►
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
This
slide
deals
with
the
revenue
as
it
relates
to
our
housing
funds.
You'll
see
that
we
have
just
over
9.7
million
in
Revenue
across
all
of
the
housing
funds.
The
internal
transfers
at
the
top
are
essentially
a
tax
increment
being
transferred
into
from
the
various
project
area
funds.
That's
the
statutory
requirement.
The
1.4
million
is
an
increase
of
what
we
are
now
receiving
and
a
projection
of
what
we'll
receive
from
the
Inland
port
and
then
the
1.7
million
the
mayor's
request
for
additional,
affordable
housing.
A
A
This
decision,
as
Jen
mentioned
in
her
Memo,
was
made
at
about
the
same
time
that
you,
as
a
board,
were
indicating
that
you
would
like
to
see
that
potentially
go
to
the
North
Temple
Project
area
for
use,
and
so
that's
a
decision
point
that
that
you
can
make
either
as
it
relates
to
this
specific
funding
request
in
this
year's
budget
or
give
us
that
direction
for
budgets
moving
forward
next
slide,
please
here's!
How
that
Revenue
looks
across
the
four
housing
funds
you
see.
A
The
bulk
of
it
is
going
into
the
housing
development
loan
fund,
which
will
be
put
out
in
anofa,
and
then
you'll
see
the
increase
in
the
west
side
committee
initiative
of
the
1.4
million
projected
for
next
year
and
then
just
a
little
over
400
000
in
the
transition
account
carrying
over
next
slide.
Please.
A
And
next
slide
moving
from
our
Revenue
into
our
obligated
expenses,
you
see
that
we
have
over
44
million
in
total
obligations.
The
biggest
of
these
is
our
reimbursement
payments,
either
to
Developers
for
tax
increment
or
our
payments
directly
to
the
taxing
entities
of
what
we
kind
of
capture
from
our
project
areas
and
then
pass
along
to
them
as
part
of
our
agreements.
We
also
have
a
significant
amount
in
debt
service,
both
for
Eccles
and
then
The
Debt
Service
on
the
North
Temple
Viaduct
payment
to
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
then
from
there.
B
It
be
possible
Mr,
chair,
sorry,
and
this
could
be
offline
if
that's
easier,
but
the
ti
reimbursement
taxing
entity
payments
could
is
it
possible
to
break
those
out
in
between
because
they
seem
like
kind
of
pretty
different
things,
be
great
to
see
how
much
yeah?
If.
B
C
Pages,
starting
on
page
83
that
will
actually
go
through
and
even
give
you
detail
on
which
tax
increment
reimbursements
were
made
with
which
businesses.
So
if
you,
if
you
want
that
level
of
detail
by
project
area,.
A
It's
a
good
time
to
get
a
snack.
No,
yes,
we
can
absolutely
break
that
out
either
between
our
annual
budget
or
provide
information
on
that
as
it
relates.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Next
slide,
please
foreign,
so
discretionary
expenses,
you
see
this
in
the
general
fund.
Department
budgets
are
called
insights
for
us.
They
relate
a
little
bit
more
to
specific
programs
and
projects.
You
see
the
header
for
programs
again.
A
This
is
a
preview
for
how
we're
starting
to
separate
allocations
within
workday,
we'll
have
Appropriations
for
programs
and
then
within
those
programs,
we'll
either
have
funding
that
go
into
them
on
a
holding
account
basis
or
we'll
have
requests
that
go
into
specific
projects.
So
that's
what
you're
seeing
in
these
slides
is
that
breakdown
between
programs
and
projects,
starting
with
arts
and
culture,
key
changes
in
our
budget.
A
New
requests
relate
to
25
000
for
additional
funds
to
do
activation
and
programming
in
McCarthy,
Plaza
and
Regent
Street
working
in
coordination
with
the
county
on
some
of
the
programs
and
activities
they're
doing
and
being
able
to
provide
some
funds
to
continue
that
effort,
and
then
the
150
000
for
essentially
a
public
art
program.
This
would
be
within
the
nine
line
project
area.
These
funds
could
be
used
in
conjunction
with
the
mayor's
goal
for
West
Side
art
installation.
If
it
falls
within
the
nine
line
project
area,
if
not,
it
would
be
for
an
additional
art.
A
A
A
Under
strategic
intervention,
you'll
recall
as
a
board,
you
have
set
aside
funds
in
different
project
areas.
For
this.
This
is
really
to
look
at
appropriating
funds
in
a
holding
account
for
project
area
development
with
certain
uses,
but
it'd
be
a
return
to
the
board
when
we
have
specific
projects
or
acquisition
or
site
development
costs.
A
Looking
at
some
of
the
infrastructure,
improvements
and
requests,
the
first
is
50
000
for
the
City
Creek
daylighting
project
that
is
currently
going
through
a
design
plan
to
Daylight
a
portion
of
City
Creek
along
Folsom
Trail.
This
would
be
looking
to
take
those
design
plans
to
a
level
of
construction,
drawings
and,
ultimately,
hopefully,
start
working
on
that
project
and
then
550
000
for
the
demolition
of
the
Sugarhouse
di
building
and
fire
station
property
there.
A
In
anticipation
of
offering
that
property
for
affordable
housing
development
next
slide,
please
and
then
additional
infrastructure
improvements,
3.6
million
in
the
depot
District.
In
anticipation
of
the
station
Center
project,
you
recall
that
U.S
board
allocated
funds
for
consultant.
That
study
is
underway
right
now,
and
this
is
starting
to
look
at
continuing
to
appropriate
funds
for
utility
upgrades
Street
improvements,
construction,
streetscape,
Parks
Etc
as
part
of
that
overall
project
than
a
hundred
thousand
within
North
Temple,
to
help
with
utility
upgrades
for
projects
or
Street
improvements
or
additional
streetscape
projects
in
that
project
area.
Mr.
E
Chair
go
ahead,
Danny
on
the
depot
district
and
the
station
Center.
Are
we
going
to
have
a
briefing
on
the
exact
scope
of
that
3.6
in
the
project
at
some
later
date,.
A
That
money
will
need
to
come
back
to
the
board
for
any
use
so
that
that'll
be
set
aside
with
the
additional
funds
right
now,
and
those
projects
will
come
back
to
the
board
and
then,
as
it
relates
to
the
specific
plan,
we're
doing
right
now,
you
should
be
getting
that
briefing,
I
think
either
July
or
August
with
the
the
outcome
of
that
study.
Okay,
okay,
Mr.
F
F
Similar
questions
so
same
areas
so
with
the
htrc.
If
we
were
to
get
it,
we
would
get
access
to
some
funding
to
do
housing,
obviously,
because
that's
the
first
thing,
but
also
for
infrastructure.
Yes
in
that
area,
so
we
could
potentially
leverage
this
money
with
that
or
just
use
that
one
and
not
use
this.
Yes,.
A
You
could
potentially
use
hcrz
for
some
of
these
purposes
and
then
have
these
funds
available
for
providing
other
benefits
or
parts
of
the
project.
Etc.
Thank.
G
A
Is
Depot
District
tax,
increment.
C
Would
be
added
to
funds
that
have
been
previously
allocated
for
that
purpose,
so
the
board
has
allocated
some
Depot
District
tax
increment
dollars
over
the
years
into
that
account.
The
total
is.
The
total
amount
is
about
8
million,
just
over
8
million,
with
this
additional
three.
If
the
board
approves
this
additional
3.6,
it's
not
quite
enough
to
fund
the
previous
estimate
cost
for
the
infrastructure
improvements,
and
so
the
board
would
have
to
discuss
sort
of
how
to
make
up
that
gap
or
whether
to
re-scoped
project.
A
E
A
Could
transfer
These
funds
out
of
the
depot
District
project
area
if
you're
using
it
for
affordable
housing?
Yes,
okay,
yes,.
H
C
E
A
The
primary
housing
fund
is
What
receives
all
of
the
statutory
obligations
from
all
the
project
areas.
So
Depot
has
a
10
requirement
similar
to
other
project
areas,
so
that
gets
all
gathered
put
in
the
primary
housing
fund.
The
secondary
housing
fund
is
additional
funds
that
you
take
also
from
Project
areas
and
then
put
towards
affordable
housing.
A
State
Statute
separates
those
two
different
sections:
different
requirements
for
reporting,
but
both
can
go
towards
affordable
housing
and
slightly
different
nuances,
and
so
is
is
Jen
and
I
described
it
in
her
Memo.
Think
of
primary
housing
of
what
you
must
do
and
that
gets
gathered
and
then
secondary
housing
is
what
you
like
to
do
above
and
beyond
that.
So.
C
And
I
would
say
that
there's
no
there's,
no
prohibition!
Sorry,
there's!
No
prohibition
against
the
board
making
a
decision
to
spend
a
hundred
percent
of
the
increment
on
affordable
housing.
It's
just
what
other
you
know
absent
your
tax
increment
obligations.
Obviously,
so
you
know
if
you've
agreed
to
repay
tax
increment
to
a
business.
You'd
have
to
do
that,
but
you
could
choose
to
spend
all
of
the
tax
increment
on
housing.
If.
C
B
I
I'm
gonna
ask
another
question:
okay,
Mr
chair!
Yes
on
that,
so
the
primary
housing
fund
and
secondary
housing
fund
are
from
all
the
taxing
all
the
areas
and
they
can
use
anywhere
in
the
city,
but
we
do
the
only
one.
That's
geographically
restricted
is
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
and
that's
based
on
our
decision
to
geographically
limit
it
to
the
west
side.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct
and
that
can
be
housing?
It
can
be
other
things.
The
West
Side
communicative
is
not
part
of
that.
C
So
well
so
because
it
is
funded
from
the
tax
increment
from
the
Port
Authority
for
affordable
housing.
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
about
ancillary
uses
of
that
money
of
that
tax,
increment
stream.
I
think
that
does
not
mean
that
you
couldn't
enhance
the
West
Side
Community
initiative
with
funding
sources
other
than
the
tax
increment
stream
from
the
port.
Does
that
make
sense
so
like
if
you
wanted
to
transfer
money
from
the
program
income
fund.
B
A
Only
two
things
I
would
add
to
that
is
I
Jen.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
I
think
the
original
statute
for
the
Inland
Port
was
to
go
towards
affordable
housing
for
the
areas
affected
by
the
Inland
Port,
so
I
think
the
general
consensus
was.
It
would
be
somewhat
near
there.
It
wouldn't
be,
you
know
across
the
city,
so
that's
kind
of
where
you
as
a
board
came
with
were
to
Define
that
West
Side
and
then
the
other
part
is
within
the
West
Side
Community
initiative.
A
B
Me
if
I
got
any
of
that
wrong,
okay,
I
guess.
Actually
my
original
question
that
I
I
lost
myself
on
was
that's
the
only
point
for
any
of
our
affordable
housing
activities.
That's
the
only
one
of
our
funds
that
is
geographically
limited.
Is
that
true
or
do
any
of
the
other
project
areas
have
specific
housing
things
within
the
project
area.
C
That
I
think
everything
else
is
Clearinghouse.
The
one
the
one
I
think
is
the
Adu
initiative
in
the
nine
line
would
be
restricted
to
the
nylon
area.
So
I
think
that
if
you
were
to
create
a
program
within
a
project
area
with
project
area
funds,
you
might
be
tying
your
hands
geographically.
So
I
think
that
Adu
program
is
tied
geographically
and
that
probably
has
as
much
to
do
with
the
County's
expectations
as
the
board's
decision.
A
That
one's
actually
yeah
Jen
you're
right
that
one's
a
requirement
to
have
one
in
the
nine
line
area,
but
the
funding
that
you
allocate
can
also
go
to
adu's
Citywide,
we're
just
obligated
to
have
one.
It
must
be
done.
A
A
Last
infrastructure
program
is
300
000
for
ballpark
planning.
This
is
essentially
to
appropriate
funds
to
engage
a
consultant
to
help
with
a
vision
and
implementation
plan
for
the
offering
and
development
of
the
stadium
and
adjacent
properties.
A
This
is
what
all
of
those
programs
and
allocations
look
like
across
the
multiple
project
areas.
So
this
is
kind
of
good
to
see
how
they
fall
within
the
project
area
budget
specifically
and
then
how
they
fall
between
the
program
and
the
projects
on
their
right.
You'll
see
that
there
are
some
allocations
and
programs
like
the
commercial
assistance
program
and
strategic
intervention
that
they
have
allocations
across
multiple
funds.
Another
quick
question.
G
Yes,
sorry
I
should
have
mentioned
it
the
if
we
go
slide
back
on
the
ballpark.
The
results
of
the
competition
were
released
very
recently
on
the
ballpark
next
design,
competition.
D
G
Administration
on
the
mayor
been
pushing
and
I
was
reading
through
those,
and
it
was
very
exciting
to
see
some
of
those
dreams
and
that
some
of
the
the
community
members
submitted.
D
G
A
It's
a
great
question
and
I
appreciate
you
bringing
that
up.
Yes,
the
the
voting
went
live
at
1201
this
morning,
so
that
those
have
been
released
and
the
voting
has
started.
The
idea
of
hiring
this
consultant
would
be
to
help
us,
as
both
an
agency
and
a
city,
to
balance
the
work
that
was
done
as
part
of
the
station
area
plan
and
then
now
with
the
design
competition.
A
As
you
said,
we're
getting
a
lot
of
ideas,
we're
getting
a
lot
of
themes
of
what
the
community
is
is
proposing
for
that,
and
so
this
would
kind
of
bridge
those
two
efforts
and
then
help
us
kind
of
pull
out.
What
we
feel
are
the
highest
priorities
and
desired
outcomes
of
what
we
want
to
see
there,
and
then
that
would
inform
us
when
we
put
the
property
out
on
the
street
for
development.
A
So
it's
taking
that
all
of
these
ideas
and
then
now
kind
of
sorting
through
them
coming
up
the
priority
and
then
putting
that
out
is
what
are
our
main
things
that
we
want
to
accomplish
in
Redevelopment
of
that
property.
Thank
you
that
answer
the
question
better.
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay
next
slide,
please.
A
So
back
to
this
you'll
see
that
with
commercial
assistance,
programs
and
strategic
intervention,
these
are
specific
allocations
across
the
different
project
areas
housing
we
can
do
anywhere,
but
the
tax
increment
we
receive
from
the
project
areas
specifically
to
any
commercial
efforts,
has
to
stay
within
those
project
areas.
That's
why
you
see
multiple
allocations
for
what
those
programs
will
be
and
how
they'll
be
spent
within
those
areas.
A
Next
slide,
please:
okay,
now
focusing
on
our
housing
activities.
This
is
part
of
your
annual
housing
funding
strategy.
First
thing
I
need
to
mention
is
that
first
dollar
amount
should
be
1
million
and
not
2
million.
We
we
had
some
overlap
in
requests
and
working
through
the
final
pieces
of
our
budget,
so
one
million
would
go
to
property
acquisition,
and
this
is
just
as,
as
you
know,
as
a
board
setting
aside
funds
regularly
for
acquisition
opportunities
as
they
come
up
and
looking
at
turning
those
into
affordable
housing
projects.
A
Crimano
your
comment
on
the
Adu,
starting
with
the
pilot
program
in
the
nine
line,
but
allocating
1.4
million
for
that
and
then
potentially
over
time
being
able
to
take
that
project
or
program
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
Next
slide,
please
Mr.
B
E
We
go
back
a
slide.
Please
sorry
is
the
housing
side
of
the
house,
so
we
have
our
four
priorities,
like
the
wealth
building,
family
housing,
deeply
and
Missy
middle,
and
we
haven't
had.
E
Requests
that
did
not
meet
meet
our
priorities
and
have
we
or
always
Met
has
always
been
a
project
that
met
the
priorities
so.
A
This
last
nofa
that
we
did
last
year
that
you
approved
the
allocations
for
back
in
December
I,
believe
that
was
probably
the
first
nofa
where
we
really
took
not
just
your
priorities.
We've
done
priorities
before,
but
that's
where
we
took
some
of
those
priorities
and
put
them
in
as
thresholds,
and-
and
you
recall,
when
we
did
that
presentation
yeah,
that
we
were
really
surprised
and
fortunate
that
we
had
so
many
projects
that
not
only
hit
the
priorities
but
actually
met
those
threshold
designations.
A
So
to
answer
your
question
technically,
the
answer
would
be
no,
but
we've
really
only
kind
of
added
that
extra
layer,
one
time
so
I
think
as
we
continue
to
do
this.
That
may
happen
and
and
we'll
discuss
at
that
time
of
how
we
either
present
that
to
you
as
a
board
as
it
relates
to
those
specific
requests
and
projects
or
if
you
then
want
to
either
reissue
the
nofa
change
the
parameters
of
it
or
just
then
put
it
out
on
an
ongoing
basis,
because
you
remember,
when
we
first
put
it
out,
it's
competitive
right.
E
Right
and
everyone
knows
what
those
are-
our
priorities
are:
they're,
not
secret,
so
they
know
where
we
want
to
go
so
I
guess
that
just
okay
that
helps
me
because
I
just
I
was
just
worried
that
hey
we
come
to
a
point
where
no
one,
no
one
makes
a
cut.
So
what
do
we
do
next?
So
I
guess
what
I'll
have
to
come
to
that
bridge
when
we
see.
H
A
Had
one
project
make
the
cut
and
then
you,
as
a
board,
have
been
approving,
along
with
the
mayor's
recommendation,
to
just
hold
on
to
those
funds
and
continue
to
leave
them
out
there
on
an
ongoing
basis.
You
recall:
we've
had
some
projects,
we've
tried
to
put
them
in
those
haven't
happened,
so
we
just
continue
to
work
on
trying
to
hit
that
goal
with
those
funds.
B
On
the
property
acquisition
I
know,
you
said
it's
1
million
instead
of
2
million,
we're
just
sort
of
brainstorming
property
acquisition
if
it's
intended
for
housing
happen
outside
of
project
areas,
even
with
project
area
funds.
Yes-
and
we
just
have
to
remember
that
we
purchased
that
with
the
intent
to
do
affordable
housing
and
we
have
to
actually
do
affordable
housing
on
it.
Otherwise,
we'd
be
out
of
compliance
with
absolutely.
A
I,
don't
think
we've
bought,
no,
that
was
in
North,
America
I,
don't
think
we've
bought
property
yet
outside
of
a
project
area.
If
you
remember,
we
were
looking
at
a
property
on
Foothill
for
a
while.
That
was
one
that
we
were
coming
to
saying.
This
is
kind
of
our
first
attempt
at
going
outside
of
a
project
area.
A
C
Thing
outside
of
the
CRA.
Yes,
because
the
high
opportunity
area
was
outside
of
a
CRA
and.
A
D
D
A
Continuing
with
the
housing
activities
looking
at
putting
just
over
four
and
a
half
million
in
the
housing
development
loan
program,
this
is
the
competitive
nofa
that
we
will
be
issuing
for
this
year,
and
then
we
have
an
allocation
of
380
000
for
family
and
Workforce
housing.
This
is
a
function
of
our
inner
local
agreements.
With
the
school
district
for
nine
line
estate
Street,
they
have
asked
us
to
take
a
portion
of
their
tax
increment
as
it
relates
to
housing
and
put
it
towards
family
and
Workforce
housing
to
support
the
school
district
teachers
Etc.
A
A
It'll
be
leveraged
with
the
other
four
and
a
half
million,
but,
as
you
stated,
one
of
your
priorities
is
family
housing,
so
we
anticipate
getting
projects
that'll
need
way
more
than
just
this
380..
We
just
have
to
report
to
the
school
district
that
this
section
of
money
actually
went
into
those
projects
and
can
be
added
to
other
funding
sources.
A
F
A
F
A
And
then
new
this
year,
as
part
of
one
of
your
priorities,
two
point
million
towards
shared
equity.
This
is
appropriation
of
funds
likely
will
go
out
initially
in
anofa,
but
this
is
to
address
shared
equity
and
wealth,
building
priority
for
the
West
Side
Community
initiative,
so
this
nofa
will
provide
those
funds
anticipated
to
be
in
the
form
of
either
loans
or
Equity
Investments
to
either
specific
projects
or
programs.
That
entities
propose
to
us,
so
you
will
see
that
as
a
board
of
if
people
are
starting
to
put
these
programs
together.
A
Outside
of
you
know
what
some
of
the
considerations
you
have
right
now,
we
know
there
are
multiple
groups
looking
at
options,
so
we
wanted
to
put
this
funding
out
there
to
see
where
some
of
those
are
at
and
start
prioritizing.
This,
as
it
relates
to
projects
specifically
within
the
West
Side
Community
initiative.
A
And
then
director
Dugan,
you,
you
kind
of
stole
my
thunder
for
this
slide,
but
this
is
just
a
recap
of
where
you're
at
with
how
this
all
fits
within
the
annual
housing
funding
strategy.
So
you
know
we
come
to
the
board
with
what
the
specific
allocations
are
for
each
of
the
funds
that
are
projected
you,
as
a
board
recently
approved
those
four
priorities
in
the
middle
and
then
now
as
part
of
the
budget
you're
allocating
those
funds
to
the
specific
activities
that
we
have
recommended
within
the
budget.
A
And
then
here's
what
those
allocations
look
across
the
four
housing
funds
and
then
the
column
on
the
left
is
what
those
look
like
with
the
specific
programs.
That's
pretty
much
the
same
information
you
see
at
the
bottom,
with
the
total
by
all
program
funds,
but
you'll
notice
that
the
nine
line,
because
that
is
a
allocation
of
tax
increment,
primarily
that
is
where
the
Adu
money
is
coming
from
and
will
be
spent
and
then
next
slide.
Please
I
think
we're
transitioning
over
to
admin.
A
G
Airport
at
five
in
the
morning
today,
so
it
on
the
Adu
can.
G
You
is
there
any
the
timeline
on
when
those
funds
will
be
available
for
the
public.
What
is
the
process,
and
are
we
partnering
with
a
community
organization,
or
are
we
starting
the
process
to
to
do
that?
To
distribute
those
funds.
A
A
We
need
to
have
a
program
up
and
running,
and
so
we're
going
to
probably
be
able
to
meet
that
we're
in
a
position
right
now
to
put
out
an
RFP
with
the
intention
of
partnering
with
other
organizations
to
help
us
really
hone
in
on
what
the
creation
and
administration
of
that
program
would
be,
and
that
could
be
a
combination
of
working
directly
with
them
or
them
providing
advice
to
us
of
how
we
could
craft
that
program
and
maintain
it
internally
and
then
I
think.
In
light
of
director
mono's
comments.
A
Recently,
we
are
going
to
be
bringing
that
back
for
discussion
just
to
update
and
answer
some
of
the
questions.
I
think
you
had
of
how
that
program
may
look
both
within
nine
line
and
address
I
think
some
of
those
larger
discussions
you've
had
as
a
council,
so
we're
setting
that
for
your
June
agenda
and
then
any
input
or
feedback
we
get
from
that.
We
can
roll
right
into
then
putting
that
RFP
on
the
street
working
with
procurement
in
that
process.
Right
now,
I.
G
I
tell
you
I'm
hearing
a
lot
from
some
of
my
neighbors.
You
know
they
do
you
discussion
that
we
had
earlier
this
year
and
there's
still
people
talking
about
adus
and
we
you
know
there
was
some
sort
of
urgency
about
us
to
to
make
that
put
those
funds,
so
yeah
I
I,
would
love
to
as
soon
as
we
can
make
that
process
go
faster.
That
would
be
great
I.
D
G
F
You
know
we
want
to
see
if
it
works
or
not,
and
then
if
it
works
great,
if
it
doesn't,
we
have
to
make
adjustments
and
then
look
at
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
that
we
were
discussing
so
if
because
you're,
adding
more
people
more
just
to
people
and
just
two
people,
and
if
you
know,
if
the
council
agreed
in
this
budget
season
first
as
a
council
to
add
that
million
dollars
that
was
in
a
legislative
intent.
B
C
A
You
next
slide
or
Tucson
I
think
that's
our
last.
It
was
the
admin.
A
B
A
Yes,
that
is
a
function
of
within
our
our
policy.
We
have
the
well.
The
city
has
a
one
and
a
half
percent
for
art-
that's
totally
separate
from
us,
yes,
but
then
our
our
policy.
We
have
that
if
we
do
infrastructure
projects,
we
will
meet
that
and
then
we
also
have
the
provision
that
we
can
either
incentivize
developers
to
incorporate
it
within
their
projects
or
you,
as
a
board,
can
also
budget
additional
public
art
funds
at
any
time
from
Project
areas.
For
projects
like
this-
and
this
is.
B
Taking
away
all
the
one
and
a
half
percent,
or
anything
else,
okay,
yep,
and
that
okay,
so
I
I,
would
love
to
find
out
what
how
that
process
will
be.
In
terms
of
I
mean.
Is
that
going
to
be
a
transfer
out
to
the
Arts
Council
or.
A
I
There's
a
an
additional
150
000
that
you'll
see
in
CIP
on
the
general
fund
side
for
New,
West,
Side
art,
so
there's
150
000
in
CIP,
which
is
separate
from
150
000
that
we
just
talked
about
in
the
nine
line
context
they
may
or
may
not
be
combined.
They
could
be
combined
if
it's
in
the
nine
line
project
area
or
they
could
be
two
separate
areas
on
the
west
side.
B
C
If
the
counselor,
sorry,
if
the
counselor
or
the
board,
felt
it
important
for
those
items
to
be
combined
on
in
terms
of
the
policy
direction
of
one
larger
piece
versus
two
less
large
pieces,
maybe
might
be
good
for
the
council
to
consider
from
a
policy
perspective.
Because
we
could
add
that
language
into
the
budget
to
specify
that
those
that
the
expectation
is
that
those
funds
are
combined.
B
I
see:
okay,
okay,
great.
E
On
the
administrative
costs,
we
have
project
areas
that
start
to
expire.
Yes,
and
of
course,
sometimes
the
bigger
project
carriers
are
expiring
and
administrative
budget
kind
of
stays
relatively
flat
was
slightly
growing.
Just
because
there's
always
administrative
costs
are
going
to
go
up,
so
the
I
have
to
believe.
You
have
a
fairly
good
strategy
on
when
these
project
areas
are
decline,
are
expiring
decline
in
retiring,
how
we
account
for
and
how
we
Supply
the
administrative
costs
going
forward.
I.
A
Think
I
think
Jen
described
this
very
well
in
her
Memo.
We
have.
We
have
a
conversation
that
needs
to
start
happening
because,
as
these
project
areas
expire,
even
some
of
the
newer
ones
we
are
approving,
while
they
may
be
matching
them
in
tax
increment.
A
A
lot
of
the
newer
project
areas,
and
especially
the
hcrz,
have
a
much
lower
threshold
for
what
we
can
contribute
towards
admin
costs,
so
our
workload
may
not
be
going
down,
but
we
need
to
start
looking
at
other
sources
of
how
to
cover
our
admin
expenses,
and
so
we
we're
already
starting
to
have
those
conversations
internally
with
financing.
We
appreciate
Jen
and
Ben
to
work
at
recognizing
that
as
well,
because
that's
something
I
think
we're
going
to
need
to
look
even
just
beyond
the
agency
for
how
we
cover
those
expenses.
Okay,.
G
G
G
It
feels
like
a
year
ago,
but
this
year
talking
to
the
legislature
about
the
Fair
Park
Authority
and
how
the
conflicts
we
have
with
that
on
stating
our
issues
with
our
model
and
also
with
the
Inland
poor,
Authority
and
creating
this
unelected
boards
that
decide
how
public
funds
are
are
used,
I
utilize
as
something
that
I
struggle
with.
So
I
would
like
to
pick
your
brain
a
little
more
and
see.
Maybe
you
can
elaborate.
A
I
can
tell
you
for
certain
we're
not
necessarily
looking
at
becoming
the
next
Inland
Port,
but
I.
Think
Jen
did
a
great
job
of
putting
this
in
the
context
of
station
Center,
because
that
is
a
conversation
that
has
come
up
as
we've
looked
at
the
development
of
that
initially,
with
potentially
looking
at
the
you
being
a
partner
and
what
level
that
is
a
true
Innovation
District
to
where
we're
at
right
now
and
where
we're
at
right
now
is.
A
You
have
some
kind
of
organization
that
helps
with
the
program
and
activation
or
what
is
our
role
in
terms
of
what
may
be
a
larger
board
and
governance
structure,
and
how
does
that
look?
So
it's
a
great
question
and
it's
one
that
we're
looking
at
and
we'd
love
to
have
any
feedback
or
input
from
the
board
of
whether
we
should
be
looking
at
that
even
Beyond
station
Center
and
what
that
could
be
not
just
on
other
properties,
project
areas
but
city-wide
for
for
tools
that
we
want
to
use.
Well.
G
Let
me
I
I,
think
that
this
is
is
good
to
explore,
is
always
good
to
like
see
how
models
work,
especially
in
an
area
like
the
station
Center
I
do
struggle
going
on
that
path,
especially
because
I
feel
like
it
undermines
the
stances
that
this
city
has
taken
with
the
legislature.
G
You
know
by
Crea
by
the
legislature
creating
this
governance
boards
that
produce
public
monies
from
the
city,
but
there
aren't
elected
and
the
accountability
is
an
issue
there.
G
In
my
opinion,
and
if
we
were
to
create
a
a
similar
entity
ourselves,
then
we
have
less
of
a
stance
to
argue
these
other
issues
with
the
state
Fair
Park,
Inland
port-
and
you
know
the
state-
would
love
to
probably
create
these
unelected
groups,
and
we
have
discussed
quite
a
bit
this
year
about
this
other
mechanisms
that
the
state
is
trying
to
create
pits
and
whatever
else
so,
I
I
usually
throw
with
the
idea.
I
do
understand
that
we
want
to
create
some
sort
of
continuity
and.
G
Long
term,
but
I
do
prefer
that
you
know
an
elected
body
holds
the
the
reins
on
this,
so
so
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
leave
that
out.
There
I.
A
Appreciate
that
context
and
and
I
know
as
a
little
flipping
with
my
initial
remark
of
saying-
we're
not
looking
to
be
the
Inland
Port
but
I
think
that's
very
relevant
because,
as
we
look
at
it,
we're
seeing
it
as
our
role
of
how
do
we
expand
upon
what
opportunity
we
would
have
as
the
long-term
landowner
of
continuing
to
be
able
to
provide
the
public
benefits
we
want.
So
while
we
talk
about
what
a
governance
structure
could
be,
that
is
to
what
extent
we
may
need
to
be
pulling
in
other
experts
or
other
providers.
A
That
would
still
be
within
that.
So
they
would
be
stakeholders.
They
would
be
people
who
are
involved
in
that
in
helping
inform
what
that
might
be
from
even
just
a
programming
inactivation
standpoint
and
then
the
benefit
of
the
structure.
As
far
as
the
RDA
is
concerned
is
how
can
we
structure
that,
in
a
way
with
a
ground
lease
or
other
development
agreements,
so
that
we
can
continue
to
even
just
apply
some
of
the
funding
or
Revenue?
A
We
get
to
continuing
to
provide
the
public
benefits
and
whether
that's
you
know
providing
space
for
small
businesses,
whether
that's
subsidizing
that
whether
that's
you
know
part
of
the
program
activation.
That's
the
level
of
how
we're
looking
at
it,
not
necessarily
something
that
I
think
would
be
at
the
level
of
what
the
state's
setting
up
in
those
but
I
think
you're.
Absolutely
right
that
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
that
within
that
right
context
and
not
providing
that
problem.
Yeah.
G
You
just
don't
want
to
create
that.
That
is
very
important
to
me
that
we're
not
going
that
route
at
least
I'm
talking
about
me
personally,
that
route
is
is
not
the
route
that
I
will
prefer
to
go
at
all.
D
G
And-
and
it
opens
up
for
a
lot
of
issues
in
our
relationship
with
the
state
but
also
I,
don't
think
necessarily
is
the
the
approach
that
this
city
needs
to
go
to
any
other.
Yes,
sorry,
no.
H
That's
fine
Mr,
chair
I
just
wanted
to
also
state
that
I
have
share
all
those
same
concerns
and
I
like
want
to
say
before
we
even
get
too
far
into
that,
but
or
too
far
down
the
road
that
I
feel
very
strongly
that
we
not
put
ourselves
in
that
position.
So
I
just
want
to
Echo
that
support
for
myself.
G
Thank
you
I.
You
know,
I
I
know
that
you,
you
have
the
some
of
the
most
brilliant
people
I
ever
interacted
with,
and
we.
H
D
G
Different
path
to
to
accomplish
similar
goals,
but
creating
a
in
an
uncountable,
unelected
group
of
people
to
direct
public
funds
I
just
want
to
leave
that
out
there
any
other
comments.
Sorry,
no.
E
Thank
you,
stay
focused
thank
you,
Mr
chair
and
maybe
a
later
date
talk
about
the
bonding
ideas
on
the
some
catalytic
projects
and
stuff,
like
that,
maybe
at
a
separate
date
in
July
or
yeah.
A
F
A
That's
all
of
our
slides
I'll
just
note
that
we
we
had
a
an
appendix
section
too.
That's
part
of
the
presentation.
So
if
anyone
really
wants
to
go
on
a
deep
dive
feel
free
to
do
that,
and
if
you
have
any
questions
as
part
of
that,
let
us
know
I
think
I'm
supposed
to
turn
it
over
to
you
for.
C
Everything,
especially
with
the
council
member
questions
throughout
so
I,
didn't
have
anything
additional
to
add
other
than
maybe
just
a
general
request
for
feedback
from
board
members.
C
If
there
are
elements
of
the
RDA
budget
that
you
want
to
see
either
adjusted
or
discussed
further,
let
us
know
we'll
let
RDA
staff
know
so
that
we
can
figure
out
when
it
makes
sense
to
talk
about
in
public
again
every
now
and
then,
especially
if
things
are
going
back
and
forth
between
the
general
fund
and
RDA,
we
try
as
much
as
we
can
to
schedule
an
RDA
meeting,
but
every
now
and
then
we
will
talk
about
an
RDA
issue
if
it's
also
related
to
the
general
fund.
F
G
A
G
Microphone
so
you
can
go
whenever.
Thank
you,
Danny
I.
There
is
no
items
on
written
briefings,
consent
and
there
is
not
a
closed
session.
So
I
think
we
are
adjourned
as
the
RDA
board.
Mr.