►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 07/18/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
Gotcha
good
afternoon
cancel.
Oh
my
goodness.
This
sounds
good.
All
right
here
to
report
for
community
outreach
you're
a
deputy
director,
Ashley
Cleveland.
What
we
got
going
on
is,
as
usual,
we
love
our
community
members
to
visit
our
slc.gov
feedback
website
to
see
everything
that's
going
on
with
Community
engagement.
It
is
regularly
updated
and
highlighted
ways
to
engage
with
the
city.
We
have
a
lot
of
expanded
opportunities
to
report
out
to
you
on
today.
There's
been
a
handful
of
extensions
next
slide,
so
the
ballpark
station
area
zoning
map.
C
We
are
reviewing
and
we're
reviewing
amendments
and
we
have
extended
public
feedback.
So
please
encourage
all
of
our
constituents
to
visit
our
feedback
page
and
they
still
have
an
opportunity
to
provide
feedback.
It
does
not
have
an
end
date.
As
of
now
we're
also
looking
at
our
subdivision
code
updates.
The
engagement
for
that
is
starting
at
the
end
of
July
and
our
community
benefit
requirements.
A
petition
has
been
initiated
and
if
you
want
any
more
information
into
the
details
of
that
I
encourage
all
of
our
community
members
to
email.
C
We
have
our
West
Side
art
project,
very
excited
about
that
we'll
be
looking
at
our
iconic
public
artwork.
On
the
west
side
in
particular,
engagement
continues.
We
will
be
having
opportunities
at
Partners,
In,
The
Park
at
mestiz
and
mestizo's
arts
and
activism,
to
figure
out
what
the
goals
of
this
project
are
going
to
be
and
get
some
ideas
from
the
community
foreign
and
you
can
visit
saltlakearts.org
for
more
information.
There.
C
For
Public
Lands
we
do
have
a
lot
going
on,
because
the
summer
is
a
season
of
getting
outside
our
wonderful
Miller
Park.
We
have
findings
of
our
engagement
project
posted
at
slc.gov,
forward,
slash
Parks.
We
also
have
our
budget
and
project
alignment
coming
Topher
and
Richmond
Park.
They
will
be
having
a
really
fun
potluck
on
August
25th,
from
6
to
8
pm
to
report
findings.
It
is
a
dog
friendly
and
family-friendly
event,
so
bring
your
Pooch
out
and
bring
your
kid.
We
also
have
updates
on
stinpick
Donner,
Trail,
Liberty,
Park
playground
and
Madison
Park.
C
C
For
the
community
outreach
team,
we
have
our
community
office
hours
coming
up.
Those
are
still
going
strong.
It's
really
a
lot
of
fun
to
get
out
in
the
community
and
have
people
see
our
friendly
faces
and
know
what's
going
on
with
all
of
you
here,
so
our
Rose
Park
neighborhood
center
will
be
having
some
engagement
coming
up
here
soon.
C
We
also
have
Partners
In
The
Park
at
Riverside
Park,
a
huge
thank
you
to
University
neighborhood
partners
for
collaborating
with
us
on
that
that
will
be
happening,
July
25th
from
6
to
8
pm
and
then
near
the
playground
at
Liberty
Park
on
July
28th.
We
will
be
having
Community
office
hours
from
2:00
to
4
30
at
the
peak
of
heat.
So
please
give
our
liaison
some
love
because
they
are
sweating
it
out
to
come
and
see
you
next
slide.
C
I
also
would
like
to
highlight,
especially
with
our
agenda.
Today
we
still
have
our
Fleet
block.
Art
healing
comment
form
open,
any
Community
member
who
wants
to
know
more
about
flea
block
and
all
of
the
engagement
that
has
happened
there
over
the
past
year
and
a
half.
Please
visit
the
slc.gov
forward,
slash
feedback
forward,
slash
website
and
click
on
the
fleet,
block
art
healing
comment
form
and
the
hope
is
for
you
to
tell
us
what
you
think
of
this
process
in
particular
that
engage
the
families
related
to
the
individuals
depicted
on
the
mural.
C
So
please
provide
your
comment
there
next
slide.
We
have
a
lot
of
events
going
on
going
strong
and
a
huge
thank
you
to
our
Civic
engagement
team
for
maintaining
that
this
list.
With
the
community
outreach
team,
we
have
East
bench
ice
cream
social
happening
tomorrow
at
Donner,
Park
Donner
trail
park
on
the
east
side
of
the
park.
We
have
Partners
In,
the
Park
there's
a
drone
show
happening
at
Liberty
Park,
which
I'll
give
you
more
details
about
shortly.
C
We
have
a
similar
a
summer
film
series
at
Liberty,
Park
they're
playing
fire
of
Love
on
the
28th,
and
you
know
this
list
is
actually
on
our
City
website
for
our
City
events.
So
you
can
always
look
at
the
SLC
website
and
look
up
City
events.
Another
one
I'm
really
excited
about
at
Liberty.
Park
is
the
African
Festival.
So
that's
coming
up
as
well.
C
And
then,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
really
excited
to
promote
an
event.
That's
happening
on
Pioneer
Day,
the
uniting
community's
powwow
is
hosted
by
the
Native
American
Chamber
of
Commerce,
and
it
will
be
held
on
July
24th
right
after
the
days
of
47
parade.
The
reason
why
this
event
is
so
exciting
is
I
feel
like
as
an
effort
in
hosting
ongoing,
meaningful
indigenous
and
Native
American
relationships.
The
mayor's
office
has
hosted
the
Utah
office
of
Indian
Affairs.
They
have
a
quarterly
tribal
Coalition
meeting
for
all
eight
of
our
Utah
tribal
leaders.
C
Over
the
past
month,
we
provide
an
afternoon
of
lunch,
a
visit
to
the
city
and
county
building
and
partnered
with
the
Tracy
Aviary
for
some
interactive
fun
and
a
tour
of
the
Jordan
River
Nature
Center.
It
has
been
a
pleasure
to
meet
with
former
tribal
government
leaders
like
chairman,
chapus,
chairman
Hart,
chairman
Lehigh
councilman,
to
be
Allison
turtle
and
even
president
Buu
Nygren
during
this
two
year,
long
relationship
building
effort,
formal
leaders
and
our
local
indigenous
Native
American
Community,
has
been
involved
with
recruiting
for
our
public
lands.
C
Advisory
Board
provided
feedback
on
our
Trails
process,
which
is
still
ongoing.
Drafted
and
passed
two
proclamations
and
invited
the
mayor's
office
in
sharing
and
spiritual
ceremony,
and
now
the
same
group
is
revamping
a
whole
new
community
event
funded
by
the
mayor's
office,
Ace
Grant,
so
I
hope
you
guys
come
out.
It's
going
to
be
an
exciting
day.
The
Powell
is
happening
from
12
to
10
pm,
with
the
Drone
show
immediately
at
10
pm.
C
D
Thank
you,
Ashley
I
have
a
question.
Yes,
we
had
talked
about
doing
like
additional
trips
or
visits
to
the
Ura
reservation
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
those
are
still
planned
on
happening
and
if
so
I
would
really
love
to
go
on.
One
I
just
need
like
a
little
more
notice
than
like
24
to
48
hours,
but
I
would
really
love
to
go
okay.
So
if
it's
possible
I'm
still
very
interested
in
that
okay.
E
Thank
you
next
slide.
You
can
see
the
numbers
still
a
really
high
utilization
rate
of
the
Resource
Centers
over
98
percent
updates
on
income
and
impact
mitigation,
mostly
focus
on
the
Jordan
River,
the
North
End
near
day,
Riverside
Library
and
probably
a
little
south
of
there,
a
lot
of
camps
again,
a
lot
of
Outreach
rehabilitations
as
well.
The
resource
Fair
last
Friday
at
Pioneer
Park,
was
very
well
attended.
A
lot
of
Partners
you
can
see
there
I
have
some
stats
as
well.
That's
helpful
for
you.
All
I
can
share
at
that
point.
E
A
big
piece
I
want
to
point
out
which
I
don't
think
it's
a
lot
of
attention
is:
we've
got
multiple
Court
jurisdictions
going
out
to
these
resource
fairs.
Now
we
know
the
Justice
Court's
part
of
the
city,
but
Third
District
Court
Salt,
Lake,
County,
Justice,
Corps,
West,
Valley,
City
Justice
Court,
very
helpful,
because
a
lot
of
our
folks
cross
jurisdictions
a
lot,
and
we
need
to
coordinate
that
as
much
as
we
can
both
for
these
efforts,
but
also
in
our
bigger
discussion.
E
We've
had
about
the
criminal
justice
system
and
getting
folks
from
in
and
out
of
that,
revolving
door
kind
of
issue.
We've
had
so
and
then
a
lot
of
great
help
from
the
food
Justice
Coalition
rough
Haven,
obviously
with
pets,
Health
Department
I
mean
a
lot
of
vaccines,
I
think
40,
vaccinations,
Wasatch
community
garden.
Was
there
Utah
health
policy
project
which,
if
you're
not
familiar
with
them,
they
do
a
lot
of
prereq
stuff
and
and
help
people
get
signed
up
for
benefits,
which
is
a
huge
deal.
E
The
last
thing
which
is
not
on
this
slide
I,
want
to
point
out
for
folks,
is
kayak
Court,
obviously
starting
that
up
again
on
the
river
this
Friday
and
we
can
get
more
information
for
it
to
you
as
you
as
you'd
like
it
as
well
right
now,
because
of
the
heat
wave
in
the
next
week
to
two
weeks,
maybe
further
than
that,
we've
also
tried
to
get
information
out
to
the
community
in
general
about
cooling
stations
during
covid.
E
The
county
was
able
to
open
up
the
convention
center
because
a
lot
of
our
public
spaces
were
closed.
Like
Library
senior
centers
Etc
right
now,
the
county
and
City
spaces
are
open
during
the
daytime
hour,
especially
when
it's
hottest
so
County
and
City
libraries,
County
recreation,
centers,
County
senior
centers
are
all
available
for
folks
to
go
and
get
cooled
off.
Get
water
bathrooms.
Those
kind
of
needs
so
we'll
try
to
make
sure
that
gets
out
to
everybody
possible,
especially
right
now
any
questions.
F
Have
a
question
thanks:
Andrew
I
was
wondering:
if
do
we
add
the
homeless
Resource
Center
to
the
utilization
to
the
count
here
or
is
it
just
the
two
hrcs.
E
The
Youth
of
the
youth-
one-
that's
not
in
this
particular
number,
but
I
can
get
that
for
you
generally
they've
been
running
pretty
full
between
20
and
30..
They
have
a
Max
of
30
right
now,
okay,
in
meeting
with
them
last
week,
it's
up
and
down,
but
usually
somewhere
mid-20s.
F
It
would
be,
it
would
be
nice
to
keep
adding
in
and
like
make
that
make
that
distinction,
because
our
youth
do
do
help
I
to
go
on
Sunday
to
volunteer
there
and
they
need
the
help.
They
need
a
lot
of
things,
still
more
food,
more
donations.
So,
if
anybody's
listening,
please
check
the
VOA
homeless,
youth,
Research
Center
and
go
volunteer,
they
need
more
people
there
and
also
thank
you
to
everybody
that
donated
the
clothes
for
the
homeless
resource
Fair
on
on
Friday
guys.
It
was
gone
within
the
30
within
30
minutes
of
me.
F
Bringing
the
four
bins
I
mean:
that's
the
need
that
it's
out
there,
so
please
donate
clothes
that
are
usable
that
are
clean.
You
can
come
to
the
third
floor
here.
The
council
building
drop
them
off
the
next
one
is
July
August,
19th,
I
believe
anyway,
I'm
not
gonna
mess
up
the
the
number
we.
E
G
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
working,
it
doesn't
it's
not
just
working
can
I
borrow
so
the
yes
awful.
G
The
question
is
regarding
the
Kaya
Court
last
time:
I
heard
that
the
river
was
too
high.
Maybe
dangerous
is
this
go
and
they
were
going
to
do
it
in
bikes,
I,
don't
know
if
that
happened
bit
league.
So
is
it
back
to
normal
azekiah
Court
in
kayaks
or
is
going
to
be
in
bikes,
because
they've
reached
folks
in
different
ways,
right
being
in
the
river,
is
easier
to
access?
A
lot
of
this
incumbents.
E
Yeah
during
the
Spring
runoff
season,
there
was
a
risk
of
the
Jordan
River
being
exceptionally
high
this
year.
For
various
reasons.
Thankfully,
we
didn't
have
any
flooding
that
I'm
aware
of
along
the
river,
but
with
that
the
risk
decreasing
and
being
really
not
there.
At
this
point,
they
are
returning
from
the
bikes
to
the
river
itself
in
the
kayak,
so
they
will
be
on
the
river.
B
B
Last
time
we
talked
about
this,
we
were
able
to
make
it
through
I,
believe
all
of
the
funded
projects
and
maybe
a
couple
of
the
unfunded
projects,
and
so
today,
yeah
the
logs
over
there
and
I'm
actually
gonna
go
get
the
one
I
took
notes
on
I'll,
be
right
back.
H
Yeah,
if
anyone
needs
a
extra
copy,
the
short
and
the
long,
both
versions
of
the
funding
log
we
have
extras
on
the
table,
there's
also
a
new
handout
that
should
be
at
all
of
your
seats.
It's
just
one
sheet
two
pages
and
that'll
be
related
to
the
administration's
presentation
to
you
about
the
capital
asset
plan,
five-year
CIP
plan
and
that'll,
be
after
going
through
the
rest
of
the
funding
log.
H
H
It
is
different
than
the
urban
Trails
project
that
is
recommended
for
funding.
We
talked
about
at
the
last
briefing
that
one
would
construct
extensions
of
the
nine
Line
Trail
as
well
as
sidewalk
improvements
to
the
Wallace
stegner
Academy
West
of
Redwood
Road.
This
is
similar,
but
it
would
be
for
design
and
it
would
be
related
to
the
tiny
home
Village,
so
same
area,
two
different
projects
in
the
same
location.
I
I
I'm
I'm
fine,
with
like
eliminating
the
redundancies
that
the
other
approval
does.
But
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
there
is
still
a
dearth
of
green
bike
stations
on
the
west
side,
and
that
element
in
particular
of
this
proposal
should
stay
highly
elevated.
H
Okay,
that
takes
us
to
number
40..
This
is
multimodal
capital
maintenance.
It
involves
bike
Lanes
if
you
picture
downtown
some
of
the
bike.
Lanes
have
those
green
markings
like
on
a
second
South
and
second
West.
Some
of
those
facilities
require
specialized
equipment
for
maintenance.
The
city
does
not
own
equipment
to
do
that
maintenance,
so
this
funding
is
to
have
third
parties.
Do
it
it's
not
recommended
for
funding.
The
council
has
funded
this
in
previous
years,
I'm,
not
sure
if
there's
funding
remaining
from
those
prior
Appropriations.
G
Thank
you.
This
is
one
of
those
that
also
just
overlaps
with,
because
it
has
speed
feedback
signs,
pedestrian
warning,
flash
flashers
and
all
of
this,
so
it
could
potentially
be
funded
through
this
other
approved
funding
related
to
safer
Crossings
and.
H
G
Could
you
could
you
could?
Could
one
say
that
this
is
also
very
important?
So
we're
not
just
you
know,
they're,
not
just
the
improvements
that
we
made
in
previous
years
need
to
be
maintained
as
a
half
far
well
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
go.
Do
they
have
a
list
of
because
I'd
remember
seeing
some
of
those
flashers
that
are
not
working
that
were
installed
in
in
Rose,
Park
and
I?
G
Wonder
if
that
is
where
this
comes
from
and
I
would
like
to
know
a
little
more
from
the
administration
and
if
they
have
a
list,
maybe
I
missed
it.
I
have
a
list
of
so
they
want
to
maintain.
So
that
will
be
interesting
for
me.
I.
B
It
seems
almost
strange
to
me
that
this
would
be
a
CIP
would
have
to
compete
for
CIP
like
shouldn't.
We
just
have
a
maintenance
program
that
we
would
do
things.
I
know
that
we've
been
trying
to
do
that
with
the
art,
public
art
programs
and
not
not
have
that
be
something
that
they're
competing
once
we
buy
something
we
should
maintain.
It
I
think,
is
the
the
sentiment.
So
is
that
is
that
something
it.
J
Is
that
I?
We
probably
should
find
out
more
about
this
or
get
someone
to
come
up
to
address
it,
because
we
I
think
that
the
general
fund
did
buy
some
equipment
to
maintain
these
areas.
Previously.
J
H
H
I
think
it
I
think
it's
both
since
it's
part
of
the
streets
division,
but
it's
also
public
right-of-way,
we'll
we'll
find
out
thanks.
Ben.
L
K
One
follow-up
Ben:
if
it's
possible
to
have
the
data
related
to
where
the
previous
budgets
are
in
terms
of
use
of
resources
and
if
there's
remaining
funds.
H
So
we
do
check
every
year
on
Old
CIP
accounts
that
are
older
than
three
years.
Okay
and
that's
part
of
the
council's
policy
for
CIP,
is,
if
you
haven't
constructed
it
in
three
years,
is
there
still
a
need,
or
was
it
finished
under
budget
this
year,
the
council
was
able
to
recapture
some
of
those
older
funds
and
make
them
available
for
these
new
projects.
I'll.
Send
you
more
information
on
that
after
great.
M
Good
afternoon,
this
application
for
CIP
was
submitted
in
coordination
with
Transportation
Transportation
has
submitted
this
application,
I'm
wondering
if
John
is
is
online,
but
if
not
I
can
give
a
little
bit
of
reference
to
what
this
funding
is
intended
to
to
do.
In
previous
years,
as
as
Ben
mentioned,
it
has
addressed
the
maintenance,
repair
and
replacement
of
certain
assets
that
are
present
on
the
streets.
M
Green
paint
for
bike
lanes
that
our
streets
division
is
not
currently
set
up
to
do
is
specialized
painting.
That
is
one
another
number
sizable
number
of
assets
on
the
right-of-way,
the
flexible
delineators.
These
are
some
that
you
will
see
on
300
South,
for
example,
300
East,
that
just
Define
certain
areas
and
and
those
are
not
in
the
inventory
of
streets
either.
M
So
all
of
these
are
addressed
are
maintained,
but
it's
a
different
pot
of
money
at
some
point
and
what
we,
the
current
effort
with
transportation,
is
to
inventory
all
of
those
assets
and
identify
if
it
makes
sense
or
not
to
bring
it
in-house
and
be
part
of
a
maintenance
program
in-house.
At
this
point,
all
of
these
are
are
contracted
up.
B
B
N
H
There
there
are
some
items
in
CIP
that
don't
go
through
the
competitive
process
and
it's
usually
for
CIP,
a
relatively
small
amount
of
funding,
200
300
000
for
Parks
maintenance
or
facilities
maintenance.
If
the
council
sees
this
as
similar
to
those
items,
you
could
ask
that
it
not
go
through
the
competitive
process
each
year,
so
there
is
funding
for
this
need.
I.
Think
that.
B
In
theory,
that
makes
sense
to
me
I'm
not
sure
like.
Perhaps
this
is
maintenance,
that's
four
years
earlier
than
it
really
needs
to
be,
or
it's
not
as
serious
as
we're
thinking
it
might
be.
So
that's
the
information
that
I'd
want
as
like.
B
How
bad
is
the
situation
right
now,
and
would
this
be
sort
of
Advanced
Maintenance
before
we
would
typically
maintain
things
or
are
we
about
to
like
not
be
able
to
know
that
there's
a
bike
lane
on
certain
streets
and
bikes
are
going
to
get
hit
by
cars,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
I
guess
I
need
to
know
the
severity
of
the
Deferred
maintenance
on
this
and
whether
or
not
we're
this.
If
funding
this
would
get
us
ahead
or
if
it
would
just
barely
keep
up,
I
think
is
the
difference
for.
G
Being
supportive
of
you
know,
maintaining
these
assets
I
mean
we
as
a
council,
we
talked
a
lot
about
the
investment
on
safer
streets
and
safer
Crossings
and
bike
lanes,
and
so
maintaining
them
once
the
Investments
were
made
is
key,
so
I
I
will
Echo
the
the
question
about.
Is
this
something
that
should
be
a
competitive
with
older
assets
and
maybe
not
and.
J
H
Number
41
some
council
members
may
recall
this
from
previous
years.
This
would
be
phase
seven
of
the
700
South
reconstruction
project.
This
was
previously
fully
funded
when
it
was
before
the
council,
but
inflation,
and
there
were
some
utilities
found
underground
that
were
not
expected
and
those
factors
increased
costs.
H
And
this
is
in
the
the
industrial
West
Side
it's
out
to
5600
West.
H
Next
is
number
42.:
it's
800,
South
1000
East
crosswalk
upgrade.
There
is
currently
a
rectangular
rapid
flashing
Beacon
at
this
intersection.
It's
near
multiple
schools.
This
request
is
to
upgrade
it
to
a
hawk
signal,
which
is
closer
to
like
a
regular
traffic
signal
where
it
has
the
overhead
arm,
and
it
has
like
the
light
with
multiple
signs.
So
it's
it's
more
expensive
than
just
the
rectangular
flashing
beacons
the.
H
G
G
For
hand-me-downs,
do
we
do
we?
Oh
I'm
back,
that's
scary,
whoa,
I'm,
gonna
stay
away
from
this
I,
so
yeah
I
mean
some
parts
of
the
city
have
been
asking
for
some.
You
know
some
of
this
for
many
many
years
and
and
I'm
also
not
talking
about
this
specific
intersection,
but
I
wonder
what
do
we
do
with
older
equipment?
You
know
like
this
square
ones
that
maybe
they
could
be
recycle
and
reuse
in
other
parts
of
the
city.
H
H
H
H
H
Number
45
is
Phase,
One,
Plaza,
349
life,
safety,
security
and
HVAC
upgrades
and
I
want
to
point
out,
while
it
has
a
requested
funding
amount
of
two
million
dollars.
This
is
a
follow-up
item
from
a
space
and
security
study
of
that
city
building
and
it's
scalable,
so
it
could
be
funded
in
smaller
amounts
over
multiple
phases.
It's
not
just
2
million
or
nothing.
So
if
like
a
like,
a
quarter
million
was
available.
That
would
still
be
able
to
be
used.
H
Number
46
is
implementation
of
safety
enhancements
to
west
side
of
Foothill
Drive,
and
this
involves
traffic
calming
improvements
to
five
different
locations,
and
this
is
also
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report.
One
of
the
projects
called
out
not
recommended
for
funding,
but
council
member
Dugan.
This
is
a
project
of
his
interest.
O
O
The
slope
of
the
I
would
say
the
streets
goes
down,
and
these
are
at
an
angle.
So
there's
a
couple
of
these
streets
where
you
could
actually
come
off
a
Foothill
like
40
miles
an
hour
and
not
even
hit
your
brakes
or
touch
your
brakes
and
exit
right
into
a
a
neighborhood
with
streets
on
that
intersection
and
there's
there's
six
intersect.
Five
intersections
and
one
is
really
critical
because
it
has
a
it's
a
strange
design
where
the
cross
street
you
have
to
stop.
O
But
then
you
have
to
pull
out
into
the
middle
of
the
intersection
for
coming
off
a
Foothill
so
that
you
can
actually
see
where
the
traffic
is
coming
off.
I
feel
to
go
back
on
Fidelity.
It's
a
weird
weird
way
to
explain
that
and
that's
right
in
front
of
Beacon
height,
not
in
front
of
but
half
a
block
away
from
Beacon
Elementary
School.
O
And
if
you
were
to
come
off
a
Foothill,
you
could
basically
come
off
Foothill
at
30,
40,
plus
at
the
speed
limit
off
Foothill
and
be
right
at
the
school
Crossings
with
the
matter
moments
because
you're
going
downhill
the
implementation
in
the
designs,
the
crests
have
been
out
there
for
years
and
I
know
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
money
here,
but
this
is
for
five
intersections.
O
There
would
be
a
possibility
to
to
break
it
down
with
the
one
intersection
being
the
the
highest
priority
and
that's
the
Blaine
2500
East
Foothill
Drive
one,
but
there's
a
couple
here:
if
you
did
it
right,
you
could
have
a
couple
there
that
all
have
that
same
design
for
the
design,
because
it's
a
again
it
was
designed
for
efficiency
of
moving
traffic,
not
for
safety,
and
these
are
critical
because
they're
coming
right
off
a
Foothill
doing
40
on
southbound.
Well,
that's
the
speed
limit
of
40.
they're
doing
usually
50..
O
So
that's
that's
the
push
for
me
on
this
fine
I.
Don't
ask
for
a
lot
of
things
on
this
thing,
but
this
is
a.
This
is
a
big
one
for
the
for
the
the
neighborhoods
on
that
west
side
of
Foothill
and
the
downward
down
slope
of
Foothill.
G
Sure
yeah
so
so
I
mean
obviously
keeping
kids,
especially
kids,
I
mean
any
person,
but
especially
Kids
Safe
they're
walking
alone.
Sometimes
it's
not
very
important
to
me
and
and
to
all
of
us
I
am
curious
to
know
how
much
would
a
hundred
thousand
make
on
this
on
that
intersection
alone,
but
also
the
second
question
to
that
is:
does
this
area
matches
with
the
map
that
the
administration
created
based
on
the
study
that
ranks
areas
by
color
on
needs
for
traffic?
Does
it?
What
color
is
this,
isn't?
G
O
I
mean
you
raise
a
good
point
for
that,
one
intersection:
the
estimate
was
170
000.
O
for
the
one
intersection
and
that
one
is
again:
yes,
it
doesn't
rank
as
high
as
the
red
categories
of
others,
but
it
it
has
a
very
serious
implication
just
because
over
the
last
couple
years,
with
the
increase
of
Foothill
traffic
and
the
speed
of
Foothill
traffic
going
to
those
kids
and
more
kids
walking
there,
that's
got
a
high
problem.
O
I
B
B
I
I,
don't
think
that
it's
if
we
continue
to
do
traffic
calling
based
on
where
the
requests
are
coming,
not
where
the
accidents
are
happening,
we're
going
to
be
missing
parts
where
accidents
are
happening,
but
the
community
is
not
empowered
to
be
asking
for
these
things.
So
that's
that
it's
hard
for
me
to
say:
let's
do
3.4
million
of
General
traffic
calming
dollars,
that's
going
to
go,
be
prioritizing
the
map,
but
let's
also
hand
pick
a
few
neighborhoods
can.
I
We
ask
a
little
bit
about
the
methodology
for
the
map
and
how
current
the
data
is,
because
I
I
do
respect
that,
and
you
know
me:
I
love
a
good
system,
but
oftentimes
Dynamics
can
change,
and
Dan
and
I
share
a
tragedy
where,
at
an
unlikely
spot,
a
young
girl
was
killed
in
his
district.
I
G
Will
support
that
and
maybe
increase
it
sorry
Mr
chair,
maybe
even
adding
more
funding
towards
the
traffic
coming
overall
I'm
saying
to
Administration.
If
this
you
demonstrate
that
this
meets
the
criteria,
go
for
it
again
being
an
external
Elementary
School
is
something
that
triggers
me
and
probably
triggers
all
of
us.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
a
safe
Crossing
as
a
safe
place
and
I
support
it.
But
these
questions
are
very
important
to
me
and
I
put
it
as
a
maybe
on
my
list
of
adding
I.
B
Believe,
we've
already
requested
to
have
scheduled
file
fact-finding
sort
of
follow-up
night
on
livable
streets
implementation
update
as
chair
Vice
chair.
So
that's
already
on
our
get,
hopefully
plan.
If
you
don't
know
that
yet
John,
we
are
going
to
ask
you
to
come
to
give
us
an
update
on
livable
streets
in
general.
But
if
there's
anything,
I
I
welcome
John
to
come
and
share
anything
if
he
has.
B
If
you
have
anything,
I,
don't
know
if
you've
been
listening
or
if
you
have
anything
to
update
us
on
on
right
now,
but
I
definitely
want
to
have
a
more
full
discussion
about
this
I
would
be
supportive
of
moving
some
of
our
money
into
traffic
calming.
So
we
we
added
money
into
CIP.
So
we
have
some
money
we
need
to
allocate
to
something.
I
would
be
supportive
of
putting
it
in
traffic.
B
K
Aside
from
having
a
better
understanding
of
when
the
data
is
collected
as
well,
what
types
of
considerations
are
going
into
the
conversation
of
traffic
calming
when
it
also
comes
to
increased
traffic
due
to
construction
and
just
kind
of
having
a
better
understanding
of
how
those
two
interplay
related
to
the
map
and
the
data
we
have
and.
O
Thank
you
and
I,
just
I
just
want
to
thank
you
very
much
I
like
the
discussion
here
and
I
really
liked
and
in
this
project
here
back
to
Mr
councilman,
please,
you
know
point
about
the
school
side
of
the
house.
These
are
this
one
is
at
right
next
to
the
school,
and
so,
unlike
some
other
school
districts,
where
the
there's
already
Street
calming
in
that
school
area,
this
is
going
from
40
to
25,
without
even
seeing
a
sign.
So
it's
not
like
it's
it's
already
in
an
area.
That's
well
marked
school's
off.
O
This
is
people
going
as
fast
as
they
can
and
then
they're
going
to
go.
Okay
I
need
to
exit
to
go
into
this
neighborhood
and
boom
I'm
going
down
the
street.
So
that's
where
the
concern
is
on
me
for
me
on
this
one
intersection,
because
it's
not
so
much
as
a
an
area
where
there's
already
plenty
of
markings
that
the
schools
here,
this
one's
coming
right
off
the
highest
speed
street.
We
have
on
the
west
side
on
the
east
side.
O
A
Trying
to
decide
which
which
questions
should
should
I
jump
into
first
I,
don't
even
know
if
you
heard.
B
Any
other
questions
so
I
think
that
we
are
looking
talking
specifically
about
the
foothill
I
know
that
there
was
also
a
question
on
the
Sugarhouse
safe
side
streets
that
we
talked
about
last
week
and
I.
The
one
question
the
councilman
Pui
asked
that
I
would
like
to
know
is:
where
do
those
two
projects
rank
on
the
map
and
the
other
question
that
is
also
relevant
is
when
was
that
map
created
and
how
often
is
updated?
Okay
and
if
you
need
to
come
back
at
our
fact-finding
agenda
item?
That's
also.
A
I
actually
I
have
I
have
the
detailed
map.
Let
me
just
grab
it.
B
I
know
that
traffic
calming
is
always
a
concern
and
always
a
high
priority,
I
I.
Think
for
me.
The
reason
why
trying
to
do
it
through
a
data-driven
process,
rather
than
a
constituent
informed
process,
is
that
it's
not
just
that.
B
We
have
a
different
number
like
that
traffic
incidents
are
different
in
areas,
but
it's
hard
to
say
like
we're
going
to
split
this
out
by
Council
District,
because
council
districts
have
vastly
different
number
of
Lane
miles
that
that
kids
and
families
can
come
into
contact
with
so
the
amount
of
money
needed
to
make
all
council
districts
safe.
If
we
split
a
dollar
amount
between
all
council
districts,
I,
just
don't
see
that
being
fair
to
all
the
districts
where
some
have
much
fewer
Lane
miles
than
others.
A
Yeah
so
the
the
area
for
this
constituent
request
for
the
West
Foothill.
It
looks
like
it's
probably
number
74
77.
out
of
Zone
priority
out
of
113.
113.
H
Color-Coded
map
is
attachment:
nine,
along
with
a
summary
of
the
livable
streets
program
and
the
accomplishments.
During
the
first
year,
John
is
looking
at
a
map-
that's
not
color
coded,
but
has
the
number
for
every
single
zone
in
the
city.
So
it's
a
different
way
to
show
the
same
data
I.
Don't
think
that
one
is
in
the
packet,
but
we
can
certainly
get
it
to
you.
No.
A
So
it
was
based
on
speed
and
crash
data
and
there's
a
pretty
strong
Equity
component
as
well,
so
it
favored
lower
income
zones
or
zones
with
census
blocks
with
higher
proportion
of
minorities,
so
that
was
also
factored
in.
B
A
So
this
was
funded
I.
Think
three
years
ago
there
was
funding
for
as
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
do
a
city-wide
analysis
of
what
it
would
take
to
implement
a
livable
streets
program,
and
so
it
we
developed
the
The
Zone
structure
and
then
the
prioritization
and
also
developed
a
toolkit
and
so
yeah
I
think
that
was
presented.
A
It
was
probably
fall
of
20,
20,
21
or
early
2022,
so
that
was
that
was
we
used
as
a
basis
for
the
development
of
this
new
livable
streets
program
prior
to
it
being
funded
in
last
year's
budget
and
then,
as
far
as
how
often
that
could
be
updated.
A
I
wouldn't
recommend
doing
it
like
too
often,
because
I
think
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
chaotic,
really
I
would
say,
probably
every
five
years
at
the
earliest.
Okay.
A
Yeah
I
think
so,
particularly
with
the
the
quick
action
funding,
and
you
know
that's
what
we
did
with
the
the
Sugarhouse
safe
side
streets
project
is,
you
know
it
wasn't
on
the
recommended
list
for
for
funding,
but
you
know
they're
kind
of
surrounded
by
construction,
either
existing
or
planned
projects,
and
so
we
looked
at
the
streets
that
were
most
likely
to
have
some
spillover
traffic,
and
so
we
did
some
temp
or
semi-permanent
traffic
calming
on
those
streets
and.
P
A
Nice
thing
with
that
is,
you
know,
they're
easy
to
move.
So
if,
if
we
decided
that,
maybe
we
needed
to
make
some
adjustments
or
maybe
it's
the
wrong
location,
it's
pretty
easy
to
fix.
Councilmember.
L
K
A
I
mean
they
definitely
could
be
I,
don't
think
that
they
have
to
be.
A
Yeah
they
just
find
out
around
them
right,
yeah,
I,
think
snow,
just
piles
up
yeah
all
around
them,
which
is
more
traffic
than
like
yeah.
Exactly
yes,
snow
snow
is
wonderful
traffic
calming
yeah,
but
we
also
we've
on
on
Emory.
Street
was
the
other
place
where
we've
done
the
the
the
concrete
barrels-
and
this
is
our
first
time
doing-
that
in
the
city
Portland's
been
did
hundreds
of
them
in
2020
during
the
pandemic
and
I
think
they've
been
pretty
popular
they've
done
it
on.
A
You
know
their
equivalent
of
neighborhood
byways,
so
in
a
lot
of
intersections
there
and
they
seem
to
be
working
really
well,
but
we
wanted
to
try
it
in
a
few
locations
and
kind
of
fine
tune
it
before
we
do.
Like
a
you
know,
a
really
broad
implementation,
but
I
think
that
there's
a
good
chance
we'll
be
seeing
them
in
many
neighborhoods
around
the
city,
Mr.
A
O
B
A
Yeah,
no
and
I
think
I
think
that's
one
of
the
values
of
them.
You
know,
and
it's
interesting
it'll
help
us
with
figuring
out.
Also
like
what's
popular.
You
know,
we
hear
a
lot
that
people
they
they
really
like
safety
and
they
like
traffic
calming,
but
they
don't
like
the
things
that
force
them
to
slow
down
and
so
the
the
challenges
that
that,
by
definition,
is
traffic
calming.
B
A
Slow
down
right,
but
you
know
I,
think
some
some
of
the
the
devices
or
implementation
methods
might
get
the
same
effect
but
be
maybe
less
annoying
in
doing
it
right,
and
so
that's
what
we
you
know
as
we
continue
to
to
implement.
A
We
want
to
do
more
of
those,
but
the
end
of
the
day.
You
know
safety
is
a
top
priority
and
and
I
think
it'll.
Take
a
culture
shift
for
people
to
learn
to
accept
that's
slowing
down.
It's
just
the
right
thing
to
do.
Mr,
chair,
yeah,
councilman,.
G
Quick
question:
I
I,
I,
I'm
thankful
about
the
Emory.
You
know,
implementation
of
this
quicker
devices
to
slow
on
traffic
I've
been
getting
quite
a
bit
of
messages
from
some
of
my
neighbors
about
how
they
look
and
I'm
wondering.
If
the
administration
have
thought
about
the
beautification
of
this
pipes,
I
mean
we
ask
you
for
those
and
we're
thankful
that
they're
there.
Thank
you.
If
not
I
don't
want
to
take
away
from.
You
know
how
big
of
an
accomplishment
that
is
and
how
fast
you
were
able
to
pull.
G
You
know
your
department
and
your
team
was
able
to
do.
This
is
thank
you
from
the
community.
Thank
you,
but
they
do
look
like
just
pieces
of
pipe
on
the
on
the
road
and
some
of
the
neighbors
are
like
well,
can
we
paint
them?
Can
we
do
mosaics
on
them
like
some
of
the
ones
downtown?
Can
we
put
plants
on
them
or
what?
What
is
it
next
to
make
them
look
less
construction,
Society.
A
Yeah
and
that's
I
mean
that
there's
no
funding
allocated
for
that
program,
it's
more
of
just
a
policy
Community
thing.
B
B
Imagine
the
community
to
get
involved
in
painting
bees
and
have
their
kids
on
the
street
come
whatever
like
be
part
of
that
project.
I
would
imagine
there
are
a
lot
of
communities
that
would
be
interested
in
doing
that,
so
I
would
love
it.
There's
some
way
that
they
could
just
say:
hey
do
I,
have
permission
to
paint
this
thing
and.
L
G
A
Yeah,
no
I
think
that
that's
that's
very
doable
and
I
I
think
it
could
follow
very
similar
policies
as
paint
the
pavement.
We
have
some
kind
of
some
policies
as
far
as
like
what
is
and
is
not
allowed
like.
We
don't
allow
words
or
anything
obscene
or
anything
that
could
be
confused
as
like
a
traffic
control
device
or
marking,
but
that
still
leaves
plenty
of
creativity
to
do
some,
some
pretty
cool
stuff,
but
one
of.
A
Councilman
Romano
one
of
your
earlier
comments,
maybe
a
month
or
two
ago
about
you
know,
maybe
our
default
is
we
could
paint
them
the
Salt
Lake
City
Blue.
A
So
that's
one
of
the
things
that
the
team's
looking
into
and
then
maybe
with
the
I
know
the
having
the
right
now
we
still
have
some
barricades
around
them
because
we
need
to
make
sure
at
night
that
they're
visible
and
so
we've
been
looking
at
you
know.
Maybe
you
could
do
like
some
white
stripes
on
the
top
and
bottom
or
things
like
that
to
help
with
the
the
nighttime
visibility.
A
So
it's
it
will
definitely
evolve
and
I
really
hope
that
it's
something
that's
engaging
and
maybe
even
a
little
bit
fun
that
the
community
can
take
some
ownership.
And
you
know
we.
We
really
want
it
to
be
an
open
dialogue
and
let
it
continue
to
evolve
thanks.
B
H
We're
on
47
page
22.,
okay
and
the
title
has
an
error.
It
says
fourth
West
and
Fourth
South.
It
should
be
fourth
North
and
the
description
is
correct,
but
the
title
is
wrong
and
we'll
update
that
for
the
final
funding
log
that
the
council
votes
on
next
month,.
L
H
H
There
are
projects
that
are
also
identified
for
receiving
funding
from
the
parks,
Bond
Madsen
Park
and
Richmond
Park
in
District
Four.
Those
are
the
two
that.
B
L
I
O
They're
they're
doing
work
right
now
to
do
the
irrigation
and
upgrade
on
the
because
they
had
it's
got
so
much
damage
on
the
that
water
side
of
the
house.
So.
O
O
Q
There
we
go.
This
is
Kristen
Riker
yeah,
so
that
funding
is
we're
going
to
request
funding
from
the
county.
For
that,
because
there
was
trucks
that
were
brought
in
by
the
county
that
ran
over
a
lot
of
the
irrigation
systems
and
broke
the
main
lines,
and
so
the
county
we're
gonna
we're
in
negotiations
with
the
county
on
what
that
can
look
like
for
them
paying
for
some
of
some
of
that,
but
yeah
the
playground
footings
are
undermined
the
irrigation
system.
A
lot
of
the
trees
are
not
doing
well.
Q
O
And
they're
working
on
it
right
now,
I
think
the
plan
is
to
have
it
done
by
the
end
of
the
summer
season,
but
it
is,
it
took
a
beating
and
it's
not
being
used
as
well
and
there's
a
lot
of
concerns
about
that.
But
yeah
there
is
work
on
the
on
the
aggregation
side
of
the
house
is.
H
From
the
county
or
in
budget
amendment
six,
the
council
did
approve
a
million
dollars,
but
a
lot
of
that
was
for
overtime
and
like
the
quick
response,
which
is
different
than
I,
think
what
Kristen
is
talking
about,
which
is
like
the
repair
of
the
asset.
Q
And
this
this
CIP
request
was
really
more
for
the
dog
park
and
looking
at
dog
park
options
up
there,
because
it
is
one
of
the
busiest
dog
parks
in
the
city.
There's
no
Gates,
there's
no
amenities.
It
was
originally
intended
to
be
a
time
limited
off
leash
dog
park
and
it's
being
used
24
hours
a
day.
Basically,
it's
very
busy.
H
Next
is
number
52:
it's
on
the
next
page,
Hanson
Avenue.
This
is
a
dead
end,
Street
off
of
300
West.
It
is
just
North
of
1700
South.
This
application
would
purchase
a
private
property
at
the
end
of
the
Dead
End
Street,
to
create
a
second
entrance.
H
O
Yeah,
just
for
Education
this
one.
This
is
the
street
that
the
design
of
it
and
this
and
the
big
camera
of
the
street
there's
some.
The
houses
on
the
South
Side
end
up
getting
flooding
from
the
runoff
coming
down
the
street
in
the
way
the
street
is
designed,
and
so
it's
kind
of
one
of
those
you
know
every
time
they
we
have
a
hundred
year
storm,
which
seems
like
we
have
one
every
year
that
they
it
gets
fun.
That's
why
the
requesters
for
this
one.
H
The
pavement
on
the
street
is
also
in
very
poor,
shape
got
it
next
is
54.
the
Sunny
Side
pickleball
courts.
It
would
be
adding
pickleball
courts.
There
are
not
currently
any
at
Sunnyside
Park.
I
H
H
H
This
would
be
to
install
a
patonk
court
or
several
courts.
H
Number
57
is
enzyme,
Peak
Nature,
Park
improvements.
This
is
also
a
item
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report.
Councilmember
Wharton
is
interested
in
funding
this.
It
would
install
a
security
fence
and
a
gate.
There
have
been
issues
with
use
of
the
area
after
hours,
sometimes
involving
criminal
activity,
sometimes
involving
risks
of
starting
fires,
and
so
the
intent
is
to
make
it
harder
for
those
nuisance
and
criminal
activities
to
occur
at
this
location.
B
D
Do
okay,
so
the
condition
it
says
is
rated
poor,
but
I
would
say
that
it's
failing
on
the
especially
on
the
safety
issues.
There
is
a
lot
of
crumbling
concrete
that
is
also
poor.
D
The
safety
issues
is
that
this
is
a
major
fire
risk
area
for
Capitol
Hill,
which
only
has
one
and
egress
once
you
get
past
behind
the
capital
and
on
East
Capitol,
Boulevard
and
and
then
there
have
been
fires
in
this
area.
For
you
know,
in
recent
years
there
were
three
your
ears
in
a
row,
I
think
2018
2019
and
20
20,
where
there
were
fires
in
the
area
in
Capitol,
Hill,
so
being
able
to
lock.
D
D
As
far
as
usage,
this
is
a
big
point
for
me.
That
I
think
is
not
captured
very
well
in
the
request.
I
mean
they
do
talk
about
the
thousands
of
visitors
each
year,
but
it
just
this.
It's
a
pretty
small
access
point
for
how
many
people
use
the
space,
and
it's
really
not
designed
to
accommodate
that
level
of
traffic.
D
It's
one
of
the
most
popular
hikes
among
locals
from
across
the
valley.
It's
a
popular
access
point
to
the
Western
end
of
the
Bonneville
Shoreline
Trail.
It's
the
closest
access
point
to
the
Foothills
chalicism
system
for
West
Side
residents,
and
it
it
really
is
just
a
big
chunk
of
crumbling
cement
and
some
flagpoles
at
this
point.
D
The
request
is,
is
for
the
low
low
price
of
two
hundred
and
ten
thousand
and
I'm
sure
that
I
know
that
the
neighborhood
is
already
stepped
up
to
volunteer
with
locking
the
fence
and
all
of
that,
so
that
that's
not
a
one
more
thing
that
Parks
has
to
worry
about,
but
we
could
probably
see
if
we
could
get
some
fundraising
to
assist
with
that
as
well.
B
D
B
D
I
think
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
like,
if
it's
a
gate
and
fencing
or
what
but
there's
like
the
main
area
that
you
kind
of
go
up
like
a
zigzag.
And
then
you
go
up
onto
the
trail,
so
I
don't
know
exactly
where
they
would
be.
Adding
that
and
there
might
be
fencing
involved
too
I'm
not
sure.
H
Yeah
I
believe
it's
it's
fencing
as
well
as
the
gate,
and
there
would
for
a
determined
hiker.
There
would
still
be
ways
to
get
there,
but
they
would
have
to
go
out
of
their
way
to
do
so,
since
their
private
property
on
either
side
of
the
trailhead,
the
fence
and
the
gate,
would
go
to
the
private
property
lines.
If
you
went
further
down
the
street
in
either
direction,
you
could
eventually
get
to
an
unfenced
area
to
get
to
the
top.
H
R
L
D
Yes,
it's
a
conceptual
request,
just
as
a
as
a
reminder,
you
know
not
that
this
necessarily
has
any
bearing,
but
I
didn't.
There's
no
projects
recommended
for
funding
this
year
in
District
three,
we
I
didn't
request
any
last
year
and
I
requested
one
the
year
prior,
but
not
the
year
before
that
so
and
then
the
one
that
I
did
requested
the
year
before
that
improvements
to
Lindsay
Gardens
was
re-scoped
and
downsized
to
save
us
money.
D
So
I
understand
that
we
have
a
lot
of
areas
around
the
city
that
are
also
very
much
in
need,
but
I
have
tried
to
be
Equitable
and
fair
in
building
up
to
this
request.
So
I
hope
that
you'll
consider
that
as
well.
G
My
question:
if
it's
a
constituent
request
or
Administration
request,
is
not
because
I
don't
think
it's
important
I
think
we
should
probably
find
the
money
for
this
I.
It
is
to
try
to
get
feedback
from
the
administration
about
how
doable.
All
of
this
is
I'm
sure
that
the
concrete
I'm
sure
they
would
love
to
have
the
funding
to
repair
and
maintain,
but
I
would
love
to
hear
you
know
from
the
administration
about
it,
but
yes,
I
I.
G
This
is
a
place
that
I've
been
very
recently
and
I,
seen
it
and
it's
very
much
used
with
very
much
use
and
very
well
attended,
So
yeah.
Thank
you.
H
So
number
58
is
11th:
Avenue
Park,
pickleball
expansion.
There
are
currently
six
pickleball
courts
there.
This
would
add
four
more
okay
and
the
one
to
Circle
back
on.
Since
we
have
new
council
member
young
with
us
is
Project
number
32,
the
Sugarhouse
safe
side
streets.
H
It
is
on
page
15
at
the
bottom
of
the
page,
and
this
this
is
part
two,
because
the
council
funded
a
similar
amount,
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
three
years
ago.
They
have
applied
since
and
were
not
awarded
funding
and
they
have
applied
again.
This
is
six
side
streets,
just
north
of
the
Sugarhouse
business
district.
H
K
Thank
you,
so
I
just
wanted
the
opportunity
to
address
my
fellow
council
members
and
note
that,
in
following
with
the
previous
conversation
with
council
member
Fowler,
I
would
like
to
also
say
that
we,
you
know
continue
to
I
continue
to
prioritize
this
related
to
the
needs
of
the
neighborhood
I.
Think
there's
a
couple
of
key
pieces
I'd
just
articulate.
First
and
foremost,
this
is
a
part
two,
so
the
council
did
indicate
support
related
to
part
one
in
terms
of
the
planning.
K
So
we
now
have
an
opportunity
to
take
action
on
that
plan.
I
think
as
well.
Looking
at
traffic
calming
being
a
priority
and
using
data-driven
decisions
is
super
important
to
me.
It's
equally
important
that
I
think
we
look
at
some
of
the
unintended
consequences
that
occur
when
we
engage
in
additional
road
construction
and
that
that
may
Place
additional
pressures
on
these
six
side
streets
that
didn't
previously
exist
related
to
Traffic
concerns
and
those
additional
areas.
K
Finally,
I'll
just
note
that
this
is
a
plan
in
place,
and
so
they
are
shovel
ready,
related
to
being
able
to
quickly
take
action.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
address
it.
As
a
new
council
member
I
appreciate.
B
B
H
B
H
How
do
we
be
trying
to
remember
unresolved
issues?
We
ended
the
annual
budget,
keeping
general
fund
balance
at
13
funding.
Our
future
fund
balance
is
higher,
I
think
it's
like
14
and
a
half
percent,
but
the.
O
H
So
I
I've
gathered
your
questions
today
and
yesterday
we'll
get
responses
from
the
administration
for
your
next
briefing
on
August,
8th.
Typically,
that's
when
the
council
will
try
to
balance
the
CIP
budget
between
items
of
console
interest
with
the
1.2
million.
That's
not
allocated
any
potential
funding
shifts
from
projects
that
were
recommended
for
funding
and
then
vote
on
the
15th.
So.
B
G
Yes,
man,
so
I
I
wanted
to
address
since
we're
still
discussing
this
and
there's
going
to
be
a
discussion
very
soon:
number
27,
North,
Temple
arts
and
tourists,
District
improvements,
I
I,
would
like
to
I
think
we
ask
a
few
questions
about
that:
I'm
very
interested
to
know
a
little
more
about
what
that
entails,
because
this
is
an
area
that
potentially
could
touch
us.
G
I
mean
not
only
attaches
two
districts,
but
it's
a
major
Corridor
for
the
for
the
city,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
challenges
in
the
area
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
are
putting
quite
a
bit
of
emphasis
in
this
area
to
try
to
curve
the
the
major
issues
that
we
have
on
North
Temple.
So
I
wanted
to
keep
it
high
in
the
priority
list.
For
me,.
L
B
H
Lot
so
the
five
projects
that
are
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report
that
council
members
want
to
fund
that
are
not
recommended
right,
a
little
over
1.4
million
dollars.
Okay,
so
it's
about
200
000!
More!
Can
you
tell
us
the
num
which
numbers
those
are
yeah?
It
is
project
number
21
and
councilmember.
Petro
said
that
she'd
be
interested
in
funding
the
traffic
calming
element,
the
driver
feedback
signs
this
year,
and
that
would
be
how
much
how
much
that
one
is
thirty
thousand
dollars.
H
H
H
At
the
last
meeting,
Tyler
Murdoch
said
that
the
funding
from
the
Geo
Bond
would
not
be
for
the
playground
it.
The
playground
is
certainly
eligible,
but
he
said
that
the
the
funding
for
the
playground
in
CIP
would
be
in
addition
to
the
improvements
from
the
bond
that
were
complicated
or
that
are
contemplated.
F
H
F
Not
clear
now
because
I
was
under
understanding
that
everything
will
be
covered
with
a
giovan
I,
miss
Tyler's.
Then
can
you
explain
again
then,
if
that's
okay,
to
go
over
that,
please.
J
S
H
Q
This
is
Kristen,
so
the
the
CIP
application
is
for
the
replacement
of
the
playground,
which
is
one
of
the
oldest
playgrounds
in
the
city.
Q
The
Geo
bond
is
this
is
reimagined
neighborhood
parks,
which
is
decided
to
activate
Parks
based
on
community
input,
and
so
we
would
be
doing
community
engagement
to
understand
how
we
could
activate
Richmond
Park
by
adding
more
amenities
or
improving
amenities
could
include
the
playground
and
you
can
see
the
playground
cost
if,
if
that's
what's
decided,
is
the
highest
priority
from
the
community,
so,
as
Ben
said,
If
This
Were
approved,
it
would
be
in
addition
to
any
amenities
that
the
neighborhood
might
want
for
the
Geo
Bond
in
Richmond
Park.
J
Just
clarify
so
if,
but
if
the
council
said
we
would
like
to
have
a
park
and
we
would
like
to
have
it
be
part
of
the
Bond
as
their
input
and
then
you
share
that
with
the
community,
the
community
could
say
community
could
say
no.
We
prefer
that
it
not
be
included,
but
it
I
mean.
Is
there
a
possibility
of
of
that
approach
or
I.
G
Okay,
Mr
chair
yeah,
so
just
to
clarify
just
some
of
the
530
thousand
dollars,
go
to
community
engagement
or
is
only
for
replacing
their
the
playground.
This.
G
On
the
community,
engagement
portion
of
this
will
be
funded
through
the
bond
or
through
other.
Q
So,
generally,
when
we
replace
something
you
know,
if
it's
a
straight
replacement,
we
don't
do
a
whole
lot
of
community
engagement.
We
would
do
some
with
a
playground.
We
would
get
the
kids
in
there,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
very
expensive
and
we
probably
handle
that
for
the
most
part
in-house
yeah,
because
it's
a
replacement
of
a
existing
amenity.
G
B
So
if
I
yeah
the
way
I'm
understanding
it
is,
there
is
money
allocated
to
this
specific
Park
in
the
bond.
We
don't
know
exactly
what
we'll
use
that
money
on,
because
we're
going
to
do
community
engagement
to
figure
out
what
is
necessary.
This
CIP
application
is
specifically
for
the
playground.
So
if
we
were
to
fund
the
CIP
application,
it
would
be
a
adding
more
money
to
that
Park,
but
saying
that,
regardless
of
what
the
communication
says,
the
playground
will
be
done.
That's.
F
H
F
So
basically,
what
we
could
do
here
is
say:
hey
instead
of
5
30.
Let's
do
212.
with
the
intention
that
it
has
to
go
to
the
playground
and
then,
with
the
bond,
supplement
the
rest
of
the
playground
plus.
Whatever
else
the
community
would
like
to
see
which
I
know
they
want
to
play
around
so
but
regardless
we'll
ask
again
and
we'll
get
that
answer
from.
H
J
F
You
have
a
lot
of
cash
to
do
of
impact
fees
cash
guys,
so
we
can
add
more
and
we
can
get
it
done
all
at
once
or
you
know
I'm
happy
to
be
frugal
and
combine
the
two
sources
of
income
so
that
we
can
do
more
stuff
in
other
areas.
D
Is
so
this
is
not
eligible
for
Parks
impact
fee?
Sorry,
my
request,
number
57
is
not
eligible
for
products.
Impact
fees
correct,
but
is
it
eligible
for,
like
any
any
other
pots
of.
H
Money
everything
is
eligible
from
the
general
fund
right.
H
I
wouldn't
say:
adding
a
fence
and
a
gate
is
necessarily
maintenance
of
an
existing
asset,
since
it's
adding
a
new
asset,
it's
not
eligible
for
the
Park's
impact
fees,
because
it's
not
increasing
the
level
of
service
or
adding
a
new
level
of
service
to
the
park.
Okay,.
Q
D
B
Okay,
I
went
through
and
marked
all
the
ones
that
I
noted
that
I
think
we
said
there
was
a
gap
in
four.
We
were
wanting
to
add
to
some,
not
we.
It
was
mentioned
that
there's
a
gap
in
four.
B
There
was
some
additional
potential
requests
for
number
six,
as
well
as
seven
and
then
I
have
marks
by
11
13
16
18
21,
22,
27,
32,
34,
40.,
42,
46,
53
and
57.
B
I've
just
marked
all
the
ones
that
council
members
had
talked
about
whether
or
not
they
said
that
they
wanted
to
but
I
had
we
talked
about
number
four:
has
a
400
000
Gap
number
six.
We
were
saying
that
that
wasn't,
potentially
not
enough
for
the
public
Way
Concrete
livable
streets
implementation
was
funded
at
about
half
of
what
was
requested.
B
So
that's
four.
Six
and
seven
I
have
number
11
and
I.
Don't
remember
why
I
marked
that
one
to
be
honest,
Three
Creeks,
West
roadways
on
number
13.,
Rose,
Park
and
Jordan
River
Recreation,
Hub
number
16.,
a
city-wide
restroom
planning,
study,
17.,
Madison
Park
was
discussed,
but
I,
don't
remember
where
we
landed
on
that
I
think
that
one
was
funded
in
the
Geo
Bond.
Until
we
took
it
out,
we
talked
about
Rose
Park,
Lane,
beautification,
Richmond,
Park,
Community
playgrounds.
B
We
just
talked
about
North
Temple
arts
and
tourism,
District
Sugarhouse,
safe
side,
streets,
part
two
Fred
and
Isla
Rose
Wetland
preserve
was
mentioned,
I,
don't
know
if
there
was
a
request
to
fund
that
no
okay,
34
number
40,
multimodal
Capital
maintenance.
We
talked
about
today
see
implementation
and
safety
enhancements
on
the
west
side
of
Foothill
Drive
councilmember
Dugan
mentioned
the
Nevada
Street
reconstruction
number
53
and
then
councilmember
Wharton
mentioned
57
enzyme,
Peak
Nature
Park
improvements.
B
O
F
B
I
I
feel,
like
my
signs
on
Rose
Park,
Lane
right,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
stick
to
those
I'm
also
interested,
as
is
council
member
Pui
in
the
North
Temple
District,
especially
as
it
relates
to
Folsom
Trail,
whichever
what's
what's
the
number
on
that
is
that.
B
I
H
The
other
question
was
since
the
project
area
includes
the
Folsom
Trail
and
the
first
issuance
of
the
parks
bond
has
five
million
dollars
to
complete
the
Folsom
Trail.
What
elements
of
the
project
could
be
Bond
funded
yeah,
so
it
could
be
another
opportunity
to
combine
CIP
in
the
bond.
That
would
be
very
good.
B
I
D
B
I,
actually
don't
have
a
request.
I,
don't
I
believe
that
none
of
these
are
my
requests.
What
I
would
like
to
do
is
fund
livable
streets
implementation
to
a
higher
degree.
Is
that
number
seven
number
seven
is
the
one
that
I
would
like
to,
and
that
again
is
what
we
talked
to
earlier
is
funding
more
city-wide
and
not
necessarily
choosing
which
specific
streets
get
funded
today,
but
putting
more
money
into
the
general
pot
for
livable
streets.
I
think
is
my
priority.
G
B
Does
that
give
you
enough
direction
to
come
back
next
time
and
help
us
make
sense
of
what
we
just
asked
for?
Yes,.
H
B
That
sounds
good
to
me.
Thank
you,
Ben,
okay,
council
members.
Are
we
good
to
move
on
to
the
next
item?
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
help.
Ben
all
right.
Moving
on
to
item
number
three,
which
is
follow-up
discussion
about
an
ordinance
for
foam
form-based,
Urban
zoning
number
three
form
form
based
and
I,
see
Nick
tar
bit
and
two
from
Council
policy
staff
to
give
us
an
update,
Nick,
Norris
and
Daniel
from
the
planning
division.
U
Okay,
thank
you
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
follow-up
briefing
on
the
fleet,
block
zoning
amendments
and
the
disposition
strategy
for
the
fleet
block
the
F.
The
the
zoning
amendments
consist
of
two
items:
the
creation
of
the
fbun
3
text,
Amendment,
which,
if
adopted,
would
become
code
in
the
city
ordinance
and
then
the
zoning
map,
which,
if
adopted
the
fleet
block,
would
be
rezoned
to
FB
un3.
Can
you
hear
me
with
the
feedback?
Sorry
I
can't
tell
bring
a
little
closer,
so
this
is
a
follow-up
from
The
Briefing.
U
The
council
had
in
November
of
last
year,
where
you
conducted
a
series
of
straw
polls
and
provided
direction
to
the
administrative
staff
on
the
drafting
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
development
strategy
for
the
block.
Since
that
time,
the
Administration
has
worked
to
incorporate
those
changes
into
the
proposal
before
the
case,
and
they
are
now
asking
that
you
review
the
text,
Amendment
changes
that
were
made
and
consider
moving
forward
with
that
and
as
well
as
moving
forward
with
the
disposition
strategy.
N
So
with
this,
the
council
can
adopt
the
text
of
the
ordinance,
creating
the
zone
and
then
later
map
The
Zone,
with
the
separate
ordinance
as
part
of
the
split.
We
also
made
some
technical
corrections
to
align
the
code
with
other
code
updates.
The
council
has
adopted
in
recent
years.
Examples
of
those
are
the
downtown
Zone
updates
and
the
tech
land
use,
updates.
N
So
the
Beyond
these
changes,
the
council
requested
information
on
a
suggestion.
The
Planning
Commission
had
related
to
property
size
limits,
so
the
current
code
limits
the
size
of
buildings
along
a
street.
It
imposes
a
200
foot,
maximum
building
length
limit
and
that's
about
a
third
of
a
downtown
block
phase.
N
The
Planning
Commission
suggested
exploring
the
property
size
limits.
In
addition
to
this
building
length
limit,
their
concern
was
that
one
or
two
buildings
could
take
up
the
entire
fleet
block
and
an
example
of
a
property
size
limit
could
be
something
like
limiting
properties
to
a
maximum
of
two
and
a
half
acres
in
size.
N
So
we
did
explore
property
size
limits,
but
we
think
the
building
length
limit
better
and
more
directly
limits
building
size
than
a
property
size
limit,
and
it's
consistent
with
how
we
limit
building
size
in
our
other
downtown
zones
with
property
size
limits.
We
also
run
into
an
issue
that
already
existing
large
properties
would
generally
be
legally
Exempted
from
compliance
and
could
just
be
developed,
as
is
as
legal,
non-compliant
properties.
N
B
O
Just
I'm
gonna
thanks
for
that
explanation
on
the
sis
and
I
like
the
way
the
Stratford
report
was
written
because
it
was
I,
could
understand
it
really
easily.
So
I
appreciate
that
I'm
more
on
the
Open
Space
Center
house
on
the
fbn
three,
the
open
space
is
10
and
maybe
I
was
a
little
confused
or
on
the
but
we're
not
including
rooftop
as
open
space.
Is
that
true,
rooftop
gardens
would
not
be
included
or
would
be
included.
O
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
including
the
rooftop,
because
it's
really
not
Public
Access,
it's
usually
just
residential
access,
so
I'd,
rather
just
look
at
the
public
access
being
something
that
you
could
walk
on
to
from
the
street.
Instead
of
having
to
go
into
a
building
to
go
up
to
the
rooftop
and
I
know,
that
was
just
a
very
small
percentage,
because
it's
not
I
mean
rooftops,
not
gonna,
be
that
big,
but
it
still
adds
to
the
open
space
and
I'd
rather
have
it
on
the
ground
floor
or
the
ground
gotcha.
B
O
Publicly
available
and
I
understand,
yeah
you're
right
I
understand
that
yeah.
Just
thank
you
for
that
clear
clarification.
I
agree.
There
I
just
think
that,
even
if
it's
private
space
on
the
ground,
it's
still
more
activated
compared
to
the
rooftop,
because
even
if
you're,
if
you're
at
your
single
family,
home
you're
in
your
front
yard,
it's
private
area
but
you're
sitting
there
in
your
yard,
and
you
can
actually
talk
to
the
neighbors
as
they
walk
by.
But
if
you're
on
your
rooftop
you're
not
gonna,
be
talking
to
anybody
because.
W
O
Just
gonna
be
talking
to
whoever's
in
your
house,
so
it's
never
really
not
activating
the
communications
with
it
with
the
the
residents
and
people
that
are
walking
by
in
your
front
yard,
Vice
on
your
rooftop.
So
that's
where
I'm
looking
at
it
as
more
of
a
engagement
of
the
whole
neighborhood.
Even
though
you
are
on
your
private
property,
you
can
still
engage
with
people
seen
in
your
Mom's
chair,
while
people
walking
by
the
street.
That's
where
I
was
looking
at
the
not
including
the
open
space
on
the
rooftop.
O
So
is
there
did
you
have
a
proposal,
then
my
proposal
would
be
that
you
would
not
include
the
open
space
on
the
rooftop
as
part
of
your
open
space
requirements.
B
F
N
B
X
So
we
use
it,
the
open
space
area
can
be
a
number
of
basically
different
things,
including
vegetation,
but
it
can
also
include
things
like
patios
and
other
types
of
things.
Our
our
definition
of
landscape
is
pretty
Broad,
and
it
includes
everything
that
you
might
find
in
a
landscape
whether
living
materials
or
not.
Yeah,.
B
F
F
N
F
F
You
know
like
some
of
the
buildings
on
far
south
that
we
wanted
them
at
some
point
really
a
lot
because
of
the
tracks
line,
but
the
flip
block
seems
a
little
bit
different
right
now
to
you
know,
to
have
the
same
thing
happen
there,
which
is
not
the
most
attractive
thing
that
we've
done
so.
N
A
lot
of
those
buildings
on
four
South
were
developed
before
we
implemented
changes
to
the
building
length
limit,
so
those
buildings
were
allowed
to
be
300
feet
per
plus,
even
bigger,
but
at
one
point
I
think
it
was
2015.
We
reduced
that
to
200
feet
and
that's
kind
of
been
the
standard
for
our
zones.
It's
a
200
foot
limit.
If
someone
wants
to
go
beyond
that,
they
have
to
go
through
either
a
design
review
process.
It's
generally
the
process.
N
F
X
I
was
going
to
just
reiterate
what
Daniel
said
about
those
changes
and
I.
Think
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
buildings,
including
one
that
the
city
was
involved
with
just
east
of
the
library
block,
that's
over
well
over
200
feet
as
well,
and
the
ground
floor
is
almost
all
completely
active,
at
least
on
400
South,
so
I
think
there's
a
different.
It's
it's
a
challenge.
X
It's
one
of
the
things
that
triggers
a
lot
of
our
design
reviews
is
people
wanting
to
exceed
that
200
feet
and
so
I
think.
One
of
the
benefits
of
how
this
is
written
is
that,
even
if
somebody
wants
to
exceed
it,
there's
still
those
percentages
that
kick
in,
and
so
hopefully
we
can
hold
them
to
a
higher
standard
if
they
want
to.
If
somebody
wants
to
do
a
bigger
building
than
what
we
anticipate
by
the
code.
Okay,.
B
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
get
what
councilman
Dugan's
talking
about
with
the
open
space.
I
may
be
open
to
considering
some
changes
on
that
I.
Do
think
that
what
we're
doing
here
I
mean
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
way
I'm
conceptualized.
This
in
my
mind,
is
that
this
is
really
kind
of
a
downtown
ish
Zone.
B
It
allows
quite
a
bit
of
height
and
quite
a
bit
of
density,
and
so
it
seems
like
that
open
space
that
we'll
talk
about
in
about
five
minutes
that
that
the
city
will
put
on
the
city-owned
property
is
really
what's
going
to
be.
The
open
space
for
that
Community
and
I
I
may
be
open
to
like
a
certain
percentage,
like
maybe
half
of
that
required.
10
open
space
needs
to
be
on
ground
level,
or
something
like
that.
I
would
want
to
know
what
staff's
thoughts
are
on.
B
That
I
would
probably
not
be
open
to
having
all
the
whole
amount
be
required
on
the
ground
floor
just
because
they
think
that's
a
back
doorway
into
just
limiting
density
in
that
area
and
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is
and
I'm
not
saying
that's
what
you're
intending
to
I'm
just
saying
I
think
that
the
effect
of
that
would
be
that
it
just
limits
density
in
an
area
that
really
makes
sense
for
some
density.
To
me.
O
O
And
when
you
go
to
some
big
cities
yeah,
they
have
high
density
because
they
go
up,
but
they
also
have
some
nice
green
spaces
that
are,
you
know,
Courtyards
in
the
back
of
that
the
back
of
the
building
or
the
front
of
the
buildings
and
those
really
activate
the
neighborhood,
even
if
it's
your
private
property
they're
still
activating
neighborhood,
because
you
can
walk
out
talk
to
your
friends
who
are
walking
by
the
streets
instead
of
being
on
a
rooftop.
That's
where
I'm
trying
to
stand
it
as
the
density.
O
I,
yes,
I
totally
agree
with
the
density,
but
I
also
looking
to
go
boy,
it's
nice
to
have
that
Breathing
Room
space
down
where
you're
actually
activated
and
engaging
with
the
other
public,
your
friends
who
are
walking
on
the
streets
and
not
not
on
on
your
rooftop.
So
that's
that's!
That's
my
only
point
now.
O
Yes,
I'm
open
to
hey,
but
you
know
because
the
rooftop
could
be
a
big
portion
of
your
open
space
because
that's
a
big
portion
of
you
know
that
could
be
a
lot
40
of
your
100
so
back
to
20
your
10.
So
it
would
be
nice
to
maybe
even
shrink
that
just
so
we
have
just
activation
space
downstairs
where
people
across.
B
The
border
I
guess
what
I'm
not
interested
in
is
requiring
open
space
on
the
ground
level
adjacent
to
the
street,
because
our
roads
are
already
very
large
there
and
the
oak,
like
the
road
itself,
should
be
the
space
that
people
are
engaging
in
and
I
really
do
want
those
buildings
to
be
pulled
up
to
the
property
line
and
up
to
the
the
street.
So.
O
And
I
I
understand.
That's
part
two!
Yes,
it's
not
your
front
yard
of
your
lawn,
because
this
is
the
building
downtown,
but
there
are
some.
There
is
some
I'll
give
it
to
the
the
developers,
the
use
of
their
imagination
or
how
they
would
actually
better
down
there
Vice
upstairs
up
on
the
roof
and.
B
I
think
that
the
things
that
are
put
in
here,
like
the
percentage
of
commercial
versus
residential
versus
non-transparent
or
whatever,
that
diagram
that
Daniel
just
showed
us
to
me,
is
what
work.
What
accomplishes
the
street
activation
and
I
think
that's
the
intention
of
those
those
requirements
is
to
do
the
street
activation
exactly
so,
I
don't
want
I'm,
hesitant
to
change
the
open
space
requirement
without
really
thinking
it
through,
because
I
think
there's
already
a
tool
to
do
what
what
you're,
asking
for
and
I
think
changing
that
could
unintentionally
reduce
the
density
of
the
area.
B
So
anything
we
can
do
to
get
our
get
that
area
more
quickly.
Moved
away
from
General
commercial
will
be
better
for
that
area.
So
I
I,
hope
that
regret.
Once
we
figure
out
a
couple
of
these
details
that
we'll
at
least
adopt
the
ordinance
and
regardless
of
what
happens
to
that
specific
City
on
parcel
That's,
My
Hope,.
F
F
F
X
W
Y
X
Yeah
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
to
bring
up
is
while
this
is
technically
called
The
un3
Zone,
when
you,
if
we
have
to
make
any
other
alterations,
we're
probably
going
to
change
the
name
of
it,
so
it
builds
some
space
for
additional
form-based
zones.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about
is
looking
at
how
to
consolidate
zoning
districts,
and
we
have
we're
actually
pretty
far
along
on
converting
a
lot
of
our
commercial
zones
to
a
form-based
zone.
X
So,
instead
of
having
to
come
back
and
make
a
technical
name
change
and
a
zoning
map
change
to
a
new
un
District,
even
though
the
regulations
are
all
the
same,
we
might
build
that
into
this.
Depending
on
what
your
adoption
schedule
is
like
for
you.
So,
for
example,
we
may
have
eight
form-based
zones.
This
one
would
probably
maybe
like
six
instead
of
three
and
that
builds
some
space
for
some.
B
X
B
B
I've
always
had
a
little
bit
of
a
hard
time
with
zoning
ordinances.
That
say
this
is
the
number
of
feet,
because
whether
it's
appropriate
is
so
dependent
on
the
scale
of
the
street
and
the
buildings
around
it
and
the
block
size
and
everything
else
and
how
tall
it
is,
and
so
just
like
a
hard
number's,
always
been
a
little
bit
difficult.
B
I
do
think
the
200
number
that
we've
sort
of
settled
on
in
the
downtown
area
doesn't
seem
like
it's
been
that
hard
to
accomplish
and
does
seem
like
it's
gotten
mostly
what
we
want
so
I,
don't
the
answer
is
I
think
it's
an
imperfect
tool,
but
we've
probably
got
the
best
number
we
can
in
using
that
imperfect
tool.
Sorry,
if
you,
if
you
disagree,
please
let
me
know,
but.
O
To
me,
it
sounds
like
I
think
I
would
agree.
I'd
also
agree
that
you
know
the
street
activation
is
already
part
of
that.
I
mean
that
200
feet
goes
quickly
if
you're
you're
activated,
if
it's
just
a
wall
with
nothing
there.
Yes,
then
it's
like.
Oh
my
God,
there's
a
wall,
but
if
it's
activated
and
you
have
a
store
there,
you
have
a
you
know
a
bar
there.
G
No
I,
you
know
this
is
something
that
is,
in
my
opinion,
welcome
the
activation
side
of
of
the
on
the
activation
side
of
this
issue.
I
think
I'm
very
supportive,
I'm
100
there
we
saw
it
in
Cincinnati
and
how
much
the
the
downtown
and
those
areas
were
active
and
you
know
thriving
and
what
the
role
of
their
their
version
of
the
RDA
and
the
city
had
on
this.
M
I
I
think
it
depends
on
what
the
function
of
the
open
space
is.
If
the
function
is
to
promote
public
engagement,
then
it
makes
sense
if
it's
just
to
make
sure
we're
not
creating
cement
blocks
that
are
unapproachable
and
it's,
irrespective
whether
it's
for
a
resident
or
for
the
public,
then
I
have
no
problems
with
it.
O
This
is
not
taken
away
from
the
rooftop
bar.
You
can
still
have
your
rooftop
garden.
I
mean
the
building
can
have
rooftop
garden,
whether
the
ground
floor,
I'm,
just
activating
I'm
just
opening
up
the
space
on
the
bottom
because
still
has
a
rooftop
garden.
There's
it's
not
prohibiting
that.
It's
just.
I
N
N
O
Not
hearing
and
I
and
I
totally
like
the
idea
of
the
rooftop
I'm,
not
gonna,
I,
love,
rooftops
I'm,
and
for
that
I'm.
Just
saying
that
the
activation
side
of
the
house,
the
private
side
of
the
house
on
the
ground
floor,
because
people
walk
into
your
building,
you
can
walk
out
to
the
park
right
there.
Instead
of
having
to
go
all
the
way
to
the
you
live
on
the
third
floor,
you
got
to
go
all
the
way
to
the
15th
floor
to
be
act
on
the
park.
O
O
There's
a
different
feel
for
that
compared
to
be
on
the
rooftop
and
that's
at
the
activation
side
of
the
house,
and
that's
where
I'm
saying
we
have
a
lot
of
people
with
a
lot
of
downtowns.
We
don't
have
any
space
to
breathe
down
below
it,
so
the
rooftop
is
still
there.
They
can
always
do
that
and
they
should
just
don't
add
that
to
the
10..
Just
my
thought.
B
O
B
B
It's
already,
it's
already
been
decided.
It's
already
decided,
yeah.
Okay,
I
have
a
five
to
two
with
council
member
valdemarsen
council
member
Dugan
voting
yes
and
the
rest
voting,
which
means
I,
think
we
move
forward
with
as
proposing.
Can
you
make
the
name
change
at
a
different
time?
Yeah,
because.
X
B
B
Z
Hi
Tammy
great
thanks.
Oh
no
problem
we'll
be
quick.
I
know
we're
in
between
your
break
starting
off,
since
we
last
briefed
the
council,
a
multi-departmental
team
with
representatives
from
the
mayor's
office,
the
Arts
Council
public
lands,
sustainability
and
community
and
neighborhoods,
including
planning
and
transportation
and
Real
Estate
Services,
have
been
collaborating
on
the
future
of
the
fleet.
Block
we've
considered
Community
input,
we've
reviewed,
adopted,
City
plans
and
policies,
we've
studied
technical
factors
and
taken
the
council's
policy
Direction
into
account.
Z
The
result
is
the
development
framework
that
we
are
presenting
and
proposing
today,
and
this
presentation
represents
a
collaborative
effort
and
we
have
representatives
from
multiple
departments
here
to
help
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
next
slide.
Please
quick
property
overview.
As
you
know,
the
property
is
8.75
Acres
that
the
city
owns
it's
between
800
and
900,
South
and
300,
and
400
West.
It's
well
situated
Southwest
to
downtown
in
The,
burgeoning
Granary
District
west
of
central,
ninth
and
technically
in
the
ballpark
Community
Council
boundary.
Z
During
our
previous
briefings,
you
all
the
council
provided
policy
direction
that
the
property
be
offered
through
multiple
procurement
opportunities,
rather
than
through
one
rfqrp
to
a
single
developer.
The
intent
of
this
is
to
not
only
incorporate
public
benefits
such
as
affordable
housing,
affordable
commercial
space
and
public
space
into
the
development,
but
to
also
market
and
develop
it
develop
the
property
in
a
way
that
is
more
accessible
to
an
inclusive
group
of
Partners.
Z
Next
slide,
please
So.
Currently,
the
administration
is
requesting
that
the
council
one
approved
the
rezone
as
the
rezone
must
be
finalized
prior
to
initiating
an
RFQ
or
P
process
to
ensure
that
procurement
processes
are
based
on
an
approved
zoning
District
2
to
indicate
support
for
the
size
and
location
of
the
public
space
and
the
Department
of
Public
Lands
will
return
to
the
council
at
a
later
date
to
formally
designate
the
public
space
as
either
a
Public
Square
or
park,
and
then,
lastly,
to
provide
any
policy
Direction
on
the
development
plan.
Z
The
Department
of
community
and
neighborhoods
will
lead
the
effort
to
subdivide
the
property
and
prepare
the
development
sites
for
an
rfqrp
process.
If
the
council
indicates
support
for
the
location
of
the
fleet,
block
public
space,
public
lands
will
initiate
a
thorough
planning
process
for
the
design
and
development
of
that
public
space.
This
process
will
build
on
the
engagement
work
that
has
already
been
completed
through
reimagined
nature
and
the
art
healing
efforts
related
to
the
murals.
Z
Among
other
efforts,
the
Arts
Council
will
also
be
involved
in
this
engagement
effort,
as
it's
in
as
it's
contemplated
that
there
will
be
a
significant
presence
of
art
throughout
the
public.
Space
subsequently
can
will
lead
the
effort
to
subdivide
the
property
and
prepare
those
sites
for
development,
and
each
RFQ
or
P
process
will
have
its
own
public
engagement
effort.
Z
Y
Thank
you
so,
as
Blake
stated,
we've
considered
council's
previous
policy,
Direction
public
input
development
constraints
and
adopted
City
policy
when
establishing
this
proposed
site
plan
to
review
City
policy
that
informed
the
site
plan,
especially
for
our
new
council
member,
the
in
adopted
policy.
It
calls
for
2.5
to
3
acres
of
open
space
on
the
fleet
block
that
must
be
on
a
corner.
Y
We
also
have
policies
and
plans
that
call
for
a
green
Loop
that
circumvent
the
downtown
area
and
that's
contemplated
to
be
running
along
900
South
and
then
also
mid-block
connections
are
contemplated
through
adopted
City
policy.
That
would
divide
the
block
into
four
quadrants
during
the
last
briefing
I
believe
that
was
back
in
April.
Y
We
brought
forward
a
contemplated
development
scenario
and
we
at
that
time
were
contemplating
the
potential
of
putting
the
park
space
on
the
northeast
corner.
The
council
gave
a
lot
of
great
feedback.
We
were
contemplating
this
because
of
the
community
initiated
murals
that
began
on
that
corner.
We
felt
like
dedicating
that
space
as
public
and
perpetuity
would
be
a
great
way
to
honor
that
corner
and
then
also
there
are
high
voltage
power
lines
along
800
South.
That
may
impede
development
a
little
bit
along
that
Corridor.
But
we
take.
Y
We
took
the
council's
feedback
and
we
really
went
back
as
a
team.
It
was
can
and
all
of
the
different
departments
and
divisions
that
Blake
talked
about,
and
we
re-looked
at
the
property
and
all
of
the
considerations,
and
we
are
now
proposing
the
site
plan
that
you
see
up
on
the
screen.
So
we
are
now
proposing
the
park
or
the
park
or
open
space,
the
or
a
Public
Square
on
the
Southeast
corner
and
one
of
the
driving
factors
that
really
made
us
want
to
propose
this
location
is.
Y
We
did
shade
and
Shadow
analysis
and
determine
that,
especially
what
the
height
proposed
through
the
zoning.
This
space
will
be
sunnier
in
the
winter
and
will
provide
more
of
a
year-round
opportunity
to
use
the
park.
In
addition,
as
we
talked
about
in
the
last
meeting,
it's
also,
there
are
great
synergies
with
the
nine
line
and
the
proposed
green
Loop.
That
will
be
along
that
Corridor,
with
locating
two
of
the
development
sites
along
the
800
South
Corridor
and
those
high
voltage
power
lines.
Y
Y
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
there's
just
another
view
of
the
proposed
open
space
and
the
next
slide.
We
can
talk
about
some
budget
considerations.
It
was
back
in
January
of
2022.
The
administration
had
the
property
appraised
it
appraised
for
37.5
million.
At
that
time
the
market
has
been
fluctuating,
so
that
appraisal
is
a
little
bit
out
of
date
and
also
that
appraised
amount
does
not
consider
the
environmental
remediation
costs
that
will
need
to
be
put
into
or
mediating
the
block.
Y
But
if
we
look
at
the
considered
or
the
proposed
site
plan
and
the
considered
uses,
46
percent
of
the
block
would
be
dedicated
to
public
space.
This
equates
to
over
17
million
of
the
land
value
being
dedicated
to
public
space
between
the
mid-block
connections
and
the
open
space.
Y
If
we
combine
that
with
the
6
million
bond
that
has
been
dedicated
to
the
open
space,
that
would
be
an
initial
city
of
investment,
already
of
23
million
to
the
open
space
between
the
parks,
the
land
value
for
the
park,
the
mid
block
and
then
the
bond
that's
already
committed.
So
that's
great,
a
great
head
start
for
the
city,
Tammy.
L
B
Y
Y
Y
The
first
option
is
to
sell
the
property
and
utilize
sales
proceeds
as
capital
investment
to
build
on-site
public
benefits.
So
the
pro
of
this
model
is
that
you
there's
a
land
sale.
You
get
up
front
cash.
We
could
use
that
for
environmental
remediation
or
to
actually
construct
some
of
the
improvements,
whether
it
be
infrastructure
or
affordable
housing.
Y
Y
The
con
of
this
scenario
is
you're
not
getting
upfront
cash
to
invest
in
the
development
of
the
block,
but
you
would
be
getting
lease
Revenue
over
time
and
that
lease
Revenue
could
actually
be
used
to
direct
to
other
city-wide
programs
such
as
affordable
housing
or
it
could
be
kept
and
generated
revolving
in
programs
on
site,
whether
it
be
to
fund
like
reduced
rent
for
residents
and
commercial
space
or
programming
of
the
public
space
or
ongoing
meetings.
Y
Just
really
brief,
I
know
we're
running
out
of
time,
but
next
slide
are
some
other
development
considerations
touching
on
the
environmental
remediation
we've
discussed
this
before.
But
one
update
is,
is
that
the
sustainability
department
is
currently
working
with
Utah's
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
on
an
application
to
the
EPA
brownfields
program
for
additional
site
assessment
work,
and
if
awarded
this
funding,
it
will
help
inform
the
development
process
as
we
move
forward.
Y
We
are
also
looking
at
ways
to
fund
the
mid-block
infrastructure,
whether
that
be
through
a
land
cell
with
getting
that
upfront
revenue
or
coming
back
with
a
CIP
request
and
we're
also
evaluating
the
pros
and
cons
of
an
RFQ
versus
an
RFP
and
RFQ
would
really
allow
us
to
focus
on
establishing
a
partnership
with
the
development
team.
That
has
the
ethos
that
aligns
with
the
city,
whereas
an
RFP
process
would
focus
on
selecting
a
particular
proposal
that
includes
specific
design
and
and
financing
proposals.
Y
The
next
slide
is
about
equity
and
inclusion,
and
we've
talked
about
this
in
previous
discussions
with
having
an
inclusive
selection
committee,
doing
community
benefit
agreements
and
tracking
specific
metrics
and
outcomes.
So
I,
don't
think
I
need
to
go
into
great
detail
on
that
at
this
time
we
can
open
it
up
for
questions
and,
as
Blake
said,
we
have
a
team
of
people
across
the
city
who
have
been
working
on
fleet
block
behind
us
who
are
here
to
answer
specific
questions.
If
there
are
some.
B
Thank
you,
Tammy
I,
before
opening
up
a
question,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
inviting
me
into
the
working
group
for
this
and
I
know:
I
wasn't
100
in
attended.
So
sorry
when
I
missed
them,
but
thank
you
for
letting
me
be
part
of
that
and
I
will
say.
I
was
probably
pretty
squeaky.
The
first
time
we
talked
about
this
and
had
a
lot
of
Demands
and
I
feel
really
hurt.
So
thank
you.
So
much
for
listening
to
us,
I
think
you're
right
about
the
open
space
being
on
the
south
corner.
B
I
think
the
analysis
the
administration
did
is
right
on
right
on
and
that
that
is
the
right
place
for
it.
It
does
seem
to
me,
like
that's
the
right
place
for
the
open
space.
So
I
agree
with
your
assessment
there,
but
with
that
council
members,
questions
or
thoughts.
O
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
appreciate
it.
I
agree
with
the
southeast
corner.
I
think
that's
a
great
call
on
making
that
the
open
space,
the
question
about
whether
we
sell
or
ground
lease
that's
what
I'm
gonna
yeah
I'm
I
like
the
idea
that
the
city
owns
it.
So,
let's
lease
it
because
then
we
have
that
long-term
Revenue
source
to
provide
other
places
for
the
long-term
future.
But
I
also
understand
that
the
idea
about
the
remediation
could
be
expensive
and
that
could
be
long
term.
O
But
but
at
the
same
time,
if
developers
want
to
develop
that
area,
then
they
would
probably
be
also
maybe
willing
to
figure
out
how
we
work
together
to
remediate
us
as
quick
as
possible
because
they
don't
want
to
sit
on
it
either
and
wait
forever
for
the
remediation,
so
I
think
I
lean
more
towards
the
leasing
side
of
the
house
just
because
of
that
long-term
funding
stream
resource
revenue
for
housing,
open
space-
and
you
know
even
taking
care
of
the
open
space
that
we
have
on
this
block.
B
Of
the
house,
if
I
don't
know
that
you've
done
this
analysis
yet
or
that
you
would
even
know,
but
how?
What
order
magnitude
of
annual
revenue
do
you
think
we
can
expect
if
we
went
with
a
leasing
Road
like?
Would
it
cover
maintenance
of
the
improvements
on
the
Block
Plus,
affordable
housing
project,
or
is
it
like
one-third
of
the
maintenance
that
would
be
required
for
the
block?
And
it's
like
does
that
make
sense,
because
I
can
kind
of
conceptualize?
Y
Z
O
I
I
lean
towards
both
the
potential
actual
captured
Revenue
here
and
the
symbolic
nature,
now
of
it
that
it's
been
through
kind
of
this
social
Crucible
with
us
I
feel
like
we
have
to
maintain
ownership.
In
fact,
I
would
be
in
favor
of
us
selling
other
property
that
maybe
might
not
be
as
pivotal
to
something
so
Central
to
our
City
Identity.
In
order
to
maintain
ownership
and
potential
control
over
what
happens,
there
I
think
the
Social
Development
there
as
much
as
the
financial
outcomes
have
to
be
calculated
on
this
property.
B
O
I
Not
as
pivotal
the
roads
that
we'll
be
going
through
are
the
roads
that
we
will
have
the
opportunity
to
name
or
will
they
just
be
numbered.
Y
I'm
sure
we'd
have
the
opportunity
to
name
them.
We
last
briefing
we
were
contemplating
whether
the
mid-block
roads
would
be
privately
owned
with
a
public
easement,
so
we
could
kind
of
Leverage
the
development
of
that
infrastructure
with
the
development
of
of
the
development
sites.
But
what
we
heard
last
time
from
the
council
was
that
the
preference
is
to
have
them,
be
public
roadways
to
maintain
the
highest
level
of
public
accessibility
and
control.
Y
So
that
means
that
we
will
need
to
identify
a
funding
source
for
construction.
The
the
two
surrounding
the
park
could
probably
be
leveraged
with
the
park,
design
and
funding
with
an
additional
CIP
request.
I
I
think
both
the
challenge
and
what's
exciting
about
this
piece
is
that
we
have
the
chance
to
consider
the
social
as
deeply
as
the
other
developmental
concerns
here
and
so
often,
especially
when
we
have
to
retrofit
for
equity
in
projects.
These
sorts
of
things
can
we
have
to
choose
between
symbolism
or
substance,
on
what
we're
going
for
and
I
think.
B
I
appreciate
those
comments,
councilmember
Petro
one
other
question
you
had
that
I
would
like
to
put
give
my
two
cents
on
is
I
would
prefer
a
highly
vegetated
Plaza
over
a
park.
Y
B
Y
L
B
Your
work
on
this
all
right
we're
at
our
break
and
do
we
have
time
to
take
the
full
20
minutes
or
are
we
going
to
be
in
trouble.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
B
AA
Thank
you
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
the
above
mentioned
property
from
its
current
r17000
or
single-family
residential
Zone
to
sr3
special
pattern.
Special
development
pattern,
residential
The
Proposal
would
also
amend
the
Sugarhouse
Community
master
plan.
Future
land
use
map
from
low
density
residential
to
medium
density,
residential.
The
petitioner's
stated
objective
is
to
construct
a
home
on
the
property.
AA
AB
We
can
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
so
I,
don't
repeat
everything
that
Brian
just
said
about
the
project
perfect,
so
the
subject
property
is
located
within
the
Sugarhouse
plan
area
and
has
quite
an
extensive
history.
I've
included
links
to
the
associated
published
administrative
interpretation
as
well
as
the
subsequent
appeal
in
the
transmittal.
AB
In
summary,
the
outcome
of
the
admin
interpretation
and
the
appeal
applications
determine
the
property
as
an
illegal
lot
and
is
considered
to
be
part
of
1572
East
Blaine.
These
amendments
are
sought
in
hopes
of
developing
a
single-family
dwelling
through
a
plan,
development,
preliminary
plaque
and
a
final
plot.
Next
slide.
AB
So
on
this
screen,
this
illustrates
property
photos
started
in
the
upper
left.
There's
a
photo
of
15782
East
Blaine
to
the
right
is
the
driveway
access
of
the
subject.
Property
in
the
lower
left
is
the
photo
of
the
driveway.
Looking
East
to
the
right
is
the
subject
property
beyond
the
oversized
detached
accessory
structure.
Next
slide.
AB
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
amend
the
zoning
from
R17
to
an
sr3
the
applicant
identified
sr3,
due
to
the
reduced
lot
width
side,
yard
setbacks
for
a
detached
single
family
structure
as
Illustrated
on
the
screen.
The
neighborhood
context
primarily
consists
of
r17000,
which
is
a
single
family
District
next
slide.
AB
The
chart
on
the
screen
illustrates
the
regulatory
differences
between
R17
and
sr3.
Like
I
previously
mentioned,
the
primary
differences
include
lot
width,
setbacks
and
lock.
Coverage
sr3
does
allow
for
quite
narrower
setbacks,
as
well
as
a
about
20
percent.
More
lock
coverage
than
an
R17
and
the
primary
land
use
changes
would
allow
a
single
family
attached
drawings
and
two
family
dwellings
in
the
sr3
next
slide.
AB
AB
Just
to
briefly
touch
on
the
adopted
plans,
policies
and
goals.
These
generally
do
not
align
with
the
proposed
amendments.
The
neighborhood
is
well
established
with
r17000
zoning,
while
the
Sugarhouse
plan
does
identify
goals
for
infill
and
flag
lot
development.
This
property
does
not
meet
the
location,
identification
for
rezoning
or
the
flag
lot
standards
or
infill
Additionally.
The
property
does
not
meet
the
intent
of
the
location
parameters
for
medium
density
classification
in
the
Sugarhouse
plan
next
slide.
AB
Ultimately,
the
amendments
are
sought
to
legalize
in
an
illegal
subdivision
for
the
purposes
of
development.
The
goals
do
not
align
with
the
identified
policy
statements
or
objectives
and,
in
summary,
the
Planning
Commission
did
forward
a
negative
recommendation
on
this
project,
and
I
am
here
to
answer
any
questions.
K
Yeah,
thank
you
so
in
terms
of
the
request,
I
noted
in
the
map
that
the
entire
block
that's
kind
of
shown
within
that
Vision
has
the
same
zoning.
Is
there
anything
within
the
related
area,
maybe
outside
of
the
snapshot
that
would
align
with
this
particular
request?.
AB
B
Kelsey,
just
so
I'm
clear
on
I
think
I
understand
the
situation,
but
this
is
how
can
a
legal,
an
illegal
subdivision
happen?
B
AB
Sometimes
the
county
can
still
record
something
that
shouldn't
be
recorded,
but
we
did
adopt
a
subdivision
ordinance
in
night
in
the
1950s
50s
yeah,
just
making
sure
so
that
would
have
required
the
city
to
approve
a
subdivision,
and
this
is
an
implanted
subdivision.
So
uru
required
a
subdivision
amendment
to
amend
any
sort
of
identified
Lots.
We.
AB
Kind
of
been
floating
around
the
administrative
interpretation
and
the
PO
go
into
more
of
that
depth
of
the
history,
but
there
are
several
Board
of
adjustment
cases
associated
with
this
property.
So
prior
Property
Owners
sought
to
they
actually
saw
a
variance
to
construct
an
oversized
garage
for
the
purposes
of
off-street
parking
for
the
Blaine
property,
which
is
a
duplex.
AB
AB
B
B
F
B
F
F
You
know
some
of
like
the
what
you
call
it
like,
like
your
your
reasoning
like
plants
are
like
doesn't,
you
know,
doesn't
support
this,
but
in
my
mind,
plants
are
like
does
support.
You
know
more
housing,
right
and
more
density,
but
I
understand
that
this
neighborhood
doesn't
want
a
lot
of
density,
but
one
one
unit
doesn't
seem
like
stints
at
all.
So
I'm
not.
F
AB
F
AB
B
B
Oh,
it
doesn't
conform
with
current
zoning,
but
it's
legally
existing
I
guess
I
mean
I,
agree
with
council
member
valderramaros
in
that
I.
Don't
think
one
additional
house
in
this
neighborhood
is
going
to
ruin
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
I
didn't
realize
that
it
was
connected
to
this
other
property.
B
So
that
makes
me
wonder
if
a
better
route
wouldn't
have
been
to
look
at
what
could
be
done
with
both
of
the
properties
but
combining
them
back
and
adding
units
I,
don't
know
what
that
would
be
or
how
that
would
work
I,
just
as
a
general
overall
goal.
I
think
that
we
are
we've
moved
past.
The
point
where
we
can
have,
where
it's
sustainable
for
every
single
family
to
have
a
minimum
of
seven
thousand
square
feet
of
land.
B
So
I
don't
think
that
the
zoning
is
I
know.
That's
not
the
question
we're
being
asked
today,
but
I.
Don't
think
the
zoning
in
the
area
is
meeting
our
future
needs
so
I
want,
like
I,
do
have
a
policy
goal
of
finding
out
finding
how
to
use
the
weird
misused
pieces
of
land
sitting
around
in
our
neighbor
in
our
neighborhoods
to
build
more
housing,
I
guess,
I'm,
a
little
I
didn't
quite
know
all
of
the
the
details
on
this
one,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
I'm,
it's
it's
a
hard
one.
For
me,
council
members.
D
Council,
member
Wharton
thanks.
Thank
you
Mr,
chair
I.
My
concern
is
about
like
process
and
precedent.
I
know
that
we
I
think
we
all
agree
that
we
need
to
add
density
and
infill
and
I
think
we
all
have
been
proponents
of
that.
But,
as
I've
said
before,
that
doesn't
mean
that,
like
every
project
that
comes
to
us,
that
adds
a
unit
should
be
approved,
and
if
we
think
that
it
does,
then
we
really
shouldn't
like.
D
We
should
just
stop
considering
results,
and
we
should
just
set
an
administrative
formula
if
we're
going
to
adopt
everything
that
adds
another
unit,
because
this
is
why
we
have
the
process
that
we
do
so
that
we
can
exercise
discretion,
and
in
this
instance
you
have
someone
the
the
current
owner.
D
That's
had
a
long
history
of
notice
and
a
long
history
of
disputes
and
a
very
clear
administrative
record
about
the
problems
with
this
property
and
has
chosen
to
go
forward
anyway,
in
a
way
that
the
vast
majority
of
of
homeowners
and
and
renters
and
everybody
else,
they
purchase
the
property.
D
You
do
your
research
and
you
build
what
you
can
build,
or
you
think
I'm
gonna
apply
for
a
rezone
and
I'm
going
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
addresses
the
city's
specific
needs
and
hope
that
we
grant
that
rezone
I,
don't
think
you
purchase
a
property
and
then
litigate
the
way
that
you
want
the
property
to
be
interpreted
and
then,
when
you
lose
at
litigation
instead
of
going.
You
know.
Turning
to
your
other,
more
reasonable
options,
you
choose
to
pursue
a
rezone
like
to
me:
that's
not
an
equitable
way
to
to
develop
property.
D
It's
not
an
equitable
way
to
address
the
city's
needs,
and
just
because
the
outcome
results
in
us
having
one
more
unit,
which
is
important,
I
think
the
cost
that
the
precedent
sets
for.
This
is
absolutely
not
appropriate,
and-
and
even
if
you
disagree
with
me,
like
the
it's
one
unit
where
they
still
could
build
a
unit,
so
we're
not
actually
even
losing
a
unit,
we're
just
losing
a
not
as
big
unit.
So
I
don't
feel
like
this
really
for
me,
it's
it's
all.
B
B
B
AB
B
B
Okay,
given
that
this
is
one
lot,
each
one
of
the
county
says
it's
two
lots.
It's
just
one
lot
is
their
and
it's
a
duplex
in
a
single
family,
Zone,
a
legal
duplex
in
a
single-family
Zone
yeah.
They
could
do
a
detached
Adu
up
to
1
000
square
feet
and
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
would
not
apply
because
it's
a
it's,
not
a
single
family
use.
AB
L
B
Okay,
here's
my
questions.
Council
members,
you
have
any
other
more
questions,
any
additional
other
more
is.
B
AB
B
AB
B
I
I
So,
while
I
understand
you're
wanting
to
not
set
precedence,
I
don't
think
we
can
assume
any
sort
of
Nefarious
motives
or
or
any
I
think
there's
just
an
element
of
this
is
a
common
practice
for
a
lot
of
people
from
a
Mediterranean
culture
that
they've
seen
successful
in
other
areas.
If
it's
not
a
gate
that
we
afflict,
we
want
to
open,
I,
respect
that,
but.
D
D
I,
don't
know
if
that
to
me
the
transfer
of
ownership
and
the
notice
that
that
they
had
shows
like
they
were
going
going
into
the
purchase
with
Clear
Eyes
about
the
the
illegality
so
I
I
I'm,
not
getting
that
and
I'm,
not
saying
it's
nefarious,
but
I'm,
saying
to
me
it
feels
kind
of
like
gaming,
the
city
so.
B
G
Councilman
report
I
mean
I
I.
This
is
a
process
that
I
mean
the
process
that
the
applicant
has
followed.
Well,
we
might
not
like
it
and
it's
a
process
that
is
set
up
and
it's
a
process
that
is
still
a
legal
process
to
follow
and
to
petition
this
and
so
on,
and
if
this
comes
awarded
to
vote
for
to
allow
this
reason,
it
still
doesn't
mean
that
we
are
not
exercising
our
discretion.
G
We
still
retaining
the
discretion
to
vote
for
it
or
not
and
I'm
not
saying
that
that's
the
right
route
or
not,
but
you
know
I.
It
is
for
this
body
to
decide
if
we
want
to
allow
it
or
not
and
I,
don't
think
it
I
I
still
don't
understand
or
or
don't
connect
with
the
the
thought
of
voting
for
this
we
are.
We
should
just
throw
everything
out
and
put
it
on
the
garbage
and
say
the
administration.
G
You
create
a
formula
or
we
need
to
create
a
formula
that
approves
all
of
these
resounds
in
the
future.
We
can
still
potentially
vote
for
it,
not
that
that's
what
we're
going
to
do
or
not,
but
we
can
potentially
vote
for
it
and
still
retain
the
you
know
the
discretion
to
not
work
for
a
future
one
so
that.
B
Comes
to
us
just
these
are
all
that's
what
I
mean.
These
are
all
really
valid,
important
questions.
I,
don't
I
think
we
straight
a
little
bit
from
the
actual
question
of
this
specific
rezone
and
so
I'm
gonna.
If
it's
okay,
close
counselor
questions
for
a
second
and
allow
the
applicant
to
speak,
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
more
questions
if
we
need
to
so.
If
the
applicant
is
here,
I
think
our
our
policies
that
you
are
about
five
minutes.
V
Okay,
thank
you
again,
sorry
for
the
mix
up
with
the
timing,
I
like
to
touch
on
the
Adu
part
and
the
connected
to
the
Lane
property
after
after
my
presentation,
but
I
will
start
that
now
so
again,
my
name
is
Anthony
Rossi
and
I'm,
presenting
1782
South
6th
East
as
part
of
the
plane,
Properties
LLC
100
master
plan
on
a
request
before
I
get
started.
I
want
to
thank
staff.
B
For
working
with
just
one
second
and
Anthony,
if
you
could
speak
a
little
bit
louder
or
more
directly
into
your
microphone,
it
might
help
us
here.
Okay,
is
this
better.
V
Yes,
at
all
better,
okay
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
working
with
me
on
this.
It's
a
very
unique
application
to
say
the
least
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
in
front
of
the
city
council
today
slide
please
to
kind
of
to
kind
of
get
orange
with
the
property
right
now.
The
property
is
classified
by
Salt
Lake
County
Schools,
but
by
Salt
Lake
City
Planning
is
recognized
as
a
single
block.
V
V
While
the
plot
has
never
been
formally
amended
before,
lots
have
been
combined
in
bitlock,
alleys
have
been
vacated
and
what
surprisingly,
has
resulted
in
a
fairly
typical
pattern?
Our
lot
seems
to
be
the
only
exception
to
this,
and
because
of
its
peculiar
historical
circumstances,
it
is
left
as
the
only
non-developable
law
in
the
entire
subdivision,
and
so
because
of
its
unique
circumstances.
We
were
looking
for
a
unique
solution
to
this.
Well,
what
we
are
fortunate
to
find
next
slide.
Please
is
Salt
Lake
City
as
a
designation
called
the
sr3
zone.
V
Sr3
is
definitionally
a
different
Zone
than
its
surrounding
properties
and
that
it
deals
with
distinctive
site
location.
This
Zone
has
been
used
liberally
throughout
the
city
to
provide
land
use
to
uniquely
uniquely
located
properties
for
the
use
of
the
surrounding
zoning
districts
would
rendered
the
site
on
developable
staff
report
says
there
are
no
sr3
properties
in
the
direct
vicinity.
V
However,
there
isn't
an
infill
law
like
ours
in
the
entire
area,
which
is
why
the
sr-3
Zone
needs
to
be
applied,
the
home
that
houses
just
one
more
family
and
reasonably
and
responsibly
be
built
on
a
lot
staff
reports
suggest
this
is
a
spot
Zone
request.
This
is
so
much
spot
zoning
and
that
we
have
the
only
non-buildable
spot
in
the
area
and
to
make
it
work.
It
should
be
noted.
The
proposed
land
use
is
compatible
with
adjacent
land
uses,
and
the
intensity
proposal
is
to
build
info
housing,
which
city
policy
encourages
next
slide.
V
Please
City
master
plan
such
as
these
two
have
clearly
established
objectives
to
increase
housing
where
it
makes
sense
and
could
be
the
minimal
impact
to
the
community.
Growing
SLC
seems
to
be
speaking
directly
to
the
subject
property
when
it
reads
official
painful
ordinances,
responding
to
the
usual
age
formative,
housing
stock
could
be,
should
be
addressed
and
leverage
to
add
incremental
density,
while
not
explicitly
reference
the
sugarass
master
plan.
Both
of
these
are
city-wide
plans.
Their
implementation
is
encouraged
throughout
the
city.
V
V
V
So
in
closing,
if
a
method
exists
to
accommodate
uniquely
configured
Parcels
in
an
existing
neighborhood
like
the
subject
property
that
doesn't
fit
the
euclidean
zoning,
it's
a
good
thing
and
although
you
have
a
negative
recommendation
before
you,
I
asked
the
city
council
to
tackle
unique
problems,
unique
Solutions,
yes,
R3!
Thank
you,
I
appreciate
it
and
open
for
any
questions.
V
S
B
Yeah,
council
members.
D
I
get
I
I,
do
appreciate
the
presentation
and
I
I
don't
mean
to
like
make
assumptions
about
the
motives
I'm
going
off
of
what
I'm,
seeing
here
and
I'm
going
off
of
a
concern
that
if
we
have
situations
where
staff
is
giving
a
recommendation
planning,
it's
giving
a
recommendation.
There's
no
support
for
this
in
any
of
the
planning
documents,
other
than
plan
or
grow
SLC
and
there's
another
method
for
the
person
to
Art
to
add
another
unit.
D
And
yes,
it's
a
legal
process,
but
it's
one.
That's
it's
legal
to
ask
for
this,
but
it's
after
coming
on
the
heels
of
fully
litigating
a
previous
process
and
doing
so
at
the
expense
of
a
more
costly
process
after
the
rezone
is
granted.
Then
what
rezone
are
we
going?
Are
we
willing
to
say
no
to
that.
B
Councilman
I
appreciate
the
question.
I
think
the
way
I'm
now
understanding
it
after
this
presentation
and
our
previous
discussion
is
that
really
the
difference
in
outcome?
B
The
process
is
a
different
question,
and
so
I
am
not
touching
on
that
right
now,
but
the
difference
in
outcome
is
that
voting
yes
to
this
would
allow
a
1
300
in
some
odd
footprint,
but
potentially
two
stories,
whereas
voting
no
would
allow
them
to
do
one
thousand
square
foot
maximum
as
an
Adu
it
in
in
terms
of
like
geometrically.
What
they
can
build,
am
I
understanding
that
correctly
yeah.
AB
V
Oh
I'm,
sorry
I
was
given
this
process
by
staff
after
the
administrative
interpretation
process
and
I
so
far
called
it.
My
understanding
is
so
the
reason
it
is
connected
to
the
Blaine
Avenue
duplex
is
the
owner
in
1985,
requested
a
variance
to
extend
the
or
car
garage
structure
and
was
granted
that
and
what
did
he
and
what
it
extended?
The
width
and
height
of
that
garage
structure.
It
ended
up
straddling
the
property
line
of
the
the
law
that
I
intend
to
build
on.
V
So
what
I've
been
told
by
staff
is
that,
if
approved,
if
the
zone
is
is
approved,
whatever
needs
to
be
done
in
regards
of
vacating,
that
variance
or
that
garage
can
be
dealt
with
in
the
plan
development?
That's
the
only
reason
this
is
connected
to
the
employability
property,
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that.
So
my
understanding
was
that
vacating,
the
variance
was
part
of
the
process
that
I
was
given
by
staff
if
the
result
were
to
be
approved.
V
Second,
with
an
Adu
and
you've
already
Kelsey's
already
touched
on
this
about
the
home
being
transferable
I,
don't
know
that
that's
a
bad
thing,
I
mean
you
know.
We
have
a
renting
crisis
in
Salt
Lake
City,
but
we
also
have
a
homeownership
crisis
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
one
transferable
property,
I,
don't
know
that's
a
bad
thing,
and
and
also
with
a
home
I'm
able
to
use
this
property
towards
a
construction
loan
as
collateral
I
understand.
V
The
city
has
some
financing
mechanism
for
financing
these
adus
and
I'm,
not
sure
what
that
looks
like
right
now.
But
what
I
do
know
is
that
a
construction
loan
is
possible.
As
we
all
know,
it's
not
simple,
just
to
put
a
Adu
on
this
property
that
costs
a
lot
of
money,
and
you
know-
and
then
third,
you
know
my
journey
for
a
home
to
live
in
started
three
years
ago
before
the
Adu
and
for
before
the
amendment,
and
it
was
never
to
turn
a
duplexity
Triplex.
V
B
O
L
O
Just
clarify
the
the
parking
structure
at
the
corner
of
the
L,
that's
part
of
the
lot,
and
that
would
have
to
that's
the
access
to
the
location
where
he
the
intended,
built
the
site.
So
he
has
to
take
that
down.
So
he
has
access
into
his
property.
O
Got
it
with
the
property
to
the
north
of
it,
which
is
correct,
328,
12
or
228.
F
B
Thank
you
all
right,
I
think
we'll
close
this
item.
There
is
a
public
hearing
on
this
on
this
evening
day.
Today.
Yes,
hey
can't
wait
to
hear
about
The
public's
thoughts
on
this.
We
are
still
running
behind
sorry,
everyone,
let's
go
to
item
number,
seven
Sugarhouse
drive
through
text,
Amendment
ordinance,
and
then
we
may
skip
the
site
distance
triangle.
Since
we
have
board
member
board
appointees
waiting.
I
don't
want
to
make
them
wait
too
long.
AA
Mr
chair,
this
is
a
proposal
initiated
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
amend
the
zoning
ordinance
that
would
prohibit
new
drive-through
facilities
in
the
Sugarhouse
business
district.
Currently,
drive-throughs
are
allowed
for
financial
institutions,
restaurants,
retail
goods
and
Retail
Services
in
the
business
district.
AA
L
AC
Can
hear
myself
all
right?
We
can
move
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
petition
was
initiated
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
request
was
to
prohibit
new
drive-through
uses
in
the
Sugarhouse
business
district
because
the
use
does
not
align
with
the
purpose
statement
of
the
district.
So
in
the
blue
box
over
on
your
screen,
we
have
the
purpose
statement
and
it
mentions
promoting
a
walkable
Community
with
Transit
oriented
mixed-use
Town
Center
that
can
support
24-hour
population.
AC
So
by
removing
the
P,
those
uses
become
prohibited
in
the
district
and
staff
is
also
recommending
a
minor
modification
to
the
accessory
use
chapters.
Just
to
make
it
very
clear
that
the
use
must
be
listed
with
the
drive-through
facility
for
it
to
be
permitted.
AC
Forgetting
yeah,
so
on
that
map,
we
can
see
restaurants,
pharmacies
and
banks
in
the
neighborhood
that
currently
have
drive-throughs.
If
this
is
adopted,
those
would
be
considered
not
conforming
uses,
and
the
important
thing
to
note
here
is
that
those
will
not
be
affected.
They
will
continue
to.
They
could
continue
to
have
a
normal
operations.
AC
AC
We
received
some
public
comments
that
mentioned
that
those
uses
were
very
useful
during
covid-19,
where
convenient
access
for
people,
while
social,
distancing
and
provided
access
for
individuals
with
disabilities.
We
agree
with
those
I
wanted
to
point
out
some
other
considerations.
That
individuals
would
also
benefit
from
having
a
more
walkable
Community,
especially
if
they
don't
use
Vehicles.
They
don't
have
access
to
a
vehicle.
There
will
be
other
social
distancing
options
still
available
like
delivery
or
stalls
that
are
reserved
for
pickup
only
appointment
times.
AC
Etc,
like
we
mentioned,
the
existing
drive-throughs
will
be
able
to
continue
to
operate
and
like
Brian
mentioned,
this
is
not
a
city-wide
text.
Amendment
in
other
districts
in
the
city
will
continue
to
Ally.
Allow
those
uses.
AC
We
also
looked
at
professional
best
practices
as
related
to
drive
through
uses,
and
we
found
that
those
are
not
typically
appropriate
in
walkable
districts.
Next.
AC
Thank
you
because
of
the
freaking
Interruption
of
sidewalks,
by
par
cars
parked
on
sidewalks
or
just
the
curb
cuts,
and
we
also
presented
in
the
Planning
Commission
staff
report.
AC
G
I
see
the
map
where
all
of
those
drive-throughs
and
those
businesses
are
marked.
Does
the
drive-through
is
retained
by
the
business
or
is
retained
by
the
property
itself?
Let's
say:
Chick-fil-A
decides
to
closer
doors
and
then
I
don't
know
what
other
Burger
King
wants
to
open
up
in
their
spot?
Is
it
do
they
need
to
change
something,
or
is
it
retained
by
the
property
just
yeah
another.
AC
Restaurant
would
be
able
to
operate
as
a
drive-through.
We
would
have
to
send
it
to
appeals
hearing
officer
for
a
change
of
non-conforming
use
if
it
was
for
a
different
type
of
drive-through,
so
a
retail
Goods
or
bank
or
Retail
Services,
which
we
don't
normally
find,
but
yeah.
AC
So
I
use
will
be
con,
be
considered
abandoned
if
it's
empty,
for
if
the
structure
is
vacant
for
over
a
year-
and
it's
not
been
marketed
for
use.
B
K
No
thank
you
for
this.
I
appreciate
the
overview
and
especially
know
some
of
the
challenges
that
that
area
has
experienced
related
to
some
of
the
existing
drive-throughs
I
just
had
a
question
noting
that
some
of
these
areas
there's
a
pretty
significant
land
that
is
undergoing
development
and
or
is
vacant.
Do
we
know
if
there's
any
plans
related
to
those
existing
vacant,
lots
to
move
towards
more
commercial
opportunities
like
drive
through.
X
K
So
in
terms
of
that,
I
guess
that
that's
probably
just
my
question
that
if
there
are
existing
plans
or
efforts
that
would
incorporate
a
drive-through
just
if
we
like
I
said
looked
into
that
in
terms
of
impacting
any
of
those
developments
from
having
to
to
change
related
to
this
yeah.
X
K
B
I
will
I
I
think
this
is
great.
I
I
think
that
there
are
parts
of
our
Community
where
drive-throughs
make
sense
and
I
think
Sugarhouse
is
not
one
of
them
anymore,
as
that
really
does
back
up
on
and
Sugarhouse
is
in
a
lot
of
ways
a
model
becoming
a
model
walkable
Transit
connected
community.
So
I
think
that
this
this
change
initiated
by
the
Planning
Commission,
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me.
B
I
C
B
Are
we
actually
caught
up
a
little
bit?
Do
we
have
all
the
board
appointees
here
or
are
we
still
waiting
on
some?
The
staff
know
I
see
two
one:
okay,
actually,
sorry
Spencer!
You
have
to
wait
a
little
more
we're
going
to
go
to
item
number,
eight
site,
distance
triangle,
text,
Amendment,.
AA
AA
The
purpose
of
the
triangle
is
to
allow
drivers,
pedestrians
and
users
of
other
Transportation
modes
to
see
each
other
and
stop
safely.
Currently,
city
code
does
not
include
intersections
of
alleys
and
sidewalks,
and
alleys
and
streets.
The
Proposal
adds
these
intersections
as
they
have
similar
risks
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Madison.
AD
So
the
project,
as
Brian
mentioned,
is
going
to
change
the
site,
distance
triangle
ordinance
and
it's
going
to
change
the
sections,
the
definition
section
and
it's
going
to
change
the
code
about
applying
it
to
principal
and
accessory
buildings,
as
well
as
the
regulations
for
fences,
walls
and
hedges
and
some
other
related
titles.
AD
As
mentioned,
the
site.
Distance
triangle
is
the
clear
Zone
area
identified
as
the
intersection
of
streets,
driveways
or
alleys,
and
streets
and
driveways
or
alleys
and
sidewalks,
where
instruction
obstructions
are
restricted
and
it's
to
increase
the
safety
for
all
modes
of
transportation
at
potential
points
of
conflict
next
slide,
please,
the
proposed
changes
include
and
adding
alleys
to
the
definition
of
sight
distance
triangle,
as
well
as
adding
the
height
restrictions
to
apply
to
buildings
and
other
structures
in
the
site.
Distance
triangle.
S
AD
So
at
it's
30
inches
for
alleys
and
driveways,
and
at
intersections
like
Street
intersections
it's
three
feet.
B
B
Two
streets
can
be
36
inches,
but
once
you
go
above
a
certain
height,
you
can't
then
come
back.
So
the
point
of
this
is
so
that
cars
and
people
can
be
seen
right,
so
I
would
ask
if
we
are
able
to
hopefully
without
going
back
to
Planning
Commission,
allow
that
once
you
get
above
a
certain
height,
then
the
citations
triangle
no
longer
is
relevant
and
I
would
propose
that,
like
one
story
but
I,
don't
know
if
that's
possible
to
do
without
restarting
the
whole
process.
B
B
It's
because
of
this
most
cities
require
a
lot
of
cities,
require
30
feet,
so
we're
requiring
a
much
smaller
amount,
which
makes
sense
for
our
Urban
context,
but
I
always
wonder
why
why
we
can't
then
go
back
to
the
full
corner
size
of
the
building,
because
the
second
and
third
floor
is
not
obstructing
anyone's
view
from
a
car
and
a
pedestrian
are
not
going
to
be
blocked
because
of
that
Mr.
G
Chair
yeah,
I,
I
have
I
mean
the
corner,
one
I
sort
of
get
it,
and
and
in
many
cases
considering
how
big
our
parking
strips
are
and
how
large
this
between
how
much
of
a
space
it
is
between
the
building
on
the
street.
This
we
don't
see
that
many
corners,
like
this
yeah
but
I'm
more
concerned
about
the
one,
the
image
where
the
example
in
a
city
block
with
buildings-
and
you
have
that
driveway
that
goes
into
the
back,
and
you
see
that
triangle.
No,
no
talking
about
one
or.
G
That
one,
oh
no
talking
about
the
one
that
has
houses
and
I,
understand
that,
but
this
one
to
me
I
mean
in
urban
settings
on
in
other
cities.
This
is
addressed
by
requiring
some
lights
and
some
Sirens
to
maximize
the
use,
and
you
know
it
is
not
common
in
many
cities
that
there
is
a
requirement
that
when
a
vehicle
is
getting
there,
this
is
hiring
so
the
pedestrians
are
light.
G
Pedestrians
are
aware-
or
you
know,
that
it
is
a
car
approach
and
then
vice
versa.
There
is
some
other
requirements
about
mirrors
that
I've
seen
in
other
cities
too,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
the
right
approach
but
I
to
me.
This
seems
like
an
enormous
setting
and
you
know,
on
a
downtown
business
district.
It
seems
to
me
like
losing
an
opportunity
for
a
space
that
could
be
developed
to
that
all
of
our.
G
So
that
that
to
me
is
the
only
concern
I
have
and
I
understand
that
you
know
safety
is
a
very
important
issue
and
I
want
us
to
address
that
and
I
think
this
audience
is
addressing
much
of
this.
But
I
have
questions
about
this
specific
case,
knowing
the
neighborhood
ones.
Knowing
the
you
know,
residential
areas
more
in
the
dense
denser
parts
of
town.
B
Scott,
could
you
go
back
one
more
slide?
Oh
one,
more
sorry,
I,
don't
know
how
many
more
I'm
just
I'll
tell
you
when
we're
there
this
one.
So
this
top
picture
here
look
I.
Think
is
what
is
councilman
police
talking
about
where
it's
more
of
an
urban
thing
and
what's
going
to
happen
there,
because
a
lot
of
our
ordinances
do
require
that
the
buildings
come
up
to
the
property
line
and
a
lot
of
our
our
ordinances.
Allow
you
to
go
to
zero
side
yard
setback,
which
are
all
good
things.
B
B
O
We're
going
back
to
your
original,
going
back
to
your
point
of
you
know,
and
after
the
first
floor
it
should
matter
anymore.
You
know,
if
you
don't
have
to
change
that,
and
you
could
make
that
stipulation
that
hey
for
the
first
floor,
I.
O
O
L
AD
There
is
in
the
proposed
code
for
the
like
buildings
or
other
structures,
that
does
say
the
planning
director
in
Consulting
with
the
transportation
director.
May
approve
alternative
design
solutions
that
result
in
similar
visual
clearance
and
effectively
mitigate
safety
concerns.
B
X
It's
just
planning
director
and
transportation
director
deciding
if
essentially
mirrors
or
some
other
warning
system
for
vehicle
approaching
across
the
sidewalk
is
appropriate.
Oh
I
see
okay,
so
that's
usually
handled
if
they're
going
through
a
development
process.
Already
it's
usually
handled
within
that
as
part
of
that
review.
If
not
it's
usually
handled
as
part
of
the
building
permit
review.
B
I
I
would
like
to
change
the
height
so
that
it
only
applies
to
the
first
story
and
I
guess
we'll
need
staff
to
help
us
figure
out
if
that's
possible.
If
we
can
just
move.
X
To
do
that,
it
can
be
as
simple
as
adding
between
three
and
ten
feet
can't
be
blocked,
but
is
that
possible.
B
B
B
T
There
we
go
hi
everybody,
I'm,
Spencer,
Lawson
I
used
to
work
here,
which
was
fun
in
the
Department
of
Economic,
Development,
hi
and
I
live
downtown
I'm,
a
District,
4,
Resident
and
I
am
a
renter,
actually
lived
back.
East
for
a
number
of
years
grew
up
in
Salt
Lake,
but
then
moved
away
for
a
long
time
and
now
I'm
back
and
I
love,
Salt,
Lake.
So
much
so
this
opportunity
is
exactly
what
I've
been
wanting:
I
loved
working
for
the
city
because
I
live
in
the
city.
T
You
know,
I
loved,
being
involved,
I
walked
to
work
every
single
day
and
I,
just
loved
that,
and
so
living
downtown
and
being
a
part
of
this
board.
I
think
is
what
I
want
to
be
doing,
because
I
love
downtown.
AA
S
B
You'll
be
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight:
cool.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
Spencer.
Let's
see
is
Annie
Olson
here,
either
in
person
or
online
yeah.
B
Annie,
okay,
Annie
Olson
has
been
recommended
for
appointment
to
the
business
Advisory
Board
Annie.
Do
you
want
to
just
give
us
an
introduction
to
who
you
are
and
why
you
want
to
spend
your
free
time
with
the
city
yeah.
P
Primarily
I'm
currently
I've
been
taking
on
roles
to
Young
Professionals
of
Salt
Lake
City,
as
well
as
the
Utah
Independent
Business
Coalition.
So
with
those
two
things
kind
of
paired
together,
I'm
really
focused
and
driven
to
find
solutions
to
improve
and
encourage
Economic
Development
downtown,
as
well
as
focusing
particularly
on
both
Recruitment
and
Retention
of
young
professionals
to
the
city.
Beyond
that
I'm,
a
big
believer
that
Salt
Lake
City
is
cool.
P
I,
don't
think
I
have
to
convince
anyone
in
this
room,
but
some
people
from
out
of
state
are
surprised
when
they
hear
that
so
any
time
that
I
can
you
know
fight
the
good
fight
for
the
city
I'm
going
to
and
in
addition
to,
the
kind
of
volunteer
roles
that
I
occupy
within
those
two
organizations.
I
also
manage
a
co-working
space.
The
shop
workspace
just
a
block
away.
P
That's
where
I
am
currently
I
live
next
door,
I'm
a
renter
downtown
as
well,
and
I
really
focus
daily
working
with
companies
who
are
coming
into
the
city
trying
to
find
that
top
talent.
You
know
whether
they're
coming
internationally
or
they're
just
opening
up
a
new
office
here.
It's
something
that
I'm
already
doing
in
my
day-to-day,
so
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
take
some
of
that
experience
and
my
kind
of
love
for
the
city
onto
the
board
and
see
what
I'm
able
to
do
to
support.
B
B
B
R
Was
it
was
not
incorrect?
It
was
pretty
good.
It's
a
CH
at
the
end,
not
the
k,
easily
forgiven
hi,
it's
nice
to
be
here.
R
Teacher
I
am
currently
education,
consultant
I
had,
as
many
of
us
been
listening
and
hearing
about
police
just
in
general
in
in
this
country,
and
have
had
some
interaction
with
police,
positive
and
maybe
not
so
positive,
as
a
teacher
I
see
a
lot
of
and
think
a
lot
about
school
to
prison,
Pipeline
and
the
way
that
the
children
are
treated
by
our
police,
and
so
when
I
read
an
article
in
the
Tribune
not
too
long
ago
that
there
are
open
spots
on
this
review
board.
R
I
was
thinking
about
this
and
there
are
some
parallels
between
the
teaching
profession
and
the
policing
profession
in
a
sense
that
a
lot
of
us
who
are
maybe
not
the
members
of
profession,
have
opinions
about
how
professional
to
run.
You
know.
Anybody
who
has
ever
gone
to
high
school
tends
to
think
that
they
know
what
teaching
is
like
and
how
it
should
be
done
and
I
feel
like
police
has
a
similar,
similar
issues.
R
All
of
us
who
are
not
professional
feel
like
we
do
have
something
to
say
so.
I
empathize
with
that
side
as
well
and
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
their
policies
and,
while
I
understand
that,
while
we're
on
civilian
police
board,
we
simply
are
trying
to
decide
whether
police
officers
have
acted
within
policy
or
not.
R
That
gives
me
an
opportunity
to
learn
about
those
policies
and
maybe
advocate
in
some
way
for
a
change
when
that
seems
necessary,
I'm,
a
firm
believer
in
accountability
and
in
feedback,
and
so
I
think
this
is
one
way
in
which
police
gets
feedback
about
what
those
that
they're
charged
with
protecting,
think
and
believe.
So
that's
primary
reason
why
I'm
here.
B
K
Yeah
I
do
just
want
to
both
thank
you
for
your
service
in
public
education,
but
also
for
the
analogy
between
those
who
understand
education
just
because
they've
been
through
it,
as
it
relates
to
your
role
on
this
board.
I
appreciate
your
approach
in
terms
of
being
a
learner,
as
well
as
making
sure
that
accountability
element
is
there.
So
thank
you.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Amina
you'll
be
on
our
consent
agenda
tonight.
You
do
not
need
to
attend,
but
of
course,
you're
always
welcome
at
our
meetings.
Thank
you.
Last
and
final
Board
of
pointy
is
also
for
the
police
civilian
review
board,
and
that
is
Justin
Neville.
This
Justin
is
here
with
us
in
person.
AE
Sorry,
good
evening,
everyone
yeah
Justin
DeVille
I,
live
in
District
Five
and
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
prior
to
my
interest
in
serving
on
the
police.
Civilian
review
board.
AE
I've
also
spent
Five
Years
on
the
housing
appeals,
Advisory,
Board,
less
exciting
talked
a
lot
about
Windows,
but
still
the
the
opportunity
to
serve
is
something
that's
really
important
to
me,
and
particularly
in
this
time
kind
of
in
this
yeah
I,
guess
social
milieu
where
we're
talking
a
lot
about
police
and
the
responsibility
of
police
officers
and
the
responsibility
of
civilians,
and
it's
also
very
yeah,
I
guess
so
visible
and
I
think
that
as
Citizens
in
the
city,
it's
important
for
us
to
inform
ourselves
about
these
really
important
issues
and
I
think,
particularly
when
having
discussions
about
such
important
social
topics.
AE
So
the
opportunity
to
learn
more
about
the
way
that
the
police
department
functions
and
particularly
of
Interest,
has
been
the
requirements
to
be
on
the
board
and
participating
in
the
ride-alongs
with
the
police
officers.
That's
been
really
interesting
and
eye-opening,
so
I
look
forward
to
taking
those
action
or
those
those
learnings
from
those
ride-alongs
and
applying
those
in
the
meetings
and
the
discussions
and
the
decisions
when
something's
placed
before
the
panel.
So.
B
Thank
you,
Justin
council
members,
any
questions
or
comments
thanks
for
representing
District
Five
yeah,
thanks
for
your
willingness
to
serve
the
city.
Thank
you
all
right.
That
brings
us
to
report
of
chair
and
vice
chair.
I
have
none
Vice
chair
pitra
has
none,
but
we
do
have
some
announcements
from
the
executive
director.
J
The
first
one
is
a
request
for
your
support
on
a
timing
and
kind
of
efficiency
issue.
The
city
is
receiving
a
contribution
from
the
Larry
H
Miller
Family
Foundation,
for
some
lighting
for
a
baseball
field
in
Riverside
Park.
J
The
city
council
has
appropriated
enough
money
to
fund
the
lighting
on
one
of
the
fields
and
the
Miller
family
is
donating
enough
funding
for
the
second
field,
and
so
this
hasn't
yet
been
approved
in
a
budget
amendment,
but
it
we
will
be
receiving
that
paperwork
soon
and
for
efficiency's
sake,
they'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
get
the
equipment
ordered
if
that's
supported
by
the
council.
Okay
and.
B
J
And
then
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
is
making
a
special
focus
on
the
west
side
of
Salt
Lake
City
and
they
Representatives
will
be
coming
to
town
this
coming
week.
J
Council,
members,
petro
and
Pui
are
organizing
a
welcome
breakfast
for
those
professionals
and
wondered
if
it
would
be
appropriate
for
the
city
council
to
host
that,
since
it
is
related
to
that
public
involvement
with
other
other
officials,
it
could
be
done
with
their
communication
budgets,
but
it
does
seem
like
worth
consideration
for
the
city
council,
fun
budget
and
everyone's
in
all.
The
council.
Members
are
invited
the
mayor's
invited
some
County
folks
and
some
community
members.
J
Great
updated
Council
photo
group
photograph,
the
options
that
we
have
identified
so
far:
August
15th,
if
that
doesn't
work,
September
5th
or
September
12th,
and
so
this
is
one
where
we
need
everyone
or
we
need
cutouts.
K
K
F
AC
B
I
I
B
B
J
All
right
so
the
fifth
then
program
is
revived
and
well,
and
you
have
several
events
coming
up
starting
Saturday
and
we
need
to
be
some
really
precise,
actually
about
which
council
members
will
be
in
attendance
at
which
events,
so
we
have
listed
here
what
we
understand
to
be
the
case
and
just
from
a
protocol
point
of
view.
J
It's
it's
really
important
that
if
you
indicate
that
you'll
be
there
that
you
do
come
and
if
you
aren't
planning
to
go,
we
should
give
them
as
soon
as
you
know,
you
think
you
might
go,
tell
us
and
we'll
give
the
organizers
a
heads
up,
because
they
are
it's.
It's
somewhat
formal,
even
the
in
the
even
in
the
informal
okay.
F
J
G
A
nice
I
should
be
on
the
dinner.
J
G
I
F
G
J
O
S
J
K
It's
nice
because,
okay,
if
you
don't
mind
so
I
was
planning
on
attending
the
meet
and
greet
on
at
the
city
council.
Building
on
Sunday.
A
K
K
Got
you
okay,
okay
and
then
I.
Also
the
squatters
dinner
that
evening,
okay
and
then
the
dinner
the
following
evening
as
well
for
the
closing.
J
B
B
This
is
a
big
opportunity.
It's
our
oldest
sister
city,
coming
from
Japan
and
we're
excited
to
host
them
all
right.
That
is
it.
We
do
not
have
a
closed
session
scheduled
today,
and
so
we
are
adjourned
from
our
work
session.
We
will
be
back
in
the
formal
room
and
I
have
bad
news.
It's
the
last
time
we're
in
the
formal
room
for
a
minute
because
they
have
to
do
something
to
it.
I,
don't.