►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 01/03/2023
Description
To view agendas and paperwork go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
Six
tons
of
produce
for
our
community.
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
being
here
today
for
taking
the
time
to
come
up
to
a
place
like
this
in
the
morning.
I
always
love
starting
my
day
in
the
garden,
there's
nothing
like
it
to
celebrate,
coming
together
as
community
and
and
leaning
on
each
other
to
find
beauty
in
the
land
that
we
have
here
in
the
city
and
taking
what
we
do
with
the
what
we
do
here
and
sharing
it
with
the
Greater
Community.
So
thank
you
so
much.
B
Good
morning,
all
my
name
is
Nicole
Farley
and
I'm,
one
of
the
organizers
that
helped
put
this
beautiful
garden
together
and
I'm.
Just
going
to
tell
you
a
little
story
about
how
I
became
involved,
I
moved
to
Salt
Lake
City
in
the
fall
of
2020,
not
knowing
a
soul
in
this
city,
but
very
excited
to
get
here
and
get
involved
in
the
community.
And
one
of
the
first
opportunities
I
had
was
while
walking
through.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
January
2023
city
council
meeting,
we
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Facebook,
YouTube
or
SLC
TV.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
C
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment.
Please
join
us
tonight
during
our
7
PM
formal
meeting
to
share
your
comments.
We
of
course
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mailing
us
at
P.O
box,
145,
476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
84114,
email,
Council,
dot,
comments
at
slcgov.com
or
24-hour
phone
line,
801
535-7654.
C
C
We'll
now
bring
in
our
work
session
and
the
first
on
the
agenda
is.
This
is
a
time
when
we
turn
over
the
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
of
the
council,
and
we
nominate
the
council
chair
and
the
vice
chair
for
this
upcoming
Council
calendar
year.
2023
and
I
will
look
for
any
nominations
for
the
chair
and
we'll
do
that
first
and
then
we'll
go
for
the
nominations
for
the
vice
chair.
C
Thank
you
Cindy
and
also
will
on
the
formal
meeting,
we'll
we'll
formalize
this
with
our
vote.
At
that
point,
Mr.
C
I
think
you
have
a
nomination
for
Darren
mono
as
chair.
Any
other
nominations
at
this
time.
C
See
no
other
nominations
at
this
time.
I'm
going
to
allowed,
because
my
Romano
to
say
a
few
words.
F
Thank
you,
councilmember
Wharton
I'm
excited
to
continue
the
work
that
I've
been
doing
with
you,
Mr
chair,
as
during
2023
or
2022
into
2023,
particularly
excited
to
continue
working
on
some
of
the
big
land
use
and
housing
issues
that
we've
been
working
on
so
I
appreciate
the
nomination
and
I'm
excited
to
serve
if
elected.
F
Thank
you,
I
just
was
saying
thank
you.
Councilmember
Wharton
for
the
nomination
I'm
excited
to
serve
and
continue
the
work
that
we've
been.
Do
that
have
been
doing
as
Vice
chair
in
2022,
particularly
excited
to
continue
working
on
housing
and
zoning
ordinances
and
land
use
issues
that
I've
been
trying
to
be
to
to
focus
on.
F
C
C
C
Oh
councilman,
thank
you
for
joining
us
glad
to
see
you
here
joining
us.
C
H
C
H
I
C
G
Thank
you
for
the
nomination
I
really
look
forward
to
this
I
believe
council,
member
mono
and
I
are
great
balances
for
one
another.
His
skill
set
that
he
has
accumulated
through
experience
and
education
is
almost
exactly
contrary
to
what
I
have
gotten
through
education
and
experience.
But
there
are
two
sides
of
a
coin
that
our
city
is
desperately
needing.
We
need
his
architectural,
critical
thinking
lens
to
understand
how
to
shape
skylines
and
how
to
communities
and
and
with
them,
kind
of
innovative
ways
to
approach
the
the
problems
that
we're
seeing.
I.
C
Thank
you,
councilman.
Any
of
the
comments
from
the
council
see
no
other
Council
comments.
We
will
but
this
time
and
two
hybrid
council
members
send
your
text
as
you
did.
The
chair.
H
Thank
you.
I
have
a
soft
voice
else.
I'll
do
better
thanks
all
right.
Those
online
I've
received
their
votes
as
well
as
those
present
council
member
Chris.
Wharton
voted
yes
for
Victoria,
sorry,
councilmember
Petro.
Excuse
me:
councilmember
Peter
voted
yes
for
herself.
Councilmember
Romano
voted
yes
for
council
member
Petro
council
member
Dugan
voted
yes
for
council
member
Petro
and
online
I
received
a
yes
from
council
member
poy
for
council
member
petro
and
a
yes
from
council
member
Fowler
for
councilmember
Petro.
C
Thank
you
very
much
Cindy
and
come
from
pizza
roll
congratulations
on
Vice,
chair
and
I.
Look
forward
to
this
coming
year.
It's
this
wonderful
opportunity!
Thank
you
all
right,
Council,
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
two,
the
informational
update
from
the
admin
we
have
Lisa
Schaefer
online.
J
I'll
pull
this
up
so
that
so
scary
to
talk
so
closely
into
a
microphone
but
hi
council
members.
Thank
you
for
giving
us
this
time
to
chat
with
you
today.
I
believe
you
have
our
slides,
oh
yeah,
perfect.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
move
forward
to
the
first
slide
and
you
can
see
some
updates.
This
is
from
The
New
York
Times
statistics.
J
So
cases
in
the
United
States
of
covid-19
are
down
11
in
the
last
two
weeks,
and
here
in
Utah
we
are
seeing
that
cases
are
down
31
over
the
last
two
weeks.
That's
you
know
pretty
promising
Trend
if
we
want
to
head
on
to
the
next
slide
that
just
breaks
down
county
by
county,
how
we're
looking
and
you
can
see-
Salt
Lake
County
at
the
bottom
of
that
list
as
being
down
26
percent
so
again,
Trend,
obviously
going
in
the
right
direction
there
on
our
next
slide.
J
You
see
data
from
our
County's
website,
which
is
case,
counts
over
time
over
the
past
three
months
and
just
stepping
down
there
with
that.
Most
recent
update
then
we'll
head
on
over
to
our
next
slide,
which
is
our
waste
Reclamation
facility
data
and,
as
of
Monday,
the
monitoring
reports
that
we
are
actually
in
a
decreasing
phase
for
for
their
testing,
so
that
is
promising
right
there,
so
that
is
kind
of
it
for
our
covet
updates.
Do
any
of
you
have
any
questions
related
to
any
of
that?
Okay,
awesome,
then
we'll
move
on
over
to
Ashley.
K
Can
you
hear
me
wonderful,
happy,
New,
Year,
council
members,
congratulations
to
our
new
advice
and
no
chair
and
vice
chair
I
have
some
Community
engagement
highlights
for
you.
As
always,
please
visit
slc.gov
forward,
slash
feedback
for
regularly
updated
info
and
with
highlighted
ways
to
engage
with
the
city
next
slide.
Please.
K
First
and
foremost,
our
community
and
oh
hold
on
one
second
I'm
having
technical
difficulties.
What
is
going
on.
K
K
Planning
has
recently
transmitted
two
ordinance
changes.
You
should
see
that
also
soon
the
Landscaping
changes
to
qualify
for
rebates.
This
is
an
update
to
align
our
ordinance
with
the
Utah
Department
of
Natural
Resources
and
the
Central
Utah
Water
Commission
rebate
requirements.
So
residents
could
obtain
the
rebate.
This
was
transmitted
on
December
21st,
so
you
should
see
an
update
soon
from
there.
K
The
second
update
is
that
the
downtown
Building
height
and
Street
activation
update
related
to
building
Heights
review
processes
and
pedestrian
spaces
within
the
downtown
zones.
This
was
transmitted
on
the
27th
of
December
and
that
will
receive
an
update
as
well
in
the
next
month
or
so
from
our
transportation
division.
We
have
our
400
South
bus,
stop
improvements
which
is
in
District
Four.
That
is
also
continuing
into
spring.
The
bus
stops
on
400
South
are
being
improved
for
Ada
accessibility,
benches
connections
to
the
sidewalk
and
to
accommodate
frequent
Transit
service.
K
The
project
is
expected
to
go
out
to
bid
on
January
in
this
month
with
expected
construction.
During
this
spring
in
November
we
saw
extensive,
substantial
Outreach
for
Capitol
Hill
traffic
calming
measures
that
was
the
last
stretch
of
Engagement.
That
plan
is
being
finalized
and
will
be
sent
for
bid
for
construction
this
spring
and
then
slc's
Transportation
master
plan
dubbed
connect.
Slc
is
being
overhauled
for
the
first
first
time
since
1996
and
will
help
guide
us
through
the
next
four
decades.
The
initial
phases
of
engagements
have
concluded
and
the
information
is
being
reviewed.
K
K
We
have
our
City
Creek
Water
Treatment
Plant,
upgrade
that
the
public
utilities
engagement
team
has
created
a
16-week
campaign
that
launches
this
month
in
a
survey
that's
available
on
our
feedback
page
on
slcgov.
It
includes
a
video
that
we
will
ask
residents
for
their
feedback.
Regarding
the
chosen
design
for
the
project.
The
survey
will
be
live
for
a
month.
K
Through
other
engagement
efforts
like
going
to
PTO
meetings,
they
will
be
implementing
their
influent
Pump
Station
action
plan
in
the
coming
weeks,
and
due
to
this
impact
on
district
one
council,
member
Petro
essler
will
be
part
of
the
Outreach
efforts
which
we're
so
excited
to
collaborate
there
next
slide
and
then
something
that
I'm
really
excited
about.
Well
I'm
excited
about
all
engagement
but
in
particular
our
love.
Your
block
program
is
going
to
be
going
through
their
second
cycle
of
applications,
they're
now
being
accepted
and
they
close
January
29th.
K
Just
as
a
recap
for
community
members,
the
love,
your
block
team
is
accepting
our
mini
Grant
applications.
K
K
We
encourage
interested
applications
to
connect
applicants
to
connect
with
our
team
to
discuss
project
ideas
and
they
can
assist
in
filling
out
an
application
love.
Your
block
provides
many
grants
to
West
Side
residents,
businesses
and
organizations
to
support
neighborhood
revitalization
through
volunteer-led
projects,
one
block
at
a
time,
so
we're
so
excited
to
be
starting
phase.
Two
of
this
application
cycle
and
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
Engagement.
We
this
past
cycle.
We
did
about
200
hours
of
deliberating
with
community
members
out
on
the
west
side.
So
looking
forward
to
another
phase,.
H
Sorry
Council
excuse
me
Andrew.
Could
you
please
give
us
some
audio
again?
H
C
H
M
Sure
the
rapid
intervention
and
encamping
impact
mitigation
teams-
it's
been
a
little
slower,
though
over
the
holidays,
the
the
County
Health
Department
staff
have
not
been
available,
so
there's
not
been
mitigations.
In
that
sense,
the
rapid
intervention
team
has
continued
to
work
on
their
regularly
scheduled
areas
and
reports.
The
Outreach
teams
for
Volunteers
of
America
have
really
focused
the
last
few
weeks
on
as
many
camps
as
possible,
getting
out
information
and
and
supplies
to
them.
Information
about
options,
Transportation
options
to
get
inside
and
some
basic
needs
items
as
well.
M
The
RIT
team
continues
to
go
around
different
areas
of
the
city
and
schedule
places
that
are
being
reported
to
do
basic
cleanings.
We
do
anticipate
the
health
department
will
be
back
in
full
Staffing
as
of
next
week
and
we'll
have
more
updates
at
that
point
where
there
is
a
resource
Fair
scheduled
for
January
13th,
the
first
of
this
new
year-
and
it
will
be
in
the
morning
at
Rio,
Grande
or
in
that
area
and
more
information
can
be
shared
with
you
soon.
C
And
the
information
update
from
the
equity
team
with
Lindsay's
still
here
and
Chris
I.
P
Believe
you
should
have
the
slides,
we'll
skip
this
a
little
bit
closer.
There
we
go
I
believe
you
have
the
slides.
P
Great
all
right
so
hi
everyone,
I'm,
Chris
I,
am
the
know.
Your
neighbor
volunteer
coordinator,
I'm
just
going
to
do
a
little
bit
of
update
on
our
program.
For
those
of
you
who
don't
know,
I'm
just
gonna
give
a
little
bit
of
background
today,
they're
around
28
million
refugees
in
the
world,
less
than
half
a
percent
of
those
will
be
permanently
resettled.
In
a
country
like
the
United
States
in
Utah,
we
have
68
000
refugees
from
the
resettlement
program
and
almost
all
of
those
are
residing
in
Salt
Lake,
County,
Salt,
Lake
City.
P
That's
just
a
little
bit
background
on
why
this
program
is
so
important
in
the
population
that
we
work
to
to
serve
in
Utah
case.
Work
for
the
population
is
around
12
to
15
months.
That
is
intended
to
help
refugees
integrate
by
assisting
with
employment,
enrollment
in
schools
and
English
classes,
teaching
public
transportation,
setting
up
health
care
plans
and
getting
to
appointments.
Official
paperwork
bank
accounts
Etc,
typically
by
the
end
of
these
12
to
15
months.
The
integration
process
is
not
finished
and
there
is
no
longer
a
official
way
to
help
these
refugees.
P
That
is
why
our
program
is
so
important.
Our
program
not
only
continues
to
help
refugees
with
these
needs,
but
we
also
focus
on
social
integration,
which
is
a
really
big
part
of
of
the
integration
process.
We
Believe
ties
to
the
community,
and
particularly
friendships,
are
vitals
to
success.
For
us,
integration
is
a
two-way
process
in
which
newcomers,
refugees
and
the
receiving
Society
our
city
work
together
to
build
and
secure
vibrant
and
cohesive
communities.
P
P
In
the
past
year
2022
we
have
utilized
250,
mainstream
volunteers
for
a
total
of
4
300
volunteer
hours.
This
brings
our
program
to
date,
total
up
to
18
000
volunteer
hours.
Those
statistics
started
to
be
collected
in
2016.
in
this
year,
over
a
thousand
refugees
have
been
impacted
by
the
program.
This
was
done
through
65
individual
matches,
10
Refugee
Services
office
programs
supported
and
volunteers
sent
to
nine
Refugee
community-based
organizations,
as
well
as
16
partner
agencies.
P
One
thing
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
guys
today
is
the
human
aspect
of
our
program.
This
is
testimony
that
was
provided
to
us
by
one
of
our
volunteers
named
Luis.
He
shared
with
us
that
on
Saturday
afternoon,
I
will
make
a
note
for
the
record
real
quick.
This
was
back
in
June
Saturday
afternoon.
I
received
a
message
from
Gabe
telling
me
that
Tuesday
would
be
his
high
school
graduation
for
a
long
time.
He
has
been
working
on
obtaining
and
fulfilling
his
this
goal
and
his
message.
P
He
told
me
that
he
would
be
very
happy
if
I
could
go
to
this
graduation.
So
I
did
he
saw
me
and
he
was
very
happy,
despite
the
fact
that
all
of
his
friends
and
family
were
there
for
him.
It
was
important
that
I
was
at
his
graduation.
This
volunteer
and
this
Refugee
had
been
matched
for
over
a
year
as
the
volunteer
as
a
tutor
Mentor
for
the
refugee.
P
Another
quick
story
I
wanted
to
share
with
you,
is
I
reached
out
to
one
of
our
volunteers
who
had
been
matched
for
three
years.
Her
and
her
sister
have
been
working
with
this
young
woman.
As
mentors
and
in
a
more
of
a
socialization
capacity,
when
I
called
them
to
get
a
comment,
so
I
could
share
it
with
you
all
three
of
them
and
all
of
their
families
were
down
in
St,
George
vacationing,
together
I
could
not
get
any
information.
P
P
So
this
program
was
previously
supported
by
one-year
Vista
contracts.
With
the
end
of
our
Vistas,
we
were
really
fortunate
to
get
a
one-year
contract
for
full-time
know.
Your
neighbor
volunteer
coordinator
that
it
I
apologize
that
started
this
state
fiscal
year,
which
is
in
October,
and
the
the
duties
and
tasks
that
have
been
outlined
for
that
position
are
all
of
the
day-to-day
operations
for
this
position.
That
means
I'll,
volunteer
and
Refugee
Recruitment
onboarding
and
matches
for
volunteers.
P
That
is
making
sure
we
have
enough
volunteers
for
all
of
our
Refugee
Community
needs,
making
sure
that
everyone
has
done
an
orientation
background,
checks
and
proper
paperwork
and
for
refugees.
That
means
that
we
know
enough
information
for
the
refugee
to
be
to
be
able
to
properly
help
them,
as
well
as
making
sure
that
we
have
their
paperwork
done
and
that
the
two
that
we
are
going
to
match
will
be
a
good
fit
for
each
other.
P
This
also
is,
there
is
also
a
component
of
coordination
for
volunteer
needs
with
partner
agencies
and
Refugee
Center
programs,
coordination
with
city
and
state
staff,
and
ongoing
projects
for
increased
program
efficiency.
Right
now.
Our
big
projects
are
getting
more
comprehensive
background
checks
which
are
fingerprints
and
data
system
updates,
so
we
can
keep
better
records
and
share
between
the
city,
the
Salt,
Lake
City
mayor's
office,
and
this
state
more
easily.
P
P
P
We
have
a
great
relationship
and
the
refugee
service
office
not
only
helps
connect
us
with
refugees
in
the
community,
but
they
have
multiple
positions
that
lend
support
to
the
know
your
neighbor
program
as
well.
This
is
the
data
specialist
program
coordinator
program
management,
Vista,
rcbo
coordinator
or
CBO
development
Vista
and
the
community
team.
C
Thank
you
very
much
Chris.
This
is
wonderful
and
thanks
for
those
stories
and
I'd
like
just
to
get
a
little
more
information
about
how
we
can
spread
the
information
about
the
volunteer
requests
and
how
we
get
it
out
to
our
councils
and
community
council
members
and
others,
because
there's
probably
a
lot
of
people
who
would
love
to
help,
but
don't
know,
there's
that
need
so
I
would
really,
let's
communicate
on
that
side
of
the
house.
C
H
H
H
Katie
I'll
go
ahead
with
this
presentation,
so
first
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
thank
you
Council
for
the
time
to
conduct
a
brief
overview
of
the
government
records
and
access
management
act,
which
is
an
acronym
that
we
use
in
the
city.
The
acronym
is
Grandma
g-r-a-m-a
today,
I
just
want
to
go
over
some
of
the
statistics
and
a
little
bit
about
the
grandma
process
here
in
the
city
next
slide.
H
H
H
This
is
more
about
the
process.
Once
a
grandma
request
has
been
received,
the
city
has
10
days
assigned
to
respond
to
the
requester.
We
can
ask
for
an
extension.
We
can
grant
the
request.
We
as
the
recorder's
office
generally
work
through
with
the
departments
on
how
much
time
will
be
required
to
complete
the
request.
H
H
If
a
denial
is
granted
for
the
reasons
noted
as
its
protected
private
or
controlled,
the
requester
May
appeal
that
denial,
they
have
30
days
to
appeal.
The
decision
and
you'll
see
here
that
it
can
go
to
the
State
records
committee.
Last
year
we
had
17
appeals
in
the
city,
none
of
which
went
to
the
state
records
committee
at
this
I.
Think
there's
one
scheduled
for
this
coming
quarter
and
next
slide.
H
So
the
key
takeaways
that
we
like
to
present
in
the
grandma
presentations
that
we
do
throughout
the
city
is
that
city
employees
are
the
stewards
of
Records
created,
received
owned
and
retained
and
records
are
regularly
requested.
It
is
strongly
encouraged
for
all
records
to
represent
the
city
professionally
and
respectfully
next
slide.
H
H
This
is
also
a
breakdown
from
what
we've
gathered
in
the
opportunity
to
discuss
this
with.
You
is
you'd
like
to
see
the
breakdown
over
90
percent
of
the
requests
in
our
system
are
for
the
police
department.
Unfortunately,
I
wasn't
able
to
get
the
police
department
Grandma
coordinators
here
today,
but
they
did
they
present
offering.
If
you
guys
have
questions,
we
can
definitely
follow
up
with
the
numbers
or
with
any
information.
Ninety
percent
of
the
requests
are
from
the
police
department
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,.
H
You'll
see
the
volume
by
Department
community
and
neighborhoods
is
our
highest
volume
Department
outside
of
the
separated
City
requests.
We
are
working
to
build
more
opportunity
for
transparency
of
the
files
and
Records.
There
are
several
instances
where
people
will
request
a
certificate
of
occupancy
record.
It's
not
easy
to
find
so
those
requests
are
counted,
although
we
may
be
giving
the
information
within
one
to
two
days.
That's
part
of
Cannes
requests
and
that's
all
of
my
presentation.
F
S
H
F
Q
Q
Thank
you
so
first
I
I'd
like
to
start
by
thanking
Cindy
Lou
and
her
team
they're,
doing
a
great
job,
continuing
to
focus
on
transparency
and
access
to
records,
as
she
just
mentioned,
and
this
open
meetings
act
presentation
is
an
annual
requirement
for
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
and
the
RDA
board
of
directors,
as
well
as
all
of
our
other
public
bodies.
But
really
the
main
theme
is
transparency.
That's
what
the
opening
public
meetings
Act
is
and
that's
what
it
requires
of
all
of
our
public
bodies.
Q
So
as
I
I
mentioned,
any
meeting
of
a
public
body
is
open
to
the
public
unless
there's
an
exception
and
the
exceptions
are
limited
as,
as
you
all
know,
in
your
experience
as
council
members,
but
the
first
question
that
we
ask
when
we
look
at
the
the
open
and
public
meetings.
Act
is
what
is
a
public
body
next
slide
and
the
city
council
is
a
public
body
just
for
all
of
your
reference,
a
public
body
is
defined
as
any
entity
that
has
created
pursuant
to
state
law,
ordinance,
resolution
or
policy.
Q
So
it's
very
Broad
and
it
can
Encompass
quite
a
few
of
our
bodies,
including,
of
course,
our
all
of
our
public
boards
and
commissions,
and
if
an
entity
is
a
public
body,
then
it's
required
to
comply
with
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
next
slide,
and
that
means
that
meetings
have
to
be
open
with
very
limited
exceptions.
So
what
is
a
meeting?
Q
It's
not
everything,
but
it
is
most
things
that
you
all
do
as
a
city
council
and
the
definition
is
convening
of
a
quorum
to
discuss,
receive
comments
or
act
on
a
matter
over
which
the
council
has
jurisdiction.
Next
slide,
please!
So
when
we
really
get
into
that,
what
does
that
mean?
Well,
it
can
mean
electronic
meetings.
Q
It
can
mean
Retreats
workshops,
field
trips,
anytime,
a
quorum
of
the
council
or
the
RDA
board
is
getting
together
to
talk
about
or
take
action
on
items
over
which
you
have
jurisdiction,
which
of
course,
is
quite
broad
as
the
legislative
body
of
the
city.
Now
there
are
some
things
that
are
not
included
chance
meetings.
You
know,
four
of
you
happen
to
meet
up
at
the
grocery
store
or
social
Gatherings.
You
all
go
to
a
holiday
party
together
or
instances
when
there's
no
Quorum.
Q
Now,
of
course,
if
you
have
a
chance
meeting
or
if
you're
at
a
holiday
party
and
you
get
together
and
all
stand
in
a
corner
and
talk
about
items
over
which
you
have
jurisdiction,
that
would
be
a
violation
of
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
so
think
about
even
in
those
chance
encounters.
If
you
do
have
a
quorum
to
really
be
cautious
about
what
you're
communicating
about.
Because
again,
the
purpose
is
to
make
sure
that
the
the
items
that
you
discuss
are
done
in
a
public
meeting
next
slide.
Q
So
transparency
starts
at
the
very
beginning.
It
starts
with
the
notice
and
it
goes
all
the
way
through
to
the
actual
meeting
and
then
the
keeping
of
the
minutes
and
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
talks
about
all
of
those
things.
So
your
Council
staff
does
an
exceptional
job
of
the
posting
of
public
notice.
They
have
to
be
posted
in
various
places,
as
are
listed
on
this
slide,
and
they
have
to
be
posted
in
a
certain
way.
Q
So
there's
not
only
a
how
which
is
this
slide,
but
there's
a
what,
which
is
the
next
slide
please,
and
that
is
both
the
annual
meeting
schedule
and
the
every
meeting.
So
you,
you,
probably
recall
discussion
in
the
the
end
of
2022
about
the
annual
meeting
schedule
and
that's
the
list
of
all
of
the
meetings
that
you
are
going
to
have
for
the
next
year
and
the
reason
that
open
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
requires.
Q
That
is
to
give
the
public
an
opportunity
to
schedule
and
know
when
you're
going
to
meet
so
they're,
not
surprised
again
under
that
umbrella
of
transparency.
Now
sometimes
the
Council
changes
its
annual
meeting
schedule
or
decides
that
it
needs
to
hold
one
more
meeting,
and
in
that
instance,
you
don't
have
to
change
your
entire
annual
meeting
schedule.
Q
But
if,
let's
say
the
council
decided,
you
know
for
the
next
six
months,
we
need
to
meet
in
on
Tuesday
and
on
Thursday,
and
you
knew
that
that
was
going
to
be
regularly
scheduled
annual
annually
or
for
this
year.
Then
you
would
want
to
revise
your
annual
meeting
schedule
next
slide
and
if
anyone
has
any
questions,
jump
in
I
apologize
for
not
being
able
to
be
there
in
person
today.
Q
So
then,
of
course,
every
meeting
that
you
have
also
has
an
agenda
and
that
that
agenda
needs
to
be
posted
at
least
24
hours
in
advance.
Again,
your
staff
does
an
exceptional
job
and
they're
typically
posted
the
Thursday
before
your
Tuesday
meeting
again
to
give
extra
transparency
to
the
public
so
that
they
have
the
opportunity
to
study
the
materials
in
the
agenda
and
the
agenda
has
to
have
certain
things,
the
date
time
and
place
of
the
meeting
and
specific
content
about
what
you're
going
to
be
talking
about.
Next
slide.
Q
Q
I'll
just
jump
in
while
we're
waiting
for
the
next
slide
and-
and
that
is
reasonable.
Specificity
deserves
a
little
time
to
talk
about,
and
you
know
the
example
that
I
always
use
is
sometimes
there
will
be
a
board
or
a
commission
who
will
want
our
office
to
train
on
open
and
public
meetings
act
and
so
they'll
just
put
on
their
agenda
Katie
Lewis,
City
attorney.
Q
You
know
coming
for
30
minutes
and
if
you're,
a
member
of
the
public,
you
don't
know
what
Katie
Lewis
City
attorney
is
going
to
talk
about,
and
so
you
might
really
carve
out
some
time
in
your
day
to
go
and
hear
that
presentation
and
you
might
be
sorely
disappointed
if
it's
the
annual
open
meetings
act.
Training.
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
put
enough
on
the
agenda
that
the
public
knows
what
the
the
public
body
is
going
to
talk
about,
so
that
they
know
whether
or
not
they
want
to
engage
so
then.
Q
The
next
item
is
the
council
can
hold
emergency
meetings
in
which
they
don't
have
to
post
24
hours
in
advance
and
I
just
lost
my
slide,
but
I'll
keep
on
going
there.
Q
We
go
and
the
the
reason
for
that
is
if
there
is
something
that's
happening,
where
really
there's
an
unforeseen
circumstance
that
requires
the
council
to
meet
with
less
than
24
hours
notice,
then
there's
just
sort
of
do
the
best
you
can
to
post
the
notice
make
sure
the
majority
of
council
members
approve
the
holding
of
the
meeting,
and
then
you
can
actually
both
hold
the
meeting
and
take
final
action
as
an
emergency
meeting.
Now,
sometimes
we
get
questions.
Q
What
is
an
emergency
meeting
and
and
it's
a
high
standard,
because
24
hours
is
a
pretty
small
amount
of
time
to
have
to
give
notice.
So
we
really
view
an
emergency
as
truly
an
emergency
there's
something
that's
happening
in
the
city
that
requires
immediate
action
and
less
than
24
hours
notice.
Next
slide.
Please.
Q
Okay,
so
now
we're
going
to
talk
about
when
the
public
body
can
close
meetings
and,
like
I
said
before,
there
are
limited
exceptions
to
that
next
slide,
and
the
reason
that
the
exceptions
are
limited,
of
course,
is
that
the
the
council,
the
legislation,
the
legis
excuse
me,
the
Utah
legislature,
really
has
a
preference
correctly
for
public
bodies
to
do
most
of
their
business
in
public,
and
so
they've
created
a
small
number
of
exceptions
of
when
the
council
can
convene
and
discuss
things
without
the
public
component
next
slide.
Please.
Q
Those
two
might
be
tied
up
all
in
one
topic,
or
there
might
be
two
separate
reasons
within
one
closed
session
to
talk
about
it
and
then
there's
also
the
advice
of
legal
counsel,
and
that
typically
is
going
to
be
someone
from
my
office.
Giving
specific
advice
to
you
all
about
a
legal
matter
next
page
slide.
Sorry,
and
if
the
council
wants
to
go
into
closed
session,
then
there
are
specific
procedures.
Q
They
first
have
to
be
in
an
open
meeting
with
a
quorum
present
and
a
two
two-thirds
of
the
council
must
be
present
and
approve
the
closing
and
the
you
all
do
a
great
job.
You've
done
this.
You
know
multiple
times
in
2022,
where
the
council
publicly
announces
the
reason
for
entering
into
closed
session,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
I
move
that
we
acquire.
You
know
closed
session
to
acquire
property
at
X
specific
address.
Q
You
just
have
to
list
the
exception
generally,
that
is
in
the
open
and
public
meetings
act,
and
then
there
needs
to
be
a
roll
call
vote
to
enter
into
closed
session
next
slide.
Please
and
then
going
back
to
transparency
and
thinking
about
what
happens
in
a
closed
meeting
versus
an
open
meeting
in
an
open
meeting.
The
meeting
is
recorded
and
then
there
are
also
written
minutes
that
are
produced,
and
the
official
record
of
that
meeting
are
the
written
minutes,
but
there
also
is
the
recording
when
you're
in
a
closed
meeting.
Q
The
times
when
recordings
don't
have
to
be
kept
are
if
the
council
is
discussing
the
character,
professional
competence
or
physical
or
mental
health
of
an
individual
or
the
deployment
of
security,
Personnel
devices
or
systems,
and
one
thing
to
note
is
that
that
recording
is
a
protected
record
under
Grandma.
So
what
that
means
is
that
if,
if
a
member
of
the
public
said
you
know,
we,
we
think
that
you
entered
into
closed
meeting
for
the
wrong
purpose,
or
we
think
you
discussed
things
in
closed,
meaning
that
shouldn't
have
been
discussed
in
that
closed
session.
Q
Then
they
can
go
through
the
grandma
appeal
process,
as
Cindy
Lou
discussed
and
an
outside
entity
will
determine
whether
or
not
Salt
Lake
City
properly
closed
the
meeting
and
discuss
things
properly
in
that
closed
meeting.
So
it's
it's
really
important
to
be
very
specific
and
accurate.
In
the
way,
we
close
our
meetings
and
what
we
talk
about
in
those
meetings
next
slide.
Please.
Q
Okay,
so
then
the
final
thing
to
talk
about
are
electronic
meetings,
and
sometimes
those
are
thought
of
as
two
separate
things.
One
of
them
is
what
we're
doing
right
now
being
in
a
hybrid
meeting
where
I'm
talking
to
you
remotely
and
there's
a
quorum
that
is
in
person
in
the
anchor
location.
There
also
are
often
questions
about
text,
messages
or
emails
or
virtual
correspondence
with
a
quorum
of
the
public
body.
So
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
both
of
those
next
slide
and
the
first
is
the
the
electronic
meeting.
Q
So
let's
say
you
just
exactly
what
we're
doing
here,
you
call
or
you
FaceTime,
into
a
meet
into
a
meeting.
The
open
and
public
meetings
act
says
that
there
has
to
be
a
resolution,
rule
or
ordinance
that
allows
a
majority
of
a
quorum
to
be
physically
present
at
the
anchor
location.
So
that's
that's
what's
happening
right
now.
You
in
fact
have
a
quorum
physically
present
at
your
anchor
location
and
the
other
individuals
can
meet
hybrid
now.
The
next
thing
to
talk
about
is
text
messages.
Q
So,
in
a
situation
where
council
members
are
texting
each
other
during
a
meeting
and
in
fact,
if
you're
texting
each
other
in
any
instances,
if
you
have
convened
a
quorum
of
the
public
body
and
are
talking
about
items
over
which
the
council
has
jurisdiction,
then
by
having
those
electronic
conversations
outside
of
the
public
eye,
that's
a
violation
of
the
open
and
public
meetings
act.
Q
And
I
I'm
actually
going
to
skip
over
this
slide
and
I'm
going
to
skip
over
the
next
slide,
because
we've
had
a
few
yeah.
Thank
you.
You
can
stop
right
there,
you,
you
will
be
meeting
and
you've
already
talked
in
the
RDA
board
and
you'll
be
talking
today
about
adopting
a
resolution
to
ensure
the
continuation
of
hybrid
meetings.
So
don't
worry
about
that
final
slide.
You'll
have
a
quick
conversation
about
it
with
Cindy
Lou
later
on
the
agenda,
and
you
already
did
with
the
RDA
board.
Q
So
then
let's
talk
about
public,
common
and
participation
in
public
meetings,
so
there
are
some
instances
when
the
public
is
legally
allowed
required
to
cut
and
excuse
me
and
the
city
council
is
legally
required
to
allow
public
participation.
These
are
public
hearings
that
are
required
under
zoning,
Bond
hearings
or
other
times.
When
the
the
council
must
hold
a
public
meeting.
Q
Sorry
public
comments.
There
are
also
times
when
the
council
can
allow
public
comments
that
are
not
legally
required.
One
is
what
the
council
does
during
formal
meeting
when
you
hold
general
comment
and
the
the
public
can
discuss
anything
that
they
would
like
other
than.
What's
already
been
discussed
in
in
previous
public
hearings
and
then
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair,
the
the.
Q
If
there
is
somebody
who
has
made
a
public
comment
and
the
chair
would
like
the
council
to
discuss
that,
even
though
it's
not
on
the
agenda,
the
council
can
do
so,
but
cannot
take
final
action
on
that
item
until
it's
put
on
an
agenda.
So
that's
one
of
those
times
when
an
item
might
not
be
on
the
city
council's
agenda,
but
a
member
of
the
public
might
have
commented
on
it,
and
this
Council
might
want
to
have
brief
follow-up
discussion
in
that
meeting
and
then
put
the
item
on
an
additional
agenda
later
next
slide.
Q
Q
And
finally,
although
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
allows
for
transparency
and
the
Public's
access
to
you
all
as
a
public
body,
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
public
May
willfully
disrupt
a
meeting.
So
the
council
does
have
the
right
to
remove
an
individual
if
they
willfully
disrupt
a
meeting
and
if
the
meeting
cannot
be
conducted
in
an
orderly
fashion.
Q
Next
slide,
please
next
slide.
So
the
the
final
thing
that
I'll
say
is
that
the
open
and
public
meetings
act
does
have
consequences
for
violating
the
ACT.
If
someone
knowingly
violates
the
closed
meeting
Provisions,
that's
a
Class,
B
misdemeanor
and
private
individuals
can
bring
a
lawsuit
for
a
violation
of
the
act,
and
one
of
the
things
that
they
can
seek
is
the
voiding
of
a
final
action
that
has
been
taken
if
it
was
done
in
violation
of
the
open
and
public
meetings
act.
Q
So
you
know
not
only
is
transparency,
a
critical
goal
of
Salt
Lake
City,
but
there
are
also
legal
consequences
for
violating
these
transparency
requirements
next
slide.
Please-
and
that's
all
I-
have
thank
you
very
much.
I
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
again
I
apologize
for
not
being
there
in
person
today.
C
Thank
you
very
much
Katie
and
thank
you.
Cindy
Lou,
any
questions
for
either
one
on
the
grandma
or
the
open
meetings.
Act.
C
T
This
is
a
Economic
Development,
Fund
economic
development,
loan
fund
potential
loan
to
a
business
called
43
Bakery,
slash
through
Salt.
It
would
be
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
at
8.75
interest
over
seven
years
and
they
would
use
that
for
construction.
Essentially,
expansion
of
the
business
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Roberta
for
any
additional
information.
And
if
you
have
any
questions,
she'll
be
the
one
with
the
answers.
U
Thank
you
Allison
good
afternoon,
council
members
good
to
be
with
you.
Yes,
as
Allison
mentioned,
43
Bakery
is
a
retail
wholesale
bakery
that
started
in
2018.
You
probably
know
them
as
streusel,
because
that
was
the
name
for
a
while
and
I
think
a
lot
of
you
guys
have
tasted
their
delicious
Goods.
He,
the
owner,
Andrew
Corral,
was
in
and
out
of,
or
was
working
in
a
lot
of
the
commissary
kitchens
until
this
year,
when
he
decided
that
he
was,
he
was
growing
enough
to
expand
into
his
own
his
own
kitchen
space.
U
We're
really
excited
about
this
project
where
it's
located,
because
it's
the
the
address
is
713
Genesee
Avenue,
which
is
about
7th
West
and
9th
South,
which
is
right
on
the
nine
line
project
area
for
the
RDA
project
area.
What's
equally
cool
about
this
is
that
they
are
going
into
an
rda-funded
building
the
West
End
development.
That's
going
to
bring
a
lot
of
much
needed
retail
and
activity
local
businesses
to
the
neighborhood.
So
we're
excited
to
be
here
to
present
this
loan
and
please,
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
C
Looks
like
oh
come
to
my
model:
oh
Roberta
Allison.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
U
C
R
R
C
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
H
C
H
H
V
H
Presence
in
the
WebEx
audio
on
the
WebEx
camera
on
in
the
WebEx,
if
you're
participating
electronically,
if
a
roll
call
is
held,
you're
verbally,
indicating
you're
present
and
there
for
the
vote.
So
those
were
ideas
generated
from
my
head
about
what
I
think
that
could
apply
by
making
yourself
known.
F
F
The
reason
why
I
was
attending
remotely
so
I
was
not
actually
in
the
meeting
for
about
10
minutes,
5
or
10
minutes,
but
my
WebEx
was
still
logged
in,
should
I
have
logged
out
so
that
my
presence
was
not
known
at
the
meeting.
Does
that
make
sense
yeah?
What's
the
best?
And
maybe
that's
just
a
staff
question,
but
that's
a.
H
If
an
individual
is
present
in
the
WebEx
meeting,
the
understanding
is
that
they're
there
and
listening
to
the
meeting
they're
engaged
in
the
meeting.
If
engagement
needs
to
be
sidetracked,
momentarily
that's
dependent
upon
the
individual
of
The
Next
Step.
Do
you
want
to
leave
the
meeting
and
log
out?
If
you
need
to
change
locations,
will
you
log
out
and
sign
back
on
generally,
if
it's
five
minutes
or
less
because
you're
changing
devices,
we
don't
notate
that
in
the
minutes.
C
C
We
have
Dan
Adams,
Tiffany,
pocket
and
and
Shane
Marshall.
C
O
We're
here
today
to
talk
about
the
I-15
Eis
study.
I
have
do
you
want
me
to
click
through
or
tell
to
the
next
slide
next
slide.
Today
we
wanted
to
go
over
the
process.
What
we've
been
through
to
date,
where
we're
headed
in
the
future,
as
well
as
the
Alternatives
and
what
they
look
like
today
and
how
to
provide
feedback.
We
are
in
a
public
comment
period
for
those
Alternatives
and
then
having
any
questions
or
discussion
that
you
might
have
next
slide.
O
But
it
is
part
of
a
larger
planning
system
next
slide
and
you
guys
jump
in
if
I
miss
anything
or
I
don't
want
to
have
any
clarifications,
and
so,
as
I
mentioned
from
the
long
range
plan,
we
identified
this
Corridor
as
first
and
foremost
a
need.
It
needs
to
be
reconstructed
but
as
well
as
we
are
looking
for
a
future
planning
Horizon
in
2015.
O
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
do
go
come
in
and
reconstruct
this,
it
is
respectful
of
what
the
Wasatch
Front
will
look
like
in
the
forthcoming
years.
So
we
are
following
the
Eis
process.
We
started
this
study
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
now,
where
we
went
out
and
asked
what
are
the
needs
of
the
corridor,
we
as
the
department
we
knew
it
needs
to
be
reconstructed.
O
We
have
aging
infrastructure
in
the
area
but
went
out
for
public
comment
and
did
a
bunch
of
technical
analysis
to
understand
what
the
needs
are
for
the
corridor
and
then
over
the
summer
and
fall.
We
did
a
bunch
of
additional
technical
analysis
based
off
of
what
we
heard.
What
our
modeling
and
travel
forecasts
look
like
for
the
future
and
came
up
with
what
we
call
Alternatives
and
that's
where
we're
at
today.
O
We
do
have
a
public
comment
period
open
currently
for
those
Alternatives
I
have
some
additional
information
on
specifically
what
those
kind
of
look
like
today,
but
we're
we're
kind
of
still
in
the
middle
of
the
process.
You'll
see
I'll
go
over
what
the
next
steps
are,
but
we've
been
through
the
review
of
the
scoping
we've
assessed
the
needs.
We
now
have
Alternatives
next
slide.
O
Oh
sorry,
I
thought
this
was
the
next
one.
O
Was
the
screening
but
I'll
go
back
to
the
screening
in
a
second,
but
the
Department's
mission
is
to
improve
quality
of
life
through
transportation,
and
so
what
those
pillars
look
like
for
a
quality
of
life,
our
better
Mobility,
good
health,
connected
communities
and
strong
economy,
and
we
wanted
to
really
make
sure
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
study
that
we
embraced
that
vision
and
make
sure
that
each
one
of
the
needs
address
or
look
at
these
quality
of
life
outcomes,
as
well
as
thinking
about
all
users
and
you'll,
hopefully
see
that
a
lot
in
our
Alternatives.
O
As
as
we
go
through
that
in
the
presentation.
Okay,
back
to
screening
sorry,
so
we
are
following
again
the
NEPA
process.
We
have
gone
through
what's
called
level
one
screening
where
we
these
Alternatives,
we
think
meet
the
needs
and
the
quality
of
life
framework
from
the
study
and
from
here
we'll
go
and
look
at
what's
called
level
two
screening
where
we
look
at
the
natural
and
built
environment,
air
quality,
noise
analysis,
a
lot
of
refinement
happens
from
here
into
the
next
level
of
screening.
O
O
This
is
a
Corolla
wide
kind
of
view
of
how
we've
looked
at
Mobility
for
all
users,
I'll
hone
in
kind
of
on
the
north,
Salt
Lake
and
Salt
Lake
area
in
a
minute.
But
this
is
a
17
Mile
Corridor
I'm
from
Farmington
to
Salt
Lake
City.
So
we
are
looking
at
every
existing
and
future
interchange
as
we
move
forward
to
make
sure
that
it
is
a
part
of
the
community
rather
than
a
barrier
to
it.
Well,
I've
moved
on
to
the
next
slide.
Sorry
yeah.
O
This
is
a
corridor
wide
V
from
the
start
in
the
north,
at
Farmington,
down
to
Salt
Lake
City,
it's
around
17
miles
that
we've
really
looked
at
making,
hopefully
I-15
more
of
a
part
of
the
community
rather
than
a
barrier
to
it.
O
W
You
back
up
one
District
yeah,
so
just
to
be
just
to
kind
of
set
the
stage
a
little
bit
prior
to
getting
to
this
point.
We
walked.
W
Mic
closer,
no
better
than
that.
Sorry
about
that
before
we
got
to
this
point
before
we
came
up
with
with
Alternatives,
we
walked
the
community.
These
intersections
interchanges
with
the
community
council
member
Warden
was
with
us
when
we
walked
six
North
from
one
side
of
I-15
to
the
other
side,
I-15
try
to
understand
what
those
needs
were
from
a
community
perspective.
All
of
that
information
has
gone
into
what
you're
going
to
see
as
Tiffany
moves
forward.
O
Next
slide,
please,
oh,
that
slide.
Yep
first
I'll
talk
about
what
the
alternatives
are
for
I-15
and
then
I'll
go
over.
What
we've
looked
at
for
additional
Crossings.
We
have
two
options
pertaining
to
I-15.
The
first
option
is
a
five
Lane
section
with
a
high
occupancy
toll
Lane
in
each
direction
or
what
we
call
the
express
lanes
today
and
then.
The
second
option
is
a
option
b
which
are
reversible
High
occupancy
toll
Lanes
in
the
center.
They
are
separated
by
barrier
next
slide.
O
An
auxiliary
Lane,
yes,
so
an
auxiliary
Lane
is
when
we
it's
not
Corridor
wide,
but
whenever
there
are
ramps
too
close
together,
we'll
just
keep
that
lane
together,
so
that
we
don't
have
the
safety
issue
of
weaving,
so
that
lane
doesn't
exist
all
the
time.
It's
just.
Whenever
two
ramps
are
too
close
together,
we
just
keep
that
lane
open.
Okay,.
G
W
Give
us
some
context
of
what
you
thought
this
project
was
was
it
this?
Was
it
this
like
it?
It
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
what
this
project
is
and
we
we
aren't
at
the
level
of
impact
analysis,
yet
right
we're
going
to
get
into
that
as
we
move
forward,
but
so
it's
this
wide
today,
it's
about
this
wide
tomorrow.
W
Most
of
this
work
occurs
in
the
middle.
If
you
drive,
especially
through
the
six
North
Area
there,
that
median
there
is
very,
very
wide
so
most
of
this
work.
85
percent
of
this
work
goes
to
the
middle
there's
very
little.
Expansion
on
the
outside,
so
in
Salt
Lake
City
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
Again,
it's
a
quarter-wide
perspective
right
and
it
changes.
If
you
go
up
further
to
the
north,
you
have
up
and
UTA
on
one
side,
so
you
have
to
move
that
other
way.
W
E
You
know
when
you
not
not
what
you're
adding,
but
that
plus
what
already
exists
is
about
as
wide
as
Guadalupe
is,
and
the
concern
that
that
is
going
to
be
born
mostly
on
in
Guadalupe,
is
really
concerning
to
them,
and
so
like
this,
you
know,
makes
a
huge
huge
difference
and
that's
what
I'm
I'm
most
worried
about
and
especially
that
you
know
those
areas
like
Argyle
Court,
where
you
know
people
already
can
reach
outside
and
touch
I-15
and
those
projects
were
part
of
neighborworks
projects
that
that
you
know.
G
Think
it's
also
worth
noting
that
the
community
is
demonstration
of
resilience
to
the
last
time
the
highway
decided
to
cut
through
the
city.
There
is
a
103
year
old
woman
who
lives
at
the
intersection
of
fifth
West
and
fourth
North.
We
all
call
her
grandma
Molly.
She
gave
up
her
house
for
the
original
15
and
is
living
in
a
house
that
is
in
the
impacted
area.
Should
we
do
that
tiny
expansion
again
so
I
think
that's
also
worth
noting
in
this
community
yeah.
E
Exactly
and
so,
and
that's
the
reality
that
they're
coming
at
it
with
I,
don't
think
there's
any
way
that
that
they're
going
to
view
this
as
Community
Building,
even
though
we
did
walk
that
bridge
and
that
bridge
is
in
huge
need
of
re-engineering
and
rebuilding.
E
But
I
would
like
to
hear
more
details
about
what
you
think
I
know
are
still
in
the
planning
stages,
but
and
I
do
also
appreciate
you
not
extending
the
period
of
time
for
feedback
on
this.
But
what
are
your
plans
for
that
area
of
Guadalupe.
R
O
Know
it
do
you
want
me
to
just
go
back
into
the
interchanges
or
I
would
just
yeah
touch
on
you
guys
care
about
the
reversible
ins
or
any
of
that
information,
because
I
can
skip
through
it
in
in
the
interest
of
time?
If,
if
that's
so
in
the
north,
Salt
Lake
Woods
Cross
area,
we
are
oh.
O
You
go
there,
you
go
so
in
the
Woods
Cross
North
Salt,
Lake
area.
O
We
are
looking
at
a
a
new,
well,
a
combined
intersection,
as
you
guys
may,
or
may
not
be
aware
that
throughout
this
Corridor,
there's
kind
of
a
spaghetti
bowl
of
weird
interchanges
and
so
we're
trying
to
consolidate
I
call
it
a
new
interchange,
but
really
it's
taking
Warm
Springs
and
making
it
look
more
like
a
traditional
interchange,
and
so
that
takes
a
lot
of
pressure
off
of
the
600
North
interchange,
where
right
now
there's
a
lot
of
trucks
coming
from
the
industry,
gravel
of
refineries
that
are
the
the
easiest
way
to
get
onto
I-15
right
now
is
600
North,
and
so
we
heard
that
when
we
walked
and
when
we
talked
to
both
north
Salt
Lake
and
Salt
Lake-
and
we
heard
that
hey
industry
needs
to
get
onto
I-15
as
quickly
as
possible.
O
O
O
Okay,
so
we're
into
Salt
Lake
option
A,
which
is
a
diamond
interchange.
What
you
see
today
is
a
spoolie
and
what
we're
what
we've
learned,
both
nationally
and
here
in
Utah,
that
a
traditional
Diamond
interchange
really
helps
slow
cars
and
vehicles
down.
O
O
D
R
G
W
The
signal
goes
across
so,
if
you're
coming
Northbound
off
of
I-15
and
you
get
on
the
off
ramp
of
six
come
up
the
top,
you
can
turn
left
or
right.
A
spooey
is
just
that,
just
a
left
or
right,
the
the
more
complicated
ones,
they're
called
diversion
diamonds-
that's
not
proposed
here!
That's
where
you
kind
of
get
on
the
wrong
side
of
the
road
to
make
that
left.
That's
not
what
we're
talking
about
here.
This
is
a
simple
single
point
place
where
one
green
light
you
turn
left.
You
turn
right.
Okay,.
W
C
Either
eight
and
right
now
you
just
still
you're
in
the
in
the
evaluation
in
the
evaluation
period,
gotcha.
G
And
yep,
and
is
it
the
addition
of
more
lights,
that
slows
it
down
because
as
dangerous
as
that,
600
North
Bridge
is
even
more
dangerous?
Is
the
800
West
600
North
interchange
and
the
900
West
600
interchange?
We
just
had
a
teenager
T-boned
there
and
you
know,
sent
to
the
hospital
critical
condition.
G
So
is
it
the
lights
or
is
it
the
way
it's
laid
out
that
slows
people
down?
What's
the
logic.
O
There,
the
geometry,
because
we
can
make
things
more
perpendicular
and
rather
than
kind
of,
because
sweeping
right
turns
like
I
apologize,
I
keep
using
the
what's
there
today
right
now,
the
geometry
is
is
laid
out
for
the
convenience
of
vehicles.
O
We
have
tried.
That's
why
I
wanted
to
Showcase
that
that
toolbox
that
we're
using
to
line
up
Geometry
more
in
a
perpendicular
manner
where
cars
are
forced
to
slow
down.
They
don't
get
these
sweeping
movements
anymore,
where
they
can
maintain
their
speed
and
and
continue
on
to
those
intersections
that
you're
talking
about.
C
O
So
those
intersections
are
outside
our
study
area,
but
we
are
trying
we
we
have
heard
that
speed's
a
problem
and
we
need
to
slow
down
right.
C
Right
so
yeah,
you
have
to
make
a
90
degree
turn
to
go
right.
Instead
of
these
big
sweeping,
we
used
to
call
them
right,
California
rights,
where
you
just
you,
maintain
your
speed
and
just
kind
of
gotcha.
W
C
That
right,
okay,
all
right,
thank
you
that
that's
helpful
I
think
not
only
just
us,
but
hopefully
the
general
public.
Thank.
O
So
this
is
option
A.
The
second
one
is,
as
we
were,
explaining
the
the
spooey
concept
and
The
Interchange
to
the
north
moves
a
little
farther
south,
but
those
are
kind
of
the
major
differences
between
option
A
and
option
b
in
Salt
Lake
City
questions.
O
And
with
it,
when
we
do
a
thank
you
Shane,
when
we
do
a
spooey
in
in
the
study
area,
because
we
do
know
that
the
geometry
is
a
little
more
favorable
to
Vehicles,
we
have
created
a
grade
separated
option
for
those
who
would
prefer
not
to
deal
with
or
or
their
comfort
level
would
be
to
kind
of,
not
be
not
be
interacting
with
the
with
the
vehicle.
So
those
are
the
thank
you.
That
was
another
kind
of
concept
that
we've
gone
through
for
the
whole,
the
whole
Corridor.
So.
F
F
O
With
the
spooey
we
do
have
a
grade
separated
option,
but
with
the
with
the
traditional
diamond,
we
do
have
larger
buffered
bike
Lanes.
You
know
larger
sidewalks
so
that
you
know
it's
not
just
not
that
we
have
still
have
options
for
Walkers
and
bikers
and
scooters
and
any
any
modes
you
choose.
You
can
hopefully
find
a
space
for
yourself.
O
Some
other
things
we've
looked
at
are
creating
new
connections
both
at
fifth
North
and
4th
North.
Oh
sorry,
next.
O
New
connections
under
I-15
at
5th
and
fourth
fifth,
would
be
a
walker
biker,
scooter
connection,
so
no
cars
and
at
Fourth
it
would
be
all
users
we
also
because
of
the
new
configuration
of
the
ramps
and
consolidating
them
along
I-15.
We
are
able
to
reduce
the
number
of
lanes
on
Beck
Street
and
create
a
shared
use
path
that
connects
North,
Salt
Lake
to
Salt
Lake
on
on
Beck
Street.
So.
R
And
both
those
ideas
were
from
the
comments
that
came
in
early
were
looking
at
increasing
East-West
connectivity.
It
has
been
interesting
in
the
public
meetings
and
things
we've
had
with
Alternatives
that
people
that
live
close
to
the
freeway
are
not
thrilled
about
that.
Yeah
they're
they're
not
excited
about
it
becoming
open,
because
right
now
with
it
basically
is
a
cul-de-sac.
They
like
it
having
a
nice,
quiet,
Street,
and
so
that's
it's
been
really
interesting.
The
conversations
around.
G
G
G
R
Mean
really
great,
we've
been
able
to
have
multiple
meetings
in
the
neighborhood,
really
good,
turnout,
lots
of
really
good
visits.
Another
concern,
too,
is
the
the
train
tracks
there
that
if
you
would
go
through
at
four
or
five
hundred,
you
then
hit
the
the
railroad
and
then
a
lot
of
comments
also
about
the
300,
is
just
a
block
away
and
is
open
now.
So.
G
O
That's
why
we
wanted
to
talk
about
the
long-range
plan
at
the
very
beginning,
because
I-15
isn't
the
only
study
or
the
only
effort
that's
going
on
for
well.
The
growth
UTA
is
also
studying
front
runner
literally
as
we
speak,
they're
also
doing
comment
periods
and
going
through
the
environmental
process
like
we
are
and.
W
G
Them
well,
and
it
feels
it
just
feels
a
little
bit
like
a
neighbor.
That's
already
sacrificed
for
efficiency
would
be
asked
to
once
again
subsidize
suburban
sprawl
by
giving
up
more
of
their
acreage
the
city
to
give
up
more
of
its
acreage
so
that
people
could
live
further
away
and
have
more
Reliance
on
a
car,
and
that
doesn't
seem
like
an
awesome
value
proposition
for
the
capital
city,
that
is
the
economic
engine
for
the
state.
G
C
So
stay
stand
with
that
same
vein,
so
my
question
I
was
holding
off
on
was
the
same
expansion
and
UTA
on
I
know
front
runner,
but
also
brts
and
using
of
brts.
Only
Lanes
is
that
part
of
the
discussion
or
that
still
with
with
the
concept
of
you,
know
the
HOV
or
HRT
Lane
or.
W
And
successful
so
front
runner,
brts
everything
they
have
in
their
long-range
plan
is
built.
Then
what
is
left
to
accommodate
for
I-15?
So
that's
the
need
that
we're
trying
to
accommodate
is
everything
after
everything's
built
what's
left
over
and
that's
why
you
see
five
Lanes
five
plus
one
Lanes
on
on
I-15
and
not
eight,
nine
and
ten,
because
there
is
a
dependence
on
transit
in
the
future.
You
without
that,
you
would
see
a
much
lighter
wider
I-15,
but
we
don't
need
that
because
there
is
a
robust
transit
system.
In
the
background
of
our
study
right.
C
R
O
Because,
as
I
mentioned,
when
we
first
looked
at
this
Corridor
because
it
it's
aging,
it's
old,
it
needs
to
be
reconstructed.
We've
done
some
Rehabilitation
throughout
the
years,
but
some
of
the
pavement
in
this
Corridor
is
the
original
I-15.
O
So
if
we
do
need
to
go
in
and
reconstruct
this,
how
does
it
need
to
look
for
for
the
community?
That's
why
we've
taken
600
North
so
seriously,
because
we
have
heard
so
much
about
it.
G
It
feels
to
me
like
this
is
the
right
time
for
us
to
dream
boldly.
We
are
in
the
middle
of
a
massive
growth
trajectory.
We
are
going
to
get
the
Olympics.
There
is
infrastructure
dollars
available
at
a
federal
level.
In
you
know
unprecedented
numbers.
G
Have
we
considered
a
non-traditional
option
that
feels
super
viable
and
would
address
endless
concerns
for
my
constituents
about
potentially
burying
and
my
conceptualization
from
there's
the
23
North
Exit,
which
is
industrial
that
would
have
to
stay
at
grade,
but
I
mean
just
south
of
there
and
then
coming
up
just
before
the
spaghetti
bowl
at
like
13
South,
you
would
reduce
PM
2.5
directly
into
homes.
You
would
reduce
the
sound
issues.
You
could
create
land
that
the
state
could
reclaim
and
monetize
to
offset
whatever
costs.
G
There
would
be
please
not
with
truck
served,
warehouses
I,
know
y'all
like
to
give
them
to
us.
No
more
of
those
but
I
mean
like
this
feels
like
a
very
forward-looking.
My
friend
was
just
in
Santiago,
Chile
I
mean
that's
considered
a
developing
nation
and
they
have
a
buried
Highway
and
they
have
a
similar
terrain.
I
get
that
the
water
tables
are
high,
but
we
just
buried
a
central
table,
a
central
tunnel
out
at
the
airport-
and
you
know,
engineering
at
this
magnitude
can
compensate
for
those
sorts
of
issues.
O
We
have
we
have
heard,
and
we
have
initially
looked
at
a
on
basically
Nationwide.
There
are
several
other
states
that
are
are
doing
similar
well.
Similar
is
probably
not
a
fair
word.
This
is.
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
unique
Corridor
and
because
we
do
have
it's
basically
at
grade
right
now,
there
are
some
some
Logistics
that
we
would
need
to
look
at.
O
What
what
this
looks
like
today
versus
the
impact
to
build
a
buried
freeway,
the
community
could
look
very,
very
different
compared
to
the
impacts,
we're
talking
about
I.
O
G
W
So
we've
we've
heard
that
feedback
over
the
last
month
or
so,
and
we
are
looking
at
what
it
would
take
and
what
it
would
look
like.
It's
I
think
if
you
went
like
that,
it
makes
a
ton
of
sense
it's
getting
from
here
to
there
that
I.
W
W
As
soon
as
we
say,
something
like
this
The
Big
Dig
comes
to
mind.
Yes
and,
like
Tiffany,
said
in
a
lot
of
these
cases,
the
freeway
has
been
depressed
before
you
get
there,
and
so
you
just
cover
the
freeway
we'd
have
to
get
the
freeway
depressed
in
this
circumstance,
so
it
there's
one
of
two
options.
Well,
three
tunnel:
like
the
big
dig,
you
build
something
to
the
rider
to
the
left
of
I-15,
which
is
really
impactful
for
the
community.
W
Like
you
said,
Guadalupe
is
right
there
today
and
we
don't
want
to
get
any
closer
or
you
close,
I-15
and
dig
it
all
out
and
then
do
it.
So
it's
pretty
substantial,
but
we
are
looking
at
it
to
see
what
are
the
ramifications.
W
We
will
at
least
have
the
information
available
to
say,
here's
what
it
would
look
like.
So
yes
appreciate
that
feedback,
I
think
that
the
two,
the
the
what
what
I
took,
what
we've
taken
away
I
think
from
this
initial
Outreach,
is
that
the
the
impacts,
the
community,
whether
it's
this
much
or
this
much
a
foot
or
two
matters,
a
great
deal,
and
so
what
we
are
we
right
now
putting
that
on
paper
and
saying:
okay,
how
do
we
avoid
first
avoid?
W
Can
we
avoid
whatever
is
out
there
with
this
with
either
alternative,
and
so
when,
at
some
point,
we'll
come
back
and
say
this
is
what
it
looks
like
on
paper
now,
not
just
this
cross
section
that
that
Tiffany
showed
you,
because
it's
really
hard
to
give
context
about
where
this
goes.
Is
it
North?
Is
it?
Is
it
East?
Is
it
West?
Where
does
it
actually
go,
but
we'll
come
back
and
say
all
right,
given
this?
R
O
O
You
we
did
release
the
Alternatives
publicly
on
November
10th
and
the
week
after
we
had
a
series
of
open
houses
that
were
we
were.
We
were
happily,
we
were
happy
with
the
attendance
and,
like
Shane
has
been
saying,
we
have
been
hearing
a
lot
getting
a
lot
of
good
feedback
over
the
next
month,
and
so
we've
got
still
a
lot
of
work
to
do
public
comment.
Oh
next
slide.
O
The
public
comment
period
did
get
extended
to
January
13th,
so
about
10
more
days.
This
is
all
the
contact
information
to
get
a
hold
of
me
and
my
team.
So
please.
O
Where
we
go
from
here
on
again,
the
common
period
will
close
mid-January
from
here.
Our
team
will
take
all
of
that
feedback
produce
I'm,
not,
and
just
so
everybody
is
aware,
because
you
did
give
a
comment,
doesn't
mean
you
will
get
a
direct
response,
but
we
will
be
if
you
did
provide
your
email
address
and
some
sort
of
contact
we
will
be
giving
you
an
update.
O
Saying
here
is
we're
going
to
be
putting
together,
what's
called
a
kind
of
alternative
screening
memo,
saying
here's
the
general
themes
that
we've
heard
and
you
know
what
what
our
kind
of
responses
are,
what
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
in
in
response
to
your
comments-
and
we
will
do
that
next
level-
level.
Two
screening
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
air
quality,
the
impacts
to
the
Natural
and
built
environment.
O
What
we
heard
I
mean
we
may
have
gotten
some
new
ideas
where
hey
we
would
rather
I
want
to
see
a
but
I
want
to
see
a
bear
are
a
barrier
protected
bike
lane
rather
than
a
buffered
bike
lane.
Those
are
the
things
that
we'll
be
kind
of
looking
at
and
come
back
with.
Another
public
comment
period
in
the
in
the
fall
where
we'll
we'll
have
more
of
that
information,
as
Shane
mentioned
to
you,
know,
review
and
then
what's
next
is
called
the
final
Eis
and
then
from
there
by
in
the
spring
of
24.
E
There
will
be
another
opportunity
once
you
I'm
asking
this
question
for
myself
and
for
people
listening,
so
you
will
come
out
with
a
plan
and
say
this
is
what
we're
pretty
sure
we're
gonna
do
and
then
there
will
be
another
comment
period
for
people
to
comment
on
that,
because
what
I'm
hearing
from
constituents
right
now
is
is
frustration
that
they're
giving
feedback
and
then
they
answer
from
you,
dot
which
I
unders
I,
see
totally
see
both
sides
of
this
you're
trying
to
say
we're
going
to
take
that
into
consideration.
E
But
they're
hearing
I
want
you
to
say
yes
or
no,
whether
my
house
is
going
to
be
gone,
so
there
will
be
that
other
opportunity
for
them
to
give
feedback.
Once
you
save,
you
know
we're
90
sure
this
is
what
we're
going
with.
Is
that
right?
Yes,.
O
But
if
you,
if
there
is
a
constituent
that
is
interested
in
speaking
with
us
at
any
time,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
today
or
before
the
13th,
and
you
are
a
property
owner
in
the
corridor
reach
out
to
us.
There
is
a
very
individualistic
process
for
business
and
Property
Owners
throughout
the
corridor.
I
am
not
an
expert
on
that
process,
so
I
I'm
already
treading
on
unknown
territory
here.
But
it
is
please
reach
out
to
us
and
there
is
a
process
and
we
will
be
working
with
with
those
constituents.
O
E
G
Can
we
make
sure
that
Chris,
Alejandro
and
I
have
that
directly
from
you?
We
we
share
the
Fair
Park
Community
Council,
which
is
one
that
would
be
bisected
by
this
and
then
also
we
need
Chris
and
I
share
the
Rose
Park
Community
Council
and
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
reiterate
that
to
them
at
the
community
councils
this
month.
G
G
R
O
Do
have
planned
engagement
opportunities
between
now
and
the
fall.
We're
not
you're
not
by
we're,
not
okay,.
G
R
I
think
we
didn't
fully
address
council
person,
Wharton's
question
early
on
about
Guadalupe
and
what's
going
to
happen
there
and
when
Shane
was
given
an
answer
to
another
thing
he
was
talking
about
where
we're
at
in
that
process
about
we're
now
going
to
start
doing
that
analysis.
Looking
at
what
those
impacts
might
be
doing
everything
we
can
to
avoid
any
impacts.
R
W
That's
that's
the
that's!
What
we're
doing
going
forward
over
the
next
few
months,
we'll
find
out
exactly
what
those
inches
look
like
where
those
inches
occur
and
and
be
able
to
report
back
about
what
those
impacts.
Look
like
what's
interesting
is
an
impact
means
a
lot
of
things
to
a
lot
of
different
people,
and
we
will
have
a
physical
footprint.
W
What
that
in?
How
that
impacts
that
that
person's?
You
know
their
yard
or
whatever
we'll
we'll
have
to
have
those
conversations
and
that's
why
that
that
this
is
an
ongoing
dialogue.
It's
this
is
the
public
comment
period.
Yes,
but
there
will
be
individual
conversations
between
now
and
any
decision
that
is
made
and
and
again
there
has
not
been
a
decision
made
in
either
way
and.
O
That's
why
the
process
is
very
individualistic
too,
because
every
property
owner
is
different
to
their
needs
are
different,
and
so
we
we
as
the
state,
may
need
to
be
just
in
your
backyard
to
build
the
physical
I-15
or
we
might
need
more
of
your
land.
Those
are
all
different
conversations
too
that
we're
going
to
have,
and
we
welcome
and
them
at
any
point.
E
And
one
last
technical
question:
I
hope
you
didn't
answer
this
when
I
had
to
run
in
the
other
room.
Just
then
with
the
with
the
final
Eis
and
the
record
of
decision
come
out
at
the
same
time.
Okay!
Yes,
oh
yes!
Yes,.
W
R
R
E
C
C
C
X
X
First,
the
city
already
requires
one
out
of
25
off-street
parking
spaces
on
multi-family
projects
to
be
configured
with
an
EV
charging
station.
So
that's
the
existing
regulation,
The
Proposal
in
front
of
you-
would
add
to
that
requirement,
not
replace
it
necessarily
to
say
that
20
percent
of
the
total
stalls,
so
one
out
of
five,
would
need
to
be
wired
to
support
a
future
charging
station.
X
However,
the
ordinance
in
front
of
you
does
not
require
station
installation
only
the
wiring
for
a
station
for
that
20
threshold
number
three,
the
requirement
would
apply
to
multi-family
residential
projects
like
condos
or
apartment
buildings
and
and
last
the
Planning
Commission
did
forward
this
with
a
positive
recommendation
with
that
I'd
ask
to
turn
it
over
to
the
department.
Thank
you
thank.
C
N
Thanks
Sam
thanks,
everyone
happy
New
Year,
so
we
we
have
a
presentation.
If
you
want
to
see
it,
we
don't
need
to
to
do
it,
but
it
is
something
that
Peter
here
has
prepared.
It
was
the
presentation
we
gave
to
the
Planning
Commission,
so
we're
happy
to
go
through
it.
We
can
do
as
much
of
it
as
you'd
like
and
then
take
questions
of
course.
So
yeah.
C
Y
Y
Y
So
for
this
afternoon's
briefing
on
the
proposal,
I'll
be
providing
some
background
on
what
we
mean
by
EV
Readiness,
in
contrast
to
current
electric
vehicle
policy,
I'll
touch
on
the
environmental
and
economic
benefits
that
this
proposed
policy
addresses
and
finally,
I'll
go
over
Provisions
included
in
the
policy
proposal.
Change
next
slide,
Tim.
Y
Y
F
Yeah
I
would
like
to
so
one
per
25
required
spaces,
and
it
looks
like
I
saw
a
brief
glimpse
of
the
next
slide.
It
said
one
in
five,
but
that's
still
on
the
required
spaces.
Y
F
We
have
some
zones
that
have
zero
parking,
minimum
and
but
developers
are
still
choosing
to
build
parking
lots,
and
so,
if
it's
based
on
the
required
parking
spaces,
that
will
require
them
to
do
zero
parking
spaces
and
I
think
it
should
be
based
on
how
many
they
choose
to
build
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
get
a
cement
input
on.
If
that's
possible,
yeah.
Y
And
I
believe
in
the
ordinance
we
have
some
language
that
specifies
instances
in
which
there's
four
or
fewer
parking
spaces
or
or
greater
than
four
but
I.
Think
that
sure
we
can
go
back
to
that.
Y
C
C
Y
So
looking
at
Market
size
and
demand
for
EV
charging
is
of
2020,
there
were
1043
electric
vehicles
registered
in
Salt
Lake
City
alone,
and
this
David
was
provided
to
us
by
the
Utah
State
Tax
Commission
in
February
of
2020,
and
it's
worth
noting
that
this
same
data
request
provided
in
February
of
2019
showed
Electric
Vehicle
registrations
of
780..
So
that
means
that
in
a
single
year,
EV
registrations
Rose
by
33
in
Salt,
Lake
City
ZIP
codes
on
the
next
slide.
Y
Y
Y
Research
gathered
by
the
sustainability
Department
indicate
that
the
cost
of
adding
EV
ready
infrastructure
at
the
time
of
new
construction
will
greatly
reduce
the
cost
it
would
have
to
have
need
to
occur
in
a
retrofit
scenario,
so
multi-family
projects
that
do
not
take
action
to
accommodate
demand
for
EV
charging
face
the
risk
of
their
asset
becoming
less
attractive
or
even
less
viable
to
Residents.
Who
will
rely
on
the
availability
of
charging
their
EVS,
where
they
live
as
EV
charging
transitions
from
an
amenity
to
an
essential
feature
of
multi-family
properties.
Y
And
just
as
critical
as
ensuring
that
we
that
charging
infrastructure
is
in
place
is
making
sure
it's
available
where
it's
needed
most
and
that's
where
we
live.
A
2015
study
by
the
Idaho
National
Laboratory
found
that
approximately
85
percent
of
charging
events
take
place
at
home
next
slide.
Y
The
same
study
found
that
even
those
with
access
to
workplace
charging,
the
at-home
carving
events
accounted
for
approximately
61
percent
on
average,
while
residents
of
single-family
homes
have
largely
had
access
to
charging
at
home.
The
access
is
extremely
Limited
in
multi-family
properties,
so
the
proposed
EV
Readiness
ordinance
helps
create
home-based
charging
opportunities
for
residents
that
live
in
multi-family
dwellings,
where
EV
charging
is
often
less
accessible.
Y
This
is
particularly
relevant
in
consideration
to
the
context
of
Salt
Lake
City's,
pronounced
growth
in
multi-family
housing.
According
to
a
chemistry,
Gardener
Institute
report
from
2019
91
percent
of
residential
building
permits
in
the
five
years
prior
had
been
for
multi-family,
housing
and
I.
Think
we
can
agree
that
that
is
pretty
much
a
state
consistent
since
then.
Y
So
what's
presented
thus
far,
anticipating
and
changing
Transportation
markets,
a
future
proofing
against
costly
retrofits
and
compromised
multi-family
assets
represent
just
some
of
the
economic
benefits
of
EV
readiness
go
to
the
next
slide.
Y
Enabling
accessible
EV
charging
is
important
opportunity
to
meet
Salt,
Lake,
City's
air
quality
and
climate
positive
2040
goals
as
well.
In
November
2016,
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
adopted
a
joint
resolution
establishing
renewable
energy
and
carbon
emissions
reduction
goals
for
Salt
Lake
City.
This
included
in
the
resolution
was
a
community
carbon
emissions
reduction
goal
of
80
by
2040.
Y
On-Road
Transportation
sector
accounts
for
20
percent
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
contributing
to
air
pollution
and
climate
change
and
threatening
the
health
and
well-being
of
residents
and
visitors
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
then
in
January
2021.
The
city
council
and
mayor
Mendenhall
adopted
a
joint
electrified
Transportation
resolution,
and
this
proposed
ordinance
aligns
directly
with
a
resolution
by
expanding
adoption
of
electric
vehicle
charging
technology,
expanding
EV
charging
infrastructure,
accelerating
EV
adoption
rates
and
supporting
the
inclusive
development
of
clean
Transportation
opportunities
for
Salt
Lake
City
community
members.
Y
F
F
Actually,
let
me
ask
a
more
basic
question:
was
the
one
in
five
EV
ready
stalls
based
on
anything,
or
was
it
just
like
a
clean
round
number
that
seemed
like
reasonable
to
request
of
developers,
or
did
we
actually
look
at
like
okay?
If,
in
this
many
years,
50
of
the
cars
built
are
electrical
electric
vehicles,
how
many
stalls
are
needed
in
multi-family
building
understanding
that
they
could?
Probably
you
know,
rotate
when
they're
using
the
thing?
F
Y
Y
That's
a
kind
of
a
best
practice
number,
and
so
that
cited
quite
a
bit,
including
from
sweep,
which
is
the
Southwest
Energy
Efficiency
project.
It's
an
organization
similar
to
Utah,
clean
energy,
but
serving
you
know,
western
states
and
the
thing
about
20
is
that
they
were
looking
at
how
much
mileage
you
know
you.
Y
So
it
gets
into
a
scenario
you're
talking
about
where
they
might
have
to
go
through
some
sort
of
arrangement
where
there
are
certain
times
when
people
can
park,
but
that
20
of
capacity,
at
least
from
the
electricity
standpoint,
would
be
able
to
charge
100
of
the
vehicles.
F
Imagine,
oh
sorry,
can
I
keep
going
I.
Imagine
there
may
be
a
point
in
the
future
where
there's
a
group
of
tenants
to
say,
like
we
don't
have
enough
Chargers
installed.
Our
ordinance
has
required
them
to
make
that
ready.
Is
it
possible
for
us-
and
this
may
be
a
theoretical
legal
question,
but
is
it
possible
for
us
in
the
future
to
say
hey
we
had
your
building
was
built,
so
it
can
be
ready.
F
We
are
now
going
to
flip
a
switch
and
you
must
install
them
or
something
to
that
effect
because
of
the
cost
of
installing
it
after
it's
ready
should
be
very,
very
small
and
a
parallel
question
is
why
not
just
ask
them
to
install
20
right
now,
because
the
all
of
the
conduit
and
the
power
and
everything
else
is
the
more
expensive
part.
The
actual
box
that
they
put
in
with
the
cord
is
far
less
expensive
than
all
the
rest
of
that.
So
why
not
just
make
them
install
20.
N
So
that's
the
short
answer,
but
I
don't
know
the
the
legal
question,
but
you
know
in
looking
at
the
analysis
that
we've
done
just
on
our
own
infrastructure
needs
it's
it's
by
far
the
the
just
just
that
conduit
laying
and
then
you
know,
when
you're,
when
you're
building
a
building,
it's
a
lot
cheaper
so
that
that's
that's,
why
we
kind
of
landed
on
that
and
and
as
as
Peter
mentioned,
that
best
practice
number
there's
a
number
of
other
cities
that
adopted
the
same
ebready
ordinance
around
of
20
percent
Chicago
Atlanta
I'm,.
F
And
I
one
last
thing:
I
promise
I'll
stop
I
I
do
want
to
go
back
to
the
first
question.
I
asked
I
would
like
to
see
this
come
back
to
us
with
the
requirement
of
1
in
25
installed
and
one
in
five
ready
on
the
number
of
stalls
that
are
built,
not
the
number
of
stalls
that
are
required,
and
that's
that
seems
like
something
that
maybe
isn't
super
intuitive,
but
that's
a
huge
difference
in
in
many
many
cases,
so
I
would
like
I
think.
F
The
point
is
that
the
building
could
can,
in
the
future
service
sounds
like
a
hundred
percent
of
the
residents
with
EV
cars
that
would
be
dependent
on
the
number
that
is
installed,
not
the
number
that
is
required.
So
thank
you.
If
I
could
request
that
change,
I
would
like
to
see
that
change
or
at
least
an
option
to
vote
on
that
change.
Yeah.
C
C
N
C
Ten
hours
yeah
so
I
and
I,
the
study
is
probably
a
lot
smaller
than
I
am
and
they
are.
They
realize
that
but
I
just
go
yeah.
Is
this
a
time
where
we
we
push
it
a
little
bit
further,
where
we
say
not
20,
but
more
than
that,
because
again
in
20
30
20
40.,
we
could
be
okay.
We
have
a
lot
more
drivers
and
now
they're
fighting
over
who
gets
a
spot
because
it's
10
hours,
they're
sitting
there
for
10
hours,
yeah.
N
And
what
they,
the
analysis
that
they
did
was
based
on
those
vehicles
with
much
larger
batteries
that
that
go
further
in
a
day
and
they
looked
at
the
average.
The
average
mileage
miles
people
drive
in
a
day
and
you
don't
normally
need
to
charge
it
to
100
every
night,
so
I
think
EV
20
would
get
you
to
like
a
60
charge
overnight.
It
could
so
it
could
accommodate
100
of
the
people
getting
60
of
their
batteries
charged.
C
The
the
the
study
and
the
information
on
that
and
I
and
I
get
really
applaud
the
this
work,
because
I
think
it's
exciting
to
do
this,
pushing
it
pushing
it
across
the
envelope
here
and.
N
G
E
G
F
Exactly
yeah
appropriate,
but
I
mean
it.
This
is
good
impact.
I,
don't
know
the
ordinance.
My
understanding
is
the
ordinance
doesn't
really
say
how
that's
managed.
It's
just
says
it
says:
what's
built
right
so
whether
or
not
a
non-ev
car
is
allowed
to
go
in
there
or
whether
or
not
they
have
to
charge
for
the
power
is
I
would
assume
our
ordinance
is
silent.
F
Y
N
You
know
in
the
larger
context
of
what
the
city
and
the
sustainability
department
is
trying
to
do
with
our
assessments,
and
our
work
on
on
EVS
is
to
really
incentivize
private
charging
right.
We
want
it.
We
know
that
it
happens
at
home,
it
happens
at
the
workplace,
so
this
is.
This
is
really
the
next
step
for
us
and
in
supporting
that
vision.
C
T
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
as
you
may
remember,
from
December
13th,
which
seems
like
a
long
time
ago.
T
You
have
raised
a
number
of
questions
on
during
the
work
session,
update
on
the
city's
anti-tentrification
and
displacement
plan,
known
as
thriving
in
place,
so
the
good
folks
that
can
have
come
back
to
help
address
any
of
these
questions
or
policy
issues
you
might
want
to
discuss.
Mr
chair
I
could
go
through
these.
If
you
like,
or
there
is
a
memo
included
in
your
packet,
how
would
you
like
to
continue
yeah.
C
Please
go
through
the
the
questions
that
you
presented
us.
T
Okay,
so
the
first
one
is
is
essentially
that
you
could
address
additional
sorry.
You
could
request
additional
information
about
the
level
of
detail
that
will
be
provided
on
the
additional
funding
needs,
anticipated
the
potential
funding
sources
and
when
to
anticipate
receiving
related
budget
updates.
T
A
the
second
question
would
be
on
the
Housing
Development
aspects
of
the
plans.
You
could
confirm
with
the
administration
that
the
RDA
would
carry
out
Housing
Development
aspects
of
the
plan,
although
the
plan
itself
had
been
stewarded
by
can.
This
was
a
topic
that
at
least
some
of
you
would
remember
from
previous
years.
Council
discussions
is
the
effort
that
the
Council
made
was
to
consolidate
housing
development
in
the
RDA
and
Housing
Services
in
the
housing
stability
division.
T
Third
question
is
essentially
that
over
the
years
both
can
and
RDA
have
expressed
their
interest
in
Community
Land
trusts.
So
you
could
request
an
elaboration
on
this,
including
how
each
Department's
work
could
be
coordinated
with
the
other,
so
we
don't
end
up
with
two
Community
Land
trusts
or
things
that
seem
very
similar
that
aren't
actually
the
same
thing
in
two
different
departments.
T
The
fourth
question
would
be
in
terms
of
the
details
and
the
elements
of
the
final
thriving
in
place
document
for
the
December
13th
briefing
you
heard
and
read
about
the
replacement
of
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance,
but
you
might
want
to
ask
about
the
other
10
near-term
priorities
that
you
can
see
in
your
packet
were
listed
in
appendix
one
of
the
initial
staff
report.
T
T
You
might
want
to
request
that
can
identify
the
critical
housing
plan
pieces
required
by
the
state
and
transmit
those
to
the
council
in
a
format
that
the
council
might
adopt
before
the
state
deadline
on
June,
30th
2023,
since,
of
course,
in
those
previous
two
months,
the
council
will
be
head
over
heels
in
the
budget
adoption
process
and
then
then,
presumably
can
could
leave
any
of
the
refinements
on
these
two
plans
to
be
adopted
separately
or
processed
separately
and
then.
T
Finally,
just
as
a
reminder
in
the
December
13th
briefing,
you
requested
that
the
administration
include
a
placeholder
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
for
housing
related
items,
so
that
opportunities
are
not
Lost
based
on
timing.
So
that
would
be
something
that
you
could
formalize
or
discuss.
Additionally,
if
you'd
like.
D
There
were
a
couple
of
these
set
as
a
staff.
We
talked
quite
a
bit
about
after
your
last
discussion.
Can
I.
Just
make
note
of
the
couple
of
those
items.
Is
that
okay?
So
there
are
a
lot
of
programs
that
are
discussed
in
in
the
draft
or
in
the
in
the
work.
That's
been
done
so
far,
that
are
new
programs
and
a
lot
of
expectations
are
created
by
plans
and
it
it.
We
were
thinking
that
it
would
help
the
council
if
they,
if
the
administration
could
come
the
next
time
they
do.
D
One
of
these
briefings
to
share
more
information
about
the
various
programs
that
they
are
anticipating,
so
that
as
stakeholders,
the
council
could
get
an
understanding
in
advance
in
case
there
are
any
problems
or
concerns
or
questions
about
them.
They're
asked
early
enough
that
the
administration
can
provide
more
information,
clarify
that
kind
of
a
thing
so
and
then
also
what
the
funding
sources
would
be
of
those
programs
that
that
potential
amounts,
those
sorts
of
things
or
the
time
frames
just
because
the
public
sometimes
thinks
well.
D
We've
spent
a
year
on
this
plan
we've
given
all
of
our
input.
They
put
it
in
the
plan,
City
Council
get
on
the
ball.
When
are
you
funding
at
all,
so
that
could
avoid
some
problems
and
then,
let's
see
I
think
that's
it
most
of
the
other
ones.
F
So
I'm
understanding,
okay,
there's
this
list
of
seven
questions
that
Allison
prepared,
which
Allison
thank
you
so
much
for
helping
us
think
through
this
I'm
understanding,
Cindy's
question
to
be.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
setting
expectations
properly,
so
we
know
how
long
this
will
take
and
how
much
it'll
cost
I
I
guess.
The
first
question
I
would
like
to
ask:
is:
are
there
any
of
these
questions?
You
want
to
answer.
First.
AA
For
the
opportunity
to
be
here
again
and
I
have,
as
you
see
a
team
of
folks
behind
me,
attorneys
on
on
deck
online
David
drisker,
our
consultant
is
online
as
well
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
of
these
questions
that
have
been
provided
here
also
happy
to
go
over
an
overview
of
housing,
SLC
and
thriving
in
place,
and
maybe
just
talk
about
how
they're,
similar
and
different,
if
that's
helpful
or
what
I'll
leave
it
to
your
guys,
discretion
of
what
you'd
like
us
to
discuss
today.
If.
C
You
could
start
with
that
point:
that's
thriving
and
housing
SLC
how
they're
similar
and
different
yeah
and
then
I
want
to
just
talk
about
some
of
the
the
near-term
actions
might
as
well
focus
on
some
of
the
near-term
things.
AB
AA
Perfect
so
thriving
in
place,
as
you
guys
know,
we've
briefed
the
Council
on
this
several
times,
most
recently
in
December,
where
we
outlined
a
very
draft
framework
on
the
21
different
strategies
that
are
on
what
we're
calling
the
placemat.
AA
We
specifically
focused
on
the
replacement
of
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
and
the
reason
that
we
focused
on
that
was
really
just
so
you
guys
had
kind
of
a
taste
test
of
sort
of
where
we
were
going
with
the
level
of
detail
and
knowing
that
housing
loss
mitigation
has
been
a
priority
of
both
the
administration
and
the
city
council.
AA
The
two
plans
have
been
contemplated
as
being
really
close,
cousins
or
married,
then,
since
really
kind
of
inception
and
I'll
kind
of
start
with
housing,
SLC
and
where
that
has
gone
over
the
past
few
months,
so
per
state
code
requirements,
the
city
is
required
to
have
a
five-year
housing
plan.
Currently
we
have
growing
SLC
that
is
ex.
It
just
is
expiring,
and
during
the
last
legislative
session,
the
state
made
a
lot
of
changes
to
Modern
income
housing
plans.
AA
Of
course,
we
weighed
heavily
in
on
those
those
changes
and
one
of
those
being
that
we
needed
to
adopt
an
implementation
plan
which
was
incredibly
inconvenient
for
us,
because
we
were
in
the
final
year
of
growing
SLC.
So
if
you
guys
remember
last
last
summer
and
early
fall,
Rudy
in
in
can
brought
forth
a
implementation
plan
for
growing
SLC
and
that
went
through
a
45-day
public
engagement
period
and
went
before
the
Planning
Commission.
AA
While
Rudy
was
working
on
the
implementation
plan
for
housing
SLC,
we
were
going
through
the
phase,
one
Community
engagement
and
data
analysis
of
thriving
in
place,
and
it
became
really
apparent,
as
we
were
going
through
phase
one,
that
there
was
a
lot
of
overlap
between
what
we
were
hearing
from
the
community
and
what
we.
What
we
anticipated
we'd
be
hearing
from
the
community
on
a
new
housing
plan.
And
so
it
only
made
sense.
We
felt
to
kind
of
combine
the
two
efforts
a
because,
while
thriving
in
place
is
an
anti-displacement
plan.
AA
So
we've
contemplated
these
two
plans
coming
together,
the
community
engagement
piece
has
been
carried
for
housing
SLC
and
for
thriving
in
place
has
been
carried
out
by
Baird
and
Driscoll,
with
a
partnership
with
the
University
of
Utah,
so
the
community
engagement
has
been
sort
of
Blended
together
for
both
of
these
plans.
The
data
analysis-
that's
happening
in
both
of
these
plans
are
interwoven
between
the
two.
All
of
that
being
said,
we
certainly
could
separate
the
two,
if
that
is
a
desire
of
the
council,
to
do
that.
AA
AA
An
important
distinction
between
the
two,
a
thriving
a
place
is
a
displacement
mitigation
plan.
Housing
SLC
is
a
housing
plan.
Housing
SLC
has
very
specific
things
that
we
have
to
do
to
be
in
compliance
with
state
code.
We
have
to
have
an
implementation
plan.
We
have
to
select
five
or
more
strategies
and
the
strategies
have
to
be
clearly
articulated
word
for
word
within
our
housing
plan
and
that's
really
important,
because
a
lot
of
cities
are
in
not
in
compliance
right
now,
because
they
didn't
have
word
for
word
and
their
implementation
plan.
G
AA
Menu
yep
exactly,
and
so
that's
where
housing
SLC
really
kind
of
differs
from
thriving
in
place,
because
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we
select
those
strategies,
their
exact
exact
words
of
what's
in
state
code
copy
in
Pace,
and
then
we
can
fill
in
how
we
want
to
achieve
those
strategies
and
that
will
come
from
the
council.
Our
community
engagement
and
the
data
analysis
that's
happening.
Does
that
feel
like
a
clear
explanation,.
C
Yes,
okay
at
this
point
so
I'm
looking
at
this
housing
SLC,
so
it's
driving
the
place
would
just
fit
very
well
into
the
housing
SLC
correct
as
one
of
the
it
could
be
part
of
any
of
those
five
goals
or
ten
goals.
Whatever
we
want
to
pick.
It's
all
part
of
that,
because
it's
housing
just
anti-displacement
on
the
housing
side,
correct.
G
C
AA
C
AA
C
AA
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
so
a
little
bit
about
where
we're
at
in
the
process
of
each
so
thriving
in
place.
David
is
about
75
percent
done
with
a
draft,
so
we've
taken
the
feedback
that
we've
gotten
from
you
guys
taken
these
21
action
items
and
started
to
drill
down
for
each
one
of
these
action
items,
and
it's
going
to
have
a
two
to
three
page
summary
depending
upon
how
detailed
it
is
and
under
each
one
of
these
is
going
to
be
the
purpose.
AA
The
next
steps,
the
budget,
the
schedule
best
practices
who
will
be
responsible
for
implementation
and
the
schedule
of
the
implementation,
so
that
will
be
completed.
That
draft
will
be
completed
by
the
end
of
the
week
or
early
next
week.
Housing
SLC
is
a
little
bit
behind
thriving
in
place
and
so
housing
SLC.
We
are
currently
Rudy's
the
project
manager
on
that
he's.
Drafting
that
right
now,
we've
done
a
data
analysis
and
existing
conditions.
Analysis
that
we'd
like
to
bring
before
the
council
in
January.
AA
If,
if
that
works
with
your
schedule
or
February,
and
then
we're
working
on
what
those
goals
would
be,
both
plans
have
a
community
working
group.
They
have
a
city
stakeholder
team
and
they
have
an
internal
policy
team
that
consists
of
staff
from
can
and
RDA
in
that
kind
of
core
policy
team.
And
then
you
know
bigger
city
stakeholder
team,
that's
almost
every
Department
within
the
city,
so
housing
SLC
is
a
little
bit
behind
to
answer
your
question
on
housing
loss
mitigation.
We
certainly
could
I
think
pieces
as
if
you
guys
can.
G
And
feel
free
to
ring
me
and,
if
I'm
getting
too
far
afield
here,
but
in
the
budget
component
that
will
be
presented,
will
that
be
Revenue
sources
and
projected
expenses?
Are
you
going
to
be
proposing,
or
do
we
have
to
make
room
in
the
general
fund
for
all
this?
Are
we
going
to
look
for
special
revenue
streams,
yeah.
AA
So
there
will
be
a
budget
component
with
each
one
of
the
21
action
items
and
then
I
believe
it
is
4A
has
is
just
a
kind
of
generalized
budget.
AA
How
do
we
create
a
funding
source
that
or
funding
sources
right
that
continue
to
kind
of
replenish,
whether
that's
an
in-lu
fee
or
a
you
know,
a
property
tax,
whatever
that
looks
like
we're
still
flushing
that
out
so
there'll
be
sort
of
that
bigger
kind
of
budget
piece,
but
then
each
one
of
these
action
items
will
have
what
could
be
a
proposed
budget
for
them
right
and
specifically
the
near-term
action
items
we'll
have
most
of
these.
If
not
all
of
them
will
have
a
budget
request.
AA
If,
if
the
council
is
okay
with
that,
it
sounded
like
in
our
December
briefing
that
you
guys
preferred
for
us
to
put
budget
requests
in
the
mayor's
recommended
budget
this
year.
Those
will
all
have
specific
budget
requests
and
I
don't
know
that
they
will
necessarily
be
coming
out
of
the
general
fund
per
se.
For
example,
you
know
if
we,
if
the
council
chooses
to
adopt
the
business
licensing
reform
that
that
we've
proposed
here
of
collecting
additional
tenant
data,
business
licensing
would
need
another
one
to
two
ftes
right.
AA
So
that
would
probably
be
something
that
would
probably
come
out
of
the
general
fund,
whereas
increasing
tenant
relocation
assistance
could
come
out
of
some
of
our
Housing
and
Urban
Development
money,
potentially
so
I
think
there's.
We
are
currently
working
on
kind
of
figuring
out
what
the
different
funding
sources
could
be,
where
we
would
need
to
have
a
general
fund
request
versus
where
we
may
partner,
with
existing
Community
organizations,
to
leverage
their
resources
and
have
them
run
a
program
for
us.
AC
G
Z
Thank
you,
Angela
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
this
again.
I.
Remember
a
lot
of
this
from
our
our
brief
in
December,
my
looking
at
the
questions
and
Ellison.
Thank
you,
as
as
councilmember
mono
said,
for
sort
of
putting
into
concise,
more
concise
words.
What
our
questions
were.
The
two
I
really
want
to
focus
on
I've
been
focusing
on
this
for
a
long
time
and
I
want
to
continue
focusing
on.
Z
It
is
not
Reinventing
the
will
in
two
different
departments,
and
so
she,
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
the
questions
bring
up
is
dividing
the
Housing
Development
money
into
RDA
and
the
housing
program
I
mean
or
the
implementation
of
different
programs
in
the
can
and
I
still
don't
know
that
that's
completely
efficient,
but
it's
more
efficient
than
having
two
different
funding
sources.
Virtual
Earth
excuse
me
and
then
secondly,
the
the
question
with
the
Community
Land
Trust
again
the
whole
idea
of
what
we've
been
trying
to
do
for
the
last
five
years.
Z
Sorry,
what
we've
been
trying
to
do
for
the
last
five
years
is
really
streamlined
processes
so
that
consumers,
I.E
renters,
mostly
aren't
the
ones
that
take
on
the
burden
of
increased
prices,
because
if
you
know
developers
will
say
that
the
city
took
too
long
or
they
didn't
have
the
streamlined
process.
So
those
two
questions
I'd
really
like
to
focus
on.
I
So
I
think
I
want
to
tag
along
what
council
member
of
Fowler
said
and
I
don't
know.
If
you
guys
talked
about
the
question,
I
think
it's
number
three.
I
You
already
have
discussed
that
you
have
not
okay,
so
yeah
I
would
like
to
understand
what
why
there's
two
groups
interested
in
the
community
Land
Trust,
when
we
thought
one
group
was
going
to
take
a
stab
at
it.
As
the
first
thing
you
know
as
to
streamline
to
Not
Duplicate
and
also
to
to
test
it.
AA
Yeah,
thank
you,
so
thriving
in
place
has
is
probably
a
little
bit
zoomed
out
from
the
dividing
of
who
would
run
the
Community
Land
Trust,
whether
it
would
be
in
can
or
RDA
or
both
departments.
AA
Right
now,
the
language
and
thriving
in
place
around
the
Community
Land
Trust,
which
David
has
ended
on
goal
three
and
is
starting
to
draft
goals
for
which
is
where
the
community
land
trust
is.
Is
we
haven't
really
gotten
incredibly
granular
within
the
plan
on
those
those
kinds
of
details
like
it's?
It's
more
zoomed
out,
because
it's
already
60
pages
and
we
aren't
we're
75
percent
of
the
way
done.
AA
So
we
haven't
gotten
into
that
level
of
detail
on
any
of
the
items
short
of
like
you
know,
this
would
be
housed
within
Community,
neighborhoods
or
within
the
Arty
area,
or
be
a
partnership
and
that
one
specifically
hasn't
hasn't
been
fully
drafted.
Yet
what
I'll
say
is
that
I
think
we've
the
lens
that
we've
had
when
we've
been
putting
together?
These
policies
is,
is
having
us
internally
with
you
know,
weigh
in
from
the
council
and
from
the
administration
and
from
the
Departments
within
the
city.
AA
That
would
be
working
on
these
to
have
us
sort
of
figure
out
what
bet
what
makes
the
most
sense,
and
so
we
haven't
gotten
into
that
level
of
detail.
I
certainly
could
work
with
the
administration
and
work
with
the
leaders
within
our
respective
departments
to
get
more
granular
on
the
Community
Land
Trust
question,
but
it
hasn't
been
something
that
we've
been
heavily
focused
on
that
division
of
those
responsibilities.
AA
C
AA
I'm
gonna,
actually,
if
it's
okay
phone
a
friend
and
have
Tammy
or
if
we
have
an
rdas,
oh
maybe
have
Tammy
and
Danny.
G
If
we
could
speak
specifically
to
the
tax
increment
money
allocated
from
the
port
and
if
that
is
already
being
dedicated
to
one
of
these
Community
Land
trusts
or
if
that
is
a
potential
Community
Land
Trust,
yet
to
be
created.
T
I
I
could
just
add
Tammy.
I'm.
Sorry,
sorry
to
interrupt
Kimberly
trichrist
from
the
attorney's
office
is
also
on
the
line,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
the
council
members
were
aware
of
that
for
additional
clarification
if
needed.
AD
So
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
RDA,
but
I
I
will
give
a
broad
overview
of
what
I
know
I
believe
it
was
four
million
dollars
allocated
from
the
Inland
Port
funding
to
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
and
I
believe
the
RDA
is
still
working
on
the
structure
of
what
exactly
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
is
and
then
speaking
on
behalf
of
community
and
neighborhoods,
it
was
in
2017.
AD
The
city
council
adopted
a
resolution
that
satisfied
1082
of
state
code
that
allowed
the
city
to
create
a
community
land
trust
to
sell
property
at
a
discounted
rate,
and
currently
there
are
17
single-family
homes
in
the
community,
land
trust
and
we're
actually
preparing
information
to
give
you
a
briefing
on
the
community,
land
trust
and
some
larger
housing
stability,
questions
and
and
an
update
on
the
housing
stability
department
at
a
future
date.
So
we
can
get
in
much
more
detail
on
how
that's
been
functioning
in
can
at
a
different
date.
AE
To
provide
some
quick
detail
on
that
question,
so
to
date
the
RDA
does
not
have
a
Community
Land
Trust
established
we
use
a
board
have
approved.
Is
the
West
Side
Community
initiative,
which
is
a
section
within
our
housing
funds
allocation
policy,
and
that
outlines
what
your
goals
and
priorities
are
as
a
board
for
how
to
spend
the
Inland
Port
money
on
the
west
side.
One
of
the
objectives
within
that
West
Side
Community
initiative
is
to
look
at
shared
Equity
models
of
development,
which
is
what
we're
working
on.
AE
E
A
E
AE
No,
the
the
city
has
the
Community
Land
Trust,
that's
the
only
one
that
you
have
officially
on
the
books
got
within
the
RDA.
You
have
the
West
Side
Community
initiative,
which
is
more
than
just
a
land,
trust
that
really
outlines
the
policies
and
objectives
and
goals
of
the
board
for
how
to
spend
the
Inland
Port
money
on
the
West
Side
got.
AD
If
I
may
add
just
some
clarification,
the
that's
my
understanding,
the
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
Danny
or
the
RDA,
but
the
I
believe
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
contemplated
a
shared
Equity
model
and
that
can
look
different
ways.
It
can
be
like
a
co-op,
so
there's
an
entity,
a
non-profit
entity
having
ownership
of
the
improvements.
E
C
I'm
sorry
I
got
the
17
pieces
of
property
that
the
city
owned
under
the
Land
Trust.
That
is
separate
from
the
west
side
there
and
those
17
properties
are
scattered.
Let
me
say
scattered
about
the
city.
They
may
be
in
this
concentrated
area,
but
I'm
just
saying
they're
they're,
not
all
in
one
section
and
the
west
side
is
specifically.
C
Outlined
in
the
contract
with
in
the
port
on
the
funding
for
from
the
tax
increment?
Yes,
okay!
So
that's
in
addition
to
the
other
17
properties.
Okay,.
AE
C
Those
could
be
vacant
Lots
or
actually
a
lot
with
a
house
on
the
17
you're
talking
about
Tammy
is
17
houses.
F
AD
We
own
the
land
and
Lease
the
land
at
very
below
Market
I.
Think
it's
like
50
a
month
or
something
like
that
to
the
owners
of
the
Improvement.
So
they
buy
the
house
at
an
affordable
rate
and
then
lease
the
land
from
the
city
and
then,
when
the
homeowner
decides
to
share,
sell,
there's
a
shared
Equity
model.
So
the
city
gets
a
portion
of
the
equity
to
go
back
into
the
land
trust
model.
And
then
the
homeowner
gets
a
portion
of
the
equity.
AD
AD
Is
that
the
way
that
it's
written,
one
of
the
shortcomings
that
we've
identified,
the
current
Administration
has
identified
on
the
current
Community
Land
Trust,
is
in
2017?
The
city
council
adopted
a
resolution
authorizing
the
city
to
create
the
land
trust
and
to
sell
properties
at
below
Market
rates.
So
there
was
a
public
benefits
analysis
done
to
satisfy
1082
of
State
Statute.
However,
the
city
council
really
didn't
set
objectives
or
goals
or
parameters
for
the
program.
AD
So
we
very
much
want
to
come
back
with
you
with
a
CLT
briefing,
so
there's
a
clear
understanding
between
the
administration
and
the
Council
of
the
functions
of
the
CLT.
So
this
is
very
much
a
discussion
that
we've
initiated
with
Council
staff.
There's
a
transmittal
that
was
just
sent
last
week
we're
preparing
more
information
on
the
community
land
trust,
but
we
very
much
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
on
the
same
page
with
how
it's
functioning.
AB
AD
A
few
of
the
homes
were
actually
new
construction,
but
the
majority
of
them
were
existing
homes
that
were
purchased
and
placed
into
the
land.
Trust
thank.
C
AD
It's
a
similar
purpose
in
providing
the
long-term
affordability,
but
no,
we
weren't
really
contemplating
this
in
the
land
trust
model
partially
because
there
won't
be
like
a
selling
of
property
for
home
ownership.
Okay,
it'll
be
it'll,
allow
tosa
to
rent
the
units
out
and-
and
there
won't
be,
that
shared
Equity
model.
Okay,.
E
And
then
about
that
it
just
having
the
RDA
separate,
does
it
I
guess
I'm
a
little
like
if
it's
a
it's
a
trust
like
you
know,
a
trust
can
have
several
accounts
in
it.
Does
it
make
sense
to
have?
E
Does
it?
Would
it
make
more
sense
to
put
all
of
the
Assets
in
the
same
trust,
but
have
it
separated
out
in
an
account
for
the
West
Side
from
that
RDA
money,
because
that
money
would
go
out?
We
would
presumably
use
that
money
for
the
west
side,
but
outside
of
the
Inland
Port
RDA
right
does
that?
Does
it
make
sense
to
like
consolidate
it
or
does
it?
Is
there
any
advantage
to
that
I.
AE
E
AE
AF
You,
council,
member
Wharton,
from
a
legal
perspective.
The
community
land
trust
is
not
legally
a
trust,
that's
what
the
program
is
called,
so
it's
a
construct
as
to
how
the
program
operates,
and
it's
called
a
trust
because
the
city
retains
ownership
of
the
land
and
this
Equity
sharing.
So
just
so,
you
know
it's
not
like
a
legal
trust
like
you're
thinking.
AA
AF
Up
as
a
separate
entity,
it's
property
owned
by
the
city,
so,
as
you
go
forward,
you'll
have
the
opportunity
to
think
about
how,
when
they
give
the
presentation
to
give
you
more
details
on
this
you'll
have
the
opportunity,
I
think
to
have
the
conversation
about
if
you
want
to
broaden
or
revise
how
the
program
works
and
how
it
might
fit
with
other
similar
objectives
in
this
city,.
C
I
appreciate
that
discussion
and
that
education
there
on
that
we
kind
of
got,
went
into
that
rabbit
hole
which
is
a
very
good
discussion
on
the
Community
Land
Trust,
because
it
is
one
of
the
top
11.
C
The
action
items
here
on
these
I
know
they're.
Not
all
it's
not
a
series,
there's
a
lot
of
in
parallels,
there's
all
one
after
the
other
there's
a
few
more
ordinances
and
there's
a
few
are
just
policy
changes
and
I.
Guess
we're
mapping
out
how
we
want
to
tackle
this,
and
you
know,
eat
this
elephant
bit
by
bit,
as
so
we're
doing
it
in
a
way
that
we
don't
have
to
have
the
full
plan
baked
out
before
we
start
taking
action
on
some
of
the
near
terms.
C
AA
We
have
been
operating
that
we
would
have
the
plan
adopted
before
we
would
start
well,
not
necessarily
before,
because
I
think
we've.
You
know,
I've
been
working
closely
with
the
attorney's
office
on
understanding.
You
know
what
our
ordinance
changes,
where
we
have
state
preemption
kind
of
how
we
move
this
forward
from
a
legal
standpoint,
and
so
Our
intention
is
certainly
to
be
working
towards
implementation
of
especially
the
near-term
action
priorities
as
soon
as
possible.
We
don't
want
to
get
ahead
of
our
skis
and
and
start
working
on
something
that
the
council
doesn't
support.
AA
AA
Would
we
we
aren't
skiing,
unfortunately
right,
but
we
don't
want
to
get
ahead
of
ourselves
and
and
start
working
on
ordinances
for
something
the
the
councils
doesn't
support
or
doesn't
align
with
your
priorities,
and
so
we
would
probably
want
to
have
more
Direction
on
things
that
are,
you
know,
specific
priorities
of
the
council,
things
that
you
guys
would
like
us
to
be
working
on,
and
we
certainly
could
start
prioritizing
those
in
the
queue,
but
we
haven't
We've
at
this
point
have
been
just
sort
of
contemplating
this
as
an
entire
package.
C
AA
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
would
be
really
helpful
for
the
administration
is,
is:
are
there
certain
things
on
here
that
we
either
have
identified
as
near
action,
near-term
action
priorities
that
you
want,
elevated,
that
you
would
like
us
to
start
working
on?
Are
there
things
that
haven't
been
identified
as
near-term
action
priorities
that
you
want
to
have
as
a
near-term
action
priority,
and
maybe
we,
you
know,
as
I
said
we're
going
to
have
a
draft
ready
early
next
week
at
the
latest.
AA
You
know
if
the
council
would
like
to
do
some
more
small
work
groups
we'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
However,
we
can
best,
engage
the
council
so
that
this
is
a
lot
to
digest.
It's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
information
here,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
information,
housing
SLC.
We
want
to
ensure
that
the
council
feels
comfortable
with
the
policies
and
programs
that
are
being
that
are
being
proposed
here
and
so
we're
we're
more
than
happy
to
get
that
information
to.
AA
I
You
thank
you
for
that
offer.
Maybe
it
is
in
a
small
group
meeting
I'm,
not
sure,
but
because
it's
a
lot
of
information
and
because
you
guys
do
you
know
really
good
work
and
you're
very
involved,
obviously
in
all
things
housing
I
would
like
to
you
know.
I
So
that's
how
I
see
this
episode,
so
my
brain,
it's
it's
easier
for
me
to
understand
what
we're
trying
to
to
get
to,
because
everything
is
important.
Obviously,
in
this
document,
I
want
to
do
everything,
but
you
guys
know
what
the
capacity
is
things
that
you're
already
working
on
and
what's
totally
from
scratch.
So
I
would
like
that
information.
That's
more
meetings!
That's.
F
Will
say
I
think
Angela.
You
said
something
to
the
effect
of
housing.
Loss
mitigation
is
something
we
can
start
working
on.
If
you
tell
us
to
I,
wasn't
sure
exactly
what
you
meant
by
that.
But
for
me,
that's
a
priority
and
I
would
like
that
to
begin
as
as
quickly
as
possible.
I,
don't
know
how
the
rest
of
the
council
feels,
but
in
terms
of
where
to
start
I
think
that's
a
great
place
to
start.
AA
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
good
feedback.
What
I
meant
by
that
comment
is
that
we
haven't
started
working
on
any
ordinance
amendments
or
anything
like
that,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
what
we're
proposing
aligns
with
the
council's
priorities-
and
so
we
could
certainly
start
and
I
know.
The
attorney's
office
has
already
started
a
red
line
of
our
existing
ordinance.
So
we
could
start
taking
those
steps
of
you
know
amending
our
existing
ordinance
and
then
Kimberly
and
Paul
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
want
to
chime
in
or
add
anything
on
this.
C
F
F
So
remember
exactly
the
chronology
of
everything
but
I.
Remember
us
talking
about
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
before
we
even
started
thriving
in
place,
so
probably
I
think
we've
been
wanting
to
do
that
and
then
we
thought.
Oh
well.
Let's
do
it
all
in
part
of
this
bigger
thing,
but
I
don't
want
this
bigger
thing
to
make
that
one
go
slower
personally
and.
E
Yeah,
since
you
asked
yes,
my
first
priority
is
to
replace
the
housing
loss,
mitigation
ordinance
and
then
my
second
and
and
every
place
after
that
priority
is
I
would
like
to
hear
from
you
all.
As
you
know,
experts
that
are
sort
of
on
the
ground.
Looking
at
these
things
every
day,
what
you
think
the
what
you
think
in
our
second
third
and
fourth
priorities
should
be
because
you
know
I
only
know
what
I,
what
I
hear
from
people
that
contact
me
that
talk
about
and
things
that
I
see
in
my
own
Community
I.
E
Don't
have
that
sort
of
global
view
of
you
know
it's
it's
more
of
like
an
inductive
than
a
deductive
view,
and
so
I
would
like
to
hear
from
you
what
you
think
we
could
have
the
next
biggest
impact,
because
I
think
the
you
know,
the
the
fear
of
all
of
this
is
that
you
know
we
spend
a
lot
of
time,
identifying
the
problem
and
and
talking
about
the
problem,
and
we
all
know
that
it's
a
big
problem.
E
But
how
are
we
you
know,
making
these
measurable
demonstrable
steps
to
show
that
that
the
plan's
actually
going
to
produce
something,
because
it
does
feel
very,
very
daunting.
You
know
when
we
hear.
Oh,
it's
not
just
Salt
Lake,
it's
like
the
whole
Wasatch
Front
that
you
need
to
fix
and
we
don't
have
jurisdiction
over
all
that
so
well,
you
think
we
should
could
should
do
next
is
what
I
want
to
hear
and
I'd
love
to
do
that
in
a
small
group
meeting?
E
C
Any
other
further
questions
comments.
Yeah
appreciate
this.
This
is
great
work
and
yeah,
it's
nice
that
we're
hitting
it
a
little
bit
by
a
little
bit,
because
it's
a
big
big
ticket
item
here.
So,
okay.
AB
C
Councilman
we're
moving
on
to
our
board
appointments
where
quite
a
bit
early.
So
the
first
one
is
the
board
appointment
for
the
Planning
Commission
of
Anaya.
Gail
is
Anaya
Gail.
Here,
oh,
is
that.
C
L
I've
done
it
in
town
and
City
Council
meetings
for
a
long
time
and
actually
really
enjoy
the
planning
process
and
see
how
important
it
is
to
the
development
and
ongoing
development
and
change
within
a
city
or
town
I
am
a
commercial
real
estate
attorney.
So
I
have
a
lot
of
I
have
the
advantage
of
having
a
lot
of
experience
with
planning
and
land
use
and
that
sort
of
thing
and
Adrian
Bell
who's.
L
F
Thank
you
for
volunteering
for
this.
This
is
the
board
that
I
was
on
right
before
I
was
appointed
to
the
council
and
I
had
a
a
chance
to
serve
with
commissioner
Bell,
and
so,
if
she
recommended
you
and
thinks
you're
at
the
right
fit
for
this
I
am
very
supportive.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
your
service.
C
Right,
thank
you
very
much,
I
see
no
other
comments
or
com
questions,
for
you
appreciate
that
very
much.
Thank
you
for
volunteering
on
this.
It
was
such
an
important
job
you'll,
be
on
tonight's
formal
agenda
for
approval,
and
you
need
not
be
there
or
online
to
be
to
win,
but
thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
Happy
New
Year.
C
S
So,
first
and
foremost
you
know
transportation
is
my
passion:
I've
been
a
professional
transportation
planner
in
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
for
over
eight
years
now,
I
am
a
University
of
Utah
graduate
student
and
well
was
a
student,
obviously
graduated
at
this
point,
where
I
currently
work
I
see
a
lot
of
opportunity
here
in
the
valley
for
improvement
with
Transportation
connections
and
would
love
to
be
a
part
of
that
effort
and
making
Transportation
a
priority
for
our
Valley.
C
Thank
you
very
much
for
volunteering
Council.
Any
questions
for
John
I
see
no
questions.
We're
pretty
easy
crowd
here.
Both
these
the
Planning,
Commission
and
transportations
are
very
hard,
working
and
vital
to
our
City's
functions.
So
I
appreciate
your
time
and
effort
and
you'll
be
also
on
our
formal
consent
agenda
items
this
evening
and
you
don't
need
to
stay
up
late
to
watch
us
and
I.
Look
forward
to
your
work
in
the
future.
C
C
Now,
Council
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
13,
which
is
the
board
appointment
interviews
for
the
racial
equity
and
policing
Commission.
We
have
a
few
people
here.
We
have
Dia
is
Liva
here
she
might
be
online
Julia,
Stephen
and
Catherine
they're.
All
here
perfect,
all
right
start
off
with
the
you
got
it
first.
C
AC
G
C
Well,
happy
New,
Year,
that's
wonderful!
I!
Appreciate
it
very
much.
It's
wonderful
to
see
young
adults
like
you
stepping
up
to
the
to
do
this
because
it's
a
big
ticket,
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
you
and
but
also
for
us
as
older
generations,
to
hear
from
the
new
fresh
minds
and
their
perspectives
so
appreciate
your
effort
here
and
you'll
be
on
our
consent
agenda.
Also
this
evening.
Thank.
AC
I
E
I
E
We'll
have
to
check
the
the
borders
on
that,
but
either
way
west
side
is
still
in
clearly
in
my
district
I'm
keeping.
AC
E
It's
so
great
to
see
someone
as
young
as
you
be
interested,
so
we're
glad.
AC
C
Next,
we
have
Oliva.
E
C
AG
So
do
you
all
know
what
Salt
Lake
City
peer
court
is
yeah,
so
I
work
for
I
do
Salt
Lake
City
peer
Court
I'm,
a
peer
mentor
and
I've
been
doing
that
for
a
couple
years
now,
so
I
get
constant
interaction
with
youth
who
feel
like
they
have
a
distrust
with
current
law
enforcement
and
how
like
police
interact
with
the
youth
and
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
feedback
from
the
people
who
I
you
know,
mentor
and
stuff
like
that
about
how
they
may
not
always
feel
comfortable
speaking
up
for
what
they
want
in
police
officers,
but
they
I've
been
like
thanked
and
stuff
about
being
willing
to
speak
and
represent.
AG
C
I
Thank
you,
yeah
I
think
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
speak
for
myself,
but
I
think
everybody
will
be
open
if
there's
and
if
anytime,
you
want
us
to
come
over
and
have
conversations
with
you
and
ask
us
questions.
Please
do
we're
available.
We
want
to
hear
and
also
share
our
perspectives,
and
we
can
all
talk
about.
You
know
the
things
that
we
know
we
need
to
improve
on
and
the
things
that
you
know
might
not,
but
but
to
to
have
that
dialogue,
because
sometimes
you
know
we're
not.
AG
D
H
AB
Good
afternoon,
okay,
is
that
better,
okay.
AH
AH
I've
raised
over
130
youth
in
the
valley
and
I've
adopted
quite
a
few
other
young
men
as
well
and
I
felt
like
this
would
be
something
me
being
an
example,
good
example
of
being
involved
with
this
to
shows
so
a
lot
of
even
those
those
kids
that
are
in
care
that
they
do
have
a
voice
and
they
can
be
heard
and
that
we
can
also
teaching
my
own
that
you
know
you
have
to
really
be
able
to
look
at
things
from
both
perspectives
so
that
you
can
have
a
real,
clear
understanding
of
what's
really
going
on
and
and
try
to
be
a
positive
voice
in
our
community.
C
Thank
you
very
much
for
all
that
work
as
a
foster
parent.
That's
that's
incredible.
That's
wonderful!
Wow!
Any
other
questions.
Comments
for
the
I
appreciate
the
your
work
on
the
rep
and
I
really
appreciate
your
work
as
in
the
foster
care
program.
I.
E
Appreciate
your
input
too,
as
a
court
administrator
and
seeing
both
sides
of
those
interactions
that
people
are
having
with
police
officers
and
I
think
that
you
bringing
that
perspective,
will
be
really
valuable.
So,
thank
you.
You
bet
no.
AI
AI
I
I,
just
recently
moved
to
Salt
Lake
City,
because
I
started
a
position
as
an
assistant
professor
at
the
U
in
the
department
of
Sociology,
where
I
primarily
teach
in
the
area
of
criminology
so,
needless
to
say,
I'm,
very
passionate
about
issues
of
equity
in
the
criminal
legal
system
and
very
passionate
about
volunteering
as
well
before
that
I
lived
in
Las
Vegas
for
five
years
and
when
I
was
there,
I
sat
on
the
citizen
review
board,
which
is
the
board
that
provides
independent
oversight
to
the
Las
Vegas
Metropolitan
Police
Department,
in
that
capacity,
I
provided
oversight
for
hundreds
of
community
complaints
against
the
police,
so
I'm,
very
just
passionate
about
doing
that.
AI
Work.
I
was
very
active
in
that
capacity,
and
I
really
understand
how
important
this
type
of
work
is
and
how
much
responsibility
can
be.
It
was
a
really
meaningful
experience
to
me.
I
plan
on
staying
in
Salt,
Lake
City
for
a
long
time
and
I
want
to
set
roots
in
the
community
and
be
involved
and
help
to
improve
the
community
and
I
think
I'm
most
prepared
and
excited
to
do
that
by
volunteering.
In
the
realm
of
the
criminal
legal
system,.
C
Thank
you
very
much,
Catherine
any
questions.
This
is
an
impressive
group.
This
is
wonderful
opportunity
for
the
city
to
have
the
four
of
you
on
this
commission.
I
mean
I've,
always
been
impressed
with
the
rip
commission.
They've
done
some
wonderful
work,
lifting
the
city
up
and
broadening
our
view
on
things
and
I.
C
Think
the
the
four
of
you
will
just
amplify
it
even
more
and
really
make
it
even
more
positive
than
it
already
is
so
I
appreciate
again
your
work
and
your
future
work
working
together
and
you'll
be
also
on
tonight's
formal
consent
agenda.
Thank
you.
We
have
one
left
and
I'm,
not
sure.
If
Oliva
is
here.
F
While
we're
waiting,
may
I
ask
a
question
related
to
the
rep
commission
when
we
created
the
RPA
commission,
it
was
important
to
myself
and
a
few
other
council
members
that
that
we
get
the
Commissioners
a
stipend.
Is
that
still
happening
great
and
where
are
we
on
other
commissions
and
stipends?
Is
that.
T
T
C
D
Two
quick
items
first,
is
that
in
January
every
year
we
remind
council
members
about
the
need
to
fill
out,
Financial
disclosure
forms,
and
it's
my
understanding.
This
City
attorney
can
correct
me
if
I'm
incorrect,
but
if
you
haven't
had
a
change,
I
think
you
don't
need
to
fill
out
one
of
the
forms,
but
if
you
have,
then
the
staff
can
assist
you
to
get
you
in
the
correct
form
so
that
you
can
do
that
with
the
assistance
of
the
city
attorney's
office.
D
So
we
have
April,
August
and
December,
and
so,
let's
see
with
an
election
year,
August
probably
should
be
avoided
for
anyone
who's
up.
I
For
election
that
for
the
printed
newsletters,
the
public
utility,
it
can
only
be
one
council,
member
in
April
or.
F
AG
D
You
can
you,
we
have
plenty
of
room
in
August
and
December,
so
you
can
choose
either.
G
F
Mr,
chair
I,
move
that
we
enter
closed
session
for
the
purposes
of
purchase,
lease
or
sale
of
real
property
and
attorney
client.
Second,.
C
C
She's
bored
and
and
is
up
boy,
probably
okay,
that
passes
five
to
zero,
with
councilmember
Fowler
and
Bowie
absent.
We
will
be
entering
closed
session
at
this
time,
so
our
work
session
meeting
is.