►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session Meeting - 08/15/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting visit https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
As
I
look
for
my
agenda,
welcome
to
today's
city
council
meeting,
we
are
now
in
city
council
Works
session.
It
is
August
15th.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Zoom
Facebook,
YouTuber,
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whatever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
A
801-535-7654
written
comments
we
receive
on
agenda
topics
are
shared
with
council
members
and
posted
to
our
website.
Slccouncil.Com
and
the
reason
for
our
6
PM
start
today
is
because
we
have
a
7,
PM
truth
and
Taxation
hearing.
That
needs
to
be
noticed
as
a
different
meeting,
so
we're
starting
our
general
formal
meeting
items
an
hour
early.
Hopefully
we'll
wrap
those
up
before,
but
we
if
we
need
to
we'll
reconvene
after
the
truth
and
Taxation
hearing,
but
at
any
rate
the
truth
and
Taxation
hearing
will
happen
exactly
at
seven.
A
So
we're
on
item
number
one
of
our
work
session,
which
is
updates
from
the
administration
that
is
I,
see
Joshua,
Boyle
and
Andrew
Johnston.
Here.
B
A
A
D
B
So
as
a
reminder,
this
is
our
webpage
for
residents
to
go
and
engage
with
the
city.
Slc.Gov
feedback
next
slide.
So
we
have
a
few
updates
from
our
transportation
division.
Capitol
Hill
traffic
calming
project
the
expected
construction
start
date
is
August.
21St
Transportation
has
sent
postcards,
alerted
the
community
council
and
are
flowering
homes
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
planned
speed
humps.
B
The
first
batch
of
them
will
be
on
Wall
Street
and
some
of
the
minor
side
streets
coming
off
of
off
300
West,
which
are
Fern,
read
and
700
North
and
the
target
end
date
is
mid-october,
the
1000
West
in
intersection,
Improvement
and
traffic
calming
there's
an
active
public
survey
on
this
project.
Asking
for
input
on
for
post
intersection,
Concepts
at
300,
400
and
500
North.
The
transportation
is
a
division,
is
planning
to
finalize
the
design
of
the
500
North
intersection
this
year
and
aim
for
construction
next
year
and
on
600
700
North,
the
Reconstruction
project.
B
Two
stakeholder
meetings
have
happened
and
the
public
survey
is
live
and
the
website
for
the
project
is
600
North
slc.org.
The
schedule
is
to
have
a
concept
established
by
the
end
of
this
year
with
the
final
design
in
2024
and
Construction
in
2025.
B
from
the
Redevelopment
agency
update,
Community
feedback
is
being
sought
on
the
natural,
active
and
Plaza
elements
of
the
design
plan
for
bringing
portions
of
City
Creek
up
to
the
surface
along
the
Folsom
Trail
between
700
and
1000
West,
and
this
is
also
together
with
the
seven
Canyons
trust
and
the
website
for
that.
But
it's
on
the
website
at
slc.gov
feedback,
a
link
to
that
survey.
B
This
week
our
community
outreach
team
will
be
is
holding
office
hours
at
local
events
tonight
at
the
partners
in
the
Park
event,
at
Northwest
Rec
Center
at
Sugarhouse
Rocks
concert
series
events
on
the
18th,
this
Friday
and
then
this
Saturday
at
the
Kensington
Street
Festival
next
slide
and
here's
more
of
our
events
for
the
rest
of
the
month.
Tomorrow
is
a
Jordan
River,
bio
Blitz
with
love
your
block
team
public
lands
and
Hogle
Zoo
at
Papa,
Grove
Park,
mayor's
bike
to
work
days.
B
This
Thursday,
starting
from
Jordan
Park
and
Kensington
Street
Festival
this
Saturday
from
two
to
eight
pm,
and
that
concludes
my
portion
for
the
community.
Outreach
updates,
so
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Andrew.
Unless
there's
any
questions.
E
Thanks
Josh,
you
can
see
the
utilization
report
still
running
very
high
throughout
the
summer.
Of
course,
rapid
intervention-
there's
no
income
and
impact
mitigation
work
this
week,
but
a
number
of
camps,
as
you
can
see
there
and
Boe,
continues
to
work
with
increasing
number
of
camps
up
to
seven
this
week
consistently
and
then
multiple
Rehabilitation
sites.
You
can
see
the
resource
Fair.
Those
happened
last
Friday
at
Library
Square
and
some
of
the
partners
there
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what
happens
there.
E
Odyssey
House
is
a
substance,
use
treatment
program,
that's
residential
and
outpatient,
and
also
a
mental
health
component,
but
they
were
there
and
they
engaged
with
two
people
who
went
to
detox
and
then
plan
to
go
back
to
Odyssey
House,
which
is
pretty
typical
for
a
lot
of
times.
So
this
is
one
of
those
times
where
you
need
multiple
providers
to
work
together
and
it
worked
here
at
the
at
the
library.
E
We
also
know
that
the
health
department
was
Zero,
28
vaccinations
were
given
free
lunches
from
the
Justice
food,
Justice
Coalition
and
then
special
thanks
to
council
member
Waldo
moros
who's,
not
here,
hopefully
she's
listening
somewhere
for
her
and
your
staff's
work
at
that
fair,
so
I
appreciate
it
very.
Very
much
kayak
Court
will
be
the
18th
in
the
Jordan
River
on
the
north
kind
of
Central
North
End,
North
Temple
of
Cornell
Street,
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
E
To
give
an
update
on
the
winter
Services
planning
we've
been
trying
to
update
you
all
this
summer,
as
the
meetings
have
progressed
from
all
the
Mayors
across
the
county
and
councilmember
Duke
has
been
part
of
that
as
well.
This
past
Thursday
the
10th,
the
salt,
the
Utah
homelessness,
Council,
approved,
accepted
and
approved
the
winter
Services
plan
that
was
submitted
by
the
by
the
mayors
that
included
over
600
beds
of
24
7
operations.
E
Only
65
of
those
will
be
only
overnight
7
PM
to
7
A.M
at
St,
Vincent
de
Paul,
and
then
175
of
those
are
planned
to
be
Flex
beds
at
the
current
Resource
Centers.
So
that
would
mean
at
the
geraldini
king
50
beds,
at
the
Gail
Miller
resource
50
beds
and
then
at
the
Pamela
Atkinson
in
South
Salt
Lake
75
bits.
Those
are
planned
to
be
open
sometime
in
October
and
run
through
the
end
of
April
and
then
across
three
different
cities
and
then
the
MVP
program
we've
talked
about
previously
in
Sandy.
E
I
think
there'll
be
about
130
beds
at
that
point,
which
is
more
than
the
80
they
had
previously
and
then
there's
also
a
code
blue
emergency
option
portion
of
this
plan,
which
deals
with
situations
below
15
degrees,
Fahrenheit
across
the
county
and
there's
still
some
work
to
be
done
on
those
options
with
some
other
Advocate
groups.
And
then
the
next
step
is
working
on
some
details
about
providers
and
the
funding.
So
Wayne
ederhauser
of
the
state
has
really
taken
the
lead
on
the
funding
piece
and
also
working
with
potential
providers
for
these
programs.
G
Andrew,
thank
you
for
the
update
on
I
saw
the
the
flex
I
read
about
that,
and
it
do.
You
know
if
there's
an
additional
funding
for
mitigation
because
of
the
flags
for
the
area
of
you
know
just
for
remediation.
Just
mitigation
mitigation
yeah,
like
some
police
funding,.
E
Or
whatnot
so
generally
yeah.
What
happens?
Is
the
they've
got
different
tiers
in
the
mitigation
fund?
We
get
the
tier
one
for
our
base,
funding
that
over
three
million
a
year
and
then
the
tier
three
is
for
winter
overflow
and
that's
done
proportional
to
the
number
of
beds
you
have.
So
if
there
are
600
beds
and
Salt
Lake
City
has
100
of
them
just
for
say
probably
165.
At
least
here
you
get
that
percentage
of
that
money,
Statewide
so
yeah
there
will
be
additional
funds
for
us
to
use.
Okay,
that's
good
to
hear.
F
H
Okay,
so
I
have
questions
in
two
veins,
both
coming
from
constituents,
HB
499,
the
flex
was
supposed
to
be
a
last
a
worst
case
scenario.
If
a
plan
wasn't
accepted
this
year,
it's
included
as
part
of
the
plan
itself.
Is
that
a
function
of
us
acknowledging
that
we
need
such
a
significant
number
of
beds,
more
than
we've
historically
looked
at,
or
is
there
a
different
reason
for
why
we're
flexing
as
part
of
the
initial
plan.
E
Yeah,
so
in
our
discussions
last
year,
as
you
brought
up
the
purp,
the
the
focus
of
that
group,
the
conference
of
Mayors
last
year
was
to
find
other
Alternatives
and
then
they
broached
the
subject
of
a
flex
as
sort
of
a
backup
to
that.
E
Now
that
set
a
precedent,
obviously-
and
so
this
year,
when
the
number
of
beds
went
from
400
to
600,
there's
a
big
gap,
obviously
and
needed
more
beds,
so
the
Mayors
and
the
work
that
was
done
identified
Flex
as
one
option
to
do
that.
It's
not
the
only
one,
but
it
was
part
of
that
base
plan
that
the
mayor's
accepted
and
put
forward
as
a
group
to
the
state
and
the
state
accepted
that
so
yeah.
The
175
are
part
of
that
base
plan.
Now,
oh.
E
Was
the
explanation
again,
this
is,
we
do
still
have
our
conditional
use
requirements
on
that
and
I
believe
the
the
city
is
going
to
have
to
take
action
to
allow
that
increase.
Now,
if
we
don't,
the
state
could
override
it
regardless,
but
that
doesn't
go
away.
So
this
is
a
temporary
plan
for
six
months,
but
the
conditional
use
still
stands.
Okay
and.
H
Then
the
second
part
is
I
know
we
at
one
point
had
been
looking
at
a
city-based
code
blue.
We
know
that
between
32
degrees
and
15
degrees
and
given
the
right
conditions,
even
above
32,
cold
weather
can
certainly
be
dangerous.
Are
we
still
investigating
those
opportunities?
Is
that
something
as
a
council,
we
can
continue
to
do
alongside
you
to
help?
Is
there
that
15
degrees,
Code
Blue
by
the
time
it's
15
degrees,
significant
damage
could
have
been
done
to
a
lot
of
people.
Sure.
E
Yeah
I
mean
anything:
cold
is
cold
right
right
in
Salt,
Lake
County.
We
have
our
Base
number
of
beds
year
round
and
then
the
winter
overflow
is
meant
to
address
the
bull
32
the
cold.
So
these
600
Beds
Are,
Meant,
For
That
overall,
what's
happened
in
previous
years,
is
you
had
say
400
or
300
beds,
and
then
you
still
had
some
Gap
there
and
so
for
folks
who
may
be
reticent
to
come
in
for
slightly
colder
conditions,
who
would
be
more
likely
to
come
in
really
cold
conditions?
E
That's
where
that
cold
blue
thing
came
in.
That's
why
the
15
degrees
is
pretty
low.
Otherwise,
if
it's
a
32,
it's
essentially
the
base
for
basically
two
to
three
months
of
the
full
thing.
So
that's
where
that
sort
of
thought
process
came
in
for
this
group
now
it
doesn't
mean
that
anybody
couldn't
identify
their
own
code,
blue,
that's
up
to
a
municipality
or
a
county.
To
do
that.
E
However,
if
we
did
that
City
by
City,
it
would
also
cause
a
confusion
within
the
county,
for
instance,
about
who's
declaring
it,
and
are
you
in
the
city
at
that
time
or
not
kind
of
thing,
and
do
you
come
to
that
City?
For
that
reason,
that's
why
the
state
decided
to
do
it
on
a
state
level
and
then
identify
Per
County
how
to
do
that
to
make
it
a
little
more
uniform
and
not
have
that
City
to
City
District
differences.
H
So
then,
in
that
vein,
will
these
beds
the
600
plus
weather
Flex,
another
elsewhere
I
mean
it
feels
like
this
homelessness
crisis
is
at
odds
with
our
need
for
water,
like
I'm,
really
praying
for
another
Super
snowy
winter,
terrified
for
the
people
who
don't
have
a
roof
over
their
heads.
So
let's
pray
and
and
hope
that
we
do
have
another
snowy
winter.
Will
these
600
beds
in
all
those
locations
be
24
7,
so
people
aren't
out
in
the
middle
of
the
day
I
know.
E
Yeah,
the
the
number
this
year
is
much
higher.
Part
of
that
is
a
realization.
There
are
more
folks,
but
if
you
look
at
the
average
the
last
few
years
it
hasn't
been
600,
it's
probably
been
closer
to
between
three
and
four,
maybe
right,
but
on
the
worst
nights
based
on
what
we
saw
last
winter,
it
got
that
high,
and
so
that's
why
the
planning
was,
let's
go
maximum
so
that
you
have
that
built-in
flexibility,
when
it's
maybe
a
lot
of
nights,
you'll
see
some
beds
not
not
used.
E
E
Can
stay
everything
except
for
St
Vincent
de
Paul,
which
is
always
sort
of
daytime
use
for
meals
and
then
nighttime
for
that
overhaul
and
oftentimes
there's
actually
a
pretty
defined
group
of
men
generally
who
go
to
St
Vinnie's
for
that
purpose?
Most
everybody
else
is
going.
We
moved
into
the
other
beds
for
24
7,
so
they
don't
have
to
bust
in
and
out
and
that
sort
of
thing.
A
E
Is
yes
not
yet,
and
then
you
also
think
of
the
MVP's
got
165
beds
so.
E
People
towards
yeah
that'll
count
towards
the
600.
Okay,
I
think
the
vo8
detox
beds
could
be
kind
of
the
part
of
that
50.
and
then
there's
also
contingencies.
I
think
that's
the
book
of
right.
There
that'd
be
the
sixth.
A
I
E
Yeah
so
to
councilmember
Dugan's
point
last
year
the
council
allowed
them
to
increase
from
30
to
50..
That
was
temporary,
though
so
that's
not
permanent,
so
that
is
not
included
in
this
planning
piece.
E
So
I
think
if
the
city
wanted
to
work
with
VOA
on
that
again
I'm
sure
they
would
be
in
minimal
to
it.
It
also.
This
does
not
count
families,
and
so
there
are
currently
a
hundred
family
options
right
now
and
last
year
we
thought
we
needed
more
than
that,
so
there
are
still
plans
being
made
to
add
more
capacity
for
families
separate
than
this
plan.
I
And
and
that
that
would
be
also
outside
of
Salt,
Lake
City
location,
yet
to
be
announced,
yeah,
that's
correct
for
families,
okay,.
F
A
I
I
for
one
would
like
to
know
if
the
VOA
needs
us
to
increase
that
cap
again
for
the
Youth
Center
I
I
didn't
hear
anyone
say
that
that
had
a
negative
impact
on
the
community
and
if
we
helped
20
more
youth,
be
sheltered
for
the
winter.
I
would
like
to
do
that
again.
If
we
need
to
I.
J
I'll
give
a
quick
introduction
and
then
turn
the
time
over
to
Daniel.
This
is
the
briefing
about
the
annexation
for
the
properties
located
approximately
2350
North
Rose
Park
Lane.
We
there's
going
to
be
a
map
up
here,
just
a
second
detailing
the
three,
so
it
won't
give
those
addresses.
This
change
would
facilitate
the
future
development
of
a
mixed-use
multi-family
residential
development
with
the
potential
for
up
to
1800
units.
J
The
zoning
of
properties
being
annexed
into
the
city
receive
their
zoning
designation.
During
that
process.
They
do
not
go
through
a
separate
rezoning
process.
However,
there
is
a
significant
public
process
as
a
part
of
that,
so
that
is
what
the
council
is
discussing
today.
So
with
that
Daniel
thank
you.
Can.
K
So
again,
this
is
a
request
by
J
Wright
properties.
There
are
two
petitions
involved.
One
is
a
rezone
request
for
property
at
2350
North
Rose,
Park
Lane,
which
is
shown
in
yellow
on
the
map
from
the
AG
2
agricultural
Zone
to
the
rmu
residential
mixed-use
Zone.
The
other
request
is
an
annexation
request,
which
is
highlighted
in
blue
on
the
map
where
the
applicant
is
requesting
the
rmu
zone
for
the
property
they
own
at
2441
North,
and
then
the
city
is
proposing
the
OS
zones
for
the
city
and
state
properties
at
2462
and
2440
North.
K
L
K
So,
just
for
some
context,
the
properties
are
located
just
off
of
the
2100
North
Freeway
Exit
on
I-215
end
of
the
city.
The
properties
are
along
a
canal
as
well
as
Rose
Park
Lane,
which
is
the
road
right
off
of
that
interchange
exit
that
part
of
Rose
Park
Lane
is
pretty
rough,
so
any
development
would
require
New
Road
improvements.
K
The
property
to
the
southeast
is
the
Salt
Lake
Regional
athletic
complex,
which
has
a
large
number
of
number
of
playing
fields,
and
just
to
the
north
of
that
is
the
state's
off
highway
vehicle
state
park.
That's
used
for
OHV
and
ATV
writing
to
the
east
of
those
is
the
Jordan
River
in
the
Jordan
River
Trail,
and
one
thing
not
shown
on
this
map
of
southerly
on
this
map
was
that
there
is
a
residential
neighborhood
just
to
the
south
of
the
rack,
and
that
also
includes
two
schools
in
elementary
and
a
middle
school.
K
So
just
for
some
future
context,
the
rack
is
planned
to
be
expanded
to
fill
the
entire
area,
that's
shown
as
city
property,
but
there
is
no
current,
no
current
date
for
that
expansion.
Along
with
that,
there
is
plans
for
a
new
future
North
Access
Road
shown
as
the
Sports
Park
Boulevard
on
this
map
in
Orange.
That
road
would
ultimately
connect
Rose
Park,
a
lane
with
Redwood
Road.
K
Next
slide,
please
so
as
far
as
standards
of
consideration,
the
2350
North
property
in
yellow
is
already
in
the
city
and
as
part
of
the
rezone
request,
our
rezone
is
reviewed
against
the
city's
standard
considerations,
which
generally
have
to
do
with
consistency
with
Master
plans,
compatibility
and
impact
of
city
services.
The
annexation
component
of
this
is
a
little
different,
except
for
some
dimensional
considerations.
There
are
no
formal
consideration
requirements.
K
So
the
applicant
is
requesting
the
rmu
zone
for
the
property,
so
I'm
just
going
to
highlight
some
of
the
major
requirements
of
that
zone
for
height
The
Zone
allows
for
up
to
75
foot
tall
development,
which
is
about
seven
stories,
has
limited
setbacks
intended
to
pull
development
close
to
the
street.
There
is
a
20
open
space
requirement,
and
on
top
of
that,
there
is
a
20-foot
landscape
tree
buffer
required
along
the
freeway
up
beyond
that,
the
Zone
allows
for
a
mix
of
mostly
residential
uses,
including
multi-family
and
low
intensity.
K
A
G
K
Yeah
next
slide,
please.
K
There
we
go
so
one
key
consideration
for
brazona's
master
plan
policies.
Again
the
city
is
proposing
to
Zone
the
city
and
state
properties
to
the
open
space
Zone,
and
in
this
case
the
properties
are
in
the
Rose
Park
plan,
which
was
adopted
in
2001.
That
plan
calls
for
open
space
or
agricultural
Zoning
for
the
properties
and
the
proposal
matches
exactly
that
and
would
support
the
use
of
the
properties
for
the
rack
and
the
state
park
in
the
future.
K
The
privately
owned
properties
are
different,
though
the
requested
rmu
Zone
doesn't
match
the
master
plan's
future
land
use
policy
which
again
calls
for
that
agricultural
or
open
space
zoning.
The
plans
policy
discussion
on
that
just
notes.
The
reason
for
that
zoning
is
so
that
the
properties
will
be
compatible
with
the
recreational
and
open
space
land
uses
on
the
rack
in
the
State
Park.
K
There
are
a
number
of
cdy
policies
that
could
support
the
rezone
and
some
that
do
not
some
policies
that
could
support.
The
proposal
include
access
to
Recreation
for
residents,
redeveloping
underutilized
properties
and
using
existing
infrastructure,
but
there
are
policies
that
might
not
support
it.
Like
prioritizing
development
with
esta.
J
K
So
two
key
issues
with
this
Zona
request
are
traffic
and
freeway
impacts.
The
applicant
provided
a
traffic
study
that
recommended
a
phased
approach
for
improvements
to
support
the
applicant's
development.
Those
are
our
first
striping
and
intersection
and
pro
improvements
to
Rose,
Park
Lane
and
the
freeway
interchange
that
would
support
up
to
500
units
and,
ultimately,
though,
it
would
require
completion
of
the
north
North
access
road
before
the
development
could
be
fully
completed
with
1800
units.
K
K
So
as
far
as
public
input,
we
receive
two
letters
opposed
to
the
rezone
and
we
received
one
letter
suggesting
conditions
related
to
health
and
air
quality.
Nine
people
spoke
generally
against
the
proposal
at
the
Planning
Commission
public
hearing.
Their
concerns
were
generally
about
traffic
infrastructure,
General,
Public,
Access,
being
limited
to
the
rack,
and
air
quality
and
noise
concerns
next
slide.
K
K
Zoning
for
the
annexation,
the
commission
reference
planned
Salt
Lake
and
the
council's
2016
housing
policy
statements
specifically
that
plan
Salt
Lake
supported
residential
with
recreational
access,
but
that
the
rack
won't
actually
allow
residents
to
use
the
fields
and
they
also
reference
the
2016
housing
policy
statement
that
supports
residential
near
Transit,
which
the
site
currently
doesn't
have
access
to,
and
I
should
note
that
on
the
city
and
state
properties,
the
commission
didn't
provide
any
concerns
on
that
annexation.
Request
next
slide.
A
G
D
A
A
very
odd
shape:
okay,
right,
yeah
I
mean
parking,
75
foot
maximum.
So
at
that
point
it's
the
building
height,
that
is
restricting
the
amount
of
density.
Also
rmu,
is
in
the
urban
center
context,
correct
parking
which
requires
zero
parking
spaces
per
unit,
which
makes
sense
where
there's
Transit
right.
How
did
staff.
A
A
A
G
I
mean
I
heard
someone
will
be
policy.
Questions
I
was
interested
in
some
of
the
posts.
Questions
noted
on
the
stuff
report
regarding
the
affordability
of
the
units,
and
there
was
one
that
was
thought.
It
was
very
right.
G
H
G
And
I,
you
know,
I
think
that,
to
the
broader
conversation
on
this
you
know
UTA,
because,
as
you,
it
you
know,
Transit
is,
is
not
considered
a
utility
for
the
State
it
should.
The
density
will
allow,
hopefully
to
to
actually
make
a
justification
for
the
transit
line
that
we
also
need
for
many
of
the
companies
in
the
Inland
Port.
G
It
just
attended
the
graduation
from
shuttler
the
apprenticeship,
graduation
and
many
of
these
kids
have
a
hard
time
to
get
to
this
very
good,
paying
jobs,
and
there
was
in
in
the
Inland
Port.
You
know
talking
about
stuttler,
but
it's
it's
very
important
that
we
have
a
transit
system
that
connects
people
from
the
West
Side,
especially,
but
not
only
the
website
to
these
jobs
and
density
might
allow
us
to
justify
some
of
this
Transit
lines.
I
Have
a
a
number
of
concerns,
but
I
just
want
to
touch
on
the
one
concern
that
councilmember
we
just
mentioned
about
Transit
out
there
you're
right
this
may
be
affordable
living.
But
it's
not
excuse
me:
affordable
housing,
possibly
affordable
housing,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
affordable
living
without
some
Transit
because,
but
we
also
have
a
lot
of
Transit
concerns
across
the
city
in
general.
Right
now.
So
we're
we're
going
to
add
an
additional
Transit
issue
and
concern
in
one
area.
I
That's
not
been
built
where
we
have
a
city
right
now
that
doesn't
have
a
very
good
Transit
plan.
When
you
have
transits
every
30
minutes,
no
one
will
use
that,
but
if
because
it's
not
frequent
enough,
so
we
have
an
issue
with
Transit
across
the
city
and
now
we're
adding
another
issue
of
transit
to
an
area
that
is
far
from
a
lot
of
places
and
far
from
jobs
onto
that
mix
and
onto
that
expense.
So,
I,
that's
where
my
concern
is
on
the
on
the
transit.
G
D
G
An
issue
connecting
this
pieces
together,
so
I
think
that
for
the
to
make
this
the
argument
to
the
state-
which
is
you
know,
we
don't
control
much
of
the
transit
and
the
state
we
just
started
to
fit
in
some
of
those
pieces,
but
we
don't
have
a
limited
resources
to
do
this
is
hopefully
the
density
allows
us
to
get
to
the
place
where
we
actually
have
better
transportation.
I
For
these
older
Parts
I
understand
that
right,
the
airport,
the
prison
and
this
location
are
not
near
near
each
other.
There
are
opposite
sides.
This
one's
on
I-15
north,
the
prison,
is
far
way
out.
18,
but
I
I,
understand
and
I
think
that
discussion
needs
to
be
had
with
UTA
in
the
state,
because
Transit
is
a
big
deal
across
the
city.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
adding
to
that
Transit
deficit
by
building
a
place.
I
H
Well,
in
that
vein,
since
you
brought
it
up,
my
neighbors
out,
there
have
been
suffering
in
silence
for
a
long
time.
Their
CIP
request
wasn't
even
considered
for
funding.
It
was
overlooked
completely
you'll
recall
that
I
just
secured
the
two
traffic
calming
signs
as
assigned
to
them
that
we
hear
them.
Development
like
this
not
only
brings
density
that
allows
us
to
justify
increased
attention
out
there,
which
is
sorely
needed.
They
have
no
sidewalks,
they
have
no
curbs
and
gutters.
They
have
no
sound
walls,
they
don't
even
have
a
fully
paved
Road.
It
keeps
crumbling.
H
They
don't
have
adequate
drainage
of
development
like
this.
If
we
leverage
it
appropriately
can
actually
improve
quality
of
life,
we
put
people
on
our
team
who,
with
the
state,
can
justify
why
we
need
the
sound
wall,
who
have
a
high
level
of
success
in
getting
those
sorts
of
things.
I
actually
am
optimistic
that
if
we
as
a
city
are
smart
with
how
we
engage
these
developers
and
this
project,
we
actually
end
up
with
a
net
positive
for
the
people
who
are
already
living
there
under
terrible
circumstances,
while
creating
something
that
is
positive
for
future
salt.
H
A
Let
me
let
me
just
councilman
has
a
question
again,
but
let
me
make
sure
I'm
understanding
this
correctly
in
terms
of
Transit,
but
also
things
like
sound
attenuation
around
the
freeway
and
other
things.
There's
already
a
lack
on
the
west
side
and
there's
a.
A
H
A
gauge
there's
a
gauged
willingness.
The
developer
has
already
voluntarily
met
with
constituents,
have
created
an
exhaustive
list
of
the
constituents
who
actually
live
there
next
to
the
project
and
has
asked
the
question
already:
can
you
live
with
this
and
what
do
we
need
to
bring
to
the
table
to
make
your
life
more
livable.
A
Okay,
so
for
staff,
and
then
I'll
get
back
to
you,
counselor
Dugan,
but
for
staff.
If
the
developer
is
willing
to
help
meet
some
of
the
needs
that
the
community
already
has
in
Return
of
like
if
we
support
this
rezone
and
the
developers
saying
they're
willing
to
do
this,
we
don't
really
have
a
legal
way
to
do
that
right,
because
that
would
be
an
exaction
or
that
would
be
like
a
taking
or
something
but
like
what
is
I'm
assuming
that
answers
development
agreement.
A
But
what
is
the
tool
that
allows
us
to
actually
get
those
public
benefits
that
it
sounds
like
there's
a
willingness
to
provide
make
sure
that
those
actually
come.
That's
a
little
bit
stronger
than
just
yeah.
We
can
do
that
as
long
as
interest
rates
don't
rise
and
our
primary
lender.
You
know,
like
all
these
seven
different
things
that
don't
that
we
that
neither
us
nor
the
city
control
as
long
as
those
don't
happen,
then
we
will
provide
those.
K
I
Daniel
with
questions
thanks,
I
appreciate,
I
appreciate
the
discussion
here.
The
the
one
thing
I
concerns
me
on
the
sound
and
the
noise
pollution
that
we
would
see
out
here.
This
is
next
to
a
freeway
which
is
almost
like
being
next
to
the
airport
and
those
sound
walls.
Work
really
well
for
a
single
story
home
in
the
vicinity
of
that
sound
wall,
but
once
it
bounces
off
that
sound
wall,
it
goes
back
and
it
hits
a
place
maybe
about
a
mile
away
and
that
sound
is
very,
is
accentuated
on
Istanbul.
I
Also,
if
you're
in
a
seventh
story,
building
the
sound
works
well
for
the
first
couple
floors.
But
after
that
you
open
up
your
window
and
you
don't
have
anything
and
I
just
know
that
from
experience,
I
have
some
some
friends
that
live
just
off
of
I-15
and
2
and
I-80
they
open
up
the
window,
they're
they're,
probably
a
half
mile
up
the
hill.
You
can't
have
a
conversation
out
there
any
time
of
the
day,
because
the
freeway
noise
so.
H
Our
constituents
made
very
clear
the
realities
that
they're
living
with
I
would
say
that
it
is
still
needed
and
having
this
on,
our
team
is
a
hope
that
that
area
has
not
seen
when
I
was
canvassing
for
my
own
election
I
came
home
with
sore
throat
because
of
the
level
at
which
you
have
to
speak
to
overcome.
They
have
the
decibel
readers
in
their
yards
80
to
90
decibels
on
an
average
day.
So
while
it
won't
solve
all
the
problems,
it
surely
is
a
chance
at
something
that
we
haven't
had.
H
I
have
been
rejected
three
times
now
by
the
good
people
at
UDOT
for
this
Improvement,
despite
the
cases
that
I'm
making
that
there's
a
material
change
to
the
use
since
that
Highway
was
put
in
yes,
it's
not
perfect.
Yes,
there
are
people,
but
let's
look
at
those
when
I
got
here,
I
took
an
apartment
off
of
North
Temple
in
600
West
and
it
directly
overlooked.
Highway,
15
and
I
got
500
a
month
off
my
rent
because
it
was
so
loud
in
there,
so
we
can
just
get
it
as
naturally
occurring,
affordable,
housing
assistance,
okay,.
A
E
I
I
was
just
backed
on
the
setbacks.
We
had
the
two
canals
in
the
vicinity,
so
we
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
setbacks
from
the
canal
building
set
back
to
the
canal
and
the
environment
impact
okay,
make
sure
that
the
canal
is
the
canals
and
exactly
the
two
canals
that
are
right
there:
nearby.
Okay,
it's.
A
L
My
questions
about
this
reminds
me
a
little
bit
of
that:
the
one
property
that
they
wanted
to
do,
Residential
and
and
now
we're
walking
back
from
that
I
think
that
was
called
Misty
water
when
we
annexed
that
I
mean
that
one
was
in
a
flight
path,
this
one's
by
a
freeway,
but
the
the
other
thing
in
common
with
them
is
that
this
would
have
been
a
residential
like
entirely
surrounded
by
commercial
and
really
like
cut
off
from
amenities
and
things.
L
K
So
originally
the
request
was
RMF
75,
which
wouldn't
allow
any
sort
of
commercial
uses
to
be
built
in
this
development.
So
staff
proposed
rmu
Zone,
which
would
allow
them
to
integrate
some
sort
of
could
be
a
small
grocery
or
something
into
the
development
to
support
so
those
quick
trips
there.
Otherwise
they
would
have
to
travel
a
little
bit
further
than
the
adjacent
neighborhood
just
south
of
the
rack
to.
H
Continues
it
continues
to
be
a
food
desert
and
the
mixed
use
was
actually
a
request
for
me,
because,
even
if
we
can't
get
a
full-size
grocery
store
or
those
other
things
that
we're
talking
about
I'm,
hoping
for
bodegas
and
other
things,
we
have
a
constituency
that
has
experienced
this
isolation,
who
again
expressed
that
same
concern.
So
you're
tracking
right
with
the
community's.
G
Concerns
I
think
to
answer
some
of
this.
You
know
I,
think
that's
it's
important
to
note
that
this
is
not
a
completely
isolated
place.
You
know
there
is
a
two
minute
away.
Neighborhood
right
south
of
this.
That
is
also
I
mean.
Unfortunately,
we
only
have
a
couple
supermarkets
on
the
west
side,
but
it's
you
know
eight
minutes
away
from
this
mess.
You
know
and
I'm.
You
know
I'm
almost
eight
minutes
always
also
from
Smith's
in
the
in
the
Glendale
neighborhood
myself.
So
just
FYI.
H
L
K
H
H
So,
as
the
roadway
is
constructed
going
from
that
location
back
to
Redwood,
Road
it'll
have
to
cross
over
not
only
the
canals
but
also
the
river
trail,
and
so
we
just
need
to
be
especially
conscientious
to
make
sure
that
I
don't
want
the
bikers
or
Walkers
to
have
to
cross
a
roadway.
That's
a
really
nice
open
use,
kind.
A
F
A
All
right
councilman,
please
do
you
have
additional
things
to
add
to
this
list.
No
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
ask
that
I
want
to
I'm.
Sorry
I
know
we're
way
behind,
but
just
I'm
the
first
to
admit
that
our
zoning
ordinance
doesn't
have
all
the
tools
in
it
or
need.
Like
we've
been
talking,
I've
been
talking
about
this
every
time.
A
I
have
an
opportunity
for
the
last
I,
don't
know
how
long
so,
with
the
understanding
that
we
often
have
to
fit
Square
pegs
into
round
holes
with
our
zoning
ordinance
in
order
to
get
a
good
project
to
become
legal.
A
This
feels
like
a
really
Square
Peg
and
a
really
round
hole
to
do
rmu
or
RMF
75,
this
far
away
from
transit.
This
far
away
from
the
downtown
core,
where
we
we
routinely
say
no
to
that
level
of
density,
even
like
right,
downtown
or
right
close
to
downtown.
So
what
is
the
condition
here
that
I
need
to
understand
as
to
why
we
would
take
what
I
would
consider
a
fairly
aggressive
like
fitting
we're
being
pretty
liberal
with
our
tools
right
and
I?
A
K
I
think
what
really
got
us
there
was
the
compatibility
and
what
other
potential
uses
would
make
sense
on
this
property.
I
think
the
rmu
or
residential
zones
or
low
intensity
commercial
zone
is
going
to
be
most
appropriate
next
to
a
big
open
space
facility
like
Iraq
versus
like
an
industrial
zone
for.
A
Example,
so,
actually,
ironically,
to
the
extent
that
it
is
far
away
from
other
developed
properties,
it
may
be,
in
staff's
opinion
appropriate
to
allow
the
additional
height
right
that
we
typically
wouldn't
that
far
away
from
the
downtown
right
is
that
what
I'm,
okay,
yeah
anything
else.
That
I
should
like
just
from
a
pure
zoning
like
am
I
wrong.
It's
it's!
It's
odd
for
this
Zone
to
be
that
far
from
yeah.
A
K
A
K
A
This
is
all
really
helpful.
I
think
we
should
give
the
applicant
it's
our
tradition
that
you
get
five
minutes
to
answer
any
of
the
things
we
just
discussed
or
do
whatever
you
want
for
five
minutes.
M
Chair
council
members,
thank
you
very
much
for
giving
us
time.
I'm
Wade
budge
I'm
here,
representing
Jay
Wright
communities.
I,
have
with
me
Lincoln
shirts,
who's
a
consultant
advising
on
the
project
as
well
as
our
urban
planner.
Who
works
with
me.
Jason,
Bull
and
I'll.
Try
to
be
brief
and
I
really
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
presentation.
They
did
a
very
good
job.
I
want
to
highlight
a
few
items.
At
the
outset.
M
M
So
we
see
here
I'm
going
to
just
get
us
to
the
elevation,
so
we
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
principles.
This
is
what
the
view
would
look
like
from
someone
on
I-215.
This
is
a
sample.
If
you
will.
The
intent
here
is
to
make
sure
that
we're
bringing
a
project
that
will
help
bring
the
resources
we
need
for
the
Sports
Park
Boulevard.
M
M
We
also
have
heard,
as
we've
talked
to
Neighbors,
about
the
need
for
more
retail
in
that
area.
It
is
true,
as
council
member
Petro
said,
we
are
going
to
include
mixed
use
within
this
project,
so
a
bodega
other
kind
of
opportunities
for
shops
and
Retail
within
the
ground
level.
But
we
also
know
that,
by
bringing
this
number
of
of
residents
to
this
area,
we're
going
to
attract
the
attention
of
retailers,
who
will
be
more
inclined
to
come
and
provide
other
retail
options
in
that
Redwood
Road
area.
M
We're
really
viewing
this
as
a
way
where
this
project
has
two
primary
ways
in
and
out.
One
would
be
over
to
Redwood
Road
through
the
Sports
Park
Boulevard,
because
that's
one
way
where
you'd
want
to
go
and
Shop.
The
other
would
be,
of
course,
off
of
Rose
Park
laying
down
to
I-215
and
then
the
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention
is.
This
is
a
highly
amenitized
project.
M
We
want
to
attract
workers
from
the
airport,
Inland
Port,
the
all
the
Vitality
that's
already
occurring
in
that
area,
but
make
it
so
they're
able
to
live
closer
to
their
work.
We.
This
will
be,
admittedly,
because
of
the
transit
items
that
have
already
been
at
Transit.
Difficulties
will
be
a
car
Community
initially
at
least
until
Transit
priorities
change
for
the
UTA.
M
We've
also
adjusted
the
the
mix
of
units
so
that
there
will
be
three
bedroom
units
included
among
the
different
types
of
classes,
because
we
want
to
have
a
variety
of
different
family
sizes
represented
in
this
community
and
then
lastly,
I
would
just
offer
we
getting
back
to
the
amenities.
This
is
a
community
that
would
have
pools.
It
would
have
bike
maintenance
rooms
and
storage
and
Locker
areas.
M
We
want
to
make
sure
that
those
people
who
come
here
know
they
can
have
an
active
lifestyle
and
go
right
down
to
the
Jordan
River
through
a
trail
that
we
would
say,
is
part
of
this
project
too,
making
sure
that
it
works.
So
we're
pleased
with
the
support
we've
received
from
members
of
the
community.
M
The
members
we
have
received
from
the
support
we've
received
from
staff
and,
frankly,
we
felt
support
even
from
the
Planning
Commission,
because
our
our
vote
there
was
a
close
one
as
a
4-6
vote,
and
it
was
primarily
just
because
of
some
open
issues
that
we've
since
developed
more
since
we
were
with
the
Planning
Commission,
we've
adjusted
the
bedroom
counts.
We've
better
worked
on
our
mixed
use
component.
We've
understood
better.
N
So,
on
behalf
of
the
developer,
we
sought
a
legislative
appropriation
that
was
awarded
by
the
legislature
to
the
Department
of
Transportation
through
interlocal
agreement.
They
have
committed
those
funds
to
Salt
Lake
City,
for
the
engineering
work
to
be
done
on
the
connection
between
this
proposed
development
and
Redwood
Road,
okay,
I'll.
A
Need
to
get
some
follow-up
on
that
one
out
later.
In
our
view,
that's
the
beginning,
the
the
rendering
that
we
were
just
looking
at.
Yes,
what
was
I
looking
at
on
the
ground
floor
there
with
all
those
windows.
M
A
Views
I
think
that's
what
one
thing
I'm
concerned
with
just
looking
at
the
rendering
is
that
We've
made
a
lot
of
mistakes
in
in
the
in
history
with
large,
large-scale
housing
projects
that
don't
have
the
appropriate
either
just
site,
design
or
mix
of
retail
and
commercial
mix
of
incomes
mix
of
all
sorts
of
things.
A
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
re-creating
those
same
problems,
and
if
this
is
a
hundred
percent
parking
on
the
ground
floor
with
all
the
units
above
I
would
say,
that's
recreating
those
same
problems
and
the
people
that
live
there
are
going
to
have
a
lower
quality
of
life.
Because
of
that
so
I
think
there's
some
things
that
I
would
like
to
know
whether
they
occur
in
the
base.
A
Zoning
of
rmu
that
require
ground
floor
activation
or
if
we
need
to
build
them
in
where
I
really
think
again,
I
think
we're
making
a
square
peg
fit
around
hole
with
rmu
zoning.
This
far
out,
because
Army
really
is
something
that
we
think
of
as
like
one
infill
property
in
a
in
a
larger
block,
and
this
is
not
the
case.
So
do
those
tools
exist?
A
I'm
not
asking
you
to
answer
this
I'm
asking
staff
to
follow
up
with
me
later,
but
do
those
tools
exist
in
the
base
rmu
zoning
to
make
sure
that
the
ground
floor
of
this
large
development
is
activated
is
safe?
It's
not
just
a
closed
parking
garage,
a
piece
of
glass
with
a
car
parked
behind
it
does
nothing
to
make
sure
that
the
person
walking
their
dog
right
outside
that
piece
of
glass
is
safe.
So
how
do
we
make
sure
that
this
is
a
that
those
issues
are
or.
O
O
M
O
So
I'm,
going
with
what
kind
saying
I
think
I
would
really
work
on
this
project
to
make
it
like
a
livable
place,
because
that's
kind
of
far
away,
and
until
we
get
all
the
transportation
people
this.
This
looks
like
a
downtown
thing
more
than
an
out
there
thing.
So
I
would
like
this
to
be
a
place
where
you're
comfortable
going
I
mean
you're
so
close
to
the
river
I
mean
it
could
offer
so
many
things
to
the
residents
than
what
I
see
right
now.
So
those
are
my
hopes
and
wishes.
Thanks.
Thank.
G
You
the
I
mean
this
is
the
view
from
the
freeway
right,
so
you
wouldn't
put
commercial
on
the
side
of
the
freeway
and
I
I
understand
what
you're
saying.
But
if
you
raise
this
comment
on
that
I
think
that
makes
sense
it.
You
know
it
looks
like
this
I
hope
that
the
other,
if
you
send
us
a
rendering
from
the
other
side,
it
doesn't
look
like
this
whatsoever,
but.
A
It's
also
the
place
where
a
personal
safety
concern
could
be
the
most
apparent
for
an
individual
person
that
is
walking
by
themselves
at
night
between
the
freeway
that
no
one's
paying
attention
to
them,
and
this
closed
parking
lot
that
no
one's
paying
attention
and
that
could
be
a
really
unsafe
place
for
an
individual
to
walk
their
dog.
That's.
D
A
A
It
just
requires
a
higher
level
of
consideration
where
we're
using
a
zone
that,
like
hasn't,
been
tested
in
this
context
at
all
and
I
I'm,
fully
supportive
of
us
making
those
considerations,
because
I
don't
think
we
have
all
the
tools
that
we
need
in
our
zoning
ordinance,
but
we
just
have
to
be
more
careful
on
this.
G
So,
just
to
continue
on
my
eternal
thought:
I
I,
this
rendering,
since
you
know
you
show
us
the
rendering
and
we
have
a
million
questions
because
of
it
and
they're
all
very
good
questions
and
comments.
I
trees
is
an
important
one
to
me.
I
only
see
a
few.
There
I
hope
that
if
you
end
up
doing
this,
there
is
a
wall
trees
between
this
and
the
on
on
the
structure
on
the
freeway
and
between
the
freeway
and
the
structure.
All
around
and
I
I
also
read
about
outdoor
filtrate.
G
You
know
air
filters.
I
want
you
to
be
creative
about
this,
and
not
only
put
these
fancy
filters
in
the
units,
which
is
basically
you
you're,
basically
putting
a
box
where
someone
will
exchange
a
filter
and
those
filters
cost
a
lot
of
money.
The
thicker
Ones
cost
a
lot
of
money,
so
you're,
basically
sending
the
the
cost
of
the
filtration
to
the
to
the
person
leasing.
G
The
unit
I
I
wonder
if
there
is
a
way
of
eating
creative
about
this,
to
make
sure
that
there
is
adequate
if
this
project
were
to
move
forward
and
again
I'm
supportive
in
in
general
terms
about
this
and
the
density
in
the
area.
G
But
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
sending
the
higher
cost
to
the
person
leasing
it
if
there
is
a
creative
way
to
either
discount
this
big
thick
filters
that
we
they're
going
to
put
on
the
units
and
whatnot
and
you
mentioned
bedroom
counts
and
that
make
me
wonder
what
is
your
current
breakdown
on
that,
at
least
how
it
is
at
the
moment.
So.
M
We're
modeling
it.
Currently,
we
have
25
being
two
bedroom
units
about
a
component
of
of.
We
don't
have
the
final
number,
but
we
have
committed
to
include
three
bedroom
units
as
well,
and
then
the
balance
would
be
one
bedroom
and
then
some
studio
as
well.
But
so
the
primary
would
be
the
one
bedroom
unit
and
we
can
bring
a
breakdown
because
we've
still
been
getting
some
comments
from
people,
as
we've
had
discussions
about
whether
we're
getting
the
right
count
yeah.
But
that
would
be
a
detail.
G
Just
the
last
thought:
when
you're
talking
about
the
commercial
you
might
struggle,
we've
seen
we've
seen
this
a
lot
and
all
across
the
city,
you
might
struggle
to
find
a
tenant
and
I
want
you
to
also
not
to
throw
your
hands
and
I'm
talking
in
general
to
the
all
the
developers
right.
You
know,
and
you
happen
to
be
in
front
of
me,
but
not
to
throw
your
hands
over
there
and
said.
Oh,
no
one
is
renting
it
right.
G
So
I
want
us
to
be
creative,
a
lot
as
far
as
like
what
level
of
discount
you're
willing
to
offer
for
that
space
that
we're
talking
about
an
amenity
that
we
need
in
the
area
and
is
the
chicken
or
the
egg.
As
far
as
like.
How
do
you
make
that
need
happen
and
whatnot?
Maybe
there
is
a
way
of
getting
creative
about
as
far
as
their
rent
for
that
space.
G
That
we
know
is
going
to
be
an
amenity
for
those
hundreds
of
people
in
there,
and
we
don't
necessarily
want
them
to
go
a
couple
miles
away
to
buy
eggs.
They
could
just
buy
it
right
there
right
and
maybe
someone
wants
to
buy
water
across
because
they're
playing
sports-
hopefully
they
just
buy
it
right
there.
So
those
are
my
initial
thoughts.
N
Council
member,
if
I,
can't
just
respond
to
this
real
quickly,
just
because
this
is
going
to
be
an
owner,
managed
and
run
facility
versus
something
that's
going
to
be
sold
to
a
rate.
I
think
there
is
opportunity
to
do
discounts
and
subsidies
to
the
retail
until
it
matures
is
the
part
of
the
development
as.
A
Well:
okay,
I
guess
we'll
I'll,
just
let
the
public
and
the
applicant
know
where
my
brain
is
at
right
now.
I
want
to
study
this
a
lot
more,
but
my
thought
is
as
opposed
to
most
rezone
requests
where
I'm
I'm
really
trying
hard
not
to
look
at
the
development
plan
in
terms
of
whether
or
not
I'm
going
to
support
this
I'm.
Trying
to
look
at
does
that
zone
make
sense
for
the
neighborhood
context.
A
I
may
be
viewing
this
one
a
little
bit
differently
and
I
may
want
a
lot
more
assurances
as
to
what
the
development
plan
is
going
to
be
and
how
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
that's
enforceable
and
I'm
not
exactly
sure
the
tool
or
how
that's
going
to
be,
and
if
it's
going
to
require
some
upfront
architecture
costs
and
Urban
Design,
like
whatever
plant
landscape
plans,
because
it
is
so
unique
that
I
think
that
I
think
I
have
to
look
at
this
one
a
little
differently
than
I'd.
Look
at
a
different
one.
A
A
For
our
best
discussion,
we
are
going
to
skip
item
number
three
move
that
to
a
different
day
and
so
we're
on
item
number
four
budget.
Amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year,
23
24.,
council
members-
are
we
going
to
keep
going
through
this
and
then
go
to
our
break?
A
D
P
P
There
are
10
items
in
the
budget
amendment.
This
includes
a
revenue
reduction
of
over
2.1
million
dollars
and
over
14.8
million
dollars
in
expenditures.
Most
of
those
expenditures
are
a
reappropriation
for
new
vehicles.
So
this
is
an
item
you
see
each
year
where
previous
Appropriations
for
vehicles
that
were
unable
to
be
encumbered
under
a
contract.
Basically,
the
manufacturer
was
not
accepting
orders,
so
the
vehicles
are
still
needed,
but
the
funding
needs
to
be
reappropriated
in
the
new
fiscal
year.
So
once
the
manufacturer
begins
accepting
orders
the
money's
there
to
make
the
purchase.
I
P
We
received
new
information
today
about
fund
balance.
I
sent
an
email
last
night,
so
that
is
now
outdated.
Can
we
get
displayed
on
the
screen
the
chart
on
page
three
of
the
staff
report?
This
shows
the
fund
balance
projection
and
if
we
could
zoom
in
a
little
bit
on
the
right
side,
so
in
the
blue
section
you
will
see
a
little
bit
near
the
middle.
An
item
called
expense
changes
and
it's
eight
and
a
half
million
dollars.
P
These
expense
changes
were
not
included
in
the
annual
budget
fund
balance
projections.
What
we
learned
today
is
the
eight
and
a
half
million
is
incorrect.
It's
actually
2.2
million,
and
this
is
good
news,
because
it
means
that
there
is
more
available
in
general
fund
balance,
so
that
would
actually
be
just
above
13,
which
is
the
minimum
Target.
The
councils
identified
now.
Those
projections
that
you're
looking
at
don't
include
two
important
things.
P
So,
each
year,
at
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year,
unused
budgets
drop
to
fund
balance,
which
increases
the
percentage.
That's
not
included
in
these
projections.
It
also
doesn't
include
revenues
coming
in
higher
than
budgeted.
Since,
when
the
council
adopts
the
annual
budget,
we
don't
have
the
actual
revenues
for
the
last
few
months
of
the
fiscal
year,
so
that
would
also
increase
fund
balance
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Mary
Beth.
Who
has
a
little
bit
more
context
on
why
this
changed.
Q
So
when
I
was
looking
today
through
Arc
akfer
I
noticed
that
the
what
it's
called
is
non-spendable.
That
number
has
changed,
so
it
went
from
the
8.5
down
to
the
2.2.
The
8.5
included
account
that's
receivable
and
taxes.
Receivable
gasbi
has
changed
that
standard,
and
it
only
includes
our
prepaid
numbers
now.
So
that's
why
it
went
from
8.5
to
2.2.
Q
Is
that
better?
Okay,
so
gasby
changed
the
ruling
in
our
akfer
and
we
used
to
include
that's
a
lot
of
acronyms
I.
Don't
know:
Gatsby
government
Accounting,
Standards
Board
I
changed
for
our
financial
statements,
the
requirements
for
non-spendable
funds
we
used
to
include
accounts,
receivable
and
taxes
receivable.
We
no
longer
include
those.
We
only
include
prepaid
expenses,
who's.
R
We
were
grateful
that
Ben
noticed
this
and
asked
about
it,
and
it
was
important
to
get
it
figured
out
before
today
and
Mary
Beth
was
kind
enough
to
work
together
with
Ben
and
Jennifer
and
get
it
figured
out,
but
essentially
it
looked
like
based
on
how
it
was
originally
reported.
It
looked
like
we
had
less
than
13
in
fund
balance.
R
In
fund
balance,
so
this
is
I
mean
to
me:
I
thought
it
was
great
because
they
noticed
they
work
together.
They
figured
it
out
and
and
now
we're
okay,
so
we're
okay.
Okay,.
A
R
P
Yes,
I'll
go
through
the
items
one
by
one
and
in
the
next
budget
amendment
we
will
have
an
updated
fund
balance
chart
reflecting
what
we
just
talked
about.
Thank
you
and
there
there
are
two
items
where
the
administration
is
requesting.
Straw
polls.
P
They
happen
to
be
the
first
two
items,
so
I'll
jump
to
those
right
now.
Item
A1:
this
is
a
donation.
Is
there
a
different.
P
So
there's
a
map
for
this
item-
page
five,
that's
it
so
this
is
a
donation
of
two
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
dollars
and
it
is
to
being
added
to
an
existing
CIP
project.
The
council
approved
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
CIP
last
year
to
add
lighting
to
the
Northeast
ball
field
at
Riverside,
Park
next
to
the
Jordan
River.
It's
the
red
marker
on
the
map.
The
donation
will
allow
the
project
to
also
add
lighting
to
the
adjacent
baseball
field.
P
The
Northwest
one
just
left
of
the
red
marker,
the
total
project
budget
is
518
thousand
dollars,
and
the
administration
requested
a
straw
poll
to
allow
for
receipt
of
the
contract
for
the
larger
the
entire
project.
The
funds
still
couldn't
be
committed
until
the
council
votes
on
this
item.
A
So
if
I'm
Translating,
that
for
the
public,
this
is
not
actually
spending
any
more
taxpayer
dollars,
it's
allowing
us
to
receive
a
donation
from
a
private
company
in
order
to
put
into
this
part
to
light
both
Fields
instead
of
just
one
correct,
but
we
have
to
officially
so.
Okay
am
I
allowed
I'm
allowed
to
Pro
straw
polls.
I
I
proposed
straw
poll
that
we
allow
the
donation
of
218
thousand
dollars
for
the
Northeast
ballpark
field
lighting.
P
P
That
money
was
limited
to
holding
the
event
in
the
summer
because
of
the
rollback
of
pandemic
regulations,
it's
become
more
difficult
to
hold
this
event,
so
holding
the
event
in
the
summer
was
proving
difficult.
The
council
reappropriated
that
half
million
dollars
to
allow
the
funding
to
be
used
for
the
event
in
the
fall.
This
is
an
additional
250
000,
so
the
total
budget
would
be
seven
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
P
The
additional
funding
is
mostly
for
purchasing
Street
infrastructure
instead
of
renting
it.
This
was
something
the
council
discussed
during
the
annual
budget,
and
can
we
get
the
table
comparing
that's
the
one
so
you'll
see
in
this
table
in
the
middle
column,
the
estimates
from
earlier
in
the
year
and
the
column
on
the
right
is
the
current
estimates.
Now
there
are
some
differences,
the
the
event
this
fall
is
for
eight
weeks,
not
the
15
weeks.
That
has
been
held
the
last
few
years.
It's
also
not
including
Thursday.
This
fall.
P
It
would
be
limited
to
Fridays
and
Saturdays.
It's
still
on
Main
Street
from
South
Temple
down
to
400,
South
and
Main
Street
would
be
closed
from
noon
until
2,
A.M,
Fridays
and
Saturdays.
For
eight
weeks
this
fall
the
biggest
expense
changes.
The
first
line
item
you'll,
see:
there's
zero
for
temporary
infrastructure.
Rentals
and
I'm
in
the
middle
of
the
chart.
You'll
see
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
UTA
Trax
barriers
and
a
contingency.
So
these
are
the
the
bollards
that
can
be
put
into
the
concrete
and
then
not
needed.
P
P
The
other
line
item
to
call
out
is
you'll,
see,
activation
and
programming
third
from
the
top,
so
this
increased
from
45
000
to
185
000..
So,
even
though
it's
a
shorter
event
of
eight
weeks,
instead
of
fifteen
there's
a
higher
level
of
activation
and
programming,
that's
proposed,
so
every
block
would
have
some
kind
of
activity
going
on
and
a
Street
Market
was
mentioned
as
one
of
the
ideas.
If
you'd
like
more
information
on
what
the
public
could
see,
what
this
could
look
like,
that's
something
we
can
ask
the
administration
for
Mr.
G
G
I
will
definitely
like
some
more
information
on
that.
It
seems
like
a
big
jump
on
that
issue
on
that
one
I,
as,
as
you
probably
remember,
I've,
been
talking
a
lot
about
the
not
renting
things
in
the
and
Main
Street.
So
it's
good
to
see
that,
but
but
that
I
see
the
activation
and
programming
too,
to
be
a
big
large
jump.
I
have
many
many
questions
about
so
I
would
love
to
yeah
no
more.
A
O
Petro
I
have
two
questions,
two
things:
when
does
it
start
again,
so
the
question
number
one
like:
when
are
we
starting
this?
Do
you
know
when
it
starts
in
the
fall?
What's
the
fall.
T
All
right
am
I
heard
there
we
go
so
this
year
the
the
event
will
take
place.
September
15th
through
October
28th.
O
T
I
think
mermaid's
Orange,
it's
not
orange
okay
it'll
be
we're
using
state
of
the
art
black
bollards
that
will
line
both
sides
of
tracks
and
then
we're
using
white
chain
to
link
them.
I.
Think
it's
gonna
look
very
attractive.
I
will
say
it
was.
It
was
difficult
to
get
to
this
solution
working
with
all
City
departments
involved,
specifically
fire,
but
we're
really
happy
and
excited
about.
H
T
The
reason
we
were
delayed
was
partially
due
to
funding.
We
didn't
have
a
source
of
funding
before
city
council
was
kind
enough
to
appropriate
money
towards
the
event
in
order
for
us
to
plan
and
to
put
in
this
more
permanent
infrastructure.
We
needed
more
time
where
we're
right
up
against
it,
but
we're
we're
very
confident
that
it's
all
going
to
happen
on
time
this
year
and
we're
really
excited.
H
Just
putting
permanent
things
in
that
might
not
have
a
function
outside
of
this
particular
use
like
the
shutting
down
of
the
street,
and
we've
said
that
we
want
to
study,
to
check
this
new
Pedestrian
Mall
and
if
I
had
my
way,
I'd
wave
my
magic
wand
and
that's
what
we
would
do.
But
we
have
public
processes
and
if
we
run
into
any
sort
of
problems,
is
this
level
of
investment
still
worth
it?
Are
we.
A
A
It's
really
like
easy
to
to
cross
into
tracks
when
it
really
shouldn't
be
anyway
right.
So
I
think
that
the
barriers
would
have
thumb
function.
It
might
not
be
worth
the
200
000
if
it
was
just
for
that
situation,
but
given
that
it
can
serve
multiple
purposes,
I,
don't
it's
not
like
it's
a
bad
thing
to
have
up
two
years.
He
pays
for
itself.
U
So
just
two
follow-ups:
when
you
say
it's
a
one-time
purchase,
do
you
have
any
sort
of
expectation
for
the
longevity
of
that
purpose
or
that
purchase
like
do?
We
think
they'll
last,
a
year
two
years.
T
U
Then
my
other
follow-up
was
just
related
to
the
additional
details
related
to
the
activation
and
the
programming
I.
Think
one
of
the
pieces
that
I'd
also
be
interested
in
is
what
type
of
feedback
are
we
receiving
and
Gathering
related
to
that
programming.
So
this
could
be
a
we're.
Gonna
try
a
lot
of
new
things
for
this
upcoming
year,
with
the
intention
of
them
being
able
to
Define,
which
are
really
Community
benefits.
T
Absolutely
and
we
we
did
conduct
a
survey
before
hosting
this
year's
event.
Activations
were
one
of
the
main
issues
that
were
pointed
out.
We
were
again
running
on
kind
of
a
small
budget,
so
act
we
didn't
have
a
whole
lot
of
activations
outside
of
the
patios
and
some
buskers
and
artists
on
the
street
you're
going
to
see
a
much
different
event
this
year.
T
O
I'm,
just
I
was
hoping
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
guys
are
working
on
this,
but
obviously
the
construction
on
200
South
has
a
lot
of
people
like
nervous
and
has
this
construction
fatigue
so
and
I
also
know
that
that
northern
part
of
the
basis
on
the
northern
part
kind
of
feel
excluded
in
a
way
because
of
the
construction,
then
the
Southern
Group.
Are
you
guys
with
this
new
185
000
for
the
programming
and
activation?
O
Are
you
guys
planning
on
doing
even
an
extra
effort
to
you
know
to
would
you
go
like
to
mitigate
some
of
that
construction
fatigue
or
the
construction
issues
that
are
preventing
people
from
going
to
those
businesses?
We're.
T
Hoping
that
the
activations
that
we
have
planned
are
going
to
draw
more
people
this
year,
so
we
did
run
into
issues
with
some
of
those
larger
blocks,
with
more
missing
teeth.
So
to
say,
like
the
Galvin
block,
The
Echoes
block
will
be
activating
those
in
a
more
intentful
way
this
year
and
really
creating
a
destination
for
folks
this
year
who
want
to
participate
in
the
event,
whereas
we
really
didn't
have
a
whole
lot
on
the
street
in
previous
years.
All
right
thanks!
T
So
we
have
and
on
that
construction
we've
been
talking
with
dominion
and
staying
up
to
date
with
them,
because
that
will
cross
right
through
Main
Street
here,
if
it
hasn't
already,
but
they
were
it's
expected
not
to
interfere
with
the
event
counselor.
F
E
L
T
For
the
street
closure
we'll
be
using
rollable
bollards
that
can
be
rolled
in
and
out
of
the
street
they're
made
of
concrete
they're
very
heavy,
but
that
was
the
solution
that
was
come
to
you
by
our
fire
department,
police,
department
and
streets.
That
would
work
for
them
were
we
have.
T
We
need
to
make
sure
that
they
have
quick
and
easy
access
to
the
street
if
there
is
an
emergency
and
so
we'll
be
using
a
rollable
baller
that
will
line
each
intersection
and
then
and
then
yes,
a
chain
and
Bollard
system
that
will
go
both
sides
of
the
street
along
tracks.
Basically,
in
that
Rumble
strip,
that's
right
next
to
the
double
yellow
line,
but.
P
A
I
will
say
I'm
comfortable
with
this
drop
haul,
for
everything
about
the
activation
and
programming,
and
the
reason
for
that
is.
This
is
in
my
mind
the
same
thing
that
I
think
councilman
Peter
just
mentioned
an
idea
of
eventually
we'd,
like
Main
Street,
to
be
more
of
a
pedestrian.
Well,
I
think
there's
appetite
to
consider
Main
Street
becoming
more
of
a
pedestrian
Mall
permanently.
A
That
would
help
Economic
Development
help
a
pedestrian
atmosphere
downstairs
downtown
downstairs
downtown,
but
I
really
don't
think
we
can
like,
if
that's
dependent
on
185
000
for
16
days,
I,
don't
even
know
the
math
there,
but
that's
a
lot
of
money
per
day
for
Activation
like
we're
not
going
to
be
continually
subsidizing
performers
in
order
to
do
that
if
it
becomes
permanent.
So
I
want
to
do
this
in
a
way
that
we're
we're
making
it
as
though
it
were
permanent,
so
that
we
could
then
transition
to
to
be
permanent.
A
So
if
the
plan
only
works
with
185
000
for
16
days
of
activation,
then
I
don't
think
it's
and
I
don't
I,
don't
know
that
I
want
to
do
it,
but
so
I
would
be
comfortable
with
all
the
other
pieces,
except
for
I'm,
not
yet
comfortable
with
that.
T
Those
costs
do
include
some
permanent
fixtures
that
come
along
with
those
activations
just
to
keep
in
mind
so
a
lot
of
it,
but
will
be
reusable
yeah.
A
G
Chairman
I
do
that
forever?
Could
we
so
the
45
that
was
requested
before
for
the
activation
and
programming,
or
that
was
intended
for
the
15
weeks?
Will
it
be
appetite
to
keep
that
level
of
funding
instead
of
the
85,
keep
the
45
and
then
the
rest
of
the
changes
us
that
are
on
the
a
week
program?
It
will
be
appetite
to
to
keep
it
at
that
level.
Well,.
D
H
F
A
Look
last
year
we
had
45
days
and
it
was
45
right
thousand
dollars.
So
that
would
be
the
same
amount
right.
H
H
It's
probably
a
good
safety
measure
anyway,
but
I
don't
know
until
we
get
constituent
feedback
and
a
plan
if
we
should
be
buying
structures
and
and
things
for
this
use
it,
it
feels
a
little
bit
like
constituent
feedback
at
that
point
is
tokenized
and
it
feels
like
on.
If
they
don't
want
this,
that
we
have
not
invested.
I
I
It's
sure,
first
of
all,
I
agree
that
it
seems
like
185
000
for
the
activation
seemed
quite
a
lot
for
eight
weeks,
but
I
would
say
that
if
you're
activating
and
make
this
permanent,
then
you
don't
have
to
do
that,
because
it's
now
permanent
and
it's
all
it's
an
ongoing
issue
so
realize
it's
like
this
is
a
very
first
step
one
and
then
after
you
do
three
or
four
steps
it.
The
price
and
cost
goes
down.
I
So
just
just
we
can
argue
different
points
of
that
issue,
but
I
also
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
the
idea.
Also
here
of
you,
know
the
constituent.
We
have
shown
that
this
activation
of
the
street
has
done
a
lot
for
downtown
this.
Has
we
have
shown
over
the
last
couple
years
that
this
has
done
an
amazing
job
to
activate
the
street
and
activate
downtown
sales
tax
and
activate
the
living
down
there?
I
So
we
have
seen
that
happen
so
I'm,
okay,
with
some
of
these
costs,
because
also
year
over
year,
the
price
is
going
to
be
less
and
the
the
activation
is
going
to
go
up
so
I'm
I'm
I
feel
comfortable.
There
I
do
understand
the
the
constituent
stuff,
but
we've
shown
in
the
last
couple
years
that
the
activation
has
been
shown
greatly
for
sales
tax
and
Street
act.
O
Yeah
we're
in
the
news,
because
of
because
of
so
you
know
nothing
and
why
news
so
I'm
I'm
not
work
super
worried
about
it,
but
I
think
you,
you
have
a
really
good
PowerPoint
presentation,
so
I
think
the
illustration
of
you
know
showing
us
what
showing
the
council
what
it
looks
like
what
what
it
used
to
look
like
and
what's
going
to
look
like
now
with
the
new
equipment
and
all
of
the
things
might
be
really
good
for
our
visuals,
because
it's
kind
of
like
we
can
only
right
now,
I
think
we'd
only
see
I
can
only
see
the
orange
construction
crappy
I'm
like,
and
then
you
tell
me
chains
and
like
well,
it's
okay
when
I'm
a
little
nervous
at
the
same
time,
so
I
feel
like
if
we
could
see
that
at
the
next
meeting
or
whatever
May
or
in
an
email.
O
Maybe
that
could
ease
our
doubts.
But
then
also
this
is
a
point.
What
that
I've
been
bringing
up
for
a
long
time.
I
would
like
to
start
seeing
and
I'm
not
sure
how
we
can
do
this
when
we
invest
in
a
certain
area
of
town
like
what
we've
done
for
two
three
years.
We
see
it
in
the
news,
obviously,
and
we
can
see
it,
but
I
would
like
to
see
it
more
specifically
in
terms
of
sales,
taxes
or
whatever
it
is,
or
or
business
feedback,
and
you
know
to
say
hey.
This
is
what
has
happened.
O
You
invested
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
in
return
you
got
two
million
dollars
worth
of
whatever.
That
is
so
that
we
can
start
looking
at
our
investments
in
that
way
like
what's
the
return
of
our
own,
our
investment,
otherwise
it's
still
kind
of
like
yeah.
It
was
good,
you
know,
but
I
do
we
really
want
to
do
another
two
hundred
thousand
dollars?
You
know,
so
it's.
V
Just
if
I,
if
I,
could
make
some
comments,
I
really
appreciate
everything
that
everyone
has
said.
I
think
this
is
we're
all
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
for
our
Salt
Lake
City
in
our
downtown.
One
of
the
reasons
we
came
back
to
you
to
ask
for
the
additional
funding
is
for
the
infrastructure.
I
believe
it
was
council,
member
Pui
who
actually
said
we're
investing
on
temporary.
It
looks
like
a
construction
zone.
V
Definitely
open
street
is
something
that
has
brought
a
lot
of
economic
impact
into
the
area
we
had
a
meeting.
Today
we
saw
visit
Salt,
Lake
and
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
from
the
time
period.
How
much
is
coming
in
I
hope
that
you've
seen
an
article
I
think
Mary
Beth,
you
send
us
some
statistical
data
that
shows
that
Salt
Lake
City
is
number
one
in
terms
of
recovery
because
of
The
Pedestrian
activity.
That's
happening
downtown
in
terms
of
the
activation.
Yes,
you're
absolutely
right
it.
The
price
seems
to
go
very
high,
very
spin.
V
What
we
saw
from
some
of
the
information
we
received
is
that
block
one
which
I'm
talking
about
City
our
Mall
up
there.
They
wanted
to
have
more
activities
that
would
reflect
kind
of
like
the
spirit
of
that
block
and
the
same
thing
with
block
two
and
three
and
four
that
they
have
different
personalities.
If
you
don't
mind
if
I
use
that
term,
so
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
do.
It's.
A
L
I
mean
is
it
to
me.
It
sounds
like
that's
the
easiest
way
to
ensure
that
we're
supporting
all
the
businesses
and
that
we're
keeping
it
consistently
active,
like
people
aren't
going
to
walk
if
one
block
is
dead,
and
you
see
that,
like
there's
nothing
happening
on
that
block,
you're
gonna
turn
around
and
go
back.
L
If
you
see
that
there's
activity
you're
going
to
keep
walking
so
to
me
I,
it's
to
me,
it
makes
sense,
but
what
I
was
going
to
say
before
that
is
I,
don't
really
mind.
I!
Think
it's
too
soon
to
say
that
185
000
is
too
much
because
I
don't
know
what
we're
getting
for
it.
L
I,
don't
I
can't
say
it's
too
much
or
not
enough
or
whatever
and
and
I'd
like
to
know
what
you
know,
what
we
are
getting
for
it,
but
I
will
say
like
having
been
on
being
on
Main
Street
a
lot
and
having
my
Law
Firm
on
Main,
Street
and
walking
on
Main
Street
every
day.
L
I
think
that
we've
had
in
the
past,
like
our
efforts
to
to
close
down
and
do
open
streets,
have
been
good
and
there
have
been
some
activation
things
that
have
been
like
cute
and
fun,
but
I
I
think
that
it
has
there's
been
opportunity
for
improvement
and
for
it
to
be
like
a
more
serious
investment
and
I
and
I.
Don't
I
definitely
think
I'm
not
advocating
that
we
shouldn't
scrutinize
High
numbers
that
come
in
front
of
us.
L
F
L
H
H
This
is
going
to
show
my
hand
and
how
I
spend
my
time
on
Main
Street.
Are
we
talking
about
full
day,
activations,
now,
typically
I'm
there
on
an
evening
meeting
a
friend
for
a
nice
dinner
and
a
drink,
and
you
know
hanging
out
on
Main
Street,
but
we're
talking
about
a
full
because
I
was
thinking.
You
know
the
Block's
closer
to
four
three
and
four
hundred
South
at
that
time.
That's
where
the
things
are
open.
Nothing
in
the
City
Creek
area
is
open
when
you're
out
at
11
o'clock
at
night.
T
Yes,
so
we'll
we'll
have
activities
planned
for
both
Fridays
and
Saturdays
from
noon,
till
2,
A.M
so
and
like
Lorena
mentioned
each
block
is
different.
There's
businesses
on
each
block,
but
some
don't
have
as
many
as
others
and
I
think.
T
Ultimately,
the
business
community-
and
this
was
from
their
feedback,
felt
that
those
blocks
that
didn't
have
the
good
cluster
of
businesses
felt
left
out
and
they
felt
that
there
was
nothing
drawing
people
to
their
business
and
so
we're
hoping
that
with
these
additional
activations
like
a
market
and
a
lot
more
and
we're
very
excited
to
share
it
with
you,
it
will
disperse
the
people
to
those
other
businesses
that
maybe
didn't
get
as
much
attention.
In
previous
years.
G
G
V
I
would
say
here
you
are
located
and
allow
us
to
have
500
000
and
we've
already
entering
negotiations
with
a
downtown
Alliance.
As
being
of
an
amendment
already
signed,
I
would
say
we
would
love
to
bring
back
to
you
what
the
activation
will
be.
We're
so
close
to
it
today
is
the
15th
August
we
will.
This
is
supposed
to
kick
off
on
September
15th,
so.
S
A
More
information
and
my
clarifying
question
to
that,
which
is
what
I
just
I,
like
that,
what
my
clarifying
question
is:
if
we,
if
you
don't,
have
the
185
000
for
Activation,
does
the
agreement
that
you
signed
with
downtown
Alliance
or
whomever
is
going
to
do
this
fall
completely?
Do
is?
Are
all
the
other
pieces
of
this
program
dependent
on
the
activations.
V
V
L
D
Q
L
L
G
I
think
that
we
have
questions-
and
maybe
maybe
there
is
appetite
on
the
in
the
console
right
now
to
approve-
maybe
this
yes,
but
we
definitely
have
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
activation.
We
really
want
the
so
one
we
want
the
administration
to
maybe
give
us
quite
a
bit
of
information
about
what
the
activation
that
programming
is
and
if
they
can
find
some
savings
on
that
185
000
and
what
those
savings
could
be.
I
think
that's
something
that
I'm
willing
to
to
propose
right
now.
A
H
G
A
A
A
I
I
got
to
use
the
restroom.
We
are
going
to
jump,
there's
been
a
lot
of
things
changing
rapidly
and
changing
again.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
move
on
to
item
number
six
in
our
work
session
agenda
and
then
we're
gonna
after
that
we
I
think
we're
gonna
we're
planning
to
break
for
a
closed
session
so
because
we
have
Representatives
here
that
need
to
leave
we'll
jump
into
that.
This
item
number
six
is
a
resolution
about
the
ivory
house.
A
W
Are
up
or
not
but
I'll
begin
so,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
this
item.
Is
a
review
of
a
public
benefit
analysis
for
a
project
that
would
provide
465
units
of
new
student
housing
at
the
University
of
Utah?
The
public
can
benefit.
Analysis
was
conducted
by
the
finance
department
and
the
project
is
already
under
construction
at
434
South,
Mario,
kopecki
Drive.
W
The
developer
is
Ivory
University
house
l3c,
which
is
the
l3c,
refers
to
a
low
profit,
limited
liability
company.
So
it's
a
it's
a
form
of
company
that
is
somewhere
between
a
private
and
a
non-profit
company.
The
public
and
the
public
benefit
analysis
assessed
whether
Salt,
Lake
City
should
waive
impact
and
permit
fees
and
provide
refunds
for
fees.
The
project
has
already
paid.
The
public
benefit.
Analysis
concludes
that
quote:
while
the
project
is
not
income
restricted,
it
will
be
rent
restricted
and
will
address
critical,
affordable
housing
needs
of
students.
X
X
Sure,
thanks,
thank
you.
I'm
Blake,
Thomas,
director
of
community
and
neighborhoods
Department
I'll,
keep
my
comments
very
brief
to
avoid
redundancy
with
Allison's
great
introduction.
Thanks
Allison
today,
the
administration
is
requesting
a
building
permit
an
impact
fee
waiver
for
Ivory
University
House,
which,
as
she
mentioned,
is
a
student
housing
project
providing
465
Apartments
of
various
sizes
as
well
as
Community
rooms,
classrooms
outdoor
study
areas.
It's
also
a
three-minute
walk
to
a
track
station
and
five
minute
walk
to
the
Student
Life
Center,
relieving
campus
congestion
and
vehicle
miles.
Traveled
is
one
benefit
of
the
project.
X
Additionally,
rent
will
be
restricted
at
30
percent
of
monthly
income
for
a
single
person,
household
of
80
Ami
or
below,
and
that
will
be
enforced
through
a
30-year
land
use,
restrictive
agreement
or
deed
restriction
to
further
assist
with
affordability.
Ivory
University
house
has
committed
that
no
less
than
25
percent
of
residents
in
the
project
will
receive
additional
housing
assistance
and
ivory.
X
University
house
has
pledged
that
if
the
2.4
million
dollars
in
fees
are
refunded,
it
will
pledge
scholarships
funded
by
the
operations
of
the
project
in
an
amount
equal
to
the
fees
waived
over
the
10
years.
They've
also
committed
that
the
scholarships
will
be
based
on
need
and
for
Salt
Lake
City
residents.
Only
and
lastly,
I'll
just
say
that
student
housing
is
in
immense
demand
in
our
community
and
University
of
Utah.
X
Undergraduate
enrollment
is
projected
to
grow
to
40
000
students
over
the
next
seven
years,
and
the
university
will
need
about
10
000
housing
units
to
allow
one
of
every
four
students
to
live
on
campus.
So
thank
you
for
the
consideration
of
the
res.
This
request
I'm
happy
to
turn
it
over
to
Mary,
Beth,
Or
counsel
and
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
Q
The
only
thing
I'd
like
to
say
council
is
that
this
is
in
budget
amendment
number
one
this
request
as
a
as
a
reduction
of
Revenue
for
the
refund
for
both
impact
fees
and
the
general
fund.
We
usually
don't
put
a
budget
amendment
in
for
refunds,
but
because
of
the
size
of
these
refunds,
we
decided
to
complete
a
budget
amendment
as
well.
L
Wharton,
so
can
you
just
like?
Can
you
just
say
again
what
you
said
I
think
it
was
like
the
last
substantive
line
of
your
presentation
that
that
the
amount
that
we're
giving
back
equal
would
be
equal
to.
Was
it
the
scholarship
amount
for
for
10
years
or
for,
and
was
that
just
the
scholarships
or
so.
X
Sure
no
problem,
so
the
fee
waiver
requested
from
the
building
permit
fees
and
impact
fees,
is
2.4
million
and
so
Ivory
University
houses
committing
to
take
that
amount
and
to
fund
student
scholarships
with
a
new
scholarship
fund.
X
O
I
still
can't
remember,
or
if
maybe
I
missed,
I
didn't
hear
you
guys,
but
I
don't
know,
I,
don't
understand
how
this
came
to
be.
This
is
something
new
that
we've
never
done.
How
did
this
happen
like?
Did
they
come
over
and
said?
Hey
you
guys
have
charged
us
for
this,
but
now
we
realized
that
we
would
like
to
do
scholarships.
Can
you
refund
that
I'm
sorry
I'm,
trying
to
like
understand.
X
O
X
Sure
I'd
be
happy
to
take
a
stab
at
that
one,
as
Allison
mentioned
in
her
introduction,
the
ivory
University
House
entity
is
a
l3c,
and
traditionally,
when
we
do
these
waivers,
you
would
have
it
go
through
the
have
board
in
a
5013c.
X
So
this
project
was
a
bit
of
a
square
peg
in
a
round
hole
in
which
student
housing
is
not
allowed
to
access
traditional,
affordable
housing
incentives
like
litec
and
also
the
l3c
status,
had
them
kind
of
outside,
of
our
plain
language
of
our
ordinance,
with
our
typical
waivers
that
we
do
based
on
the
income
or
rent
restrictions
that
they're
placing
on
the
project.
So
typically
it
would
be
formulaic
and
would
run
through
something
like
the
half
board.
This
is
the
vehicle
for
a
unique
project
that
we
really
need
in
our
community.
X
So
that's
how
we
wound
up
here
and
taking
this
path,
and
it's
just.
We
really
appreciate
Ivory
for
also
being
willing
to
say
that
if
we
are
refunded,
then
we're
going
to
commit
dollar
for
dollar
scholarships.
I
So
originally,
when
we
I
remember,
we
had
the
proposal
and
the
the
lease
is
from
the
the
churches:
leasing,
the
property
to
ivory
and
the
the
development
was
for
a
scholarship
residence,
and
you
know
I
would
say
the
word
scholarship,
because
everybody
in
there
would
be
honest,
some
type
of
scholarship
from
the
University
of
ivory.
X
X
I
know
that
Annelise
is
in
the
audience
with
Ivory
in
case
there's
any
clarification,
but
my
understanding
is
that
there's
25
percent
of
the
units
in
which
Ivory
University
house
is
willing
to
provide
additional
assistance.
The
fund
would
be
needs-based
scholarships
and
not
neces.
It's
my
understanding
that
not
necessarily
every
bedroom
would
be
utilizing
a
scholarship
and.
I
So
it's
already
going
to
be
activated
and
I
love
that
I
love
being
right
next
to
schools,
you
don't
need
a
car,
don't
don't
impact
the
traffic
and
it's
perfect
places.
You
know
you
should
be.
Students
should
be
on
campus
or
right
next
to
campus,
and
this
is
awesome
for
that.
That's
appreciated
very
much
I'm,
just
curious.
I
If
the
when
we
have
the
initial
discussions,
the
initial
discussions
didn't
talk
about
in
the
impact
fee,
waivers
and
and
I
just
I'm
curious
at
the
the
end
game,
where
we're
already
now
we're
asking
for
impact
fees,
adjustments,
the
buildings
there,
the
scholarships
are
already
set
in
place
and
we're
already
moving
ahead
and
at
the
same
time
this
is
a
great
program,
but
it's
also
not
a
full
non-profit
organization,
so
I,
just
I'm
I
like
it,
but
I,
also
have
just
concerns.
In
my
head
about
that,
proportioner
of
that
contract,
Mary.
A
A
Okay,
so
I'm,
looking
at
this,
if
I'm,
looking
if
I'm
I'm,
not
saying
I,
am
looking
as
if
I'm
looking
at
this
from
a
purely
Financial
standpoint,
it's
as
though
we're
saying,
okay,
you
don't
we're
gonna
refund
this
amount
of
money
and
you're
going
to
pay
that
back
to
us
with
zero
percent
interest
over
a
period
of
ten
years
in
the
form
of
providing
scholarships
to
our
students,
not
not
in
the
form
of
cash
repayments,
we're
saying
so
it's
a
25,
000
25
2.5.
How
much
is
it
again?
A
A
F
F
L
Go
ahead
and
in
that
paragraph
about
rent
restrictions,
it
says,
however,
unlike
HUD
units,
these
would
not
be
income
restricted,
but
it
talks
in
the
preceding
language
about
how
it
is
restricted
to
80
Ami.
So
what
is?
Does
that
mean
it
wouldn't
be
income
restricted
in
that
the
income
can
come
from
any
source.
A
L
A
F
A
What
I
I
mean
we
just
that's
what
I'm
struggling
with
is
like
what
it's
just
it's
really
like
way
above
the
student,
an
average
student's,
thirty
percent
of
an
average
student's
income,
so
does
that
additional
income
rent
restriction
matter,
it's
going
to
be
whatever
students
can
afford
to
pay
right
is
what
they're
going
to
be
able
to
charge
because
there's
no,
these
students
are
paying
for
this
out
of
loans.
There's
no
conceivable
way
that
a
student
is
making
that
an
average
student
is
making
forty
thousand
dollars
a
year
while
going
to
school,
full-time.
W
A
Right
but
I'm
saying
like
we're,
not
we're
not
under
some
delusion
that
this
is
a
product
that
a
student
can
like
flip
Burgers
10
hours
a
week
and
afford
to
pay
this
rent.
That's
in
no
way
the
case,
they're
they're
paying
for
the
rent
through
the
same
way
that
they're
paying
for
their
rent.
They
live
in
the
dorms
or
if
they
live
in
private
housing
off
campus.
It's
just
that.
There's.
H
Fact
we
just
did
some
quick
calculations
and
assuming
a
twenty
dollar
per
hour
rate,
which
is
not
an
easy
assumption
to
make
for
students,
in
particular,
for
the
largest
unit
they'd
have
to
work
53.75
hours
a
week
for
this
unit
for
it
to
be
30
percent.
Oh
no
I'm,
sorry!
That
was
wrong.
It
was
59.
H
A
week
yeah,
so
I
am
one
of
those
people
who
will
be
paying
back
her
student
loans
until
the
year
after
she
dies
and
worked
two
jobs
as
a
PA
to
a
venture,
capitalist
and
as
a
waitress
and
I.
Don't
love
the
idea
of
giving
the
Next
Generation
that
same
burden
as
well
as
that
same
stress,
while
they're
in
school.
A
I
Because
I
think
back
to
the
idea
about
the
the
rent-
basically
that's
student
housing
is
this:
the
same.
Is
this
the
same
cost
as
student
housing
on
on
campus
student
housing
I
mean
there's
different
costs
because
there's
also
you
have
you
have
food
vouchers
or
yeah
yeah
meal.
F
A
F
Y
My
name
is
Annalisa
Wilson
and
I'm
here,
representing
Ivory
University
house
l3c,
and
the
first
thing
I
want
to
address
is
just
the
fact
that
it
is
an
l3c,
because
I
know
that
is
a
unique
entity
that
we
don't
run
into
a
lot
and
so
just
to
address
any
concerns
of
it
not
being
operated
on
a
non-profit
basis.
Y
I
can
guarantee
to
this
Council
that
it
will
be
more
of
a
non-profit
than
any
non-profit
that
has
ever
been
before
you
today
and
that's
because
we
are
contractually
obligated
in
our
lease
with
the
Church
of
Jesus
Christ
of
Latter-day
Saints,
that
we
cannot
keep
one
dollar
profit
every
single
dollar
up
and
above
our
operating
costs
must
go
to
a
scholarship
fund
at
the
University.
So
we
are
very
much
operating
in
a
non-profit
way
and
the
second
issue
is
to
clarify
the
scholarship
so
know
not.
Every
student
at
Irene
University
house
will
be
on
scholarship.
Y
That
is
just
something
that
the
family
wants
to
do,
because
they
feel
it's
important
to
have
diversity
to
have
the
best
student
experience
on
campus,
and
so
that
is
why
they're
doing
the
rental
assistance
it
is
separate
from
the
ivory
University
scholarship
fund
recipients
from
that
fund
are
not
required
to
live
at
Iber
University
House
they'll
have
many
different
housing
options.
If
they
do
get
a
housing
voucher
or
they
may
not
even
receive
housing
assistance,
they
may
receive
a
tuition
site
vendor
some
other
type
of
scholarship
assistance.
Y
A
Y
Sure,
well,
it's
not
a
separate
fund.
There's
the
ivory
University
House
scholarship
fund
that
will
be
housed
at
the
University
of
Utah
and
funded
through
the
revenue
that
is
created
by
the
student
housing
project.
Okay
and
then
separate
from
that.
The
ivory
family
has
committed
that
25
of
the
students
at
Ivory
University
house
will
be
receiving
some
type
of
housing
assistance,
whether
it's
from
the
ivory
University
House
scholarship
fund
or
some
other
type
of
housing
assistance
directly
from
Ivory
University
house,
so
that
we
can
have
a
diverse
array
of
students
living
there.
I
A
G
Okay,
a
quick
question,
Mr
Sharon,
I,
think
I.
Don't
necessarily
want
an
answer
right
now
on
the
spot.
You
know
it
was
brought
up
as
far
as
residency
and
I.
Think.
A
couple
of
us
here
are:
you
know
where
International
students
at
some
point
or
another,
and
we
were
not
qualifying
to
residency.
You
know
for
multiple
reasons.
Even
you
know,
so
that's
something
that
I
would
like
you
guys
to
explore.
G
A
Makes
a
lot
of
sense
councilman
report
like
what
what
what
does
it
mean
to
qualify
for
that
set
aside?
2.5
million
dollars
of
Salt
Lake
City
resident
scholarships,
and
you
have
to
be
a
naturalized
citizen.
Or
can
you
be
an
immigrant?
That's
a
that's
a
perfect
question.
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
all
right,
I!
Think!
That's
all
we
have!
Thank
you.
This
item
there's
a
this.
Is
a
public
benefits
now,
so
there
will
be
a
public
hearing
set
for
already
happened.
Oh
we
set
the
public
hearing
last
time.
A
A
G
So
Mr
chair,
yes,
go
ahead.
I
I
would
like
to
move
to
that.
We
enter
into
a
closed
session
in
our
capacity
as
both
the
city
council
on
the
Redevelopment
agency
board.
The
purpose
of
the
closed
session
for
both
entities
is
to
receive
advice
from
legal
counsel.
In
addition,
the
purpose
of
the
RDA
closation
might
include
discussion
of
this
position
of
real
property.
Second,
okay,
I.
A
U
A
I'm,
a
yes
that
passes
7-0
for
the
record.
We
will
adjourn
as
RDA
board
after
this,
but
we
are
only
recessing
from
Council
work
session.
A
Has
been
we
bounced
around
a
lot
so
now
we
are.
We
have
we're
now
back
in
Council
work
session
and
we
are
on
item
a
a
seven
of
the
work
session,
which
is
unallocated
housing
program,
income
funds,
follow-up
discussion,
Ben,
ludke,
Tammy,
hunsaker,
Tony,
Milner
and
I.
Think
Blake
may
be
online
as
well
for
this
discussion.
Ben.
Do
you
want
to
queue
it
up.
P
This
is
a
follow-up
briefing
from
the
council's
discussions
on
February
21st
and
during
the
annual
budget.
There's
a
handout
at
your
seats
as
well
as
attached
to
the
online
packet
summarizing.
The
individual
proposed
projects
and
programs
by
their
type,
the
funding
source
and
which
city,
division
or
Department
would
be
the
lead.
P
The
potential
next
steps
are
listed
in
the
column
on
the
right
most
side
and
those
are.
If
the
council
supports
that
item,
the
funding
amounts
were
estimated
in
the
annual
budget,
so
the
actual
program
income
received
could
be
somewhat
different,
not
by
a
lot
a
little
bit
based
on
the
amounts
on
the
handout.
This
is
because
we
were
estimating
the
amounts
before
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year.
P
Z
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
okay,
so
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
is
a
table
of
the
funds
that
been
outlined.
It's
important
to
note
that
they
are
splitted
and
split
into
two
general
categories:
the
HUD
funding,
which
is
cdbg
and
home
program
income
and
then
non-restricted
funds.
Z
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
is
a
table
of
the
administration's
proposed
funding
recommendations.
Many
of
these
recommendations
are
based
on
policy
Direction
previously
provided
by
the
council.
Timeliness
requirements
were
an
important
consideration
for
the
HUD
funds,
in
an
effort
to
identify
projects
that
are
shovel
ready
and
that
are
that
will
help
us
meet
timeliness.
We
did
also
reach
out
to
the
housing
authority
of
Salt
Lake
City
for
potential
partnership
opportunities
due
to
the
relationship
between
our
two
organizations.
Z
So
these
funding
categories,
the
the
HUD
restricted
and
the
non-restricted,
they
have
two
separate
paths
forward,
so
Tony
is
going
to
outline
the
HUD
program
income
first,
that
will
be
treated
through
its
own
process
and
then
he
will
turn
it
back
over
to
me
and
I
will
go
through
the
non-restricted
funds.
AA
Great
thank
you.
Can
we
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
the
one
after
that,
okay
and
again
huge
thanks
to
council
for
your
guidance
and
direction
as
we
bring
forward
these
dormant
funds.
We
recently
had
a
monitoring
with
our
HUD
representative
and
they
were
very
happy
to
hear
that
the
council
is
very.
This
is
front
and
center
for
you.
You
know
the
importance
of
getting
these
funds
out
in
a
timely
manner
and
then
especially
not
having
to
give
the
funds
back
to
HUD.
AA
We
always
are
making
sure
that
we
have
to
be
spending
our
program
income
first
before
any
new
funds
from
HUD
program
income
will
be
estimated
and
considered
as
part
of
the
annual
HUD
application
process,
which
is
brought
forward
to
you
around
if
it's
like,
April
or
May,
and
then
of
course,
Council
has
the
final
funding
allocations
for
the
different
Grant
recipients.
AA
For
example,
we
kind
of
brought
forward
a
million
dollars
in
cdbg,
as
well
as
800
000
in
home.
Again,
that
is
just
for
fiscal
year.
24
anticipated
for
this
year,
so
we're
finally
in
alignment.
So
next
steps
that
if
the
council
does
indicate
support
for
administrative
proposed
funding
allocations,
housing
stability
will
finalize
and
transmit
a
substantial
amendment
to
our
City's
five-year
HUD
Consolidated
plan,
as
well
as
this
year's
one-year
annual
action
plan.
AA
So
timeline
and
again
last
time
we
were
briefing
in
June.
You
were
very
aware
of
just
the
time
frame
that
we
have,
which
is
mainly
the
biggest
one,
is
cdbg.
Every
year
we
have
to
meet
a
timeliness
test,
it's
always
very
hard
to
meet
that
timelessness
test.
If
we're
going
to
be
bringing
forward
additional
funds
they'll
make
that
test
even
harder,
so
there
will
be
strict
expenditure
timeline
requirements
once
the
Consolidated
plan
and
the
annual
action
plan
are
amended
to
recognize
the
funds
cdbg
and
home
have
different
timelines.
AA
AA
So
the
proposed
allocation
for
cdbg
and
again
this
is
all
in
the
information
that's
in
front
of
you
three
here
and
these
are
from
Council
provided
directions.
One
would
be
property
acquisition
around
5.7.
This
could
be
for
the
acquisition
of
a
future
property
for
the
development
of
housing.
80
Ami
can
can
work
with
RDA
and
the
Housing
Authority,
for
example,
to
identify
and
purchase
a
property
or
multiple
properties.
Council
could
identify
policy
priorities
such
as
high
opportunity,
Area
Properties,
Community,
Land,
Trust,
Acquisitions
or
possibly
missing
middle
housing.
AA
Another
one
that
Council
provided
Direction
on
was
West
Side
improvements,
250
000
that
would
be
sidewalk
and
related
infrastructure
improvements
on
the
west
side
for
about
safety,
accessibility
and
connectivity.
Part
of
that
being
again,
timeliness
for
for
all
three
of
these
categories
would
be
possibly
funding
or
being
leveraged
with
an
existing
infrastructure
program
or
our
projects.
So
then
that
way,
those
funds
can
be
spent
in
a
timely
manner.
Last
one
is
the
facade
program.
AA
This
is
something
that
Council
was
interested
in
to
get
additional
dollars
into
the
city's
very
successful
neighborhood
business
Improvement
program,
which
is
also
called
the
facade
program
for
small
businesses
in
a
West
Side
Target
area.
The
council
did
approve
925
000
in
cdbg
funds
already
for
this
year,
and
so
these
additional
funds
would
provide
more
opportunities
for
about
five
more
applicants
to
be
served
this
year.
Next
slide.
AA
AA
AA
The
RDA
can
move
forward
with
issuing
the
nofa
and
selecting
the
projects,
while
we're
still
doing
the
HUD
substantial
amendment
process
so
that
shouldn't
hold
up
it
shouldn't
hold
up
their
timeline
at
all.
We're
able
to
do
both
of
them.
At
the
same
time,
the
other
one
is
Housing
Development,
and
this
is
one
that,
in
communication
with
Housing
Authority
for
Salt
Lake
City
is
a
project
on
1159
West,
West
Temple,
it's
just
north
of
the
ballpark
area.
This
is
a
project
that
has
been
in
the
plans
for
a
while.
AA
The
RDA
already
gave
about
a
million
dollars
about
six
years
ago
and
then,
just
recently
last
year
gave
an
additional
540.
this
year,
they're
currently
applying
for
litec
nine
percent.
Roughly
it's
about
55
units,
they're
still
getting
the
exact
bedroom
broken
down
of
how
many
bedrooms
all
the
units
will
be
at
least
60
or
below,
including
some
deeply
affordable
for
homeless
individuals.
It's
a
very
good
project,
such
funding
being
directly
directed
towards
them
by
Council
decision.
Z
The
non-restricted
funding
sources,
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
just
a
quick
clarification
before
moving
forward
I,
know,
there's
a
lot
of
working
parts
here
and
moving
parts
and
it's
been
moving
quickly.
The
it's
my
understanding
that
the
RDA
nofa
amount,
which
is
the
6.476
million
that
has
been
allocated
through
the
budget,
so
the
next
step
there
would
be
to
have
that
approved
through
the
HUD
substantial
Amendment.
Z
So
the
council
has
actually
already
made
that
funding
allocation
and
then
the
other
funding
allocation
on
the
chart
that
has
been
made
is
my
understanding.
It's
the
NOAA
renter
rehab
program
for
1.2
million,
so
those
have
already
been
made
and
HUD
Tony
went
through
the
HUD
process
and
and
the
HUD
program
income
is
really
the
piece
that's
timely
and
we
need
to
move
quickly
on
the
non-restricted
funds.
We
have
a
little
bit
more
time
to
work
out
and
get
situated.
Z
Z
As
a
point
of
clarification,
this
Loan
Fund
would
support
programs
targeted
to
tenants
and
homeowners
where
the
rda's
tools
typically
support
development
activities,
and
there
are
about
575,
outstanding
home
buyer
and
home
rehab
loans,
with
a
balance
of
about
25
million,
so
establishing
a
formal,
Loan
Fund
with
previous
program
income
as
well
as
new
repayments.
Coming
back
to
the
city
would
allow
us
to
continue
to
provide
revenue
for
housing
activities
that
benefit
homeowners
and
tenants.
So
it
would
be
a
great
way
to
formalize
those
activities
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
Z
Revolving
Capital
would
be
budgeted
annually
by
the
council
to
the
programs
associated
with
The
Loan
Fund.
These
programs
would
be
revolving
in
nature
with
principal
and
interest
payments
return.
Turning
to
the
fund,
however,
the
council's
discretion,
you
could
use
revenue
from
the
fund
annually
to
fund,
like
one-time
initiatives.
Z
These
are
the
four
programs
that
we
are
proposing
be
attached
to
the
Loan
Fund,
we're
proposing
that
the
homebuyer
program,
which
provides
below
market
rate
mortgages
to
moderate
and
low-income
households
to
further
home
ownership
opportunities,
we're
proposing
a
million
dollars
be
allocated
to
that
program.
We're
proposing
just
over
1.14
million,
be
allocated
to
the
Community
Land
Trust
I,
think
you
know
the
land
trust
model.
The
city
maintains
ownership
of
the
land.
The
homeowner
buys
the
housing
improvements
and
then
we
lease
the
land
at
a
below
market
value
to
further
afford
the
home
repair
program.
Z
Z
Rehabbing
the
units
right:
yes,
that's
good,
okay,
good
catch,
thank
you
and
then
the.
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
we
have
three
more
allocations
to
discuss.
These
would
be
with
the
non-restricted
funds.
These
are
not
proposed
to
be
part
of
the
revolving
Loan
Fund.
These
would
be
direct
allocations,
so
we're
proposing
a
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
be
allocated
to
rental
assistance,
and
this
would
be
leveraged
with
a
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
that
the
council
already
approved
through
the
FY
24
budget
for
a
new
pilot
tenant
relocation
program.
Z
That's
proposed
through
thriving
in
place.
We're
also
proposing
that,
based
on
council's
Direction
60
000,
be
provided
to
Public
Services
activities.
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
back
when
you
were
deliberating
on
cdbg
applications.
You
requested
that
some
of
this
funding
make
some
of
the
applications
Hull
up
to
the
applied
to
amount,
there's
four
non-profits
that
this
would
go
to
to
a
for
a
total
of
sixty
thousand,
and
then
we've
talked
about
this
in
previous
briefings,
but
over
the
last
I
think
it's
at
least
the
last
decade.
Z
There
was
a
line
of
credit
that
the
city
would
provide.
Some
mortgage
buy
down
it's
it's
kind
of
complicated,
but
the
city
hasn't
been
using
the
line
of
credit
in
a
while,
and
so
we
are
proposing
that
three
million
dollars
of
these
non-restricted
funds
just
go
to
pay
off
the
line
of
credit.
The
line
of
credits
there
were
there
were
two
line
of
credits:
they're
not
active
any
longer,
so
we
could
just
get
rid
of
that
debt
and
stop
that
practice
moving
forward,
so
we're
proposing
three
million
be
used
for
that.
Z
So
I
know
we're
short
on
time,
but
the
questions
for
city
council
really
are:
are
you
supportive
of
our
funding
our
recommended
funding
allocations?
If
so,
we
will
quickly
turn
around
an
amendment
to
the
HUD
Consolidated
plan
and
annual
action
plan,
so
we
can
get
that
moving
and
help
meet
our
timeliness
requirements
and
then
the
other
big
policy
question
for
the
council
is:
is
the
council
supportive
of
the
idea
of
a
tenant
and
homeowner
revolving
Loan
Fund
that
these
programs
be
attached
to?
U
So,
thank
you.
I
just
have
a
quick
question
about
order
of
operations.
So
with
the
council
support
you
will
move
forward
to
amend
the
existing
Consolidated
application.
Do
we
have
to
wait
for
that
application
to
be
approved
before
we
can
begin
action
on
these
time-sensitive
restricted
funding,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
whether
that
has
to
happen
and
what
our
expectation
is.
AA
Yes,
we
basically
have
the
substantial
Amendment
transmittal
ready
to
send
to
council,
so
we
can
get
that
going.
We
do
again
work
with
Council
staff
to
set
up
a
30-day
public
notice
period,
including
the
public
hearing
that
you
guys
will
host
and
then
basically,
we
give
over
to
HUD
HUD
takes
about
30
days
to
approve
it
sometimes
they'll.
Do
it
a
lot
sooner
than
that.
Z
There
is
a
little
bit
of
flexibility,
Tony
and
the
housing
team
have
been
working
with
RDA
staff,
because
the
RDA
nofa
money
has
been
allocated
by
Council,
so
the
RDA
can
actually
go
ahead
and
issue
that
notice
of
funding
availability
actually
select
applications.
We
just
can't
enter
into
a
formal
commitment
of
funding
with
a
developer,
so
we're
still
moving
forward
on
some
of
these
processes.
That
makes
sense.
Thank
you.
A
Important
so
I
didn't
know.
Eight
minutes
left
before
we
had.
L
L
Z
L
L
Yes,
I
love
the
self-funding
part,
so
it
sounds
magic.
So
that's
the
part
that
I
don't
understand,
but
I'm
generally
in
favor
of
it
and
but
I
want
to
just
more.
Z
Yeah,
a
piece
of
clarification
like
it's
it's
the
program-
income
that's
been
generating
would
actually
go
into
a
formalized
Loan
Fund,
so
it
would
be
principal
and
interest
coming
back
to
the
city
from
outstanding
loans.
We
have
about
25
million
in
outstanding
loans
that
we're
getting
we're
collecting
revenue
from.
P
This
is
also
one
of
several
programs,
and
it's
listed
in
the
next
steps-
column
right
programs
that
do
not
have
Council
adopted
guidance
and
policies.
So
as
part
of
the
the
next
steps
getting
into
those
nitty-gritty
details
would
come
to
the
council.
The
administration
would
draft
policies
for
you
to
consider
and
there'd
be
future
briefings
for
you
to
review,
modify
and
ultimately
adopt.
Yes,.
Z
Is
all
of
the
fun
so
the
cdbg
and
the
home
column?
Those
two
columns
on
the
left
are
the
most
timely,
the
non-restricted
there's
more
flexibility.
These
are
all
of
most
all
of
the
funds.
It's
the
funds
through
April
30th,
there's,
probably
a
little
bit
of
program
income
that
was
generated
between
April
30th
and
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
that
we
will
sweep
up
through
a
future
budget.
Amendment.
P
It
would
be
a
true
up.
It's
almost
like
the
annual
true
up
for
the
RDA
property
tax
increment.
We
estimate
it's
a
little
different
and
then
it
comes
to
the
council
to
recognize
the
difference.
Perfect.
F
F
C
C
C
F
Right
well,
we
are.