclamations,
this
applies
to
our
V's
Indy
restaurant
or
bar
within
Salt
Lake,
with
a
fully
executed,
right-of-way
increment
agreement
between
the
restaurant
or
property
owner
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
What
this
is
talking
about
is
outdoor
dining
seating
or
other
restaurant
or
bar
related
encroachment.
So
you
can
imagine
a
bar
your
favorite
bar
restaurant.
Perhaps
that
has
outdoor
seating.
That's
on
the
public
right-of-way
on
the
sidewalk
space
they
rent
that
space
from
the
city.
D
There,
though,
all
of
those
entities
are
receiving
a
90-day
deferral
of
their
2020
encroachment
fees.
Next
is
any
tenant
leasing,
city
owned
or
RDA
real
property,
with
a
valid
written
lease
prior
to
the
date
of
this
April
10th
proclamation
will
receive
a
rent
deferral
for
the
months
of
May
and
June.
Now,
there's
just
two
more.
The
developed
picnic
sites
in
City,
Creek,
Canyon
and
developed
campgrounds
in
affleck
Park
will
remain
closed
to
public
recreation
until
the
termination
of
this
proclamation
and
finally,
the
overflow
shelter
at
st.
C
F
E
G
Residents
have
the
public
has
until
the
22nd
to
get
their
preliminary
damage
reports
into
the
county
from
there.
Those
go
to
the
state
for
their
mitigation
team,
who
submits
an
entire
package
to
FEMA
for
review,
and
so
it
it
takes
into
consideration.
This
review
takes
into
consideration
the
estimated
dollar
amount
of
damage
and
then
the
amount
of
property
insurance
that
covers
that
damage,
and
so
we
would
like
to
request
that
this
Proclamation
remain
open
until
we
have
final
determination
from
FEMA
as
to
whether
or
not
any
any
reimbursement
will
be
available.
H
H
F
G
And
if
I,
if
I,
might
interject
a
little
bit
here
as
far
as
context
for
those
of
you
who
were
around
during
the
microburst
that
produce
some
flash
flooding
a
couple
of
years
ago,
that
FEMA
determination
was
not
actually
made
for
a
couple
of
months
after
the
event.
So
it's
really
hard
for
us
to
recommend
an
actual
date
to
extend
the
emergency.
But
I
would
say
that
when
you're
dealing
with
this
many
layers
of
government,
it's
not
going
to
happen
that
quickly.
So
we
would
like
to
leave
it
up
to
you.
G
G
It's
not
exactly
clear
that
we
have
to
leave
the
emergency
open,
but
I
think
out
to
stay
consistent
with
the
county's
lead
on
this.
Who
is
our
next
line
up?
They
have
extended
it
and
so
to
stay.
Consistent.
I
think
that
that's
the
wisest
thing
to
do
Katie
might
have
some.
You
know
something
to
offer
there
from
a
legal
perspective,
but
I,
but
I
think
that
this
is
is
more.
G
They
extended
theirs
till
July
6th,
but
when
we
requested
information
as
to
why
that
date
was
significant,
it
just
wasn't
significant.
It
was
sort
of
the
Tuesday
after
the
last
meeting
or
so
I.
Don't
know
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
necessarily
significant.
They
just
stretched
it
out
and
similar
to
what
they
did
with
the
Cova
expansion
they
just
they
chose
to
do
a
longer
extension,
as
opposed
to
a
30-day
or
whatever
was
that
we
decided
to
do.
Okay,.
H
Only
thing
that
I
will
add
is
in
my
research
on
how
this
FEMA
money
flows
down,
there's
a
period
of
time
for
the
federal
government
to
accept
our
local
emergencies
and
start
to
flow
that
money
and
given
the
the
pandemic
and
the
fact
that
this
is
sort
of
a
second
emergency
and
then
I'm,
assuming
the
federal
government
is
paying
attention
to
a
lot
of
different
things.
That
may
be
the
reason
why
the
county
left
their
earthquake
emergency
and
why
it
may
make
sense
for
us
to
do
that
until
we
know
the
emergencies
been
accepted.
Okay,.
H
Not
none
that
I
can
think
of
council
chair
and
this
emergency
is,
was,
you
know,
sort
of
a
date
in
time
and
isn't
the
same
as
the
what
you're,
seeing
with
the
kovat
emergency,
where
there
are
a
lot
of
emergency
powers
being
exercised
and
contemplated?
So
really,
the
only
purpose
of
extending
right
now
is
to
access
those
federal
funds.
H
E
I
I
just
had
a
question
also
probably
for
Katie
is:
are
we
extending
the
emergency
situation
or
are
we
extending
the
actual
proclamation
like
well?
We
have
to
go
back
and
extend
all
seven
of
the
or
all
six
I
guess
of
the
kovat
related
proclamations,
or
is
it
that
we
have
to
sort
of
concurrent
emergency
situations
and
then
the
mayor
can
make
as
many
proclamations
as
she
deems
necessary
within
that
time
period,
I
I,
guess
I'm
a
little
confused
about
all
that
works.
That's.
H
A
great
question,
thanks
for
that,
so
your
second
example
is
is
what's
happening
here.
There
is
a
process
for
the
mayor
to
declare
an
emergency
and
that's
sort
of
the.
What
and
we
had
to
at
the
same,
you
know
pretty
much
concurrently,
coronavirus,
Cova,
19
and
the
earthquake,
so
the
mayor
has
declared
a
local
emergency
for
both
of
those
once
that
emergency
is
declared
it's
in
place
for
30
days
or
the
emergency
itself
can
be
extended,
which
is
what
you
are
contemplating
today
for
the
earthquake
and
what
you
contemplated
last
week
for
Cova
19.
H
That's
that's!
The
question
that
you're
being
asked
today
is:
does
the
emergency
extend,
then
both
state
law
and
city
code
allow
for
the
mayor
to
exercise
emergency
powers
while
that
local
emergency
is
in
effect,
the
mayor
has
not
exercised
any
emergency
powers
for
the
earthquake,
but,
as
you
are
aware,
she
has
exercised
a
series
of
emergency
powers
or
the
Cova
19,
which
is
why
I
previously
said
you
know
when
you're
thinking
about
extending
the
earthquake
emergency
there
aren't.
C
Hey
I
don't
see
any
other
question
hands
or
questions
on
this
so
but
I
do
want
to
go
back
to
the
inchoate
emergency
because
the
item
that
they
Rachel
Otto
brought
up
about
and
the
Arts
Council
and
then
I
believe
we
also
had
some
information
from
from
then
about
the
emergency
loan
program
that
council
members
have
questions
on.
So
sorry,
I
move
done
tonight
item
2
quickly,
so
we
want
to
go
back
to
that
Rachel.
Do
you
want
to
talk
to
us
about
the
Arts
Council.
F
J
Thank
you
Rachel
and
council,
chair
warden
and
just
a
quick
update,
something
we
wanted
to
run
by
the
council.
At
the
early
stage.
The
department
received
a
request
from
the
Arts
Council
Foundation,
which
is
the
nonprofit
our
of
the
Arts
Council,
and
just
for
a
little
bit
of
background
for
us
to
consider
any
contract
modifications.
J
What
we
ask
is
for
the
Foundation
Board
to
consider
and
approve
that
request
to
the
department.
Just
so
we
know
that
we
are
consistent
with
what,
if
we
take
action
as
a
department
with
a
contract
modification
that
we
are
consistent
with
what
the
board
is
requesting,
as
well,
not
just
city
staff,
so
just
a
sort
of
mechanism
that
we
have
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
as
much
feedback
as
possible.
J
So
last
Thursday
the
board
met
and
considered
a
request
to
the
department
which
was
for
repurposing
about
the
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
funds
to
support
local
artists.
We've
seen
several
programs
out
there
that
can
support
arts
organizations
and
businesses,
but
this
is
specifically
targeted
towards
artists,
individual
artists.
J
So
the
intent
is
to
ask
for
a
strawpoll
next
week
on
the
subject,
but
wanted
to
give
an
early
stage
heads-up
that
we
didn't
receive
this
request
from
the
Hart's
Pennsylvania
foundation
board,
and
we
wanted
to
bring
it
up
to
council
members
at
the
early
stage
and
we
also
have
Felicia
on
the
line
to
maybe
talked
about
the
program
side
a
little
bit
more
and
what
the
partnership
with
the
state
is
that's
being
contemplated.
Leacy
are
you
on.
C
F
It's
nice
to
see
all
of
you,
so
so
a
couple
of
things
happen
to
that
kind
of
led
us
to
the
idea
of
developing
this
program.
One
is
some
funds
that
you
will
not
be
executing
on
because
of
canceled
events,
and
the
other
is
some
grant
funding
that
we
have
is
existing.
So
under
the
purview
of
our
departmental
contract
with
the
city,
we
do
programming
and
grants,
so
we
really
identified
this
need.
A
number
of
other
cities
have
funds
for
individual
artists
they're.
F
Currently,
no
leave
funds
for
individual
artists
there,
just
right
now
for
organizations
and
a
lot
of
independent
contractors
are
having
a
hard
time
with
unemployment.
So
the
program
is
targeted
emergency
fund
with
$500
Awards
or
grants
to
individual
artists,
and
we
would
like
to
have
that
fund
be
at
about
$50,000.
F
The
intention
is
that
we
develop
a
co
application
with
the
state
for
the
reason
that
they
have
some
funding
for
the
same
purpose
and
that
we
want
to
we
work
closely
with
them
receive
funds
from
them
already,
and
we
want
to
ensure
that
the
resources
can
be
distributed
as
widely
as
possible,
so
that
people,
if
we
had
our
own
program
and
they
had
a
program,
we're
not
duplicating
funding.
So
we
would
develop
a
co
application.
F
They
would
gather
all
the
data
and
then
the
review
criteria
we
develop
in
tandem
together,
and
we,
of
course,
just
pay
out
these
really
funds
to
only
Salt
Lake
City
residents,
as
we
normally
do.
So.
The
rubric
and
grant
processes
are
already
kind
of
well
in
place
for
our
organization
and
and
we're
really
hopeful
that
we
would
be
able
to
execute
this
in
partnership
with
the
state
and
I'm
happy
to
take
any
any
questions
about
process
or
that
sort
of
thing.
C
F
Great
question
so
there's
sort
of
areas:
one
is
an
outreach
category
that
we
have
for
programming,
which
was
for
the
busker
festival,
which
was
set
to
happen
in
June.
So
we
would
still
like
to
execute
a
virtual
option
of
that,
as
well
as
some
other
outreach
activities
related
to
living
traditions
in
this
fiscal
year,
but
the
would
be
much
less
expensive
and
so
50,000
was
originally
for
a
contract.
C
Okay,
and
how
is
this
different,
is
this,
or
is
this
different
from
other
emergency
loans
that
we've
given
out
in
terms
of
you
know
what
we're
asking
artists,
what
do
they
have?
What
information
do
they
have
to
produce
for
us
so
and
with
our
with
our
last
one
that
we
eat
the
emergency
loan
program
that
went
to
the
businesses?
This
was
to
also
keep
it
was
to
keep
it
business
as
afloat
and
to
keep
employees
to
cover
payroll.
So
what
would
we
be
asking
them
to
produce
for
this.
F
So
the
main
difference
is
that
this
is
not
alone
and
it's
also
significantly
less
dollar
amount,
so
they're
only
they're
capped
at
$500.
This
came
from
research
on
a
lot
of
national
models,
so
there
there's
a
number
of
criteria
that
we've
developed,
but
they
must
be
Utah.
Artists
that
are
practicing
the
most
of
our
artists
in
the
state
are
not
full-time
artists,
it's
a
challenge
for
them
and
we
view
them
as
small
businesses,
but
because
they're
singular
employees
of
their
own
businesses.
F
Many
of
them
are
not
eligible
at
all
for
the
grants
or
sorry
for
the
loans
program
that
we
had
so
so
a
number
of
funding
sources
are
prohibitive
to
them,
so
they
must
be
21
years
old,
a
practicing
artist
experiencing
financial
hardship
related
to
copan.
There
is
a
number
of
obviously
taxable
they
can
receive.
You
know
their
US
citizen,
they
live
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
boundaries
and
they
haven't
received
anything
from
these
funds.
We
also
are
prioritizing
a
number
of
diversity
and
Geographic
considerations
that
are
in
the
rubric.
F
F
Part
of
the
reason
is
that
we
have.
The
idea
was
to
develop
this
program
in
conjunction
with
the
state,
and
their
criteria
is
a
little
bit.
F
C
F
With
the
state
it
was
just
in
a
preliminary
draft
of
the
application
and
their
their
intention
is,
you
know
they
there's
a
sense
of
urgency
around
launching
that,
and
so
we
can
kind
of
tag
in
at
any
time
or
we
could
forge
forward
on
our
own,
so
that
qualifier,
because
it
certainly
could
be
negotiable.
We're.
I
C
I
think
we
can
all
think
of
a
number
of
artists
in
our
community
who
we're
not
and
from
the
United
States,
but
are
really
not
contributing
to
scene
in
Salt,
Lake
and
I.
Don't
know
if
they're,
legal,
permanent
residents
or
if
they
have
dual
citizenship,
work
that
have
become
naturalized
thing
I
would
I
would
hate
to
eliminate
them
I
first
time,
council
member,
do
gifts,
handout,
so
yeah.
E
F
F
Then
so
yes,
they're
they're
all
eligible,
and
it
would
just
be
supporting
individual
artists
in
a
different
way.
Chris
I
just
want
to
come
back
to
Amy
your
question
I'm,
looking
more
closely
at
our
application
and
in
in
parentheses
it
is
citizen,
green
card,
older
or
permanent
resident,
who
can
provide
a
social
security
number
or
w-9.
But
again
we
can
look
at
other
modifications
so
that.
C
F
C
F
Think
you
know
we
there's
a
really
great
willingness
on
the
part
of
the
state
to
be
collaborative
and
flexible
on
this,
and
we
do.
Of
course
you
know,
have
an
interest
of
just
sharing
data
and
streamlining
the
process
to
reach
as
many
people
as
possible.
So
there's
certainly
potential
to
do
a
separate
pool
that
just
comes
from
the
Arts
Council
for
targeted
groups.
F
L
L
Sorry
guys
we're
sharing
a
living
room
today
and
so
know
for
sure
you
know
we
can
get
creative
I,
think
people
that
have
work
permits-
and
you
know
who
should
be
allowed
and
I
wouldn't
want.
In
my
case
when
I
was
a
student,
I
was
able
to
participate
in
competitions
which
would
grant
money
or
a
gift,
and
you
know-
and
that
was
ego-
and
it
was
fine,
so
I
think
we
can
get
creative.
You
know
in
terms
of
that.
C
Is
there
a
reason,
sorry
didn't
feel
to
have
their
hand
up
where
I
asked
him
the
question
you
don't
see
anybody
so
is
there
a
reason
why
we
decided
to
give
500
to,
and
you
know
AV
for.
However,
many
were
giving
as
opposed
to
giving
like.
Maybe
maybe
a
thousand
dollars
would
be
would
be
better
and
to
end
tip
to
fewer
or
how
did
you?
How
did
you
come
to
that
balance?
Yeah.
F
We
probably
like
twenty
to
thirty
models
across
the
entire
United
States
based
on
city
size
and
how
large
their
pool
was.
The
state's
pool
is,
although
I
think,
they're
still
determining
final
numbers,
but
it
was
really
based
on
knowing
many
of
the
applications
nationally
by
some
city
entities
for
this
closed
early
because
of
overwhelming
demand
and
most
of
those
applications
ranged
from
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
up
to
about
two
thousand
dollars
and
in
in
bigger
cities.
F
You
know
we
saw
we
saw
wards
of
ten
thousand
or
so,
of
course,
in
major
metropolitan
areas,
but
it
was
a
number
that
that
felt
doable
to
serve.
You
know
the
I
anticipate
will
probably
see
the
volume
of
hundreds,
more
applications
that
and
will
be
able
to
give
out
and-
and
that's
been
typical
of
most
of
these
programs.
So
that's
ok,.
C
Any
other
questions
on
the
arts
and
proposal.
Ok,
so
we'll
have
time
to
think
about
that
and
then
we'll
do
a
straw
poll
at
our
next
meeting
and
I
do
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
emergency
loan
program
and
the
breakdown
of
that.
The
first
thing
is
well
I'll.
Let
you
walk
us
through
it.
Go
ahead.
J
Thank
You
council,
chair
Wharton,
so
maybe
I
can
just
start
by
expressing
appreciation.
I
know:
business
development
ran
this
program
within
the
department,
but
it
was
a
much
wider
effort
than
just
our
team
included.
Other
departments
council
chair
your
Samir
support
and
helping
review
applications
was
no
minor
task
for
the
two
rounds
and
we
also
brought
in
partners
to
help
with
loan
processing
and
reviews,
and
it
was
quite
a
substantial
operation
to
pull
off
in
such
a
short
period
of
time.
I
know
special
things
he's
deserved
for
the
business
development
staff.
J
I've
said
this
before
and
I
said
again
like.
It
was
not
uncommon
for
the
team
to
do
60
to
80
hour
weeks
during
the
administration
in
this
loan
program,
and
so
you
know
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
again
to
all
those
who
count
administer
this.
So
we
recognize
that
this
was
not
necessarily
a
perfect
program.
J
When
we
did
our
business
survey,
we
knew
one
of
the
biggest
factors
and
what
we
had
to
do
quickly
was
administered
the
the
funding
to
the
businesses
for
the
loan
program
with
the
intent
of
bridging
to
the
SBA
program.
So
we
knew
that
there
were
going
to
be
it
wasn't
gonna
be
perfect
and
we
have
some
lessons
learned:
learn,
definitely
that
we,
if
we
could
do
it
all
over
again,
we
would
we
received
more
than
700
applications.
J
I
think
the
final
number
was
730
applications,
and-
and
so
we
don't
want
to
take
a
victory
lap,
because
we're
funding
52
of
those
and
I
think
there's
a
sensitivity
to
those
680
applications
that
could
not
be
funded,
that
we're
all
very
cognizant
of
and
want
to
address.
It
I
think
you
know
the
it's
also
difficult
being
you
know.
We
were
first
in
the
state
to
pull
something
like
this
off
and
shared
our
resources
and
every
other
resource
that
we
put
together
with
the
wider
state,
even
members
outside
of
the
state
other
municipality.
J
We
were
one
of
the
first
in
the
country.
If
not.
The
first
I
saw
some
comments
from
New
York
City
of
battled
loan
program
before
but
I
think
that
may
have
been
the
only
program
that
beat
us
to
the
punch
that
I
could
easily
find
the
state
mention.
We
were
first
in
the
country,
but
it
were
may
have
been
second,
so
being
a
first
mover
makes
it
hard
in
a
lot
of
ways.
J
So
you
know
we
know
in
terms
of
lessons
learned.
We
have
some
things
we
put
in
the
transmittal
that
we
know
we
give
some
attention
to
particularly
one
of
the
interesting
things
that
we
found
and
one
of
the
things
we'd
love
to
be
able
to
go
back
and
do
again.
This
is
we
notice
between
round
1
and
round
2,
for
example,
that
our
diversity,
the
divers
that
came
in,
were
significantly
increased
in
rome
2
and
there
was
a
timing
thing
that
really
came
into
play.
J
You
know
in
room
1
and
getting
the
word
out
too
and
so
I
think
a
focus
on
the
early
side
of
the
loan
program
you
and
we
even
thought
about
it,
and
it's
a
reason
why
we
split
it
up
the
way
we
did
so
that
we
didn't
administer
it
all
at
once.
That
was
one
of
the
considerations
and
we
thought
this
might
be
a
ramification,
but
even
a
more
intense
effort,
and
we
already
had
on
what
we
could
have
done
to
reach
that
population
even
faster
with
round
one,
for
example.
J
J
You
know
the
feedback
and
really
take
a
careful
look
at
this
and
document.
In
case,
we
do
get
subsequent
rounds
of
funding
from
either
a
partnership
or
from
future
funding
in
the
city.
And
so
we
want
to
take
comments
into
account
feedback,
and
we
honestly
want
to
take
that
in
from
councilmembers
incorporated.
E
C
Yeah,
that's
just
something
that
I
was
noticing
when
I
was
talking
earlier.
What
counseling
Baltimore
us
about
our
numbers
is
that
I
think
that's
off,
but
the
the
other
numbers
look
correct
to
me:
do
you
have
information
about
diversity
in
terms
of
the
total
number
of
applicants
versus
that
diversity
within
the
awardees.
J
Yes,
we
have
a
transmittal
memo
and
we
we
captured.
So
there
are
three
different
categories:
there's
the
total
applicants,
which
was
about
7:30
there,
the
completed
applications
which
was
in
the
300,
and
then
there
were
the
final
improved
which
were
in
the
fifties.
So
we
had
to
pull
that
in
information
from
every
individual
application.
So
we
only
pulled
it
from
a
completed
applications
in
the
approved
ones,
because
those
are
the
ones
we
want
to
really
hold
ourselves
accountable
to
make
sure
that
we're.
J
You
know
we
didn't
have
the
option
to
approve
applications
as
a
review
committee
and
from
ones
that
were
incomplete,
and
so
we
pulled
it
from
those
two
numbers.
So
this
is
the
seven
30s
and
catch
rate,
but
the
three
hundred
and
some
some
odd
applications
are
captured
and
one
of
the
data
points
that
we
found
was
both
with
you
know:
diversity
for
atomicity
and
in
terms
of
male/female
applications.
It
was
pretty
consistent
from
the
completed
applications
to
the
approved
applications.
H
L
And
then
thank
you
so
much
I
have
I,
have
a
few
questions
and
one
number
shirts
not
not
finding
this
right,
but
I
would
have
liked
to
see
a
comparison.
I
know
you
guys
are
a
good
job,
showing
my
order
or
the
racial
diversity
and
women-owned,
but
it
would
be
also
nice
to
compare
it
to
regular
white.
You
know
white
folks,
I
applied
for
this
and
then
I
would
have
liked
to
see
or
maybe
actually
see,
I
didn't
read
it
here,
but
you
said
there
were
total
of
330
applications.
L
I
know
what
you
did
here
was
the
ones
that
were
eat
and
the
ones
that
were
awarded,
but
it
would
be
helpful
to
know
the
total,
whether
it
whether
it
was
incomplete
or
not
complete
and
then
out
of
those
incomplete
and
what
type
of
read
you
know
outreach.
Do
you
guys
do?
How
did
you
communicate
with
this
folks
saying?
Hey
your
application
is
incomplete.
We
need
more
information
or
here's.
A
deadline
to
complete
us.
I
was
a
a
chance
for
these
folks
are
having
complete
applications
to
why
or
to
explain
information
that
was
missing.
J
So
for
the
two
data
points
we
happy
to
add
to
what
we
what
we
already
have
and
get
that
information
back
to
the
council.
As
for
the
complete
and
incomplete
you
know
what
the
730
applications
it
was
very
difficult
to
consult
with
each
applicant
and
say
you
know,
I'm.
Sorry,
here's
what
you
can
add
here's!
What
me
did
here's
what's
missing,
so
the
approach
that
we
took.
J
We
knew
we
had
to
be
consistent
across
the
board,
so
we
got
the
information
out
as
much
as
we
could
that
harness
was
on
the
applicant
to
submit
a
completed
application
in
that
only
completed
applications
would
be
considered.
We
put
an
out-of-office
on
the
email
INBOX.
We
also
sent
emails
out
to
those
who
had
applied
whether
they
were
complete
or
incomplete,
because
we
had
to
get
the
information
out
to
everyone
just
to
ensure
that
the
applications
double-checked
their
applications.
J
In
between
Rams
1
&
2,
however,
we
did
take
a
lot
of
the
incomplete
applications
from
round
1
and
we
notified
them
of
the
missing
elements
from
their
applications.
So
we
couldn't
do
that,
obviously,
for
round
2
because
round
2
flows
and
we
were
working
with
round
1
applicants
to
work
on
completing
their
applications
and
notifying
them.
So
we
did
it
for
round
1.
We
notified
them,
but
for
round
2
that
just
wasn't
a
possibility.
What
they
amount
of
manpower
we
had
for
processing
the
applications.
J
Well,
we
have
a
scoring
system
that
we
outlined
in
the
transmittal,
but
the
main
portions
were
clear,
Joe
or
the
ratings
one
of
the
things
in
terms
of
not
saying
how
people
voted,
because
it's
a
review
committee
process,
where
the
review
committee
selected
a
top
25
applicants,
regardless
of
score
of
all
of
the
completed
applications,
but
in
terms
of
getting
a
score
as
an
applicant.
The
process
was
fairly
simple
and
it
was
based
on
completion.
So,
for
example,
one
of
the
things
that
was
requested
was
narrative.
J
Some
companies
inserted
a
narrative,
but
it
may
have
been
one
or
two
sentences.
That
said,
we're
suffering
Kove.
It
isn't
a
great
thing
for
her
business,
and
that
was
the
extent
of
their
narrative.
So
the
fact
that
they
included
it,
they
received
points,
but
they
did
not
receive.
It
was
a
portion
of
the
point
total
for
completion
and
it
was
pretty
objective
and
by
Neriah
was
it
a
complete
narrative
or
a
partial,
and
the
only
other
factor?
Really
besides
completion
and
completion
was
the
the
credit
score
of
the
company
and
it
was
pretty.
J
It
was
presented
to
the
review
committee
that
that's
how
this
was
ranked
in
that
the
review
committee
had
the
ability
to
select
their
top
applications,
regardless
of
credits
for
any
other
factor.
So
you
know
that
may
not
have
factored
in
to
what
the
review
committee
had
seen
for
the
story
and
from
what
I
heard
from
the
team
and
I
didn't
go
back
and
do
this
analysis.
But
what
I
had
heard
from
the
team
is
just
because
you
got
a
100
score
and
had
a
complete
application,
didn't
mean
that
you're
guaranteed
funding.
E
L
Just
want
one
last
thing:
I
am
you
know,
I
received
calls.
You
know
saying
that
you
know
may-maybe.
There
were
more
Hispanic
applicants
that
and
did
not
get
approved,
or
we
overlooked
and
I'm.
Just
just
looking
at
your
numbers.
It
looks
like
a
good
23%
of
the
total
of
the
applicants
that
were
Hispanic
did
receive
alone,
but
I.
L
Think
I
would
like
to
compare
that
number
with
a
total
application,
a
very
tall
what's
complete
or
incomplete,
so
that
we
can
see
like
a
bigger
picture,
because
maybe
there
is
a
language
barrier
or
some
misunderstanding
on
what
it
meant
to
you
know
to
have
a
complete
application
or-
or
you
know,
the
information
that
we
need
it.
So
we
can
get
that
at
some
point.
That
will
be
great,
but
thank
you
for
the
information
that
you
have
here
and
I
appreciate
the
guys
that
you,
the
work
that
you
did
and
in
such
quick
manner.
L
J
Thank
you
and
I
will
say:
I
think
we
have
a
shared
interest
in
that
information
and
we'll
be
happy
to
put
that
together
and
get
that
back
to
the
council
and
I
would
like
to
say
as
well.
You
know
the
metric
is
really
tough
in
terms
of
total
awarded
loans
versus
the
request
for
loans,
and
so
we
got
that
we
got.
We
were
the
team
worked
with
some
really
difficult
emails,
I'll
say
in
terms
of
responding
to
people
throughout
the
process,
and
it
really
was
a
bit
of
a
challenge
with
that
regard
across
the
board.
J
M
M
My
question
is:
I
love
the
the
scenario
here
of
lessons
learned
and
as
we
look
forward,
we
know
there's
going
to
be
other
grants
and
funding
coming.
How
would
you
be
able
to
implement
those
with
your
lessons
learned
and-
and
you
know
the
mistakes-
you
not
mistakes,
but
the
challenges
that
you
face
while
doing
this.
C
Hey
well,
thank
you
and
I
appreciate
it.
I
appreciate
you
guys
putting
forward
this
information
and
all
the
work
that
was
put
into
it
to
try
to
get
this
out
the
door
as
fast
as
we
could
and
get
money
in
the
hands
of
our
small
businesses.
So
thank
you
for
putting
in
the
time-
and
please
tell
your
team
how
much
we
appreciate
it
and
all
the
hard
work
that
they
put
in
Thank
You
council
trip.
J
C
All
right:
let's
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
item
number
three,
which
is
an
ordinance
and
for
a
rezone
at
eleven
seventy
two
East
Chandler
dry
and
a
table
for
this.
We
have
Nick
target
the
council
office
and
Mayor
Alima
for
the
principal
planner
John
Anderson
principal
planner,
Nick,
Norris,
planning,
director
and
Bruce
beer
Barrett
applicant
representative.
B
G
O
All
right,
so
this
is
the
rezone
from
OS
to
fr3.
Os
is
open.
Space
at
bar
three
is
foothills
residential.
It's
the
property.
There
highlighted
you
can
see
that
it's
surrounded
by
other
property,
zoned,
OS
and
fr3,
and
this
property
was
created
in
1983
likely
to
be
used
for
the
adjacent
property.
In
this
picture
from
1983.
You
can
see
the
house
built
and
this
subject:
property
partially
landscaped.
The
current
owner
owns
both
of
the
properties
and
in
our
records.
We
see
that
the
two
properties
had
been
sold
together
since
the
creation
of
this
lot.
O
It
was
likely
that
this
property,
when
it
was
created,
also
had
residential
uses,
permitted
and
right
now,
with
the
OS
zoning
district.
There
are
some
limitations
on
what
this
property
could
be
used
for,
and
that
could
be
a
limitation
on
using
for
Assessor
uses
for
the
residential,
because
residential
uses
are
not
permitted
in
the
OS
zoning
district
planning
staff
is
recommending
approval,
like
Nick
turbot
mentioned,
with
the
condition
that
the
two
lots
are
consolidated.
O
The
applicant
headach
had
expressed
interest
in
using
the
lot
only
for
Assessor
uses
and
the
consolidation
would
allow
them
to
do
that.
We
have
not
received
any
public
comments
on
this
project,
but
we
feel,
like
the
consolidation,
would
mitigate
any
impact
development
on
this
property.
So
with
the
consolidation,
only
assessory
uses
and
accessory
structures
would
be
allowed,
but
not
a
principal
use
and
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation.
O
E
E
C
I
Was
I
remember
correctly,
there's
a
unique
parcel
in
the
its
own
open
space
and
the
surrounding
open
space
is
not
owned.
Privately
am
I.
Understood
am
I
remembering
that
correctly,
so
it's
it's
edge
of
open
space
and
foothills
residential,
but
it's
also
the
only
open
space
parcel
that
is
owned
by
a
private
resident.
Is
that
correct,
or
am
I
remember
something
different
in.
C
E
Somebody
can
hear
me
yes,
first
Ben
is
on
the
phone
calls
well
I
want
to
take
an
opportunity
to
thank
the
council
and
the
mayor
for
all
the
work
you've
done
to
keep
us
all
safe
and
if
my
video
is
working,
I'm
wearing
my
good
hoodie
just
for
you,
so
entropy
a
glass
of
wine
which
you
couldn't
have
do
at
home
for
these
meetings
we
won't
keep
anybody
any
longer.
We
think
mayara
and
Nick
have
done
a
great
job
when
I
thank
the
Planning
Commission
for
its
unanimous
recommendation,
I
can
tell
you.
E
I
was
actually
the
City
Attorney
assistant
city
attorney
of
95
when
the
reasoning
and
the
mapping
was
done,
and
there
were
some
errors
and
some
private
open
space
was
actually
was
in
private
properties.
Accidentally
own
zone
open
space,
there
was
one,
for
example,
near
Watson
is
hollow
behind
where
my
old
house
used
to
be
I'm
near
Wilson's
house,
which
was
zoned
to
open
space
accidentally
and
the
city
fixed
that
about
ten
years
ago.
E
That's
all
we're
asking
to
do
is
to
fix
the
you
know,
private
property,
so
it
can
be
so
and
for
used
for
accessory
uses
and
we're
happy
to
stall
happy
to
agree
to
enter
into
a
development
agreement
or
whatever
the
process.
The
city
has
to
go
through
the
subdivision
to
recombine
the
Lots
so
that
it
would
only
be
used
or
accessory
purposes
just
like
everybody
else's,
but
we're
just
here
to
answer
any
questions.
M
E
C
E
O
E
Okay
and
we
understand
from
Nick
what
the
rest
of
the
process
is
in
terms
of
your
hearing,
hopefully
on
the
fifth
and
then
your
second
reading,
either
a
week
or
two
after
that,
and
we
appreciate
that
as
soon
as
the
rezoning
Stein
will
apply
for
the
subdivision
and
do
whatever
we
need
to
do
for
the
development
agreement.
Great.
Thank
you.
E
O
O
E
C
Thank
you
all
right,
councilmembers.
We
will
move
on
to
agenda
item
number
four,
which
is
an
update
and
timeline
for
the
city's
2020
2020
for
consolidated
plan
guiding
the
use
of
u.s.
department
of
housing
and
urban
development
funds
follow
up
and
at
the
table
we've
got
been
lucky.
The
council
policy,
analyst
Lonnie
egersund
got
the
director
hand,
Jennifer
Schumann,
the
deputy
director
pan
and
Tony
Miller,
and
the
ham
policy
and
program
manager.
E
H
C
Yeah
I
guess:
let's
go
ahead
and
and
put
those
up
on
the
screen,
so
council
members
would
and
there's
something
on
the
screen.
It's
I
can't
see
all
of
you.
So
if
you
we'll
use
the
hand
tool
to
raise
your
hands
when
there's
something
on
the
in
front
of
all
of
us.
F
N
N
Last
night
the
administration
sent
a
memo
with
responses
to
the
council
members
questions
and
requests
from
the
last
meeting
that
ordinate
or
worded
its
to
the
council
earlier
today,
I
believe
hand.
Staff
is
here
to
walk
through
the
memo,
or
we
could
jump
to
specific
questions.
If
council
members
prefer.
C
I
want
to
just
start
by
thanking
the
mayor
and
staff
and
for
hearing
what
we
said
and
incorporating
it
into
an
update
to
this
plan,
and
so
thank
you
for
doing
that
and
I
do
think
that
there
will
be
some
more
questions
as
we
go
forward
with
the
small
group
meetings
about
maybe
how
they
fit
in,
but
or
how
were
how
we're
fitting
these
in
its
strategies
and
but
I
want
to
give
ample
time
to
ask
questions,
and
so
are
there
any
questions
at
the
outset?
B
All
right,
Thank,
You
mr.
chair
and
again
and
Ben
I'm
you've
been
incredible
through
this
process.
I'm
I
really
appreciate
the
time
to
talk
through
this
last
week.
I
know
that
we
went
way
over
time
and
it
was
very
helpful
to
hear
councils
direction
and
hear
this
conversation.
So
thank
you
for
for
prioritizing
it
and
making
the
time
I'm
some
of
the
things
that
we
heard
I'm
included.
B
How
can
we
think
about
education
as
it
relates
to
early
childhood
education
and
promote
Digital,
Inclusion
and
address
food
insecurities?
These
are
our
goals
that
we
had
in
the
previous
plan
that
fell
out
of
the
2024
plan.
So
what
hand
went
back
and
looked
at
again
with
with
your
Direction
was:
are
there
specific
goals
that
we
can
align
these
under
and
weapon,
and
what
we
looked
at
is
revising
goal
number
three
to
read
differently,
but
still
encompass
the
existing
economic
development
kind
of
activities
but
expanded.
Thank
you
for
scrolling
down
on
the
screen.
B
I
appreciate
that
so
taking
the
goal
of
economic
development
to
expand
access
to
economic
mobility
and
assist
small
business
owners,
adjusting
that
to
really
focus
on
building
resiliency
and
changing
the
gold
build
resiliency
by
providing
tools
to
increase
economic
and/or
housing
stability
under
that
there's,
a
bulleted
list
of
strategies
that
we
could
encompass
again,
providing
a
council
with
a
menu
of
options
that
could
be
utilized
as
we
look
at
applications.
So
the
first
two
are
consistent
with
what
is
existing
in
the
proposed
plan.
B
However,
there's
italicized
words
right
at
the
end
that
says,
council
could
and
again
looking
for
how
can
we
help
provide
some
flexibility
to
this
body
right?
The
council
could
opt
to
deprioritize
the
assistance
during
the
first
two
years,
while
focusing
on
other
economic
development
activities,
while
salt
lake
city
works
to
recover
from
the
current
crisis,
I'm
so
again
just
trying
to
highlight
where
I'm,
where
we
identify
a
space
where
council
could
kind
of
make
some
some
ships
or
or
provide
some
flexibility.
As
you
think
about
your
decisions,
I'm
the
next
bullet.
B
The
last
three
bullet
points
are
in
direct
relation
to
the
conversation
about
providing
early
childhood
education,
Digital,
Inclusion
and
food,
addressing
food
insecurity
for
vulnerable
populations.
Those
are
carryovers
from
the
existing
plan
than
1519
sorry
I
had
to
do
math
and
from
the
current
plan
and
pulling
them
into.
As
you
said,
I'm
into
the
22.
B
Thank
you.
So,
as
we
looked
at
each
of
those,
we
did
reach
out
to
different
groups
to
understand
better.
What
are
the
needs
that
others
are
seeing,
and
how
can
we
I'm
fully
encompass
the
ideas
that
that
the
council
brought
forward
and
identified
as
as
priorities,
so
moving
on
to
number
two,
the
target
areas
and
the
graphic
equities,
small
group
meetings
and
we
certainly
reached
out
and
that
that's
working
on
being
or
we
are
working
on,
coordinating
that
I'm
with
council,
schedulers
and
council
staff.
B
So
I'm
small
group
meetings
coming
soon,
one
of
the
things
that
we
also
heard
as
it
relates
to
the
target
areas.
Though,
and
we
look
through
this
plan
and
as
as
its
presented,
we
we
thought
about,
you
know,
certainly
leveraging
with
RDA
areas
and
hearing
back
from
this
body,
and
we
went
back
to
that
to
say
you
know:
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
provide
some
different
options
for
this
body
to
to
think
about?
B
As
we
talk
about
target
areas,
we
know
there's
not
a
lot
of
CDBG
funding,
that'll
be
limited
to
these
spaces,
but
it
is
important
to
think
about
how
it
impacts
the
community.
So
in
the
memo
we
provided
a
couple
of
different
options
for
council
to
consider
and
a
map,
and
the
map
was
a
pretty
quick
and
dirty
map,
so
I
wanted
to
walk
through
it
just
really
quickly.
B
This
is
really
looking
at
my
school
yeah
beautiful.
So
this
is
really
looking
at
the
density
of
low-income
populations
in
census
tracts
throughout
the
city.
So
you
can
see
that
in
the
center
of
the
kind
of
the
map,
there's
dark
red
and
that
certainly
identifies
that.
Ninety
to
a
hundred
percent
of
the
population
that
lives
there
meets
I'm,
the
80%
or
below
designation
that
HUD
uses
it's
also
overlaid
with
the
RDA
and
project
areas.
So
you
can
see
where
those
income
densities
kind
of
align
with
the
project
areas.
B
B
One
target
area
option
number
one-
is
really
to
just
think
about
like
as
its
proposed
in
the
plan.
That
is
certainly
an
option
I'm.
We
certainly
heard
back
that.
We
wanted
to
think
about
that
a
little
differently,
though
so
the
next
one.
The
next
option
talks
about,
maybe
limiting
or
prioritizing
activities
to
the
newest
RDA
project
areas,
including
State,
Street,
nine-line
and
north
temple,
and
that
would
further
target
funding
to
the
areas
that
maybe
don't
have
the
many
many
years
of
RDA
investment
and
where
we're
looking
to
have
some
rapid.
B
I'm
changes
occur:
option
three
steps
outside
of
the
RDA,
the
existing
RDA
project
areas
and
really
uses
boundaries
to
help
identify
a
potential
option
so
option
three
is
kind
of
a
smaller
area.
An
option
for
is
a
much
larger
area,
so
these
were
just
options
that
we
thought
we
we
could
bring
forward.
That
would
give
the
council,
maybe
some
other
considerations
than
just
simply
looking
at
the
Rd,
the
existing
RDA
project
areas
I'd
like
to
pause
it
there
and
see.
If
there's
any
direct
questions
on
on
that.
B
The
next
part
of
the
memo
talks
about
kovat
relief
funding
and
we're
really
excited
to
be
for
better
for
worse
right
to
be
I'm,
to
be
able
to
access
that's
coming
through
Kovac,
really
funds,
and
we
are
learning
every
single
day
on
what
this
means
and
what
it
looks
like
and
there's
a
separate
designation
for
three
grant:
CDBG
you'll
notice,
the
CV
designations
of
CDBG
cv,
es
j
cv
and
HOPWA
cv.
I'm
there
is
still
a
lot
of
information.
B
That's
coming
out
very,
very
much
so
on
a
day-by-day
basis
about
how
we
can
utilize
these
funds,
and
so
when
we
are
in
hand
we're
looking
working
very
closely
to
identify
what
options,
what
kind
of
flexibility
propose
a
process
follows
HUDs
requirements
and
accessing
these
funds?
We
do
know
that
there
are
waivers
that
are
coming
out
and
even
today
there
was
an
additional
webinar
to
talk
about.
The
waivers
that
aren't
coming
through
and
those
waivers
are
talking
are
really
pushing
towards.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
increase
flexibility?
B
So
more
information
is
coming
out
and
as
we
as
we
are
able
to
wrap
our
heads
around
this
quickly?
Moving
thing-
and
we
will
certainly
be
in
conversation
with
not
only
the
mayor's
office,
but
the
council
as
well
I
think
the
next
question
talks
specifically
about
consolidated
plan
requirements
and
and
whether
or
not
we
can
maybe
reduce
the
plan
itself
and
I'm
here
to
identify
that
we
have.
B
We
have
created
a
proposed
plan
that
meets
all
of
HUDs
requirements
and
if
anyone
wants
to
nerd
out
with
us,
I
gave
you
a
link
that
goes
to
I'm
at
319
page
document
that
talks
about
all
of
the
requirements
and
then
like
I,
have
to
a
little
bit
on
on
the
consolidated
plan.
So
we
have
not
gone
above
and
beyond
the
minimum
requirements
of
the
plan.
We've
certainly
recognized
that
there's
a
lot
of
information
that
HUD
requires
as
we
as
we
evaluate
what
the
needs
are
within
the
community
and
present
to
plan
forward.
E
I
C
P
E
P
B
C
Council
members
other
other
questions
just
on
the
hand,
map
itself
they're
dead,
nuts
or
not
the
end
outfit
here's
my
question:
we're
gonna,
have
a
conversation
about
the
in-between
and
I
think
we've
all
gotten
a
lot
of
enquiries
from
members
of
the
community
about
the
in-between
and
if
we
wanted,
if
the
council
wanted
to
fund
the
in
between
what
we
have
to
find
a
way
to
also
make
that
a
strategy
in
the
health
plan,
or
can
we
have
our
HUD
plan
and
then
we
also
fund
is
this
other
organization?
That's
not
really
in
life.
I'm.
B
B
C
C
B
C
Okay,
well,
just
to
sort
of
and
I
appreciate
the
different
options
that
the
administration
has
has
given
us,
and
there
are
these
different
alternative
plans
and
I
wished.
It
and
Andrew
could
be
here
with
us
to
attempt
to
give
his
input
on
the
alternatives
that
have
been
presented
and
for
me
just
so
that
council
members
know
where
I'm
at
is
that
I
do
really
want
to
focus
on
the
low-income
areas,
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
us
prioritize.
C
I
want
to
do
that.
I
want
to
focus
on
that,
because
I
think
residents
need
to
see
meaningful
improvement
in
their
neighborhoods
in
these
underserved
neighborhoods
and
so
I'm
thinking
about
looking
more
at
the
red
and
orange
areas
or
saying
that
you
know
we'll
tie
them
to
I.
Think
it's
one
of
the
first
I
think
it's
the
first
alternative
saying
it
will
tie
it
to
some
of
the
RTA
areas,
but
I
just
want
island
council
members
to
know
where
I'm
at
and
hopefully
get
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you
and
I.
Think.
I
Also
a
I
think
to
me
the
two
areas
that
are
here
the
option
three
and
four
well
I,
want
to
say:
I
want
to
advocate
for
option
three,
because
it's
my
neighborhood
and
its
district
five,
it
seems
like
it
would
make
more
sense
if
it
was
between
those
two
to
also
include
out
to
redwood
roads.
So
I
I
think
really
in
terms
of
east-west
equity.
I
Just
focusing
on
this
area
between
I-15
and
State
Street
makes
maybe
a
little
less
sense
than
going
out
to
redwood
to
me
just
because
I
think
the
area
between
I-15
and
State
Street
already
will
get
a
lot
of
investment.
So
if
we're
not
going
to
tie
it
to
project
areas,
I
would
I
would
kind
of
think
option
for
seems
a
little
more
equitable
across
the
board.
But
those
are
just
my
initial
thoughts
and
I
didn't
see
it
in
my
email
this
morning,
so
I
just
barely
I'm
looking
at
it
now.
A
K
Inks
I
mean
I,
think
it,
and
it
should
always
be
a
goal
of
ours
to
make
sure
that
any
funding
or
programs
are
being
distributed.
You
know
equitably
and
to
focus
on
our
low
income
and
more
affordable
income
housing,
because
we
know
that
that's
areas
that
we
need
I
just
wanted
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
tying
our
hands
too
tight
behind
our
back
and
part
of
the
idea
of
including
some
of
those
other
goals.
K
How
can
we
incorporate
these
concerns
so
that
we
did
have
flexibility,
flexibility
and
so
I
guess
for
me,
I
would
rather
I
recognize
that
we
kind
of
do
have
to
have
targeted
areas,
but
I
also
think
I,
don't
know,
I
think
that
we
should
just
be
a
little
careful
of,
like
I,
said
tying
our
hands
too
tight
behind
our
back
and
not
giving
us
flexibility,
knowing
that
our
priority
are
going
to
be
in
certain
areas.
But
what
if
there
is
a
great
project
or
a
great
thing
in
two
years
from
now?
K
That's
just
outside
of
one
of
those
targeted
areas
and
then,
but
if
we
had
expanded
to
all
of
the
year,
Artie
Aires
or
all
of
these
things
then
and
we'd
be
able
to
provide
that.
So
I
just
want
to
caution
us
to
make
sure
that
if
there's
a
way
to
create
flexibility,
but
with
the
understanding
that
the
priority
is,
but
we
what
was
just
mentioned,
but
the
chairperson
and
councilmember
mano
that
that
might
be
a
good
idea
as
well.
So
I
don't
have
an
input
as
far
as
which
option
just
saying.
K
C
C
B
B
So
you
could,
for
example,
if
it
was
RDA
areas
just
because
that's
easiest
to
show
this
example
on
you
could
prioritize
for
years,
one
two
and
three
a
specific
area
that
doesn't
mean
that
if,
if
a
project
comes
about
in
a
different
RDA
area
that
it's
completely
off
the
table,
it's
just
you're
going
to
prioritize
the
most
of
the
funding
to
these
specific
areas
that
you'll
identify
and
then
evaluate
anything
else
outside
of
that
on
a
more
annual
basis.
So
that
could
be,
and
that
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
tied
to
RDA
areas.
B
It
could
even
be
if
you're
doing
I'm
a
larger
Wetmore
west
west
side
focused
target
area.
We
can.
We
can
break
that
into
quadrants,
where
we
are
really
focused
in
certain
on
certain
years
in
certain
spaces,
and
that
might
again
help
by
some
flexibility
for
council
to
address
these
kinds
of
questions.
B
C
James
I
need
to
call
you
out,
but
yesterday
our
last
meeting
you
said
something
that
really
resonated
with
me
that
you
said
that
you
know.
North
temple
has
been
an
RDA
area
for
eight
years
now,
and
it's
never
been
worse.
And
how
do
you
feel
about
the.
C
M
Absolutely
think
it's
a
great
start
right
and
I
think
it
for
me:
there's
a
there's
many
components
to
it,
but
this
is
absolutely
one
that
will
help
address
that
there's
other
things
that
we're
you
know
we're
gonna
be
discussing
like
what
we
just
did
in
the
RDA,
with
housing
fact-finding
with
that
increment.
So
there's
a
lot
that
you
know
moving
forward
that
it's
gonna
help
complement
this.
But
this
is
a
number
one
start.
I.
Think:
okay,.
M
C
C
L
A
question-
let's
say:
let's
say
we
like:
we
go
with
Jam
what
you
were
saying:
okay,
we're
gonna
prioritize
certain
areas,
a
match
for
the
RTA,
but
then
we
can,
if
the
project
comes
up
somewhere
else,
that
wasn't
on
our
plan
that
we
told
HUD
and
we
do
it
and
then
all
the
time
we're
doing
a
lot
of
projects
not
in
the
they're
outside
these
areas
will
will
we
get
penalized
by
hard
or
I
mean?
Is
there
any
problems
that
you
could
foresee?
B
What
is
what
is
the
risk
right?
What
is
the
risk
that
that
we
run
afoul
at
federal
regulations?
So
what
HUD
is
going
to
say
is
any
infrastructure
projects
that
we
undertake
have
to
occur
within
the
target
area.
So
if
you
make
the
target
area
a
little
bit
larger
I'm,
and
then
you
say
you
know
I
and
yours,
one
two
and
three
we're
gonna
prioritize
in
these
three
spaces
and
years,
four
and
five
we're
going
to
maybe
then
explore
whether
or
not
we're
done
in
one
two
and
three
and
move
to
four
and
five
right.
B
So
then
it's
not
that
projects
are
happening
outside
of
the
target
area.
It's
just
you're,
even
further,
targeting
inside
the
target
area,
but
you're
able
to
identify
a
large
enough
space
to
where
there's
flexibility
over
those
five
years
to
where,
if
a
amazing
project
comes
up
and
it's
in
an
area
that
isn't
necessarily
a
priority
area,
but
you
feel
strong
enough
about
it,
you
can
still
you
can
still
sorry,
you
can
still
do
the
project
there,
but
recognizing
that
it
wasn't
one
of
the
priority
areas
within
an
already
restricted
area.
Does
that
hope.
L
E
L
B
E
C
And
what
about
in
Amy's
scenario?
How
hard
is
it?
Let's
say:
there's
you
know,
we've
set
these
boundaries
and
then
there's
well,
it's
just
outside
the
boundary
that
I'm,
like
I,
wish
that
we
had
included
it
there
is.
Is
that
part
of
amending
the
plan?
If
it's
something
small
like
not
just
like
a
boundary
adjustment?
Does
that
require
a
lot
of
work?
B
There's
that
question,
though
right
like
there's,
always
going
to
be
a
project
just
outside
there's
always
going
to
be
just
not
quite
enough
funding
in
in
this
case,
it
would
require
an
amendment
of
the
plan
to
be
approved
by
HUD
before
we
can
commit
any
dollars
to
it.
C
All
right,
okay,
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
on
this
part
before
you
move
to
CDBG.
C
C
C
Okay,
so
let's
see
and
how
are
we
doing
this
before
I
was
reading
them
and
then
we
were
asking
questions,
I
think
and
so
I'll
go
ahead,
and
just
do
that
and
again
so
under
on
page
eleven
starting
with
number
one
is
Catholic
community
services,
the
Wiegand
homeless,
Resource
Center
operational
support
and
for
the
day,
shelter,
first
step
house,
on-site,
behavioral
health
assessment
referral
and
peer
support
services
to
individuals
at
the
man's
fellows
Resource
Center,
a
shelter
the
homeless
I
was
requesting
ESG
funding
to
assist
with
the
utilities
for
the
two
new
homeless
resource
centers
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Road,
home
operational
expenses
for
st.
E
L
Do
they
have
they
apply
for
any
rental
assistance
for
their
other
clients?
You
know,
Tony
I
mean
I
I
felt
like
the
last
time.
I
talked
to
them.
They
said
that
they
had
availability
and
in
terms
of
housing,
but
they
did
not
have
enough
funding
to
help
cover
for
this
housing
and
looking
at
the
statistics
on
domestic
violence
month
since
we've
had
this
pandemic,
I
feel
like
this
group
use
that
help,
but
women
that
they
service
they
help
could
use
some
housing.
You
know
to
get
away
from
dangerous
situations
like
domestic
violence.
Yes,.
M
C
H
Was
Jennifer
yeah
she's
having
some
interactivity
issues,
I,
apologized,
I,
think
for
clarity,
councilman,
you
were
asking
about
funding
our
future.
We
we
did
have
an
application
from
YWCA
for
$60,000
under
that
mechanism
and
I
just
I.
Think
I
was
hearing
some
confusion
about
whether
it
was
CDBG
or
funding
our
future.
It
was
funding
our
future,
but.
P
E
M
They
had
a
total
of
like
ninety
seven
thousand
dollars
funding
between
the
tier
and
this
year
we
don't
know
funding
our
futures.
Do
we
know
how
much
is
going
to
be
allocated
to
them?
That
is
part
of
their
20-year
FY
your
four
year,
twenty
I
see
what
you're
saying
I
see
why
I
came
out
to
93.
That
makes
more
sense
to
me
now
I'm
understanding
that
thank
you.
C
Age
13-
and
this
is
homeless,
prevention,
rapid
rehousing
and
I'll.
Just
go
ahead
and
read
these
again
really
quickly:
housing
authority
of
Salt,
Lake,
City,
justice,
individuals
and
families
to
prevent
addiction
through
rental
assistance,
rental
arrears
and
associated
fees.
A
Salt,
Lake,
Community,
Action
DBA
is
Utah
Community
Action
Division
program
support
in
the
form
of
salaries
of
operational
support.
Diversion
is
a
light,
touch
approach
to
working
and
find
safe
alternatives
for
clients
rather
than
entry
into
shelter,
Salt
Lake,
Community,
Action
DBA.
C
C
Number
one
is
housing
authority
at
the
county
of
Salt
Lake;
a
k,
housing
connect,
rental
assistance
for
aqua
eligible
tenants
and
staff
salaries
or
program
administration
second,
and
is
from
Utah
County
action,
program,
salaries
and
operational
support
and
read
at
rental
assistance
for
HOPWA
housing
program.
There
is
the
Utah
AIDS
Foundation
salaried
support
for
case
manager
to
provide
housing
related
case
management
to
people
with
HIV
or
their
household
number
for
Salt
Lake
City
Corporation
to
provide
management
oversight.
Monitoring
of
the
program.
C
E
E
C
Okay,
so
I
know
we
just
got
this
information
recently
and
this
morning,
so
people
may
not
have
had
time
to
review
it,
but
do
people
want
to
read
and
do
we
want
to
have
a
discussion
right
now
about
the
in
between
based
on
what
the
questions
were
that
were
raised
in
our
last
meeting
or
do
council
members
wanted
to
Emily
and
go
through
that
in
small
groups?
What
would
you
not.
C
Wondering
and
I'm
sorry
I
asked
this
last
time
and
that
I
was
wondering
based
on
the
comments
that
were
received
at
the
formal
meeting,
which
was
after
we
asked
the
administration
to
come
back
and
some
information
about
the
in
between.
But
can
we
get
some
additional
information
on
journey
of
hope
and
why
that
was
not
recommended
by
the
committee
for
funding.
C
C
Just
remember,
council
members
that
we,
you
know
there
are
a
couple.
Applicants
are
on
here
that
are
new,
that
we're
fundings
been
recommended
where
we
could
reallocate
some
of
that
and
actively
decide
if,
once
we
just
say
community
in
between
information,
if
we
decided,
we
want
to
provide
the
same
funding
that
we
did
in
previous
years,
which
I
think
was
forty.
C
C3
5800.
Thank
you.
Okay,
any
other
questions
on
CDP
so,
and
this
is
not,
let's
see
our
last.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
the
last
opportunity
to
view
the
straw
polls
on
this
and
then
we'll
be
voting
to
finalize.
C
K
K
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something.
You
said
because
I
remember
going
through
this
my
first
time
and
it
was
confusing
so
for
the
newer
council
members.
It's
I
think
it's
maybe
a
little
bit
clearer
to
say,
move
from
one
program
to
another
program,
because
the
money
in
each
pot
has
to
stay
in
that
pot,
meaning
you
can't
take
CDBG
money
and
over
to
ESG.
You
can't
take
ESG
move
into
hot
watts.
K
E
C
Reminder
within
the
pots
that
it
continue,
so
it's
more
of
like
they.
We
can
move
within
the
pots,
but
they
have
to
be
on
the
same
stove.
So
the
ESG
stove
is
off
limits
to
the
cdbg
stove,
so,
okay,
okay,
any
other
or
any
questions
or
anything
else.
Anybody
wants
out
on
this
Hey
great.
Let's
move
on
to
agenda
item
number
six,
which
is
a
break
and
we're
a
little
bit
early.
So
everybody
gets
a
full
hour
for
dinner
and
then
we
will
reconvene
at
seven
o'clock
for
our.
C
We'll
reconvene
for
our
ordinance
on
shared
housing,
zoning
text,
amendments
or
formerly
SROs,
and
our
information
on
the
chart
of
council
tools
and
for
our
limited
formal
meeting.
So
council
members
we're
going
to
normally
we
we
would
start
a
new
WebEx
meeting
for
a
formal
meeting.
We
won't
be
doing
that
this
time.
C
A
A
A
A
C
C
E
No,
it's
called
shared
housing,
I'm,
sorry
and
it
deletes
single
room
occupancy
from
be
from
the
zoning
code,
and
it
contains
a
section
in
title,
a
title,
titled
accessibility
that
says
all
areas
of
shared
housing
development
shall
be
designed
to
be
universally
accessible,
as
required
by
applicable,
federal
and
state
laws.
That
is
a
result
of
meeting
of
meetings
between
council
members,
Planning,
Division
staff
and
housing
advocates
and
I
I
think
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Nick
Norris,
because
he's
he's
worked
pretty
hard
on
this
thing.
N
Thank
you.
This
is
Nick
I.
Don't
really
have
much
to
add
and
can
entertain
some
questions.
There
is
one
thing
that
I
think
needs
to
be
corrected
in
the
staff
report.
Be
there's
a
discuss.
The
top
paragraph
there's
a
discussion
about
where
the
zoning
districts
are
and
how
many
acres
of
land
are
east
and
west
and
staff
report
mentions
I-15
I
believe
it's
supposed
to
be
I-15,
just
a
quick
clarification
but
other
than
that
I'm
open
to
any
any
questions
that
the
council
has.
J
I
Thanks
yeah
Nick.
First
of
all,
thanks
for
providing
that
clarification,
I
was
confused
about
the
2:15
thing
and
it
didn't
quite
make
sense
so
appreciate
it.
A
couple
things
one,
the
term
universally
accessible
to
me
as
an
architect,
is
confusing,
because
there's
kind
of
two
different
terms
that
are
used
a
lot:
one
is
universal
design
and
one
is
accessible.
Design
and
universal
design
goes
far
beyond
I.
Think
what
was
written
was
deeply
required
by
their
cover.
It's
written,
universal
design
goes
far
beyond
that.
I
So
the
term
universally
accessible
to
me
kind
of
like
makes
me
think
that
I
have
to
go
some
somehow
beyond
the
laws,
as
written
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
confusing
and
I'd
like
to
clarify
the
the
goals
of
that,
because
if
the
goals
are
to
go
above
and
beyond
what
would
be
required
anyway,
then
it
seems
to
me
like
it
needs
to
be
clarified.
I
N
So
that
I
believe
that
term
came
from
HUDs
guidelines
for
universally
accessible
buildings,
and
so
the
intent
was
to
comply
with
the
federal
regulations.
It
wasn't
necessarily
to
go
above
those.
It
was
just
to
make
sure
that
minimum
those
are
complied
with.
Whether
or
not
a
proposal
is
subject
to
the
HUD
requirements.
Funding
or
not.
I
Okay,
I
think
that,
to
me,
that's
not
clear
in
the
ordinance
been
that
it
has
to
be
accessible
and
regardless
of
whether
they're
they're
requesting
HUD
financing,
I
guess
I
would
I
think
that
it
probably
needs
to
be
clarified.
But
I
would
at
least
want
some
response
to
why
it's
written
that
way,
because
it
seems
like
when
it
says
I
should
have
or
but
when
it
says,
to
meet
federal
laws.
That,
to
me
just
sounds
like
IBC
and
eighty-eight
code
would
be
less
than
universal
design.
Yeah.
I
N
Okay,
yeah,
it's
I
mean
we
can
talk
to
the
attorneys
about
how
to
write
it
and
do
that.
But
so
there's
none
requirements
that
apply
and
then
there's
the
Fair
Housing
Act
requirements
that
would
apply
to
every
housing
or
a
certain
number
of
sleeping
rooms
or
dwelling
units,
so
that
that's
kind
of
how
we're
trying
to
deal
with
this
is
that
it's
not
just
one
or
the
other,
there's
multiple
that
can
apply
in
multiple
situations.
So
I'm
happy
to
circle
back
with
with
the
City
Attorney's
Office
and
try
to
figure
out
the
correct
wording.
E
C
L
Just
just
to
go
to
the
things
that
happened.
If
we
change
anything
one
sure
now
we're
gonna
call
them
share
housing
instead
of
single
occupancy
room
right
and
we're
going
to
allow
it
in
more
zones
than
what
we
have.
That
is
that
correct,
there's,
more
sons
now
right
there
are
louder.
Has
it
always
been
like
this?
No.
N
I
think
it's
pretty
much
the
same
but
prior
to
November.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
haven't
expanded.
That
is
that
that
would
be
something
that
we'd
have
to
go
back
through
the
process
with
you
wanted
to
add
new
zoning
districts
and
based
on
the
briefing
in
November
I,
think
the
direction
was
that
let's
move
forward
with
what
we
have
and
then,
if
we
want
to
expand
this
to
other
areas,
that
would
be
a
follow
up
process.
Okay,.
L
N
N
Not
we
are
relying
on
the
the
bulk
and
mass
regulations
of
the
underlying
zoning,
and
that's
primarily
because
this
district,
where
we're
putting
this
forward
Venis
the
most
part,
don't
have
any
kind
of
density
requirements.
Anyways
okay,
exception
of
some
of
the
rme
zones.
But
we
think
this
is
more
in
line
with
multifamily
in
those
zones
which
also
don't
have
the
density
limitations.
So
that
that's
why?
It's
also
one
of
the
reasons
where
we're
gonna.
L
N
L
Right
I
just
hear
I
have
to
reaffirm
my
constituency,
there's
a
group
that
really
wants
them
and
they
want,
like
everybody,
citywide
and
others
that
aren't
happy
as
is
or
not
as
happy,
but
they
prefer
this
method
sergeant
to
see
in
the
future
after
we
get
some
built
out,
see
what
happens
so.
Thank
you.
That's
it.
C
C
H
H
A
E
E
C
E
C
C
C
P
Thank
you
and
Cindy
Lou
will
put
up
the
charge.
Oh
so
basically,
this
this
chart
you've
all
seen
it
before,
but
we
are
just
going
through
it
now
as
a
follow-up
to
what
you
were
talking
about
it,
your
retreat,
in
terms
of
trying
to
make
it
bigger
sorry
in
terms
of
keeping
up
on
all
the
tools
and
the
policies
and
that
type
of
a
thing
so
common
sense
stuff
going
into
the
budget,
though
it
might
be
helpful.
P
So
we
across
the
top
you'll
see
that
the
the
first
set
of
items
are
sort
of
the
resources
and
some
options,
and
then
we've
got
a
line.
That's
a
little
darker
that
separates
intuitive
formal
actions.
So
then
down
the
side
of
the
chart,
we
have
the
number
of
council
members
and
and
what
can
be
achieved
with
one
person,
two
three,
four,
five,
six
and
seven
and
the
shading
is
intended
to
show
sort
of
the
weight
of
what
can
happen
with
more
people.
P
So
I
will
just
start
with
item
the
first
item,
which
is
one
council
member
and
what
they
can
achieve
and
if,
if
you
don't
want
to
go
through
all
of
this,
that's
fine.
Just
stop
me.
Okay,
well,
I
won't
go
into
much
detail,
but
basically,
as
an
individual
council
member,
you
can
suggest
anything.
You
can
inquire
about
anything.
You
can
recommend
anything
request.
Anything
advocate
for
anything.
P
So
so
all
of
these
things
are
overlaid
with
with
the
group
kind
of
your
group
norms
and
your
council
policies,
then,
beyond
that
you
have
the
more
formal
items
and
well
I
guess
I
should
say
if
you
get
two
or
three
people,
there
are
a
few
more
things
that
you
can
do.
You
can
more
time
more
staff
time
if
you
have
more
Council
members
in
the
conversation,
and
you
can
also
begin
to
request
work
on
a
citywide
issue.
You
get
up
to
three
council
members,
then
you
can
ask
to
have
a
the
council.
P
Consider
a
petition
asking
for
some
land-use
action
or
that
type
of
a
thing
and
I
don't
want
to
minimize
what
you
can
do
as
a
as
an
individual,
because
you
can
do
a
lot,
especially
if
what
you're
doing
is
collaborating
with
your
your
peers
on
an
informal
basis
rating
with
the
the
mayor
and
the
department
heads
so
there's
a
lot
you
can
do,
but
in
terms
of
actually
getting
an
appropriation
or
an
ordinance
passed,
then
you
need
to
get
to
four.
So
then
that's
where!
P
Yes,
if
you
could
scoot
it
up
a
little
bit,
you
can
do
really
any
budget
allocation
or
any
ordinance
adoption
with
or
council
members.
The
reason
it's
always
nice
to
have
five,
and
this
does
not
come
up
very
often,
but
it
does
occasionally
that
a
supermajority
of
the
council
are
five
council.
Members
can
override
a
mayoral
veto
and
it
also
tends
to
give
the
public
a
little
more
of
where
the
council
is
coming
from
yeah.
P
You
can
sometimes
read
articles
in
from
the
past
about
a
four
to
three
split
or
four
to
three
book
and
and
really
what
it
means
is
that
it
could
even
be
back
the
next
week
by
someone
on
the
prevailing
side
and
the
boat
could
be
different.
So
the
more
councilmember
you
get,
the
more
effective
it's
more
of
a
solid
situation
that
you
have
created.
P
So,
really
by
the
you
get
to
having
seven
council
members,
it's
it's
detail
proof.
It
sends
an
extremely
clear
message
to
the
to
the
public
about
what
you
are
interested
in.
It
reduces
the
likelihood
that
people
will
will
sort
of
lobby
and
try
to
get
you
to
reconsider
something,
but
there's
nothing
at
all.
That
makes
it
necessary
to
have
seven
people
on
everything
or
six
or
five.
P
But
one
thing
to
remember
is
that
once
you
have
four
people,
you
can
change
the
city
ordinances
so
once
in
a
while,
you'll
you'll
have
the
feedback.
Well,
this
the
ordinance
doesn't
allow
that.
But
if
you
have
for
people
who
are
interested
or
in
a
in
a
briefing
session,
if
you
have
realized
that
there
are
four
people
interested
in
it,
you
can
then
begin
to
be
more
confident
in
the
possibility
of
an
ordinance
change.
P
M
P
Short
I'm,
two
things
come
to
mind.
I
would
say
right
now.
The
tool
for
council
members
to
work
in
a
collaborative
way
with
the
mayor
is
much
more
significant
in
your
toolbox
than
say
it
five
six
four
three
two
years
ago,
just
based
on
the
rapport
that
you
have
and
the
way
things
have
started
out
with
the
new
administration.
P
So
so
that
would
be
told
that
you
would
of
course
want
to
take
advantage
of,
for
you
know,
be
especially
aware
of
the
council
has
evolved
to
be
much
more
proactive
and
it
started
many
many
years
ago
with
Dale
Lambert
when
he
was
on
the
council,
and
he
was
pointing
out
why?
Why
is
alleged?
Would
we
be
just
reacting,
and
so
the
council
has
progressively
become
more
proactive
at
the
requests
and
interests
of
council
members.
So
you'll
see
that
council
members
now
initiate
things
much
more
often
and
that
type
of
thing
you're
smiling
Chang's.
P
So
so
you
can
initiate
things
and
we
now
have
more
tools
in
place
or
more
knowledge
about
how
to
do
that,
as
opposed
to
waiting
for
a
transmittal
to
come
from
whichever
mayor
is
in
office
and
then
the
council
acting
on
it
and
like
they
don't
have
other
choices.
Besides
saying
yes
or
no
to
that
proposal,
there
are
always
other
choices.
M
P
C
Welcome
to
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
limited
formal
meeting,
if
you're
just
tuning
in
our
meeting
remotely
due
to
the
declarations
of
emergency.
We
first
met
earlier
at
2
o'clock
p.m.
and
as
the
Redevelopment
Agency
Board,
followed
by
us,
changing
our
hats
and
meeting
as
the
city
for
a
work
session
to
discuss
some
briefing
items.
We're
now
convening
for
a
limited,
formal
meeting,
which
means
that
this
is
not
a
standard,
formal
meeting
agenda.
Tonight.
C
The
council
needs
to
consider
action
on
only
one
agenda,
a
resolution
that
would
extend
May
the
mayor's
March
18th
proclamation,
declaring
a
local
emergency
relating
to
a
magnitude
5.7
earthquake.
Therefore,
since
this
is
the
only
eye
council
to
take
action
on
tonight
there-
and
there
is
no
other
council
business-
there
will
be
no
public
comment
opportunity.
The
next
opportunity
for
public
comment
will
be
at
the
councils,
Tuesday
April
24th
formal
meeting
at
p.m.
also.
C
The
council
always
welcomes
your
comments
by
mailing
us
at
P,
o
box,
one
four,
five
or
seven,
six
Salt
Lake
City
Utah,
eight
four
one,
one,
four,
five,
four,
seven
six
or
you
can
email
us
at
council
comments
at
SLC,
gov
calm
or
by
calling
our
24-hour
comment
line.
Eight,
oh
one,
five,
three,
five:
seven,
six.
Five.
All
agenda
related
comments
received
through
any
source,
are
shared
with
the
council
and
added
to
the
council's
public
meeting
record
within
24
hours.
Following
the
council
meeting
for
instructions
to
guide
you
on
how
to
practice.
C
Excuse
me
participate
electronically
in
any
of
our
WebEx
meetings.
Please
visit
SLC
council
comm
or
call
up
eight,
oh
one,
five,
three,
five
7600!
Thank
you
and
we'll
just
move
right
into
it.
We'll
skip
items
a
through
D
and
move
to
Section
E,
which
is
our
new
business,
and
that
is
a
resolution
that
would
extend
the
mayor's
March
18th
proclamation.
Declaring
a
local
emergency
relating
to
a
magnitude.
5.7,
earthquake
and
I
will
look
for
a
motion.
Mr.
K
C
H
C
Thank
you,
Katie
I
was
I.
That
was
my
hesitation,
but
I
saw
that
there
was
a
an
alternative
one,
but,
oh
sorry,
I
misread
it.
So
I'm
councilmember
Fowler.
Do
you
want
to
specify
a
time
how.
E
B
C
L
Sorry,
it's
this
extension
so
that
folks,
that
have
time
until
April
22nd
to
provide
information
about
the
earthquake
was
that
they
had
with
their
homes
and
now
they
give
that
to
the
county
in
accounting,
a
state
state
gives
to
FEMA.
So
this
is
why
we're
extending
this
all
the
way
till
July
6?
Yes,.
C
And
that's
my
understanding
and
my
understanding
is
also
bad
and
yeah.
By
extending
it
it
gives
us
it
puts
us
in
a
better
position
to
request
FEMA
funds
and
that
we
have
to
extend
it
for
a
lengthy
period
of
time
because
of
the
multiple
levels
of
government,
but
also
because
of
the
delay
that
we're
all
experiencing
because
of
the
other
emergency
or
experiencing
so,
but
also.
My
understanding
is
that
this
isn't
going
to
interfere
with
any
any
normal
operations
that
there's
there's
no
legal
downside.
That's
continuing
it
for
that
length
of
time.
Okay,.