►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 07/12/2022
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
Lake
city
and
welcome
to
the
july
12
2022
work
session
meeting
it's
great
to
be
back
and
seeing
all
the
bright
faces
in
front
of
me.
A
We
welcome
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
person
and
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds.
Online
hybrid
council
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
building.
We
are
continuing
to
watch
coveted
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
In
fact,
although
maths
are
no
longer
required
in
the
building,
since
covet
cases
are
rising,
we
encourage
people
to
wear
masks
while
they're
here
in
the
meeting
there
are
some
in
the
hallways.
A
A
However,
please
join
us
at
the
7
pm
formal
meeting
tonight
for
a
public
comment
opportunity
and,
of
course
the
council
always
invites
the
public
to
provide
feedback
with
a
city
council
at
any
time
on
general
topics
by
mailing
us
at
po
box,
145,
476,
salt
lake
city,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council.com,
slcgov.com,
or
calling
our
24-hour
phone
line.
801-535-7654.
A
Lastly,
the
council
is
excited
to
announce
our
tuesday
july
19th
meeting
will
be
held
on
the
west
side
at
the
sorensen
unity
center
located
in
1383,
south
900
west
in
the
black
box
theater
room.
Our
work
session
will
begin
at
2,
followed
by
our
7
pm
formal
meeting
with
opportunity
for
public
comments.
Please
join
us
at
our
off-site
meeting.
B
Good
afternoon,
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
council
members
at
the
conclusion
of
andrew's
presentation
or
update.
Today.
We
also
have
captain
derek
diamond
and
deputy
chief
scott
marcos
joining
us
to
talk
to
give
you
a
few
pd
updates
police
department
updates.
So
at
the
conclusion
of
andrew
they
are
joining
virtually.
B
If
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
okay,
so
it's
been
a
while,
since
we've
met
with
you
guys
in
person
to
talk
about
covet
and
all
of
these
regular
updates,
I
know
we're
all
paying
close
attention
to
the
latest
variant
and
quickly
kind
of
go
through
some
of
our
regular
numbers
today
for
situational
awareness.
So
I
gave
you
the
comparison
between
june
14th
and
this
week
here
you
see
just
the
very
very
slightest
uptick
in
eligible
people
that
are
up
to
date
on
their
coveted
vaccines.
B
B
B
So
case
identification,
I
know
we
all
knew
like
10
people
a
month
ago
that
all
had
covid
and
today
we
maybe
know
like
four
people
who
have
coven
in
our
near
circles
right.
So
you
see
a
little
bit
of
a
downturn
in
case
identification
this
week.
Of
course
those
numbers
are
still
a
little
bit
circumspect
because
of
all
of
the
home
testing.
That
is
happening
now
next
slide.
Please.
B
Next
slide.
Please
here's
the
wastewater
data-
and
this
is
not
this-
doesn't
look
that
revealing,
but
I
will
say
that
on
the
some
of
the
wastewater
data
that
we've
gotten
that
director
briefer
gets
directly
from
this,
this
system
here
points
out
that
the
last
round
of
testing
the
the
the
indicator
was
quite
a
bit
bigger
than
it
had
been
the
previous
round
of
testing.
B
B
Based
on
my
like
my
very
very
layperson
observation,
it
seems
like
we're
seeing
you
know
the
spikes
again
happen
and
some
of
the
places
where
we
normally
see
that
have
seen
those
big
spikes
and
then
the
way
it
will
wave
across
the
u.s
again.
So
you
know
buckle
up
stay
healthy.
All
those
things
next
slide.
Please.
B
I
wanted
to
give
you
the
weekly
watering
guide
for
this
week.
In
case
it
was
had
escaped
your
notice.
It's
really
dry
out
there,
and
this
is
the
recommendation
that
you
know
the
watering
guide
would
be
three
irrigations
again
critical
to
make
sure
that
you're
checking
your
sprinklers
to
make
sure
that
they
are
operating
correctly
and
you're,
not
over
watering
or
watering,
the
sidewalk
or
the
street.
Or
what
not
you
know
we.
B
B
That
is
the
the
app
where
you
can
report
all
manner
of
things
in
the
city
for
attention
and
there's
actually
a
report
type.
There
called
water
conservation
and
you
can
pinpoint
the
location
and
public
utilities
will
do
their
best
to
contact
the
property
owner.
If
there
is
a
sprinkler,
that's
broken
and
you
know
firing
into
the
street
or
whatever.
So,
please
feel
free
to
report
those
things
if
you
see
them
on.
You
know:
public
property,
private
property,
residential
property.
Whatever
the
case
may
be
any
questions.
C
All
right
engagement
highlights
the
websites,
of
course,
that
is
maintained
by
civic
engagement
team.
They
keep
it
as
up
to
date
as
possible.
If
they,
you
see
anything
missing,
please
let
us
know,
and
we
will
try
to
get
it
on
there,
that
we,
we
call
the
feedback
page
we're
trying
our
best
to
really
collect
everything
we
can.
That
requires,
or
is
asking
the
community
to
provide
feedback
on
and
put
it
there
for
sort
of
a
one
stop
shop.
C
C
C
If
you
know
anybody
that
would
like
to
attend
that
as
they
continue
through
the
outreach
on
that
project
early
on
in
the
project
2100
south
reconstruction
2025
is
when
2100
south
will
be
reconstructed
from
7th
east
to
13th
east.
This
project
is
a
little
earlier
in
the
development
phase.
There
will
be
very
soon.
A
survey
announced
that
individuals
can
participate
in
through
the
end
of
the
month,
so
stay
tuned
for
details
on
that
next
slide.
C
Public
utilities
has
launched
their
adopt
a
storm
drain
program.
They've
had
over
30
residents
sign
up
already.
This
is
where
residents
can
take
their
time
and
energy
to
keep
the
drains
clear
of
debris
and
promote
some
cleaner
waterways,
and
I
think
they
can
even
name
it
as
well.
C
C
30Th
will
impact
left
turns
on
south
temple
and
as
they
move
from
east
to
west
on
on
south
temple,
the
water
reclamation
facility,
as
you
all
know,
is
being
reconstructed,
and
this
is
still
slated
to
be
done
in
2025
later
this
month,
we'll
be
utilities
will
be
releasing
a
later
sorry,
a
construction
highlight
progress
brochure
that
will
let
you
all
know
where
they're
at
on
that
and
the
next
slide
sustainability.
C
The
community
renewable
energy
program
plan
for
low
income
assistance.
They
now
have
a
live
survey
that
is
linked
through
the
feedback
page
that
is
open
through
august
7th.
As
you
know,
this
is
to
better
understand
residents,
energy
burden,
energy
choice,
preferences,
they're
working
with
community-based
organizations
to
work
on
some
of
their
outreach.
C
They
did
a
scientific
version
of
this
survey
already
in
april
and
may
this
is
just
another
opportunity
for
the
community
to
participate,
and
then
the
ev
ready
ordinance
in
collaboration
with
the
planning
department
is
headed
to
the
planning
commission
it'll,
be
there
tomorrow
and
then
heading
your
way
after
that.
That's
all
of
my
updates
any
questions.
D
Next
slide,
please,
the
shelter
capacity
is
still
high,
97
percent.
In
the
last
week,
that's
been
pretty
consistent
over
the
last
month,
in
fact,
and
you
can
see
that
the
miller
mixed
resource
center
is
at
100
that
and
geraldine
have
kind
of
flip-flopped
it
at
full
capacity.
Exactly
for
a
few
weeks
now
next
slide
resource
fair
was
last
week.
D
This
was
new
in
that
it
happened
in
south
salt
lake
and
so
there's
a
collaboration
between
salt
lake
city
and
south
salt
lake
to
do
it
at
the
tracy
avery
nature
center
and
south
salt
lake
has
some
staff
that
participated
with
our
staff.
You
can
see
the
partners
that
were
there,
including
a
new
one,
powerful
moms,
who
care,
which
is
a
group
of
folks
who
have
experience
or
have
experienced
homelessness
in
some
capacity
and
are
offering
their
mentorship
and
their
support
to
navigate
systems
and
very
good
group.
D
D
Right
now
we
are
under
heat
advisory.
I
believe
until
at
least
thursday
evening
and
probably
passed
out,
I
saw
a
six
out
of
the
next
seven
days,
we'll
probably
top
100
degrees
and
lows
will
be
quite
high
as
well
at
night.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
questions
about
resources
and
the
biggest
resource
right
now
are
city
and
county
libraries
and
county
senior,
centers
and
recreation
centers.
Those
are
open
to
anybody
who
can
come
in.
They
do
have
water.
D
Some
of
them
have
showers
air
conditioning,
obviously,
especially
during
the
daytime
hours
recommending
everyone
who's
unsheltered
who
can
get
there.
The
outreach
teams
are
actively
working
and
promoting
them
to
get
into
those
resources
and
also
giving
out
other
resources
like
water
and
basic
needs
through
the
voa
outreach
teams,
primarily
and
then
the
resource
centers
are
also
offering
hydration
stations
and
so
you'll
see
a
number
of
folks
who
are
in
the
shade
or
in
the
lobbies
getting
water
during
the
daytime
of
those
centers.
D
There's
still
ongoing
need
for
donations.
So,
if
anybody's
interested
in
helping
the
resource
centers,
the
providers
are
looking
for
water
and
other
things
you
can
go
to
their
websites
and
see
a
complete
list
and
how
to
help
out
the
last
piece.
That's
not
on
a
slide
here
is
another
update
on
the
this
coming
winter
overflow
process.
There
is
another
meeting
this
week
of
the
account
conference
of
mayor's
subcommittee:
that's
actively
going
through
a
list
of
potential
properties,
they're
sorting
through
the
feasibility
of
each
of
those,
and
there
should
be
a
recommendation
or
recommendations.
D
A
F
D
For
the
removal
there
has
been
a
problem
for
a
while
now
as
you're
aware
about
the
contractor
or
contractors
we've
had
I've
told
that's
been
resolved
and
there
is
a
contractor.
That's
actually
going
out
with
the
police
department
to
help
with
those
particular
issues.
So
if
you
or
others
are
reporting
those
they're
on
our
list
and
they
will
be
addressed
particularly
schools,
it's
a
high
priority.
D
The
second
piece
of
that
question
about
a
place
for
them
to
go.
There's
currently
no
plan
that
I'm
aware
of
through
the
county
or
the
city
for
a
location
for
sanctioned
use
of
rvs.
That
kind
of
way
we
are
still
enforcing
that
48-hour
block
face
requirement,
and
hopefully
that
will
continue
forward
with
our
also
options
of
trying
to
help
with
repairs
and
those
kind
of
things
to
keep
people
moving
as
much
as
we
can.
But
it
has
been
difficult
for
a
while
now,
but
it
should
be
resolved
as
far
as
the
towing
piece.
F
Dogwood
cottonwood
dog
park
had
a
fire
in
the
bushes
there,
where
people
have
been
camping
out
resulting
in
the
people
at
the
dog
park,
watching
people
who
are
homeless,
trying
to
gather
their
things
and
run
for
their
lives,
and
we've
had
several
instances
reported
by
constituents
of
people
who
are
homeless,
that
their
life
is
hell
and
they
are
tired
of
living
in
hellish
conditions
and
they're
snapping
when
people
are
talking
to
them
who
are
sheltered
and
then,
similarly,
my
neighbors,
who
are
sheltered
are
tired
of
living
with
the
crisis
on
their
doorstep
and
they're
snapping.
F
I
am
really
concerned,
and
I
want
to
be
on
public
record,
that
we
are
creating
a
tragedy
in
the
west
side
neighborhoods,
as
these
temperatures
increase,
as
resource
scarcity
becomes
more
a
thing
because
of
climate
change.
We
are
seeing
that
the
west
side
communities
are
increasingly
facing
these
just
basic
humanitarian
issues.
F
D
The
first
piece
of
that
which
was
a
positive
step
I'll,
say
a
small
one.
The
reason
I
highlighted
south
salt
lake
participating
in
a
resource
fair,
is
that's
the
first
time
that
I'm
aware
of
that.
Another
city
has
been
stepping
into
that
realm.
To
help
in
that
limited
capacity,
it
doesn't
mean
that
that
led
to
everybody
getting
endorsed,
which
is
what
we'd
like
to
see.
D
D
D
In
the
meantime,
it
is
very,
very
tough,
acknowledge
that
fully
there
are
several
we're
looking
at
about
400
people
that
we
are
identifying
that
need
help
come
this
winter
and
that's
sort
of
our
our
threshold
right.
We
have
lost
some
of
the
funding
through
one-time
stimulus
money
that
we've
used
for
motel
rooms
from
the
city
end.
You
have
budgeted
money
and
allocated
it
that
is
being
used
towards
folks
who
are
unsheltered
getting
into
motel
rooms
towards
the
housing
piece
and
the
outreach
workers
are
actively
doing
that
in
those
camps.
D
As
well
and
their
work
to
do
pre-work
with
every
single
camp,
they
can
before
any
cleanings,
and
things
happen
that
way,
because
you're
right,
just
balancing
two
pieces
of
human
safety
and
trying
to
take
care
of
themselves
in
ways
that
sometimes
are
detrimental
with
also
the
reality.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
resource
options
currently,
so
thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
we
appreciate
it.
I
do
appreciate
the
dire
need
out
there
and
we
are
still
working
on
it.
G
G
But
you
know
I
am
getting
just
so
many
messages
and
complaints
and
and
related
to
violence
along
the
jordan
river
along
north
temple,
along
south
temple,
1700
south
and
with
all
the
trailers
and
camps,
and
I'm
getting
people
tell
them
to
tell
me
that
they
are,
they
feel
unsafe
because
they
are
getting
harassed
and
bottles
been
thrown
to
people,
and
I
am
trying
to.
Obviously
I
relate
to
the
frustration
and
I'm
trying
to
set
the
record
straight
about
what
the
city
is
doing
to
address
this
issue.
G
I
I
just
want
to
put
it
out
there
that
my
community-
and
you
know
this
very
well-
that
it's
asking
for
more
and-
and
I
don't
know
what
the
answer
is,
but
we
need
something
more
and
something
bold
and
I
it's
becoming
a
little
out
of
hand,
and
I
I
just
hate
receiving
those
messages
of
people
telling
me
that
they're
never
going
to
come
back
or
they're,
never
going
to
use
the
john
river
again
and
it
hurts
me-
and
I
know
that
we
can
do
a
little
better
and
I
don't
know
again
what
that
is,
and
I
appreciate
the
efforts,
but
I
just
wanted
to
put
it
out
there
that
there
is
a
lot
of
need
and
the
west
side
is
is,
is
struggling
right
now
with
this
issue.
D
I
appreciate
that,
thank
you,
councilmember
and
perhaps
talking
through
the
police
discussion
next
may
be
a
piece
of
it,
not
all
of
it
clearly,
along
with
park
range,
which
was
brought
up
earlier,
some
physical
presence,
along
with
the
other
refugees
efforts
with
mental
health
outreach.
D
We
know
him
downtown
on
the
jordan
river,
particularly
we
see
a
lot
of
that
with
the
county.
We're
trying
to
work
on
those
things,
so
all
work
taking
together
would
be
a
piece
of
that
or
a
large
part
of
the
puzzle
to
solve
that
puzzle.
So
maybe
we
go
to
that
next
one
first,
and
perhaps
we
can
loop
back
into
this
and
see
how
that
works
with
the
police
department
as
well.
H
I
want
to
ask
you
about
the
shelters,
how
cause
I
went
visit
it
properly
yesterday,
really
close
to
the
shelters,
with
some
people
from
the
administration
and
representative
romero
and
representative
briscoe.
So
some
of
the
neighbors
claim
that
you
know
there
are
some
human
trafficking
out
of
the
women's
shelter
in
my
district
that
go
to
this
to
this
area,
so
the
neighbors
were
and
they're
dealing
with
the
fbi
and
other
things
that
it's
beyond
the
city,
but
they
were
wondering
with
the
funds.
H
D
So
the
money's
going
into
the
police
department,
primarily
with
some
other
things
as
well,
the
two
pieces
police
department
units
we
will
talk
about.
The
second
piece
was
some
other
outreach
workers
through
the
city
through
our
contract.
We
already
have
with
the
volunteers
of
america
around
those
resource.
Centers
those
outreach
teams
are
pretty
flexible.
They
focus
around
those
centers
within
a
few
blocks,
but
they
can
move
based
on
where
we're
seeing
because
you'll
know
at
the
geraldine
within
a
block.
Sometimes
it's
a
big
deal,
but
sometimes
it's
two
blocks
away
south
of
the
7-eleven.
So.
D
Some
flexibility
there,
the
police
department
right
now,
I
believe,
is
hiring
sergeants
and
the
sergeants
are
the
first
thing
in
those
units
to
run
the
units
and
they'd
be
full-time
assigned
to
the
resource.
Centers
we've
talked
through
with
the
operators
and
the
police
department
and
those
are
ongoing
discussions
about
having
them
housed
in
the
buildings
or
right
close
to
the
building
so
physically
located
there
in
that
neighborhood
ballpark
is
sort
of
the
epicenter
here
of
that
and
so
talking
through
both
resource
centers,
where
the
best
location
is
for
them
to
be
housed.
D
So
those
units
would
be
physically
there
all
the
time
as
far
as
jurisdictional
piece
and
the
the
geography
around
it,
that's
still
a
little
fluid.
I
think
the
intention
clearly
is
within
a
block
to
two
blocks
all
around,
but
you
know
sort
of
how
things
move,
and
so
they
don't
want
to
limit
it
to
say
we
can't
go
outside
that
thing,
but
they
want
to
make
sure
their
focus
is
right
there.
D
So
progress
is
moving
forward.
It's
a
hiring
issue
with
the
police
department,
obviously,
and
getting
probably
using
overtime
first
up
and
then
backfilling
through
their
recruiting
classes
and
other
folks
moving
around
the
department.
So
it
will
take
some
time
to
ramp
up
that
way.
But
the
first
step
is
those
sergeants
recruiting
newer
people
getting
the
infrastructure
where
they're
going
to
be
located
in
place,
so
the
funding
will
go
towards
those
things.
First,.
B
Actually,
I
believe
that
deputy
chief
mark
goes
and
captain
diamond
will
be
on
to
give
this
update,
and
this
I
know
we
all
have
been
getting
a
lot
of
questions
and
concerns
regarding
main
street.
So
we've
we've
asked
the
police
department
to
come
talk
specifically
about
plans
for
that
area.
Thanks.
E
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
It's
good
to
be
here.
I
I
asked
captain
diamond
to
come
along
as
he's
a
division
commander
over
that
specific
area,
so
he
has
the
most
the
most
information
about
the
significant
amount
of
attention
that
he's
been
putting
to
that
area
and
what
we've
been
doing
as
a
police
department.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
the
time
over
to
him
to
explain
that
and
of
course,
I'd
be
willing.
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
following
that
as
well.
I
Hey
good
afternoon,
specifically,
I
was
asked
with
regard
to
the
300
south
issue
we've
been
having
on
main
street
and
how
we
were
addressing
that
problem.
I
300
south
has
has
been
a
a
problem
area
for
a
while,
with
the
issue
of
we've
got
several
businesses
there
that
are
closed,
boarded
up
businesses
with
alcoves
that
are
inviting
for
some
of
our
unsheltered
friends.
It
makes
them
kind
of
feel
like
they
can
go
and
lay
down
there
and
be
out
of
the
sun.
I
We
get
complaints
constantly
through
the
downtown
alliance
and
in
elsewhere,
about
all
the
illegal
activities
and
about
them
being
around,
and
so
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
address.
You
know
exactly
why
they're
there
what's
causing
what
we
can
do
about
it,
and
one
of
the
biggest
issues
that
we're
finding
that
that's
been
difficult
is
just
the
fact
that
they're
homeless
unsheltered
a
lot
of
times
they're.
They
have
serious
ventilation,
mental
health
issues;
they
may
be
unkempt
dirty
but
short
of
them
committing
any
crime.
I
Sometimes
it's
hard
for
us
to
actually
just
tell
them.
They
need
to
leave
the
area.
The
area
like
I
said
it's
shaded,
it's
a
nice
inviting
place
to
be
there
and
that's
exactly
why
why
they're?
There
is
somewhere
to
go,
and
you
know
when
it
comes
down
to
it.
They
are
people
and
we
can.
We
can
move
them.
I
I
So
so,
beyond
that,
what
we're
doing
as
a
police
department
is
I've
identified
that
as
one
of
my
top
three
blocks
in
the
central
patrol
division
area,
that
I'm
directing
all
the
resources
whenever
officers
have
time,
maybe
even
it's
just
when
they've
they're
in
between
calls
and
they're
trying
to
write
a
report,
I'm
directing
to
that
area
to
either
sit
in
their
car
and
do
the
report
in
the
area
or
if
they
have
time
to
get
out
and
walk,
that
block,
try
to
offer
some
ideas
of
assistance
if
they're,
if
there's
people
that
are
unsheltered
or
if
there's
any
kind
of
illegal
activity
going
on.
I
Obviously
that's
that's
where
we're
most
interested
in
is
stopping
illegal
activity,
whether
it
be
drug
sales
or
use.
Obviously,
we
we
had
a
issue
of
violence
yesterday,
which
we
arrested
the
person
almost
immediately,
and
so
there's
a
there
are
a
lot
of
people
down
there
so
beyond
beyond
the
regular
patrol
officers,
which
generally
anywhere
from
6
to
14
officers,
directly
part
of
the
central
patrol
division
that
are
covering
the
whole
central
area,
we
also
have
the
illegal
camp
mitigation
officers
that
are
doing
over
time.
I
They're
responsible
for
pioneer
park,
rio
grande
the
two
hrc's
and
then
the
surrounding
areas,
and
so
we've
added
some
extra
shifts
into
the
area
of
300
south
main
and
as
for
the
next
couple
of
weeks
anyway,
I've
added
two
officers
on
foot
between
ten
in
the
morning
and
six
o'clock
at
night
to
stay
in
that
area.
To
make
sure
that
it's
clear
and
try
to
you
know
have
people
that
are
looking
at
doing
any
kind
of
illegal
activities
is
pushing
them
away
from
that
area.
I
But
then
you
know
the
trick
is
is
where?
Where
do
they
go
from
there?
And
you
know?
How
do
we
maintain
that
pressure
on
them
or
try
to
get
a
rest
when
you
know
when
we
do
find
that
illegal
activity?
H
Thank
you
for
that.
I
wanted
to
ask
you
you
know
in
the
area
in
the
area
of
geraldine
a
few
months
ago,
you
guys
put
two
patrols
in
between
second
east
and
third
east
and
they
were
just
parked
for
a
while,
and
I
feel
like
that
deterred
a
lot
of
illegal
activity
from
that
block
for
a
while
now
we're
kind
of
getting
back
to
what
it
used
to
be,
especially
on
topher
park,
but
regardless
I
do
feel
like
that
was
effective.
In
a
way.
H
I
did
notice
that
on
third
south,
you
guys
put
cameras
like
the
the
mobile
ones,
yes,
but
what
would
it
take
for
you
guys
to
be
stationed?
Even
if
you
take,
if
you
took
a
couple
of
parking
stalls
out
of
the
in
one
of
the
medians
or
whatever
you
can
park
in
that
area,
to
hopefully
deter
the
illegal
activity?
We're
not
obviously
we're
not
talking
about
people
hanging
out
by
a
planter.
That's
totally
fine!
H
What
I
think,
what
what
the
concern
is,
people
you
know,
trafficking
drugs,
the
you
know,
the
cells,
the
open
drug
use,
which
is
very
dangerous
and
also
other
human
necessities.
That
people
need
to
do
that.
Hopefully
you
know
we
deter
that
as
well,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
how
often
you
patrol
like.
Are
you
going
around
the
block?
H
I
don't
know
if
that's
information
that
we
can
share
in
the
public,
because
it's
that
type
of
information,
but
is
it
possible
that
we
would
have
a
couple
of
patrol
cars
parked
overnight
during
the
day
whenever
you
guys
think
you
know
it's.
I
Appropriate
and
that's
a
great
question:
that's
not
that's
exactly
what
we're
looking
at
so
so
you
you
referenced
down
there
by
geraldine
king
when
we
had
those
officers
parked
that
actually
still
is
part
of
the
ongoing
camp
mitigation
officers
and
they
are
doing
those
things
in
all
those
areas,
including
over
by
topher
park
and
geraldine
king
pioneer
park,
rio
grande
and
third
south
and
maine.
I
When
I
looked
at
the
statistics,
they'd
made
146
contacts,
five
felony
arrests
and
seven
misdemeanor
arrests
in
that
area
and
and
so
there's
almost
constant
contact.
I
know
myself
and
my
executive
officer
go
over
there
every
weekday
and
spend
some
time
over
there.
I
went
over
there
this
morning
and
actually
it's
looking
really
good
today
but,
like
I
said,
I've
got
some
of
those
camp
mitigation
officers.
I
I
increased
their
shifts
during
the
weekdays
to
where
there's
officers
that
are
actually
going
to
be
on
foot
there
in
that
kind
of
third
south
main
corner
area
walking
around
that.
That's
going
to
be
something
that,
like
I
said,
hopefully
it
will
help
make
some
deterrents,
but
even
even
when
that
we
finish
that
up,
we
still
maintain.
I
You
know
constant
pressure
in
that
area
to
keep
the
illegal
activities
out
and
I'm
always
hearing
about
the
illegal
activities
and
we've
sent
undercover
officers
over
there.
I've
spent
a
lot
of
time
watching
and
it
I
I
know
that
it's
pushed
out
there
that
it's
happening
all
the
time,
but
you
know
we
do
spend
a
lot
of
time
there
and,
and
unfortunately-
or
I
guess
fortunately,
is
it
it's
not
at
quite
as
prevalent
as
what
is
always
reported
to
me
because
we're
just
not
seeing
that.
I
As
far
as
putting
pressure
there.
We
are
actually
actively
working
with
business
owners
right
there
with
possibility
of
putting
a
salty
city
police
substation
right
there
around
280
south
main,
which
would
I
would
probably
house
my
bicycle
unit
there.
So
that
means
there
would
be
police
cars
in
the
area,
police
officers
on
bikes
coming
and
going
quite
often,
and
I
think
that
would
be
beneficial
to
make
that
area.
You
know
stay
a
little
clearer
too.
H
Thank
you.
I
would
just
add
to
your
comments
and
I
appreciate
the
work
and
the
additional
work
that
you
guys
are
planning
to
do,
but
also
to
extend
some
of
that
love
to
north
temple
in
the
in
800
west,
where
we
know
it's
also
have
for
illegal
activity
and
the
river
as
but
yeah
the
one
that
I
have
it
most
present
is
the
is
north
temple.
So,
if
that
you
know
if
we
can
deter
some
of
the
crime
that
way
by
all
means,
please
use
those
resources
that
we
have.
Thank
you.
E
E
I'm
sorry
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
can
address
that
north
temple.
We
we
have
been
putting
a
significant
amount
of
resources
into
the
north
temple
area
as
well.
North
temple
is
a
pioneer
patrol
division
rather
than
central
patrol
division,
and
so
that's
the
area
that
they've
been
focusing
on
over
in
pioneer
patrol
division
and
they've
been
putting
hundreds
of
hours
of
effort
along
north
temple,
as
well
as
getting
the
contractor
to
come
and
spray
the
streets
along
there
and
we've
been
seeing
a
lot
of
work
from
our
patrol
officers
in
that
area.
E
It's
important
to
keep
in
mind
that
while
we
push
as
many
resources
there
as
we
can,
we
still
are
struggling
with
significant
staffing
issues
and
rising
calls
for
service.
So
we
would
love
to
put
more
resources
there
as
we
build
those
numbers
back
up.
But
until
that
time
we
put
as
many
as
we
can
in
those
areas
that
we've
identified
within
each
patrol
division.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much.
I
just
wanted
really
quickly
to
chime.
In
that
I
appreciate
all
of
the
efforts.
J
Okay,
I'll
give
them
all
to
you,
that's
fine.
I
have
no
power
to
do
that,
but
I
will
give
them
to
you.
Captain
diamond.
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
what
you
just
said
that
so
much
of
what
the
complaints
we
hear
are
the
perception
that
people
have
and
not
the
actuality
of
what
people
experiencing
homelessness
are
going
through,
and
I
I
really
want
to
say.
J
J
We
all
get
the
complaints,
I
again
it's
in
all
of
our
neighborhoods,
and
yet
we
do
and
are
all
trying
very
hard
in
in
so
many
different
facets
to
work
on
all
of
the
issues
that
a
person
experiencing
homelessness
has
I
mean,
there's
an
experience
right
now
happening
right
in
in
our
office,
and
I
just
truly
appreciate
the
humanity
and
you
particularly
captain
diamond,
seeing
that
and
reminding
us
to
remember
that.
So
thank
you.
G
Since
we
just
talked
about
substations,
I
wanted
to
bring
that
conversation
back
to
to
here
right
now.
What
is
the
status
of
any
of
progress
on
north
temple?
Substation.
B
We
will
talk
with
you
more
about
this
in
the
very
near
future,
we're
moving
forward
with
different
plans
for
substation
for
three
substations
right
now
and
are
looking
forward
to
bringing
details
to
you
as
soon
as
possible.
But
I
don't
want
to
talk
too
much
right
now,
since
we
don't
have
leases
in
place.
Thank.
B
F
B
I
don't
know
if
anybody
from
fire
is
online,
but
we
can.
We
should
definitely
talk
about
how
we
can
get
messaging
out
around.
You
know.
E
F
B
A
K
Chair
sorry
darby,
so
I
actually
have
darby
with
me
today.
She's
our
equity
coordinator
for
special
projects
and
moana
is
online.
We
also
have
a
couple
of
human
rights
commissioners
online
to
speak
to
the
next
item,
but
they
they
are
here,
if
you
all
have
any
questions
for
them
about
cedaw,
so
we
have
a
short
powerpoint
presentation
for
you
today.
K
So
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
who
my
team
consists
of
it's
myself.
Chief
equity
officer.
Darby
is
our
equity
coordinator
for
special
projects.
Darby
actually
manages
our
government
alliance
for
race
and
equity
ambassadors
program
citywide,
so
she's
going
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
it
today
and
then
we
have
fatima
who's.
Our
policy
advisor
for
refugees
and
new
americans.
K
Roxanna
is
our
language
access
coordinator.
We
also
have
ashley
she's
our
ada
coordinator.
We
just
hired
a
new
person.
Her
name
is
michelle.
She
is
our
equity
liaison
and
she
works
with
darby
very
closely
on
our
dei
proclamations
and
also
on
our
social
media
post,
and
we
have
moana,
who
is
our
equity
manager,
you'll
hear
from
her.
K
Our
office
provides
toolkits,
trainings
best
practices
and
support
to
encourage
the
use
of
an
equity
lens
for
fair
and
just
distribution
of
resources
and
access
to
services
and
opportunities.
So
I
want
to
give
darby
a
moment
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
how
we
are
doing
with
gear
and
some
recent
rollouts
across
the
city.
L
L
L
This
is
a
picture
of
the
home
screen.
Just
so
you're
aware,
salt
lake
city
was
the
first
jurisdiction
in
the
state
of
utah
to
join
the
gear
network.
Since
that
time
there
have
been
other
local
jurisdictions
who
have
expressed
an
interest
and
actually
reached
out
to
coletta,
and
we
have
provided
guidance
on
connecting
with
the
gear
staff
so
that
they
can
be
involved
as
well.
L
Additionally,
we
just
recently
renewed
our
gear
membership,
thanks
to
city
council
and
mayor
mendenhall,
for
approving
the
budgetary
funds
to
go
towards
that
effort.
This
allows
for
over
3
000
of
our
salt
lake
city
employees
to
gain
full
access
to
the
gear
member
portal,
which
has
a
plethora
of
resources
on
advancing
racial
equity.
There
are
there
there's
an
affiliate
group
as
well,
that
has
produced
publications
that
are
just
a
great
resource
to
read
about.
L
L
L
So
the
gear
ambassadors
are
currently
responsible
for
attending
a
monthly
meeting.
They
are
responsible
for
implementation
of
gear
within
their
respective
departments,
they're
also
responsible
for
inter-departmental,
training
and
facilitations,
and
just
so
you
all
are
aware.
The
larger
departments
do
have
more
than
one
representative,
so
that
would
include,
for
example,
public
services.
I
believe
we
have
three
or
four
gear
ambassadors
for
that
department
and
we
have
been
meeting
since
last
september.
L
L
N
K
N
K
And
we
also
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
know
that
this
is
maybe
in
part
additional
work.
However,
we
do
we
are
exploring
incentives
for
employees
and
how
we
can
help
to
either
compensate
them
or
provide
additional
benefits
for
them
to
participate
as
gear
ambassadors,
language
access,
liaisons
and
also
ada
liaison.
So
those
are
three
separate
functions
and
three
separate
persons
for
each
department,
and
so
now
we
have
an
update
by
moana.
I
believe
she's
online.
K
And
it
looks
like
we
also
have
commissioner
stole
with
us
and
commissioner
salazar
hall
good
afternoon.
Everyone
can.
We
have
the
next
slide
please
before
we
talk
about
the
human
rights
commission
and
go
into
the
cdawg
proposed
ordinance.
I
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
about
the
two
commissions
that
I
manage.
K
So
a
quick
update
for
the
racial
equity
and
policing
commission
this
month,
we're
in
summer
recess
and
will
reconvene
in
august
and
during
this
month
we
are
updating
the
rep
webpage
so
that
it
is
a
bit
more
functional
and
accessible
for
everyone
to
know
the
work
and
understand
the
work
that
the
rep
has
been
undergoing
over
the
last
couple
of
years,
and
then
we
are
currently
working
with
slcpd
on
the
hiring
process
for
local
diversity,
trainers,
providing
feedback
for
the
sro
mou,
contract
negotiation
with
jennifer
newell
and
then
re-examining
ways
in
which
racial
and
ethnic
data
is
collected
in
salt
lake
city,
and
then
we
are
drafting
the
end
of
year
report
that
would
be
presented
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
on
work
that
has
been
completed
in
progress
and
recommended
for
2022
next
slide.
K
K
And
for
the
human
rights
commission
also
in
reach
summer
recess
and
will
reconvene
in
august
we're
also
updating
the
hrc
webpage
and
drafting
the
end-of-year
report
and
just
to
highlight
that
we
have
a
candidate
that
will
be
interviewed
for
digital
three
and
we're
excited
about
that
today
by
the
city
council
later
this
evening
and
then
district
4
and
6
recently
opened
because
a
couple
of
our
commissioners
moved
out
of
state.
So
we
are
actively
looking
to
fulfill
those
two
spots
and
we've
been
the
the
commission.
K
A
Okay,
so
let's
just
move
quickly
into
item
number
three:
the
the
convention
on
the
elimination
of
all
forms
of
discrimination
against
women,
c
daw
and
gender
equity
go
ahead.
Moana
thank.
K
You
thank
you
chair.
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
the
commissioners
that
are
here
with
us.
It's
our
chair,
esther
seoul
and
then
our
vice
chair,
jason
wessel,
and
then
we
have
commissioner
salazar
hall
that
is
joining
us
today
and
they
specifically
have
been
on
the
subcommittee
that
has
been
pushing
and
researching
and
working
on
this
ordinance.
K
K
I
also
wanted
to
just
go
over
a
few
things
historically
about
the
timeline
here
in
salt
lake
city,
that
since
2009
it
was
a
human
rights
com
commission
recommendation
to
propose
an
ordinance
such
as
this
one
and
over
the
years
in
2011
and
20
2012
data
was
compiled
and
dialogues
on
women
or
community
were
held
within
salt
lake
city.
K
Some
of
you
who
are
serving
now
on
the
city
council
were
part
of
these
discussions
and
gathering
data.
So
the
2013,
the
status
of
women
in
salt
lake
city
report
was
published
by
the
by
the
office
of
diversity
and
human
rights
and
focused
on
education,
health
and
safety
of
women,
as
well
as
their
political
and
social
and
economic
power
within
salt
lake
city,
and
so
in
2016.
K
There
was
a
joint
resolution
passed
here
in
salt
lake
city
to
adopt
the
or
in
support
of
cities
for
cedaw
and
its
principles,
and
so
today
we
wanted
to
focus
on
what
this
cdaw
ordinance
will
be
doing.
The
most
important
four
themes
is:
it
would
codify
the
chief
equity
officer
position
as
an
oversight
personnel
who
would
work
directly
with
the
human
rights
commission
to
review
practices
and
policies,
policies
as
it
relates
to
gender
equity,
and
it
would
establish
every
five
years.
K
F
E
J
It's
funny
that
council
member
petro
echler
said
that,
because
when
I
saw
that
I
was
like
shouldn't,
it
be
every
year
which
I
wish
it
were
the
norm.
But
at
this
point
I'm
wondering,
but
I'm
serious,
I'm
wondering
if
we
actually
do
need
to
look
at
it
more
often
than
every
five
years
and
that's
I
don't
want
to
get
in
the
way
of
anything,
but
I
seems
to
be
going
in
opposite
directions
right
now.
So
I'd
rather
be
looking
at
it
more
closely.
M
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I'm
just
wondering
a
question
on
this
with
one
wondering
whether
cdot
is
the
place
or
if
the
city
has
another
place
where
we're
looking
at
gender
equity,
not
just
between
men
and
women,
but
transgender
employees
in
our
city
is
that
is:
does
that
fall
within
the
cedaw
ordinance
that.
K
That
would
actually
be
a
separate
piece
for
us,
but
councilmember
mano.
I
wanted
to
assure
you
that
we
are
looking
into
those
pieces,
so
you
may
get
something
very
soon,
either
as
an
update
from
what
departments
are
currently
doing
or
something
that
we
will
be
bringing
in
the
near
future.
To
address
that.
Thank
you
yes
and
oh,
can
I
I'm
sorry
I
cannot
see
so
I'm
just
answering
from
here.
K
O
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody.
Who's
worked
on
this
currently
and
over
the
years.
This
is
some
a
project
that
we
started
when
I
was
on
the
human
rights
commission,
which
was
a
long
time
ago,
and
so
many
times
we've
had.
We've
had
a
lot
of
delays
and
things,
not
not
placing
the
fault
on
anybody,
but
getting
to
this
point,
and
so
it's
really
exciting
too.
O
We
we
hadn't
quite
finished
cedaw
when
I
was
off
of
the
human
rights
commission
so
to
be
able
to
see
it
come
to
the
ordinance
come
to
fruition.
Now,
as
a
member
of
the
council
is
really
exciting,
and
I
know
that
it
feels
like
generations
of
work
went
into
this.
So
thank
you
for
for
bringing
it
across
the
finish
line
and
I'm
excited
to
have
this
formalized
in
an
ordinance.
P
I'd
like
to
acknowledge,
can
you
hear
me.
F
Wrestle
I'm
sure
you
could
say
a
few
things
on
this.
I'm
just
glad
to
see
this
at
this
point.
A
lot
of
people
have
worked
on
this
and
it
is
a
great
addition
to
our
city
and
it's
always
nice-
to
see
salt
lake
city
at
the
forefront
of
these
things.
So
thank
you
all
for
the
participated.
F
Thank
you
council
members
for
promoting
this
as
well
and
most
of
all
to
the
commissioners
that
have
had
the
chance
to
work
on
this
and
moana
for
being
such
a
great
manager
for
our
commission
and
making.
O
E
Probably
address
the
details
of
this
most,
I
just
kind
of
had
the
institutional
knowledge
in
the
history
of
working
on.
E
Hall,
thank
you.
I
I
think
council
member
wharton
is
correct,
that
this
was
generations
in
the
making
and
I
think
major
acknowledgement
needs
to
be
given
to
retired
representative
rebecca
chavez-hauck.
This
was
her
baby
for
a
lot
of
years.
Q
And
I
I
don't
think
without
her
hard
work.
We
would
be
here
today
so
you're,
correct.
E
Councilmember
wharton
we're
seeing
this
through
fruition
we're
finally
getting
across
the
finish
line,
and
I
I
do
want
to
thank
you
for
for
putting
this
on
the
calendar
so
that
we
can
make
this
a
reality.
A
A
A
N
N
And
I
believe
in
this
case
the
chair
and
vice
chair
have
decided
to
start
with
counsel,
questions
or
ideas,
thoughts.
There
have
been
many
small
group
meetings
and
email
questions
and
information
shared
with
the
council.
We've
included
most
of
that
in
your
packets,
for
anyone
in
the
public
who
wants
to
look
check
both
or
check
the
agenda
item
for
both
this
item
and
the
next
item,
which
is
cip
since
there's
some
overlap
in
the
two.
So
I
believe
we're
starting
with
the
general
obligation
bond
conversation
is
that
great.
A
Thank
you
very
much
jennifer.
So
we've
all
had
plenty
of
side.
Small
group
meetings
on
these
different
bonds-
and
I
want
to
just
specifically
just
go
over
the
general
obligation
bonds
and
look
at
that
as
just
one
group
together
and
I'm
just
going
to
open
up
the
floor
now,
we've
had
a
number
of
conversations,
there's
probably
some
that
are
we're
all
fairly
in
favor
of
supporting
and
others
that
we
possibly
want
to
adjust
I'll
open
up
the
floor.
A
Now
to
anyone
who
has
wants
to
take
the
first
cut
at
some
of
their
ideas.
O
G
You
know
upon
research
and
talking
to
and
learning
about
the
history
of
allen
park.
I
would
like
to
suggest
to
this
body
to
reduce
the
amount
from
nine
million
dollars
to
half
of
that
to
4.5
million
dollars
for
that,
and
I
will
open
that
to
to
discussion.
G
G
So
I
wanted
to
start
there
with
that
reduction
there
and
then
moving
some
of
that
money
around
maybe
to
the
seven
parks
increase
that
a
little
bit
did
seven
neighborhood
parks
or
we
call
it
neighborhood
parks
or
something
different
like
that,
and
and
maybe
increasing
the
amount
for
the
fleet
block
with
some
of
those
savings
from
the
island
park.
A
Did
you
hear
what
he
counseled
was
looking
at
we're
looking
at
the
geo
bond
and
councilman
made
the
recommendation
of
reducing
allen
park
to
sev
to
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
and
increasing
the
neighborhood
parks
and
the
fleet
box
by
that
funding?
A
J
N
However,
because
the
educational
campaign
is
already
so
abbreviated,
I
guess
with
the
word
the
sooner
they
can
start
that
educational
process
the
better,
and
so,
if
the
council
had
a
straw
poll
tonight
in
support
of
that,
we
would
put
a
resolution
on
your
next
meeting
to
approve
that
that
said,
legally
speaking,
you
have
until
the
end
of
august,
to
where
I
believe
middle
of
august,
the
second
meeting
in
august
to
make
that
decision.
N
I
think
that
what
we're
trying
to
balance
is
that
and
in
talking
with
the
administration,
it
seems
that
if
the
council
didn't
make
that
decision
until
the
end
of
august
final,
it
would
be
difficult
to
turn
around
the
materials
for
that
educational
campaign
so
fully
recognizing
that
the
council
has
legally
has
more
time
to
discuss
this.
There
are
some
practical
challenges
about
that
educational
effort.
If
the
council
wanted
to
make
substantive
changes
to
the
project
list
on
that
bond,
so
there's
not
a
great
answer.
Apologies.
J
Hey
it's
city,
government,
there's,
never
a
great
answer,
but
so
as
far
as
reducing
allen
park,
I
I
am
actually
fine
with
that.
My
the
reason
I'm
asking
questions
here
is
because
I,
in
some
ways,
of
course,
I
want
to
give
money
to
allen
park,
but
I
I
still
haven't
heard
any
conversations.
J
There's
an
entire
group
called
the
friends
of
allen
park
and
when
we
purchased
allen
park,
the
idea
was
that
there
was
also
going
to
be
some
fundraising
from
the
community
and
some
outreach
with
the
community,
and
I
don't
know
that
I
have
heard
from
I've
heard
once
from
the
friends
of
allen
park
that
were
like
hey.
J
What
is
the
city
planning
on
doing
because
that's
not
what
we
want
over
there
and
I
don't
know
that
I've
had
any
follow-up
discussion
or
had
any
of
those
questions
answered
as
far
as
what
the
neighborhood
actually
wants
for
allen
park.
I
imagine
four
and
a
half
million
dollars
needs
to
go
for
some
maintenance
of
allen
park
and
for
what
it?
What
needs
to
like
the
sort
of
bare
minimum
in
some
ways.
J
But
I
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
they're,
the
the
community
that
is
there
feels
like
they
have,
and
it
probably
utilizes
it
more
than
anybody
else
really
has
a
voice
in
this.
So
I'm
actually
fine,
reducing
it
to
four
and
a
half
million.
I'm
just
wondering
is
like
do
we
actually
need
that
full
four
and
a
half
million
right
now?
J
There
does
seem
to
be
other
areas
that
this
can
go
to
when
we
know
that
we
have
some
philanthropic
ideas
that
coming
out
of
allen
park.
So
I
I
yes,
I'm
okay,
reducing
it
to
four
and
a
half,
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
more,
maybe.
E
J
A
Have
not
talked
to
the
friends
of
allan
park
because
they've
been,
I
think,
slightly
quiet
on
that
issue.
I
know
they've
talked
to
kristin
the
one,
the
one
I
I
do
want
to
say
that
on
the
neighborhood
parks,
we're
looking
at
neighborhood
parks
across
all
of
them
and
so
increasing
that
funding
to
look
at
all
the
parks
in
the
different
districts.
A
And
maybe
that
and
again
I
go
well-
is
that
partially
to
allen
park?
Is
that
partially
to
some
other
different
parks?
And
so
that's
just
that's
not
a
specific
line
item,
because
that
would
be
kind
of
more
of
a
general
light
item.
Okay
and
that's
where
I
was
looking
at
the
the
funding
inside
the
house
and-
and
I
wanted
to
eliminate
the
word-
the
seven
meaning
just
the
neighborhood
parks,
because
across
the
whole
city.
J
But
I
think
with
if
I
made
council,
chair
and
jen
and
everyone's
smarter
than
me
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
with
the
geo
bond
we
have
to
be,
we
can
be
somewhat
big,
but
not
totally
vague,
and
so,
if
we
say
like
parks
throughout
the
city,
yes,
we
can
use
parks
throughout
the
city,
but
then
our,
if
there's
an
expectation
that
there's
a
park
in
each
district
like.
I
guess
that
I'd
kind
of
like
to
know
about
as
well.
J
Do
we
leave
that
one
per
district,
or
at
least
one
per
district
right,
where
at
at
least
then
my
constituents
can
also
say?
Oh
okay,
we've
reduced
some
of
allen
park,
but
we're
going
to
get
something
over
at
like
just
even
finishing
the
the
trail
mcclellan
trail
or
something
along
those
lines
right.
But
are
we
going
to
leave
in
some
language
that
says
at
least,
and
maybe,
if
there's
leftover
money
but
jen,
I
think
we
have
to
be
somewhat
specific
or
at
least
there's
an
expectation
there.
I
think
I.
N
Think
that
I
think
the
council
has
approached
it
both
ways.
I
think
that
it
always
helps
to
be
specific
if
you
want
to
see
a
specific
outcome.
So,
to
the
extent
that
you
want
the
outcome
to
be
able
to
say
to
each
district's
constituents,
there
will
be
at
least
some
money
spent
in
each
district.
I
think
it
helps
to
say
I
think
that
language
is
great,
to
say
at
least
one
per
district,
and
then
that
then
the
administration
has
flexibility.
N
N
Then
it
it
allows
for
that
or
one
district
has
three
small
parks
that
need
investments,
but
not
one
big
park,
and
that
that
may
provide
that
flexibility,
but
still
assure
the
outcome
that
the
council's
hoping
I
mean
the
council
could
issue
an
80
million
dollar
bond
and
just
say
for
parks
and
public
lands,
but
then
you're
not
guaranteed
to
see
this
list
of
projects,
and
so
it
to
the
extent
that
you
absolutely
want
to
see
glendale
invested
in
right.
That's
where
it
helps
to
be
specific
about
that,
and
so
it's
sorry,
but.
J
N
My
understanding,
I
think
there
are
some
ways
to
to
be
a
little
flexible,
like
I'm
remembering
back
on
the
public
safety
building
bond.
N
The
the
intention
was
for
the
public
safety
building
that
one
building
that
was
built,
but
it
said
public
safety
facilities,
and
so
there
was
a
discussion
at
the
time
that
if
there
was
any
money
left
over
in
the
bond
it
could
be
technically
it
could
be
used
for
fire
station
facility
or
whatever,
and
we
didn't
have
enough
any
money
left
over
and
so
that
resolved
itself,
but
there's
a
way
to
be
like
a
little
bit
general.
N
And
so
that's
where
I
think
that
line
item
about
neighborhood
parks
is
is
probably
that
that
flexible
area
most
of
the
other
ones.
I
mean,
if
you
say,
liberty,
park,
playground
that
feels
pretty
specific,
where
it
would
be
spent
on
a
playground
in
liberty
park
and
not
on
like
the
aviary
in
liberty
park
or
something
okay.
So
so.
G
Yeah
and
I'm
and
I'm
okay
with
change
to
suggesting
a
change.
If
that's
a
point
to
to
you,
councilmember
fowler,
to
say
at
least
one
per
district
and
removing
the
war
seven
and
saying
neighborhood
parks,
at
least
one
per
district
and.
G
O
So
in
my
meeting
with
parks,
one
of
the
main
things
that
they
wanted
to
do
with
allen
park
was,
if
we
don't
stabilize
the
lodge,
we
could
lose
the
lodge
just
four
and
a
half
million.
Is
it
possible
to
do
the
stabilization
with
that
amount
of
money.
M
Mr
chair,
while
she's
coming
up,
can
I
just
clarify
councilmember
poi:
did
you
suggest
a
specific
amount
of
that
4.5
to
go
to
the
neighborhood
parks
versus?
Was
it
fleet
block.
G
O
M
O
G
You
know,
and-
and
this
is
a
discussion
that
we
we
could
have
a
little
later
later
date,
but
the
idea
is
to
increase
that
and
then
it
gives
us
more
flexibility
for
other
parks
and
and
other
projects
in
our
districts
on
open
space.
I
guess.
P
N
P
O
I'm
just
wanting
to
know
my
impression
from
the
meeting
was
that
the
the
most
urgent
thing
was
stabilizing
this
lodge,
because
it
we
might
lose
it
if
we
don't
stabilize
it
and
it
sounded
like
the
other.
Things
were
important
things
and
things
that
we
definitely
want
but
like
if
we
don't
do
something
about
them
in
the
next
year,
they're
not
going
to
go
away.
O
O
I
just
want
to
know
that
that's
this
when
I
think
of
it,
as
as
averaging
only
another
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
per,
if
you
spread
that,
on
average
among
the
seven
districts,
how
much
impact
does
that?
Have
I
don't
even
know
what
you
can
buy
with
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
G
G
Is
a
I
really
appreciate
this
because
just
to
inc,
to
put
it
in
comparison,
the
administration
is
requesting
warm
springs
to
stabilize
the
ginormous
building
six
million
dollars
and
to
stabilize
fisher
mansion
1.8
million
dollars,
and
I
don't
remember
seeing
the
lodge,
but
the
lodge
is
not
the
size
of
warm
springs
and
it's
closer
to
the
size
of
fisher
mansion.
G
So
just
from
that
point
of
view
and
I'm
not
an
expert-
and
I
think
I
believe
that
they
can,
the
administration
can
find
money
to
stabilize
some
buildings
and
do
some
other
improvements
in
there
and
I
to
the
point
about
the
neighborhood
parks
potentially,
and
this
is
why
we
could
potentially
put
some
of
that
money
back
into
island
park
from
the
from
the
neighborhood
parks.
So
it
gives
us
a
little
more
wiggle
room.
If,
if
it
wasn't
enough,
then
it
was
enough
and
then
we
can
put
it
in
a
different
project.
O
N
Sorry,
I
I
need
to
pause
the
conversation
we
lost
audio
on
webex,
and
so
the
people
joining
on
webex
can't
hear
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
what
was
I'm
sure,
a
brilliant
sentence,
but
I
wanted
them
to
hear
it.
So
can
we
yes
in
one
minute
sorry.
O
As
I
was
saying,
a
big
like
blunder
or
like
question
policy
question
mark
that
I've
had
since
I've
been
on
the
council
is:
do
we
continue
with
our
strategy
of
bringing
buildings
up
to
just
a
stable
condition,
but
still
have
these
buildings
that
are
unusable,
or
is
it
better
to
to
put
more
money
towards
one
building
at
a
time,
get
them
up
to
a
condition
where
they're
habitable?
O
Because
my
feeling
and
nobody,
my
hypothesis,
I
guess
and
no
one's
been
able
to
disprove
it-
that
I've
heard
so
far,
is
that
this
strategy,
where
we
just
stabilize
buildings
but
they're
still
not
usable,
is
not
serving
us.
Well,
because
we
have
a
handful
of
buildings
that
are
are
not
falling
over
on
people,
which
is
great,
but
we're
still
not
confident
about
letting
people
in
them,
which
is
bad
and
so
to
me,
I
don't
feel
like
that's
the
the
best
use
of
our
assets.
O
Of
course,
I
have
a
favorite
among
the
candidates,
but
as
a
whole.
I
think
that
we
need
to
maybe
test
that
hypothesis
and
I
think
now
might
be
the
time
to
do
it
and
to
the
extent
this
allows
us
flexibility.
I
appreciate
that.
J
And
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
councilmember
wharton.
I
do
appreciate
your
hypothesis
and
the
discussions
that
we've
had
about
it,
but
I
think,
in
partnership
with
that
is,
is
just
that
partnership.
I've
been
pushing
for.
When
are
we
doing
private
public
partnerships?
Why
are
we
the
only
like
I
don't
disagree?
J
J
So
I
don't
disagree
that
I
think
your
hypothesis
is
correct
in
that
you
know.
Do
we
wait?
Do
we
put
all
of
the
money
all
of
the
chips
in
right
now
on
one
building
and
come
back
to
the
next
one
next
year
and
kind
of
do
this
domino-ish
effect
that
way
which
fine,
I
think,
that's
probably
great,
but
at
the
same
time,
what
is
it
about
creating
a
usable
space?
If
we
don't
have
somebody
using
it.
O
No-
and
I
agree
I
I
I
would
say,
though,
when
I
say:
let's
get
them
to
habitable
usable,
I
think,
if
we're
gonna,
to
get
a
private
partner
to
want
to
join
us,
we
have
to
be
able
to
say
look.
We
have
a
building.
That
is
up
to
a
condition.
That
is
that
we
can
take
you
in
and
let
you
like
look
around,
see
it
and
tell
us
what
you
think
we
could
do
with
this
and
as
a
partner
and.
O
J
This
is
not
the
time
or
place
to
have
that
particular
discussion
or
or
maybe
it
is
right,
maybe
allen
park.
We
should
just
spend-
I
don't
know
60
million
dollars
on
allen
park
and
then
say
somebody
can
come
in
and
use
it
allen
park.
But
I
don't
think
that
that's
what
we
want
either.
Nor
do
we
need
that
right.
So
it
is
sort
of
this
balancing
act
and
I
think
that.
J
M
A
E
M
In
regard
to
what
chris
brought
up-
okay
relating
to
not
directly
to
council
member
police
drop
hole
but
to
historic
buildings
in
general,
which
is
that
I
agree
with
chris's-
or
I
am
also
very
tempted
by
figuring
out
if
chris's
theory
is
correct,
that
the
current
strategy
is
not
necessarily
serving
us.
Well,
I
also
agree
with
councilmember
fowler
that
we
need
to
look
at
public-private
partnerships
for
a
lot
of
these.
M
A
lot
of
these
buildings
could
be
something
that
the
private
real
estate
market
is
really
interested
in
helping
us
preserve
if
we-
and
I
think
that
we
have
the
ability
to
put
a
preservation
easement
on
the
buildings
and
then
put
them
out
to
rfp
and
not
continue
to
put
city
and
taxpayer
dollars
into
these
buildings
and
still
not
use
them
so
rather
than
us
stabilizing
them.
I
think
there
are
probably
some
cases
where,
if
we
were
to
write
down
the
cost
of
the
land
or
something
that
the
private
market
would
stabilize
it.
M
So
but
I
I
would
like
to
consider
that
as
well,
and
I
don't
know
of
within
any
of
the
buildings
that
we're
talking
about.
There
are
like
kind
of
ideas
of
what
they're
going
to
be
used
for,
but
none
of
them
seem
like.
Oh,
yes,
let's
invest
an
unlimited
amount
of
money
of
taxpayer
dollars
in
that
building.
In
order
to
make
it
become
that
thing
which
makes
me
feel
like
we
need
to
have
the
private
real
estate
market
come
in
and
help
us
figure
out
how
to
fund
it
and
how
to
use
it.
A
H
I
I
think
I
like
where
this
is
going.
I
I
think
I'm
gonna
like
defer
to
council
member
fowler
and
what
the
appropriate
number
is
for
for
this.
You
know
frontline
park,
which
is
in
your
district,
and
it's
the
only
ask
that
you
that
or
there's
the
only
proposal
there.
I
definitely
think
it's
kind
of
like
what
we
need
to
figure
out
is.
Do
we
go
with
what
darren
said?
We
are
just
going
to
put
a
preservation,
easement
and
then
give
it
to
someone,
and
then
we
don't
spend
any
money
or
we
are.
H
We
are
at
the
table
with
the
with
the
private
groups
that
says:
okay,
we,
we
can
invest
this
much
as
long
as
you
invest
this
much
and
that's
where
I'm
at
like.
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
right
answer
is
like
it
could
go
both
ways
like
we
completely
forget
about
it
or
we
actually
invest,
and
we
have
some
teeth.
H
You
know
and
down
at
the
table
in
the
negotiation
table
when,
if
we
go
with
a
public
private
partnership,
which
I
think
like
amy
said
she
has
wanted
it
for
a
long
time,
and
I
have
wanted
it
for
a
long
time
as
well.
We
have
to
leverage
those
dollars
out
there
that
people
haven't
want
to
invest
in
our
city,
one
more
thing
jen,
I
know
amy
was
talking
earlier
about.
H
N
H
J
N
Then,
and
then
mr
chair,
I
believe
we
have
the
mayor
has
her
hand
up,
but
we
can't
just
so
the
mayor
understands.
We
can't
see
hands
raised
in
this
format
of
webex,
and
so
let
me
know
by
text
if
there's
a
any
other
future
point,
you
want
to
comment
so.
M
So
councilman,
my
really
quick
comment
is
just
to
on
to
councilmember
voldemort's
point:
it's
probably
a
different
answer
for
each
building,
but
I
think
what
I'm
coming
to
the
conclusion
of
is
that
the
answer
of
just
barely
stabilizing
but
not
using
is
probably
not
the
correct
answer
in
all
cases,
which
is
the
only
answer
that
we've
been
doing
so
it
that
may
be
the
case
in
some.
It
may
be
completely
privately
funded.
It
might
be
a
partnership
in
others.
It's
probably
different
for
each.
P
Us
thank
you,
yeah.
Thank
you,
council
for
giving
me
a
moment
a
couple
points.
Councilmember
fowler's
point.
Actually
you
did
just
create
a
park
maintenance
fund
as
the
fifth
bucket
of
the
funding,
our
future,
unless
I'm
mistaken,
and
that
was
changed
in
the
budget
and
I
missed
it,
but
that
that
is
a
new
ongoing
revenue
source
that
we
haven't
had
before
for
parks
maintenance.
P
Second,
I
wanted
to
mention
that
this
escalation
of
the
degree
to
which
we
are
investing
in
these
buildings
that
have
been
boarded
is
exactly
for
my
my
intentions
of
bringing
them
to
a
place
where
we
can
explore
public-private
partnership,
but
not
to
the
point
where
we've
invested
so
much
that
their
use
is
somewhat
fixed.
P
So
those
aren't
questions
that
we
need
to
answer
now,
but
this
stabilization
money
is
more
than
we've
done
it,
which
is
a
bare
minimum
of
literally
just
patching
the
hole
in
the
roof.
When
there's
water
flowing
through
it
we'd
be
doing
we'd,
be
bringing
it
up
enough
that
we
could
have
an
actual
conversation
with
the
private
market
about
what
those
benefits
could
be.
So
that's
why.
P
G
No,
I
want
to
address
a
few
of
the
things
that
I
I
think
that
I
think
is
interesting
for
me
and
I
I
think
it's
important
to
to
mention
I.
Obviously
our
city
doesn't
have
a
very
good
track
record
on
stabilizing
a
building
and
then
bringing
out
to
the
community
and
saying
what
are
you?
What
do
you
want
to
see
with
this
thing?
G
We
you
know.
We
have
plenty
of
unfortunate
examples
of
that,
and
I'm
hoping
that,
while
this
conversation
right
now
is
on
the
geo
bond,
I'm
hoping
that
we
address
some
of
these
concerns
and
the
sales
tax
bond
related
to
maybe
the
fisher
mansion
or
warm
springs.
I
think
that
that
might
be
how
you're
winking
at
me
right
now,
but
so
I
I
think
that
there
is
a
way.
G
Obviously
there
is
not
unlimited
amount
of
monies
to
fix
all
these
buildings,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
start
somewhere
and
there
is
a
line
in
my
mind
of
buildings.
I've
been
waiting
for
many
many
years
and
I'm
not
saying
I'm
not
taking
it
away
from
allen
park,
but
it
is
a
recent
purchase
from
this
this
this
this
city,
and
there
is
other
amenities
that
we've
been
sitting
on
for
many
many
years
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
move
the
needle
on
those
soon,
hopefully
with
the
sales
tax.
G
So
I
I
hope
that
the
next
4.5
million
that
allen
park
needs
can
be
partially
raised
by
the
community
or
some
of
these
interest.
People
that
did
offer
this
and
at
some
point
I'm
not
saying
that
they're
going
to
raise
4.5
million,
but
maybe
they
can
contribute
with
half
a
million.
And
so
I
think
that
there
may
be
interest
there,
but
it
seems
like
we
are
just
beating
the
same
dead
horse.
So.
A
J
I
have
just
a
very
quick
logistical
question,
and
this
is
I'm
looking
at
jen
and
the
analysts
and
and
ben
and
allison
on
this,
and
it's
not
I
mean
I
know
my
nickname
is
tiny
dictator
and
I'm
not
trying
to
be
a
dictator
here.
But
if
we
just
sort
of
very
generally
say
you
know,
here
is
10.5
million
dollars
for
these
neighborhood
parks,
one
in
at
least
one
per
district
parks
trails
and
open
space.
J
N
Yeah
as
long
as
it's
one
per
district,
I'm
trying
to
think
maybe
there
would
be
a
step
where,
in
order
to
spend
that
money,
there
would
need
to
be
a
budget
amendment,
or
at
least
it
would
have
to
be
approved
in
the
annual
budget
as
the
money
comes
through
the
debt
service
fund.
E
J
N
That
that's
sometimes
an
opportunity
other
depending
on
the
timing.
Sometimes
it's
a
budget
amendment,
because
the
g.o
bond
money,
as
it
flows
through
the
city
where
we
collect
it
from
property
taxes
and
then
pay
the
debt
service
is
a
budget
line.
It's
like
its
own
budget
outside
of
the
general
fund,
but
it
is
a
budget
that
is
approved
by
the
council
so
that
first
year
that
you're
making
those
you
know
you've
you've
already
issued
the
bonds.
And
so
you
couldn't
necessarily
say
don't
issue
the
bonds
for
those
parks.
N
Some
sort
of
reporting
touch
point
after
those
bonds
are
issued,
asking
the
administration
to
come
back
and
report
how
those
funds
will
be
used.
Maybe
that
would
be
a
an
appropriate
step,
but
marcus
mark
contrell
attorney
is
joining
remotely
and
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
follow
up
with
him
and
marina.
After
the
factor
marine
is
coming
up
to
the
table.
N
Maybe
she
has
some
information
and
just
if
the
council's
interested
in
knowing
what
those
projects
are
before
releasing
the
funds,
is
that
what
I'm
hearing?
Yes.
J
The
reason
I'm
thinking
about
it
is
a
great
example
that
alejandro
just
brought
up
councilman
puy
is
that
you
know
lowering
the
allen
park
money
to
4.5
but
increasing
that
sort
of
vague
neighborhood
park.
We
could
take
some
of
that
money
and
use
it
towards
allen
park.
But
but
again,
maybe
that's
not
necessarily
what
the
district
itself
my
constituents
want,
and
so
then
I
it
just
sort
of
got
me
thinking.
But
if
we
allocate
this
money
in
a
bond
we
say:
okay,
there
you
go.
H
E
So,
let's
say
in
november
the
election
gets
the
ballot
proposition
gets
approved
for
80
million,
I'm
just
just
hypothetical.
So
but
then
every
time
we
issue
a
bond,
we
would
go
to
the
council
for
a
briefing
and
a
bond
resolution
approval.
So
you
would
have
another
discussion
and
another
decisions
to
make.
E
J
So
sorry,
may
I
follow
up
with
a
question,
and
this
is
something
I
didn't
realize
because
I
don't
know
that
I
mean
we
did
the
sales
tax
bond,
but
that
was
strictly
for
street
reconstruction,
and
so
I
don't
know
that
I've
thought
about
it
quite
actually.
N
And
that
was
a
geo
bond.
Oh
it
wasn't
anything
it's
actually
going
to.
The
last
sort
of
tranche
of
issuances
is
actually
going
to
be
on
your
agenda
next
at
the
next
council
meeting,
and
I
think
that
council
member
amnesia
over.
J
N
You're,
fine
you're,
fine.
I
think
that
that's
a
great
that's,
a
great
clarification,
marina
and
I
think
that
we've
had
differing
approaches
on
those
separate
issuances,
because
sometimes
it's
like
a
procedural
matter.
So
in
the
case
of
the
streets
bond,
it's
very
procedural
because
you
guys
discussed
it
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
how
much
how
quickly
engineering
can
spend
the
money,
because
there's
a
spend
down
requirement
in
the
case
of
like
the
leonardo,
for
example,
that
geo
bond
was
approved
by
the
voters.
N
But
the
council
didn't
want
to
issue
the
bonds
until
they
confirmed
that
the
private
match
was
required,
and
so
there
were
a
ton
of
briefings
before
and
that
the
business
plan
was
vetted.
So
there
were
a
ton
of
briefings
before
the
council
issued
those
bonds.
So
that's
a
that.
Actually,
if
the
council
wants
that
discussion,
I
think
we
can
be
more
intentional
about
each
time
those
bonds
are
issued
because
80
million
likely
wouldn't
be
issued
all
at
once
to
have
that
discussion
with
the
council
about.
H
Jen
at
some
point
I
remember
that
if
we're
so,
we
can
be
somewhat
vague,
but
also
we
have
to
be
somewhat
specific,
because
once
we
go
to
the
public
and
say
this
is
the
list
and
to
the
bond
the
one
holders.
This
is
the
list
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
do.
Then
we
cannot
come
back
and
change
what.
N
N
By
the
time
the
bonds
were
actually
issued,
construction
costs
were
double,
and
so
what
was
actually
built
was
about
half
of
what
was
told
to
the
voters.
So
in
a
sense
it
was
changed.
However,
it
fit
within
the
legal
parameters,
because
you
still
built
what
you
told
the
voters,
you
still
build
at
least
as
much
as
you
could.
H
N
What
you
told
the
voters
you
could
now,
could
you
have
changed
that
money
from
a
soccer
field
to
a
fire
department
building?
No,
you
know
it's
like
so
in
in
in
these
cases
you
couldn't
change
it
from
a
liberty
park,
playground
to
the
tracy
aviary,
but
you
could
change
it
to
say
if
the
playground
is
now
twice
as
expensive,
we're
going
to
build
half
of
what
a
smaller
program.
H
H
N
Think,
that's
probably
where
finance
and
maybe
the
bond
council
would
advise
to
say
just
say,
allen
park,
yes
and
don't
specify
allen
park
stabilization,
okay,
so
that
way
it
could
be
spent
on
stabilization
in
allen
park
or
it
could
be
spent
on
something
else
in
allen
park
as
as
long
as
what
the
outcome
you
want
is
that
that
money
is
spent
somewhere
in
allen
park.
G
You
have
it
yes,
okay,
my
struggle,
I'm
gonna
restate
the
struggle
so
to
change.
The
island
park
amount
to
4.5
million,
to
change
the
seven
neighborhood
parks,
one
per
district
to
say:
neighborhood,
open
space,
at
least
one
per
district
to
10.5
million
dollars
and
to
change
flip
block
park
from
5
million
to
6
million.
J
A
F
Even
I
am
completely
fine
with
the
amount,
but
even
if
the
geo
bond
should
not
be
approved
by
voters,
I
would
prefer
that
we
have
money
readily
accessible
to
move
forward,
if
not
complete
it
by
adding
reallocating
it
to
the
sales
the
sales
tax
bond.
I
I
have
tried
to
get
my
brain
and
my
heart
into
a
place
where
I'm
comfortable
with
this,
but
I
am
not
comfortable
with
all
27
000
being
in
the
g.o
bond
million.
J
F
J
F
J
N
So
I
think
that
they're
in
the
middle
of
their
planning
process
for
that-
and
so
it's
probably
hard
to
say
I
think,
they're
coming
back
to
they're
coming
to
the
council
at
some
point
in
the
next
couple
meetings
to
give
like
a
midpoint
update
on
that.
But
in
my
observation
working
here
for
18
years,
things
are
always
more
expensive
than
you
sort
of
initially
think
they're
going
to
be,
and
so
and
especially
because
you
are
building
that
park
from
scratch.
You're
not
improving
an
existing
open,
improved
facility.
P
Jen
right,
what
we
have
right
now
is
a
vision
plan,
and
so
there
isn't
construction
documents
to
give
you
cost
estimates
we
estimated
27
million,
would
give
us
a
really
good,
significant
impact
in
that
park.
We
don't
know
if
we
could
build
everything
at
this
time.
P
A
So
there
are
other
options
on
top
of
the
27,
but
I
think
there's
a
strong
support
for
leaving
that
27
in
here
and
possibly
looking
at
other
options
for
the
other
areas.
So
I'm
going.
J
F
M
Mr
chair,
we
kind
of
according
to
what
staff
is
telling
us
we
kind
of
have
to
decide
on
the
geo
bond
asap
so
that
we
can
advertise
for
it.
So
we
keep
that
in
there,
but
if,
if
that
fails
in
november,
if
the
voters
do
not
approve
that,
we
still
have
options
past
november
to
fund
glendale
park
right
like
we
have
like,
we
can
issue
another
sales
tax
bond.
We
can
also
use
our
parks
impact
fees,
our
general
cip
allocations.
M
So
I
agree
with
you
councilman
peter
ashler,
that
I
I
see
the
optics
of
like
putting
the
entire
park
in
something
that
we
don't
know
the
outcome
of
and
that's
scary,
but
I
guess
I'll
at
least
give
my
informal
sort
of
nod
that,
like
that
is
an
important
thing
to.
I
think
I
believe
everyone
on
the
council.
So
if
that
geo
bond
were
not
to
pass,
I
am
supportive
of
looking
for
other
sources
for
that
park.
Absolutely.
H
H
A
Okay,
the
straw
poll
on
the
floor,
any
questions
about
the
struggle
on
the
floor
thumbs
up
on
that
straw
poll,
I
have
seven
thumbs
up
that
passes
unanimously
now.
Moving
on
to
the
sales
tax
sales
tax
bond.
A
And
again,
I
think
there's
been
some
great
discussions
in
small
groups
on
this
different
sales
tax
and
I
think,
there's
a
number
of
these
line
items
on
the
sales
tax
bonds
that
the
majority
of
us
agree
to
and
then
there's
a
couple
that
have
that
need
some
discussions
and
possibly
further
discussions.
Now
the
sales
tax
bond.
A
In
this
case
these
are
items
that
were
recommended
requested
from
the
administration,
and
I
just
opened
up
the
discussion
at
this
point
to
the
general
stuff
councilman
of
victoria
peter.
F
N
I
think
that
everyone
would
say
that
doing
it
more
quickly
is
more
financially
advantageous.
I
think
the
problem
is:
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
questions
about
some
of
the
projects
that
cannot
be
answered
now
and,
and
some
of
the
projects
are
urgent.
We've
heard
from
the
administration
that
the
let's
see
the
central
plant
electrical
transformer
and
backup
generator
is
especially
anxiety
producing,
and
so
I
think
that
there's
an
interest
just
operationally
to
get
some
of
the
projects
done,
and
so
that
was
the
sort
of
best
of
two
imperfect
options.
A
Eight
months
of
you
know
research,
but
they
may
need
a
month
and
a
half
or
two
months
and
it'd
be
nice
to
get
some
of
these
things
started
now,
especially
for
the
engineer
side
of
the
house.
So
I'm
going
to
open
up
the
floor
to
discussions
and
I
think
councilman
armando
did
you
have
a.
H
So
I
wanted
to
ask
the
administration
if,
because
there
are
some
projects
that
could
wait
for
a
month
and
a
half
or
two
until
we
have
more
solid
numbers,
if
that's
realistic,
really
like,
if
that's
truly
realistic,
that
we
can
get
more
atomized
numbers
on
the
construction
costs
that
you
anticipate
for
certain
projects
in
this
list,
so
that
so
that
we
know
you
know
we're
confident
that
the
money
that
we're
asking
will
be
sufficient
or
not.
N
I
think
that
I'm
not
trying
to
answer
for
the
information
or
for
the
administration.
So
please
anyone
pop
up,
but
some
of
the
questions
are
actually
council
member
questions.
I'm
thinking
particularly
warm
springs
and
reevaluating
the
entire
kind
of
reuse
plan
of
that
building
and
maybe
asking
the
administration
to
go
out
to
an
rfp.
N
So
I
don't,
I
don't
think
two
months
is
necessarily
a
when
we
would
have
all
of
the
information,
but
that's
when
the
council
could
kind
of
reconvene
on
some
of
those
conversations
and
give
the
administration
some
more
specific
asks
on
those
items,
because
I
think
the
proposal,
the
the
questions
relate
to
how
to
get
both
of
those
buildings,
both
the
fisher
mansion
and
the
and
the
warm
springs
plunge
to
some
place
beyond
just
stabilized
and
whether
or
not
there
are
private
dollars.
That
could
be
part
of
that.
N
I
don't
think
you
know
that
until
you
actually
go
out
to
the
private
market,
which
I
don't
think
could
be
done
in
two
months,
so
maybe
it's
a
six
months
time
frame,
I
don't
know
okay,
but
what
one?
I
guess
one
piece
of
information.
I
don't
know
if
it's
helpful
there.
There
is
no
limitation
to
how
many
sales
tax
bonds,
you
issue,
it's
just
ability
to
pay
and
it's
efficiency
for
cost
of
issuances.
N
So
if,
in
two
months
you
have
a
lot
more
clarity
on
one
of
the
projects,
that's
been
waiting,
you
could
issue
a
bond
for
that
project
and
then,
if
in
six
months,
you
have
additional
clarity
on
some
of
the
other
projects
that
are
waiting,
you
could
issue
a
bond
for
that
project.
Now,
again
it's
ability
to
repay
and
so
making
sure
to
check
in
that
the
debt
service
is
coverable,
you're,
not
limited
by
issuing
one
or
two
or
three
bonds,
it's
just
about
paying
them
and
then
recognizing
that
there's
a
cost.
H
You
know
I
because
I
know
there
are
quite
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
wish
we
had
those
before
to
be
honest
with
you
like,
when,
when
there's
a
proposal
that
we
had
a
little
bit
more
of
itemized,
because
then
we
are
here
kind
of
like
between
a
rock
and
a
hard
place
right
like
trying
to
decide
what
to
do,
but
we
don't
are
not
sure
what
the
numbers
there's
questions
especially
for
pioneer
park.
We
don't
have
like
a
solid
answer.
H
I
know
you
know
pioneer
park
has
been
waiting
for
a
long
time
beyond
our
you
know
beyond
our
time.
Anybody
here
for
like
a
good
final
investment
right
like
a
good
number
and
then
we're
moving
on,
but
some
of
the
council
members
have
questions
like
what
are
we
getting
for
10
million
dollars,
and
it's
not
clear
yet
you
know.
H
A
O
Cosmetic
and
so
just
really
explicit
from
the
beginning,
I
do
not
mean
this
in
an
accusatory
way
at
all,
but
I've
been
asking
the
question
about
warm
springs
for
like
years.
O
I
I
think
that
the
motion
speaks
for
itself
yeah,
so
it
just
feels
like
there's
always
going
to
be
reasons
to
wait
and
to
wait
for
more
information.
O
I
would
like
to
make
our
decisions
quickly,
because
I
think
we
should
tell
like
their
residents
should
have
this
information
quickly,
but
I
also
know
that,
like
you
know,
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know.
I
just
want
to
know.
Why
should
I
be
more
confident
that
we're
gonna
have
a
better
answer
in
three
to
four
to
six
months
when
it's
been
years.
R
O
O
Well,
I
do
want
an
answer,
but
but
not
from
I
wasn't
asking
for
one
from
you,
I'm
if
anybody
knows
anyone's
free
to
answer.
E
J
So
I
was
just
thinking
about
this
and
I
know
this
is
a
little
bit
crazy,
but
welcome
to
my
brain
when
we
did
the
sales
tax
increase.
I
guess
it
was
an
increase.
J
N
I
think
you
have
the
same
options
before
you
as
you
do
with
the
geo
bond,
where
you
could
be
specific.
If
you
wanted
a
specific
outcome
or
you
could
be
general
to
allow
some
flexibility,
I
think
that
in
fact
we
even
floated
that,
as
an
idea,
you
could
combine
the
funding
for
both
historic
structures
and
then
have
the
administration
come
back.
I
think
what
we
as
staff
were
realizing.
N
Is
that
there's
not
enough
funding
sure
for
what
the
council
was
asking
about,
and
so
and
we
didn't
know
how
to
get
the
council
and
answer
for
how
much
funding
would
be
needed
for
the
ideas
that
were
coming
up,
and
so
yes,
so
the
answer
is,
you
could
be
as
specific
or
as
general
as
you
wanted.
J
So
I
was
just
sitting
here
sort
of
brainstorming
this
a
little
bit
and
there
are
a
lot
of
questions.
I
think
that
council
members-
I
I
won't
speak
for
everybody
else
that
I
have
like.
Of
course,
I
want
ballpark
improvements,
but
what
does
that
mean
and
look
like?
Of
course
I
want.
J
You
know
warm
springs,
but
obviously
there's
questions
there
or
fish
or
mansion
there's
some
of
them.
That's
pretty
like
necessary
in
some
ways,
but
couldn't
we
again?
I
don't
want
to
throw
a
total
wrench
on
things
but
similar
to
how
we
did
the
sales
tax
increase,
and
we
just
said
here
are
the
four
areas
now
five,
because
we
just
approved
that.
J
Is
there
a
way
to
to
do
that?
Almost
with
this
sales
tax
bond,
where
we
say
these
are
all
going
towards
parks,
improvements
and
facility
improvements
on
parks
or
whatever
come
up
with
the
language
there?
Where
then,
we're
not
necessarily
deciding
that
today
or
tomorrow
or
next
week,
the
pioneer
park
needs
one
million
dollars,
zero
million
dollars
or
10
million
dollars.
But
we're
saying
we
know
that
this
sales
tax
bond
is
going
to
this
and
we're
going
to
have
sort
of
that
same
very
transparent
process,
similar
to
how
we
do
funding
our
future
dollars.
J
With
this
sales
tax
bond,
where
then,
we
have
sort
of
a
reporting
requirement
from
the
administration
coming
up
with
like
here's.
What
we
want,
there's
like
another,
yet
ben
would
have
to
make
this
sheet
like
even
bigger
and
add
like
another
column
during
the
budget
for
sales
tax
bond
monies,
but
something
along
the
can
we
would
it
be
possible
to
do
something
like
that.
If
we
wanted
to,
I
think.
N
That
that
would
yes,
you
could.
I
think
that
it
would
inadvertently
reduce
council
control.
You
know
it
would
tie
your
hands
in
ways
that
maybe
you
don't
feel
comfortable.
I
also
think
that
there
are
some
projects
on
this
list
that
are
like,
oddly
specific,
like
radio
towers,
that
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
and
then
railroad
quiet
zones.
I
don't
know
how
you
like
there's,
maybe
there's
a
couple
of
specific
projects
and
then
others
that
are,
I
don't
know
I'd
have
to
think
more
about
that.
I
I
don't
know
and
and
like.
A
And
what
I'm
looking
at
is
I
I
understand
your
position
there,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
kind
of
kick
the
can
down
the
road
there
and
I
think,
there's
as
I
look
at
this
there's
two
areas:
there's
three
areas
that
have
that
we
have
concerns
pioneer
park,
warren
springs
and
and
and
the
fisher
mansion
the
other
items.
I
think,
there's
fairly
a
good
sense
that
we
should
fund
those
and
we
should
move
ahead
with
them
and
allow
the
the
administration
to
move
forward
with
the
projects
there.
A
And
then
we
look
at
the
other
three
that
says:
hey
these
three
have
too
much
question
marks
across
the
board
and
whether
we
add
money
to
the
sales
tax
bond
and
increase
the
sales
tax
fund.
We
reduce
the
sales
tax
bond,
but
and
but
we
have
some
discussions
there-
private
partnership,
private
public
partnerships,
sale
lease
land
all
that
stuff.
So
I
see
that
as
being
separate
than
you
could
possibly
may
adjust
that
and
you
could
actually
then
add
a
project
to
it.
If
you
want
to
add
something
to
it,.
J
I
don't
disagree
that
there
do
seem
some
that
are
very
specific
and
it's
kind
of
like
okay.
We
just
need
to
get
these
down
like
our,
and
it
reminds
me
a
lot
of
the
street
reconstruction
like
we
just
have
to
reconstruct
streets,
and
so
I
don't
I
don't
mind
at
all,
taking
out
those
sort
of
those
three
and
then
adding
glendale
as
a
fourth
to
that
rate
of
saying.
But
then
I
do
think
that
maybe
that's
where
we
could
have
that
discussion
of.
A
E
F
J
A
All
right
would
it
be,
would
it
be
okay
to
look
at
go
line
by
line,
and
do
it
a
a
a
straw
line
by
line
what.
G
If
I
so
what
mr
chair,
if
I
suggested
straw
poll
to
approve,
as
recommended
the
city
cemetery
at
600,
north
korea,
transformation,
radio
towers,
central
plant,
electrical
transformer
upgrade
and
emergency
backup
generators,
I
need
to
practice
some
of
those
words.
I
the
west
side,
railroad,
quiet
zones.
G
A
G
A
M
I
should
know
this,
so
hopefully,
staff
can
give
me
like
a
one
sentence.
Answer
the
600
north
corridor
transfer
information.
Is
that
just
the
typical
complete
streets
transformation
or
is
there
something
special
about
them,
because
it
feels
like
a
large
number,
and
I
think
we
already
have
other
money
allocated
to
that,
but
is
that
just
just
a
big
road
or.
E
It's
a
big
road
and
it's
a
big
project
and
it's
more
than
the
typical
complete
streets
transformation.
It
does
include
a
linear
park.
It
includes
enhancements
for
the
frequent
bus
route
that
runs
every
15
minutes
on
there.
So
it's
complete
streets.
H
E
E
M
E
Three
at
grade
crossings
where
city
streets
and
the
railroads
intersect,
all
three
would
need
to
be
improved.
It's
mostly
safety
improvements.
The
result
for
the
neighbors
is:
they
won't,
have
train
horns
blaring
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
because
without
those
safety
improvements,
the
trains
must
blare
their
horns
per
federal
regulations.
N
And-
and
if
I
could
add
this
has
actually,
this
was
an
original
rda
project.
Probably
15
years
ago,
the
rda
started
putting
away
funds
for
it
and
because
those
funds
were
inadequate,
I
think
there
were
like
three
million
set
aside
for
it
and
we
knew
the
project
would
be
closer
to
seven,
six
or
seven,
when
the
council
did
the
reallocation
of
funds
in
the
rda.
This
was
one
of
those
accounts
that
was
reallocated
to
housing.
N
That
said
separately.
The
inland
port
has
been
working
with
the
railroads
to
consolidate
train
traffic
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
So
I
think
there
is
an
opportunity
to
partner
these
funds
with
other
activities
that
are
going
on,
but
it's
absolutely
a
neighborhood
quality
of
life
problem
right
right
now
that
has
been
on
the
city's
radar
for
20
years.
Yes,.
G
Let
me
add
this
to
this:
this
is
such
an
important
project
and
and
to
those
people
that
live
literally,
you
know
30
feet
from
the
train
and
the
the
train
is
very
loud,
and
I
am
now
going
to
talk
about
certain
companies
that
runs
the
trains
but
they're
not
very
interested
in
doing
these
improvements
themselves.
They
have
no
interest
in
doing
these
things,
and
you
know
it
falls
into
the
municipalities
to
do
this.
H
N
You
know
lisa
schaefer
was
online
remotely.
There
are
there's
a
contractual
obligation
related
to
this
item,
but
maybe
lisa.
Could
you
explain
that
in
a
little
more
specificity,
sorry.
P
Hi,
council
members,
thanks
for
giving
me
a
chance
to
speak
with
you
remotely,
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
yeah.
We
we
under
our
current
lease
agreement.
The
city
is
contractually
obligated
to
make
all
baseball
related
upgrades
up
to
major
league
standards.
P
H
Okay
and
last
question
on
the
on
the
600
north
corridor
transformation
was
that
not
part
of
our
funding
our
future
money
at
all
in
the
street
reconstruction?
That
amy
was
talking
about.
N
It
was
not
included
as
part
of
the
geo
bond
since
that
was
more
focused
on
reconstructing
existing
streets
instead
of
providing
like
a
neighborhood
transformation.
I
believe
the
conversation
started
with
council
member
rogers.
If
I'm
right
and
maybe
council
member
wharton,
I
think
because
it
extends
into
marble
aid
as
well
as
a
result
of
constituents
talking
about
the
negative
impacts
of
heavy
traffic
on
that
street
transportation.
Division
has
been
managing
it
and
I
believe
some
of
it
has
been
is
being
funded
with.
Is
it
the
county
quarter?
Cent.
E
Yeah
there
there
are
several
funding
sources.
The
county
quarter,
cent
there's
some
funding
our
future
there's
also
some
state
money.
That's
involved.
I
don't
know
all
the
specifics,
but
there's
like
a
dozen
different
funding
sources
that
are
all
feeding
into
the
project.
O
G
Q
D
H
I
you
know,
the
only
worry
I
have
about
separating
this,
you
know
is
that
we
might
lose
momentum
on
wanting
to
do
this.
You
know
wanting
to
do
this
three
projects
and
council
member
poi
was.
H
You
know
convinced
me
that
it's
really
important
that
we
invest
as
much
as
we
can
on
facial
mention,
for
example,
like
not
just
the
minimum
like,
let's
go
all
out
as
much
as
we
can
not
unlimited,
but
as
much
as
we
can
to
make
this
usable
and
not
just
stabilizing
it,
and
I
think
that's
important
to
me
that
we
bring
it
back
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we're
going
to
bring
it
back
or
there's
going
to
be
interest
on
top
of
pioneer
park.
H
Council
member
poi
also
mentioned
to
me
that
you
know
we
we're
all
kind
of
tired
of
pioneer
park.
We
want
this,
we
we
want
this
to
happen.
We
want
something
to
happen,
big
and
we're
moving
on
into
the
future,
and
not
talking
about
you
know
any.
You
know
not
about
funding
more
in
pioneer
park,
but
talking
about
the
public
private
partnerships,
the
maintenance
of
programming,
it's
a
great
park.
H
You
know
revenue
sales,
we
pay
our
bonds
back.
This
is
great,
so
those
are
my
only
worries
on
to
moving
them
out
like
can
we
put
our
ourselves
a
timeline
like
because
my
petrol
said
we
did
this
with
conditional
uses
for
the
shelters
that
we
had
a
timeline
to
come
back
and
talk
about
this
and
make
a
decision
on
yes
or
no
and
the
conditions.
H
Can
we
do
that
here
as
well,
because
I
feel
like
that's
if
we
can
commit
to
talk
about
this
and
take
a
hard
look
at
these
three
issues
and
that
we
will
try
to
invest
as
much
as
we
and
I'm
excited
to
you
know
to
support
the
straw
poll,
but
if
we
are
going
to
talk
about
it
later
and
kind
of
forget
about
it
and
then
you
know,
life
gets
in
the
way
and
somebody
doesn't
like
premier
park.
Somebody
doesn't
like
the
fisher
mansion.
Somebody
doesn't
like
those.
H
You
know
the
warm
springs
for
some
reason,
and
then
we
end
up
with
less
than
what's
proposed
today,
which
is
generally
not
that
much
in
the
realm
of
all
of
these
things.
You
know
it's
only
10
million
dollars
for
district
4,
and
you
know,
and
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
there's
there's
little
things
here
and
there
that
these
asks
are
not
that
big
to
me
if,
instead
I'd
rather
go
for
it
now,
instead
of
later
before,
we
forget.
J
You,
mr
chair,
I
I
understand
your
concern,
but
I
really
think
that
we
as
council
members,
are
the
ones
that
can
hold
ourselves
accountable
for
what
we
talk
about
and
what
what
is
a
priority
to
us
and
that
I
do
think
that
we
can
come
back
and
say
you
know,
and
there's
money
in
impact
fees.
There's
money
in
cip
next
year,
there's
budget
money.
There
is
a
time
to
have
I'm
fine
having
a
deadline.
J
I'm
saying,
let's
come
back,
and
do
this
totally
fine
with
that,
but
I
do
have
a
lot
of
questions
on
these
things
and,
to
be
quite
honest,
like
I
don't
know
that
I
feel
comfortable,
allocating
10
million
dollars
to
pioneer
park
right
now
and-
and
that
is
a
struggle
for
me
and
whereas
maybe
I
do
want
to
say,
let's
put
another
5
million
into
warm
springs.
But
what
does
warm
springs?
Look
look
like
what
do
we
want
with
that
project?
Is
it
a
discussion
that
I
think
we
dare?
It
was
me
darren?
J
Was
it
you,
dan
that
we
had
a
discussion
in
having
built
or
trying
to
build
a
relationship
with
our
native
people
and
the
people
that
had
this?
That
was
their
land
before
us?
This
is
sacred
land
to
them.
So
what
kind
of
discussion
are
we
having
about
that
and
are
we
going
to
just
put
six
million
dollars
to
stabilize
it,
which
is
great
and
fine,
and
maybe
we
are
just
stabilizing
it,
but
I
kind
of
want
to
have
some
answers
on.
J
Where
are
these
projects
coming
from
and
these
partnerships
coming
from
and
these
discussions
coming
from
and
why
there
are
other
stakeholders,
besides
us
and
besides
just
the
people
that
live
around
the
area
or
the
business
owners
that
are
around
the
area
that
should
be
involved
in
some
of
these
discussions.
In
my
opinion,
and
so
that's
why,
for
me
putting
it
off
a
little
bit
and
saying,
I
don't
want
to
hold
up
this
stuff,
and
I
do
want
to
have
money
come
into
these
parks
and
we
can
issue
a
sales
tax
bond
anytime.
J
We
want,
and
no
it's
not
fun
to
to
do
it,
but
we
can-
and
I
think
that
these
are
important
things
for
our
city
and
open
space
and
accessibility
to
open
space
is
incredibly
important,
but
so
is
making
sure
that
all
of
the
stakeholders
are
involved
in
the
discussions
and
not
just
some
of
the
stakeholders,
and
so
some
of
these
things
that
we
have
brought
up.
I
think
in
putting
this
discussion
off
a
little
bit.
We
kind
of
in
some
ways
maintain
a
little
bit
of
leverage.
J
Regarding
that
conversation
saying
I
we've
talked
about
private
partnerships
with
fisher
mansion.
What
are
we
doing
to
actually
do
it
right,
and
so
I
think
if
we
say
we're
having
a
deadline
to
have
this
conversation
in
six
months
and
we're
kind
of
giving
administration
staff
us
out
of
that
a
little
bit
of
time
to
wrap
our
heads
around
it
and
to
have
that
discussion,
then
we
come
back
to
it,
whereas
the
other
things
are
just
like
again.
I
keep
coming
back
to
this,
but
it's
road
reconstruction
like
it
needs
to
be
done.
J
J
So
there's
some
of
those
things
that
are
just
incredibly
practical
and
other
things
that
I
know
are
a
priority
and
we
want,
but
there
needs
to
be,
for
my
personal
opinion
needs
to
be
further
discussion
on
it,
and
then
I
also
just
would
say
like
as
a
sort
of
just
another
asterisk
is
that
if
we
do
support
the
straw
poll,
that
was
made
that
it's
not
just
those
three
projects,
but
that
we
add
glendale
to
the
discussion
there.
That
would
be
like
sort
of
a
friendly
to
the
straw
poll
yeah.
G
And
I'm
I'm
amicable
to
the
to
the
to
the
suggestion
there.
I
I
I
don't
know
if
there
is
more
questions
on
this.
I.
M
Member,
oh
councilman,
to
clarify
amy's
amendment
glendale
gets
added
into
with
the
three
that
we're
still
discussing
not
to
decide
today.
Okay,.
F
I
have
a
hard
time
justifying
the
urgency
of
the
urban
wood
reutilization
unless
we
have
some
sort
of
condition
saying
that
it
has
to
be
profit
or
revenue
generating
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
really
look
at
how
we're
going
to
maximize
and
leverage
that
in
our
city.
F
But
then
the
second
thing
is:
is
this
cemetery
investment
reflective
of
the
appropriation
we
didn't
receive,
and
are
we
going
to
be
going
for
another
appropriation
to
supplement
this,
or
is
this
the
totality.
O
O
And
then
we
didn't
know
if
we
were
going
to
be
going
back
to
the
legislature
to
ask
for
money
this
year,
but
some
legislators
have
suggested
that
we
should
and
other
people
in
the
community
who
would
be
really
helpful.
So
I
think
that
we
definitely
so
we're
we're
restarting
those
efforts
and,
in
the
meantime,
the
friends
group
has
applied
for
some
grants.
Private
grants
that
we
would
just
add
to
it.
O
So
they
they
their
strategy,
is
to
kind
of
build
the
snowball
and
and
have
that
going
into
this
fall
and
then
the
legislative
session
for
2023..
I.
O
N
There's
no
limit
to
the
needs.
The
the
one
asterisk
I
have
to
what
councilmember
wharton
was
saying
is
that
the
legislative
subcommittee
hasn't
been
able
to
meet
yet
and
so
they're
meeting
in
the
next
couple
weeks
to
discuss
what
the
city
is
going
to
be
asking
for
yeah.
H
I
do
appreciate
that,
coming
from
both
petro
and
wharton,
I
with
a
wood
one,
I
do-
and
I
think
I
sent
you
guys-
an
email
with
some
of
my
thoughts
on
that.
I
do
think
poi
was
explained
to
me
what
we're
going
to
do
with
that.
The
wood
chips
that
in
that
reduces
funds
from
the
city
so
we'll
produce
our
own
wood
chips
to
use
in
our
parks
and
areas
that
we
did
it
too,
but
I
think
also
because
it's
kind
of
like
a
good
number
like
I
always
look
at.
H
Maybe
it
is
a
double
whammy
there
that
we
can
do
who's
in
charge
of
that
on
the
lobbying
that
chris
was
talking
about
that,
it's
being
done
at
the
legislature
level.
You
know
I
feel
like
there's
interest
and
we
have
constituents
that
are
interested
in
lobbying
for
certain
parks
in
our
city.
H
We
have
that
interest
for
pioneer
park
as
well
and
whether
is
that
they
lobby
the
legislature,
for
you
know
the
the
central
park
in
in
salt
lake
city
or
in
the
capital
city,
or
we
do
the
public
private
partnership
like
asap,
I'm
interested
in
really
talking.
You
know
like
getting
those
done,
those
processes
so
that
we
can
actually
come
up
with
a
number
where
we
say
the
cd
is
going
to
do
this
as
long
as
you
do
this
and
here's
the
process
to
do
it.
H
H
You
know
the
fastest
growing
district
in
in
the
city.
Is
that
with
it
with
at
least
access
to
open
space
in
the
entire
city,
and
it's
very
highly
unlikely
that,
even
with
the
parks,
trails
and
open
space,
with
at
least
one
per
district
geo
bond
thing
that
we
that
we
did,
that
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
buy
another
piece
of
land
to
make
another
parking
district
for
like
with
the
prices?
It's
really
unrealistic
to
think
that
we
will.
H
We
will
be
able
to
do
that
and
so
to
me,
giving
that
last
push
to
pioneer
park
with
as
much
as
we
can
is
what
I
would
like
you
guys
to
consider
and
ponder
and
see
if
that's
something
that
we
can
do,
we
can
leverage
those
funds
for
maintenance
and,
for
you
know,
and
for
programming
with
private
partnerships,
but
also
understanding
that
it's
not
an
investment
just
in
the
park
per
se.
H
It's
an
investment
to
generate
more
revenue
sales
overall
in
the
area
that
will
pay
back
the
bond
that
we're
talking
about
this
area
is
already
kind
of
happening.
Naturally,
because
it's
downtown
so
we
rely,
I
feel
like
we
rely
a
lot
on
certain
projects
to
generate
those
revenues.
So
that
we
can
pay
back
what
we're
trying
to
get
for
other
areas
don't
generate
as
much.
H
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
any
sense,
so
this
one's
kind
of
like
an
easy
way
to
to
you,
know
to
make
sure
that
we'll
have
the
money
to
pay
for
the
bonds.
It's
just
one
park
out
of
the
whole,
you
know
out
of
the
whole,
the
city,
so
that
needs
that
last
boom.
All.
A
O
O
I
don't
want
their
us
to
have
a
misperception
in
our
minds
that,
just
because
we
can
issue
sales
tax
bonds
at
any
time,
which
we've
heard
a
lot
today
that
that
means
that
that's
it's
always
going
to
be
a
good
time
to
issue
sales
tax
bonds.
Those
are
two
really
different
things.
Chris.
O
Sorry,
so
so,
just
because
we
can
issue
sales,
tax
bonds
at
any
time
doesn't
mean
that
any
time
is
a
good
time
to
issue
sales
tax
bonds.
So
I
I
would
like
to
have
some.
O
You
know
more
than
just
an
expectation
that
that
we
can
get
the
information
that
that
people
council
members
feel
that
they
need
to
make
their
decisions
on
these
and
and
not
have
it,
be
kicking
the
can,
because
the
the
risk
is
that
all
of
the
numbers
could
go
up.
While
the
momentum
for
everything
could
go
down,
and
I
would
be
real
mad
about
that.
J
E
J
Okay
and
we've
heard
a
lot
about
the
need
and
urgency
of
at
least
a
couple
of
these,
particularly
again,
I
go
back
to
the
transformer
upgrade
and
emergency
backup
generators
can.
Is
there
an
ant
when
do
like?
Ideally,
we
would
have
done
this.
I
don't
know
years
ago
right,
but
is
this
something
that
needs
to
happen
tomorrow
again?
I
ideally,
we
would
have
done
it
years
ago,
but.
P
Hi
councilmember
fowler,
would
you
mind
repeating
the
question?
Is
it
about
a
specific
project
on
the
list
or
all
of
the
projects
yeah.
P
Generators,
yes,
this
is
we're
on
borrow
time
with
the
transformer
we're
on
borrow
time.
We
don't
know
right,
and
hopefully
we
won't
experience.
P
You
know
a
catastrophic
failure
of
the
transformer,
but
this
planning
for
and
budgeting
for
and
trying
to
hope
for
this
transformer
replacement
has
been
on
this
list,
for
I
want
to
say
two
two
and
a
half
years,
and
so
we're
definitely
on
borrowed
time.
We
also
keep
in
mind
have
lead
times
for
ordering
of
the
equipment.
P
You
know
rfp
getting
getting
the
contractors
on
site.
All
of
those
things
take
time
and
ben
ludke
has
a
really
nice.
You
know
email
outlining
all
of
those
contingencies
that
need
to
be
in
place
for
the
transformer
itself
to
actually
be
installed,
thanks
to
jorge
and
his
team,
providing
that
information,
but
we're
close
to
100
design,
and
we
would
be
able
to
kick
off
construction
pretty
quickly,
but
but
we
don't
know
how
much
time
we
have
before
the
transformer
will
no
longer
function.
A
Would
I
would
I
liked
the
idea
there,
but
I
would
really
like
to
get
some
of
this
stuff
over
the
gold
line
now
get
this
in.
I
know
it's
a
couple
months,
but
that
couple
months
can
give
that
couple
months
for
these
projects
and
then
allow
us
to
because
we
don't
have
discussions
on
the
rest
of
their
projects.
A
But
it'd
be
nice
to
make
a
decision
now
on
these
other
other
items
on
the
the
other,
the
top
seven.
Besides
the
three.
J
And
I
understand
that,
I'm
just
saying
I
understand
what
you're
saying
I'm
just
trying
to
think
of
a
compromise
that
council
member
wharton
is
saying
as
well
is
like
and
council
member
valdo
morris.
Are
we
going
to
come
back
and
have
this
discussion
and
then,
if
we
come
back
and
have
this
discussion
or
then
at
that
point
we're
going
to
be
like?
J
Oh,
we
really
don't
want
to
issue
another
sales
tax
bond
right,
which
I
think
I'm
not
trying
to
woman,
explain
what
chris
said,
but
that
seems
to
be
what
I'm
hearing
as
far
as
like
what
you
said
right.
Is
that
like
not
always,
is
it
a
good
time,
even
though
it's
it's
a
we
can
time,
and
so
my
my
thought
is
just
to
hold
off
a
little
bit
instead
of
a
straw
poll
today
to
hold
off
a
little
bit.
G
What
if
I
suggest
to
put
a
deadline
to
come
back,
and
I.
A
A
O
O
I'd
like
to
suggest
an
alternative
to
which
I
wish
I'd
thought
of
earlier.
O
I
don't
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
increasing
beyond
10
000
pot
in
your
park,
10.
O
Excuse
me,
it
sounds
like
there
may
be
some
interest
in
increasing
warm
springs
past
6
million.
O
H
F
F
I
would
really
like
to
stop
the
tasmanian
devil
swirling
that
we're
doing
with
our
rhetoric
right
now.
The
biggest
deadline
we
have
in
this
is
that
by
the
end
of
2024,
we
have
to
have
those
generators
installed.
We
have
about
22
weeks
minimum,
so
we
need
to
allocate
at
least
six
months
to
get
the
things
we
should
commit
that
by
the
last
meeting
in
august.
We
have
revisited
this
and
voted
on
it,
but
we
are
no
longer
engaged
in
useful
conversation
and
I'd
really
like
to
move
on
to
something
useful,
wait.
F
No
I'd
like
to
get
this
done
before
fall.
I'd
like
us
to
put
an
urgent,
an
urgent
push
on
us
to
get
this
done
before
the
fall
starts,
but
there
are
some
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
and
none
of
the
suggestions
are
doing
anything
for
us
to
get
down
to
the
brass
tacks:
they're
just
spiraling
us,
okay,.
A
I
have
a
straw
poll
on
the
floor.
Any
off
give.
A
Already
discussed,
we've
already
discussed
any
any
thumbs
up
or
thumb
sound.
H
F
R
F
H
Yeah
I
wanted
to
ask
a
friendly.
I
want
to
talk
to
a
friend
amendment,
and
the
friendly
amendment
to
me
is
to
talk
about
this
again,
either
in
august
or
september
like
and
then
get
it
and
get
it
get
all
of
the
bonds
out
and
decide
it
on
before
it's
too
late,
so
I'm
there.
H
G
Okay,
okay,
so
I
accept
the
friendly
amendment
to
add
september
as
the
the
deadline
to
revisit
the
older
items,
including
glendale,
has
a
discussion.
N
That's
not
what
I
heard
yeah.
E
N
A
A
A
The
item
number
five,
the
capital
improvement
program,
project
follow-up,
we'll
be
postponing
that
to
a
future
date
and
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
number
seven,
which
is
an
informational
update
on
the
anti-gentrification
and
displacement
plan
thriving
in
place
at
the
table.
I
have
allison
rollins
from
the
staff
here,
blake
thomas
dave,
driscoll
and
tim
thomas
also
at
the
table.
Allison
thank.
P
You,
mr
chair,
so
as
you
mentioned,
this
builds
on
the
update
that
was
presented
on
this
work
at
the
april
12
work
session,
and
it
will
include
results
of
the
team's
community
engagement
efforts
and
data
mapping
and
refinements
to
its
plans
for
the
next
phase.
The
council
allocated
funding
in
june
2020
for
a
gentrification
assessment
displacement,
minifig
mitigation
plan
and
the
project
work
got
underway
september
2021..
P
So
today's
an
opportunity
for
the
council
to
provide
feedback
on
this
work
at
this
point
and
can
expects
to
return
in
september
with
proposed
policy
recommendations.
There
are
a
number
of
policy
questions
in
the
staff
report
associated
with
this,
but
I
will
turn
it
over
to
blake
for
what
he
needs
to
say.
P
P
So
today
the
the
team
will
be
presenting
what
we
learned
from
our
engagement
and
the
data
analysis
with
the
intention
of
setting
the
stage
for
future
policy
discussions,
and
I
wanted
to
thank
you
again
for
allowing
us
the
time
to
present
today
and
for
your
participation
in
helping
the
city
find
solutions.
The
city
has
accomplished
or
made
reasonable
progress
on
27
of
the
27
action
items
outlined
in
growing
slc.
P
All
of
this
goes
a
very
long
way,
and
we
will
see
today
that
continued
investment
in
housing
is
needed
to
support
salt
lake
city
residents.
So
looking
forward
to
the
conversation
this
afternoon
and
your
input
and
I'll
now
turn
the
time
over
to
david
driscoll,
who
is
the
lead
consultant
on
the
project
thanks.
S
Great
thanks:
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
thanks
for
having
us,
it's
been
an
honor
and
a
pleasure
to
work
with
your
city
staff
and
with
the
community
on
this
project.
We've
called
it
thriving
in
place
through
actually
a
conversation
with
our
community
working
group
to
frame
it
as
the
the
thing
we're
trying
to
achieve,
which
is
to
create
a
place
where
people
can
stay
afford
to
be
raise
their
families
grow
old
and
thrive,
and
that's
while
we're
looking
at
how
we
can
stop
displacement.
S
All
of
that
work
is
towards
creating
a
healthy,
thriving
place
for
everybody.
I'm
going
to
talk
briefly
about
what
we
heard
through
the
community
engagement
tim's,
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
we
learned
through
the
data
analysis
and
then
I'm
going
to
talk
about
what
comes
next.
Very
briefly,
I
know
you're
behind
schedule,
so
we're
going
to
fly
through
a
little
bit
and
I
just
want
to
call
out
to
people
listening
in
all
of
the
material
we're
going
to
talk
about
has
been
uploaded
to
the
thriving
in
place.
S
Slc.Org
website
there's
a
summary
report.
There
there's
links
for
digging
deeper.
You
can
download
the
survey
data
and
look
at
it
by
council,
district
by
income,
etc.
You
can
go
to
the
sorting
of
all
the
input
we
had
from
interviews
and
focus
groups,
but
we're
going
to
give
you
a
very
high,
take
away
presentation
this
evening.
S
So
key
takeaways,
probably
not
a
big
surprise,
but
display
some
pressures
in
salt
lake
city
are
very
high
and
all
the
analysis
shows
that
it's
getting
worse,
it's
very
top
of
mind
for
the
community
from
the
survey
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
survey
input
that
we
had.
It's
impacting
a
lot
of
people
in
many
areas
of
the
city,
not
in
just
one
or
two
neighborhoods,
we're
losing
diversity
as
a
result
of
displacement.
S
S
A
S
Q
S
N
S
N
S
No
problem
no
problem,
so
I
I'm
just
going
to
jump
to
the
the
punch
line,
which
is
we
really
see
the
the
results
from
the
phase.
S
All
this
data
should
should
underscore
that
the
need
for
a
coordinated
response
to
the
challenges
of
displacement.
I
want
to
underscore
okay,
if.
Q
S
Go
to
the
next
slide
underscore.
We
did
a
really
broad
and
deep
engagement
effort,
and
I
want
to
call
out
and
thank
doctors,
evas
garcia
and
alessandro
rigolon
from
the
university
of
utah
and
dozens
of
their
students
who
were
out
in
the
community
interviewing
people
doing
surveys
hosting
focus
groups.
S
They
really
helped
us
leverage
the
outreach
effort
and
reach
thousands,
literally
thousands
of
people.
We
also
had
six
community
liaisons
who
worked
with
us
people
from
community
who
we
hired
to
go
and
do
in
language
engagement
with
people
who
are
particularly
hard
to
reach.
So
we
had
focus
groups
with
people
who
are
unsheltered
people
who
are
in
insecure
housing
situations.
S
So
we
could
really
understand
not
just
the
data
but
the
real
sort
of
the
life
stories
of
what
it's
like
to
go
through
displacement
and
the
impacts
that
ripple
beyond
just
being
displaced
from
a
house
but
sort
of
what
that
what
happens
in
people's
lives
and
how
do
they
deal
with
the
impacts
of
that
and
and
the
repercussions
I'm
just
going
to
we're
going
to
fly
through
the
next
few
slides.
So
if
we
skip
past
getting
the
word
out,
there's
our
community
liaisons,
who
I
described
on
the
next
slide,
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
S
If
I
can
do
it,
we
did
one
of
the
things
that
was
particularly,
I
think
great.
In
this
eva
center
students
did
workshops
in
several
schools.
We
had
about
200
students
talking
about
what
home
means
talking
about.
Neighborhood
change,
that's
happening
in
their
neighborhoods,
their
idea.
What
makes
a
neighborhood
a
great
place
and
I'm
going
to
jump
ahead
and
just
out
of
the
interest
of
time,
jump
down
to
slide
13.
S
S
The
factors
that
drive
it
and
and
the
geography
where
it's
playing
out
in
salt
lake
city
and
around
the
region-
I
really
want
to
underscore
this-
is
not
just
a
salt
lake
city
issue.
It's
a
regional
issue
and
the
analysis
looked
at
the
at
the
region
and
also
underscored
this
is
not
unique
to
the
wasatch
area.
S
This
is
playing
out
in
cities
around
the
country
in
terms
of
escalating
housing,
prices
and
rents
and
what
that's
doing
to
communities
so
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
to
learn
from,
and
there's
also
a
lot
of
great
opportunity
to
lead
and
show
other
other
cities
about
what
can
be
done.
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
tim
to
talk
about
the
work
that
they
did.
C
Thanks
dave,
so
much
can
I
move
it
to
slide
16
please.
This
is
the
second
map
there
you
go.
Thank
you
so
much.
My
name
is
tim
thomas,
I'm,
the
research
director
for
uc
berkeley's
urban
displacement
project.
I
study
gentrification
displacement
across
the
nation.
We
specialize
on
international
gentrification
displacement.
It's
been
a
real
honor
to
work
on
salt
lake
city
and
I
have
to
admit
I
found
some
things
here
that
I've
never
seen
before.
C
So
what
you
see
on
the
map
on
the
right
here
is
all
the
green
areas
in
that
area
within
the
city
of
salt
lake
city
are
what
we
call
considerable,
affordable
spaces
or
neighborhoods
for
folks
that
are
making
about
50
percent
of
the
area.
Median
income
and
the
slashes,
the
red
slashes
in
short,
show
the
displacement
that's
going
on
in
the
areas.
What
that
tells
me
is
that
every
single
area
in
salt
lake
city,
unfortunately
that
is
affordable,
is
experiencing
displacement.
C
That
was
one
of
the
more
shocking
findings
I
found
before,
and
a
lot
of
the
problems
that
this
draws
from
is
that
this
is
a
regional
impact
ogden
to
provo,
everything
is
is
reflected
and
the
market
is
impacted.
What's
going
on
in
salt
lake
city,
it's
a
whole
regional
issue
where
there's
a
lot
of
folks
moving
in,
but
the
market
is
also
increasing
at
a
very,
very,
very
rapid
rate.
C
So
if
I
can
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
I'll
just
talk
real
quickly
about
key
takeaways
and
then
let
you
all
ask
key
questions
on
what
you
would
like
to
know
more
about
in
this
report.
One
of
the
big
things.
The
first
thing
is
that
displacement
is
very
well
significant
and
it's
getting
worse.
In
salt
lake
city,
there
are
no
more
affordable
neighborhoods
in
salt
lake
city,
where
families
can
move
once
displaced,
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
we
used
a
model.
That's
never
been
used
before
in
measuring
displacement.
C
There
are
three
families
for
every
one,
affordable
unit
for
them.
Almost
half
of
all
salt
lake
city
households
are
rent
burdened.
More
than
half
of
all,
families
with
children
live
in
displacement,
risk,
neighborhoods,
latinx
and
black
households
have
median
incomes
that
are
lower
than
what
is
required
to
afford.
S
I'm
going
to
quickly
close
it
by
highlighting
that
what
comes
next
so
there's
a
lot
of
data
to
dig
into,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
people
understand
that
we've
also
started
developing
a
framework
for
what
we
do
in
response.
And
if
you
go
on
the
website,
there's
both
the
what
we
heard
and
learned
page,
which
gives
all
the
results
from
phase
one.
S
And
then,
if
you
also,
if
you
click
on
priorities
for
action,
you'll
find
that
there
are
five
draft
guiding
principles
that
we've
put
out,
and
these
will
be
the
the
focus
for
a
conversation
tomorrow
with
a
cross-departmental
team
here
at
the
city
and
on
thursday,
with
our
community
working
group
as
a
first
step
towards
going
back
to
the
community
and
talking
about
okay,
here's
the
situation.
What
are
the
things
we
could
do
and
just
to
highlight
examples?
S
One
of
the
guiding
principles
is
that
we
need
to
be
both
pro-housing
and
we
need
to
be
pro-tenant
and
we
need
to
do
those
at
the
same
time
and
oftentimes.
Those
are
set
up
as
being
somehow
in
opposition
to
each
other,
but
we
need
to
do
them
both.
So
there's
sort
of
going
to
be
a
combination
of
policy
recommendations,
we'll
come
back
to
you,
and
these
are
draft
guiding
principles.
We're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
conversation
about
them,
but
we'll
be
coming
back
september.
S
Is
our
target
to
come
back
and
present
to
you
an
anti-displacement
strategy,
some
some
specific
things
in
a
sequence
and
phase
that
could
be
done
to
make
a
difference
immediately
and
then
some
important
things
that
need
to
be
done.
That
would
have
a
longer-term
benefit,
but
an
important
benefit.
Yeah
all
right.
Thank.
M
I
appreciate
this
and
I'm
terrified
by
what
you
just
told
us
my
question
for
your
the
next.
The
second
phase
of
your
work
is:
how
specific
is
that
going
to
be
to
salt
lake
city
and
our
legal
landscape,
because
a
lot
of
the
things
that
I
imagine
working
in
a
lot
of
other
states
cannot
and
are
your
solutions
going
to
be
specific
to
what
we,
as
the
city,
council
and
the
mayor
of
salt
lake
city,
have
the
control
to
do.
M
M
Thanks
and
can
I
ask
a
follow-up
question,
I
I
guess
I
I
I
think
about
housing
a
lot
and
how
and
this
question
a
lot
and
I
kind
of
come
up
with
a
lot
of
things
that
I
think
would
work,
but
is
there
in
that
work?
Are
you?
M
Are
we
gonna
have
like
sort
of
a
prioritization
list
like
here's,
the
most
important
thing
and
you
need
to
be
focusing
on
creating
this
many
units,
but
also
this
many
affordable
units
like
I
have
a
hard
time,
knowing
if
we're
working
enough
on
just
creating
units
just
creating
supply
in
total
or
if
we
need
to
really
focus
more
on
just
creating
specifically
affordable
units.
M
I
think
displacement
is
happening
at
all
levels
in
the
market.
If
I
in
my
observation-
but
you
probably
know
a
little
bit
better
than
me,
so
I
think
we
kind
of
have
to
make
create
housing
at
all
levels.
But
I
guess
how
specific
is
that
policy
recommendation
going
to
be
able
to
get
us
so.
S
Q
S
And
that
there'll
be
a
number
of
recommendations.
I
think
you
know
what's
important
about
this,
that
it's
it's
not.
You
know.
Yes,
it
intersects
with
an
affordable
housing
plan,
but
this
is
an
anti-displacement
strategy,
so
it's
going
to
focus
in
particular
on
the
most
vulnerable
and
things
we
can
do
to
to
stop
their
displacement,
but
also
speak
to
other
things
that
are
important
to
do
on
a
broader
scale
in
order
to
create
again
the
the
goal
of
this
is
a
city
that
you
can
stay
and
thrive
in.
F
A
And
just
on
this
is
affordable
housing,
and
then
we
talk
also
about
affordable
living,
which
includes
another
big
portion
of
their
income,
which
is
the
transportation
side.
Does
your
study
kind
of
bring
those
two
together,
keep
them
separate
or,
and
will
we
see
something
on
the
transportation,
because
I
know
that's
also
a
big
piece
of
their
affordability.
A
O
All
right,
can
you
just
restate
earlier.
You
said
you
saw
something
you'd
never
seen
before
and
it
sounded
like.
You
were
saying
that
people
are
being
displaced
and
there's
nowhere
else
to
go,
but
I
I
feel,
like
I
read
that
that
happens
in
a
lot
of
cities,
and
there
are
no,
there
are
no
more
lesser
or
more
affordable
neighborhoods.
C
C
O
R
H
I
have
a
question
on
and
I
know
you
said
you're
going
to
come
back
with
some
ideas
and
solutions
will
will
this
apply
to
or
have
you
guys
looked
at
the
some
of
the
rda's
ideas
that
we
already
have
to
kind
of
mitigate
some
of
these
issues
that
we're
dealing
as
a
administration's
desire
that
what
you
propose?
We
also
take
a
look
into
within
the
rda
lens,
or
is
it
just
just
city-wide
and
but
not
necessarily
rda-related?
S
I
think
there
will
be
a
combination
of
things
city-wide
and
then
and
more
focused
in
terms
of
having
a
equity
lens
in
in
terms
of
where,
where
where
this,
it's
not
there's
not
gonna,
be
a
one-size-fits-all
solution.
Nor
is
there
gonna
be
any
quick,
easy
solution.
It's
going
to
have
to
be
tailored
to
particular
areas
and
particular
neighborhoods.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Hi
angela
price
policy,
director
and
community
neighborhoods
just
want
to
speak
to
the
rda.
So
we
have
a
city
stakeholder
group
that
consists
of
members
from
almost
every
single
division
or
department
within
the
city.
N
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure,
because
sometimes
people
who
are
joining
the
meeting
listening
can't
see
the
slides
that
are
on
the
website
is
thriving
thrivinginplaceslc.org.
N
And
that
has
a
lot
of
this
information
that
they
talked
about.
If
council
members
have
any
other
questions
based
on
that
information
on
the
website,
please
just
send
them
to
council
staff
and
we'll
make
sure
to
get
them
to
the
consultants.
So,
thanks.
A
P
My
eyes
get
worse
as
the
night
goes
on,
so
yes,
this
is
a
briefing
on
progress
in
the
new
ballpark
station
area
plan,
the
department
of
community
and
neighborhood
development,
or
can
has
been
working
on
this
since
october
2020..
The
purpose
of
the
briefing
is
to
update
the
council
at
this
midpoint
in
the
process
and
provide
the
council
the
opportunity
to
make
comments
and
suggestions
on
the
draft
plan.
P
The
plan
is
designed
to
guide
future
public
and
private
investment
in
the
vicinity
of
smith's
ballpark
and
the
ballpark
track
station.
It
recommends
specific
infrastructure
improvements
in
the
area
to
create
a
heart
of
the
neighborhood,
to
facilitate
transit
connections
and
to
support
livability
and
growth
in
residential
office,
restaurant
and
retail
properties.
P
The
city's
transportation
division
was
awarded
a
transportation
and
land
use
connection
grant
from
the
wasatch
front
regional
council
and
this
helped
fund
the
plan.
The
draft
plan
is
premised
in
large
part
on
continued
use
of
the
city-owned
ballpark
facility
by
a
privately
owned
sports
franchise.
The
council
on
the
administration
agree
on
the
importance
of
this
private
franchise
in
the
city
as
a
centerpiece
to
future
planning
and
investment
and
to
the
neighborhood
as
a
whole.
P
The
draft
plan
recommends
six
big
moves,
which
nanette
will
discuss
more
in
her
presentation,
and
the
planning
commission
will
consider
the
draft
plan
and
hear
public
comment
at
their
july
27th
meeting
after
additional
reviews
and
updates,
the
plan
will
be
brought
back
to
the
council
for
consideration
and
potential
adoption
later
this
year.
The
policy
questions
are
in
your
staff
report,
including
questions
about
public
investments
proposed
in
the
area
and
other
aspects,
but
I
will
turn
it
over
to
nan
unless
someone
else
needs
the
mic.
First,.
Q
O
Q
Thank
you,
scott
and
if
we
could
go
to
the
first
slide,
so
the
purpose
of
the
this
presentation
is
to
give
the
council
a
briefing
on
the
ballpark
stairs
stationary
plan
and
where
we're
where
we
are
at
in
the
process.
The
ballpark
stationary
plan
was
initiated
by
the
mayor
in
december
2020..
Q
The
consultant
on
the
plan
was
gsbs,
whose
staff
worked
closely
with
to
identify
goals
for
the
future
development
of
the
community.
The
stationary
plan
is
intended
to
capitalize
on
community
assets
and
guide
future
development
and
redevelopment
in
the
neighborhood.
The
plan's
boundaries
are
within
both
the
central
community
master
plan
and
the
downtown
master
plan.
The
boundary
includes
the
neighborhoods
from
I-15
to
the
west
side
of
state
street
and
900
south
to
1700
sales.
Q
During
the
development
of
the
draft
plan,
the
central
communi
community
master
plan,
the
downtown
master
plan,
growing
slc,
planned
salt
lake
and
reimagining
and
and
reimagined
nature
were
considered
other
plans
that
were
considered
that
hadn't
currently
been
adopted.
Our
life
on
state,
the
homeless,
resource,
center's,
neighborhood
action
strategies
and
the
salt
lake
city,
street
lighting
master
plan,
and
the
next
slide.
Please
scott.
Q
Q
And
next
slide,
please
so
the
ballpark
stationary
plan
proposes
key
concepts
to
guide
development
and
redevelopment
in
the
neighborhood.
These
key
concepts
will
have
significant
impact
to
the
ballpark
neighborhood.
The
small
area
plans
recommend
six
big
moves
in
the
community
that
will
help
transform
the
neighborhood
as
pressure
for
development
or
redevelopment
occurs.
Q
Please,
the
goals
and
strategies
and
actions
are
also
listed
in
the
small
area
plan
on
pages
11-15
on
the
draft.
The
goals
here
are
broad
in
nature
and
direct
future
development
in
the
community
strategies
are
more
focused
than
a
goal
and
describe
ways
to
implement
the
larger
picture
goal.
Actions
describe
specific
ways
to
implement
the
goal
as
development
or
redevelopment
occur
over
a
longer
time
frame.
Q
The
drought
future
land
use
map
in
a
com
accompanying
future
land
use
designations
can
be
found
on
pages
17
through
19
of
the
plan.
Each
of
the
future
land
use
designations
describe
the
appropriate
development
pattern
of
the
area
where
density
building,
height
land
use,
emphasized
transportation
modes
and
catalyst
areas
which
are
attributes
the
designation.
Q
Q
There
are
several
areas
in
the
trans
where
transportation
is
addressed
in
the
plan,
but
the
major
the
major
connections
are
described
on
pages
14
through
16
and
page
20
of
the
draft
plan.
The
recommendations
include
widenings
by
walk,
lit
widths,
prioritizing
heavily
used
corridors
within
the
neighborhood.
Q
The
plan
also
recommends
bike
routes
on
major
streets
like
300,
west
and
main
street
and
east
west
routes
to
the
north
of
the
ballpark
station
on
paxton
avenue,
kings,
kensington
and
andrew
avenues.
Easier
access
to
track
stations
is
recommended
with
a
pedestrian
connection
from
the
station
to
lucie
avenue
towards
the
north
and
next
slide,
and
the
last
key
item
that's
proposed
for
the
creation
of
the
ballpark
plan
is
the
creation
of
a
festival
street.
Q
Q
Q
Great,
the
required
public
notification
process
began
in
december
2021
and
continues
today,
based
on
some
of
the
public
comments.
Staff
received.
The
small
area
plan
has
been
modified
to
reflect
these
comments
on
june
8
2022.
The
planning
commission
was
briefed
on
the
draft
plan
during
a
work
session
meeting
and
additional
modifications
had
been
made
to
the
draft
plan.
As
a
result
of
this
meeting,
the
station
area
plan
will
will
return
to
planning
commission
on
july
27th
for
a
public
hearing
and
possible
recommendation
to
the
council.
Q
After
this
hearing,
a
transmittal
to
city
council
is
possible
late
summer
for
a
possible
hearing
late
summer
or
fall
22,
and
this
is
a
good
time
if
the
council
has
any
questions
for
staff
or
general
comments,
we're
happy
to
address
or
answer
those
questions
or
comments.
M
That's
my
mono
yeah
thanks
nan.
I
first
just
a
comment:
I'm
I'm
really
really
excited
for
this.
I
have
been
involved
and
been
able
to,
and
I've
been
reviewing
it
and
been
in
community
meetings,
and
I
think
it
we
need
to
give
some
props
to
sues.
Who
is
here
as
well
who
kind
of
started
this
in
transportation,
which
is
really
weird,
but
I'm
glad
that
the
work
from
transportation
is
really
more
turned
into
this
big
planning
effort.
I
really
think
it's.
M
I
think,
the
vision
that
this
presents
for
my
neighborhood,
I'm
a
resident
of
ballpark,
not
just
a
represent,
not
that
just
council
person
for
it.
I
think
it's
exactly
what
I
am
hoping
to
see.
My
neighborhood
transform
into
I've
said
this
a
million
times,
but
I
think
the
ballpark
has
the
so
much
potential
to
become
one
of
the
premier
neighborhoods
and
and
really
a
story
that
that,
like
students
in
urban
design
classes,
are
going
to
be
looking
at
in
10
years
and
saying
like
how
did
they
do
that
there?
M
So
I'm
really
excited-
and
I
think
that
this
plan
it
sets
us
out
on
the
right
foot.
I
I've
have
one
really
specific
question
that
I
haven't
been
able
to
quite
figure
out.
There's
two
maps
in
the
plan
that
look
almost
similar.
One
is
the
land
use
map
and
the
others
the
character
area
descriptions.
Can
you
just
like
talk
me
through
the
difference
between
those
two
maps
and
what
people
should
look
to
for
character?
Q
Yeah
I'd
be
happy
to
so
the
character
description
map
really
describes
what's
presently
at
that
location,
so
it
describes
like
attributes
like
building
scale
massing
of
buildings,
types
of
uses,
general
connectivity.
Q
Attributes
of
the
area
and
the
character
map
influenced
the
future
land
use
map
and
the
future
land
use
map
would
be
a
map
that
reflects
the
character
maps,
but
it
also
proposes
future
land
juices
in
the
area
and
it's
the
future
land
use
map
that
influences
the
zoning
map.
Q
A
E
A
Think
that's
a
great
bonus
to
the
to
the
area,
so
I
appreciate
the
briefing
and
you
guys
have
a
great
day
unless
there's
any
further
questions
nope.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thanks
for
your.
E
A
Moving
on
to
number
item
number
nine:
the
resolution
to
transit
master
plan
implementation
interlocal.
Well,
that's
that's
a
written
briefing,
so
number
nine's
a
written
briefing
and
number
ten,
which
is
a
board
appointment
for
the
transportation
advisory
board.
Janae
nardone
and
she
is
going
to
come
on
the
webex.
M
E
N
N
Yeah,
the
information
has
been
available
in
the
public
realm,
and
so
I
think
and
you've
advertised
the
public
hearing.
So
I
think
you
you
have
to
go
forward
with
the
public
hearing
tonight,
but
would
do.
P
A
So,
let's
take
a
break
until
5,
55.,
okay,
555
we'll
come
back.
R
R
R
A
And
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
10
board
appointment,
the
transportation
advisory
board
and
janae
nardone
is
on
the
screen
with
us.
Janae
welcome
to
the
city
council
meeting.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
desire
to
serve
on
the
transportation
advisory
board.
Tell
us
a
few
reasons
why
you
or
tell
us
about
why
you
want
to
join
on
the
join
the
board.
L
I
came
out
here
in
2010
for
graduate
school
lived
here
for
a
while
moved
back
to
california
and
moved
back
and
as
I
intended
to
root
here,
I
started
engaging
in
the
ways
I
could
so
that
most
immediately
met
community
council,
but
I
for
my
career,
I've
worked
in
mission,
oriented
organizations
and
non-profits
with
some
experience
with
experience
with
grassroots
organizing
and
some
some
experience
around.
You
know
looking
at
things
through
a
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion
lens,
and
I
currently
also
serve
on
the
board
of
sweet
streets.
L
I
bike,
walk
and
take
transit
in
salt
lake
city
and
I'm
familiar
with
those
issues
within
the
ball.
You
know
in
the
ballpark
liberty
wells
in
our
district
five
area,
I'm
rambling,
but
that's
I
think
that
gives
you
a
kind
of
an
idea.
I
just
I
care
about
our
community.
A
M
Thanks
for
applying
for
this,
I
know
that
you've
been
interested
in
this
for
a
while.
I
was
excited
to
see
that
the
mayor
selected
your
application
for
the
transportation
advisory
board,
because
I
know
how
how
engaged
you
are
in
in
these
issues.
So
thank
you
for
continuing
to
serve
district
five
and
the
city.
A
And
janae,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
There's
no
other
further
comments
or
questions
here.
I
appreciate
your
engagement
and
I
appreciate
your
your
desire
to
serve
the
city
and
that's
always
a
welcome
to
for
volunteers.
To
do
that,
so
your
name
will
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda
for
our
seven
o'clock.
Formal
meeting
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
you
can
always
join
us
and
you
know
at
our
meeting
so
have
a
great
evening.
A
A
Take
a
seat
and
again
thank
you
for
your
engagement.
Thank
you
for
your
application
and
just
tell
us
a
little
bit
reason.
You
want
to
join
the
board.
E
Sure
so
this
board
sort
of
combines
my
twin
passions
of
transportation
and
salt
lake
city,
so
pretty
pretty
good
combo.
I
was
not
born
here.
E
I
was
born
in
germany
moved
here
when
I
was
four,
my
family
moved
here
as
refugees
and
in
short,
this
city
shaped
me
in
so
many
ways,
and
so
it's
an
honor
to
be
able
to
serve
the
city
in
in
this
capacity
in
some
small
way
and
as
far
as
the
transportation
component,
I
went
to
school
for
city
planning
and
it's
what
I
think
about
all
the
time
I
you
know
I
walk.
I
bike.
I
take
transit
in
this
community
and
I
drive
from
time
to
time
as
well.
A
A
So
it's
it's
so
refreshing
to
have
someone
again
who
wants
to
make
the
city
better
and
has
a
passion
on
the
side
also
so
appreciate
it
very
much
again.
You'll
also
be
on
our
consent
agenda.
This
evening's
formal
meeting-
and
you
need
not
hang
around
until
then,
but
you're,
more
than
welcome
all
right
thanks
a
lot
leo.
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
Yeah
wonderful.
A
And
we're
kind
of
olivia.
N
Was
planning
on
joining
in
person,
but
I'm
not
seeing
her?
Oh
okay,
she
wasn't
scheduled
until
605.
So
oh.
G
N
Was
maybe
I'll
go
through
this
announcement
really
quickly,
if
that's
okay
and
maybe
by
a
little
time,
just
wanted
to
make
sure
the
council
is
aware
that
our
meeting
next
tuesday
is
at
the
sorensen
center
and
in
preparation
for
that
meeting,
we've
identified
that
there
are
some
bandwidth
limitations
at
the
sorenson
center
and
so
making
sure
that
you
down
you'll
download
your
packet
in
advance
of
the
meeting
just
in
case
there
are
issues
downloading
it
while
you're
there,
especially
during
the
day
when
that
internet
is
being
used
by
a
bunch
of
people
who
access
the
center,
we'll
have
maybe
back
up
some
backup
packets.
N
Just
so
that,
if
things
aren't
reliable,
we
can
have
a
backup.
There
are
a
couple
of
ways
you
can
download
your
dropbox
materials
to
your
computer.
You
can
download
it
from
primegov
to
your
computer
or
we
can
have
a
hard
copy
printed
out
for
you,
just
let
us
or
your
liaison
know
if
you'd
rather
have
a
hard
copy.
N
So
just
let
us
know,
and
then,
if
there
are
any
questions
about
the
logistics
for
that
meeting,
let
us
know
that
as
well.
Our
staff's
been
working
hard
at
noticing
it
and
coming
up
with
fun
plans
for
it.
So
I
think
it
will
be
a
good
experience,
so
yeah.
M
N
That's
accurate,
yes,
our
staff
has
been,
and
I
give
credit
to
ims
and
cindy
lou
for
trying
in
all
manner
of
ways
to
make
it
work.
N
You
know
we'll
record
it
and
have
it
on
all
the
normal
places,
so
people
can
walk
so
people
can
watch
after
the
fact
and
yes,
there
will
be
a
food
truck
for
meeting
attendees
so
come
to
the
meeting
and
get
a
raffle
ticket
or
a
thing
for
a
meal
at
the
food
truck.
Yes,
go
ahead.
N
Looking
at
like,
maybe
she
knows
more
specifics
about
what
the
social
media
plans
are.
I
have
a
feeling
our
people
are
already
planning
that
if
they
haven't,
we've
asked
the
mayor
to
promote
it
and
share
it
on
her
social
media
feeds.
Since
there's
a
lot
of
engagement
there
so
yeah.
Thank
you
all
right.
I
don't.
F
N
I
think
we're
all
really
excited
for
for
the
event,
I
think
it'll
be
great
and
thanks
for
your
guys's
help
in
facilitating
it.
So
should
we
take
a
quick
break,
the
council
could.
N
N
It
won't
be
for
the
formal
meeting
yet
we'll
return
to
the
work
session
once
the
board
appointment.
Oh
she's,
walking
in.
R
A
Yeah
have
a
seat.
Thank
you
sure
thing:
council,
we're
back
and
for
item
number,
12
board,
appointment,
human
rights,
commission,
olivia,
armigalo.
A
L
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you,
council.
My
name
is
olivia
jaramillo
and
I
was
born
and
raised
in
mexico.
I
immigrated
to
the
united
states
when
I
was
14
and
I
I've
experienced
many
things
in
my
life.
I'm
a
transgender
woman,
I'm
a
retired
air
force
veteran
I've.
Ever
since
I
retired
from
the
military.
Three
years
ago.
L
I've
been
actively
involved
in
politics
because
it
feels
like,
like
that's
the
right
thing
to
do,
and
ever
since,
since
I
immigrated,
I've
always
felt
this
need
to
help
people
and
being
an
immigrant
I've
been
on
the
other
side.
I've
been
on
the
other
side
of
being
thrown
in
the
back
of
a
border
patrol
van
just
because
of
my
skin
color
I've.
L
I
came
over
as
a
documented
immigrant
and
it
still
occurred
to
me
for
me
it's
always
been
about
correcting
wrongs
or
ensuring
people
don't
go
through
some
of
the
experiences
I've
had
and
I
think
that's
what
made
me
join
the
military.
That's
what
made
me
run
for
the
state
legislature
a
couple
years
ago.
That
is
what
really
drives
my
passion
working
with
equality
utah.
L
It's
I've
always
been
it's.
I
I've
always
joked
with
my
son.
That's
my
son
back
there
and
I
always
joke
with
him.
You
know
that
it's
like
this
thing
that
we
have
that
it's
almost
like
we're
like
real
life,
superheroes
all
of
us,
because
anybody
who
wants
to
do
better
for
somebody
else,
it's
it's
a
hero
and
and
I've
always
felt
that
drive
within
me
to
do
so
so.
G
O
I
I've
known
olivia
for
a
long
time
and
she's
an
excellent
district,
three
resident,
in
addition
to
being
an
excellent
person
and
yeah,
first
and
foremost,
let's
which
district
does
she
live
in,
but
I
can't
I
can't
think
of
a
better
fit
for
someone
on
our
human
rights
commission
in
the
direction
that
we
want
our
human
rights
commission
to
take-
and
I
think
it'll
be
a
great
addition
and
I'm
super
excited
to
support
you
and
thanks
for
applying.
H
You
all
have
good
things
to
say
about
you,
so
thank
you,
and
you
know
I
know
earlier
for
a
few
years
and
campaigning
and
things
like
that,
and
so
I
know
her
kindness,
so
I'm
excited
to
bring
this
kind
soul
to
this
human
rights
commission,
and
I
know
you're
gonna
make
a
great
leader
there.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilwoman.
M
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
your
passion.
I
appreciate
your
willingness
to
get
involved
because
that's
the
big
effort
so-
and
this
is
a
wonderful
commission
so
awesome.
I
appreciate
that
very
much
you'll
be
on
tonight's
formal
consent
agenda.
A
E
A
But
thank
you
very
much
for
joining
the
commission.
Thank.