►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Work Session - 9/7/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Going
to
today's
city
council
meeting
to
help
reduce
the
transmission
of
covid19,
we've
returned
to
holding
our
meetings.
Virtually
this
return
to
online
meetings
follows
an
increase
in
copen,
19
cases
and
updated
mass
requirements,
we're
closely
monitoring
the
situation
and
the
council
will
return
with
hybrid
or
in-person
meetings
when
appropriate
and
safer
for
the
public
and
city
employees.
B
As
many
of
you
know,
there's
no
public
comment
during
a
work
session.
However,
please
join
us
remotely
for
the
7
pm
formal
meeting
tonight
to
share
any
any
comments.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcome
and
you
can
share
with
the
city
council
anytime
by
mailing
us
po
box,
145476
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council.comments.slcgov.com.
B
So
I'm
going
to
turn
this
directly
over
to
I
see
the
mayor,
I'm
sorry
mayor,
I
don't
know
if
rachel
is
here
or
lisa,
but
we're
going
to
just
turn
it
straight
over
to
you.
C
The
whole
crew
is
here,
but
I'll
speak
to
you.
First
give
you
a
covet
update
and
a
little
bit
about
eviction,
moratorium,
expiration
and
rental
and
rent
a
rear
funds
that
are
available,
then
andrew's
going
to
give
you
an
update
on
homelessness
and
then
chief
brown
on
policing.
Does
that
sound?
Okay?
Mr
chair
great,
thank
you.
Let's
go
to
that
first
slide
and
the
next
slide
I
mean.
C
C
Here's
the
that
student
case
data
that
is
on
the
salt
lake
county
covet
dashboard.
You
can
look
by
district
and
of
course,
next
week
will
be
the
30-day
point
since
that
mask
mandate
went
in
place
for
or
the
next
meeting
prior
to
that
30-day
expiration
for
the
council
to
consider
an
extension
of
the
mask
requirement.
C
This
is
the
same
data
that
you
and
I
and
everyone
in
the
public
has
access
to
from
salt
lake,
county
health
department
and
18
of
the
37
schools
in
our
district
have
cases
and
those
cases
all
together,
total
36
students
over
the
last
14
days
so
that
18
number
for
salt
lake
city
school
district
behind
the
36.
Our
case
is
older
than
14
days
so
36
in
the
last
two
weeks,
I'll
just
make
mention
that
we
have
21
000
students
or
so
in
salt
lake
city.
School
district
murray
has
6
000
about
6
500.
C
1100
school-aged
child
cases
right
now
and
617
just
since
friday.
These
the
data
is
just
coming
out
from
the
long
weekend
and
a
lot
of
a
pretty
tremendous
growth
over
the
rate
of
last
year.
This
is
a
slide,
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
from
salt
lake
tribune.
The
gray
line
is
this
time
last
year.
The
blue
line
is
where
we're
at
today.
C
C
So
those
funds,
as
they
have
been
throughout
the
pandemic
from
salt
lake
city,
are
available
through
community
action
program,
dial
211
go
to
rentrelief.utah.gov
and
there's
they
are
multilingual
in
their
ability
to
help
connect
people
with
the
funds
they
need,
and
as
always,
we
just
encourage
people
to
not
wait.
Don't
wait
if
you
know
that
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
cover
your
rent,
get
on
it
as
fast
as
you
can
and
connect
with
this
8.2
million.
That's
out
there
through
december
31st
and
we've
already
funded
8.2
million
into
the
community.
C
So
thanks
to
our
housing
stability
folks
for
creating
this
great
graphic,
we'd
love
to
share
it
with
you,
council
members.
If
it
would
be
helpful
for
your
newsletters-
and
this
is
the
last
slide
before
andrew
johnston-
talks
to
you
about
homelessness.
If
there's
any
questions
for
me,
I'm
happy
to
take
them.
C
D
Thanks
mayor
next
slide,
this
is
the
the
typical
update
on
the
capacity
at
their
resource
centers
for
adults,
and
you
can
see
it's
up
above
91
on
average
for
all
three
of
them.
This
data
is
about
a
week
old
due
to
the
holiday
yesterday,
it
takes
state
a
little
longer
to
process
the
the
data,
so
we'll
have
probably
a
couple
weeks
for
you
next
week
when
we
meet
again
next
slide.
D
The
one
thing
that's
new
this
year
is
a
fall
point
in
time.
Count:
there's
a
federal
mandate
to
do
a
point
in
time
count
every
year
and
generally
it's
in
january,
during
the
winter
time
due
to
covid
and
the
impact
that
had
on
doing
that
count
this
year.
It
did
happen,
but
not
the
same
way.
We
typically
do.
There
was
a
great
desire
on
the
state
level
to
get
more
information
as
much
as
we
could
this
year,
so
doing
a
special
one
september
10th
this
friday,
it's
from
3
a.m
to
6
a.m.
D
It's
run
by
volunteers,
so
anybody
can
sign
up
online
or
contact
us.
We
can
put
you
in
touch
with
the
right
people
and
you
go
out
in
teams
and
you
meet
with
folks
and
get
information
about
them,
and
we
do
a
literal
count
of
everybody
who
is
homeless
on
the
streets.
This
also
includes
folks
in
the
shelters
and
other
resource
centers
to
include
a
whole,
a
full
picture
of
who's
out
there
this
time
of
year-
and
the
next
slide
has
some
more
information
on
that
particular
event
this
week.
D
D
I
want
to
also
bring
up
a
couple
things.
The
mayor
talked
about
the
latest
numbers
for
the
covid
impact
and
that's
also
impacting
the
unsheltered
and
sheltered
community,
and
so
in
coordination
with
salt
lake
county,
the
health
department
in
the
county
there's
a
lot
of
work
by
by
the
salt
lake
valley
coalition
and
the
shelter
opera,
the
resource
center
operators
to
ensure
there's
ongoing
testing
immunizations
outreach
to
folks
and
also
there's
a
lot
of
coordination
right
now
on
quarantine
and
isolation
needs.
We
had
a
full.
D
We
as
a
system
had
a
lot
of
beds
last
winter
to
handle
that
and
when
it
decreased
the
need
decreased.
It
wasn't
financially
feasible
to
keep
all
those
empty
beds
going
indefinitely,
so
looking
to
ramp
up
more
options
going
forward
right
now
in
the
fall,
as
we
see
an
increase
in
in
rates
both
in
the
hospitals
and
outside
the
last
piece
is
talking
about
overflow.
D
We
are
talking
multiple
times
per
week
amongst
all
the
partners,
the
government
and
the
nonprofits
to
talk
through
plans,
what
they're
seeing
what
options
they
have
available
and
there
are
actual
applications
going
in
next
week
to
the
state
for
their
gopb
funds,
which
are
a
state
match
program.
So
those
efforts
are
going
forward
and
we'll
have
more
updates,
as
we
have
more
information
for
you
all.
B
D
If
not
y'all
know
where
to
find
me
anyway
and
feel
free
to
reach
out,
and
we
can
update
you
as
much
as
we
can.
B
Thanks
andrew,
I
appreciate
you
mayor
for
being
here,
so
we're
going
to
turn
it
over
to
chief
brown,
correct.
E
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
thank
you
council
for
your
time
this
afternoon.
If
I
could
get
our
slide,
deck
pulled
up
real,
quick
thanks,
taylor
council
today.
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
calls
for
service
and
where
we're
at
hold
on
that
slide.
Real,
quick
2020
with
everything
it
brought
earthquakes,
pandemics,
protests,
everything
that
we
encountered,
people
being
quarantined
less
traffic
on
the
roads.
E
The
one
thing
that
we
saw
is
that
calls
for
service
went
up
19,
for
whatever
reason
someday
some
criminologists
will
probably
explain
that
to
us,
but
we
know
that
during
that
time
we
responded
on
19
over
19
000
calls
for
service
compared
to
the
three-year
average
and
as
we
move
into
2020,
that
pace
has
not
slowed
our
top
calls
for
service
council.
As
we
break
this
down
a
little
bit.
We
want
to
talk
about
the
divisions
and
the
calls
for
service
in
august
of
2021.
E
the
pioneer
division
that
includes
districts,
one
and
two,
our
central
patrol
division
includes
districts,
three
and
four
and
liberty.
Division
is
five
six
and
seven.
The
reason
we
have
three
different
divisions
is:
it
gives
geographic
accountability
and
allows
our
police
administrators
our
captains
to
work
with
their
staff
and
problem
solve
from
our
an
organic,
organic
community-based
issues
that
they're
dealing
with
next
slide.
Please.
E
So
this
is
the
pioneer
division
august
2021
calls
for
service
those
locations.
The
address
those
are
the
top
three
calls
for
service
that
we
responded
to
in
august
of
2021..
The
7-eleven
on
960
westmore
temple
is
the
first
and
you
can
see
that
we
responded
on
37
calls
for
service.
That's
that's
down,
though.
Three
from
from
july
the
number
two
area
or
business
that
we
responded
to
was
2025
900
west,
which
is
the
flying
jake
truck.
Stop.
E
E
at
the
7-11
during
july.
The
unwanted
trespass
calls
for
service
decreased
from
15
to
nine.
That's
a
good
thing.
The
number
one
calls
for
call
for
service
at
the
7-eleven
was
a
drug
problem.
During
august,
one
business
along
red
red
road
had
a
200
percent
increase
in
calls
for
service
from
july
to
august
of
2021.
E
They
totaled
15.,
but
as
we
go
through
our
compstat
model
and
look
at
calls
for
service,
one
of
the
things
is
to
figure
out
why
or
not
to
just
keep
going
to
call
to
call
to
call
but
to
figure
out
and
solve
why
we're
going
there
detective
oliver,
who
is
the
dc
lo
fourth,
pioneer
found
that
this
location
had
an
expired
trespassing
agreement
and
so
he's
working
on
updating
that
that
allows
our
officers
to
enforce
trespassing
onto
that
property
when
they're,
not
when,
when
the
property
owners
are
not
there
next
slide,
please
moving
to
central
division
again
for
august
of
2021.
E
E
We
went
on
71
77
calls
for
service,
which
again
is
down
three
from
july
and
then
the
motel
six
at
six
south
and
about
200
west
we
went.
We
responded
on
36
calls
for
service,
which
again
is
down
one
from
july,
but
the
geraldine
king
women's
center
had
a
60
decrease
in
the
number
of
cell
9-1-1
hang-up
calls
and
harassment
from
july
to
august
of
2021.
We'll
look
in
to
see
what
what
we
were
doing
to
to
help
decrease
those
calls
for
service
and
working
with
their
staff.
E
The
voa
resource
center
had
a
a
133
increase
in
trespass,
unwanted
calls.
From
july
to
august
of
2021.,
we
have
identified
two
people
as
the
primary
suspects
for
these
calls
of
service
salt
lake
city
is
working
on
a
strategy
to
help
those
people
that
keep
calling
or
the
you
know.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
that
call
and
call
and
call,
and
rather
than
just
go
and
respond,
we're
looking
for
ways
to
solve
the
issue
and
not
have
to
go
on
those
calls
next
slide.
E
E
That's
up
38
from
july
of
2021,
but
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind:
walmart
does
hire
off
to
the
often
police
officers
to
take
those
those
shoplifting
calls
and
different
issues
that
we
address
there
palmer
court
at
999,
south
main
in
august
we
responded
98
times,
that's
up
36
times
from
july,
and
then
the
jefferson
school
apartments
on
west
temple
63
times
in
august.
That's
down
three
from
july
walmart,
like
I
said
they
had
an
84
84
increase
in
shoplifting.
The
calls
for
service
compared
to
july
of
2021..
E
That's
substantial
and
we'll
look
in
to
see
what
that
might
be,
but
just
again
remember
they
do
hire
off
to
the
officers
to
be
there.
Palmer
court
had
had
over
200
200
percent
increase
in
family
fight,
dv
fight
calls
for
service
compared
to
july
of
2021..
E
Again,
that's
something
that
we'll
be
working
with
them
and
their
staff
to
see.
If
we
can
address
and
then
one
additional
note,
one
business
in
the
area
of
900
east
21st
cell,
they
called
at
least
15
times
in
25
days
about
a
trespasser,
the
subject
or
this
individual
has
been
formally
trespassed,
but
continues
to
return.
We're
working
with
a
strategy
with
that
business
to
prevent
this
person
from
from
coming
back
onto
the
property
and
then
having
to
respond
to
those
calls
for
service
next
slide.
E
Now
we
track
these
calls
for
service
week
by
week,
and
last
week
from
august
30
to
september
5th,
was
week
35.
the
calls
for
service,
that's
anybody
that
called
a
citizen
or
business
to
9-1-1
or
our
non-emergency
number
of
799-3000.
E
E
That's
444
calls
for
service
that
we
responded
to
last
week
now,
if
you
project
that
out
for
the
year
will
be
or
exceed
the
pace
of
2020
in
our
calls
for
service
that
will
be
over
20
000
calls
for
service
that
we
have
responded
to
which
again
is
the
trend
that
we're
seeing
consistent
with
20
and
20
20
20..
Also,
the
one
thing
that
happens
is
officers
go
call
to
call
to
call
their
on-view
time
or
their
ability
to
go
out
and
handle
on-view
calls.
E
And
then
this
this
kind
of
breaks
it
down.
What
are
we
going
on
here
are
the
top
five
calls
for
the
week
of
the
week
35,
which
was
just
last
week.
The
number
one
call
that
we
go
on
is
an
assist
for
another
agency.
That
would
be
an
assist
for
fire
or
for
another
pd
transient
related
problems
is
second
that
would
be
any
transient.
E
Go
on
every
one
of
those
calls
suspicious
circumstances.
That
would
be
someone
a
person,
a
car,
a
lot
of
times.
People
are
looking
at
ring,
doorbells
or
different
video,
and
they
see
somebody
walk
across
their
front
yard
or
through
their
backyard
again
they're
calling
and
we're
responding
to
those
and
then
the
last
is
the
citizen,
motor,
assist
or
towing,
and
that's
just
exactly
what
you
would
think
would
be.
Anybody
that
needs
help
on
the
roads
are
calling
for
police
assistance.
E
So
with
that
being
said,
that's
kind
of
down
in
the
weeds
about
what
we're
doing
with
calls
for
service
and
what
we're
trying
to
track.
But
remember
the
thing
we're
trying
to
do
is
solve
these
issues
so
that
we
don't
have
to
keep
going
on.
These
calls
called
you
know
over
and
over
and
over
working
with
the
business
owners
and
different
non-profits
to
see
if
we
can't
resolve
the
issues
before
we
have
to
go
so
with
that
counsel.
I'll,
take
any
questions.
If
you
have
any.
F
Thanks
chief
brown,
I
just
wanted
to
say
first
say:
thank
you.
That's
a
really
interesting
information.
I
have
actually
a
lot
of
questions.
I'm
wondering
if
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
just
sit
down
on
a
small
group
meeting
or
something
to
dig
into
a
few
more
questions,
but
for
one
that
I'd
like
to
just
ask
now
is:
are
these
so
with
the
calls
for
service?
F
My
my
question
that
I
keep
coming
back
to
in
my
mind
and
what,
when
I've
talked
to
some
residents
in
different
parts
of
the
city,
I've
heard
is
that
there's
some
people
that
don't
want
to
make
calls
for
service
and
others
that
are
more
more
comfortable,
calling
the
police
department,
and
so
is
there
any
metric
to
know?
Like
actual,
are
there
other
data's
that
aren't
data
points
that
aren't
just
calls
for
service?
F
That
will
tell
us
how
many
resources
we
need
to
allocate
to
different
neighborhoods,
and
I
guess
the
point
I'm
getting
is,
I
think,
there's
my
worries
that
there
may
be
some
neighborhoods
that
do
need
police
presence
or
do
need
resources,
but
but
the
members
of
that
community
don't
feel
comfortable,
engaging
with
police
and
I'm
thinking
potentially
undocumented
areas
with
more
undocumented
individuals,
or
things
like
that
is
there.
Are
there
other
data
points
we
can
also
just
match
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
only
using
one.
F
It
just
strikes
me
that
the
input
of
calls
for
service
may
be
a
bit
flawed,
especially
when
you
talk
about
that
one
instance
of
a
certain
person
that
called
like
87
times
in
a
month
yeah,
and
if,
though,
if
that's
being
rolled
up
into
our
data,
is
there
any
other
way?
We
can
just
make
sure
that
there's
not
outliers.
We
need
to
sort
through
kind
of
like
that.
One
does
that
make.
E
Sense,
yeah,
council
member
model.
That's
a
great
that's
a
great
question.
I
think
the
the
data
that
I
presented
to
you
is
just
the
calls
for
service
calling
our
dispatch
center,
but
you
got
to
remember,
there's
also
online
reporting
and
there's
the
ability
to
be
anonymous.
Now
somebody
may
be
afraid
to
call
the
police,
but
they
can
al
also
remain
anonymous,
so
that
or
if
they
want
personal
contact,
they
can
request
it
by
phone.
E
But
to
your
last
point
to
overcome
that
fear
of
calling
the
police
that's
going
to
take
some
time,
it's
going
to
take
some
work.
We
need
to
build
those
relationships
and
trust
to
let
them
know
that
they
can
call
us
we
would.
We
were
not
interested
in
their
status,
we're
interested
in
their
crime
and
then
we
need
to
we.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
they
feel
safe
in
in
calling
us
for
service.
E
So
I
would
welcome
further
conversations
to
really
we
can
dig
into
this
a
lot
more,
but
thanks
for
those
questions
and
and
I'll
look
into
those
things
as
well.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
chief
for
the
information
I,
for.
I
think
people
are
aware
at
least
council
members
that
we
had
a
the
mayor
had
a
press
conference
this
morning
at
pioneer
park
in
light
of
the
recent
incidents
that
we
had
there
and
we
had
in
in
other
areas
of
town,
and
I
just
wanted
just
to
hear
like
the
mini
version
of
that
presentation,
or
at
least
or
maybe
I
can
just
ask
you
the
question.
G
What
in
this,
you
have
a
central
division
for
three
and
four
and
if,
if
there's
going
to
be
increased
patrolling
around
pioneer
park
in
that
area
of
town,
neighbors
have
texted
me
and
asked
me
about
that,
because
they
weren't
they're
waiting
for
the
news
to
for
the
for
the
tv
to
show
the
channel
to
show
that
press
conference,
and
also
you
know
also.
I
have
complaints
that
you
know
that
that,
even
if
they
called
it
takes
too
long
and
so
on
and
so
on,
for
the
officers
to
respond.
G
So
in
light
of
what's
been
happening,
the
last
couple
of
weeks
last
month.
What
are
we
going
to
change
around
pioneer
park
in
terms
of
policing?
Thanks.
E
E
Look
we're
doing
great
we're
hiring,
and
we
appreciate
the
council's
support
and
especially
in
the
mayor's
support,
and
especially
with
those
raises,
because
that's
been
great,
but
every
week
we
respond
to
anywhere
from
200
to
250
calls
for
service
that
are
related
to
three
people
that
are
experiencing
homelessness,
that
can
be
trespassing,
unwanted
persons.
E
Things
like
that
with
the
additional
calls
for
service
that
we're
experiencing
out
in
patrol
our
officers
are
going
call
to
call
we
talk
about
doing
the
star
pattern,
they're
going
all
over
the
city,
they're
not
really
having
the
time
to
dedicate
to
their
beats.
So
what
we've
done
through
mayor
mendenhall's
ccp
program
is
we've
done
an
extensive
crime
or
a
camp
relocation
and
crime
mitigation.
E
So
we
we've
allowed
officers,
24
7
to
be
in
those
areas
in
those
locations
to
increase
their
presence,
and
so
that
will
include
the
area
down
around
seven,
south
and
state,
but
also
down
around
rio
grande
and
immediately.
When
that
situation
arose.
On
saturday
we
expanded
the
boundaries
of
the
rio
grande
focus
area
and
officers
since
then
have
been
spending
much
more
time
in
that
area.
So
what
community
will
see
is
more
officers
in
those
areas
working
to
to
increase
public
safety
and
prevent
crime.
B
Any
other
questions
for
chief
brown.
Yes,
I
have
a
question:
okay,
council
member,
first
chief,
similar
what
council
member
baldomoros
asked
have
we
considered
and
honestly
I
don't
know.
H
That
you
can
answer
this
here
and
now,
but
something
to
consider
for
a
future
briefing
that,
because
of
our,
we
did
the
press
conference
this
morning
in
pioneer
park.
We
all
acknowledge
that
there
have
been
significant
issues
in
lots
of
parks
throughout
the
city.
Have
we
considered,
although
the
we've
pulled
a
lot
of
officers
to
be
more
call
responsive?
F
Patrol
assignments,
so
that
we've
got
something
a
little
bit
more.
E
Yeah,
council,
member
paris,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
being
there
this
morning
as
well
for
your
support
yeah.
As
the
council
knows,
we
have
three
bike
squads,
one
for
liberty,
one
for
central
one
for
pioneer
and
then
the
fourth
is
a
park
bike
squad
because
of
the
backlog
and
calls
for
service.
We've
we've
taken
those
squads
and
asked
them
to
help
with
the
911
calls
with
the
799-3000
non-emergency
calls
to
see.
E
If
we
can't
clear
up
any
backlog
that
may
be
out
there
and
then
once
that
backlog
is
manageable,
then
they
go
about
their
project
areas
and
their
the
different
air
zones
and
areas
and
parks
that
they
that
they
really
work.
So
the
park
squad
does
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
the
parks.
E
But
it's
a
balance.
You
have
to
find
that
balance
right
now
and
until
our
staffing
comes
up
and
I'm
hoping
in
the
next
couple
months,
we'll
really,
we
will
really
see
an
influx
that
will
allow
us
to
put
those
those
bike
officers
back
into
the
parks
into
the
communities
that
they
need
to
be.
But
we
are,
they
are,
are
working
they're
still
working
on
a
balanced
schedule.
B
Patrol
sorry,
councilmember
dugan,
I
can't
see
you
so
I
don't
know
if
you've
got
a
question
or
not
nope
you're,
good,
okay,
thanks
so
much
chief
for
being
here
andrew
johnston
and
the
mayor,
I
know
you'll
probably
stick
around
in
case
other
questions.
Come
up.
We're
gonna,
move
on
to
item
number
two
updates
on
racial
equity
and
policing.
We
have
allison
roland,
who
is
our
council
office
policy
analyst
here
to
discuss
that
with
us.
I
J
You
about
that
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
process
to
both
formalize
the
rep
commission
as
a
permanent
commission
for
the
city
and
doing
the
the
advice
and
consent
votes
for
the
current
commission
members.
So
last
august
24th,
whenever
that
was
the
last
meeting
we
had,
you
were
briefed
on
the
commission
ordinance
from
coletta
lynch,
the
chi,
the
city's
chief
equity
officer,
and
today
you
will
have
the
rep
commission
ordinance
on
the
unfinished
business
agenda
in
the
formal
session
to
consider
for
adoption.
J
J
J
Is
pretty
much
accepted
by
everyone,
and
so
that
we'll
just
go
straight
ahead
on
september
21st
to
the
advice
and
consent
for
these
members
on
that
evening.
Did
that
all
make
sense.
B
It
did
to
me
allison,
so
if
there
aren't,
if
it
didn't
council
members,
please
speak
up.
J
Okay,
so
the
in
the
chair
and
vice
chair
in
deciding
not
to
do
the
interviews
was
also
very
concerned
about
not
delaying
the
commission
to
get
up
and
operating
under
their
new
form.
So
we
raised
the
idea
of
inviting
commissioners
in
over
the
next
several
months
to
either
share
information
or
for
council
and
the
commissioners
to
get
to
know
each
other,
but
that
was
the
reason
is
there's
no.
J
First
of
all,
as
allison
said,
they've
already
been
doing
the
work,
but
second
of
all,
if
we,
if
we
held
up
all
of
the
appointments
in
order
for
you
to
have
time
to
interview
them,
it
would
take
it.
You
know
several
weeks,
so
that
was
the
thinking.
B
Thanks
for
that
cindy
that
added
bit
that's
very
helpful.
I
messed
up
and
did
not
give
rachel
otto
an
opportunity
to
speak
from
the
administration,
so
we're
gonna
just
go
back
to
item
number
one
quickly
and
give
rachel
an
opportunity.
K
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
actually
just
needed
to
correct
something
that
that
I
mixed
up
on
the
previous
slides
that
we
showed
you
and
just
want
to
clarify
that,
while
the
cdc
this
is
regarding
the
eviction
moratorium
and
while
the
cdc
had
originally
intended
for
that
eviction,
moratorium
to
stay
in
place
until
october
3rd,
the
supreme
court
subsequently
decided
that
the
moratorium
ended
at
the
end
of
july.
K
So
there's
been
a
little
confusion
in
the
in
the
intervening
time,
because
the
supreme
court
didn't
decide
that
until
the
end
of
august,
so
there's
a
there's,
a
question
as
to
whether
tenants
have
been
covered
until
the
end
of
august
and
then
there
have
been
just,
I
think,
a
lot
of
confusion
around
when
the
date
actually
is.
But
as
we
get
closer
to
that
october
third
deadline
that
was
originally
in
people's
minds.
K
I
think
we
are
expecting
to
continue
to
see
evictions
increase
and
the
message
of
course
remains
that
we
still
have
rental
assistance
available
for
people
and
hope
that
they
can
seek
assistance
sooner
than
later.
So
just
wanted
to
clarify
those
dates.
I
apologize
for
that
error.
B
J
B
Yep,
I
just
saw
a
couple
hands,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
was
just
them
scratching
their
faces,
or
is
everybody
good
to
move
on
we're
good
to
move
on?
Okay
item
number:
three:
we're
going
to
move
on
to
potential
ordinance
for
a
rezone
and
master
plan,
amendment
at
554
and
560,
south
300
east.
B
J
All
right,
thank
you,
sir.
As
you
said,
this
is
a
briefing
about
a
proposal
to
amend
the
property
at
554
and
560
south
300
east,
from
ro
to
rmu
and
to
amend
the
central
community
future
land
use
map.
These
proposed
amendments
are
intended
to
allow
retail
service
uses
on
the
property
in
addition
to
office
uses.
L
Thanks
nick
and
I
don't
nick,
do
you
have
the
presentation?
Oh
great
looks
like
taylor's
pulling
it
up
here.
L
Great
so
mario
worthlin,
with
representing
the
property
owner,
is
requesting
an
amendment
to
the
future
to
the
master
plan's
future
land
use
map
and
zoning
map
on
the
properties
located
at
approximately
554
and
560
south
300
east.
The
proposal
is
to
amend
the
master
plan
and
re-zone
the
two
properties.
L
L
Great
the
properties
are
currently
located
in
the
residential
office.
Zoning
district
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
the
site
to
residential
mixed
use
or
rmu
staff
has
found.
The
proposed
rezone
to
rmu
meets
the
intent
of
the
district,
which
is
appropriate
in
places
where
the
creation
of
a
walkable
urban
neighborhood
with
pedestrian
scale
activity
is
supported
with
both
transit
and
automobile
infrastructure
and
next
slide.
Taylor.
L
The
proposal
also
includes
an
amendment
to
the
central
community
master
plan's
future
land
use
map
from
residential
office.
Mixed
use
to
high
mixed
use.
Staff
has
also
found
that
amending
these
sites
from
residential
office,
mixed
use
to
high
mixed
use
is
appropriate
in
the
master
plan,
as
the
central
community
master
plan
high
next
use
designation
allows
for
medium
to
high
density,
residential
and
higher
intensity
commercial
types
of
uses.
L
L
The
site
is
also
within
the
east.
Downtown
neighborhood
plan
within
this
neighborhood
plan
is
a
view
corridor
and
height
limitation
map
to
protect
the
view
corridor
for
the
state,
capitol
building
the
cathedral
of
the
madeleine
and
the
city
and
county
building.
The
subject
sites
are
within
the
75
foot,
height
limitation
recommendation.
L
Overall
staff
has
found
that
the
petition
amendments
meet
the
standards
and
criteria
that
are
listed
in
title
21a
and
recommends
that
the
city
council
follow
the
recommendation
of
planning
commission
to
approve
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments,
and
I
think
I
saw
marielle's,
was
present
in
this
meeting
as
well,
and
I
believe
that
she's
prepared
for
any
questions
that
you
might
have
for
her
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
the
council
might
have
for
me.
M
Could
you
go
through
the
parking
requirements
for
the
different
areas?
The
rmu
is
it
at
a
lower
minimum
higher
minimum
maximum
compare
the
current
zone.
L
So
the
ro
district
or
residential
requires
more
parking
spaces
per
residential
unit.
I
believe
the
rmu,
the
number
of
required
spaces
is
reduced
by
half
just
off
the
top
of
my
head,
so
there
is
that
reduction
in
parking
in
the
rmu
district.
I
believe,
overall,
they
are
very
similar
parking
standards,
otherwise.
B
I
do
have
one
question:
it's
probably
more
directed
towards
nick
norris,
our
planning
director,
and
that
is,
I
don't
even
know
how
long
ago
it
was
nick,
but
we
just
rezoned,
I
want
to
say
within
the
past
18
months
it
could
have
been
longer
a
piece
of
property
on
500
south
as
well
from
office
to
I
believe
mixed
use.
I
think
that
was
through
james
alfondre.
He
was
doing
that.
Are
you?
B
Do
you
plan
on
seeing
a
bunch
more
of
rezones
coming
this
way
on
our
on
our
arterial
corridors
right
there
on
fifth
and
sixth.
H
Pro,
probably
more
on
500,
south
versus
600,
south,
just
the
nature
of
the
two
streets
and
what
our
plans
say,
but
the
plans,
the
central
community
master
plan
had
a
portion
of
that
up
and
you
can
see
that
it
in
that
general
area,
particularly
the
further
west.
You
go
on
those
two
streets
between
downtown
and
say:
600
east.
There
definitely
is
more
intensity
anticipated.
H
In
that,
in
those
along
those
few
blocks
less
so
on,
600
south,
mainly
600
south,
starts
to
step
down
in
intensity.
The
further
east
and
south
you
go,
and
so
the
the
plan
would
not
support
at
least
how
it's
written
now
would
not
support
any
additional
building
height,
in
particular
in
those
along
that
corridor.
B
Great
thanks
nick
appreciate
that
did
we
want
to
give
marielle
some
time
to
talk
about
that.
I
know
that
she
doesn't
have
a
project
proposed,
but
is
just
currently
seeking
that.
J
B
Okay,
great
thank
you
for
being
here
and
thanks
again,
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
an
ordinance
a
rezone
and
master
plan
amendment
at.
Let
me
double
check
nope!
I'm
sorry
skip
this
informational.
It's
the
urban
forest
action
plan,
an
associated
zoning
amendment,
nick
tarbet's,
going
to
stay
with
us
in
his
little
cube
there,
and
we
also
have
laura
bandara
from
the
urban
designer
here
to
discuss
this
as
well.
All
right.
Nick
all.
J
Right.
Thank
you,
sir.
This
is
a
briefing
about
the
urban
force
action
plan
being
processed
by
the
planning
division,
they're
developing
in
the
urban
force
action
plan,
in
tandem
with
an
associated
text,
amendment
related
to
the
regulation
of
trees
on
private
lands
and
within
public
streets.
Now
this
is
an
early
check-in
being
done
in
accordance.
J
N
N
What's
coming
up
here,
is
it
possible
for
me
to
drive
the
presentation
or
do
you
guys
just
do
it?
Do
you
just
want
me
to
ask
you
to
forward
through
it.
N
If
you
don't
mind
that
would
probably
be
simpler.
I
tested
it
this
morning,
so
I
think
we're
good.
N
Great,
so
I'm
as
you've
heard,
I'm
laura
bender,
I'm
the
urban
designer
in
the
city
and
I
work
in
the
planning,
division
and
collaborate
with
departments
citywide
to
address
urban
design
needs.
N
So
the
big
picture
purpose
of
the
action
plan
is
to
take
a
holistic
view
of
the
urban
forest
to
address
interconnected
challenges,
develop
priorities,
find
solutions
and
build
a
long-term
plan
of
action
and
policy
makers.
Planners
community
members
create
action
plans
to
unite
a
broad
range
of
community
stakeholders
around
a
shared
cause.
N
N
In
terms
of
of
rooting
it
in
our
in
our
past
plans
really
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
collaboratively
collaboratively,
develop
the
steps
needed
to
realize
this
vision
set
out
in
plain
salt
lake
and
because
the
urban
forest
is
a
modified
natural
system
that
intersects
with
all
kinds
of
built
systems,
particularly
underground
utilities,
it's
something
that
really
requires
collaboration
to
for
it
to
thrive,
and
in
recognition
of
that,
we've
created
a
collaborative
project
team.
N
So
the
project
is
led
by
planning
and
collaborating
closely
with
urban
forestry,
of
course,
and
then
we
also
have
sustainability
and
water
quality
managers
in
public
utilities,
as
team
members-
and
I
did
just
want
to
make
a
quick
clarification
from
the
agenda,
so
this
plan
is
being
entirely
done
in-house
that
we
don't
have
any
consultants
working
on
this.
N
N
Public
infrastructure
taken
together
city
trees,
form
an
urban
forest.
It's
a
living
infrastructure
system
which
makes
it
different
from
other
types
of
built
infrastructure,
but
it
also
means
that
it
provides
a
great
return
on
investment,
but
we
need
a
plan
and
a
strategy
to
be
able
to
make
the
most
of
those
benefits
and
to
value
it
for
the
full
range
of
benefits
it
provides
and
distribution
right.
It's
a
public
good,
so
we
want
the
urban
forest,
particularly
the
canopy,
to
be
spread
equitably
across
the
city.
N
So
I'm
just
gonna,
I'm
I'm
sure
you
are
familiar
with
summer
all
of
these,
but
I'm
just
gonna
quickly,
refresh
you
on
what
the
benefits
of
the
urban
forest
are,
and
I
won't
read
all
these.
But
you
know
this
information
will
all
be
made
available
to
you.
So
the
urban
forest
mitigates
adverse
environmental
impacts
and
we
are
particularly
focused
on
air
and
water
quality
and
urban
heat
island
effect.
N
When
we're
looking
at
things
that
the
urban
forest
can
mitigate
and
then
again
looking
at
this
epa
data,
which
shows
trends
in
our
air
quality,
while
we
see
that
winter
air
quality
has
improved
over
the
years,
we
have
that
persistent
summer.
Air
quality
problem
and
the
right
trees
in
the
right
place
can
address
ozone
pollution,
and
that
is
one
of
the
biggest
contributors
to
poor
air
quality
in
the
summer
months.
N
So
the
urban
forest
mitigates
the
impacts
of
urban
heat
island
effect.
It
reduces
energy
consumption,
it
promotes
active
transportation
and
safety
and
improves
mental
and
physical
health
outcomes
and
then
because
a
picture
is
worth
a
thousand
words.
What
you
see
here
is
that
trees
improve
livability
and
urban
design
in
business
districts
and
in
neighborhoods.
N
N
So
the
plan
we
anticipate,
making
some
recommendations
around
policy
and
implementation
that
kind
of
aim
at
these
larger
goals
right
to
protect
the
urban
forest
by
aligning
policy
and
practice
to
value
the
urban
forest
for
the
full
range
of
benefits.
It
provides
to
provide
solutions
in
the
right-of-way
where
trees
compete
for
space
with
other
infrastructure
and
then
to
provide
guidance
to
on
urban
forest
priorities
and
preservation
to
project
reviewers
and
inspectors,
so
that
we're
really
capturing
the
kind
of
full
life
cycle
and
and
making
sure
that
our
forest
is
maintained.
N
So
the
anticipated
outcomes
of
the
kind
of
biggest
level
are
that
our
policy
ordinance
and
practice
around
the
urban
forest
will
align
with
the
city's
goals
for
growth,
environment
and
community.
So
when
I
talk
about
growth,
for
example,
the
urban
forest
really
can
add
value
for
developers,
and
we
can
we're
considering
looking
at
trades
for
improved
growing
conditions
which,
for
on-site
storm
water
retention,
which
potentially
could
provide
more
area
for
people
to
develop.
N
We're
also
looking
at
incentives
for
soil
cells,
particularly
downtown,
to
get
larger
trees
that
will
mitigate
the
urban
heat
impact,
as
well
as
storm
water
flows
and
improve
water
quality
in
terms
of
environment,
we're
looking
at
air
quality
and
water
quality,
as
I
mentioned.
As
you
know
recently,
our
our
storm
water
infrastructure
system
is
over
taxed
by
these
short
heavy
bursts
of
rain.
N
We're
seeing
in
the
summer
trees
can
help
with
that
when
you
use
the
right
kinds
of
systems
and
mitigate
urban
heat
island
impacts,
which
are
really
exacerbated
by
climate
change
right,
we
all
felt
that
this
summer,
at
the
same
time,
he
creates
a
really
significant
public
health
burden
on
our
most
vulnerable
community
members.
So
children,
older
adults
and
of
course
this
is
disproportionately
experienced
by
lower
income
community
members
and
in
terms
of
our
goals
for
communities.
This
plan
is
really
focused
on
equity
and
these
next
few
slides
we'll
get
into
that.
N
So
we
looked,
we
did
a
redlining
analysis
right,
recognizing
that
there's
a
lasting
impact
to
redlining
a
federal
policy
that
was
implemented
nearly
a
century
ago,
and
what
we
see
is
that
wealthier
neighborhoods
generally
have
at
least
twice
the
tree
canopy
as
lower
income
historically
redlined
areas.
It's
really
important
to
underline
here
that
salt
lake
city
is
not
alone.
N
N
N
N
So,
city,
creek
airport,
northwest
quadrant,
the
the
high
and
low
canopy.
You
would
expect
to
see
that,
based
on
ecology
and
land
use
in
those
areas,
but
in
all
the
other
master
plan
areas,
we
see
that
phenomenon
that
I
said
you
know
just
explained
exists
throughout
the
us.
N
N
You
know,
residential
and
commercial
areas,
so
the
east
side
actually
has
an
average
of
four
times
the
canopy
of
downtown,
and
while
this
is
has
a
relationship
to
historical
redlining,
particularly
in
in
the
southern
part
of
the
downtown
master
plan
area,
it
also
has
to
do
with
challenging
growing
conditions
in
our
most
highly
paid
master
plan
area.
N
So
this
map
demonstrates
the
differences
in
land,
surface
temperature
at
a
single
point
in
time
and
land
surface
temperatures.
You
know
nasa
provided
us
with
this
data,
it's
measured
by
satellite
and
indicates
how
hot
a
given
surface
feels
to
the
touch.
N
So
what
you
see
in
this
is
that
our
downtown
master
plan
area
surface
temperatures
are
comparable
to
the
northwest
quadrant
and
when
you
look
at
this,
you
might
scratch
your
head
when
you
look
at
capitol
hill,
but
it's
important
to
remember
that
we
do
have
a
lot
of
industrial
areas
in
that
included
in
that
master
plan
area.
Along
with
you
know,
this
was
taken
at
5
00
pm
on
july
31st
west
facing
slopes
that
have
been
heated
up
throughout
the
day.
N
So
redlining
policies
of
the
past
also
have
implications
for
the
distribution
of
urban
heat
island
effect,
and
I
want
to
be
clear
that
urban
heat
island
effect
is
due
to
a
complex
interaction
of
variables
and
we
we
couldn't
capture
all
of
those
in
with
what
we're
doing
right
now,
but
looking
at
surface
temperatures
does
at
least
give
us
a
good
idea
of
which
areas
of
the
city
may
need
more
shade
and
more
cooling
and
planning
is
actually
working
with
partners
at
the
university
of
utah
to
identify
locations
where
they
can
deploy
sensors
to
take
more
sensitive
measurements
based
on
recommendations
we
make
in
the
plan,
and
this
will
give
us
a
more
complete
picture
so
that
we
can
understand
where
the
impacts
are
greatest.
N
So
we're
doing
a
series
of
analyses
and
what
you
see
here
is
the
raw
gas
data
that
will
get
refined
into
the
plan
but
again
lower
canopy
on
the
west
side,
which
correlates
to
higher
bipod
populations.
N
Higher
levels
of
asthma
and
then
that
purple
area
you
see
it
on
the
east
side,
of
course,
is
the
university
area
as
well
as
lack
of
health
insurance
right.
So
these
are
just
some
of
the
data
points
that
we're
looking
at
and
then
just
to
quickly
wrap
up
with
a
sort
of
example
solution,
because
a
big
part
of
this
plan
will
be
to
run
these
analyses
and
then
look
at
best
practices
and
propose
some
solutions.
N
Suspended
pavement
technology
is,
is
one
that
there's
a
lot
of
research
that
shows
this
works
very
well,
so
suspended
pavement
systems.
Some
of
you
may
have
heard
of
them
referred
to
by
their
by
a
brand
name
silva
cell,
but
what
they
do
is
they
provide
space
for
tree
roots
to
spread
without
having
compacted
soil,
and
they
also
provide
area
to
store
overflow
storm
water,
which
eventually
waters
the
tree
but
and
infiltrates
into
the
soil.
N
N
And
then
a
10-year
study
in
a
commercial
area
in
toronto
demonstrated
that
this
pavement
suspended
pavement
system
uses
a
small
surface
area
while
increasing
the
tree
canopy
so
more
shade,
more
storm
water
interception.
You
know
all
those
good
things
you
want
in
a
smaller
surface
area,
it
provided
stormwater
management
by
reducing
water
volumes,
improved
water
quality
through
increased
infiltration
and
pollutant
removal
by
soil
and
it
lower.
It
has
a
lower.
They
have
an
overall
lower
maintenance
cost
than
kind
of
daylit
surface
bioretention
soils.
B
F
Thanks
laura
this
that
was
really
interesting,
fascinating
and
also
sounds
very,
is
very
critical
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
I
I
like
that.
We
touched
on
economic
reasons
why
our
urban
forces
are
important,
ecological,
as
well
as
equity
reasons.
So
those
are
those
very
interesting
to
me.
I
have
a
question
though,
and
I'm
I
I'm,
I
guess,
encouraged,
that
this
plan
is
being
generated
or
being
led
by
the
planning
department
planning
division.
F
My
question
is,
I
guess,
in
my
experience
as
an
architect,
I'm
like
going
through
and
your
site
planning
a
project
and
whether
or
not
you
save
a
mature
existing
tree
is
oftentimes
the
lowest
priority
that
the
client
tells
you,
because
you
have
these
really
firm
setbacks
and
number
of
parking
stalls
required
and
number.
You
know
all
these
geographic
things
that
are
based
on
lot
lines
and
they're,
not
based
on
whether
an
existing
mature
tree
is
present
or
not,
and
there's
no
like
exceptions
to
well
the
tree's
here.
F
N
Yeah,
so
this
plan
is
looking
at
that
and
that
actually
is
a
piece
of
the
associated
text
amendment,
because
we've
looked
at
best
practices,
we've
sort
of
run,
an
analysis
of
our
code
and
then
we're
going
to
look
at
which
parts
of
the
code
it
should
fit
in,
but
again
some
of
this
comes
down
to
just
having
the
right
information
in
the
right
place,
so
we're
working
on
right
now,
our
urban
forest
information
is
all
maintained
by
davie
tree,
and
so
it
doesn't
exist
in
our
gis
system,
so
we're
working
on
getting
it
into
our
gis
system
so
that
you
know
when
an
architect
or
designer
pulls
up
their
site.
N
They
can
say:
oh
there's
a
tree
here
right,
I
mean
really
basic
stuff,
but
yes,
so
essentially
this
plan
will
make
recommendations
for
what
some
of
those
best
practices
are.
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
the
the
policies
in
place
and
I
think
some
of
it
comes
down
to
making
sure
again
it's
that
collaboration
right,
so
that
everyone
who
looks
who
touches
the
project
at
some
point
in
the
city
you
know,
has
a
recognition
of
the
the
value
of
trees
as
public
infrastructure.
N
So
it
doesn't
mean
that
you
could
you
can
save
every
tree
or
even
that
every
tree
needs
to
be
saved.
It's
more.
Where
can
we
maximize
the
property
the
city
owns?
N
Where
can
we
really
mitigate
some
of
these
challenging
environmental
impacts,
and
you
know
make
sure
that
everyone
in
the
city
kind
of
has
the
tools
they
need
to
evaluate
it
from
their
perspective,
right
of
whatever
it
is
they're
doing
and
how
they
their
their
work.
Intersects
with
the
urban
forest.
M
Thank
you.
I
love
that
presentation.
I
appreciate
it
very
much.
I
have
a
question
going
to
the
and
I
really
like
the
suspended
pavement
technology,
this
discussion
and
look
at
that
go.
It's
gotta
be
a
little
more
expensive
than
just
planting
a
tree,
and
when
we
have
some
new
developments,
how
do
we
incorporate
that?
M
Because
I
know
a
developer
is
not
going
to
say:
oh
I'm
going
to
do
that
because
it's
going
to
be
a
few
more
dollars
than
just
putting
a
tree
in
and
is
that
how
do
we
promote
that?
Or
our
push
for
that?
M
With
you
know
the
city
and
planners
on
new
developments
we
have
the
fleet
block,
we
got.
You
know
a
research
park
going
into
different
things.
We
have
the
whole
downtown
area
and
how
do
we
incorporate
that?
Because
we
have
all
the
storm
router
runoff
problems
in
the
future
we
will
have
more
and
how
do
we
make
that
a
reality
advice?
Just
a
nice
presentation
and
a
nice
view
from
toronto.
N
So
there's
we
have
a
whole
kind
of
suite
of
ways
that
we
can
do
that.
One
thing
that
we're
okay,
so
right
now
we're
focused
focusing
on
areas
that
are
highly
paved
right
like
downtown,
because
in
a
lot
of
areas
we
have
very
large
park
strips
that
support
large
trees
and
that's
great,
like
we
don't
need
to
touch
those
for
downtown
with
all
these
new
projects
going
in
one
thing.
N
Last
month,
I
with
the
mayor
presented
to
the
downtown
development
committee,
essentially
a
modified
version
of
this
presentation
that
focused
on
the
suspended
pavement
and
so
we're
gonna,
have
a
sort
of
charette
style
workshop
to
come
up
with
some
goals,
so
it
could
be
through.
You
know,
with
working
with
the
downtown
alliance,
but
I
think
you
know
there's
a
whole
range
of
things
where
we
can
provide
incentives
to
use
these
technologies.
N
We
can
also
look
at.
There
are
some
new
state
requirements
related
to
stormwater
on
sites
over
an
acre
where
they
have
to
retain
stormwater
on
site.
Boise
has
done
some
stuff,
where
they've
traded,
that
we
may
be
able
to
see
if
there's
adjacent
parcels
that
add
up
to
an
acre
that
we
could
then,
instead
of
them
retaining
the
stormwater
on
site,
get
them
to
pay
for
the
silva
cell,
because
the
cost
would
probably
equal
out
there.
N
We
could
even
look
at
sort
of
a
sponsorship
model
depending
on
how
we
want,
and
nick
norris
probably
would
have
more
insight
on
how
that
might
actually
work.
But
I
think
it's
something
that
it
sounded
like
there
was
support
when
I
went
to
the
downtown
development
committee
to,
I
think
you
know,
engage
them
early
and
often
and
make
sure
they
understand
what
the
real
costs
are
and
how,
but
also
what
the
costs
are
of
not
doing
it
right,
because
we're
seeing
we've
seen
that
all
summer.
N
So
I
think
that
there
is
a
grow
and
then,
of
course,
you
know
with
covet
as
well
right
people
want
to
be
outside
more.
So
how
can
we
make
outside
downtown
a
better
place
to
be.
H
H
When
there's
only
one
solution
out
there
an
engineer
in
engineering
standard,
it
makes
it
really
hard,
and
so
I
think
part
of
this
will
be
considering
alternatives
so
that,
when
somebody
comes
in
it
may
be
that
something
works
great
in
one
location,
but
maybe
not
on
around
the
block
or
something
else
based
on
those
site-specific
conditions.
So
it
does.
J
H
Back
a
little
bit
to
what
councilman
romano
was
talking
about
was
having
the
flexibility
in
certain
regulations,
and
so
whatever
we
come
up
with
from
a
regulatory
standpoint
is
to
make
sure
that
it
provides
that
flexibility
easily
so
that
developers,
property
owners
etc
can
put
that
into
their
formula
at
the
beginning
of
their
development
process.
Instead
of
being
surprised
by
something
towards
the
end
that
they
have
to
do
that,
they
haven't
accounted
for.
M
Exactly
I'm
just
looking
at
station
center
fleet
block
and
other
areas
that
are,
in
the
you
know,
incubation
stage
now
or
the
early
stages
and
how
we
incorporate
that
in
those
developments
sooner
or
as
back
to
the
flexibility
back
to
making
we
incentivize
it.
So
it
could
work
instead
of
going
oh
boy,
I
wish
we
had
done
that.
M
I'm
just
like
I'm
I'm
glad
we're
having
this
discussion
now
before
we're.
Actually,
you
know
approving
the
plans
for
those
areas.
N
Well
and
one
thing
I'm
going
to
bring
to
you
through
the
text
amendment
process
to
discuss
and
other
cities,
some
cities
do.
This
is
a
soil
volume
requirement,
and
so
that's
really
what
trees
need
to
thrive
is
a
certain
amount
of
soil,
but
then
there's
these
different
ways
to
provide
it.
So
you
know
that
is
something
that
we
can
look
at
as
well.
N
I
think
that
with
something
like
the
fleet
block,
it
might
even
be
possible
to
include
something
like
this
in
the
rfi,
particularly
because
we
know
there
are
challenges
with
the
existing
infrastructure.
There.
G
Mr
sher,
can
I
ask
my
question:
okay,
so
lara
just
following
up
on
the
practicality
of
this,
for
especially
for
downtown
and
especially
in
those
sidewalks
that
are
concrete
right
now.
Right
so,
let's
say
all
of
these
passes.
Developer
comes
over
or
architect
and
says,
and
we
say
hey,
we
need
a
tree
here.
How
do
we
solve
that?
How
do
we
like
what
happens
is?
Is
that
the
developer's
responsibility
to
open
up
our
sidewalk
and
put
a
trio?
Can
we
put
like?
N
So
the
way
it
works
right
now
is
essentially
when
a
new
development
goes
in.
N
We
ask
for
one
tree
per
every
30
feet
of
frontage,
and
so
I
think
what
the
plan
is
going
to
explore
is
actually
look
at
some
urban
design
criteria
to
think
about,
as
well
as
environmental
criteria
to
think
about
how
do
we
get
the
scale
of
trees
that
we
need
in
our
very
large
rites
of
way,
and
so
every
one
tree
for
every
30
feet
and
essentially
what,
as
nick
said,
we
would
be
looking
at
some
options
for
how
do
you
provide
that,
and
we,
I
think
you
know.
N
There's
also
some
things
we
probably
should
be
looking
at
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
after
the
trees
go
in,
they
get
watered
regularly
as
they're
being
established
and
that's
actually
a
whole
separate
issue
that
the
plan
is
gonna.
Look
at
because
obviously
water
is
a
huge
issue
here,
but
I
think
essentially
it
would
be
tweaking
what
we
have
now
in
our
code,
to
I
mean
they're
already
doing
this.
N
N
They
have
to
destroy
the
sidewalk
anyway,
to
build
their
building,
so
they'd
be
rebuilding
the
sidewalk
anyway
and
we
would
say
okay,
so
this
suspended
pavement
system
goes
underneath,
and
I
know
that
on
our
on
200
south
for
the
the
urban
designers
who
are
who
are
working
on
the
transit
corridor,
there
are
looking
into
that
as
well,
because
that
might
be
a
good
test
place,
particularly
because
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
storm
water
pipes
under
the
ground.
There.
That's.
G
Perfect,
that's
awesome,
great
yeah
and
so
yeah
and
yes,
and
but
I'm
thinking
that,
if
I
think
if
we
want
to
do
this,
if
we
really
want
to
push
this,
you
know
in
our
city
or
especially
downtown
where
it's
what
we
saw
it's
most
needed.
It
could
be
a
tough
sell
to
say
everybody.
G
You
know
as
soon
as
you
build
something
and
you're
going
to
rip
this
off,
then
you
know
put
the
tree
and
now
it's
all
new,
you
know,
or
maybe
it
I'm
not
trying
to
offer
it-
I'm
not
trying
to
to
commit
any
the
council
or
you
know
the
planning
to
to
do
anything
else.
But
maybe
there
is
a
financial
cost
here.
G
N
One
question
I
should
mention
is
we're
looking
at
the
downtown
denver
initiative
as
a
model,
so
they
because
the
other
thing
I
mean
it's
sort
of
amazing
what
trees
do
but
and
there's
a
lot
of
research
to
back
this
up.
They
actually
can
help
with
crime
reduction,
and
I
could
you
know,
go
into
why
that
is,
but
we
don't
have
all
day.
So
you
know
take
my
word
for
it
and
I'll
send
you
a
website,
but
the
the
way
they
do.
N
It
is
essentially
there's
almost
like
a
fund,
and
it's
kind
of
I
think
it's
through
their
equivalent
of
a
business
bid,
business
improvement
district,
and
so
I
think
there
are
different
ways
we
can
tackle
this,
but
it
probably
to
me
seems
like
the
best
way
is
to
have
a
sort
of
collective
effort
in
downtown
and
maybe
there's
a
pool
of
funds
that
folks
can
pull
from
to
offset.
So
maybe
they're
they're
paying
some
of
the
cost,
and
then
this
fund
provides
grants.
N
B
Thank
you,
council,
member
baltimore's,
looking
to
other
council
members
that
might
have
any
questions.
Councilmember
wharton.
I
Hi,
I
just
wanted
to
say
thanks
for
the
presentation.
I
think
this
is
really
fascinating.
I
would
be
really
interested
to
hear
about
the
crime
correlations
with
trees
and
yeah
best
of
luck
going
forward.
I
look
forward
to
coming
back
to
us
with
some
more
details
and
some
more
feedback
from
residents
and
businesses.
B
Thanks
councilmember
wharton
laura.
If
you
wouldn't
mind,
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions
too.
In
our
policy
questions
number
two:
it
talks
about
other
stakeholders.
I
think
the
university
of
utah
I've
heard
from
council
member
dugan
speaking
about
research
park
up
on
the
east
side,
as
well
as
the
potential
of
them
with
station
center
with
fleet
block,
I
think
for
them,
specifically
with
the
degrees
that
they
have
in
the
architecture
program,
whether
it's
you
know,
landscape
architecture,
that
type
of
thing
and
looking
at
station
center.
B
This
would
be
something
that
would
be
tremendous
for
them
to
be
involved
in
as
well,
and
we
talked
about,
I
don't
see
any
issue
at
all
with
city
owned
property.
Doing
this,
you
know
looking
at
these,
these
properties
that
we
might
be
turning
over
or
leasing
over
cert
or
current
parks
that
we
own.
But
my
my
follow-up
question
in.
In
addition
to
that
is
our
first
policy
question
and
that
is
the
council
was
wondering
what
kind
of
type
of
regulations
are
being
considered
for
private
property.
You
know.
B
Is
that
something
that
we're
looking
at
doing
and
when
did
we
start
looking
at
mandating?
The
types
of
trees
that
would
be
planted
in
somebody's
yard-
I
know
we're
looking
solely
right
now
at
the
central
business
district.
But
how
are
we
looking
at
doing
that?
Why
are
we
looking
at
doing
that
on
somebody's
private
property,
if
they're
gonna
be
doing
something.
H
So
I
can
start
with
that.
We
currently
already
have
some
regulations
in
place
that
deal
with
trees
and
on
private
property.
One
is
that
if
a
tree
is
considered
what's
called
a
and
defined
in
the
code
as
a
specimen
tree
even
on
private
property,
it
ends
up
potentially
having
to
be
saved
or
they
have
to
get
special
approval
and
pay
to
a
street
mitigation
fund
that
urban
foreign.
H
I
believe
it
goes
into
urban
forestry's
budget,
but
I'm
not
quite
sure
about
that
and
two
we
currently
require
landscaping
to
be
on
certain
water
zones
and
how
they're
how
they're
watered
through
automated
automated
sprinkler
systems
and
the
idea
behind
that
is
so
that,
like
plants
that
have
similar
watering
requirements
are
being
watered
similarly
and
not
wasted
or
over
watered
or
underwater,
and
I
don't
know
that
we're
necessarily
going
to
get
into
species
that
must
be
planted.
H
But
I
think
one
example
of
where
we
may
may
end
up
is
that,
if
there's
not
space,
for
example,
for
a
street
tree
in
a
public
right-of-way
that
maybe
it
can
go
on,
maybe
it'd
be
on
private
property.
If
it.
If
it
can
be
close
enough
for
the
sidewalk
and
still
achieve
those
same
goals,
so
I
think
I
don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
going
to
be
a
bunch
of
new
requirements.
H
It
may
be
tweaking
some
things
and
providing
some
flexibility
like
one
thing,
and
this
gets
back
to
council
members,
mono's
first
question:
you
know
it's:
it's
there's
a
little
a
little
known
clause
in
our
zoning
code
that
allows
the
planning
directory
to
actually
modify
setbacks
and
hide
to
preserve
existing
mature
trees
on
private
property.
H
It's
rarely
used.
In
fact.
I
think
I've
only
done
it
once
and
I
don't
know
that
we've
ever
done
it
outside
of
that,
and
so
it's
things
like
that
that
we're
talking
about
so
that
we
can
try
to
be
as
flexible
as
possible
but
still
improve.
You
know,
increase
our
our
urban
forest.
B
Yeah,
I
really
appreciated
the
the
slideshow
that
you
had.
It
was
awesome,
laura
tells
a
telltale
sign
of
you,
know,
trees
and
why
the
mayor
has
been
so
proactive,
even
while
on
the
council
trying
to
push
for
more
trees
being
planted
by
you
know,
hiring
another
urban
forester
and
pushing
you
know
the
tree
initiative
on
the
west
side.
I
think
she's
at
the
forefront
of
what
the
real
issue
is
and
and
making
that
come,
come
about
with
equity
issues.
B
So
I
just
to
follow
up
I'd
love
to
see
the
university
of
utah
as
one
of
the
stakeholders,
as
well
as
discussing
a
little
bit
more
with
private
property
owners
and
what
we're
looking
at
with
enforcing
on
that.
I
appreciate
that
explanation
nick,
but
another
concern
I
have
is
why
this
is
called
an
action
plan
and
not
a
master
plan.
I
feel
like
everybody
feels
like
when
we
deal
with
master
plans.
It's
you
know
something
solid
and
something
that
is
immovable
and
with
an
action
plan.
We're
always
I
feel
like.
B
N
So
the
just
to
go
back
to
the
the
quickly
the
the
zoning
amendment
will
be
a
separate
process
right,
they're
related
we're
learning
things
by
doing
the
plan
that
it
will
inform
it,
but
that's
a
whole
piece.
That's
going
to
come
in
front
of
the
council
separately,
so
you
know
we'll
have
plenty
of
time
to
address
those
issues
and
really
get
into
them
in
terms
of
it
being
an
action
plan.
So
because
you
know
this
is
city-wide
and
we're
trying
to
implement
a
vision
that
was
established
through
the
general
plan.
N
What
I
you
know
as
a
urban
designer
trained
in
landscape
architecture.
You
know
it's
been
my
observation-
that
many
cities
don't
look
holistically
at
the
urban
forest
right
it,
because
it's
a
system
that
intersects
with
all
these
other
systems
and
given
my
training
in
landscape
architecture,
that's
sort
of
what
we
do.
What
we
look
at
right
and
so
an
action
plan
is
really
the
goal
for
this
was
not
sort
of
hot.
It
was
to
take
some
high
level
policy
things,
but
also
marry
it
to
practices
that
happen
on
the
ground
right.
N
So
a
lot
of
this
has
been
figuring
out.
You
know
where,
where
are
the
underground
utilities
that
impact
trees
and
vice
versa?
N
How
can
we
solve
those
problems,
and
so
an
action
plan
you
know
was
the
way
that
I
felt
would
be
most
holistic
to
to
address
these
issues
at
the
same
time,
you
know
to
me
this
is
really
phase
one,
because
this
is
going
to
be
it
to
get
this
implemented
at
the
scale
that
we
want
it
implemented
in
order
to
actually
have
an
impact
to
actually
make
parts
of
our
city
cooler
to
slow
storm
water
flows,
all
those
things
that
trees
can
do
it
needs.
N
We
need
private
partners
and
so
there's
going
to
be
a
whole
second
sort
of
pha
after
the
plan
is
adopted,
there's
we're
looking
at
a
potential
education
campaign
and
so
again
having
these
sort
of
concrete
steps
that
we
can
say
like
these
are
things
we
want
to
do.
These
are
goals
we
have.
That
was
the
idea
behind
it
being
an
action
plan.
N
One
of
the
recommendations
from
the
action
plan
will
be
to
create
an
urban
forest
master
plan,
but
this
action
plan
allows
us
to
there's
sort
of
so
many
steps
and
things
we
need
to
understand
before
we
can
even
get
to
the
place
where
we
can
master
plan.
Our
urban
forest.
J
B
J
Just
this
is
something
that
we,
probably
as
staff
we'd
like
to
suggest
that
we
work
with
the
administrative
staff,
the
mayor's
office
and
city
attorney's
office,
as
well
as
planning
to
try
to
standardize
what
how
these
plans
are
named,
because
it
is
getting
a
little
bit
confusing.
We
do
have
some
really
old
plans
in
the
city
that
were
not
adopted
by
the
council,
and
now
the
council
has
an
ordinance
that
that
requires
certain
plans
to
come
for
formal
adoption
and
we've
loosely
referred
to
those
as
master
plans.
J
But
as
as
the
plans
come
to
you
with
all
kinds
of
different
names,
it
it's
getting
a
little
bit
confusing,
and
just
this
weekend
we
had
a
confusion
about
the
foothill,
foothill
and
trails
master
plan.
It
was
adopted
as
a
master
plan
and
then
is
referred
to
as
a
some
other
type
of
plan.
J
So
if
we
could
just
kind
of
coordinate
with
the
administration
online
and
maybe
come
up
with,
how
can
we
get
a
shared
understanding
and
a
shared
like
naming
naming
convention
approach,
or
something
like
that,
so
that
we're
leaving
a
good
path
for
the
future
and
not
not
creating
confusion?
For
later.
F
B
Well,
and
if
it's,
if
it's
confusing
to
you,
just
think
what
it
is
to
everybody
else,
councilman
romano.
So
I
appreciate
that
if
there
aren't
any
other
questions
lara,
we
really
appreciate
you
coming
forward
and
presenting
this
it
sounds
great,
but
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
number
five
we're
just
a
teeny
bit
behind
schedule,
which
is
the
ordinance
reason.
B
It
could
be
a
potential
ordinance
for
arizona
master
plan,
amendment
at
461,
south
400,
east,
and
let
me
tell
you
who's
there
switch
over,
which
is
we
have
brian
fulmer,
who
is
our
council
office
policy
analyst
and
we've
got
nick
norris.
I
believe
the
the
director
of
planning
so
nick
appreciate
you
being
here
it's
a
busy
day
for
you
with
all
this
planning
stuff.
L
Thanks
nick
yeah,
so
this
is
my
second
item
to
the
council
this
afternoon
and
it's
very
similar
to
my
first
item:
taylor,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
sharing
the
presentation,
so
this
project
is
also
a
master
plan
amendment
and
a
zoning
map
amendment
again
in
the
central
community
master
plan
area
and
it's
just
north
of
the
property
that
was
previously
discussed,
that
within
the
last
year
and
a
half
was
rezoned
to
rmu
as
well
and
again,
this
property
is
similar
to
the
other
one
in
that
it's
an
older
office
building,
looking
at
potentially
being
redeveloped,
the
amendments
that
are
proposed
and
the
site
is
located
at
461,
south
400
east.
L
The
amendments
that
are
proposed
would
accommodate
a
potential
redevelopment
of
the
site,
for
that
would
include
uses
as
residential
retail
and
live
work
units,
and
it
would
eliminate
the
parking
structure
which
fronts
500,
south
400,
east
and
denver
street.
This
parking
structure
encompasses
about
60
percent
of
the
existing
sites.
L
The
site
is
located
again:
it's
an
approximate
10
minute,
walk
of
two
light
rail
stations,
one
of
which
is
the
library
light
rail
station.
It's
near.
G
L
Lanes
which
are
on
500,
south
300,
east
and
600
east,
and
it's
also
located
near
two
existing
bus
routes
that
are
along
500,
east
and
state
street.
Furthermore,
this
site
is
considered
highly
walkable
because
it
because
of
its
proximity
to
different
job
centers
and
grocery
stores.
This
site
is
also
just
outside
of
the
central
city,
local
historic
district.
L
L
Currently,
the
property
is
located
in
the
rmu
45
district
or
residential
mixed
use.
Maximum
height
45
foot
district,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
the
site
to
tsa,
unc
or
transit
station
area.
Urban
neighborhood
corazoni
district
staff
is
reviewed
with
the
applicant
other
districts
to
ensure
the
best
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
community
and
found
tsa
unc
to
be
most
appropriate
to
the
area.
L
And
similar
to
the
last
item
that
I
presented
on
this
site
is
also
within
the
east
downtown
neighborhood
plan
and
again,
with
this
neighborhood
plan,
there
is
a
view:
corridor
height
limitation
map
to
protect
the
different
landmarks
in
the
community
in
this
area.
This
subject
site
is
within
the
75
foot,
height
limitation
recommendation.
L
L
L
L
So
it's
for
these
reasons
that
staff
has
found
that
the
petition
for
a
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendment
meets
the
criteria
in
title
21a
and
recommends
that
the
city
council
follow
the
recommendations
of
planning
commission
to
approve
the
amendments
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
the
council
may
have
for
me
and
the
applicant
magid
is.
I
believe
I
saw
him
in
the
meeting
as
well
and
he
is
also
available.
B
I
apologize
to
our
policy
analyst
brian
fulmer
brian.
Did
you
have
anything
else
you
wanted
to
added?
I
should
have
turned
it
over
to
you
at
the
beginning.
B
Okay,
great
council
members
we're
going
to
open
it
up
to
questions
either
that
for
planning
staff
or
for
the
the
applicant
himself.
M
Mr
chair,
I
really
don't
have
a
well.
My
question
would
go
back
to
the
parking
idea,
but
I
think
you
kind
of
answered
it
here
and
I
really
appreciate
both
these
two
rezonings
in
this
area,
increasing
the
density
and
kind
of
removing
or
pulling
out
a
lot
of
the
parking
requirements.
I
think
that's
a
big
bonus
for
us.
It
helps
us
the
public
transportation
side
of
the
house.
M
It
helps
us
only
make
it
more
of
a
walkable
city
and
I
really
appreciate
the
hopefully
the
elimination
of
a
large
parking
structure
in
an
area
that
we
have
plenty
of
public
education
and
make
a
much
more
walkable
city.
So
I
look
forward
to
both
these
rezonings
if
we
approve
them,
but
this
is
a
breath
of
fresh
air.
So
thank
you.
B
Any
other
questions
on
this
item:
okay,
appreciate
you
being
here:
nanette
and
brian,
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
six,
which
is
a
potential
rezone
and
master
plan,
amendment
at
203,
east
2100,
south
221,
east
2100,
south
and
1991
south
200
east,
and
I
think
this
is
the
the
item
where
we
have
nick
norris,
who
will
be
here
but
also
brian
fulmer,
who
is
our
council
office
policy
analyst
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
brian.
First.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
It's
a
proposal
to
amend
the
central
community
master
plan,
future
land
use
map
and
the
zoning
map
for
the
properties.
Current
zoning
is
rmf
45,
which
is
moderate
and
high
density.
Multi-Family
residential
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
fbun2
which
is
fill
form-based
urban
neighborhood
district
mixed
use,
including
multi-family
housing,
is
proposed
for
the
site.
However,
a
specific
development
proposal
has
not
been
submitted.
D
H
You
can
see
the
subject
property
outlined
in
red
and
and
unlike
some
of
the
other
zoning
moments
you've
seen
tonight,
this
does
have
fairly
close
proximity
to
some
lower
intent,
lower
density
residential
districts
as
the
city
steps
down
away
from
200
east
to
the
east.
H
Again,
it's
a
proposal
to
amend
the
master
plan
from
medium
high
residential
to
high
mixed
use
and
to
change
the
zoning
from
rmf45
to
fbun2,
one
of
the
key
differences
between
the
rmf45
and
fbn2,
and
I
this
is
anticipation
of
the
question
about
parking.
But
I
think
you
don't
know
that
fp
and
un2
does
not
have
a
park,
a
minimum
parking
requirement,
which
is
something
that
is
applied
typically
to
areas
that
have
good
access
to
transit.
H
Just
as
we
discussed
with
the
last
item
and
on
this
particular
item,
there's
transit,
high
frequency,
transit
on
twitter
and
south
and
on
state
street
as
well
as
rough.
Approximately
one
block
to
the
south
is
the
s
line
that
provides
access
to
the
regional
transit
rail
network,
the
difference
in
height,
so
in
other
fbu
n2
zones
where
there's
a
corner
property.
Some
have
requested
that
the
corner
be
added
to
the
extra
height.
H
F
F
Is
can
you
correct
me
if
I'm
remembering
this
wrong,
but
I
think
I
saw
a
community
council
meeting
several
months
ago.
It's
the
property
owner
of
them.
Is
it
magnolia,
not
magnolia.
There's
existing
apartments
there
right
and
so
those
would
stay
and
be
rezoned,
but
their
actual
hard
corner
parcel
is
the
potential
spot
for
an
additional
building.
Is
that
still
what
is
being
proposed-
and
I
know
that
what
they're,
what
they
property
owners
owners
tell
us
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that's
what
will
always
stay,
but
am
I
remembering
right.
H
That's
my
understanding
that
apartment
buildings,
the
giorgio
apartments,
which
I
think
was
in
the
news
a
couple
years
ago
that
people
are
familiar
with
but
yeah
that
that's
my
understanding
and
I
don't
I
have
don't
know
if
the
applicant
is
here
to
provide
more
clarity
on
that.
L
F
F
So
that's
something
that
will
be
on
my
mind,
but
I
mean
I
also
agree
with
what
dan
ducan
just
said
about
how
the
city
should
move
away
from
car
dependency
and
more
towards
encouragement
of
public
transit
use.
So
those
are
the
two
competing
factors
I'll
be
thinking
about.
I
think
in
terms
of
height
and
setbacks,
because
it's
just
the
county
complex.
I'm
not
super
concerned
about
the
different
that
it
added
five
feet
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
would
be
that
spillover
impacted
to
neighborhoods.
B
B
D
K
Thank
you.
So
the
request
is
to
vacate
the
eastern
portion
of
the
alley.
The
applicants
cite
a
lack
of
use
as
the
reason
for
the
request
and
the
purpose
of
requesting
this
is
to
incorporate
the
land
into
before
budding
properties
which
would
lead,
and
ideally,
legalize,
the
two
structures
that
were
built
in
the
public.
Right-Of-Way
staff
recommended
the
planning
commission
forward
a
negative
recommendation
to
the
city
council
and
they
ended
up
forwarding
a
positive
recommendation.
K
So
the
lack
of
use
argument
comes
from
that
the
valley
way
is
blocked
and
it
can't
be
used,
but
staff
believe
that
the
lack
use
could
be
contributed
to
the
unpermitted
structures
being
built
in
the
public
right-of-way,
which
is
why
the
negative,
why
it
was
a
negative
recommendation,
the
reasoning
being
that
would
not
support
the
city's
master
plan
policies
which
aim
to
increase
pedestrian
connectivity
and
act
of
transportation.
K
Thank
you.
So
if
the
alley
is
vacated,
the
the
structures
would
not
be
automatically
legalized,
and
this
is
not
equal,
an
exception
to
any
applicable
zoning
standards
and
the
ordinance
would
not
affect
the
distribution
of
the
vacated
right-of-way
as
established
in
utah's
state
code
and
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation.
But
if
you
have
any
questions
about
the
intent
or
staff
report,
please
let
me
know.
M
Yeah,
thank
you
on
the
alleyway.
Would
if
we
lose
the
vacation
there,
would
it
be
split
in
half
between
the
southern
and
the
northern
properties
or
how
does
that
work?
Because
I
don't.
I
can't
remember
that.
Yes,
how
that.
K
Yep,
it
would
split
in
half
and
if
that
does
happen,
then
the
property
owners
will
need
to
go
through
lot
line,
adjustments
and-
and
hopefully
the
those
structures
will
be
legalized,
because
right,
regardless
of
vacating
or
not,
the
property
lines
would
go
through
the
middle
of
the
structures.
At
that
point,.
M
K
Correct
the
eastern
portion
wasn't
hasn't
really
been
open.
The
western
portions
always
been
used,
people
access
their
garages
from
there
and
based
on
the
photographs
and
just
past
research.
K
The
first
structure
has
been
there
for
a
long
time
and
some
of
the
properties
have
been
using
that
alley
as
their
as
their
own,
but
the
the
newer
garage
that
was
it
wasn't
the
current
property
owner.
But
the
original
proprietor
did
come
to
the
city
and
was
informed
that
it
wasn't.
It
was
not
private
property,
but
the
middle
of
the
alley
was
being
used
by
by
the
surrounding
properties
for
a
while.
B
Command
I've
got
I've,
got
a
follow-up
question
council
member
doing
if
you're,
okay
with
that
sorry
council
member
first,
my
my
question
is
the
active
transportation
master
plan.
When
was
that
adopted.
B
K
Yes,
yes,
we
believe,
so
we
don't
know
exactly
when
they're
built
we're
going
off
of
the
aerial
photographs,
but.
F
K
Moving
forward
the
there
was
an
enforcement
case
that
was
started,
but
of
course
put
on
put
on
hold
as
we
as
we
go
through
this
process,
but
to
legalize
them
there
would
need
to
be
when
sally
was
vacated
and
split
in
half
the
property
owners
would
have
to
apply
for
lot
line,
adjustments
and
maneuver.
The
the
two
structures
on
the
the
parcels
that
have
been
using
them,
which
is
the
corner
property
and
then
2188.
K
And
if
it's
not
approved,
then
well,
I
think
that
they
would
just
work
with
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
happened
to
be
honest,.
H
And
that's
a
that's,
a
question
that
or
something
that
our
engineering
division
would
actually
or
would
lead
up
on
that.
F
O
That's
correct:
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
jonas
great.
Well,
I
amanda
gave
a
great
briefing
I'll.
Just
I'll
be
brief
myself.
My
name
is
jonas
sappington.
This
is
my
wife,
danielle
sappington
and
we're
petitioning
for
the
partial
alleyway
vacation
behind
our
home
of
11
years
at
at
that
address.
O
We
know
that
the
alleyway
topics
are
a
hot
topic
so
and
that
you
guys
look
forward
to
these,
but
we
appreciate
your
time
very
much.
We
also
want
to
just
reiterate:
we
feel
strongly
that
these
are
best
addressed
on
kind
of
a
case-by-case
basis,
rather
than
kind
of
a
blanket
policy.
So
we'd
appreciate
it.
O
If
you
guys
would
consider
our
case
specifically
there's
a
couple
as
a
man
to
describe
there's
a
couple
structures
that
have
been
there:
they're
blocking
the
east
half
of
our
alleyway
behind
the
behind
our
home,
and
these
there's
two
sheds
in
one
garage
they've
been
there.
They
were
built
by
previous
owners
in
every
every
account
they
were
built
by
previous
owners
and
seem
to
have
been
there
established
for
20
plus
years,
some
of
them
the
present
day
owners.
We've
all
inherited
this
situation,
so
we're
just
hoping
to
make
legal.
O
What
kind
of
what
already
is,
so
that
we
could
improve
on
the
area
around
us?
The
alternative,
of
course,
is
to
knock
over
these
structures
and
open
up
our
alleyway,
so
we've
carefully
kind
of
developed
this
application
to
gain
the
support
of
every
home
owner
who's
immediately
involved.
O
So,
like
some
of
the
counselors,
have
asked
what
would
happen
to
the
buildings,
whether
they,
whatever
the
decision
is,
if
the
application
is
approved
to
vacate,
then
we
right
now
we
have
a
verbal
agreement
that
everyone's
kind
of
happy
the
way
things
are,
but
it
would
need
to
be
made
official
like
amanda
said,
so.
O
We
also
feel
like
we
have
a
pretty
big
support
from
our
neighborhood,
so
it's
not
just
a
a
selfish
land
grab,
but
a
lot
of
people
in
our
neighborhood
feel
positive
about
it,
as
the
alleyway
being
open
in
our
opinion,
is
not
a
benefit
to
our
neighborhood
and
could
even
be
a
hindrance
in
some
ways.
O
O
In
addition,
the
salt
lake
police
department
shared
their
opinion
that
keeping
the
alleyway
closed
as
opposed
to
removing
the
structures
and
opening
it
back
up
to
the
public
is
advisable
to
quote
push
people
to
the
front
sidewalks
of
the
homes
which
makes
it
safer
for
the
entire
neighborhood
unquote,
so
pedestrian
traffic
needs
are,
we
feel,
are
adequately
met
and
provided
for
by
these
front
of
the
home
sidewalks,
as
well
as
the
the
tracks
line
to
the
south
and
again,
we
just
feel
confident
that
this
is
a
would
be
a
long-term
benefit
to
the
homeowners
as
well
as
the
neighborhood.
B
F
Just
trying
to
do
my
research
that
this
is
one
of
three
connected
alleyways
that
currently
exist
on
paper,
two
of
which
are
effectively
vacated
but
not
officially
vacated,
and
the
third
is
still
possible.
Is
that
true?
And
if
so,
why
would
we
not,
if
we're
going
to
do
that
for
this
existing
alleyway
that
is
encroached
upon?
Why
not
do
it
for
both
at
the
same
time?
F
B
Let's
have
steph
see
if
they've
got
an
answer
for
that
amanda
or
nick.
F
It
looks
like
there's
also
an
existing
alleyway
and
I'm
just
looking
on
the
parcel
lines
that
come
up
on
google
maps
and
earth,
so
it
might
not
be
accurate,
but
behind
the
that
runs
north
south
kind
of
tease
into
this
alleyway
between.
I
think
it's,
eight
or
ninth
and
tenth
or
something
like
that
or.
D
To
it's
your
chair,
I
might
be
able
to
add
something
here.
Yes,
please,
brian,
the
the
subject
alley
is
half
of
the
alley
between
10th,
east
and
lincoln
street,
and
then
west
of
lincoln
street
to
900
east
is
another
alley.
Neither
of
those
segments
are
part
of
this
application
so
that,
if
the
intersecting
alley
that
councilman
romano
is
talking
about,
might
be
lincoln
street
and
I
think
matt
castle
had
his
hand
raised,
he
might
have
something
more
to
add
to
that.
Q
Yes,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
add
just
one
small
piece
of
information
which
is
rockmount
power.
Power
lines
are
in
that
alleyway
and
the
structures
are
immediately
underneath
that
power
line,
and
so,
if
the
vacation
is
approved,
we
still
need
to
provide
a
access
easement
for
rocky
mount
power
to
access
their
power
lines
so
leaving
it
in
its
current
state.
It's
probably
going
to
be
in
the
current
state
of
the
neighborhood.
It's
probably
going
to
be
a
difficult
endeavor,
especially
with
rocky
mountain
power.
Back
there.
B
Q
B
Q
They
have,
we
have
a
letter
in
engineering
concerning
their
concern
for
not
they
didn't
know
about
it,
so
it
was
through
the
vacation
process,
where
there
was
realized
that
there
was
blockage
of
the
alleyway.
I
Yeah
in
the
findings
of
the
planning
commission,
they
said
that
it's
not
one
of
the
findings
is
that
it's
not
contrary
to
city
policies.
But
can
you
explain
why,
like
what
that
was
based
on,
because
it
doesn't
seems
to
me
that
it
doesn't
follow
our
normal
disposition
policy.
K
And
then
just
look
at
the
minutes
earlier
and
I'm
trying
to
remember
which
specific
policy
they
were
referring
to
that
in
that
conversation.
K
No
you
I,
I
believe
it
was
the
lack
of
use
policy.
We
talked
a
lot
about
the
pedestrian
network
and
how
the
alley
to
the
the
west
is
is
still
open,
but
there
are
some.
Some
other
ones
have
been
closed
in
the
area,
so
there
wasn't
there's
no
longer
a
through
connection.
Q
K
The
main
conversation
was
revolved
around
the
pedestrian
connections
and
then
the
public
safety
of
whether
or
not
opening
it
would
be
safer
or
not.
Okay,.
B
So
okay
we'd
like
to
thank
the
applicants
and
nick
and
amanda
and
brian
for
presenting
and
answering
all
of
our
questions.
Let's
look
at
this
really
quickly.
B
O
That
thank
you
very
much.
I
would
one
of
the
counselor
mono
described
the
the
t-shaped
of
what
was
the
original
alleys
that
went
on
the
three
kind
of
blocks
between
9th
east
and
11th
east
and
all
the
north
and
south
alleyways
have
been
vacated.
O
The
the
east
and
west
ones
are
are
different
to
the
block.
East
of
us
has
been
vacated,
and
the
one
to
the
west
of
us
has
not
and
and
that's
kind
of
a
good
example
to
us
of
what
it
would
be
like
if
we
opened
it
up
and
it's
it's
not
a
good
example
of,
for
our
opinion,
the
kind
of
traffic
that
we
want
to
have
around
our
homes
and
then
the
only
other
thing
I
would
like
to
say
briefly
is
about
the
rocky
mountain
power.
O
We
we
approached
rocky
mountain
power
and
and
they
they
unofficially
because
we're
not
you
know,
we
don't
have
jobs
in
the
government,
but
they
said
that
they
didn't
have
an
issue
with
it.
Also
they've
been
accessing
the
power
line
behind
our
home
for
the
past
20
plus
years
or
whatever.
It
is
without
any
issue,
and
we
have
photos
documenting
how
they
do
that
it
seems
to
be
quite
accessible.
B
B
B
While
we
go
on
to
item
number
nine,
which
is
general
obligation,
bond
series,
20
21
in
regards
to
our
street
reconstruction,
so
everybody
let's
take
a
26
minute
break
and
get
back
here
at
4,
30.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Item
number
nine,
which
is
a
resolution
on
general
obligation,
bonds,
series
2021
for
street
reconstruction.
We've
got
kira,
luke
who's,
a
policy
analyst
in
public
engagement
for
council
staff,
but
we
also
have
the
city
treasurer
marina
scott.
We
also
have
our
cfo
mary
beth
thompson,
as
well
as
the
city
engineers,
matthew
cassell.
J
J
This
particular
issuance
is
for
23
600
000
and
is
planned
to
be
issued
later
this
year.
In
2018,
after
extensive
public
engagement,
the
council
placed
this
bond
on
the
ballot
and
salt
lake
city.
Voters
ended
up
approving
it.
Although
specific
streets
planned
for
the
bond's
use
weren't
outlined
in
the
outreach
for
this
bond.
A
lot
of
the
conversations
we
had
with
the
public
emphasize
the
importance
of
particularly
enhanced
transparency
and
communication
on
how
these
funds
are
used.
J
J
During
policy
discussions
before
placing
the
bond
on
the
ballot,
the
council
gave
direction
for
an
80
20
split
of
funding
between
major
streets
and
local
streets,
with
projects
in
all
seven
districts.
To
make
sure
that
all
areas
of
the
city
can
enjoy
the
benefits.
From
this
funding
and
when
combined
with
the
earlier
two
issuances,
this
issuance
has
20
million
for
major
streets
and
3
million
for
local
streets.
I
J
G
Thank
you
akira,
so
this.
J
Proposed
bond
is
the
third
block
of
bonds
to
be
issued
from
the
2018
authorization
and,
as
kira
mentioned,
it
will
finance.
Approximately
23
million
and
23.4
million
in
street
projects
exhibit
one
that
was
attached
to
the
transmittal.
It
was
prepared
by
engineering
and
it
details
street.
M
Maybe
more
for
the
engineer
side,
this,
the
three
million
for
the
local
streets
is
that
in
line
with
the
150-ish
miles
a
year
and
how
long
would
this
bond
take
us?
How
far
into
the
future.
Q
Go
ahead,
this
this
bond
is
not
part
of
the
150
miles
per
year.
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
many
lane
miles.
We
can
figure
that
out
how
many
lane
miles
we
do,
which
each
use
of
local
funds
each
year,
but
it's
not
150
miles.
It's
probably
closer
to
10
miles,
maybe
5-10
miles.
M
Okay,
so
the
majority
of
this
is
going
to
the
the
larger
projects.
Q
Right
this
I
mean
this
is
for
reconstruction.
So
it's.
If
you
think
about
this,
our
reconstruction
costs
about
half
a
million
per
lane
mile
to
reconstruct
a
segment
of
roads,
so
it
it's.
We
don't
get
as
far
along
with
reconstruction.
M
So
I'm
this
is
kind
of
outside
the
bond,
but
it's
on
the
streets
side.
So
I
apologize
for
the
question
here,
but
when
we
do,
the
street
survey
reagan
is,
is
that
incorporated
in?
Are
we
redoing
that
survey
in
the
near
future
to
update
the
streets
that
were
the
side
streets
that
we're
planning
on
repaving.
Q
Yes,
the
surf
the
the
survey
road
survey
is
actually
going
to
start
in
probably
three
weeks
at
the
latest,
and
it
will
gather
information
from
every
single
road
and
street
in
the
city
and
those
roads
that
we've
reconstructed
those
roads
that
we
have
surface
sealed
all
to
be
taken
into
account.
With
that
new
survey,
and
with
that
information
we
will
come
back
to
council
and
let
you
know
where
we
are,
after
a
couple
years
of
an
extra
crew
to
do
our
surface
seals
and
then
the
reconstruction.
Q
M
And
this
share
just
another
question
on
and
so
right
now
the
plan
goes
out
to
2026.
I
think
it
is.
Does
that.
Would
this
go
from
26
on
or
would
this
actually
just
if
the
survey
could
adjust
the
streets
that
were
planned
to
new
streets
between
20
22
and
beyond
that
works.
Q
We,
the
the
bond
funds,
are
go
to
2026
and
after
that,
we're
looking
for
other
funds
to
continue
with
a
more
robust
program
than
previous
to
the
bond.
J
Council
chair,
if
you
don't
mind,
if
I
weigh
in
this,
is
lorna
vote
in
public
services
to
add
on
to
what
matt
is
saying,
it's
a
complex
mix
between
the
reconstruction,
which
is,
as
matt
said,
far
fewer
miles.
The
155
miles
in
the
streets
division
is
actually
happening
and
happening
very
well.
J
The
next
step
is
then
to
look
at
the
remaining
bands
of
oci
and
that's
what
that
survey
will
do
is
give
us
a
new
oci
and
come
up
with
a
long-term
plan
for
addressing
the
full
scope
of
work.
That
needs
to
be
done
as
matt
works
on
the
worst
first
end
of
roads
and
streets
is
working
on
preserving
the
best
quality
roads.
J
B
It
doesn't
look
like
it
matt.
This
was
an
and
kira.
This
was
an
easy
one
for
you
guys.
I
have
one
question:
having
been
involved
with
funding
our
futures
how's,
that
second
pavement
crew.
Doing
maybe
matt
can
answer
that
one
or.
J
Lorna
that
one's
in
the
streets,
division,
they're
doing
remarkably
well
and
as
they've
put
in
a
couple
years
now
of
surface
treatments,
even
with
the
windstorm
they
were
able
to
complete
nearly
all
the
155
miles
and
they're
actually
been
able
to
experiment
with
some
new
technologies
and
systems.
They've
streamlined
their
work.
It's
it's
really
fun
to
see
what
they've
been
able
to
do
with
their
scheduling.
It's
just
been
remarkable
work
from
the
streets
division,
so
they're
booming
along
and
we
love
the
new
crew.
B
B
Of
that
cure
is
still
here,
she's
our
policy
analyst
and
public
engagement
specialist.
We
also
have
liz
buehler
who's,
our
innovation
team
lead
and
kyrene
gibb
from
y2
analytics.
B
J
I'll
just
set
it
up
real
quick
again.
This
is
a
biennial
resident
survey,
the
city
conducts
every
two
years.
The
questions
have
evolved
slightly
each
time,
but
this
has
overall
been
a
helpful
tool
for
the
city
to
start
gathering
and
tracking
insights
over
time
on
how
outside
factors
and
city
policies
are
affecting
resident
quality
of
life.
J
Council
staff
had
the
opportunity
to
help
shape
this
year's
survey,
which
includes
some
new
insights
on
kovid
19
impacts
and
community
perspectives
on
policing
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
liz
buehler
thanks
kyra-
and
I
don't
have
much
to
add
to
that
great
intro-
I'm
actually
going
to
ask
kyreen
to
review
the
survey
results.
So
the
expert
can
present
the
data
to
you
herself.
P
P
Over
time
generally,
we've
been
tracking
approval
of
city
services
and
asking
residents
to
evaluate
their
perceptions
of
their
neighborhood,
their
quality
of
life
in
the
city
city
services
overall,
and
then
looking
at
some
specific
prioritization
around
various
initiatives
that
the
city
has
pursued
and
examine
the
ways
in
which
residents
expect
to
receive
information
from
and
reach
out
to
the
city.
P
As
kira
mentioned,
a
couple
of
the
newly
added
sets
of
questions
this
year
revolved
around
covet
19
experiences,
and
then
we
also
had
some
questions
specifically
focused
on
perceptions
of
salt
lake
city
law
enforcement
as
well
a
quick
look
at
survey
methodology.
The
survey
was
conducted
back
in
april,
so
we
had
live
telephone
interviews
conducted
the
week
of
the
14th
to
the
21st,
and
then
online
interviews
occurred
concurrently
and
then,
with
a
little
bit
more
extra
time.
P
On
the
back
end,
at
the
14th
to
the
26th,
we
received
a
total
of
1214
responses,
and
that
gives
us
a
margin
of
error
for
the
full
sample
of
about
2.8
percentage
points.
The
phone
survey
was
slightly
abbreviated
compared
to
the
online
survey.
So
when
we're
looking
at
online
survey,
only
questions
that
margin
of
error
for
the
full
sample
is
about
3.4
percentage
points.
P
We
have
a
really
good
cross-section
of
residents
here,
so
pretty
even
gender
split,
pretty
even
between
homeowners
and
renters,
and
a
good
mix
of
ages
of
residents
represented
as
well
as
some
ethnic
diversity
that
matches
the
composition
of
the
city
again,
according
to
those
census
estimates-
and
this
is
just
a
quick
look
at
the
geographic
distribution
of
residents
who
responded
to
the
survey
as
you
can
see,
we've
got
pretty
good
coverage
throughout
the
city
as
a
whole,
slightly
lower
response
rates
in
districts,
one
and
two,
which
is
what
we've
seen
consistent
with
responses
in
the
past
as
well.
P
So
diving
into
some
of
the
highlights
here
up
first,
you
can
see
that
we
have
a
pretty
consistent
quality
of
life
rating
overall,
we're
down
slightly
from
the
2019
metric,
where
we
are
at
an
81
on
a
zero
to
100
scale,
where
100
would
be
a
very
high
quality
of
life.
So,
overall
again,
residents
are
pretty
consistently
satisfied
with
their
quality
of
life
in
salt
lake
city
and
that
downtick
gets
us
right
back
to
the
2017
levels
and
so
nothing
outside
the
range
or
realm
of
the
ordinary.
P
Here,
it's
worth
noting
that
that
dip
in
2018
represents
a
survey
of
not
all
residents
but
rather
registered.
Voters,
specifically
that
was
a
survey
conducted
in
preparation
for
the
funding,
our
future
projects,
so
a
little
bit
of
a
different
population,
a
little
bit
of
a
more
critical
lens
from
that
population
as
well-
and
this
is
a
quick
look
at
those
quality
of
life
distributions
across
council
districts.
So
it's
worth
noting
that
our
council
district
6
has
the
highest
average
quality
of
life
rating
and
80
on
that
zero
to
100
scale
districts.
P
We
asked
residents
to
indicate
how
they
felt
the
city
had
responded
in
to
the
kobe
19
pandemic.
Again.
This
is
in
april,
reflecting
on
the
past
year
or
so
of
the
pandemic.
At
that
time.
Overall,
the
city
receives
pretty
good
marks
here
with
64
percent
of
residents,
saying
that
the
city
did
an
excellent
or
good
job
in
response
to
the
covet
19
pandemic.
The
salt
lake
county
government
also
receives
majority
positive
marks
here.
The
state
and
federal
government
receiving
lower
scores
from
salt
lake
city
residents
overall.
P
C
I
P
J
Just
I
I
believe
I
queued
it
up
to
where
you
had
stopped
actually
liz.
Could
we
go
back
to
slides
so
that
the
council
can
see
those
and
and
hear
a
little
hear
that
again.
J
We
might
have
lost
kyrie
for
so
just
for
a
little
bit.
I
will
fill
in
with
her.
You
can
see
the
difference
by
districts
here
and
you
can
see
that
there
is,
and
I
apologize,
that
district
7
has
fallen
off.
J
P
Thank
you,
liz,
I'm
sorry!
I
was
cutting
out
there.
I'm
happy
to
jump
in
here
easy
enough
for
you,
wonderful,
please,
okay,
so
apologies
for
the
technical
difficulties
folks.
So
our
next
set
of
questions
here
we
asked
residents
to
what
extent
their
access
to
city
services
was
affected
during
the
pandemic,
and
a
majority
of
residents
indicated
that
their
access
to
city
services
in
salt
lake
was
only
impeded
to
a
small
extent
or
not
at
all
so
55
58
total
said
it
was
it
had
a
small
or
negligible
impact
on
their
access
to
city
services.
P
I
think
it's
helpful
to
know
that
among
residents
who
had
access
to
some
of
those
emergency
aid
or
relief
resources
in
response
to
the
coveted
pandemic,
17
took
advantage
of
those
opportunities,
so
a
larger
share
than
those
who
said
their
city
service
access
was
impacted
to
a
great
extent,
which
I
think
points
to
a
good
management
of
circumstances.
In
less
than
ideal
scenarios
to
be
sure.
P
We
can
go
ahead
to
the
next
slide
great,
so
this
is
a
quick
look
at
our
top
city
service
ratings.
Overall,
we're
pretty
consistent
with
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
here
fire
department
and
paramedics
at
the
top
of
our
list
of
highly
rated
city
services
on
a
one
to
seven
scale.
None
of
the
changes
on
this
slide
compared
to
2019
were
statistically
significant,
so
overall,
a
really
similar
lineup
of
satisfaction
with
city
services
compared
to
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
next
slide.
P
P
A
change
of
0.7
points
is
statistically
significant,
so
again
just
a
shift
there
in
perceptions
of
homeless
services
and
the
police
department
overall,
but
otherwise,
a
very
similar
picture
to
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
here,
including
I'll
just
mention,
really
quickly
an
increase
in
or
positive
perceptions
of
street
maintenance
that
one's
not
statistically
significant.
But
I
do
think
it's
worth
noting,
given
all
the
funding
our
future
projects
and
things
that
have
been
prioritized
over
the
past
two
years,
that
that
perception
or
that
rating
is
going
up.
P
P
Although
we
have
a
slightly
larger
cohort
of
residents
who
say
that
supporting
local
businesses
should
be
a
high
priority
for
the
city.
This
is
something
that
has
increased
since
2019,
likely
largely
because
of
the
impacts
of
the
kova
19
pandemic
on
our
local
economy.
There's
certainly
been
some
surge
to
support
local
businesses
in
the
area,
but
expanding
sustainability
programs
and
improving
city
street
conditions
are
consistently
high
priority
and
popular
initiatives
and
then
another
one
here.
P
19
pandemic,
we've
seen
a
pretty
sharp
decrease
in
the
number
of
in-person
contacts
from
residents
reaching
out
to
the
city
for
service
or
some
other
request
when
it
comes
to
the
mode
that
residents
prefer
to
use,
if
given
only
one
option
or
if
they
had
to
pick
their
most
preferred
way
to
reach
out
to
the
city
about
a
third
of
residents,
indicate
that
they
would
prefer
to
reach
out
to
the
city
over
the
phone
which
makes
that
the
most
popular
means
of
communication.
P
P
And
then
this
next
slide
is
a
quick
look
at
the
ways
in
which
residents
would
prefer
to
receive
information
from
the
city,
so,
whereas
the
slide
before
was
how
residents
are
reaching
out
to
salt
lake
city
offices,
this
is
a
quick
look
at
how
residents
would
like
to
get
information
or
news
from
the
city.
Social
media
has
increased
in
popularity
pretty
significantly
with
43
of
residents,
indicating
that
they
have
used
social
media
to
gain
information
about
the
city
in
the
past
year.
P
The
newspaper
is
still
a
very
prominent
source
as
well,
though
down
just
slightly
from
2019.
39
percent
of
residents
say
that
they
they
rely
on
the
newspaper
for
city
information,
then
emails
from
the
city,
the
city
website
and
the
city
newsletter,
or
an
insert
in
the
municipal
bill,
are
really
second
tier,
all
statistically
tied
there,
basically
for
our
our
second
most
used
or
third
most
utilized
resources.
P
Again,
if
asked
to
choose
one
information
source,
we
have
a
slightly
different
landscape
here,
so
emails
from
the
city
become
the
most
popular
preferred
information
source.
If
residents
are
again
forced
to
choose
one
with
38
to
just
over
a
third
of
residents,
indicating
that
that's
how
they
would
prefer
to
receive
information
from
the
city,
I
will
say
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
digital
bias
here,
because
this
was
one
of
those
questions
that
was
only
asked
to
residents
completing
the
survey
online.
P
So
we
might
see
a
little
bit
of
a
different
landscape
or
this
question
administered
over
the
phone,
but
social
media
newspaper
and
the
city
website
are
all
also
popular
ways
of
receiving
information
about
the
city,
and
then
city
hosted
virtual
events
down
there
at
the
bottom
of
the
list,
with
10
percent
of
residents,
suggesting
that
that's
how
they
prefer
to
get
information
about
the
city.
Certainly,
this
is
something
that's
risen
in
popularity
and
prominence
in
the
wake
of
code,
19.
P
Our
last
couple,
slides
here,
are
just
looking
at
perceptions
of
law
enforcement,
so
overall
we
have
about
66
percent
of
residents
who
say
that
they
trust
the
police
in
salt
lake
city
at
least
a
moderate
amount.
A
25
percent
have
a
great
deal
of
trust
in
the
police
department
and
41
a
moderate
amount.
P
That
majority
is
pretty
consistent
across
demographic
subgroups
as
well,
so
racial
minority
respondents
or
people
of
color
in
the
community
have
about
equal
perceptions
or
or
levels
of
trust
in
the
police,
as
do
their
white
counterparts
in
the
city.
New
residents
and
long-term
residents
are
relatively
close
as
well.
61
percent
of
newer
residents
indicate
that
they
trust
the
police
in
salt
lake
city
at
least
a
moderate
amount
where
we
start
to
see.
Some
differences
are
looking
at
our
lgbtqia
and
non-binary
residents.
P
While
we
have
a
small
sample
size
of
those
in
the
community,
our
respondents
who
represent
those
groups
have
significantly
lower
levels
of
trust
in
the
salt
lake
city
police
department
and
our
youngest
cohort
of
respondents
have
report
lower
levels
of
trust
in
the
police
department,
as
well
50
among
18
to
34
year
old
residents
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
city,
which
is
roughly
in
the
mid
60s.
There.
P
So,
while
residents
do
have
majority
trust
in
the
police,
majority
of
residents
indicate
that
they
have
at
least
a
moderate
amount
of
trust
in
the
police
department.
Certainly,
there
are
some
perceptions
that
there's
room
for
improvement
in
the
way
that
policing
is
handled
in
salt
lake
city,
a
majority
of
residents
and
in
fact
a
super
majority
of
residents
agree
that
law
enforcement
agencies
should
build
relationships
with
the
community
to
develop
strategies
that
reduce
crime
and
disorder.
P
More
than
two-thirds
of
residents
also
agree
that
local
law
enforcement
officers
need
to
do
a
better
job
working
with
community
members
to
identify
problems
and
solutions
that
local
law
enforcement
officers
should
attend.
Community
events
give
public
presentations
and
participate
in
community
service
projects
and
that
it
would
be
valuable
for
the
community
if
local
officers
interacted
with
the
public
outside
of
enforcing
the
law.
P
So
a
lot
of
support
here
for
some
of
those
community
policing
initiatives
getting
law
enforcement
officers
involved
in
the
communities
they
serve
in
ways
that
are
not
punitive
where
we
start
to
see
some
interesting
division
in
these
responses
is
when
we
start
to
talk
about
the
budget
as
it
relates
to
law
enforcement.
So
we
have
two
sort
of
polarized
statements
here
decreasing
the
law
enforcement
budget
will
make
my
community
less
safe.
That
is
a
pretty
divisive
statement.
P
We
have
nearly
equal
levels
of
agreement
and
disagreement
there
and
then
providing
more
funding
to
police
will
improve
law
enforcement
in
my
community
again
we're
really
splitting
the
city
down
the
middle
there
with
nearly
equal
levels
of
agreement
and
disagreement
when
it
comes
to
either
decreasing
the
budget
or
increasing
the
budget
for
the
salt
lake
city
police
department.
So
no
silver
bullets
here,
I'm
afraid,
but
certainly
some
interesting
perspectives
about
local
law
enforcement
in
salt
lake
city
then
the
last
slide
I
have
is
just
a
quick
recap.
P
So
these
are
some
of
the
findings
that
we
thought
were
most
prominent
from
the
survey
sort
of
again
tracking
data
that
we've
seen
over
time
and
highlighting
a
couple
of
those
new
points
that
we've
seen
so
overall.
Quality
of
life
remains
relatively
stable
from
prior
years,
but
again
we're
certainly
seeing
the
effects
of
cove
19
in
many
of
the
survey
responses,
not
just
questions
that
are
directly
related
to
the
pandemic.
P
We
also
find,
overall
that
residents
are
satisfied
with
their
neighborhoods
and
are
willing
to
pay
for
infrastructure
improvements,
and
there
were
a
couple
questions
that
we
didn't
highlight
in
this
particular
presentation
that
indicate
that
residents
would
largely
support
a
use
fee
or
some
sort
of
infrastructure
fee
to
fund.
Some
of
the
improvements
that
they're
eager
to
see
in
their
neighborhoods
residents
also
are
overall
positive
about
the
economic
outlook
of
the
city,
they're
less
likely
to
say
that
there
are
job
opportunities
for
people
like
them
in
the
city,
but
residents
are
very
enthusiastic
again.
P
Looking
thinking
about
those
city
initiatives
that
we
highlighted
for
the
city
to
support
local
businesses-
and
that
was
evident
in
a
couple
areas
of
the
survey
and
then
a
quick
review
of
our
communication
preferences
email-
is
a
popular
two-way
mode
of
interacting
with
the
city
both
for
contacting
and
receiving
information,
but
overall
residents
still
prefer
to
reach
out
via
phone.
If
they're
looking
to
contact
the
city,
that's
the
primary
method
of
communication
and
again
high
levels
of
trust
in
the
police
generally.
B
B
Karine
I've
got
a
question
for
you
when
you
asked
the
residents
of
salt
lake
city
about
the
25
fee.
How
did
you
say
that
that
fee
would
come
about
what
would
that
fee
and
actually
be.
P
Yeah,
that
is
a
great
question,
so
the
framing
for
that
fee
and
I'm
gonna
just
jump
back
to
that
on
my
version
of
the
presentation,
so
that
I
get
the
wording
right
here.
If
I
remember
correctly,.
P
That's
okay.
I
appreciate
it,
so
we
did
not
indicate
a
specific
mechanism
for
that
25
fee.
Instead,
we
just
said
we
asked
residents
how
willing
they
would
be
to
pay
an
additional
25
dollars
per
year.
The
goal
there
was
to
gauge
a
willingness
to
pay
an
an
interest
in
this
type
of
fee
to
support
infrastructure
projects,
without
tying
the
city's
hand
to
one
mechanism
or
another.
So
certainly,
that's
still
open
to
additional
interpretation
and
investigation.
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know
of
any
fee,
that's
for
renters
or
tenants.
I
don't
know
of
any
fee
out
there
that
they,
they
you
could
charge
them
with.
I
know
that
you
could
do
that
with
property
tax,
which
are
property
owners
in
the
city.
So
if
you're,
looking
at
your
statistics
and
using
50,
renters
and
50
homeowners,
I
mean
that
would
only
affect
those
people
that
own
homes.
P
Yeah,
I
guess
the
the
interesting
sort
of
loophole
there
is
many
cities
will
do
some
sort
of
a
utility
usage
fee
that
impacts
renter
and
owner
households.
If
it's
attached
to
some
sort
of
municipal
utility,
that's
administered
through
the
city.
That
said,
I
know
different
apartment
complexes
and
rental
situations
handle
all
of
those
things
differently.
So
whether
it's.
I
B
Totally
I'd
love
to
see
a
way
that
everybody
is
able
to
be
charged
fairly.
For
that
you
know
what
I
mean,
and
just
something
to
highlight
as
well
is
that
district
one
has
the
largest
percentage
of
home
ownership,
and
I'm
wondering
if
that
had
something
to
do
why
the
number
of
strongly
disagree
with
that
fee,
because
you
know
the
majority,
I
shouldn't
say
the
majority,
but
the
highest
percentage
of
home
ownership
is
from
district
one.
B
P
And
we
could
certainly
look
at
that
level
of
support
broken
out
by
homeowners
and
renters
as
well
to
see
if
that's
where
all
of
that
disparity
is
coming
from,
I
think
we're
likely
also
looking
at
some
of
the
socioeconomic
differences
between
the
districts.
When
we
see
those
levels
of
support
25
in
council,
district
6
is
maybe
not
perceived
quite
the
same
way
as
it
is
in
council
district.
One.
R
B
B
B
We
also
have
alejandro
moya
who's
looking
to
be
appointed
to
the
art,
design,
board,
color
maesh
and
I'm
sorry,
I
probably
murdered
your
last
name.
I
know
she's
here
I
saw
her
the
art,
design,
board
arts
council
board
joe
sand
glass.
B
Sarah
longoria
to
the
arts,
council
board
and
carlton
gets
to
the
historic
landmark
commission.
So
maybe
taylor
you
can,
let
me
know
if
any
of
those
are
here.
I
know
color
is.
J
B
Yeah,
so
give
us
a
little
idea
why
you
want
to
be
a
appointed
to
the
art
design
board.
K
Okay,
well,
I've
been
a
lifelong
resident
off
and
on
in
salt
lake
city,
and
I
think
at
this
point
you
know
our
city
is
growing,
so
much
that
it's
just
such
an
exciting
time
to
be
a
part
of
how
our
public
art
expands
as
our
city
grows
and
hopefully
working
to
have.
It
reflect
new
ideas.
K
I'm
really
passionate
about
the
potential
of
working
with
underrepresented
and
emerging
artists
as
a
new
voice
in
our
community,
and
I'm
also
really
passionate
about
how
our
visual
world,
how.
P
K
How
it
shapes
our
relationship
to
all
of
our
world
around
us,
and
I
feel,
like
public
art,
has
this
amazing
way
of
allowing
us
into
that
world
and
especially
when
there
is
community
buy-in.
I
think
when
there
are
broader
and
more
stories
told
by
more
people,
people
have
a
bigger
tendency
to
to
engage
with.
B
Appreciate
that
anybody
have
any
questions
for
color.
B
If
you
do
just
pipe
up,
I'm
really
excited
for
you
to
join
the
the
art
design
board,
but
you
don't
you
don't
have
to
tune
in
tonight
unless
you
want
to
you
know
you've
already
you
got
you
showed
up
early,
which
I'm
extremely
grateful
for,
but
you
know
you'll
be
on
the
consent
agenda
this
evening
to
be
appointed
to
that
board.
So
great
thank.
B
F
I
just
wanted
to
say
color
that
I'm
really
excited
for
you
to
be
serving
the
city.
I
haven't
met
you,
but
I've
heard
your
name
at
least
a
thousand
times
from
people
connected
to
yumoka
or
other
architecture,
arts,
community,
and
so
I'm
very
excited
to
you-
have
a
very
strong
reputation
and
I'm
very
excited
to
have
you
serving
sometimes.
J
B
J
I
am,
I
have
always
been
involved
in
by
the
way
I
do
have
a
piece
of
color
meshes
work
in
my
family
room
and
she
is
an
amazing
artist.
So
I
do
have
to
add
that
before
well.
J
Especially
small
world
in
salt
lake,
I
have
been
involved
in
some
kind
of
volunteer
work,
probably
really
since
college,
when
I
was
a
big
sister
for
big
brothers
and
big
sisters,
I
worked
the
suicide
and
crisis
hotline
sunday
graveyard
shift
for
years
in
san
jose
that
I
was
in
professional
organizations
with
human
resources,
which
is
my
background.
30
years
of
human
resources
and
most
recently
in
the
arts
community,
I'm
now
a
visual
artist.
J
I
was
fortunate
enough
to
be
able
to
retire
early
from
fidelity,
which
was
my
last
employer
for
15
years
and
studied
with
a
local
artist
and
now
show
at
phillips
gallery
in
salt
lake
city
and
I've
been
involved
in
three
different
arts
organizations
here
umoca
at
the
time
it
was
salt
lake
city,
arts
council,
I
mean
not:
arts,
council,
salt,
lake
city,
arts,
center
art
access
and
committee
work
with
umfa
and
at
the
time
I
also
did
that
with
with
felicia
baca.
J
So
it's
it's
been
a
couple
of
years
since
I've
been
involved
in
an
organization
larger
than
myself,
and
it
just
seemed
like
the
this
opportunity.
Just
seemed
like
the
right
opportunity.
Marrying
sort
of
my
hr
background,
as
well
as
my
arts
background,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
responsibilities
that
go
with
a
board
appointment.
B
Well,
you
are
a
talented
lady,
appreciate
you
putting
your
name
out
there
to
look
to
be
a
point
in
any
questions
or
comments
for
josan
awesome.
So
just
and
you,
like,
I
said
to
color,
you
don't
have
to
stay
on
at
seven
o'clock
for
these
long
council
meetings,
you're
on
the
consent
agenda
to
be
appointed
to
the
arts,
arts,
design,
board
arts
council
board
so
appreciate
your
willingness
to
serve
the
city.
F
I
We
have
two
appointees
who
are
working
on
logging
on
right
now,
so
if
we
could
give
them
just
a
minute
alejandro
and
sarah
alejandra
muya.
B
F
M
B
M
Our
foothills
end
up
north
of
huntsville.
H
I
We
have
sarah
longoria
here
taylor,
instead
of
her
being
able
to
turn
on
her
camera,
we're
not
able
to
move
her
over
to
the
panelists,
and
so
taylor
will
just
unmute
her.
If
that's
okay,.
J
B
K
B
No
you're
fine!
How
about
you
give
us
some
ideas
of
of
why
you
want
to
serve
on
the
arts
council
board.
K
Yeah,
so
I
am
the
director
of
a
salt
lake
city,
nonprofit,
ballet
company
called
municipal
ballet
company,
which
I
founded
in
2012,
and
I
have
been
on
the
applicant
side
of
the
grant
process
through
the
salt
lake
arts
council,
and
I
thought
that
it
might
be
a
nice
point
of
view
for
to
add
to
the
board
as
far
as
like
how
how
things
are
run
and
how
things
are
going.
And
if
I
can
like
add
that
perspective
of
an
artist
who's
applied
before
that.
It
might
be
a
good
thing.
B
That's
great
sarah.
I
love
that
any
questions
for
sarah.
B
K
A
B
B
K
I
Mr,
we
don't
have
any
word
from
alejandro
moya
and
we
just
received
word
that
carlton
can't
log
carlton
gets
can't
log
in
for
another
10
15
minutes.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
go
to
announcements
or
if
you
want
to
just
take
a
break
nope.
I
I
I'll,
just
chime
in
great
the
first
announcement
is
the
wasatch
front.
Regional
council
is
having
a
workshop
on
november
1st
for
municipal
elected
and
appointed
officials
in
northern
salt
lake
county,
specifically
to
update
the
transportation
components
of
the
regional
of
the
wasatch
choice,
regional
vision.
I
This
plan
is
revised
in
four
years.
The
meeting
will
run
from
about
four
to
six
pm.
We've
added
this
workshop
to
the
calendar,
but
let
staff
know
if
you
plan
on
attending,
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
they
are
prepared
for
you
guys,
there's
a
little
bit
more
information
for
you
guys
there.
I
So
then,
the
next
item
is
an
opportunity
to
close
out
previous
year's
legislative
intense
before
the
september
14th
briefing,
we've
handled
legislative
intents
differently
different
years,
so
this
is
just
one
other
way:
we're
trying
to
handle
it
and
wanting
to
give
you
guys
an
opportunity
to
look
through
the
legislative
intents
before
we
have
a
public
briefing
on
it,
and
so
it
let's
see,
there's
also
some
time
to
discuss
legislative
intents
that
have
been
pending
from
this
year
or
before.
I
So
the
term
advice
requested
that
council
members
review
the
list
of
previous
year's
intents
allison
sent
it
this
last
thursday.
So
it's
in
your
email
from
her
from
september
2nd,
and
so
if
you
could
just
take
a
quick
look
through
those
so
that
we
can
have
a
quicker
discussion.
That
would
be
great
also
if
you
have
specific
thoughts
like
oh
this
legislative
intent,
you
know
seems
out
of
date,
doesn't
really
I'm
not
really
interested
in
anymore.
I
That's
the
kind
of
feedback
that's
really
valuable
for
staff
to
have,
because
then
we
don't
have
to
take
your
time
during
the
briefing
going
through
that
stuff.
So
if
you
could
take
a
look
at
her
email
and
let
us
know
any
of
your
thoughts
before
the
14th,
that
would
be
great
or
just
ready
to
come
on
and
that's
it.
Mr
chair.
B
Alejandro's
made
it,
I
can
see
him
on
her
screen.
So
if
you
wouldn't
mind
alejandro,
why
don't
you
give
us
why
you
want
to
serve
on
the
art,
design,
board,
we'd
love
to
hear.
F
Hi
well,
thank
you,
everyone
for
meeting
with
me.
I
am
a
designer
and
an
artist,
and
the
reason
why
I
want
to
serve
is
similar
to
why
I
make
art
and
design.
You
know.
I
think
that
arden
and
design
is
a
powerful
force
in
the
life
of
people.
You
know
and
can
be
transformative.
F
It
can
build
community,
it
can
lift
the
spirit,
and
so
I
want
to
now
lend
my
services
not
just
as
artists
and
designer,
but
also
in
making
being
a
part
of
the
team
selects
the
type
of
art
that
you
know
is
in
our
public
spaces.
I
think
that
I
have
skills
and
experience.
You
know
that
were
beneficial
to
to
our
city
to
to
the
board,
and,
honestly,
I
was
very
excited.
You
know
when
I
heard
about
the
opportunity
to
to
help.
F
You
know
I
I'm
very
interested
on
on
how
art
can
connect
people
to
each
other.
You
know
and
on
like
on
how
we
can
see
ourselves
reflected
on
the
art
or
how
art
can
speak
to
ourselves.
F
I
moved
from
mexico
when
I
was
16
and
you
know
I
think
I
have
a
sense
of
like
what
place
means
for
for
many
of
us.
You
know
and
whether
we
belong
or
not,
and
I
think
art
public
art
is
a
great
way
to
to
create
spaces
for
for
everyone.
You
know
to
feel
people
welcome
and
also
you
know,
for
for
the
economy.
F
You
know
to
create
landmarks
that
create
public
interest,
and
I
create
experiences
for
visitors
for
people
who
live
here,
and
so
I
think,
that's
part
of
why
I
want
to
be
in
the
board.
B
Appreciate
that
alejandro,
that's
that's
a
great
background
in
into
your
professional
life.
So
any
questions
for
alejandro.
B
No
looks
like
everyone's
a
thumbs
up.
You
don't
need
to
tune
in
tonight
at
seven
o'clock
for
the
formal
meeting
you're
on
the
consent
agenda
and
I'm
sure
that
you'll
hear
from
the
art
design
board
after
you,
you've
been
appointed.
So
thanks
for
serving
salt
lake
city
on
this
board,
it's
much
appreciated.
I
Mr
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
no
not
a
question
but
wanted
to
say
hi
to
alex
and
thanks
for
volunteering
and
to
lend
your
professional
talents
to
our
boards.
So
it's
good
to
see
you.
F
B
B
Okay,
mike,
I
don't
know
if
you
heard
the
introduction
from
alex
but
we'd
love
to
hear
why
you
want
to
serve
on
the
planning
commission.
H
Well,
I
am
just
looking
for
opportunities
to
serve
in
the
city
and,
given
my
background
with
the
master
of
city
and
metropolitan
planning,
I
felt
that
this
would
be
a
good
fit
and
yeah.
I
just
would
enjoy
the
opportunity
to
to
learn
more
about
salt
lake
city
and
to
have
this
experience.
B
Well,
for
those
other
council
members
mike
has
served
on
several
other
boards
in
the
city,
too,
he's
he's
very
dedicated
to
salt
lake
city.
So
this
is
a.
This
is
a
really
great
commission
to
be
on
you'll
learn
a
lot.
You
know,
there's
a
there's,
an
analogy
that
you
drink
from
a
fire
hose
once
you're,
an
elected
official.
I
think
the
planning
commission
is
the
exact
same
way
and
I
think
council,
member
darren,
mano
who's.
Also
an
architect
could
tell
you
that
it
is
it's
a
learning,
it's
a
learning
curve
for
sure.
B
So
we
appreciate
your
willingness
to
serve
and
and
and
do
that
for
salt
lake
city,
any
questions
or
comments
for
mike.
Yes,
anna.
G
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
mike
for
being
so
persistent
and
and
like
involved
with
salt
lake
city.
It's
important,
and
I
love
that
that
you
know
a
lot
of
salt
lake
city
already
like
like
james
said,
we've
seen
you
different
committees,
come
over
to
community
council
meetings
to
all
sorts
of
meetings
that
the
city
puts
together
and
other
agencies.
G
H
B
H
B
H
H
I
Kidding,
no,
I
don't
have
a
concern.
Just
a
question
mike
you've
been
involved
in
a
lot
with
the
city.
What
do
you,
how
do
you
feel
about
and
what,
how
do
you
view
the
feedback
from
the
public
as
part
of
the
planning
commission.
H
B
Thanks
thanks
mike
back
to
my
closing
statement
that
you
are
on
the
consent
agenda
for
this
evening,
so
knowing
you,
you
probably
will
tune
in,
but
if
you
don't
you're
you're
pretty
clear
so
sounds
good
appreciate
it
thanks.
I
J
I
J
B
B
I
I
B
I
Minutes
thanks
so
much
and
taylor.
Will
you
wait
and.
A
A
A
A
A
B
R
Sure
let
me
mute
one
thing
here,
so
you
don't
get
a
feedback.
B
And
I
appreciate
you
jumping
a
little
bit
earlier
than
expected
on
so
I
know
we
didn't,
have
you
scheduled
till
about
six
o'clock,
so
thank
you
so
much
yeah.
R
No
problem
yeah,
so
I
applied
to
the
landmark
commission
for
a
couple
reasons,
primarily
because,
when
I
started
out
in
engineering,
historic
preservation
was
where
I
started
out
in
washington
dc.
It's
always
been
a
passion
of
mine
and
I've
worked
on
several
projects
and
historic
preservation
in
dc
developed
a
passion
for
it.
R
When
I
was
there
and
subsequently
came
to
salt
lake
city,
been
here
for
quite
some
time
and
have
taken
up
a
number
of
historic
preservation
projects
in
salt
lake
city,
just
within
the
avenues
itself,
as
well
as
around
the
city,
and
it's
it's
continued
to
be
a
passion
of
mine.
Ever
since
I
began
in
engineering,
so
it's
it's
been
something
that
I've
really
focused
on.
I
think
that
preserving
architectural
history
is
very
important.
R
It's
always
been
something
that
I've
appreciated
and
I
hope
that
other
people
appreciate
it
too,
and
it
can
be
preserved
where
reasonable
and
appropriate,
for
you
know,
future
generations
to
appreciate.
A
I
Thanks
me
again:
hi
carlton,
thanks
for
applying
to
represent
our
district
district,
three
on
the
historic
landmarks
commission.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you
what
your
view
is
of
public
input
and
the
what
role
does
public
input
have
in
the
the
things
that
you're
going
to
be
hearing
on
the
planning
commission?
What
does
that
mean
to
you.
R
It
has
to
be
taken
into
consideration,
but
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day
that
the
landmark
commission
is
there
to
be
the
final
authority
and
to
adjudicate
those
differences
of
opinion
where
some
members
of
the
community
may
believe
that
there
is
a
historic
value
and,
and
others
may
not,
and
to
ensure
that
there
is
the
proper
balance
between
the
two
going
forward,
both
to
serve
the
the
modern
needs
of
the
city,
as
well
as
the
historic
needs
of
the
city.
R
So
I
think
it's
important
that
those
go
together,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
public
input
has
to
be
weighed
against
the
other
factors
that
are
involved
when
making
those
decisions.
B
Yeah
thanks
carlton.
We
appreciate
your
willingness
to
serve
salt
lake
city
and
specifically
on
the
historic
landmark
commission.
So
you
don't
have
to
tune
into
this
evening
for
our
formal
meeting
you're
on
the
consent
agenda,
with
the
other
individuals
looking
to
be
appointed
to
various
boards.
But
thanks
so
much
for
logging
in
and
and
we
look
forward
to
you
serving
our
city.
R
B
J
B
Did
I
don't
have
anything
to
report
cindy?
Maybe
you
want
to
go
over
the
announcements
one
more
time
just
to
make
sure.
Maybe
there
was
something
else
you
wanted
to
to
add
unless
you're
in
the
circle
of
death.
J
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
the
circle
of
death,
but
no
jennifer
covered
everything,
so
we're
set
okay.
B
Nope
and
then
we
don't
have
a
closed
session
this
evening,
so
I
think
we
are
good
until
seven
o'clock,
so
you
guys
go
go
to
one
of
your
local
restaurants.
You've
got
an
hour
and
14
minutes
till
seven
o'clock.
So
thanks
everyone.