►
From YouTube: SLC Council Work Session - 6/8/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
I
could
just
start
telling
you
about
it
if
you
want
okay
for
covid
our
14-day
case
rate
of
is
less
than
100
per
100
000..
There's
no
zip
codes
above
that
191
per
100
000
positivity
rate,
which
is
great
and
last
week,
salt
lake
county,
as
you
know,
entered
the
low
transmission
level
according
to
state
guidelines
and
vaccinations
in
the
central
city
and
west
side.
B
Areas
are
still
increasing
by
two
to
three
percent
per
week
and
they're
still
beside
behind
the
east
side,
which
is
50
to
60,
fully
vaccinated
thanks
bobby,
we
can
go
to
the
third
slide
yeah.
Thank
you.
There's
those
rates
great
to
see
that
they're
pretty
consistently
increasing
still
for
those
three
zip
codes
that
have
been
hardest
hit.
B
The
next
slide
is
again
the
county-wide
demographic
totals
for
fully
vaccinated
individuals
and
the
next
one
is
about
upcoming
events
that
we're
helping
to
organize
with
salt
lake
county
and
we'll
try
to
bring
back
data
from
these
clinics
as
they
happen
and
again,
council
members,
we
are
always
happy
to
work
on
liaisoning
ideas
that
you
may
have,
or
your
communities
may
have
for
other
opportunities
for
vaccination
events.
So
please,
let
us
know
if
you've
got
some
ideas
there
we
can
go
to
the
next
one,
which
is
our
emergency.
B
C
Thanks,
madam
mayor
you'll,
see
the
table
on
the
screen,
shows
the
current
three
adult
single
adult
resource
centers
and
then
on
the
far
right,
the
totals
and
averages
of
those
three
for
the
last
week.
You
can
see
we're
hovering
about
88
capacity.
C
A
lot
of
the
beds
that
are
unoccupied
per
night
are
oftentimes
reserved
for
somebody,
who's,
working
or
other
things
during
times,
so
they're,
not
there
at
night,
when
the
account
happens.
So
those
beds
are
not
necessarily
just
vacant,
they
may
be
occupied
by
somebody
typically,
but
not
at
that
point
for
the
count
next
slide.
C
The
next
one
we'll
talk
about
the
community
commitment
program,
there's
a
resource
fair,
which
we
do
pretty
often
for
camps
in
the
city,
particularly
before
we
clean
them.
C
This
next
one
is
for
cottonwood
park,
which
is
along
jordan,
river
north
of
north
temple
on
the
16th,
and
in
addition
to
that,
we
haven't
put
it
here,
but
on
the
12th
there
is
that
vaccination,
fair
down
at
rio
grande
by
the
wigan
center.
C
The
heart
team
does
work
with
advantage
services
closely
about
trash
throughout
the
city
and
particularly
around
hot
spots,
with
either
cleaning
and
or
trash
cans.
And
these
are
this
is
a
list
of
places
where
they
suggested,
having
additional
trash
cans
to
those
that
already
there
we're
always
open
to
new
ideas
for
folks.
So
we
take
feedback
from
the
community
and
from
you
all.
If
you
hear
of
places
that
might
be
beneficial
to
have
more
next
slide,.
C
And
then
some
overflow
updates,
most
of
these
overflows
were
set
in
place
for
the
winter
time
like
we
do
most
winters
and
with
additional
funding
through
the
state
and
other
entities
the
county
they've
extended,
but
they
are
coming
to
an
end.
So
the
airport
in
a
north
temple
is
closing
on
june
15th
for
renovations
they're
going
to
renovate
this
summer
and
reopen
in
september
they're,
estimating
with
their
full
100
beds
or
excuse
me
100
rooms.
C
The
folks
are
in
there
now
a
number
of
them
plan
to
come
back
in
the
fall
and
start
doing
short-term
rentals
there
in
the
meantime,
they're
being
offered
placements
in
the
resource
centers
themselves.
A
number
of
these
folks
came
from
camping
and
some
of
them
are
going
back
to
camping,
they're
reporting,
so
we're
still
getting
some
estimates
about
numbers
there.
C
The
vulnerable
populations
hotel
in
salt
lake
has
been
operated
through
covid
through
county
money,
and
that
is
closing
the
end
of
june.
The
end
of
the
month.
Combination
of
the
funding
is
running
out
and
the
current
owner
wants
to
bring
it
back
into
service
as
a
hotel.
There's
a
little
over
100
people
in
there.
Most
of
those
folks
came
from
resource
centers
and
have
underlying
health
conditions,
which
made
them
more
vulnerable
to
covid's,
symptoms
and
problems.
So
most
of
them,
we
anticipate
are
going
to
go
back
into
the
resource
centers
and
the
operator
right
now.
C
The
road,
home
and
others
are
working
with
them
actively
to
get
into
those
resource
centers.
So
it's
not
waiting
until
the
end
of
the
month.
They've
been
doing
this
for
another
a
week
at
least
already
and
they'll
keep
doing
that
through
this
month
and
then
the
winter
overflow
program
for
motels,
which
we
run
most
winters
for
women,
primarily
at
scattered
motels,
that
has
additional
funding
from
the
state
to
operate
until
october
until
the
next
winter
cycle.
C
B
Thanks
just
another
update
that
actually,
the
the
opening
of
the
magnolia
has
been
a
little
bit
delayed,
and
so
I
think
that
we're
going
to
be
shifting
some
things
with
the
drop
off,
I'm
not
sure
if
any
of
the
staff
that's
on,
has
a
any
updates
on
that.
B
But
we
still
invite
people
to
help
put
together
kitchen
kits
for
the
new
residents
who
will
be
coming
into
their
permanent
supportive
housing
apartments
at
the
magnolia
apartments
there
they
can
be
new
or
gently
used
and
there's
a
list
at
the
slc
core
website
where
you
can
look
at
the
items
on
amazon.
But
of
course
you
can
get
anything
from
anywhere.
That's
new
or
gently
used
and
put
it
together
to
help
people
out
thanks
for
allowing
us
the
time
to
give
an
update
council.
D
Thank
you.
This
is
also
my
I've
seen
the
flyers
and
the
and
the
efforts
out
there
to
get
people
to
participate
and
I've
seen
a
lot
of
staff
posted
on
facebook
about
people
wanting
to
to
go
donate.
So
I'm
super
excited
about
that.
Having
that
said
how
the
andrew,
how
does
this
work
like
we,
we
have
this
project
that
will
be
opened
for
as
permanent
supportive
housing.
C
Yeah,
it's
a
good
question
about
how
the
housing
flow
moves
right
so
when,
when
the
this
permanent
support
of
housing
project
has
vouchers
attached
to
it
for
subsidizing
each
of
the
units,
those
are
managed
through
a
coordinated
intake
process
through
the
county,
the
housing
authorities
and
all
the
providers
work
together
with
a
list
essentially
of
folks
who
have
applied,
who
fit
the
criteria
for
that
type
of
housing,
and
then
they
move
them
in
individually
to
ensure
that
they
meet
the
right
qualifications,
etc.
That
income
all
that,
so
that
is
very,
very
coordinated.
C
Now
we
do
anticipate
a
number
of
those
folks
are
in
the
shelter.
Some
of
them
may
not
necessarily
be
in
the
shelter
right
now
they
may
have
been
in
us
before
they're,
not
in
right
now
they
kind
of
come
and
go
in
and
out
so
that
list
does
overlap
with
the
shelter
list,
but
it
may
not
be
exclusively
folks
in
the
shelter.
If
that
makes
sense,
they
could
be
on
house
on
the
street.
They
might
be
doubling
up
with
somebody
temporarily
and
coming
back
into
the
shelter.
C
Some
of
the
complications
of
administering
a
coordinatory
system
is
actually
locating
the
person
right
they
may
have
applied
over
a
year
ago
for
this
type
of
housing
and
finding
out
where
they
are
and
tracking
them
down
to
ensure
we
give
them.
The
opportunity
sometimes
takes
a
little
bit
of
time,
and
so
that's
why
that
coordinated
entry
is
so
important
to
keep
track
of
contact
information,
coordinate
with
all
the
providers
to
figure
out
where
the
person
might
be
right
now
and
then
get
them
in
as
soon
as
possible
into
that
unit.
D
All
right,
okay,
thank
you.
G
I
was
wondering
about
the
list
of
the
places
where
the
trash
cans
are
suggested.
If
I,
I
expect
that
some
of
my
constituents
would
be
interested
in
some
locations.
If
they
have
ideas,
how
do
we
get
those
to
you?
Should
we
just
have
them,
send
them
to
me
and
email
them
to
you
or
what's
the
best
way
to
convey
those
suggestions.
C
F
Great,
thank
you
and
madame
mayor
I
see
the
chief
is
chief
brown
is
on.
I
don't
know
if
we
wanted
to
do
a
quick
police
update
as
well.
F
H
A
brief
update,
yeah,
madam
chair
and
council.
I
have
with
me
today
sergeant
mason
gibbons,
who
is
heads
up
our
background
unit,
but
I
think
this
kind
of
stems
out
of
last
week's
conversation
about
where
we're
at
with
our
process,
not
so
much
the
process,
but
where
we're
at
with
the
numbers,
and
so
I
do
have
a
slide
deck
and
we
can
get
through
them
fairly,
quick.
So
if
you
can
bring
up
that
first
slide
and
please
counsel
as
we
go.
If
you
have
questions
just
just
jump
in,
let's
talk
as
we.
H
H
H
All
right,
so,
a
few
months
ago,
director,
deb
alexander
myself,
talked
about
the
process
and
how
we
had
a
process.
That
was,
we
used
to
open
a
process
and
then
close
it,
and
then
we
would
take
those
applicants,
but
we
moved
to
that
open,
always
going
process,
and
so
this
kind
of
breaks
down
the
demographics
of
what
we've
accomplished
since
january
of
this
month
to
june
3rd.
So
next
slide,
please.
H
All
right
since
january
of
of
2021
to
june
3rd,
we've
had
613
applications
put
in
for
to
be
a
police
officer
here
in
salt
lake
city
of
those
96
percent
or
593
have
put
in
for
the
new
higher
higher
entry
level
positions
and
3.3,
or
we've
received
20
applications
for
the
lateral
higher
hiring
positions.
H
H
Now
to
break
down
in-state
and
out-of-state
applications,
483
or
78
percent
of
those
applications
we
received
were
from
utah
residents
and
21.2
or
130
applications
were
received
from
outside
the
outside
of
our
state
and
into
the
provinces
in
canada,
those
that
were
that
had
citizenship.
So
we
had
a
good
response,
but,
as
we've
talked
council,
remember,
the
one-third
rule
that
we
kind
of
lose
one-third
of
our
applications
as
we
move
through
the
process.
H
I
Thanks,
chief,
okay,
so
the
graphic
on
the
side
there,
you
can
kind
of
follow
along
it's
represented
in
fractions
or
in
percentages.
Rather,
if
you'd,
like
the
actual
number,
I
can
give
those
as
well
but
of
the
new
higher
category
hotel
residence
that
accounts
for
468
applicants.
Now
what
how
did
those
all
land?
That's
that's
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at
here.
Okay,
63
of
that
are
the
ones
that
have
withdrawn
for
various
reasons
that
could
be
they
self-withdrew.
I
That
could
be,
they
just
stopped
communicating
or
it
could
be,
they
applied
and
never
did
anything
after
that
which
we
suspect
is
probably
due
to
unemployment,
keeping
unemployment
benefits
going
by
applying
to
jobs,
the
remainders
29
or
roughly
a
third
again,
that's
going
to
be
a
common
trend
are
still
in
the
process
where
we
have
currently
disqualified,
eight
percent,
just
off
the
top
based
on
previous
history,
work
history,
criminal
aspects,
all
of
those
above
are
there
any
questions
on
that
slide.
I
I
H
And
then,
madam
chair,
I
think
the
conversation
was
what
those
disqualifying
events
might
be.
I
mean
just
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
we're
not
talking
about
somebody
who
used
marijuana,
you
know
five
or
six
years
ago
we're
talking
about
individuals
that
have
committed
a
domestic
violence
or
a
violent
crime.
Those
are
the
individuals
that
are
disqualifying
out
that
we
don't
want
them
here
within
our
police
department.
H
One
of
the
big
things
with
the
domestic
violence
is
sometimes
it's
just
one
incident,
but
there's
a
pattern
of
violence
that
precludes
that,
and
so
we
don't.
We
don't
want
that
individual
and
by
law
once
convicted
of
a
domestic
violence
they
can.
They
cannot
carry
a
firearm
which
absolutely
disqualifies
them
from
being
a
police
officer.
So
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
we're
not
looking
for
those
very
minor
things.
H
I
So,
with
the
lateral
hires,
it's
a
smaller
pool,
you
also
have
to
consider
this
job
was
posted
only
what
a
month
ago.
So
that's
why
the
numbers
are
are
much
lower
than
the
continual
higher
new
higher
process,
but
of
that
there
are
15
applicants
who
are
utah
residents
of
that
and
you
could
do
quick
math.
Just
by
looking
at
the
ratio.
I
Five
were
disqualified
and
ten
were
withdrawn
for
various
reasons.
Again,
mostly
they
self
withdrew
or
they
just
stop
communicating.
After
applying.
I
H
Yeah
so
four
of
them
they
went
through
to
stay
with
their
current
agency,
so
they
put
their
name
in
the
hat.
We
went
through
some
of
the
process
communicated
with
them.
They
decided
to
stay
with
their
current
agency
or
applicants,
stop
communicating
for
whatever
reason
we
don't
know
they.
Just
they
didn't
want
to
be
part
of
the
process
and
we
couldn't
couldn't
contact
them
to
further
the
process
along
two
applicants
accepted
jobs
at
different
agencies
and
then
five
were
dq'd
and
and
without
being
real
specific.
H
The
disqualifying
events
were
were
problems
with
their
work.
History,
some
were
involved
in
criminal
activity
or
under
investigation
within
their
own
agency.
H
Some
had
made
bad
decisions
and,
as
I
talked
to
pastor
davis,
who's
part
of
the
commission.
He
he
said
when
we
talked
about
hiring,
he
said
chief,
we
don't
want
just
officers,
we
want
the
right
officers
and
so
council.
I
want
you
to
know
we're
keeping
our
standards
as
high
as
high
as
we
ever
have,
and
it's
imperative
that
we
get
the
right
officers
to
serve
here
in
salt
lake
city.
H
H
Some
feel
like
the
the
wages
aren't
at
the
level
they
need
to
be
or
want
them
to
be,
and
so
those
are
kind
of
some
of
the
overarching
themes
that
we
continue
to
hear
from
from
the
lateral
group
and
then
the
last
slide.
I
Oh
sorry,
chief,
I'm
just
enjoying
the
graphics
so
for
the
last
group,
a
category
are
non-resident
lateral
hires.
With
this,
the
graph
shows
five
total
candidates,
and-
and
I
do
that-
because
there
was
one
that
contacted
the
background
unit
exclusively
and
we
were
working
and
trying
to
get
to
apply
and
because
we
were
working
on
them.
We
counted
as
a
statistic,
but
there
are
actually
only
four
lateral
applicants,
who've
applied
and
all
four
have
withdrawn
and
again
what
the
team
said.
It's
moving
costs,
it's
housing,
it's
the
pay.
I
H
H
I
want
to
end
on
a
good
note.
We
have
offered
10
conditional
offers
to
to
our
new
hire
class,
and
then
we
have
another
24
that
we're
going
to
be
moving
into
the
backgrounds
and
sergeant
givens
continues
with
his
team.
H
F
E
E
The
full
commission
recently
approved
recommendations
drafted
by
the
policies
and
practices
subcommittee
and
an
additional
round
of
recommendations
from
the
school
safety
subcommittee
staff
is
working
to
coordinate
a
date
that
those
can
be
presented
to
the
council.
We're
approaching
the
end
of
the
first
phase
of
the
rep
commission's.
E
The
commission
is
also
always
accepting
stories,
concerns
or
perspectives
from
the
public,
but
particularly
right
now.
The
consultants
who've
been
working
with
the
commission
since
last
fall
are
compiling
their
report
on
phase
one
of
the
commission's
work
and
they've
asked
the
public
to
share
any
feedback
that
they
want
included
in
that
report
by
friday
june
11th.
This
would
be
in
addition
to
all
the
feedback
that's
been
received
so
far
through
email,
listening
sessions
comment
at
commission
meetings,
so
I
just
want
to
do
a
quick
pitch
for
ways
to
share
feedback
with
the
commission.
E
E
F
You,
okay,
as
I
mentioned
before,
item
number
three,
the
rezoned
at
approximately
860
and
868
east
third
avenue
will
be
rescheduled
to
next
week
and
item
number
four
funding.
Our
future
recap
will
be
a
written
briefing
that
you
should
have,
and
so,
if
you
have
questions
please
let
kieran
know
so
that
brings
us
to
item
number
five,
which
is
our
unresolved
issues
with
the
budget,
and
we
are.
F
A
Maybe
I'll
just
do
a
quick
before
I
start
to
share
the
screen
of
where
we
are
in
the
process,
just
so
that
the
public
can
understand.
The
mayor
presented
the
budget
on
the
first
tuesday
in
may.
The
council
has
been
collecting
information
from
departments
since
then
receiving
information
to
questions.
A
Things
like
that
and
staff
has
been
tracking
all
the
interests,
all
the
items
of
interest
that
council
members
raised
and
collected
them
and
compiled
them
onto
a
list
that
we
call
the
tracking
list,
and
essentially
it's
just
a
way
to
make
sure
we
keep
the
budget
balanced
as
people
talk
about
new
ideas
they
have
to
fund
or
as
we
get
new
information
about
revenues.
A
Okay,
so
let
me
know
if
you
can
see
that
and
I
will
start
to
walk
through,
maybe
I'll
do
a
quick
recap
of
what
the
council
has
already
straw
polled
so
like
I
said
this
is
a
compilation
and
it's
trapped
by
department,
but
we
can
scroll.
A
The
items
that
the
council
said
I'd
like
to
come
back
to
that
are
highlighted
in
orange.
Those
are
the
items
that
we
haven't
gotten
to
yet,
and
so
I
will
just
scroll
up
and
then
the
items
that
are
highlighted
in
yellow
are
just
little
things
that
staff
needs
to
confirm
with
the
council
before
we
officially
get
the
budget,
and
I
I
forgot
to
mention
where
we
need
to
go
where
we
need
to
get
to
after
today's
conversation
or
worst
case
scenario.
A
Thursday's
conversation
is
a
balanced
budget,
where
the
council
feels
good
about
everything
that
was
either
added
or
removed
from
the
mayor's
proposal.
So
that's
why
we
ask
for
struggles.
A
That's
how
we
get
a
majority
of
the
council
to
say
yes,
I'm
interested
in
this
or
no
not
that
so
what
the
council
has
straw
polled
already
I'll
start
with
this
line
item,
which
was
to
take
the
fund
balance
that
existed
in
funding
our
future
and
put
it
in
a
holding
account
to
have
further
conversation
with
the
administration
and
racial
equity
and
policing
commission
to
look
more
broadly
at
different
response
models
for
emergency
situations,
so
everything
from
traffic
enforcement
to
medical
response
to
social
workers.
A
It's
a
very,
very
large
bucket
of
things.
I
think
that
falls
into
that
category
right
now,
and
hopefully,
with
further
discussion
with
the
administration
and
rep
commission.
We'll
get
some
more
definition
on
that
as
we
go
forward
and
in
the
meantime,
the
council
did
fund
a
few
other
things
on
that
are
kind
of
a
related
topic.
So
the
council
straw
pulled
to
fund
additional
axon
body
camera
services
to
increase
transparency
and
ease
of
analyzing
those
videos.
A
The
council
also
funded
additional
six
additional
social
workers
beyond
the
six
recommended
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
That
funding
is
for
10
months
so
that
the
social
worker
program
can
start
ramping
up
more
quickly.
A
The
the
council
also
recognized
that
the
public
safety
building
doesn't
have
enough
space
for
all
the
social
workers
and
so
put
in
a
placeholder
of
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
lease
space,
with
the
understanding
that
the
administration
will
have
to
come
back
and
let
us
know
if
that's
sufficient
or
if
other
resources
are
needed.
A
The
next
item
that
the
council
had
straw
polled.
Actually
this
was
one
of
the
first
items
that
the
council
straw
pulled
was
recapturing
1.8
million
that
had
been
set
aside
from
funding
our
future
transportation
dollars
and
directing
that
towards
additional
funding
for
the
600
north
corridor
transformation
project.
The
bulk
of
that
funding
is
coming
later
in
the
summer
when
you
guys
talk
about
a
potential
sales
tax
bond,
but
this
would
enable
that
project
to
go
further.
A
A
The
reason
I
didn't
turn
this
blue
is
because,
at
the
time
that
the
council
pulled
it,
the
council
made
a
mention
that
if
you
stronghold
other
things-
and
there
aren't
quite
enough
dollars
to
do
all
of
it,
but
that
is
something
that
you
could
revisit:
there's
not
a
specific
project
that
needs
exactly
2.7
million
dollars,
and
so
that
is
one
of
those
more
flexible
line
items
in
terms
of
allocation.
A
Because
of
the
drought
in
the
valley,
currently
the
council
also
straw
polled
whether
or
not
to
add
these
forest
preservation
and
growth,
fte
and
one-time
money.
Those
have
been
proposed
to
be
funded
through
the
arpa
dollars
and
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
and
then
we
received
information
that
they
were
not
eligible,
but
the
council
would
have
had
to
add
them
to
the
budget
if
you
wanted
them
to
be
part
of
the
city
for
the
coming
fiscal
year
and
the
council's
drop
hold
no,
and
that
takes
us
to
where
we
ended.
A
So
I
don't
know,
madam
chair,
if
you
want
to
kind
of
reintroduce
where
we
ended
or
if
you
want
me
to
or
and
then
if
it
would
be
more
helpful
for
me
to
stop
sharing
the
screen.
Just
let
me
know.
F
Okay,
thank
you
jen
thanks
for
that
recap.
I
think
that
is
incredibly
helpful
and
I
believe
where
we
ended
was
a
discussion
about
the
restructuring
of
of
the
public
services.
F
A
So
the
way
that
this
sheet
is
structured
is
to
have
a
line
item
for
any
edition,
and
so
all
of
the
additions
related
to
the
public
lands
department
are
reflected
here,
and
so
that's
the
new
department
of
public
lands.
A
The
council
does
have
an
ordinance
that
you're
considered
that
the
administration
forwarded
that
formally
creates
the
department
of
public
lands,
but
that
creation
of
the
department
happens
on
the
staffing
document
which
the
council
also
adopts,
and
so
we
do
just
need
some
direction
of
if
you're
comfortable,
creating
that
department
or
not,
and
then
we've
listed
each
of
the
ftes
specifically
so
that
if
you,
if
the
council
wanted
to
consider
the
proposal
by
each
fte,
you
could
do
that
related
to
the
restructuring.
A
Is
the
public
services
department
there
are
engineering
is
being
transferred
from
or
proposed
to
be
transferred
from
can
to
public
services,
and
so
some
of
those
ftes
are
related
to
that
transfer
in
this
section.
But
I
think
that
the
conversation
last
time
was
focused
more
on
the
public
lands
department,
and
so,
if
we
wanted
to
start
there,
I
think
that
would.
F
Yep,
that's
where
I
want
to
start
so.
Council
members.
G
A
That's
correct:
I
stopped
sharing
the
screen
just
so
that
you
guys
could
see
each
other,
but
I'm
happy
to
re-share
that
all
of
the
ftes
that
are
listed
are
in
the
budget
unless
you
straw,
pull
to
remove
them.
E
F
K
Yeah
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
this.
K
Creating
a
separate
department,
and
so
for
me,
I
think,
back
to
what
my
residents
have
said
to
me
over
the
last
four
years
and
what
they're
saying
now
and
they
really
see
parks
as-
and
I
I
believe
rightly
so-
that
they
see
parks
as
a
core
function
of
the
city
and
and
including
in
that
public
lands.
K
And
while
I
don't
think
anybody
is
excited
about
a
tax
increase
or
wants
a
tax
increase.
I
hear
people
saying
that
they
their
expectation
about
the
level
of
service
that
that
they
want
to
see
that
they're
willing.
They
would
be
willing
to
pay
more
to
to
meet
that
level
of
expectation.
K
So
so
there's
that,
then
I
look
at
the
fact
that
it
seems
like
there's
some
unprecedented
growth,
and
I
know
that
there's
some
unprecedented
growth
in
salt
lake
city
and
in
salt
lake
valley
and
as
we
run
out
of
space.
But
we
add
people,
I
think,
having
public
lands
and
parks
trails
becomes
much
more
important.
K
And
so
I
understand
for
me,
it
makes
sense
to
have
parks
and
public
lands
be
a
separate
department,
and
just
because
I
think
that
the
vision
of
the
city
going
forward
is
is
going
to
include
more
and
more
an
emphasis
on
our
parks
and
the
the
level
of
service
that
we
dedicate
to
our
parks,
and
I
think
one
way
that
we
communicate
that
vision
is
and
ensure
that
vision
from
one
administration
to
the
next
is
to
to
create
a
parks
department.
I
also
feel
like
we're
doing
the
work
right
now.
K
The
division
of
parks
is
kind
of
doing
the
work
of
a
department
and
they're
they're
kind
of
at
that
level.
So
for
me,
it
also
makes
sense
to
to
formalize
what
has
basically
become
a
de
facto
situation
where
they
are
this.
K
This
division,
that's
operating
like
a
department
but
I've,
given
a
lot
of
thought
to
to
what
james
has
said
about
being
worried
about.
You
know,
being
top
heavy
and
that's
weighed
on
me
a
lot
as
well.
K
So
I
would
be
open
to
like
discussing
how
how
we
manage
that,
along
with
with
supporting
this
as
a
priority
for
based
on
the
impact
or
the
input
that
I
got
from
my
residence.
G
Yeah
I'll
just
sort
of
also
share
what
I'm
hearing
from
my
residents,
which
is
majority,
are
also
saying
that
parks
is
a
priority
for
them,
even
if
it
were
to
result
in
a
tax
increase.
They
think
we're
not
doing
a
good
enough
job
of
maintaining
our
parks
now
and
as
we
bring
new
parks
online
like
I
was.
G
I
just
went
to
allen
park
recently
for
the
first
time
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done
there
and
the
new
glendale
water
park,
there's
just
a
lot
of
growth
that
we're,
we
know
is
going
to
come,
but
also.
We
hope
that
there
will
be
more
growth
in
public
lands,
and
I
think
that
there's
a
general
sense
that
we
aren't
doing
a
good
job
of
maintaining
those
or
we're
not
adequate
yet,
and
so
I
I
am
supportive
of
adding
to
that
workforce,
I'm
less.
G
E
M
I
appreciate
councilmember
wharton
and
mano
their
opinion,
but
let's
face
it.
Councilmember
wharton
we're
talking
east
side
west
side
here.
You've
got
a
lot
of
people
with
disposable
income
on
the
east
side,
whereas
westsiders
are
typically
those
that
have
the
disposable
income
and
when
you
create
a
new
department,
that's
exactly
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
a
tax
increase
increase,
so
the
people?
What
I'm
hearing
from
in
my
neighborhood
is
hey.
Let's
stop
this.
This
top
heavy
growth.
Let's
go,
let's
grow
the
base
and
I'm
more
than
willing
to
look
at
those
employees.
M
If
that's
what
it
takes
to
hire
so
that
they
feel
comfortable
having
the
staff
that
they
need
to
do
it,
because,
let's,
let's
face
it,
you
go
on
the
jordan
river
trail,
it's
an
encampment
city.
I
don't
think
you
can
even
use
the
park
right
now,
the
jordan
river
trail,
because
it's
so
full
of
camps.
So
when
I
hear
and
receive
an
email
talking
about
needing
a
spot
at
the
table,
you
know
what
the
mayor
can
invite
kristen
to
the
table
without
making
it
a
department
it
can
be.
M
M
What's
currently
done,
I
I
just
disagree
not
only
that
we
had
covet
we're
in
covid
for
the
past
18
months
or
so,
and
where
our
parks
were
closed.
So,
let's
get
out
of
this
coveted
pandemic.
Let's
actually
do
a
real
analysis
with
people
using
the
park,
seeing
how
much
weight
and
and
use
is
being
used
on
it
before
we're
going
to
go
and
discuss
a
brand
new
department.
M
It
doesn't
make
any
sense
for
us
to
be
doing
that
until
we
hire
new
employees,
make
sure
that
the
grounds
are
being
kept,
that
the
issues
that
are
already
there
making
sure
that
their
staff
fully
staffed
and
making
sure
that
that
part
team
staff
has
everything
that
they
need,
because
we
know
everywhere
across
the
city.
Jobs
are
available,
but
they're
not
being
filled
so
to
say
that
these
jobs
are
automatically
going
to
be
filled
is
not
not
being
forthright.
M
N
I
certainly
understand
what
councilmember
rogers
is
saying,
and
I
will
absolutely
want
to
do
my
very
best
to
avoid
a
tax
increase
in
the
future.
We
certainly
don't
want
to
burden
our
residents
any
more
than
already
so,
but
I
do
think
that
parks
are
a
very
important
part
of
the
city's
responsibility
and
of
the
and
very
important
to
our
residents.
We've
got
the
city
council
decided
last
year
that
ellen
park
was
a
big
enough
priority.
N
That's
gonna
take
some
staff
to
manage
if
the
whatever
we're
going
to
do
with
the
glendale
water
park
is
definitely
going
to
take
some
significant
staff
possibilities
of
fleet
block.
There
are
a
number
of
options
that
and
council
member
rogers
also
referred
to
this-
that
there
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
maintenance,
a
lot
of
things
that
need
to
happen,
and
this
is
the
staff
that
is
being
requested
so
that
those
things
can
happen.
N
So
I
do
think
the
resources
are
justified
in
this
request
and
that
we
should
probably
show
that
show
how
much
of
a
priority
parks
and
green
space
open
space
are
to
us
to
our
residents
and
quite
possibly
elevate
it
to
a
department.
E
K
Just
I
think
I
mean
james
might
be
right,
and
maybe
maybe
this
isn't
the
year.
Maybe
this
is
something
we
look
out
for
future
years.
I'm
just
saying
that
mine's
more
about
saying
the
vision
of
the
city
long
term
and
how
important
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make
it
I
mean,
is
that
the
vision
of
the
city
long
term
is
that
this
is,
I
think,
something
that's
going
to
be
more
and
that's
going
to
grow
and
become
more
and
more
important
and
more
and
more
vital
to
our
residents.
K
And
so,
if
this
isn't
the
right
year,
then
I'm
I
totally
understand
sensitive
to
that.
But
if
we're
going
to
fund
the
employees,
if
we're
going
to
to
make
the
investment-
and
we
agree
that
that's
needed,
then
I
think
that
you
know
talking
about
elevating
this
to
the
department
level
at
some
point
is,
is
an
important
part
of
that
discussion,
but
yeah
it.
K
What
I
also
hear-
and
what
I
see
is
that
we're
you
know
we're
making
they're
we're
making
mistakes,
not
not
intentionally
everybody's
working
hard,
but
I've
seen
mistakes
happen
in
the
parks.
K
In
my
district,
I
think
we
we
all
have
had
experiences
like
that
in
our
own
districts,
and
I
think
it's
because
we
we're
asking
them
every
year
to
do
too
much
with
too
little,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
time,
if
not
this
year,
then
soon
to
make
that
investment
and
to
make
that
to
elevate
that
position
in
the
city,
government
and
so
but
yeah
james,
might
may
well
be
right
that
this
isn't
the
right
year
to
do
it,
and
maybe
we
take
another
year
or
whatever
to
look
at
it.
K
But
my
concern
is
that
you
know
I
can
list
a
number
of
examples
where
I
wish
that
our
park
staff
maybe
did
have
more
hands
helping
and
they
could
be
more
proactive
and
more
visionary
with
how
we're
going
to
roll
things
out
in
the
future,
as
opposed
to
just
reacting
to
things
as
they
come
up.
And
that's
so
that's
more
my
point
and
that's
what
I'm
asking
council
members
to
think
about.
M
And
council
member
wharton,
if
you
don't
mind,
madam
chair,
I
just
want
to
correct
what
I
said
I
meant
by
when
the
parks
were
closed,
that
the
equipment
was
closed.
The
kids
couldn't
go
and
play
on
it.
I
want
to
make
that
perfectly
clear
and
council
member
wharton.
I
agree
with
you
100.
Let's
do
an
analysis.
Let's
look
at
that,
but
let's
take
it
to
the
voters:
let's
just
not
make
it
preemptive
for
seven
individuals
to
do
it.
Let's
go
to
a
geo
bond.
K
Right,
I
don't
I
don't
I
I
would
like
to
avoid
taxes
if
it's
possible,
or
at
least
offset
them
or
mitigate
any
increases
by
being
able
to
plan
more
proactively.
You
know
I
think
about
like
when
I
came
on
the
council.
There
were
two
things
my
first
year
that
really
stuck
out
for
me.
K
There
were
two
things
that
really
stuck
out
to
me:
one
that
like
crumbling
infrastructure,
where
we
literally
had
pieces
of
things
falling
on
people
and
then
having
this
lots
of
land
that
that
was
in
the
parks
department
that
had
basically
gone
fallow,
that
we
weren't
able
to
care
for,
and-
and
you
know
when
I
see
that
those
things
are
happening
plus
on
top
of
that,
how
much
people
did
rely
on
the
outdoors
during
covet
and
how
much
the
people
that
are
struggling
in
our
city
are
making
lower
income,
how
much
they
rely
on
parks
as
a
as
a
free
service
that
they,
where
they
can
go
and
take
their
families
and
recreate.
K
I
think
that
if
we
can
free
up
some
time
too
so
that
the
leadership
of
parks
can,
you
know,
apply
for
grants
or
find
other
ways
to
bring
in
money
to
mitigate
that
offset.
I
think
that
we
have
to
give
them
the
the
space
and
the
resources
to
do
that.
F
One
thing
I
would
want
to
say
is:
I
really
appreciate
this
conversation,
and
I
think
I
mentioned
this
the
other
day
when
we
sort
of
started
our
overview
of
the
budget,
is
that
we've
heard
a
lot
and
we're
excited
about
the
erp
that
is
going
to
be
implemented
throughout
the
departments,
and
the
idea
behind
this
is
that
it's
sort
of
this
technology
that
will
connect
the
departments
in
a
much
more
seamless
way,
along
with
their
budgets
and
what
people
are
doing,
and
so
there's
this
these
hopes
and
dreams
of
what
the
erp
will
do
and
and
null
makes
me
believe
that
it's
all
true,
and
so
one
of
the
things
I
would
suggest-
and
I
think
I
suggested
this
before-
is
let's
get
this
system
implemented-
see
how
it's
affecting
our
departments,
hopefully
in
a
really
positive
way,
which
I
again
believe
will
do
and
and
do
what
james
is
asking
and
evaluate
whether
or
not
we
need
a
new
department.
F
After
we
kind
of
have
this
technology,
that's
meant
to
help
all
of
us
manage
things.
A
little
bit
differently,
and
so
I
I
don't
disagree
with
you
at
all
chris-
that
I
think
that
this
is
a
way
to
show
where,
where
our
priorities
lie,
I
just
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
the
right
year.
F
For
me,
it
doesn't
feel
like
the
right
year
to
do
that
and
when
I,
in
one
week
when
I
have
two
constituents,
email
me
about
one
parts
person
told
one
of
my
constituents
that
they
couldn't
fix
the
faucet
that
was
leaking
in
in
the
park
and
she
was
very
upset
about
that
because
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
drought
and
now
there's
water
running
and
then
another.
F
That
said,
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
get
rid
of
the
weeds
on
land
that
we
own
because
and
we
are
in
the
middle
of
a
drought
which
is
a
fire
hazard
next
to
people's
houses.
So
those
that
those
things
are
what
concern
me
if
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
supporting
parks.
F
But
it
seems
to
me
that
if
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
have
people
do
the
work,
then
that's
a
discussion
that
we
need
to
be
having
and
if
it's
a
recruitment
thing,
if
it's
do,
we
need
to
look
at
how
much
we're
paying
people
and
have
that
discussion
so
that
we
can
actually
recruit
people
to
come
and
work
with
us.
I
mean,
maybe
that
is
where
this
discussion
needs
to
go,
and
it
seems
for
me
like
that.
F
That
is
more
concerning
to
me
than
creating
a
new
department
right
now
and
it
kind
of
sounds
in
all
honesty.
What
most
of
you
have
said
is
like
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
right
is
that
you
have
constituents
calling
and
saying:
why
isn't
my
park
being
maintained?
How
do
I
do
this,
and
these
things
are
important
to
me
and
the
playground
equipment
is
broken
and
my
kids
are
going
to
get
hurt,
and
so
how
do
we
balance
making
sure
that
we
can
manage
the
workers
and
getting
the
workers.
F
Anyone
else
want
to
say
anything,
so
I
guess
what
we
can
do
at
this
point
is
go
through
the
ftes,
and
I
mean
I
guess
we
could
straw
pull
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
agree
or
accept
the
proposal
to
create
a
new
department.
A
And
that
the
proposal
to
create
a
new
department
isn't
a
separate
line
item
on
this
and
my
apologies-
we
probably
could
have
listed
it.
So
if
you
want
to
struggle
that
separately,.
E
Sorry,
sorry,
I'm
sure
that
that
was
my
question.
Whether
we
agree
with
a
new
department
or
not,
these
ftes
are
all
in
either
way
and
are
either
decision.
A
E
A
Right
because
there's
not
a
specific
balancing
aspect
to
that,
but
we
could
certainly
just
add
a
line
here
just
to
make
it
easier.
A
E
Right,
that's
and
that's
my
one
question.
I
have
this
because
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
from
councilman,
rogers
and
board
is
that
they
agreed
to
in
a
very
big
theory
for
these
fts,
but
not
the
high-end,
the
management
side
of
it.
So,
whether
that's
the
deputy
director
position
only
or
whether
it's
a
couple
other
high-end
positions
like
I
think,
you've
both
agreed
that
we
want
to
have.
You
know
groundskeepers
and
trail
managers
in
that
that
side
of
the
house.
E
So
if
we
go
hey,
no
new
department,
which
ones
which
positions
drop
off,
is
a
question.
I
have.
K
F
A
And
I
did
see
you,
you
might
not
be
able
to
see.
I
saw
lorna
pop
on
video.
O
O
A
A
Okay,
we
can
start
here
is
that
okay,
just
next
line
deputy
director,
this
is
ten
months
of
funny.
So
all
of
these
positions
are
ten
months
of
funding.
So
I
don't
really
have
much
more
to
the
the
the
department
or
allison
are
probably
much
better
at
explaining
these,
but
maybe
just
ask
questions
if
you
have
them
so
yeah.
A
It
recognizes
that
it,
it
is
next
to
impossible
to
hire
an
employee,
that's
funded
in
june
as
of
july
1.,
and
so
this
is
just
recognizing
that
it
takes
about
two
months
to
hire
an
employee.
Even
if
you
start
advertising
so
rather
than
allocate
the
budget
for
the
whole
year
and
not
use
it,
it's
just
ten
months
of
funding
and
that's
the
strategy
by
the
way
for
every
single
fte
in
the
proposed
budget.
Okay,.
K
I
actually
think
maybe
we
should
start
with
the
ones
that
we
agree
on,
that.
We
think
that
we
should
do
and
get
like
cross
those
off.
D
Okay,
is
there
anywhere
organizational
diagram
to
see.
A
A
Page
e69
is
where
the
sort
of
general
org
chart
is,
and
then
the
staffing
document
is.
F
A
A
M
F
Yeah,
I
agree
for
the
record:
we're
gonna,
just
travel,
it's
gonna
be
easier,
jen
and
so
I'll
call
it
I'll
roll
call
it
we'll
not
real
call
it
but
call
it
out.
So
for
the
record,
if
you
support
this,
show
your
thumbs,
I've
got
me
councilmember,
rogers.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
one
fte
for
trails
and
natural
lands
technician.
What
does
that
even
mean
I'll
defer
to
the
department
to
give
more
information?
I
we
have
a
write-up
that
I
could
read,
but
it's
probably
more
useful.
Having.
O
Yeah
well,
if
kristen's
on
I'll,
let
her
speak
to
these,
but
just
real
quickly.
Only
four
of
these
positions
are
related
to
what
we
would
consider
the
formation
of
the
department,
so
there's
separate
initiatives
that
we
put
forward.
So
the
trails
and
natural
lands
technician
is
to
take
care
of
our
expanding
growth
on
our
trails,
he's
specifically
working
to
make
sure
that
our
natural
lands
are
well
managed.
As
you
know,
that's
something
that
has
to
happen
just
like
with
the
park
space.
O
M
M
If
that's
really,
I
mean
help
me
understand,
I'm
just
trying
to
look
at
how
we
can
save
money
and
not
you
know,
look
at
a
tax
increase,
but
that
seems
like
something
we
could
send
out
to
a
consultant,
or
you
know
somebody
at
the:
u
of?
U?
Who
is
trying
to
go
into
parks
and
rec,
or
something
like
that?
For
you
know
I
don't
know,
I'm
just
trying
to
be
creative.
Instead
of
burning
us
with
more
employees
that
you
know
we
have
to
pay
retirement
and
benefits
and
health
care,
and
all
of
that.
O
Sure
I
I
know
I
understand
that
and
chris
and
I
have
talked
about
this
quite
a
bit
if
any
of
these
positions
could
be,
you
know
released
without
as
much
impact,
and
that
would
be
the
one
and
I'd
like
to
ask
kristen
to
jump
in
to
see
if
she
has
any
different
on
that.
But
that's
my
last
recollection
of
our
conversation.
That
is
the
one
that
we
still
do
believe.
We
need
good
signage
and
we
need
multilingual
signage
throughout
our
system
and
it
will
take
quite
a
while
to
do
that.
J
Yeah,
I'm
here
hi,
everyone
yeah,
the
the
the
signage
coordinator
position
is
not
just
for
the
foothills,
but
the
jordan
river
trail
as
well-
and
you
know
signage-
is
an
ongoing
thing
in
our
city
that
we
we
have
to
replace
and
an
update.
J
I
try
not
to
have
too
much
sign
pollution,
but
this
is
something
that
is
ongoing,
so
that
we
make
sure
that
our
trail
systems
are
user-friendly
and
welcoming
and
people
know
where
to
go
and
know
where
they're
at
this
is
a
position.
That
is
a
a
graphic
designer
type
position
that
develops.
These
signs
does
the
branding
for
the
for
the
organization
and
deals
with
the
fabricate
fabrication
and
the
maintenance
of
those
of
our
signage
throughout
our
system.
M
But
it's
not
a
person,
that's
going
to
actually
make
the
signs.
It's
somebody
that
sends
out
graphic
art
to
a
sign
company
and
says
I
need
30
of
these
to
say
bilingual
and
spanish
and
english,
and
then
do
they
actually
go
and
implement
and
install
them
or
were
they
sending
out
to
one
of
the
parks
persons
to
go
and
do
it.
J
So
they
don't
make
the
signs
they
we
hire
somebody
to
actually
make.
We
don't
have
that
system
within
parks,
and
so
they
design
it.
They
determine
what's
necessary
what
it
should
say,
make
sure
we're,
following
ordinance,
make
sure
that
the
rules
are
all
accurate.
Make
sure
that
the
language
is
clear.
J
That
kind
of
thing
and
as
lorna
said
you
know,
I
mean
this-
is
this-
is
a
position
that
you
know
if
we
had
to
prioritize
this
wouldn't
be
our
top
one,
but
but
we
still
feel
like
it's
a
really
important
position
that
that
would
add
a
lot
to
our
our
trails.
You
know.
L
O
Yeah
we
have
a
sign
shop,
that's
set
up
for
street
signs
for
regulatory
signs,
they
don't
have
the
equipment
or
they
have
to
go
out
and
buy
the
blanks.
O
Basically
they
don't
have
anything
other
than
that
and
they're
pretty
tapped
out
right
now,
we've
been
working
with
pd,
for
example,
to
install
no
trespassing
and
no
camping
signs,
and
that
takes
quite
a
bit
of
time
because
there's
a
there's
a
lot
of
science
in
the
city
and
we
have
to
meet
requirements
to
make
sure
they're
reflective,
so
there's
constant
sign
replacement
and
so
even
with
pd.
We
have
asked
them
to
consider
using
a
contractor
because
of
the
burden
it
puts
on
the
sign
shop
at
streets.
J
M
It's
a
3m
product,
yeah,
I'm
very
familiar
with
with
signs.
That's
part
of
what
my
family
does
is
signs.
So
to
me,
council
members,
I'm
I
don't
want
to
nitpick
and
dive
into
this,
but
this
is
something
that
I
think
that
we
absolutely
could
look
to
public
services
and
doing
and-
and
you
know,
look
to
interns
and
there's
so
many
bilingual
people
and
figuring
out.
You
know
a
template
that
we
can
use
like
the
jordan
river
parkway.
I
heard
kristin
talk
about
that.
M
That's
something
we
should
we
should
collaborate
with
with
the
jordan
river
commission
on.
So
I
just
to
me
this
is
low-hanging
fruit
that
we
should
just
move
on
to.
So
my
straw
poll
would
be
that
we
just
move
on
and
not
put
this
into
the
budget.
F
E
F
So
that's
that's
my
thought,
but
we
have
a
strap
hole
on
the
table.
That
says
to
not
include
this.
F
A
Okay
and
we
we
didn't
straw,
pull
the
trails
and
lands
technician.
I
have
more
information.
I
can
read
on
that
unless
I
think
lorna
was
going
through
it
and
we
stopped
at
the
signage
coordinator.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
council
wanted
to
struggle
that
one.
F
A
J
Jennifer,
can
I
just
share
what
that
position
is
yeah,
so
that
position
goes
along
with
the
the
new
amenities.
So
basically,
this
is
a
full-time
position
to
manage
the
the
seasonals
that
are
going
to
be
out
in
the
field
and
working
in
those
new
properties.
So
some
of
those
include
parley's
point
three
creeks
confluence
park
allen
park
and
then
we
have
a
smattering
of
other
small
facilities,
but
I
mean
parley's
point
is
300
acres
and
and
it's
mostly
not
to
land.
J
So
that's
why
this
is
in
the
natural
lands
area,
but
there's
trails
that
will
be
going
through
there.
There's
the
three
creeks
confluence
park
is
a
pretty
beautiful
new
park
that
we
would
love
to
have
some
full-time
supervision
to
go
along
with
the
seasonal
staff
that
we
have
working
out
there,
as
well
as
in
ellen
park.
M
So
kristen
and
sorry,
madam
chair,
my
question,
for
you
is,
what's
the
difference
between
that
and
then
the
recreational
trail
manager
I
mean
to
me
it.
It
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
instead
of
hiring
two
employees.
Now,
let's,
let's
hire
one
and
see
you
know
divide
the
time
between
them
says
one
is
a
trail
manager
and
the
other
one
is
the
trails
and
natural
lands
technician.
J
So
the
trails
and
natural
lands
technician
is
overseeing
seasonal
staff
that
are
working
in
the
field
in
our
parks
and
on
all
these
new
amenities.
J
The
trails
manager
is
a
different
position
and
basically,
they
will
oversee
trail
construction
that
happens
not
only
in
the
foothills
but
but
throughout
the
city,
from
the
public
land
side,
because
anytime
there's
an
urban
trail,
there's
always
green
space
next
to
it,
they'll
oversee
the
maintenance
of
trail
projects,
manage
partnerships
and
environmental
requirements
that
happen
on
trails,
manage
improvements
in
the
trail,
accessibility
and
and
make
sure
that
the
trails
that
we're
building
are
are
well
maintained
and
a
good
recreational
experience
for
the
public.
J
This
person
also
will
help
with
leveraging
external
funds
for
the
trail
system
working
with
partners
to
help
develop
funding
strategies
for
long-term
maintenance,
so
that
it's
not
as
much
of
a
burden
on
the
city
to
manage
these
trails.
There's
there's
a
group
right
now
that
is
working
to
form
a
foundation
for
the
foothill
trails
and
we
need
a
liaison
and
to
to
work
with
that
group
from
the
city
side,
so
the
trails
manager
would
be
that
liaison.
In
addition
to
oversight
of
all
these
projects,.
M
M
You
know
what
we
hear
is
that
we're
not
having
our
parks
aren't
being
maintained,
and
I
understand
that
we're
into
the
trails
and
they're
most
of
them
are
on
the
east
side
and-
and
you
know,
allen
park
is
on
the
east
side,
and
I
know
that
we're
coming
to
the
glendale
park,
but
that's
still,
you
know
at
least
a
year
out
before
anything
like
that
comes
to
fruition.
So
I
don't
know
this
is
both
of
these
are
tricky
for
me
because
they
sound
very
similar.
J
J
I
know
that
they
put
north
temple
groundskeeper,
but
so
trails
of
natural
lands
has
changed
their
groundskeeper
name
to
senior
natural
resources.
Technician
and
the
parks
is
landscape,
parks,
technician.
So
just
so,
you're.
E
K
Chris
would
just
say
that
that
there
have
been
so
many
issues
just
with
the
addition
and
you've.
I,
the
council,
I
think,
as
a
whole,
we've
heard
a
small
sliver
of
those
in
our
recent
formal
meetings
with
some
of
the
people
who
called
in,
but
there
have
been
a
lot
of
issues
with
opening
phase,
one
of
the
trails
project
and-
and
but
I
also
I
mean
we
have
in
the
works-
the
folsom
trail.
I
think
we
need
to
make
improvements.
K
Vast
improvements
on
the
jordan
river
trail
to
me,
adding
to
trails
employees
makes
sense,
given
the
just
the
sheer
number
of
trail
mileage
that
we're
going
to
be
bringing
online
in
the
next
couple
years
or,
if
it's
online
now,
but
right
now,
it's
just
louis
and
who
else
is
helping
with
tyler
yeah
so
yeah?
K
I
I
I
can't
help
but
think
that
if
we
had
had
some
more
people
on
hand
that
maybe
we
could
have
avoided
or
could
have
helped
the
public
prepare
more
and
manage
more
the
problems
that
we're
seeing
right
now,
the
mistakes,
it's
not
because
kristen
and
her
team
aren't
working
hard
enough.
K
I
I
think
it's
actually
because
they're
working
too
hard
that
there
are
things
that
are
falling
through
the
cracks
and
I
think
we
can
save
ourselves
and
save
residents
a
lot
of
headache
by
being
more
strategic
and
and
having
better
planning
and
better
work
out
of
things
like
this.
So
I'm
inclined
to
support
these
two
transpositions.
N
So
I
I
would
like
to
echo
chris's
statements.
Certainly
if
this
is
an
east
versus
west
issue,
the
foothills
trails
definitely
benefit
everyone
in
the
city,
but
we
also
have
the
folsom
trail
that
just
started
building
last
week,
the
continuation
of
the
nine
line
trail,
which
will
finally
connect
the
east
to
the
west
sides
and
the
improvements
that
need
to
be
made
along
the
jordan
river
trail.
So
there's,
certainly
a
a
large
amount
of
trail
benefit
to
be
had
on
the
west
side
of
salt
lake
city.
A
E
I
was
just
gonna
basically
say
you
know,
with
the
drought
and
other
issues
going
on
with
the
trails
and
the
parks
and
everything
else.
I
think
it's
used
us
to
have
some
oversight
in
this
stuff
with
technicians
and
the
managers.
So
I'm
agreeing
with
chris
and
dennis.
A
F
A
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
converting
the
seasonal
funding
to
a
full,
fte,
groundskeeper
and
kristin.
Let
us
know
if
we
need
to
change
the
title
of
that
for
the
staffing
document.
We
always
do
that,
and
so
this
would
be
a
straw
fill
it
wouldn't
result
in
any
budget,
but
just
adds
that
fte
to
the
snapping
document.
A
M
F
I
would
agree
with
you
and
I
think
what
we
can
do
and
what
I
was
thinking
is.
We
can
have
a
legislative
intent
that
parks
comes
back
to
us
with
some
of
the
if
we're
saving,
51
000
right
here,
for
example,
which
isn't
a
ton
but
because
we
just
we're
taking
that
out.
If
there's
other
positions
that
we
decide
not
to
fund
that
we
do
a
legislative
intent,
asking
parts
and
and
public
services
to
come
back
and
say
what
do
you
need
to
recruit
and
to
retain
or
to
get
people
to
be
doing
the
work?
D
And
volunteer
to
add
to
that
going
back
to
that
communications
was
a
communications,
the
signage
coordinator.
I
would
like
that
too.
James
had
a
good
point.
This
could
be
the
resourced
out
and
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it
does
happen.
So
I
would
like
to
the
staff
to
come
back
as
well
and
say
this
is
how
much
you
would
need
to
pay,
because
something
to
take
care
of
this
because
we
do
need
to
we
need
we
need.
We
do
need
the
signage,
updated
for
sure.
O
Madam
chair,
may
I
weigh
in
this
is
lorna.
Yes,
please.
I
thank
you
very
much
for
the
support
for
the
seasonal
staff.
I
just
want
to
give
you
an
update
of
public
lands.
Some
of
our
other
divisions
he's
held
a
hiring
affair
trying
to
recruit
seasonals,
because
we've
had
such
a
difficult
time.
They
have
raised
the
wages
significantly.
It's
bumping
up
against
our
full-time
people
now
plus.
O
Plus
referral
recruitment
and
retention
bonuses
are
being
offered
right
now
and
out
of
the
higher
end
fair.
They
have
five
people
apply
for
their
positions
and
we
will
continue
that
kind
of
effort
with
hr.
But
you
are
right.
This
has
been
a
growing
problem
for
all
of
our
divisions,
hiring
seasonal
employees,
and
we
are
constantly
increasing
that
wage.
The
the
landscaping
position
that
we're
converting
from
seasonals
because
of
the
increased
demands
to
improve
the
north
temple
tracks
line
landscaping
along
that
area,
and
it.
F
F
Thank
you
for
that
lorna.
Okay,
let's
keep
going.
J
I
can
share
with
that
and
then
I'll,
let
lerna
also
so.
Public
lands
for
the
last
several
years
has
split
a
financial
analyst
with
golf,
and
this
position
is
this
person
does
a
really
great
job,
but
but
they
are
stretched
pretty
pretty
tight
with
the
duties
that
they
have
so
golf
being
an
enterprise
fund
has
a
very
complex
budget,
there's
a
lot
of
very
tight
revenue
monitoring
expenditure
balancing
throughout
the
year
and
then
public
lands
has
three
three
large
divisions.
That's
also
split
with
this
position.
J
So
now
all
those
four
divisions
are
together
and
public
lands
is
looking
at
more
grant
funding
we're
applying
for
more
for
as
many
grants
as
we
can
to
improve
our
system.
J
There's
bond
opportunities
that
are
coming
up
and
our
new
mayor
is
bringing
in
more
donations
than
ever,
which
we
love,
but
it
does
add
quite
a
bit
more
work
and
we're
looking
for
an
administrative
level
person
to
track
these
manage
these
expenses
and
revenues
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
we're
staying
within
our
budget
and
using
our
resources
the
best
way
possible
making
sure
that
our
our
funds
and
when
we
go
out
and
purchase
things
we're
purchasing
at
the
best
price
and
there's
the
best
oversight
of
our
budgets
possible.
E
G
Given
that
that
description
from
kristin
I'm
inclined
to
support
this,
but
would
there
be
a
cheaper
option
of
keeping
golf
in
public
lands
with
the
same
finance
manager
and
adding
a
junior
person
to
them
or
a
part-time
person
to
help
that
so
instead
of
two
people,
it
goes
to
one
and
a
half
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
if
that
would
work
or
not,
but
just
trying
to
think
outside.
M
G
J
This
is
the
position.
Sorry,
madam
chair,
to
jump
in
this
is
the
position
that
was
recommended
to
me
by
the
public
services
finance
team
that
we
need
to
build
and
maintain
a
strong
financial
group
to
track
all
these
revenues
and
expenditures.
So.
E
And
manager,
I
think
this
position,
the
intent,
would
be
also
to
save
us
money
not
to
cost
this
money.
So
that's
especially
when
you,
when
you
have
so
many
things
going
on
right
now,
we
could
actually
be
stepping
over
dollars
to
save
dimes
here
on
something
like
this
position,
especially
if
you've
got
a
lot
of
assets
coming
on
new
amenities
and
everything
else
and
contracts
and
grants.
We
could
actually
be
spending
more
money
if
we
don't
have
someone
overseeing
it.
M
M
Department,
though
council
member
mono
has
its
own
finance
person,
I
I'm
fine
with
that.
This
isn't
a
department,
so
I
would
much
rather
see
somebody
from
finance
in
there
not
a
not
a
finance
manager,
but
an
accountant
who
can
oversee
that
to
me
where
this
was
recommended
as
a
department
and
that's
why
the
manager
was
recommended.
M
So
we
can
go
to
something:
that's
a
little
bit
lower
level
staff
that
has
not
affected
our
budget
as
much.
I'm
just
saying,
if
we're
looking
at
cip
dollars,
we're
looking
at
all
these
other
dollars
that
we
want
to
fund,
we've
got
to
start
looking
at
where
we're
cutting
and
we're
not
cutting
anywhere
right
now,.
N
But
we're
also
talking
about
bringing
in
regardless
of
whether
or
not
parks,
public
lands
becomes
a
department,
we're
still
definitely
bringing
golf
in
under
the
umbrella,
creating
a
lot
more
work
within
this
area.
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
happening
here
and
I
agree
with
council
member
dugan
that
having
the
right
person
in
there
could
actually
help
to
fund
a
lot
of
the
other
things
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
do.
F
Okay,
council
members
other
thoughts,
I'm
with
james,
I'm
not
saying
that
they
don't
need
help
in
this
area.
I
just
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
at
the
level
that
they're
suggesting
I
think
we
could
go.
We
could
go
down
a
little
bit
and
still
have
the
support
there,
because
they
would
still
have
the
financial
team
from
public
services
if
we
choose
not
to
make
this
a
department
this
year,
and
so
that
those
are
my
thoughts
I'm
with
james
on
this
one,
but
I'm
looking
for
a
straw
poll.
F
B
K
F
We
could
certainly
say
what
taught
to
finance
and
ask
finance
what
another,
what
an
accountant
would
be
or
what
a
position
that's
lower
than
a
manager
right,
and
so
maybe
maybe
we
can
skip
this
one
for
right
now.
I
would
like
to
see
that
number.
I
would
like
to
look
at
what
a
lower
position
would
look
like.
K
E
E
So
we
leave
that
the
budget
and
then
we,
the
intent,
is
at
a
lower
level
to
see
how
the
numbers
pan
out
the
end.
N
F
A
And
I'm
messaging
to
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
that
information
during
this
discussion,
but
maybe
for
now
leave
that
as
a
placeholder.
I
don't
know-
and
I
see
cindy
popped
on
and
then
more.
P
Yeah,
I
would
just
say
this
sounds
impolite,
but
we're
not
ever
going
to
get
through
the
budget
and
if
we
are
engaged
at
this
level
with
every
department-
and
I
know,
there's
reason
to
engage
with
this
department
at
this
level,
but
but
you
probably
have
reason
to
engage
with
several
others
at
this
level
and
they
aren't
going
to
have
that
benefit.
So
I,
if
you
could
just
let
us
work
with
finance,
to
make
our
best
estimate.
P
Then
we
can.
We
can
have
a
number
for
you
and
it'll
probably
be
you
know
at
least
twenty
thousand
dollars
less
than
the
number
they
have
there.
P
The
other
thing
is,
I
would
not
necessarily
use
this
the
fifty
thousand
dollar
figure
and
take
that
out
as
savings,
because
the
salary
ranges
are
broad,
and
it
may
be
that
if,
if,
if
the
folks
in
these
positions
are
in
a
situation
where
they
are
having
to
do
a
lot
of
different
and
difficult
work,
the
mayor
mage,
it's
certainly
within
her
authority
to
change
those
salaries
within
the
ranges.
So
you
might,
if
you
want
to
give
them
flexibility,
you
might
not
take
that
50
000.
P
A
G
F
A
A
The
next
item
is
a
public
land
planner
and
it
would
manage
project
coordination
and
continuity
for
new
cip
impact
fee
and
bond
projects.
I
think
I'm
reading
the
right
one
lorna
kristen.
Sorry,
you
guys
go
ahead.
J
Yeah,
so
thanks
jen,
this
position
would
support
the
growth
of
our
impact
fees,
cip,
funding,
that's
being
put
into
public
lands
and
potential
bond
projects
that
are
coming
up.
This
person
does
a
lot
of
the
planning
for
park
acquisition.
M
J
M
F
F
K
Okay,
I
I
think
why
isn't
this
something
that
a
deputy
director
couldn't
do
if
we
were
to
give
a
deputy
director
position
that
was
going
to
oversee
operations
between
two
deputy
positions,
a
deputy
of
planning
and
a
deputy
of
operations?
Couldn't
they
do.
J
This,
if
I
could
answer
that,
madam
chair
yeah,
a
deputy
director
right
now,
we
all
do
this
job
and
I
do
this
job
and
our
division
directors
do
this
job
and
a
lot
of
our
program
staff.
Do
this
job
our
operations
staff
do
this
job
and
that's
that's
part
of
the
reason
why
we're
putting
this
in
is
because
it's
this
increased
demand
for
public
engagement,
that
the
public
is
expecting
now
with
all
these
new
projects.
J
That
is
pulling
a
lot
of
us
into
the
weeds
of
of
these
projects,
and
so
this
person,
not
only
would
do
the
public
outreach
for
for
those
projects,
but
they
would
also
work
with
our
volunteer
programs,
which
are
growing.
We
just
put
a
new
online
volunteer
program
sign
up
on
our
web
page
and
our
our
volunteer
programs
are
full
and
people
are
dying
to
get
out
there
and
volunteer
with
us.
So
this
person
would
help
coordinate
some
of
that.
J
They
would
work
with
our
new
pilot
park
ambassador
program,
so
we're
we've
just
started,
or
I
mean
it's
this
week-
we're
just
starting
a
park
ambassador
program,
so
this
person
would
work
with
park
ambassadors
out
in
our
our
parks.
We
don't
have
a
whole
lot
of
funding
for
the
ambassadors
at
this
time,
but
working
with
them
to
make
sure
they're
in
the
right
place
and
talking
to
folks
and
just
helping
to
make
our
park
experience
the
best
it
can
be,
and
they
would
also
work
with
our
growing
friends
groups.
J
B
J
Them
also
do
fundraising,
so
that's
what
this
position
would
do.
Could
a
deputy
director
do
that?
Yes,
a
deputy
director,
could
the
deputy
director
that
I've
proposed
we
have
additional
other
duties
that
I'm
happy
to
go
through
as
well.
E
F
I'm
just
gonna:
are
there
any
other
thoughts
from
council
members
or
if
we
were
to
give
a
deputy
director,
then
we
could
have
a
volunteer
coordinator
that
would
probably
be
less
or
somebody
that
or
an
apprentice
program
for
some
of
the
communication
outreach
pieces
of
things,
maybe
not
being
able
to
do
all
of
the
things
kristin
said.
But
if
we
are,
you
know
pushing
some
of
the
apprentice
programs
or
things
like
that.
Then
some
of
the
things
that
were
mentioned
would
definitely
fall
under
some
of
that.
N
I
do
think
that
someone
like
this
can,
just
in
in
my
experience
with
non-profits
a
volunteer
coordinator,
pays
for
itself
10
times
over
the
amount
of
people
that
it
can
draw
in
and
coordinate
their
efforts
for
free
having
volunteers
like
the
friends
groups
that
simply
care
about
the
spaces
in
their
neighborhoods
that
they
utilize
and
can
bring
that
love
to
and
put
their
work.
To
show
that
love.
It
is
absolutely
worth
the
investment
prime's.
The
pump.
F
J
So
this
position
is
provides
the
daily
operations
and
oversight
of
employees
in
the
public
lands
group.
J
Mostly
what
this
position
does
is
it
creates
capacity
for
myself
so
that
so
that
I
can
do
my
job,
which
is
oversight
of
the
the
divisions
making
sure
that
we're
following
policy
do
some
short
and
long-range
planning,
look
at
grant
funding
opportunities
and
work
with
our
staff
on
those
I
don't
write
those
generally.
Sometimes
I
help,
but
we
work
together
on
which
opportunities
and
funding
opportunities
that
we
want
to
seek
out.
J
I
work
on
community
relationships
in-house
process
improvements,
so
this
course
this
position
would
play
a
key
role
on
on
some
special
projects.
Primarily
their
oversight
is
day-to-day
management
of
public
lands,
amenities
and
public
spaces,
and
it
would
pull
myself
out
of
the
weeds
and
allow
me
to
be
more
of
an
oversight
person
for
our
managed
spaces,
so
some
of
the
special
projects
that
they
would
be
involved
with
would
be
the
salt
lake
city
cemetery
master
plan
implementation.
J
Looking
at
improving
our
permitting
system
to
make
salt
lake
city
more
event
friendly
again,
this
person
would
also
work
with
friends
groups.
So
we'd
have
the
person
pulling
in
all
of
these
volunteers
and
working
with
friends
groups,
but
then
we
also
have
to
manage
that
with
our
operational
groups
and
and
make
sure
that
operational
groups
are
coordinated
with
all
of
the
volunteer
and
the
friends
groups.
J
So
there's
a
lot
of
coordination
that
happens
happens
there
with
you,
know
the
equipment
and
the
timing
and
and
the
oversight
of
volunteers,
and
this
person
would
also
help
us
look
at
strategies
for
attracting
and
maintaining
seasonal
and
full-time
staff.
As
lorna
said
right
now,
we're
we're
very
understaffed
with
our
seasonal
employees.
You
know,
I
mean
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
restaurants
have
talked
about
not
having
their
weight
staff,
we're
in
the
same
position
right
now.
J
We
don't
have
very
many
people
to
go
out
and
mow
our
lawns
and
and
to
mow
down
the
weeds
and
and
to
do
some
of
those
things,
and
we
are
looking
at
quite
a
few
different
strategies
to
to
get
more
folks
and
part-time
staff,
because
that's
where
a
lot
of
our
hands
come
in
is
in
the
summer
time,
but
having
somebody
to
help
oversee
some
of
that.
J
Those
strategies
and
work
with
staff
to
to
get
more
people
online
would
be
another
role
for
this
person,
but
primarily
this
person
would
oversee
our
maintenance
teams
and
work
to
make
sure
that
our
divisions
are
communicating
and
working
together
and
that
we're
all
following
similar
processes
and
and
within
salt
lake
city
policy
and
ordinance.
So
that's
what
this
position
is
is.
Is
it's
really
more?
J
It
would
be
a
deputy
to
me
to
to
allow
us
that
capacity
to
focus
on
some
of
these
bigger
idea,
projects
for
public
lands
and
really
to
look
to
the
future
of
what
public
lands
can
be.
Okay,.
D
I
members
a
question
christian.
You
mentioned,
like
you,
mentioned
a
lot
of
things
that
this
person
potentially
might
might
have
to
do,
but
I
thought
we
did
in
a
conversations.
There
were
some
positions
that
were,
for
example,
long-range
planning
or
master
planning
and
then
the
other
one
was
they
might
write
grants
and
try
to
find
more
money
too.
So
I
have
it
seems
like
we're
already
over
for
the
for
this
deputy.
D
It
seems
like
we're
reviewing
so
many
tasks
that
it
looks
like
we
might
need
more
people
in
the
future
to
do
all
those
things
and
or
am
I
confused,
and
we
do
already
have
those
folks
that
mentioned
earlier,
that
we
funded
and
and
now
we're
overlapping,
like
your
deputy
and
those
guys
are
going
to
be
doing
slightly
the
same,
am
I
the
only
one
confused
about
that?
Maybe
I
misunderstood
you.
J
Know
I
might,
I
might
have
said
that
in
a
weird
way,
but
so
this
person
wouldn't
be
doing
the
long-range
planning
and
and
seeking
out
funding.
They
would
provide
space
for
me
to
be
able
to
do
more
of
that
long-range
planning,
the
budgeting,
contracting
oversight
of
fiscal
controls,
making
sure
that
you
know
our
our
teams
are
communicating.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna
say
I
think,
the
right
person,
this
job
makes
the
operations
flow
smoke
so
much
smoothly
and
allows
kristen
to
keep
that
strategic
side
of
the
house
and
not
go
in
the
weeds,
and
I
would
be
there
so
I
stronghold
and
keep
this
position.
F
M
I
appreciate
anna
bringing
that
up,
because
when
chris
asked
the
question
about
the
the
coordinator
and
the
deputy
director,
I
thought
that's
the
route
that
he
was
going
was
to
eliminate
one
of
those
positions,
and
I
thought
that
kristen
did
an
excellent
job
explaining
that
to
me
to
all
of
us
actually
describing
that
that
position
could
be
done
by
both
the
deputy
director.
So
that's
just
my
two
cents.
K
My
question,
or
I
was
just
gonna,
say
I
personally
support
both
both
this
position
and
the
community
partnership
coordinator,
and
so
my
question
was
more
like
if
we
were
going
to
if
we
were
concerned
about
money.
I
think
that
the
deputy
director
could
do
some
of
the
community
partnership
coordinator
work
so,
but
I
supported
the
community
partnership
one
as
well.
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that,
like,
if
I
had
to
choose
it
sounds
to
me
like
the
deputy
director
is
more
important,
but
that's
just
to
clarify
my
position.
A
That
leaves
the
last
one
of
the
department
or
division
in
public
services.
I'm
lorna
assured
at
the
beginning
of
the
discussion
about
the
estimated
difference
between
the
department
and
the
division
in
terms
of
salary
levels.
I'm
not
positive.
I
want
to
put
that
in
as
like
a
balancing
figure
yet
until
we
like
work
it
through
with
mary
beth,
but
I'm
just
leaving
it
there
for
information.
E
N
Feel
so
beat
up
already,
I'm
exhausted.
I
certainly
like
the
idea
of
elevating
parks
to
a
department
to
be
able
to
show
that
give
the
emphasis
that
this
is
a
priority
for
our
city
for
our
residents.
We
have
a
lot
of
green
space
that
needs
a
lot
of
maintenance.
F
M
So
I
don't
want
to
be
a
jerk,
but
I
guess
I'm
going
to
be
being
you're
owning
your
own.
Business
means
that
you
have
to
do
hard
decisions
and
do
hard
things
and
that
this
is
a
hard
one.
I
know
everybody
wants
to
feel
good
and
create
its
own
department,
but
remember
sustainability,
economic
development.
M
They
should
not
be
their
own
departments,
they
should
be
sliding
in
underneath
everybody
else,
and
here
we
are
we're
opening
up
these
floodgates,
we're
going
to
create
another
department
when
the
mayor
could
absolutely
invite
kristin
to
the
table
as
a
and
and
participate
in
all
the
cabinet
decisions
that
are
being
made.
Let's
not,
let's,
let's
make
some
hard
decisions
here.
I
don't
feel
like
we're
doing
that.
N
M
M
F
D
And
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
like
the
like
the
public,
the
constructions,
the
taxpayers
are
understanding
fully.
What
we're
getting
into
by
creating
a
new
department
like
this
will
cost
us
something,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
they
are
fully
aware
that
something
that
they
want.
I
I'm
I'm
you
know
I'm
I'm
in
favor
like.
I
think
I
think
they
they
deserve
to
be
a
department,
but
maybe
not
this
year
like
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
of
public
outreach.
Like
james
said
earlier
earlier
conversation.
D
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure,
because
I
don't
want
to
commit
my
my
constituents
or
something
that
they
might
not
be,
that
might
not
be
their
like
number
one
priority
and
that
they
will
have
to
pay
for
later.
D
F
K
K
I
think
most
of
us
recognize
the
need
coming
down
the
road,
so
it's
not
like
to
create
it
to
give
it
the
department
title
at
this
point
to
me,
I
think,
is
negligible
in
terms
of
cost,
so
it
I
don't
know
why
we
don't
just
do
it
now,
if
that's
and
and
have
a
you
know,
they're
coming
out
of
the
gate
with
some
new
employees,
but
with
some
very,
very
high
expectations
that
we
put
on
them,
and
so
I
think
we
should,
if
we
agree
that
that
this,
that
parts
are
a
priority
and
that
their
core
function
and
that
we
we
believe
in
this
vision
of
them
going
forward.
M
I
think
there
are
other
50
other
departments
that
would
spill
the
same
way
chris.
So
I
don't
think
that
paying
playing
favorites
is
the
same
thing
that
we're
doing
right
here
and
you
know
all
we're
doing
is
increasing
salaries,
and
I
know
that's
why
everybody's
receiving
text
messages
from
everybody
in
these
departments
wanting
to
have
this
stuff
elevated.
So
I
I
am
completely
again
against
this.
Just
exactly
what
ana
said.
We
need
to
go
out
to
the
taxpayers
who
are
going
to
be
paying
this.
M
K
And
I
understand
that
tax
is
likely
for
a
number
of
reasons,
not
just
because
of
this
department,
but
for
many
reasons,
but
is
it
necessarily
a
foregone
conclusion?
I
don't.
M
When
I'm
looking
at
a
tax
increase,
I
have
no
hesitation
in
doing
a
tax
increase
for
police
at
all,
but
when
it
comes
to
doing
a
department,
so
people
feel
good.
There's
absolutely
no
reason
for
me
to
do
that
until
we
go
and
discuss
it
with
the
residents
of
salt
lake
city
and
if
they
want
to
do
it,
let's
go
to
a
vote.
Let's
go
to
a
geo
bond
and
make
improvements
to
what
we
already
have
that's
completely
deferred.
I
mean
chris.
M
E
F
F
E
A
Okay,
one
thing
that
I
forgot
to
share
earlier
today
was
that
we
had
final
revenue
numbers
for
the
judgment
levy
and
that's
that
one
time,
one
year,
property
tax
adjustment
that
allows
the
city
to
pay
ourselves
back
for
property
tax
revenue.
We
were
shorted
in
the
previous
year.
The
council
usually
does
it
it's
just
a
one-time
thing
and
that
amount
is
43
000
higher
than
was
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
So
the
council
could
choose
to
recognize
that
revenue
if
you
wanted
so
figured
I'd,
start
that,
on
a
good
note,
right,
ready.
A
Okay,
the
next
item
that
the
council
highlighted
was
and
our
plan
just
so
that
the
council
knows
is
to
go
through
the
items
that
the
council
highlighted
and
then
let
me
start.
Let
me
share
my
screen
really
quick
and
not
necessarily
go
through
line
by
line.
The
council
went
through
that
last
part
line
by
line,
because
the
council
highlighted
that
whole
section.
A
So
the
next
item
that
the
council
had
was
the
business
analyst
in
finance
and
the
discussions
I
think,
revolved
around
all
the
grant
dollars
coming
in
it's
not
eligible
for
arpa
dollars.
But
if
the
finance
department
needed
that
extra
business
analyst
there
is
one
fte
in
that
department,
that's
being
added
for
that
purpose.
A
D
M
F
Just
wrapping
up
the
credit
card
debt
questions
on
this
business
analyst,
so
this
one
is,
they
would
have
two
new
business
analysts
right
and
I
think
the
last
time
we
spoke
mary
beth
said
it
could
do
with
one,
but
obviously
prefer
both.
F
M
E
A
No,
the
business
analyst,
the
merchant
fees,
the
council,
you
kind
of
have
to
pay
them
right.
It's
an
item,
we're
adding,
but
it's
a
housekeeping
thing:
okay,
okay,
well,.
A
Yeah
the
council
didn't
highlight
those
so
we're
not
at
least
not
initially
so
we're
looking
at
the
business
analyst.
F
A
The
yes
item
that
was
highlighted
by
the
council:
oh
go
ahead.
Sorry.
A
Which
means
the
council
straw
pulled
it,
I
did
not
add
numbers
into
the
cell,
and
so
it
is
not
in
the
budget.
Okay,.
A
We
make
up
the
system
as
we
go
every
year.
It
seems
like
so
colors
in
my
own
head
that
I
make
up
so.
The
next
item
is
construction
mitigation
proposal
that
originally
was
proposed
to
be
part
of
the
budget
through
the
arpa
dollars.
It
was
not
eligible
for
our
dollars,
and
the
council
highlighted
it
as
something
that
they
might
be
interested
in
coming
back
and
revisiting.
A
One
thing
staff
has
wondered
is
if
this
would
be
a
good
candidate
for
talking
about
in
a
budget
amendment
the
first
budget
amendment
of
the
year,
as
you
can
see,
there's
an
there's,
a
net
positive
of
arpa
funding,
meaning
there
are
more
there's
more
revenue
than
there
are
expenses
within
that
arpa
column,
because
we
are
still
evaluating
what
what
is
eligible
and
what
is
not
eligible.
A
And
so
I
think
that,
in
discussions
with
the
administrations,
one
of
the
things
we've
been
talking
about
is
maybe
focusing
that
first
budget
amendment
on
getting
those
dollars
getting
those
programs
more
tailored
to
the
arpa
dollars,
which
the
guidance
actually
still
isn't.
Final.
A
It's
not
final
until
like
mid-july,
so
thinking
that
there
probably
is
a
way
to
tailor
a
small
business
recovery
program,
tailor
more
specifically
to
that
post-covet
recovery
that
might
be
eligible
for
our
dollars,
and
so
that's
one
thing
that
steph
has
been
talking
about
so
rather
than
funding
it
in
the
general
fund.
You
could
kind
of
flag
it
for
funding
in
a
budget
amendment.
E
A
I
think
that
the
tech
lake
city
felt
harder
to
tie
exactly
to
covid
recovery,
which,
it
seems
like,
is
the
guiding
principle
of
a
lot
of
the
arpa
guidance,
and
so
that
one,
you
may
want
to
add
into
the
general
fund,
if
you're
interested
in
seeing
it.
But
we
thought
differently
for
the
other
one
and
then.
E
I
see
her
so
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry
to
combine
those
two.
Let's
stick
with
the
first
one,
the
construction
one.
So
I
have
a
straw
pillow
that
we
sideline
that
if
we
have
the
arc
of
funding
that
will
be
funded
at
that
point,.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
appreciate
giving
me
just
a
second
council
members,
just
as
a
sort
of
orientation
reminder
funny.
Our
future
street
projects
are
going
ahead
and
there's
there's
other
street
projects
from
the
bond,
not
just
the
sales
tax
revenue,
of
course,
and
when
we
close
a
street
for
construction
to
happen.
All
those
small
businesses
currently
get
nothing
in
the
way
of
sandwich
board,
wayfinding
still
open
park
here,
directional
and
and
we're
still
open
signage.
B
There
was
a
incident
when
ninth
south
roundabout
construction
was
happening.
B
The
business
owner
had
to
purchase
their
own
sandwich
board
to
say,
open,
enter
this
way,
one
of
the
trucks
crushed
it
during
the
construction
process,
and
they
had.
We
had
nothing
even
to
help
her
replace
that,
so
this
fund
is
really
about
looking
in
the
face
of
the
construction
impacts
that
we
render.
You
know
with
good
intentions,
around
reconstruction
efforts
and
just
helping
those
businesses
with
really
just
the
communication
aspects
on
the
ground
there
to
make
sure
that
the
customers
who
are
being
detoured
can
still
access
their
business.
B
And
when
you
look
at
the
the
impact
from
covid
on
so
many
small
businesses,
you
know
we'll
we'll
see
how
we
can
link
it
if
we
can
with
the
july
definition,
but
those
construction
projects
are
going
to
go
on.
So
I
hope
that
the
council
could
find
a
way
rather
soon
to
be
able
to
support
the
businesses.
While
we
rebuild
streets.
F
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
have
a
straw
poll
from
dan
about
sidelining
this
until
we
can
get
and
look
at
it
in
budget
amendment
number
one.
So
everyone
show
your
feelings.
A
No,
it
was
proposed
in
this
is
like
the
gray
area,
one
it
was
proposed
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
after
the
mayor
submitted
the
budget.
That's
when
the
initial
treasury
guidance
came
out
that
this
the
way
it
was
presented
as
construction
mitigation
for
our
streets
projects
is
not
eligible
for
arba.
That's
just
the
initial
again,
the
initial
guidance
of
it.
So
if
the
council
wanted
it
to
go
forward
as
of
july
1,
you
would
need
to
put
it
into
the
budget
into
the
general
fund
budget.
F
But
then
what
we're
saying
is
that
if
we
there
may
be
a
way
to
link
it
to
the
arpa
funding
to
support
small
businesses
affected
by
covid.
But
we
don't
know
that
quite
yet,
because
we
don't
have
the
final
arpa
guidelines.
A
F
A
Sounds
like
based
on
the
mayor's
based
on
the
mayor's
discussion
that
it's
that
that
is
maybe
a
slightly
different
nuance
on
it
than
mitigating
businesses
from
construction.
That's
gonna
happen
anyway,.
G
Okay,
so
I
would
like
to
keep
this
because
I
know
that
ninth
south
construction
and
300
south
construction
are
both
happening
in
district
five
in
the
next
year,
and
I
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
businesses
along
those
that
that
are
going
to
need
this
support.
So
I
would
like
to
keep
this.
E
I'm
going
to
pull
my
straw
poll
because
I
have
another
question
on
this:
is
this:
could
this
be
funding
our
future
because
of
the
safety
side
of
the
house,
or
is
it
is
there?
I
mean
it.
A
Could
be
but
you've
already
spent
those
dollars,
so
I
think
in
the
future
you
could
evaluate
that.
Definitely,
I
think
you
could
also
I'm
wondering
if
it
could
also
be
like
a
cip
applicant
that
make
you
know
what
never
mind,
because
the
cost
of
the
things
is
not
50
thousand
dollars.
D
G
Yeah-
and
I
guess
I-
I
think
that,
if
so
included
in
this
green
box,
that
says
85
000
left
is
that
we've
spent
2.7
on
increasing
cip
from
six
to
seven
percent
right.
So
my
proposal
would
be
to
take
that
to
six
and
a
half
percent.
I
would
like
to
to
fund
more
of
the
constituent
cip
projects,
but
if
we're
doing
that
at
the
expense
of
the
small
businesses
happening
along
the
construction
routes
or
whatever
else,
then
I
am
worried.
G
So
I
do
think
that
it's
our
responsibility
to
do
what
we
can
to
support
the
businesses
along
where
we're
doing
construction
projects.
D
And
jen
is
there
any
other
area
that
we
can
find
those
funds
like
from
transportation
or
streets,
or
I
mean
anywhere
else.
A
I
mean
if
the
the
county
transportation
dollars
may
be
eligible
for
this,
but
those
have
already
been
spent,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
this
is
the
spot.
You
guys
are
in
the
budget,
which
is
that
this
is
the
money
that's
on
the
table,
and
so
you
kind
of
just
have
to
decide
how
to
arrange
it.
So
you
could
fund
it
with
funding
our
future,
but
it
would
mean
removing
some
other
item
from
funding
our
future.
You
could
fund
it
from
transportation
dollars,
cip
or
maybe
even
well,
no,
probably
not
classy.
A
You
could
fund
it
with
with
general
fund
dollars
that
were
otherwise
going
to
cip,
but
then
that
means
fewer
dollars
in
cip.
So
this
is
just
the
balancing
that
you
guys
are
at
and
and
with
regard
to
your
suggestion,
to
take
it
to
6.5
percent
councilman,
romano,
just
so
that
when
we're
calculating
on
the
fly,
I'm
not
making
like
massive
errors,
can
we
adjust
cip
downwards
so
that
you're
balanced
and
then
we'll
calculate
how
much
the
percentage
is
sort
of
after
the
fact?
If
that's,
okay,
okay,
so.
M
A
A
E
M
E
And
realize
councilman
valenwar
we're
just
looking
at
whether
we
fund
it
we'll
figure
out
where
it's
coming
from
after
jen
does
her
magic
with
the
numbers.
E
F
This
straw
is
to
add
200
000
from
the
general
fund,
as
it
sits
right
now
for
construction
mitigation.
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
only
reason
I
am
going
to
vote
on
this,
not
because
I
don't
think
we
need
it,
but
I
do
think
that
there
is
a
way
to
make
this
work
with
arpa
funding
and
we
could
wait
to
see
and
then,
if
not,
we
still
could
have
a
budget
amendment
to
fund
this
out
of
the
general
fund.
That's
just
my.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
my
position
on
this.
F
D
A
I
think
it's
likely
that
these
funds
would
be
spent
before
like.
I
think
that,
if
you
want
to
fund
this
with
arpa,
you
should
not
put
it
into
the
general
fund.
Now
I
think
if
you
want
to
wait
and
fund
it
with
parpa,
then
it
can
be
considered
in
a
budget
amendment
and
if
it's
not
eligible,
you
can
always
appropriate
fund
balance.
A
K
E
G
K
G
A
I
think
there's
always
some
yeah
there's
always
some
mitigation
included
in
construction
budgets,
but
we
find
that
it's
usually
not
enough.
I
don't
know
if
the
administration
would
have
any
thoughts
about
the
timing
of
the
money.
If
that
timing
is
critical.
B
I'd
ask
lorna:
maybe
she
can
give
us
a
person
yeah.
L
Absolutely
I
think
our
biggest
concern
is
to
ensure
that
we're
getting
the
information
out
in
a
timely
fashion,
because
if
we
don't
communicate
with
the
stakeholders
that
are
being
impacted,
you
know
that's
that's.
Basically,
our
biggest
concern
is
to
ensure,
in
fact,
we
we
just
had
a
meeting
about
this
and
and
how
incredible
important
it
is
for
us
to
communicate
with
them.
L
So
I
I
can't
speak
to
the
trump
you
know
to
the
department's
construction
in
terms
of
what
they
had
on
their
budget.
That's
beyond
my
knowledge
at
this
point,
so
it
would
be
great
to
have
somebody
from
transportation
to
speak
on
that
issue.
A
I
think
we
also
sometimes
have
a
like
different
roles
right,
like
transportation,
has
a
role
to
manage
the
project
and
deliver
it
on
time,
and
economic
development
has
a
role
of
liaising
with
businesses
to
kind
of
troubleshoot
what
what
unique
needs
they
might
have,
and
I'm
I'm
not
sure
that
transportation
has
always
like
been
been
suited
to
fill
that
role
right
and
that's
why
we've
had
sometimes
this
extra.
A
L
So
I
just
want
to
add
that
that's
one
of
the
things
that,
in
terms
of
our
department,
we're
trying
to
coordinate
a
lot
more
with
other
departments
to
ensure
that
we're
talking
to
one
another
and
to
ensure
that
we
are
part
of
the
same
team,
because
that's
how
our
stakeholders
really
see
us,
but
right
now,
as
far
as
part
of
the
recovery,
you
know
every
time,
there's
a
closure
any
time
you
know,
there's
encampment
the
cleanup
our
business
community
is
reaching
out
to
us
because
they
don't
they're
so
concerned
about
the
impact
that
they
may
feel,
as
we
do
some
of
these
things
that
are
taking
place,
of
course,
for
the
overall
benefit,
but
they're
just
very
sensitive
right
now
to
all
those
issues.
D
So
go
ahead,
so
one
we
need
to
find
out
if
there
is,
if
there
is
any
mitigation
money
already
appropriated
for
300,
west
reconstruction
and
then
two
I
I
am
interested
in
funding
that
one,
if
we
don't
but
two
potentially
with
our
performance
but
still
leave
it
in
the
general
and
just
in
case
we
don't
get
apple
funding.
D
E
K
G
A
Okay,
just
so
you
know
functionally
we
have
to
budget
for
the
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
in
in
terms
of
balancing,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
council
understands
that,
but
we'll
we'll
make
that
contingent.
Note.
E
N
G
A
We
can
add
that
to
legislative
intent.
I
did
see
blake
pop
on
and
I
don't
know
if
he
was
ready
just
trying
to
speak
about.
Oh
and
then
the
mayor
has
her
hand
raised.
Sorry
thanks,
jim.
B
I'll
just
mention
that
it
is
absolutely
my
desire
and
intention,
I
think,
with
2020.
We
just
didn't
have
the
bandwidth
to
create
a
policy,
but
we
would
really
support
a
policy
that
contemplates
even
a
half
a
percentage
of
the
total
capital
cost.
Maybe
one
percent
of
the
total
capital
cost
of
construction
project
to
be
set
aside
for
mitigate
small
business
impact
mitigation
and
that
that's
our
desire
and
intention
blake's
checking
on.
We
think
that
the
budget
of
300
west
we
were
able
to
work
that
in
because
it
was
such
a.
K
Yeah
thanks
it's
my
understanding
that
there
is
a
percentage
dedicated
to
that
project.
We've
got
transportation
on
the
call,
but
really
engineering
will
have
a
specific
and
exact
answer
to
that
they're,
not
on
the
call
now.
A
And
I
think
that
this
may
be
one
of
those
cases
where
the
coordination
among
departments
is
the
is.
The
thing
that
needs
to
be
is
the
nut.
That
needs
to
be
cracked
as
as
much
as
the
funding,
because,
like
I
said,
I
think
transportation
has
their
their
charge
to
to
deliver
the
project
and
and
thinks
about
it
in
a
different
way
than
economic
development
does
not
that
they
can't
coordinate.
A
Okay,
let's
see
the
next
item
is
an
item
that
was
included
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
That's
not
eligible
for
arpa
dollars.
It
was
forty
five
thousand
dollars
for
tech
lake
city
and
some
council
members
expressed
an
interest
in
finding
a
way
to
fund
that
in
the
general
fund,
I'll
start
sharing
my
screen
again.
Sorry.
A
A
I'll
defer
to
the
admin,
I
think
that
ben
spoke
to
it
on
the
or
maybe
I'm
having
a
memory
of
someone
speaking
to
it
at
one
point
in
one
of
our
briefings.
L
Yeah,
I
I
can
basically
add
this
is
one
of
our
initiatives
that
we
have
been
working
on
to
ensure
we
have
the
right
ecosystems
in
salt
lake
city
to
create.
Basically,
you
know,
work
growth
and
our
tax
base
really
is
strong
as
it
needs
to
be
so.
L
Tech
city
is
a
big
part
of
what
we're
doing
right
now.
We're
working
on
on
this
really
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
we're
attracting
the
right
businesses.
If
there's
any
other
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer.
L
No,
it's
it's.
Basically
we're
going
to
be
using
the
funds
to
basically
work
on
this
area
that
we
have
already
started.
As
you
have
seen,
we've
brought
the
mayor
had
recursion
is
one
of
the
companies
came
from
the
university
of
utah,
so
basically
it's
just
to
continue
funding
the
activities
that
we're
engaged
in.
So
it's
it's
not
a
position.
It's
not
a
an
fte.
L
So
you
know,
I
know
that
we're
part
of
a
group
that
is
also
working
on
this.
So
that's
going
to
go
to
to
work
on
those
part
of
that
group
that
we're
working
with
right
now
and
I
can
actually
get
the
person
who
is
running
this
initiative
to
join
us
and
even
provide
some
additional
information.
I
don't
have
all
the
details
right
at
the
top
of
my
fingers.
I
apologize,
but
I
can
definitely
get
an
answer
for
you.
F
Let's,
let's
skip
this
for
right
now:
lorena,
if
you
don't
mind,
we
can
come
back
to
it
later
or
on
thursday,
as
we
get
a
little
bit
more
information.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Unless
the
council
adds
it,
the
next
is
the
let's
see
I'll
I'll,
probably
kind
of
group
these
together,
since
they
were
kind
of
starred
together,
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
included
three
planners
at
the
associate
level
to
be
funded
with
arpa
dollars.
A
The
council
discussed
wanting
to
find
ways
to
add
that
those
resources
to
planning
through
the
general
fund,
rather
than
arpa
and
so
planning
responded
with
a
couple
of
different
levels
of
ftes
that
the
council
could
consider
all
of
the
items.
I
should
note
in
this
column
are
10
months
of
funding
the
same
kind
of
concept
we
were
talking
about
before,
and
none
of
them
are
in
the
budget
unless
the
council
adds
them
so
like
the
three
planners
are
not
in
the
budget
unless
the
council
has
them.
F
E
E
D
I
agree
yes
like
yes,
like
I
don't
think,
there's
a
I
don't
know
if
the
the
rest
of
the
council
would
like
to
discuss
this,
but
you
we
all
have
seen
how
much
work
and
how
much
things
we
want
them
to
do
and
they
can't
get
to
because
of
the
amount
of
work
that
they
have,
and
I
think
this
is
a
yes
for
me.
Absolutely.
E
A
J
A
See
that
and
so
that's
why
we
have
them
listed
here,
and
I
don't
know
if,
since
planning
gave
us
that
information,
if
the
department
has
more
information
they
want
to
share
or
if
there
are
other
questions
I
see,
councilmember
wharton
has
his
hand
raised
chris.
A
A
And
I
see
blake
thomas
is
raising
his
hand.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
amy.
K
Oh,
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
jennifer
read
my
mind
as
far
as
the
preferred
scenario
would
be
a
manager
and
three
senior
planners
for
that
flexibility.
To
then
kind
of.
K
Classify
down
based
on
the
the
needs-
and
I
think
part
of
that
to
council
member
mano's
point
the
manager
and
the
senior
would
be
important
in
terms
of
having
the
existing
associate
planners
doing
the
land
use.
P
I
just
blake
could
address
this,
but
I
know
that
the
highest
the
work
that's
highest
highest
has
the
highest
regard
in
planning
is
the
long-term
planning,
and
so
I
think
that
if
you're
adding
new
positions
you
you
wouldn't
want
to
earmark
those
as
not
working
on
applications
but
working
on
long-term
planning,
because
then
you're
sort
of
sending
a
message
to
your
existing
staff
that
that
they
have
to
keep
doing
the
parts
that
aren't
what
they
aspire
to
do.
P
G
F
A
F
Thank
you
very
much,
I
don't
doubt
and
don't
I
don't
disagree-
that
we
need
more
planners.
Just
feeling
incredibly
stressed
out
about
all
of
this.
So
everybody
knows
what
the
straw
poll
is.
F
F
F
M
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
but
can
I
just
highlight
something
that,
to
be
honest,
the
problem
isn't
enough
planners
in
the
planning
department.
It's
that
we're
not
approving
projects.
They
comment
to
us
seven
times
and
we
haven't
even
voted
on
it.
So
I
think
it's
time
that
when
we
do
have
a
project
come
to
us
that
we
start
voting
on
it
and
not
have
the
morale
of
the
planning
department
go
down
the
drain.
F
E
A
So
the
next
item
that
the
council
starred
was
the
prosecutors-
I
don't
know
if
the
council
wants
to
go
to
that.
You
do
have
board
appointments
in
a
couple
minutes.
A
Let's
see
what
we
can
ruffle.
There
is
some
new
information
on
that
one
and
the
reason
I'm
going
to
add
this
is
that
the
council
members
asked
a
question
about
using
one
of
the
ftes
to
provide
funding
for
reclassification
reclassifications,
and
the
short
answer
is
that
that
works.
So
if
the
council
funded
two
ftes
and
then
one
directed
funding
for
one
of
the
ftes
to
be
for
reclassification
instead
of
salaries,
those
re
reclassifications
would
cost
about
75,
000
and
because
there's
89
000
each
for
prosecutors.
A
That
actually
leaves
about
ten
thousand
dollars
savings.
If
you
did
that,
instead
of
funding
three
prosecutors.
F
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
information.
Council
members.
I
have
a
my
thoughts
on
this
that
I'm
brought
up
during
the
budget,
but
what
I
would
propose
is
fund,
because
there
there's
three
ftes
for
prosecutors
and
one
proposal
for
the
victim
advocate.
F
A
A
O
A
A
You
she's
popping
in
and
out,
but
you
know
what
we
can
I'll
put
in
a
placeholder
of
a
savings
of
one
prosecutor
position
and
then
I
can
confirm
with
the
admin.
Okay.
F
F
A
Okay,
work
everywhere,
all
the
we
do
have
to
come
back
for
a
closed
session
on
to
discuss
a
couple
other
budget
things,
so
we're
not
done
with
budget
yet,
but
that
was
a
lot
of
work.
Thank
you.
F
Oh,
my
gosh,
sorry
about
that
great
thanks
everyone.
We
have
a
couple
of
board
appointments.
Let
me
turn
to
my
agenda.
F
I
have
amy
hawkins
is
here
and
she
is
hi
amy.
F
E
Thank
you
for
your
time,
council
members
and
thank
you,
chair
fowler,
I'm
interested
not
because
of
strong
expertise,
but
because
I
see
the
housing
authority
playing
a
really
strong
role.
They're
located
within
my
neighborhood.
F
F
F
M
F
Oh
and
amy,
I'm
sorry,
you
are
on
tonight's
consent
agenda.
I
just
got
a
text
correcting
me,
which
I
appreciate,
because
I
am
wrong
all
the
time.
So,
of
course
you
do
not
have
to
sign
in
and
be
present
but
you're
more
than
welcome
to
so
we
will
have
you
on
tonight's
consent
agenda.
F
L
F
You,
let's
see
I'm
kind
of
jumping
around
the
agenda
just
because
I
saw
some
the
tiles,
but
do
we
have
raheem
bennett
with
us.
K
E
F
I'm
doing
really
well.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
joining
us
today
and
raheem
is
looking
to
be
appointed
to
the
position.
I
tried
to
just
put
the
whole
thing
together:
the
police
civilian
review
board.
Why
don't
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
why
you're
interested
in
that
work
position.
O
E
So
thank
you
to
council
members
and
sheriff
fowler
for
the
opportunity.
I
moved
to
salt
lake
city
in
2018
for
a
position
at
goldman.
E
E
I
live
here,
900
west,
but
being
a
part
of
the
salt
lake
city
community
is
important
to
me
and
I
think
that
you
know
this
is
something
that
I
could
see
myself
doing
and
helping
out
the
the
the
council
in
the
community
that,
as
all
and
the
police
right.
C
So
it's
really
it's
kind
of
personal
for
me
as
well.
E
My
cousin,
my
great
cousin,
was.
E
Some
abuses
and
and
and
died
in
police
custody.
He
probably
wasn't
doing
what
he
was
supposed
to
be
doing
at
the
time
right.
But
but
but
you
know
it's
it's
important
that
you
know
we
have
representation
and
it's
important
that
that
all
voices
are
heard,
and
so
that's
that's
why
I'm
here.
F
I
don't
see
any
hands
just
some
thumbs
up,
so
that's
good
raheem.
Thank
you
so
much
for
wanting
to
serve
on
this
board.
It
is
an
incredibly
important
board
for
all
of
us
and
we
appreciate
you
being
willing
to
take
the
time
to
be
a
part
of
this
board
and
we,
you
will
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda
as
well
at
our
formal
meeting
at
seven.
F
You
don't
have
to
log
in
or
watch
if
you
don't
want
or
listen,
but
you
will
be
on
the
agenda
and
we
look
forward
to
having
you
serve
with
salt
lake
city.
Thank
you
again.
F
Okay
bobby,
do
we
have,
were
we
able
to
get
justin.
E
Madam
chair,
we
still
haven't
seen
justin
but
tina
just
arrived.
F
Nope,
you
are
right
on
time,
just
fine,
oh
perfect,
so
tina
you
are
looking
to
be
on
the
housing
authority
of
salt
lake
city
board
and
just
if
you
don't
mind
telling
us
a
little
bit
about
why
you
want
to
be
on
this
board.
F
P
Of
course,
so
I've
just
been
talking
with
my
case
manager
and.
E
Stuff
about
it-
and
she
was
just
telling
me
that
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity.
L
F
Well,
that's
great!
Thank
you!
So
much
council
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments
for
tina
tina?
We
look
forward
to
having
you
serve
on
this
board.
It's
always
I.
I
always
appreciate
when
residents
step
up
and
dedicate
some
of
their
time
to
the
many
needs
of
the
city,
and
this
is
one
of
them
and
look
forward
to
having
your
voice
in
there
and
being
heard.
So,
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us
today
and
you
will
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda.
F
You
don't
have
to
log
in
or
anything,
but
you
you'll
be
on
the
agenda.
Awesome.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
much.
C
E
P
Madam
chair,
we
do
have
one
announcement
that
we
could
do
that'd
be
great
okay,
and
that
is
the
mayor's
office
has
kindly
offered
to
have
council
members
join
them
at
the
giant
in
our
city
banquet
that
is
held
every
every
year.
I
don't
know
if
it
was
held
last
year,
but
in
most
years
it
is
thursday
june
24th
and
they
are
honoring
posthumous
huma.
I
can't
even
say
it
posthumously.
P
Bob
garf,
so
sorry,
I
couldn't
get
this
up
on
my
screen
but
anyway,
so
the
we
just
need
a
count
of
how
many
council
members
are
interested
in
going
to
that.
It's
thursday
june
24th
6
p.m,
and
they
would
like
to
find
out
by
tomorrow
at
3
p.m.
P
If
council
members
are
interested
in
going
and
that's
all
I
have-
and
I
know,
may
madam
chair,
you
have
to
take
an
extra
long
dinner
break
tonight
because
we
do
have
a
couple
of
council
members
who
have
other
commitments.
So
it's
my
understanding
that
you
would
take
a
a
break
until
seven.
Is
that
correct
that.
F
Is
correct:
council
members
you
we
are
breaking
for
dinner
right
now
and
ex
we
have
our
formal
meeting
starting
at
seven.
So
please
be
back
in
time
for
that
and
and
then
we'll
we
will
have
work
session
after
this
special
set.
Formal
meeting,
so
don't
get
your
hopes
up
that
it
will
just
be
in
and
out
real
quick.
We
need
to
get
back
into
work
session
too.
Okay.