►
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
It
is
august
9
2022.
This
is
the
meeting
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
redevelopment
agency
of
salt
lake
city.
We
welcome
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
person
and
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds.
Online
hybrid
board
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building.
We
are
continuing
to
watch
covet
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
In
fact,
although
masks
are
no
longer
required
in
the
building,
since
covet
cases
are
rising,
we
encourage
people
to
wear
masks.
A
While
here
in
our
meeting
there
are
some
in
the
hallway.
If
anybody
needs
one,
we
will
continue
to
monitor
the
situation
and
take
any
reasonable
precautions
for
the
public
and
staff.
Let's
move
on
to
our
first
agenda
item,
which
is
section
a
comments.
We
start
our
already.
We
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
B
A
Council
member
board
member
sorry,
we
are
accepting
your
comments
in
person
and
through
webex,
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line,
a
separate
telephone
line.
I
want
to
mention
our
rules
of
the
quorum.
These
are
guidelines
to
help
our
meetings,
progress
in
an
orderly,
efficient
way.
We
want
to
give
everybody
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
A
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
quorum
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
in
person
or
into
our
virtual
meeting.
The
rda
board
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
or
you
will
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point.
You're
welcome
to
email,
board
members
or
call
our
comment
line.
A
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
own.
Our
rules
of
the
quran-
if
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information
for
those
joining
in
webex.
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
you.
Scott
corpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions.
We
are
commenting.
Registration.
A
Where
did
I
leave
off
I'm
so
sorry,
scott
corpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks,
so
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration,
taylor,
hill
and
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
A
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
in
webex.
She
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please
re
please
step
up
to
the
podium
right
there
and
if
you
have
a
mask,
please
feel
free
to
remove
it
before
making
a
comment.
A
B
C
Okay,
you're
discussing
walkability
on
the
housing
development
loan
program,
which
should
include
public
safety.
There
are
many
cases
where
walkability
is
non-existent
around
the
shelters
in
the
rda
area,
especially
on
a
near
paramount
due
to
public
safety.
So
walkability
is
discouraged
with
broken
windows
and
damaged
storefronts,
and
the
city's
rba
board
should
address
this.
In
addition,
I
know
the
board
is
not
sexist,
but
the
system
is
sexist.
C
If
a
woman,
small
business
owner
is
continually
ignored
when
she
complains
of
her
business
being
assaulted
again,
she
is
ignored
due
to
her
constant,
legitimate
complaints
and
that's
how
sexism
builds.
You
know
that
you
agree
with
that
and
you're
not
sexist,
but
sexism
builds
when
women
are
ignored,
and
that
is
important.
I
urge
the
rda
chair
to
entertain
a
motion
to
set
a
public
hearing
on
setting
up
a
crime
mitigation
fund
through
rda
at
next
week's
formal
city
council.
C
B
E
B
Okay,
let's
circle
back
to
jeff
murdock,
once
more
jeff
here,
unmuted.
A
So
thank
you
for
those
that
provided
general
comments
and
I
don't
see
anybody
else
with
any
other
comments
in
person
unless
nope,
we
have
no
public
hearings
today,
so
we're
moving
on
to
item
c1,
and
that
is
the
approval
minutes
of
june
14
2022.
So
I
need
a
motion
for
this.
F
A
I
have
a.
I
have
a
motion
by
board
member
poi,
a
seconded
by
board
member
mano,
I'm
going
to
roll
call
this
petro,
yes
mano.
Yes,
we,
yes
wharton
fowler,
yes,
dugan!
I
got
my
name.
G
A
C
A
And
I'm
a
yes
so
that
passes.
We're
moving
on
to
item
two
and
I
think
jen
has
a
comment
before
we
continue.
H
Madam
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know,
I'm
filling
in
for
allison
roland
okay
on
the
staff
on
the
issue.
A
All
right,
so
I'm
going
to
introduce
this
and
then
jen
will
substitute
allison.
So
item
number
two
of
the
agenda
is
a
resolution
about
the
housing
development
loan
program,
emergency
gap,
funding
allocations,
so
we're
receiving
a
briefing
today
and
at
the
table
we
have
jen
bruno
tracy,
tran,
kate,
weard
and
danny
walls.
H
Madam
chair
just
do
a
quick,
intro
and
then
turn
it
over
to
these
guys.
Just
by
way
of
reminder,
the
board
set
aside
a
separate
pot
of
money
that
could
be
accessed
by
developers
to
fund
gaps
in
current
projects.
H
As
part
of
setting
aside
that
money,
the
board
adopted
some
criteria
to
guide
how
those
choices
were
made,
and
so
the
rda
staff
is
here
to
present
their
recommendations
for
who
should
receive
that
emergency
gap
funding.
It's
our
understanding
that
the
the
staff
is
requesting
the
board
adopt
or
act
on
this
fund
tonight
or
today,
because
obviously
this
construction
costs
are
only
increasing.
So
thanks.
I
As
was
mentioned,
this
is
part
of
the
housing
development
loan
program
and
the
the
goal
here
is
to
provide
financial
assistance
to
incent,
to
incentivize
development
of
affordable
housing,
and
this
this
funding
was
set
aside
by
the
board
as
part
of
the
housing
development
loan
program
or
hdlp
program,
in
order
to
allow
for
emergency
gap
financing
to
be
made
available
due
to
the
increasing
construction
costs
that
we
have
been
seeing.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
slide
taylor.
I
Thank
you.
So
we
we
have
a
total
of
just
over
three
million
dollars
that
is
available
for
this
program.
Originally,
you
had
approved
two
million
dollars
for
this.
However,
one
of
the
initial
nofa
applications
had
to
cancel
so
we
rolled
in
the
funding
that
they
received
into
this
emergency
gap
program
to
make
that
available
to
additional,
affordable
housing
applicants.
I
In
june
on
june,
2nd
of
this
year,
we
released
the
emergency
gap
nofa.
This
is
an
open-ended
application
that
was
made
available
to
anyone
on
a
first-come,
first-served
basis.
We
received
four
applications
for
for
this.
This
funding,
however,
one
of
those
applications
has
rescinded
their
app
their
application,
so
you
may
have
noticed
in
your
packets
that
you
had
details
for
four
different
applicants.
However,
we'll
just
be
reviewing
those
three,
the
one
that
rescinded
their
application
noted
some
revised
escalation
costs
as
the
reason
that
they
no
longer
needed
the
funding.
I
So
that's
good
news
for
that
project,
but
the
other
three
are
are
hopeful
for
your
acceptance
of
their
of
their
applications.
So
we
have
between
those
three
remaining
applicants.
They
are
requesting
a
total
of
three
million
dollars,
so
there
will
be
just
about
eighty
two
thousand
000
left.
If,
if
you
opt
to
to
fund
all
of
them,
let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
application.
I
Great.
Thank
you
on
an
annual
basis.
The
board
determines
funding
priorities
for
for
the
the
housing
development
loan
program
and
these
are
established
in
the
housing
allocation
policy.
This
just
lists
out
those
different
funding
priorities
that
you
have
and
what
different
applicants
can
do
to
decrease
their
interest
rate
that
they
will
be
paying
on
these
loans
and
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
developers.
Affordable
housing
developers
to
attain
affordable
projects,
affordable
interest
rates
and
include
public
benefits
in
their
projects.
Let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
one
in
next
slide.
There
we.
J
I
As
part
of
our
our
application
review,
we
we
have
several
different
parts.
First
off
we
receive
the
application,
we
do
a
threshold
review
and
as
part
of
that
threshold
review,
there
are
certain
requirements
that
each
applicant
is
required
to
meet.
That
includes
leveraging
their
funding.
So
we
we
make
sure
that
there
is
a
public
private
connection
there
that
they
there
is
some
kind
of
funding
coming
from
other
sources,
just
not
salt
lake
city.
I
All
of
these
applicants
have
a
very
broad
source
list
that
that
they
that
they
reached
out
to
and
have
received
funding
through.
So
the
three
applicants
we're
looking
at
all
met
that
additional
threshold
requirements
include
meeting
the
sustainability
requirements
that
were
in
place
before
the
how
the
sustainability
policy
was
finalized.
I
I
From
that
point,
we
move
on
to
make
sure
that
they
have
the
ability
to
close
their
loan
within
90
days,
which
is
a
requirement
that
the
board
put
in
place.
So
that's
that's
a
major
difference
between
the
competitive
nofa
and
this
emergency
gap.
Nofa
is
that
90
day
closing.
So
all
of
these
loans,
if
approved
today,
will
be
closing
in
november
with
that
we'll
go
ahead
and
look
at
the
map
that
shows
where
the
different
applications
are
coming
from
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
tracy
yeah.
K
Thank
you
so
much
so
yeah.
This
is
a
map
of
the
four
applications
that
we
received.
So
the
first
one
is
the
nest
located
at
382
south
rio
grande
street.
The
second
is
230
west
1700,
south.
The
third
one
was
255
south
state,
that's
the
project
that
was
withdrawn
and
then
the
fourth
application
was
144.
South
500
east
next
slide.
K
So
here's
just
a
summary
of
the
three
applications
still
seeking
emergency
gap
funding.
This
information
in
additional
detail
is
found
in
attachment
a
and
attachment
d
of
the
memo.
K
So
all
three
applications
are
seeking
one
million
dollars
each,
and
this
sharp
in
this
chart
shows
the
total
project
costs
for
each
project,
as
well
as
the
percent
of
the
current
loan
requests
to
the
total
project
cost.
Both
the
nest
and
144
south
were
both
approved
for
an
rd
housing
loan
through
the
last
competitive
nofa.
K
K
All
of
these
projects
will
be
four
percent
tax
credit
developments
and
all
three
of
the
projects
will
also
be
affordable
to
those
earning
60
ami,
so
they're
100,
it's
100,
affordable
to
60
emi
both
the
nest
and
144
south
have
a
mix
of
studios
and
one
bedrooms
and
the
1700.
South
development
has
a
mix
of
studios
one
two
and
three
bedrooms.
K
So
I
wanted
to
note
that
these
are
the
emergency
funds
from
the
2021-2022
fiscal
year
and
that
the
next
housing
development
loan
program,
competitive
nofa,
that
should
be
released
in
the
next
few
weeks,
will
reflect
the
2020
to
23
housing
priorities
that
the
board
adopted
earlier
this
year,
so
that
will
include
the
thresholds
that
will
require
deeply
affordable
units
and
or
family
size
units,
which
would
be
three
or
three
plus
bedrooms,
along
with
the
other
priorities
of
missing
middle
and
home
ownership.
K
So
staff
reviewed
these
applications
and
these
all
these
three
applications
meet
all
of
the
threshold
requirements
and
other
requirements
laid
out
in
the
housing
development
loan
program
guidelines.
Next
next
slide.
Please-
and
I
just
wanted
to
note
so-
the
rd
finance
committee
did
review
these
applications
in
july
and
they
recommended
that
these
three
applications
be
funded
and
if
the
board
wishes
to
fund
these
three
applications,
there
will
be
about
82
500
remaining
for
the
emergency
gap
funds,
and
so
here
are
the
kind
of
preliminary
terms.
K
K
So
at
this
time
we
can
take
any
questions.
I
believe
all
of
the
three
developers
are
here.
If
we
have
any
specific
questions
for
them,.
A
Great,
thank
you
tracy,
the
great
information,
so
I
will
open
the
floor
for
questions
or
comments
for
me.
Mermano
go
ahead.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
tracy
and
kate.
Thank
you
for
that.
My
question
is
looking
at
the
terms.
They
seem
vastly
different
between
the
three
projects,
with
the
most
maybe
generous
terms,
being
one
percent,
with
a
40-year
amortization
schedule
and
the
least.
F
F
K
K
A
great
question,
so
the
standard
loan
terms
in
the
standard
loan
terms
that
talks
about,
like
the
interest
rate
reductions
and
when
that's
all
laid
out
in
the
housing
development
loan
program
policy
that
you
guys
have
adopted.
So
it
does
provide
a
little
flexibility
there,
so
it
does
allow
for
a
term
it's
generally,
it's
the
30-year
term,
but
if
they
do
have
like
a
higher
or
a
longer
term,
we
would
require
a
longer
affordability
period.
K
So
there's
some
things
that,
within
the
policy
it
allows
them
to,
to,
you,
know,
be
a
little
creative
on
the
term
and
amortization
and
the
interest
rate
reductions
are
based
on
how
many
are
are
based
on
that
list
of
project
priorities,
so
some
projects,
I
believe
the
144
south-
does
meet
like
four
of
the
project
priorities,
so
they
were
able
to
reduce
that
from
three
percent
to
one
percent,
whereas
the
other
ones,
you
know
they
they
met
various
some
met,
one
public
or
one
priority.
F
F
That's
fine!
Let's
do
that,
but
I
am.
I
have
been
suspicious
that
those
are
that
sometimes
the
public
benefits
are
not
compatible
with
the
amount
of
financial
benefit
that
comes
from
the
interest
rate
reduction,
and
it's
also
something
that
is
totally
dependent
on
the
a
dollar
amount
of
the
loan
that
we're
giving
so
a
20.25
interest
rate
reduction
on
a
small
loan.
F
So
I'm
just
signaling
my
desire
to
understand
that
a
little
bit
better
and
a
request
for
specifically
these
three.
If
you
could
give
me
just
like
an
email
or
something
that
says,
here's
the
the
public
benefits
that
each
of
them
provided
that
qualified
for
them
for
that
interest
rate.
So
I
can
just
sort
of
analyze
that
and
think
yeah
that
makes
sense
or
actually
wow,
that
you
might
as
well
put
a
bike
rack
in
and
save
12
million
dollars
in
the
long
run
like
there
are
some
things
that
I
think
are
probably
pretty
simple.
F
To
do,
that
you
can
get
a
pretty
big
interest
rate
and
others
that,
like
are
pretty
hard
to
do
that
you.
So
I
would
want
to
just
right-size
those
interest
rate
reductions,
and
I
love
that
there's
three
specific
projects,
we're
looking
at
the
same
time,
so
that
I
can
have
a
real-life
case
study
to
sort
of
understand
that.
So,
if
you
could
just
maybe
help
me
with
that,
I
don't
need
that
for
today
or
for
the
decision.
But
I
would
like
to
look
at
that
a
little
further
as
we
continue
to
refine
our
policies.
A
Anybody
else
any
questions,
fowler.
G
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question
of
how
we
put
money
back
into
the
nofa
after
we
spend
it
all.
I
So
it
was
awarded
and
then
I
don't
know
if
you
remember
the
schmidt
apartments
project
that
they
they
were
unable
to
re
finalize
and
solidify
the
other
funding
sources,
so
they
canceled
their
project.
No.
H
So,
and
maybe
I
could
chime
in
just
from
what
I've
observed,
and
I
think
that
it
maybe
I'll
preface
this
by
saying
it's
up
to
the
board
to
decide
how
to
replenish
it.
How
it
was
done
for
this
previous
fiscal
year
was
that
you
allocated
funding
from
funding
our
future
from.
H
Fund
to
the
rda
and
then,
as
the
rda
gets
loan
repayments,
those
are
kind
of
reprogrammed.
The
rda
also
puts
in
quite
a
bit
if
I'm
remembering
from
not
quite
a
bit,
but
the
statutorily
required
housing
set
aside
into
some
of
these
programs
as
well.
So
that's
a
much
smaller
amount,
obviously,
but
there's
no
sort
of
statutory
limit
on
how
much
from
funding
your
future
funding
our
future.
You
could
contribute
to
this,
and
so
that's
been
an
item
we
flagged.
H
You
know
as
if,
if
the
need
was
this,
you
know
if
the
need
was
10
million
and
you
were
only
allocating
three
each
year
you
could
reevaluate
sort
of
how
you
split
up
the
funding,
our
future
allocation
to
to
look
at
that.
G
Thank
you
jen.
I
appreciate
that
and
the
reason
I
bring
this
up
is
because
I
appreciate
that
we
can
do
something
like
this
right,
that
this
is
the
whole
point
of
having
this
particular
fund
and
and
when
we
have
something
that
says
we
have
these
great
projects
that
are
are
adding
that
affordability
and
attainability
to
our
housing
stock,
and
we
have
something
there.
We
have
that
piggy
bank
there
to
say.
Okay,
we
can
help
out.
G
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
I
think
probably
we
ought
to
think
about
this
for
the
next
year
as
well,
until
and
see
what
happens
with
the
world
with
our
the
market
and
everything
in
the
foreseeable
future.
I
do
appreciate
that
you
mentioned.
One
of
them
does
have
three
bedroom
apartments
and
that's
in
the
shorehouse
area,
I
believe
on
17th
or
maybe
not
sure
house,
but
further
south
17th,
south
and
230.
A
And
I
once
again
to
reiterate
to
the
world
that
is
listening
and
to
that
is
observing
how
the
rda
works
and
as
staff
has
mentioned,
we
are
really
interested
in
family
size
housing.
When
we
put
funds
out
there,
that's
the
one
thing
that
we
need
that
constitu
the
constituents
ask
for
us
for
and
the
obvious
need
in
salt
lake
city
is
that
we
have
bigger
units,
so
anybody
that
is
listening,
we're
here
for
you,
if
you
come
with
to
us
with
multi-family
sorry
multi
family
size,
housing
funding,
needs
anybody
else
all
right.
H
A
With
that,
would
you
please
say
a
motion.
G
A
C
A
L
L
L
L
The
the
lower
left
corner
is
the
marmalade
library
and
then
the
three
buildings
just
north
of
it
on
300
west,
are
residential
buildings
with
some
ground
floor,
commercial
and
you'll
notice
behind
them.
There's
kind
of
what
looks
like
a
construction
space,
and
that
is
the
location
for
the
plaza
to
be
built,
and
it
would
provide
connections
for
pedestrians
to
access
the
interior
of
the
block
in
all
four
directions.
I
think
there's
also
a
stairwell
that's
being
built
there.
L
There
are
two
sources
for
the
one
million
dollars.
First
is
seven
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars,
which
would
come
from
the
revolving
loan
fund.
This
would
leave
an
available
to
lend
balance
of
almost
three
million
dollars.
So
if
there
are
projects
in
the
pipeline,
there
is
still
funding
available
for
it
up
to
the
3
million.
L
L
L
L
So
this
is
an
example
of
the
city
using
multiple
funding
sources
on
the
general
fund
side
and
the
rda
side
to
move
the
project
forward
and
there's
one
policy
question:
if
the
board
is
interested
in
the
administration
evaluating
additional
parks
impact
fees
for
this
project,
my
recollection
is
the
original
amount
of
1.1
million
maximized
it.
But
since
the
costs
have
gone
up,
there
may
be
an
option
to
use
additional
parks,
impact
fees.
A
G
G
G
The
person
yeah,
my
I'm
wondering
if
the
rda
provided
any
sort
of
financial
benefit
in
to
the
developer,
and
I'm
sort
of
like
recalling
this
via
some
vast
memory
back
here
of
a
few
years
ago,
that
that
included
part
of
this
park
and
this
open
space.
H
No,
the
rda
yeah
the
rda
had
contributed.
I
think
and
ben
pointed
it
out,
not
just
rda
funding,
but
city
parks
impacts
fees
funding.
I
think
there
was
and
I'm
looking
into
danny.
I
can't
remember
if
any
was
here,
there
have
been
a
few
developers
on
this
property
and
the
market's
changed
a
lot
since
the
first
time
the
the
board
put
it
or
the
city
put
it
out.
I
think
there
was
a
land
right
down
as
part
of
encouraging
certain
development.
There.
J
G
And-
and
I
asked
this
question
simply-
I
know
that
everything
has
increased.
It
is
what
I
mean
we're
going
to
be
seeing
this
for
the
next
two
or
three
years
of
of
overages,
but
if
we've
reached
out
and
and
sort
of
said,
if
there
is
some
of
that
partnership
with
the
developer
that
can
be
made
as
with
any
of
these
funds
or
anything
along
those
lines,
it's
just
sort
of
one
random
idea.
I
have
you,
don't
have
to
answer
that
danny
just
something
that
maybe
I
mean,
I
guess.
G
That's
it
that
this
thought
of
whether
or
not
there
would
be
a
some
more
partnership
there,
because
of
that
kind
of
quid
pro
quo,
we're
helping
you
out,
you
help
us
out.
This
is
one
of
those
public
benefits
going
back
to
it
board.
Member
mano
said
that,
like
are
we
actually
seeing
with
what
we
are
incentivizing.
J
But
for
this
park,
construction-
probably
not
an
opportunity
to
reach
back
out
for
assistance,
but
I
will
note
that
the
developers
through
what
was
originally
constructed
as
an
hoa
and
will
probably
transition
to
a
special
assessment,
will
provide
towards
a
maintenance
parks
will
take
it
over.
They
will
provide
part
of
it,
but
then
there's
also
an
assessment
for
the
surrounding
property
owners
that
they
do
contribute
some
towards
the
maintenance.
G
J
That
is,
as
jen
would
say:
that's
entirely
at
the
will
of
you
as
a
board.
We
can
do
that.
I
just
wanted
to
beat
jen
to
that
part
of
the.
The
rationale,
though,
is
we?
We
know
we
don't
have
enough
to
do
arctic
court
right
now,
so
we
we
fully
anticipate,
probably
needing
to
identify
other
funding
sources
and
come
back
to
the
board
to
prove
that.
So
we're
already
doing
that.
J
So
where
that
money
is
sitting
there
right
now,
just
utilize
that
and
not
necessarily
have
the
revolving
loan
fund,
carry
the
full
weight
of
it.
We're
asking
for
a
million
dollars.
We
don't
know
if
we
will
need
all
of
that,
and
so
the
thought
is,
if
we
need
less
than
the
million
whatever
is
not
used
would
just
go
right
back
into
the
revolving
loan
fund.
So,
okay.
J
It's
a
great
question:
we
don't
have
that
amount
right
now.
There
is
a
plan
and
we
probably
come
back
either
as
one
of
our
later
budget
amendments
when
we
get
the
final
tax
increment
numbers.
If
we
have
that
information,
then,
and
if
we
don't
have
it,
then
you'll
probably
see
it
in
next
year's
budget
as
a
housing
request
to
do
that
project.
G
F
But
that's
maybe
a
discussion
for
another
day,
but
I'm
this
feels
like
it's
opening
up
a
possibility
to
like
discuss
the
future
of
that
and
I
think,
there's
actually
some
really
interesting
things
and
maybe
that
could
tie
in
with
the
community
land
trust
or
the
west
side
initiative,
even
though
it's
the
east
side
of
the
freeway,
but
it's
the
west
side
of
state
street.
So
it
feels
like
it
could
be
part
of
that.
That
model.
F
At
any
rate,
the
west
side
community.
H
F
But
I
I
think
that
there's
some
possibilities
for
arctic
court
to
be
part
of
that
that
package
of
solutions
for
families,
especially
because
you
know
it's
a
house,
so
it
could
become
a
family,
but
I
I
will
talk
about
like
we
can.
I
would
like
to
talk
about
that
at
some
point.
If
possible
is
now
the
time
to
talk
about
station
center
or
we'd
still
need
that
to
be
introduced.
A
So
sorry,
can
you
hear
me
now?
I
don't
want
soda
or
splatter
all
over
the
microphone
as
I
talk
anyway.
I
am
interested
in
that
what
he
was
talking
about,
because
we
have
this
house
of
opportunity.
I
think
I
had
that
question
when
we
did
the
tour.
I
just
can't
remember
if
you
can
share
that
like
if
it's
going
to
be
rebuilt
reconstructed,
is
it.
A
J
I
should
say
the
current
plan
as
it
stands
right
now,
subject
to
whatever
we
finalize
is.
We
we
do
have
plans
for
that
house.
Those
plans
have
been
approved
by
the
historic
landmark
commission,
so
we
were
at
the
point
that
we
were
getting
ready
to
bid
that
project
all
of
the
funds
we
had
previously
for
that
project
were
not
enough
to
cover
that
cost.
So
at
that
point
we
just
it
had
kind
of
gone
on
hold,
naturally,
until
we
identified
the
opportunity
to
come
back
to
you
as
a
board
and
request
more
funds.
J
So
while
this
wipes
out
all
of
the
funds,
we
still
have
the
plans,
we
still
have
a
project
that
has
been
approved
and
we
can
move
forward
and
I
think,
as
board
member
mono's
indicated,
we
can
certainly
come
back
and
present
that
for
what
that
strategy
is-
and
I
think
we
can
certainly
look
at
incorporating
ways
of
either
doing
the
land
trust
or
having
some
time
some
long-term
commitment
to
what
that
house
can
be
as
far
as
either
affordability
or
who
the
occupant
is,
and
so.
A
Yeah
that
answers
the
question
for
sure
we
want
to
earmark
this
house.
It
could
be
our
you
know
our
first
test
on
on
what
you
just
said.
So
thank
you.
If
there's
no
more
questions
about
this
house
for
these
funds,
chris,
I
see
no,
you
know,
okay,
okay,
so
we're
moving
on
then
to
ben
and
station
center.
L
Yes,
the
second
item
in
the
budget
amendment
is
a
3.9
million
dollar
request
to
purchase
property
in
station
center
in
the
depot
district
project
area
and
scott.
Could
you
put
up
the
site
plan
map
first
station
center
station
center
is
two
blocks
between
500
and
600,
west
200
and
400
south,
and
the
three
parcels
that
are
proposed
for
purchase
are
in
development
site
number
four.
L
L
L
L
Taking
the
3.9
million
out
of
that
existing
fund
would
further
reduce
the
funding
for
public
infrastructure
improvements
to
about
five
and
a
half
million.
Now
the
administration
has
indicated
that
the
sale
of
station
center
property
those
proceeds
could
be
used
to
fully
fund
the
15
million
dollar
need
for
the
infrastructure
improvements.
L
L
L
F
Madam
chair
first
did
we
have
we
already
acquired
the
art
space?
The
other
diagonal.
That's
already
done
so
that's
should
actually
be
dark,
blue
in
this
diagram
right.
So
it's
those
three
parcels
in
four
correct.
I
guess
what
I'll
say
is,
and
you
probably
aren't
going
to
be
surprised
what
I'm
going
to
say,
but
I
I
think
it
it's
great.
I
know
that
we
have
the
option
to
purchase
it,
so
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
exercise
that
option.
F
I
would
like
to
purchase
it
with
a
restriction
that
it
be
used
for
ground
floor
publicly
accessible
commercial
spaces
and
affordable
housing,
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
I.
It
goes
to
the
concerns
that
I've
been
having
about
this
project
for
over
a
year
now,
where,
if
we
do
a
master
development
with
one
participant
and
only
one
user,
and
in
this
case
it
sounds
like
it
may
be.
Still
the
university
of
utah
that's
still
being
discussed.
My
is
my
understanding.
That's
the
last.
F
I
understand
I,
I
I'm
an
alum
of
the
university
of
utah.
I
think
it's
great,
but
I
I
think
any
time
we
have
two
city
blocks
where
a
majority
of
the
parcels
are
owned
and
operated
by
one
entity
and
managed
and
developed
by
one
entity
that
leads
to
things
that
I
don't
consider
to
be
great
urban
scale
and
to
be
great
neighborhood
and
community
building.
F
So
I
would
like
to
have
these
parcels
be
purchased
and
and
put
out
as
a
separate
rfp
to
somebody
that's
interested
in
affordable
housing
and
ground
floor
commercial
space,
because
I
think
those
are
the
two
pieces
that
I
haven't
heard
come
through
with
the
station
center
plan
that
I
would
really
like
to
see
happen
on
that
site.
So
that
would
be
my
thought.
Can
I
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
respond
or
if
other
council
members
want
to
respond
to
that,
can.
J
I'm
happy
to
respond
unless
anyone
wanted
to
add
on
to
that
first.
Okay,
my
response,
first
and
foremost,
would
be.
We
100
agree
with
you
and
if
we
have
not
conveyed
that
to
where
you
understand
that
that
is
our
goal
of
station
center,
then
I
apologize
for
that,
and
we
will
certainly
do
that.
J
I
say
that
both
in
terms
of
the
original
plan
for
the
station
center
development
that
the
rda
did
as
well
as
what
our
goals
have
been
as
part
of
even
our
conversations
with
the
university
as
you've
stated,
the
conversations
with
the
university
right
now
are
still
ongoing.
J
But,
prior
to
that
happening,
we
were
engaged
in
a
significant
outreach
and
public
engagement
study
to
look
at
what
the
uses
for
station
center
could
be,
and
I
think
that's
probably
the
part
we
have
not
adequately
passed
onto
the
board
or
conveyed
because
it
was
in
process,
but
for
anyone
who
went
to
those
meetings
and
have
been
involved
in
that
or
even
wants
to
have
that
information
very
much.
The
priorities
for
this
development
is
street
level
activation
as
well
as
affordable
housing.
J
What
those
different
components
are
where
they
end
up
in
the
property
we
don't
know
yet.
So
I
think
it
may
be
premature
to
attach
that
specifically
to
these
parcels
as
much
as
understand
that
that
is
going
to
be
a
significant
portion
of
how
we
build
out
this
project.
Even
in
our
initial
conversations
with
the
university,
we
were
having
those
discussions
with
them
of
what
that
activation
level
would
be,
what
the
uses
would
be.
J
How
would
we
one
for
lack
of
a
better
word
require
that
how
would
we
phase
the
development
into
different
parcels
so
that
it
wasn't
feeling
like
it
was
a
master
developer,
building
it
all
at
once,
and
then
also
what
components
like
affordable
housing
would
we
need
to
put
out
to
other
developers
that
you
know,
aren't
the
university
and
isn't
necessarily
their
niche,
so.
F
I
guess
I
I
can
understand
that
with
a
site
this
large,
you
want
some
flexibility
as
to
like,
where
things
make
the
most
sense
and
if
we
were
to
just
say
these
three
specific
parcels,
especially
because
there's
a
little
piece
in
between
it.
F
Maybe
that's
geometrically
challenging,
but
could
we
put
a
stipulation
that
whatever
percentage
of
the
rda's
property
ownership
in
those
two
blocks
is
comprised
of
this
that
that
percentage
be
put
out
as
a
at
least
that
percentage
be
put
out
for
a
separate
rfp,
specifically
for
affordable
housing
and
ground
floor
public
commercial
space,
so
that
at
least
that
one
piece
of
the
parcel
of
the
property
is
sort
of
it
seems
like
since
we
haven't
owned
it,
yet
it
hasn't
been
sort
of
softly
offered
to
the
university
as
part
of
whatever
agreement.
F
They're
doing
so,
it
seems
like
a
good
opportunity
to
kind
of
be
able
to
carve
out
at
least
one
chunk
and
say,
there's
going
to
be
two
separate
rfps
that
come
out
one,
that's
going
to
be
with
for
this
concept
that
the
innovation
hub
or
whatever
and
another
that
is
for
affordable
housing
and
commercial
space.
To
me,
university
campuses
are
a
different
thing
right
and
and
it's
okay
for
university
campuses
in
some
ways
to
just
sort
of
be
a
massive
site.
That
is
all
education
based.
F
But
even
if
you
look
at
like
campuses
like
nyu
things
that
are
integrated
in
the
urban
fabric
of
a
city,
it's
not
that
way
and-
and
there
are
buildings
owned
by
the
university
intermixed
with
buildings
not
owned
by
the
university,
and
I
think
that
that
leads
to
a
really
good
urban
experience.
And
I
would
like
to
see
that
here.
So
I
want
at
least
whatever
percentage
those
three
parcels
comprised
of
to
be
carved
off
into
one
separate
rfp
and
I'm
okay,
giving
the
rda
the
flexibility
to
put
that
wherever
it
makes
the
most
sense.
J
I
think,
as
staff
we're
totally
comfortable
with
that
on
behalf
of
the
administration,
that's
entirely
their
goal.
I
recognize
from
the
board
that
you
probably
want
to
put
some
guarantees
on.
That
is
exactly
what
you're
saying,
so
I
would
look
at
either
jen
or
even
katie
of
what
level
we
could
do
that.
As
far
as
approving
the
budget
amendment
so
yeah,
I.
H
Think
that
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
brainstorm
this
with
katie.
So
it's
great
that.
H
This
is
an
informational
briefing
step.
We
have
a
public
hearing
next
month.
I,
the
the
tool
that
is
kind
of
percolating,
in
my
mind,
is
similar
to
what
we've
done
with
budget
contingencies,
which
is
that
the
money
is
released
when
a
contingency
is
achieved,
and
but
we
can
brainstorm
with
katie
allison
sort
of
what
appropriate
tool
makes
sense.
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
My
comment
with
councilman
romano
fully
agree.
I
just
want
to
be
a
little
bit
more
specific
when
we
talk
about
affordable
housing
back
to
our
previous
emergency
loans,
I
like
to
see
some
affordable
family
housing,
which
just
doesn't
mean
just
two
bedroom,
a
few
two
bedrooms,
but
maybe
possibly
three
bedroom
apartments
here
and
maybe
with
some
support
services
for
family
housing
vice
just
affordable
housing.
E
I
also
am
struggling
a
little
bit
with
how
we're
doing
ground
floor
commercial,
this
concept
of
small
spaces.
I
I
I
don't
want
to
give
directives
to
people
who
don't
report
to
me,
but
it
seems
more
efficient
if
we
had
a
more
proactive
economic
development
lens
that
would
recruit
and
then
customize
spaces,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
I
mean
we
know
that
we're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
food
desert.
The
bodega
at
gateway
is
the
only
thing
that
will
be
walkable
from
here.
E
The
closest
other
things
are
on
the
other
side
of
the
tracks
presenting
that
issue.
So
we
know
that,
like
there's
going
to
be
a
food
desert
here,
why?
I
would
like
to
see
us
when
we're
doing
those
ground
floor
commercials
to
be
more
proactive
with
the
lens
that
we're
using
to
customize
those
spaces,
so
they're
more
readily
available,
both
in
scale
and
price
point
for
people
who
are
likely
to
come
in
and
make
it
a
vibrant
area.
A
Thank
you.
Anybody
else
talk
about
any
questions
comments.
No,
I
think
her
wholeheartedly
agree
with
what
has
been
said.
I
think
I
know
the
administration
has
plans.
A
If
we
forgot
or
people
don't
don't
know
about
it's
a
tech
lake
city,
so
it's
beyond
just
the
university
of
utah
and
I
think
we're
going
to
be
great
partners
as
we
acquire
these
properties
as
we
think
through
what
the
needs
are
of
institutions
like
the
university
other
companies
and
also
the
needs
of
our
residents
and
how
we
want
people
to
experience,
downtown
and
navigate
our
city.
So
I'm
really
excited
for
this,
and
you
have
my
support
but
we'll
have
the
public
hearing
next
time.
A
A
A
Welcome
so
you
we're
going
to
interview
to
interview
you,
which
is
not
as
scary
as
it
sounds,
and
you
would
start
your
your
term
at
some
point
soon,
but
then
it
would
end
in
2026.
So
what
we
usually
do
and
council
chair
dugan
does
is
just
tell
us
a
little
bit.
Why
you're
interested
and
tell
us
you
know
briefly
and
and
then,
if
more
members
have
questions,
we'll
ask
some
questions.
If
not
you'll
be
off
the
hook,
thanks.
D
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
members.
For
the
time
today,
my
name
is
baxter.
Reeser
I've
been
a
resident
in
salt
lake
city
for
a
little
over
four
years
now
and
I'm
an
architect
and
the
president
of
the
cno
design
we're
a
part
of
a
affordable
housing
development
group
and
we
do
affordable
and
permanent
supportive
housing
all
over
the
country,
primarily
in
missouri
and
georgia
and
new
york.
But
we
have
a
couple
projects
here
in
utah,
arizona,
texas,
a
few
other
states
as
well.
D
My
interest
for
being
part
of
the
community
council
for
the
rda
is
just
that.
I'd
like
to
be
involved
in
kind
of
the
city
effort
to
you
know
shape
the
future
of
the
work
we
do.
In
my
you
know,
past
careers,
past
companies
that
I've
worked
for.
D
I
think,
and
that
I
get
to
work
with
developers
every
single
day,
all
over
the
country
and
observe
how
different
states
can
free
up
funds,
how
they
can
be
creative
in
their
urban
planning
and
be
really
intentional
about
how
their
funding
can.
You
know,
directly
influence
their
larger
goals
as
a
city,
and
I
think
that
might
sum
up
kind
of
my
interest.
A
Right
well,
thank
you.
So
much!
That's
great
information!
I'm
excited
that
you
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
other
places
so
that
you
can
tell
us
what
not
to
do
and
what
board
members
you
have
any
questions
or
comments.
F
I
don't
I
have
a
comment
just
I
feel
like
I
have
to
comment
because
you're
an
architect
that's
going
to
be
appointed
to
the
redevelopment
advisory
advisory
committee,
which
is
the
first
board
that
I
served
on
in
the
city.
So
thank
you
for
your
service.
Thank
you
for
being
willing
to
volunteer
for
the
city.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
have
people
that
have
experience
actually
designing
and
building
things
understanding
how
how
the
public
process
works
for
some
of
those.
So
thank
you
for
for
being
willing
to
do
that.
A
We
are
moving
on
to
five
the
war
member
appointment
for
same
committee,
right
redevelopment
advisory
committee,
so
it's
amy,
roland
and
amy
is
in
person
nice
to
see
you
amy
we're
yeah.
Please
sit
there
and
we're
going
to
ask
you
the
same
thing
briefly.
Tell
us
what
you
want
to
serve.
B
B
Okay,
I'm
amy
roland
I've
been
a
resident
of
salt
lake
city
this
round
for
30
years.
I've
lived
right
next
to
the
capitol
hill
redevelopment
area
for
the
whole
time
that
it's
existed
so
had
that,
and
then
I've
had
quite
a
bit
of
overlap.
I
guess
in
both
my
career
and
other
boards,
I've
served
on
with
the
rda
done.
Some
done
some
training
for
the
rda
staff,
a
prior
job.
B
We
did
consulting
for
the
rda,
so
I've
had
a
lot
of
overlap
there,
but
haven't
served
on
any
of
the
formal
committees
for
it.
So
I
just
thought
it
would
be
an
interesting
thing
to
do
my
current
job.
I
work
with
new
markets,
tax
credits,
which
obviously
can
have
some
role
in
what
the
rda
does.
So
it's
always
good
for
me
to
keep
on
top
of
what
you
guys
are
doing
anyway.
So
I
think
that
sums
it
up.
A
Thank
you.
That
sounds
like
great
insight
and
also
great
experience.
I
know
you've
been
doing
this
for
a
long
time,
so
I
appreciate
that
you
want
to
serve
again
and
help
us
make
good
decisions.
Anybody
else
has
any
comment
for
amy:
okay,
well,
amy.
Thank
you.
So
much.
Thanks
for
your
service,
we'll
see
you
around.
A
We
will
move
on
to
item
number
six
report,
announcements
from
the
executive
director
and
I'm
gonna
look
at
rachel,
no
okay,
no
comments
from
the
executive
director
at
this
time,
and
then
we
are
moving
on
to
item
number
seven
report
and
announcements
from
the
rda
staff.
J
You,
madam
chair,
you
were
a
little
bit
quicker
on
that,
so
allow
me
some
time
to
find
my
email
and
notes
on
it.
So
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
give
a
few
quick
project
updates
and
then
one
staff
issue
of
note
number
one.
The
rda
has
closed
on
the
seven
million
dollar
loan
with
asher
adams.
This
is
for
the
renovation
of
the
union
pacific
depot
and
addition
of
a
hotel
behind
it.
This
has
been
a
loan
that
the
board
approved.
J
I
don't
want
to
say
how
long
ago,
but
it
was
at
least
pre-cove
it
we'll
just
go
with
that.
Okay,
I
think
that's
a
good
mark,
and
so
during
covid
and
beyond
they've
been
structuring
their
financing
they've
been
successful
with
that
and
we
have
closed
on
our
loans.
So
we're
excited
to
see
that
finally
close
and
we'll
get
you
information
on
what
we
anticipate
being
a
groundbreaking
at
some
point
in
the
near
future.
J
Number
two
I
think
chairwoman
baltimore
is:
you
spoke
at
the
opening
of
the
uta
station,
600,
south
and
main
street.
It
was
very
exciting
for
us
to
complete
that.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments
with
that.
It
was
covered
very
well
by
the
media
and
it
was
very
critical
of
this
board
and
the
funding
that
you
approve.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
thank
you
for
that.
There's
a
little
bit
of
a
leap
of
faith.
J
J
I
think
that
was
something
that
was
unsure
of
when
we
first
proposed
this,
but
we
were
successful
with
that,
and
so
I
think
that's
significant
when
we
look
at
how
we
partner
on
these
public
transit
projects,
and
then
I
want
to
give
credit
to
carol
linsley
who,
if
nothing
else,
continue
to
convince
me
that
this
was
going
to
be
successful
and
that
we
could
do
this
and
she
and
the
rest
of
staff
delivered
on
that.
So
we
have
a
new
station,
great
public
art
as
part
of
it
and
within
the
area
of
the
city.
J
That's
seeing
a
lot
of
developments.
So
thank
you
again
for
your
support
on
that
and
then
third
and
finally,
it
is
bittersweet
to
announce
the
departure
of
court
utley,
who
I
think,
most
of
you
heard
after
11
years
with
the
city
he
is
moving
on.
He
has
taken
a
job
with
larry
h,
miller,
real
estate
to
go
and
be
essentially
in
charge
of
their
placemaking
and
community
engagement
development
as
part
of
their
development.
J
So
it's
hard
to
see
him
go
he's
been
part
of
the
agency
for
a
while,
but
we're
excited
for
his
opportunity,
and
I
don't
know
if
he's
back
there,
you
can
certainly
call
him
up
if
you
want
and
embarrass
him,
but
if
nothing
else,
we
wanted
to
say
publicly
thank
you
for
his
contribution
in
the
city
and
and
rda
projects.
So
that's
all
we
have
unless.
F
J
F
For
an
rda
rfp
and
did
not
win
that,
but
court
said
darren.
I
think
you
should
be
on
the
the
redevelopment
advisory
committee.
I
was
like.
I
have
no
idea
what
that
is,
but
I'll
apply
and
that
sort
of
got
the
ball
rolling.
So
thank
you,
and
also
I'm
mad
at
you
for
doing
that,
but
but
you're
going
to
do
a
great
job
there
and
I'm
sure
that
arc
paz
will
continue
to
cross
with
that
position.
So
good
luck.
G
Madam
chair
yeah
go
ahead
amy
I
want
to
just
say
that
court-
I
you
didn't
run
this
past
me
before
you
decided
to
do
this,
so
I'm
denying
your
request
to
leave
the
city.
No,
I
do
want
to
say.
Congratulations.
G
I
think
it's
an
awesome
opportunity
and
we
will
be
very
very
we
very
sad
to
see
you
go,
and
I
am
grateful
to
have
had
the
last
few
years,
working
with
you
and
the
time
and
dedication
and
energy
that
you
put
into
really
honing
in
on
the
mission
and
values
of
the
rda,
has
created
a
foundation
for
every
future
rda
board
and
every
future
rda,
employee
and
director
that
that
comes
into
salt
lake
city.
Because
you
did
that
with
such
such
minute.
G
A
Thank
you.
Anybody
else
well,
court.
I
also
want
to
echo
that,
but
I
feel
like
you
having
such
an
instrumental
partner
rda
as
long
as
I've
known
you,
I
think,
for
a
long
time
and
there's
a
saying
in
argentina
that
says
you
put
on
the
jersey
of
the
team,
meaning
that
you
have
been
such
a
great
leader
in
such
a
la
camiseta.
Look
at
him!
Yes,
I
talked
yeah
fact
check.
A
He
has
put
the
jersey
on
because
jersey
soccer
argentinian
anyway,
but
but
that's
what
it
means
that
you
have
really
been
true
like
a
true
part,
and
you
know
a
teammate
and
also
moved
the
agency
along
and
really
defended
it
and
did
everything
you
could
to
you
know
to
make
it
successful.
So
we're
sad
to
see
you
go.
Obviously,
I'm
excited
at
the
same
time,
because
I
know
you're
gonna
do
awesome
things
for
that
group
as
well.
So
congratulations
and
obviously
stay
in
touch.
Okay,.
A
All
right
also
something
that
you
forgot.
We
had
a
community
event,
we
had
japan,
town
and
I'm
sure
if
we
talked
about
that
there
was
there
in
an
idea.
Yes,.
J
Been
I
guess
it
has
been-
I
feel
like
that
was
a
while
ago
and
we
may
have
provided
an
update
on
that,
but
you're
correct.
We
had
a
what's
the
word,
I
want
to
say
we
had
a
presence
at
the
obon
festival
and
and
had
a
booth
there,
presenting
the
plan
and
receiving
additional
input
or
providing
information
to
people
who
wanted
to
understand
what
that
study
was
and
how
we
can
continue
to
push
that
along.
So,
yes,
thank
you
for
reminding
me
of
that.
A
J
A
Thank
you.
So
now
we
are
moving
on
to
we
item
d,
written
briefings,
consent
and
then
emotion
to
approve
to
the
consent
agenda.
C
A
Second
right
motion
by
board
member-
we
second
advisor
member
fowler,
I'm
gonna
roll
call,
this
petro,
yes
mano.
Yes,.