►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 12/13/2022
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
Happy
holidays
and
welcome
to
the
13
December
2022
city
council
meeting.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
means
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whatever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
A
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment.
Please
join
us
tonight
during
our
7
PM
formal
meeting.
To
share
your
comments.
We
of
course
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mailing
us
at
P.O
box,
145-476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
84114,
email,
council.com
or
via
VIA.
Our
24-hour
phone
comment
line,
801
535-7654
written
comments
receive
on
agenda
topics,
are
shared
with
council
members
and
posted
to
our
website.
A
B
B
So
even
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City
we're
down
three
percent
from
where
we
were
last
week,
we'll
head
to
that
next
slide,
which
is
our
update
from
Salt
Lake
County,
just
to
kind
of
show
the
progress
that
we've
made
over
the
past
three
months
in
cases
in
case
counts
and
then
the
next
slide
is,
as
always,
the
Wastewater
update,
which
continues
to
show
no
Trend
so
present,
but
no
Trend,
which,
which
is
where
it
was
last
week.
Oh,
that's
on
the
the
next
slide.
B
That's
they're,
we're
hitting
record
numbers
with
that,
and
then
emergency
visits
at
Intermountain,
Primary,
Children's
Hospital
are
setting
records
for
the
last
decade,
at
least
according
to
people
at
the
hospital
up
there.
So
this
winter,
it's
critical
to
make
sure
that
you
have
your
flu
vaccine.
They
say
if
you
haven't
gotten
it
yet
get
it
now,
and
if
you're
feeling
just
a
little
bit
under
the
weather,
mask
up
something
that
you
might
not
even
think
is
cold
it
just
a
scratchy.
B
C
Good
afternoon,
council
members
for
our
community
engagement
highlights
first
of
all,
we
always
direct
people
to
the
community
engagement
feedback,
page
slc.gov
feedback
regularly
updated
with
surveys
and
engagement
opportunities.
Next
slide,
please
from
our
planning
division,
digital
sign
regulations.
This
is
a
proposal
from
the
Salt
Lake
City
School
District
to
regulate
electronic
Message
Board
signs
on
school
properties,
the
45-day
engagement
period
for
that
ends
on
December
30th.
C
Next
slide,
please
from
transportation
to
Virginia,
Street
and
West
Temple
reconstruction
feedback
maps
are
now
live
and
looking
for
public
input,
you
can
navigate
to
those
project,
pages
and
feedback
opportunities
through
the
feedback
Community
page
or
by
emailing.
The
email
addresses
set
up
for
these
projects.
C
Construction
is
underway
on
the
bypass
pipe
for
direct
filtration.
This
is
the
secret
Water
Treatment.
Plant
engagement
is
being
done
to
inform
the
public
that
City
Creek
Canyon
Road
will
be
closed
on
weekdays
to
pedestrian
and
bicycle
traffic.
At
about
picnic
site,
16
three
miles
up
the
canyon
through
mid-January
due
to
heavy
equipment
use.
It
is
open
on
weekends
and
holidays
through
this
phase
of
construction
for
recreational
use
from
our
office
on
the
mayor's
office.
A
reminder
that
tonight
at
midnight
is
the
deadline
for
Ace
applications.
C
C
And
lastly,
our
upcoming
events-
winter
Farmers
Market,
continues
through
April
15th
at
the
Gateway.
The
last
park.
Ranger
jingling
mingle
event
is
next
Friday,
the
23rd
and
the
last
hurray,
which
is
a
New
Year's
Eve
event
is
being
put
on
by
the
Gateway
downtown
Alliance
and
the
blocks,
and
that
is
31st
starting
at
8
pm.
That's
it
for
me.
If
there's
any
questions
for
Community
engagement.
D
I
can't
really
explain
why,
to
be
honest
with
you,
we
would
have
expected
a
little
higher
uptake
rate
with
the
weather,
we'll
see
how
this
week
goes
with
the
snow
we're
seeing
outside
right
now,
but
there
is
capacity
in
almost
all
those
places
each
night,
so
we
are
encouraging
everyone
to
go
inside
as
much
as
possible,
particularly
now.
You'll
also
see
the
total
bids
have
gone
up
in
the
last
two
weeks.
D
That
is
what
the
VOA
has
opened
up
more
Flex
beds
in
their
women's
area
as
well
as
you
can
see
all
of
the
flex
blood
Flex
beds.
Excuse
me
and
all
the
Resource
Centers
are
now
24
hours
a
day.
They
move
from
that
12
hour
thing.
We
talked
about
earlier
to
doing
all
night
all
day,
so
people
can't
stay
in
there,
which
is
a
huge
benefit
to
the
system
and
fewer
people
coming
downtown
to
Rio
Grande,
hopefully
for
day
Services.
There
any
questions,
questions
on
that.
D
Youth
Resource
Center,
yes
yeah,
they
are
working
on
opening
up
more
beds.
The
council
gave
them
the
authority
to
do
that
and
they're
working
on
the
Staffing
and
the
logistics
of
that.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Yeah
next
slide
winter
clothing
drive
I'm,
pretty
sure
the
Council
Office
knows
about
this
has
been
advertising
it
for
the
public.
The
city
is
doing
a
closing.
Clothing
drive
this
Thursday
3
to
6
p.m.
Here,
on
the
east
side
of
the
building,
you
can
drive
up,
drop
off
items
and
there'll
be
staff
there
to
pick
them
up.
D
The
rapid
intervention
team
is
working
on
eight
locations.
However,
there's
not
current
encampment
impact
mitigation
activities
this
week.
For
various
reasons,
however,
there
are
some
Vehicles
along
ninth
West,
canac
Corridor
that
are
being
engaged
with
right
now.
The
other
thing
to
bring
up
is
next
week.
Next
Wednesday
is
the
annual
Candlelight
vigil
for
those
who
have
passed
on
the
streets.
That'll
be
5,
30
p.m.
In
Pioneer,
Park.
A
Council
will
be
moving
on
to
item
number
three
informational
on
the
thriving
in
place:
And
We,
Have
Allison
at
the
desk.
We
have
a
lot
going
on
today.
We
have
a
closed
session
and
a
few
other
things,
so
we
have
an
hour,
but
if
we
could
probably
cut
it
off
at
45
minutes
because
we
have
a
number
of
things
to
catch
back
up.
So
thank
you
very
much
Allison.
You
can
kick
us
off
in
Angela.
E
E
Just
two
other
things
to
respect
the
time.
One
is
that
full
implementation
of
the
plan
would
require
budget
and
Staffing
increases
ordinance
changes,
strategies
for
state
level
advocacy
and
new
Community
Partnerships.
The
department
anticipates
incorporating
this
plan
into
the
forthcoming
draft
of
the
new
five-year
housing
plan,
dubbed
housing
SLC,
and
can
Will
transmit
a
draft
of
housing
SLC
to
the
council
in
early
2023..
E
The
idea
is
that
housing
SLC
will
serve
as
the
state
mandated
moderate
income
housing
plan
and
the
city
needs
to
adopt
that
plan
by
the
end
of
20
of
FY
23.
That
is
end
of
June
to
comply
with
the
recent
state
code.
Changes
last
thing
I'm
going
to
mention
is
there
are
some
policy
questions
in
the
staff
report
and
I
I
will
turn
it
over
I
assume
to
met
a
mayor.
F
Thanks
Allison,
thank
you
Mr
chair,
and
we
failed
to
include
one
part
in
our
administrative
updates,
which
was
congratulations
to
Argentina
on
I,
can't
believe
you
have
two
council
members
who
are
still
here
participating
in
your
meeting,
but
it's
exciting.
Thank
you
for
I'm
I'm,
almost
as
excited
actually
to
congratulate
Argentina
as
I
am
to
have
thriving
in
place.
Yeah
thank.
F
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
collaboration
from
the
beginning
of
my
time
in
this
role
on
addressing
inequity
that
has
existed
for
decades
in
this
city,
some
of
which
has
even
been
embedded
in
our
own
policies
and
our
investments.
And
so
we
present
to
you
today
the
city's
first
gentrification
mitigation
plan,
fondly
known
as
thriving
in
place
of
which
Angela
and
others
are
going
to
give
you
the
details,
but
just
laying
back
to
December
of
2020.
F
We
brought
you
a
collective
Vision
around
how
to
actually
address
the
inequities
in
our
city
and
you've
already
implemented.
Some
of
the
zoning
issues
that
we've
brought
to
you
and
you
took
a
you-
had
a
very
big
meeting
a
couple
of
months
ago
and
addressed
a
bunch
of
those,
but
also
included
in
that
Beyond
land
use
policy
are
calls
to
action
of
specific
strategy
strategies
for
us
to
address
the
displacement
that's
happening
in
our
city
and
the
urban
displacement
project.
F
Analysis
that
happened
that
you're
going
to
learn
about
really
painted
a
grim
picture
in
a
data
format
of
which
we
already
knew
from
our
experience
living
in
the
city
and
representing
people
here,
which
is
that
there
is
no
affordable
housing,
no
affordable,
neighborhoods
I
should
say
left
in
the
entire
city.
Even
in
the
entire
region,
there
are
no
more
affordable,
neighborhoods
left,
and
so
when
people
are
displaced,
there
is
nowhere
for
them
to
go
nearby.
F
Families
and
people
of
color
are
disproportionately
impacted,
and
we
show
that
in
the
data
that
is
in
this
report
and
that's
also
been
further
exacerbated
by
the
housing
cost
increases
and
the
stagnant
wages
here,
thriving
in
place
is
a
Community
Driven
plan
and
what
you're
looking
at
is
based
off
of
4
000
comments
that
we
received
through
the
incredible
engagement.
That's
gone
on
in
this
process.
H
F
Today,
as
you
hear
from
this
project
team
about
the
ways
that
we
can
take
action
to
mitigate
displacement,
they're
going
to
focus
on
community
benefits
policy
and
tenant
relocation
assistance
program,
and
this
this
proposed
policy
is
absolutely
in
response
to
our
outdated
housing
loss
mitigation.
Ordinance.
Although
that's
really
just
one
component
of
many
solutions
that
you're
going
to
see
I
want
to.
F
Thank
you
for
the
time
the
attention
you
and
your
staff
have
already
given
to
thriving
in
place
and
your
feedback
that
we've
included
in
this
policy
framework,
so
I
hope
that,
as
we
move
into
the
adoption
phase,
you'll
continue
to
support
it
and
you
will
see
you
are
very
likely
to
see
funding
allocations
requested
in
our
next
year.
Budget
process
so
I'll
hand
it
over
to
Angela
price,
our
policy
director
in
community
and
neighborhoods
and
her
team
to
take
it
from
here.
Thanks
for
giving
me
a
moment.
I
Great
thank
you
mayor,
I,
appreciate
that
we
want
to
be
really
cognizant
of
our
15
minutes
to
present
so
I
just
want
to
before
I
turn
the
time
over
to
David.
Just
tell
you
that,
as
as
the
mayor
said,
this
is
really
kind
of
focusing
on
not
the
replacement
of
housing
loss
mitigation
which
David
will
get
into
of.
Why
we're
not
calling
it
a
replacement,
but
the
proposed
strategies.
I
This
is
a
proposal
we're
here
to
seek
your
feedback,
because
we
have
we're
currently
drafting
the
report,
and
so
I
want
to
just
emphasize
that
we
want
your
feedback
on
this.
We've
been
refining
even
up
until
yesterday
afternoon
on
how
we
are
presenting
this
and
the
framework
that
that's
being
proposed
here.
So
we
welcome
your
feedback.
We
welcome
your
hard
questions
and
with
that
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
David
for
a
short
presentation
and
then
as
much
time
as
you
guys
want
to
allocate
for
questions
where
we're
available.
So
thank
you
so
much.
A
J
J
What
we
learned
from
the
analysis
there's
also
the
draft
strategy
from
about
a
month
ago,
the
framework-
and
you
can
go
into
that.
That's
evolved
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
what's
in
the
council
packet
and
we're
working
towards
having
a
strategy,
a
full
strategy
document
to
share
out
in
January
that'll.
Go
then
through
the
formal
process,
so
we're
still
in
refinement
mode
and
I
do
want
to
thank
the
entire
city
team.
J
That's
been
like
really
rolling
up
sleeves
with
us,
and
the
community
members
have
been
rolling
up
sleeves
with
us
to
figure
out
how
we
take
these
ideas
and
and
present
them
in
a
way
that
people
can
understand
how
they
they
work
together
as
a
strategy
and
to
really
make
them
workable
in
terms
of
thinking
forward
to
implementation.
How
you
manage
these
strategies
over
time,
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
J
There's
just
a
diagram.
I
just
want
to
share
quickly,
if
you're
going
to
remember
what
it
is,
what
is
the
anti-displacement
strategy?
It's
these
three
Central
circles
protect
preserve,
produce
so
protect
tenants
from
displacement,
preserve
the
affordable
housing
that
we
have
when
we
can
and
then
produce
more
affordable
housing
at
the
end
of
the
day.
The
challenge
that
we
have
is
there's
not
enough
housing
to
meet
the
needs
at
all
income
levels
and
the
hardest
part
of
producing
housing
for
lower
income
is
sort
of.
J
How
do
you
put
the
pieces
together
financially
in
terms
of
land
and
Regulatory
structures
to
meet
that
lower
income
need
because
the
market
doesn't
tend
to
go
there?
It's
really
challenging
for
a
developer,
without
some
form
of
other
forms
of
contribution
to
make
affordable
housing
for
lower
income,
households
a
reality
and
you'll
see
their
expanding
funding
partnering
and
collaborating
and
advocating
for
changes
in
terms
of
the
state
regulatory
structure,
so
that
we
could
do
some
things
that
maybe
we
can't
do
today,
but
maybe
in
the
future.
We
could,
if
we
had
some
changes
gonna.
J
J
Just
in
terms
of
what
the
framework
does
I'll
use
the
term
framework
to
describe
sort
of
that
that
scaffolding
of
all
the
pieces
of
the
strategy,
so
framework
and
strategy
are
kind
of
interchangeable
as
I
do
this
presentation,
but
just
you
know
what
does
this
do
like?
It
elevates
anti-displacement
as
a
city-wide
priority,
and
it
defines
what
we
mean
by
anti-displacement.
J
It
increases
calls
for
increases
to
City
investment
and
services
to
help,
in
particular,
lower
income.
Tenants
renters
are
the
folks
who
are
facing
the
brunt
of
involuntary
displacement.
When
rents
go
up,
it
might
go
up
150
bucks,
but
for
a
lot
of
people
that
that
puts
them
over
the
edge
and
being
able
to
afford
staying
in
the
unit
they're
in
and,
as
was
said
in
the
interior
remarks,
when
they
have
to
leave
that
unit,
there's
not
a
more
affordable
place
for
them
to
move
to
all
the
places
that
are
have
more
affordable.
J
Affordability
in
them
are
the
places
that
are
experiencing
displacement
in
Salt
Lake,
so
we're
looking
to
help
those
folks
who
are
at
near-term
risk
of
displacement,
as
we
also
do
the
work
of
number
three
on
this
slide,
which
is
prioritize.
The
creation
of
more
affordable
housing,
particularly
housing,
that's
going
to
be
affordable
in
the
long
term.
We
get
a
lot
of
units
and
they're
valuable
to
have
but
units
that
have
a
20
30
year.
J
Deed
restriction
on
them
are
great
for
20
or
30
years,
but
there's
a
huge
risk
that
you
have
then
a
bulk
of
units
that
in
20
30
years
time
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
extend
the
deed
restrictions
on
those
so
that
they
remain
affordable.
So,
looking
for
every
opportunity,
we
have
to
create
long-term
affordability
and
I
use
this
term
community-owned
housing
there's
a
lot
of
forms.
J
What
that
looks
like
we
can
talk
about
that,
but
everything
from
non-profit
or
Housing
Authority
housing
to
Shared
Equity
models
and
others
that
make
them
part
of
your
long-term
housing
stock
as
affordable
units
and
then
there's
a
lot
in
the
strategy
about
changing
how
we
work
with
impacting
communities
and
with
partners
and
then
how
we
use
land
use
tools.
We're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
land
use
tools
to
drive
some
of
the
affordable
housing
outcomes
that
we're
looking
for.
J
Go
to
the
next
slide,
just
I'm
not
going
to
go
to
these,
but
what
it
doesn't.
Do
it's
not
going
to
solve
the
affordable
housing
challenge.
That's
a
long-term
effort
and
we're
going
to
do
better.
But
it's
it's
a
huge
challenge
that
every
Community
around
the
country
is
facing
and
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
stop
displacement,
but
we're
hoping
that
we
can
help
those
who
are
feeling
the
brunt
of
displacement
impacts.
Even
as
we
do
the
important
long-term
work
to
create
more
affordability,
so
that
people
can
stay
in
the
community
and
thrive.
J
We
have
state
preemption
hurdles.
Those
are
not
obviously
going
to
be
fixed
by
adoption
of
the
strategy,
but
it's
going
to
cause
some
priorities
to
work
on
where
we
have
a
resource
Gap
in
terms
of
meeting
the
level
of
need,
it's
extremely
high
level
of
need.
We
can
do
better,
but
we're
not
not
going
to
bridge
that
Gap
and
building
trust
with
the
community
is
something
that
takes
place
over
time.
I
feel
like
we've
had
great
partnership
through
this
process
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
putting
in
place
structures
to
continue
that.
J
So
we
build
more
trust
over
time.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
six
goals,
21
actions,
there's
11
near-term
priorities,
I'm,
going
to
just
focus,
in
particular
the
things
we're
proposing
to
replace
the
housing
loss,
mitigation,
ordinance
and
a
very
high
level
on
some
of
the
other
near-term
strategies.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
J
Sorry
I'm
going
really
fast,
but
I
know
you
don't
have
a
lot
of
time.
So
here's
your
what
we're
talking
about
in
terms
of
housing
loss
mitigation
is
how
do
we
address
the
impact
of
new
development
when
there's
existing
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
you'll
hear
that
term
NOAA
is
the
short
the
acronym
but
I'm
going
to
just
call
it
naturally
occurring
or
affordable
housing.
When
there's
an
affordable
housing
struck
a
unit
whether
it's
a
single
family
home,
a
duplex
older.
J
They
tend
to
be
older
units
that
are
ripe
for
redevelopment,
because
the
zoning
on
them
allows
for
more
or
could
allow
for
more.
What
do
we
do
to
help
the
people
who
are
living
in
those
units
and
how
do
we
try
to
either
preserve
or
replace
the
units
that
are
affected
by
that
direct
Redevelopment
action?
J
All
of
this
work
is
improved.
Data
Systems
I've
just
got
a
few
slides
on
each
of
these
and
then
we'll
be
done.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
community
benefits
policy,
so
this
gets
triggered
when
a
development
is
requesting
of
change
to
zoning
and
triggers
a
master
plan
amendment
in
those
situations
we
have
the
opportunity
to
do
a
development
agreement
and
to
make
an
ask
which
we
would
call
Community
benefits
and
those
would
be
defined
in
the
code.
J
That
would
be
what
the
developer
is
giving
to
the
community
in
return
for
that
increase
in
development
capacity.
So,
like
I
said
before,
that
could
be
involved
the
preservation
of
those
units
and-
and
in
this
case,
unlike
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance,
this
would
be
concerned
not
just
about
the
unit
itself,
but
the
affordability
of
the
unit.
J
So,
looking
for
comparable
or
better
affordability
of
the
unit,
that
was
on
the
site
before
Redevelopment
replacement
of
those
units
or
like
I,
said
before
an
in-loof
fee,
payment
or
land
donation-
and
this
would
be
not
not
what
you
currently
have
in
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
in
terms
of
the
equation.
That's
there
that's
a
different
beast,
but
this
would
be
essentially
payment
that
could
then
be
used
by
the
city
and
partners
to
create
an
equivalent
affordable
unit
on
another
site
and
office.
J
You
need
to
have
a
plan
for
how,
where
and
how
you
would
do
that
buy
right
products.
This
is
important,
buy
right
projects.
If
they
have
the
zoning
and
master
plan
in
place
for
redevelopment
and
they're
not
requesting
any
change,
we
wouldn't,
they
would
have
the
ability
to
proceed
without
any
mitigation.
There's
really
nothing
that
we
could
do
from
a
regulatory
perspective
to
incentivize
or
require
them
to
do
a
mitigation.
J
This
would
build
on
that
idea
and
when
a
unit
is
being
demolished
because
of
new
development,
that
there
would
be
a
set-aside
fund
to
provide
relocation
assistance
to
help
them
find
new
housing.
The
way
your
current
program
structured,
that's
with
a
part
of
our
community
partner,
that
does
the
assistance.
We
would
probably
just
look
to
do
the
same
thing
in
terms
of
implementation
of
this.
J
The
challenge
here
is
to
identify
those
tenants
that
are
facing
dislocation
because
of
development,
and
that's
where
the
Community
Partnership
is
really
key
to
know
where
that's
happening,
because
sometimes
it
happens
oftentimes
it
happens
before
there's
actually
demolition
or
even
before.
There's
an
application
in
some
cases
so
notify
the
impact
attendance
that
there's
assistance
of
available.
They
would
have
to
income
qualify
for
that
assistance.
It
would
be
support
for
the
relocation
and
then,
if
they
need
ongoing
rental
assistance,
there's
the
rental
assistance
program
to
support
them
longer
term.
J
But
the
key
thing
here
is
the
disruption
that
happens
when
people
are
displaced
by
new
development
and
helping
them
have
a
more
smooth
transition,
and
then
the
last
bullet
here
is
about
what
a
lot
of
communities
call
a
community
preference
policy.
So
when
you
have
deed
restricted
units,
that
means
the
people
who
are
applying
to
live
in
those
units
need
to
be
income
qualified.
So
therefore,
30
percent
of
area
median
income
are
fifty
percent.
J
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
This
is
just
some
of
the
a
few
other
things
collecting
rent
data
through
the
landlord
ten
initiative,
which
people
call
the
good
landlord
program.
That's
a
voluntary
program.
We
can
ask
them
to
provide
us
information
on
the
rents,
their
charges.
We
have
better
rent
information
on
an
ongoing
basis,
improving
the
tracking
of
units
that
are
lost
to
demolition
Demolition
and
what
replaces
them.
One
thing,
I
forgot
to
say
in
the
earlier
slide:
we
did
some
analysis
or
and
big
thanks
to
the
planning
department
for
pulling
this
together.
J
So
just
a
couple
quick
examples
so
say:
you've
got
six
townhouses
that
are
proposed
and
a
property
that
currently
has
a
single,
an
older
single
family
home.
That's
functioning
as
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing.
If
they
are
not
requesting
a
change
in
the
zoning,
they
already
have
the
zoning
in
place,
and
it's
says
in
the
master
plan
that
that's
what
we
want
to
see.
Then
they
have
that
right
to
develop
that
and
we
do
not
have
a
trigger
to
make
a
requirement.
J
J
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
just
you
know,
if
you
up
the
ant-
and
you
said,
there's
going
to
be
a
42
unit-
apartment
development
on
that
on
a
site
with
maybe
more
units
or
maybe
it's
an
office
building
again,
the
trigger
is
if
there
needs
to
be
a
rezoning
and
a
master
plan
amendment.
In
that
case,
you
would
be
looking
to
get
a
larger
Community
benefit
than
you
would.
J
In
the
other
example,
where
there's
so
much
smaller
development,
so
you'd
be
looking
at
trying
to
mitigate
the
loss
of
what
might
be
four
units
on
that
side
or
six
units
and
then
either
again,
preservation
replacement
or
another
form
of
mitigation.
I
do
want
to
underscore
that
in
the
fee,
payments
and
land
donations
can
be
a
really
valuable
contribution
towards
affordability.
J
This
is
a
lot
of
small
text,
but
so
this
is
like
just
some
of
the
other
near-term
priorities
that
are
on
the
framework
I'm
just
going
to
highlight
a
couple
of
them
and
we
can
go
into
any
of
them.
That
you'd
like
to
ask
questions
about,
but
one
is
sort
of
how
do
we
partner
with
communities
in
an
ongoing
way
to
engage
them
in
understanding?
What's
going
on
the
neighborhood
and
prioritizing
City
Investments
and
actions
to
help
counter
displacement?
J
So
it
sounds
really
simple,
but
it's
really
impactful
and
it's
something.
We've
heard
from
the
community
like
be
wanting
to
be
able
to
have
ongoing
dialogue
and
for
the
different
departments
that
are
working
in
an
area
to
be
collaborating
and
looking
at
multiple
actions
at
the
same
time.
So,
if
I'm
doing
a
large
Transit,
Improvement
I'm,
also
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
investments
in
that
area,
so
they're
being
coordinated
and
we're
creating
affordable
housing
before
maybe
the
land
values
go
up
because
of
a
other
investment.
J
The
other
one
is
looking
at
Community
Land
Trust
models,
so
that's
the
community
ownership
piece
where
and
how
we
can
grow.
You
have
a
Community
Land
Trust,
so
some
of
these
ideas
are
not
new,
necessarily
but
they're.
How
can
we
take
them
to
scale
and
make
them
more
broadly
applicable,
and
then
I'll
just
highlight
one
more,
which
is
again
a
fairly
simple
thing:
a
One-Stop
shop
for
tenant
resources.
J
So
right
now,
if
you
wanted
to
go,
find
the
different
ways
in
which
you
could
be
find
support
as
a
renter
in
Salt,
Lake
you'd
have
to
navigate
that
system
on
your
own,
but
having
one
place
where
I
can
find
out,
am
I
eligible
for
rental.
Assistance.
Are
there
utility
subsidy
programs,
I
could
qualify
for?
Are
there
lower
cost
Transit
passes
or
free
Transit
passes?
J
I
might
be
eligible
for
having
one
place
that
people
can
access
existing
programs,
let
alone
increased
certain
levels
of
service
to
meet
the
needs
that
are
out
there
in
the
community
and
then
last
slide
or
it
may
be.
Getting
close
to
the
last
slide.
Next
steps
we're
shooting
to
release
the
draft
strategy
in
January
that
wouldn't
then
go
through
the
45-day
public
review
period
for
the
refinement
and
then
adoption
with
the
recommendation
and
Planning
Commission
and
then
to
council
we're
looking
to
form
a
city
implementation
team
that
would
continue
the
cross-department
collaboration.
J
J
And
then
the
last
slide
is
the
actual
timeline.
So
we
would
be
coming
to
council,
ideally
in
April,
to
June
with
for
the
council
hearing
and
adoption.
But
you
can
see
there
are
a
number
of
steps
that'll
be
happening
before
then,
including
the
housing
SLC
plan,
which
would
be
working
in
tandem
with
the
thriving
in
place
strategy
to
respond
to
the
affordable
housing
issues.
I
I
So
that's
why
you
see
this
trigger
really
tied
to
a
Master
Plan
agreement
and
not
to
any
sort
of
zoning
Amendment
and-
and
that
is,
is
going
to
be
a
really
big
shift
for
us
and
it's
unfortunate
that
that's
the
case,
but
that
is
that
is
where
we're
at
with
state
law.
And
then
we
also
have
some
concerns
of
just
case
law
on
the
fee
that
charging
a
fee,
and
so
this
revamp
has
gone
through
our
attorney's
office.
I
I
K
Think
you
just
answered
it,
but
I'm
still
want
a
little
more
clarification,
so
we
can
only
request
the
development
agreement
if
it
requires
a
rezone
and
a
master
plan
Amendment
not
just
if
it
requires
a
rezone
odd
to
me,
because
the
master
plan
Amendment,
my
understanding
is
the
reason
really
is
the
law
and
the
master
plan
is
kind
of
Our.
Intention
to
that.
I
Yeah
and
Nick,
if
you
want
to
chime
in
on
this,
feel
free,
but
essentially
what
the
state
code
says
is
that
we
can't
require
as
a
condition
of
a
land,
use
approval,
inclusion
of
affordable
housing
units,
and
so
if
an
application
comes
in,
it's
already
congruent
with
existing
land
use.
We
can't
require
a
community
benefit
from
that,
because
it's
already
allowed.
K
L
I
can
jump
in
I
think
one
of
the.
Hopefully
everyone
can
hear
me.
Okay.
One
of
the
concerns
we
have
is
that
there
is
some
momentum
out
there.
I
guess
that
is
going
to
require
cities
when
a
zoning
Amendment
complies
with
a
master
plan
to
essentially
approve
it,
and
so,
if
that
happens,
that
raises
some
concerns
about
whether
or
not
we
are
we're
actually
implementing
our
plans.
L
M
L
L
But,
for
example,
say
we
have
a
plan
that
has
a
recommended
density
of
20
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
someone's
proposing
a
zoning
District
that
would
allow
35
dwelling
units
per
acre.
That
would
be
a
situation
where,
if,
where
we
could
require,
say,
look
you're
increasing
the
proposed
density
above
what
the
plan
says.
Therefore,
you
have
to
amend
the
plan
as
part
of
that
there
will
be
some
sort
of
consideration
for
a
community
benefit.
L
The
code
would
provide
some
a
framework
for
what
those
Community
benefits
may
be,
so
it
may
not
always
be
housing,
but
in
the
future
the
city
may
want
to
figure
out
some
other
community
benefits
it
could
that
could
be
included
in
that
as
well.
Okay
and
then
the
second
part
of
that
is
that
when
we
do
go
in
and
update
our
community
plans,
we
would
put.
L
M
Okay,
so
sort
of
on
the
same
lines
if
we
are
looking
when
I
go
back
to
the
slide
of
community
benefits
policy,
which
is
something
that
we
do
in
the
RDA
right
of
and
you
don't
have
to
put
the
site
up
there.
But-
and
it
says
you
know
if,
if
this
is
this
benefits,
analysis
is
triggered
and
we
come
to
some
sort
of
agreement
that
it
would
be
I
would
hope.
Memorialized
within
and
it
mentions
as
a
development
agreement.
M
And
so
would
that
mean
we're
doing
development
agreements
for
every
project
that
we're
in
this
benefits.
Analysis
is
triggered
which
I'm
fine
with
because
it
holds
everyone
to
their
to
their
responsibilities
and
and
the
agreements
that
we've
come
up
with.
But
it
does
seem
like
a
lot
of
work
unless
there's
sort
of
like
a
eventually
a
template
of
sorts.
L
N
N
A
I
Yeah,
so
we've
started
having
those
discussions.
Housing
stability
is,
you
know,
currently
runs
the
Housing
Programs
within
the
city.
We've
had
discussions
with
them
on
eligibility
for
like
a
displacement,
voucher
program
within
the
existing
funding
sources
that
they
oversee.
So,
as
you
know,
we
have
Community
Development
block
grant
program
under
their
purview.
We
have
funding
our
future.
I
They
have
an
emergency
rental
assistance
program
as
well,
so
this
type
of
program
would
fall
under
any
of
those
any
of
those
funding
sources
and
then
it
would
most
likely
be
a
community
partner
that
would
oversee
that
program.
There
isn't
something
similar
right
now
that
any
of
our
partners
are
running,
but
we've
had
those
conversations
with
some
of
our
Community
Partners
to
see.
If
that
would
be
something
that
they'd
be
interested
in
doing,
and
there
are,
there
is
some
interest
out
there
in
the
community
of
managing
a
program
like
that
for
the
city.
I
So
you
know,
as
you
guys
know,
we
are
often
seen
as
a
leader
throughout
the
state
and
there's
a
lot
of
eyes
on
that
yeah.
Exactly
there's
a
lot
of
eyes
on
on
this
plan
right
now,
and
the
Utah
League
of
cities
and
towns
has
been
really
great
to
participate
as
well,
and
so
I
think
that
we
have
an
opportunity
here,
not
just
within
the
state
but
within
the
country,
to
shape
some
really
impactful
policy
that
can
serve
as
a
model.
I.
M
Well,
we
know
that
the
community
benefit
analysis
isn't
going
to
be
triggered
because
they
don't
need
to
come
and
ask
us
for
anything
right.
They
can
kind
of
do
whatever
they
want,
but
then
it
says:
there's
you
know,
assistance
with
tenant
relocation,
but
how
would
we
actually
hold
the
developer
to
assisting
with
tenant
relocation?
I
mean
if
we're
looking
at
the
fact
that
again,
if
it's
zoned
that
wave
it's
done
that
way,
they
can
kind
and
it's
their
private
property.
It
can
do
whatever
they
want
on
it.
M
I
I
think
there
are
two
probably
more
than
two
ways
but
two
ways
that
are
coming
to
me
right
now.
First
is
I,
I
believe
in
Danny
and
Kara
feel
free
to
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
the
RDA
already
has
a
tenant
relocation
policy.
So
if
their,
if
a
project
is
getting
sitting
investment,
we
certainly
could
require
that
regardless
of
the
underlying
zoning
and
then
I
think
it's
also
a
programmatic
and
policy
decision
by
the
city
council
and
mayor.
I
I
A
M
You
Mr
chair
finally
on
the
the
first
box
here
the
protect
tenants
from
displacement,
and
this
is
something
that
we
talked
a
lot
about
in
Kansas
City
with
the
national
league
when
I
went
to
a
lot
of
their
housing
things
and
that
is
and
something
I
brought
up
before
when
we
look
at
the
resources
and
legal
services.
I
am
very,
very
interested
in
a
right
to
counsel
for
tenants
so
I'm,
throwing
that
out
there
as
a
priority
of
mine
and
that's
all
see,
I
love.
A
O
Until
someone
tells
me
it's
absolutely
impossible
or
illegal,
because
I
really
do
think
that
we
could
fight
not
just
the
loss
of
affordable
units
which,
which
is
important,
but
we
could
also
fight
the
geographical
Equity.
Traditional
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinances
continue
to
concentrate
affordable
housing
in
the
places
where
they
historically
have
been,
and
so,
since
you're
being
bold
anyway,
I
want
to
join
you
in
the
boldness
and
try
to
ameliorate
two
negative
things
in
the
way
we
recraft
this.
I
Here,
thank
you
and
I
know.
We've
discussed
this
Nick
and
I've
been
bringing
storming
something
similar,
and
so
we
haven't
fully
baked
that,
but
we
have
been
meeting
with
other
cities
that
have
kind
of
a
transfer,
development
right
program
and
I
absolutely
agree.
I
would
love
to
see
more
units
on
other
and
other
high
opportunity
areas
within
the
city.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
please
keep
pushing
that
and
I
think
it
could
be
built
into
this
framework
and
it
has
certainly
been
being
discussed.
So
thank
you.
A
I'm
back
onto
the
the
funding
piece,
which
is
always
critical
on
these
big
bold
projects,
but
first
of
all,
I
love
this
map.
It's
going
to
take
a
long
time
to
digest
so
before
I
get
to
the
funding
piece.
You
have
a
bold,
tight
timeline
between
now
and
June,
and
there's
only
a
couple
things
that
happen
in
the
June
time
frame
the
May
June
time
frame
and
consume
a
lot
of
time
and
energy
across
the
board.
So
let's
work
together
incrementally
through
the
whole
process.
A
I
As
well,
it's
a
lot
and
I
I,
hear
you
and
I
agree:
we've
sent
Council
staff
a
proposed
timeline,
we're
happy
to
shift
that
and
and
amend
that,
as
as
appropriate
for
your
agendas.
Our
intention
is
to
come
back
in
January
with
a
draft
of
what
will
be
the
final
report
for
your
feedback.
That
would
then
go
out
to
a
45
we'd
make
refinements
to
that.
Based
on
your
feedback.
That
would
then
go
out
to
the
45-day
public
engagement,
Planning,
Commission
hearing,
and
then
you
know
we
do
have
a
very
aggressive
timeline.
I
I
We
also
are
happy
to
work
out
until
June
to
give
you
guys
some
time
to
digest
everything
and
go
through
the
process,
but
we've
really
appreciated
the
feedback
that
we've
received
from
the
council
and
the
various
briefings
that
we've
done
and
we
we've
done
to
date,
and
we
want
to
continue
that
collaborative
process
with
you
and
whatever
that
looks
like
if
it's
small
group
meetings
or,
however,
we
need
to
do
that
to
accommodate
your
schedules.
So.
A
H
A
I
Obviously,
the
tenant
relocation
assistance,
the
business
licensing
piece
is
really
important
and
that
part
is
important
because
we've
continually
heard-
and
you
guys
see
this
when
you
guys-
are
doing
rezones
right
of
of
the
community
coming
out
and
saying.
Well,
these
are
affordable
units.
We
want
to
understand
that
affordability,
so
that
we're
replacing
like
for
like
and
so
tracking
that
and
information
is,
is
really
critical
and,
as
you
guys
know,
having
data
helps
us
inform
policy
decisions.
I
So,
in
order
to
track
that
within
business
licensing,
we
would
probably
need
maybe
another
staff
person
there
and
then
also
some
funding
to
improve
their
software
to
be
able
to
do
that
and
the
zoning
amendments
we
are
proposing.
If
we,
if
we
do
move
forward
with
those
policies
to
do
those
in-house.
But
again
that
would
be
a
shifting
of
the
planning
divisions
prioritizations
on
different
things
that
they're
working
on,
and
so
really
this
will
kind
of
be
a
choose.
I
Our
adventure
of
what
policies
are
really
important
to
the
mayor
and
to
the
city
council
for
us
to
put
forth
in
a
budget
recommendation
and
we're
happy
to
flush
that
out
more
for
you
guys
in
January.
If
there
are
certain
things
that
are
kind
of
rising
to
the
top
for
you
and
happy
to
present
that
in
any
way
that's
helpful,
our
intent
would
be,
if
possible,
to
bring
some
policy
recommendation
or
some
budget
recommendation
to
you
and
the
mayor's
recommended
budget.
I
Knowing
that
we
may
not
have
an
adopted
plan
by
then
so
again,
that
would
be
a
preference
of
the
council.
If
you
are
okay
with
us
doing
that
or
if
you
would
prefer
that
to
come
as
a
budget
amendment
after
the
plan
is
adopted
so
I'm
hoping
we
would
be
to
a
point.
You
know
as
we're
putting
forth
the
mayor's
budget
that
we
would
have
a
pretty
good
idea
of
what
your
policy
priorities
are,
that
we
could
put
forth
some
some
potential
funding
recommendations
there.
But
again
that
would
be.
A
K
Actually,
I
feel
ready
to
say
what
I
think
I
think
that
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
placeholder
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
even
though
we
don't
know
exactly
what
those
policy
recommendations
are
going
to
be.
We
we
all
agree
that
this
is
an
issue,
and
this
issue
is
probably
one
that
will
need
some
funding
so.
H
A
I
A
P
A
P
So
the
applicants
Engineers
submitted
a
letter
which
we
included
in
the
packets
for
the
council
to
see
and
for
the
public
to
be
able
to
review
and
the
applicant
and
their
engineer
are
here
or
excuse
me,
I,
believe
the
engineers
online,
the
applicant
is
here
and
they're
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
council
has
them
Additionally.
The
council
asked
for
a
couple
of
different
types
of
motions
to
be
drafted,
the
first
of
which
we've
talked
with
the
applicant,
and
they
are
okay
with
the
items
that
were
outlined
in
it.
P
Those
Provisions
included
a
few
recommendations
from
the
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
others
from
the
council,
and
they
are
as
follows.
Accessory
buildings
shall
not
be
allowed
in
rear
yards
along
the
westernmost
property
line
of
the
subject:
property,
where
the
westernmost
property
line
is
in
a
rear
or
side
property
line.
The
second
levels
of
any
homes
located
there
shall
be
sent
back
at
least
30
feet
from
the
corresponding
line.
P
A
K
K
Q
Q
R
P
S
S
Presumably
similar
process
had
an
engineer
design
them
had
someone
sign
off
saying
they
were
safe,
have
the
city
sign
off
on
it,
and
yet
they
fail
and
I'm
not
saying
that
that
it's
impossible
that
you
know
you
can
guarantee
everything,
but
I
was
hope.
The
point
of
asking
for
that
was
to
for
so
that
residents
and
the
public
could
hear
why
these
are
going
to
be
safe
and
I.
Don't
feel
like
the
letter
answered
that
so
do
you
want
to
speak
to
that.
Q
I'm
sorry,
okay,
I
really
can't
speak
to
that
I
think
that's
more
appropriate
for
the
structural
engineer,
but
that
was
the
intention
of
that
letter
showing
that
they
would
go
through
all
best
and
standard
practices
in
the
industry
and
then
building
code
and
Engineering.
That
was
the
intention
of
the
letter
and
the
intention
of
bringing
him
along
to
the
meeting
digitally
virtually
excuse
me.
Q
Okay
well
again,
I
don't
know
that
I'm
the
most
qualified
to
speak.
To
that
what
I
can
speak
to
is
that
the
the
site
plan
is
not
complete.
We
don't
have
any
known
walls,
yet
we
know
generally
what
we're
doing
IGS
has
already
conducted
a
study.
Right
now
did
a
couple
potholes
of
the
northern
most
boundary
to
understand
the
soils
we
intend
and
will
certainly
comply
with
anything
in
terms
of
engineering
and
building
code
and
designed
to
the
safest
manner
possible
in
whatever
the
walls
would
occur,
to
be.
S
Sure
and
I
and
I
do
appreciate
that
I
guess
that
that
puts
me
back,
though,
to
the
other
question
that
my
understanding
is
that
if
we
were
to
require
our
normal
wall
ordinance,
the
five
feet
up
three
feet
back:
that
that
would,
if
you
were
to
go
forward
with
the
design
exactly
as
it
is
now.
That
would
impact
like
four
or
five
units,
and
you
would
make
you'd
have
to
make
changes
to
that.
Q
S
You
know
part
of
the
reason
that
or
I
guess
the
reason
that
I'm
requesting
this
briefing
and
and
with
these
with
this
information
is
to
understand
like
isn't.
It
then
possible
to
just
build
under
the
existing
city
code
for
these
types
of
walls
and
then
make
changes
to
those
four
to
five
units,
maybe
make
those
a
little
bit
smaller
than
the
other
ones.
Q
Quite
a
bit
more,
it
would
be
a
much
different
product
than
what
we've
been
showing
as
Our
intention
this
whole
time.
I
guess
my
only
point
that
I
would
like
to
share
here
is
we
understand
that
the
motion
isn't
in
regards
to
safety,
and
we
want
to
highlight
that,
along
with
the
city,
we
are
equally
concerned
with
the
safety
of
any
product
by
tying
it
to
one
particular
wall
specification,
as
is
outlined
as
the
minimum
in
the
code,
but
not
necessarily
the
only
way.
Q
This
is
one
of
those
codes
that
is
allowed
for
exception
in
the
plan
development.
The
only
change
was
that,
along
with
the
ending
of
the
special
exceptions
ordinance,
this
was
one
of
those
got
that
became
orphans,
but
there
were
other
ways
to
build
walls.
Our
only
idea
is
there's
several
ways
to
build
walls
safely
and
to
tie
it
to
one
is:
would
hamstring
the
project
in
a
lot
of
ways
and
would
change
the
site
plan.
S
Q
Yeah
I
intended
to
defer
to
the
experts
in
Structural
Engineering.
That
was
the
intention
of
that
letter
and
I'm
I'm,
not
the
right
person
to
speak
to
that,
and
we
don't
have
a
wall
for
him
to
engineer
yet.
So
that's
we've
made
efforts
to
find
out
soils
right
now
and
get
started
on
the
known
factors,
but
we
don't
know
what
our
walls
are
going
to
look
like
yet
to
design
those.
K
Romano
I,
just
I,
want
to
go
back
to
something
I
think
I
stated
before
I
think
the
fundamental
question
we're
being
asked
is
what
density
is
appropriate
for
this
area
and
I'll
restate
that
I
think
the
requested
density
is
appropriate
for
the
area
I
think
to
bring
in
this
question
about
the
retaining
walls
in
this
one
specific
part
of
our
code,
which
I'm
still
not
clear.
Why
we
have
that
in
our
code
and
when
it
got
in
there,
there's
some
questions
that
that
I
still
haven't
gotten
answered
on
on
that.
K
But
to
say
that,
yes,
we
agree
with
the
with
the
density,
but
this
specific
project
must
conform
with
this
one
specific
thing
that
every
other
project
in
our
city
has
a
process
to
get
get
an
exception
to
feels
like
an
overreach
and
so
I'm,
not
supportive
of
keeping
that
in
and
I
think
that
doing
so
would
would
go
a
little
bit
too
far.
Then
I'm
comfortable
I.
S
O
S
T
Pick
was
more
involved
in
the
drafting
that
for
three
stepping
requirement,
so
maybe
he
can
better
answer
that,
but
at
four
feet
there
is
a
requirement
that
you
comply
with
building
code
requirements.
So
that
was
essentially
why
the
four
foot
trigger
was
was
chosen
because
at
that
point
you
have
to
get
a
permit
for
that
height
of
a
wall.
Yeah.
T
S
Yeah
and
and
and
if
I'm,
misstating,
I
I
first
of
all,
I'm
sorry
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
I
didn't
anticipate
this
at
all,
but
I
had
inquired
like
when
we
set
up
this
four
foot,
three
foot,
that
at
least
one
of
the
considerations
or
or
the
primary
consideration.
However,
you
want
to
put
it
is
that
these
are
generally
safer
than
walls
that
are
require
larger
higher
steps
and
shorter
depth.
T
T
S
T
S
So
so
I'm,
just
you
know,
to
to
explain
the
Dilemma
again
from
my
perspective
is
that
we
put
this
off
so
that
we
could
get
this
information
to
get
this
Clarity.
It
was
put
off
another
again
with
not
at
my
request
but
more
time,
given
the
letter
States
what
process
they
follow
when
building
a
retaining
wall.
In
my
view,
that
was
not
the
question.
S
If
that
was
the
question
for
other
council
members,
I
hope
they
got
their
answers.
I
don't
feel
that
I
got
my
question
answered,
and
so
my
concern
is
still
there.
So
that's
the
reason
I'll
be
making
the
motion
this
evening.
If
you're,
if
you're
satisfied
with
the
answer
that's
been
given,
then
that's
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say
to
my
colleagues
but
I'm,
not
and
I,
don't
feel
like
it
was
responsive
to
the
question.
Thanks.
R
Yeah
so
I
just
wanted
to
you
know:
I
I
feel
like
I
trust,
the
city
engineers
and
the
process
that
we
have
set
up
to
to
build
these
walls
and
but
the
question,
the
question
in
front
of
us
is
about
density.
The
question
right
now
and
this
this
Council
decided
to
split
the
split
the
conversation
and
to
vote
on
density
once
and
then
to
vote
on
the
on
the
project
after
the
process.
R
So
I
feel
like
we
have
opportunities
to
to
to
discuss
this,
but
right
now
we're
talking
about
density
and
I.
I
believe
that
this
is
the
appropriate
amount
of
density.
It
is
actually,
in
my
opinion,
I
said
this
before-
is
actually
low
density
and
should
be
higher
density
in
my
opinion,
but
I'm
I,
I'm,
okay,
with
with
the
density
that
that
is
requested
and
for
this.
R
This
property
I
also
wanted
to
say,
though,
that
that
the
concerns
of
councilmember
Wharton
are,
you
know,
he's
he's
voicing
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors
and
the
amount
of
work
he's
put
on
this,
and
the
amount
of
you
know
passion
on
these
issues
and
trying
to
move
the
Needle
and
to
shape
a
better
project
that
builds
and
bridges.
The
issues
of
the
district
is
is
very
clear
to
me.
I
do
not
agree
with
with
some
of
the
you
know.
R
The
concerns
I
I,
still
very
much
trust
the
city
and
the
city,
employees
and
our
engineers,
and
to
approving
a
project
that
is
safe.
That's
why
we
hire
our
Administration
and
we
have
probably
the
best
Engineers
any
government
could
wish
for.
So
that's
that's
what
I
say
what
I
State
and
I
I
feel
comfortable
with
motion
number
three,
as
I
stated
in
the
in
the
motion
sheet.
Thank
you.
A
G
G
I
have
a
few
moment
a
few
comments.
I
the
question
of
density
I'm
on
board
with
I.
Don't
I,
don't
see
any
issues
with
that,
but
I
somewhat
shared
the
concerns
with
council
member
Wharton,
but
I
think
it's
more
of
a
broader
policy
that
I
don't
know.
When
was
the
last
time,
and
now
we
have
we
looked
at
this,
but
we
are
in
an
earthquake,
prone
geographical
area
and
so
I
don't
know.
G
When
was
the
last
time
we
looked
at
our
building
structures
and
rules
and
if
they
are
up
to
par
to
the
international
building
code
that
says
hey
for
you
know
for
earthquake
prone
areas.
This
is
the
standard
so
that
we
can
provide
the
most
safety
and
in
the
case
of
a
catastrophe
you
know
the
the
last
the
less
casualties
or
the
less
damage
we
can
mitigate
that
damage
as
much
as
possible.
G
So
that's
where
I'm
at
in
in
a
sense,
I,
don't
know
if
we're
up
to
date,
whatever
engineers
and
are
building
for
many
people
are
saying.
This
is
good
enough.
This
is
up
to
standard,
so
we're
going
to
sign
off
on
on
this
proposal
as
is
or
or
you
know,
it
brings
a
broader
question
about
the
public
safety
and
do
we
need
to
update
our
are
our
building
code
Etc.
G
So
that's
where
I'm
at
and
so
I
do
share
some
concerns
with
council
member
Wharton
in
that
sense,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
for
a
later
discussion,
where
we
need
to
look
at
that,
or
maybe
some
staff
has
the
information
that
we're
good
to
go
in
terms
of
new
designs,
new
structural
designs,
safer
designs,
etc
for
this
type
of
projects
in
this
type
of
area.
Thanks
thank.
A
L
Yeah
I
I
can
weigh
in
on
that
and
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
we
can
follow
up
with
more
specific
information
too,
but
the
any
sort
of
seismic
regulation
is
adopted
through
the
state
level
when
they
adopt
building
code
and
and
seismic
zones
are
all
included
in
that,
so
we
we
have
to
follow
whatever
the
state
does.
My
understanding
is
that
they
are
current
for
that
regard.
L
In
regard
to
the
a
couple
things
I
wanted
to
clarify,
so
any
retaining
wall,
that's
over
four
four
feet
or
high
or
tall
requires
engineering,
an
engineer
stamp
on
it.
That's
why
that
forefoot
was
set
in
our
zoning
code
was
for
that
the
three
foot
setback
was
added
to
provide
a
way
to
break
up
the
monotony
of
tall
walls,
and
that
was
in
direct
response
to
20
plus
foot
wall.
That
was
received
a
special
exception
up
in
the
upper
Federal
Heights
area.
L
S
Just
had
a
question
about
what
council
member
pulley
stated
like
he
made
reference
to
that
we've
split
the
process
and
right
now
we're
talking
about
density
and
we
didn't
split
the
process
so
I'm,
not
if
or
if
we
did
I'm
confused
about
that.
My
understanding
is,
we
only
get
one
vote
and
our
vote
is
about
whether
to
increase
the
rezone
and
I
and
I'm
saying
for
purposes
of
this
conversation.
R
R
K
I
just
feel,
like
we've
been
talking
this
over
and
over
again
and
I
I'm,
just
gonna
say
that
I
I
still
believe.
The
fundamental
question
is
about
density
and
we're
talking
about
these
walls,
because
it's
a
way
to
reduce
the
density
without
saying
we're,
reducing
the
density
and
that's
how
I
feel
and
that's
the
that's
the
way
that
this
has
been
presented
to
me
and
the
way
that
it's
been
argued
and
so
I
am
opposed
to
adding
that
restriction
in
I'd.
O
D
D
U
K
A
A
So
that's
why
you
have
building
codes
and
that's
why
you
have
all
codes
and
that's
why
we
have
building
codes
if
you're
going
up
to
50
feet
versus
six
feet,
you
know:
there's
all
these
codes
based
on
the
height
size
and
the
weight
of
the
the
material
and
the
Earth
is
on
so,
and
we
have
to
trust
our
Engineers
to
give
us
those
answers
and
our
Structural
Engineers
they're
putting
their
stamp
on
it
and
that's
their
responsibility
to
do
that,
and
that's
why
we
have
Engineers
to
build
airplanes.
Rocket
motors
and
houses.
M
Mr
chair
event,
if
I
may
I
know,
we've
been
on
this
a
minute,
but
you
know
I,
hear
everybody's
points
and
all
of
the
things
and
in
reality,
I
have
absolutely
no
problem
with
density
up
here.
I
think
it
to
agree
with
many
of
my
co-workers
or
my
colleagues.
It
could
be
more
dense.
My
issue
is
that
and
I
think
it
relates
to
these
like
incredibly
weirdly
controversial
walls
is
that
if
the
units
were
smaller,
you
could
have
more
density
and
it
they
might
actually
be
affordable
to
people
so
I.
M
My
issue
is
more
about
how
we
just
sat
and
talked
about
about
housing,
attainability
and
affordability
and
and
and
like
that,
isn't
necessarily
A
consideration
in
getting
an
exception
to
this
wall,
where
maybe
it
should
have
been.
Maybe
that
should
have
been
a
priority
and
I'm
not
on
the
Planning
Commission,
so
I
can't
be
there,
and
it's
not
that
and
I'm
not
saying
that
I'm
simply
saying
that
for
me,
this
it
comes
down
to.
If
we're
going
to
sit
and
talk
about
density,
then
the
idea
is:
why
do
we
want
density?
M
M
These
aren't
necessarily
affordable,
and
so
it
doesn't
have
that
same
payoff
for
me,
but
I'm
all
about
the
density
bring
it
on,
but
there
needs
for
me
to
be
another
component
of
some
sort.
That
makes
sense
and
I
I
think
that's
in
part
what
I'm
hearing
why
these
walls
are
so
controversial
in
some
weird
ways:
right
and
so
I'm,
that's
just
my
two
cents,
throwing
it
out
there.
S
Development
has
one
access,
road
and
I.
Think
that's
another
important
consideration
that
maybe
you
know,
speaks
to
why
we
would
want
to
say
in
this
process.
We
can't
give
you
the
exemption.
You
would
normally
get
because
of
the
ex
characteristics
of
this
particular
plot
that
you
purchased,
but
I
heard
Peter
say
you
could
still
build
these.
You
just
would
have
to
build
them
smaller.
A
V
V
Okay,
so
the
the
internal
audit
information
is
basically,
we
use
the
term
audit
and
it
naturally
triggers
the
finance
concept,
but
it
is
not
the
council's
oversight.
Audits
can
be
financed.
They
can
be
anything
really.
It's
your
your
opportunity
to
exercise
your
legislative
oversight
function.
So
sometimes
we've
referred
to
them
as
as
management
audits
or
management
reviews.
V
It
could
be
a
systems
analysis,
it
could
be
a
best
practices
review.
It
could
be
really
anything
that
the
council
would
like
to
consider
an
extra
look
at.
We
have
three
or
four
firms
on
contract,
and
so
we
can
go
right
to
them,
as
we
did
with
the
review
of
some
of
the
functions
in
the
police
department.
So
really,
this
time
is
for
you
to
determine
whether
any
of
the
topics
that
we
have
just
brainstormed
here,
we
would
rise
to
the
top
of
your
interest
or
whether
you
would
like
to
suggest
other
topics.
V
And
there
is
one
thing
that
we
have
spoken
with
the
administration
about,
and
that
is
that
we
have
two
or
three
departments
that
are
really
overwhelmed
right
now,
with
the
volume
of
work
that
they
are
doing
and
need
to
get
stay
on
track
with
that.
And
so
so
we're
suggesting
that
we
avoid
anything
to
do
with
our
finance
department
and
I
can't
remember
which
others,
but
but
oh
human
resources
and
IMS.
A
V
Years
we
used
to
try
to
get
through
the
Departments
as
as
we
you
know
like,
like
we
do
fire
and
then
police
and
then
airport
or
whatever,
but
the
councils
over
the
years
have
taken
different
approaches.
So
the
more
surgical
approach
of
looking
at
the
police
aspects
that
you
decided
to
look
at
during
that
George
Floyd
time.
So
you
can
do
it
on
a
big
scale.
It
it's
less
meaningful,
I!
A
V
We
are
now
and
that-
and
that
is
yes
there's
not
a
set
number
that
we
can
do,
but
it
something
like
that
the
police
checking
back
with
the
auditor
checking
back
with
the
administration
and
with
the
commission.
That
is
not
difficult,
so
that
would
be
one
that
could
be
added
on
to
any
of
these
others.
H
A
V
Think
that
the
things
are
so
different
that
we
would
want
to
know
from
you.
What
are
the
parts
that
you
are
most
interested
in
or
would
you
know
would
like
to
learn
more
about
that
type
of
a
thing
it
just
to
say
out
of
this
department
and
there's
you
know,
15
functions
that
are
distinct
might
not
might
not
be
the
best
use
of
the
money.
A
H
V
There
I
mean
what
we
found
with
the
police
audit
is
that
we
did
need
to
have
a
system
in
place
to
do
the
whole
job
that
that
you
wanted
to
do,
but
there
were
at
least
10
other
things
that
were
very
meaningful.
That
came
out
of
that
review
that
you
can
follow
up
on,
so
that
having
that
system
in
place
will
inform
almost
everything
in
the
city,
but
it's
not
essential
you
could
you
don't
have
to
put
all
of
your
audits
on
hold
in
order
to
and
wait
for
that
system.
I.
M
I
I
with
this
I
think
it's
also
important
in
Cindy
in
anyone
else
in
the
room.
That
remembers
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
we
also
recently,
rather
recently,
either
updated
or
created
our
reporting
ordinance,
yes
and
so
I
think
when
looking
at
some
of
these
and
the
the
questions
as
they
relate
to
our
reporting
ordinance,
like
some
of
those
questions,
may
be
answered
without
an
entire
audit,
it
could
be
answered
through
what
we've
already
required
departments
to
do
with
different
projects
or
programs,
or
things
like
that
through
our
reporting
ordinance
right.
V
Kind
of
possibly
I
can't
I
can't
think
of
any
that
right
off.
The
bat
would
be
answered
that
way,
but
that,
but
you
can
certainly
what
we
try
not
to
have
the
reporting
ordinance,
be
some
giant
burden
around
the
neck
of
each
department
or
the
administration.
But
but
you
could
probably
tailor
your
reporting
ordinance
based
on
your
your
interests
and
take
off
some
things
that
aren't
any
longer
important
to.
M
This
to
the
group
I
think
the
one
I'm
thinking
of,
and
it
may
not
even
come
through
the
reporting
ordinance,
but
is
the
rep
stuff.
We've
we've
sort
of
throughout
the
racial
equity
and
policing
stuff
have
said,
come
back
to
us
in
x,
amount
of
time
with
x,
amount
of
results
or
or
the
results
from
these
metrics,
and
that
just
seems
to
fall
more
on
that
reporting
ordinance
side
if
ish
or
like
what
we've.
V
V
A
Mean
I
have
a
couple
that
just
looking
through
this
again
a
list
that
say
yeah
I'd,
like
maybe
it
nodded
on
the
public
safety.
This
is
under,
can
number
two
and
four,
which
is
real
estate
practices
management.
I.
Would
you
know
those
are
two
that
seem
to
be
high
on
the
radar
right
now
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
things,
but
is
there
and
then
the
Water
Management
on
the
public
utilities?
But
is
this
a
first
plus
should
we?
We
need
to
kind
of
give
you
an
answer
now
or.
V
No,
we
just
we
just
had
committed
during
the
budget
council
member
valdemoris
was
one
that
raised
it
and
then
others
were
interested.
We
committed
to
come
back
to
you
as
soon
as
we
could
get
our
bearings
and
and
and
share
with
you
the
I
different
ideas
and
options.
We
can
pick
this
up
anytime.
We
also
can
ask
our
staff
to
think
a
little
bit
more
about
it,
because
some
of
you
have
raised
suggestions
or
your
interest
areas.
V
Some
of
those
could
could
definitely
be
turned
into
a
study,
a
review
or
or
an
audit
and
I'll
just
clarify
one
other
thing,
and
that
is
that
that
the
auditing
is
is
done
based
on
the
professional
International
standards,
and
that
means
you
aren't
auditing
someone
in
a
punitive
way.
But
what
you're
doing
is
we
would
collaborate
with?
And
we
have
policies
that
spell
this
out,
but
we
collaborate
with
the
administration
on
developing
the
scope
and
then
bring
it
to
the
council
for
approval,
putting
it
out
to
RFP.
V
O
V
O
My
concerns
are
identifying
the
places
where
we
are
working
very
hard,
but
there
might
be
an
opportunity
to
work
smarter
to
identify
those
places
where
our
need
to
adapt
to
emergency
situations
and
then
rapidly
re-adapt
to
life
as
usual
or
whatever
those
places
where
those
of
us
in
the
weeds
doing
the
everyday
work
can't
see
in
an
outside
set
of
eyes
could
help
us
go.
Oh
yeah.
We
we
actually
are.
You
know
it's
like
when
you're
at
the
gym
and
you
forget
to
breathe
and
they
have
a
trainer
there
and
they're
like
oh.
O
O
How
many
of
those
get
the
ongoing
Grant
support
that
we
need
and
how
many
of
those
transition
to
general
fund
under
police
and
fire
I
know
one
of
the
things
we
were
concerned
about
was:
are
we
creating
redundancies
when
we
have
this
whole
department
of
child
and
families
that
have
kind
of
a
captive
audience
for
us?
And
then
we
have
youth,
focused
programs
separately
that
don't
capitalize
on
the
momentum
there
that
are
executed
by
the
Departments.
G
Yeah
I
yeah,
council
member
Petra,
said
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
it
was
important
for
me
to
come
up
with
some
audits
because
of
just
to
prevent
to
prepare
to
be
ready
in
case.
You
know
a
recession
hits
and
we
need
to
provide
the
services
that
we
have
agreed
to
to
the
taxpayers
and
and-
and
you
know,
prepare
our
staff
as
well
to
you
know
to
do
what
they
need
to
do
if
they
need
to
report
efficiently.
G
Let's
find
a
way
now
so
thanks
Cindy
for
for
bringing
you
know
for
bringing
it
up
and
and
reminding
us
that
this
is
what
we
agreed
to
when
we
approved
the
budget
and
I'm
you
know,
I'm
I
would
like
to
hear
more
from
from
the
staff
on.
You
know
some
other
ways
to
accomplish
what
council
member
pictures
just
said
so
that
you
know
we
could
get
more
of
our
the
brain
power
working
and-
and
you
know,
moving
things
forward,
and
you
know
preparing
for
that.
G
V
A
quick
follow-up
in
that
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
could
based
on
these
comments
come
back
to
you
with
is
some
things
that
we
could
add
to
our
staff
reports
as
a
a
routine
question
of
the
department
that
that
might
just
capture
some
things
and
make
we'll
cut
we'll
come
back
to
you
with
I.
Just
have
the
thought
of
it
in
my
mind,
and
then
we
can
categorize
these
in
a
little
bit
of
different
way,
based
on
the
comments
that
you've
made
here
today.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
W
A
X
Well,
I'm,
a
working
artist
specific
quickly,
an
art
teacher
on
the
west
side
and
I
am
very
interested
to
see
more
art,
especially
more
accessible
art
to
my
neighbors
here
on
the
West,
Side
and
so
I
I
believe
that,
like
what
I
do
on
my
own
time
definitely
makes
a
difference,
but
I
also
believe
at
a
systemic
level.
My
participation
on
the
board
could
also
help
use
art
to
improve
things
in
our
city,
especially
in
my
neighborhood.
A
O
A
A
U
U
So
I
just
found
out
about
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
over
the
summer
didn't
know
it
was
a
thing
but
I've
been
to
every
meeting
since
so
it's
been
really
interesting
to
learn
a
lot
of
the
details
about.
What's
going
on
in
the
city,
about
bikes
and
I've,
been
pretty
involved
in
my
immediate
Community,
where
I
live
and
I'm
excited
about
the
opportunity
to
be
involved
in
my
broader
community.
A
U
A
A
Y
Yeah,
so
I
love
commuting
by
bike
I've
been
doing
it
for
the
past,
oh
about
nine
years,
almost
exclusive
about
nine
months
a
year.
I
don't
do
year
round
for
like
days
today,
but
it
just
brings
me
such
joy
and
when
something
brings
Joy
you
want
to
share
it,
and
so
I
really
like
to
be
able
to
help
advise
others
on
how
to
start
and
how
to
make
it
easier
and
better
for
other
people
who
want
to
commute.
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
passion
on
in
riding
bikes,
nine
months
out
of
the
year.
That's
still
pretty
pretty
nice
pretty
nice
work,
I,
don't
see
any
questions
or
comments
here
from
the
council
members
again,
you'll
be
also
on
tonight's
consent
agenda.
You
need
to
be
present
to
win,
but
you
more
than
welcome
to
join
our
formal
meeting
here.
It
started
at
seven.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
volunteering
to
be
on
the
council
and
I
appreciate
all
your
efforts
moving
forward.
Thank.
H
X
Z
Definitely
yeah
I
have
only
been
riding
a
bike
for
about
a
year,
a
friend
gifted
me
one
and
I
thought
I.
Surely
I
remember
how
to
do
this,
and
the
answer
has
been
mostly
I
do
and
it
has
been
really
enlightening.
I've
lived
in
or
around
Salt
Lake,
my
whole
life
and
it's
kind
of
a
whole
new
world.
You
know
to
to
commute
and
get
around
by
biking.
So
it's
been
really
wonderful.
Z
It's
been
freeing
and
it's
been
frustrating
all
at
the
same
time,
and
so
that's
the
kind
of
things
that
drive
me
to
get
more
involved
and
particularly
in
my
neighborhood
I,
have
seen
the
ways
that
other
people
have
kind
of
driven
involvement,
using
bikes
and
particularly
with
somewhere
in
my
neighborhood
starting
a
bike.
Bus
for
kids
at
Rose,
Park,
Elementary
and
I.
Just
thought:
that's
incredible
and
reached
out
to
kind
of
my
community
to
see
what
was
something
I
could
do.
A
A
A
A
A
AA
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much.
Any
questions.
Comments
from
the
board
for
the
council.
I
see
no
comments
from
the
council.
Thank
you
again
for
your
passion
on
historic
landmarks
and
I
appreciate
your
volunteering
forward
be
on
the
commission.
You
will
also
be
on
tonight's
formal
consent
agenda.
You
can
join
our
formal
meeting
at
seven
o'clock
if
you
feel
free
to
or
feel
free
to,
join
us,
otherwise
have
a
happy
holidays.
A
All
right,
Council,
we're
moving
on
to
item
nailed
it
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
11,
which
is
a
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
consumer
model.
I
have
one
announcement
sad
announcement,
but
also
a
happy
day
too
for
a
woman
who
always
has
a
twinkle
in
her
eye,
and
it's
been
so
wonderful
for
the
city,
council
and
the
city
for
the
last
27
years.
Jan
you've
been
special
to
us
all
from
from
day
one
and
from
day
one
that
I
showed
up
here.
You've
been
so
good
to
me.
A
A
A
You
have
an
infectious
smile
and
your
contributions
are
just
been
overwhelming,
so
you're
carrying
your
compassion,
you
keep
us
laughing.
You
keep
us
sane.
You
feed
us
good
food,
you
probably
even
taught
Tucky
some
some
magical
twists
in
the
kitchen
right,
so
I
appreciate
that
very
much,
and
each
of
us
have
seen
that
magic.
You
bring
to
the
office,
and
you
have
put
your
heart
into
your
relationships
and
made
the
Council
Office
family
what
it
is
today.
A
AB
AB
And
I'm,
not
the
one
to
present,
you
know
I'm,
that's
not
my
talent
at
all
I'm,
so
humbled
by
this
opportunity.
When
I
came
here,
I
knew
nothing
about
city
government
and
how
I
got
hired
Kerry,
Nakamura
and
Russell
weeks
believed
in
me.
I
believe
I
was
shaking
in
my
shoes
because
Russell
I
was
so
intimidated
by
this
smart,
intelligent
man,
but
I've
really
am
very
grateful
to
have
a
career
that
I
have
Cindy.
Gus
Jensen
has
been
awesome.
AB
Everyone
in
this
room
is
a
friend
of
mine
and
a
family
of
mine.
Sorry
I
don't
want
to
get
emotional,
but
it's
very
Bittersweet
I
feel
like
I've,
given
my
best
I
hope.
I
haven't
made
a
difference.
I
am
so
fortunate
of
all
the
talented
people.
I've
worked
amongst
not
only
council,
members
are
so
committed
and
they
love
their
community
and
what
you
do
to
survive.
W
H
W
W
V
Only
that
we
have
given
you
the
updated
calendar
and
made
the
corrections
that
you
all
suggested
previously.
So
if
you
see
anything
that
concerned
you
in
the
next
couple
days,
let
us
know
otherwise
we'll
get
it
published
and
you
can
change
it
at
a
later
date,
but
we
I
think
we've
got
the
basics.
Thank.
A
O
F
S
A
V
A
AC
AC
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
For
our
episode.
This
week
we
spoke
with
Josh
Willey
about
the
900
South
reconstruction
project.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
Fremont
tribe
in
their
early
time
in
Salt
Lake
City.
Before
we
get
to
those,
though,
let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update
and
our
look
backs.
AD
At
its
November
22nd
beating
the
city
council
reviewed
a
proposal
for
the
fleet
block
that
included
zoning
changes,
Green
Space
and
a
mix
of
uses
held
hearings
for
budget
amendment
4
and
adopted
a
joint
resolution
with
the
mayor
marking
December
1st,
as
World
AIDS
day
in
Salt,
Lake
City
as
the
board
of
canvassers.
They
certified
the
results
from
the
recent
election
Paving
the
way
for
the
85
million
dollar
Parks
trails
and
open
space
Bond,
as
approved
by
City
boaters.
AD
AD
Council
member
Anna
faldemoros,
along
with
the
downtown
Alliance,
hosted
a
watch
party
of
the
First
Team
USA
World
Cup
game
at
the
Galvin
Center
residents,
cheered
on
Team
USA,
as
they
achieved
a
stunning
tie
against
Wales.
More
watch
parties
are
planned
in
other
districts
as
the
World
Cup
unfolds
check.
The
city
council's
social
media
for
updates
Salt
Lake
City,
is
in
need
of
crossing
guards
to
help
school
children
safely
cross
the
streets
as
they
walk
to
and
from
school.
AC
Salt
Lake
City
snow
Fighters
are
committed
to
clearing
the
streets
of
snow
and
ice
within
36
hours
of
a
snowstorm
during
a
storm.
They
work
24
7,
to
ensure
the
safety
of
the
traveling
public,
to
open
emergency
routes
to
hospitals
and
fire
stations
and
ensure
school
buses
have
safe
routes
to
get
kids
to
school.
There's
also,
a
dedicated
team
that
works
to
clear
city,
sidewalks
and
bike
Lanes.
AE
Yeah,
my
name
is
Josh
Willey
I'm,
the
project
management
supervisor
in
the
engineering
division
working
with
our
right-of-way
group
managing
roadway
reconstruction
projects.
My
role
on
this
project
is
the
project
manager.
This
is
a
big
project.
It's
a
it's!
A
combination
of
a
lot
of
different
things
coming
together,
all
at
the
same
time,
in
the
same
location,
the
entire
Corridor
stretches
from
900
West,
all
the
way
to
950
East.
We
designed
the
entire
project
as
one
long
Corridor,
but
for
the
construction
we
broke
it
up
into
two
phases.
AE
Our
first
phase
is
the
central
ninth
section
from
300
West
to
West
Temple
and
that's
a
project
really
pushed
by
the
Salt
Lake
City
Redevelopment
agency
and
then
the
rest
of
the
corridor
is
a
coordination
between
the
engineering
Division
and
the
transportation
Division
and
Public
Utilities
to
do
improvements
from
900
West
to
300
West
and
then
from
West
Temple
to
Lincoln
Street,
950
East.
For
the
phase
two
sections,
the
big
push
was
to
install
the
the
intersection
of
the
nine
Line
Trail.
AE
So
there's
the
existing
nine
Line
Trail,
that's
going
from
about
700
West
to
Redwood
Road,
and
we
have
a
new
section
east
of
Lincoln
Street
that
we
built
a
few
years
ago
and
so
now
we're
building
the
center
section
of
the
nine
Line
Trail
to
connect
the
East
and
West
sections
of
the
trail.
The
the
new
Trail
section
will
be
behind
the
curb
Trail.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
very
safe,
comfortable
space
for
people
to
bike
and
and
walk
and
move
around
the
city.
It's
going
to
connect.
AE
You
know:
Trail
users
from
the
east
side
of
the
city,
to
the
Jordan
River
Trail
out
here
on
the
West,
which
gets
them
to
a
lot
of
other
destinations.
So
so
it
really
makes
this
great
connection
for
people
to
get
out
and
bike
and
and
for
pedestrians
to
get
out
and
be
able
to
connect
to
a
lot
of
other
Trail
sections
that
we
have
in
the
city.