►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 07/11/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
City
Welcome
to
today's
city
council
meeting
our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Zoom,
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable
today.
This
meeting
currently
is
a
work
session
during
which
there's
no
Public
public
comment.
A
A
Written
comments
on
written
comments
that
we
receive
on
a
gender
related
topics
are
shared
with
all
council
members
and
are
also
posted
on
our
website,
SLCC
council.com
and
now
we'll
begin
our
work
session.
Our
first
item
on
the
work
session
agenda
is
item.
One
updates
from
the
administration,
hello.
C
B
You
thank
you.
I,
didn't
know
that
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
the
slides.
B
As
always
just
a
reminder
that
the
slc.gov
feedback
page
is
a
great
way
for
residents
to
engage
with
the
city
and
see
all
the
different
surveys
and
things
that
are
open
public
comment
periods
that
are
open
right
now,
next
slide.
Please.
B
We
have
some
updates
from
public
utilities
on
the
City
Creek
Water
Treatment
Plant
Public
Utilities
is
working
with
the
contractor
on
tentative
plans
to
start
closures
when
primary
construction
begins,
which
will
likely
be
in
January.
Currently,
the
Canyon
is
open
with
no
construction.
Related
closures
planned
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
Public
Utilities
is
working
on
putting
together
a
potential
groundbreaking
ceremony
for
the
beginning
of
next
year.
They
are
using
signage,
social
media,
mass
text
messages
and
their
website
to
communicate
pertinent
information
to
the
public
next
slide.
B
Please,
the
public
comment
period
for
the
remedial
action
plan
for
The,
Other,
Side
village
started
on
June
23rd
and
the
division
of
Environmental
Quality
received
one
set
of
comments
so
far.
It's
likely
that
more
comments
will
be
received
which
will
delay
approval
of
the
remedial
action
plan
and
thus,
when
construction
can
start
and
members
of
the
public
can
submit
comments
through
July
23rd
to
the
Utah
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
by
emailing
CJ
Howell
utah.gov
slide.
Please.
B
A
couple
of
updates
from
public
lands,
both
steenblick
Park
and
Donner
trail
park
will
be
reimagined
using
geobond
dollars,
and
public
engagement
is
underway
for
both
parks
to
understand
the
community's
vision
and
needs
for
those
Parks
steenblick
Park.
They
have
received
232
survey
responses
so
far
and
are
planning
to
keep
that
survey
open
through
August
next
week
on
the
18th.
They
will
do
an
engagement
event
with
a
popular
taco
truck
to
encourage
people
to
share
their
input
and
a
Donner
trail
park.
B
B
Most
of
those
survey
responses
so
far
are
coming
entirely
from
yard
signs
word
of
mouth
and
social
media
and
they
will
be
attending
the
East
bench.
Community
Council
ice
cream
social
next
week
to
engage
and
encourage
people
to
take
that
survey
and
both
of
those
survey
links
are
currently
linked
on
the
feedback
feedback
page
next
slide.
B
Amendment
Community
Council
Citywide
have
been
notified
of
the
application
and
will
have
45
days
to
submit
comments,
and
this
is
tentatively
set
to
go
before
the
Planning
Commission
on
September
13th,
affordable
housing,
incentive
incentives
have
been
transmitted
with
the
ordinance
to
can,
and
then
the
public
input
process
is
underway
for
both
the
ballpark
station
area,
zoning
map
amendments
and
the
2100
South
Station
area
plan
and
Zoning
amendments,
and
then
for
both
the
Adaptive
reuse,
ordinance
and
the
historic
overlay
enforcement
draft
ordinances
are
being
next
slide.
Please.
B
B
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
this
is
not
it.
For
me.
Here
are
a
number
of
upcoming
events
in
July
I
apologize,
I
forgot
about
this
one.
These
are
City
sponsored
events,
Ace
events
and
just
events
that
the
public
are
welcome
to
attend.
It's
definitely
event
season
in
the
city
so
and
before
I
close
any
questions
for
me
on
all
these
updates.
D
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
thank
you
I'll,
take
questions
on
those
as
well.
If
you'd
like
which
ones
will
you
be
at
Andrew
next
slide
as
many
as
I'm
invited
to
council
chair
the
the
information
you'll
see
here
is
an
update
from
about
three
weeks
ago,
from
this
Council
July
3rd
through
the
7th,
you
can
see
still
a
high
utilization
rate
for
the
Resource
Centers,
which
is
typical.
D
You
also
see
that
cabin
impact
mitigation
work
will
be
done
on
South
Temple
this
week
near
the
freeway
underpass
and
then
a
lot
of
camps.
Obviously
a
lot
of
work
by
the
rapid
intervention
teams
resource
fair,
this
Friday
at
Pioneer
Park
in
the
morning,
and
then
kayak
court
is
going
to
return
to
the
river
this
month
since
we're
past
the
critical
stage
of
potential
flooding
and
so
they're
going
to
be
back
there
engaging
with
folks-
and
we
haven't
had
any
issues
to
my
knowledge
along
the
river
this
spring.
D
So
that's
good
news,
a
couple
of
verbal
updates
for
you
all
on
things
that
are
probably
pertinent
to
your
interest.
One
is
the
500
000
of
the
council
allocated
towards
sanctioned
camping
and
pursuing
that
Concept
in
a
pilot
way.
D
We
have
had
discussions
between
Administration
staff
in
the
Departments
and
the
council
staff
to
talk
through
the
intent
of
that
that
funding
parameters
of
what
could
be
recommended
for
what
the
outcomes
should
be
and
then
also
a
process
that
hopefully
will
work
for
you
all
and
you'll
be
briefed
on
that
very
very
quickly,
along
with
the
mayor,
so
you
can
have
discussions
on
that.
D
D
We
know
that
the
Fair
Park
point
is
open
and
I
think
fully
leased
up
at
this
point
with
94
units,
and
then
bill
will
be
197
units
I
believe
still,
and
there
should
be
news
coming
out
very
shortly
about
the
medically
vulnerable
program,
the
MVP
program,
with
information
on
their
update
as
well.
So
that's
good
news.
D
Last
piece:
councilmember
Dugan
and
myself
have
been
joining
with
the
account
Conference
of
Mayors
group
regarding
the
winter
overflow
planning
winter
Services
is
here
they
are
working
on
three
different
groups
weekly
on
elements
of
that.
The
deadline
to
submit
the
proposal
to
the
state
is
August
1st,
so
within
three
weeks
from
today.
So
we'll
have
some
definitive
ideas
at
that
point
about
what
the
plans
will
look
like
and
more
updates
at
that
point.
For
you
all,
are
there
any
questions.
E
No
I
just
have
a
request
on
the
not
for
anybody,
but
for
the
public
in
general
that
Pioneer
Park
on
Friday,
where
the
resource
fair
I,
will
have
my
table
again
and
I'm
collecting
used
clothes
that
you
might
want
to
to
give
away
to
some
of
our
shelter
friends.
So
please
stop
by
or
just
drop
them
off
to
me
here
and
I'll
take
them
on
on
Friday
morning.
Okay,
thanks.
A
Councilmember.
Thank
you
all
right.
It
looks
like
those
are
all
the
comments.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
two
on
our
agenda
item
number
two
is
a
briefing
about
a
resolution
for
the
capital
Improvement
program
projects
for
the
year.
Ben
ludke
Council
policy
analyst
will
give
us
an
introduction
and
then
I
have
a
bunch
of
other
names
listed,
but
are
they
here?
A
Okay,
great
I
have
Aaron
Price
Deputy
Chief
Financial
Officer
Mike
Atkinson,
Chief
asset
planning
manager
and
CIP
impact
fees,
manager,
Rachel,
Molinari,
CIP
and
impact
fee
manager
and
Jordan
Smith
CIP
financial
analyst
and
Mary
Beth
Thompson
available
as
needed
go
ahead
and
give
us
an
injection
Ben.
F
F
They
also
have
the
same
ID
number.
So
if
in
doubt
you
can
always
say
you
know,
project
number
and
it'll
be
exactly
the
same
between
the
different
funding.
Logs
and
PDF
versions
are
attached
to
the
staff
report.
If
you
prefer
electronic
copies
I
think
it's
been
a
quick
recap.
The
council
added
a
little
over
1.2
million
dollars
to
CIP
above
the
mayor's
recommended
budget,
and
if
you
go
to
the
last
page
of
the
long
funding
log
you'll
see
two
dollar
amounts
highlighted
in
green.
F
F
There
are
five
projects
that
council
members
previously
highlighted
projects
of
interest
that
were
not
recommended
for
funding
by
The
Advisory
board
or
the
mayor.
You
can
find
those
listed
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report,
just
a
reminder
that
the
funding
recommendations
from
The
Advisory
board
and
the
mayor
are
nearly
identical
this
year.
The
only
exceptions
are
the
three
projects,
also
on
the
last
page
of
the
funding
log.
Those
were
added
after
The
Advisory
board
made
their
funding
recommendations.
F
F
There's
new
information
about
two
projects
in
the
staff
report.
It
starts
at
the
bottom
of
page
three
project
number
one,
so
the
highest
scored
project
is
the
library,
Plaza
structural
assessment
and
visioning
project.
There's
some
additional
description
about
how
that
might
relate
to
previous
studies
that
the
council
funded
and
there's
a
policy
question
about
how
multiple
studies
would
be
related
to
this
specifically
200
East
between
Washington
Square
and
Library
Plaza.
F
You
may
recall
funding
a
study
for
the
green
loop
around
downtown,
which
runs
down
200
East.
The
council
also
funded
a
master
plan
of
this
block,
Washington
Square
and
during
the
council's
past
discussions,
the
concept
of
a
Civic
campus
was
raised
to
connect
these
blocks,
Washington
Square,
Library,
Plaza
and
then
the
public
safety
building
and
various
ideas
were
raised,
such
as
changing
200
East,
as
well
as
infrastructure
changes
to
support
public
events
and
festivals.
F
So
if
the
Civic
campus
is
something
the
council
is
interested
in,
that
would
be
helpful
policy
feedback
for
this
funding
and
this
study,
the
other
project,
is
number
60
with
new
information
that
is,
maintenance
of
city-owned
property.
So
it's
one
of
the
three
on
the
last
page
of
the
funding
log,
the
staff
report
and
you'll
see
a
summary
in
the
funding
log
description.
There
are
five
individual
uses
for
that
funding
that
we
received
from
the
Real
Estate
Services
office
and
I
I
wanted
to
point
out.
F
F
F
For
the
agenda
schedule
going
forward,
the
council
vote
on
The
Project
Specific
allocations
is
scheduled
for
August
15th,
and
the
first
of
two
public
hearings
is
scheduled
for
next
Tuesday.
F
So
we
asked
how
the
library
Plaza
study
would
relate
to
the
multiple
other
studies
that
are
looking
at
200
East
and
then
either
this
block
and
or
Library
Plaza
and
the
council
previously
talked
about
a
Civic
campus
concept
that
wasn't
specifically
called
out
for
this.
But
since
it
was
a
council
interest,
we
wanted
to
raise
that
idea.
If
it's
something
you
wanted.
This
study
to
also
look
at
or
if
you
wanted
more
information
about
the
multiple
studies
for
the
same
area.
F
A
Okay
got
it
so
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
go
through
them
one
by
one
like
we
typically
do.
Okay,.
A
F
Start
at
the
top
and
I'll
ask
Scott
if
he
can
zoom
in
for
people
viewing,
so
they
can
read
the
project
descriptions
a
little
easier.
A
H
H
J
F
K
And,
based
on
an
earlier
conversation,
I'll,
add
another
point
of
clarification:
that
each
of
the
columns
are
a
different
source
of
funding,
so
there's
a
column
for
general
fund,
a
column
for
impact
fees,
column
for
transportation
funding.
So
that's
also
why
some
of
the
columns
might
have
numbers
in
them
and
some
might
not.
F
F
F
L
L
L
The
senior
well
I
get
I
get
yelled
at
when
I
call
it
senior
it's
55
and
over
housing,
but
there
is
a
great
preponderance
of
of
like,
like
actually
senior
citizens
who
live
there
and
it
they
are
very
close
to
the
600
North
intersection.
So
I
understand
that
it
might
seem
irrational
to
put
a
mid-block
Crossing
there,
but
this
is
a
special,
almost
80.
A
ish
kind
of
concern.
I
have.
A
All
right,
Ben,
I,
guess
the
question
related
to
the
CIP
funding
log
is:
there
are
some
streets
and
some
places
listed,
but
two
questions
is
the
one
that
councilmember
Peter
just
mentioned
listed
and
what
is
the
city-wide
like?
How
much
of
that
city-wide
is
still
to
be
determined
where
it's
going
to
be
used.
F
M
F
And
then
number
four:
this
is
an
item
the
council
sees
every
year.
It
is
Transit
capital
for
frequent
Transit
routes.
So
these
are
the
frequent
bus
routes,
every
15
minutes
service
that
the
council
funds
from
funding
our
future.
This
funding
is
to
make
improvements
to
the
bus
stops,
so
the
city
typically
Pours
and
owns
the
concrete
pad
and
then
UTA
partners
with
the
city
for
the
amenities,
the
shelter,
the
benches
Etc
and
they
do
empty
the
trash,
because
that's
often
a
question
UTA
does.
F
I
would
expect
to
see
this
every
year
for
the
foreseeable
future,
yeah
the
the
goal
of
getting
the
same
level
of
amenities
at
every
bus,
stop
on
all
the
frequent
Transit
routes
is
going
to
take
several
years
of
funding
and
then,
after
that,
it'd
be
reevaluating.
Do
you
want
that
on
the
the
routes
with
a
lower
level
of
service
right
right.
N
See
quick
question
on
this
one
Mr
chair,
the
the
request
amount
is
50
one
1.5
million
and
the
recommended
amount
from
the
board
and
the
mayor
is
a
million
million
bucks.
What
will
be
the
difference
in
service
by
not
funding
into
the
request?
N
The
question
I
would
like
to
find
out
what
would
be
the
effect.
So
I
would
like
to
know
what
the
impact
of
that
Gap
funding
will
be.
The.
F
G
A
F
A
F
N
I
would
like
to
ask
a
little
question
on
this
one:
how
how
do
we?
How
is
the
city
prioritizing
this?
This
request,
I
personally
submitted-
probably
a
six
very
dangerous
I.
Actually
one
of
those
I
was
doing
it
with
councilmember
Petra
last
four
of
July
so
a
year
ago,
and
it's
still
there
and
it's
about
a
foot
of
a
step
and
a
sidewalk
in
an
area
that
there's
a
lot
of
seniors
and
it's
very
dangerous
to
to
do
that,
and
I
would
like
to
know
how
our
prioritizing
this
is
it
by
request.
N
Is
it?
Are
we
using
some
sort
of
data
Gathering,
so
that
would
be
very
important
to
me.
L
N
I,
don't
know
if
there's
an
equitable
way
of
doing
this,
maybe
if
the
administration
comes
up
with
an
answer,
maybe
I
will
be
interested
in
maybe
finding
how
long
this
money
goes
for.
You
know,
like
you
know
how
many
six
feet
of
sidewalk.
Do
we
get
for
750
000
just
to
have
an
idea,
or
you
know,
I,
don't
know
this.
This
might
be
an
important
thing
for
me
to
not
to
know.
A
I
would
be
willing
to
bet
that
it
doesn't
cover
the
whole
city
or
anywhere
close
to
that
so
I
think
the
big
question
I
think
what
counselor
Pui
was
in
some,
maybe
asking,
but
maybe
what
I
the
piece
of
that
question
that
I'm
most
interested
in
is:
how
are
we
deciding
how
to
spend
the
600
750
000
understanding
that
it
won't
cover
the
whole
city
yep,
and
or
is
it
just
based
on
requests
or
is
it
based
on,
like
with
the
I,
was
really
impressed
with
the
road
condition
survey
where
it
was
like
done
by
data
and
a
thing,
a
machine
that
lasers,
like
lasers,
that
told
us
what
the
condition
of
the
street
was?
A
N
G
O
Is
it
on
now
yep,
okay,
good
afternoon,
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
clarify
this.
This
portion
first
I
would
like
to
start
with
the
fact
that
they
maintenance
of
the
sidewalks
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
homeowner
as
per
code
right.
So
we
have.
We
have
two
programs
in
the
city
to
address
maintenance
and
replacement
of
concrete
of
those
sidewalks.
First
one
is
50
50
that
allows
a
homeowner
to
split
the
cost
with
the
city
when
their
sidewalk
needs
repairs.
O
While
you
are
looking
at
in
this
CIP
application
is
for
those
areas
that
require
immediate
attention
due
to
safety
issues.
This
is
not
your
regular
crack
on
on
on
a
sidewalk.
This
is
a
lifting
sidewalk
because
of
what
what
is
happening
on
the
bottom
right
and
so
the
homeowner
may
or
may
not
have
the
ability
to
repair
as
per
the
responsibility,
so
the
city
will
address
it
right
away.
So
when
we
learn
about
those,
we
use
these
funds
to
repair
that
sidewalk.
O
Furthermore,
and
and
I'm
going
to
let
Mark
add
a
little
bit
more
information
here
on
the
inventory
that
we
you
were
talking
about.
Do
we
know
where
are
these
locations
that
need
or
will
need
attention
based
on
on
how
the
damage
is
evolving?
Yes,
we
do
and
Mark
if
you
want
to
go
ahead.
P
Mark
Steven
city
engineer
there
there's
a
couple
different
ways
that
we
handle
and
approach
this
for
the
publicly
concrete
program
money,
the
the
Windstorm
money
was
separate
that
was
allocated
by
the
council.
As
a
result,
all
the
wind
storm
items
that
were
brought
up
and
brought
her
attention
have
been
handled.
P
The
public,
Way
Concrete
program.
We
have
done
very
similar
to
the
oci
for
roadway
index.
We've
done
an
inventory
across
the
city.
Within
the
past
couple
of
years
of
sidewalks
and
identified
locations.
We
typically
try
and
go
worst
first
when
it
comes
to
ones
that
the
city
identifies
what
Jorge
spoke
to
with
the
50
50
program.
That
is
when
homeowners
with
their
adjacent
sidewalk
will
say:
hey
I've
got
you
know,
deteriorated
concrete
and
it's
their
responsibility
for
these.
These
sort
of
items
like
for
curb
and
gutter
where
we
have
ponding
issues.
P
We
have
tree
roots
that
have
affected
you
know
raising
trip
hazards.
We
will
assess
those,
but
across
the
city
in
all
districts,
it
is
something
that
is
it
plagues
the
city
with
our
Urban
forests,
these
kind
of
issues
with
the
trees
and
and
what
the
tree
roots
do.
So
that
is,
that
is
primarily
how
we
handle
that
if
there's
any
risk
management
items
that
are
brought
to
our
attention
from
trip
and
Falls,
then
we'll
typically
go
out
and
prioritize
those
as
well.
P
P
L
K
F
Do
think
it
would
need
to
be
amended
and
some
of
the
dormant
cdbg
funds
that
the
council
has
talked
about
the
last
few
months.
One
of
the
policy
priorities
that
you
gave
to
can
was
sidewalks,
and
so
there
is
an
amount,
that's
going
to
be
coming
back
to
the
council
for
a
follow-up
briefing,
because
you
would
have
to
amend
the
the
one
year
and
the
five-year
HUD
plans
to
use
the
funding
for
those
categories.
So
it'd
be
one-time
money,
but
it
could
be
an
opportunity
to
add
the
funding
for
this
use
in
this
program.
A
K
I
guess
a
different
way
to
phrase.
It
is
that
the
city
covered
the
residence
portion
with
cdbg
and
the
city's
portion
was
CIP
I.
Think
in
both
categories
there
wasn't
enough
funding
to
go
around
so
so
it's
not
that
100
of
the
need
the
needed.
Sidewalk
projects
got
done,
but
there
were
funding
sources
for
both.
N
I
think
we
had
that
in
last
year's
cdbg,
because
I
remember
talking
with
this
with
Cindy
and
I,
think
we
actually
might
have
done
it
last
year.
F
N
A
H
Sorry
I
don't
mean
to
go
backwards,
but
a
quick
question
on
the
the
one
before
that,
but
the
Virginia
Street
we're
checking
to
see
if
how
much
more
can
be
done
in
addition
to
21st
and
Virginia
Street
right,
but
those
will
definitely
be
covered.
A
P
F
And
attachment
nine
has
the
map
showing
the
individual
zones
that
are
done
together
and
it
shows
by
number
which
ones
have
been
funded
and
which
ones
would
be
funded
with
this
additional
funding.
There's
113
zones,
they're
color
coded
by
Red,
which
are
the
most
in
need
versus
blue,
which
are
the
least
in
need
great.
A
Get
that-
and
this
is
again
just
as
an
aside-
it
would
be
great
just
in
order
for
us
to
communicate
with
our
constituents.
This
is
not
the
only
line
item
for
traffic
calming
in
our
budget
could
could
we
at
when
there's
time
which
I
know
that's
never,
but
like
get
a
list
of
all
the
different
ways,
we're
funding
traffic
calming
in
the
city.
That
would
help
us
help
me
wrap
my
head
around
it
and
be
able
to
communicate
that
okay.
O
N
You
know
there
is
the
city
put
the
effort
on
coming
up
with
the
areas
that
need
the
most.
You
know
and
created
a
map
and
created
a
red
area,
some
different.
You
know
different
categories
of
urgency
on
this,
but
then
you
have
the
parallel
route
where
and
they
were
in
a
different
area
outside
these.
These
red
areas
could
apply
for
this
for
this
funding
and
it
could
be
potentially
funded,
which
is
fine,
but
maybe
there
is
a
discussion
there.
Could
we
prioritize
funding
for
especially
for
Speedy
mitigation?
N
Q
N
It
will
narrow
it
down.
I
guess
this
is
a
bigger
conversation,
but
I
want
us
to
maybe
start
thinking
about
this.
You
know
that
we
shouldn't
be
putting
these
funds
across
the
board,
but
we
are
we're
trying
to
tackle
the
biggest
issue
and
the
biggest
area.
Some
we
put
the
efforts.
You
should
put
the
effort
on
coming
up
with
the
study
and
recognizing
these
areas
first,
but
sometimes
we
are
pulling
these
funds
to
other
sections
and.
A
I
think
to
add
to
your
comment:
counselor,
not
just
the
funding.
Maybe
we
can
find
funding
for
all
of
the
ones
that
are
read
on
our
map
or
whatever
Plus
a
couple
others,
but
we're
spreading
out
our
staff
time
as
well.
So,
however
long
it
would
take,
even
if
the
money
is
available
to
do
that
so
I'm
not
opposed
to
that
conversation
at
all
and
I
I
would
tend
to
to
lean
towards.
Let's
do
the
ones
that
our
data
shows
need
it,
the
most
councilman
Duke
and
did
you
have
a
comment.
N
I
think
we
can.
That
would
allow
us,
maybe
hopefully
to
finish
some
of
those
areas.
First
and
then
we
can
go
down
the
list
into
the
other
colors
and
you
know
they're
less
urgent,
but
hopefully
we
can
get
through
the
list
faster
and
there
is
a
thought
process
and
there
is
a
plan
that
we're
following.
So
it's
almost
redirecting
some
of
the
applications
from
the
neighbors
into
some
categories
or
yeah
I
think
that's
a
conversation.
A
I
think
that's
a
policy
discussion
that
we
can
have
and
I
think.
If
that's
the
direction
we
go,
we
should
clarify
with
the
community
that
this
is
how
we're
gonna
do
traffic
calming
through
this
process
and
the
other
process
may
not
be
worth
your
time.
Does
that
make
sense
like
if,
if
we
have
a
data-driven
approach
to
how
we're
going
to
prioritize
these,
then
spending
effort
in
that?
Because
there
are
communities
that
have
spent
effort
in
that,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
ignore
that.
G
And
I
think
if
this
goes
back
to
your
first
comment
about
the
different
ways,
because
we
have
those
quick
action
plans
and
stuff
like
that
and
I
know:
Transportation
has
a
a
good
deal
on
how
they
want
to
do
it.
There's
a
lot
of
different
funding
sources
and
I.
Think
it
it
kind
of
dovetails
into
everything.
We're
talking
about
here,
it'd
be
just
nice
that
everyone
understands
how
we
allocated,
who
gets
it
and
what
what
pot
it
comes
out
of
the
quick
reaction
or
number
seven
here
or
some
other
pot
of
funding.
N
Because
we're
going
to
open,
also
CIP
applications
very
soon,
so
it
will
be
nice
if
we
are
going
to
have
that
discussion
to
have
the
discussion
before
so
we
set
the
records
trade.
If
that's
what
the
direction
this
Council
wants
to
go
and
then
you
know
when
neighbors
are
applying
for
the
applications.
There
is
some
that's.
A
A
F
The
next
one
is
number
eight,
the
neighborhood
byways
and
it's
specific
to
construction
of
the
West
Point
Jordan
Meadows
byway
and
designed
for
a
sugar
house
to
University
of
Utah.
By
way.
F
Correct
when
the
city
is
reconstructing
a
street
it
will.
The
project
will
typically
Encompass
the
entire
public,
right-of-way
so
sidewalk
to
sidewalk
if
there
are
slabs
or
curb
and
gutter.
That
also
need
to
be
addressed
for
the
efficiency
and
reducing
disruption
to
the
neighborhood
doing
it
all
at
once
makes
sense.
F
A
F
A
F
13
is
Three
Creeks,
West
roadways
addendum
this
one's
also
not
recommended
for
funding.
F
A
A
A
Thank
you,
okay,
and
so
that's
the
same
as
number
11
number
nine.
This
is
the
complete
streets
pieces
of
complete
reconstructions
that
are
funded
elsewhere
and
separate
from
the
bond
and
and
separate
from
the
bunt.
Now
could
some
of
the
number
nine
go
to
the
bond
roads,
though
no,
never
mind,
I,
don't
need
the
answer
to
that.
Thanks.
F
15
Urban
trails
and
specifically
a
new
urban
trail
that
would
serve
The,
Other,
Side,
village,
the
tiny
home
Village,
as
well
as
the
Wallace
stegner
Academy,
connecting
them
to
Redwood
Road
and
existing
public
transit,
as
well
as
a
soon
to
be
completed.
Mobility
Hub
at
Orange
Street,
which
is
just
past
Redwood
Road,
since
these
are
new
sidewalks.
This
might
also
be
another
opportunity
to
use
some
of
the
dormant
cdbg
funding.
It
would
need
to
be
included
in
updating
those
HUD
plans,
but
this
one
and
earlier
the
proactive,
concrete
program.
F
L
Can
I
confirm
just
because
the
word
Trail
is
used
is
a
is?
Are
these
actually
the
sidewalks
that,
like
Wallace
stegner,
has
been
waiting
for
since
they
were
built
or
is
it
a
sub?
Thank
you.
John
I
see
you're,
not
yeah.
Okay,
it's
not
just
like
a
separate
trail
that
would
be
close,
but
not
quite
what
they
need.
N
Answer
yes,
sweet,
okay,
it's
important
as
an
important
piece.
Yes,
okay,
and
so
this
will
also
I
trust.
You
finish
the
end
of
the
line.
Nine
Line
Trail
going
west
a
little
bit
of
the
Nightline
Trail
sort
of
dies
disappears.
It
becomes.
It
follows.
F
R
We
hired
a
consultant.
Sorry.
Can
you
hear
me
now:
okay,
we're
in
the
process
of
figuring
all
that
out.
We
actually
hired
a
consultant
to
do
some
of
the
planning
and
design
to
basically
see
how
far
we
can.
We
would
be
on
this
stretch.
R
Whatever
budget
we
get
but
yeah,
the
top
priority
would
be
extending
sidewalk
along
Indiana
Avenue
Far
Enough
West
from
Redwood
Road
to
serve
both
the
it's
called
bending
River
Road
that
the
wall
stegner
Academy
is
on
and
then
also
where
the
other
side
Village
is
and
then,
if
we
can
keep
going
further
and
start
working
on
the
Surplus
Canal
Trail,
then
we
will,
but
later
this
year,
we'll
be
able
to
have
that
study
complete.
So
it
will
at
least
know
what
needs
to
be
built
and
what
it
will
look
like.
A
R
So
that's
the
good
news
we'll
be
able
to
move
pretty
quick
Mr.
N
Chair
the
thus
just
to
does
the
funding
and
clarification.
Does
the
funding
also
or
the
study
looks
into
bending
River
Road,
which
is
where,
while
the
stagner
sits
on
just
a
little
bit
south
of
Indiana
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
part
of
the,
because
it
will
be
frustrated
for
the
patrons
of
Wallace
stagner
to
see
all
that
Improvement
and
then
yet.
The
sidewalk
that
they've
been
asking
for
five
years,
not
to
happen.
R
So
I
we
can
look
at
that.
I
thought
there
on
the
west
side
of
the
road
that
they
did
have
sidewalk
all
the
way
down.
But
no,
there
is
just.
L
Brooks
on
the
east
side,
there
is
some
that
gets
broken
up.
However,
the
case
has
been
made
repeatedly
because
of
both
the
industrial
and
the
carpooling
traffic
that
there's
no
safe
Crossing,
so
using
the
sidewalk,
that's
there
actually
in
perils
people
even
further
and
then
on
the
west
side,
where
the
kids
do
have
to
walk.
It
is
just
goat
heads.
K
A
F
F
N
I
think
I
mentioned
this
too
I
mean
I,
mean
my
interest
in
something
similar
to
this
to
the
restroom.
You
know
to
look
into
all
the
restrooms
in
the
city
and
to
do
an
assessment
of
what
is
needed.
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
patrons
to
Parks
they're
on
unshiltered
that
uses
them
and
they
need
them
to
be
in
functioning
order.
So
this
is
something
that
I
really
be
interested
in
and.
A
A
F
We
can
get
the
cost
break
out
and
I.
Remember
the
applicant
shared
examples
of
similar
studies
that
were
done.
I
think
it
was
Denver
and
Pittsburgh
and
maybe
Portland,
but
if
you
wanted
to
see
examples
of
similar
studies,
we
have
those.
H
F
F
F
On
that
one,
thank
you
number
20.
is
the
337
Park
development,
and
this
is
recommended
for
full
funding.
It
would
be
a
community
garden
or
it
was
initially
a
community
garden,
but
because
of
the
development
on
either
side,
it's
really
limited
the
Sun
that
has
access
to
those
plants
and
has
made
the
community
garden
more
difficult
to
be
successful.
Where.
A
E
and
it
became
a
garden
like
you
said
there
was
some
public
art
in
2017,
then
there,
but
it's
not
super
visible.
Like
I
mean
you
have
to
turn
it's.
E
E
H
H
S
A
F
So
that
takes
us
to
21
Rose,
Park,
Lane,
beautification,
Trail
and
safety
improvements.
This
one
is
not
recommended
for
funding.
Councilmember
Petro
spoke
at
the
first
briefing
last
month
about
wanting
to
partially
fund
this
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
the
driver,
feedback
signs.
L
I
think
we
also
need
to
pay
attention
to
the
rest
of
the
request.
I,
don't
think
with
the
competing
priorities
right
now.
I
can
push
it
as
far,
but
between
the
lack
of
the
sound
barrier
there,
which
is
not
our
responsibility,
but
I've
now
been
rejected
for
twice
I
think
so.
Each
rejection
I
view
is
progress
towards
the
ultimate
goal,
but
the
neighbors
there
are
living
under
significant
duress
plus
we
have
an
upcoming
land
use
request
to
densify
in
that
area
to
do
a
high
density
project.
L
So
I
do
think
this
needs
to
stay
on
our
radar
and
we
need
to
be
strategic
about
how
we
approach
it
and-
and
the
concerns
raised
here
are
really
valid.
I
just
have
a
hard
time
prioritizing
it
among
all
the
other
competing
priorities.
Right
now,.
L
L
I
think
well,
I.
Think
right
now
us
doing
the
feedback.
Signs
is
a
good
first
step
because
we
definitely
do
need
to
address
the
issue
there,
but
with
all
the
development
coming
there.
It
feels
as
though
we're
going
to
have
an
organic
reason
to
assess
and
evaluate,
and
so
once
we
know
what
this
land
use
request
happening
up
at
the
Hunter
Stables
area
is
going
to
be,
will
have
a
better
context.
I
would
hate
us
to
commit
this
and
then
realize
this
doesn't
make
sense
with
other
things
we
have
to
do
to
develop
up
there.
A
So
my
question
is:
I
thought
that
in
our
livable
streets
master
plan,
the
responsive
feedback
signs
were
part
of
the
toolkit
that
we
adopted
is
that
true,
so
I'm
seeing
a
yes
not
so
it
is
when
we
funded
those
big
other
chunks
of
livable
streets
implementation,
money
in
different
parts,
including
in
this
CIP
I,
believe
right.
Does
that
include
responsive
feedback
signs,
or
would
we
need
to
add
additional
ones
to
accomplish
this?
This?
What
is
a
relatively
small
request
for
responsive
feedback
signs
in
whatever
spot
I.
F
To
repeat
the
question,
could
the
driver
feedback
signs
be
funded
out
of
the
quick
intervention
funding?
Could
it
be
funded
out
of
the
livable
streets
funding,
or
does
it
need
to
have
separate,
dedicated
CIP
funding
and
I?
Think
a
question?
Thank
you.
It
could
work
any
of
the
three
ways.
R
Yeah,
that's
correct,
so
they
probably
like
in
this
case
it
probably
makes
the
most
sense
for
the
to
pull
it
out
of
the
quick
action
funding.
How.
L
N
Assume
just
sort
of
we
remember
the
conversation
we
had
this
conversation
on
the
unresolved
issues,
conversation
and
briefly,
councilman
Petro.
You
know
you
said
the
same
thing
that
you
said
right
now
is
you
know
we
want
to
indicate
to
these
neighbors
we're
being
heard,
but
we
also
need
to
wait
for
a
lot
of
pieces
to
be
finished
and
we
were
discussing
how
much
those
signs
cost.
We
were
going
to
allocate
some
money
for
those
signs.
N
At
least
we
talked
about
the
possibility,
you're
allocating
some
money
for
the
signs
and
I
sort
of
sneak
under
the
rug
in
there
and
I
requested
also
to
for
those
for
district
two,
two
additional
signs,
so
it
was
two
for
for
district
one
and
two
for
District
Two
and
councilman
Roberto
once
and
most
likely
to
be
in
the
well
I
mean
in
that
area
as
a
sign
to
those
Neighbors.
A
I
guess
I
for
my
purposes,
I'm
comfortable
with
the
money
we've
already
allocated
to
those
two
programs
that
that
those
four
signs
could
be
accommodated.
I'm
also
open
to
adding
more
money
to
that.
If
you're
saying
what
you
want
us
to
appropriate
in
such
a
way
that
it
could
only
go
to
those
four
spots,
that's
maybe
one
more
layer
of
discussion
that
I
would
want
to
have,
because
but
I
I
think
that
the
program
already
is
sufficiently
flexible
for
individual
constituents
and
or
council
members
to
work
with
the
Department
to
figure
out.
L
F
E
However,
the
staff
report
says.
E
Okay,
212
000
is
eligible
from
Park
impact
fees
because
that's
only
for
new
for
a
new
amenity
because
they
have
a
playground,
they
have
somewhat
there's
amenities
there
so
and
then,
but
it's
been
foreign
like.
Would
you
refresh
my
memory
band
like
so?
If
it's
fun
dead
or
something
is
going
through,
the
general
obligation
bond
is
that:
can
we
use
those
funds
for
the
replacement
of
the
playground?
For
example,
okay,
yeah.
E
F
F
From
the
bond
yeah,
so
it's
one
and
a
half
million
per
District
approximately,
since
not
every
park,
has
the
same
need.
So
since
I
think
there
were
two
locations:
Topher
Park,
Richmond
Park,
assuming
you
split
the
one
one
and
a
half
million
it'd
be
750
000
to
Richmond,
Park.
Okay,
we.
F
L
L
Is
significant
Housing
Development
just
south
of
there,
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
an
awkward
spot
because
it
feels
industrial
and
like
we're
getting
into
rural,
but
there's
also
Suburban.
So
the
residents
are
right
to
be
stressed
and
want
responsiveness,
just
knowing
what
I
know
is
on
the
horizon.
I
just
don't
think
this
is
what
we
should
be
prioritizing.
It's
going
to
be
a
priority
because
of
the
development.
A
Apartments
that
are
going
in
they're
not
paying
streets
impact
fees
right
so
unless
they
are
low
income,
affordable,
they're
exempt
from
Impact
fees.
Okay,
but
theoretically,
that
type
of
additional
density
in
a
neighborhood
right
could
pay
for
the
need
for
improved
infrastructure
through
impact
fees,
I
mean
I,
say
theoretically
Loosely,
but.
F
L
A
A
Jefferson
parks
and
ballpark
I
believe
that
one
was
also
part
of
the
Geo
Bond
funding
can
I
get
a
little
bit
of
clarification
about.
Do.
We
need
both
sources
of
funding
to
do
what
we're
wanting
to
do
in
Jefferson,
Park
and
or
how?
If.
U
Yeah,
yes,
it
is
identified
as
one
of
the
reimagined
neighborhood
parks
for
your
District
I.
Think.
At
this
time
we
would
love
to
see
both
funding
sources.
It
would
give
us
greater
flexibility
and
significant
improvements
there.
This
CIP
request
is
has
been
a
constituent
request
for
several
years
and
is
primarily
looking
at
Trail
reconstruction
around
the
park
on
the
perimeter
yeah
around
the
perimeter.
A
When
the
lighting
geobond
money
would
be
for
different
types
of
improvements,
yeah
I
guess,
my
question
is:
I
also
have
constituents
that
have
continued
to
ask
about
first
encampment,
Park
and
I.
Think
their
request
is
relatively
small
and
so
I'm
wondering,
if
would
it
ruin
Jefferson
Park?
If
we
diverted
a
little
bit
to
First
encampment
and
it
maybe
you
could
give
me
a
little
bit
of
information
on
their
requests
and
how
that
could
fit
in
and.
C
M
A
That
would
be
I,
don't
want
to
I
want
Jefferson
Park
to
happen
and
I
want
Jefferson
Park
to
be
as
as
good
as
we
can
get
it.
But
if
there's
two
different
sources
of
funding
and
we're
getting
quite
a
bit
into
Jefferson,
Park
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
peeling
a
little
bit
off,
because
I
think
it
was
only
like
150
000.
They
were
asking
for
for
first
encampment
Park
yeah
in
order
to
get
that
to
spread
over
there
as
well.
If
that's
feasible,.
U
A
U
F
A
F
Fully
funded
I
believe
so
great
26,
the
Fair
Park
Traffic
Circle
Construction
phase.
This
is
on
10th,
West
and
5th
North.
It
is
recommended
for
full
funding,
and
this
is
one
the
council
had
talked
about
in
CIP
last
year.
As
funding
the
study.
This
is
Construction.
E
B
G
F
27,
the
North
Temple
arts
and
tourism
District
improvements.
This
one
is
not
recommended
for
funding.
It
would
be
centered
around
the
intersection
of
the
Folsom
Trail
and
eighth
West.
N
I
and
when
we
discussed
this
and
again
I
didn't
dug
in
too
deeply
on
it
when
we
were
talking
about
this
doing
unresolved
issues,
but
this
is
something
that
it
is
an
important
quarter
for
the
whole
city.
But
you
know
it's
an
important
piece
of
of
the
West
side
and
there
is
a
lot
of
obvious
struggles
on
North
Temple
and
any
activation
of
any
form
and
any
amount
of
money
that
could
give
us
something
there.
N
L
Get
it
we
have
a
I
have
a
constituent
too.
Who
is
a
bike?
He
primarily
uses
bike
for
Transit
and
has
had
difficulty
using
the
Folsom
Trail
because
of
a
variety
of
issues,
including
people
driving
on
it,
and
so
anything
that
we
can
do
to
reclaim
the
intended
purpose
of
the
Folsom
Corridor
would
potentially
be
a
really
great
investment
for
us
to
make
sure
that
that
new
investment
we've
made
doesn't
inadvertently
get
to
a
state
that
requires
remediation.
Eventually,
you
know
can
just
right
now
we
can
reclaim
it
through
some
basic
usage.
F
This
is
another
project
that
has
some
overlap
with
the
parks,
Bond
there's
five
million
dollars
for
completing
the
Folsom
Trail
and
adding
in
amenities
that
were
removed
when
it
was
constructed
due
to
cost
increases
and
I
think
the
full
5
million
is
included
in
the
first
issuance
of
the
parks
Bond.
So
it's
possible.
Some
of
this
could
be
implemented
with
the
parks,
Bond
funding
but
eligible
for
bonfire.
N
And
that
would
be
for
the
portion
on
the
photon
Trail,
but
this
could
be
a
little
more
focused
on
the
North
Temple
part
and
eighth
West
on
8th
West.
Yes,
and
you
know
there
is
a
piece
there
that
I've
been
been
interested
in,
which
is
the
public
art
idea
on
North
Temple
to
try
to
and
it's
part
of
the
description,
but
that
was
something
that
I
I
believe
it
will
change
in
a
positive
way,
not
Tempo,
but
yeah
breakdown
will
be
very
useful
for
me.
F
A
F
This
is
fire
station
number
one
apparatus,
Bay
extension,
the
the
this
is
a
major
renovation
to
allow
larger,
modern
fire
engines
and
trucks
to
fit
in
the
Bays.
When
the
facility
was
constructed,
the
vehicles
that
were
used
by
the
fire
department
were
smaller
and
the
call
volume
was
lower.
So
this
location
now
has
Bays
that
are
smaller
than
the
modern
vehicles
and
they
are
now
they've
basically
outgrown
the
facility
because
of
the
call
volume
that
they're
responding
to
and
it
is
recommended
for
full
funding.
F
Number
30:
this
is
an
item.
The
council
sees
every
year
in
CIP
the
facilities
asset
renewal
plan
facilities
has
a
10-year
plan
to
get
all
City
facilities
out
of
deferred
maintenance.
The
cost
is
significant.
It
would
take
all
of
CIP
almost
so.
Instead
of
fully
funding,
the
45
million
dollar
need
the
depart.
The
division
comes
to
the
council
each
year.
Saying
here
are
the
priority:
life
and
safety
needs
and
then
Energy
Efficiency
needs
and
then
lower
needs.
F
A
F
Number
31-
you
may
remember
this
from
the
annual
budget
because
it
had
an
ongoing
component
in
public
services
for
the
supplies
and
materials.
This
is
the
one-time
purchase
of
the
equipment.
So
it's
a
Mill
and
overlay
maintenance
pilot
program.
The
department
currently
rents
these
vehicles.
This
would
be
to
purchase
it.
So
you
already
approved
130
000
for
the
supplies
in
the
annual
budget.
This
is
to
purchase
two
vehicles
and
it's
a
step
in
between
it's
above
a
pothole
below
of
an
overlay.
A
F
The
next
one
number
32-
this
is
Sugarhouse
safe
side
streets,
part
two,
it's
a
traffic
calming
constituent
application
that
was
partially
funded
three
years
ago.
It
was
not
recommended
for
funding
in
the
last
cycle
and
the
constituent
has
continued
to
reapply.
So
the
designs
have
been
done.
This
is
to
implement
the
traffic
calming
recommendations
at
six
cross
streets
in
the
Sugar
House
area.
How.
N
N
I
don't
want
that
to
go
to
Western
part,
but
also
in
on
the
second
part
of
my
question.
It
goes
back
to
my
previous
point
on
this.
Does
this
overlap
with
any
of
the
areas
that
the
city
have
recognized
to
be
priority
priorities
for
this
sort
of
a
investment?
A
F
A
M
R
Ahead,
John
I
just
thought.
Maybe
it
was
worth
mentioning
that,
especially
with
the
construction
on
Highland,
Drive
and
the
pending,
or
soon
to
be
construction
on
21st
South,
and
considering
that
this
is
near,
where
there's
some
concern
about
some
spillover
traffic
during
the
construction.
R
So
we
did
some
quick
action
stuff
on
these
streets,
the
you
know
we're
still
testing
what
they'll
look
like
and
we've
really
liked
your
idea
of
the
painting
them
the
Salt
Lake
City
Blue,
but
we
did
put
some
of
the
those
big
concrete
Planters
on
some
of
these
streets,
some
of
the
more
critical
ones
so
I
just
thought
that
was
worth
mentioning
and
and
perhaps
even
might
be
worth
looking
at
something
permanent
just
because
of
the
the
they
still
have
a
few
more
years
of
construction
that
they
have
to
live
through.
R
So
we're
just
really
sensitive
to
that.
Thanks,
John.
A
F
N
Or
north,
it's
just
East
of
the
gardens
it's
across
the
street
from
the
Sandy
Anderson
Senior
Center
on
the
99
Trail.
F
N
L
F
That
takes
us
to
number
35.
a
traffic
signal
replacement.
This
particular
signal
is
75
years
old,
not
the
oldest
in
the
city
yep
and
every
year
in
CIP,
there's
requests
to
replace
traffic
signals.
Ideally,
the
city
would
replace
I
think
four
a
year
we
we
typically
don't
fund
it
at
that
level.
F
G
F
F
The
next
one,
37
Liberty
and
Jordan
Parks
greenhouses
two
different
greenhouses,
one
at
Liberty,
one
at
Jordan
they're,
both
quite
large
they're,
both
used
year-round
by
public
lands
to
propagate
and
create
the
plants
that
are
then
used
in
public
lands
throughout
the
city.
This
is
not
recommended
for
funding,
because.
N
Sorry
Mr
chair
go
ahead.
I
mean
I,
know
that
the
the
greenhouse
I'm
sure
same
thing
with
the
Liberty
one,
but
the
one
in
Jordan
Parks
is
a
key
piece
for
the
peace
Gardens
where
they
grow
a
lot
of
the
plants
that
end
up
going
on
the
peace
Gardens.
So
I
wonder
if
if
this
will
bring
us
problems
in
maintaining
the
the
peace
Gardens
and
keeping
it
as
beautiful
as
it
is,
as
it
is
right
now,
so
just
more
questions
about.
N
A
A
This
is
a
study
that
would
like
redesign
the
buildings
to
be
used
for
different
types
of
things,
like
events
and
activities
and
programming,
and
things
like
that
which
I
was
just
going
to
mention
that
it's
not
something
that
I
feel
compelled
to
find
funding
for
in
this
year's
budget,
but
I
those
buildings
are
actually
really
cool
inside
and
it's
a
it
could
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
create
something
really
special
inside
of
those
two
parks.
So,
yes
to
councilman
puie's
question
about
it
like.
A
U
To
that
yeah
happy
to
respond
to
that
with
regards
to
Jordan
Park
Greenhouse,
we
don't
use
the
greenhouse
to
grow
the
plants
that
are
at
International,
Peace
Gardens.
We
store
them
there,
so
it
is
a
storage
problem
that
we
would
have,
as
for
Liberty,
Park
same
thing
for
Liberty
Park
for
a
lot
of
our
annual
plants
that
we
have
at
Liberty
Park.
We
have
been
expanding
our
native
plant
program
significantly
and
using
the
Liberty
Park
greenhouses.
A
17Th
South
and
fifth
East
I
believe
I
think
we're
at
the
scheduled
time.
If
we're
wanting
to
stay
on
schedule,
we
have
another
CIP
briefing
Tuesday
next.
A
Tuesday,
so
why
don't?
Why
don't
we
hold
there?
Well,
actually,
I
just
want
to
flip
through
the
rest
of
them
are
not
recommended
for
funding
until
the
last
page.
Is
that
correct?
No,
yes,
the
very
last
page
West
Side!
Actually,
why
don't
we
just
go
through
the
last
three
that
are
recommended
for
funding,
and
then
we
can
pick
up
on
Tuesday
with
the
rest
of
them
that
are
not
okay.
Does
that
sound
okay
to
council
members
yeah?
So
do
the
last
page
right
now,
let's
jump.
F
To
the
last
page,
and
then
we'll
remember
to
do
the
so
that's
number
59
the
West
Side
art
project,
it's
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
it
could
go
anywhere
on
the
west
side.
This
could
be
combined
with
or
be
separate
from,
the
other
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
the
RDA
nine
line.
Project
area.
F
G
F
It's
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
remaining
from
last
year.
You
probably
want
to
leave
some
funding
because
there's
always
something
unexpected
that
comes
up
with
vacant
property,
but
there.
Yes,
there
might
be
a
chance
to
use
some
of
these
funds
elsewhere,
but
we
would
want
to
check
with
Real
Estate
Services
I.
A
F
A
E
Mean
there
there
are
some
issues
and
some
of
special,
for
example,
in
my
district
PSP,
it's
been
sitting
there
vacant
for
a
long
time,
and
there
are
a
few
process
going.
This
process
going
slow
and
it's
been
redone
apparently,
but
regardless
of
what
we
do
with
that
property
there,
there
needs
a
lot.
It
needs
a
lot
of
Maintenance
and
that's
something
that
I've
been
working
out
with
the
administration,
but
that's
an
example
of
city
property.
On
that
we
need
to
take
care
of
this.
E
A
A
A
F
We
we
do
have
an
answer.
Oh
it's
on
page
three
of
the
staff
report,
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
the
former
public
safety
building.
It
would
include
repairing
the
existing
gate,
a
new
motorized
gate
which
would
control
access
to
Magnolia
parking,
the
permanent
Supportive
Housing
next
door,
and
then
it
would
have
improvements
to
the
park
strip,
Landscaping,
Maintenance
and
cleanup,
including
bio
waste
cleanup,
as
well
as
car,
towing
and
Disposal.
A
H
M
A
N
A
F
And
this
one
there's
a
few
line
items
in
CIP
that
don't
go
through
the
competitive
process,
their
base,
funding
for
maintenance
right,
there's
some
for
Parks
some
for
facilities.
This
is
a
new
one.
So
that's
why
we
called
it
out
and
added
it
to
the
funding
log
and
why
it
didn't
go
to
The
Advisory
board.
So
this
would
be
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
maintenance
of
urban
Trails,
so
nine
line
Folsom
McClelland
as
well
as
some
of
the
new
ones
that
were
discussed
today
like
over
by
Wallace
stegner
Academy.
F
A
I
see
what
you're
saying
I
mean
I
think
it's
necessary
we're
putting
a
lot
of
money
into
our
trails
and
if
we
don't
fund
maintenance,
then
we're
gonna
regret
that
yep,
okay,
a
bathroom
break,
has
been
requested.
So
let's
end
this
until
next
Tuesday
take
a
five
minute
break
and
then
come
back
to
item
number
three.
Oh
my
gosh
we're
only
on
three.
M
M
A
V
Thank
you
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
10
Parcels
at
the
address
you
mentioned
from
their
current
D2
or
downtown
support.
District
zoning
to
D1,
which
is
Central
business
district.
The
former
Sears
department
store,
was
located
on
this
site.
Intermountain
Health
owns
the
property
and
stated
they
would
like
to
construct
an
urban
Hospital
on
the
site.
Hospitals
are
not
allowed
on
either
D1
or
D2
zoning,
and
the
request
also
includes
a
text
amendment
that
would
allow
hospitals
and
ambulance
services
as
permitted
uses
in
the
D1
zoning
District.
W
A
W
W
Hi
hum
Intermountain
Health,
the
property
owner
is
requesting
a
zoning
map
Amendment
for
the
property
at
752,
South
State
Street
to
change
the
zoning
from
D2
downtown
support,
District
to
D1
Central
business
district.
As
Brian
mentioned,
there
are
10
parcels
and
the
property
is
approximately
nine
acres
in
size
and
if
the
amendments
are
approved,
the
property
owner
intends
to
build
an
urban
Hospital
on
this
site.
Next
slide.
Please.
W
On
the
second
portion
of
the
request
is
to
amend
the
downtown,
District's
land
use,
table
and
add
the
following
uses
as
conditional
within
the
D1
zoning
District
ambulance
services,
both
indoor
and
out,
they
have
the
same
definition
as
listed
below
and
then
a
hospital,
including
accessory
lodging
facility
to
know
the
applicant
Israel.
The
applicant
originally
requested
these
uses
to
be
permitted,
but
the
Planning
Commission
forwarded
a
recommendation
that
they
be
conditional
next
slide.
Please.
W
W
Planning
staff
had
the
following
considerations
when
reviewing
the
zoning
map
and
text
amendments
the
proposed
if
it
meets
our
general
plan
policies
in
both
downtown
plan
and
plan,
Salt
Lake,
the
development
potential
of
the
property
and
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties.
The
proposed
amendments
are
aligned
with
the
general
principles
and
strategies
as
identified
in
planned
Salt
Lake.
W
The
plan
recognizes
that
the
neighborhood
is
becoming
more
urbanized
and
is
perceived
as
the
backbone
of
the
county,
so
growth
is
expected
and
appropriate,
and
the
proposed
rezone
would
allow
for
denser
development
in
taller
buildings
than
what
the
the
plan
of
Visions
for
this
South
State
neighborhood.
But
the
designation.
The
zoning
designation,
would
support
the
initiatives
as
outlined
in
the
plan.
Higher
impact
development
is
expected
and
then
new
developments
should
use
existing
infrastructure
when
possible.
W
W
And
then
the
third
thing
is
we
review
the
compatibility
with
adjacent
properties.
The
subject
property
is
unique.
It
is
within
multiple
Community
Council
boundaries
and
the
community
councils
had
a
joint
meeting
and
submitted
a
letter
regarding
the
proposal.
The
site
is
within
the
ballpark
Community
Council
boundary,
but
it
is
within
the
downtown
plan.
W
As
the
as
mentioned
before
compatibility,
the
downtown
area
is
expected
to
continue
to
expand
to
approximately
900
South,
and
the
proposed
rezone
is
compatible
with
the
development
to
the
north
and
represents
how
the
community
envisions
the
expansion
of
the
downtown
neighborhood
and
next
slide.
Please.
W
And
to
wrap
it
up
earlier
this
year,
the
Planning
Commission
voted
seven
to
three
to
four,
to
positive
recommendation
to
the
council
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
the
subject
properties
and
then
also
to
add
the
uses,
as
requested
as
conditional
within
the
D1
zoning
District
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
and
the
applicant
is
also
here.
N
Yes,
I.
Thank
you
Mr,
chair
I.
My
questions
in
general
focus
on
estro
activation
on
State
Street.
I
know
that
this
is
looking
into
a
hospital
a
facility,
and
you
know,
I
haven't
seen
many
hospitals
that
do
at
least
in
Utah.
They
do
a
lot
of
Street
activation.
N
They
usually
have
a
very
large
setbacks
or
there
are
on
top
of
a
mountain
or
something
like
Universal
Utah
right,
but
I
I,
so
I
just
I.
It
is
very
important
to
me
personally
to
to
see
and
I
see
the
potential
of
State
Street
as
in
Bay
corner
to
the
state,
and
you
know
that
street
that
invites
everybody
and
everybody
will
go
to
and
I'm
worried
that
this
will
be
a
Caesar's,
a
Sears
block
again
and
on
the
State
Street
phase.
N
You
know
a
wall,
maybe
some
plants
or
whatnot
I'm
sure
it's
going
to
be
prettier
than
that.
But
my
concern
is
the
activation
and
the
lack
of
their
lack
thereof
on
that
street,
so
that
that
is
something
that
I'm
very
focused
on.
Obviously,
I.
Don't
have
necessarily
issues
with
with
the
use
on
with
the
intent
and
where
the
height
and
with
all
of
that
I
personally
don't
have
issues
with
that
and
I
very
supportive
of
the
plan.
N
But
to
me
stay
straight
should
be
activated
and
I'm
not
talking
about
when
I
talk
about
activation
and
I
mentioned
this
before
I'm,
not
talking
about
a
gym
or
you
know,
or
something
like
that.
I'm
talking
about
in
and
out
people
things
that
attract
people
to
the
sidewalk
and
activate
that
that
street
face
I.
A
Share
that
priority,
but
I
want
to
expand
and
say
that
I
think
it's
not
just
State
Street
that
matters
Main
Street
is
on
the
other
side
and
all
of
the
streets.
There
are
really
becoming
that
whole
district
is
really
becoming
a
hopefully
becoming
a
walkable
there's
some
of
the
best
restaurants
and
every
all
sorts
of
things.
Development
is
happening
in
that
area.
So
for
me,
it's
not
just
State
Street
that
that
matters
for
Street
activation.
It
would
be
all
of
them
any
other
questions
before
we
invite
the
app's
gonna.
A
T
Awesome,
can
you
hear
me
now
great
thanks,
Tyler
buswell
attorney
at
Kurt
McConkey
and
represent
Intermountain
Health
with
me:
I'm
Heather
wall
she's,
the
CEO
and
hospital
administrator
for
the
area
where
this
hospital
will
go
and
I
also
have
Bentley
pay.
Who
is
the
senior
real
estate
director
for
Intermountain
Health
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Bentley
to
run
through
some
slides
and
give
just
a
short
presentation.
Q
See
if
this
is
already
pushed
thank
you
for
being
here
allowing
us
to
be
here
with
you
in
your
time.
We
really
appreciate
it
and
are
excited
about
the
project
and
look
forward
to
answering
any
questions
that
you
have
we'll
be
very
brief
within
the
five
minutes
and
make
sure
we
answer
your
questions.
Did
you
have
our?
How
do
we
advance
the
oh
next
slide
and
I'll
skip
a
few
slides,
because
the
staff
did
such
a
great
job
with
their
write-up?
Thank
you,
Amanda.
Q
Just
a
little
bit
of
background.
Sorry,
you
just
go
one
slide
back
sort
of
why
we
picked
this
side.
It
might
be
helpful
to
understand
in
when
we
were
planning
for
a
potential
Urban
hospital
here,
we're
looking
for
Access
for
our
patients
easily
off
the
freeway
I'm
really
excited
about
the
new
track
stops
that
was
there
that
was
there
on
the
kitty
corner
there,
so
that
patients
could
access
the
the
facility
via
tracks
as
well,
also
prioritizing
a
place
where
Physicians
wanted
to
practice
and
and
work
in
an
urban
setting.
Q
It
was
difficult
to
find
that
much
acreage
for
some
context.
A
lot
of
our
hospitals
are
around
40
acres.
This
one
sits
on
about
nine
and
we'll
talk
about
that
in
just
a
minute,
but
to
find
a
single
transaction
where
we
could
buy
that
much
space
at
one
time
inside
the
urban
District
was
was
really
important
for
us
and
then
having
the
city
support
of
wanting
to
bring
an
urban
hospital
to
Salt
Lake
City
the
next
slide,
then
we
can
skip
this
one.
Q
X
Would
love
to
so
the
the
rationale
Bentley
explained
very
well
as
to
the
as
to
why
that
consideration?
For
that
downtown
location,
the
two
freeway
exits,
but
the
other
element
is
the
adjacency
and
the
accessibility
to
the
airport.
X
So
one
of
the
things
that
this
group
might
not
to
know
is
that
we've
got
a
phenomenal
balance
in
our
downtown
hospitals,
of
providing
extraordinary
care
to
the
individuals
that
are
right
there
in
our
downtown
area
and
we've
had
the
opportunity
to
serve
49
out
of
the
50
states
last
year
in
people
traveling
to
Utah,
for
health
care,
and
so
creating
a
really
accessible
location
was
important.
X
Making
sure
we
were
in
a
area
that
had
access
to
hotels
that
had
access
to
restaurants
was
really
important,
also
an
area
that
could
accommodate
the
fact
that
we
we
will
have
over
seven
1700
caregivers
that
will
be
traveling
to
the
downtown
area
for
work
on
any
given
24-hour
period
as
it
is
a
24-hour
operation,
and
so
that
local
patient
was
ideal.
In
that
we
would
have
the
ability
to
have
that
freeway
accessibility,
but
also
the
ability
to
assure
a
great
location
for
care.
X
X
It
takes
the
tracks,
stop
as
well
as
two
bus
transfers
to
get
to
where
either
patients
need
to
be,
or
the
caregivers
that
are
caring
for
them
need
to
be,
and
so
the
accessibility
of
the
bus
line,
the
accessibility
of
that
Trax
line
and
the
ability
to
go
north
south
and
from
the
airport
made
this
I
this
area,
something
that
was
extraordinarily
attractive
from
a
hospital-based
perspective
and
I'll
pause.
There.
Thank.
Q
You
Heather
and
I
think
the
last
two
comments
before
we
answer
any
questions.
The
the
question
here
about
Street
activation
and
Community
engagement.
We've
spent
a
lot
of
time
over
the
last
several
months
since
we
acquired
the
property
meeting
with
the
business
districts
and
their
meetings.
The
letter
that
was
that
Amanda
reference
talked
a
lot
about
Street
activation
permeability
and
we
certainly
recognize
that
the
site
is
going
to
be
very
different
than
anything
Intermountain
has
built
in
the
state.
Like
I
said
they're
on
40
70,
100,
Acre
Parcels.
Q
This
will
be
an
urban
hospital.
It's
going
to
look
and
feel
very
different,
so
keenly
aware
of
that
street
activation.
Q
We
can
talk
more
about
that
if
you
have
specific
questions
on
it,
but
we
are
engaged
with
the
community
on
those
concerns
and
certainly
want
to
address
it,
and
it's
important
to
us
that
we
blend
into
to
what
is
in
the
urban
context
and
how
the
property
flows
and
and
frankly
that
allowing
it
to
go
to
D1
is
facilitate
some
of
those
things
we
can
go
higher
and
allow
for
that
kind
of
activation
and
permeability.
I.
A
Guess
maybe
a
more
specific
question:
is
it
possible
in
an
urban
Hospital,
with
a
zone
that
allows
unlimited
height
for
the
first
one
at
least
one,
if
not
one
or
two
floors,
to
not
be
part
of
the
hospital
to
be
leased
to
businesses
that
could
activate
the
street
Frontage
in
a
way
that
a
hospital
typically
would
not?
Obviously
you
need
some
Ingress
in
egress.
You
need
your
hot,
your
ambulances
to
come
in
and
out,
but
is
it
possible
for
that
first
level,
given
that
this
change
allows
unlimited
height?
Does
that
work
in
an
urban
Hospital?
X
X
If
you
were
to
say,
none
at
all,
I
think
that
would
be
very
difficult.
But
when
you
look
at
cities
like
Seattle,
when
you
look
at
cities
like
New
York,
they
actually
have
phenomenal
Street
accessibility
to
to
services
that
serve
both
the
people
inside
the
hospital
and
outside
of
the
hospital
coffee
shops.
24,
7
pharmacies.
X
Other
areas
like
that
that
have
to
be
on
that
first
floor,
because
we
expect
individuals
to
come
from
the
street
and
to
utilize
those
services,
but
also
come
from
the
backside
where
they're
coming
out
of
the
hospital
out
of
the
clinic.
So
I
would
suggest
that
it
would
be
difficult
to
do
it
in
its
entirety.
But
our
expectation
is
that
we're
creating
an
area
that
it
really
draws
the
community
in
because
that's
what
hospital
is
for
is
is
being
that
that
Center
for
individuals
who
need
Karen.
G
A
N
Sorry
I
to
me:
that's
you
know,
I
again,
I
don't
have
any
issues
with
the
height
I.
Don't
have
any
issues
with
the
purpose
with
the
goal:
I
love
that
the
urban
setting,
but
to
me
that
would
be
a
deal
breaker
not
having
a
street
activation,
and
you
know
in
all
you
know
at
some
level.
Obviously
the
internal
parts
of
the
you
know
the
building
I'm
talking
about
the
front
edge.
You
know
of
the
of
the
building
to
that
activates,
the
street.
N
That
brings
people
in
customers
of
yours
and
also
you
know
if
I
want
to
grab
a
coffee.
You
know,
and
that
to
me
is
very
important
and
we
have
seen
worst
case
scenarios
in
our
city
and
in
other
cities,
and
you
can
have
it
the
most
amazing
you
can
have
the
most
amazing
building,
but
then
the
street
will
become
the
sidewalk
will
be
dead
and
that's
really
what
I
want
us
to
avoid
in
this,
and
this
thing
so
to
me.
T
I
can
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
that.
Just
as
you
know,
we've
been
following
very
closely
since
last
fall
the
the
proposed
downtown
Building,
height
and
Street
activation
tax,
right,
which
we
understand
that
the
purpose
of
that
is
to
you
know,
have
you
know
retail
and
you
know
other
uses
by
the
public,
potentially
some
open
space.
All
of
those
things.
We
understand
that
to
get
the
additional
height
we're
going
to
have
to
go
through
the
design
review
process.
T
We
understand
that
we've
been
following
that
we've
been
supportive
of
that,
because
the
truth
is
we
wanted
to
do
that
anyways,
and
so
once
that
passed,
that
that
makes
a
ton
of
sense
for
us,
but
right
now
we're
just
sort
of
looking
at.
Can
we
get
these
approvals
so
then
we
can
really
begin
the
design
review
process.
So
we
appreciate
the
comments
and
we
we
we
understand
that,
and
that
is
certainly
in
our
plan.
I.
A
A
Would
there
be
some
sort
of
tool
that
can
that
that
we
could
Implement
here,
such
as
a
development
agreement
that
would
maybe
go
beyond
what
we're
doing
and
is
that
is
the
downtown
building
Heights
study
downtown
building,
Heights
ordinance
that
were
re-adopting
or
whatever
we're
doing?
Is
that
adequate,
or
is
this
something
that
we
can?
Is
there
some
way
that
we
can
go
a
little
bit
beyond
that
and
make
sure
that
certain
amount
of
it
is
used
in
certain
ways
and
I?
W
Mean
yeah
I
mean
a
development
agreement
and
stuff;
it's
definitely
something
that
could
be
worked
through,
so
that
you,
if
there's
specific
things
that
you
want
to
see,
you
know
the
breaking
up
of
the
block,
a
certain
percentage
of
whatever
you
know
whatever
it
may
be
ground
floor
activation
open
space,
that
sort
of
thing
that
could
be
in
a
development
agreement,
yeah.
A
A
So
for
me
it
would
be
that
there's
some
amount
of
that
street
Frontage.
That
is
actually
just
least
space.
I.
Think
the
other
thing
to
remember
is
that
well
never
mind,
but
I
I
think
it
just
a
mixture
of
uses
any
one
large
building
that
is
even
if
there
are
ancillary
uses
that
are
related
to
the
hospital
use.
A
Any
one
large
use
in
a
downtown
area
can
become
a
vacuum,
and
so
we
want
to
avoid
that
by
adding
seemingly
non-complementary
uses
into
the
mix,
which
would
allow
that
to
I
know
that
a
hospital
is
24
7,
but
it's
it's
a
specific
kind
of
use,
and
so,
if
we
can
have
a
little
bit
more
of
a
mixture,
I
think
that
helps
and-
and
this
does
extend
our
downtown
right-
our
Central
business
district,
further
than
we've
ever
agreed
to
extend
it
so
I.
Think
it's
not
too
big
of
an
ask
to
say.
A
E
You
Mr
I
think,
following
up
on
what
you
have
said,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
expectation.
I
think
we
talked
about
this
in
our
meetings.
There's
a
lot
of
expectations
from
the
public
from
the
council,
because
it's
the
combination
of
our
downtown,
if
you
will
for
the
next,
however
many
years,
and
so
when
opportunities
like
this
come
along,
we,
our
expectations,
are
here
and
because
we
laid
the
groundwork
for
years.
E
The
community
is
a
life
on
State,
our
downtown
master
plan,
the
the
heights
changes,
because
we
want
to
see
something
spectacular
and
the
amount
of
community
engagement
has
been
pretty
significant
as
you've
all
read
the
letter
and
and
every
Community
Council
that
I
go
to.
E
Overall,
you
know
it's
possible
and
there
are
other
things
that
you
know
that
that
we
talked
about
in
some
of
our
meetings
when
we
meet
with
the
public,
but
almost
everything
is
there
late
in
the
groundwork
already
like.
If
you
look
like
boys
just
talked
about
all
the
things
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
those
happen.
E
I
know
we
also
talked
about
Workforce
housing
for
the
staff
that
might
be
coming
to
work
at
the
hospital,
including
the
doctors
or
whoever
so
I
know,
that's
something
that
I
would
like
to
see
as
well
expand
if
we
can
collaborate
or
or
whatever,
that
is
to
make
it
more
and
even
more
robust
Community
there,
and
so
that's
why
I
think
that
development
agreement
idea
is
floating
around
just
to
make
sure
that
we
can
see
that
through
so
having.
E
That
said,
because
my
expectations
are
really
high,
so
having
that
said,
is
there
any
way
we
can
see
some
or
when
do
you
expect
to
have
some
conceptual
plan
or
or
renderings
for
the
building
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
you've
already
chosen
your
Architecture
Firm
but
I'm
sure
you're
working
towards
that?
We.
E
Q
But
part
of
it
will
be
is
depending
on
the
outcome
of
this
zoning
request.
So
if
we
have
the
D1
zoning-
and
we
know
about
the
height
that
we
can
go,
then
that
would
start
the
design
work.
We
really
wouldn't
start
it
until
then,
and
conceptually
we're
not
opposed
with
any
of
these
Concepts
about
the
permeability
that
street
activation
I
think.
Q
As
far
as
the
development
agreement
I
think
it
just
becomes
a
procedural
issue,
which
is
why
we
are
excited
about
the
ordinance,
because
that
would
give
us
the
mechanism
to
come
back
with
our
design
review.
We
couldn't
get
the
height
that
we
need
without
I
think
some
of
the
criteria
here,
the
Midway,
mid-block
walkway,
affordable
housing,
incentives,
additional
ground
floor
use
and
visual
interest.
Q
Those
kind
of
things
we
would
hope
could
be
addressed
in
the
in
that
part
of
the
process,
which
is
quite
a
bit
quicker
than
the
multiple
rounds
that
a
development
and
agreement
would
take.
So
we
hope
that
we
can
get
to
the
same
place
via
that
procedure
versus
a
development
agreement
and
then
move
the
project
forward
on
a
on
a
quicker
Pace
but
still
meeting
the
needs
of
the
city
and
the
community.
G
Mr
chair
go
ahead,
councilman.
Thank
you
and
I
appreciate
the
discussion
and
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
the
concept
of
activating
this.
The
the
streets
I'm
going
to
kind
of
shifted
a
little
bit
here.
G
Salt
Lake
City
is
growing
and
it's
nice
to
have
a
it'd,
be
wonderful
to
have
an
urban
hospital
that
people
can
take
public
transportation
or
walk
or
easily
accessible,
but
also
I'm.
Looking
at
the
services
that
would
be
provided
at
the
hospital
you
know,
50
of
our
population
is
women,
so
you
know
women's
reproductive
care
services.
I.
G
Think
that
needs
to
be
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what
the
mix
of
your
services
are
for
the
hospitals
and
if
they
change,
but
that
would
be
something
that
I
think
would
be
necessary
and
important
to
have
in
this
city
and
and
that
Reproductive
Services
would
cover
the
full
gamut.
That's
is
allowed
by
the
the
laws
and
the
second
one
would
be
Mental.
Health
Services
we
have
a
you
know.
G
We
are
the
center
of
a
lot
of
unsheltered
people
and
that
and
and
Paul
even
sheltered
people
have
a
lot
of
mental
health
problems
and
being
a
large
city.
We
also
need
to
have
plenty
of
care
for
that
too,
and
being
in
the
center
of
the
area
where
we
have
a
lot
of
hrcs
and
other
primitive
Supportive
Housing.
If
that
can
also
be
inbred
into
the
services
provided
for
the
hospital,
would
be
invaluable
to
the
to
the
city
as
a
whole.
So
would.
X
Welcome
the
chance
to
actually
comment
on
that
right
now
we
have
the
amazing
opportunity
to
treat
a
significant
number
of
patients
experiencing
homelessness.
We
provide
services
to
a
a
wide
swath
of
individuals,
from
mental
health
issues
to
Cancer
Care
to
women's
Reproductive,
Services
and
all
across
that
all
across
that
gamut.
We
do
not
expect
that
to
change.
L
Chance
I
want
to
thank
you
for
bringing
us
the
opportunity
to
expand
Healthcare
infrastructure,
because
we
know
what
the
exponential
growth
we're
expecting.
If
we
do
not
keep
up
with
this,
we
will
find
ourselves
in
a
crisis
soon.
So
I
look
forward
to
problem
solving
with
you
around
some
of
these
issues.
I
think
my
colleagues
I'm
not
nearly
as
concerned
about
Street
activation,
because
I
really
am
concerned
about
Good
Health
Care
access
for
our
citizens,
but
duly
noted
and
I'm
in
support.
L
I
am
also
in
concerned
about
inviting
in
organizations
and
programs
that
are
responsive
to
our
unique
needs.
We
know
that
child
care,
for
instance,
is
one
of
them
so
making
sure
that
maybe
on-site
Child
Care
is
available,
especially
constituents
in
my
district,
who
are
likely
to
be
the
the
sweat
labor
that
keeps
the
hospital
going
making
sure
that
those
kinds
of
jobs
are
respectful
and
responsive
to
those
actual
needs.
L
Also,
if
you
could
create
create
an
urgent
care
where
my
kids
could
get
stitches,
so
I
don't
have
to
pay
an
emergency
room.
Copay
I
would
consider
having
another
child
to
name
it
after
you
all
why
this
is
a
the
Bronze
Age
Technology.
Why
am
I
still
spending
a
thousand
dollar
copay
to
get
it
done,
but
that
that's
a
different
conversation.
H
Thanks
I
I
I
wasn't
gonna,
bring
it
up,
but
I
appreciate
what
councilmember
Dugan
said
and
and
I
guess,
I
wanna
and
what
councilmember
Petro
said
and
I
guess.
I
want
to
kind
of
challenge
you
to
think
about
inclusion
and
integration
in
a
lot
of
different
ways.
H
I've
I've
heard
from
people
in
my
community
the
LGBT
community
that
they
feel
that
some
of
what
I
actually
is
doing
or
sorry
IH
is
doing
is
like
stepping
back
from
serving
the
LGBT
community
and
if
there's
a
way
for
you
to
show
that
commitment
in
this
hospital
with
her
it's
in
the
programs
that
you
have
or
how
you
use
the
space.
H
But
yeah
I
do
think
that
that
there
is
that
concern
and
with
the
new
hospital
coming
in
people
are
going
to
be
asking
us.
You
know
what
is
the
city
getting
in
exchange
and
and
is,
is
IH
going
to
be
the
kind
of
downtown
partner?
That's
going
to
represent
everybody
in
our
city
and
is
going
to
serve
everybody
in
our
city
and
that's
a
real
concern
and
you
don't
have
to
explain
to
me
like
business
decisions
that
you
make
or
whatever.
H
But
I
think
it's
helped
for
you
helpful
for
you
to
hear
that
that
is
a
concern
among
populations
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
I.
Think
that
that
conversation
is
going
to
keep
keep
coming
up
as
more
details
about
this
project
come
forward,
and
so
I
would
challenge
you
to
think
about
that
level
of
inclusivity,
as
well
as
the
activation,
the
imz
medical
center
in
Murray,
which
is
a
beautiful
facility
and
is
a
great
facility
and
we're
lucky
to
have
it
in
Utah.
H
But
it
really
is
like
difficult
to
leave
the
hospital
amenities
and
even
go
across
the
street
and
access
them
and
then
get
back
to
the
hospital
and
to
do
that
safely.
I
don't
want
to
have
that
in
Salt,
Lake
City
I,
don't
want
to
have
like
a
row
of
retail.
That's
like
facing
away
from
the
hospital
where
you
have
to
like
exit
that
environment
to
access.
H
I
want
to
make
it
easier
for
those
people
to
do
that.
Thanks.
A
Agreed.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
We
are
going
to
move
on
to
the
next
item.
Item
number
four.
Thank.
A
A
X
A
S
S
This
is
where
things
get
a
little
different,
that
there's
technically
two
ordinances
for
the
council
can
consider
tonight.
The
applicant
has
a
petition
that
went
through
the
process
and
it
would
receive
the
negative
recommendation
from
planning
staff
from
the
Planning
Commission
after
that
got
to
the
council.
Councilmember
Wharton
had
been
briefed
on
the
issue
numerous
times
throughout
the
process.
S
He
asked
staff
if
it
would
be
possible
to
create
a
different
ordinance
that
would
allow
the
applicant
to
meet
their
goals.
Planning
staff
said
that
was
possible
and
so
there's
an
outline
of
an
ordinance
in
the
package
that
you
received
so
Kelsey
will
now
go
over
the
I
guess
the
two
different
ordinances
that
are
before
the.
A
Y
So
this
is
a
request
for
a
zoning
text
Amendment
from
the
petitioner
Stephen
pace
to
permit
the
restoration
or
reconstruction
of
a
historic
Carriage
House
for
the
purpose
of
creating
a
dwelling
unit
as
you'll
see
on
the
aerial
the
Carriage
Houses
associated
with
222
4th
Avenue
and
181
B
Street
next
slide.
Please.
Y
Y
This
is
an
image
of
the
carriage
house
from
the
1970s
next
slide,
Okay.
So
as
discussed
within
the
transmittal
and
the
published
staff
reports,
the
current
proposal
has
a
number
of
issues
which
Nick
tarbet
briefly
touched
on.
They
include
a
narrow
applicability,
unenforceable,
language,
lack
of
a
clear
process
as
well
as
how
would
we
administer
the
language
next
slide.
Y
For
a
quick
recap
of
the
timeline
associated
with
the
petitioner's
text
Amendment,
the
applicant
submitted
the
text.
Amendment
application
in
2020
staff
attempted
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
the
language
Solutions,
but
was
ultimately
unsuccessful.
Staff
awarded
the
amendment
to
the
Historic
Landmark
commission
for
review
and
ideally
direction
to
the
applicant
on
the
proposed
language.
Y
After
her
lengthy
lengthy
discussion,
The
Landmark
commission
decided
to
recommend
negatively
against
the
proposal.
Eventually
the
Planning
Commission
heard
the
proposal
and
afforded
a
negative
recommendation
in
February
of
2022.
The
Proposal
remained
unchanged.
It
was
ultimately
at
the
request
of
the
city
council
that
planning
staff
drafted
the
ordinance
language
to
address
the
identified
issues
next
slide.
Y
Thank
you.
So
how
did
we
address
the
issues
we
defined
the
parameters
of
Eligibility
to
include
properties
that
are
a
local
Landmark
site
and
required
clear
documentation
of
the
footprint
location,
shape
of
the
roof
approximate
height
of
the
structure,
as
well
as
location,
Arrangement
size
and
details
of
any
window
or
doors,
including
carriage?
Y
We
also
established
submittal
requirements.
These
requirements
closely
follow
those
of
the
new
construction
in
any
local
historic
district.
We
established
some
zoning
flexibility
for
the
reconstructed
structure.
These
include
law,
bulk
and
density
established,
allowed
uses
it.
It
can
be
a
single
family
home.
Y
Any
allowed
accessory
use
in
the
district
or
in
Adu
also
established
a
Prohibition
on
any
future
subdivision
of
the
property
created.
An
application
and
review
process
with
the
Historic
Landmark
commission
having
the
authority
of
approval
or
denial
requires
and
also
requires
the
applicant
to
submit
an
updated,
intensive
level
survey
to
planning
this
would
be
utilized
for
updating
our
records
after
the
carriage
house
is
reconstructed.
A
A
Y
A
W
Y
A
A
A
M
A
A
Z
While
he's
doing
that
I'll
actually
start,
my
name
is
Kirk
huffaker
and
I've
been
the
preservation
consultant
to
the
applicant
Mr
Stephen
pace,
and
you
know
to
me
this
really
shows
the
range
of
things
you
guys
deal
with.
I
mean
from
talking
about
an
IH
Urban
hospital
to
a
carriage
house
on
a
very
small
piece
of
property
in
the
Avenues.
Z
But
we
thank
you
for
your
time
to
consider
this,
as
Kelsey
has
has
said
and
described.
If
this
has
been
a
long
process,
it's
been
sort
of
ups
and
downs.
I
do
want
to
commend
the
planning
division
for
continuing
to
work
with
us
and
the
applicant
to
get
to
this
point
and
Nick
tarbat
and
councilman
Wharton
for
helping
to
get
it
here
today
before
you.
So
my
job
really
is
to
to
talk
about
how
significant
of
a
parcel
this
is.
Z
Historically,
it
was
an
individual
landmark
in
the
late
1970s,
even
before
the
Avenues
was
a
historic
district.
This
was
a
recognized
historic
property
associated
with
Dr
beers,
who
was
one
of
the
earliest
OB
gyns
in
the
city
and
was
very
well
respected,
and
you
know
built
a
mansion,
and
this
Carriage
House
came
soon
after
the
mansion
in
the
late
1800s,
designed
by
Richard,
k.a
cladding,
really
The
Godfather
of
historic
architecture
in
Utah,
and
so
it's
architectural
character
is
cannot
be
overstated.
Z
Unfortunately,
this
Carriage
House
is
really
the
last
missing
piece
of
this
estate
and
the
applicant
desires
to
rebuild
that
and
bring
that
that
estate
back
together.
This
was
never
really
a
joined
parcel
at
the
corner
of
B
Street
and
4th
Avenue.
They
were
separate
Parcels,
but
really
realizing
that
the
original
vision
of
Richard
cladding
is
the
goal
of
rebuilding
the
carriage
house
and
that's
what
this
process
will
help
facilitate
at
this
point,
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Mr
pace
thanks
Kirk.
I
You
in
looking
at
the
policy
findings
that
the
planning
staff
came
up
with
four
years
ago,
when
we
first
had
a
run
at
this
project
beginning
on
page
three
of
this
document,
you'll
find
a
lot
of
stuff
to
like
I
think
about
this
proposal.
I
The
key
consideration
on
page
six
is
that
the
proposal
fits
with
everything
that
the
adopted
policies
are
the
standards
of
review
the
proposed
zoning
changes
or
or
kosher
the
city
plan
considerations
have
been
met.
The
analysis
of
zoning
Amendment
standards
has
been
met.
You
can
see
that
these
things
run
to
a
whole
lot
of
pages.
In
the
180
plus
page
staff
report,
the
furtherance
of
specific
zoning
standards
is
met.
I
The
purpose
statements
of
the
zoning
ordinances
met
the
consistent
The
Proposal
is
consistent
with
the
purposes
of
the
overlay
District
and
to
the
extent
that
the
proposed
text
Amendment
implements
best
current
planning
practices.
I
It
does
that
so
we
had
in
I
tend
to
look
a
little
bit
ahead,
sometimes
in
the
reading,
and
we
couldn't
see
anything
very
much
that
looked
like
it
was
a
deal
killer
on
this
project,
but
nonetheless
the
historic
landmarks
commission
did
Kill
the
deal
when
this
was
presented
to
them
in
2000
in
the
year
2000.
I
The
downsides,
if
there
are
any
downsides,
which
I
doubt
for
this
project
are
pretty
much,
are
pretty
minimal.
There
have
been
some
concerns
raised
to
the
benefits
of
the
proposed
text
Amendment,
but
the
criticism
simply
do
not
hold
water
based
on
close
reviews,
we'd
invite
anybody
to
either
come
out
and
look
at
the
property
or
put
whatever
kind
of
Spotlight
you
want
on
the
way
this
was
conceived
and
the
way
documents
were
put
together
on
it
and
we're
basically
pretty
proud
of
it.
I
There
were
some
concerns
raised,
which
we
failed
to
completely
understand
by
the
historic
landmarks
Commission
stating
that
individuals
would
perhaps
try
to
take
advantage
and
build
faux
Carriage
Houses
as
a
planning
division
referred
to
it.
I
guess
that's
a
French
word
for
fake
makes
it
sound
more
disgusting,
but
we
couldn't
find
anybody
that
built
a
fake
Carriage
House
in
Utah
we'd
be
glad
to
be
educated
on
that.
If
such
a
thing
exists
thanks,
but.
A
Time
Keepers
telling
us
that's
five
minutes,
I
want
to
just
clarify,
for
my
understanding
does
the
second.
The
second
proposed
text
accommodate
what
the
applicant
is
asking
for.
I,
don't
know
if
Kirk
or
or
Mr
pace,
you're
able
to
you
under
you've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
that,
but
I
think
it's
a
it's
an
amendment
so
I
see
nodding.
Yes,
excuse
me.
A
Ordinance
that
that
our
staff,
our
planning
staff
at
the
request
of
councilmember
Wharton,
have
come
up
with.
It
sounds
like
we
all
believe
that
that
will
accommodate
this
request
in
a
way
that
will
help
that
will
alleviate
some
of
the
concerns
of
the
Planning
Commission
Historic
Landmark
commission
had
just
wanted
for
the
record.
Does
the
applicant
believe
that
that
will
accommodate
the
goal
as
well.
I
Well,
I
guess
my
take
on
this
thing
is
slightly
different
than
yours.
I!
Look
at
it
and
think
that
there
are
very
few
of
these
things
left
Carriage
Houses
left
in
this
town.
Probably
you
could
count
them
on.
A
A
So
councilman
there's
any
other
questions
for
the
applicant.
Well,
we
have
them
appreciate
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
here.
Thank
you
for
helping
us
through
this
Kirk.
Thank
you
good
to
see
you
thank
you
for
assisting
this
will
be
next
Tuesday.
We
will
be
setting
the
date.
A
S
A
But
we
just
to
me
that
sounds
like
it's
accomplishing
everyone's
goal:
yeah,
okay,
we'll
do
that
thing!
Yes!
Is
that
that
let's
move
forward
with
that
plan
we'll
be
setting
the
public
hearing
next
week,
the
public
comment
period
would
be
on
August,
8th
with
tentative
action
on
August
15th.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
Sam
Owen
is
online
Hi
Sam
and
he
is
going
to
explain
this
to
us
and
then
Debbie
Lyons.
Oh
oh
Debbie's,
here
hi,
we'll
help
talk
us
through
this
Oh
no
you're,
not
Debbie
you're,
Sophia
Debbie's
back
there
I
see
okay.
M
AA
Go
ahead,
thank
you,
sorry
to
be
joining
you
remotely
at
a
scheduling
issue
this
afternoon.
So
I'll
just
briefly
go
over
the
finger.
Considering
the
thing
that's
being
presented
to
you
today,
Scott,
are
you
able
to
pull
up
the?
Maybe
the
slides
are
already
up
there.
I
don't
know
for
sure.
If
they
are
here,
they
are
great.
Thanks,
I
appreciate
it.
So
we
can
advance
one
wow.
AA
Okay,
so
today
the
transmittal
that
the
council
is
going
to
discuss
is
that
an
opportunity
to
review
that
Sab
has
worked
on
is
a
resolution,
so
I'll
just
ask
you
to
keep
that
in
your
mind
for
a
minute,
while
we
advance
to
the
next
slide
to
kind
of
at
a
high
level
go
over
the
details
of
the
of
the
resolution,
so
Community
renewable
energy
agency
making
its
application
to
the
state
regulatory
body
as
part
of
that
all
of
the
member
cities
sign
a
utility
agreement
that
has
to
do
with
allocating
certain
costs
between
the
communities
in
Rocky,
Mountain
Power.
AA
As
as
that
comes
to
fruition.
This
resolution
has
been
presented
to
you
and
it.
It
really
does
these
three
main
things
as
part
of
the
resolved
Clauses.
Those
are
the
three
things
enumerated
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide.
AA
One
basically
validates
and
ratifies
the
city's
participation
in
the
community
renewable
energy
agency
and
advancing
with
the
program
and
its
application
to
demonstrate
support
of
council
member
Dan,
Dugan
and
executing
the
utility
agreement
and
his
role
as
chair
of
the
the
board
of
the
community
renewable
energy
agency,
and
then
three.
This
was
already
true,
but
it's
important
I
think
to
clarify
here
again.
The
city
council
reserves
its
rights
to
separately,
consider
adoption
of
the
ordinance
that
would
enact
the
renewable
energy
program.
AA
So
anything
any
requirement
or
obligation
that
comes
to
the
city
as
a
result
of
the
utility
agreement
only
becomes
active
when
the
council
considers
and
potentially
adopts
the
ordinance
that
activates
the
program
for
Salt
Lake
City.
So
keeping
keeping
all
of
that
in
mind.
We're
kind
of
going
to
this
ordinance
consideration
and
this
utility
agreement
step
is
on
the
path
to
this
ordinance
consideration
that
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
will
have
the
opportunity
to
take
up
not
for
a
while.
AA
You
know,
probably
like
three
or
six
months
down
the
road,
so
I
want
to
stop
there.
If
it's
okay,
Mr
share
and
answer
questions
that
I
can
from
Council
Members
or
see.
If
there
are
questions
that
would
be
more
appropriate
to
direct
to
Administration
staff,
thanks
for
being
here.
A
J
There
we
go
yeah
I
just
want
to
talk
about
how
how
much
we've
done
coming
to
this
point
so
far.
J
We're
bringing
the
resolution
to
you
in
part,
because
this
is
the
single
largest
undertaking
for
the
city
as
we
as
we
work
to
meet
our
net
100,
clean
electricity
goals
and
our
80
percent
carbon
reduction
goals
for
the
community
and
we've
been
working
on
it
since
well
before
2019.,
and
we're
I
think
we're
seeing
the
impacts
of
climate
change
around
the
country
right
now.
J
Thankfully,
we're
not
experiencing
anything
like
Vermont
or
the
South,
or
all
of
these
places
that
are
really
experiencing
some
horrific
climate
impacts,
but
I
think
it
just
underscores
why
it
is
that
we're
doing
this
from
our
perspective.
J
So
in
the
spirit
of
working
with
you,
the
city
council
and
wanting
to
keep
you
informed
early
and
often
we're
about
to
fingers
crossed
work
achieve
a
very
significant
Milestone
with
the
the
Korea,
the
Utah
100
communities
agency,
and
we
expect
that
they
will
be
able
to
vote
on
the
utility
agreement
on
as
early
as
next
week.
J
And
in
that
spirit,
we
wanted
to
bring
this
to
you
to
Signal
the
council's
continuing
support
of
the
community
renewable
energy
program
as
well
as
Salt
Lake
City's
continued
forward
progress
on
the
program.
So
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
and
certainly
council
member
Dugan
can
also
speak
to
and
Christopher
is
our
staff
expert
as
well.
So
thank
you
great.
D
G
This
is
how
I
just
want
to
kind
of
reiterate
the
utility
agreement,
just
a
couple
things
and
we've
been
working
with
Rocky
Mountain
Power
to
write
this
document
so
that
we
can
approve
it
across
the
18
municipalities
that
are
part
of
the
program.
This
is
a
piece
of
the
application
process
that
goes
before
Public
Services
Commission,
and
this
is
just
one
piece
of
that
and
there's
multiple
parts
of
this,
and
this
is
really
just
kind
of
a
basic
steps
that
says:
hey.
G
We
have
terms
of
Consultants
we've
already
done
that,
how
we
pay
out
opt
out
notices,
we've
already
done,
that
we
budgeted
it
and
how
we
do
some
unpaid
terminal
termination
fees
and
that's
some.
Those
are
just
a
high
level
side
house.
This
is
just
one
piece
of
it
and
part
of
that
is
once
we
apply
that
we
get
that
six
months
later,
then
we
then
we
as
a
council
and
all
the
rest
of
the
United
families.
We
vote
on
the
the
full
package
of
the
whole
program,
whether
we
opt
in
or
opt
out.
G
This
is
this
does
not
talk
about
cost
to
members
who
will
be
participating
it?
Whether
they're
individual
residencies
or
businesses,
or
how
we
do
the
financial
aid
to
financial
aid,
Financial
backstop
to
the
to
the
different
resource
providers
or
any
termination
fees.
So
this
is
just
one
small
piece:
there's
no
more
Financial
responsibility
at
this
point,
because
we're
already
paid
going
forward
we're
looking
for
a
emotion
and
approval
of
it
in
the
near
future.
G
A
I
appreciate
the
update.
I
would
love
councilman
Bergen
if
you
can
just
keep
us
updated
on
your
work
on
that.
If
there's
anything
major
that
changes
but
I
I
think
that
the
council
is
in
pretty
unanimous
support
of
this.
A
So
once
things
need
to
come
back
to
us
for
official
action,
I
think
we're
ready
to
do
that,
but
I
I
feel
comfortable
with
the
direction
that's
been
going
and
I
think
that
we
can
maybe
take
the
informational
briefings
as
a
written
briefing
next
time
so
that
we
can
just
keep
this
process
moving
forward
thanks,
counselor
Dugan,
all
right.
We
are
moving
on
to
item
number
six,
which
is
a
written
briefing
related
to
the
frequent
Transit
bus
networks.
A
Item
number
seven
has
been
moved
been
removed,
and
so
we
are
now
on
item
number
eight,
which
is
a
board
appointment
for
the
peanut
Parks
natural
lands,
urban
forestry
and
trails
Advisory
board
for
Kerry
Nakamura,
hi
Carrie.
AB
A
Face
to
all
of
us,
but
for
the
public,
would
you
introduce
yourself
and
talk
about
why
you
want
to
give
some
of
your
free
time
to
the
city
to
talk
about
parks.
AB
Sure
so
my
name
is
Carrie
Nakamura
and
thank
you
for
considering
my
application
for
this
board.
I
was
at
a
30-plus
year,
Public
Employee
I
decided
to
I,
don't
call
it
a
retirement.
AB
That
is
where
they
do
sidewalk
chalk,
those
kinds
of
things,
and
so
it
it's
something.
I
know
I,
know,
government,
I,
know,
budgets,
I
know
how
that
works.
I'm
excited
to
be
part
of
that
process,
and
this
just
seemed
like
a
great
opportunity
to
continue
to
serve
the
community.
If,
if
you
will
all
will
have
me.
N
Chair
I
I,
don't
have
a
comment
to
a
question
to
Kerry
Nakamura,
but
I
do
have
a
comment.
I
I
Carey
has
been
not
only
a
mentor,
but
the
reason
that
I
am
anything
today
is
in
great
part
to
carry
Nakamura
I
mean
I'm,
not
kidding
I,
and
no.
This
is
not.
You
know
Superfluous.
This
is
very
real
to
me.
N
She's
been
the
biggest
cheerleader
and
supporter
and
show
me
call
me
out
when
I
did
something
wrong
very
many
times
and
I
I
I
owe
a
great
deal
of
gratitude
to
her
and
her
leadership
and
that
she's
one
of
the
smartest
people
I
know
so
we're
very
lucky
to
have
her.
N
If
we
support
this
and
I
think
that
we
will
I
hope
so
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
on
the
record,
because
she
she
is
an
asset
and
I'm
very
happy
that
she
moved
to
Salt
Lake
City
to
have
her
District
Five.
Yes,.
A
Thank
you
so
much
we're
honored
to
have
you
serving
the
city
you'll,
be
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight
for
our
approval.
AB
A
K
There's
a
page
in
front
of
you
guys
just
wanting
to
draw
your
attention
to
the
schedule
for
Thursday
July
13th,
since
it's
a
little
different,
the
state
of
downtown
hosted
by
the
downtown
Alliance
is
Thursday.
This
Thursday
at
Le
Meridien
and
at
3
P.M
they'll
honor
recipients
of
the
downtown
Creator
award,
which
this
year
includes
Danny
Walls,
the
RDA
director.
The
meeting
is
scheduled
for
later
than
4
15.,
so
the
downtown
Alliance
event
is
scheduled
to
go
later
than
4
15.
K
But
we
understand
the
bulk
of
the
program
will
be
between
3
and
4
30
for
any
council
members
who
are
interested
in
going
the
city
council
meeting
where
you
will
conduct
vacancy
interviews
will
start
at
4
30..
So
maybe
keep
us
posted
if
you're
planning
on
going
and
then
we
can
figure
out
the
most
efficient
way
to
transport
you
from
those
items.
K
So
they
know
how
many
of
you
guys
to
plan
on
I
think
there
had
reserved
a
couple
of
spaces
just
so
that
we
make
sure
we
have
enough
and
then
at
4,
30
you'll
start
your
council
meeting
and
just
wanting
to
confirm
that
you
guys
will
be
there
for
that,
since
it's
a
pretty
important
council
meeting
on
Thursday
and
what
thanks
to
John
Rand
and
the
IMs
team's
hard
work,
we'll
be
having
it
in
the
chambers
across
the
hall
yay.
Finally,.
A
Thank
you
team
for
getting
that
room
ready
for
us
and
district
7
applicants.
We're
excited
to
hear
from
you
on
Thursday
at
4
30.,
all
right,
let's
see,
and
we
do
not
have
a
closed
session
today
that
I'm,
aware
of
so
we
are
adjourned
from
our
work
session.
We'll
come
back
at
seven
o'clock
also
across
the
hall
today.
We're
going
across
the
hall
today
is
that
for
real.
Yes,
your
dreams
are
coming
true.