►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - July 28, 2021
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - July 28, 2021- Rebroadcast
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
There was an issue with the encoder at the end of this live stream this is the archive version of this meeting.
A
To
order
welcome
everyone
to
the
planning
commission
meeting
for
july
28th
wayne
or
whomever
mr
michaela
or
nick,
would
you
care
to
give
a
a
brief
introduction
on
how
people
can
participate.
B
B
Okay,
so
for
those
of
you
that
are
joining
us,
welcome
on
the
screen,
you'll
see
a
couple
of
links.
One
is
the
actual
link
to
the
meeting
and
then
there's
a
a
link
to
a
guide
to
help
you
be
involved
and
and
some
instructions
on
how
to
how
to
be
involved
into
the
meeting.
B
B
We
have
people
that
are
monitoring
our
email
system.
So,
if
you're
having
difficulty
wanting
to
make
a
comment
or
get
in,
you
can
send
those
send
us
an
email,
and
we
can
read
your
comments
during
the
hearing
for
those
of
you
that
are
in
attendance.
B
If
you
open
up
your,
I
believe
it's
your
participants
panel
or
your
attendee
panel,
there's
a
very
small
little
hand.
Looking
thing
down
here,
when
the
item
comes
up
the
public
hearing
for
the
item
that
you'd
like
to
speak,
if
you
could
hit
that
hand
button
that
lets
us
know
that
that
you'd
like
to
speak
on
that
item
and
that's
all
I
have.
A
Okay,
thanks
wayne,
it
looks
like
we
have
carolyn
now
and
we're
just
missing
crystal
so
if
she
pops
on
then
I'll
try
to
pay
attention
to
that.
We
do
not
have
minutes
prepared
for
last
meeting,
so
we
will
not
be
voting
on
that.
Brenda
is
absent
today.
So
we
don't
have
a
any
remarks
from
the
chair.
I
have
none
as
vice
chair,
but
the
director,
I
believe,
has
some
comments.
They'd
like
to
share
to
the
commission.
B
But
one
thing
that
is
just
just
happened
in
the
city
is
that
the
mayor's
issued
a
new
executive
order
due
to
increase
in
covered
cases,
and
so
we
don't
know
what
that
means
for
the
hybrid
meetings
that
we've
been
planning
on
hosting
that
we
keep
getting
delayed,
but
just
want
to
let
the
planning
commission
know
that
there's
a
good
chance
that
we're
going
to
be
staying
virtual
for
the
foreseeable,
at
least
in
the
short
term,
but
we'll
know
more
after
we
work
with
a
city
recorder
and
the
city
council
on
what
they're
doing
and
hopefully
follow
those
leads.
B
So
just
wanted
to
give
a
heads
up
about
that.
Since
you
met
last,
the
city
council
has
heard
a
num
a
number
of
give
several
briefings
on
various
proposals
that
have
come
through
the
planning
commission.
B
They
held
a
briefing
on
the
changes
to
the
special
exceptions
and
eliminating
those
two
weeks
ago
and
that's
scheduled
for
a
public
hearing
and
tentative
date
for
a
decision
in
august.
So
we'll
keep
you
up
to
date
on
how
that
unfolds.
B
They
also
approved
a
number
of
zoning
changes,
including
the
zoning
change
along
at
the
old
snellgrove
site
and
sugarhouse,
so
that
project
will
be
it's
still
in
that
planned
development
design,
review
phase.
I
think
one
of
those
two
applications,
but
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
the
status
of
that
is
so
anyway.
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
quick
update
on
that,
and
I
think
we
gave
you
an
update
on
this
in
july,
but
for
those
that
may
have
missed
it
in
the
in
the
budget
that
was
adopted
in
june.
B
For
this
current
fiscal
year,
the
city
council
did
allocate
four
new
positions
in
planning,
so
we're
going
to
be
that
money
becomes
available
on
september
1
and
so
we're
going
to
be
reorganizing
our
division
a
little
bit.
So
we
can
have
more
focus
on
big
picture
policy
types
of
things,
and
so
that's
that's
a
good
thing.
B
So
hopefully
we
can
address
some
of
these
issues
that
the
community,
the
the
city
the
planning
commission
has
have
identified,
has
just
things
that
need
to
be
either
addressed
because
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
or
their
problems
with
the
code
or
there
are
ways
to
improve
the
code.
So
hopefully
it'll
probably
take
us
a
few
months
to
get
new
people
up
to
speed
and
on
board,
but
once
we
do,
hopefully
we
start
seeing
some
of
those
types
of
general
improvements
to
our
our
plans
and
codes.
B
So
that's
all
I
have
oh
and
one
other
thing.
You
should
know
that
the
the
design
review
decision
for
the
utah
theater
site
was
appealed
so
that
that
was
anticipated.
So
we
will
be
working
through
that
process
as
well.
A
I
I
failed
to
download
that
kind
of
agenda
that
has
all
the
steps
to
it,
but
I
think
I
got
them
all,
but
let
me
know
if
I
missed
something:
if
we're
ready
to
start
the
public
hearings,
we
can
begin
with
number
one,
which
is
the
ivory
house
university,
ivory
house
zoning
map
amendment.
Let
me
open
it.
Sorry.
A
E
E
E
E
I
will
start
with
the
review
of
the
zoning
map
amendment,
so
the
amendment
for
the
subject
property
is
from
I,
which
is
institutional
to
rmu,
which
is
a
residential
mixed
use.
The
property
was
recently
subdivided
from
the
larger
30.8
acre
site
to
create
approximately
5.4
acres,
which
is
a
new
corner
parcel
which
has
frontage
both
on
mario
kapecchi
drive
and
south
campus
drive.
E
E
Currently
contains
the
church
of
the
latter-day
saints
institute,
building,
which
was
used
associated
with
the
university
of
utah,
and
the
existing
zoning
is
institutional
which
you
can
see
is
also
the
zoning
to
the
north,
the
east
and
the
west,
as
well
as
the
south.
Additional
zones
in
this
area
include
research
park
and
some
open
space
domain.
E
You
have
a
photo
of
the
property
looking
west
sorry,
these
aren't
the
best
photos,
it's
actually
a
challenging
property
to
photograph
and
then
a
prop
a
photo
of
the
subject:
property
looking
southwest
again
southwest
and
then
directly
west,
and
these
are
two
photos
of
the
abutting
well
adjacent
and
a
buddy.
So
the
other
corner
property
to
the
north
is
the
lower
photo
and
to
the
east
is
fort
douglas.
E
E
E
The
requested
zoning
map
amendment
is
supported
by
the
east
bench:
master
plan
policy
statements
and
guidelines
for
regional
activity,
centers
the
rezone
locates,
a
large
student
housing
project
within
the
university
of
utah
boundaries
and
relieves
some
traffic
pressure
for
student
commuters
along
foothill
drive
the
location
according
to
the
east
benchmaster
plan
policies
is
preferred
due
to
its
proximity
to
the.
U,
and
the
proposed
rezone
would
encourage
a
student
housing
development
where
student
housing
is
needed,
which
is
on
campus.
E
Additionally,
this
development
would
relieve
some
pressure
in
the
east
bench
neighborhoods,
which
currently
serves
as
where
many
of
the
students
live.
Currently,
there
were
no
identified
conflicts
or
concerns
with
the
policy
statements
or
guidelines
within
the
east
benchmaster
plan.
Additionally,
the
plan
salt
lake
had
four
identified
guiding
principles
in
support
of
the
proposed
rezone.
E
In
consideration
with
the
discuss
zoning
map
amendment,
the
applicant
is
also
requesting
approval
for
an
associated
plan,
development
and
design
review.
The
plan
development
is
a
is
to
accommodate
multiple
buildings
on
one
lot,
which
is
what
one
of
which
does
not
have
public
street
frontage
and
the
design
review
is
required
to
exceed
the
maximum
front
yard
setback
within
the
rmu
zoning
district.
E
That
requirement
specifies
that
25
of
the
building
frontage
is
required
to
be
within
15
feet
of
the
front
line,
front
property
line
and
the
development
incorporates
large
front
yard
setbacks
along
the
street
frontages.
E
E
The
following
slides
identify
where
the
buildings
are
located,
the
associated
height
and
the
materials.
So
building
a
faces,
south
campus
drive
it's
approximately
67
feet
and
11
inches
in
height.
This
is
the
associated
primary
elevation
as
well.
As
the
plan
view,
building
b
faces
mario
kapecchi,
approximately
73
feet
in
height
a
primary
elevation
facing
mario
kapecchi,
as
well
as
the
plan
view.
E
Building
c
is
66
feet,
seven
inches
the
primary
elevation,
as
well
as
the
plan
view
and
then
building
d,
which
also
faces
mario
kapecchi,
is
approximately
73
feet
three
inches
in
height,
and
this
is
the
primary
elevation
and
the
planned
view.
They
are
all
designed.
Quite
similarly,
in
regard
to
the
landscaping
and
the
parking
circulation,
the
red
boxes
identified
along
south
campus
drive
and
mario
kapecchi
highlight
the
mature
landscaping
that
the
developer
is
hoping
to
preserve
through
the
design
review
process.
E
A
F
E
I
believe
that
the
university
was
working
on
a
plan
and
I'm
not
familiar
with
its
publication.
There
are
two
representatives
from
the
university
here
this
evening
to
speak
on
behalf
of
this
project
and
they
should
be
able
to
address
that.
Okay.
A
Any
other
commissioners,
all
right,
kelsey.
I
have
a
question
about
landscaping.
Are
there
any
provisions
in
this
zoning
to
increase
some
of
the
landscaping
in
the
interior
of
this
development
because
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
anything.
E
E
E
Go
so
the
landscaping
is
there's
20
required
in
the
rmu
and
they're
providing
28.5,
which
is
67
000
square
feet
approximately.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
kelsey.
Any
other
commissioners
have
questions
for
staff.
A
Okay,
so
the
two
presenters
that
I
had
listed
for
tonight
are
not
in
the
list,
so
you
might
need
to
tell
me
who
is
presenting
for
the
applicant,
because
I
had
ashley
hadfield
and
scott
bates.
A
I
was
looking
at,
I
was
looking
in
the
attendees,
so
that's
why
I
didn't
see
them
so
good.
Okay,
we
will
move
on
to
the
presenters,
so
we
have
ashley
hadfield
and
scott
bates,
who
are
together
to
present
for
the
applicant
and
ms
hadfield
and
mr
bates.
You
have
10
minutes
to
give
your
presentation
and
if
you
are
ready,
they
can
give
you
presenter
rights
if
you
have
a
presentation
to
take
over
the
screen.
But
the
time
is
yours.
D
Thank
you.
We're
ready
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
I'll
start
out
my
name's
scott
bates,
I'm
very
excited
to
represent
this
amazing
project.
It
brings
salt
lake
city,
the
university
of
utah,
the
lds
church
and
the
ivory
foundation
together
as
partners
to
meet
the
critical
needs
of
student
housing
near
campus,
and
also
it
creates
an
innovative
model
to
fund
scholarships
for
tens
of
thousands
of
students
over
the
next
century.
D
I'm
also
excited
because
I'm
a
u
of
u
grad,
undergrad
and
also
a
law,
school
grad
and
I've
been
involved
in
real
estate
law
and
development
for
23
years
and
done
a
lot
of
neat
projects
that
have
been
cool
to
be
involved
with
such
as
overseeing
the
renovation
of
utah
jazz
arena.
But
this
one
has
been
the
most
gratifying
project
because
of
the
social
impact
that
it'll
have.
D
D
D
D
D
I'd
like
to
thank
salt
lake
city,
in
particular
the
community
development
team
and
planning
staff.
It
have
been
remarkable
to
work
with
during
this
entitlement
process
so
far
and
the
church
of
jesus
christ
of
latter-day
saints,
which
has
agreed
to
demolish
an
existing
functioning
chapel
and
give
ivory
foundation
100
year
lease
on
the
ground
to
enable
this
project
to
help
students.
D
So
what
will
ivory
house
do?
It
will
first,
it
will
make
two
critical
needs.
First,
it
will
help
meet
the
need.
The
critical
student
housing
need
near
campus.
The
data
for
this
slide
was
provided
by
our
partners,
the
university
of
utah,
who
are
here
tonight
in
support
of
the
project.
In
addition,
the
planning
staff
report
notes
that
in
2014
there
were
32
000
students
enrolled
at
the.
U,
but
only
3
300
student
housing
units
on
or
near
campus.
D
D
Their
focus
is
on
students
who
again
need
it.
The
most
first
generation
students
who,
whose
parents
and
grandparents
et
cetera,
have
never
attended
college
and
then
ivy
accelerated
scholarships
are
focused
on
those
students
who
are
enrolled
but
have
to
drop
out
due
to
financial
hardship.
We
approach
those
students
provide
them
a
scholarship,
so
they
can
come
back
and
finish
their
degree.
D
D
D
G
Awesome,
thank
you,
scott
planning,
commissioners,
it's
great
to
be
before
you
this
evening.
First
thing
that
you
need
to
know
about
me:
I'm
also
a
proud
university
of
utah
alumni,
even
though
my
family
are
byu,
fans
so
causes
a
little
bit
of
strife,
but
I
graduated
from
the
masters
of
real
estate
development
program
back
in
2019
and
upon
graduation.
I
came
and
started
working
at
the
ivy.
G
You
know
the
ivory
foundation
and
the
ivory
foundation's
been
a
lot
of
fun
and
there's
always
exciting
projects
going
on,
and
this
is
one
of
them
that
I've
really
been
happy
to
be
involved
with
the
best
part
about
working
for
the
ivory
foundation
is
that
we
get
to
work
with
a
lot
of
people
who
are
doing
really
good
and
a
unique
thing
about
this
project.
G
Is
we've
been
able
to
bring
in
recently
graduated
students
as
long
as
current
students
and
been
able
to
get
their
feedback
in
this
project,
and
it's
been
fun
to
have
their
energy
and
also
their
input?
As
we've
been
designing
this
so
to
get
started,
let's
kind
of
talk
about
the
site,
there
could
not
be
a
better
site
for
this
project
and
we
are
very
grateful
for
the
church
to
being
able
to
work
with
us
on
it.
The
site
has
four
5.4
acres.
It's
kitty
corner
mario
kapecca
and
south
campus
drive.
G
There's
a
lot
of
great
benefits,
we're
close
to
the?
U
there's
a
track
station.
The
student
life
center
is
a
five
minute
walk
away,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
benefits
here
for
the
salt
lake
city
residents
and
some
of
those
are
that
we
are
able
to
reduce
the
traffic
from
daily
student
commuters
by
bringing
these
students
closer
to
campus
and
then
also
increasing
this
housing
stock.
As
stock
scott
mentioned,
there
isn't
a
lot
of
on
campus
housing
compared
comparatively
to
the
student
body
here
at
the.
U.
G
So
as
we
set
out
to
start
looking
at
ivory
university
house,
we
took
a
look
at
two
main
things,
and
that
was
one.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
enhanced
the
surrounding
development
and
the
existing
development
there
and
then
two.
We
went
out
across
the
nation
and
went
and
looked
for
the
best
student
housing
and
wanted
to
bring
that
back
to
utah,
and
so
that's
what's
really
came
up
with
this
layout.
G
So
if
you
see
the
layout,
we
have
536
beds
and
they're
separated
in
between
four
buildings
and
the
reason
why
we
did
this
is
that,
as
we
were
looking
at
these
student
housing
complexes,
there
was
great
benefit
for
students
be
able
to
get
outside
and
get
fresh
air
in
a
secure
environment.
And
so
this
allows
us
to
create
two
courtyards
that
have
big
gathering
options
while
also
having
more
intimate
settings.
G
So
if
we
look
at
the
elevations,
this
is
color
running
rendering
of
one
of
the
buildings,
they'll
kind
of
vary
depending
on
the
other
three
buildings.
But
the
main
thing
I
want
to
call
to
the
attention
is
the
masonry-
and
this
just
kind
of
goes
back
to
tying
into
the
institute
in
fort
douglas.
G
So
as
we
were
studying
and
doing
our
analysis
nationally,
there's
two
main
things
that
we
took
away
and
one
is
the
need
for
good
student
engagement
while
also
having
some
single
living
advantages,
and
so
we've
kind
of
came
up
with
this
new
model
that
we're
excited
to
introduce,
and
so
you
can
see
here
that
there
is
two
these
red
boxes,
and
these
are
our
common
cores
and,
as
we've
been
doing,
our
research,
no
student
will
tell
you
what
good
a
common
immunity
space
would
be
because
some
of
them
want
gaming
area
as
well.
G
Some
want
study
halls
so
we're
able
to
have
the
flexibility
of
being
able
to
offer
this
in
variety
ways
and
there's
some
inspiration
photos
of
what
we've
been
looking
at.
The
next
thing
is
this
actual
student
units,
and
these
are
what
we
are
really
excited
about.
G
G
You
can
see
some
inspiration
photos
of
what
these
kind
of
look
like
and
why
we
kind
of
move
to
this
is
that
I
think
we
can
all
talk
about
from
our
college
days
of
having
student
roommate
drama,
and
this
allows
these
students
to
create
their
own
healthy
environment
in
which
they
can
kind
of
control.
What
comes
in
and
out,
while
being
able
to
go
out
into
the
hallways
in
the
common
areas
and
being
able
to
have
that
face-to-face
engagement.
G
This
also
allows
students
to
focus
on
studies,
and
then
another
major
thing
that
we've
been
focusing
on
is
the
safety
of
students,
and
so
our
building
has
a
three-point
check
entrance.
So
this
allows
us
to
make
sure
that
people
are
getting
in
who
needs
to
be
in
and
keeping
people
out
who
aren't
supposed
to
be
there?
G
We're
also
going
to
have
on-site
security
here,
which
we
are
very
excited
about
and
then
also
again
we're
just
kind
of
making
sure
that
we
create
the
most
healthy
and
engaging
environment
for
these
students
as
they
continue
their
education
career.
G
So
with
that,
we
are
very
excited
to
be
here
tonight,
as
you
are
our
next
step
in
fulfilling
our
mission
of
creating
opportunities
for
affordable
education
and
housing.
We
are
requesting
three
things:
one
is
the
rezone
from
institutional
to
residential
mixed
use,
and
this
just
allows
us
to
actually
build
this
project.
G
The
second
thing
is
is
that
we
are
requesting
the
design
review
to
save
those
27
beautiful
trees
along
mario
kapecca
and
south
campus
drive,
and
then
the
third
thing
is
is
that
we
want
the
design
the
plan
development,
which
allows
us
to
have
the
building
in
the
back,
to
be
able
to
create
that
outdoor
courtyard
and
keep
those
students
and
give
them
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
be
outside.
G
So
with
that,
we
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
as
we
create
a
opportunity
for
students
to
be
able
to
be
able
to
succeed
in
their
higher
educational
career.
So,
thank
you
so
much
and
if
any
questions
so
we'd
have
to
be
happy
to
answer.
A
Okay,
I
actually
have
a
question.
I
didn't
see
any
renderings
in
here
to
give
me
a
good
idea
of
regarding
the
plan
development
request
for
the
one
building
that
doesn't
have
street
finance.
Is
I
can't
in
the
staff
report
it's
the
typology
is
really
fuzzy,
so
I
can't
tell
is
that
building
c
that
is.
A
G
A
A
You
have
a
rendering
that
is
from
south
campus
drive
to
get
a
better
look
at
how
that
lays
out
in
regards
to
that
building.
Since
that's
the
one
that
is
not
facing
the
streets.
G
You
know
I
don't
we
don't
have
one
at
this
current
time,
but
we'd
be
happy
to
be
able
to
provide
any
other
information
that
you
need
so.
A
A
G
E
A
A
E
That's
correct:
can
you
see
my
plan?
I
can.
E
Yeah,
it
does
get
a
little
fuzzy
I'll,
just
let
it
load
a
little
bit,
but
that's
much
better
yeah.
So
there
are
cooperate.
Okay,
there
we
go
so
there's
a
walkway
from
south
campus.
These
walkways
do
connect
from
the
existing
sidewalk
along
south
campus
all
the
way,
through
this
new
kind
of
quad
area
to
the
eastern
portion
of
this
building,
and
then
there's
also
an
entrance.
E
So
let
me
just
share
that
one
more
time
here
we
go
so
they're
they're
the
same
on
both
sides,
so
this
elevation
would
face
it's
just
behind
that.
First
building
that
faces
south
campus
drive.
E
This
would
be
the
elevation
that
you
would
see
and
students
could
enter
from
that
track
station
or
from
campus,
and
then
it
would
just
be
reversed
as
it
faces
the
surface
parking
lot.
A
F
One
question
amy
for
the
applicant:
please
I
mean
I
understand
that
the
university
supports
you
know
more
housing
closer
to
campus,
but
is
there
a
campus-wide
master
plan
that
sort
of
identifies
areas
in
addition
to
this
or
possible
housing
development?
I'm
just
curious
more
than
anything,
if
there's
any
other
land,
you
support
for
the
rezone
application.
D
H
D
We'd
better
defer
to
the
university
of
utah
representatives
who
are
here
tonight
and
support.
They
may
know
the
answer
to
that
question.
We
don't
we
don't
know
it.
I'm
sorry.
A
Oh
miss
mcdonald.
We
will
pick
you
up
in
the
public
hearing
portion,
but
if
you
would
have
an
answer
for
that,
that
would
be
great
for.
H
A
Okay,
we
just
have
to
do
it
in
the
right
order,
so
that
we
run
the
meeting
fairly.
A
Okay,
with
that,
I
am
going
to
open
the
public
hearing.
I
would
just
give
you
some
brief
guidelines
for
the
public
hearing.
If
you
wish
to
speak
on
this
particular
item,
there
is
a
little
hand
down
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen.
It
looks
just
like
that
go
ahead
and
raise
that
that
lets
us
know
that
you
wish
to
speak
on
this
item.
When
you
have
spoken,
please
unclick
that
so
we
know
you're
done.
A
You
will
have
two
minutes
to
speak
and
you
can
say
whatever
you
wish,
but
if
you're
a
university
of
utah
representative,
please
consider
addressing
some
of
those
master
plan,
questions
that
commissioner
bell
brought
up.
That
would
be
very
helpful.
Okay
wayne,
do
you
see
anyone
from
the
community
council.
A
Okay,
then
well,
then
I'm
going
to
make
the
chair
decision
that
normally
we
give
community
council
representatives
five
minutes,
I'm
going
to
make
the
decision
that
the
university
of
utah
representative
can
take
that
five
minutes.
B
I've
also
moved
over
jonathan
bates
in
case
he
wants
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
university
into
the
panelists.
So
jonathan,
you
also
can
mute
and
unmute
yourself.
A
So
I'm
going
to
give
the
university
of
utah
five
minutes
to
speak.
If,
then,
after
that,
five
minutes,
someone
from
the
university
of
utah
wishes
to
speak
again,
you'll
you'll
end
up
with
two
minutes
as
a
regular
public
participant.
So
we
would
have.
I
think
it
was.
I
can't
remember
the
first
name,
laura
mcdonald
and
then
bates
was
the
one.
You
just
said:
yeah
laura
mcdonald,
yes,
and
if
you
want
to
speak,
go
ahead,
I'm
going
to
give
you
guys
the
five
minutes.
A
J
Thanks
lori,
I
do
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
I'm
joining
the
meeting
more
as
a
citizen
than
a
university
representative,
but
to
answer
the
question
about
the
master
plan
in
my
role
at
the
university,
the
identified
land
is
not
university
owned,
it's
owned
by
the
lds
church
and
as
such,
it's
not
identified
or
a
component
of
our
master
plan.
We
do
have
areas
in
our
master
plan
identifying
areas
for
additional
student
housing,
development
for
on-campus
housing.
H
And
this
is
I'm
laurie
mcdonald,
I'm
the
vice
president
for
student
affairs.
I
can
just
speak
to
the
fact
that
we
are
seeing
a
tremendous
increase
in
demand
for
student
housing.
We
have
more
students
coming
to
the
university
and
applying,
and
we
this
year
we
opened
a
900
bed,
residence
hall
and
it's
completely
full
and
we
have
a
wait
list.
This.
H
Which
we
have
not
had
before
so
we
do
know
demand,
is
growing
and
welcome
opportunities
for
students
to
be
close
to
campus.
In
addition
to
our
plans
for
expanding
housing.
A
Okay,
thank
you
both
for
that
and
I
appreciate
your
participation
tonight.
So
thank
you
wayne
is
there
any
other
hands
up.
A
Okay-
and
there
are
no
emailed
comments.
A
Okay,
with
that,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
to
the
planning
commission
for
any
final
questions
or
thoughts
and
comments
at
this
time.
Regarding
the
three
questions
before
us,
the
zoning
map
amendment
the
plan
development
and
the
design
review
you
for
applicants
and
staff.
B
J
If,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
do
have
one
comment
and
one
question
my
comment
and
both
of
these
are
as
a
citizen
of
an
east
bench
neighborhood.
First
of
all,
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
I'm
very
supportive
of
this
plan.
My
concern
is
around
the
density
on
the
east
bench.
We
have
very
few
tod
potential
opportunities.
J
We
have
very
few
if
any
multi-family
projects
focused
on
affordability
in
the
east
bench,
and
I
think
this
current
location
is
prime
for
density
in
a
location
that
would
not
create
issues
for
single-family,
neighborhoods
or
other
constituents.
Those
are
my
comments
and
if
you
can
get
a
question
out
of
there,
you're
probably
a
better
person
than
me,
but
hopefully
there's
a
question
in
there
as
well.
A
Okay,
with
that
I'll,
formally
close
the
public
hearing
again
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
and
at
this
point
the
applicant,
if
you
would
like
to
address
mr
bates
vision
of
having
more
density
and
more
height,
why
you
chose
to
do
what
you're
presenting
that
would
be
helpful,
and
that
would
be
the
applicant
responding.
G
Okay,
yeah
right
now,
based
on
current
needs.
This
is
kind
of
projecting.
We
do
have
the
option
in
the
parking
area
to
be
able
to
go
denser
if
we
want
so
we
do
have
that
option
depending
on
parking
needs
of
the
students,
but
right
now,
that's
where
we're
kind
of
fitting
of
where
we're
seeing
that
need
being.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
miss
haddock,
any
other
questions
or
comments
and
thoughts
from
the
commissioners.
If
not,
I
think
andreas
was
ready
to
make
a
motion.
I'd
entertain
that
undress.
K
K
A
E
Commissioner,
barry
I'm
so
sorry
to
interrupt
again
the
there
is
a
condition
in
that
motion
that
needs
to
be
there.
It's
the
condition
that
the
city
council
will
prove
the
rezone.
The
plan,
development
and
the
design
review
are
contingent
upon
that
approval.
A
A
Right,
yeah
you're
right.
I
had
not
opened
the
motion
sheet
yeah,
so
andreas.
If
we
back
out
it
looks
like
we
have
a
different
motion
for
each
petition
number.
A
We
can
take
these
one
at
a
time
through
the
vote
and
then
we'll
go
back
and
do
the
second
one
and
then
the
third.
K
K
A
Okay
carolyn.
Thank
you
all
right,
so
we
are
voting
specifically
on
the
zoning
map
amendment
at
this
time
and
so
I'll.
Take
our
roll
call.
Sarah.
L
F
Yes,
but
I
would
also
strongly
encourage
the
university
to
consider
the
comments
that
were
raised
at
the
public
hearing,
and
this
is
kind
of
the
issue
I
was
trying
to
get
at
of
thinking
more
broadly
about
housing
on
campus
and
waste,
where
that's
appropriate,
not
necessarily
on
the
university's
property
but
within
the
vicinity,
but
I
still
vote
yes.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
J
K
A
Okay,
and
with
that,
we
have
one
two
three,
four:
five:
six
votes,
yes,
zero
announced
so
that
passes.
I
will
now
entertain
a
motion
for
the
plan.
Development.
K
K
Oh
yeah
did
I
yeah,
I'm
sorry,
yes
you're
right,
so
let
me
the
file
number
yeah
I'll.
Do
it
again,
based
on
the
findings.
K
B
If
you
go
down
further
in
the
document
under
motion
sheet
for
university,
ivy
house
plan
development.
K
A
H
A
A
K
Right,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
and
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
of
the
public
hearing,
I
moved
the
planning
commission
approved
that
requested
design
review
file,
number
pl
and
pcm
2021-00315
for
an
increased
front
yard
setback
for
the
property
located
at
approximately
1780
east
south
campus
drive
with
the
following
condition:
the
applicant
the
applicant
continues
to
work
with
urban
forestry
to
ensure
the
appropriate
tree
preservation
measures
are
taken
along
mario
kopecki
drive
and
south
campus
drive
number
three.
The
city
council
approved
the
requested
zoning
map
amendment
from
institutional
to
rmu,
residential
mixed
use.
A
A
Yes,
adrian,
yes,
carolyn,
agree,
rain
and
john
yes,
okay,
that
passes
unanimously.
Good
luck,
ivory,
you're,
you've
got
our
approval
and
good
luck
with
the
city
council.
A
M
N
M
M
This
presentation
is
for
a
planned
development
and
preliminary
subdivision
for
the
asia
place,
which
is
located
between
600,
north
and
700,
north
and
300
west
in
paxley
street.
M
M
This
slide
shows
that
the
capitol
hill
master
plan
calls
for
this
site
to
be
high
density,
and
the
other
slide
also
shows
the
zoning
on
on
the
site,
which
is
mixed
used,
and
you
know
around
that
area
also.
M
These
are
photographs
of
the
site,
the
first
one
you
can
see
the
this
property
on
on
the
left
and
on
the
right
there,
they're
both
are
proposed
to
be
removed
and
on.
The
second
slide
is
just
the
the
property
on
the
right.
That
is
is
part
of
the
the
project,
but
it
also
shows
a
shared
driveway
that
exists
right
now,
and
the
third
photograph
is
a
picture
of
the
property
from
pugsley.
M
One
is
lack
of
street
frontage
from
all
these
units
that
are
not
going
to
have
street
frontage,
just
the
ones
facing
300
west
additional
10
parking
spaces
from
what
the
maximum
is
required
and
a
five
foot
encroachment
on
these
units
on
facing
300
west
because
of
the
it
because
it
will
encroach
the
the
front
yard
setback.
M
The
landscape
plan
for
this
prop
project
shows
two
additional
trees
and
then
also
trees.
Those
two
additional
trees
are
going
to
be
on
the
parking
parks
park
strip
and
three
additional
trees
buffering
some
guest
parking
on
the
on
the
project,
and
you
know
smaller
trees
on
the
edges
of
the
buildings
in
the
corner
of
the
buildings
here
and
then
mostly
shrubs,
that
are
going
to
be
facing
the
the
entrance
of
the
of
the
units.
M
This
is
some
of
the
rendering
rendering
of
the
project
how
it's
going
to
look.
The
materials
are
going
to
be
fiber,
cement,
lab
siding
on
this
darker
part,
stucco,
the
slider
part,
cedar,
siding
and
then
brick
veneer
on
the
ground
floor.
M
Started
last
year,
but
was
pulled
back
because
of
the
the
applicant
is
including
an
additional
property
here.
So,
as
you
can
see,
you
know
some
of
the
main
changes
on
this
project
from
what
was
presented
before
to
the
community
council,
not
to
the
planning
commission,
though
it
was
to
retain
the
shared
driveway
on
the
south.
M
M
Courtyard
as
part
of
these
two
accesses
from
300
west,
the
applicant
had
to
ask
for
approval
from
u
dot
and
u
dot
approved,
with
a
condition
that
this
north
axis
here
would
be
an
entrance
only
and
then
the
other
two
prod
two
axis
would
be
an
anton
in
an
exit.
M
M
One
of
the
things
that
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
this
project
added
was
a
balcony
with
more
of
a
front
entrance
and
additional
windows
on
on
the
front
facade
of
the
the
project.
M
And
the
lack
of
street
frontage
is
another
issue.
You
know
the
the
there's,
only
these
three
or
five
units
that
are
going
to
have
street
frontage,
but
the
project
does
provide
circulation
to
vehicles
and
there
is
pedestrian
circulation
through
these
this
sidewalk
system
within
the
project.
M
Another
issue
that
has
been
brought
up
by
the
residents
that
face
pugsley
is
that
they
are
concerned
that,
with
this
new
project,
there's
going
to
be
additional
traffic
addition
additional
parking
and-
and
that
would
bring
you
know-
also
additional
needed
maintenance
on
pugsley
and
pugsley
is
a
private
road.
It's
not
a
public
street,
so
his
maintenance
issues
need
to
be
addressed
by
the
property
owners.
A
buddy
puxley.
M
And
as
something
else
that
I
would
like
to
point
out
here
is
the
is
that
the
applicant
is
working
with
some
of
the
property
owners
to
help
them
fix
some
of
these.
But
you
know
the
these
bottles
and
also
creating
more
of
a
circulation
that
would
decrease
some
of
the
the
the
traffic
on
pugsley.
M
The
last
issue
is
the
tree
on
the
park
strip,
and
that
tree
is
has
been
okayed
by
urban
forestry
to
be
moved
or
replaced,
and
the
applicant
is
willing
to
provide
two
additional
trees
in
place
of
this
one.
M
Our
the
planning
staff
recommendation
is
to
approve
this
project
sub,
subject
to
the
following
conditions
that
are
listed
in
the
staff
report
and
that
is
to
submit
a
final
subdivision
plot
to
record
a
document
that
discloses
future
private
infra
infrastructure
costs
record
documentation
that
establishes
an
entity
to
manage
the
private
infrastructure
in
compliance
with
all
other
city
department
conditions
and
now
an
an
additional
condition.
That
was
a
request
from
the
property
owner
that
shares
celeste,
skyland
lane,
which
is
the
the
driveway
on
the
south.
M
It's
an
existing
easement,
but
according
to
documents
that
I
received
yesterday
was
that
you
know
this.
Easement
has
not
the
the
the
applicant
and
the
property
owner
mr
carmen,
who
owns
this
property
here
in
the
south.
M
They
have
been
in
negotiation
with
to
just
change
the
you
know
record
a
new
easement
and
they
would
like
mr
carmen
would
like
the
execution
and
recording
of
a
new
easement
on
the
south
share
driveway,
together
with
provision
of
title
insurance
to
be
added
as
a
condition
of
approval
for
this
plan
development.
M
And
with
that
I
end
my
presentation
and
would
like
to
ask
if
anyone
has
questions
or
clarifications.
F
M
Correct,
whoever
developed
the
properties
alone-
part
parsley,
never
had
decided,
never
to
create
a
street
and
deed
it
to
the
street
to
the
city,
so
it
just
became
a
private
road.
A
You
will
have
10
minutes
and
if
you
want
to
share
your
screen,
I
believe
you
do.
You
have
presenter
rights
now.
A
C
A
Good
evening,
your
10
minutes
starts
now.
C
All
right
sounds
good.
Well,
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
present
to
you,
let
me
got
a
pdf
presentation
that
I'd
like
to
to
share
and
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
type
of
homes
that
we're
going
to
be
that
we
want
to
build
here.
C
So
the
name
of
the
project
is,
is
azure
place
and
that's
that
man
is
meant
to
just
convey
what
we
do
at
garbat,
which
is
we
try
and
build
the
most
energy
efficient
and
sustainable
homes
that
we
can
at
an
attainable
price,
and
you
know,
as
part
of
the
plan
development
you're,
you're
required
to
go
above
and
beyond
with
certain
metrics
and
one
of
the
main
ones.
C
You
know
that
I
wanted
to
focus
on
was
our
was
our
sustainability
every
home
that
we
build
is
a
is
a
high
performance
home,
and
this
graphic
here
illustrates
some
of
the
some
of
the
things
that
we
include
in
every
single
home
and
that
we
will
be
including
here
in
in
our
azure
place
development.
So
each
unit
is
pre-wired
for
solar.
It
makes
it
really
seamless
to
come
in
and
add
solar
panels
to
your
home.
C
You
get
a
lot
of
mileage
out
of
just
increasing
your
insulation
to
make
your
homes
more
energy
efficient
and
saves
you
a
lot
of
money
on
on
heating
and
cooling
and
makes
for
a
more
sustainable
home,
innovative
framing
techniques.
Where
we've
you
know
we
space
out
studs
so
that
you
can
fit
in
more
insulation
instead
of
using
a
standard
two
by
four
we're
using
two
by
sixes
on
exterior
walls,
increasing
surface
areas
for
that
insulation
to
have
more
of
an
impact
throughout
the
entire
home.
C
Every
home
comes
with
an
erv
system,
and
what
that
does
is
it
circulates
well,
because
our
homes
are
so
tight
and
so
energy
efficient?
We
need
to
be
constantly
circulating
new
clean
air
from
from
the
outside,
so
the
erv
system
does
exactly
that
runs.
24
7
brings
in
new
air
new
air
filtered
and
and
dispels
with
the
old
there.
So
we're
constantly
cycling
that
air,
through
these
homes,
while
filtering
it,
we
have
high
performance
windows
and
lights,
high
performance,
heating
and
cooling,
thinkless
water
heaters,
water
heaters
and
eco-friendly
materials.
C
C
We
live
in
a
time
when
there's
a
lot
of
green
washing,
so
people
can
say:
oh
yeah,
my
home
is
energy
efficient,
but
what
we
we
decided
to
focus
on
metrics
and
and
the
best
metric
tool
to
measure
the
sustainability
and
the
energy
efficiency
of
a
home
is
called
the
hers
rating
score
and
what
that
does
is
basically
tells
you
how
much
energy
you're
you're
consuming
and
how
efficient
your
home
is.
If
you
look
at
this
graph,
so
a
zero
energy
home
gets
a
score
of
a
zero
closer
to
zero.
C
Also,
we
want
to
be
mindful
of
the
landscaping,
and
so
we
have
moved
to
a
local
scape
model
with
all
of
our
homes,
where
we
plant
more
indigenous
plants
that
are
lower
maintenance
and
have
greater
water
savings,
while
still
maintaining
that
curb
appeal
that
our
buyers
want
within
the
homes.
We
have
a
number
of
systems
that
we've
adopted
that
also
save
water.
These
tankless
water
heaters,
low
flow
toilets
and
faucets
and
energy
star
appliances,
you
know
refrigerators
and
freezers,
all
of
which
contribute
to
greater
sustainability.
C
This
is
the
site
plan
that
kochez
has
gone
over
with
you,
so
just
the
summary
of
that
is
37
new
homes
to
this
area.
We
have
two
different
floor
plans.
We
have
two
car
garage
with
a
two
bedroom
and
a
one
car
garage
with
a
one
bedroom.
So
this
larger
two-car
garage
home
will
be
about
11
almost
1200
square
feet,
while
the
one
smaller
one
car
one
bedroom
will
be
just
under
a
thousand
square
feet,
so
smaller
smaller
homes,
but
ultra
efficient.
C
Here's
some
renderings
just
a
modern
contemporary
style
that
I
think,
adds
some
variety
and
and
diversity
to
the
the
block
face
in
this
neighborhood.
C
C
Here
you
can
see
one
of
those
that
deck
that
faces
towards
300.
You
know
just
bringing
more
presents
to
that
street
face
and
making
it
more
welcoming
and
fighting.
I
really
like
this
this
courtyard.
I
think
it'll
really
contribute
to
the
streetscape
for
not
just
the
residents,
but
those
walking
by
the
floor
plans
two-car
garage.
C
These
are
going
to
be
three
stories
main
level
and
then
the
two
bedrooms
on
the
on
the
top
level-
and
this
is
the
plan
for
the
one
car
garage-
it's
just
under
a
thousand
square
feet
with
a
master
bedroom
at
the
top
level
and
some
of
the
material
charts
that
we're
planning
to
use
cedar,
siding
fiber
cement,
brick
veneer
stucco.
I
think
we're
incorporating
a
lot
of
good
variety
and
some
great
design
elements
that
will
really
make
for
an
attractive
and
an
exciting
community.
C
C
And
I
yeah
that's
basically
my
presentation,
we're
really
excited
about
this.
I
I
think
you
guys
are
as
aware
as
I
am
that
right
now
there's
a
desperate
need
for
housing.
I
live
in
this
neighborhood.
I'm
part
of
this
of
this
this
area.
A
Okay,
I
would
like
to
hear
more
about
the
easement.
What
is
the
current
easement,
and
why
did
you
need
to
renegotiate
it.
A
C
C
C
A
Okay,
are
you
adverse
to
the
possibility
of
adding
a
condition
that
the
easement
is
recorded.
C
C
I
wanted
to
definitely
record
it
after
meeting
the
planning
commission,
you
know
just
pending
our
the
verdict
that
we
get
today
so.
A
C
A
F
F
Okay,
so
I
would
say
our
purposes:
that's
not
really.
I
don't
know
that
we
want
to
get
into
that.
I
mean,
I
think
the
recording
of
the
easement
makes
sense
as
a
condition,
but.
F
Is
a
little
way
beyond
our
purview,
yeah
yeah,
we
don't
get
into
that.
I
do
have
a
question
about
pugsley
street
and
I'm
curious,
and
I
mean
I
guess
this
is
a
question
for
both
planning
staff
as
well
as
for
the
applicant,
why
a
condition
of
of
approval
wasn't
added
to
require
upgrades
to
that
street,
since
it's
used
as
a
means
of
both
ingress
and
egress.
F
For
this
project
I
mean-
and
I
understand
you've
been
in
discussions
with
the
landowners
on
doing
that
and
wanted
to
get
your
sense
first,
if
would
be
opposed
to
having
that
as
a
condition,
and
then
I'd
like
staffs
at
some
point
to
to
respond
to
that
question
as
well.
C
Yeah,
so
what
we've
expressed
that
we're
willing
to
do
is
is
patch
up
the
potholes
that
exist
on
pugsley.
C
M
Other
than
you
know
fixing
you
know
some
of
the
main
maintenance
issues
like
potholes.
I
think
it's
hard
to
make
those
conditions,
because
this
is
a
private,
a
private
street.
It's
not
a
public
street,
but
I
think
that
planning
stuff
has
no
problem
with
you
know,
adding
that
condition
of
you
know.
F
M
Yes
correct,
you
know,
but
I'm
curious
to
understand
more.
What
kind
of
maintenance
are
you
or
or
work
on
pugsley
street?
Are
you
would
like
you
know,
trying
to
figure
out
or
were
asking
about.
F
Well,
I
would
think
fixing
the
potholes
as
a
minimum,
but
ensuring
that
the
road
is
actually
serviceable
by
fire
safety
vehicles.
If
they
haven't
already
confirmed
that.
C
Yeah,
I
I
know
that
fire
has
I've
reviewed
this
site
plan
a
number
of
times
with
fire.
This
is
the
version
that
they
they
have
given
me
their
verbal
approval
of
approval
on
I'm
not
sure
if
they've
driven,
pugsley
or
not-
but
I
think,
with
the
addition
of
of
those
most
significant
repairs
in
the
road
patching
up
the
potholes,
it
will
serve
very
well
as
emergency
vehicle
access,
in
addition
to
the
two
access
points
that
you
have
here
along
300
west.
M
And
fire
is
aware
of
our
request.
You
know
for
paxley
street,
you
know
to
use
puzzles,
paxley
street,
and
they
it
has
been
brought
to
their
attention
several
times
that
this
is
a
private
road.
In
confirmation
that
you
know
they
will
be
able
to
use
public
pugsley
as
a
nexus
for
fire.
A
C
A
A
But
I'm
wondering
if
on
the
ground,
you
can't
maybe
do
a
little
bit
more
to
delineate
the
entrance
like
their
their
kind
of
outdoor
space.
So
I've
seen
some
stuff
recently
where
there's
like
a
little
fencing
outside
their
front
door,
and
it
just
adds
that
appeal
that
this
is
your
entrance.
A
A
C
Once
you
have
that
and
the
patio
furniture,
I
think
there
will
be
no
mistaking
that
this
is
this,
is
the
main
entrance
it'll
be
very
street-facing,
so
I
think
just
the
placement
of
these
trees
isn't
100
accurate
to
where
we
will
be.
I
think
it'll
make
a
lot
more
sense
built,
but
if
there
are
some
ideas
that
staff
has
of
what
we
can
do
to
improve
we're
happy
to
entertain.
A
C
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
commissioners
before
I
open
the
public
hearing
very
well,
so
we're
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
for
this
agenda
item.
If
you
are
interested
in
speaking,
please
raise
your
hand
at
the
bottom
and
do
we
have
wayne
a
representative
from
the
capitol
hill
community
council.
B
We
do
excuse
me,
we
actually
have
two.
We
have
david
shear
who's,
the
the
chair
and
then
brian
hutchinson,
who's
part
of
the
transportation
committee.
I'm
gonna
call
in
david
shearer.
First.
D
A
A
Okay,
well
you're
the
chair,
so
we're
gonna
give
you
that
after
you
are
done,
other
public
comments.
You
have
two
minutes
to
speak
and
I
do
time
you
all
to
try
to
be
fair.
So
the
five
minutes
are
yours.
Now,
mr
share
go
ahead.
O
Thank
you
very
much.
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
this
product
has
created
quite
a
lot
of
heartburn
in
the
community.
We
want
the
housing.
We
admire
the
architectural
qualities
of
the
project.
We
want
to
replace
the
existing
blighted
structures
that
would
be
torn
down.
On
the
other
hand,
pugsy
street
is
really
a
problem.
There
are
people
among
us
who
would
question
ms
pace's
assertion
that
this
street
was
never
public.
Unfortunately,
the
relevant
documents
apparently
were
destroyed
in
a
flood
as
far
as
fire
access
goes.
O
But
if
you
read
the
letter
from
the
fire
department,
that's
in
your
packet
you'll
see
that
the
radii
shown
are
do
not
meet
their
standards.
Pugsley
is
a
private
street.
It's
a
confused
situation.
Some
of
the
parcels
extend
into
what
was
the
right-of-way.
Some
are
bordered
by
it.
It's
only
20
feet
wide.
It
has
no
sidewalks,
so
vehicular
and
pedestrian
traffic
are
combined.
It
is
not
maintained.
O
It's
also
a
cut
through
traffic
opportunity
that
people
use
to
avoid
the
light
at
sixth,
north
and
third
west,
which
can
create
a
substantial
delay
so
residents
there
already
endure
safety
hazards
and
nuisance
from
noise
cars
cutting
through
at
all
days,
at
all
times
of
the
day
and
night.
If
you
went
and
looked
at
it,
you
would
see
something
that
would
really
shock
you.
This
is
a
black
eye
for
the
city
of
salt
lake.
It's
a
third
world
looking
street
that
should
not
exist
in
a
modern
city
like
ours.
O
The
residents
on
the
street
have
tried
repeatedly
to
get
the
city
to
take
possession
of
it
and
improve
it
without
success.
They've
been
told
that
they
need
to
raise
two
million
dollars
to
bring
the
street
up
to
city
standards,
and
if
you
look
at
the
homes,
you
will
see
that
this
is
so
far
out
of
reach
for
the
residents
that
it's
practically
an
insult
to
even
bring
it
up
with
them.
The
project
will
add
about
250
daily
vehicle
trips,
calculated
by
standard
planning
methods.
O
I've
talked
with
mr
garbett,
and
he
has
acknowledged
these
hazards
and
nuisances
and
has
agreed
to
take
several
measures
which
you've
already
heard
to
mitigate
them,
mainly,
namely,
making
pug
street
one
way
northbound
to
while
they're
in
possession
of
the
project
before
they
sell
it,
to
use
their
influence
to
help
the
residents
of
buckley
street
persuade
the
city
to
take
possession
of
it
to
perform
temporary
repairs.
O
P
P
Yes,
it's
brian
hutchinson,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
transportation
committee
for
the
capitol
hill,
neighborhood,
council
and
paul.
We
met
a
couple
years
ago
with
black
diamond.
I
don't
know
if
you
remember,
but
yeah.
We
you
know,
applaud
the
architectural
efforts,
the
design
efforts,
but
one
thing
that
I
should
point
to
is
the
street
topologies
and
street
intersection
topologies
plan
of
transfer
of
salt
lake
transportation
division
there
and
also
the
capitol
hill
traffic
calming
plan
that
is
going
through
the
approval
process.
P
Right
now,
these
are
meant
to
restore
neighborhood
liveability,
and
david
spoke
to
some
of
the
problems
we
currently
have
immediate
neighbors
neighbors
in
the
houses
on
pugsley,
but
also
the
apartments
to
the
north
have
a
growing
number
of
children
and
they
they're
working
closely
with
the
city
transportation
on
on
redesigning
the
street
at
700
north
with
bulb
outs
and
other
traffic.
Calming
measures
this
this.
P
P
Don't
want
any
egress
or
ingress
on
pugsley,
because
what
it
would
do
is
exacerbate
a
a
traffic
problem
that
threatens
pedestrians
and
children,
as
I
say
that
that
play
on
700,
north
and
pugsley
the
patching
couple
hundred
dollars
worth
of
patching
on
pugsley
or
a
two
million
dollar
improvement
of
the
road
is
not
a
panacea.
It
actually
invites
more
conflict,
and
so
we
urge
a
formal
transportation
circulation
plan
that
involves
only
300
west
huxley
would
be
for
emergencies.
Only.
B
Okay,
how
about
greta,
spendlove.
Q
Thank
you,
I'm
greta
standlev
and
I'm
the
attorney
for
richard
and
mary
carmen,
and
they
are
the
owners
to
the
south
of
the
project
and,
as
as
mr
garbett
acknowledged,
we've
been
that
the
carmen's
originally
had
a
dispute
about
their
easement
and
the
placement
of
the
project
across
the
easement.
We've
resolved
that
we've
prepared
an
easement
agreement,
which
mr
garbett
has
acknowledged.
Q
That
he's
willing
to
have
that
and
have
the
recording
of
that
easement
agreement
specified
as
a
condition
to
approval
of
the
plat,
and
that
is
what
we
want
we
would.
He
also
indicated
that
our
agreement
is
that
it
will
be
recorded
upon
final
approval
of
the
plat
or
such
earlier
time
as
he
obtains
financing
and
and
we'd
like
to
have
that
included.
Our
concern
is:
is
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
that
the
the
easement
has
first
position
against
the
property?
Q
It's
it's
access,
that's
extremely
important
to
the
carmens,
and
we
don't
want
to
have
a
situation
in
which
he
there's
a
possibility
of
of
you
know,
prior
financing
that
that
forecloses,
our
easement
and
so
so
that
the
timing
of
that
of
recording
prior
to
his
getting
financing
is
an
extremely
important
part
of
the
deal.
And,
and
my
understanding
is
that
he's.
Okay
with
that
and
and
we'd
like
that,
listed
as
a
condition.
B
Okay,
next
is
jeff
carleton.
H
H
Project
we
feel
that
azer
place
is
a
much
welcome
improvement
to
an
underutilized
and
transitional
area
in
the
community.
We
appreciate
the
density
of
this
development.
We,
like
the
architecture
this
supposedly
in
this
private
road
matter,
to
david's
point
that
this.
D
H
Issues
around
that
are
going
to
take
a
while
to
get
resolved,
and
we
think
that
the
the
folks
that
are
living
in
that
development
will
most
likely
not
utilize
that
road,
because
it's
such
a
mess,
but
at
the
same
time
we
don't
think
the
developers
should
be
responsible
for
resolving
that
issue
in
terms
of
safety,
lighting
and
occupancy
in
this
area.
It's
dark.
There
are
very
few
residences.
H
A
Thank
you,
mr
carlton.
I'm
just
a
reminder
to
the
public.
If
you
have
spoken,
if
you
would
please
unclick
that
hand
at
the
bottom,
that
will
help
us
know,
who's
already
had
their
turn
all
right
wayne.
A
R
I'm
jeremy
harris
thank
you
for
listening
to
me.
I
also
submitted
some
written
comments.
I
like
some
of
the
comments
I've
heard
tonight.
I
agree
I
think
garbette
would
be
a
good
partner
to
have
on
the
pugsley
street
problem.
This
been
an
issue
for
many
years.
R
I
disagree
a
little
bit
with
some
of
the
characterizations
about
cut
through
traffic
and
children
on
puglie
street.
The
only
pedestrians
I
really
see
walking
through
pugsley
street
are
drug
buyers
going
to
and
from
a
drug
house
on
the
street.
I
take
my
dog
down
there.
Every
night,
I've
never
seen
children
playing
on
that
street,
at
least
on
this
and
closer
to
700
north.
So
I
just
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
garbett
on
board
as
a
partner
for
what
to
do.
R
I
think
their
offer
to
do
temporary
patches
on
the
street
is
good
that
might
solve
the
short-term
problem
and
the
long-term
problems
are
going
to
take
some
involvement
from
the
city.
I
don't
think
a
cut
through
street
that
has
16
adjacent
properties
should
be
a
private
road.
I
think
the
city
should,
but
I
think
that's
a
fight
for
another
day
and
I
think
azure
place
is
a
reasonable
proposal
that
should
be
approved
tonight,
so
they
can
move
forward
and
it
would
be
a
very
welcome
addition
to
the
neighborhood.
R
I
didn't
state
this
at
the
beginning,
but
I
am
an
adjacent
resident.
I
own
one
of
the
condos
in
the
condo
association
next
door
to
where
this
development
would
be
so
I
just
I
I
encourage
you
to
approve
it.
Garbett
seems
like
they
are
good
neighbors
to
have
they'd,
be
good
partners
to
help
solve
this
pugsley
street
problem,
and
I
don't
see
any
reason
that
the
commission
should
turn
them
away
tonight.
Thank
you.
R
R
Thank
you
and
my
family
has
been
involved
in
that
area,
we're
back
into
the
early
40s
and
speaking
on
that
my
agreement
with
paul
and
that
we've
got
that
all
worked
out.
I'm
not
worried
about
my
easement.
What
I
find
fascinating
is
discussion
about
pugsley
street
being
a
non-public
road.
I
find
that
hysterical
and
here's
my
reasoning.
Why
number
one
it's
named
a
street
not
a
way
not
a
place,
not
a
lane.
It's
a
street
back
in
the
1940s,
my
mom,
the
garretts
lived
on
that
street.
R
The
neighbors
got
together
and
deeded
their
property
back
to
the
city,
so
they
could
city
could
come
in
and
fix
the
street
and
put
sidewalks
in
it.
Now
I
heard
earlier
somebody
say
that
records
were
destroyed
by
a
flood
at
some
time
that
could
be,
but
it
falls
on
the
city's
responsibility
to
go
back
to
the
original
property
owners
as
best
they
can
to
reconstruct
those
records
and
those
records.
R
B
You
know
I
do
not
see
any
more
hands
raised
and,
like
you
mentioned,
we
received
a
number
of
public
comments
or
emailed
comments
that
have
all
been
forwarded
to
you
over
the
last
couple
of
days.
A
A
Okay
and
mr
carmen,
if
you
would
just
click
that
hand
at
the
bottom
to
un
unclick
it,
so
we
know
that
you've
spoken.
That
would
be
helpful
all
right
with
that.
I
will
close.
Thank
you.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing,
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
Mr
garbett,
would
you
like
to
take
a
moment
to
respond
to
anything
of
the
public
comments.
C
C
I
think
I
think
fixing
the
potholes.
That's
that's,
obviously
the
most
glaring
problem
that
needs
to
be
addressed,
and
we
are
committed
to
work
with
the
neighborhood
to
improve
this.
This
block-
and
that
includes
working
on
this
on
pugsley
street
and
and
going
through
the
appropriate
avenues
and
channels
to
see
what
we
can
do
as
far
as
getting
the
city
to
help
out
with
it.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
commissioners,
this
time,
if
you
have
any
further
questions
for
the
applicator
staff
or
thoughts,
slash
concerns.
Please
go.
A
F
So
I
would
support
including
a
condition
that
upgrades
are
made
to
above
pugsley
street
so
that
the
potholes
are
fixed
and
there's
a
you
know,
a
level
page
surface,
that's
accessible
by
the
proposed
residents
and
also,
I
would
include
the
condition
of
the
recording
of
the
easement,
along
with
the
recording
of
the
plot.
A
B
This
is
this
is
nick.
Can
I
just
have
a
I
have
a
clarifying
question
on
where
that
southern
road
curves
and
it
looks
like
it's
outside
of
the
area,
the
easement,
but
it
also
looks
like
it
leaves
the
subject
property
I'm
going
to
make
sure
that
that's
and
it
might
have
been
just
earlier,
but
I
wasn't
quite
clear:
can
we
make
sure
that
that's
addressed
on
the
record
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
approving
some
access
road
on
someone's
property
that
isn't
subject
to
that
to
some
other
agreement,
legal
agreement.
B
C
C
H
F
Creating
a
level
paved
surface
along
the
stretch
of
publicly
street
and
that
the
applicant
is
required
to
record
an
access
easement
or
along
the
southern
boundary
of
the
property,
covering
all
areas
shown
on
the
site
plan
where
we
see
encroachments
on
the
adjacent
property
and
the
easement
is
to
be
recorded
along
with
the
recording
of
the
plot.
F
Adrian,
I
have
a
question
sure
you
said
recorded
with
the
plat
and
I
think
the
other
requirement
greta
was
asking
for
was
recorded
with
the
plot
or.
F
I
don't
see
that
as
our
issue,
if
they
want
to
address
subordination
provisions
in
their
easement
agreement.
That's
between
them.
Our
concern
is
that
the
easement
is
granted
along
with
the
recording
of
the
plot.
H
Vickery,
I
do
have
one
suggestion.
H
The
improvements
to
pugsley,
I
think
we
could
also
allow
the
posting
for
an
adequate
public
infrastructure
surety,
whether
it
be
in
a
bond
or
whatever
form
the
city
allows,
so
that
the
subdivision
could
be
recorded
prior
to
the
improvements
being
made.
Just
make.
That
suggestion.
H
Are
made
or
an
adequate
public
infrastructure
surety
is
posted.
A
All
right,
then
we'll
do
our
our
roll
call
carolyn.
A
Sarah,
yes
maureen.
Yes,
yes,
andres.
K
A
Okay
and
adrian
yes,
okay,
that
passes
unanimously
mr
garvacher
good,
to
go
good
luck
on
your
project.
We
will
now
move
on
to
our
third
agenda
item
you're
welcome,
which
is
the
alley
vacation,
a
pln
pcm,
20.
H
A
Okay,
pln
pcm.
H
P
Thank
you
good
evening.
C
H
C
C
H
Staff
recommends
approval
for
this
request,
with
the
condition
that
a
utility
easement
is
established
in
place
of
the
existing
public
alley
right-of-way
to
accommodate
power
lines
that
run
through
their
currently
they're
private
power
lines.
They
do
not.
They
only
serve
residents
of
the
block
along
here.
C
That,
but
were
in
discussions
with
rocky
mountain
power.
There
was.
H
H
A
All
right,
then,
we'll
move
along.
We
have
mr
steven
black,
who
is
the
petitioner,
mr
black,
do
you
have
a
presentation
you
want
to
give
like
where
you
need
to
share
your
screen,
or
would
you
just
like
to.
H
I
I'm
sure
the
the
presentation
of
the
slide
that
I
made
with
aaron
and
I'll
just
let
him
show
it
and
display
it
yeah.
Okay,
let
me
pull
it
up.
A
A
H
Hi,
my
name
is
steve
black.
It's
a
pleasure
to
speak
with
you
regarding
my
application
to
have
the
city
vacate
the
east-west
alley
between
13th,
east
and
12th
east,
the
mcclellan
trail
and
boarded
by
the
homes
on
kensington
bryant
avenue.
As
aaron
mentioned,
the
slide
shows
the
affected
neighborhood.
H
It's
the
same
same
slide
that
aaron
used
and
I've
highlighted
the
homeowners
in
pink
that
signed
our
petition
to
vacate
this
alley,
and
we've
also
received
letters
as
aaron
noted
in
support
from
the
homeowners
of
this
property,
or
that
about
this
alley
to
support
the
the
vacation,
this
property
by
vacating
the
alley.
This
will
allow
the
property
owners
to
build
on
this
land
and
incorporate
it
into
their
backyard
living
spaces,
and
I
also
think
the
easement
will
be
an
improvement
for
rocky
mountain
power
right
now.
A
I
am
you
know
it's
that
additional
speaker.
I
gotta
turn
both
of
them
on
and
I
forgot
do
any
commissioners
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
okay.
I
have
one
question
so
we
have
an
easement,
it
looks
like
we
already
have
quite
an
encroachment.
I
think
it's
from
1542
1300
east,
with
probably
a
garage.
H
H
A
Okay,
there
you
are
so
do
people
understand
that
recording
and
easement
may
require
them
to
do
some
modifications
of
their
structures.
H
What
do
you
mean
this?
My
understanding
of
the
utility
easement
is
that
as
long
as
the
power
company
can
access
the
power
lines,
there's
no
impact
coming
buildings
there.
It's
a
requirement,
simple
requirement
of
being
able
to
access.
For
example,
in
my
yard,
the
telephone
pole
in
the
mid
block
is
in
my
backyard,
which
I
I'll
I'll
have
a
driveway
and
easy
access
up
to
it.
That
isn't.
Currently
there.
A
B
East
liberty
park
and
wasatch
hollow
it's
near
both
of
those
I
don't
see
names
from
either
of
those.
D
L
Q
A
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you
judy.
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
so
if
you
are
attending-
and
you
wish
to
speak-
please
take
a
moment
to
raise
that
hand.
Hit
that
hand
on
the
bottom.
Otherwise,
any
other
comments
you
received
wayne.
A
L
Okay,
this
is
for
kensington
avenue
alley.
Vacation
petition,
number
pl,
npcm.
A
L
A
A
A
Yes,
yes
and
maureen:
yes,
okay,
we
have
five,
yes
and
one.
No,
so
that
motion
does
pass
all
right.
Mr
black,
you
are
good
luck
with
the
city
council,
we're
going
to
move
forward
to
our
last
item.
I
just
want
to
double
check
with
commissioners.
A
A
N
N
So
let's
do
this
is
a
request
by
west
coast,
towing
represented
by
heather
levy
for
conditional
use,
approval
to
create
and
operate
an
automobile
impound
lot
and
outdoor
storage
of
commercial
vehicles
such
as
semis
and
freight
on
an
undeveloped
parcel
at
approximately
1050
south
500
west
outdoor
storage
is
a
permitted
use
and
impound
lots
require
conditional
use
approval
in
the
cg
zoning
district
subject
to
it
being
located
at
least
a
thousand
feet
from
a
single
family
or
two
family
zoning
district
and
conforming
with
the
provisions
in
section
21a54
conditional
uses.
N
The
location
of
the
property
is
is
next
to
the
underpass
for
I-15
at
500
west.
It
is
adjacent
to
the
railroad
tracks
and
the
freeway.
The
nearest
intersections
are
1300
south
to
the
south
and
900
south
to
the
north.
N
As
part
of
the
conditions
of
approval,
it
needs
to
be
a
minimum
of
a
thousand
feet
from
any
residential
zone,
and
I'm
this
is
just
demonstrating
that
it's
also
showing
what
the
surrounding
zoning
district
is.
Most
of
them
are
cg
zones
and
then,
and
then,
let's
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
the
next.
N
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
use
the
existing
fence
and
access
off
of
500
west.
They
are
proposing
to
use
compacted
road
base
for
the
surface
of
the
proposed
impound
lot.
N
The
conditions
of
approval
listed
that
I
had
listed
in
the
staff
report
or
requirements
for
per
ordinance
for
impound
lots.
This
means
that
even
if
this
wasn't
a
conditional
use,
they
would
be
required
to
to
have
put
in
these.
These
upgrades,
however,
due
to
the
lot
being
used
for
larger
commercial
vehicles,
the
applicant
could
obtain
a
special
exception
for
non-hard
surface
parking
storage
area
for
the
vehicle
if
it
meets
the
criteria
for
this
type
of
exception,
which
is
listed
in
the
slideshow,
the
lot
is
used
for
long-term
vehicle
storage,
not
for
regular
parking.
N
The
vehicles
stored
are
large
and
are
on
tracks.
The
parking
surface
is
compacted
with
at
least
six
inches
of
road
base,
and
then
hearts
are.
There
needs
to
be
some
type
of
wash
bay
or
something
along
those
lines
to
prevent
mud
and
sand
from
getting
into
the
public
right
away,
and
then
there
needs
to
be
50
feet
of
driveway,
that
from
the
public
street
property
line
and
then
city
transportation,
director
director's
approval
is
also
required.
N
A
All
right,
are
you
finished,
jenna,
yeah,
okay,
all
right!
Sorry,
commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
anna
okay?
I'm
I'm
now
a
little
confused
on
the
conditions.
Is
it
just
the
three
or
is
it
also
those
the
five
you
had
listed
in
the
previous
slide?
N
A
See
I
see
yeah.
Okay,
thank
you,
yeah
all
right.
I
don't
hear
anything
from
commissioners,
so
we
will
move
on
to
the
applicant
heather
levay.
It's
you!
It's
leyva!
No!
Thank
you
for
the
correction.
Heather
leyva!
You
are
up.
You
should
have
presenter
rights.
If
you
have
a
presentation,
you
can
share
your
screen.
I
I
think
that
we
pretty
much
covered
as
far
as
what
needs
to
be
shown
on
the
screen.
It's
it's
pretty
simple.
You
know
we're
dedicated
to
leaving
space
better
than
we
found
it.
We're
looking
to
expand
our
stubborn,
our
coverage
statewide
we're
not
a
salvage
or
or
a
dismantler
we're,
not
in
the
business
of
being
a
junkyard
we're
in
the
business
of
heavy-duty
commercial,
towing
and
recovery.
We
deal
with
free,
semis
accident
recovery,
short-term
storage
of
commercial
vehicles
in
their
cargo.
I
If
approved,
we
plan
to
run
power
to
the
location
that
is
at
10,
50,
south
and
500
west
right
now,
it's
a
very
dark
corner.
It's
on
the
corner,
where
the
tracks
meet
as
you've.
Seen
on
the
on
the
screen
that
it
was
it's
a
triangle,
piece
of
property,
the
homeless
are
cutting
the
fence,
and
it
is
it's
just
a
really
dark
place
at
night.
We
want
to
light
it
up.
We
want
to
make
it
bright.
I
We
want
to
make
it
a
better
place
than
where
it's
sitting
right
now
and
help
the
city
to
to
clear
that
of
the
transient
problem.
The
transients
have,
like,
I
said,
been
cutting
the
fence
on
the
property
and
we
are
continuing
to
maintain
that
and
and
show
that
we
are
a
presence
in
the
city.
We
want
it
to
be
a
bright
environment
that
is
going
to.
You
know,
keep
our
customers
equipment
and
their
cargo
safe
and
we're
committed
to
that.
The
property
is
currently
being.
I
It's
just
a
it's
a
vacant
place
and
it's
it's
just
being
used
as
a
pass-through
really
for
drug
addicts
and
people
who
are
down
there
doing
things
that
are
unscrupulous
at
night,
and
we
want
to
help.
We
want
to
help
just
make
sure
that
that
is
a
is
a
better
place
and
brighten
it
up
and
and
make
it
a
good
part
of
the
community.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
commissioners.
Any
questions
for
miss
leyva.
A
All
right
with
that,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
again
wayne,
I'm
not
sure
what
community
council
this
falls
in,
but.
A
Okay-
and
there
were
no
comments
in
our
staff
report
in
the
dropbox,
so.
I
Comment.
Sorry,
I
didn't
see
that.
A
Okay,
yeah:
we
do
have
that
in
our
dropbox
all
right
with
that
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
Any
questions
concerns
thoughts.
B
Commissioners,
if
I
can
jump
in
really
fast
and
if,
if
the
commissioners
decide
to
go
with
approval
on
this
project
and
read
the
motion
sheet,
I
just
kind
of
want
to
make
a
point
of
clarification
on
the
conditions,
and
I
I
think
anna
did
a
good
job
on
on
this.
But
I
want
to
clarify
it
a
bit
more,
so
that
condition
number
one
about
the
hard
surfacing.
B
The
hard
surface
thing
is
actually
an
ordinance
requirement
and
then,
as
anna
mentioned,
there's
a
process
that
the
applicant
can
go
through
to
try
to
get
an
exception
to
that
ordinance
requirement.
The
commission
may
want
to
consider
excluding
that
condition
from
your
motion,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that,
if
you,
if,
if
you
strictly
say
in
that
condition
that
they
shall
do
that,
it
almost
kind
of
prevents
them
from
going
for
that
exception,
and
it's
a
separate
process.
It
can
be
reviewed
just
something
to
consider.
B
There's
already
ordinance
requirements
for
hard
surfacing
and
those
exceptions
are
already
in
the
ordinance.
So
maybe
something
for
the
planning
commission
to
consider
to
let
the
process
and
the
applicant
pursue
that
exception.
A
I'm
leaving
this
up
to
the
commission,
I'm
open
for
a
motion
if
and
anybody's
ready.
F
F
A
K
A
Sarah,
yes
maureen,
yes,
adrian,
yes
and
john.
Yes,
yes,
okay,
that
is
passes
unanimously.
Good
luck
with
that,
ms
leyva
and
thank.
N
A
Thank
you
and
we
are
concluding
with
the
planning
commission
tonight
unless
anybody
has
a
comment.
I
will
adjourn
this
meeting
and
we
will
see
you
all
again
august
11th,
good
night,
it's
good
everybody.