►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 04/04/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
B
The
world
archaic,
foragers
who
were
spread
across
Utah.
They
lived
in
distinctive
pit
dwelling
homes
and
were
capable
farmers
and
foragers.
It's
thought
that
they
vanished
as
a
people
in
Utah,
somewhere
between
900
and
1300,
CE
being
absorbed
into
other
tribes.
Thanks
to
the
changing
climate
that
made
farming
much
more
difficult,
the
Fremont
were
United
across
a
huge
swath
of
territory
by
their
art
and
Customs,
but
we
don't
know
what
the
Fremont
called
themselves.
B
It's
important
to
remember
that
the
name
Fremont
was
given
to
them
for
the
purposes
of
archaeological
study
in
1998
when
Excavating
for
the
infrastructure
for
a
new
track
station
in
front
of
the
Arena,
where
the
Utah
Jazz
play
a
skull
and
other
bones
were
found.
Archaeologists
were
called
in
and
discovered
that
these
human
remains
were
from
this
era
of
Fremont
settlement.
Further
digging
revealed
some
of
the
ancient
pit
houses
the
Fremont
lived
in
that
would
have
existed
close
to
the
shores
of
what
we
now
know
as
City
Creek.
B
B
Today,
Utah
is
home
to
as
many
as
22
herds
of
wild
horses
across
the
state,
though
many
of
these
were
started
in
the
19th
century,
when
domestic
horses
escaped
and
took
on
the
life
of
wild
horses
on
their
own.
In
1971,
Congress
passed
the
Wild
free
roaming,
horses
and
Burrows
act
to
protect
these
horses,
as
quote
Living
symbols
of
the
historic
and
Pioneer
Spirit
of
the
West.
B
Welcome
to
Capital
City
News
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
Salt
Lake
City
Government
I'm,
your
host
Brian
Young,
with
Salt
Lake
City
TV.
On
our
episode
this
week
we
spoke
with
Katie
Matheson
from
the
city's
Economic
Development
Department
about
the
importance
of
shopping
local
during
this
holiday
season.
In
our
history,
minute
is
about
the
history
of
wild
horses
in
the
area,
but
before
we
get
to
those,
let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update
and
our
look
backs.
C
City
council
also
heard
a
briefing
on
the
plan
to
improve
roadway
safety,
reliability
and
mobility
in
Little
Cottonwood
Canyon
from
the
Utah
Department
of
Transportation
or
UDOT
separately.
There
was
a
midpoint
check-in
about
the
draft
SLC
Transportation
master
plan
and
finally,
city
council
adopted
a
joint
ceremonial
resolution
with
mayor
Mendenhall
declaring
November
20th
as
transgender
day
of
Remembrance
in
Salt
Lake
City,
Salt,
Lake,
City
values,
the
lives
and
contributions
to
our
community
by
transgender
people
and
the
city
has
the
responsibility
to
promote
equality
and
prosperity
for
all
members
of
the
transgender
community.
D
D
I'm
gonna
open
up
to
my
script,
which
I
should
have
done
before
I
called
in
hi,
chairperson,
Darren
mono
I'm
going
to
be
chairing
today,
simply
because
chairperson
Mano
is
at
a
conference
and
I
hope.
That's
okay
with
you
and
Victoria's
away.
So
you
are
all
stuck
with
me.
I
apologize!
D
Welcome
to
today's
city
council
meeting.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone
healthy,
safe
and
to
have
more
accessibility
for
those
who
cannot
make
it
in
person.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
in
person
by
watching
the
council's
agenda.
Page
Facebook,
YouTube,
SLC
TV
we're
everywhere.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
the
most
comfortable.
D
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment,
but
we
do
have
a
formal
session
tonight,
yay
at
7
pm,
and
that
is
where
we
can
take
all
of
the
public
comments.
However,
you
are
always
welcome
to
comment
via
mail
at
P.O
box,
145476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Utah,
84114,
email,
council.com
or
our
24
hour
phone
comment
line.
D
And
all
of
that
can
be
found
on
our
website,
obviously
written
comments
and
any
comment
that
is
given
in
any
form
or
a
fashion.
Even
if
it's
a
carrier,
pigeon
are
shared
with
council
members
and
it
is
put
into
the
public
record.
So
please
do
not
think
that
your
comments
are
not
heard
because
they
certainly
are
with
that.
We
will
be
turning
to
our
first
agenda
item.
We
are
on
informational
updates
from
the
administration.
D
E
E
E
E
And
then
just
moving
to
some
of
our
Outreach,
our
Outreach
team
will
be
doing
community
office
hours.
This
next
slide.
Thank
you.
These
are
some
of
the
places
that
we
go
out
and
engage
with
the
community.
The
two.
This
week's
will
be
public,
EDS
and
King's
English
Bookshop
and
then
I'll
be
at
tazanti
on
April
12th
next
week
from
two
to
four
and
that's
all
we
really
have
for
our
our
updates.
E
F
D
G
Here
give
us
an.
H
Thank
you,
as
you
can
see,
on
your
screen,
overflow
utilization
is
up
slightly
from
last
week.
95.
You
can
see
the
numbers
for
the
rapid
intervention
team
and
the
encampment
impact
mitigation
work.
All
of
that
work
is
subject
obviously
to
weather,
and
so
we
have
days
like
the
last
two
days,
really
there's
not
a
lot
that
happens
throughout
the
city
other
than
maybe
emergency
stuff.
So,
as
you
can
see
this
winter
time,
it's
been
a
little
bit
starting
starting
to
stop
throughout
the
time.
H
So
you
can
see
those
numbers
you
can
see.
The
next
resource
fair
is
still
planned
for
the
14th
of
this
month
at
Pioneer,
Park,
obviously
weather
permitting
and
then
kayak
Court
in
May.
We've
also
mentioned
before
that.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
we've
mentioned
before
that.
As
the
Overflow
locations
start
to
ramp
down,
there
will
be
a
resource,
Fair
options
there,
as
well,
so
on
the
screen.
H
You
can
see
that,
starting
on
the
15th
of
this
month,
the
Saint
Vincent
De,
Paul,
Danny
Hall
nightly
overflow
will
cease
operations
as
it
does
every
year.
The
number
of
beds
are
on
the
right.
The
youth
resource
center
right
now
is
planning
to
cut
back
again
to
its
original
number
of
30.
Instead
of
50.
H
H
The
Gail
Miller
Geraldine,
King
and
Pamela
Atkinson
were
all
ramp
down
those
operations.
You
can
see
the
number
of
overflow
beds
on
the
right
and
then
the
total.
H
We
have
been
working
on
other
options
for
housing,
obviously
that
you've
been
aware
of-
and
we
can
talk
more
about
as
they
come
online
starting
this
month
into
the
next
few
months
and
then
still
talking
through
with
the
state
about
next
year's
overflow,
which
discussions
are
starting
immediately
and
then
also
options
for
this
summer
time,
whatever
we
can
figure
out
with
all
of
our
partners.
Any
questions.
H
D
D
Every
one
of
the
federal
delegation
asked
about
what
we
were
doing
to
prepare
for
potential
flooding
and
literally
every
single
one
of
us
talked
about
how
grateful
we
are
to
have
you,
as
the
Director
of
Public,
Utilities
and
monitoring
all
of
what
is
about
to
come
and
have
been
monitoring
it
for
a
while.
I
was
first
elected
when
you
were
first
entrenched,
literally
in
a
flood
your
first
year
here.
So
again,
your
Praises
have
not
been
sung
higher,
so
thank
you
and
I
will
turn
the
time
over
to
you
and
I
hope.
I
Thank
you
and
I
actually
have
a
great
team
here
at
public
utilities
and
Citywide
with
our
Emergency
Management
and
many
other
divisions
and
Departments
of
the
city
that
are
part
of
our
runoff.
Preparation
for
2024
and
I
do
have
a
short,
a
couple
few
slides
to
share
with
you.
If
we
could
pull
those
up.
I
So
I
wanted
to
just
give
you
a
little
bit
of
update
on
our
2023
runoff,
not
2024,
runoff
I
just
did
my
2024
budget
presentation
so
now
I
got
confused
with
fiscal
year
and
runoff
year,
so
our
2023
spring
runoff
and
flood
control
update
so
for
situational
awareness,
we're
monitoring
the
weather
patterns
right
now,
this
spring,
as
you
can
tell,
by
looking
outside,
we
had
a
significant
winter
storm
and
and
and
it's
the
spring
so
we're
hoping
that
that
pattern
changes
our
runoff
characteristics
this
year
are
going
to
be
highly
dependent
on
weather
patterns
over
the
next
few
weeks
and
we're
hoping
for
a
weather
pattern
that
is
conducive
to
a
more
measured
spring
runoff
and
not
get
us
into
a
situation
where
it
gets
extremely
warm
all
at
once.
I
We
have
been
looking
at
the
forecasted
outlooks
prepared
by
the
National
Weather
Service
and
the
one
month,
temperature
Outlook,
the
last
one
I
saw,
appears
to
be
cooler
than
normal,
but
I
think
that
might
have
just
changed
today
and
the
one
month,
precipitation
Outlook,
is
projected
to
be
equal
stances
above
or
below
the
average.
For
this
time
of
year.
I
Our
current
snowpack
in
the
Provo
River
Utah
Lake
Vernon
River
basin-
for
this,
this
Great
Salt
Lake
Basin
Watershed,
is
207
of
median,
which
is
phenomenal
from
a
water
supply
standpoint
than
our
local
advantages
have
water
supply
forecast
ranges
from
the
low
end
is
128
of
average
in
City
Creek
and
the
high
end
is
200
percent
of
average.
In
the
Parleys
watershed
the
photo
I
have
here
is
credited
throughout
the
ski
area.
I
This
week
they
just
passed
the
coveted
800
inches
of
snow
and
it's
surreal
up
in
those
Canyons
right
now.
A
lot
lots
and
lots
of
snow
next
slide.
Please.
I
So
just
a
few
notes
on
our
spring
runoff
planning
and
preparation
status.
The
map
that
you
see
on
the
left
of
the
screen
here.
I
know
you
can't
see
the
detail
of
it,
but
it's
indicative
of
a
tool
that
we
are
using
to
Overlay
a
whole
bunch
of
things
related
to
runoff
and
that's
our
streams
that
enter
into
the
city.
The
FEMA
mapped,
floodplains,
Federal,
Emergency,
Management
agency,
flood
Plains
and
our
storm
drain
system.
I
So
we've
been
doing
a
lot
of
system.
Modeling
I
have
our
deputy
director
Jesse
Stewart
in
my
office
right
now,
who
has
been
part
of
the
team
to
spearhead
this
and
the
system
modeling
is,
is
incredibly
important
to
identify
any
areas
of
vulnerability
in
the
drainage
system
and
other
known
areas
of
concern.
I
should
note
that
a
lot
of
comparisons
have
been
made
to
this
runoff
between
this
runoff
year
and
1983
and
1984..
I
There
are
a
lot
of
unique
changes
or
differences
between
83
and
84,
and
this
year,
a
similarity
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
snowpack
and
water.
We
have
but
differences
in
the
infrastructure
that
we
have
and
since
1983
and
84,
the
city
and
county
have
invested
in
a
lot
of
features
in
the
drainage
system,
including
little
Dell,
Dam
and
Reservoir,
which
is
the
flood
control
facility
and
a
lot
of
other
features
that
I
think
will
help
us
out
a
lot
this
year,
especially
if
we
get
a
more
quick,
quick
warm-up.
I
We
continue
to
release
water
from
Little
Dell
Reservoir
to
increase
capacity
in
anticipation
of
runoff.
That
will
be
really
helpful
to
us.
We
have.
We
are
monitoring
for
situational
awareness,
particularly
Upstream
in
the
snowpack
Utah
Lake,
Jordan
River
and
other
streams
Upstream
from
us,
but
also
Downstream
as
well,
equipment
and
sandbag
staging
we've.
I
Preliminarily
identified
key
areas
such
as
pinch
points
in
the
system,
along
culverts
stream
channels
and
maintenance
Lids
along
North,
Temple,
1300
South
and
the
800
South
storm
drains.
We've
been
actively
filling
and
storing
sandbags.
We
the
numbers
change
today.
We
now
have
more
than
9
000
sandbags
and
we'll
meet
our
goal
of
10
000
or
more
this
weekend.
I
I
want
to
especially
thanks
the
parks
department
and
director
Kristen
Riker,
for
allowing
some
of
her
staff
to
help
us
fill
stem
stand
bags
for
us
to
store
strategic
movement
of
water
in
the
system
is
something
that
that
Jesse
and
our
team
have
been
working
on
planning
for.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
options
in
our
system
to
reduce
pressure,
especially
on
the
1300
South
Durand,
which
captures
flows
of
immigration,
Red,
Butte
and
Parleys
Creek.
We're
able
to
bifurcate
those
flows
to
reduce
pressure
there
and
send
them
elsewhere.
I
I
Chief
Bowden
and
Chief
Mecum
over
at
Salt
Lake
County
have
been
really
great
to
work
with
and
we
have
set
up
level
four
of
the
Emergency
Operations
Center
as
well
to
monitor
public
engagement
is
incredibly
important
and
the
joint
information
center
is
up
and
running.
I
We
have
a
lot
of
Engagement,
ranging
from
media
to
social
media
Andrew
and
his
team
working
on
social
Outreach,
Community
meetings,
constituent
feedback,
we've
been
handling
a
lot
of
constituent
feedback
and
we're
also
working
on
some
consistent
messaging
between
Salt
Lake,
City
and
Salt
Lake
County,
as
we
both
have
joint
Management
Authority
for
different
parts
of
the
runoff
system,
I'm
also
working
on
a
single
website
for
the
public
to
access
to
make
information
more
readily
available
next
slide.
Please.
I
Oh,
we
have
a
lot
of
questions
from
residents
about
what
they
can
do
to
prepare
for
spring
runoff
this
year
and
I
love
this
photo
on
the
right.
This
is
Salt
Lake
County,
mayor
Jenny,
Wilson
and
former
Salt
Lake
City
mayor
Ted
Wilson
working
to
fill
sandbags.
Ted
was
the
mayor
during
the
1983
and
84
floods
and
has
been
a
wealth
of
information
for
us
as
well
during
this
planning.
I
So
what
can
residents
do
first
and
foremost
determine
risk
and
there
are
a
lot
of
tools
available
to
determine
whether
your
home
or
business
is
located
in
a
flood
zone.
Whether
or
not
flood
insurance
is
appropriate
and
also
just
some
general
risk
determination.
I
Also,
preparation
is
important.
We
have
Salt
Lake
County
has
a
really
good
flood
preparedness
manual
on
their
on
their
flood
preparedness
website.
Lots
of
sandbags
public
publicly
facing
sandbag
filling
stations,
Salt
Lake
count
we're
partnering
with
Salt
Lake
County
on
that,
and
then
we
also
want
to
receive
any
kind
of
notification.
I
If,
if
a
member
of
the
Public
Notices
a
clogged
stormwater
grade,
please
contact
our
24-hour
dispatch
line
at
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Public
Utilities,
so
that
we
could
get
out
there
and
take
care
of
it
and
then
finally
be
safe.
So
during
runoff
streams
are
going
to
be
fast
and
deep,
do
not
walk,
swim
or
drive
through
fast
flowing
water
and
also
keep
pets
and
children
from
fast
flowing
water.
So
so
definitely
that
component
of
safety
next
slide,
please
so
these
are.
This
is
my
last
side.
These
are
just
key
references.
I
The
picture
on
the
right
is
just
a
screenshot
of
the
Salt
Lake
County
map.
That's
the
second
lake.
Under
the
flood
zone
mapping,
it's
a
really
great
website
where
an
individual
can
type
in
an
address,
and
it
will
show
you
whether
you're
in
any
of
the
FEMA
flood
zones
or
in
areas
adjacent
to
Creek
that
might
be
subject
to
flooding.
I
So
that's
a
really
great
resource,
and
also
this
Salt
Lake
County
website
has
some
really
great
preparedness
resources,
as
does
the
state
of
Utah's
be
ready
website,
and
then
our
Salt
Lake,
City
Public
Utilities
website
also
has
resources.
Many
of
our
sites
point
back
to
each
other
too,
to
to
coordinate
on
the
different
resources
that
are
available,
and
that's
the
end
of
this
update
I
plan
to
keep
you
updated
as
as
much
as
you
would
like,
I'm
happy
to
be
here
on
a
weekly
basis.
If
that
makes
sense,
as
we
move
into
this
runoff
season,.
D
G
K
Could
we
Madam
chair
get
those
links
where
could
if,
in
case
people
can't
type
that
all
right
people
get
a
get
a
hyperlink
to
that
map.
I
I
I
can
provide
that
to
council
staff
in
a
an
email.
If
that
works.
D
Perfect
I
was
just
going
to
say
to
as
a
shout
out
to
Julie
that
I
would
love
to
have
this
in
my
newsletter
and
I'm
sure
most
Council
people
on
the
would
like
to
put
this
in
their
newsletter,
especially
at
the
beginning
of
this
month,
as
we
enter
into
what's
next
director
briefer
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
while
we
were
in
DC,
Congressman
Stewart's
Council
talked
about
flooding,
and
we
talked
about
all
of
the
preparation,
I'm
wondering
and
I'm
sure
that
you
have
contact
with
them,
but
that
first
slide
of
what
Salt
Lake
City
is
doing
and
for
preparedness
may
be
something
nice
to
share
with
them.
I
Yes,
that
would
be
great.
I
could
definitely
share
that,
and,
if
and
you're
welcome
to
share
that
as
well
council
member.
M
Thank
you
I,
so
I,
obviously
I'm
looking
at
a
female
map,
and
there
is
a
significant
parts
of
my
district
that
there
are.
You
know
their
potential
flawed
areas
on
that
could
be
just
the
map
alone
could
be
scary
to
think
about,
and
hopefully
this
doesn't
happen,
but
I
have
a
few
questions
related
to
and
I
guess.
M
This
might
be
questions
for
the
county,
but
maybe
you
can
help
us
track
those
questions
correctly,
but
are
there
locations
in
the
west
side
where
neighbors
can
pick
up
sandbags
and
if
not,
can
we
encourage
the
county
to
to
do
so?
And
so
that
will
be
one
question.
I
guess
and
we
I
can
stop
right
there
because
I
think
that's
it's
a
good.
It's
a
good
segue
for
the
next
part,
I.
I
Suppose,
yeah:
okay,
yes,
with
respect
to
sandbags.
That
is
something
that
we'd
be
able
to
and
happy
to
coordinate
with
the
county
on
additional
sandbag
locations.
I
know
that
they
have
their
one
location
is
in
Murray
Midvale
Midvale,
but
you
know
I
think
that
there
have
been
some
requests
for
some
additional
locations
and
actually
some
folks
that
have
stepped
up
to
the
plate
to
volunteer
for
sand
bag
filling
locations.
So
I
will
follow
up
with
you
on
that
council.
Member
I
also
should
mention
that
there
are.
I
There
are
areas,
particularly
in
the
proximity
to
the
Jordan
River
that
are
listed
in
the
FEMA
flood
Plains.
There
is
a
major
piece
of
flood
control
infrastructure
that
alleviates
that
pressure,
and
that
is
the
Surplus
Canal,
which
essentially
is
able
to
to
drain
the
Jordan
River
away
from
those
areas
when
it
reaches
higher
flows
or
to
accommodate
anticipated
flows.
So
that
is
one
area
that
might
be
helpful
to
communicate
and
potentially
mitigate
some
of
those
concerns.
M
That's
great
I,
you
know
I
guess
when
we're
preparing
for
something
like
this,
it's
better
to
be
prepared
for
worst
case
scenario,
and
you
know
be
ready
and
and
say:
okay,
we
overreacted
a
little
bit
and
that's
better
than
you
know,
having
some
some
things
and
that
you
you
mentioned
very
recently
to
us
about
all
the
improvements
that
been
done
since
83
and
84
to
prevent
that
from
happening
again
and
I.
M
You
know:
I
hope
that
we
can
fire
up
those
engines
and
make
sure
that
everything
is
working
because
they
haven't
been
used
for
many
years.
Some
of
these,
these
tools
that
we,
you
know
that
were
invested
and
when
we're
talking
about
communicating
with
the
community
I
the
city
has
the
City
Salt,
Lake,
City,
mobile,
app
and
I
think
it
could
be
very
useful
to
to
test
some
push
notifications
through
the
app
and
you
know,
and
maybe
invite
members
of
the
community
to
sandbags
event.
M
Some
you
know
making
bags
I,
don't
know
how
you
say
that
making
sandbags
and
or
some
other
information
about
this-
if
this
is
necessary,
I
many
and
might
actually
encourage
some
people
to
download
the
app,
which
is
always
a
good
thing
to
be
part
of
the
of
making
the
city
better
and
as
far
as
reporting
the
storm
water
drains.
What
I
I've
been
seeing
some
of
that
in
social
media
I
think
maybe
we
should
encourage
the
administration
to
present
to
all
the
community
councils,
but
the
importance
to
do
that
right
now.
M
Before
the
you
know,
the
the
one
it's
going
to
be
like
60
some
this
weekend,
so
we're
going
to
have
quite
a
bit
of
melting,
snow
I.
Don't
know
why
I
shovel!
You
know
a
foot
of
snow
from
my
my
driveway
a
minute
ago,
but
I
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
communicate
that
information
very
well
with
the
community
councils
and
to
be
completely
sincere.
It's
hard
for
communities
like
mine,
sometimes
to
to
have
the
time
to
do
this
work,
and
you
know
we
need
to
remember
that.
I
For
raising
that
council
member
and
if
there's
anything,
my
team
and
I
can
do
in
coordination
with
you
and
community
members,
you
know
we're
happy
to
come
out
to
Neighborhood
meetings
and
make
ourselves
very
available
to
address
questions
and
provide
resources
where
we
can.
So,
let's
keep
in
communication
about
that.
D
N
Thank
you
for
having
us
Roxanna
orellana
policy
advisor
for
Refugee,
new
Americans
and
I'm
just
here
to
introduce
to
you
our
new
Afghan,
Court.
Okay,
there
you
go.
Okay!
N
Is
that
better
okay
I
am
here
to
introduce
our
new
Afghan
coordinator,
salmi
maylar,
and
he
is
our
newest
member
through
a
one-year
grant
that
we
received
through
the
county
and
I'll.
Just
let
him
speak
for
himself
about
his
work.
O
O
O
You
go
yeah,
that's
good,
I'm
coming
from
know
your
neighbor
benefit
to
this
position.
I
was
in
IIT
program,
which
know
your
neighbor
volunteers,
support
that
program
and
start
the
job
in
the
IMs
Salt
Lake
City
Corporation,
as
apprentice
and
hire
here
in
the
mayor
office
in
this
position.
So
this
is
like
example,
the
benefit
of
the
know,
your
neighbor
program,
so
I'm
an
example.
O
There
are
a
lot
of
Afghan
family
living
here
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
I
know
their
problem.
I
know
their
cultural
varies,
I
know
their
challenges
here,
and
this
is
why
I
I
can
help
them
better
to
solve
their
problems.
When
there
are
a
lot
of
Afghan.
I
came
to
United
States
with
the
evacuation,
so
there
are
a
few
organizations
can
help
them.
Irc
ccs
and
some
governmental
organisms
Edition,
but
their
budget
and
their
staff
was
not
enough.
So
right
now
there
are
a
lot
of
Afghan.
O
They
don't
have
any
specific
supports
so
from
the
organization
right
now.
Government
and
people
only
to
site
can
help
these
refugees
so
I
know
a
lot
problems:
the
Afghan
refugees.
They
have
problem
in
speaking
in
English
language,
because
many
of
them
just
came
here
without
preparation
to
learn,
English
or
go
to
some
English
classes.
O
They
have
problem
in
housing,
they
have
problem
in
health,
they
have
problem
in
the
education,
Transportation,
child
care
and
many
other
area
and
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
women
have
specific
problems
because
of
their
cultural
Pro
problem
in
Afghanistan,
and
here
with
different
culture.
They
need
more
help,
especially
the
woman
refugees,
more
than
the
other
area.
O
Many
these
problems
interconnected,
each
other,
for
example,
in
an
Afghan
family
one
person
going
to
a
job
and
working
and
have
income
the
other
people.
Don't
have
why?
Because
their
wives
or
woman,
they
don't
know
how
to
work.
They
don't
know
how
to
speak
so
and
they
have
a
lot
of
child.
They
cannot
leave
their
child
at
home
and
they
don't
know
how
to
use
the
transportation.
O
So
here
the
volunteers
can
help
this
kind
of
people
and
if
they
don't
go
to
the
job
and
find
the
opportunity
or
education,
so
their
family
cannot
actually
be
like
other
Americans.
Here
before
here,
we
came
I
thought
Afghan,
family
problems
more
than
other
refugees.
Why
so
I
I
was
in
Afghanistan
when
there
was
a
question,
so
in
one
night
everything
destroyed
and
many
people
just
tried
to
take
their
body
and
come
to
United
States,
so
they
don't
bring
any
documents.
O
They
don't
prepare
it
for
any
English
or
living
here
in
different
culture
in
different
economic
and
every
situation
so,
and
they
came
here
thousand
thousand,
so
a
lot
of
Afghan
came
here.
They
cannot
find
house,
they
cannot
actually
find
like
education
and
other
opportunities.
Also
I
understand.
There
are
a
lot
of
mental
problem.
Afghan
family
Refugee
has
here
so
know.
O
Your
neighbor
program
can
help
a
lot
Afghan
family
refugees
and
other
refugees,
because
when
we
don't
have
enough
Source
in
organization
and
governmental
organization,
people
can
help,
but
people
cannot
connect
with
the
African
refugees
and
this
program
make
connection
between
their
volunteers
and
refugees.
So
we
have
different
programs
in
know
your
neighbor
program,
for
example.
We
have
next
slide,
please
sorry
next
slide,
so
we
have
like
work.
C
program
works
is
a
program
that
African
Refugee
can
learn.
O
English
language
and
can
learn
job
skills
in
English
language,
so
it
can
help
them
to
find
a
job
and
can
help
them
to
speak
in
society
and
make
relation
with
other
Americans.
Also,
we
have
child
care
programs.
So,
in
this
program
some
volunteers
help
the
Afghan
Refugee
to
help
with
their
child.
So
with
this
child
care,
the
woman's
or
the
family
can
go
to
find
job
and
continue
their
education.
O
We
have
document
assistance
so
in
with
this
help
so
volunteer
help
refugees
to
process
their
document,
their
legal
status
solve
because
legal
status
is
a
problem,
so
many
of
them
don't
know
how
to
fill
forms
for
work,
permit
for
forms
for
TPS
and
other
or
social
security
card.
So
here
volunteers
can
help
them
or
we
have
in
the
refugee
Center
a
lot
of
programs
which
volunteer
support
to
this
program
like
I.T
ceiling
classes
and
also
women,
mentorship
programs.
So
it
means
volunteers
can
help
a
lot
refugees
I
understand.
O
So
I'm
not
ask
this
or
request
this
support
for
know
your
neighbor
from
the
council
as
a
person
who
worked
in
this
program
as
a
Afghan
part
of
the
Afghan
Community
here,
because
I
understand
there
are
a
lot
of
refugee
Afghan
Refugee
and
they
like
to
be
like
older
people
in
society
like
other
American
people,
but
they
need
the
people
Help
and
only
way
other
people
can
help
with
the
name
know
your
neighbor
thank
you,
and
we
are
here
for
your
question.
Thank
you.
J
I
have
a
question:
I
know
we're
short
on
time,
but
it
seems
like
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
help.
It
seems
like
there
is
a
lot
of
need
and
then
my
I
don't
know
how
the
whole
system
works,
but
then
maybe
you
can
enlighten
me
and
how
it
works,
because
if
you
know
if
I
know
this,
we
we
welcome
refugees.
J
So
I
think
the
state
is
always
demonstrated
that,
but
it
to
me
it
seems
like
we
say:
yes
we're
going
to
invite
and
we
want
this
amount
of
people,
but
then
we
don't
have
the
resources
to
help
them
get
the
documents
that
they
need
and
go
through
the
immigration
process,
so
that
they're,
you
know
they
they
become
regular
and
all
the
things.
And
so
what
what
happens
like?
Can
you
educate
me
because
I
I
don't
feel
like
I
understand
why
you
know
we
we
need
so
much
still
like
people
need
so
much
help
because
I.
N
Can
start
that
you
know
let
Kristen
follow
through
that.
Well,
the
Afghan
group
is
a
little
bit
different
because
so
many
of
them
came
at
once.
N
Usually
you
can
scale
in
groups
like
in
steps,
but
because
it
was
a
specific
particular
situation
they
all
came
at
once
and
and
it
was
an
emergency
so
also
the
state
offers
that
support,
not
the
state,
I'm,
sorry,
the
resettlement
organizations,
but
again
unlimited
funds
and
and
then
that's
when
the
state
takes
over
and
the
city
assists
through
the
know,
your
neighbor
program
to
assist
those
groups
once
they
have
exited
the
resettlement
agencies,
services
and
then
the
state
steps
in-
and
it's
just
you
know,
backlog
of.
N
Like
anything,
you
know
related
to
immigration
or
resettlement,
it's
it
takes
time
and,
for
example,
we
just
the
mayor
just
sent
a
letter
in
support
of
asking
the
federal
government
to
try
to
speed
up
the
process
for
refugees
to
be
able
to
access.
N
Work
work
documents,
so
they
can,
for
example,
Venezuelans
or
Afghans
can
integrate
a
little
faster
into
the
system
because
right
now
the
waiting
period
is,
you
know
up
to
a
year
and
people
need
to
work
so
yeah.
There's
there's
always
gaps
there,
but
the
Afghan
Community.
Is
it's
a
little
bit
different
in
that
area,
because
so
many
of
of
them
came
as
a
group
ones.
P
P
It
wasn't
used
in
the
scale
that
it
was
for
the
Afghan
crisis
previously
ever
before
in
the
U.S,
so
they're
all
brought
essentially
through
Refugee
resettlement
Pathways,
but
without
that
actual
legal
status
of
being
refugee,
which
ends
up
with
citizenship,
which
means
that
they
are
all
expected
to
apply
for
Asylum
if
they
would
like
to
stay
here
permanently,
and
that's
about
918
people
in
Utah
applying
for
Asylum
all
at
once
beyond
all
of
the
backlog
from
all
the
other
Asylum
communities
that
we
have
here.
So
that's
another
issue
with
them.
P
Sorry
could
you
repeat
that,
but
like
our
Venezuelans?
Yes,
exactly
so
it's
that
918,
on
top
of
our
our
traditional
backlog
and
I,
would
just
like
to
also
mention
that
the
pathway
that
Roxanna
was
talking
about
with
the
case
management
period
through
the
resettlement
agencies
and
Utah
was
just
brought
down
from
two
years
to
12
months,
which
is
another
issue
that
is
facing
these
communities.
P
D
Thank
you
for
your
work
council
members.
Anything
else,
councilman
Romano
I,
want
to
make
sure
I
see
you
over
there.
Okay
again,
thank
you
so
much
for
presenting
today.
Thank
you
for
your
work.
It's
valuable
work
to
our
city,
so
thank
you.
So
much
with
that,
we
will
be
moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
three.
Q
D
Oo
we
have
75
minutes
allotted
for
this
and
I
know
that
we're
a
little
bit
behind.
But
if
I
can
I
plan
on
taking
as
much
time
as
needed,
because
I
think
Ben,
you
told
me
yesterday
we
got
through
two
items
on
the
agenda.
Two.
D
L
L
L
I,
don't
know
that
won't
work
either,
because
why
she'll
be
on
that
meeting
until
3
30.
it's
and
then
she
has
no
choice
about
that.
Maybe
I.
D
Item
number
four
and
talked
about
the
downtown
Building
height
and
Street,
activation
until
sure,
okay
for
30
minutes
that
would
put
us
at
three
okay.
We
can
take
a
break
and
then,
as
soon
as
she
gets
here,
we
can
go
to.
Is
that,
okay
with
everyone
here,
I
I,
want
to
make
sure
everybody
has
a
chance
to
talk
about
what
they
want
to
talk
about?
Finding
stuff,
I,
don't
see
them.
D
Oh
planning
staff
yeah
hold,
please
we're
having
calendaring
issues
because
I
don't
know
that
it
makes
sense
to
start
a
conversation
and
then
restart
it
when
she
gets
here
right.
D
Was
no
that's
fine
I
just
right
like
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
start
the
conversation
and
then
restart
it
if
she
did
didn't
have
many
things,
but
well.
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
D
So
thank
you
again
for
a
brief
recess.
We
are
in
fact
going
to
move
on
to
cdbg
Ben
and
the
team.
If
you
will
come
up
and
give
us
your
intro
and
we
can
go
from
there.
R
R
Attachment
four:
we
do
have
hard
copies
of
this
one
available
today.
This
was
prepared
by
Council
staff
council
members
had
asked
for
a
summary
sheet
of
all
of
the
funds
that
are
going
through
the
housing
stability
division.
That
will
still
need
Council
approval,
so
those
funds
are
on
attachment.
Four.
R
R
You'll
see
the
very
first
thing
listed.
Is
the
annual
HUD
grants
what
we're
talking
about
today
and
then
there
is
also
I
believe
six,
seven
other
pots
of
funding
listed
below
it,
the
status
column,
it's
the
second
from
the
right
hand,
side
the
status
column
tells
you
where
these
funds
are
currently
at
in
some
instances,
such
as
the
pandemic
emergency
rental
assistance
funding.
Most
of
that
has
already
been
spent,
but
there
is
still
two
million
dollars
to
come
back
to
the
council.
R
R
The
other
new
attachment
is
number
five.
We
don't
have
hard
copies
of
this
one,
it's
attached
in
the
packet,
it's
comparing
the
housing,
Rehabilitation
and
repair
programs.
This
is
from
the
division.
It
has
an
overview
of
13
different
housing,
Rehabilitation
programs
that
are
available
in
the
county,
eight
of
which
are
available
in
the
city.
R
And
this
relates
to
cdbg
housing
number
one
and
cdbg
housing
number
five.
At
the
last
briefing,
some
council
members
expressed
interest
in
shifting
some
or
all
of
the
funding
for
the
small
repair
program.
It's
a
little
over
forty
one
thousand
dollars
shifting
it
from
the
application
that
housing
stability
division
submitted
to
assist,
which
is
the
first
application
in
the
housing
category.
R
R
The
the
other
new
attachment
is
number
six.
This
is
the
one
that
you
you
asked
about
it
a
moment
ago,
comparing
the
housing
stability,
division
programs.
R
R
R
R
Well,
it's
on
the
big
screen
in
the
corner,
so
there
are
three
three
different
grants
and
they
each
have
separate
sources
of
recaptured
funding,
it's
relatively
small
for
hopwa,
eighty
thousand
dollars
and
in
home
it
was
one
previous
award,
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
the
organization
CDC
Utah
was
unable
to
use
any
of
the
funds
for
cdbg.
There
are
several
awards
that
are
being
recaptured,
and
these
are
from
the
last
two
cycles,
so
not
just
last
year,
but
also
the
year
before
fiscal
year,
21.
R
D
D
So
why
haven't
we
used
it
and
and
like
if
this
is
for
administrative
costs?
Is
this
something
to
pay
an
FTE?
Do
we
need
to
transfer
this
to
finance
and
have
Finance
get
an
FTE
to
go
over?
Some
of
the
federal
guidelines
is
where,
where
why
aren't
we
using
almost
two
a
million
dollars
a
year
for
administrative
costs,.
R
It's
a
it's
a
total
of
half
a
million
dollars
from
the
last
two
years.
Oh.
R
Yep
and
a
note
in
previous
years,
it
was
separated
out,
so
a
certain
amount
was
available
to
the
attorney's
office,
a
certain
amount
to
finance
and
a
certain
amount
to
the
division
this
year,
it's
all
rolled
together
into
one,
so
the
funding
is
more
flexible,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
translate
into
more
use,
so
I
think
your
question
still
stands
about
why
the
half
million
dollars
wasn't
used.
The
last
two
years,
I.
S
To
put
you
on
the
spot,
but
I
am
your
question
councilman
Fowler,
so
the
short
answer
is
basically
with
those
two
years
the
program
year,
2020
2021,
21
22..
A
lot
of
it
comes
down
to
some
staffing
changes
in
Staffing
capacity,
but
then
also
covid.
So
this
kind
of
directly
relates
to
covid
both
for
our
programs,
but
then
the
other
programs
that
we
were
funding
in
the
community.
Cdcu
neighbor
works
as
well
all
experienced
large
declines.
C
S
D
Okay,
but
the
administration
part
is
just
in-house
administrative
work
right.
Yes,
okay,.
L
Connect,
yes,
Audrey
just
to
follow
up
on
that,
so
they
to
the
extent
that
our
city
wasn't
able
to
use
that
Federal
money
we
used
City
taxpayer
money
in
its
place
is
that.
S
D
S
D
Bringing
terms,
but
that
turn
out
to
be
like
weird
lawyer
ideas
like
so
basically
the
person
that
is
assigned
to
work
on
HUD
programming
sort
of
bills,
their
hours,
if
you
will
and
then
that
billing
of
hours
goes
to
HUD,
we
as
the
city
re
like
pay
that
person,
but
then
those
build
hours
go
to
HUD
and
they
reimburse
us
for
those
build
hours.
Yes,.
S
D
And
so
because
of
covid,
because
there
was
just
I
mean
the
world
shut
down
for
a
minute
there,
we
didn't
we
weren't
billing
enough
hours
to
maximize
this
half
a
million
dollars
over
the
last
two
years.
Yes,
okay,
that
helps
me
make
a
little
bit
more
sense.
I
think
yeah.
L
D
And
I'm
sorry
to
like
keep
digging
this
hole,
but
but
we
do
have
finance
and
attorney
that
are
eligible
to
Bill
ours,
I'm,
going
to
keep
using
that
lawyer
term,
because
it
makes
sense
to
me
eligible
to
build
hours
in
the
administration
of
those
funds.
It's
not
like
the
program
person
is
like
writing
the
check
right.
It's
that,
if
you're
working
on
moving
those
funds
from
a
to
c,
then
you
can
build
those
hours.
T
Member,
so
thanks
to
that
clarification
and
education
there.
So
now
these
are
recaptured
and
do
they
have
a
timeline
that
we
have
to
use
these
funds
with,
or
they
all
just
still
molded,
together
with
the
current
fundings,
so
that
they
can
actually
have
increased
programs,
and
we
can
actually
do
more
this
year
because
we
have
the
additional
funds
to
to
use
it.
And
then
the
next
question
is:
do
they
have
to
stay
in
the
same
block
as
far
as
what
they
were
used
in
the
first
time
or
same
program?
I
guess.
U
Yes,
does
that
make
sense
yeah
it
does
yeah,
so
the
the
time
to
spend
them
down
is
related
to
the
timeliness
tests
that
happen,
so
that
all
that
money
that
is
being
reallocated
is
included
in
the
totals
that
are
here
with
admin.
You
can't
use
old
admin
on
admin
from
like
the
previous
year,
so
that
was
at
that
amount
was
the
20
cap
that
were
allowed
for
cdbg
admin.
That
was
the
amount
that
we
were
under
that
and
so
that
that
money
just
becomes
sort
of
generally
available.
T
D
R
R
The
council
had
asked
what
the
previous
appropriation
of
250
000
in
fiscal
year
21
was
used
for
and
what
the
request
for
the
new
appropriation
four
hundred
and
six
thousand
dollars
would
be
used
for
the
previous
appropriation.
The
quarter
million
dollars
was
used
with
other
funding
sources
to
purchase
three
homes
that
are
in
the
community
Land
Trust.
R
Now
the
406
thousand
dollars
that's
requested
would
be
used
to
continue
the
current
approach
of
exercising
the
buyback
option
in
mortgages,
so
the
properties
that
are
in
the
community
Land
Trust
have
a
buyback
option
and
this
can
only
be
exercised
if
the
mortgage
is
sold
within
the
first
15
years
and
it
could.
The
funds
could
also
be
used
to
purchase
new
properties
and
add
them
into
the
trust.
It
depends
on
when
the
current
property
owners
in
the
community
Land
Trust
want
to
sell.
L
J
I,
have
my
children
have
questions
so
so
you
purchased
three
homes
with
250
dollars,
250
just
kidding,
250
000.
That
was
amazing,
and
but
you
said
you
leveraged
that
money
with
another
pot
of
money.
What
other
part
of
money
is
the
first
question
and
then
the
second
question
is:
where
are
these
three
homes?
We.
Q
Yeah,
so
it
was
leveraged
with
previously
budgeted,
cdbg
and
home
program
income
when
they
were
budgeting
funds
through
the
annual
process
for
program
income
previously,
and
we
provided
two
Council
staff,
a
list
of
all
the
CLT
properties.
And
so
we
can
certainly
highlight
on
the
sheet
that
we
provided
to
council
staff,
where
those
homes
are.
L
Okay
and
I'll
just
know:
sorry,
if
I
could
that
the
program
income
fund
is
the
funding,
that
is,
that
is
going
to
be
coming
to
you
at
a
later
date
for
you
to
appropriate,
because
it
wasn't
clearly
delineated
in
the
past
correct.
So
there
are
two
sources:
two
issues
relating
to
this
program
that
it's
a
good
program,
but
it
needs
clearer
appropriation
and
Council
weigh
in.
D
Cindy,
so
at
this
point,
if
I'm
looking
at
our
log,
we're
looking
at
number
six
on
this
issue
right
Ben,
this
is
the
ask
for
406
thousand
dollars
and
what
I'm
seeing
is
that
we
have
200
250
000
dollars
already
there.
D
D
D
Questions
on
this
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
take
that
money
and
put
it
elsewhere.
Sorry,
no
offense,
but
I
am
just
because
we
haven't
had
like
a
Clear
Vision
on
where
we're
going
with
the
community
land
trust
and
seems
like
they're,
it's
good,
but
there's
still
some
questions
there
and
if
we're
talking
about
program
income
program
Finance,
what
is
the.
D
T
Q
K
I
have
a
question
on
that
Madam
chair.
Yes,.
Q
K
S
So
to
clarify
councilman
Mount,
so
the
the
17
homes
in
currently
in
the
community
Land
Trust,
none
of
those
have
been
sold.
If
they
ever
were
to
be
sold
to
a
new
home,
it
would
be
to
an
eligible
homeowner.
The
city
always
maintains
the
land.
So
then
that
way,
it's
that's
permanently
affordable.
The
three
new
homes
that
question
they
were
purchased
with
our
first
ride
of
refusal
through
the
city's
separate
home
ownership
mortgage
program.
S
So
they
we
have
a
fir
in
all
of
those
mortgages
with
a
15-year
right
of
refusal,
Clause
that
we
can
either
exercise
or
not
exercise
so
for
the
three
that
were
utilized
no
for
the
other
ones
those
were
utilized,
but
since
we've
kind
of
paused
this
program
waiting,
Council
Direction.
Since
then,
there
have
been
three
sold
of
our
mortgages.
G
V
K
R
That's
everything
I
have
for
responses
to
the
council's
questions
from
the
last
briefing,
so
we
can
pick
it
up
at
the
top
of
Page
Three
perfect.
That
item
there's
only
one
in
the
category
of
neighborhood
improvements
this
year
in
previous
years.
This
is
also
where
you
would
have
seen
things
like
Transportation.
There
were
no
applications
this
year
related
to
the
transportation
goal.
R
The
one
item
we
do
have
is
the
neighborhood
business
facade
Improvement
program.
The
recommendation
for
funding
is
nine
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
This
is
a
significant
increase
over
what
the
program
has
been
awarded
in
previous
years.
That's
a
combination
of
two
things:
it's
inflation,
so
it
costs
more
to
do
the
same
projects,
but
also
a
hope
to
do
more
projects
as
well,
and
so
that
would
have
a
a
workload
increase
for
the
current
staff.
J
U
Here
so
the
the
unspent
funds
from
this
program
from
the
previous
years
was
recaptured
and
it
goes
into
including
this
pot,
but
yeah
this
one
in
the
housing.
It's
just
part
of
the
total
1.2
million
that
we
reallocated
or.
J
J
M
I'm
sure
so
I,
you
know,
I
do
like
this
program
a
lot
and
I
think
it's
very
useful,
I
I
guess
this
is
not
so
much
about
the
money,
but
it
relates
to
the
money.
But
in
previous
years
they
created
area
where
this
money
needed
to
be
utilized
on
many
of
those
areas
where,
in
my
district
or
on
the
West
Side,
and
what
I
worry
is
that
we
are
the
significant
increase
in
budget.
M
But
then
we
go
too
wide
on
this
area,
and
you
know
the
impact
is
the
impact
on
the
communities
fewer.
If
that
makes
sense,
so
do
you
guys
decide
already?
What
areas
are
you
guys
going
to
try
to
Target
for
to
use
this?
This
facade,
Improvement,
Scott.
R
R
If
we
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit
it's
we,
if
you
remember
selecting
the
area,
we
called
this
the
Utah
option,
because
it
vaguely
looks
like
the
state
outline
yeah.
L
R
R
The
black
hash
marks
correct,
and
this
was
partly
selected
because
on
the
North
End,
it
aligns
with
the
North
Temple
RDA
project
area
and
on
the
east
side
it
aligns
with
the
State
Street
RDA
project
area,
exactly.
W
L
W
D
Sorry,
I
put
a
mint
in
any
other
questions
from
council
members
on
this
item.
All
right,
Ben
we're
making
we're
on
to
number
two.
Let's
go.
R
So
that
takes
us
to
the
public
services
category.
This
is
the
category
that
has
the
most
applications,
but
the
least
available
funding,
which
is
what
makes
it
difficult.
Every
year
the
the
total
category
is
limited
to
15
of
the
annual
cdbg
award.
The
funding
recommendations
do
max
out
at
the
15
percent.
This
means,
if
funding
is
to
be
shifted
from
one
Public
Services
application
to
another.
You
can't
take
funding
from
a
different
cdbg
category
and
add
it
to
Public
Services.
It
all
has
to
be
within
this
category.
D
W
Would
like
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
minimum
threshold
on
these
is
thirty
thousand
correct,
I'd
like
to
make
sure
we
get
to
thirty
thousand
for
line
item
number.
Eight
I
know
from
experience
that
those
who
are
most
closely
acquainted
with
the
community
often
are
those
most
capable
of
spending
the
money
efficiently,
and
so,
if
we're
not
trying
to
reach
refugees,
that
organization
seems
uniquely
poised
to
do
that.
I!
J
I
have
my
my
request
as
well
to
fund
number
seven,
because
it's
the
adult
mental
health
program
that
serves
the
adults
with
a
primary
severe
mental
illness
diagnosis.
So
it's
very
important.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
talk
every
day
about
I
feel
like
at
least
maybe
in
my
head
myself,
I,
don't
know,
but
it's
very
important
that
we
tackle
this
issue
from
all
the
angles
that
we
can
within
our
statutory
responsibilities.
J
W
D
That's
fine
I
think
for
me
if
we
were
to
at
least
do
the
threshold
of
30.
right
that
that
gives
us
because
I'm
with
you
sorry
these
meant
no
for
real
but
I.
This
is
important
to
me
as
well,
so
I
think
at
least
if
we
try
to
figure
out
a
way
to
meet
that
30
000
threshold
on
that
one
and
also
I
agree
with
councilmember
Petro
that
30
000
threshold
with
number
eight
are
important.
None
of
us
have
ideas
yet
of
where
to
take
this
from
wait.
D
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
in
between
I
love,
the
in
between
I
support,
the
in
between
I
somewhere
in
my
brain.
Remember
that
maybe
or
maybe
not
they
got
some
funding
from
the
state.
Does
anyone
remember
this
or
did
I
make
this
up
in
a
dream.
D
W
R
So
I'm,
looking
at
Kate,
Bradshaw's
presentation
to
the
council
from
I
think
two
weeks
ago
and
it
listed
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
the
in
between
for
end
of
life,
respite
care,
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
for
programming
or
Capital
Improvements,
but
a.
W
D
M
D
Mean
there
the
request
here
is
56.,
so
even
if
we
took
them
down
to
the
threshold,
knowing
that
they
had
some
money
from
the
state,
that's
twenty
six
thousand
dollars
that
we
can
put
towards
one
of
the
other
programs
that
we're
interested
in
funding
right.
So
again,
it's
all
about
feeling
less
bad,
because
we
don't
have
enough
money
to
feel
all
the
way
good.
D
K
Just
want
to
just
drop
my
two
cents
in
here
I
I'm,
hesitant
to
take
money
away
from
the
in
between,
but
I
am
understanding
we're
trying
to
stretch
things
as
far
as
we
can
go,
but
it
it's
it'll,
take
a
little
bit
of
additional
conversations
for
me
to
be
comfortable
with
with
removing
it
from
that
specific
applicant
yeah.
X
I
I
agree:
I
would
like
to
keep
the
funding
for
the
in
between
I
know
that
we
have
those
previous
conversations
and,
and
previously
the
in-between
wasn't
scoring
within
the
the
limit,
the
they
weren't
scoring
high
enough
from
the
recommendations
or
from
the
committee
to
make
them
competitive,
and
so
since
they
made
those
improvements,
I
I
would
not
support
cutting
them.
D
Well
and
I
just
want
to
be
be
clear:
I
I,
don't
I'm,
not
suggesting
not
funding
them
I'm,
suggesting
taking
some
of
their
money,
considering
they
got
money
from
the
state
and
I.
Don't
think
any
other
organization
on
this
list
has
gotten
money
from
the
state,
so
it
is
simply
again
I
support
them.
I've
been
supporting
them
from
the
beginning.
T
And
I
know:
we've
done
this
in
the
past,
also
where
we
also
make
sure
that
we're
not
we're
funding
them
for
what
they
can
for
the
appropriate
amount.
If
we
cut
too
much
off
of
them,
then
they
can't
get
a
full
FTE.
They
can't
get
the
full
program,
so
we
and
I
know
you've
done
that
before,
where
hey.
If
they
don't
get
this
much
money,
they
don't
get
an
ft
either
they
don't
get
this.
They
can't
service
the
program.
Well
enough,
so
really
it
ends
up
being
a
waste
to
even
fund
them.
T
R
Yeah,
if
the
council
needs
additional
information
about
what
level
of
funding
the
applicant
thinks
they
could
work
with,
and
sometimes
it's
a
question
of.
Are
they
a
large
enough
organization
to
have
other
funding
sources?
We
can
gather
those
details.
Yeah.
That's
that's
I.
W
W
The
dental
services
I
just
took
five
thousand
off
because
you
know
you
need
a
little
bit.
Fifty
thousand
is
a
nice
round
number.
So
that's
number
nine
sorry.
W
W
And
that
would
provide
us
with
86
617
dollars
did
I
miss
number
20,
sorry
correct,
yes,
number
20!
We
could
go
down
to
six
thousand
two
remove
six
thousand
two
hundred
forty
nine
dollars
from
that,
and
that
would
still
be
a
thirteen
thousand
dollar
year-over-year
increase
for
the
YWCA
which
I
fought
for
last
year.
So
thanks
for
not
making
me
fight
for
them
this
year,
that
would
give
us
8
600
86
617
dollars
to
spread
around
that
could
be
32
the
one
that
I
care
about.
Where
is
the
number
to
number
eight?
D
D
D
D
Would
be
receiving
so
taking
down
some
of
this
to
spread
that
to
Odyssey
House,
which
and
I'm
just
going
to
put
my
plug
in
here
real
quick,
Odyssey
House.
You
know
I
work
with
a
lot
of
people
coming
out
of
incarceration
a
lot
of
people
struggling
with
substance,
abuse
disorders,
mental
health
disorders
that
find
themselves
in
the
criminal
justice
system
in
Odyssey.
House
does
an
amazing
job
at
creating
another
space
for
people
for
step.
House
does
also
an
amazing
job.
They
cater
to
a
certain
population.
D
I,
the
the
more
the
more
spaces
I
have
to
help
clients
find
resources
the
better.
For
me,
it's
the
my
criminal
defense
person,
talking
not
just
my
council
person
talking
so
knowing
that
first
step
house
has
these
other
applications
and
thinking
that
maybe
we
can
kind
of
support
another
program
and
another
resource
is
really
important
to
me,
because
I
do
know
that
there's
different
populations
that
are
met
there.
T
Commands
here
on,
on
that
same
note,
with
the
Odyssey
House
and
the
you
know,
the
the
county
funding
and
the
state
funding
on
different
mental
Health
pots
of
money.
You
know
it'd
be
nice
to
know,
is
the
Aussie
house
getting
additional
fundings
or
were
they
were
there
other
different
funding?
That's
coming
from
because
again
this
is
the
city
doing
some
of
the
jobs
that
from
the
county
signpoint
they
do.
R
D
K
W
M
K
R
D
Council
members
I
mean
I'm,
just
Pro
tem
acting
chairperson
right
now,
because
Darren
is
in
Philadelphia
and
Victoria
came
in
off
of
another
very
important
meeting.
But
my
suggestion
would
be
that
we
sit
with
this
proposal
because
it
was
just
sort
of
thrown
out
I
think
we
can
all
Talk
Amongst
ourselves
determine
what
we
want
to
do
with
that.
D
This
is
sort
of
how
cdbg
Works
generally
is
some
negotiations
between
people
and
then
come
back
and
I
would
leave
that
to
chair
and
vice
chair,
obviously,
either
the
11th
for
an
updated
briefing
or
just
prepared
to
vote
on
the
18th,
but
I
think
the
I'm
in
favor
of
the
proposal
and
looking
at
some
of
those
things
that
were
proposed,
there
may
be
something
else
that
another
council
member
may
bring
up.
But
what
do
council
members
think
of
that
idea?.
W
Real
quickly,
I
am
looking
at
how
much
we
actually
need
to
take
from
First
Step
house
to
make
this
60
000
threshold.
So
I
will
get
back
to
you
with
a
proposed
number,
which
will
be
a
smaller
cut
to
the
in
between
sorry.
J
I
wanna
I
I,
like
the
direction
that
we're
heading
and
what
usually
suggested
and
I'm
sure
dog
dentists
out.
There
are
already
donating
time,
probably
but
I
mean
I'm,
assuming
they
are
helping
the
dental
services,
but
if
there's
any
way
that
we
can
send
a
request,
I'm,
not
sure
if
there's
a
Utah,
Dental
Association
or
the
School
of
Dentistry
at
the
U
or
whatever
to
say
you
know,
we
highly
encourage
you
to.
J
You
know,
donate
your
hours
and
your
services
to
this
group
that
we
really
need
their
downtown
Salt,
Lake
City's,
our
homeless
neighbors,
we're
short
five
thousand
dollars.
Would
you
guys
be
able
to
you
know,
donate
this
I
mean
I,
think
there
are
other
other
resources
out
there
for
us
to
like
send
a
letter
or
an
email
at
least
of
encouragement,
so
that
we
can
spread
the
love
with
the
money
that
we
have
from
cdbg
and
not
have
to
fight
amongst
ourselves
or
feel
like
we
couldn't
do
that
program.
J
W
It's
removing
15
616
from
their
current
suggested
appropriation,
I.
M
D
M
M
D
Thank
you,
Alejandra
I,
appreciate
that
you're
welcome
and
again
I'll
leave
that
to
the
agenda
for
chair
Vice
chairs,
simply
a
suggestion
that
we
do
move
on.
Knowing
that
there's
a
proposal
out
there
and
maybe
some
follow-up
questions
with
the
housing
stability
Department
can
bend
and
our
team,
but
we're
not
even
done
with
the
log.
What
time
is
it
352.
D
all
right,
we're
only
two
minutes
behind
how
quick
do
you
think
we
can
get
through
ESG
and
home?
Well,.
R
Something
to
point
out
with
ESG,
so
we're
on
the
green
heading
of
the
funding
log,
starting
on
page
eight.
It's
divided
into
two
parts,
so
part
one
is
page
eight
and
then
part
two,
which
only
has
three
applications
is
on
page
nine
and
the
reason
I
point
out.
This
is
part.
One
has
a
cap
similar
to
the
Caps
that
we
just
discussed
for
public
services.
U
R
Next
is
the
orange
heading
page
11.?
This
is
the
home
investment
partnership
program.
W
G
R
D
And
in
public
services,
neighbor
works
also
was
not
funded
for
their
financial
counseling
program.
Right
yeah.
Y
D
They
are
being
funded
in
in
the
housing
department.
R
R
D
But
and
okay,
so
how
exactly
does
this
program-
and
you
may
not
have
the
answers,
but
maybe
we
can
get
them?
How
does
this
program
differ
from
the
program
that
they're
getting
four
hundred
and
seven
thousand
dollars
from
from
the
housing
program,
because
both
of
them
look
like
Rehabilitation
programs
for
neighbor
works
or
similar
I
like
neighborworks
I,
want
to
fund
all
of
the
things
I
possibly
can
I
just
want
to?
Does
that
make
sense
and.
U
W
We
have
do
we
have
reports
in
this
one
about
development
activities,
including
acquisition,
new
construction.
Do
we
have
any.
W
I
just
remember
so
we
have
programs
here
that
are
pilots
listed
that
are
getting
funded
at
almost
full
ask
and
that
to
me
seems
like
a
much
riskier
investment
of
our
money
than
another
program
where
we
may
have
seen
a
track
record
of
success.
So
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
get
clarification
on
that
too,
if
possible,
please.
T
W
I'd
like
to
know
if
it
was
a
matter
of
it,
wasn't
written
in
a
way
that
the
Grant
reviewers
found
appealing
or
easily
digestible
this.
This
organization,
under
this
leader,
has
my
lifetime's
worth
of
experience
so
I'm
willing
to
overlook
sentence
structure
if
we
can
get
guarantees
of
efficiency
and
effectiveness.
D
R
The
the
homebuyer
program
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
the
homebuyer
program
is
where
the
215
current
mortgages
were
originally
financed,
and
those
are
the
ones
that
have
the
buyback
option.
The
first
right
of
refusal.
D
And
I
am
gone
this
so
I'm
like
marking
number
eight
as
needing
to
have
more
information
on,
especially
as
it
relates
to
the
homebuyer
program
and
the
community
land
trust
and
this
buyback
program
and
all
of
the
things
that
right
now
seem
like
a
little
spider
web
to
me
that
I
haven't
quite
figured
out,
and
it's
probably
just
me,
Madam.
J
Chair
I
wanted
to
add
to
that,
because
you
know
some
some.
These
are
some
of
the
policy
questions
that
we
always
we
have
a
raised
in
the
past
and
and
things
that
we
have
to
decide
on.
J
Are
we
as
a
city
going
to
have
a
home
buyer
program
ourselves
or
the
community
land
trust,
or
are
we
going
to
support
those
non-profits
out
there
that
are
already
very
successful
at
doing
that
and
therefore,
if
we
get
into
this
and
we're
competing
with
them,
so
are
we
duplicating
the
work
and
all
of
those
things
so
I
think
it's
a
valid
question.
J
I
think
that,
in
what
your
race
and
I
would
like
to
be
in
that
small
group
meeting,
if
you
will
just
to
talk
about
how
that
works,
compared
to
whatever
neighborhoods
or
CDC
or
whoever
else
does
similar
program
and
then
maybe
perhaps
make
a
decision
in
the
for
the
future
to
say:
okay
from
now
on,
I
think
this
is
what
you
know.
We
need
to
be
doing
versus
what
they
need
to
be
doing
and
be
more
effective
thanks.
D
M
M
So
the
question
is
that
I
I
was
asking
some
of
the
staff
members
through
my
texting
was
had
we,
the
council
has
ever
in
the
past
padded
or
added
funds
from
General
budget
to
meet
some
of
these
demands
or
demands
not
requests,
maybe
because
we
fell
very
strongly
and
apparently
the
answer
is
yes
and
you
know
I
would
like
to
really
ask
you
know
to
look
at
the
opportunities
to
do
that,
maybe
not
to
necessarily
cut
it,
because
ten
thousand
dollars
might
be
not
a
huge
impact
into
our
HUD
funds
or
other.
M
D
You
know
I
think
that,
as
you're
aware,
we
try
to
have
the
general
fund
at
a
safe
balance
for
catastrophes
in
the
world
which
none
of
us
have
ever
experienced,
but
I
I
think
that
if
we
taught
that
one
of
the
things
for
me
when
we're
here
is
talking
about
what
our
priorities
are,
so
that
staff
and
administration
can
go
back
and
be
like
okay,
we
heard
this
priority.
D
How
can
we
help
out
that
a
little
bit
and
we
may
have
to
cut
from
programs?
It
just
is
what
it
is.
This
is
like
Ben
said
this
is
one
of
the
first
years
I've
been
on
the
council
that
it
was
like
wait
a
minute
one
whole
section
got
funded.
What
that's
silly
talk,
but
I
think
this
is
important
to
come
back
and
say:
how
can
we
look
at
some
of
these
creative
financing
tools
that
we
may
have,
or
where
can
we
cut
from
here?
Where
can
we
look
at
other
things
and.
R
Ben
I
was
just
going
to
respond.
That
I
can
think
of
three
examples
in
the
eight
years
I've
done
cdbg.
One
of
them
is
the
rape
Recovery
Center
and
though
there
were
extenuating
circumstances
specific
to
Salt
Lake
City
in
getting
the
backlog
of
untested
sexual
assault,
evidence
kits
all
sense
to
be
tested
which
caused
a
spike
in
the
demand
for
that
non-profit
Services.
As
the
only
provider
in
the
city.
The
general
fund
continues
to
provide
a
thirty
thousand
dollar
funding
to
that
organization.
To
this
day,
there
was
also
one-time
funding.
R
I
think
it
was
also
thirty
thousand
dollars
from
the
general
fund
to
the
in
between
and
the
application
that
year
scored
poorly,
and
so
they
did
not
receive
cdbg
funding.
But
the
Council
made
a
determination
to
give
a
one-time
thirty
thousand
dollars
from
the
general
fund
to
help
them
transition
their
program
as
they
sought
other
funding
sources,
since
they
were
a
young
organization
and
somewhat
reliant
on
limited
sources
of
funding.
The
the
other
thought
is.
We
have
funding
our
future
with
a
housing,
critical
need
category,
and
many
of
these
applications
are
related
to
housing.
R
L
Okay,
Cindy,
just
in
addition
to
what
Ben
said
you
may
have
covered
this
Ben
and
I
missed
it,
but
with
the
other
Federal
funding
of
funds
that
are
coming
to
the
council,
the
the
dormant
HUD
funds,
basically
I,
think
some
of
those
could
be
used.
If
the
council
chose.
R
There
is
so
attachment
four
has
all
of
those
other
funds,
half
of
which
the
council
has
not
discussed
in
detail
about
policy
guidance.
That's
a
good
point.
D
Yep
perfect,
so
real,
quick,
because
I
would
love
to
like
at
least
get
all
the
way
through
the
log
as
a
favor
to
the
acting
the
actual
chair
and
vice
chair.
Is
there
anything
in
particular,
we
need
to
talk
about
hapla
everything.
All
the
applications
from
Hawa
are
funded
and
we
got
more
this
year
than
we
have
in
years.
Prior
ever
I
just
been
just
said
ever
so
yay
for
us
on
that.
With
that
I
think
there's
some
questions.
D
W
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilwoman
Fowler,
for
being
such
an
excellent
chair.
While
I
attended
to
Port
business,
we
will
move
on
now
to
item
number
four:
the
ordinance
regarding
downtown
Building,
height
and
Street
activation
text.
Amendments
at
the
table,
we'll
have
Brian
Fulmer,
Nick,
Norris
and
Kelsey
Lindquist.
Z
You,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
city's
zoning
ordinance
related
to
building
Heights
and
pedestrian
engagement
in
the
downtown
plan
area.
The
administration's
proposal
also
recommends
changes
to
the
design,
standards
and
design
review
processes
in
city
code
consultants,
for
the
proposal,
design
Workshop
are
joining
us
remotely
and
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Kelsey
and
Nick.
AA
AB
Good
afternoon,
can
you
hear
us
okay?
Yes,
thank
you
great.
Thank
you
so
much.
My
name
is
Jessica
Garrow
and
I'm
joined
by
Cali
new.
We
are
with
design
workshop
and
we
are
looking
forward
to
sharing
just
a
summary
of
the
proposed
building,
Heights
and
pedestrian
code.
AB
Update
with
you
today,
you
wanna
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
we're
going
to
go
through
just
a
process
overview
and
then
we'll
go
into
some
specifics
related
to
the
proposed
amendments,
pedestrian
orientation,
Building,
height,
human
skill,
design,
code,
clarification
and
then
have
some
time
for
any
questions
that
you
might
have
moving
into
the
process
overview.
AB
This
is
the
design
Workshop
team
that
worked
on
on
the
project
and
we
were
excited
to
join
staff
in
in
this
work.
Next
slide
shows
just
an
overview
of
the
land
use
process.
We
began
in
the
fall
of
2021,
with
the
awarding
to
Salt
Lake
City
of
a
wfrc
transportation,
land
use
connection
Grant,
and
then
we
were
awarded
that
project
and
and
began
work.
AB
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
you
can
see
here.
Just
this
is
the
overall
process
we
started
with
a
review
of
the
document.
Then
we
moved
into
Community
engagement.
We
did
some
focus
groups,
a
community
survey
and
then
moved
into
drafting
the
code
language.
We
had
a
number
of
conversations
and
meetings
with
the
Planning
Commission
for
their
review
and
recommendation
and
now
we're
here
at
that
adoption
stage
with
you.
AB
The
next
slide
just
illustrates
the
geography
of
the
proposed
amendments,
so
you
can
see
the
existing
Zone
districts
on
the
left
and
the
downtown
master
plan
boundaries
on
the
right.
As
we
get
into
a
discussion
of
some
of
the
code,
changes
that
are
proposed,
some
apply
to
the
entire
downtown
area
and
others
are
specific
by
Zone
district
and
we'll
call
those
out,
as
as
we
go
so
next
slide,
we're
just
going
to
move
into
those
specific
code,
changes
and
start
with
pedestrian
orientation.
AB
AB
Any
development
that
implements
a
larger
setback
is
required
to
provide
some
kind
of
pedestrian-oriented
element
such
as
seating
landscaping
or
protection
from
weather
elements,
a
limitation
on
the
location
and
size
of
surface
parking.
Lots
has
also
been
included,
as
well
as
requirements
to
implement
mid-block
walkways
that
have
been
identified
in
the
downtown
plan.
Both
of
these
standards
really
reinforce
the
overall
Street
connectivity
and
walkability
of
downtown.
AB
The
next
slide
just
outlines
a
chart
showing
some
of
those
specific
setback
requirements,
so
you
can
see
there's
some
adjustments
to
what
exists
today
in
terms
of
existing
minimum
or
maximum
setbacks.
AB
The
next
slide
just
discusses
a
few
other
elements
that
are
included
really
downtown
wide.
The
first
is
requiring
some
screening
updates
for
service
areas,
with
the
idea
of
Trying
to
minimize
the
negative
visual
impact
that
those
screening
that
those
service
areas
can
have.
AB
We've
also
included
a
number
of
really
streetscape
related
standards
to
support
a
successful
public
realm.
So
this
is
everything
from
minimum
tree.
Canopy
coverage
along
the
streetscape
to
ensuring
soil
volumes
are
appropriate
so
that
those
trees
can
survive
into
the
future,
as
well
as
minimizing
things
like
curb
cuts
and
and
adding
overhead
cover
through
through
canopies
and
similar
features.
AB
The
next
slide
talks
about
some
of
the
design
review,
updates
that
are
included
relative
to
pedestrian
orientation.
So
this
includes
addition
of
things
like
transparency
requirements
that
the
ground
level
and
some
standards
to
ensure
that
any
private
Open
Spaces
have
minimum
amenities,
we're
also
addressing
that
parking
and
onstite
circulation
and
screening.
That
I
mentioned
in
the
previous
slide.
AB
And
the
next
slide
we
get
into
some
of
the
specific
changes
by
Zone
District.
So
all
sidewalks
in
downtown
are
required
to
have
10
feet
in
width
to
enable
clear
pedestrian
access,
and
this
is
something
that
was
really
important
to
include.
We,
we
heard
in
our
Outreach,
particularly
from
the
disability
Community,
but
it's
important
to
have
kind
of
clear
paths
for
everyone
to
go:
go
through
and
use
the
sidewalk
and
experience
downtown.
So
that's
something
that
applies
to
all
of
those
downtown
zones
in
the
D2
Zone.
AB
We
have
made
some
adjustments
for
anything
related
to
vehicle
sales
or
lease
slots
really
to
ensure
that
durable
materials
are
used.
That
Landscaping
is
included
just
to
minimize
some
of
the
visual
impacts
that
can
come
from
those
types
of
land
uses
in
The,
General
commercial
Zone.
We've
had
some
updates
related
to
outdoor
spaces,
again
making
sure
that
those
are
really
usable
and
some
similar
updates
are
Incorporated
with
the
most
form-based
Zone
districts.
AB
Next
slide
will
transition
to
some
of
the
building
height
changes.
So
these
changes
really
seek
to
balance
development
with
the
preservation
of
views
and
reflecting
existing
character
of
different
neighborhoods
within
Salt
Lake
City.
AB
The
next
slide
shows
the
proposed
Heights
with
a
map
indicating
where
each
of
these
Zone
districts
is
located
on.
The
highlighted
Heights
that
are
here
in
yellow
are
going
to
be
discussed
in
more
detail
on
some
of
the
next
slides,
but
really
high
level
in
the
D1.
There's
been
some
additional
considerations
Incorporated
for
buildings
that
are
lower
than
the
minimum
100
foot
height,
as
well
as
for
buildings
that
are
over
200
feet
in
height.
AB
An
additional
height
has
been
identified
in
these
other
Zone
districts.
So
you
can
see
here
an
adjustment
from
what
exists
today
in
terms
of
our
maximums
and
and
increasing
height
in
and
some
of
the
locations,
particularly
in
D3
GMU
CG
form
based.
AB
Next
slide
discusses
requirements
that
are
specific
to
D1
and
I'm.
Going
to
summarize,
this
I
know
it's
a
lot
of
text
here,
but
we
wanted
to
have
that
up
here
in
case
you
you
wanted
to
get
into
those
details
so
specific
to
D1.
Any
building
that
is
lower
than
100
feet,
which
is
our
new
minimum
height
that
can
be
approved
when
the
building
or
the
parcel
size
is,
is
relatively
small.
AB
So
we
really
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
accounting
for
some
of
the
different
sizes
of
parcels
that
that
are
located
in
different
size
buildings
that
are
located
downtown
for
buildings
that
are
over
100
feet.
Some
step
backs
are
required
just
to
address
snow
and
ice
shedding
into
public
spaces
for
buildings
over
200
feet.
AB
On
the
next
slide,
it
shows
in
D3
this
is
similar,
so
any
building
that
is
over
75
feet
has
to
meet
those
same
standards,
so
design
review
or
one
of
those
five
options
in
D4
design
review
is
required
for
any
building
over
75
feet
in
height,
and
there
are
some
requirements
for
more
commercial
space
on
the
ground
floor
as
a
percentage
of
the
overall
lot
size.
So
just
again,
trying
to
really
encourage
that
active
use.
Visual
interests
of
the
new
buildings
in
downtown
next
slide
talks
about
a
new
height
transition
standard.
AB
This
has
been
added
to
ensure
that
buildings
do
not
overwhelm
areas
that
are
in
lower
height,
so
a
transition
is
required
when
a
development
is
adjacent
to
a
Zone
District
that
has
a
lower
allowable
maximum
Building
height.
These
standards
don't
apply
in
separate
with
when
properties
are
separated
by
a
right-of-way
necessarily,
but
when
they're
right
next
to
one
another,
that
that
is
a
really
important
transition,
making
sure
that
zone
District
that
has
a
200
foot
height
limit
next
to
one
that
maybe
has
75
that
there's
some
transition
there
and
it's
not
so
abrupt.
AB
Additionally,
some
of
the
differences
that
are
in
the
D1
Zone
related
to
Corner
lots
and
mid
block
lots
that
exist
in
the
code
today.
Those
have
been
removed,
and
so
all
Lots,
regardless
of
their
location
in
D1,
are
subject
to
the
same
standards,
and
that
was
something
that
was
seen
as
a
way
to
really
simplify
the
code.
AB
Finally,
moving
on
to
human
scale,
design
on
the
next
slide,
this
was
the
final
and
a
core
element
of
what
we
were
trying
to
achieve
with
with
these
code
amendments.
So
this
is
related
to
things
like
architectural
elements
that
first
floor
activation
and
Public
Access
so
on.
The
next
slide
is
a
list
of
a
number
of
changes
that
are
included
in
the
design
standards
to
support
this
idea
of
a
human
scale
design.
AB
So
key
change
is
the
addition
of
language
for
what
we're
calling
visual
interest
on
the
ground
floor,
and
this
requires
active
uses
on
the
ground
floor
in
downtown.
So
things
like
a
restaurant,
a
retail
establishment,
a
cafe
things
that
are
really
going
to
draw
people
in
are
included
in
that
standard.
Supporting
this
are
some
requirements
for
additional
glass
and
transparency.
AB
On
the
ground
level,
again
to
just
promote
additional
human
interaction
on
upper
floors,
we've
added
some
limitations
related
to
the
glare
from
glass,
knowing
that
that
is
an
element
that
is
typically
seen
in
in
buildings
in
downtowns,
but
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
having
too
much
glass
to
have
a
lot
of
glare
on
the
street
for
all
areas.
There
are
new
standards
to
limit
blank
walls.
AB
Some
Upper
Floor
step
backs
are
also
Incorporated
to
minimize
the
impact
of
taller
buildings
on
The
Pedestrian
level.
I
wanted
to
note
that
staff
has
suggested
some
changes
to
those
areas
just
to
ensure
that
the
standards
and
the
code
meet
the
individual
District
character,
so
that's
proposed
to
be
removed
as
a
requirement
from
D1
and
to
revert
to
current
requirements
in
the
Sugarhouse
area.
AB
Next
slide
talk
a
little
bit
about
his
horizontal
facade
articulation,
so
that
requires
a
stepping
of
a
portion
of
the
street
facing
facade
forward
or
backward
from
the
main
facade
or
building
plane
that
can
be
achieved
through
elements
like
a
bay
window
recessed
or
projected
windows
and
entrances
gateways,
porches
and
Colonnades.
AB
So
the
blink
wall
requirements
for
really
building
length,
and
it
requires
that
there
is
a
massing
material
and
plane
change
to
all
the
facades
that
are
200
feet
in
length
again,
really
making
sure
that
we
don't
have
blank
walls
that
there's
a
lot
of
interaction
at
The,
Pedestrian
level
for
all
the
buildings
going
in
downtown
also
included
are
some
cornice
and
roofline
standards
just
to
ensure
consistency
within
the
area
and
neighborhoods
in
the
GMU
Zone
requirements
for
base
differentiation
are
required,
and
this
you
can
sort
of
see
on
the
image.
AB
That's
on
this
slide,
so
the
requirements
for
a
really
strong
base
in
the
GMU
of
one
to
three
stories.
That's
distinguished
from
upper
stories
again
focus
on
that
pedestrian
and
human
scale,
and
that
this
was
really
an
important
element
to
include
in
GMU,
given
the
existing
characteristics
of
that
zone.
AB
Finally,
next
Slide,
the
last
changes
really
focus
on
General
clarifications
and
guided
just
the
overall
approach
to
the
work
trying
to
streamline
the
process
where
possible,
combining
standards
where
possible
and
just
trying
to
reduce
just
the
overall
length
and
number
of
sections.
You
have
to
go
to
to
understand
what
can
happen
on
a
property
that
you
might
own
so
on
the
next
slide.
This
just
shows
an
updated
table
that
we've
included
to
articulate
what
are
the
standards
and
where
do
they
apply
within
each
of
the
Zone
districts?
AB
So
Clarity
is
given
to
win
the
design
standards
and
design
review
apply.
Design
standards
have
been
added
for
each
Zone
in
the
design
standards.
Chapter
and
they've
been
taken
out
of
each
individual
Zone
District.
So
you
would
go
to
your
Zone
District
understand
what
are
my
dimensional
requirements
and
then
go
to
the
design
standards
chapter
to
understand
the
design
pieces,
which
is
a
typical
type
of
format
for
most
codes
on
the
next
slide.
We
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
modifications
in
the
design
review
process.
AB
So
thinking
about
streamlining
of
of
what
are
the
things
that
make
sense
to
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
versus
what
can
be
approved
at
the
planning
director
level,
and
so
that
has
been
outlined
with
within
the
code,
so
that
not
every
project
is
necessarily
going
to
Planning
Commission
that
some
things
can
be
reviewed
at
that
administrative
level
to
increase
overall
efficiency
of
the
process.
AB
So
with
that
I
maybe
skip
ahead
to
two
slides.
This
just
outlines
the
overall
approach
to
this
code.
Work
really
wanting
to
make
sure
things
are
clear:
consolidating
text
focus
on
a
more
urban
feel
of
downtown
and
emphasizing
the
idea
of
pedestrian
spaces
and
and
walkability
so
I'll
pause
here
and
maybe
turn
it
back
to
staff.
If
they've
got
anything
else
to
add
and
then
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
AA
I
was
just
going
to
add
one
clarification.
Thank
you,
Jessica.
That
was
a
great
presentation
a
couple
times.
Jessica
mentioned
that
it
would
be
an
or
option
for
the
design
review
or
a
public
amenity.
Some
sort
of
public
benefit,
It's,
actually
an,
and
so
it
that
would
be
required
to
increase
your
height,
be
a
public
benefit
and
a
design
review
process.
T
Thank
you,
Mr
Man,
Madam,
chair
Jessica.
Thank
you
for
that
presentation.
I
have
a
couple
questions
because
I'm
I'm
glad
to
hear
and
talk
about
the
human
scale,
but
when
I
hear
the
word
human
scale
and
I
see
a
10
foot
wide,
sidewalk
I
I
it
to
me
it's
they're,
not
they're
magic
they're,
not
matching
I've,
walked
in
a
number
of
larger
cities.
These
days
and
I,
walk
through
in
the
sidewalks
are
really
wide
and
you
can
actually
walk
down
the
sidewalk
without
having
to
go
single
file
this
in
sections.
T
When
you
have
a
group
and
of
course
the
streets
are
narrower,
but
the
sidewalks
are
bigger
and
with
a
10
foot,
minimum
sidewalk
or
maximum
sidewalk
or
10
foot
sidewalk
and
a
large
building,
it's
it's
not
it's
not
to
me.
It's
not
the
human
scale.
It
should
be
a
20-foot
sidewalk,
not
a
10-foot,
sidewalk
and
I'm,
just
Curious
on
the
design
of
that
I
know.
T
We
have
streets
here
that
already
have
a
small
sidewalk
and
we
have
wide
streets,
but
I'd
like
to
see
that
the
sidewalks
expand
with
the
buildings
height
going
up,
because
that
scale
is
going
to
be
really
look
like
you're,
no
matter
where
the
setback
is
at
the
fifth
level,
you're
not
going
to
see
that
from
from
right
next
to
the
store
and-
and
it's
not
going
to
be
pedestrian
friendly,
because
it's
it's,
you
feel
like
you're,
going
to
be
in
a
in
a
Slot
Canyon
instead
of
a
a
nice
Street.
T
So
that
my
first
question-
and
my
second
question
is
on
the
the
the
windows
we
talked
about
the
windows
and
the
reflective.
Is
this
a
place
to
put
in
bird
friendly
Windows?
Because
again
we
have
design
standards
for
bird
friendly
other
areas,
but
we
are
with
our
standards,
have
been
lacking
in
the
bird
friendly
window.
Arena
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
incorporated
in
the
newer
designs
for
businesses
and
buildings
going
in
forward.
AA
Yeah
great
question:
thank
you,
councilmember
Dugan,
Jessica
I'll.
Let
you
tackle
the
10-foot
sidewalk
question
and
I
can
address
your
bird
friendly
window
question.
This
would
be
the
ordinance
to
add
that
to
we
could
definitely
add
something
as
far
as
bird
friendly
glass
requirements
I
believe
we
had
a
presentation
from
the
Audubon
Society
yeah
and
it's
only
a
certain
area
of
the
building.
That
would
require
that.
So
we
could
look
into
that
further
and
add
that
to
this
language,
yeah.
T
I
know
exactly
right:
there's
a
certain
height
requirements
or
suggestions;
recommendations
on
that,
so
I
defer
to
the
experts
on
that
one.
So
thank
you.
AB
On
the
question
on
sidewalks
that
the
10
foot
is
a
minimum
standard
and
so
sidewalks
could
be
larger
and
if
you
were
going
through
a
design
review
that
could
be
part
of
that
conversation.
One
of
the
things
that
we
did
with
our
setbacks,
though,
is
Really
Trying
to
minimize
those
those
setbacks
as
much
as
possible,
so
bringing
a
building
closer
to
that
property
line
to
help
kind
of
decrease.
T
Okay,
that
that
makes
sense,
because
it
is
that
this
is
the
public
realm
that
I
wanted,
because
when
I
look
at
a
10
foot,
minimum
sidewalk,
that's
what
we're
going
to
get
we're
going
to
get
10
minutes
10
feet.
If
we
put
a
20
foot
minimum
set
sidewalk
we're
gonna
get
20
feet
because
no
one's
going
to
go
any
more
than
the
minimum
just
because
of
the
the
cost
and
the
because
square
footage
is
money.
So
I,
I'm
and
I
see
chair.
T
G
J
Thank
you.
So
would
you
so
for
illustration
purposes
for
us
I
think
I
can
think
of
a
narrow,
like
sidewalk.
If
you
guys
go
on
400
South
and
you
see
the
new
apartment,
buildings
are
massive.
How
big
are
those
sidewalks
because
they
are
not
super
friendly?
So
that's
an
example
of
what
we
don't
want
correct
that.
A
Right
so
those
sidewalks
vary.
There
is
narrow,
as
I
think
five
feet
and
that's
partly
because
it's
a
UDOT
right-of-way,
and
so
they
actually,
when
the
light
rail
line
was
built,
they
dictated
what
was
left
over
after
they
had
their
travel
Lanes,
but
along
400
South.
One
thing
that
we
do
require
with
new
development
is
that
if
the
sidewalk
we
do
require
10-foot
sidewalks
along
the
400
South.
So
if
they
can't
accommodate
that
within
the
right-of-way,
they
actually
have
to
provide
that
on
their
property.
They
can
Market
his
private
property
and
they
fully
control.
A
What
happens?
They
can't
put
barriers
to
prevent
something
there,
but
but
they
because
it
is
private
property,
they
fully
control
any
kind
of
behavior,
and
things
like
that.
That
can
happen
there.
But
that's
one
approach
that
we've
we've
take.
We
do
the
same
thing
in
North
Temple
if
they
don't.
If,
because
when
that
light,
rail
line
was
built,
we
couldn't
always
get
the
right,
sidewalk
width,
and
so
that's
that's
one
thing
that
we
that
we've
done
and.
J
Then
there's
other.
There
are
other
examples
of
where
the
sidewalks
are
too
wide
as
well,
and
so
the
building
is
all
the
way
down.
C
AC
J
AA
That's
correct,
so
some
will
just
be
by
code
right
if
they
okay
and
then
build
okay,
buy
right
and
are
within
that
threshold.
They
want
to
increase
that
height.
It
would
be
a
design
review
process.
Okay,
that
would
go
to
Planning
Commission.
Okay,
what
we're
adding
to
the
design
review
process
that
gives
staff
a
little
bit
of
leeway,
our
our
smaller
changes.
It
does
not
include
Building
height,
okay,
all
right
thanks.
J
A
So
everything
is
the
same,
but
that
we
can
still
have
some
variety
in
character,
defining
areas
within
our
downtown
and
we
we
building
shape
that
quite
dramatically,
and-
and
so
we
want
to
be
able
to.
We
can
capture
it
when
some
currently,
if
something's
going
through
that
design
review
process,
but
there's
a
gap
in
our
code
where
things
that
aren't
going
to
that
design
review
process.
M
So
I
the
the
questions
I
have
I
mean
this
is
an
impressive
amount
of
change
and
it's
fantastic
I.
You
know
I'm
very
excited
about
most
of
these
things
and
I
have
a
quick
question
about
some
of
the
the
recommended
changes
on
CG
on
the
Zone
CG,
and
especially
because
I
I
see
that
there
is
a
two
parts
to
this
one
being
in
the
depot
district
and
one
being
on
The
Granary
on
what
you
this
plan
recommends,
is
the
grinder
being
lower
in
height
than
the
depot
district
and
I.
M
Don't
know
if
I
necessarily
agree
with
that.
This
is
a
heavily
industrial
area
that
next
to
the
freeway
and
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
don't
understand
the
downsides
from
limiting
the
height
to
a
lower
height,
and
maybe
there
is
a
better
reason
that
I
don't
understand.
But
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
to
encourage
more
housing
and
more
opportunities
to
grow
and
limiting
it
in
an
area
that
it's
very
industrial
there
is
no.
You
have
to
really
make
sense
to
remove
a
mitigated
land
there
to
actually
create
something.
M
You
have
to
really
make
the
numbers
work
and
it's
very
hard.
Sometimes,
to
make
those
numbers
work
in
an
area
like
this,
where
there
is
a
lot
of
problems
with
the
actual
land-
and
you
know,
maybe
adding
more
height,
is
how
they
can
pencil.
The
those
those
numbers
so
I
would
like
to.
You
know,
maybe
understand
a
little
bit
about
why
that
discrepancy
between
75
feed
versus
150
feet,
with
design
review,
yeah.
AA
AA
It
wasn't
working
and
we
addressed
the
height
to
have
a
buy
right,
I,
think
of
90
feet
and
then
up
to
180
feet,
so
the
height
in
the
depot
is
significantly
changing
the
height
for
The
Granary
and
that
CG
that
kind
of
carved
out
geographic
area
that
you
see.
That's
where
a
lot
of
that
development
that
we're
seeing
in
The
Granary,
where
they're
already
going
through
a
design
review
process
to
increase
their
height
and
that
area
was
identified
by
a
lot
of
our
stakeholder
groups
and
the
public
as
an
acceptable
location
for
additional
height.
M
M
AA
M
I
see
so
I'm
trying
to
say
you
know
additional
height
on
The
Granary
makes
sense
to
me
it's
it's
an
area
that
is
heavily
industrial.
It's
hard
to
make
the
numbers
up
to
work
well
and
I.
Think
that
limiting
the
height
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
in
The
Granary.
AA
Yeah
I
would
say
that
that
was
definitely
a
balance,
well
we're
trying
to
achieve
a
balance
with
some
existing
warehouses
that
are
hopefully
going
to
be
preserved,
as
well
as
Redevelopment
and
new
development.
It's
it's
difficult
to
kind
of
strike
that
balance
where
it
where
it
doesn't
look
awkward
where
you
have
a
200
foot
tall
building
next
to
an
existing
two-story
Warehouse,
you
see
quite
a
bit
of
adaptive,
reuse
in
The
Granary
as
well,
and
so
we
landed
at
150
to
try
to
strike
that
balance.
A
Think
the
other
thing
that
we've
been
considering
is,
as
we've
been
working
through
our
affordable
housing
incentives
in
these
districts.
It's
really
hard
for
those
incentives
to
work
just
because
of
what
can
already
be
developed
by
right,
and
so
unless,
unless
the
city
is
willing
to
lower
a
lot
of
existing
development
potential
and
right,
which
I
think
there's
some
real
risks
and
challenges.
A
In
doing
that,
we
were
trying,
at
least
in
these
areas
where
there
could
be
some
flexibility
in
getting
up
to
particularly
like
with
the
timber
frame
construction
up
to
180
feet,
and
things
like
that.
We
were
trying
to
provide
some
space
for
those
incentives,
whether
they're,
affordable
housing
or
some
future
incentive.
That
might
be
incorporated
in
our
code
to
work.
M
And
that
is
fantastic,
because
I
saw
that
in
the
you
know,
some
of
the
possible
questions
I
would
love
to
see
some
of
that
and
and
maybe
in
this
area
I
would
like
to
see.
This
is
the
idea
there's
a
lot
of
adaptive,
reuse
and
and
The
Granary
happening.
We
want
people
to
live
in
the
area
too,
so
maybe
there
is
a
way
of
incorporating
some
of
the
other.
They
can
go
either
higher
if
only
a
Friday
and
that's
you
know
the.
M
If
there
is
some
component
of
affordability
too,
and
you
know-
and
that's
that
might
be
something
exciting
to
incorporate
there-
that
there
is
another
thought
I
had
when
you
guys
talking
about
The,
Pedestrian
amenity,
adding
this
pedestrian
I
mean
I
love
it.
You
know
it
just
came
back
from
seeing
all
sorts
of
other
cities
and
in
the
last
week
and
I've
seen
all
sorts
of
great
ideas
and
I
would
like
to
encourage
more
of
that.
M
M
As
far
as
amenities
can
we
potentially
push
them
a
little
more
and
say
this,
and
this
instead
of
the
ore,
because
we
want
to
see
more
activity
on
the
sidewalk,
we
want
to
see
more
things
you
know
to
embrace
the
community
and
the
people
to
come
back
to
the
sidewalk
and
when
we're
talking
about
commercial-
and
we
have
talked
a
lot
between
us
and
in
different
settings
about
many
of
the
development
that
we
see,
especially
in
you
know,
I
know
this
is
not
in
my
area
well,
part
of
it
is
in
my
district
now,
but
we
see
a
lot
of
development
that
happens
that
doesn't
think
about
commercial
Underground
Level
because
they
they're
not
able
to
pencil
the
numbers
out
immediately
and
they
prefer
to
put
the
gym
or
they
prefer,
to
put
the
leasing
office
in
those
spaces.
M
That
I
think
that
are
fantastic
to
think
about
a
coffee
shop.
Fantastic
to
think
about
you
know
a
little
market
or
something
like
that
and
I
know
that,
from
their
point
of
view,
it's
hard
to
pencil
it
out,
but
I
I
think
we
really
need
to
think
about
not
only
incentivizing
that
but
requiring
it,
and
because
the
city
is
going
to
double
in
population.
M
It's
obvious,
we're
gonna,
need
it
and
then
we're
gonna
have
all
of
this
development.
It
doesn't
have
any
ground
level
activation
and
it
makes
it
makes
me
very
angry.
I
had
a
developer
developer
mention
a
gym
as
a
community
Amendment
amenity
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
I
was
like
that's,
not
a
community
amenity
unless
it's
a
gym
for
everybody,
but
it
wasn't
so
I
think
we
I'm
more
of
a
pushing
that
a
little
more
as
far
as
a
requirement,
not
necessarily
as
a
possibility
in
specific
areas.
So
that's
something
important
to
me.
K
Madam,
chair
I,
the
conversations
moved
a
little
bit
past,
where
my
comments
were
but
I
and
director
Norris
answered
some
of
them
already,
but
I
do
think.
It's
important
for
us
to
look
at
the
I.
Do
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
about
the
sidewalk
widths
and
things.
K
So
if
there's
because
generally
the
sidewalk
is
in
the
right-of-way,
but
it
sounds
like
the
answer
is:
if
there's
not
enough
space
in
our
right-of-way
to
make
a
10-foot,
sidewalk
or
larger,
if
we
deemed
that
to
be
appropriate,
that
has
to
go
on
to
the
private
property,
but
that's
only
if
they're
going
above
the
the
a
certain
height.
How
does
that
I'm
confused
about
how
that
all
works?
K
What
I
don't
want
to
see
is
like
sidewalks,
changing
width
at
every
building
and
like
outlining
up
with
each
other
I
I
would
imagine
in
most
of
our
streets
downtown.
We
have
plenty
of
width
in
the
public
right-of-way
to
accommodate
larger
sidewalks
and
I
also
want
to
just
agree
with
councilmember
valdemarle
set
large.
K
It's
not
always
that
larger
is
better.
Sometimes
sidewalks
can
be
too
big
and,
and
that
won't
relate
that
you
can
scale
as
well.
So
we
need
to
get
the
sweet
spot,
but
can
you
help
me
understand
how
this
works
when
part
of
the
sidewalks
in
the
right
way
and
part
of
it
is
in
the
public
on
private
property
and
the
adjacent
building
may
not
be
doing
the
same
thing
of.
AA
AA
What
director
Norris
was
referring
to
was
we
have
these
requirements
in
other
districts
so,
for
example,
on
North
Temple,
since
there's
not
a
lot
of
right-of-way
due
to
tracks
in
order
to
accommodate
the
10-foot
sidewalk,
sometimes
a
private
property
owner
and
a
developer
has
to
provide
a
portion
of
that
sidewalk
on
private
property,
and
so
it
doesn't
jog
like
you
were
referring
to.
It
would
be
a
consistent
sidewalk
part
of
it
just
wouldn't
be
necessarily
publicly
owned.
K
Little
bit
but
but
let's
say,
there's
two
properties:
one
chooses
to
redevelop
and
needs
to,
and
our
ordinance
says
that
they
need
to
increase
the
sidewalk
to
10
feet
and
part
of
that
needs
to
go
on
private
property,
but
the
property
next
door
does
not
choose
to
redevelop.
Does
that
mean
that
the
10
foot
width
drops
back
down
to
five
and
then
back
up
to
10,
depending
on
who's
developed
when,
yes,.
AA
Sorry
Nick
yeah
it
does,
and
that
actually
currently
happens
with
mid-block
walkways
in
preparation
for
installing
in
a
block.
Walkway
one
property
owner
will
be
redeveloping
and
test,
anticipating
the
installation
of
that
mid
block
walkway,
while
the
other
property
owner
is
maybe
five
ten
years
down
the
road.
So
that's
kind
of
to
be
anticipated
with
a
developing
City.
J
Yeah
I
don't
really
question,
but
maybe
it's
just
some
thoughts,
I
hear
what
council
member
Pui
says
saying.
Maybe
we
do
hire
here
because
of
all
the
development
that
we're
going
to
have
and
I'm
not
a
poster,
because
I
think
that's
potentially
a
good
idea
to
go
a
little
bit
higher,
but
at
the
same
time,
like
globally
and
looking
into
the
future
for
Salt
Lake
City
work
constrained
geographically,
that's
the
truth.
J
We're
gonna
have
to
build
up
at
some
point
and
so
and
add
more
density
and
all
of
the
things,
and
so
my
question-
Maybe,
theoretically
I,
don't
know
if,
theoretically
about
just
as
planning
in
the
future,
isn't
something
that
we
should
contemplate
now
go
higher
in
certain
areas
that
maybe
is
not
as
high
as
some
people
may
want.
J
Or
are
we
going
to
wait
another
10
years
to
see
where
the
market
goes,
where
Society
goes
where
Salt
Lake
City
goes
and
then
review
it
again,
because
what
I
think
I
think
what
happened
when
we
started
talking
about
this
was
because
we
as
far
as
I
remember,
there
was
a
project
in
the
depot
area
that
needed
additional
height
right
and
the
Sony
didn't
allow
it
so
it
died.
So
we
couldn't
facilitate
that
fast
enough
for
this
project
to
go
high.
So
that's
when
I
feel
like
we
were
like
no.
J
We
need
to
review
this
because
we're
missing
out
not
only
on
our
new
growth
taxes,
for
for
our
budget
to
to
grow
and
to
provide
the
services,
but
also
Financial
economics,
all
the
things
that
new
growth
Bill
brings
other
than
property
taxes,
but
to
the
growth
of
the
city
and
sales
taxes
Etc.
So
what
do
you
think
Nick.
A
So
I
think
I
think
we
have
to
consider
a
lot
of
different
things
in
in
that
broad
question
right.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
areas
where
we
can
accommodate
a
lot
of
future
growth
and
just
off
the
top
of
my
head.
You
know
we
have
the
entire
State
Street
Corridor,
which
is
essentially
under
zoned
right
now
we
have
the
700
West
Corridor,
which
consists
mostly
of
M1
Zone,
really
close
to
our
neighborhoods
in
our
downtown,
which
should
not
be
M1
anymore,
that
those
are
areas
that
should
be
transitioned.
A
We
also
have
the
Redwood
Road
Corridor,
which,
for
at
least
on
the
west
side
of
Redwood
Road,
is
also
a
collection
of
uses
that
are
probably
negatively
impacting
the
uses
on
the
east
side
of
Woodward
Road
and
can
accommodate
some
more
growth.
So
I
think
that
we
have
a
lot
of
space
to
growth
to
grow
I,
don't
think
that
we've
necessarily
looked
at
what
that
current
zoning
capacity
is
knowing
that,
in
reality,
very
few
developments
max
out
their
zoning
capacity,
but
I
think
we'd
have
to
do
that.
A
We
do
actually
have
some
tools
now
that
we
can
use
to
project
that
which
we
haven't
had
in
the
past,
and
so
hopefully
those
are
things
that
we'll
start
seeing
as
we
look
into
some
of
those
corridors
and
areas
of
potentially
rezoning
those
so
that
we
can
figure
out
what
that
maximum
potential
growth
potential
is
in
those
those
areas,
knowing
we're
not
going
to
get
it,
but
that
you
know
if
we
get
50
or
60
percent
of
that.
What
does
that
mean
for
the
year
2060
or
2070.?
A
W
T
I'm
sure
we
have
some
straw
polls
should
we
just
have
to
take
that
to
another
council
meeting
about
the
Sugar,
House
Heights
and
stuff
like
that,
and
we
really
didn't
talk
about
Sugarhouse.
So.
A
Just
real
quick:
this
was
something
that
there
was
never
an
intention
to
alter
any
of
the
zoning
in
the
Sugarhouse
business
district.
As
part
of
this,
unfortunately,
when
we
went
to
the
Planning
Commission,
there
was
a
link
between
that
design
standard
that
applies
to
SugarHouse
and
what
we
changed,
and
so
that
really
is
fixing
it
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
unintentionally
changing
something
that
we
haven't
advertise
and
we
haven't.
We
haven't
gone
through
so
yeah,
it's
yeah.
AA
W
Think
so,
okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
all
right,
then
we're
going
to
move
on
except
Nick
isn't
going
to
move
on
he's
going
to
stay
in
his
chair
and
Brian
is
as
well
we're
going
to
welcome
up
Amy,
Thompson
and
Caitlin
Harris
to
talk
about
the
rezone
at
792,
West,
900,
South
and
875
South
800
West.
Z
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
properties
that
you
mentioned
previously
they're
in
Council,
District,
2
and
currently
zoned
M1
or
light
manufacturing,
and
the
proposal
is
to
amend
the
zoning
map
to
rmu
or
residential
mixed
use.
The
petitioner
stated
objective
is
to
construct
a
fourplex
on
each
of
the
two
vacant
properties.
Z
Z
AD
Okay,
can
we
pull
up
the
present
there?
It
is
awesome
okay.
So,
as
we
mentioned,
this
is
a
zoning
map
amendments
from
M1
to
rmu.
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
is
a
area
that
has
been
zoned
M1
for
quite
some
time,
but
the
land
use
in
the
area
doesn't
reflect
that
zoning
on
the
west
side
of
this
block,
the
predominant
land
use
is
single-family
housing.
AD
There
are
two
commercial
slash
industrial
uses
integrated
into
that
block,
but
they
are
quite
small
to
the
east
of
this
block
was
an
area
that
was
recently
rezoned
to
rmu
to
accommodate
a
large
mixed-use
development
and
also
to
enable
the
Redevelopment
of
those
two
existing
warehouses
into
an
Adaptive
reuse.
AD
Here's
kind
of
a
wider
look
at
the
existing
zoning
right
now,
as
you
can
see
to
the
West,
there
is
an
established
single
family
residential
neighborhood
into
the
South.
There's
the
I
believe
it's
a
paper
box
facility
which
is
industrial,
so
next
slide
all
right.
So
the
existing
and
proposed
zoning,
like
we
mentioned
the
land
use
on
the
property
in
that
area,
doesn't
really
reflect
M1.
But
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
development
potential
is
possible.
AD
Currently,
for
this
site,
the
maximum
Building
height
is
65
feet
for
the
M1
Zone
a
minimum
lot
width
is
80
feet,
it
does
have
some
front
and
Corner
side,
yard
setbacks
and,
as
mentioned
residential
uses
are
prohibited.
The
rmu
zone
is
designed
for
high
density
mixed
use
and
because
it
has
a
variety
of
uses,
permitted
I'm,
focusing
mostly
on
multi-family
zoning
regulations.
Just
because
that's
what
the
applicant
is
proposed
to
develop,
so
the
maximum
height
for
Mac
for
multi-family
is
75
feet.
The
minimum
lot
width
is
50
the
setbacks.
AD
AD
The
Planning
Commission
determined
that
the
proposed
zoning
map
Amendment,
improves,
density
with
minimal
neighborhood
complaints,
meets
all
Lake,
City's
goals
of
a
variety
of
housing
types
and
improves
air
quality,
and
they
voted
six
to
five
to
forward
a
positive
recommendation
on
to
you.
The
city
council,.
W
W
AD
W
Okay,
perfect,
okay,
the
petitioner
care
to
come
up.
W
AE
AE
I
thought
it'd
be
helpful
just
to
just
kind
of
talk
about
this
today,
as
as
we
talked
about
it's
in
M1
Zone.
Currently,
a
hotel
is
actually
an
approved
use
in
the
M1
Zone,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
it's
actually
what
the
area
needs
I
see
a
fourplex
would
bring
longer
term
tenants
that
would
incorporate
better
into
the
fabric
of
our
community
and
as
a
current
property
owner
I
own
two
homes
in
the
neighborhood
as
well.
AE
On
800
West
I've
been
working
for
a
couple
years
to
improve
the
quality
of
living
there
and
I.
Think
rme
is
a
better
zone
for
it.
I
think
it's
helpful
to
actually
go
and
take
a
look
at
why,
at
the
at
the
verbiage,
for
rmu
zoning
and
specifically
I
think
it's
like
when
we,
when
we
talk
about
rmu
I,
think
it's
helpful
to
think
of
the
standard
of
use
in
the
rmu
zone.
I
just
want
to
quote
directly
from
the
Salt
Lake
City
Zoning
24.
Excuse
me,
21a.24.170.
AE
And
it
reads:
this
quote:
the
standards
for
the
district,
referring
to
the
rmu
district
are
intended
to
facilitate
the
creation
of
a
walkable
Urban
neighborhood,
with
an
emphasis
on
pedestrian
scale
activity.
End
quote:
if
we
were
to
look
at
the
intent
of
the
nine
line,
Corridor
master
plan,
it's
my
belief
well
and
as
we
look
at
the
actions
taken
there,
we're
literally
pulling
up
a
lane
of
traffic
car
traffic
and
reducing
it
with
The,
Pedestrian
walkway
and
in
essence
to
me.
AE
It's
it's
my
belief
that
today
we
have
the
opportunity
to
align
the
nine
line.
Corridor
master
plan,
with
the
standard
of
use
outlined
in
Salt
Lake
City's
code
for
rmu
I,
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
I
think
it's
helpful
to
look
at
to
see
if
we've
seen
anything
around
like
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
It
would
be
like
this
and
I
brought
this
little
chart
just
kind
of
gives
you
an
idea.
Hopefully
you
can
see
it
here.
We
have
I
15
and
I-15
artery
and
then
immediately
following
the
I-15
order.
AE
AE
See
I'm
probably
close
to
time.
Lastly,
I
think
it's
just
helpful
to
notice
that
public
comment
for
this
was
all
positive.
The
Poplar
Grove
Community
chair
was
in
full
support
of
it
as
well.
If
we
were
to,
if
the
West
Side
master
plan
could
actually
speak,
I
think
it
would
say
something
like
this:
we
have
a
nine-line
corridor
master
plan
that
is
specific
to
900
South
and
it's
intended
use
is
to
bring
more
people
and
improve
air
quality
and
I.
Think
we
have
the
opportunity
to
do
that
by
changing
to
rmu
Zone.
AE
AE
If
the
master
plan
could
speak,
it
would
say:
wouldn't
it
be
nice
if
we
could
incorporate
some
fourplexes
some
residential
multi-family
into
our
neighborhood,
rather
than
Mega
apartment
complexes,
to
give
someone
an
Equitable
or
someone
the
chance
to
live
in
that
if
we
looked
also
at
Equitable
access
to
a
park
and
living
in
a
small
multi-family
unit
that
exists
around
Liberty
Park
today,
but
doesn't
exist
around
the
International
Peace
Park
and
we
again
have
the
opportunity
to
provide
that
using
with
this.
W
Thank
you
so
much
thanks,
council
member
Pui.
M
Yeah
so
quick
questions,
I
I
see
that
you
would
like
to
fit.
You
know
four
units
and
and
those
two
Parcels.
Yes,
how
many
bedrooms
are.
You
would
think
this
would
be
one
bedroom
units,
one
bedroom
units,
okay
and
and
I
I
will
contend
that.
That
is
not
necessarily
the
housing
that
we
are.
You
know
really
hungry,
for
we
have
literally
in
within
a
couple
blocks
from
my
house,
literally
thousand
units
of
being
built
or
planned,
and
we
need
is
more
housing
for
families,
not
so
much
libertini.
AE
M
I
and
I,
so
I'm
I'm,
assuming
that
there
are
going
to
be
for
rent,
they
are
okay
and
what
is
the
the
height
of
the
the
the
the
general
height
of
your
proposal?
Of
so.
AE
The
the
height
limitation
that
we're
dealing
with
today
really
centers
around
the
fire
code.
This
lot
is
surrounded
by
power
lines
that
and
the
fire
code
won't
allow
for
actually
building
above
30
feet
and
the
height
restriction
the
height
concern,
because
you
can
go
75
feet,
there
was
initially
concern
and
we
talked
about
the
concern
about
going
any
higher,
but
really
that's
that's
not
really.
A
concern
is
that,
like
last
spring,
Pacific
Corp
actually
quoted
2.5
million
to
actually
bury
the
power
lines
in
order
to
go
higher.
AE
The
other
challenge
we
face
is
that,
in
order
to
provide
off-street
parking
it
it
can
get
pretty
these.
These
lots
are
only
.05
Acres,
so
together,
they're
on
that's
a
tenth
of
an
acre.
M
Yeah
an
idea
mentioned
parking
because
I,
there's
I
know
the
area
very
well,
and
you
know:
there's
not
I
think
that
the
area
could
absorb
the
parking
easily,
so
I
I,
you
know,
I
would
like
to
you
know
the
the
policy
questions
drafted,
number
two
and
number
three
especially
number
two
and
see
if
the
the
applicant
will
be
willing
to
enter
into
a
development
agreement
limiting
the
high
to
35
feet
and
if
we
can
to
be
to
move
a
little
more
with
a
restrictive
covenant
that
runs
with
the
land.
M
M
I
I
think
that
again,
I
agree
in
many
aspects
with
with
the
applicant
that
we
need
more
density
and
we
needed
in
this
area.
I
wish
it
was
a
different
kind
of
density,
though
focus
on
families
and
for
sale,
some
sort
of
product
for
sale,
but
those
are
the
the
things
that
I
would
like
to
ask
for
support
for
for
the
limitation.
Thank.
K
I'm
I'm
a
little
confused
about
this
request,
just
because
so
and
I
think
this
question
is
for
planning
staff.
Maybe
rmu
is
a
high
density
Zone.
This
area,
obviously
M1,
is
the
wrong
zone
for
that
it's
single-family
houses
and
a
mixture
of
things
M1
does
not
make
sense
there.
So
a
reason
of
some
sort
makes
sense,
but
I'm
confused
as
to
what
might
happen
if
an
if
this
area
is
all
rezoned
to
rmu.
K
A
couple
things
that
come
up
are
like
the
minimum
lot
size.
The
lot
minimum
lot.
Width
that
is
required
within
there
seems
like
is
not
compatible
with
the
current
lot
sizes
of
that.
So
that's
going
to
encourage
lot,
consolidation
and-
and
so
I
guess
that's.
Maybe
the
first
question
is
that
am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
AD
K
Okay
and
if
we
are
applying
that
to
lots
to
these
two
lots,
it's
likely
that
the
other
Lots
on
that
street.
We
could
apply
it
to
that
as
well
or
that
they
could
come
and
ask
for
that
that
zone.
It
seems
like
that's,
not
unreasonable
for
them
to
do
if
we,
if
we
approve
it
here,
but
that
would
mean
that
those
lots
well,
let's
just
talk
about
these
two
principal
subject:
Lots
right
now
do
those
need
to
be
combined
then,
in
order
for
us
to
get
50
feet.
AD
Yeah
there
are
a
number
rmu
35,
rmu
45
would
even
allow
it.
You
could
even
Explore
fbu
and
two,
although
that
doesn't
it's
not
really
close
to
Transit,
so
that
one
might
be
hard
to
justify.
U
A
G
AE
AE
W
My
question:
anyone
anyone
else
all
right.
Thank
you
all
so
much
Council.
We
have
made
up
our
time
we're
four
minutes
behind
now.
Does
anyone
need
a
quick
potty
breaker?
Are
we
good
to
keep
moving
I
respect
it
I
respect
it
all
right?
Let's,
let's
do
the
every
man
from
self-style
on
this
all
right,
then,
let's
invite
up
Allison
Roland
to
walk
us
through
some
more
legislative
intents,
oh,
oh
you're
on
the
screen.
I
was
looking
for
the
door.
Yes,.
AF
I
apologize
for
that
I
am
coming
in
from
home
today,
so
good
to
see
you.
Thank
you.
Likewise,
except
I
can't
see
you
at
the
moment.
So
this
is
the
continuation.
As
Council
Vice,
chair
Pedro,
mentioned
of
the
legislative
intents
review.
AF
We
got
through
three
of
the
Department
slash
council's
own
categories
last
time,
so
we
could
start
today
on
the
fire
department
and
Scott
I,
don't
know
if
you
could
pull
up
or
rather
I
request
that
you
pull
up
the
staff
report
or
whatever
it
was
like
yeah
I,
think
it
was
the
staff
report
I
sent
you
earlier
and
oh
Bingo
you're
right
on
it.
Thank
you
so
Mr
I
mean
sorry.
AF
Madam
chair,
would
you
like
me
to
read
the
titles
of
the
legislative
intents,
and
then
you
can
jump
in
any
of
you
can
jump
in
when.
W
You
have
that's
probably
the
easiest
way
with
you
online
right,
yeah.
AF
Okay,
thank
you.
So
number
four
is
fire
department
and
there
was
a
legislative
intent
on
fire
department
costs
options
for
recouping
costs
for
calls
at
the
University
of
Utah
B,
the
the
city's
hazardous
waste.
Sorry,
the
city's
hazardous
materials
ordinance
and
implementation
of
that
ordinance
to
assure
that
the
city
is
reimbursed
from
private
insurance
payments
to
those
responsible
for
an
incident
and
see
continue
evaluating
options
for
electrified
fire
vehicles.
AF
D
W
Is
there
is
B
the
the
ordinance
that
allows
us
to
take
down
can
properties
that
are
being
neglected?
Is
that
a
totally
separate
issue?
It's.
W
AF
And
and
yes,
as
you
can
see,
the
Administration
intends
to
provide
information
forthcoming,
so
I
hope
in
time
for
the
budget.
I
don't
know
if
their
Administration
folks
there
who
would
like
to
or
mayor's
office
folks
there.
Who
would
like
to
comment.
AF
All
right,
six
Police
Department
from
FY
21,
the
police
department
role,
I,
is
social
workers.
Double
I
is
internal
affairs
unit
and
triple
I
is
police
civilian
response.
Team
B
is
if
white
is
also
from
FY
21
Police
Department,
zero-based
budget
exercise,
and
then
C
is
Police
Department
reporting
ordinance,
which
was
actually
moved
to
council
Ed
intents,
so
I
believe
we've
discussed
that
in
our
last
conversation.
AF
AF
Is
public
lands,
maintenance,
funding,
estimate
and
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
the
as
an
attachment
to
the
legislative
intent
transmittal
there
was
a
separate
there
was
a
lengthy
attachment
on
public
lands,
maintenance
funding
estimates,
and
so
we
have
tentatively,
or
rather,
the
chair
has
tentatively
scheduled
this
for
a
discussion
on
May,
2nd,
so
I'll
do
a
separate
staff
report
for
that
one.
AF
Eight
is
public
services
department.
This
is
an
old
classic
from
fy15
maintenance
of
business
districts.
As
you
can
see,
there
is
a
quite
lengthy
response
from
the
public
services
department,
and
the
bottom
line
is
essentially
that
that
public
services
department
does
not
have
any
general
fund
funding,
or
rather
any
specific
funding
for
maintenance
of
this
business
districts.
Apart
from
the
central
business
district
and
Sugarhouse
business
district.
W
J
Council,
member
valdemaros
so
Allison
so
that
so
let
me
understand
so
public
service.
We
we
asked
that
question
hey
what
would
it
take
to
clean
the
CBD
or
and
to
keep
it
and
maintenance
and
all
the
things
somewhat
of
a
different
standard?
If
you
will
than
the
rest
and-
and
we
we're
told
no-
we
don't
have
any
funding
for
that,
so
that
needs
to
come
from
somewhere.
If
we
were
to
provide
that
service
is.
L
And
I
might
be
a
conversation
behind
because
I
was
working
on
something
else,
but
or
we're
talking
about
the
maintenance.
Is
that
right?
Okay,
so
the
downtown
cdbg
or
C.
G
L
Sorry,
yes,
really
area
does
not
contribute
financially
to
the
maintenance,
the
enhanced
level
of
Maintenance
in
that
area.
The
assessment
district
is
a
promotional
assessment
District
in
many
downtowns
across
the
country.
The
assessment
district
is
to
pay
for
the
enhanced
level
of
maintenance
got.
L
J
Higher
standard
of
Maintenance,
but
not
here,
apparently
okay
and
that
I
mean
maybe
maybe
I
needed,
a
small
group
meeting
with
Allison
and
whoever
deals
with
with
the
assessment
area.
Because
you
know
we
do
clean
up
the
streets.
J
It's
kind
of
like
on
demand
and
we
do
fund
that,
through
through
other
sources,
so
I'm
trying
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
who
does
what
do
we?
Do?
We
fund
a
private
entity
to
clean
up
and
also
give
us
a
higher
standard
of
Maintenance,
or
do
we
need
to
consolidate
or
do
we
need
to
change
the
CBD
so
that
it
does
both
the
promotion
and
the
cleanup
yeah.
L
It's
I
need
I
need
yeah,
it's
sticky
yeah
well,
and
it
is
sticky
because
the
city
has
current.
It
currently
does
and
has
historically
funded
the
maintenance
from
the
general
fund
in
the
central
business
district
and
at
Sugar
House.
Some
of
the
other
businesses
from
throughout
the
city
have
expressed
concern
because
they
feel
like
it's
not
Equitable.
So
if
you,
if
something
is
spilled
on
the
sidewalk
in
front
of
your
business
in
the
downtown
or
Sugar
House,
the
cdb
cdb,
sorry
comes
and
cleans
it
up.
L
Okay,
if
something
is
filled
in
front
of
your
business
in
another
area
of
the
city,
you
are
cleaning
it
up
with
a
brush
and
a
bucket,
so
picking
up
the
trash
cleaning
up
the
areas.
Those
are
things
that
other
businesses
would
like.
The
Administration
has
looked
at,
creating
some
districts
where
that
could
be
funded
by
those,
the
the
reason,
those
by
those
businesses.
L
The
reason
that
it
is
incl
is
provided
in
the
downtown
and
and
sugar
house
is
very
it's
historical
context
in
terms
of
that's
where
the
concentration
of
businesses
were
and
the
concentration
of
tax
dollars,
and
so
there
was
a
desire
for
many
many
years
to
to
make
those
areas
look
especially
good.
So
it
it's
a
policy
dilemma
and
that's
why
it
is
on
your
list
constantly
all
right.
W
K
I
think
I.
This
is
also
important
because
I've
heard
from
the
city
has
more
than
just
two
business
districts.
Obviously,
and
some
of
our
newer
business
districts
are
becoming
very
successful
and
very
vibrant,
and
so
we
either
need
to
get
that
additional
maintenance
to
be
figure
out.
A
policy
wherein
the
general
fund
will
start
to
fund
new
area
is
for
that
additional
service
or
move
it
back
to
what
other
areas
do
where
the
those
areas
can
opt
in
and
pay
for
that
out
of
a
special
assessment.
K
So
I
do
think
that
I'm
not
necessarily
advocating
for
one
or
the
other,
but
I
think
just
saying
these
two
areas
are
the
only
ones
that
get
additional
services,
and
that
comes
out
of
the
general
fund
isn't
going
to
work
very
very
much
longer,
because
those
aren't
the
only
two
areas
that
are
important
important
for
us
to
serve
the
businesses.
So
I
I
would
like
to
do
part
of
those
conversations
as
well.
AF
And
if
I
could
just
point
out
that,
obviously
Cindy
knows
a
lot
more
than
I
do
about
this
subject
and,
of
course
so
does
public
services
department
they
have
it
right
there
in
black
and
white
on
the
screen
in
the
last
paragraph
of
the
italics
section
that
yes,
the
that
the
issue
of
funding
for
CBD
maintenance
is
separated
into
maintenance
and
clean
up
or
sorry
yeah
I'm
going
to
get
it
wrong
again.
AF
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
Public
Services
has
it
right
as
well
as
Cindy
does.
AF
Right
next
next
item
is
the
public
utilities
department,
a
is
water
usage
by
the
city
and
that
actually,
those
those
responses
are
are
provided
by
public
services
and
public
lands,
because
those
are
actually
the
organisms.
The
parts
of
the
city
that
track
the
water
usage.
AF
Next
is
the
RDA,
the
a
is
new
programs
and
capital
accounts
review
B
is
prioritize,
equity
and
variety
of
professional,
professional
opportunities
and
C
is
structure
of
accounts
within
RDA
and
all
other
departments,
including
fund
balances
and
previous
capital
projects.
That's
one
from
FY
22.
AF
AF
And
finally,
number
11
is
the
sustainability
Department.
There
was
an
FY
23
sustainability
holding
account
the
council
approved
releasing
the
funds
and
the
department
is
in
the
process
of
establishing
agreements
and
launching
the
following
projects.
AF
That
is
correct
and
sorry
a
cat
here
is
having
a
nervous
breakdown.
So
so
actually,
if
you
don't
have
other
other
comments
or
questions,
then
then
we
can
call
this
good.
Thank.
W
AF
W
All
right
with
that
we're
ahead
of
schedule,
but
I
see
Bill
Wyatt
in
the
room,
so
I'm
gonna
put
him
in
the
hot
seat
two
minutes
early,
we'll
do
our
airport
title
16
amendments
and
I'll
welcome
Sam
Owen
up
with
Bill
Wyatt,
our
airport
director
Shane
Anderson,
the
director
of
administration,
Commercial
Services
and
Megan
depaulis
senior
City
attorney.
Y
Y
The
changes
take
a
number
of
specific
regulations
listed
in
the
existing
ordinance
and
relocate
them
to
an
administrative
rules
and
regulations.
Document
that
exists
has
existed.
It
predates
this
proposal,
which
is
referenced
in
the
existing
and
proposed
ordinance.
It's
also
online
with
your
packets,
the
Amendments
would
shift
regulations
and
Authority
from
being
written
in
the
council
adopted
ordinance,
making
it
administrative
rules
document
the
primary
reference
for
the
city's
regulation
of
its
airport,
rather
than
having
that
spelled
out
in
the
ordinance.
Y
Many
of
the
proposed
amendments
appear
reasonable
for
consolidation
purposes,
housekeeping
type
of
improvements
and
to
remove
items
that
are
more
operational
in
nature.
However,
the
council
may
prefer
to
review
the
list.
The
proposed
changes
more
closely.
To
that
end,
staff
is
working
with
the
administration
for
an
accessible
and
comprehensive
index
of
things
that
are
changing
or
would
be
changing
with
the
proposed
amendment.
Thank
you.
AC
All
right,
Bill
great,
thank
you
so
I'm
going
to
just
make
a
brief
introduction
and
then
turn
this
over
to
Shane
1960..
That's
when
Title
16
was
originally
established
and
created.
It's
been
amended
obviously
over
the
years
many
times,
but
if
you
think
about
1960,
that's
when
Terminal
1
of
the
old
airport
was
first
built,
there
were
no
Jets
serving
Salt
Lake.
AC
There
were
no
jet
Bridges
serving
Salt
Lake
and
the
world
of
commercial
Aviation
looked
obviously
very,
very
different,
and
so
Through
The
Years
change
was
accommodated
by
simply
adding
or
not
necessarily
subtracting,
I
think
just
adding
to
title
16,
and
shortly
after
I
arrived
here
in
2017,
our
staff
came
to
me
and
said:
hey.
We
have
to
do
a
comprehensive
rewrite
of
title
16,
so
I
took
a
look
at
it
and
thought
gee.
AC
Maybe
I'll
be
dead
first,
because
it's
not
the
most
exciting
proposition
that
I've
ever
encountered,
and
so
you
may
be
thinking
well
you're
here.
So
what
happened
and
really
what
is
driving
this
is
that
one
of
the
phenomena
that
occurred
during
covet
is
that
the
world
of
general
aviation
really
altered
in
significant
ways
and
we're
seeing
more
demand
than
we
have
the
capacity
to
serve.
AC
And
so
when
I
say
general
aviation
I
think
you
all
know
this,
but
it's
it's
not
the
commercial
side
of
the
airport,
it's
the
private
side
of
the
airport,
and
it
includes
South,
Valley
and
Tooele
and
I'm
not
going
to
say
that
we're
on
the
verge
of
getting
sewer
and
water
at
Tooele.
But
you
know
it
feels
good
and
to
do
that,
we
need
to
really
lay
out
the
rules
of
the
road
for
how
those
operate
as
as
businesses
which
they
are
essentially
and
title.
16,
wasn't
really
built
to
do
that.
AC
Yeah,
in
fact,
the
city
council
didn't
exist
in
1960.
It
was
a
commission
form
of
government,
and
I
would
have
probably
been
working
for
a
commissioner
at
that
time
and
I'm
familiar
with
this
form
of
government,
because
my
old
Hometown
in
Portland
just
was
the
last
major
city
in
the
United
States
to
get
rid
of
it,
and
so
a
lot
has
changed.
That
really
is
what
is
driving
our
interest
in
this.
There
certainly
are
a
lot
of
issues
here.
It
can
be
pretty
tedious,
I
appreciate
that
and
we're
willing
to
take
whatever
time.
G
AG
AG
So
I'll
try
to
remember
if
they're
not
tied
together.
So
as
Bill
mentioned,
you
know,
updates
to
title
16
have
been
necessary
for
quite
a
long
time.
AG
I
probably
wouldn't
be
tackling
this
right
now,
but
as
as
Bill
mentioned,
there's
been
some
recent
general
aviation
industry
interest
at
all
three
of
the
airports.
Two
years
ago
we
had
a
company
that
approached
us
and
said
you
know:
I
want
to
build
a
large
hanger
facility
on
the
east
side
of
your
airport.
I
want
to
sell
aircraft
out
of
it.
AG
I
want
to
lease
back
that
air
the
aircraft
to
the
the
owners
of
the
aircraft
I
want
to
be
able
to
service
the
aircraft
and
also
fuel
them
all
from
this
facility,
and
we
looked
at
title
16
at
that
time
and
said
wow.
We
really
don't
have
a
classification
for
this,
and
really
that
was
the
trigger
for
us
to
go
down
this
path,
starting
in
2021
to
update
Title
16..
It's
involved
internal,
obviously,
the
department
Department
of
airports
and
external
stakeholder
involvement.
AG
The
Federal
Aviation
Administration
has
reviewed
the
minimum
standards
that
are
in
the
materials
today
and
we've
also
had
our
tenants,
our
fixed
base
operators
and
our
skydiving
operator
at
the
Twill
airport
review.
The
proposed
minimum
standards
we've
taken
all
their
feedback
into
consideration,
which
is
embedded
in
the
documents
that
you
see
today
and
really
minimum
standards
are
an
industry
best
practice
they're
recommended
by
the
FAA.
D
Moment,
yeah
I
interrupt
you
yeah,
of
course,
I'm
very
good
at
that.
Do
things
like
the
impetus
of
where
this
started
this
person
developer?
Whoever
came
to
you
and
said
we
want
to
build
a
hanger.
Does
this
also
create
generate
revenue
for
the
airport?
It.
AG
AG
AC
D
AC
That's
the
thing
that
was
particularly
challenging
about
this
one
is:
we
just
have
these
brand
relatively
new
leases
with
two
very
large
fixed-based
operators.
Who've
invested
a
lot.
Suddenly
somebody
comes
to
town
and
says:
I
want
to
do
part
of
that.
The
real
money
making
part
I
don't
want
to
do
the
service
part
and
we
would
be
allowing
them
to,
in
our
opinion,
unfairly
compete
with
people.
Who've
just
signed
30-year
leases
to
do
that.
AC
AG
AG
It's
a
document
that
we
can
hand
them
and
they
can
walk
away
with
knowing
exactly
what
the
requirements
are
and
what
they
need
to
develop
at
each
of
the
three
airports
that
we
own
and
operate
and
then,
just
last
but
not
least,
the
fees
that
are
embedded
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
terminal
use
fees.
They
will
still
remain
linked
to
the
Consolidated
fee
schedule.
So
there's
no,
no
change
there.
AG
In
general,
there
are
four
main
category:
I'm
sorry
yeah
next
slide,
thanks
Bill
keeping
me
honest.
AG
AG
So
minimum
standards
you
may
say:
well
what
are
they?
They
are
standards
that
regulate
commercial,
aeronautical
activities
at
airports
and
really
what
they're
designed
to
do
is
ensure
that
the
airport
sponsor
does
not
unjustly
discriminate
against
the
same
categories
of
users.
So
we're
not
making
business
deals
with
one
entity
and
a
separate
business
deal
with
different
standards
with
another.
They
create
a
Level
Playing
Field
and
ensure
that
the
public,
the
traveling
public,
has
a
safe
and
secure
and
consistent
experience
at
the
airports.
AG
They're
an
industry
best
practice,
as
I
mentioned
before
and
they'll
vary
based
on
the
airport,
so
the
standards
for
Salt,
Lake,
City
International
are
going
to
be
very
much
different
than
the
two
general
aviation
airports
that
we
own.
If
you
do
a
Google
search
for
international
minimum
International
Airport
minimum
standards,
you'll
see
there,
there's
a
spattering
of
all
the
documents
across
the
country
and,
of
course,
there's
just
pages
and
pages
of
them,
but
really
as
proposed
by
taking
everything
out
taking
minimum
standards
out
of
title
16
and
creating
these
documents.
AG
AG
There
are
two
general
categories
in
minimum
standards:
there's
a
fixed
Base
operator
that
bill
mentioned
earlier
and
then
there's
also
a
term
specialized
aeronautical
service
operator
or
Sasso.
An
assasso
is
basically
everything
that
doesn't
fall
into
the
fixed
Base
operator
category,
so
they
can
include
businesses
that
provide
aircraft
maintenance,
aircraft,
rental
flying
clubs,
flight
schools,
Charter
cells,
skydiving,
commercial,
Hangar,
hanger
operators,
Etc.
They
also
minimum
standards
have
require
an
operating
permit
or
a
lease
agreement
to
have
those
business
activities
take
place
at
the
airport.
AG
There's
an
application
process,
there's
language
for
violations
of
minimum
standards
and
then
also
enforcement
processes
to
make
sure
that
everybody
again
is
playing
with
a
Level
Playing
Field,
the
minimums
are
broken
down
into
Services,
provided
so
and
there's
actually
a
really
good
example
of
this
in
the
minimum
standards
that
you
you'll
see
before
you
today,
there's
a
provision
for
our
fixed
base
operators
at
the
Salt
Lake
City
International
Airport
to
tow
aircraft
off
the
Airfield
when
they
become
disabled.
It's
not
something
we
have
today.
AG
AG
So
a
real
world
example
minimums
are
also
in
the
documents
for
their
leased
space,
land,
apron
and
structures,
fuel
storage,
how
big
the
tanks
have
to
be
how
many
fuel
trucks
have
to
service
aircraft
insurance
requirements,
spill
prevention,
personnel
and
the
like
one
thing
that
I'll
mention
here
is
that
since
2016
the
department
of
airports
has
been
operating,
the
fixed
Base
operator,
we've
been
an
FBO.
Basically
at
the
South
Valley
Regional
Airport,
it's
not
a
business
that
we
want
to
be
in
and
actually
we're
looking
to
get
out
of
it.
AG
So
today
what
you
see
on
the
on
the
left
there
sorry
one
more
slide.
AG
Mixing
myself
up
knew
I
would
do
that
on.
The
left
there
you'll
see
is
where
minimum
standards
are
today
and
title
16
and
then
on
the
right.
The
proposed
two
documents
that
have
been
generated
using
consultants
in
the
aviation
industry
and
then
airport
staff
next
slide.
Please.
AG
In
terms
of
redundancy
things,
we're
looking
to
take
out
of
title
16
on
the
left
column,
you'll
see,
there
are
items
that
are
regulated
by
the
FAA,
so
things
like
aircraft,
registration,
traffic
rules
for
flight
operations,
accident
reporting
requirements
for
Pilots
taxiing
across
the
Airfield
Crossing,
runways
and
clearance
and
then
take
off
and
Landing
procedures.
Those
are
things
that
are
very,
very
regulated
by
the
the
FAA
and.
D
D
There
any
reason
to
actually
keep
some
of
this
inordinate
simply
because
things
change
and
protocols
change
and
would.
AC
D
AC
Hardcore
right
I
mean
in
this
case
it's
a
little
awkward
because
there
are
items
over,
on
the
left
hand,
column
there
they're
not
consistent
with
federal
policy
that
we
are
obligated
to
follow
in
order
to
retain
our
part
139
certificate,
which
is
what
the
FAA
gives
every
airport
every
commercial
airport
and
it's
we
were
preempted,
we
do
it,
but
it's
a
little
weird.
You
know
yeah.
L
We
don't
have
any
way
to
know
whether
there
are
things
that
really
ought
to
be
retained
so
that,
in
with
a
different
Administration
things,
the
council
could
take
back
delegated
authority.
So
if
there
aren't
delegations
in
the
ordinance,
if
there
are
no
mention
any
more
of
certain
things,
then
you
can't
really
take
it
back
later,
because
it
would
be
considered
administrative.
So
there's
probably
a
lot
of
administrative
stuff
in
here
that
doesn't
need
to
be
an
ordinance,
But,
It's
Tricky
enough
that
it's
a
pretty
big
deal.
D
Well
and
that's
what
I
was
I
appreciate,
that's
Cindy,
you've
kind
of
read
my
mind.
That's
sort
of
what
I
was
getting
at
like
clearly
FAA
is
one
thing.
We
can't
really
do
anything
with
fa,
but
some
of
these
things
in
rules
and
regulations
and-
and
maybe
it's
not
this
list
right
but
to
Cindy's
point
administrations
can
change
directors,
can
change.
Executive
directors
can
change
all
of
that
stuff
can
change?
L
AG
We've
I
mean
we've
been
very
thoughtful
in
in
trying
to
draft
a
new
ordinance,
a
new
title
16,
if
you
will,
that
addresses
all
those
concerns
and
try
to
keep
the
more
operational
in
the
weeds
type
stuff
out
of
it.
But
yeah
I
definitely
understand
the
concern
there.
Things
on
the
right.
You
know
that
that
are
in
rules
and
regs
that
are
again
very
operational
focused
are
security
and
keys.
How
do
you
get
keys
to
the
airport?
How
do
you
get
access?
AG
You
know
what
are
our
graphic
standards
and
advertising
policies
and
how
do
you
take
photography?
Some
of
that
stuff
is
is
again
it's
in
title
16,
but
it's
also
in
our
rules
and
regs
so
again
just
trying
to
consolidate
it
at
the
bottom.
There
I
I
think
it's
it's
kind
of
cute
there,
but
there's
an
exemption
for
altitude
on
for
reindeer
flying
on
Christmas
Eve,
that's
in
city
code,
right
now
in
title
16.
I
thought
it
was
kind
of
cute
I
did,
we
sure,
can.
W
Do
we
have
any
additional
information
or
ordinances
around
things
like
air
quality
like
because
of
our
topographical
nature,
the
number
of
private
jets
we
might
want
to
allow
in
or
the
business
that
relies
on
things
that
would
emit
above
and
beyond
what
the
core
function
of
the
airport
is,
might
be
something
that
we
would
prefer
to
have
legislative
input
on.
Do
we
have
anything
around
those
sorts
of
issues.
W
So
are
those
are
those
things
that
are
governed
by
FAA
use
or
those
things
that
we
can
have
an
additional
overlay
in
the
legislative
process
that
could
offer
unique
protections.
Well,
it's.
W
AC
Actually
like
to
there,
there
and
you'll
you'll
you'll
get
the
opportunity
here
soon,
because
one
of
the
things
that
will
be
happening
over
time
is
that
Hangar
rates
at
International
are
going
to
go
up
and
that
will
cause
owners
of
smaller
planes
to
think
about
gee.
Where
else
can
I
go
and
we
want
to
create
those
opportunities
as
well
you're.
M
So
the
the
questions,
obviously
you
know
I
read
this
stuff
report
about.
You
know
what
is
what
is.
Maybe
the
cancer
should
retain
just
in
case,
and
you
know,
I
I
will
stay
with
those
questions.
They'll
get
a
good
answer
on
that
again
as
we're
thinking
about
worst
case
scenario.
You
know
this
is
no
worst
case
scenario
at
all.
You
know
this
relationship
with
with
you
guys
you
guys
are
fantastic
I.
M
Do
you
know
what
councilmember
Petro
mentioned
about
pollution
could,
and
this
may
be
something
that
we
can
talk
offline
but
could,
and
one
of
the
topics
was
about
fees
right.
Well,
you
know
how
do
we
deal
with
that
and
it
could
be
a
delegation
to
your
authority
to
to
impose
those
and
or
do
we
review
them
before
they're
implemented
right,
like
that's
part
of
the
question,
but
could
could
an
airport
impose
a
fee
to
not
good
planes
or
higher
fee,
or
you
know,
because
there
is
a
different.
AC
How
yeah,
when
it
comes
to
regulating
aircraft
itself,
we
have
really
limited
Authority,
but
there
are
many
other
aspects
of
the
airport
in
which
there
are
emissions
involved.
Some
you
might
not
even
think
about,
but
the
council
three
or
four
generations
ago,
I
think
when
the
current
airport
Redevelopment
program
was
approved
required-
and
this
was
more
part
of
the
budget
process
than
it
was
this,
but
required
that
it
achieved
or
it
be
targeted
for,
and
it
has
in
fact
achieved
League
Gold
status
well
to
get
there.
AC
M
AG
So
the
third
item:
there
is
a
consolidation
of
the
ground,
transportation,
related
ordinances,
all
into
Title
Five.
So
again,
just
looking
to
remove
all
of
the
identical
language
from
from
chat,
title
16
and
leave
it
in
title
five
and
keep
it
in
one
place.
AG
There
will
be
updates
to
Chapters,
5.71
and
5.72
at
some
time
in
the
future,
they're
not
necessary
today,
based
on
this
action,
but
there
is
some
general
just
updating
like
we're
doing
with
title
16
that
that
staff
will
be
coming
back
for
in
the
future.
But
there's
some
examples
down
below
of
you
know.
The
definitions
are
in
two
places:
language
about
unauthorized,
solicitation
of
businesses
in
two
places
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
ground
transportation
booths
there
on
the
left.
AG
In
the
former
airport,
we
had
booths
that
could
be
used
on
a
per
day
basis
in
the
new
airport.
We
have
just
two
booths,
they're
downstairs
on
level
one
and
we
do
three-year
leases
for
them.
So
the
language
is
no
longer
relevant
in
title
6,
seen
as
was
written
back
in
the
day
and
then
just
general
updating
as
you
go
throughout
title
16.
There's.
Oh
I'm.
Sorry
next
slide
as
you
go
through
title,
16
you'll
see
that
there's
just
a
lot
of
outdated
language.
It
still
refers
to
Salt
Lake
City
Airport
number
two.
AG
Instead
of
South
Valley
Regional
Airport,
not
a
major
deal.
There's
the
terminal
use
fees,
an
annual
space
rental.
As
part
of
our
budget
process.
We
establish
what
the
the
terminal
rents
are
going
to
be
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
That's
included
in
our
budget
process
and
and
updated
in
the
Consolidated
fee
schedule
that
you
will
see
I
think
you'll
actually
see
it
on
the
18th
of
this
month
when
Brian
comes
back
with
Bill
to
talk
about
our
budget,
but
you
can
see
there
at
the
bottom
with
that
Arrow
July.
AG
Me
too.
We've
had
you
know
several
auas
as
we
call
them
and
several
amendments
since
then,
including
the
one
that
Delta
just
signed
through
20
they're
44..
So
again,
just
general
updating.
AG
So,
just
in
summary,
next
I
think
my
just
my
last
slide
here.
Just
to
summarize
my
points,
so
we
feel
that
updates
to
title
16
are
necessary.
We
it's
a
basic
rewrite,
because
it
would
be
really
messy
to
try
to
track
a
red
line.
I
attempted
to
create
a
color-coded
version
that
would
track
with
all
four
of
those
different
categories,
but
even
that
was
confusing.
So
council
is
working
on
drafting
a
red
line
that
will
make
this
more
understandable
minimum
yeah
right
minimum
standards
are
do.
AG
L
AG
Creation
of
minimum
standards
and
Central
and
documents
are
a
best
practice.
Has
you
know
you
know
recommended
by
the
FAA.
They
give
us
flexibility
to
respond
to
an
ever-changing
environment.
You
talked
about
sustainability,
eventually
we're
going
to
have
EV,
tall's
electric
vehicle
takeoff
and
landings.
So
battery
powered
aircraft
that
take
people
from
their
home
to
the
airport,
Chicago
airport
is
going
to
be
trialing
this
in
a
few
years,
there's
also
sustainable
aviation
fuel.
AG
That
is
basically
biodiesel,
that
airports
are
experimenting
with,
so
things
are
going
to
continue
to
evolve
in
this
space,
and
so
this
gives
us
a
chance
to
update
and
be
flexible
most
airports.
Once
they've
adopted
these
minimum
standards
documents
they
update
them
annually
and
then
again
just
the
goal
here
is
to
create
a
more
user-friendly
approach,
not
only
for
the
public
but
for
the
general
aviation
community.
T
Thank
you
for
this
update
and
I
appreciate
all
the
the
consolidation
of
this
stuff,
because
you're
right
about
the
FAA
you
get
plenty
of
notems
and
everything
else.
All
the
time
on
the
infrastructure
side
of
the
the
airport
outside
of
the
airport
operations
is
that
that's
not
going
to
change.
As
far
as
you
know,
our
responsibility
and
approval
of
ground
I'm,
saying
like
parking
lots
infrastructure
of
that
nature.
That's
nothing
of
that
is
changing.
AC
That's
connected
with
our
budget,
for
example,
o
m
or
capital,
or
whatever.
You
will
continue
to
have
complete
authority
over.
T
That,
okay,
really,
this
is
just
more
the
airport.
Basically,
the
airport
itself,
operations
yeah
outside
of
the
or
inside
the
I
would
say
the
fenced
area.
Yeah.
Okay,
appreciate
that.
D
Fowler,
thank
you
so
I
see
on
our
agenda
that
we're
setting
a
public
hearing
date
for
I
mean
we're
setting
the
public
hearing
day
today,
holding
potentially
holding
comment
on
the
18th
and
then
action
to
be
determined,
I
wonder
since
we
don't
have
that
red
line,
and
it
does
seem
like
there's
some
questions
regarding:
what's
administrative,
what's
legislative,
what
I
mean
this
is
our
first
briefing
on
this.
That
I'm
aware
of
I
would
turn
to
chair
and
vice
chair
and
and
Council
staff,
but
it
seems
unless
there's
something
that
is
a
time
constraint.
D
AC
AC
Only
thing
that
we're
sort
of
ready
to
move
with
is
the
RFP
for
the
FBO
down
at
South
Valley
airport.
So
we
need
to
be
able
to
tell
people
who
are
interested
and
I.
Think
we'll
have
a
lot
of
interest
just
based
on.
AC
What's
going
on
in
the
industry,
what
what
they're
going
to
be
held
accountable
for
and
we
we
might
be
able
to
just
say,
listen,
we
want
you
to
know
something's
coming
you're
going
to
be
subject
to
that
and
get
the
process
started,
but
we're
we're
ready
down
there
and
it's
important
because
we
need
a
viable
operator
down
there
so
that,
as
changes
begin
to
occur
at
International,
there
are
things
to
places
to
go
and
so
we're
we're
ready.
But
that's
not
something
that
has
to
happen
tomorrow
morning
either.
W
Perfect
so
then,
we'll
we'll
put
this
on
the
next
chair,
Vice
chair
agenda,
and
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us
right
and
while
they're
leaving,
we
are
going
to
stay
on
the
topic
of
airport,
like
one
of
the
best
things
about
being
district.
One
is
that
you
get
to
be
on
the
airport
board,
there's
always
so
much
cool
stuff
at
their
Advisory
board
meetings
and
we
get
the
chance
to
appoint
a
new
member
of
the
airport
board.
Hong
Nguyen.
W
F
Hello,
everyone
can
you
hear
me:
okay,
yep,
okay,
great
first
off.
Let
me
please
apologize
for
not
being
in
person.
I
was
fully
planning
on
attending
in
person,
but
I
had
another
commitment
and
with
the
weather
I'm
getting
ready
to
to
walk
into
the
Salt
Lake
Democratic
politi,
sauce
dinner
fundraiser
that
I
know.
All
of
you
are
kicking
yourself
that
make
tonight
so
I
do
apologize
for
not
being
there
in
person.
F
My
name
is
song.
Nguyen
I
am
co-founder
and
managing
partner
of
software
Investment
Group
when
I
was
approached
with
this
opportunity
to
join
The
Advisory
board
for
the
airport.
I
thought
that
this
would
be
a
fascinating
opportunity.
As
many
of
you
know,
software
investment.
We
are
a
locally
owned
family
investment
firm
here
in
Salt
Lake,
where
we
have
various
different
businesses,
one
of
which
is
in
Hospitality
with
the
restaurants
and
bars,
and
we
we
really
like
to
show
people
when
they
come
to
Utah.
There's
fun
things
to
do
here.
F
There's
a
lot
more
different,
diverse
businesses
available
in
this
Valley
in
the
state
than
what
people
think
when
they
think
about
Utah
outside
of
outside
of
the
state
and
the
airport
if
they
are
on
a
layover
or
they
come
for
an
overnighter.
That's
the
first
touch
point.
They
have
to
kind
of
see
what
is
a
little
bit
different
about
Salt
Lake
City
here
for
us
to
really
be
able
to
Showcase
the
fun
unique
businesses
that
we
have,
and
so
with
this
opportunity
to
join
this
Advisory
Board.
F
That's
what
I'm
hoping
to
bring
to
this
Advisory
Board
is
more
of
just
the
culture
and
diversity
that
we
can
share
through
our
terminals
when
people
are
here
for
a
few
hours
or
a
few
days.
That
is
my
hope
and
that's
why
I
hope
to
bring
to
The
Advisory
board.
So
at
this
point,
I
would
love
to
just
take
any
questions
from
the
council.
T
Thank
you
very
much
for
representing
District
six
great
to
see
you
thank.
J
I
I
love,
Kong,
I,
think
she's
a
great
asset
to
have
within
you
know,
one
of
our
boards
she's
a
very
active
Community
member
and
a
business
owner
and
I,
don't
know
where
she
finds
time
to
sit
on
so
many
words.
So
I
aspire
to
be
like
you
hang,
but
welcome.
I'm
excited
to
see
in
this
capacity
as
well.
Thank.
W
You,
okay,
council
member
Fowler,
give
you
a
yay
I
just
want
to
advise
bill
that
allowing
us
to
sit
next
to
each
other
would
be
a
really
great
strategic
option
during
board
meetings
just
or.
K
L
W
W
V
I'm
Joseph
Murphy
I
go
by
jerfy
and
I
live
in
District
3.
I'm.
Currently,
the
chair
elect
of
the
greater
Avenues
Community
Council
and
as
I've
moved
into
the
District
3
recently
I've
been
extremely
impressed
by
the
Civic
engagement
of
my
neighbors,
how
involved
informed
and
and
caring
about
the
community,
and
it's
inspired
in
me
a
desire
to
become
more
civically
engaged.
So
that's
why
I
joined
the
Avenues
Council.
V
As
a
result,
this
year
I'm
heading
up
a
subcommittee
to
stand
up
grants
within
the
community
council
and
when
this
opportunity
on
the
city,
council,
Advisory,
Board,
came
up,
I
thought
it'd
be
a
perfect
segue
and
be
able
to
share
Lessons
Learned
From
how
the
city
operates
its
grants
programs
and
take
that
back
to
The.
Avenues
really
excited
for
this
opportunity
to
learn
and
to
contribute
and
support
the
city.
X
I
just
want
to
thank
Jeffy
for
getting
involved.
I've
been
hoping
that
you
would
apply
for
a
boarding
commission
for
a
long
time.
I
know
you
did
apply
quite
a
while
ago
and
I'm
so
glad
to
see
you
here
and
I.
Think
you'll
be
a
great
addition
to
the
board.
Thanks
for
representing
District
three.
W
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
willingness
to
serve.
You
will
also
be
voted
on
in
the
consent
agenda
tonight.
You
don't
need
to
be
present
and
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you,
foreign
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
bike
bicycle
advisory
committee
and
we
have
Allah
chernenko
a
la
I,
see
you
there
on
the
screen.
How
are
you.
AH
My
name
is
Alex
ronenko
I
live
in
District
Five
in
the
ballpark
neighborhood
and
I
cycle
for
fun,
exercise
and
transportation,
I'm
a
big
proponent
and
a
big
believer
in
a
bicycle
as
a
great
equalizer,
they're
cheap.
They
get
you
around
faster
than
walking
and
they
do
very
well
in
sort
of
vibrant
Urban
environments,
which
is
what
we
are
trying
to
build.
AH
It
seems
in
downtown
Salt,
Lake,
I,
end
up
sort
of
doing
a
lot
of
casual
advocacy
where
I'm
having
conversations
with
people
who
have
never
considered
what
infrastructure
looks
like
or
somebody
who
is
not
driving
a
motorized
vehicle
and
sometimes
you
sort
of
see
a
light
bulb,
go
off
and,
like
oh
I,
never
thought
that
that
intersection
is
dangerous
when,
when.
AA
AH
Not
driving
so
I
find
that
you
know
the
next
step
for
me
to
you
know.
Take
that
casual
advocacy
to
bless
casual
level
would
be
to
join
the
bicycle
committee.
W
So
here
I
am
thank
you.
So
much
council
members
any
comments
all
right.
We
got
a
lot
of
thumbs
UPS
over
here.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
willingness
to
serve.
You
will
also
be
voted
on
the
consent
agenda
this
evening.
No
need
to
attend
and
thank
you
so
much
for
being
willing
to
share
your
talents
and
passions
with
us.
Thank
you
all
right
and
our
final
appointment
to
the
parks,
natural
lands,
urban
forestry
and
trails
Advisory
Board
to
Lula
pantuti.
AI
Well,
please
awesome
thanks
y'all,
yeah
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
be
honest:
Advisory,
Board,
I'm,
a
graduate
student
studying
geography
and
I'm,
a
strong
passion
for
environmental
justice
and
Food
Systems,
and
just
how
we
move
around
our
city
and
I
thought.
This
was
a
unique
opportunity
to
go
past.
AI
AI
I'm
also
excited,
because
I
think
I
will
have
access
to
a
bunch
of
students
and
a
population
in
the
city
that
maybe
isn't
that
engaged
with
this
Advisory
Board
normally
and
then
also
with
the
new
American
community
that
I
volunteer
with
so
I
think
it's
a
unique
opportunity
to
kind
of
see
who
I
can
talk
to
and
kind
of,
get
some
feedback
from
the
community
and
then
support
anything.
You
all
are
working
on
yeah,
so
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
and
look
forward
to
working
with
you
all
potentially.
W
Yeah,
thank
you
for
sharing
this
with
us,
we'll
vote
on
you
this
evening
as
well
in
the
consent
agenda.
So
good
luck
on
the
peanut
board
and,
thank
you
think
so.
Council
members
we've
reached
the
end
of
our
business
stuff.
We
are
now
to
the
report
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair,
chair,
chair
mono.
Do
you
have
anything
for
us
live
from
APA.
W
I,
don't
have
anything
as
well
Madam,
executive
director,
nothing
as
well.
All
right!
Do
we
have
a
closed
session.
Okay,
hey
guys!
We
get
a
break
this
week.
This
is
so
exciting.
All
right,
then
I'm.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
and
we'll
reconvene
at
seven,
we
don't
need
a
motion.
All
right,
then
we'll
just
reconvene
at
seven
yeah
all
right.
Thank
you
all.