►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - April 08, 2020
Description
Inadvertently, this meeting was originally streamed live on our sister channel: https://youtu.be/QaWUh_3OBm4
Planning Commission Meeting - April 08, 2020
B
Okay,
great
welcome
everyone
to
the
Salt
Lake
City
Planning
Commission
meeting
of
April
8th
2020.
This
is
a
new
format
for
all
of
us,
so
please
be
forgiving
of
any
technical
glitches
as
we
get
used
to
being
virtual
here
in
the
Planning
Commission.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
the
approval
of
minutes
or
March
11th
2020.
B
E
B
A
Can
everyone
hear
me
just
give
me
a
thumbs
up?
I
want
to
make
sure
okay,
so
I
have
on
the
screen
some
links
that,
hopefully
everybody
can
see
about
how
you
can
submit
comments
during
the
meeting
we
will.
Everybody
will
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
during
the
public
hearing,
so
if
your,
but
first
off,
if
you're
having
a
hard
time
you're
watching
on
channel
17
or
on
on
YouTube
and
you're
having
a
hard
time
trying
to
get
onto
the
WebEx
meeting
on
the
screen,
is
the
address
that
you
that
will
help
guide
you
to
connect.
A
If
you
need
help,
you
can
email
us
at
planning
comments
at
SLC,
govt
comm.
Those
are
were
monitoring.
Monitoring
that
email
address
live
so
we'll
be
able
to
see
your
comments
and
we
have
a
number
of
staff
members
who
get
those
comments
who
can
help
us
troubleshoot
and
help
make
sure
that
any
comments
submitted
are
heard
and
read
into
the
record.
So
just
some
tips
when
you
log
in
if
you
used
your
phone,
you
may
want
to
use
your
phone
for
audio.
A
It's
a
little
bit
more
consistent
of
a
connection
and
if
you
don't
lose,
if
we
don't
lose
Internet
access
and
you
can
still
hear
everything,
it
also
helps
prevent
some
of
the
background.
Echoing
that
happens,
in
terms
of
submitting
comments
for
everybody,
who's
logged
into
WebEx,
we
can
see
your
name
and
how
you
joined,
and
we
will
give
you
when
we
open
that
specific
item
that
you're
here
to
become
out.
We
will
you
should
be
able
to
see
a
little
icon
towards
the
bottom
of
your
screen,
that
it
looks
like
a
little
hand.
A
A
If,
for
whatever
reason,
you
can't
find
that-
and
you
want
to
speak,
send
an
email,
the
planning,
dot
comments
and
SLC
govt
comm
and
then
just
saying
I
want
to
speak,
but
I
can't
figure
out
my
my
hand
and
in
the
email
put
your
name,
so
we
know
who
it
is
and
that
way
we
can
make
sure
that
everybody
is
given
a
best
of
opportunity
as
we
possibly
can
you
speak
as
normal.
We
obviously
asked
for
all
the
comments
to
be
respectful
and
they're
focused
on
the
issue
at
hand.
A
A
The
we're
gonna
try
to
keep
the
commissioners
video
feeds
visible
at
all
time.
Staff,
members
and
others
will
probably
not
have
their
video
on
unless
we're
part
of
the
discussion.
So
applicants
will
have
about
ten
minutes
to
make
of
their
presentation
and
when
it's
their
current
I
will
move
the
hosts,
we'll
move
that
applicant
up
to
a
participant
level,
so
they
can
share
their
presentation
their
screen.
So
everybody
can
see
and
just
declare
this
to
reiterate
kind
of
the
role
the
Planning
Commission,
because
we
have
two
different
types
of
items
on
the
agenda.
A
Tonight
we
have
legislative
items
and
administrative
items.
The
legislative
items
are
those
items
where
the
city
kicker,
where
the
Planning
Commission
is
making
a
recommendation
through
these
City
Council
and
the
City
Council
is
ultimately
the
decision-maker.
The
other
items
are
referred
to
as
administrative
items.
Those
are
things
conditional
uses
or
design
review
and
planned
developments
where
the
Planning
Commission
is
the
decision
maker
and
those
decisions
are
the
role
the
Planning
Commission
really
used
to
make
sure
that
all
the
standards
are
applicable.
Standards
are
complied
with
and
go
from
there.
A
A
E
A
E
A
F
B
A
G
H
E
G
I
will
start
over,
so
this
is
a
conditional
use
request
for
a
place
of
worship
in
a
single-family
zone
for
a
property
located
approximately
eleven
eighty
five
west,
one
thousand
north.
This
is
an
r1
seven
thousand
zone.
The
property
was
originally
granted
conditional
use
approval
in
1996.
It's
required
to
go
through
a
new
conditional
use
because
of
your
proposing
your
innovation
that
would
increase
the
floor
area
by
more
than
25
percent
staff
is
recommending
for
this
item.
G
G
The
hours
of
operation
are
expected
to
remain
the
same
for
about
8
a.m.
to
5
p.m.
and,
although
they
are
increasing
the
floor
area
and
adding
a
second
story
and
they're
not
planning
on
having
more
seating
for
their
congregations,
so
the
seating
on
any
given
Sunday
is
expected
to
remain
about
30
to
50
individuals
I'm.
Additionally,
there
is
two
residential
units
on
site
for
one
for
a
person.
That's
there
all
the
time
and
then
one
for
a
visiting
clergy,
and
these
are
allowed
through
an
administrative
interpretation.
G
As
far
as
neighbourhood
compiled
compatibility
goes
the
intended
use
of
the
renovation,
that's
actually
to
move
events
that
are
currently
held
outside
indoors.
So
this
would
presumably
reduce
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood.
Additional
site
is
bordered
to
the
northeast
by
the
unity
Baptist
Church
and
Rose
Park
Elementary
School
to
the
east
and
their
track
to
the
south,
and
there
are
single-family
homes
on
the
north,
west,
corner
and
west.
The
uses
surrounding
the
site
are
generally
compatible
with
the
use
and
it
is
an
existing
use.
It's
just
expanding.
G
This
is
the
elevation
that
shows
the
second
storey
that
will
be
added,
and
the
renovation
includes
was
went
through
a
special
exception
process
over
the
summer
of
2019.
This
was
approved
by
staff
as
it
can
be
approved
at
the
administrative
level
I'm
at
the
maximum
height
allowed
in
a
are
one,
seven
thousand
zone
is
28
feet
and
they
were
proposing
31
feet,
10
inches.
This
was
approved
due
to
the
neighborhood
compatibility
that
I
mentioned
before,
where
the
elementary
school
to
the
east
is
currently
32
feet.
G
A
J
B
A
B
B
E
E
E
So
we
can
reduce
the
impact
for
the
neighborhood
and
then
the
reason
wanna
put
a
increased
space
under
existing
building
is
a
dispute
is
very
beautiful
and
then
we
really
like
to
chip
it,
and
then
we
want
to
be
also
reduce
the
environmental
impact
for
those
a
termination
issue.
So
we
we
wish,
we
can
territory
just
put
a
spacer
understand
building.
B
B
J
F
B
B
E
A
A
Don't
know
if
somebody
is
out
there
trying
to
provide
a
comment
through
email,
I,
don't
know
that
it's
working
I'm
wondering
if
maybe
you
could
just
use
either
Miami
email
address
or
Mikayla's
or
yours.
Instead,
we
want
to
broadcast
that
sure
I,
don't
I,
don't
care
who's.
I,
don't
know.
John
yours
is
is
easy
to
sell
anybody
I
agree.
So
if
there's
anybody,
that's
honored,
it's
John
Anderson,
so
Jo
HN
dot
and
EDRs,
o
n
at
SLC,
govt,
calm.
A
D
A
A
A
I
haven't
read
anything
and
I
know
that
there's
Christian
events
and
they
haven't
received
a
lot
of
public
input
on
the
project
either.
So
I
don't
think
we
were
expecting
a
lot,
but
certainly
we
can
be
patient.
I
do
have
a
hand
that
just
came
up
Bryan
Hobbs,
I'm,
gonna
unmute,
you
and
you'll
have
two
minutes.
E
E
A
B
E
A
H
B
B
L
B
B
I
Okay,
so
this
is
a
planned
development
and
a
preliminary
subdivision,
plat
wrapped
together.
The
address
the
project
is
located
on
700
West,
immediately
west
of
the
freeway
I
15.
There
are
three
vacant
lots
and
the
applicant
seeks
to
combine
those
Lots
and
develop
it
as
a
multi-family
project.
It
would
contain
24
units
divided
up
into
four
different
buildings,
so
the
first
slide
kind
of
give
you
a
sense
of
the
vicinity.
I
I
The
setbacks
are
all
in
compliance
with
the
zoning
for
an
RM
RM
f-35
zone,
and
then
they
stayed
at
this
point
that
currently
the
property
zone-
s
r1,
as
you
can
see
by
this
slide
here
over
on
the
right
side,
highlighted
in
red
property,
is
currently
zoned
s
r1
and
is
being
considered
by
the
City
Council
to
be
changed
to
an
RMF
35,
which
is
residential,
multi
only
35
being
the
height
women.
The
council
was
scheduled
to
take
action
on
this
last
night.
I
They
postponed
action
on
changing
the
zoning
because
of
the
difficulty
and
receiving
public
comment,
so
the
zoning
has
not
been
changed
at
this
time.
This
proposal
hold
this
plan.
Development
would
be
subject
to
that
zoning
being
changed,
going
back
to
the
site
plan,
all
be
setbacks
and
building
height
are
complied
with.
The
building
height
is
proposed,
approximately
30
feet.
The
building
height
limit
in
the
zone
would
be
35
feet
and
the
front
setback,
rear
setbacks
and
side.
Setbacks
are
all
met.
I
You're,
looking
at
on
the
left
side
of
that
is
the
front
of
the
building
that
you
would
see
from
700
west.
The
driveway
would
go
down
the
middle
and
access
garages
on
each
of
the
buildings,
two-car
garages,
three
level
units
and
then
down
here
on
the
right
of
your
screen.
This
is
a
better
straight
on
shot
of
being
the
proposed
building
at
least
the
front
of
it.
I
The
other
standard
being
modified
is
that
there
are
four
buildings
intended
for
this
one
larger
lot
and
the
code
currently
requires
one
building
four
lot:
the
applicant
has
tried
to
break
up
the
building
to
allow
for
more
green
space
and
more
light
for
the
area,
so
with
that
staff
determined
that
the
project
complies
with
the
standards
of
planned
development
and
recognize
the
project
be
approved,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report
specifically
subject
to
them
to
the
zoning
change.
So
with
that
all
and
my
presentation.
I
H
So
I
have
a
question
regarding
the
the
changes
we
made
and
I
don't
know
if
they're
in
effect,
yet
that
gave
planning
staff
the
ability
to
approve
certain
parts
of
cameras
for
plan
developments.
But
we
talked
a
lot
about
direction
to
planning
staff
regarding
that
frontage
of
the
Main
Street
and
do
do
you
remember
what
I'm
talking
about.
H
No,
we
had,
we
had
discussed
in
it
and
it
was
approved.
It
was
like
a
general
approval
given
to
staff
now
to
make
approvals
of
some
aspects
of
projects
so
that
they
didn't
come
to
the
Planning
Commission,
and
one
of
the
sticking
points
we
talked
about
was,
if
you
had
adequate
direction
in
in
writing
about
what
would
constitute
approval
from
a
staff
for
street-level
frontage
of
like
what
what
that
building
is.
Looking
like
and
I'm
just
wondering
when
that
gets
applied,
did
you
apply
it
or
is
it
for
something
totally
different?
H
A
Yeah
area
I
think
talking
about
the
purpose,
changes
the
arm
at
30
zones
that
we
discussed
a
few
months
ago,
which
would
have
allowed
a
lot
of
these
things
to
be
done
by
right,
rather
than
through
a
plan
development,
and
so
that
was
for
their
Emma
30
zones
and
actually
hasn't
been
to
the
council.
Yet
so
that.
H
Little
memory
job
so
I
guess
one
thing
I'm
curious,
KC
is:
did
you
work
with
the
applicant
regarding
what
this
thing
looks
like
on
7th
west
because
I'm
not
too
thrilled
with
its
engagement
and
I?
Don't
know
if
you
tried
to
work
with
them
and
they
didn't
make
changes
or
if
you
felt
like
it,
was
meeting
standards.
I
M
But,
to
me
mean
the
rest
of
the
zone
seems
to
be
much
smaller
than
RMF
35
in
general
I'm.
Just
wonder
if
you
could
maybe
dive
a
little
bit
deeper
understanding.
Maybe
you
know
about
why
you
feel
that
this
mass
scale
and
intensity
matches
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
particularly
the
surrounding
parcels
that
are
zoned.
Are
you
know,
RMF,
25
or,
and
the
lower
zones
kind
of
around
it?
M
I
Selling
that
way
previously,
partly
20
years
ago,
the
property
of
the
south
of
it
is
own
Darden
f-35
and
has
existing
multifamily
projects
of
about
a
similar
height
and
on
it.
This
meets
all
the
requirements
for
RM
f-35.
So
it's
really
kind
of
assumed
that
if
the
zoning
does
change
the
RMF
35,
then
the
dimensional
requirements
that
are
allowed
by
that
zone
would
would
be
compatible.
So
that's
the
question
is
really
answered
to
at
that
point.
I
So
if
this
does
get
changed
to
RM
f-35
then-
and
this
meets
all
the
dimensional
requirements-
it's
assumed
that
it's
compatible
size-wise
now
remaining
to
the
properties
to
the
north,
with
our
zoned
single-family
yeah.
There's
a
question
there
that
this
would
definitely
mass
wise
is
bigger.
The
height
is
similar.
A
single-family
zone
is
allowed
building
height
of
28
feet
posed
at
approximately
30
feet,
just
less
than
30
feet,
although
granted
28
feet
is
a
pitched
roof
where
this
is
a
flat.
I
I
N
M
We
have
all
these
standards
that
are
listed
and
you
know
for
plan
developments.
You
know
attachment
G
and
our
staff
report
and
I'm
just
I'm
wondering
know
how
how
to
interpret
those
if
they,
if
they
comply
outright
with
the
underlying
zone,
do
we
consider
whether
the
standard
or
not
applies
when
approving
a?
We
only
have
the
standard,
that's
being
modified.
M
I
Think
so,
yes,
so
when
someone
applies
for
a
plan
development,
it
opens
up
the
project
to
review
against
all
the
standards
that
are
applicable,
which
there
are
plan
development
standards,
so
yeah
in
the
staff
report
I
go
through
those
address
those
but
you're
right.
It's
it's
it's
subject
to
all
those
standards.
O
Is
John
I'm
just
curious
about
this
street
facing
facade,
as
you
take
us
through
that
process
a
little
bit
of
the
approval?
That
is
it's
something
that
that
we're
requiring
to
create
this
amount
of
busyness
on
one
facade,
that's
so
small!
Just
because
it's
applied
to
such
a
small
building
or
is
it?
Is
it
more
of
a
architects
choice
to
add
so
much
to
the
facade.
I
B
O
L
K
K
Guys
see
that
okay
yeah
all
right
so
here,
let
me
let
me
first
just
before
I
get
into
this.
Let
me
address
the
street.
They
seem
asada
with
you
guys
so
going
through
this
I
think
a
lot
of
you
are
probably
fairly
familiar
with
some
of
our
other
developments.
Downtown.
We
definitely
push
the
more
modern
aesthetic.
K
We
are
ones
that
I
know
that,
for
some
people,
stucco
is
a
four-letter
word.
We
actually
like
stucco
for
its
filling
and
modern
aesthetic.
Before
Chris,
we
actually
had
a
lot
more
stucco
on
the
street
facing
and
through
working
with
staff.
They
wanted
us
to
push
a
little
bit
more
durable.
It's
where
we
brought
in
the
lap,
siding
and
the
black
lap
side,
so
here's
kind
of
a
call-out
of
all
the
materials
you
know
we're
we're
open
to
cleaning
this
up
and
making
it
a
little
bit
more
sophisticated.
K
We
we
would
personally
like
to
maybe
make
it
or
simplify
it.
The
things
that
we
really
wanted
to
focus
on
was
the
porch
on
the
grade
that
you're
on
the
same
I
level.
This
pastor
buys
that
are
walking
down
the
street.
We
also
wanted
to
wear
that
level
to
balcony.
Is
this
the
main
living
space,
the
kitchen
living
dining
area?
So
you
know,
and
then
we've
added
a
lot
of
other
windows.
So
you
know
we
we're
open
to
working
with
you
guys
on
that.
O
K
Sounds
good
so,
as
you
can
see
we've
you
know
looking
at
this
site
when
we
started
looking
through.
You
know
this
parcel
land
being
changed,
RMF
35
to
match
the
existing
zoning
of
the
apartment
complex
to
the
south.
You
know
we're,
essentially
you
know
predominantly
the
site
is
surrounded
by
armed
f-35.
So
that's
why
we
felt
like
there
was
a
justification
to
rezone
this
to
arm
of
35.
K
Doing
so
would
make
it
so
that
you're
only
pedestrian
interaction
would
be
facing
700
West,
where
tenants
would
either
go
into
an
internal
corridor
from
the
tuck
under
parking
or
come
into
the
building
straight
from
7th
west.
If
we
maxed
out
the
site
footprint
to
the
10
foot
side
yards,
it
would
make
it
so
that
the
small
green
space
in
there
rare
could
probably
only
be
accessed
through
the
building,
so
we
would
essentially
be
cutting
up
the
site
and
which
would
reduce
and
less
pedestrian
interaction.
K
So
we
wanted
to
look
at
you
know
splitting
this
up
into
four
separate
buildings
and
from
our
from
our
out
the
survey
calculating
the
the
max
density
per
this
zone,
which
is
thirty
units
per
acre,
we're
at
0.94
acres.
So
we
could
go
up
to
28
units.
However,
you
know
we
are
looking
at
this
being
a
four
cell
project
where
we
want
to.
We
want
to
provide
home
ownership
in
this
area,
and
in
doing
so,
we
want
to
focus
more
on
the
site
quality
in
versus
trying
to
put
it
as
many
units
as
possible.
K
So
we
reduced
down
to
24
units
to
provide
a
larger
landscape
buffer
on
the
side
yards
where
the
front
doors
are
as
well
as
provide
a
larger
green
space
in
their
rear
of
the
property,
so
that
these
you
know
we
kind
of
a
tagline.
We
try
to
create
communities
within
communities.
We
wanted
to
create
just
a
small
green
space,
slash
pocket
park
for
these
tenants
with
a
a
decent
sized
side
yard
that
can
pull
them
through
by
the
front
doors
to
the
cold,
pedestrian
activity
back
into
the
site,
and
so
in
doing
that,
you
know.
K
I
want
to
thank
Casey.
Casey
was
great
to
work
with
you
know
we
we
pushed
back
back
and
forth,
but
he
was.
He
was
great.
His
attention
to
detail
and
patience
with
us
was
was
great.
You
know
we
going
through
this.
You
know
work
with
him
he's
he
mentioned
a
lot
of
the
items
you
know
discussed
that
we
only
needed
to
do
a
ten-foot
landscape
buffer
along
the
north,
but
we
wanted
to
push
that
to
12
12
feet.
K
Also,
as
you
can
see
here,
along
on
the
right
hand,
side
those
Street
facing
units
that
I
kind
of
started
with
they
do
have
a
non
grade
patio,
so
that
people
can
sit
out
there
interact
with
pastor
advised
that
are
walking
just
by
the
side
on
the
public
sidewalk.
You
know
we
believe
strongly
and
eyes
on
the
street,
and
we
try
to
do
that
and
we
try
to
really
up
that
by
giving
eyes
on
every
part
of
the
site
and,
as
you
can
see,
breaking
up
the
building
and
reducing
unit
count.
K
Our
building
pad
is
only
forty
percent
of
the
site
where
we
could
have
found
it
to
sixty
percent
and
I
mentioned
that
we're
only
we're
only
proposing
24
units
instead
of
twenty
eight
here's
a
couple
other
renderings,
we
kind
of
dress
the
one
on
the
left.
That's
the
street
facing
unit
and
also,
as
you
walk
down
this,
that
the
side
yards
where
the
front
doors
are.
K
C
Yeah
I
have
question
so
concerning
your
green
space
in
the
front
yard
that
you're
talking
about
here
in
the
front
setback.
There
is
a
tree
lon,
then
there's
a
sidewalk,
then
there's
a
large
sort
of
front
setback.
So
what
we
don't
really
have
a
landscape
plan
that
shows
what
you're
doing
with
that
we
just
we
do
have
some
indication
of
trees
on
on
in
the
front
yard
setback,
but
you,
but
that's
not
what
you
showed
in
the
rendering
just
now.
So
how
do
we
know
what
we're
getting
so.
K
C
C
And
in
addition,
so
you
could
then
do
smaller
trees
within
the
front
yard
or
either
way,
whichever
way
seems
to
work
better,
but
I
know
I,
even
in
the
apartment
next
door,
which
is
a
apartment
complex
next
door,
which
is
not
you
know
for
sale,
it's
a
more
affordable
unit.
There
are
very
mature
trees,
but
to
make
the
project
looked,
really
you
know
much
more
human.
So
that's
an
important
part
of
it.
K
Yeah
I
guess
you
did.
You
went
to
the
side,
you
can
see
that
there
was
a
lot
of
trees
on
site.
We
have
done
to
our
survey.
We
have
done
a
thorough
inventory
of
the
trees,
and
so
you
know
trees
that
can
be
they're
all
pretty
overgrown,
and
so
we
do
have
a
plan
that,
if
there's
trees,
we
can
keep
and
prune
cut
back
to
make
them
healthy.
Again,
we
will
plan
on
doing
that.
C
K
You
know,
based
off
our
experience
with
our
past
developments
that
we
have,
we
have
put.
We
have
programmed
those
out
quite
a
bit
more
and
through
cell
surveys
and
talking
to
people
that
have
now
been
living
there
for
over
a
year,
plus
people
love
their
animals,
especially
their
dogs,
and
they
have
asked
us
like
we
wish.
K
D
K
O
So
the
part
of
my
question
is
how
much
of
this
is
kind
of
what
your
intent
was
versus.
How
much
of
this
is
our
standards
for
the
city
because
I'll
be
honest,
I
am
an
architect
as
well
I'm,
a
more
contemporary
architect
and
some
I've
had
similar
instances
where
try
to
do
a
simple,
elegant
building,
and
then
it
ends
up
with
a
lot
of
things
that
were
unintended.
So
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
what
goal
was
and
then,
where
we
ended
up.
K
Yeah,
like
I
there's
a
little
bit
of
that
I
can
understand
so
one
thing
here
we
are
striving
to
make
this
an
you
know
a
good,
affordable
project
that
kind
of
matches
the
the
home
values
of
the
area.
There
was
a
comment
by
staff
that
they
didn't
want
to
see
any
stucco
that
faced
the
street,
and
we
just
said
you
know
we
like
I
kind
of
started
with
leave.
We
don't
when
we
use
stucco,
we
don't
use
it
to
say
we
want
to
save
money.
We
use
it
intentionally
because
we
do
like
the
modern
aesthetic.
K
We
do
understand
that
there
is
a
little
bit
of
a
stigma
for
it
and
so
kind
of
a
middle
ground.
Working
with
staff
is
I
said
we
kind
of
victims
of
look.
We
want
to
keep
it
predominantly
the
filled
material
stucco.
We
incorporated
these
bands
of
smooth
lap
siding
to
give
a
little
bit
more
haptic
interest
to
the
tree
facing
facade,
and
so
it
a
compromise
from
all
parties,
I'd
say
so
that's
kind
of
how
we
ended
where
we
we
did
so
so.
C
C
K
E
O
C
I
grew
John,
I,
think
that
there's
just
too
much
going
on
here,
I
mean
I.
Think
that's,
maybe
also
true
on
the
side
on
the
what
we
calling
the
front
facade,
which
is
kind
of
a
funky
little
funky
little
facade
to
where
there
just
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
it's.
You
know
striped
in
a
vertical
fashion,
which
I
don't
I,
don't
I'd
still
don't
understand
that
tendency
and
again
three
different
materials
for
different
materials.
It's
just
a
little
bit
too
much
for
for
a
project
like
this,
so
especially
in
the
front
facade.
O
O
K
O
Is
I
I
agree
with
you,
I
think
stucco
done
well
is
really
great.
Stucco
done
truly
is
is
really
awful,
so
you
know
if
you
can
keep
the
level
of
finish
where
it
needs
to
be
for
it
to
be
correct
and
I
think
that
that's
that's
more
acceptable
to
me
personally,
but
I
just
I
think
that
would
be
more
of
a
trade-off
that
I
would
be
willing
to
make
versus
just
adding
more
materials.
Just
just
because.
C
We
need
to
simplify
it.
I'm,
not
I,
wouldn't
you
know
give
any
specifics.
There
I
would
actually
tend
to
bring
the
the
panels
the
fiber
cement
panels
down
to
the
ground
instead
of
having
stucco
there.
So
in
whichever
way
you
want
to
know
whatever,
whatever
simplification
you
can
do
to
this,
it's
just
a
little
too
busy
for
the
front
street
front
right
now
for
this.
C
K
I
think
you
know,
I
I
think
I
can
see
a
little
bit.
That's
coming
from
guidelines.
I
think
you
know
I,
think
staff
is
there
they're
following
the
guidelines
and
I
know
that
a
lot
of
your
zones,
stucco,
is
very
frowned
upon
and
so
I
think
when
they
see
a
predominantly
dominant
stuff,
go
facade
that
it
kind
of
throws
up
red
flags
for
him.
So
I
can,
when
they're,
when
they're
viewing
under
the
context
of
some
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
K
K
I
K
O
One
more
comment
for
these
two
renderings
you
have
open
is
another
another
way
to
simplify
it.
You
may
be
getting
rid
of
the
stucco,
that's
underneath
the
l-shape
and
to
the
side
of
the
l-shape
and
keeping
the
stucco
more
like
it
is
on
the
right
image,
where
it's
more
of
a
border
yeah.
That
might
be
another
way
to
simplify
and
maybe
just
three
doing
that
and
bringing
that
gray
panel
to
the
ground.
I,
don't
like
I,
don't
have
specific
options,
but
I
think
just
looking
at
it
briefly.
Those
types
of
things
could
make
a
difference.
O
K
O
I
B
E
I
C
C
C
I
I
I
E
E
C
E
B
It
will
now
move
on
to
the
public
comment
portion
of
the
meeting
a
couple
of
points
I'd
like
to
make
before
we
start
just
to
reiterate
what
Casey
mentioned
during
his
report.
We're
here
tonight
to
evaluate
the
plan.
Development
application
of
the
subdivision
plat
and
our
focus
in
evaluating
those
proposals
is
to
consider
the.
B
Standards
that
are
in
the
staff
report
and
in
the
code
and
those
standards
speak
to
such
issues
as
consistency
with
the
city's
adopted
policies
and
plans
and
compatibility
in
terms
of
height
and
density
and
setbacks
and
landscaping
with
the
surrounding
area.
The
City
Council
obviously
has
discretion
when
making
a
decision,
whether
to
approve
or
deny
a
rezoning
petition.
They
have
a
lot
more
discretion
to
make
that
decision,
and
that's
not
what's
before
us
tonight.
B
E
A
L
E
A
B
A
B
E
I
This
is
a
bell
on
the
left.
You'll
see
what
the
original
plan
was.
So
there
was
some
concern
about
stucco,
but
also
and
I'm
concerned
about
just
adding
more
features
to
it.
So
the
week
as
you
can
tell
the
applicant
added
the
balcony
of
a
front
entrance
there,
we
we
did
get
to
the
point
where
it
is
now
with
those
multiple
materials
trying
to
increase
the
interest,
and
maybe
that
was
too
far
but
just
kind
of
to
give
you
a
sense
of
where
we've
come
from.
That's.
C
Yeah
I'm,
okay,
I
have
another
place
for
you.
I'm
sorry
Casey,
which
is
the
Police
Department
report,
asks
for
four
specific
kinds
of
fencing
along
the
sizes
property
in
particular,
and
and
maybe
the
back
as
well
and
also
they're
concerned
about
the
gap
between
the
two
buildings.
You
know,
there's
no
windows.
I
would
be
concerned
about
that
as
well
for
safety
reasons
and
also
for
design
reasons,
but
certainly
for
safety
reasons.
The
gap
between
the
two
buildings
there
should
be
some
windows
is
there
are
not
on
that
facade
and.
I
C
O
K
B
E
E
C
16
right
back,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay
and
also
I
am
also
concerned
about
the
the
fencing
on
the
side,
because
we're
talking
about
that
for
whatever
reason
and
I'm
a
suspecting
it's
because
of
the
narrowness
of
the
lot
having
those
units
have
their
front
entrance
facing
the
side
facing
a
fairly
narrow,
even
though
it's
not
as
narrow
as
it,
you
know,
could
have
been.
It's
still
a
fairly
narrow
side
yard
of
only
12
feet,
which
means
the
quality
of
that
fencing
is
really
what
you're
going
to
be
certain.
That's
gonna!
C
K
C
C
Backyards:
yeah,
okay,
all
right,
which
case
the
privacy
fence
would
probably
be
more
appropriate
I,
also
yeah.
If
I
may
I
want
to
note
for
the
discussion
of
the
Planning
Commission
that
there
was
a
petition
signed
by
many
many
people
on
this
project
against
this
project,
which
I
assume
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
City
Council
made
the
decision
to
to
table
this
discussion
until
people
could
arrive.
Just
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody
saw
that
in
terms
of
the
consideration
and
I
know
not
being
affordable.
B
Know
that
the
that
the
are
what's
before
us
is
subject
to
the
approval
of
the
rezone.
So
if
the
City
Council
approves
the
rezone
and
if
we
approve
the
application
before
us
than
they
would
be
approved
at
the
city,
council
elects
not
to
approve
the
rezone,
then
even
if
we
approve
this
tonight,
it
would
have
no
effect.
That's
a
condition
to
our
approval
or
condition
precedent
to
our
problem.
A
B
A
First,
email
is
from
an
Elizabeth
Estrada
Marie.
Oh,
it
says
hello
I'm,
a
current
resident
of
Rose
Park
and
have
been
for
the
last
ten
plus
years.
I
have
seen
my
peers,
friends
and
loved
ones
being
just
they
said.
The
long-term
effect
of
redlining
and
what
has
developed
to
gentrification
rent
will
be
raised.
If
this
development
plan
continues
and
low-income
folks
will
be
displaced,
what
we
need
is
affordable
housing.
A
Please
take
the
folks
that
have
been
living
here
or
living
there
for
years
into
consideration,
and
then
the
other
comment
received
was
from
a
Daniel
Sutherland
who
wrote
I
urge
you
to
stop
development
that
hurts
Rose
Park
residents
in
parentheses,
Ely
and
it's
or
le.
However,
you
say
that
and
instead
invest
more
into
affordable
housing,
and
that's
it
all.
B
D
E
B
C
O
D
M
When
this
went
through
this
doning
I
think
I
was
also
there
alone.
No
vote,
I
mean
I,
actually
like
CW
and
I.
Think
they've
done
I
like
a
lot
of
projects
they
do.
I
was
I,
didn't
really
support.
The
reason
I
felt
like
there
was
always
this
need
to
have
kind
of
a
breakdown
between
the
single-family
residence
in
these
more
higher
intensity,
stuff.
I'm,
just
going
to
be
rezoning
that
whole
area
to
arm
of
35
and
I
was
overruled
there.
O
Would
just
throw
out
that
you
know
the
center
of
the
block
really
is
a
higher
density
and
those
three
Lots
are
such
an
odd
shape.
It
would
be
very
difficult
to
break
that
into
something
reasonable
for
someone
to
use
or
just
and
so
I
do
think
it's
a
good
use
for
the
site
as
it
stands
I
you
know,
we
do
need
more
density
in
our
city.
We
have
a
housing
shortage
and
you
would
think
if
we
were
to
build
enough
housing
that
that
would
reduce
the
price
of
housing,
because
people
have
to
give
us
someplace.
O
B
O
My
my
opinion
is
if
we
could
reduce
way
that
it's
broken
up,
where
you
have
stucco
cement
board,
stucco
cement
board
and
then
underneath
that
cement
board
and
more
stucco,
that's
just
a
lot
of
transitioning
if
you
could
go
stucco
cement
board
and
then
at
Grayson
and
board
all
the
way
to
the
ground.
That's
an
option.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
solutions,
just
reducing
the
busyness
of
it
even
mimicking
the
stucco
portals
that
are
on
the
sides
on
the
front
and
then
having
the
infill,
be
something
some
simplified.
E
E
D
B
B
A
C
F
F
The
project
site
is
located
at
470,
West
200
north
and
that
TSA
UCC
zoning
district
and
has
two
frontages
along
two
public
streets
on
two
hundred
north
and
ninety
west
old
pedestrian
uses
limit
out
limited
in
the
area.
Presently,
the
project
site
is
also
in
an
area
that's
developing
for
increased
pedestrian
use.
F
Originally,
the
project
came
in
as
a
TSA
development
score
review.
The
salt
lake
crossing
project
met
the
criteria
for
an
administrative
review,
but
it
was
found
by
staff
to
not
meet
the
required
design
guidelines
along
the
490
west
frontage
in
the
TSA
zoning
district.
The
Planning
Commission
previously
heard
this
request:
On
February,
26
and
provided
to
the
applicant
and
staff
direction
on
a
design
review.
F
The
first
design
modification
proposed
by
the
applicant
is
the
maximum
length
of
the
building
facade
on
490
west.
The
design
standard
allows
a
maximum
width
of
200
feet.
The
requested
modification
is
for
up
around
50
foot
building
links.
The
purpose
of
creating
a
maximum
building
facade
length
is
to
break
up
large
expanses
of
building
facade
link
exceeds
the
maximum
length
of
the
design
standard.
It's
opinion
that
the
project
meets
the
intent.
If
the
vertical
column
columns
in
between
the
vertical
columns
is
an
open
courtyard
which
will
break
up
the
expanse
of
the
building.
F
The
active
ground
floor,
uses
and
visual
interest
is
also
being
requested
to
be
modified.
The
design
standard
requires
that
at
least
60%
at
the
ground
floor
uses
an
action
to
use
other
than
parking.
This
active
use
must
extend
25
feet
into
the
building.
This
standard
also
requires
that
the
ground
floor
provide
at
least
25%
visual
interest.
The
subway
crossing
project
is
proposing
18%
active
ground-floor
use,
and
it
will
enhance
visual
interest
by
providing
space
for
art
displays
near
the
entrances
to
the
building
along
lady
West.
F
Salt
development
has
been
working
with
local
and
youth
artists
and
occupying
these
art
display
spaces.
The
project
will
also
provide
green
walls
and
seating
areas
along
490
West
in
February,
Planning
Commission
heard
a
work
session
of
this
project
to
direct
planning
staff
and
the
applicants
on
the
design
of
the
project.
One
of
the
topics
of
discussion
and
an
overall
concern
with
the
design
of
these
green
walls
applicant,
has
addressed
this
concern
by
increasing
the
depth
of
these
green
walls
by
3
feet.
F
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
a
modification
to
the
ground
floor
glass
with
a
proposed
32%
of
ground
floor
glass.
The
majority
of
this
glass
houses,
the
art,
displays
along
490
West.
The
final
request
is
to
allow
for
modification
to
building
entrances.
The
requirement
is
of
one
building
entrance
for
every
40
feet
to
frontage.
The
proposed
is
the
proposal
is
for
80
e
in
between
each
building
entrance.
The
placement
of
these
building
entrances
is
staff
films
as
appropriate
as
it
connects
the
design
of
the
upper
floors
to
the
building
of
the
building
to
the
ground
floor.
F
Further,
the
modification
to
the
glass
standard
is
also
considered
appropriate,
as
the
fenestration
provided
on
the
building
provides
for
visual
interest
in
his
position
toward
towards
the
Pacifica
Destry,
so
its
staffs
opinion
that
overall,
the
project
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
district
and
the
design
review
standards
of
the
TSA
you
see
see.
Zoe,
strict
and
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
design
reviewed
for
salt
lake
crossing
with
the
four
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report,
and
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation
for
Salt
Lake
crossing.
C
L
C
L
Right
so
all
I'll
be
briefed
on
on
part
of
this
since
I
know,
you're
somewhat
familiar
with
the
project,
given
our
working
session
last
month
or
in
February,
and
just
just
looking
at
Hardware
district
making.
This
change
is.
This
is
just
context
of
the
neighborhood,
our
project,
being
that
this
in
the
corner
here
some
of
the
other
apartment
buildings
that
we
put
it
around.
L
So
you
know
we
know
our
neighbors
decently
here
we're
trying
hard
to
create
a
district,
we're
trying
to
do
something
meaningful
in
this
area,
and
we
think
this
project
is
a
key
component
to
that.
It's
kind
of
it's
a
new
type
of
apartment
building.
It
combines
the
co-working
type
of
environment
with
Co
living
with
micro
units
and
Studios
this
front
building.
This
has
the
coffee
shop
in
the
lower
portion
here
in
our
lobby.
This
contains
a
few
levels
of
office
level
gym
and
some
Clubhouse
function
now
just
to
cut
to
the
chase.
L
L
This
is
what
it
used
to
look
like
right,
a
little
bit
barren
and
it's
dark
right,
and
so
there
were
some
comments
about
trying
to
make
this.
Give
it
more
depth,
give
it
more
interest.
This
is
where
we
land
and
we've
created
these
little
pocket
parks.
We've
pushed
these
in
for
give
it
more
depth
to
accentuate
the
building
lines
coming
down,
so
it
feels
like
more
of
a
break
than
it
did
before
and
give
me
a
little
more
attention
to
the
detailing
of
the
landscaping
and
how
the
vines
interact.
L
With
these
columns,
which
we
planted
a
tree,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
room
for
trees,
so
we're
really
incorporating
that
into
the
architecture
as
well.
Just
another
view
of
the
same.
So
you
get
an
idea
what
the
depth
is
along
that
walk
along
490
west.
So
each
of
these
has
similar
characteristics
to
plant
the
tree,
planters
the
benches,
a
planter
in
the
in
the
vine
wall.
This
goes
into
the
garage
Beyond
and
that's
kind
of
the
piece
that
we're
discussing
as
I
back
up.
L
You
can
see
these
pocket
parks,
the
land
between
the
buildings
and
below
the
building
at
the
base
of
the
building
itself,
we're
creating
the
art,
niches
right
and
we're
actually
pretty
excited
about
that.
I
have
at
least
the
opportunity
that
we
have
to
have
something
that's
more
interactive
with
the
public.
We
like
events
and
so
we're
excited
about
the
type
of
vents
we
could
have
there.
It's
just
backing
up
and
for
anybody
that's
new
to
this
project.
L
That
piece
is
right
at
the
intersection
that
leads
to
the
front
runner
to
access
the
front
runner
platform,
and
so
that's
where
the
coffee
shop
lands.
That's
where
our
lobby
lands
a
lot
of
action
and
we're
putting
some
seating
areas
for
the
coffee
shop
out
on
the
street
little
planters
to
give
them
to
find
their
space
a
little
bit
and
then
moving
to
the
north.
That
this
is
where
all
the
residents
units
happen.
This
is
all
studio
and
micro
units
being
TSA
urban
core.
L
We
have
one
level
parking
above
and
then
we've
got
down
with
another
level
into
the
water
table
down
there,
but
we
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
this
facade
working
with
Planning
Department
and
from
our
working
session
last
time.
This
is,
you
know,
a
little
view
of
the
seating
areas
in
front
of
the
coffee
shop,
trying
to
activate
that
corner,
giving
it
a
mixed-use
component
just
a
few.
L
What
the
inside
of
that
South
building
will
look
like
this
would
be
filled
with
office
space
with
gym,
and
then
it
has
a
roof
deck
on
top
hot
tub.
Fire
pits
the
whole
bit
you
like
to
have
a
little
fun
close-up
of
the
art
niches.
What
would
those
look
like
so
they'll
be
about
three
feet
deep,
so
we
can
actually
walk
in
there.
Hang
art
and
they'll
be
lit
at
night
and
trying
to
create
little
moments
of
pause
along
that
walkway.
L
We
love
to
have
events
at
our
projects.
That's
kind
of
what
makes
what
our
projects
unique
in
a
way
is
the
community
that
we
create,
and
so
we're
excited
about
the
potential
of
using
this
street.
It's
a
really
wide
street.
Actually,
so
we're
excited
about
the
opportunity
of
getting
it
on
the
gallery
stroll
and
we
actually
have
murals
in
our
nearby
buildings
and
lots
of
displays
areas
in
those
as
well.
So
we
think
this
could
be
a
pretty
hot
area.
L
Just
to
take
over
the
street
on
occasion,
so
that's
in
the
plan
we're
working
with
a
gallery
and
West
High
School
for
the
art
work
or
the
very
extreme
north
end.
That's
our
dog
park
or
I'm.
Excuse
me,
our
dog
wash,
which
will
be
probably
the
nicest
dog
wash
you've
ever
seen,
and
that's
caddy
corners
just
behind
us
in
the
in
this
rendering
is
our
dog
park
and
just
another
view
of
those
little
parklets.
That's
the
seating
areas.
L
So
the
the
project
in
a
nutshell
like
I,
can
go
deeper
into
more
detail.
They
didn't
want
to
rehash
it
too
much,
given
that
you
know
some
of
the
familiarity
that
you
have
with
it.
But
this
really
is
a
new
product
type
that
we're
bringing
on
and
we're
really
focusing
on
the
social
rather
than
a
career
oriented
where
I'll
be
parking
about
50%
or
0.5
per
unit
stalls
0.5
cells
per
unit.
C
L
L
L
Sure
that
was
intentional
is
very
intentional,
actually
to
break
that
apart
from
the
residences,
and
if
you
look
some
of
our
buildings,
you
know
just
to
the
south
to
face
this.
We've
worked
hard
to
bring
a
historical
context
of
this
neighborhood
and
to
give
us
some
variety
as
well,
and
so
this
building,
where
it's
a
different
function,
it's
a
different
product
type.
We
wanted
it
to
feel
different
than
the
rest
of
the
project,
and
so,
if
you're
back,
you
know
to
the
north
is
where
people
live,
and
this
is
where
people
are
are
working.
L
C
Well,
I
think
it's
in
it.
It
might
be
okay
to
be
a
contrast,
because
there
are
different
uses
and
it
also
don't.
It
is
already
in
a
really
long
facade
I
mean
that's
been
a
problem
we've
had
from
the
beginning
and
so
having
something
different
is
more
it's
more
like
having
a
city
where
things
are
built,
not
all
at
the
same
time
and
not
all
the
same
way,
I
think
yeah.
C
C
L
L
Here
we
go,
and
so
the
the
other
portions
that
are
meant
to
look
more
modern,
they're,
very
intentionally,
modern,
that's
where
we're
bringing
in
the
wood
and
the
glass.
You
can
see
we're
putting
a
lot
of
glass
in
this
compared
to
what
you
normally
see
on
an
apartment.
Building
right,
keep
in
mind.
This
is
an
apartment.
L
Building
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know,
can
crack
contrasted
to
some
of
the
others
we've
seen,
but
trying
to
bring
the
butterfly
roofs
in
and
the
glass
in
the
wood
trying
to
give
this
a
really
unique
character
where
the
front
building
is
meant
to
look
like
an
older
building
like
it's
always
been
there.
So
we
really
feel
these
should
contrast,
rather
than
trying
to
blend
them
together.
C
A
C
C
E
C
E
Had
to
log
off
and
come
back
on,
that
was
probably
it
so
so
I'm
with
self
development
as
well.
Ethan
and
I
attended
the
Community
Council
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
if
nobody
was
here
from
the
Community
Council
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
flavor
or
color
from
how
that
meeting
was
Ethan
and
I
walked
through
many
of
the
same
renderings.
E
Even
though
we've
reworked
some
of
the
additional
details
following
conversations
when
Anna
and
her
team,
but
the
Community
Council
traditionally
for
West
Capitol
and
the
marmalade
area
has
been
a
very
fairly
rigid,
Community
Council,
where
they
care
quite
a
bit
about
what's
going
into
the
neighborhood
and
after
our
presentation,
I
was
surprised
and
we've
been
to
many
community
council
meeting
them
on
past
project.
I
was
surprised
at
the
number
of
individuals
that
came
up
and
thanked
us
for
trying
to
put
something
historical,
something
elegant
some
good
architecture
into
their
neighborhoods.
E
B
E
H
So
I'll
pipe
in
I,
based
on
the
working
session
again
I
just
want
to
make
the
comment
that
I
I
am
finding
this
architecture
to
be
really
attractive
and
I'm
generally
never
pleased
by
the
architecture
that
I
see
in
our
project.
So
I
wanted
to
come
in
you
for
we're,
listening
to
staff
Nannette
and
then
our
working
session
that
you're
really
you're
really
hitting
on
the
intent
of
what
the
zoning
code
says
and
I
think
that
this
is
a
very
attractive
development.
And
it's
going
to
be
a
nice
addition
to
a
district.
M
C
E
Like
this
building
a
lot
so
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
I
move
the
Planning
Commission
of
fruit
petition
of
pl
and
PC
and
2019
one
one
zero
regarding
this
salt
lake
crossing
design
review
in
order
to
comply
and
have
it
comply
with
the
standards
of
approval.
One,
the
design
of
the
project
will
be
consistent
with
the
staff
report
and
submitted
Design
Review
application
to
the
TSA
development
score.
Approval
is
required
prior
to
the
building
permit
approval.
Three.
C
Thank
you.
Amy
I
have
a
motion
by
Maureen
seconded
by
Amy
babe,
so
I'm
gonna
go
through
the
roll
call.
I
have
my
own
list,
so
it's
different
Amy.
Yes,
Maureen!
Yes,
Matt,
yes,
Sara,
yes
crystal
yes,
the
motion
passes,
did
I
call
everybody
name
who's
eligible
to
vote
here.
I
think
I
did
okay,
and
now
we
will
go
back
to
yeah.
A
H
B
N
So
this
is
a
request
by
the
property
owner
for
a
map
amendment
to
rezone
ten
parcels
and
a
portion
of
a
city-owned
public
alley
at
approximately
seven,
oh
six
to
seven
forty
West
nine
hundred
sell
the
properties
are
currently
zoned
light
manufacturing,
m1
and
the
request
is
to
rezone
them
to
R
mu,
which
is
residential.
Mixed-Use
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
with
conditions.
N
There
are
two
existing
commercial
buildings
on
the
site.
The
applicant
plans
to
rehabilitate
for
restaurant
and
retail
type
uses
that
are
currently
allowed
under
the
m1
zoning
designation,
as
well
as
the
proposed
RM.
U,
zoning
designation.
The
requested
rezone
would
accommodate
future
development
of
the
vacant
eastern
portion
of
the
site
for
a
multi-family
residential.
The
developer
has
not
proposed
a
specific
development
plan
as
part
of
the
rezone
and
does
not
have
any
pending
building
permits
or
other
development
applications
for
the
property.
N
With
the
exception
of
the
small
alley,
that's
proposed
to
be
to
be
vacated,
that's
included.
In
this
reason,
the
subject
properties
are
located
west
of
Interstate
15
along
900
South,
one
of
the
gateways
to
the
West
Side
neighborhoods.
Several
community
uses
around
the
subject
site
in
putting
the
nine
line
trail,
9
line
bike
park
and
community
gardens.
The
predominant
street
frontage
of
the
vacant
portion
of
the
properties
is
along
900
South,
as
well
as
700
West.
The
surrounding
properties
on
the
block
are
zoned
m1.
N
However,
with
the
exception
of
just
a
few
properties,
the
primary
use
is
predominantly
single-family
potential.
There's
also
a
religious
use,
Summum
adjacent
to
the
site
on
the
northeast
corner
of
the
block.
These
slides
show
a
photo
of
the
site
as
well
as
surrounding
development,
and
this
is
some
of
the
surrounding
development.
This
is:
will
family
residential
that
is
adjacent
to
the
property.
N
The
project's
situated
along
900,
South
and
700
West
industrial
corridor,
an
area
that
the
West
Side
master
plan,
identifies
as
an
important
gateway
into
the
larger
West
Side
community.
The
proposed
RM
hue
zoning
district
provides
for
a
vibrant
mix
of
uses
that
are
more
consistent
with
the
future
development
goals
and
vision
for
the
area
than
what
could
be
developed
under
the
existing
m1
zoning
designation.
N
The
parcels
included
in
the
proposed
rezoning
are
currently
underutilized,
mostly
vacant
land
that
are
identified
in
the
master
plan
as
an
appropriate
area
for
high-density
housing
master
plan
policies
supporting
the
proposed
map.
Amendment
are
discussed
in
greater
detail
in
attachment
D
of
the
staff
report.
N
N
Planning
staff
is
recommending
as
a
condition
that
the
design
standards
applicable
to
the
d2
zone
are
applied
to
any
new
project.
On
the
subject,
parcels
that
are
developed
under
the
proposed
zoning
district,
one
way
this
could
be
accomplish
is
through
a
development
agreement.
Development
agreements
can
only
be
a
cry
city
council.
This
slide
shows
the
design
standards
that
would
be
applicable
just
under
the
RM
room,
its
proposed,
as
well
as
the
d2
design
standards
that
staff
is
recommending,
are
imposed
on
the
project
and
the
properties
within
the
boundaries
of
the
Poplar
Grove
Community
Council.
N
Prior
to
submitting
the
reason
application,
the
applicants
did
attend
a
poplar
grove
community
council
meeting,
which
was
hosted
on
the
subject
site
in
the
vacant.
Warehouse
buildings.
During
the
meeting
applicants
discuss
their
plans
to
rezone
the
property,
their
intent
for
future
development
of
the
site.
Planning
staff
also
attended
that
meeting
and
answered
questions,
questions
from
the
community
related
to
height
design
standards
and
building
materials
that
would
be
applicable
under
the
requested,
our
industry.
N
We
also
sent
a
early
notification
to
the
community
council
chairs
of
Poplar
Grove
and
Glendale
community
councils,
as
well
as
property
owners
and
residents
with
a
beautiful
project.
We
also
held
an
open
house
because
the
projects
within
two
feet
or
600
feet
of
duty
council
districts
and
we
did
receive
two
letters
of
support
from
both
Poplar
Grove
Community,
Council
and
Glendale
Community
Council,
and
all
public
comments
that
were
received.
As
of
the
publication
of
the
staffer
staff
before
aren't
putting
an
attachment.
N
Cheek
and
again,
staff
has
reviewed
the
project
for
compliance
with
the
zoning
map,
amendment
standards
and
we
are
recommending
that
the
Commission
forward,
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
with
the
conditions
and
those
conditions
relate
to
the
city-owned
Ally
and
the
petitioner
entering
into
a
purchase
agreement
with
the
city.
If
the
Ally
is
approved
by
City
Council,
as
well
as
the
design
standards
applicable
to
the
d2
zone,
we
applied
to
this
project
if
it's
resolved,
and
that
is
all
I
have
for
the
presentation.
Believe
the
applicants
have
a
presentation
as
well.
B
H
Okay,
thanks
Amy
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
The
first
one
is
related
to
that
Valley
and
Allie
vacation
I
generally
opposed
to
them
without
more
specific
lands,
but
we
also
have
standards
on
the
books
of
look
when
somebody
applies
for
an
Allie
vacation
or
petitions,
for
it
has
do
you
apply
those
like
public
nuisance,
safety
and
whatnot
were
those
looked
at
when
you
made
your
recommendation
to
approve
the
Allie
vacation
on
this
one.
N
H
N
Have
a
construction
plan,
but
a
conceptual
plan
isn't
associated
with
this
rezone,
so
they
do
intend
to
redevelop
those
two
commercial
buildings
on
the
site
into
restaurant
retail
type
uses,
and
they
do
intend
to
have
that
alley
as
part
of
that
they
they
have
not
submitted
a
formal
application.
They
do
have
a
conceptual
plan
that
they
may
show
images
of
tonight.
But
there's
not
a
development
plan
associated
now.
H
Irene
I
remember
the
conceptual
plan,
but
I
didn't
necessarily
remember
that
it
was
this
address.
So,
okay,
that's
helpful.
The
the
question
I
had
was
what
is
the
difference
and
why
are
you
proposing
an
R
mu
versus
an
R
mu
35,
which
is
what's
happening
to
the
West?
What's
the
difference?
What's
the
main
difference,
and
why
is
an
R
mu
more
preferable
than
what
what's
going
on
in
West.
N
Why
they're
proposing
what
they're
proposing,
but
in
terms
of
some
of
the
main
differences
between
R,
mu
and
RM
e
35,
would
be
the
height
R
mu
can
go
up
to
75
feet
for
residential
uses
and
r
mu
35
to
go
to
35
feet.
So
I
would
say
that's
the
biggest
difference
there.
Maybe
setback
or
other
differences,
but
I
think
the
height
is
the
main
difference.
Thank.
M
So
those
are
only
applying
it
just
this
this
this
area,
this
these
Lots,
you
know
these
properties,
I
just
know
it
isn't.
Common
I,
don't
know
if
I
remember,
modify
design
review
standards
for
a
specific
parcel,
with
a
zoning
change
ever
before,
just
curious
on
why
that's
happening
together
instead
of
going
in
layer
on
a
part
of
a
plan,
develop
there
something
else
that
we're
looking
at
those
design
review
points
instead
of
in
a
zoning
project,
the.
N
Recommendation
is
to
not
to
modify
those
specific
standards
it's
to
impose
additional
standards,
because
the
army
zone
just
has
basically
two
design
standards
and
the
d2
zone
has
a
lot
more
design
standards
and
we're
recommending
that
those
are
imposed
on
the
project.
If,
at
a
time
when
the
developer
does
have
a
development
proposal,
if
they
wanted
to
modify
design
standards,
then
they
would
come
before
you
or
it
may
be
in
those.
B
A
This
is
Nick
I'm
gonna
weigh
in
on
this
one,
and
it's
not
it's
not
common.
This
is
actually
fairly
unusual.
The
reason
why
we
are
proposing
this
is
because
we
feel
like
the
rme
zone
on
its
face
is
incompatible
with
what
the
master
plan
for
the
area
says,
and
so
we
just
haven't
had
time
to
update
the
rme
zoning
district.
We
haven't,
have
the
staff
resources
do
it,
and
so
this
is
our
Avenue
to
be
able
to
do
that
at
this
time.
Okay,.
B
A
In
fact,
I
think
it's
like
3%
of
our
total
land
area
zoned
for
multifamily,
and
that
includes
all
the
mixed-use
districts
like
the
d1
and
the
TSA
zones
and
sugarhouse
business,
district
and
and
so
part
of
our
some
of
the
other
master
plan
policies
that
we
do
have
as
a
city
do
talk
about
transitioning
some
of
these
older
industrial
areas
into
more
of
a
mixed-use
type
of
area,
and
so
given
where
this
is
and
some
of
the
other
structures
and
infrastructure.
That's
that's
around
it
and
what
the
current
zoning
allows
as
far
as
building
scale.
B
C
B
J
Can
you
see
my
screen
yeah
perfect?
Well,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
First
off
enemy
for
shepherding
this
this
process.
Quite
complicated
I
also
want
to
thank
the
community
for
their
input
in
their
involvement.
You
know
the
neighbors
in
the
community
were
we're
very
we're,
very
active
and
voicing
their
opinions.
J
J
It
could
be
very
catalytic
for
for
the
west
side
and
really
sort
of
start
activating
the
what
you
know,
sort
of
like
that
gateway
beyond
I-15
other
railroad
tracks.
Just
the
point
of
my
presentation,
I
think
Amy
covered
a
lot
of
things
and
there
may
be
some
redundancy
I
just
really
wanted
to
highlight
how
I
felt
that
this
zone
amendments
is
really
consistent.
We
put
the
West
Side
master
plan
and
a
nine
line
cord
our
master
plan.
J
Just
to
give
you
a
quick
recap:
I
think
you
guys
are
familiar
with
this,
but
you
know
the
the
water.
You
know
the
property
in
question.
As
you
can
see
is
in
the
in
the
red
lines
we
acquired
both.
You
know
these
two
sites
just
over
a
year
ago,
and
obviously
we
request
zona
man
from
from
m1,
which
is
like
manufacturing
to
you
just
to
dive
right
into
it.
J
I
mean
I,
think
you
know,
according
to
the
West
Side
master
plan,
there's
your
wet
there's
a
real
lack
of
connectivity
between
the
west
side
and
the
rest
of
the
city
and
I
think
it
talks
about
strengthening
the
connections.
You
know
I'm
sort
of
across
from
the
west
side
to
to
the
other
parts
of
the
city
in
particularly,
if
you
all
familiar
with
this,
we
know
it's
800,
South,
900
cells
and
in
1300
cells
and
900
South
was
sort
of
identifying
is
the
one
that
needed
the
most
attention
again.
J
I
think
I
think
you
know
using
you,
know,
doing
this
zone
amendment
and
trying
to
to
change
this
vacant
land
into
something
that
is
actually
a
mixed-use
development.
I
think
I
think
would
really
be
consistent
with
some
of
the
visions
of
the
master
plan.
I.
Think
I
think
you
saw
this
I.
Think
I
pulled
this
as
well
from
the
nine-line
master
plan,
because
this
was
an
Amy's
presentation.
I
think
really,
the
main
point
being
obviously,
is
your
Wolfen?
No
wait?
There's
a
BMX
bike
park,
this
community
garden.
J
J
If
you
come
on
900
south
from
from
the
east
towards
there,
you
know
the
the
railroads
the
railroad
tracks,
the
I-15
seem
very
much
like
a
barrier
and
I
think
there's
it
almost
like
sort
of
prevents
you
from
going
across
and
and
I
think
I
think
you
guys
were
obviously
quite
asking
questions
about
height.
You
know
there
is
there's
two
two
reasons
for
height
that
we
have.
We've
thought
about
is
one
just
to
start.
Obviously,
the
you
know
we
talked
about
structures
that
are
high
around
there.
J
What's
next
to
it
again,
we're
not
talking
about
getting
rid
of
those
existing
vacant
warehouse
buildings
which
I
don't
know
why
they
are
but
assume
they're
about
25
to
30
feet,
high
I
think
it
would
sir
be
a
step
down
to
sort
of
you
know
the
more
for
single-family
housing
again.
This
is
sort
of
it.
I
wanted
to
zoom
out
to
sort
of
give
you
a
little
bit
of
an
idea
of
where
exactly
this
is
located.
J
I
I
think
this
development
makes
a
lot
of
sense
if
you
think
of
all
the
things
that
are
happening
on
that
and
of
itself
sort
of
extending
extending
that
development.
I
think
creating
like
I
said.
A
gateway
sort
of
a
catalytic
project
on
the
other
side
of
the
freeway
I
think
would
be,
would
be
really
great,
for
you
know
kind
of
you
know
getting
people
to
go
across
that
barrier
that
is
currently
I-15
and
railroad
tracks.
You
know
make
use
of
the
Jordan
River
Park
and
all
the
amenities
that
the
west
side
has
as
again.
J
You
know
we
talked
about
you
know
the
West
Side
master
plan.
You
know
I,
think
I.
Think
one
of
one
of
the
things
that
it
talks
about
is
how
there
is
an
inequitable
share
of
land,
dedicated
manufacturing,
uses
again
I
think
with
this
his
own
amendment
I
think
we
would
would
obviously
help
help
with
that
and
again
I
think
it's
in
the
spirit
of
of
the
West
Side
master
plan.
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
here
when
we
sort
of
talked
to
the
community.
J
There
was
a
lot
of
talk
about
what
the
community
was.
Looking
for,
and
obviously
a
lot
of
things
that
we
we
heard
we
heard
was
services,
restaurants,
coffee
shops,
there's
not
actually
a
coffee
shop.
You
know
on
west
of
of
I-15,
so
so
I
think
that's
one
of
the
I
think
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
this
mixed
use
is
is
to
really
create
services.
You
know
in
those
vacant
warehouse
buildings
which
is
phase
one
with
sort
of
like
a
public.
J
You
know
public
square
for
the
community
and
eventually,
for
potentially,
you
know,
residents
of
the
future
mixed-use
development,
but
I
think
I
think
the
idea
really
is
to
create
services
for
the
community
as
such
as
restaurants
and
coffee
shops
in
those
warehouse
spaces
which
I'll
address
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
at
this
stage
and
then
finally,
you
know
we
talked
about.
You
know
multifamily
infill
again,
both
both
plans.
J
J
Obviously
we
have
these
two
vacant
commercial
structures.
We've
got
the
alley.
We
want
to
re-energize
this
area
by
I
said,
like
I,
said,
creating
some
services
for
local
community.
Obviously
that's
a
little
bit
tied
into
you
know
being
able
to
get
this
one
amendment
on
so
we
can
actually
have
more
residents,
and
you
know
you
know
more
residents
on
what
is
currently
the
vacant
land
to
sort
of
you
know
get
more
activity
going
in
this
area.
J
We
also
want
to
reinvigorate
the
neglected.
What
mid-block
crossing
like
I
said.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
that
sort
of
public
that
public
square
between
the
two,
those
two
buildings
and,
as
you
can
see
on
the
next
presentation
that
that's
the
hope,
would
it
look
what
it
will
look
like
when
we
actually
done
with
you
can
see
that
arch.
That's
essentially
between
those
two
buildings,
that's
a
view
from
the
alley,
looking
east.
J
So
that's
essentially
what
we're
trying
to
do.
Just
an
update
on
that
I
think
we
finalize
the
budget
on
this,
we're
working
with
the
RDA.
Obviously
we're
trying
to
get
financing
with
the
RDA.
We
were
pretty
far
along,
as
you
may
know,
but
we're
finalizing
the
budget
at
the
end
of
this
month.
It's
coming
in
as
we
expect
it
and
we're
looking
to
apply
for
building
permits
on
this
phase,
one,
hopefully
May
and
again,
I
think
the
whole
like
I,
said
we're
pretty
excited
at
this
project.
J
M
Ren
raised
don't
show
a
like
sixty
five
foot
building
I'm.
Just
talking
me
through
like
what
how
you
see
that
kind
of
thing
on
the
piece,
the
parcel,
if
it's,
if
you're
just
going
that
through
part
of
the
parcel
of
the
whole
parcels,
gonna
be
65
feet,
do
any
sense
of
how
you
see
I
mean
playing
itself
out
to
be.
J
Honestly,
this
is
a
two-faced
project.
I,
from
my
perspective,
I
think
this.
It's
really
sort
of
a
little
bit
contingent
on
the
zone.
Amendment
I
think
I
think
this
idea
of
65
feet,
I,
like
I,
told
you
I,
think
I
think
my
biggest
concern
is
I
think
to
create
to
be
successful
to
be
successful
with
the
commercial
phase.
One
I
think
I
think
you
know.
Obviously,
currently
it's
mostly
you
know
single-family
homes
they
I,
think
to
really
be
successful
with
the
commercial
services.
J
I
think
you
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
density
on
the
vacant.
None
on
the
vacant,
land
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
asking
for
65
feet
why
I
am
asking
for
it.
I
think
we'd
be
great
to
be
above
the
freeway,
because
the
freeway,
if
you,
if
you
walk
there,
it's
quite
imposing
and
actually
having
having
a
structure
that
actually
is
a
little
bit
taller
than
the
freeway
would
actually
I
think
enhanced
in
the
Abad,
because
now
you're,
actually
looking
at
a
nicer
building
and
B
I
think
it
would
be.
J
You
could
see
it
from
way
anyone
attract
what
to
finally
come
to
that
side
and
sort
of
create
an
extension
of
the
grain
or
yourself
I'm,
not
I
want
a
65
foot
building
and
we
really
haven't
talked
that
much
about
design.
I
mean
GSP,
s
is
helping
me
with
this,
and
we've
mastered
I
think
the
way
we've
had
it.
It's
roughly,
you
know,
like
I,
said,
probably
a
story
higher.
Then
then
the
and
the
freeway.
M
J
The
only
thing
I
can
tell
you
is
obviously
you
know
from
my
perspective.
You
know
these
two
buildings,
actually
it's
very
expensive
to
adaptive.
Reuse
on
these
buildings
is
to
these
two.
You
know
warehouse
buildings
which
I
think
are
beautiful
and
I
want
to
keep
because
I
think
they're
they're,
a
part
of
the
history
of
of
this
I
think
we
would
not
try
to
put
a
building
manner
that
would
clash
with
that
or
just
I
think
we're
obviously
pretty
mindful
of
aesthetics
and
I.
J
Think,
obviously
you
know
if
we
have
to
come
back
for
this
one
review.
I
think
we
would.
Obviously
we
know
that
you
know
Amy
and
planning
would
certainly
want
to
see
certain
standards
and
it
was
the
community
I.
Think
that's
your
sort
of
dressing,
the
biggest
issue
that
community
is
add,
which
is
nobody
wants
like
an
ugly
building,
they're.
M
C
On
page
14
and
I
think
15
of
the
staff
report
we
see
amassing
drawing
it's
basically
showing
a
you
know,
sort
of
how
big
a
building
could
be
built,
they're
actually
built.
You
know
it
could
be
bigger
than
that
really
not,
but
certainly
how
tall
it
is.
So
is
that
sort
of
I
know
that
you
haven't
designed
anything,
and
it
was.
It's
obviously
not
going
to
be
a
big
white
box
like
shown
here,
but
that
yeah
accurately
represents
like
a
75
foot
tall
building,
mass
and
passive
might
be
you.
C
J
J
We're
trying
to
get
above
the
freeway
that
that
sort
of
like
we,
the
whole
purpose
of
that,
and
so
that's
really
where
I'm
coming
from
is,
is
I,
think
being
above
the
freeway
I
think
a
this.
We
need
more
housing
in
the
city,
I
mean
we
all
know
this
I
think
this
is
a
great
place.
This
is
a
transitional
area.
J
If
there's
gonna
be
a
place
next,
you
know
where
we're
gonna
put
a
higher
building
I
think
it
should
be
next
door
freeway,
so
we're
just
literally
just
trying
to
be
realistic
and
saying
you
absolutely
right.
We
could
go
that
high
I
think
it
would
be
actually
beneficial
to
the
neighborhood
to
be
actually
taller.
Then
freeway.
O
O
Obviously
this
is
a
placeholder
and
I
think
it's
a
little
misleading
as
to
what
the
potential
of
the
building
is
back.
I've
worked
on
sites
similar
to
this
and
I
feel
that
just
to
block
some
of
the
sound
and
block
the
visual
impact
of
what
the
freeway
is
and
how
imposing
it
is
on
the
neighborhood
I
think
something
like
this
actually
makes
sense
and,
as
the
neighborhood
develops
around,
this
I
would
hope
to
see
kind
of
things
that
would
transition
that
scale
as
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
develops
as
well.
O
N
Madam
chair
can
I
can
I
add
to
that.
This
is
Amy.
Yeah
I
was
just
gonna,
add
what
Commissioner
Lee
just
said.
That
was
the
set
the
that
was
similar
to
what
the
comments
were
when
we
attended
the
community
council
meeting.
Many
of
the
residents
commented
on
how
they
thought
that
this
a
taller
building
would
shield
sound
from
the
freeway
and
they
thought
it
would
be
a
good
transition
to
not
have
to
see
the
freeway
and
rather
see
if
you'll
see
a
building
so
I.
Just
thanks.
B
Amy
yeah
I
would
agree,
and,
given
that
the
adjacent
parcels
under
the
Emmys
own
could
also
be
much
taller
if
they
were
built
to
their
full
density,
that
doesn't
seem
to
me
that
it's
that
radical,
a
change
even
based
on
what's
currently
in
existence
in
the
area.
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
right
now.
B
A
A
P
Hello,
all
my
name
is
Dennis
Farris
I
am
former
chair
current
vice
chair
of
the
Poplar
Grove
Community
Council
I
would
definitely
love
to
speak
on
behalf
of
this
project
strongly
in
favor
of
it.
This
developer
and
his
team
have
been
in
constant
communication
with
us
on
the
council
in
the
community
since
day
one.
He
first
called
us
to
say
that
he
had
the
property
under
contract
and
before
he
determined
a
plan
for
the
site,
he
wanted
to
hear
what
it
is.
P
The
community
wanted
or
needed
to
have
that
communication
has
continued
since
day,
one
so
we've
been
engaged,
he
has
actually
implemented
any
and
all
possible
suggestions
and
requests
that
we
have
made
I.
Think
it's
a
grand
tribute
to
them
in
their
plan.
That
phase
one
is
to
renovate
and
restore
the
existing
historic
buildings,
even
though
there
is
no
pre-existing
protection
for
them
that
he
felt
that
that
was
an
important
step.
One
to
do
I
think
says
a
lot
for
his
willingness
to
work
with
and
for
the
community
as
a
whole.
P
Along
with
this
rezone,
some
neighbors
nearby,
the
property
on
the
same
block,
have
also
inquired
about
rezoning.
Their
own
properties,
looking
perhaps
to
rebuild
their
homes,
that
sort
of
thing
and
it's
a
more
difficult
to
do
in
an
m1
zone
than
it
would
be
with
our
mu,
and
these
guys
have
actually
assisted
us
along
the
way
in
helping
those
residents
to
further
that
application
process
too.
P
This
project
would
give
us
a
much
needed
increased
housing
density
within
the
city
within
our
neighborhood,
as
you
guys
saw,
there
is
a
lot
of
single-family
homes.
In
fact,
in
our
neighborhood,
and
particularly
there
is
a
more
land
per
house
than
just
about
anywhere
else
and
to
be
able
to
offset
that
and
get
a
few
more
people
in
there
would
actually
be
good.
P
It's
a
little
bit
stronger
tax,
big
tax
base
there,
let's
see
developer,
also
has
a
immediately
cleaned
up
the
property
upon
closing
of
the
deal.
It
was
a
horrific
eyesore
for
many
many
decades
and
has
already
been
cleaned
up
dramatically
and
he's
kept
it
secure
and
he's
proven
to
be
a
strong
partner
for
us
already.
P
P
Access
to
regional
parts
like
Jordan
Park,
the
bike
park,
that's
kitty,
corner
from
this
project,
the
community
gardens
right
across
the
streets
gives
it
a
lot
of
available
green
space
for
even
the
majority,
the
large
number
of
families
that
could
potentially
reside
in
this
project.
Eventually,
and
as
far
as
I
know,
some
people
are
concerned
about
the
overall
possible
height
of
this,
but
within
one
block,
when
you've
got
not
just
the
grain
silos
at
welfare
Square,
you
also
have
the
silos
of
the
mountain
cement
company.
You
also
have
the
silos.
P
R
Can
you
hear
me
great
yeah
what
I'm
concerned
about
is
I
own
property
in
the
area,
but
is
it?
Is
that
we're
getting
rid
of
all
the
areas
from
low-income
housing?
There's
nothing
included
or
affordable
housing?
Yes,
we're
buying
up
this
land
and
the
neighbors
want
to
be
able
to
change
their
zoning,
so
they
can
put
a
big
building
in.
But
you
know
what
this
is
doing
is
just
taking
a
Paul
Lam
bit
low-income
people
used
to
live
in
and
yeah.
We've
got
some
big
buildings,
but
we
don't
allow
for
any
type
of
affordable
housing.
R
There
are
schools
just
up
the
street
on
seventh
West
Jackson
elementary
there's
bright.
What's
it
bus
people
over
there's
West
High,
but
we
don't
have
anything
that
really
caters
to
multi
families,
which
is
what
they
said
they
aren't
wanting
to
do,
and
and
I
tried
to
make
a
comment
during
the
last
thing
about:
where
do
people
park
their
friends
and
you
know,
and
and
and
where
is
the
low-income
housing
involved?
R
That's
my
concern.
I
am
I,
actually
am
involved
with
another
project
with
affordable
housing
them
and
I.
Don't
know
if
I
missed
it
but
I
at
the
end.
Maybe
we
could
revisit
it.
You
probably
might
have
already
voted
on
it
and
because
I
guess
I
thought
that
started
closer,
just
7:30
or
8:00,
but
anyway
that's.
My
comment
is
that
there's
we've
eliminated
a
low-income
housing
and
we're
taking
up
all
the
land
on
the
west
side
and,
and
where
are
these
other
people
are
gonna
live
anyway?
That's
my
comment:
is
that
reasonable
yeah
hey?
B
E
So
this
happened,
it
will
be.
It
will
completely
change
the
pleasant
dynamics
currently
going
on
in
the
area.
We
also
understand
the
developers
interested
in
obtaining
more
property
close
by.
We
understand
there
currently
are
no
specific
development
proposal.
Is
there
going
to
be
any
oversight
on
what
the
site
plan
is?
We
oppose
any
zoning
change
until
we
understand
was
specifically
intended
for
this
area
and
Bernie
wrote.
Another
comment
in
after
the
community
councils
comments.
E
So
now
we
are
finding
out
our
church,
which
is
in
a
sacred
place
of
rested
and
sanctuary
for
individuals
coming
to
partake
of
the
divine
I.
Loo
is
now
going
to
be
hemmed
in
by
a
very
tall
building
right
next
to
us.
This
is
very
concerning
it
will
impose
significantly
on
the
religious
environment
that
we've
established
since
1978.
This
is
not
a
benefit
to
us
at
all
and
imposes
on
our
minority
church
will
stop.
E
B
B
B
N
So
I
don't
have
the
I.
Don't
have
my
screen
sharing
abilities
anymore?
But
if
you
look
on
the
staff
report
in
the
site
plan,
it's
basically
the
north,
the
North
East
portion
of
that
block.
So
it's
I,
don't
know
if
you
are
familiar
with
the
site
having
driven
out
there
or
anything.
But
it's
where
the
parent
there's
a
pyramid
on
the
corner.
Oh.
B
N
B
N
N
Beliefs,
the
corner
property,
is
I'm
I,
don't
think
that
they
own
the
property
to
the
west,
but
I'm
not
positive
about
that.
But
yes,
the
corner
property
is
okay
and
I
did
speak
to
somebody
from
the
group
came
to
the
open
house
as
well
as
came
to
the
city
offices,
to
talk
about
just
what
would
be
required
in
terms
of
setback
with
setbacks,
what
they
could
do
now
versus
what
I
could
do
like
a
bar
mu
and
they
were
going.
B
N
O
B
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
giving
me
I
guess.
The
only
thing
I
would
question
is
the
peaceful
nature
of
the
neighborhood.
The
alley
is
pretty
well
known
as
being
having
a
lot
of
crime,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
that
we're
trying
to
activate
it
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
issues.
There.
We've
had
a
lot
of
issues
with
people
leaving
John
garbage,
which
is
why
I
think
in
the
pictures
you
can
see
why
we'll
get
the
concrete
barriers
in
we've
had
a
lot
of
issues
towing.
O
B
O
Make
a
comment
in
relation
to
or
Duvall
saying,
I
think
one
of
the
misconceptions
is
that
creating
more
housing
automatically
makes
everything
else
more
expensive
and
the
comment
I
want
to
make.
Is
you
know
this
law
in
particular
we're
not
really
tearing
down
any
existing
homes?
It's
really
cleaning
up
too
lots
that
are
pretty
rough
at
the
moment
of
them
being
honest
and
and
in
theory
the
end
of
these
are
gonna,
create
more
housing
for
people
in
a
housing
shortage,
so
that
should
maintain
the
existing
homes
to
be
more
affordable.
O
The
other
comment
I
wanted
to
make
was
a
lot
of
the
homes
nearby
aren't
talking
about
necessarily
selling
their
property
they're,
just
trying
to
get
more
an
easier
access
to
just
upgrade
their
homes
to
make
them
nicer,
which
I
also
think
is
a
benefit
to
the
community
as
well
and
maintaining
their
homes
to
be
able
to
keep
those
as
affordable
housing.
So
that's
kind
of
my
comments.
H
And
I
just
wanted
to
come
in
when
we
talk
about
where
density
kind
of
belongs
everything
back
in
the
presentation
we
had
from
the
Wasatch
Front
Regional
Council,
and
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
they've
brought
up
have
really
broadened.
My
view
about
lower
density
belongs
because
we
do
need
more
housing,
but
we
don't
want
density
everywhere,
and
you
know
low
density,
mid,
dense,
medium
density
and
high
density
and
and
when
we
look
what
I
look
at
now
places
where
high
density
really
makes
sense.
C
Quite
a
few
studies
actually
done
about
the
level
of
air
pollution,
damaging
air
pollution,
led
a
knock-knock,
sigh
side
and
other
kinds
of
particulate
matter
that
accumulate
along
highways
to
the
detriment
of
particularly
of
children.
So,
and
so
so,
people
are
now
no
longer
wanting
to
have
schools
near
highway
because
of
the
possibility
of
children
being
out
and
playing
and
so
forth.
So
I
don't
think
as
a
general
rule,
putting
a
high-density
residential
neighborhood
residential
area
right
next
to
a
highway
and
I
don't
know.
C
I
was
trying
to
find
the
literature
on
it
just
now,
but
the
distance.
But
it's
certainly
within
the
distance
that
this
project
is
next
to
the
highway.
So
I
think
this
is
a
consideration
that
we
have
not
discussed
and
by
allowing
a
pretty
dense
residential
project
to
go
in
here.
I
think
that
I
mean
I
had
no
problem
with
this
project
when
it
when
I
thought
it
was
for
some
reason,
lower
height
project,
when
we
were
talking
about
the
original
project
that
we
were
looking
at,
where
the
alley
was
vacated.
C
E
H
In
that
discussion,
prior
to
me,
being
on
the
Planning
Commission
Planning
Commission
approved
a
residential
building,
that's
gonna
be
built
right
along
the
freeway
in
Turkish
2
meter
office
buildings
in
a
major
residential
building
that
residential
is
being
built
now
and
so
I'm
sure
I
could
think
of
other
high-density
buildings
that
are
already
in
existence
a
Jason
to
freeways,
in
addition
to
one
zine
that
one
I
know
is
going
up.
So
why
aren't
we
concerned
about
that
everywhere
and
prior
to
me,
getting
on
was
that
brought
up
for
the
residential
building?
C
The
answer
is,
I,
don't
think
it
was
brought
up,
but
I
think
it
should
be
an
issue
or
I
density.
Residential
zoning
everywhere
I
mean
I
was
involved
in
building
an
apartment,
building
right
on
a
freeway
and
I
still
look
at
that
building
and
regret
every
day.
You
know
the
amount
of
pollution
that
goes
in
to
right
in
through
the
window.
You
know
30
feet
away
from
from
the
highway.
O
C
B
A
A
Instead
of
trying
to
apply
standards
that
haven't
really
been
factored
into
this
area
necessarily
or
analyzed
is
you
do
have
the
option
of
requiring
any
new
development
to
go
on
that
parcel
to
go
through
the
design
review
process
and
that
process
has
fairly
extensive
standards
it
that
they
would
have
to
demonstrate
how
they
meet
those
standards.
Instead
of
having
the
prescribed
standards
of
the
D
2
zone
applying
and
just
throwing
that
out
there
as
something
for
the
Commission
to
consider.
B
D
Based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approved
the
proposed
zoning
map,
amendment
from
M
1
to
R
M,
you
file,
PLN,
PCM,
2019,
0,
1,
1,
3,
7,
410
parcels
and
a
portion
of
a
city-owned
alley
located
at
approximately
seven.
Oh
six,
740
West
900
South,
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report,
also
with
a
third
condition
that
any
new
development
must
go
through
the
design
review
process.
C
D
B
Q
So
this
is
a
proposal
to
rezone
a
split
zoned
property
from
r1
5000
single-family,
residential
and
MF
35,
moderate
density,
multi-family
residential
to
RM
f-35.
The
proposed
rezoning
to
allow
for
redevelopment
of
the
site
with
additional
multifamily
housing
to
provide
a
greater
context.
The
property
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
redwood
road,
approximately
1/4
mile
north
of
north
temple,
and
it's
also
north
of
several
properties
zone
TSA,
where
there
are
apartments
under
construction,
are
currently
or
I'm.
Sorry
recently
constructed
in
this
general
area.
Here
this
one
is
under
construction.
Q
Now,
as
far
as
the
existing
zoning,
as
I
mentioned,
it
split
sound
and
see
the
arm
of
35
portion
here
in
the
r15
thousand
portion
here
as
a
result
of
an
1887
rezoning
that
affected
approximately
750
acres.
At
that
point
in
time,
there
was
concern
regarding
more
intensive
development
of
properties
in
the
area
and
right
now,
the
property
to
the
south
is
zone.
Rm
f-35
further
to
the
south,
as
GSA's
owned
property
to
the
east
is
additional
TSA
zone
property
and
then
to
the
north
and
west
properties
that
are
also
sown
ar-15
thousand.
Q
As
far
as
the
existing
conditions
on
the
site,
the
left
shows
the
photograph
of
the
existing
development
from
redwood
road
and
then
the
right
photo
shows
the
rear
of
the
property
looking
towards
redwood
road
from
Gemini
drive,
which
terminates
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
There
are
some
existing
zoning
limitations
with
the
splits
owning
the
property.
Currently
has
four
units
there's
enough
land
area
for
one
additional
unit.
The
r15
thousand
zoned
area
has
enough
land
area
for
five
units.
Q
This
would
likely
be
difficult
because
of
the
frontage
requirements
the
proposed
zoning
would
allow
for
up
to
26
units
on
the
site.
As
far
as
compatibility
with
the
master
plan,
the
proposal
requires
a
master
plan
amendment.
However,
it
is
consistent
with
some
planning
documents
plan.
Salt
Lake
has
growth
and
housing
initiatives
that
it's
consistent
with
these
include
locating
development
near
transit
and
transportation
corridors.
It's
located
about
a
quarter
mile
north
of
the
tracks
line
on
North
temple
and
redwood.
Road
also
has
a
frequent
service;
it
also
promotes
infill
and
redevelopment
and
underutilized
land.
Q
It
would
increase
medium
density,
housing
options
and
it
would
also
direct
growth
areas
with
existing
infrastructure,
which
are
all
included
in
plan
Salt
Lake.
The
proposal
is
also
consistent
with
growing
SLC
and
it's
consistent
with
the
North
Temple
master
plan
station
area
policies
and
strategies.
Q
The
Northwest
master
plan,
which
was
adopted
in
1992,
does
not
call
for
changes
in
this
area,
but,
as
previously
discussed,
there
has
been
a
number
of
changes
in
the
area
recently,
and
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
some
of
those,
but
some
of
those
changes
it
would
provide
for
a
transition
for
more
intensive
development.
It
would
provide
additional
housing
in
the
area
and
would
provide
infill
development
on
an
underutilized
parcel.
Q
As
far
as
public
process
planning
meal,
the
recognize
organization
notice
sent
early
notification
to
property
owners
and
also
sent
the
like
hearing,
notice
and
staff
has
not
received
comments
from
the
public,
and
so
staffs
recommendation
is
that,
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
I
need
Commission
recommends
of
the
Planning
Commission
or
our
staff
recommends
at
the
Planning
Commission
forward.
A
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
for
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
and
also
the
proposed
master
plan
amendment,
and
that
concludes
staffs
presentation.
A
B
B
A
R
If
we
did
this
in
the
avenues,
people
would
be
really
upset
if
we
allow
all
this
kind
of
development
and
anyway
that's
my
that's.
My
concern
is
that
why
don't
we
talk
about
how
much
we're
gonna
rent
these
places
for
and
and
see
if
people
can
really
afford
it
with
it?
They're,
not
the
subsidized,
somehow
2500
to
5000
dollars
a
month,
that's
bizarre
anyway!
That's
my
concern
is:
is
that
we're
just
eating
up
all
the
website
putting
up
all
these
buildings?
Nobody
can
afford.
R
None
of
the
poor
people
can
afford
them
I,
even
if
they're,
even
if
they're
even
Section,
eight
won't
even
subsidize
it
because
they
have
a
window.
We
have
a
certain
window
that
people
can
can
rent
and
if
you
can't
bend
that
window
and
the
people
will
rock
drop
their
rent,
most
people
cannot
live
there,
so
we're
just
eat
yeah,
gentrifying
the
whole
west
side.
That's
my
concern
and
you
know
where
the
parks
gonna
be,
there's
no
there's
no
parks
that
are
really
around
there.
R
Do
we
have
any
area
for
people
to
to
to
go
play
soccer
other
than
there's
one
over
by
the
Jordan
River,
where
there's
just
school,
when
the
schools
there,
they
don't
allow
people
in
and
they
lock
the
gates
anyway.
I.
That's
my
concern
so
that
we're
not
we're
looking
everybody
out
of
living
that
neighborhood
out
of
living
there.
The
children
can't
live
there
anyway.
I
appreciate
that's
my
comment:
I'm
just
concerned
about
low-income
housing
and
how
it's
disappearing.
R
A
B
D
So,
let's
see
that
maybe
he
I
missed
this,
but
I
see
in
the
pin
some
of
the
pictures,
this
Jim
and
I
Drive.
That
seems
to
be
closed,
where
this
property
is.
How
is
that
has
that
been
closed
and
or
are
they
going
to
build
on
that
or
do
we
know
well,
they
have
to
keep
that
open
as
they
create
a
design.
Q
Sure
sorry
so
Gemini
drive
does
end
at
that
property
boundary,
and
so
they
did
I'm
not
sure
what
their
proposal
would
be.
At
this
point,
I
think
it
would
depend
on
what
everybody
would
need
access
from
Gemini
drive
or
not.
They
haven't
submitted
a
proposal
as
part
of
this
project,
but
right
now
the
right-of-way
for
it
ends
at
the
property.
D
Q
O
Q
D
B
C
A
just
a
service
or
or
a
fire
lane
within
that
I
was
out
there
today
and
it
doesn't
even
really
line
up
so
I
mean
it
kind
of
lines
that
you
could
do
it.
But
if,
even
if
you
did
do
it,
it
would
be
difficult
you
may
you
might,
you
would
have
to
get
the
permission
of
the
apartment
complex
to
use
that
as
a
process
way
and
that
that
is
by
no
means
you
know.
That's.
D
Q
I
just
wanted
to
add,
when
the
applicant
didn't
provide
us
any
kind
of
development
proposal,
but
did
indicate
in
at
least
part
of
his
said
middle,
that
there
was
some
intent
to
develop.
Low-Income
housing
on
the
property.
I
didn't
include
that
as
part
of
the
presentation
but
I'm
based
on
the
comments
just
wanted
to
add
that.
A
E
H
B
C
Just
like
to
point
out
that
I
was
looking
at
the
width
of
this
lot
and
it's
pretty
much
the
same
as
the
width
of
the
lot
or
the
CW
urban
le
project
that
we
just
looked
at
so
knowing
how
those
guys
had
sort
of
put
that
thing
together.
This
would
be
a
likely
one
way
that
what
a
person
could
develop
a
lot
that
was
long
and
skinny
like
that.
I.
O
Q
A
A
A
B
C
C
Sorry
we're
okay,
positive
recommendation
to
City
Council,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report.
That's
disgusting
at
the
public
hearing,
I
missed
at
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
with
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
file
PL
in
PCM
2019,
zero,
one,
zero;
eight
six
opposed
own
change
from
r1
r1,
five
thousand
single-family
residential
district
to
RM
f-35,
moderate
density,
multifamily,
residential
and
file;
PLN
PCM
2019,
zero,
one,
zero,
eight,
seven,
the
puppet
master
plan,
amendment
from
low
density,
residential
to
medium
density,
residential.
E
D
B
A
Did
want
to
thank
everybody
for
bearing
with
us
this
went
way
smoother
than
I.
Think
we
anticipated
I
was
actually
impressed
that
we
have
30-something
attendees
but
meeting
so
that
went
well.
If
anybody
has
any
feedback
on
ways
to
improve
or
anything
like
that,
don't
hesitate
to
shoot
us
an
email
and
again
they
thanks
for
everything.
It's
a
crazy,
crazy
world
and
somehow
we
managed
to
figure
this
part
out.
So
thanks.
Everyone
now
thank.