►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 06/13/2023
Description
To view the agenda of this meeting please visit https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
Council
meeting
our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
us
in
personal
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Zoom
Facebook
YouTuber,
SLC
TV.
Please
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable
right
now.
We
are
in
work
session,
which
means
there's
no
public
comment,
but
please
join
us
tonight
during
our
7
PM
formal
meeting
to
share
your
comments
and
of
course
we
always
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mail
at
P.O
box,
145476,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
Utah,
814114
email
at
council.com
or
via
our
24-hour
phone
comment
line.
801-535-7654.
B
You
have
some
paperwork
at
your
places.
Some
motion
sheets
that
we'll
be
going
through
just
to
make
sure
we're
prepared
for
adoption
later
tonight
at
seven
I
did
just
want
to
cover
a
few
highlights.
I
think
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time.
You
guys
have
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
the
weeds
and
the
very,
very
detailed
discussions
on
different
items,
different
elements
in
the
budget,
and
so
as
staff.
B
We
thought
it
might
be
helpful
to
kind
of
Zoom
back
out
and
highlight
some
of
the
few
kind
of
big
takeaway
big
themes
from
this
year's
budget,
because
I
think
it
accomplishes
a
lot
of
the
goals
that
the
council
and
the
administration
have
establish.
Those
priorities.
I
think
the
major
themes,
just
from
a
money
perspective,
were
housing
and
homelessness
from
sort
of
all
different
angles.
B
Overall,
you've
increased
funding
for
housing
between
the
RDA
and
general
fund
and
other
funding
sources
by
around
20
million
dollars.
17
million
in
the
RDA
and
other
funds
you've
also
expanded
how
we
do
housing
in
the
city
so,
rather
than
just
giving
loans
for
Housing
Development
you've
established
a
Citywide
Adu
incentives
program,
which
you
just
talked
about
in
the
RDA
briefing
and
then
a
program
to
provide
loans
for
repairs
for
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing.
B
It
expands
the
city's
response
to
homelessness
and
the
community
impacts
of
homelessness
in
a
variety
of
ways
in
various
departments
in
the
city
are
all
part
of
that.
Increasing
the
Community
Health
Access
team
in
the
fire
department
increasing
the
civilian
responders
in
the
police
department,
adding
a
new
RV
compliance
team,
along
with
funding
for
RV
repairs
for
folks
who
would
move
along
but
have
barriers
to
do
that
for
whatever
reason,
and
then
it
increases
the
budget
for
cleaning
around
encampments
and
in
the
public
right-of-way.
B
The
council's
ultimate
deliberations
do
keep
fund
balance
above
the
13
goal
established
by
policy
and
in
the
funding
our
future
category.
Well
about
that,
and
with
the
council's
continued
legislative
intent,
the
council
is
continuing
to
ensure
efficient
use
of
tax
dollars
and
appropriate
roles
for
the
city
through
continued
evaluation
of
new
and
existing
programs.
B
The
council
also
continued
the
priority
of
Transit
by
enhancing
the
K-12
high
of
pass
by
adding
parent
Guardians
for
the
school
district
program,
and
then
the
council
increased
the
total
amount
to
the
capital
Improvement
program
budget
by
over
1.2
million,
and
those
will
be
those
funds
will
be
discussed
later
in
the
summer.
So
that
was
just
an
effort
to
sort
of
take
some
of
the
what
has
been
Council
priority
in
recent
years
and
sort
of
highlight
where
the
budget
either
furthers
that
priority
or
achieves
that
priority
and
I
I'd
be
interested
to
know.
B
A
C
Yes,
so
if
the
so,
if
you
can
remind
me
all
the
way
back
to
just
yesterday
when
we
strop
pulled
the
air
quality,
did
we
put
all
of
that
in
the
holding
account
just
the
programs,
just
the
new
program,
funding,
okay
and
then
the
FTE,
where
it's
funded
is
funded?
So
if
we
need
to,
if
we
decide
to
fund
the
programs
later,
that
won't
come
out
of
general
fund,
it
will
come
out
of
the
holding
accounting
account.
C
B
C
B
B
With
yes,
it's
a
giant
paper,
okay,
so
just
to
walk
you
through
what
each
motion
does
the
motion
number
one
adopts
the
library
fund
budget
and
we
have
historically
approved
the
library
fund
budget
separately.
Different
councils
at
different
times
have
wanted
to
vote
on
it
separately
and
that's
why
we
do
it.
The
next
budget
or
the
next
motion
adopts
the
city
budget
and
within
that
City
budget,
adoption
ordinance
it
references
all
of
the
contingent
Appropriations.
So
these
Appropriations,
you
don't
need
to
read
them
out
loud.
B
B
The
second
one
is
a
continued
contingency.
This
is
one
we
do
each
year
for
funding
our
future
sales
tax
dollars.
The
third
one
is
a
contingency
relating
to
the
air
quality
incentives
program
that
councilmember
Wharton
was
just
referencing
and
the
last
one
is
a
contingency
relating
to
the
sanctioned
camping
catalytic
Grant
fund.
B
So
you
don't
need
to
read
those
aloud
when
you
make
your
motion
to
approve
it,
but
just
know
that
approving
that
motion
also
approves
those
contingencies.
Then
motion
number
three
sets
all
of
the
tax
rates
for
the
city.
This
is
like
probably
the
most
important
motion,
because
it's
literally
the
money,
so
we
do
read
off
the
decimal
points.
So
apologies
about
that.
B
Then.
The
next
motion
approves
the
amount
to
be
transferred
into
CIP,
including
the
funding
shown
on
this
motion
sheet,
so
that
all
of
The
Debt
Service,
payments
that
are
proposed
to
be
funded
out
of
CIP
can
be
funded
as
of
July
1..
So
this
means
that
you'll
approve
a
lot
of
the
Project
Specific
amounts
later
in
the
summer,
so
and
you'll
finalize
them
in
August,
but
you'll
be
able
to
make
your
debt
service
payments.
As
of
July
1.
B
A
B
No
matter
how
many
times
we
do
this,
we
always
catch
something
so
motion
number
six
is
all
other
budget
related
ordinances,
so
this
is
basically
everything
all
the
other
ordinances
that
are
needed
to
implement
the
budget.
The
one
additional
one
that
is
here
is
number
J
item
J,
which
is
the
resolution
relating
to
compensation
philosophy.
That's
the
one,
the
resolution
that
you
guys
read
yesterday
during
yesterday's
meeting
so.
A
Members
any
more
questions
on
what
we
are
doing
tonight.
I
guess
we'll
get
new
pieces,
yes
paper,
yes,
but
the
wording
for
those
contingent,
Appropriations
Legends.
It
should
be
the
same
so
right
catch
anything
else.
Let's
yeah,
please!
Let
us
know,
let's
all
read
through
it,
real
quick
before
we
do
that.
I
think
that
we
are
were
there
any
other
questions.
E
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
budgets
that
it's
been
easier
to
understand
easier
to,
like
you
know,
see
where
the
money's
coming
from
how
we're
going
to
do
it
and
I
think
there's
been
more
discussion,
perhaps
so,
and
a
lot
of
information
for
you
guys.
So
thank
you
so
much
Ben
and
everybody
else
that
is
listening
to
our
staff.
E
A
C
And
it's
one
of
the
things
that
I
talked
about
at
the
retreat
is
funding
a
more
robust
and
expansive
mural
program
and
so
I
think,
in
light
of
the
other
issues
that
we
needed
to
address,
this
budget
I,
like
I,
said
kind
of
took
that
off
the
stove
but
I'm,
something
that
I'm
going
to
be
pushing
for
more
I'm
going
forward.
So
I
hope
that
we
can
start
having
that
conversation
now,
because
I
think
it's
important
to
address.
So.
Thank
you.
A
A
F
F
Moving
on
to
our
next
slide,
Community
engagement
highlights
this
is
our
regular,
regularly
updated
highlights
that
we
do
out
throughout
the
city.
As
you
know,
Outreach
is
so
important,
and
this
is
just
a
reminder
for
our
residents
where
they
can
go
and
engage
with
the
city,
find
the
most
recent
surveys
and
and
updates
from
those
surveys
and
next
slide.
F
The
project
team
has
made
several
presentations
as
requested
to
the
recognized
Community
organizations
and
will
also
be
at
the
partners
in
the
park
tonight
event
tonight.
June
13th,
Jordan
Park
community
members
are
encouraged
to
visit
the
plan
website
thriving
in
place
slc.org
to
review
the
plan,
the
overview,
the
two-year
strategy
and
to
provide
input
up
until
June
26th.
F
And
then
next
slide
we
have
our
community
outreach
team.
This
is
real,
exciting
for
particularly
Josh
and
I
have
been
covering
the
last
couple
months
and
Hannah
to
so
Zoe
Stewart
is
our
new
digital
Community
liaison
she's
a
part-time
and
she'll,
be
helping
with
answering
and
responding
to
folks
trying
to
engage
with
the
mayor's
office
and
the
city
through
digital
means,
like
social
media
and
as
we
get
up
to
speed.
Well,
we
are
hopeful
that
she'll
be
able
to
do
some
of
the
more
proactive
work
in
spreading
information
in
the
digital
formats.
F
She
will
be
closely
working
with
the
mayor's
office,
Communications
team
and
our
SLC
TV
media
and
then
to
my
left
here
very
excited
to
have
Alicia
de
Leon.
She
just
started
with
us
on
Monday
and
she'll,
be
our
new
community
liaison
for
the
mayor's
office.
She
replaces
Ava
Lopez,
we're
still
kind
of
finally
finalizing
the
council
districts.
Our
team
will
be
covering
we're
meeting
on
that
tomorrow
and
there
will
likely
be
some
changes
coming,
but
we'll
notify
Council
Office
when
we
finalize
that-
and
did
you
want
to
that's.
B
E
F
G
You're
next
next
slide.
Please
we'll
keep
it
short
today.
I
know
on
your
busy
schedule.
You
can
see
the
numbers
still
very
high
utilization
rate
of
the
Resource
Centers
over
99.
Still
this
week,
There's
an
encampment
impact
mitigation
occurring
on
Gladiola,
Street,
West
of
215
and
District
2,
I
believe
and
a
number
of
camps.
Still
you
can
see
the
numbers
there
a
lot
of
activity
by
their
intervention
team.
We
had
a
resource
Fair
on
Friday
at
the
9th
South
River
Park,
and
you
can
see
some
of
the
highlights
about.
G
Justice
Court
was
there
in
the
health
department,
some
cases
were
resolved
some
vaccinations
and
then
the
kayak
Court
continues
to
be
maybe
a
single
location
Court
this
so
far,
this
spring
and
summer,
due
to
the
location
of
individuals
and
other
factors,
so
they're
still
working
on
where
that
will
be
this
coming
Friday,
let
you
know
that
as
soon
as
possible,
the
only
other
updates
are
the
task
group
focused
on
winter
overflow
for
next
winter.
The
task
group
of
Mayors
in
the
county
is
meeting
with
other
elected
officials
and
representatives.
G
They
have
essentially
divided
into
three
parts.
They
are
looking
at
lands
right
now.
The
cities
are
brought
forth
to
look
at
land
and
buildings
that
are
possibilities
as
well
as
state-owned
county-owned
facilities.
Wayne
eater
house
is
deeply
involved
in
that
they're.
Also
looking
at
the
budget
and
a
lot
of
that's
coming
from
the
state.
Obviously-
and
they
have
some
money
right
now,
set
aside
from
the
office
of
homeless
and
services
towards
that
effort,
and
then
the
third
piece
is
the
actually
operating
of
it
so
finding
an
operator
to
run
it
and
protocols.
G
D
This
last
meeting
we
had
last
week,
there
was
I
think
four
or
five
locations
in
cities
that
were
you,
know,
really
actively
looking
and
actively
participated
in
the
discussions,
and
it
would
kind
of
was
great
to
hear
different
areas
that
you
weren't
hearing
from
two
years
ago,
stepping
up
and
and
really
participating
in
the
process.
So
hats
off
to
the
whole
team
on
on
making
that
transition.
G
Thanks
councilmember
I
I
will
say
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
still
in
this
space
and
from
the
provider's
side
and
they're
participating
in
this
process.
They
are
still
advocating
actively
for
a
year-round
option.
So
it's
not
a
set
it
up
in
the
wintertime
and
shut
it
down
in
April,
which
we've
seen
for
a
number
of
years,
which
isn't
helpful
for
most
folks.
So
that's
still
still
the
undercurrent,
but
the
reality
for
the
state
legislation
and
the
funding
available
is
it's
winter
and
we'll
work
on
the
bigger
process
of
vehicles.
Here.
A
A
Now
we
should
go
to
break.
Is
there
anyone
I,
don't
see
well
Daniel's
here,
but
I
don't
see,
Nick,
okay,
I
think
we
should
go
to
break.
It
doesn't
look
like
the
we're
here.
So
let's
come
back
yet
should
we
say
three
o'clock:
it's
20
minutes
we're
ahead
of
time
and
people
aren't
in
the
room.
Yet
so
why
don't
we
come
back
at
three
thanks.
A
H
I
Thank
you
so
again
we're
in
the
very
beginning
stages
of
this
planning
process
and
again
this
is
for
the
300
West
Corridor
and
Central
Point
Station
area
plan.
We
just
want
to
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
the
process
that
we're
looking
at
and
then
getting
the
early
input
from
the
council
next
slide.
Please.
I
So,
let's
just
start
by
going
over
the
area
that
we're
looking
at
so
the
project
area
extends
from
the
I-15
on
and
off
ramp
at
about
a
thousand
south
on
the
North
End
extends
down
south
to
2100,
South
and
then
from
I-15
on
the
west.
It
extends
to
the
Trax
line
or
200
West
on
the
East,
and
then
it
has
a
carve
out
at
1700
South
to
2100
South
that
extends
up
to
West
Temple.
I
I
Next
slide,
please
so
just
for
some
background
here.
This
area
has
been
on
the
minds
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
staff
for
a
number
of
years.
The
residential
development
interest
has
been
particularly
high
in
this
area
for
the
past
few
years,
but
there's
been
a
realization
that
the
zoning
in
place
really
does
not
align
with
City
policies
related
to
housing.
Walkability
connectivity,
Street
engagement,
in
particular,
the
zoning
out
here-
is
General
commercial
and
The.
General
commercial
is
really
intended
for
commercial
development
line.
Industrial
Development,
it's
not.
I
So
as
a
result
of
this
plan,
we
want
to
ensure
that
we
do
have
design
standards
in
the
zoning
in
our
land
use
policies
that
apply
to
Future
development.
In
this
area,
Additionally
the
300
West
Bikeway,
recently
completed
installation
and
again
The
General
commercial.
Zoning
really
has
no
policies
or
no
regulations
that
require
any
sort
of
Street
engagement
or
encourage
use
of
the
Bikeway,
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
the
state
recently
imposed
a
mandate
for
a
station
area
plan
for
any
cities
that
have
a
track
station
in
their
boundaries.
I
We
are
required
to
develop
a
new
station
area
plan
for
the
area
around
that
station,
and
in
this
case
we
have
the
Central
Point
Station
at
21st
South.
That
requires
a
new
plan
next
slide.
Please
so
because
of
those
reasons,
this
city
applied
for
a
grant
from
Wasatch
Front
Regional
Council
to
hire
a
consultant
to
develop
a
new
plan
and
develop
new
Zoning
for
the
area.
We
were
awarded
140
000
dollars
with
a
ten
thousand
dollar
match
from
the
city.
I
I
So
as
far
as
timelines
go,
we
are
again
just
barely
starting
this
process
of
we're
in
June
now
so
we
are
beginning
some
public
Outreach.
The
first
part
of
that
will
involve
direct
interviews
with
business
owners,
property
owners
and
residents,
we'll
also
be
sending
out
a
mailer
to
all
prop
to
all
properties,
resident
residents
and
business
owners,
so
they
can
put
their
feedback
on
a
website.
I
Following
that
engagement
and
that
existing
conditions
report,
the
consultant
will
develop
two
different
alternatives
and
they
will
then
take
those
alternatives
to
a
open
house
in
August
for
public
feedback
and
then
based
on
the
public
feedback
we
get.
They
will
take
one
of
those
scenarios
forward
as
the
draft
plan
and
then
we'd
anticipate
bringing
that
draft
plan
to
the
council
in
fall
or
winter
2023..
I
G
D
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much,
thanks
Daniel
for
this
introduction
on
this.
The
project
schedule
when,
when
the
policy
questions
just
talks
about
the
public
engagement
process-
and
you
know
when
we
usually
talk
about
these
plans-
and
we
talk
about
the
neighborhoods-
there's
a
big
neighborhood.
Well,
this
doesn't
have
a
big
neighborhood
I
mean
it
has
a
you
know:
Costco
Home,
Depot
and
those
are
to
owners
of
big
property.
I
We're
we're
considering
doing
some
social
media
outreach,
some
signs
actually
on
the
site
that
people
that
are
just
traveling
into
the
area
might
see
but
recognize.
It
is
a
little
difficult
to
capture
people
that
are
just
driving
in
and
driving
right
out.
If
we
are
considering
also
doing
some
Outreach
at
the
track
stations,
we
are
capturing
people
traveling
in
and
out
through
the
track
station.
We
haven't
finalized
the
complete
strategy,
but
I
think
that's
a
good
consideration.
J
A
I
am
wondering
about
the
let's
see
you
have
in
there
that
the
consultant
scope
that
they
were
hired
for
actually
includes
drafting
the
land,
use
and
Zoning
code
changes.
Is
that
new,
or
is
that
typical?
Because
if
I
remember,
station
ballpark
stationary
plan
did
like
staff
is
doing
that
themselves
right?
Is
this
something
that
we
plan
to
do
more
of
in
the
future
of
having
the
consultant
plan?
Those
land
use
code
changes
right
on
the
tail
of
the
small
area
plans.
K
Yeah-
and
this
particular
consultant
that
was
selected
is
also
the
consultant
who
worked
on
the
downtown
building
head
stuff,
so
they're
already
familiar
with
the
Zone
in
question
for
the
majority
of
the
zone.
So
we
felt
it
was
there
there's
less
of
a
I,
don't
know
the
right
term,
but
they
have
a
solid
understanding
of
it,
and
so
we
felt
this
was
appropriate
to
put
in
for.
A
A
Council
members
any
more
questions
about
this
very
excited
about
this
project
and
and
excited
for
the
changes
that
will
be
happening
there
and
I
know
that
this
one's
a
little
tricky
because
you're
coordinating
with
South
Salt
Lake
as
well
right
and
is
it
the
same
consultant
working
with
both
municipalities?
It
is.
A
A
A
I
I
think
I
see
that
next
one
so,
okay,
we
will
move
on
to
item
number.
Five
Brian
Fulmer
from
Council
staff
is
going
to
give
us
an
introduction.
This
is
an
ordinance
for
a
rezone
at
approximately
510
South
200
West
Diana
Martinez
is
the
principal
planner
here
and
I
see
John
Anderson
as
well.
Hello.
L
Thank
you
Mr
chair.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
for
the
approximately
one
acre
parcel
at
510,
South
200
West
from
its
current
D2
or
downtown
support,
District
to
D1
or
Central
business
district,
and
it's
located
in
Council
District
Four.
No
development
plans
were
submitted
with
a
petition
and
the
petitioner
is
in
the
audience,
I
believe
and
available
to
answer
questions.
If
the
council
has
them
with
that,
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Diana.
M
M
A
All
right
councilors
any
questions
before
we
see
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
address
the
council.
Okay,
typically,
we
allow
the
applicant
a
few
minutes.
If
they're
here
would
you
like
to
come
up,
looks
like
no,
you
don't!
Okay,
if
there
are
no
more
questions
Brian,
can
you
help
us
through
the
timeline
on
this
one.
L
D
A
L
All
right,
this
is
a
proposal
from
the
administration
to
amend
the
city,
ordinance
related
to
non-conforming
signs.
These
are
signs
which
were
permitted
under
city
code
when
they
were
constructed,
but
under
the
current
code
they
do
not
conform
to
the
standards.
So
the
proposal
would
allow
more
flexibility
in
maintaining
reusing,
modifying
and
updating
these
existing
signs.
It
would
also
align
sign
standards
with
federal
and
state
statutes,
City
goals
and
would
help
support
businesses
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Nick.
K
So
I'm
kind
of
flying
by
the
seat
of
my
pants
here
on
this,
but
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide
on
the
presentation,
I'm
happy
to
go
through
it
so
generally,
a
non-conforming
sign
is
a
sign
that
was
legally
existing
at
the
time
it
was
constructed,
but
over
time
it
has
changed
and
I'm
gonna.
Let
Kaylin
take
the
presentation.
Sorry.
N
N
You're
ready
to
be
out
of
here
all
right,
so
yeah,
so
non-conforming
signs,
I'm,
sure,
you're
familiar,
but
just
to
sum
up,
they're
just
signs
that
were
legally
existing
at
the
time
they
were
constructed,
but
due
to
changes
in
the
zoning
ordinance
or
map
amendments,
they
are
no
longer
conforming
to
the
current
standards.
There
are
types
of
non-conforming
signs
that
are
not
impacted
by
this
text:
Amendment.
Those
are
vintage
signs
and
billboards.
Those
are
both
regulated
separately
by
their
own
individual
ordinances
and
they
will
not
be
impacted
by
this
text.
Amendment.
N
Mix
that
so
the
current
code
is
very
restrictive.
Basically,
no
alterations
are
permitted
whatsoever,
including
changing
the
sign
face
to
a
different
businesses.
Sign,
for
example
like
this
one
right
here,
the
car
wash
they
changed
business
ownerships
and
required
changing
the
sign.
We
had
to
do
some
mental
gymnastics
to
get
around
the
ordinance
for
this,
because
there
is
federal
law
that
states
that
we
cannot
regulate,
sign
content,
and
so
this
is
problematic
in
our
code.
N
So
we
needed
to
make
sure
we
addressed
that
there's
also
language
in
there
that
prevents
any
kind
of
relocating
the
sign.
Making
the
sign
smaller,
replacing
it
altering
it
in
any
way
is
prohibited
unless
the
whole
thing
is
brought
into
compliance
with
current
zoning
standards.
There's
a
state
law
that
indicates
that
non-conforming
uses
and
non-compliant
structures
are
required.
We
are
required
to
allow
their
reuse
and,
under
this
current
zoning
ordinance,
it's
very
preventative
of
allowing
people
to
reuse
those
signs.
N
So
the
proposed
code
is
relatively
simple.
Modifications
are
permitted
so
long
as
those
modifications
do
not
increase
the
level
of
non-conformity,
and
this
includes
changes
to
location,
dimensional
standards
like
sign
phase
size
or
height
and
the
replacement
of
any
part
of
the
sine
structure.
It
also
clarifies
that
sign
maintenance
is
permitted,
so
people
who
own
non-conforming
science
can
do
maintenance
to
keep
them
looking
nice.
N
N
So,
during
the
public
engagement
process,
we
received
some
comments
with
concerns
about
the
city
standards
or
lack
thereof,
addressing
electronic
signs.
Currently,
the
only
area,
the
only
portion
of
the
sign
ordinance
that
addresses
electronic
science
is
the
Billboard
ordinance,
and
so
those
only
are
related
to
Billboards.
There
is
language
in
the
code
that
does
prohibit
animated
signs,
but
as
long
as
the
sign
is
fully
legible
within
three
seconds,
it's
not
considered
animated.
N
Under
the
current
code
there
was
a
text
Amendment
addressing
electronic
science
standards
broadly,
that
was
process
proposed
in
2012,
but
the
city
council
at
that
time
decided
not
to
take
it
up.
That
included
language
and
definitions
related
to
dwell
times
and
12
times
how
big
an
animated
or
an
electronic
sign
can
be
that
kind
of
thing.
D
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
back
on
the
the
Dual
time
and
the
lights.
Is
there
anything
on
the
brightness
and
dimming
them
and
and
hours,
because
I
know
that
we
have
that
we've
had
that
discussion
on
billboards
and
but
how's
it
impact
this,
or
does
this
impact
the
lights
or
state
anything
about
lights?
This.
A
K
A
K
N
K
And
but
those
don't
apply
right
now
to
on-site
signs,
and
so
it
would,
it
would
be
I
mean
I,
think
it's
a
simple
text,
amendment
that
doesn't
mean
it
won't
be
controversial,
but
it
should
be.
You
know
it
should
be
taking
those
same
parameters
and
just
applying
them
to
any
electronic
sign.
Mr,
chair,
yeah.
M
J
O
O
A
O
K
K
K
K
E
J
A
C
K
I
mean
signs
are
really
expensive,
and
so
it
we've
had
a
number
of
small
businesses
who,
whether
right
or
wrong,
they
would
go
out
and
invest
in
these
signs
to
replace
it
on
a
poll
or
something
and
that
sign's
not
allowed
anymore,
and
they
can't
do
it,
and
so
this,
basically
is
making
it
easier
for
small
businesses
to
utilize
existing
signage
and
create
some
updates
to
those
signs
to
be
more
efficient
with
lighting
how
they
change
things
out.
Things
like
that.
C
Yeah
I
mean
and
I
don't
want
to
like
over.
It
probably
doesn't
matter,
but
because
my
reading
of
the
current
one
is
that
it
allows
for
you
to
modify
and
maintain
a
non-consistent
sign
as
long
as
it's
put
back
on
the
same
location
in
Manner,
and
that
seems
to
be
substantially
similar
to
what
the
new
ordinance
does.
N
If
you
go
back
in
the
presentation,
I
have
the
language
of
the
existing
one
more
yeah.
So
the
first
sentence
is
the
big
part.
The
non-conforming
science
shall
not
be
reconstructed,
raised,
moved,
replace,
extended,
altered
or
enlarged,
unless
the
sign
is
changed
so
as
to
conform
to
all
provisions
of
this
chapter.
So
that
means
if
the
sign
is
non-conforming,
because
it's
too
big
and
they
want
to
move
it
to
a
different
spot.
They
can't,
unless
they
make
it
smaller.
J
P
A
L
Okay,
thank
you.
This
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
zoning
map
and
Northwest
Community
master
plan.
Future
land
use
map
for
the
properties
at
fifteen
hundred
fifteen.
Sixteen
fifteen
twenty
two
West
500
North
and
552
North
1500
West
current
zoning
is
r17000
or
single-family
residential
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
r15000
and
sr3
and
sr3
is
special
pattern
residential.
L
P
So
next
slide
there
will
be
a
map,
because
that
was
a
lot
of
addresses
that
will
help
illustrate
what's
going
on
here.
Even
here,
we'll
try
and
break
it
down
so
they're.
Basically,
two
separate
requests:
Happening
Here.
The
first
is
a
zoning
map
Amendment
and
master
plan
Amendment
for
a
section
of
these
properties
to
be
rezoned
to
sr3,
and
that
requires
the
the
master
plan
amendment
to
well
the
master
planet,
to
keep
the
rezone
in
in
line
with
the
adopted
plan
of
that
neighborhood.
P
The
the
master
plan
amendment
is
also
necessary
and
then
the
other
section
of
this
rezone
is
the
South
section
facing
500
North,
where
the
properties
would
existing
houses
would
be
rezoned
to
R1
5000
in
order
to
accommodate
a
little
bit
more
space
in
the
area
behind
them.
So
next
slide
here's
the
map
from
on
the
next
slide,
so
the
blue
section
here
is
the
area
that
would
be
is
requesting
to
be
rezoned
to
sr3,
including
that
Master
Plan
Amendment.
P
Then
the
green
is
the
section
that
would
be
reasonable
to
r15000
and
you'll
notice
that
the
rezone
doesn't
quite
line
up
with
property
lines,
but
that
requests
is
a
plan.
Development
request,
also
coming
through
and
I,
am
processing
that
at
the
moment
that
would,
as
well
as
a
subdivision
application
that
is
meant
to
align
the
rezone
align
the
properties
with
the
rezone.
P
P
P
P
P
So
what
does
change
with
this
sr3?
Smaller
lots
are
permitted
up
to
two
two
thousand
square
feet
for
single
family
detached
homes,
but
single
family
attached
homes
are
also
permitted
different
housing
types.
There
are
more
options,
including
town
homes
and
two
family
duplexes,
and
then
the
setbacks
are
a
little
tighter
than
in
the
r17000
next
slide.
P
So
this
was
one
of
the
more
challenging
parts
of
it
was
trying
to
keep
the
master
plans
in
line
with
one
another.
So
the
sr3
district
really
is
an
effective
compromise
between
plant
Salt,
Lake
and
growing
SLC,
which
promote
that
Medium
density
infill
and
the
Northwest
Community
Master
plans
requests
to
kind
of
limit
non-single.
Family
development
within
the
community,
so
sr3
promotes
that
infill
without
significantly
changing
what
was
established
in
that
Community
master
plan
in
1992
next
slide.
P
Just
a
note
on
neighborhood
character,
you
can
see
many
of
the
Lots
on
this
block
are
very
deep
and
there
is
some
dense
infill
in
proximity
of
the
subject:
property
there's
a
set
of
Twin,
Homes
and
duplexes
immediately
north
of
the
subject
property
and
then
to
the
West
elsewhere
in
yellow.
There
is
a
plan
development
that
was
approved
many
years
past,
with
multiple
homes
accessed
onto
a
single
private,
Street
right
next
slide.
P
Next
slide
there
was
some
public
feedback,
specifically
a
neighborhood
initiated
petition
that
was
included
with
the
transmittal
and
they
spoke
at
the
Planning
Commission
hearing
and
had
concerns
about
especially
about
traffic,
on
500
North
next
slide,
and
as
I
mentioned
before,
there
is
a
plan
development
petition.
This
site
really
cannot
be
developed
to
the
potential
the
applicant
would
like.
Without
plan
development,
you
can
see
there.
P
The
50-foot
right-of-way
width,
the
lot
width
there
requires
plan
development
in
order
to
be
developed
and
then
also
to
establish
that
new
property
line
on
the
south
side,
and
with
that
you
know
in
applying
development,
there
are
additional
standards
that
need
to
be
met
as
far
as
traffic
and
impact
on
the
neighborhood,
so
that
the
Planning
Commission
will
review
that.
This
is
only
the
the
first
step
in
the
process.
P
J
Q
To
avoid
that,
the
intended
rezone
allows
more
flexibility
in
housing
options
through
development
of
the
inner
block,
while
maintaining
the
R1
5000
along
the
500
North.
Our
intended
homeowners
are
diverse:
middle
income,
oftentimes,
dual
income
families
and
intended
to
be
owner
occupied.
Our
proposal
contains
only
single-family
homes
with
multiple
floor
plans
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
diverse
population,
including
multi-generational
families.
Q
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
a
purpose
statement
of
the
sr3,
as
Aaron
just
explained,
and
with
a
variety
of
housing
types
and
scale
and
character.
The
development
located
with
the
interior
portion
of
the
city
blocks.
So
all
the
new
homes
will
be
on
the
inside
of
the
city
blocks
and
will
be
renovating
the
homes
on
the
along
the
fifth
North.
Q
R
P
R
R
Q
R
R
A
Q
A
That
that
proposed
walkway
would
go
from
all
the
way
to
fifth
North.
Oh
that's
great,
are
you
saying
so?
Is
that
proposed?
That's
just
in
the
proposed
plan?
That's
not
part
of
a
development
agreement
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
is
part
of
the
proposal.
It
looks
like
you
already
have
a
plan,
development
application
and
so,
if
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission,
that
becomes
required
or
does
it
not?
How
does
that
work
with.
Q
A
R
R
A
L
Okay,
this
is
a
proposal
to
amend
the
Zoning
for
those
properties
you
mentioned
in
addition
to
1574
South
900
West
from
their
current
R1
7000
or
single
family
residential
zoning
to
RMF
30,
low
density,
multi-family
residential.
The
petitioner's
objective
is
to
construct
row
houses
on
the
properties,
I
believe
he
they
are
in
the
audience
and
available
to
answer
questions.
The
council
may
have
and
turn
it
over
to
Caitlin.
N
This
gives
you
an
idea
of
what
the
zoning
is
in
the
area.
Just
south
is
the
CB
Zone
and
there's
also
been
some
Redevelopment
in
that
area
for
multi-family
housing
as
well.
There's
an
R2
and
rmf-35
Zone
nearby,
the
strip
of
land
on
1000
West.
That
would
remain
one
R1
7000
has
a
I
believe
two
single-family
homes
on
it,
but
also
a
number
of
duplexes
in
that
zone,
so
they're
non-conforming
to
the
zone
that
is
in
place.
Currently
next
slide.
N
The
standards
for
the
two
are
actually
quite
similar,
except
for
the
number
of
units
that
are
permitted
per
lot.
The
maximum
height
for
the
r17000
is
28
feet,
while
RMF
30
is
30..
The
maximum
lot
width
for
RMF
30
is
110
feet,
so
they're
not
going
to
have
be
able
to
create
Mega
Lots.
The
setbacks
are
also
quite
similar.
The
block
face
average
Corner
side
yards
are
10
feet,
interior
side
yard.
Setbacks
are
six
feet
in
the
rear
yards.
Maximum
setback
is
25
feet.
N
They
also
are
required
to
have
two
off
street
parking
stalls
per
dwelling
unit,
and
that
is
similar
as
in
the
single
family,
residential
Zone.
The
main
difference
again
is
the
number
of
units
that
are
permitted
in
row.
House
development
in
the
rmf-30
zone.
They
are
permitted.
Each
building
is
required
to
have
at
least
three
units,
but
no
more
than
six
units
per
building.
N
The
Planning
Commission
heard
this
on
the
March
8th
agenda
and
determined
that
the
rmf-30
Zone
implements
key
policies
and
goals
outlined
in
the
west
side.
Master
plan
which
identifies
vacant
and
underutilized
Parcels
in
this
area
as
preferred
locations
for
multi-family
and
field
development,
and
was
voted
nine
to
one
to
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
and
that's
the
end
of
that.
O
N
S
A
S
S
A
All
right,
I,
don't
see
any
other
questions
appreciate
that
give
same
schedule
on
this
one,
keeping
it
consistent.
Thank
you
Brian
for
all
of
your
work
on
those
we
are
moving
on
to
our
standing
items
Sharon
by
share
report.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everyone
for
bearing
with
us,
through
this
budget
process,
staff
and
council
members
and
everybody
for
all
of
your
hard
work,
and
especially
the
mayor's
staff
and
administration
Vice
chair
any
reports.
Okay,
we
do
have
a
report
from
the
executive
director.
T
The
Redevelopment
agency
previously
several
years
ago
did
a
organize
some
fact-finding
missions
to
various
cities
and
the
council,
members
mayor
and
some
of
the
professional
staff
from
the
city
departments
and
also
the
Planning
Commission
attended
and
came
back
with
several
ideas
that
were
implemented
successfully
in
the
city.
So
this
is
a
continuation
of
that
that
has
been
on
hold
for
several
years.
T
T
Hopefully,
by
the
end
of
this
week,
if
you
are
available
to
attend-
and
it
is
quite
a
ways
away
so
give
us
your
best
guess
as
to
whether
you'll
be
here
and
then
if
something
happens
in
terms
of
scheduling
on
your
end,
let
us
know
as
soon
as
it
changes
so
that
we
can
get
anything.
We've
tentatively
reserved
to
get
that
canceled.
So
let
us
know
Friday,
preliminarily
and
then
ASAP
after
that
for
sure.