►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City - 7/20/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
Let
me
see
this
where
I
am
hold
on
the
public
comments.
The
public
will
be
able
to
provide
comments
in
person
in
room
three
to
six
of
the
syrian
county
building
or
online
through
webex
for
more
information,
including,
what's
connection
information.
Please
visit
slc.gov
forward,
slash
council
forward
forward
virtual
meetings.
A
A
phone
line
will
also
be
available
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
we
are
having
some
issues
with
what
with
one
of
the
cameras,
so
you
might
not
see
us,
as
you
were
able
to
see
us
last
week
or
as
sharply
we're
also
having
issues
with
telephone
lines.
So
as
we
are
resolving
that
please
bear
with
us
and
board.
Member
mano
is
also
here
at
this
meeting,
but
virtually-
and
he
is
here
present.
A
Let
me
see
we
start
so
we're
in
section
a
of
our
agenda
and
we
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcomed
and
you
can
share
that
with
the
board
anytime
by
mailing
the
council
office
at
po
box,
145476
salt
lake
city
utah,
eight
four
one,
one:
four
or
emailing
us
at
council
that
comments
at
slc
gov.com
or
by
calling
our
24
hour
phone
comment
line
at
801-535-7654.
A
A
These
guidelines
guidelines
are
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
and
efficient
way.
We
will
move
through
the
agenda
and
want
to
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
current
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
into
our
meeting.
The
rda
board
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
avoid
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
A
If
you
use
profanity
during
your
comment,
your
line
will
be
muted
and
any
comments
that
reach
a
level
of
disrespect.
I
will
ask
that
you
be
muted
and
you
will
be.
You
will
forfeit
your
opportunity
to
address
the
board
today,
if
you're
not
able
to
complete
your
comments
this
afternoon,
you're
welcome
to
email
the
board
or
call
our
comment
line.
A
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
for
your
name
during
the
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
the
quorum.
If
you
register,
if
your
registered
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
use
the
chat
feature
to
gather
that
information
from
you,
taylor,
hill
from
our
staff,
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
we
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
A
Taylor
hill
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment
and
unmuting
lines.
When
taylor
and
mutes
your
line
and
lets
you
know
it's
your
turn,
please
state
your
first
name
and
last
name
indicate
the
topic
you're
speaking
on
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
We
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted.
A
We
will
now
open
our
general
comment
period.
However,
we
do
have
one
comment
that
is
in
person
and
we
will
start
with
a
with
a
with
the
people
that
is
here
in
the
in
the
meeting,
and
then
we
will
go
with
those
that
are
calling
in
or
in
webex.
So
first
general
comment
to
the
rda
board
is
by
michael
valentine
and
michael.
Please
come
to
the
podium
and
you
have
two
minutes.
B
C
Right
that
better,
all
right,
cool,
so
nice
to
see
you
guys
in
person,
I
say
that
sincerely.
I
think
it's
been
a
crazy
year,
so
it's
also
nice
to
be
here
as
a
mayoral
candidate
for
2023.
So
that's
very
exciting.
Last
week
I
was
arrested
before
I
could
speak
at
the
planning
commission.
I
don't
plan
to
be
arrested
today,
so
keep
things
civil,
but
the
reason
I
was
arrested
is
because
I
opened
the
pantages
theater
for
the
public
to
see
it.
C
In
the
first
time
in
years,
mayor
aaron
mendenhall
went
in
there
about
a
month
ago,
with
her
family
darren
mano
was
there
in
april.
I
think
it's
pretty
obscene
that
the
city
council
on
elected
officials
are
able
to
go
in
and
tour
the
building
whenever
they
like,
but
the
public
can't
see
the
theater
that
we
own.
So
I'm
also
here
to
speak
about
corruption
and
fraud
in
the
rda,
specifically
with
danny
waltz
over
there.
C
In
the
blue,
he's
known
that
the
theater
would
be
eligible
for
the
stork
registry
since
2018
and
it
would
qualify
for
the
national
tax
credits.
I
have
a
letter
from
preservation,
utah
proving
it
that
he
was
at
this
meeting.
Specifically
too.
He
and
tammy
hunsaker
also
colluded
with
heinz
to
hide
this
information
from
the
public
hours
after
an
rda
meeting
in
october
2019.
C
That,
I
think,
is
pretty
amazing.
We
have
this
email
specifically
right
there
from
them.
That's
a
meeting
that
chris
asked
about
the
historic
registry
and
danny
lied
to
him
to
his
face
in
that
meeting,
which
again,
I
think
this
is
very
concerning
information,
we're
calling
for
a
full
investigation
and
an
audit
into
the
rda
we're
calling
for
the
firing
of
danny
wallace
and
tammy
hunsaker,
and
we
want
this
to
be
taken
seriously.
This
is
a
goes
way
beyond
the
theater.
This
is
about
democracy.
C
This
is
about
transparency
and
and
facts
and
not
discrediting
historical
experts,
and
we
made
a
whole
documentary
about
this
there's
a
lot
more
than
just
I
can
fit
in
two
minutes,
but
danny
also
inflated
restoration
costs,
and
we
can
prove
this
because
we're
working
with
a
group
called
evergreen
architectural
arts.
They
restored
three
of
our
sister
pantages
theaters,
the
hollywood
tacoma
and
minneapolis
they're,
restoring
the
the
temple
right
now-
and
this
is
an
email
from
them
saying
five
to
seven
million
for
interior
scope.
That
goes
way.
D
C
Lower
than
anyway
I'll
leave
this
with
you
guys
and
hope
to
come,
speak
more
soon,.
A
Thank
you
michael.
You
can
leave
it
right
there.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
The
phone
line
is
up
and
taylor.
Please
start
with
our
first
comment:
if
there's
any.
E
So
it
looks
like
we
have
about
five
more
people
here
to
speak
for
general
comment.
First,
we
will
have
robert
stephanic,
followed
by
jennifer
mcgraw
and
then
keith
marmer.
Thank
you.
A
A
E
Okay,
we
will
skip
robert
and
troubleshoot
with
him
and
then
come
back.
Let
us
move
on
to
jennifer
mcgrath
jennifer.
You
are
unmuted
hi.
Thank
you
thanks
for
having
us
today,
keith
and
I
are
here
representing
the
university
of
utah's
research
park
and
we
just
want
to
speak
in
support
of
the
station
center
proposal
that
will
be
before
you
today
and
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have.
Thank
you
again.
A
F
Thank
you
hi.
As
jen
said,
I'm
keith
marner,
I'm
the
chief
innovation
officer
at
university
of
utah.
E
A
A
H
Perfect,
hello,
everybody.
I
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
two
things.
The
first
one
is.
I
want
to
make
a
comment
about
public
engagement
and
inclusion
in
all
these
city
meetings
and
that
I
think,
having
this
hybrid
of
in-person
and
zoom
call
is
a
great
one
working
into
the
future
to
give
as
many
people
an
opportunity
to
make
public
comments.
H
H
You
know
my
take
on
it
coming
from
architecture.
Development.
Construction
background
is
that
I
deal
with
private
developers
who
make
deals
with
other
private
developers
and
landowners
all
the
time
and
and
my
impression
of
the
theater
deal,
and
maybe
where
the
rda
has
headed
since
the
last
administration
took
charge,
is
that
it
wants
to
be
a
private
developer
or
it's
trying
to
act
like
one.
H
It's
making
deals
thinking
that
it's
not
a
public
agency
and
that's
you
know,
as
you
share
the
details
about
the
theater
deal
in
particular,
and
all
the
questionable.
What
I
think
are
questionable
choices
and
decisions
that
were
made
along
the
way
it
just
adds
up
to
too
much
too
many
questions
too
many
too
many
things
that
make
the
the
public
scratch
their
head
about
how
this
deal
came
to
be,
and
I
think
that's
that's
the
lighter
side.
H
You
know
obviously
michael
made
shared
his
opinions
about
it,
but
that's
an
opinion
that
I
hear
from
people
as
well.
I
hear
the
whole
gambit,
but
none
of
it
none
of
it's
good,
none
of
it.
None
of
it
is
good
for
the
public
trust
in
city
leadership
acting
on
behalf
as
the
rda.
H
So
I
would
also
encourage
you
to
to
put
a
halt
to
the
deal
to
do
an
investigation
about
how
we're
how
we're
dealing
with
with
these
development
projects
and
how
they're
coming
to
be
with
private
developers
where
the
details
are
coming
from
and
and
for
for
costs
and
for
valuation
of
property
and
yeah.
So
that's
the
end
of
my
comments.
A
E
And
we
will
go
back
to
robert
stefanik,
it
looks
like
nicole
curtis
has
left
so
robert.
You
are
unmuted.
A
I
All
right,
I'm
talking
today
to
save
the
utah
pantages
on
top
of
it,
I
don't
know
what
else
I
can
really
say
than
what
I've
already
said,
but
I
have
other
means,
but
we
need
this.
Theater
heinz
can
build
their
tower
or
anywhere
else.
It's
kind
of
sad
that
you
guys
have
now
been
shown
the
truth
of
all
the
information
that
you've
been
lied
to
and
you're
still
not
doing
anything
to
look
into
this
and
corruption
you're
not
looking
into
the
bribes
you're,
not
looking
into
you're,
not
even
voicing
anything.
I
I
I
believe
that
democracy
was
the
best
that
utah
had
no
was
more
like
would
never
do
this
and
you
guys
shocked
me
that
you're
not
stopping
this,
you
this
deal
needs
to
end
because
of
all
the
lies-
and
I
implore
you
to
please
do
that
or
you
guys,
I'm
going
to
say
it
right
now.
You
guys
are
going
to
be
out
of
a
job.
We
will
vote
for
other
people
who
want
this.
A
What
can
we
do
with
that?
Can
we.
D
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
send
your
emails
stating
your
name
and
your
comments
and
tell
us
that
you
were
not
able
to
get
in
the
meeting
via
webex
or
of
tough
online
to
counsel
that
comments
at
slcgov.com.
D
A
All
right
we're
moving
forward
to
item
c1
and
it
is
the
approval
of
minutes
of
tuesday
may
19
2020.
B
Adam
chair,
I
move
that
we
approve
the
minutes
of
may
19th
2020.
G
A
Right,
we
have
motion
by
board
member
wharton
and
a
second
seconded
by
board
member
dugan,
all
in
favor,
say
aye.
G
A
A
The
innovation
district
concept
will
be
anchored
by
the
university
of
utah
for
technology
development,
from
research
to
startup
incubators
to
mature,
profitable
businesses.
As
part
of
the
briefing
the
world
will
also
receive
a
predisposition
report
that
includes
preliminary
information
prior
to
marketing
the
property
at
the
table.
We
have
council
office
policy,
analyst
ben
lutky,
ashley
ogden,
which
is
a
rda
project
manager
and
carol
leansley,
rda
project
manager,
and
maybe
none
of
them,
but
then.
M
M
M
The
transmittal
includes
a
property
predisposition
update
as
required
by
board
policy
selling.
A
property
is
a
function
of
the
administrative
branch.
The
board
has
a
role
in
reviewing
and
providing
feedback
on.
The
predisposition
report,
that's
in
front
of
you
today,
and
the
board
also
has
a
role
in
determining
how
to
use
the
proceeds
of
any
sale.
M
Over
the
years
the
board
has
approved
11
million
dollars
for
station
center
public
infrastructure
improvements.
This
is
envisioned
as
including
three
new
street
segments,
several
public
utility
improvements
to
facilitate
higher
density
development
on
the
adjacent
blocks,
as
well
as
a
festival
street
on
300
south.
M
N
Hello,
thank
you.
I
think
I'm
going
to
share
the
presentation
from
my
end,
so
let
me
pull
that
up.
N
Yeah
so
good
afternoon
my
name
is
ashley
ogden.
Presenting
with
me
today
is
carol
winsley
and
we
will
be
providing
an
update
on
the
station
center
project.
N
While
the
agency
has
undertaken
significant
site
planning
and
design
efforts,
and
we
feel
that
we
have
an
ambitious
vision
for
the
neighborhood,
we
do
recognize
the
unique
opportunity
that
we
have
here
to
do
something
especially
impactful
in
early
2020.
The
rda
began
to
engage
in
discussions
with
the
university
of
utah
related
to
the
establishment
of
a
downtown
university
presence
with
the
mayor's
support.
N
Some
of
you
may
already
be
familiar
with
the
concept
of
an
innovation
district,
but
the
brookings
institution
who
first
coined
the
term,
describes
them
as
dense
enclaves
that
merge
the
innovation
and
employment
potential
of
research-oriented
anchor
institutions,
high-growth
firms
and
tech
and
creative
startups
in
well-designed
amenity-rich,
residential
and
commercial
environments.
N
Creating
demand
for
these
newly
developed
downtown
innovation
districts.
As
you
don't
have
to
work
as
hard
to
create
that
diverse
mixed
use
environment,
some
examples
of
university
anchored
innovation
districts
that
you
may
be
familiar
with-
include
research
triangle
park,
which
is
located
in
close
proximity
to
multiple
universities
and
governed
by
the
private
nonprofit
research
triangle
foundation.
N
Research
triangle
park
has
been
around
since
1959
and
pioneered
the
idea
that
different
universities
and
companies
could
partner
to
commercialize
new
technologies
due
to
its
age.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
it
falls
into
the
category
of
research,
part-style
campus
that
is
now
trying
to
modernize
to
keep
up
with
evolving
preferences.
N
N
N
A
few
different
events
have
contributed
to
the
success
of
this
project,
including
the
extension
of
light
rail
near
the
site
and
multiple
universities
have
located
higher
education.
Programming
was
in
the
district,
and
this
enhanced
connectivity
and
the
reactivation
of
the
downtown
has
attracted
further
private
investment
and
drawn
new
residents
to
live
in
the
area.
N
N
O
Ashley
so
ashley
mentioned
that
the
rda
partnered
with
the
university
of
utah
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
creating
an
innovation
district
in
station
center.
So
these
next
few
slides.
I
wanted
to
use
to
summarize
the
findings
and
recommendations
that
came
out
of
that
effort,
which
was
made
up
of
three
parts.
O
O
On
the
life
sciences
side,
the
consultant
identified
opportunities
in
research
and
genetics
and
use
of
robotics
and
medicine,
advancing
access
to
healthcare,
education
and
providing
spaces
for
startups
that
outgrow
their
incubator
space
and
then
on
the
community
health
side.
They
identified
opportunities
in
expanding
our
urban
agricultural,
local
food
systems,
improving
access
to
nutritious
food
and
incorporating
preventive
health
programs
on
site
in
the
district
and
then
the
third
part
of
the
study
looked
at
governance
and
real
estate
structures.
O
So
the
consultant
looked
at
structures
that
were
used
in
other
successful
innovation
districts
which
again
typically
involve
public-private
partnerships.
So
for
station
center
they
recommended
creating
a
new
non-profit
entity
to
govern
the
district,
and
it
would
include
representatives
from
the
university
and
the
city
and
other
partners
from
the
community
and
the
tech
industry.
O
We're
still
in
the
early
stages
of
looking
into
the
details
of
how
this
governance
structure
might
work.
But
it's
something
we
would
establish
early
on
to
make
sure
that
the
rda
and
the
city
are
involved
in
influential
in
planning
and
developing
the
district.
O
O
O
The
project
would
result
in
a
significant
amount
of
economic
benefit
like
job
creation,
on-site
earnings
and
regional
economic
output,
and
we
wanted
to
note
that
all
private
development
in
the
district
would
be
considered
a
taxable
improvement
and
then
finally,
the?
U
is
currently
under
contract
to
purchase
an
additional
two
acres
in
the
district,
which
would
facilitate
extending
the
400
south
tracks
line
and
create
a
connection
from
station
center
directly
to
the.
N
U
yeah
thanks
kara,
so
while
it's
obvious
that
the
type
of
assets
and
expertise
that.
B
N
You
would
bring
to
the
table
are
necessary
to
create
this
type
of
district.
We
have
heard
about
how
many
other
districts
have
failed
to
pair
their
innovation
programming,
with
the
physical
land
planning
necessary
to
create
the
sense
of
place.
That's
required
to
spread
a
high
level
of
interaction
and
collaboration,
which
is
the
whole
dose
behind
these
districts.
N
Pitfalls
include
a
loss
of
character
through
the
demolition
of
historic
structures,
construction
of
oversized
buildings
that
eliminate
a
sense
of
human
scale
and
walkability,
a
lack
of
diversity
in
building
design
and
a
clear
divide
between
areas
with
sterile
institutional
buildings
and
those
containing
neighborhood
amenities
like
retail
restaurants,
bars,
etc.
N
N
O
O
This
is
one
of
the
disposition
methods
made
available
through
our
disposition
policy,
allowing
the
rda
to
exclusively
negotiate
when
selling
property
to
a
non-profit
or
government
entity
for
community
development
or
public
use,
while
we'd
be
exclusively
negotiating
with
eu
to
plan
the
district.
The
actual
development
partners
will
still
be
selected
through
a
competitive
rfp
process,
and
this
next
slide
lays
out
what
this
would
look
like.
O
Like
I
mentioned,
the
preferred
structure
is
for
the
you
to
purchase
the
rds
property
through
a
fee
title
sale,
the?
U
of?
U
would
then
ground
lease
property
to
private
developers
that
are
selected
through
a
competitive
rfp
process,
and
the
eu
would
maintain
long-term
ownership
and
preserve
the
innovation
district
use
by
leasing,
ground
leasing
to
end
users.
O
This
grammarly
structure
is
common
in
innovation
districts,
because
revenues
can
then
be
used
to
fund
ongoing
district
programming
and
maintenance,
and
then
in
this
blue
box.
Here
we
just
wanted
to
call
out
when
we
were
exploring
different
potential
disposition
methods.
Some
of
the
primary
considerations
that
led
us
to
what
we're
proposing
here
are
described
in
this
box.
The
rda
would
sell
property
at
or
near
fair
market
value.
N
N
N
N
After
that,
we
would
work
with
you
to
complete
a
market
study
that
would
help
us
deter
determine
a
phasing
plan
for
the
development.
This
would
also
inform
the
terms
of
the
partnership
in
property
disposition
agreements,
and
the
general
goal
is
to
be
able
to
draft
and
release
an
rfp
for
the
first
phase
of
development
in
early
2022.
N
So
that
wraps
up
our
presentation,
we'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
you
may
have,
and
I
know
clark
cahoon
with
economic
development
is
available
and
we
also
have
representatives
from
the
university
here,
including,
I
believe,
jonathan
bates
jenna
graf
and
keith
marmer
with
the
pivot
center.
A
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
presentation.
Ashley
did
you
say
that
the
university
of
utah
would
like
to
speak
or
they
are
available.
If
we
had
questions,
I'm
sorry,
I
missed
that
part.
A
A
The
the
disposition
is
decided
by
the
executive
director,
which
is
the
mayor
in
this
case,
and
she
has
that
right
to
sell
all
of
these
properties
a
market
rate
value.
If
that's
is
what
she
wishes
to
do
and
then
the
proceeds
is
our.
Is
our
decision
on
what
to
use
the
proceeds,
for
one
option
is
to
do
infrastructure.
A
However,
there
is
a
gap
according
to
ben
that
we,
you
know,
we
don't
have
like
there's
a
gap
here-
that
this
will
not
be
coming
out
of
this,
this
transaction,
but
some
somewhere
else,
if
somewhere
else,
but
also
kara,
also
mentioned
that
some
of
these
proceeds
could
be
used
for
other
rda
project
areas.
But
to
me
that
doesn't
make
sense,
because
if
we
have
a
gap
then
they
won't
have
enough
money
to
do
anything
else.
So.
L
Yeah
go
ahead
dan.
I
could
just
clarify
on
that.
Madam
chair.
The
sales
proceeds
are
what
have
always
been
intended
to
be
used
to
fill
the
gap
between
what
the
rda
has
currently
budgeted,
the
nine
plus
million
dollars
and
what
we
anticipate
being
the
total
cost.
So
those
proceeds
would
be
used
to
fill
that
gap
and
then
anything
left
over
after
that
is
what
could
be
used
for
seed
funds
for
other
purposes.
A
Okay,
now
it
makes
sense
to
me:
do
you
guys
have
any
questions?
Is
this
something?
This
is
an
idea
that
you
guys
are
excited
about,
or
is
it
something
that
we
need
to
keep
talking
about,
because
we
do
have
other
projects
that
we
are
interested
in
pursuing
and
they
are
you
know
within
the
rda
or
another
question
that
I
had
another
thought
was:
can
we
combine
this?
You
know
momentum
that
we
have
with
the
station
center,
potentially
with
a
research
park
and
also
momentum
that
is
happening
at
the
north
temple
area.
P
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
map
that
was
shown
earlier.
There
were
some
parcels
that
were
shaded
in
red.
Those
are
parcels
of
the
university
utah
has
a
contract
to
purchase
from
land
owners
that
are
not
the
rda.
Is
that
correct?
P
L
Happy
to
answer
that
that
is
correct.
We
would
proceed
with
closing
on
the
properties
that
we
have
under
contract
or
have
option
agreements
on,
and
then
those
would
be
included
in
the
disposition
with
the
university
of
utah.
P
Okay
thanks
danny
yeah,
I
mean
I
think
this
is
an
exciting
potential
use
for
station
center.
I,
like
I,
love
that
we
would
have
a
built-in
a
very
strong
anchor
tenant.
I
I
am
a
university
of
utah,
alum
and
faculty
member.
So
of
course
I
think
the
world
of
the
universe
utah.
My
concern
is
that
if
we,
if
we
dispose
of
all
of
the
property
to
one
entity,
that
we
then
we
I
know
that
we
that
ashley
talked
about
it,
not
turning
into
a
sterile
research
center.
P
But
my
concern
is
that
this
area
really
needs
to
be
a
place
that
is
a
destination
for
all
people
from
salt
lake,
including
people
that
aren't
in
biotech
or
related
fields.
And
so
I
I
to
me
the
best
way
to
do
that
would
be
for
the
rda
to
retain
a
few
of
the
parcels
and
sell
those
as
an
rfp
or
a
long-term
ground
lease
to
unrelated
entities,
but
ones
that
would
help
build
a
neighborhood
so
similar
to
what
happened
in
central
9th
with
like
spy
hop.
P
I
I
would
to
me
it
would
be
a
great
idea
for
these
parcels
to
at
least
a
few
of
them
to
remain
in
rda
hands
and
be
sold
to
unrelated
partners
so
that
we
don't
just
have
an
anchor
tenant,
because
an
anchor
tenno
only
really
makes
sense
when
there's
also
ancillary
tenants.
But
if
we
sell
the
entire
two
blocks
to
the
university
time,
I
worry
is
that
we
only
have
an
anchor
tenant
and
we
don't
have
the
smaller
ones
as
well.
P
So
maybe
there's
another
way
around
this,
but
it
would
seem
like
we
would
have
to
write
some
conditions
or
restrictions
onto
the
title
of
the
land
to
ensure
things
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
even
can
do
that.
So.
My
concern
is
that
we
sell
this
all
to
the
university
of
utah
and
then
lose
control
of
what
actually
gets
built
there,
and
then
it
ends
up
being
a
place
that
the
only
people
that
go
there
are
the
ones
that
work
there
or
live
there.
P
G
To
follow
on
that,
I
agree
with
or
board
member
mono
on
those
points
there
and
my
question
is
we
mentioned
the
other
innovation
districts
in
phoenix
and
in
missouri
and
other
places,
and
were
they
all
sold
or
was
it
long-term
leasing
on
those
properties
and
is
there
just
one
anchor
tenant
or
is
it
divided
up
and
that
so
my
question
also
is
we
have
six
lots
here
locations
and
can
we
break
those
up
into
a
different
long,
lease
cell
instead
of
just
selling
it
all
to
one?
G
And
then
I
have
some
other
comments,
but
I'll
I'll
hold
that
on
for
another
section
and
then
well.
My
next
comment
was
just
on
the
governing
structure.
If
they
use
the
uni
the
owner,
do
they
have
51
percent
of
the
votes
on
the
on
the
structure,
but
I
guess
that
would
be
talked
about
more
on
the
negotiations
of
the
governing
body,
or
would
that
be
a
even
split
amongst
the
different
stakeholders.
L
I'll
jump
in
on
that
last
one
and
simply
say
I
don't
know
if
we
have
the
details
on
how
the
specifics
of
that
structure
would
be.
We
can
certainly
follow
up
on
that,
but
I
think
that's
part
of
what
the
university
is
is
structuring
right
now
themselves
or
thinking
through
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
ashley
and
kara,
and
they
can
give
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
other
district's
examples
and
some
of
the
structures
that
we
looked
at
as
far
as
those
were
concerned.
A
Yeah,
that's
okay.
I
I
know
board
member
wharton
had
a
question.
B
I'm
just
wondering
how
this
does
this:
I'm
guessing
it
doesn't
compete
with
research
park,
otherwise
the
university
wouldn't
see
the
wouldn't
want
to
compete
with
themselves.
So
what
niche
does
this
film
art
fill?
That's
not
filled
by
research
park
and
not
filled
by
the
private
market.
Can
you
tell
me
just
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
F
Can
I
take
that
question
yeah,
I'm
going
to
take
that
I'm
going
to
go
with
things,
so
the
alignment
with
the
university
of
utah
is
one
of
the
things
that
makes
this
potential
project
really
incredible
and
unique
just
having
a
research
institution
that
wants
to
move
some
of
this
activity
down
to
a
you
know
what
I
see
as
a
gap
in
the
city,
something
that
we
can
connect
with
public
transportation
and
and
really
when
it
comes
down
to
an
innovation
district.
I
I
just
as
councilmember
mono
mentioned.
F
If,
if
you
can
just
look
at
the
innovation
district
as
as
an
anchor
but
really
what
we're
talking
about
is
creating
a
robust
and
balanced
and
thoughtful
neighborhood
within
the
city
and
one
of
the
things
that
makes
it
really
unique.
It's
actually
the
component
that
gets
me
most
excited
about
working
on
this
tech
lake
city
initiative
for
the
mayor
is
the
public
benefit
that
we
get
from
being
able
to
move
that
programming
and
a
lot
of
that
energy.
F
F
For
me,
the
the
crowning
opportunity
is,
is
creating
that
connectivity
between
education
partners,
with
apprenticeships
and
and
with
mentorships
of
having
people
in
these
companies
actually
interacting
with
the
community,
there's
not
a
better
place
in
the
city,
to
move
that
off
of
the
east
bench
and
to
have
that
activity.
That's
happening
in
in
this
location.
You've
got
the
grand
boulevard.
You've
got
the
activity,
that's
happening
in
the
growth
in
granary,
and
then
you
have
a
you
know:
a
world-class
top-notch
company
in
recursion.
F
That's
adding
an
additional
100
000
square
feet
at
the
gateway,
and
this
is
a
really
great
way
to
close
that
gap,
bring
that
energy
and
and
really
when
it
comes
to
the
innovation
district.
It
can't
be
this
stale
place
that
we
see
in
some
of
these
other
places
that
that
haven't
hit
the
mark.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
really
add
some
interesting
components
to
this
and
make
it
a
you
know:
a
destination,
a
neighborhood,
that
people
want
to
come
and
be
a
part
of.
P
I
appreciate
that
clark
I
just
from
the
rda's
position.
If
we
sell
all
of
the
land
that
we
currently
control,
I
don't
know
that
how
we
control
creating
that
destination
and
again
no
offense
to
the
university
of
utah,
it's
a
great
institution,
but
it's
a
college
campus
that
is
not
connected
to
the
city
as
well
as
I
would
like
it
to
be
in
terms
of
a
neighborhood
and
a
place
making.
So
how
and
research
parks
certainly
is
not
either.
P
So
I'm
wondering
how
this
is
different
if,
unless
we
maintain
control
of
a
percentage
of
the
property
and
and
force
the
the
neighborhood
to
be
built
with
smaller
human
scale,
buildings
and
businesses,
in
addition
to
those
things,
because
unless
you're
a
student
or
a
faculty
member
or
you
work
at
the
university
of
utah,
you
may
go
there
once
or
twice
a
year
for
an
event
or
a
play,
but
other
than
that
you
don't
go
there
for
lunch.
K
Understand
where
board
member
mono's
coming
from,
because
I
hate
going
up
to
the?
U
because
it's
car
centric,
that's
all
it
is
you
go
from
car
to
car
in
order
to
get
there.
This
has
already
been
planned.
The
development's
already
been
done
through
through
festival,
street
or
mardi
gas
street
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
K
But
I
just
have
a
few
questions
following
up
to
this,
because
you
know
I
was
around
for
when
dj
was
here
when
we
started
trying
to
get
rid
of
these
parcels
and
looking
at
individual
developers
for
them,
and
I
actually
was
not
in
favor
of
that.
I
thought
I
should
have
gone
out
to
one
developer,
because
in
order
to
do
that
and
we
can
make
it
work
through
development
agreements
like
danny
was
talking
about
and
making
that
look.
That
way
I
mean
we're
already
talking
about
affordable
housing.
K
We're
talking
about
restaurants,
we're
talking
about
whether
it's
a
you
know
a
research
small
research
park,
but
research
park
was
master
plan
the
way
it
is
because
they
wanted
cars
up
there,
and
this
is
one
that
we
don't
want
cars.
You
know
we
do
have
the
opportunity
to
make
this
a
good
project,
and
I
think
that
having
the
right
partner
to
make
that
happen
and
waiting
for
partners
to
come
along,
we'll
jump
start
this
project
so
danny.
K
L
I
mean
the
latest
numbers
we
have
put
it
the
total
cost
in
the
neighborhood
of
17
to
18
million
dollars.
Obviously,
those
were
probably
about
a
year
ago
which
construction
costs
have
gone
up
significantly.
Have
you
seen
with
a
lot
of
city
projects?
We
have
nine
million
right
now
that
the
board
has
approved
so
you're,
looking
at
anywhere
between
eight
to
nine
million
starting
point
for
closing
that
gap,
and-
and
I
should
note
also
that
that
that
has
been
part
of
the
plan
for
quite
a
while
with
this
project.
L
I
think
you
may
recall
that
the
agency
was
actually
under
contract
for
selling
some
of
the
properties.
You,
as
a
board
had
already
proved
the
right
down
in
terms
of
those
properties
to
fill
that
gap
for
the
infrastructure.
So
that's
that's
been
the
model
for
how
to
fund
a
portion
of
the
infrastructure
for
a
while.
K
Yeah-
and
I
want
to
go
back
to
that
because
dj
took
us
on
an
excursion
up
to
denver
where
what
really
changed
my
mind,
and
I
think
what
started
to
change
the
board's
mind
under
his
leadership
from
going
from
individual
parcels
to
to
one
developer,
is
that
in
denver
they
did
that
where
he
said
the
the
developers
couldn't
believe
how
fast
you
know
that
project
came
along,
and
you
know
the
university
of
utah
has
far
more
reach
in
understanding
these
businesses
and
the
growth
of
these
catalytic
businesses
that
they
have
at
the
research
park
in
order
to
spark
the
development
there
and
bring
that
creativity
to
the
area.
K
My
my
about
three
or
four
others
stack
development.
We've
been
sitting
on
that
as
a
council
board.
As
council
members,
I
mean,
I
think
it's
been
eight
over
18
months
now
in
looking
at
that-
and
I
that's
our
fault.
I
mean
that
is
totally
on
on
on
the
city
council
and
delaying
that.
How
can
we
make
sure
that
that
development
moves
forward
in
collaboration
with
if
we're
looking
at
doing
this
disposing?
All
of
these,
so
that
it's
not
hodge
podge?
Together,
I
mean,
I
know
that
stack
has
great
ideas.
K
L
That
that's
a
great
question.
I
think,
if
you
I
mean
in
the
several
briefings
you've
had
as
a
city
council
on
that
zoning
change.
I
think
you've
seen
our
comments
in
that
from
an
rda
that
you
know.
We
obviously
support
any
consideration
for
additional
height.
We
have
the
design
guidelines
for
station
center
right
now
that
we've
had
in
place
for
a
while
and
so
we're
prepared
to
move
forward
with
the
zoning
as
it
is.
L
But
I
think
if,
if
as
a
council
and
as
a
city,
we
decide
that
we
want
to
increase
that
height,
then
we
would
certainly
work
not
just
with
the
university
but
with
stack
in
terms
of
what
that
would
look
like
as
far
as
scale
and
development
options
and
still
being
sensitive
to
what
the
original
vision
and
plan
for
station
center
was.
But
I
would.
L
I
would
think
that,
regardless
of
where
that
zoning
and
the
height
goes,
we
will
engage
with
stack
and
the
university
to
make
sure
that
what
we're
doing
is
is
part
of
a
cohesive
plan
and
we
know
stack
has
been
interested
in
working
with
us
and
talking
to
us
about
what
the
development
plans
are
for
station
center.
We
haven't
been
in
a
position
to
do
that.
K
I
don't
want
to
call
this
a
pivot,
but
I
I
really
appreciate
this
being
brought
to
us
because
to
me
this
is
a
jump
start.
This
is
not
something
that
we're
sitting
on
it's
an
actual
partner
that
has,
you
know
hardcore.
You
know
background
in
making
things
work
and
bringing
you
know,
businesses
to
the
state.
K
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
parcels.
We
we
talked
in
there
that
it's
going
to
be
private
development.
How
do
we
ensure
that
these
aren't
non-profit
businesses
that
aren't
that
won't
be
paying
property
taxes?
How
do
we
ensure
that
all
of
these
parcels
for
this
for
the
city
that
we
would
be
disposing
of,
are
you
know
not
taxed
exempt.
L
That's
a
great
question:
the
university
has
known
that
that's
a
priority
for
us,
both
as
a
cities
and
agency
as
we
develop
these
that
that
would
be
something
that
we
want
to
make
sure
is
involved
in
those
development
agreements
with
those
uses
and
that
we
understand
that
if
the
university
does
have
some
presence
there,
some
portion
of
the
properties
may
be
tax
exempt,
but
that
the
goal
is
to
maximize
that
and
put
users
in
there.
That
long
term
will
be
paying
property
taxes.
So
they
acknowledge
that
they
agree
with
that.
K
L
K
K
B
Can
I
ask
a
quick
clarifying
question
just
while
we're
waiting
so
would
the
the
parts
that
we
had
planned
for
for
housing
with
those
being
the
university
would
be
taking
those
and
running
the
housing
as
well.
L
That
I
don't
know
has
been
decided
at
this
point
if
they
would
be
running
it
as
university
housing.
I
believe
it'd
probably
be
more
of
a
private
partnership
with
the
university
that
housing
would
be
owned
and
managed
by
a
private
entity,
but
through
its
partnership
with
the
university.
K
L
B
K
So
go
figure.
This
is
in
regards
to
the
downtown
master
plan,
page
104
and
107.
talks
about
partnership
opportunities
I
kind
of
want
to-
and
I
know
this
is
just
the
devils
and
the
details
right
and
making
sure
that
we
move
forward
and
having
this
collaboration,
but
partnership
opportunities.
What
does
that
mean?
K
You
know
leveraging
the
resources
that
we
can
divide,
define
how
that
is
going
to
be
a
benefit
towards
the
west
side
and
making
these
happen,
what
type
of
programs
we're
looking
at
the
investment
that
they're
looking
at
doing
long-term
involvement
board's
role
in
looking
at
those
you
know
there
should
be
some
sort
of
apprenticeship
program
with
a
lot
of
these
life
science,
businesses
or
you
know,
whatever
type
of
tech
companies
we're
looking
at
coming
in
there.
What
does
that
mean
for
salt
lake
city
school
district?
That's
a
taxing
entity
in
this
area
as
well.
K
How
can
they
partner
with
them
infrastructure,
land
cell
proceeds
and
defining
that
and
where
we're
looking
at
doing
in
that?
I
think
that
for
me,
when
we're
moving
forward
one
height
as
well,
I'm
all
in
favor
of
looking
at
more
height
in
in
this
and
making
sure
that
that
happens,
because
we
know
that
we
only
have
so
much
land
downtown.
And
if
we
maximize
that
property
and
using
it
mixed
use
with
housing
and
tech
and
restaurants.
And
that
type
of
thing
we
will
activate
it.
K
There's
a
lot
more
to
discuss,
but
that's
where
I'm
at
danny.
Thank
you
for.
A
G
I
just
want
I,
I
appreciate
the
vision
and
I
like
the
vision
and
I
like
the
idea
that
we're
going
to
try
to
connect
the
east
and
the
west
side
on
this
in
this
area,
but
when
we
try
to
connect
the
east
and
west
and
make
it
a
good
connection,
we
have
a
big
moat.
We
have
to
cross
every
morning
to
get
from
the
east
to
the
west
side,
the
west,
to
the
east
side
here
and
I'm
putting
kind
of
a
plug-in
for
the
rio
grande
train
box.
G
It's
a
rio
grande
is
a
great
train
station
and
a
great
center
right
there.
But
if
we
continue
to
have
all
those
railroad
tracks
going,
dividing
the
east
and
west,
then
we
don't
really
have
a
connection
from
the
east
and
west,
and
we've
got
to
really
work
on
that
side
of
the
house.
So
that's
my
plug
for
that
position.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thanks.
J
A
Thanks
more
member
followers,
so
we
are
going
to
have
to
come
back
or
if
you
have
questions
specific
questions,
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
questions
and
answers
today.
I
think,
because,
as
we're
processing
the
information,
so
you
can
send
them
to
me
and
staff
so
that
we
see
what
we're
talking
about,
but
I
also
have
a
lot
of
questions
about
maintenance
of
infrastructure.
A
The
public
benefits
you
know
for
for
selling
this
land,
the
million
things
that
you
guys
already
talked
the
connection
is
west,
like
tangible,
real
things,
even
the
finances
of
what
are
we
getting
for?
What
we're
selling
it
for
and
that's
it
you
know-
is
it
is
this:
what
the
taxpayers
would
like
to
see
is
as
beneficial
to
the
taxpayers
that
currently
technically
own
the
land.
A
So,
moving
on
to
number
three,
we
are
talking
about
fiscal
year:
2021,
affordable
housing,
development,
funding
priorities,
it's
a
follow-up,
alison
roland
from
the
council
staff,
danny
and
tammy
henseker
are
here
at
the
table
to
talk
about
it.
Today
about
this
topic.
We
are
going
to
kind
of
give
the
give
the
the
floor
to
our
staff
alison
and
vice
chair
dugan,
and
so
that
we
can
structure
a
little
bit
to
see
how
the
discussion
can
move
forward.
A
So
alison,
it's
just
a
little
bit
different
that
what
we
do
so
alison
go
ahead
and
then
we'll
follow
up.
E
I
would
just
defer
to
board
member
dugan,
who,
who
has,
I
think,
a
proposal
for
how
to
structure
this
conversation,
and
I
can
add
in
on
anything
he
may
not
remember
or
be
clear
on,
or
that
might
be
useful
how's
that
go
ahead.
Thank.
G
You
allison,
so
I
looked
at
the
the
proposals
over
the
weekend
and
they
are
the
priorities
over
the
weekend
and
trying
to
kind
of
rearrange
them
and
look
at
them
and
said
we
have
having
13
priorities,
we
kind
of
narrow
those
priorities
and
I
broke
them
down
into
a
couple
groups,
and
I
sent
this
out
to
the
the
staff
and
the
the
board
members
and
I'll
just
go
through
my
email.
G
It
was
very
high
level
and
very
kind
of
a
brief
in
in
the
discussion,
and
I
broke
it
down
into
a
couple
groups
and
said
interest
reduction
priorities.
Here
are
my
main
priorities
that
I
want
the
rda
to
function,
to
focus
on
in
affordable
housing
and
in
the
order
of
I'm
saying
priority.
Just
for
the
discussion
purposes:
family,
housing
target
population,
missing
middle
and
the
unique
housing
types
number
four
would
be
home,
ownerships
expand
opportunities,
number
five
and
then
the
final
one
is
the
commercial
vitality.
G
All
the
definitions
of
those
are
in
the
in
the
package
for
the
funding
strategy,
and
then
that
I
would
say
there
was
some
thresholds
thresholds
just
to
get
into
the
to
the
game.
The
first
one
being
sustainability,
and
that
is
the
minimum
threshold
you
have
to
have
sustainability
as
part
of
your
the
project
and
then
one
of
the
three
neighborhood
safety,
neighborhood
impact
and
transportation
opportunities.
G
So
sustainability
and
one
of
those
other
threes
adds
a
threshold
minimum
threshold
to
get
to
the
interest
reduction
priorities,
and
then
I
finally
said
three
others
that
are
nice
to
have,
but
they're
not
really
a
priority.
The
historic
preservation
adaptive
reuse
are
nice
to
have
public
guard
fund.
Leveraging
are
all
nice
to
have,
but
to
me
they're,
not
the
priorities.
G
The
priority
is
on
the
affordable
housing
side
of
the
house,
which
are
the
top
six
and
then
the
minimum
threshold,
which
should
be
sustainability
plus
the
one
of
the
other
three,
that's
that's
where
I
was
coming
from,
and
I'm
just
throwing
that
out
as
a
first
blush
of
we
can
discuss
from
this
point
allison
on
her
own
with.
Oh,
I
guess,
with
other
staff.
Members
came
up
with
a
similar,
but
some
different
priorities
there.
At
the
same
time,
over
the
weekend
did
I
hit
it.
E
Madam
chair
yeah
go
ahead.
Oh
I'm!
Sorry,
I'm
just
thinking
in
terms
of
context
which
I
neglected
to
give
if
I
could
just
say
a
sentence
or
two.
This
is
a
continuation
of
the
conversation
that
the
board
began
back
last
spring
about
how
to
structure
their
annual
priorities
based
on
all
the
work
that
tammy
and
the
rest
of
rda
has
been
doing
in
terms
of
structuring
the
housing
development
trust
fund
funds.
I
don't
know
if
tammy
would
like
to
correct
or
improve
what
I
just
said.
E
No,
that's
exactly
right
and
thank
you
for
forwarded
forwarding
me
councilmember
dugan's
priority
list.
I
do
have
a
question
on
the
list
just
to
make
sure
I'm
clear.
The
first
set
of
six
priorities
that
you
read
are
those
what
you
are
proposing
be
used
to
rank
applications
as
we
get
them
to
rank
and
compare
applications
like
rank
rate
rate,
one
application
higher
than
another,
and
then
also
use
those
for
the
interest
rate
reductions.
A
All
right,
council
members,
do
you,
do
you
have
questions
or
other
ideas
on
how
to
move
forward,
so
they
can
start
announcing
the
funds
available
for
housing.
J
I
guess
I
just
need
to
see
this.
I
mean
I'm
very
confused
right
now
and
feel
that,
like
maybe
some
more
context
and
information
would
be
helpful.
So
perhaps
we
could
have
like
a
I'm
a
visual
person
and
so
being
able
to
see
something.
Visually
would
be
helpful
for
me
to
understand
what
we're
doing.
G
J
G
Mentioned
that
we
should
have
screen
shared
that
thing,
that
document,
so
I
think.
J
E
Don't
know
about
them,
I
apologize.
I
apologize
council,
I'm
sorry
board.
Member
fowler,
the
I
believe
I
did
send
the
email
to
the
front
office.
I'm
hoping
taylor
amanda
could
pull
it
up.
If
not,
I
can
see
if
I
can
screen
share
without
subjecting
anyone
to.
Oh
look
at
that
amber's
doing
it.
E
Thank
you
and
then,
whatever
the
board
members
say
if
you
could
just
follow
along.
Thank
you.
B
L
She
can
go
through
just
the
highlights
of
that.
If
there
does
want
to
be
a
discussion
today,
if
not,
I
think
allison
is
prepared
to
kind
of
go
through
the
email
and
the
information
that
was
sent
to
the
board
and
then
his
staff.
We
are
more
than
happy
to
take
whatever
level
direction.
The
board
gives
us
today
and
return
next
month
with
something
that
kind
of
puts
this
within
context
and
a
plan
and
a
strategy
that
explains
a
little
bit
better.
D
J
G
G
Yes,
I
here's
a
thrust
minimum
threshold
and
then
here's
our
top
six
priority
and
I
was
probably
inexperienced
or
remiss
and
in
trying
to
think
I
looked
through
this
for
a
little
bit
and
you
know
you're
just
gonna
assume
like
oh
everyone
else
is
doing
the
same
thing
and
it
and
it's
really
not.
You
know
it
was
a
lot
at
one
time.
So
I
threw
this
out
and
says:
hey.
I
want
to
have
the
discussion.
Here's
our
top
six,
here's
a
threshold
to
get
there.
J
So
I
guess
for
me:
if
there's
not
a
deadline
at
this
point
for
something,
then
this
would
need
to
be
like
changing
sort
of
what
we
had
discussed
throughout.
A
pretty
long
process
feels
like
it
would
need
more
discussion,
and
that's
where
I'm
at
at
this
point,
but.
A
That
was,
we
cannot
fund,
not
one
project
we
have
all
of
it
at
once,
so
we're
trying
to
condense
and
kind
of
organize
it
so
that
we
can
move
forward
and
get
this
money
out.
All
of
these
things
that
are
in
the
list
are
from
the
13
that
were
existing,
so
there's
nothing
new
here,
nothing
different
other
than
reorganizing
it
and
giving
priorities
to
to
certain
things
that
we've
been
talking
about
and
in
hopes
that
we
agreed
on
now.
L
We
wanted
to
have
it
be
a
conversation
as
part
of
the
budget
process,
so
the
user
board
could
try
to
give
us
a
little
bit
direction
on
what
your
priorities
would
be
for
placing
the
housing
funds.
You've
obviously
approved
our
budget.
You've
set
those
high
level
priorities
with
the
allocations
that
you've
done,
and
so
this
conversation
right
now
to
put
it
in
context,
has
two
purposes.
One
is
to
set
those
priorities,
either
as
thresholds
or
higher
priorities
for
how
they
would
be
applied
to
the
selection
of
projects
that
we
ultimately
provide.
L
L
So
that's
the
first
item
that
we
wanted
to
have
those
priorities
kind
of
put
in
the
plan
so
that
that
informs
us
when
we
get
10
applications,
we
know
how
to
rank
them
and
then
bring
them
back
to
the
board
for
for
selection.
The
second
item
that
we
use
these
priorities
for
is
once
those
projects
get
through
the
thresholds.
L
In
the
context,
we
then
use
those
priorities
to
determine
which
ones
qualify
for
an
interest
rate
reduction,
and
so,
to
that
extent,
having
more
priorities
and
having
a
larger
list,
that's
more
robust
is
a
little
bit
better
because
then,
once
those
projects
hit
that
initial
threshold
of
maybe
those
two
or
three
priorities,
they
then
have
an
opportunity
within
their
specific
development,
to
figure
out
what
level
of
other
priorities
they
could
then
qualify
for
an
interest
rate
reduction.
So,
ideally,
this
happens
before
we
start
the
budget
process
so
going
into
the
budget.
L
J
Madam
chairman,
so
maybe
just
for
a
little
bit
of
context
from
what
I
remember
for
newer
board
members.
A
lot
of
this
discussion
started
three
plus
years
ago,
when
we
were
looking
at
the
mission
and
vision
and
mission
of
the
rda,
which
was
then
eventually
adopted
by
the
board
as
a
new
vision
and
mission
for
the
rda,
and
it
lays
out
a
lot
of
these
same
priorities
from
that
mission
and
vision.
We
we,
as
a
board,
asked
the
rda
to
go
back
and
create
a
housing
policy
that
we
could
follow.
J
That
policy
includes
reporting
to
the
rda
board
having
these
sort
of
different
ideas
and
thresholds.
When
projects
come
up
or
when
housing
policies
come
up
and
then
from
there
we
said
we
need
to
see
the
board
said
based
on
this
policy.
We
also
want
some
flexibility
because,
potentially
in
year,
2021
the
most
important
things
for
us
may
be
transportation
opportunities,
and
so
the
board
can
sit.
J
Hence
when
danny
was
saying,
ideally,
this
would
come
to
us
at
the
end
of
the
year,
but
before
the
budget
we
could
say
well,
let's
look
at
where
we
want
the
budget
to
go.
Next
year
and
of
these
13,
what
we
really
think
is
important
for
2022
are
target
populations,
so
that's
priority
number
one
out
of
13
and
then,
if
we
were
to
say,
there's
three
major
priorities
that
we
see
and
the
idea
from
the
discussions
that
we've
had
over
the
couple
of
years
is
that
these
priorities
are
like
what
we've
come
through.
J
J
A
Total
sense,
and
so
what
the
like
teacher
and
vice
chair
are
saying
that
we,
I
guess,
following
that,
we
would
like
you
to
focus
if
the
world
wants
on
this
six
things
and
then
the
thresholds,
but
maybe
that's
that's
that's
what
we're
trying
to
say
this
is
up
for
discussion.
This
is
something
that
we
all
agree
on
and
we
can
tell
the
rda
staff
when
a
project
comes.
A
B
B
Can
we
further
define
or
like
consolidate
some
of
these
somehow,
but
to
say
that,
like
from
my
perspective,
like
the
rda
to
to
say
that,
like
arts
and
historic
preservation
are
like
nice
to
have
but
not
priority,
not
the
major
priorities
like
those
are
the
best
tools
that
we
have
for
arts
and
for
historic
preservation.
So
if,
though,
if
they're
not
among
the
top
priorities,
then
where
are
we
prioritizing
those
elsewhere
in
the
budget
and
elsewhere
in
our
actions?
So
for
me
I
would
say
like
maybe
we
need
to.
B
I
think
it
would
be
more
helpful
to
have
a
discussion
that
that
kind
of
goes
back
to
the
vision
and
the
objectives
that
we
put
in
place.
I
think
last
year
or
the
year
before
and
saying
okay,
these
are
some
13
priorities
that
have
kind
of
been
out
there
for
a
long
time.
How
does
that
square
within
what
we
already
passed
recently
about
the
the
vision
and
the
strategic
plan
for
the
rda,
and
are
there
some
of
these
that
we
can.
B
Achieve
achieve
the
same
objectives
without
having
such
an
expansive
list,
but
but
I
would
say
going
into
that
discussion
that
art
and
historic
preservation
for
me
are
always
going
to
be
major
priorities
for
rda
and,
like
again,
that's
the
reason.
Those
are
part
of
the
reason
why
we
have
the
rda
is
for
those.
So
that's
my.
E
If
I
may
add,
yeah
the
13
priorities
did
in
general,
come
from
the
list
of
guiding
framework
and
livability
benchmarks
that
the
board
approved.
I
believe
it
was
in
november
of
2019.,
so
I
think
you're
right.
The
question
is:
does
the
board
want
to
weight
some
of
those
priorities
higher
in
this
funding
year?
I've
been
hearing
that
family,
housing
and
home
ownership
is
very
important,
but
in
terms
of
that's
in
ranking
applications
against
one
another
during
the
evaluation
process
and
keep
in
mind
that
the
board
has
the
final
say
on
what
projects
receive
funding.
E
So
these
funding
priorities
aren't
the
end
all
and
be
all
there's
an
application
and
a
review
process.
Other
factors
are
considered
like
the
financial
viability
of
the
project,
other
components
and
the
projects
come
to
the
board
for
a
final
funding
decision
and
then,
in
terms
of
interest
rate
priorities.
I
think
it's
important
to
think
about
the
caret
that
we're
providing
here.
E
B
B
13
is
like
too
many
priorities.
Okay,
let's
accept
that
as
a
premise
like
what
is
the
problem
that
is
caused
by
13
priorities
like
are
there
people
that
are
like?
I
don't.
I
don't
know
how
to
rank
these
because
there's
too
many
like,
I
think
it
for
me,
it's
it's
more
like
what
is
the
problem.
What
are
the
problems
that
are
being
caused
in
in
the
rda's
ability
to
issue
these
funds
or
to
solicit
people
that
are
interested
in
them
by
the
13.
E
We've
had
about
that
many
priorities
in
the
past
funding
years
and
we've
used
it
more
in
looking
at
how
many
priorities
the
projects
are
hitting,
so
we
just
need
approval
from
the
rda
board
on
what
priorities
they
want
us
to
issue
with
the
nofa
for
this
funding
year
and
instead
of
looking
at
the
number
of
priorities.
If
that's
not
a
priority
for
the
board,
you
could
wait.
You
could
narrow
them
down
or
weight
some
of
them
higher.
D
I
can
take
a
run
at
wha
what
we
thought
we
understood
from
your
last
discussion
and
obviously
we
may
not
have
understood
correctly,
but
we
we
thought
that
you
were
occasionally
when
you
get
the
applications.
We
hear
council
members
board.
Members
say
why
this
project,
why
I
thought
we
wanted
to
focus
on
x?
D
I
thought
we
wanted
to
focus
on
family
housing
or
I
thought
we
wanted
to
focus
on
especially
low-income
housing
or
or
this
or
that
so
so,
each
time
when
an
application
comes
to
you,
we're
we're
hearing
different
things
where
people
are
a
little
frustrated,
and
so
we
thought
well.
Okay,
up
front
is
the
time
when
you
can
influence
that
it's
way
too
late
to
influence
that
once
a
developer
has
invested
all
of
that
time
and
the
staff
has
invested
all
of
that
time.
D
We
had
heard
council
members
ask
occasionally
with
applicants
what
what
their
energy
efficiency
was
with
the
project
and
then
when,
when
the
answer
was
that
isn't
something
that
was
addressed.
D
We
heard
the
feedback
that
energy
efficiency
should
be
addressed
with
all
projects,
and
so
that's
where
the
the
the
wording
of
kind
of
a
basic
entry
level
that
you'd
have
a
few
things
that
are
just
you'd.
We
don't
fund
things
that
don't
at
least
have
xyz
whatever
your
xyz
is
so
anyway,
apologies
for
not
giving
enough
context,
not
getting
it
to
you
sooner.
D
We
just
ran
out
of
time.
So,
okay.
B
That
makes
sense
to
me
and
that
helps
me
think,
through
how
a
discussion
to
address
it
would
be
more
helpful
because
I
guess
I
was
not
quite
understanding
what
what
the
the
underlying
problems
were.
So
I
that
makes
sense
to
me-
and
I
just
need
to
think
on
that
now
before
I
can
say.
A
D
A
Try
to
guide
ourselves,
you
know
and
and
do
that
because
let's
say
tomorrow
right
we
get
an
application.
The
rda
gets
an
application
and
you
guys
go
through
it,
but
you
know
you
then
comes
to
us
and
then
how
you
know
their
their
stuff.
A
Doesn't
really
I
mean
they
have
13
priorities
right
now,
so
it
could
be
any
application
and
right
now,
as
is
you,
will
have
to
take
the
application
and
say
sure
you
know
we'll
look
into
it
and
we'll
ask
the
board
and
go
through
all
that
work
and
but
but
if
the
rda
staff
said
look,
the
board
is
really
interested
in
home
ownership
right
now.
So
if
you
were
to
do
units
that
are
for
sale,
then
this
is
probably
you
know
the
the
board
most
likely
will
favor
your
project.
A
So
yes,
let
me
take
a
look
at
it
and
and
we'll
process
it
so.
L
A
L
Yeah
and
if
I
may
suggest
madam
chair
we're
happy
to
take
this
conversation
and
come
back
with
the
revised
strategy
and
we
we
can
incorporate
vice
chairperson
dugan's
comments
into
that
and
work
with
allison
roland
on
that,
so
that
we
can
come
back,
provide
that
context.
L
Put
it
in
the
framework
that
we
think
we're
hearing
from
the
board
and
then
address
the
concerns
of
what
priorities
are
going
to
be
for
that
threshold,
that
qualifying
of
use
of
funds
and
then
what
priorities
would
be
for
those
interest
rate
reductions
and-
and
I
think
we
have
information
I'll
turn
it
over
to
tammy.
If
there's
anything
else,
she
thinks
we
need
in
order
to
take
that
next
step.
Q
Just
a
word
of
caution
that
back
when
I
had
frustration
as
a
board
member
about
our
definitions
for
interest
rate
reduction
for
environmental
and
sustainability
improvements
in
a
project
which
felt
insufficient
or
weak
to
me
that
even
their
proximity
to
a
track
station
could
net
them
a
0.5
interest
rate
reduction
when
they
didn't
do
anything
to
put
a
track
station
there
and
they
aren't
doing
anything
to
connect
their
residents
or
their
customers
to
using
public
transit.
So
we've
been
working
to
improve
that
and
what
what
it
brings
up
for
me
here
is.
Q
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
want
us
to
end
up
inadvertently,
giving
out
more
discounts
because
there's
a
real
there
may
be
a
coupling
effect
of
some
of
the
priorities.
So
I'm
just
looking
at
the
council
member
dugan's
list,
because
that's
the
one
that's
up
like
if
you're,
if
you
are
providing
housing
access
for
target
populations,
you
are
also
expanding
opportunities
simultaneously
and
you
also
may
be
doing
it
by
unique
housing
types
may
be.
The
mechanism
by
which
you're
having
targeted
populations
have
better
access.
B
Agreed
that
that
that
makes
that's
like
a
better
articulation
of
what
I
was
saying
when
I
say
like
some
of
these
might
overlap,
I'm
not
saying
that
we
should
get
rid
of
one
and
or
jam
them
together,
just
to
make
a
shorter
list,
but
there
there
are
ways
that
you
know
one
or
two
of
these
things
can
then
fulfill
two
or
three
other
things.
So
I
don't
know
how
I
don't
know
how
to
describe
that.
It's
kind
of
like
a
yeah
okay.
A
Makes
sense,
okay,
so
danny,
then
you
would
like
we'll
come
back
to
this
conversation
again
at
a
later
time,
and
we
are
thank
you
board
members
who
are
moving
on
just
keep
thinking
about
this,
please
so
that
we
can
give
them
more
direct
answers
next
time
cindy.
I
need
your
help
right
now.
We
are
at.
D
We
need
to
know
from
the
rda
staff
my
I
might
have.
D
A
A
Okay,
so
we
are
not
number
four
utah
performer
performing
arts
center
interlocal
agreement,
jim
bruno
katie
lewis
go
ahead.
E
An
item
that
would
be
both
before
the
board
and
the
city
council
to
or
to
agree
to
allow
the
county
to
continue
operating
the
eccles
theater
and,
specifically
the
ancillary
spaces
around
the
delta
hall.
That's
the
really
really
quick
version.
I
can
talk
about
it
longer,
but
I
probably
shouldn't
so
you'll
have
to
adopt
a
motion
both
as
the
board
to
enter
into
this
interlocal.
A
Right
go
ahead
board
member
father
looks
like
you're
ready
to.
I.
K
A
Kidding
rogers,
second,
by
board
member
fowler,
those
who
are
say
yay,
if
you're
in
favor
and
if
not
yay,
all
right,
that
was
in
opposition.
I
don't
hear
anybody,
I'm
a
yeah
too,
so
it
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you.
A
J
A
You
we're
moving
we're
skipping
number
five
report:
an
announcement
from
the
executive
director.
L
L
There
is
still
some
of
the
structure
that
remains
and
that's
just
a
function
of
the
burnt
rubble
has
to
be
disposed
of
differently,
so
we're
still
working
on
that
demolition
and
then
finally,
galvin
center
has
reopened
for
outdoor
events,
they've
already
hosted
utah
symphony
and
ballet
west,
as
well
as
excellence
in
the
community,
is
back
to
having
live
concerts.
So
they
have
wednesday
night
movies
and
food
truck
thursdays,
so
we're
open
for
business
and
public's
invited.
So
any
questions
on
any
of
those.
A
No,
we
don't
so
we
are.
A
J
I
was
just
going
to
say,
and
I
don't
I'm
looking
towards
jen
and
cindy
and
leihua
as
well.
I
think
if
we
we
could
do
the
closed
session.
If
we
then
started
the
council
at
four,
because
I'm
in
me
looking
at
the
council
agenda,
I
think
we
can
there's
a
because
we're
not
doing
vip
a
couple
of
things
on
there
anyway,
that
we
have
agenda,
like
the
agenda
item
number
two
that
we
have
15
minutes
for
so.
J
B
Madam
chair,
I
move
that
we
enter
closed
session
for
the
purpose
of
strategy
negotiations
to
discuss,
purchase
exchange,
release
of
real
property,
imminent
litigation
and
advice
of
counsel.
J
A
We
have
a
motion
by
board
member
wharton
is
seconded
by
amy
fowler
to
enter
into
a
closed
session.
Everybody
gives.