►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - October 13, 2021
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - October 13, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
B
Yeah,
I
would
be
happy
to
do
that
thanks.
Madam
chair
again,
we'll
welcome
you
to
this
planning
commission
meeting
to
those
who
are
listening.
If
you
would
like
to
participate,
you
can
read
on
this
page
how
to
do
that.
You
can
log
into
the
meeting
and
we'll
find
you
on
the
attendee
list
or,
if
you're,
having
any
trouble
logging
in
you
can
always
send
us
an
email
at
planning
comments
at
slcgov.com,
and
we
will
continue
to
check
that
email
account
throughout
the
meeting.
So
if
you
have
a
question,
you
need
help.
B
B
You
need
to
raise
your
hand
so
that
we
realize
you'd
like
to
speak.
Please
only
raise
a
hand
if
we're
at
the
public
hearing.
You
would
actually
like
to
speak
at
and
once
we've
called
on
you-
and
you
spoke
if
you'll
please
hit
that
button
again,
so
that
we
know
that
you're
not
ready
to
or
wanting
to
comment
on
the
other
future
public
hearing
agenda
items
that
would
be
helpful
and
hopefully
move
through
this
lengthy
agenda
more
quickly
again
always
feel
free
to
send
us
an
email
planning
comments.
Slc
slcgov.com
thanks.
A
All
right
thanks,
john
okay,
we'll
move
on
with
the
agenda
and
I'm
looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
A
D
E
A
All
right
that
passes
unanimously
report
of
the
chair,
so
I
just
want
to
this-
is
my
first
meeting
fulia's
chair
and
I
think
somebody
doesn't
like
me
what
a
meeting
we're
going
to
have.
I
think
we
all
know
we're
in
for
a
long
night.
A
This
is
partly,
I
think,
what
we
sign
up
for
when
we
agree
to
serve
on
the
planning
commission,
I
will
endeavor
to
move
things
along
as
efficiently
as
possible,
but
I
want
to
raise
my
expectation
with
you
that
I
still
expect
that
we
give
our
due
diligence
review
to
all
of
the
applications
tonight.
This
is
a
pretty
important
document
of
projects,
but
with
that,
please
try
and
be
succinct.
A
Keep
our
discussions,
your
comments
or
your
concerns
related
to
the
items
we're
actually
being
asked
to
look
at
and
then,
if
you
have
real
concerns
with
a
broader
spectrum
of
it,
that
you're
keeping
it
tied
to
a
standard,
so
we're
actually
having
important
discussions
that
we
can
do
something
about.
Okay
with
that
said,
be
succinct
myself.
Reporter
of
the
vice
chair,
I
have
nothing
to
report.
B
It
is
I'll,
keep
it
short,
so
you
may
or
may
not
know
crystal
resigned
as
of
september
30th.
So
she'll
no
longer
be
a
member
of
the
commission,
but
we
are
going
to
welcome
andra
to
her
first
mining
commission
meeting
today.
So
welcome
to
her.
We
do
have
several
others
that
are
in
the
pipeline
as
well,
so
we
should
have
a
full
commission.
A
Wonderful
welcome
andra
and
trial
by
fire
for
you.
Thank
you.
I
did
not
call
on
you
to
vote
for
the
minutes
because
you
weren't
in
attendance
last
time,
but
for
the
remainder
of
the
night
you'll
be
part
of
the
roll
call.
A
Okay,
let's
get
going
item
number
one,
so
this
is
a
time
extension
request
for
the
union
pacific
hotel.
This
is
nothing
in
this
seems
to
be
terribly
controversial,
but
if
you
have
any
questions
you
can
give
them
to
staff
at
this
time,
which
is
kelsey.
Otherwise,
I'd
be
looking
for
a
motion
to
move
this
forward.
F
Just
to
clarify
chair,
I
is
this:
the
second
time
we're
seeing
this
extension
or
the
third
kelsey.
G
F
Thank
you
for
that.
Thanks
for
that
clarification,
yeah
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion.
Oh
except
I
didn't
pull
it
out
so
never
mind.
Somebody
else
can
do
this.
Okay,.
A
I
would
also
request-
and
I'm
sorry
I
forgot
to
do
that
if
you're
going
to
make
a
motion,
please
read
it
directly
from
the
motion
sheet
in
your
dropbox.
That's
greatly
helpful
to
staff.
F
A
H
Thanks
for
asking
I'm
not
that
particular
I'm
not
that
particular,
but
I
usually
say
andra,
but
it's
not
a
big
deal
andra
it
is.
I'm
not
gonna,
be
offended
if
you
say
andre
again:
okay,.
B
G
A
F
A
Yes,
yes,
thank
you,
okay,
that
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you
for
that.
One
all
right!
We're
going
to
move
on
to
the
second
item
on
our
agenda,
which
is
the
sugartown
snellgrove
ice
cream
factory,
design,
review
at
approximately
850
and
870
east
2100
south.
This
is
case
number
pln,
pcm
2021-00025.
A
We
have
the
planner
lex
up
for
this
one.
D
Hi
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
commission,
members
of
the
public,
I'm
going
to
keep
this
as
a
very
brief
introduction.
This
is
a
request
for
new
mixed-use
development,
consisting
of
approximately
319
residential
units
in
ground
floor
retail
commercial
space.
D
D
D
And
this
is
an
aerial
of
the
project
that
is
as
has
been
redesigned
since
the
time
of
the
work
session
back
in
may,
and
this
is
looking.
This
is
2100
south.
If
you
can
see
my
cursor,
this
is
ninth
east.
This
is
eighth
east
over
here.
This
is
the
front
main
facade
of
the
the
structure.
D
Planning
stats
to
review
the
project
and
based
on
a
political
sections
of
the
city
code
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
project
with
conditions.
As
noted
in
the
staff
report,
I
have
received
additional
public
comment
and
community
council
comments
that
have
put
in
your
dropbox
this
morning
for
your
consideration
and
with
that
I
would
turn
this
over
to
the
applicant
to
describe
their
project
for
you,
I'm
available
to
answer
questions
as
needed.
A
Okay,
not
hearing
anybody,
we
will
move
on
welcome
mark.
Are
you
moved
up
to
there's
a
panelist
john.
A
Welcome
alex
and
mark
you
have
10
minutes
for
your
presentation.
If
you
are
ready
to
begin,
do
you
need
a
posting
or
a
panelist
privileges
to
share
a
presentation.
K
Perfect
here
we
go
and
I've
turned
on
my
timer,
madam
chair
and
commission.
We
are
heavily
aware
of
the
size
of
the
agenda
tonight.
We
are
not
going
to
take
10
minutes,
we're
going
to
leave
it
for
your
time
for
questions
for
all
of
us.
My
name
is
mark
isaac,
I'm
sitting
with
alex
stoddard
we're
at
architectural
belgique.
K
The
architectural
firm.
That's
designing
this
project
for
us
in
sugar
house,
but
those
of
you
looking
on
the
screen
and
especially
for
the
public
that
may
or
may
not
have
seen
this
application
before
or
orientation
the
street
on
the
left-hand
side
of
your
screen
is
900
east
the
street
that
goes
sort
of
angular
on
the
bottom
side
of
the
building
or
the
bottom
of
our
screen
is
2100
south.
K
What
we're
going
to
do
for
you
in
the
commission
is
we're
going
to
walk
through
the
previous
design
and
application
for
your
benefit,
especially
for
andra
and
some
of
the
new
planning
commissioners
that
may
not
have
been
here
before
the
previous
design,
as
you
can
see,
was
our
original
submittal.
It's
your
show
now
alex.
I
Yeah,
so
we
set
this
up.
Look
mark
was
just
mentioning
kind
of
we'll
show
what
was
previously
on
here.
At
the
last
meeting,
we
have
the
work
session
and
then
kind
of
some
of
the
adjustments
that
we've
made.
This
is
the
21st
south
facade,
there's
that
big
empty
lot
across
the
street,
so
that's
kind
of
what
the
view
actually
looks
like
right
now.
I
One
of
the
big
comments
we
got
was
that
the
building
was
kind
of
kind
of
monotonous
and
and
too
much
of
the
same
material.
So
what
we
did
we,
we
changed
the
material
palette
and
we
kind
of
broke
up
this
facade
along
21st
south
to
really
emphasize
kind
of
a
central
building
and
some
side
buildings,
and
then
that
carries
through
to
the
ground
level.
So
it's
not
just
one
continuous
long,
pedestrian
experience,
but
there's
there's
step
backs
at
ground
level
and
there's
variation
in
materials.
I
It's
a
little
bit
hard
to
read
here,
but
there's
a
different
material
here
than
there
is
in
the
center
and
on
the
sides,
and
one
of
the
big
focuses
was
this
giant
garage
entrance
that
we
had.
That
was
really
emphasizing
the
scale
toward
you
know
auto
traffic,
and
so
we
scaled
that
down.
So
it
really
just
ties
in
now
and
becomes
kind
of
one
of
the
storefront
entrances
is
the
garage.
So
it's
not
such
a
point
of
emphasis
and
that
central
focus
is
now
more
on
the
pedestrian
scale.
I
Rather
than
pointing
you
to
the
middle
of
the
garage
here
and
then
another
change
we
made
was
just
increasing
the
heights
of
the
first
floor
to
better
serve
this.
This
retail
section
along
21st
south
the
right
side
of
the
building
is
the
future
home
of
the
davc
liquor
store
and
then
we've
got
some
retail
here
and
ground
floor
uses
for
the
building
as
well.
I
So
you
can
see
here.
One
of
the
changes
we
made
to
in
the
renderings
was
just
adding
in
what
was
actually
on
the
landscape
drawings
rather
than
this
was
just
kind
of
bring
some
trees
on
just
to
give
a
little
bit
sense,
a
little
bit
better
sense
of
what
it's
going
to
look
like,
and
you
can
see
that
revised
maxing
and
other
changes
that
I
think
help
break
up
the
building
a
little
bit
more.
I
This
is
kind
of
what
I
spoke
to
with
that
that
auto
entrance
this
large
garage
entrance.
If
you
guys
can
see
my
cursor
is
now
reduced
to
kind
of
an
internet
that
ties
in
with
the
rest
of
the
building.
I
The
commonwealth
facade
was
where
we
talked
a
lot,
because
it
was
a
very,
very
long
facade
of
similar
materials
and
some
architectural
styles,
and
so
what
we
did
is
we
really
broke
that
up
building
still
connected
with
these
glass
walkways
as
it
was
before,
but
we
kind
of
reduced
the
scale
of
this
west
building
and
we
gave
three
very
distinct.
I
Architectural
styles
break
up
the
length
of
this
really
long
facade,
and
then
we
also
worked
on
the
design
along
commonwealth,
where
there's
ground
floor
units
on
about
two-thirds
of
the
building
and
they
have
kind
of
extended
patios,
and
we
focused
on
that
pedestrian
experience
down
there.
So
it
wasn't
just
a
big
long.
K
K
The
the
loading
docks,
for
example,
for
the
dabc
for
the
liquor
store,
are
on
the
commonwealth
side
of
this
building.
I'm
going
to
go.
Have
you
go
backwards?
Two
slides
real,
quick
alex
here,
one
more
this
one,
yeah
it's
on
the
left-hand
side,
alex's
cursors
right
there.
We
worked
very
hard
to
build
a
large
enough
dock
that
the
trucks
when
they
back
into
that
dock.
They
will
be
completely
off
the
street
completely
inside
our
building.
K
In
fact,
they
can
even
close
the
garage
doors,
and
you
won't
even
know
that
there
are
delivery
trucks
in
the
building
working
for
the
dabc
and
their
loading
dock
is
very,
very
recessed
into
the
building
and
then
on
the
opposite
side
of
that
building.
You'll
see
the
circulation,
that's
vehicular
circulation,
breaking
up
traffic
so
that
we
weren't
dumping
all
of
it
in
and
out
of
our
pedestrian
scale,
frontage
on
2100
bifurcating
circulation,
for
traffic,
into
a
couple
different
directions
and
to
the
right
of
alex's
cursor.
There
you'll
see
a
smaller
garage
door.
K
We
have
an
enclosed
trash
room
with
trash
and
dumpsters
that
will
be
loaded
and
unloaded
just
by
rolled
out
onto
the
street,
unloaded
and
then
rolled
back
into
the
building
and
hidden
and
then
on
the
far
left
side
of
the
west
side
of
our
project.
There's
ingress
egress
into
the
parking
underneath
that
building
off
of
800
east
that
will
be
adjacent
to
the
entrance
to
the
di
and
the
smitty's
pancake
house
there.
So
we
have
three
different
vehicular
circulation
routes
in
and
out
of
the
building
we've
camouflaged,
the
traffic
are
the
trash.
K
Excuse
me
and
the
loading
docks
we're
very,
very
pleased
with
that
work,
trying
so
hard
to
be
better
neighbors
on
the
commonwealth
side.
And
then
we
have
our
walk-out
units
down.
Two-Thirds
of
the
street,
where
we
don't
have
walk-up
units
as
easy
for
all
of
you
to
understand,
is
where
we
have
some
of
our
servicing
requirements
off
of
commonwealth.
I
Okay-
let's
see
here
so
this
is
the
west
side.
That
mark
was
just
mentioning.
There's
a
drive
entrance
here
that
enters
this
building
with
ground
floor
parking
that
serves
the
public
parking
for
the
davc,
and
you
can
see
the
previous
design
one.
You
know
comments
on
the
scale
this
building,
so
they
work
to
kind
of
reduce
it
as
you
transition
into
a
single
family,
neighborhood
and
also
just
to
differentiate
it.
So
it
looks
completely
different
than
the
building
next
to
it,
where,
before
it
was
really
an
extension
of
the
same
style,.
K
So
those
are
the
major
changes
commission
that
you
were
requesting
at
the
work
session.
We
are
about
seven
and
a
half
minutes
into
our
10
minutes.
We're
gonna
call
it
a
day
there
and
answer
your
questions
now,
we'll
flip
back
and
forth
to
slides,
as
you
see
fit,
amy
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
A
A
Okay,
really,
okay,
all
right
then
hold
tight.
You
guys,
because
we'll
start
the
public
comment
period
and
then,
after
that,
I'll
give
you
an
opportunity
to
address
any
of
the
concerns
that
come
up
during
that
period.
A
My
notes
out.
Okay,
if
you
wish
to
speak
on
this
item,
please
raise
your
hand.
As
john
said,
in
the
lower
right
hand,
area
of
your
screen
there's
a
hand
that
you
need
to
click,
and
I
can't
really
tell
john
so
john.
I
know
we
have
judy
here
from
the
community
council.
We're
gonna
open
up
the
public
comment
period
and
we'll
begin
with
her
representing
the
community
council.
B
B
All
right
so
landon
says
to
the
planning
commission.
My
name
is
lanny
clark
and
I'm
chair
of
the
cigarettes
community
council.
I
know
judy
short,
will
give
a
much
more
detailed,
four-minute,
passionate
speech,
but
I
wanted
to
chime
in
on
how
this
process
went
for
the
community
council.
We've
seen
this
group,
probably
five
or
more
times
at
a
regular
sugar
house,
community
council
meeting
and
they
presented
at
judy
shorts
land,
uses
only
meeting
about
the
same
amount
of
times.
A
few
of
us
have
also
met
with
this
group
of
various
times
throughout
the
year.
B
The
amount
of
outreach
they
have
done
has
been
more
than
any
developer.
So
far
in
sugar
house,
sharehouse
has
been
bombarded
with
development
over
the
past
five
years.
It
was
always
a
pleasure
when
we
work
with
a
group
who
are
so
willing
to
listen
to
the
community,
we're
very
much
looking
forward
to
getting
this
project
underway
thanks.
A
Just
go
ahead
and
state
your
name
judy
for
the
record.
Yes,
short,.
L
I'm
vice
chair
of
the
sugar
house,
community
council
and
land
use
chair
and,
like
landon,
said:
we've
seen
these
guys
a
million
times
and
we
love
having
them,
and
I
have
to
say
this
is
for
mark's
benefit.
We
always
appreciate
the
work
of
the
design
review
for
a
project
in
the
sugar
house,
business
district,
because
I
know
it's
been
grueling
for
him
at
times
trying
to
come
up
with
something
better
and
he
certainly
has
achieved
that.
L
L
L
L
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
community
engagement
on
the
final
iterations
because
we
just
received
the
plans
a
few
days
ago,
but
generally
the
comments
were
favorable
and
one
thing
we
really
liked
is:
the
sidewalks
are
wider,
so
they're
now
eight
feet
wide
on
21st,
south
and
six
feet
wide
at
commonwealth
commonwealth
has
been
about
four
feet
which
feels
like
about
two
feet
for
the
last
50
years.
So
these
are
good
improvements.
B
G
Hi
there
it's
great
to
join
you
all.
My
name
is
elizabeth
brennan,
I'm
a
community
member.
I
was
born
and
raised
in
sugar
house,
so
I
remember
the
old
snell
grove,
ice
cream,
parlor
and
yeah,
I'm
just
here
tonight.
I've
just
you
know
having
been
raised
in
the
area
and
now
I'm
a
working
professional
adult
and
just
you
know,
seeing
the
rapid
development
in
the
area
has
been
a
concern
of
mine
just
but.
M
What
you're
doing
having
a
more
walkable
my
concerns
would
just
be
you
know
the
traffic
and
congestion
in
the
area.
That's
already
quite
developed.
D
Over
the
last
15
20
years,
but
I
really
like
the
incentive
for
local
businesses
as
well
to
have
storefronts
in
your
development
and
just
yeah.
It
sounds
like
you're
really
open
to
working
with
the
community
and
getting
community
input.
A
Okay,
thank
you
elizabeth.
I
appreciate
that
any
other
hands
raised
john.
B
I
do
not
see
any
other
hands
raised
and
I
do
not
believe
we
received
any
additional
emails
on
this.
A
K
K
K
We've
had
a
little
discovery
with
the
snellgrove
family
recently,
there's
actually
an
artesian.
Well,
that
was
the
water
source
for
a
lot
of
the
ice
cream
for
a
number
of
years
on
this
property,
we're
working
through
the
semantics
and
the
legal
side
of
it
to
see
if
we
can
provide
a
water
bottle
filling
station
for
the
neighborhood,
that's
associated
with
the
artesian
well
in
the
old
history
of
the
snellgrove
family
plan.
So
we're
going
to
be
mindful
of
the
history
mindful
of
what
this
community
is
after
here,
we're
really
really
appreciative
of
all
your
time.
K
C
I
have
a
I
have
a
question.
I
was
I'm
sorry
that
I
was
not
at
the
I.
I
wasn't
at
the
original
design
review
session
this
summer
or
the
briefing
this
summer.
I
have
a
question
about
the
parking
for
the
liquor
store.
K
Yes,
alex:
let's
go
up
to
the
original
slide.
The
aerial,
I
think
brenda
would
be
best
for
us
to
describe
it
the
the
beauty
of
this.
If
you
look
on
the
left
hand
side,
your
main
entrance,
where
alex's
hand
is,
has
quick
driving
drive
out
stalls
every
single
one
of
those
stalls
underneath
the
building
are
dabc
stalls,
we've
provided
more
stalls
than
they
have
at
any
other
liquor
store
in
salt
lake
city,
we're
super
proud
of
the
stall
counts
and
the
the
abc
dfcm's,
absolutely
thrilled
with
it.
K
The
beauty
for
us
brenda
is
because
the
liquor
stores
don't
open
until
11
and
they
close
at
10
o'clock
and
they're
also
not
open
on
sundays.
We
have
a
real
nice
opportunity
for
shared
parking,
so
we
we
are
going
to
utilize
those
for
overnight
stalls,
but
our
property
management
team
will
be
policing
them,
that
they
are
liquor,
store
and
daytime
retail
user
stalls
and-
and
we
think
that
it's
a
really
really
nice
blend
and
subsequently
we've
parked
this
multi-family
with
a
little
better
ratios
than
most
of
the
multi-family,
has
been
parked
in
the
sugar
house.
K
F
Just
want
to
say
thanks
to
the
development
team,
for
really
reaching
out
to
the
community
and
engaging
in
a
meaningful
way
with
them
and
also
with
being
so
responsive
to
the
comments
that
we
provided
in
may.
I
think
we
all
appreciate
the
level
of
outreach
and
work
that
went
into
that,
and
so
thank
you
for
that.
A
K
A
That's
wonderful.
I
appreciate
all
of
the
work
you've
done
and
listening
to
the
review
we
gave
in
the
work
session
any
other
questions,
comments
or
concerns
from
commissioners.
If
not,
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
F
Okay,
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
in
the
staff
report,
that
the
standards
for
design
review
have
been
substantially
met,
testimony
and
their
and
the
proposal
presented.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
request
for
design
review
located
at
approximately
850
and
870
east
2100
south
for
a
new
mixed
use
project
subject
to
two
conditions.
As
noted
in
the
staff
report
dated
20
21.
A
D
A
M
Good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
commission,
most
of
you
won't
recognize
me,
but
my
name
is
brooke
olson
and
I
just
started
with
salt
lake
city
in
may,
so
I
am
looking
forward
to
future
meetings
with
you
all
and
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
meet
you
in
person.
Sooner
than
later,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
M
M
Just
to
give
you
a
quick
overview,
the
proposed
project
is
a
six-story
mixed-use.
Building
containing
110
residential
units,
at
least
20
percent
will
be
affordable
units
set
aside
for
renters
at
50
of
the
area
median
income.
The
building
will
also
include
a
cafe
integrated
into
the
entry
lobby
on
the
ground
floor,
a
co-working
business
center
and
a
variety
of
amenities
for
the
residents
of
the
building.
M
Through
the
plan
development
process,
the
applicant
is
requesting
for
modifications
of
the
zoning
ordinance
you
will
be
reviewing
tonight.
The
first
is
an
open
space
modification.
The
rnu
zoning
district
requires
a
minimum
of
20
percent
of
the
law
area,
be
maintained
as
open
space
area
in
the
form
of
landscape
yards
plazas
and
courtyards.
M
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
install
an
873
873
square
feet
of
open
space
on
the
ground
level
and
a
in
3709
square
foot,
elevated
courtyard
on
the
first
level
and
a
1
340
square
feet
of
rooftop
terraces.
M
M
The
next
modification
the
applicant
is
requesting
is
removal
of
parking
lot
parameter,
landscaping
requirements
parking
lot.
Perimeter
landscaping
is
required,
seven
feet
in
width
protected
by
a
six
inch
curb
where
a
parking
lot
is
located
within
20
feet
of
a
property
line.
So
the
dash
yellow
line
shows
the
approximate
location
where
this
landscaping
is
required
around
the
surface
parking
area
to
provide
buffering
between
the
parking
area
and
the
neighboring
properties.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
install
a
six
foot
tall
wooden
privacy
fence
around
the
northern
and
western
parking
lot
perimeter.
M
The
applicant
is
also
proposing
to
locate
a
small
dog
run
at
the
southeast
corner
and
preserve
the
existing
six
foot
tall
chain
link
fence
located
along
the
southern
and
eastern
portion
of
the
proposed
parking
area.
As
shown
in
the
image
staff,
is
recommending
approval,
with
the
condition
that
the
proposed
six
foot
tall
wooden
privacy
fence
is
installed
around
the
southern
and
eastern
boundary
of
the
surface
parking
area
as
well.
M
Oops,
okay,
the
final
modification
the
applicant
is
requesting
is
approval
to
exceed
the
warrior
coverage
requirements
in
residential
districts.
Any
portion
of
an
accessory
building
is
not
allowed
to
occupy
more
than
50
of
the
rear
yard.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
exceed
the
rear
yard
coverage
requirements
by
7.
M
So,
after
reviewing
the
requested
modifications,
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
plan
development,
as
proposed
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
So
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions
at
this
time.
I
believe
the
applicant
is
also
on
the
call
if
you
would
like
to
hear
from
them
as
well.
A
Okay,
thank
you
brooke
any
questions
for
staff.
At
this
time,
commissioners.
A
Okay,
I
believe
our
applicant
is
peter
caron.
Is
he
going
to
be
moved
up,
john,
so
hear
from
him?
Yes,.
A
Great,
mr
curran,
do
you
have
a
presentation
for
us
that
you
need
to
share.
N
I
I
don't
have
a
presentation
to
share,
but
I'm
here
our
architect
is
on
on
the
call
as
well.
So
I'm
just
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
we
do
feel
that
this
project
fits
in
with
the
neighborhood
all
of
the
properties
on
500
east
between
first
and
second
south,
have
no
open
space
or
limited
open
space
on
the
ground
level
other
than
the
public
strip
in
front
of
the
building.
N
Our
project
would
be
consistent
with
that.
This
is
this.
Property
is
a
is
located
in
a
high
density
zone,
similar
to
what
would
be
a
ts,
tsa
zone
actually
on
this
property,
the
height
limit
is
125
feet.
We're
only
going
up
to
74
75
feet,
I
believe,
and
so
again
we
think
this
project
fits
fits
in
with
the
neighborhood
fairly
well,
there
are
multiple
types
of
buildings
on
this
block:
there's
tall
buildings,
there's
short
buildings
and
so
we're
we're
sort
of
in
the
middle
between
the
two
in
terms
of
the
increased
parking.
N
This
is
not
something
I
really
want
to
do,
but
hud
is
requiring
that
we
have
the
one-to-one
parking
in
order
to
get
their
financing.
I
even
tried
to
request
a
congressional
inquiry
into
the
denver
office
to
prevent
having
one-to-one
parking,
but
they
insisted
that
we
have
one-to-one
parking.
This
is
going
to
be
an
affordable
housing
project.
All
of
our
units
will
be
at
or
below
60
percent
of
the
area,
median
income
and
brook
that
is
a
little
bit
of
a
change.
N
We
had
a
couple
of
units
that
weren't,
but
now
all
of
our
units
are
are
supposed
to
be
all
all
affordable
units.
We
do
have
the
shared
parking
with
the
ben
albert
apartments
next
door.
So
that's
a
reason.
Another
reason
we
need
additional
parking
and
we
do
have
some
retail
and
co-working
space
as
well
so
and
there's
very
limited
on-street
parking
along
fifth
east
on
our
side
of
the
street.
In
terms
of
the
perimeter
lot
landscaping,
none
of
our
neighbors
have
landscaping
along
our
property
line.
N
They
all
either
have
parking,
lots
or
parking
driveways.
So
what
we're?
What
we're
planning
on
building
is
consistent
with?
What's
already
there
and
same
with
the
carport
is
already
there
and
where
the
carport
exists,
we're
actually
10
feet
higher
than
the
neighboring
property
to
the
west,
which
is
lower
than
the
than
our
property.
So
it
really
will
have
no
detrimental
effect
on
the
neighboring
property.
So
just
a
few
extra
things
for
you
that
for
you
to
consider
there.
N
A
All
right,
thank
you,
commissioners.
Any
questions
at
this
time.
C
N
We
we've
applied
and
so
we're
in
the
application
process.
We've
already
been
in
the
application
process
for
almost
a
year
because
of
kovid
things
have
not
gone
very
quickly
with
with
hud
but
we're
in
the
process.
We
we
had
our
initial
interview
with
them
and
so
we're
in
our
we're
now
in
our
application
phase
with
hud.
H
N
It's
the
221
d4
program
with
hud
and
the
reason
we're
seeking
that
it
has
a
40-year
amortization
program
which,
which
is
what
we
need.
This
project
is
very
expensive
already
and
with
the
increased
parking,
it's
it's
expensive,
but
with
or
without
the
hud
financing.
We
do
need
a
40-year
amortization
period,
which
that
is
one
of
the
few
that
offer
that.
N
C
So
is
it
so?
Is
it
safe
to
say
that
if
you
don't
get
the
financing,
you
will
not
need
all
that
parking
or
you
will
not
do
the
project.
C
N
Redesigning
the
project,
it's
already
in
it's
already
in
building
services,
we've
been
building
services
for.
C
Actually,
my
concern
is
approving
a
a
design
review
conditional
use
where
someone
would
come
in
later
and
build
a
lot
more
parking
than
they
would
really
actually
need.
So
is
there
like?
So
I
guess
this
is
a
question
for
staff.
Is
there
a
condition
under
this
approval
if
we
approve
it,
that
says
that
it's
conditioned
upon
had
approval
of
the
project.
M
So,
since
this
is
a
planned
development
request,
they
are
required
to
meet
a
planned
development
objective.
So
in
this
case
they
are
doing.
Affordable.
Housing
is
the
main
one
and
they
also
meet
a
mobility
requirement.
So
it's
possibility
that
they
don't
include
the
verbal
housing,
but
want
to
move
forward,
may
need
to
be
reheard
or
modified.
B
Yeah
and
commissioners-
here
I
just
tell
you-
I
mean
this-
is-
that
is
something
is
tough
for
us
to
police.
You
know
when
somebody
comes
in
with
an
affordable
project,
whether
it
remains
that
way,
and
so
this
is
something
we
are
trying
to
solve
with
the
affordable
housing
overlay
and
a
few
other
things
to
actually
put
forth
staff
to
that's
what
they
do.
Basically
right
is
to
kind
of
police
those
and
make
sure
that
they
remain
an
affordable
status.
C
Actually,
actually,
john,
that
wasn't
my
question.
My
question
was:
if
this
particular
project
proposal,
this
particular
design
as
it
is
didn't
go
forward,
is:
is
it
still
okay
for
the
next
guy
to
have
this
many
hou
parking
units.
B
Okay,
no,
they
would
not,
they
would
have
to
come
in
and
request
additional
parking
as
well
through
the
same
process.
A
All
right,
I
actually
have
a
question.
Slash
comment:
I'm
even
though
the
existing
conditions
are
sparse
on
landscaping,
I'm
actually
really
concerned
that
we
then
just
continue
to
allow
that,
and
I'm
also
wondering
why
we
want
a
fence
to
separate
parking
lots.
I
don't
know
what
negative
impact
a
parking
lot
is
going
to
have
on
a
parking
lot
and
that's
pretty
much
what
surrounds
this
so
peter.
A
Have
you
what
I'm
thinking
of
is
doing
away
with
the
fence
and
then
putting
some
landscaping
there
instead
to
give
some
greenery
in
this
area
and
change
what
the
existing
conditions
are
for
the
better,
but
not
have
a
fence
pretty
much
around
any
of
it,
but
let
alone
just
separating
parking
lots.
I
don't.
I
don't
see
the
need
for
that.
But
what
are
your
thoughts
on
that.
N
So
if,
if
we
I
mean
we
could
get
rid
of
the
fence,
but
if
we
tried
to
add
landscaping
along
the
border,
then
we
would
lose
parking
and
that's
our
big
issue.
Right
now
is
parking
because
of
the
parking
requirements.
A
A
And
you
grew
ivy
up
it:
you're
not
losing
space
per
se
for
some
of
that
greenery.
N
Yeah
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
could
put
landscaping
along
the
edge
without
not
losing
our
parking
spaces.
That
would
work.
I
think
it's
doable
is
gary.
Gary.
Are
you
on
the
call?
Can
he
be.
O
P
A
Yeah,
I
think
it's
totally
doable
and
you
won't
have
to
lose
any
parking
space,
but
I'm
not
really
keen
on
giving
you
approving
like
putting
the
open
space
requirement
on
the
roof
and
losing
your
landscape
perimeter.
I
think
the
reason
when
we
see
projects
is
to
find
items
in
that
area
that
are
existing
conditions.
That
aren't
something
we
want
to
move
forward
and
I
think
a
barren
landscape
back.
There
is
one
thing
I
don't
want
to
see
move
forward.
So
if
I
was
going
to
approve
you
know
a
rooftop
open
space
requirement
there.
N
On
the
on
the
south
side,
sorry,
on
the
west
side
of
our
property,
we're
10
feet
higher
than
the
neighbor,
so
we
would
we
do
feel
we
need
a
fence
there
to
prevent
anybody
from
going
over
the
edge
for
a
lack
of
a
better
word.
A
That's
fine!
What
about
the
chain
link
fence
on
the
north
side.
N
We're
happy
to
on
the
on
the
south
side
we're
happy
to
convert
that
to
something
else.
A
A
F
A
F
I
have
a
question
I
remember
so
I
know
this
property.
Well,
I
walk
by
it.
I
see
the
your
neighbors
that
are
going
up
and
what's
happening
there.
I
really
like
that.
My
original
or
my
memory
is
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
mid-block
walkway
associated
with
this
part
of
the
project.
Is
that
outside
of
what
we're
looking
at,
or
you
know
to
the
just
to
the
west
of
you
or
has
that
been
removed?
Do
you
know.
N
J
N
I
don't
think
it
would
even
be
possible
because
the
properties
to
the
west
of
us
are
different
elevations
than
us,
as
I
mentioned
one's
10
feet
higher
than
and
the
one
a
little
bit
to
the
north
of
us
is
also
to
the
wet
the
wet
northwest
is
also
at
a
lower
elevation.
So
we
could
have
a
walkway
between
the
two.
I
A
A
A
Okay,
john.
If
you
want
to
start
calling
on
people
who
have
raised
their
hands.
B
Q
Hi
yeah,
my
name
is
kelsey
moss
and
I
I
actually
you
I
just
moved,
but
I
lived
essentially
on
the
400
east
side
of
this
walk
and
I
just
a
few
general
comments
as
someone
who
lived
close
to
the
downtown
amy,
your
comment
about
landscaping.
I
also
feel
that
I
would,
in
the
summer
when
it
was
quite
hot.
I
would
do
you
know
a
walk
around
the
block
and
this
area
is
littered
with
parking.
You
have
empty
big
lots.
Q
You
have
the
bank
on
the
corner,
you
have
hamachi,
which
is
smaller
but
is
all
paved,
so
I
just
think
I
get
that
there's
the
hud
requirements
in
this
situation,
but
just
because
it
exists
already
maybe
trying
to
buck
that
so
we
get
more
grain
spaces
is
really
important.
Q
Also,
I
do
recognize
that
you
know
it's
a
hud
requirement
and
affordable
housing
is
huge,
so
I
do
would
love
to
see
that
for
affordable
housing,
but
this
is
by
a
major
bus
corridor
as
well,
so
again
for
projects
that
are
like
this.
I
guess
if
they
do
not
have
that
that
parking
requirement,
I
would
hate
to
see,
there's
so
much
public
transit
in
this
area,
and
then
I
guess
my
other
just
general
concern
is
the
studio
and
one
bedrooms
for
affordable
housing.
Q
That's
all
I
feel,
like
I
see
from
developers,
I'm
not
sure
where
families
are
supposed
to
go
for
affordable
housing.
So
I
would
love
to
see
more
options
that
have
you
know
two
three.
You
know
bedrooms
for
actual
family,
so
yeah.
Those
are
my
general
comments.
Thank
you.
A
A
Just
one
second
peter:
I'm
going
to
give
it
a
couple:
breaths
I've
always
prematurely
closed
the
public
comment
period
and-
and
it's
come
back
to
bite
me:
okay,
we're
not
seeing
any
hands,
so
I
with
that
I
will
close
the
public
comment
period
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
and
at
this
time
yes
peter
you
or
gary-
want
to
respond
to
some
of
the
concerns
that
kelsey
raised.
N
Just
just
so
everybody
knows
the
parking
is
really
under
the
building
and
behind
the
building,
so
we
will
have
landscaping
in
front,
and
so,
if
anybody
walking
by
the
only
place
that
they
really
would
see
any
fencing
or
anything
would
be
on
that
just
on
that
southwest
corner,
which
is
which
is
located
just
behind
the
u.s
bank
parking
lot
anyway.
So
if
somebody's
walking
by
they're
primarily
going
to
see
landscaping
in
front
of
our
building,
they
will,
they
won't
see
really
any
of
the
parking
because
it
will
be
behind
the
building.
A
All
right,
commissioners,
any
follow-up,
questions,
concerns
and
comments.
D
A
F
C
That
is
a
friendly
amendment
accepted
by
me.
D
A
Got
you
I
had
a
lag
there,
but
I
understood
okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
by
brenda
in
a
second
with
by
mike
with
the
friendly
amendment
accepted
for
the
fence,
landscaping
part
any
discussion
or
questions
to
the
motion
from
commissioners.
A
To
that
motion
has
andreas
called
in
yet.
A
Yeah,
I
asked
him
to
call
in
and
marlene
sent
him
the
phone
number,
but
I
still
don't
see
him.
Okay,
all
right.
L
B
Yeah,
I
can
check
that
just
for
those
attendee
lists,
I'm
going
to
open
up
for
these
different
call-in
users
to
see
if
it's
a
specific
person.
All
I
know
is
this
is
calling
user
six
and
it
starts
with
the
number
seven.
Is
this
andres.
B
P
You
know
I
did
join
through
half
of
it.
I
think
I.
B
A
Okay,
andrea,
so
you
don't
need
to
raise
your
hand
or
anything
when
you
want
to
speak
up
just
pipe
up
and
we'll
I'll
hear
you.
A
Thank
you
so
much
and
with
that
we
have
that
motion
passed
unanimously.
So
thank
you
all
and
good
luck,
mr
curran
and
mr
knapp
we're.
A
And
with
that,
our
planner
on
this
project
is
nan.
G
The
proposed
redevelopment
of
the
site
would
allow
for
the
redevelopment
of
a
site
used
for
outdoor
storage,
currently
to
a
development
of
commercial
ground
floor
use
and
a
seven-story
parking
structure
with
the
creation
of
a
new
private
mid-block
street,
which
will
be
called
elder
court.
The
overall
site
extends
from
700
south
towards
the
to
the
south,
to
600
south
towards
the
north,
and
it's
just
east
of
the
600
south
freeway
off
ramp,
which
is
a
central
vehicle
corridor
into
the
downtown
area.
G
The
proposed
redevelopment
of
the
site
meets
the
design,
review
and
planned
development
standards
by
providing
additional
design
elements
to
the
site
and
building
that
exceed
the
standards
of
the
underlying
cg
zone,
because
this
site
is
in
the
cg
zoning
district.
There
are
few
design
standards
required.
G
Currently,
the
proposed
redevelopment
of
the
site
meets
the
cg
standards
by
providing
operable
building
entrances
along
the
street
facing
facade
and
an
overall
improved
site
layout
and
amenities,
and
additional
landscaping
on
the
site
has
found
the
neighborhood
industry
project
meets
the
goals
and
intent
the
master
down
the
downtown
master
plan
and
the
downtown
in
motion
transportation
plan,
in
that
it
will
provide
for
convenient
off-street
parking
for
visitors,
an
expansion
of
a
mid-block
street
system
and
redevelopment
that
encourage
encourages
employment
in
the
granary
district.
G
A
G
Fan
height,
this
would
allow
for
two
additional
floors
for
parking.
This
additional
building
height
will
be
mitigated
through
improved
building
design,
which
includes
a
mid-block
placement
of
a
parking
structure,
an
active
ground
floor,
commercial
use,
building,
step
backs
artistic
screening
of
the
upper
parking
levels,
increased
fenestration
on
the
ground
floor
than
what's
required.
G
The
second
requested
modification
is
for
a
lot
width
reduction.
The
required
lot
width
in
the
cg
district
is
60
feet.
This
lot
is
measured
from
the
property
from
the
front
property
line
along
the
public
street.
The
proposed
front
property
line
for
the
neighborhood
industry
project
is
along
700
south.
The
proposed
lot
width
is
26
feet
and
this
encompasses
the
width
of
the
proposed
mid
block
private
street,
which
is
elder
court.
G
So
included
in
the
recommendation
of
approval
from
staff
are
the
three
suggested
suggested
conditions
of
approval?
These
conditions
relate
to
a
subdivision
being
approved
and
recorded
before
the
issuance
of
the
building
permit
that
a
walkway
is
provided
to
the
north
of
the
site
that
would
allow
for
access
to
the
properties
to
the
east
for
pedestrians
and
that
the
parking
agreements
related
to
the
proposed
site
will
meet
the
parking
requirements
for
future
projects.
G
Planning
staff
again
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
request.
The
staff
has
found
the
proposed
development
development
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
district,
the
applicable
master
plans
and
the
plan,
development
and
design
review
standards,
and
I
did
see
the
applicant
in
the
meeting
jesse
dean
and
I
believe,
jason
winkler
will
also
be
available
for
their
presentation
and
any
questions.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
nan,
commissioners,
any
questions
for
staff
at
this
time.
C
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
a
little
confused
about
this
project
in
that,
so
we
have
sort
of
strict
limits
on
parking.
You
know
parking
for
various
uses,
but
it's
okay
to
just
have
a
parking
garage.
C
Right,
we
don't
have
in
our
staff
report
any
sense
of
the
surrounding
conditions
at
all
or
the
future
plans
of
industry.
Is
there
some
particular
reason
why
we
don't
have
that?
That
shows
where
these?
Why
why
we
need
a
parking
garage
like
this
or
what
it's,
what
its
context
is
going
to
be
or
is
even.
R
Would
you
like?
May
I
may
I
take
that
commissioners
is
that
okay.
A
No
not
just
yet
we're.
I
will
open
it
up
to
you
guys
in
just
a
minute
that
thank
you
so
hang
tight.
I
was.
B
Going
to
say
that,
commissioner,
I
think
they
have
a,
I
don't
think
they've
actually
submitted
an
actual
master
plan
necessarily
for
the
site.
I
think
we've
seen
some
images
and
some
you
know
ideas,
but
they
are
here,
I'm
assuming
they
have
a
presentation
and
they
may
be
able
to
allude
to
a
little
more
detail.
C
Well,
I
guess
I
guess
my
question:
is
you
know
if
we
don't
have
a
master
plan
proposal?
Is?
Is
this
parking
garage
premature
in
that?
C
B
Right
they
do
have
an
existing
space
there
that
I
know
they
need
parking
for
that's
across
the
street,
but
they
would
have
to
provide
you
more
detail
about
the
rest
of
their
block
that
they
wanted.
A
Okay,
with
that,
we
will
move
on
to
the
applicant.
We
do
have
jason
winkler
and
jessie
dean.
I'm
assuming
you
have
a
presentation.
A
Do
you
need,
I
basically
wonder
if
you
need
screen
sharing
privileges.
P
A
Yeah
john,
if
you
can
give
that
to
jesse,
that
would
be
great.
Yes,.
A
Okay,
so
you're
set
up,
you
have
10
minutes,
feel
free
not
to
take
10
minutes,
but
you
have
that
time
and
the
floor
is
yours.
R
Great
and
we
will
endeavor
not
take
that
time-
you
guys
have
so
much
going
on,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
having
us
everyone.
It's
a
pleasure
to
be
here.
My
name
is
jason
winkler
and,
together
with
my
wife
and
business
partner,
ellen
we're
the
owners
of
q
factor
and
we're
really
excited
to
be
doing
really
fun
work
in
the
granary
and
the
the
very
great
question
was
already
posed.
R
Why
the
heck
are
we
building
a
big
parking
structure
which
is
shown
in
the
previous
image
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
nowhere?
And
the
answer
is
that
that
976
stall
garage
will
serve
a
number
of
buildings,
one
of
which
is
already
there
in
the
area,
and
that
is
our
industry,
salt
lake
city
building.
We
call
it
and
it's
about
330,
000
square
feet
of
office
and
other
kind
of
office
related
uses.
It's
about
half
done.
R
Our
first
phase
was
was
just
about
half
of
that
330
000
square
feet
and
it's
full
and
occupied,
or
mostly
occupied.
R
I
should
say
it's
lightly
occupied
due
to
covet,
but
it's
quite
full
and
least,
and
so
that
building
just
for
reference
will
have,
and
there
are
some
of
the
before
shots
of
the
building,
and
I
bet
there
are
some
after
shots
to
follow,
and
so
we
estimate
that
that
we'll
have
between
a
thousand
and
twelve
hundred
people
working
in
the
building
every
day
and
several
hundred
visitors
out
to
the
building
every
day
as
well,
and
that's
based
on
our
similar
buildings
in
denver,
which
are
about
half
the
size,
and
so
we've
just
doubled
the
number
of
of
expected
workers
and
visitors
so
that
building
is
half
complete
and
the
second
half
is
under
construction
right
now.
R
So
I
do
wish
we
could
wait,
but
it's
very
much
not
premature.
I
would
say,
unfortunately,
not
premature
to
answer
your
really
good
question
from
before.
In
addition
to
serving
the
office
building,
there
will
be
two
apartment
buildings
there,
on
on
the
same
parcel
directly
to
the
north
and
sharing
elevator
and
staircores
with
the
parking
structure
will
be
a
roughly
220
unit
apartment
building,
which
we
affectionately,
call
our
workforce
housing.
R
So
so
that'll
be
we're
estimating
a
60
to
80
ami
targeted
project
and
we'll
use
that
parking
it'll
be
the
only
parking
that
it
has
and
then
to
the
southwest
of
the
parking
structure
will
be
a
market
rate
apartment
building,
estimated
to
be
plus
or
minus
200
units,
and
it
will
have
some
of
its
own
parking
built
in,
but
will
rely
pretty
heavily
on
this
parking
for
a
nighttime
use
as
well.
R
In
addition
to
our
projects,
some
of
the
neighboring
projects
we
anticipate,
will
also
get
a
great
use
out
of
this
regional
parking
structure,
most
notably
directly
to
the
east
of
the
parking
structure
is
some
retail
and
some
future
and
a
climbing
gym.
So
so
there
will
be
other
users
in
addition
to
us
that
will
make
use
of
the
parking
structure.
R
So
that
was
out
of
order
answering
the
questions,
not
quite
in
the
way
I
intended
to
do
them.
So
I
hope
I
hit
the
major
points,
but
in
addition
to
to
jesse
who's
here
and
knows
the
project
intimately,
we
also
have
kaz
martin,
who
is
one
of
our
brilliant
architects,
and
if
it
gets
really
technical,
we
may
call
kazan
for
the
hard
stuff
otherwise
jesse
and
I
can
hopefully
knock
out
any
any
other
questions.
A
No
sorry
andra,
if
you
can
hold
that
to
when
they're
finished
and
then
I'll
open
it
up
for
you
to
ask
any
questions
of
the
applicant.
Thank
you.
Go
ahead.
Jesse.
P
I
was
just
going
to
mention
that
commissioner
shearer,
I
think,
if
you
look
at
there
with
the
additional
kind
of
information
towards
the
end
of
the
packet,
we
do
have
some
additional
sort
of
renderings
that
show
the
kind
of
additional
mappings
and
additional
uses
that
are
part
of
the
space.
As
jason
already
mentioned.
P
The
project
that
we're
planning
directly
to
the
north
of
the
parking
structure
is
that
workforce
housing
project
that
will
not
will
have
zero
parking
as
part
of
that
as
part
of
that
site
and
is
already
and
will
be
co-located
and
have
the
same
common
elevator
in
stair
course.
P
Just
a
couple
other
kind
of
minor
comments,
as
it
relates
to
the
conditions
of
approval.
You
know,
I
think,
just
some
additional
context
in
terms
of
the
preliminary
subdivision
that
we
are
working
through
and
we
are
having
a
lot
of
fun
in
what
jason
likes
to
call
urban
redevelopment.
There's
21
parcels
on
the
site
that
are
all
from
former
industrial
uses,
including
old,
private,
right-of-way
and
other
fun
issues
from
anything
from
union
pacific
rail
lines
to
other
items.
P
So
we
are
nearing
that
completion
and
I've
been
working
with
nan
and
the
staff
for
the
planet
from
the
planning
department
to
get
that,
and
so
we
understand
that-
and
I
think,
as
it
relates
to
sort
of
the
items
two
and
three
we're
obviously
very
excited
about
the
idea
of
the
additional
kind
of
mid-block
connection
to
the
east.
P
Part
of
the
reason
why
we're
really
excited
about
this
dense
parking
structure
is
recognizing
that
we
will
be
able
to
provide
parking
for
and
a
good
transit
oriented
site
in
the
future.
If
there's
the
400
west
track
expansion,
but
you
know
having
that
connection
and
that
point
to
us
is
great.
So
you
know
that's
something
we
have.
What
we're
actively
you
know
excited
that
the
city
is
working
is
looking
to
work
with
that
with
that
neighboring
property
owner
as
well,
and
then
you
know
the
third
point.
P
Obviously
we
understand
the
the
parking
requirements
and
the
off-site
parking
agreements,
so
those
are
all
makes
sense,
make
sense
to
us,
and
we
appreciate
that
the
staff
for
working
through
them
with
us.
R
And
I
would
add,
maybe
jesse
one
more
high
level
thing.
You
know
right
now.
Getting
the
parking
done
is
important
because,
as
you
can
probably
imagine,
we're
looking
to
minimize
the
visual
effects
of
the
parking
and
kind
of
bury
it
if
you
will
within
the
site
so
that
the
outsides
that
are
really
activated
with
people
are
the
parts
that
you
see
and
and
secondary
to
that
and
jesse
flashed
through
it.
And
I
know
you
guys
have
it
in
your
packet,
but
we
won't
waste
your
time.
R
Folks
are
doing
really
great
things
in
adjacent
blocks,
but
really
what's
being
created
for
not
for
a
number
of
blocks
in
both
directions
is
a
really
walkable
environment
and-
and
we
hope
that
we're
doing
that-
we're
basically
taking
part
in
smart
development
of
what
I
think
are
great
having
these
big
blocks,
but
you've
got
to,
in
my
opinion,
cut
them
up
so
that
they're
walkable
and
that
they're
they're
of
the
human
scale.
R
And
so
we
spent
a
lot
of
time-
and
there
are
some
nerdy
images
that
I
get
really
excited
about,
but
I'm
not
going
to
babble
about
them
now.
But
please
check
those
out
if
you,
if
you
care
to
and
always
happy
to
talk
about
that
more
because
we
take
it
really
seriously
and
really
like
the
end,
end
result
so
enough.
For
me,
sorry
that
was
too
long
thanks.
You
guys
appreciate
your
time
and
attention.
A
Okay,
thank
you
both
all
right
with
that
commissioners,
if
you
have
questions
for
the
applicant
and
staff
at
this
point,
this
is
your
turn.
So,
let's
start
with
andrew
yeah,
so.
H
Thanks
so
much,
I
I'm
simply
like
to
everything
you're
doing
your
term
workforce
housing
referring
to
ami
of
60
to
80.
H
I
think
the
implication
from
what
you're
saying
is
households
below
60
ami
aren't
working,
and
I
guess
I'm
so.
I'm
I'm
I'm
sort
of
concerned
about
that
language,
because
it
is
very
loaded
language
to
refer
to
60
to
80
as
workforce
housing,
and
I
realize
you
are
not
unique
in
this,
but
I
I
might
just
maybe
this
is
a
complaint,
but
maybe
encourage
the
term
moderate
income
housing
as
opposed
to
workforce
housing.
R
Sure,
thank
you
and
I
I
appreciate
and
totally
understand
the
comment.
It's
it's
interesting.
I
would
love
to
use
the
word
affordable
with
a
cat
with
a
lower
case
a
but
then
people
confuse
it
with
affordable
subsidized
capital,
a
so
totally
heard,
and
and
and
definitely
it's
interesting.
Thank
you
for
the
commentary
and
and
hear
it
appreciate
it,
and
it's
always.
R
A
Okay,
I
have
a
question
for
nan
and
then
possibly
for
the
applicant,
so
this
this
condition
for
that
walkway
to
the
east
along
the
north.
Where
do
we
have
a
rendering
in
the
staff
report
of
where
that's
going
to
land.
G
The
parking
structure
goes
to
the
property
line
along
the
north
facade,
so
that
walkway
will
have
to
be
north
of
the
site,
and
it
would
be
something
that
we
would
work
with
the
applicant
on
making
sure
that
they're
meeting
the
mid
block,
walkway
standards.
So
we're.
G
You
know
we
don't
have
any
renderings
for
it.
This
was
between
staff
and
the
applicant
trying
to
find
a
way
to
integrate
even
more
pedestrians
into
the
site,
and
one
of
those
ways
is
providing
that
mid-block
pedestrian
path,
because
it's
anticipated
this
parking
structure
would
also
serve
the
properties
to
the
east.
I
I
don't
want
to
misspeak
jesse.
So
if
I
said
anything
incorrect,
there's
not
mine,
I
guess.
A
I'm
concerned
like
where
it's
going
to
go:
are
we
talking
a
walkway
north,
south
or
east
west,
and
what
does
the
master
plan
have
a
mid-block
walkway
passed
in
for
this
block.
G
There
is
a
master
plan,
mid-block
walkway,
but
that's
already
being
provided
along
the
that
goes
north
south
along
that
direction.
This
would
be
an
east-west
direction.
Mid-Block
walkway,
that's
located
to
the
north
of
the
subject.
Site
can.
A
You
enlighten
me
as
to
where
that
north-south
mid-block
walkway
is
landing
in
relationship
to
this
parking
structure.
G
So
the
that
would
be
elder
court
there's
a
sidewalk
that
would
be
included
with
elder
courts.
So
the.
A
That
and
had
private
roads
become
pedestrian
walkways
and
they're.
Not
meshing.
Are
you
planning
on
making
the
pedestrian
part
of
this
actually
usable,
instead
of
like
a
four
foot
wide
or
six
foot
wide,
sidewalk
thinking,
they're
gonna,
that's
a
nice
safe
inviting
walkway
is
is
not
how
it
comes
out
in
reality.
What's
your
plan
for
that.
R
Sure
yeah
yeah,
now
we
and
again
using
using
precedent
where
we've
done
this
really,
I
think
successfully
in
the
past.
We
are
very
much
I
mean
we.
There
are
no
requirements.
I
don't
think
for
us
to
do
these
crossblock
or
mid-block
crossings,
and
we
very
much
intended
always
to
do
them
from
the
get-go.
A
I
think
that
the
if
it's
in
the
master
plan,
then
then
we
would
definitely
hold
that
you
accountable
to
that.
So
you
know
in
a
sense
yeah.
It
is
a
requirement
and
when
we're
looking
at
an
entire
block,
I'm
very
sensitive
that
we're
we're
not
losing
the
opportunity
to
do
this
because
we're
getting
one
shot
at
this
block.
C
Can
I
jump
in
here
for
a
second
amy.
I
think
people
people
are
cross
talk
here,
a
little
bit.
A
mid-block
walkway
doesn't
have
to
be
all
only
just
a
walkway,
it
can
also
be
a
street
and
a
walkway,
and
they
actually
they
act.
Well,
they
actually
they
may
not
know
that
so
they
actually
have
the
the.
There
is
a
plan
as
part
of
their
proposal
that
shows
the
sidewalk
and
the
landscaping
for
that.
So
you
have
an
actual
something
to
hold
their
feet
to
the
fire
on
there.
P
So
I
think
you
know
part
of
part
of
our
goal
and
again
we
were
actually
took
all
of
the
master,
the
downtown
master
plan
into
account.
We
were
actually
designing
a
lot
of
this
work,
recognizing
that
we
wanted
to
build
not
only
a
green,
green
space
on
500
west,
so
we're
actually
trying
to
pull
as
much
traffic
and
and
also
you
can
even
do
additional
work
on
500
west,
which
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
southern
court,
but
we
were
actually
able
to
create
a
new
road,
a
new
pedestrian
friendly.
P
You
know
mixed-use
street
with
this
area
that
connects
it
spans
the
entire
660
feet
of
the
block,
so
that
goes
north
south
and
includes
the
parking
structure
as
well
as
the
additional
developments
we
have.
I
mean
again:
we've
we've
considered
all
the
landscaping
requirements
and
everything
else
as
part
of
this
block,
recognizing
that
we
want
this
to
be
just
as
friendly
for
pedestrians
as
it
is.
You
know,
for
you
know,
for
people
who
live
there
as
well,
and
people
who
are
experiencing
that.
P
P
You
know
that's
why
we
keep
old
buildings
where
we
can
and
that's
the
project
that
we
showed
you
before
and
so
the
project,
and
what
kind
of
I
think
led
us
to
what
we're
talking
about
here
today
is
we
were
talking
about
the
original
connection,
which
was
the
north
south,
which
included
the
entire
elder
court
right
of
way
that
we
were
just
discussing
as
well
as
a
connection
directly
to
the
west,
which
would
connect
to
our
industry
office
project
and
what
we're
talking
about
now
is
going
above
and
beyond,
to
connect
to
the
east
as
well
of
property,
that
we
do
not
own
ourselves
but
are
working
with
the
property
owners
directly
to
that
east,
so
that
we
can
try
and
connect
connect
all
of
those
pieces
and
really
it
helps
the
city
to
enact
the
master
plan,
which
we
are
true.
A
Okay,
I
thank
you
for
that.
I
think
part
of
the
consternation
on
my
part
is
really
not
seeing
the
totality
of
how
this
block
is
going
to
play
itself
out,
and
so,
but
I
question:
if
condition
two
is
even
necessary
now,
given
that
it's
just
gonna
be
the
sidewalk.
F
But
I
think
what
they're
saying
is:
it
goes
to
the
east
as
opposed
to
the
west,
so
they're
proposing
already
a
walkway
that
would
go
to
the
west
from
the
parking
garage
to
connect
to
their
property.
What
they're
saying
and
jesse
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
you
would
add
an
additional
walkway
to
the
east
over
property,
that
they
don't
control.
R
A
G
Thank
you.
I
maybe
share
my
screen
one
more
time,
so
I
can
pull
up.
P
P
Should
work
now,
jason
pulls
my
jason
pulls
my
presentation,
privileges
all
the
time.
So
it's
not
true,
so
I
think
what
we're
talking
about.
Maybe
this
will
kind
of
help
to
kind
of
clarify
things,
so
this
is
sort
of
the
existing.
You
know
new
proposed.
You
know
to
the
west
location.
This
is
our
existing
industry
asset,
that's
right
here
or
the
office
creative
office
building.
This
is
the
elder
court.
You
know
right-of-way
that
includes
both.
You
know
a
pedestrian
pedestrian
space
as
well.
P
As
you
know,
space
for
our
car
for
vehicles
to
move
through.
This
is
sort
of
additional.
You
know,
you
know
plaza
and
activated
kind
of
you
know
landscape
area,
and
then
I
think
the
area
that
we're
really
talking
about
in
in
terms
of
where
there
would
be
a
connection
to
the
east
is
really
right
in
this
section.
P
So
I'm
just
gonna
mark
this
just
so
you
guys
can
kind
of
see
what
I'm
talking
about
so
you'll
notice
that
there's
essentially
an
ability
for
us
to
potentially
look
at
some
sort
of
connection
point
to
the
to
the
east,
which
would
go
in
and
extend
in
condition
all
the
way
out
to
this
side.
As
we
stated
before,
we
do
not
own
any
of
the
land
directly
to
the
east,
and
so
it
is
a
little
bit
out
of
our
control,
and
I
think
that
that's
you
know
where
we've
had.
P
You
know
if
there's
any
issue
at
all
that
it's
something
that
we'd.
Rather
you
have
have
you
guys.
You
know
grill
the
property
owner
directly
to
the
east
versus
us,
because
we'd
love
to
do
it,
but
that's
really
our
only
our
only
thing
so.
A
R
A
Okay,
rest
assured
jesse.
If
that
owner
comes
before
us,
we'll
grill
him
just
the
way
we
grill
you
so
so.
C
I
I
also
have
a
question
about
that
pathway.
What's
marked
in
there
called
pedestrian
path
and
and
and
you
don't
have
any
intentions
for
that
right
now
I
mean
you,
don't
have
any
design
for
that.
We
don't
know.
If
it's
you
know
20
feet
wide.
We
don't
know
if
it's
a
street,
we
don't
know,
and
will
it
actually
be
built
before
any
of
the
other
development
so
that
your
actual
employees
and
so
forth
can
cross
over
that?
P
Commissioner,
commissioner,
commissioner,
I
think
you
can
rest
assured
that
we
would
have
a
mutiny
on
our
hands
if
we
did
not
provide
a
connection
from
the
parking
structure
to
the
office
building
where
we
have
1200
people.
But
I
think
that
you
know
for
us
really
again.
It's
the
only
connection
point
that
we
really
have
in
order
to
you
know
to
move
people
over
into
our
office
building.
P
We
are
not
planning
on,
and
I
think,
if
you
look
at
the
larger
preliminary
plat,
which
I
don't
know,
if
I'm
allowed
to
pull
that
up
here
or
talk
about
that,
but
you
can
see
the
parcel
lines
that
we
are
creating.
That
actually
include
and
even
delineate
where
these
sort
of
you
know
connected
connections
will
be.
And
so
one
of
our
parcels
is
this.
P
R
And
if
this
is
helpful-
and
we
won't
pull
it
up
right
now,
but
we
can
share
with
with
folks
if
they're
interested
some
of
the
president
from
past
projects
and-
and
I
think
what
you'll
see
is
that
we
pride
ourselves
into
jesse's
point
we'd,
be
part
of
the
mutiny
on
ourselves.
If
we
didn't
create
the
type
of
walkable
spaces
and
human
skill
spaces
that
you
guys
are
envisioning.
R
F
G
F
A
Okay,
with
that,
we
will
move
on
to
the
public
comment
period.
Jason
and
jesse
hang
kite.
If
you
have,
if
we
have
anything,
come
up
we'll
call
back
to
you.
Okay,
I
do
see
one
hand
raised
john.
If
you
wish
to
we'll
open
the
public
comment
period
and
call
on
them.
B
Sure
all
right
go
ahead.
Mike
weiss.
D
Hey
thanks
for
taking
my
comment.
I
was
on
a
walking
tour
that
the
planet
commission
did
about
two
years
ago
that
stopped
by
the
industry
site,
and
I
have
been
a
fan
of
the
project
since
then.
I
will
say
that
it
looks
like
and
I'm
glad
that
they've
survived
covet.
It
looks
like
their
plan
is
progressing
pretty
much
what
they
described
two
years
ago
or
whenever
that
was.
D
I
understand
that
underground
parking
is
kind
of
problematic
in
that
area.
So
you
know
it's
not
like
they
can
put
it
underneath
the
buildings
that
they're
going
to
be
building
very
well
also
the
great
repurposing
of
industrial
buildings
that
they're
doing,
of
course,
are
going
to
require
more
parking
than
what
an
industrial
site
would
have.
A
Okay,
thank
you
mike
appreciate
that
any,
if
any
of
anybody
else
in
the
public
wishes
to
speak,
if
you'd
raise
your
hand
otherwise
amy
did
we
have
any
emails,
come
in.
A
Okay,
all
right
with
that,
we
will
close
the
public
comment
period
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission,
nothing
controversial
in
that,
so
I
think
we
can
bypass
any
comments
from
the
applicant
at
this
time.
Commissioners,
do
you
have
questions,
concerns,
thoughts
or
a
motion.
C
I
am
still
concerned
that
we
don't
have
a
plan
area
that
gives
the
context
for
this
parking
garage.
It
seems
to
me
that,
for
example,
if
we
had
a
housing
project
here
that
was
proposed
under
new
parking
ordinances,
it
would
not
be
allowed
to
have
as
much
parking
as
you
know.
This
would
this
would
be.
This
would
be
to
to
serve
it.
So
we
are.
C
We
are
embedding
in
a
way,
an
auto
oriented,
a
continuation
of
the
auto
oriented
systems
that
we
have
been
trying
for
a
long
time
to
to
work
through,
and
I
know
that
although
the
the
transit
isn't
there
yet,
the
buildings
are
also
they're,
not
there
yet.
So
I'm
a
little
confused
about
why
we
I'm
not
seeing
a
plan
at
all
a
master
plan
at
all
and
and
and
I'm
not
sure
that
I'm
willing-
I
mean-
I
know
that
you
know
they're
all
you
know
the
project
itself.
C
It
is
really
nice
and
it
does
seem
to
be
pretty
active
at
this
point,
although
through
covid,
but
we're
anticipating
an
sort
of
project
orientation
here,
and
so
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that,
and
I
don't
know
if
others
have
that
you.
A
F
F
We
could
certainly
question
it,
but
who
knows
if
and
when
transit
will
reach
this
section
of
the
city
and,
in
the
meantime,
they're
trying
to
grow
this
area
and
invest
in
this
area
and
if
their
plans
have
determined
that
additional
parking
is
needed
to
support
that
growth?
I
I
think
we
should
support
that.
M
A
H
H
It
was
go
ahead
and
speak
okay,
brenda
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
your
concerns,
and
I
guess
and-
and
maybe
this
is
my
own
view-
and
I'm
the
newest
commissioner
here
but
my
interpretation
of
the
staff
report.
H
H
I
don't
know
that
it's
a
question
for
the
planning
commission,
whether
you
know
if
it
meets
the
intent
of
the
the
various
plans
that
the
staff
reports
cited.
I
guess
my
inclination
is
to
side
with
staff,
but
whether
that's
something
we
need
to
address
in
the
master
plan.
Instead,
you
know
with
in
concert
with
us
building
transit.
I
get
that's
my
inclination,
but
I
I
could
be
swayed
a
different
direction.
B
C
And
I
would
not
you
know,
stand
in
the
way
of
that,
I'm
just
I'm
just
what
I'm
just
questioning
whether
or
not
this
is
this
is
appropriate
for
this
area
and
for
the
future.
F
Ahead,
based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
it
is
nope
based
on
the
information,
the
staff
report.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
design
review
and
plan
development
as
presented
in
petition
pln
pcm
2020-00168.
F
And
pln
pcm
2020-00167
with
the
following
conditions:
one
a
preliminary
subdivision
is
approved
and
recorded
with
the
county
prior
to
the
issuance
of
the
building
permit
to
a
walkway,
be
included
from
the
subject
site
and
the
property
to
the
east
along
the
north.
Facade
of
the
proposed
building
and
three
off-site
parking
share.
Parking
and
leased
parking
agreements
shall
meet
the
parking
requirements
for
the
various
future
projects.
D
A
F
I
am
voting
yes,
and
I
would
like
to
also
add
that
I
really
like
what's
happening
in
the
granary,
and
this
development
team
is
a
huge
part
of
that
again,
I
walk
this
area.
Quite
a
bit
super
excited
to
see
what's
happening
and
I'm
excited
to
see
this
next
portion
of
their
project.
So
thank
you
for
being
such
good
members
of
our
community.
C
I'm
gonna
vote
no,
but
I
also
appreciate
the
work
that's
already
been
done
there.
I
I
just
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
a
greater
justification
for
a
much
larger
project
than
was
isolab
by
zoning.
A
Adrian,
yes
and
maureen:
yes,
okay,
that
is
a
vote.
Six
two
one
that
motion
passes.
You
are
ready
to
move
on,
mr
winkler,
mr
dean,
good
luck
and
we
will
now
go
on
to
number
five.
Thank.
A
R
If
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
your
time
and
energy
and
counselor
shara
and
everybody
here,
we're
really
thrilled
to
show
you
guys
more
information
as
you'd
like
it,
but
appreciate
your
help
this
evening
and
appreciate
the
work
you
guys
do.
Thank
you
so
much.
A
O
Thank
you
so
much.
This
is
a
proposed
40
unit,
townhome
style
plan
development,
titled
gabitz
row
at
1448,
south
in
1470,
south
main
street.
O
The
applicant
is
in
the
plan
development
process
because
they're
requesting
modifications
to
the
normal
front
and
corner
side
yard,
landscape
setbacks,
cc
zone
requires
15
feet,
setbacks
on
the
corner
side
and
15
feet
from
the
front
yard
and
they're
requesting
modification
to
about
one
foot
to
two
feet:
they're
also
requesting
modification
to
vehicle
access,
gate
setbacks.
O
So
I'm
going
to
go
through
this
quickly
and
leave
it
to
the
applicant
to
really
present
their
design.
This
is
a
site
plan
just
showing
the
layout
of
the
site,
to
orient
you
to
the
development.
There
are
two
rows
of
town
homes
separated
by
a
driveway
that
runs
north
to
south.
The
homes
along
main
street
have
their
primary
front
facades
on
main
street
and
the
row
along
the
alley
at
the
top
of
the
screen
has
its
front
facades
along
the
alley.
O
O
It
meets
the
design
related
standards
with
an
engaging
facade
design
that
with
a
high
level
of
transparency,
the
use
of
high
quality
materials,
inclusion
of
pedestrian
level,
lighting,
roofline
details
and
door
and
window
detailing,
and
it
also
meets
the
compatibility
standards
as
it's
buffered
from
single
family,
lower
scale
development
to
the
west
of
the
site
by
an
alley
and
additional
landscape
offering
and
the
scale
is
generally
compatible
with
the
arterial
main
street
context.
O
So,
as
far
as
modifications
again,
the
applicants
asking
for
relief
from
the
front
and
corner
yard
setbacks
of
15
feet,
as
well
as
the
17
foot
vehicle
access
gate
setback.
So
you
can
see
that
15
foot
setback
line
in
yellow
and
the
vehicle
access
skate
itself
is
toward
the
right
of
the
slide
coming
in
from
merrimack
avenue.
So
the
gate
would
be
right
in
line
with
the
front
facade
there.
O
So,
regarding
the
gate,
they
are
proposing
the
driveway
gate
and
again
in
line
with
the
front
facade
in
merrimack.
The
location
does
provide
some
additional
security
and
doesn't
project
in
front
of
the
facade
doesn't
disrupt
that
facade
line
and
staff
is
also
aware
of
the
level
of
security
concerns
in
this
neighborhood.
O
So,
on
the
building
height
modification,
the
pd
process
allows
for
five
feet
of
additional
height.
In
this
case,
the
applicant
is
proposing
the
additional
height
only
along
the
main
street
facade,
so
that's
away
from
the
single-family
homes
on
the
west
side
of
the
site,
where
there
could
be
an
impact
from
this
from
the
height
such
as
from
shadowing
impacts.
O
So,
based
on
that
staff
is
recommending
approval
again
with
the
conditions
noted
previously
and
also
a
standard
condition
that
the
applicant
get
an
encroachment
permit
for
any
parts
of
the
building
that
project
over
the
right
of
way
and
with
that
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
And
the
applicant
is
also
here
to
present.
A
All
right
we
will
move
on,
it
looks
like
we
have
riley
young
and
corey
middleton,
which
one
of
you
needs
presenter
privileges.
I
I
think
daniel
daniel
thank
you
for
this
is
corey
middleton.
Thank
you
for
that
presentation.
I
think
you
you
covered.
D
It
quite
well,
I
don't
think
we
have
anything.
I
To
present
other
than
what
daniel's
already
already
shown
so.
D
We're
welcome
to
questions.
B
Or
whatever
we
can
cover
manager,
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know.
One
of
the
people
on
the
list
is
james
alfondre,
for
some
reason
the
system
won't.
Let
me
make
him
a
presenter,
but
I
can
unmute
him
and
so
he
can
participate,
but
for
some
reason
I
went
through
the
whole
list
he's
the
only
name
that
I
can't
make
a
panelist
for
some
reason.
So
james
you
are
able
to
speak
right
now.
A
J
J
Yes,
my
name
is
james
alfondre
with
urban
alfondre
and
gavitz
row
is
project
we
are
proposing
here
to
speak
to
your
question
directly.
The
need
for
reduced
setbacks
is
these
are
missing
middle
housing
types.
These
are
stacked
units
that
what
we
like
doing
is
creating
very
efficient
units
to
bring
the
price
down
and
to
create
more
affordability
in
in
housing,
and
especially
in
this
neighborhood,
we
did
the
same
thing
in
row:
17,
which
is
a
block
which
just
is
just
a
block
south
on
17th
south
we
came
to
the
planning
commission.
J
Those
units
have
to
get
a
little
longer
lengthwise
and
with
the
drive
island
between
necessary
for
that
and
then
to
be
able
to
provide
those
kinds
of
units
that
was
the
need
for
getting
a
reduced
setback,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
we
also
wanted
to
really
go
above
and
beyond
the
design
facades
the
design
detailing.
J
So
it
works
really
well
with
main
street
and
engages
engages
main
street
very
well.
We
also
want
more
eyes
on
the
street
here.
We
do
have
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
issues
with
criminal
activity
in
this
neighborhood,
so
having
a
rooftop
deck
that
brings
more
engagement
to
the
to
the
to
the
street,
and
the
activation
from
main
street
was
really
important
to
us
as
well.
J
The
front
of
the
building
is
main
street.
Yes,.
A
H
Yeah,
so
I
I'm
sympathetic
to
the
need
to
build
larger
units,
and
maybe
you
could
just
describe
the
unit
mix.
My
other
question.
I
I'm
a
little
confused
about
the
rendering
having
all
the
green
grass,
because
I,
the
city
of
salt
lake,
is
paying
property
owners
to
remove
green
grass
and
put
in
xeriscaping
right
now.
Given
our
drought-
and
you
have
this
very,
very
green
grass
in
your
rendering-
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
particular
reason
for
that.
J
J
J
O
C
J
Yes,
we
are
putting
a
lot
of
money
into
improving
that
alley.
First
of
all,
just
activating
it
is
going
to
be
a
big
improvement.
We
are
undergrounding
the
power
lines,
which
is
a
big
cost
and
a
big
way
to
help
make
that
alley
more
activated,
we're
also
adding
lighting
and
units
facing
that
that
alley
that
will
in
nature,
improve
it
by
adding
activity
and
new
features
to
to
that
alley.
That's
now
very
dark
and
not
not
well
activated
at
all.
A
Ariel
on
google
earth
trying
to
see
where
what
your
neighbor
is
going
to
be
on
the
north.
A
Yeah,
so
the
north
part
of
your
building,
though,
since
you're
not
taking
the
whole
block,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
is
it
that
single
family
home
that's
operating
as
a
trophy
shop.
J
Oh
that's
to
the
south.
No,
that
is
to
the
south
of
us.
Yes,
so
so
that
is
a
that
is
a
stream
okay,
yeah.
So
so
that's
a
commercial
property
that
we're
going
to
be
neighboring.
C
Yeah,
I
do
what
is
the
shown
in
your
plan
there?
That's
not
the
townhouses
on
the
very
southern
end
of
your
plan
on
main
street.
What
is
that
there's
an
entrance
to
the
parking
or
what?
What.
J
Is
all
this
stuff
that
is
a
that
is
a
fence
and
a
an
access.
So
we
have
two
access
points,
one
from
maine
and
one
from
merrimack,
and
this
is
for
fire
access
purposes
to
create
that
throughway
between
merrimack
and
maine.
J
We
are
activating
that
with
landscaping
we're
trying
to
create
open
space
for
the
the
residents
we'd
like
to
make
it
for
the
public,
but
we
have
too
many
issues.
We
have
to
secure
this
area
as
well
as
we
can
so
we're
trying
to
maximize
space
as
much
as
possible
here
we're
going
to
have
open
space,
we're
going
to
have
place
to
gather
for
barbecue
pits.
J
We're
also
going
to
have
try
to
create
this
use
this
space,
not
just
for
driveways
for
cars,
but
also
for
residents
to
gather
and
and
and
hang
out
as
well,
so
so
that
that
is
a
landscaping
element.
We're
adding.
C
So
that
there's
no
three-dimensional
element
there,
that's
all
flat,
there's
no
building
there
actually
correct.
Okay.
J
A
Any
other
questions
from
commissioners.
J
J
A
B
J
You
talk
through
it
I'll
leave
that
up
to
the
commissioners.
If,
if
that's
something
they'd
be
that
they'd
want
to
see
or
if,
if
they
have
all
the
information,
they
need.
A
I
I
have
a
feeling
we
probably
have
all
the
information
we
need,
but
I
would
like
other
commissioners
to
pipe
in
okay
yeah.
I
think
we
can
forego
it,
not
that
I
don't
want
to
see
it,
but
I
did
not
realize
that
you
were
the
one
that
had
the
presentation,
so
I
apologize
as
well
all
right.
Well,
then,
let's
move
forward
and
open
the
public
hearing.
A
But
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands
raised.
B
A
Hey
it's
quiet
night
for
public
comments
too
yeah.
Okay,
going
going
gonna
close
the
public
comment
period
and
bring
it
back
to
commissioners
for
a
discussion
or
you
know
general
thoughts.
Any
concerns
on
this
project.
C
One
thought
I'm
sorry
go
ahead,
brenda
so,
okay,
I
like
this
project
a
lot
and
I
think
the
intention
of
it
is
great
and
it's
replacing
what
appears
to
be
chop
shop
to
me
as
I
drove
out
there,
and
so
it
is
actually
a
wonderful
replacement
for
a
terrible
use.
That's
there.
I
am
concerned
at
our
tendency
to
just
go
ahead
and
reduce
these
setbacks
that
are
traditional
along
main
street.
C
If
you
look
at
the
aerial
photograph
that
they
showed
in
the
very
beginning
that
was
shown
in
the
staff
report,
you
can
see
that
every
other
property
along
there
is
set
back
where
it's
supposed
to
be
and
and
there's
landscaping
that
some
of
the
huge
trees
actually
in
that
la
in
that
setback
area
as
well.
So
while
I'm
not
gonna,
I
wouldn't
make
a
fuss
about
this
particular
project.
I
I
think
that
there's
a
tendency
for
us
to
ignore
the
pattern
that's
already
been
set
up
historically
along
these
streets.
C
We've
done
it
even
in
places
like
north
temple,
which
are,
you
know,
have
huge
setbacks
that
are
really
part
of
the
character
of
that
street.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
as
a
comment
and
hope
in
the
future
that
we
don't
have
that
we
have
a
little
bit
more
consideration
before
we
just
give
up
the
the
traditional
setbacks
that
that
have
created
these
wonderful
tree-lined
streets
in
in
salt
lake
city.
A
Have
to
say
thank
you
brenda.
I
will
just
pipe
in
and
tell
you
james.
This
is
the
honest
truth.
I
generally
like
about
three
percent
of
what
comes
before
us.
Most
of
it
is
just
really
not
raising
the
bar,
but
I
really
really
like
this
project.
This
is
in
my
top
three
percent,
so.
D
A
You
appreciate
the
work
you've
done
and,
and
I'm
a
tough
cookie
on
that-
I
really
don't
like
most
of
what
we
see
so
I
would
live
here.
If
I
ever
need
to
look
for
a
new
place,
I
will
be
looking
here
and
it's
going
to
be.
J
Well
great
project:
well
I
appreciate
that
I
mean
we're
we're
double
framing
our
facades,
our
front
facades
out,
so
we
can
get
more
window
depth
like
we're,
we're
really
getting
into
the
details
here
of
what
we
see
on
a
lot
of
our
in
marmalade
and
in
the
avenues
and
along
broadway
and
along
edison
street.
We
we
we
want
to
heart.
We
believe
our
arc,
we're,
not
california,
we
we
don't.
J
A
Said
I
am
open
to
emotion.
F
A
D
A
A
Sorry,
yes
and
brenda:
yes,
yes
all
right!
Thank
you.
That
motion
passes
unanimously
and
good
luck,
gabbitt's
row
team.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
this
done.
Thank.
J
A
Thank
you
all
right.
We
are
halfway
through
our
agenda.
I
am
going
to
call
for
a
five
minute
break
because
I
need
one,
but
if
we
could
all
reconvene
at
7
40
exactly
we'll
call
the
meeting
back
to
order.
A
Thank
you
and,
while
your
break,
please
turn
off
your
video.
That
was
a
request
as
well
from
staff,
so.
B
Thank
you,
hey
marlene.
If
I
give
you
a
presenter,
can
you
put
that
on
that
screen
back
up,
that
tells
people
where
they
can
send
emails.
B
M
A
A
Maureen,
oh
marlene.
I
like
that
our
graphic
well
done.
P
A
Thank
you
so
we're
just
waiting
for
brenda
and
andrew.
A
Okay,
so
even
without
them,
we
have
a
quorum
convene
welcome.
Thank
you
all
right.
Let's
move
back
into
a
business
item
number
six
on
our
agenda,
which
is
the
huxley
plan,
development
and
design
review
at
approximately
74
64
and
52,
south
600,
west
and
618
west
and
100
south.
This
is
case
numbers
pln,
pcm,
2021-00071.
G
G
The
gmu
zoning
district
requires
a
minimum
of
70
percent
of
exterior
materials
to
consist
of
brick,
masonry
pattern
concrete
or
cut
stone.
Any
other
material
requires
design,
review
approval
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
approval
to
use
fiber
cement
panels,
which
was
not
identified
in
the
allowable
materials
in
the
gmu
zoning
district
generally,
the
ratio
ranges
between
70
to
78
of
brick
on
each
elevation
and
the
rest
of
the
elevation
will
consist
of
fiber
cement
paneling
and
to
just
go
through
these
quickly.
G
The
east
elevation
has
approximately
72
percent,
broken
glazing,
28,
fiber,
cement
panels,
south
elevation,
71,
birkin,
glazing,
29,
fiber,
cement,
the
north,
seventy
percent,
broken
glazing,
30,
fiber
cement
and
then
the
west
78
working
glazing,
22,
fiber
cement,
the
in
addition
to
the
material
requests,
they're,
also
seeking
additional
height
up
to
10
feet,
and
so
the
east
elevation,
which
is
what's
illustrated
on
the
screen
in
the
primary
elevation
they're
seeking
85
feet
of
total
height
and
the
south
elevation,
which
runs
along
first
south,
is
seeking
also
85
feet
of
additional
height
the
west
and
the
north
is
just
six
feet
of
additional
height
up
to
81..
A
Okay,
we
will
move
on
to
the
applicant's
presentation,
jason
miller
and
ryan
macau.
Sorry
you're
gonna
have
to
say
your
name,
ryan.
A
Yeah
well
all
right,
which
one
of
you
would
be
presenting.
O
I
think
we'll
probably
keep
it
relatively
short,
as
other
applicants
have
done
this
evening.
We're
just
excited
to
take
a
a
a
pretty
prominent
area
that
could
use
some
a
little
love.
We're
excited
to
get
started
on
a
big
pro
on
a
nice
project
that
will
include
some
studios
up
to
two
bedrooms.
Some
nice
views
out
to
the
city.
We've
got
five
stories
of
housing.
Two
stories
of
parking
garage
we've
got
units
at
the
street
level,
really
engaged
that
street
we've
got
a
little
bit
of
commercial
space
along
600
west.
O
I
guess
we're
just
really
excited
to
get
going
on
this.
One
we've
put
together
design,
we
think,
is
kind
of
a
historic
modern
blend.
I
guess
kind
of
an
art,
deco
sort
of
style
to
begin
with,
and
with
some
with
some
modern
flair
to
it,
and
just
appreciate
your
time
appreciate
your
consideration.
Look
forward
to
the
discussion
this
evening.
D
Well,
thank
you.
I
ryan
did
a
pretty
good
job.
There
yeah
we're
just
looking
to
improve
this
area
that
if
you
go
down
600
west
and
see
what's
there
now
it's
a
kind
of
a
rundown
area
and
we're
looking
to
really
improve
this.
D
Going
to
be
a
huge
upgrade
to
what
is
there
now,
it's
kind
of
the
direction
that
the
city
is
kind
of
growing
and
improving
towards
the
west
and,
like
ryan
said,
we've,
we've
tried
to
take
the
advice
and
counsel
from
the
the
staff.
T
D
Activate
the
street
by
having
street
units
and
not
having
our,
you,
won't
see
any
parking
garages
or
anything
like
that.
The
street
you'll
have
units
that'll,
be
you
know,
townhouse,
looking
type
units
that
come
right
off
of
the
the
sidewalk
right
there,
along
with
our
leasing
office,
which
will
be
on
the
corner
of
the
building,
as
you'll
have
some
office
space
right
there
and
then
to
towards
the
north.
D
We've
got
a
small
section
of
retail
that
could
have
you
know,
maybe
a
cookie
shop
or
a
coffee
shop,
something
right
there
at
the
street
level.
So
we've
tried
to
take
the
advice
and
and
counsel
of
kelsey
and
the
staff
and
meet
the
requirements
and
hope
that
we
will
pass
this.
Q
D
A
Okay,
commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
andre
go
ahead,
yeah.
H
So
thanks
so
much,
I
I'm
slightly
concerned
about
the
number
of
one
and
two
bedroom
units
and
no
two
bedroom,
plus
den
or
three
bedrooms.
For
a
few
reasons,
one
we
know
the
biggest
affordability
needs
are,
of
course,
families,
particularly
single-parent
families
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
we're
not
really
addressing
their
needs
and
the
filtering
this.
H
Obviously
their
housing
needs
are
mostly
met
through
filtering.
But
this
is
not
really
accelerating
that.
My
second
concern
is,
you
know
all
of
the
data
that
we're
seeing
indicates
that
most
of
the
growth
in
rents
has
been
in
two
and
three
bedroom
units
and
four
bed,
even
four
bedroom
units,
since
the
pandemic
started,
and
so
I'm
kind
of
concerned
that
we
might
end
up
with
over
supply
in
salt
lake
city
of
one
bedroom
units,
and
I'm
just
wondering
why,
focusing
on
these
one
and
two
bedroom
units
and
sort
of
slight,
like
slightly
larger
units.
O
Well,
I
could
kind
of
start
so
we
have
market
studies
done.
Obviously,
when
we
do
these
types
of
projects,
we
didn't
get
the
same
feedback
from
our
market
study
now
analysis,
and
so
I
would
kind
of
curious
to
hear
you
know.
Maybe
the
sources
that
you're
hearing
that
from
it's
an
interesting
take
for
sure,
but
it's
just
not
the
same
information.
We
start
we
received.
H
Yeah
I
mean
this
is
freddie
mac.
If
you
follow
freddie,
mac's
multi-family
reports,
I
mean
this
is
all
publicly
available
data
as
well.
As
you
know,
any
sort
of
analysis
of
affordability
will
document
that
the
greatest
share
of
households
that
are
paying
either
more
than
30
or
more
than
50
of
their
income
towards
housing
are
definitely
single-parent
households,
but
I
don't
know
who
can
which
consultant
you're
using.
H
But
I
I
maybe
it's
a
question
for
the
general
city
plan,
whether
we
have
a
housing
analysis
at
this
sort
of
city
level
in
terms
of
the
unit
mix.
We
need-
and
I
don't
know
whether
that
exists
and
whether
this
is
in
compliance
with
that.
O
Yeah
yeah,
as
I
said,
everything
would
be
interesting.
You
know
that
when
you
talk
about
you
know
single
single
parent
families
and
somebody
who'd
need
a
three
bedroom
a
unit.
Are
they
the
type
of
people
that
are
gonna,
be
right,
downtown
salt
lake
city?
Are
they
gonna
be
a
little
further?
You
know
further
east,
maybe
or
a
little
further
south,
perhaps
even
north.
H
Yeah
so
again,
you're
not
probably
building
for
those
households
but
you're
building,
so
that
there's
some
filtering
down
to
those
hustles
but
fair
question.
I
don't
think
we
know
the
answer
to
that,
but
just
generally
we
know
the
growth
has
been
in
rents,
for
you
know
larger
size
units.
Since
the
start
of
the
pandemic,
I
can
put
that.
Is
there
a
chat
function
on
webex,
no.
B
Actually,
commissioner,
we
actually
we
don't
use
the
chat
function
on
here,
just
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
comments
are
settle
outs
or
the
minutes
and
the
record,
and
I'm
gonna
say
I
think
whatever
you're
saying
by
the
way
is
very
fascinating,
but
do
do
keep
in
mind
we're
making
our
decisions.
B
I
do
have
to
be
based
on
standards
and
there
is
not
a
standard
about
unit
size,
not
to
say
that
you
couldn't
have
this
discussion
that
you
find
it
interesting,
but
just
keep
that
in
mind
as
we're
moving
through
the
meeting.
C
I
I
also
find
that
very
interesting
and-
and
and
actually
you
know
it's
true-
that
it
doesn't
reflect
an
issue
around
standards.
However,
we
we
we
are
proving
something
like
well
we're
going
to
approve,
or
we
might
approve
something
like
a
thousand
over
a
thousand
housing
units
tonight
and
I
think
very
few
of
them.
In
fact,
probably
none
are
more
than
two
bedrooms,
so
it
is
it's
important
I
think,
even
though
the
commission
can't
can't
always
do
anything
about
it.
C
A
Thank
you,
brenda.
I
have
a
question
regarding
the
standard
of
human
scale.
You
have
a
wonderful
neighbor
to
the
west,
the
wasatch
community
gardens
and
one
of
the
standards
is
regarding
minimizing
the
apparent
perception
of
height
and
shadowing,
which
is
really
important
for
a
community
garden.
So
I'm
that
west
elevation
really
looks
almost
a
little
industrial
in
the
rendering.
A
That
doesn't
mean
that's
really
how
you
intend
it,
but
I'm
concerned
about
the
the
massive
scale
of
that
considering
your
western
neighbor
is
a
community
garden,
and
you
know
the
negative
impact
and
the
standard
regarding
shadowing
and
just
that
perception
of
height.
I
would
like
your
feed
your
comments
on
that.
O
I
would
suggest-
or
I
would
propose,
that
in
downtown
salt
lake
as
as
land
starts,
continues
to
be
gobbled
up
as
quickly
as
it
is
at
rates
that
it's
going
to
that
it
is,
I
wonder
how
long
a
community
garden
will
be
able
to
to
kind
of
resist
the
temptation
to
move
on
to
other
pastures,
a
pretty
good
rate,
and
I
I
mean
it's
a
fair
point
and
I
guess
to
to
the
to
your
comment
about
the
west
elevation,
so
we're
a
little
bit
we're
a
little
bit
limited
with
regard
from
from
a
building
code
standpoint
with
regard
to
how
many,
how
much
opening
we're
allowed,
because
we're
so
close
to
the
proper
line
we're
using
as
much
of
the
land
as
as
is
feasible.
O
We're
only
limited
to
a
certain
amount
of
percentage
of
openings
across
that,
and
and
so
we're
we've
got
a
little
bit
of
a
limitation
there
and
then
obviously
the
the
durable
materials
we've
got
to
have.
You
know
a
certain
amount
of
brick
that
we're
proposing
that
upwards
of
70
percent
brick.
O
So
there's
a
lot
of
different
factors
here
that
we're
trying
to
you
know
that
we're
trying
to
to
keep
in
balance.
A
Okay,
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
there's,
like
literally
it's
just,
looks
very
flat
and
there
could
be
some
variations
in
patios
and
and
and
that-
and
I
would
I
would
let
you
know-
that
wasatch
community
gardens
is
a
very
beloved
nonprofit
in
this
city
and
very
well
supported.
So
I
see
them
there
for
quite
a
while.
S
A
See
they're
going
to
be
giving
that
up,
they're
they're
looking
to
continue
to
expand
so
kelsey.
Can
you
kind
of
comment
about
that
that
negative
impact
standard
and
how
you
reviewed
this
project
to
that
and
how
it's
relating
to
its
massive
scale,
relation
to
their
western
property
neighbor?
Of
course,.
G
Property
in
several
of
the
properties
surrounding
it,
and
so
that
is
not
a
permanent
use.
The
typically
staff
is
a
little
bit
more
flexible
on
like
undulation
and
articulation
on
interior
facades.
A
A
Okay,
we'll
move
on
we'll
open
the
public
hearing.
I
notice
we
have
one
participant
that
has
her
hand
raised
john.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
call
on
her.
Q
Yeah
hi
this
is
kelsey
moss
again
and
also
for
disclosure,
I'm
with
the
preservation,
utah
historic
preservation,
nonprofit
yeah.
I
guess
I
just
have
a
few
comments
about
this
proposal.
I
I
mean,
I
don't
think
it's
very
good.
I
I
do
apologize
to
be
so
so
upfront
about
it.
There
are
a
lot
of
historic
structures
there
from
the
1890s,
some
really
old.
You
know
historic
buildings.
Q
So
that's
a
big
concern
for
me
to
replace
it
with
quite
a
generic
large-scale
building
that
is
yeah,
I'm
just
being
replicated
and
replicated
throughout
salt
lake
city.
So
I
do
think
that
there
could
be
a
little
bit
more
effort
and
creativity
done
on
the
developers
standpoint.
Q
I
also
I'm
just
curious
why
the
height
is
why
more
height
is
needed.
I
know
those
are
the
questions
that
are
being
asked
here.
I
think
there
was
a
statement
of
two
levels
of
parking.
I
guess
I'm
curious
why
that
is
needed,
since
this
is
literally
like
across
the
street,
from
the
largest
transportation
hub
in
salt
lake.
So
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
concern
for
me
to
have
so
much
perking
put
in
here
and.
Q
I
would
just
like
to
directly
ask
the
developer:
did
they
do
any
carbon
study
impact?
You
know,
I
think
we
need
to
start
asking
developers
to
fork
up
the
money
to
show
what
the
cost
is
for
for
the
public
when
they
take
buildings
down
and
put
up
large
scale
buildings.
So
thank
you.
A
Hi,
thank
you.
Kelsey,
don't
see
any
other
hands
any
email
comments,
amy
or
john.
B
All
right,
it's
also
amy's
first
meeting
as
a
manager,
so
she
was
recently
promoted
as
well
as
case
kelsey,
so
you'll
get
to
see
kelsey's
manager
in
two
weeks.
I
think
so.
A
Well,
well
deserved.
Okay,
with
that
we're
going
to
close
the
public
hearing,
seeing
no
other
hands
raised
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
for
well,
actually
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
applicant.
If
you
want
to
take
a
moment
to
address
the
concerns
expressed
by
the
public
comment,
kelsey.
O
I
was
gonna
say
with
regard
to
the
building
height.
It's
not
a
huge
ask,
at
least
in
our
in
our
from
our
stance.
It's
not
a
huge
ask.
We
are
asking
for
a
10-foot
increase,
but
even
that
is
only
at
the
building
corners
really
to
give
some
hierarchy
to
the
to
the
exterior.
O
Primarily,
the
extra
height
is
limited
to
less
than
five
feet.
So
hopefully,
that's
not
too
big
of
an
ask
from
the
city
she
mentioned
height.
The
parking
really
is
kind
of
a
balance
between
what
the
city
you
know
allows
or
requires
versus
what
we
think.
The
demographic
that
we'll
be
living
here
will
will
have.
I
mean
yes,
we're
we're
really
promoting
public
transportation
as
much
as
we
absolutely
can,
but
the
reality
is
people
still
like
to
have
their
cars.
O
They
still
need
a
place
to
put
their
car,
and
so
again
it's
always
about
kind
of
striking
a
bounce,
particularly
in
these
urban
areas,
jason
I'll.
Let
you
go
there.
D
I
was
just
going
to
mention
on
regards
to
the
homes
that
are
there
that
are
very
dilapidated
and
old
and
run
down
and
very
barely
standing
they're.
Mastering.
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
our
concept
here
is:
we've
tried
to
have
a
lot
of
masonry
to
this
building,
and
actually
we
have
more
of
the
the
old
style,
brick
tone
red
brick
tones
on
our
building
with
a
lot
of
the
old
style
type
of
glass.
We've
got
a
dark,
bronze
or
black
glass
on
our
building
and
I
think
you'll
be
very
you're.
A
Okay,
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
at
this
point
for
a
discussion,
concerns
thoughts
or
emotions.
A
F
Well
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion,
I'm
not
thrilled
with
the
project,
but
that's
beyond
the
scope
of
what
we're
looking
at
right
now.
So,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing,
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
request
to
plan
development
and
design
review
file
numbers
pln
pcm
2021-00071.
F
For
a
new
multi-family
building,
located
at
74,
64
and
52,
south
600,
west
and
618
west
100
south
subject
to
the
following
conditions
that
the
applicant
will
work
with
the
salt
lake
city,
art
board
on
an
acceptable
public
art
piece.
Final
approval
of
details
for
street
signage
development
and
site
lighting,
off-street
loading
street
lighting
and
street
scape
details
be
delegated
to
planning
staff
lack
consolidation,
be
submitted
and
approved
by
planning
staff.
A
D
A
A
Brenda,
yes,
sarah!
Yes,
all
right!
That
motion
passes
unanimously.
We
will
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item,
which
is
number
seven
bumper
house,
design
review
and
plan
development
at
approximately
10
50.
What
or
10
1050
south
washington
street
case
number
pln
pcm
2021-00168.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
this
is
for
the
bumper
house.
Salt
lake
city
has
received
a
request
for
a
design
review
and
a
plan
development
from
george
hauser
with
m,
or
excuse
me
smh
builders
who
is
representing
the
property
owner.
G
The
proposed
redevelopment
of
the
site
would
allow
for
construction
of
a
278
residential
unit,
a
residential
structure,
with
seven
stories
that
friends
along
washington
street
and
a
future
light
rail
extension
line.
This
site
is
currently
within
walking
distance
of
the
light
rail
station
to
the
south
east,
which
is
located
on
200
west,
and
currently
the
the
site
is
used
for
outdoor
storage
and,
I
believe,
it's
vacant.
At
the
moment,
the
bumper
house
project
specifically
meets
the
standards
of
the
planned
development
and
design
review
by
providing
additional
design
elements
beyond
the
standards
of
the
cg
district.
G
This
includes
ground
floor
murals
and
projecting
balconies
that
engage
the
pedestrian
pedestrian
paths
that
connect
the
site
to
the
larger
redevelopment
potential
of
the
larger
community
and
how
the
community
relates
to
the
light
rail
extension
and
the
existing
light
rail
station
on
200,
west
and
screened
interior
parking
and
a
pedestrian
plaza
near
the
lobby
of
the
residential
structure,
because
this
site
is
in
the
cg
zoning
district.
There
are
again
a
few
design
standards
that
are
required
in
the
cg
zoning
district.
G
The
bumper
house
project
meets
these
standards
by
providing
for
operable
building
entrances
along
washington
street
and
through
the
plan,
development
and
design
review,
it's
was
determined
that
the
improved
site,
layout
and
amenities
and
additional
landscaping
on
the
site
also
meets
the
standards
in
the
cg
district
staff
has
found
that
the
bumper
house
meets
the
meets
the
intended
goals
and
of
the
central
community
master
plan
in
planned
salt
lake,
as
the
project
will
allow
for
redevelopment
of
an
underutilized
site
and
transit-oriented
development
within
walking
distance
of
a
light
rail
station.
G
The
requested
modifications
for
the
bumper
house
include
first,
an
increase
in
building
height
again.
The
cg
district
allows
by
right
a
60-foot
structure.
The
bumper
house
proposal
includes
a
request
for
19
additional
feet
that
will
allow
for
one
additional
residential
story
and
mechanical
equipment
on
the
roof
that
will
be
set
back
from
the
facades
of
the
structure,
so
it
will
screen
the
mechanical
mechanical
equipment
on
the
roof
from
the
street.
G
G
The
upper
floors
between
three
through
seven
floors
will
project
into
the
setbacks
of
four
feet
with
projecting
balconies
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
modification,
as
the
intent
of
the
district
is
improved
and
preserved
through
a
four
foot
wide
balcony
that
is
practicable
and
and
there
which
a
narrower
back
balcony
would
render
too
narrow
and
not
as
comfortable
to
actually
use
to
the
residents
and
the
first
and
second
floor
setbacks
are
being
maintained
and
the
10
foot
front
and
rear
yards
will
be
fully
landscaped.
G
These
conditions
again
relate
to
the
lock
consolidation
since
there's
most
multiple
parcels
at
the
moment,
and
a
separate
review
is
required
for
proposed
transformer
in
the
front
yard
area
of
the
building.
It's
also
requested
that
additional
trees
are
provided
in
the
park
strip
at
a
rate
of
one
tree
per
30
feet
of
frontage.
G
So
planning
staff
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
requests
his
staff
has
found.
The
proposed
development
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
district
in
the
planned
development
and
design
review
standards
and
george
hauser
is
the
applicant,
and
I
believe
I
did
see
him
in
this
meeting
here.
E
G
A
C
Yeah,
I
I
actually
have
a
question
about
that
about
the
alleyway,
and
maybe
this
is
your
question
too
amy
I
mean
we.
We
approved
the
project
just
to
the
north
there
and
sort
of
required
it
to
have
a
sort
of
sidewalk
on
that
alleyway.
C
That
would
anticipate
that
that
be
a
pedestrian
amenity
at
a
future
point
in
time,
especially
when
this
project
gets
developed,
and
now
we
are
looking
at
this
project,
basically
coming
right
up
to
that
alleyway
without
any
setback
whatsoever,
and
so
I
was
wondering
if
you
had
any
had
considered
that
as
a
part
of
any
requirements
in
terms
of
the
conditional
uses
that
are
that
are
being
asked
for
here.
G
G
As
far
as
the
public
improvement
of
that
alley
or
the
improvement
of
that
alley
that
wasn't
discussed,
there
is
a
pedestrian
path
towards
the
west.
That
would
connect
chrome
works.
The
planning
commission
previously
approved
to
the
bumper
house
project
and
then
it
this
pedestrian
path
would
curve
to
the
south
heading
east
in
order
to
connect
it
with
a
redevelopment
project.
That's.
G
That
could
potentially
happen
with
the
property
to
the
south
and
to
the
east
of
the
subject
site,
but
a
discussion
about
the
improvement
of
that
public
alley
towards
the
north
was
not
had
between
staff
and
the
applicant.
But
that's
something
that
if
you
want
to
talk
to
the
applicant
about
you
know,
I
think
it's
opened
to
discussion.
Of
course.
Thank
you
name.
G
Side,
the
front
yard
is
to
washington
street,
since
that's
the
only
public
street
on
the
site,
the
uta
right-of-way
to
the
west
is
considered
to
be
the
rear
property.
G
So
you
are
able
to
access
from
brooklyn
avenue
to
washington
street.
It's
pretty
industrial
right
now,
there's
not
a
sidewalk,
there's
no
curb
and
gutter,
but
it
is
accessible
right
now
I
was
out
at
the
site
and
you
can
get
to
it
either
through
walking
or
bike
with
your
car.
A
Okay,
you
talked
about
pedestrian
paths
in
your
report,
but
exactly
where
are
they
on
here?.
G
Yeah,
so
the
pedestrian
path
to
the
west
is
along
here,
which
is
what's
labeled,
the
uta
right-of-way
and
that's
a
future
light
rail
extension
on
all
of
the
light
rail
extension
scenarios.
That
uta
has
surveys
on
at
the
moment
and
then
there's
a
pedestrian
path
towards
the
south,
as
well
as
a
building
setback,
and
then
it's
just
a
wider
pedestrian
path.
That's
the
sidewalk!
That's
landscaped
that
it's
not
currently
being.
A
Okay
with
that,
we
will
move
on
to
the
applicant
portion.
Mr,
do
you
have
a
presentation
that
you
I.
A
Okay,
so
if
john
can
give
you
presenter
rights,
I
think
it
would
also
be
great
if
you
could
pay
some
attention
in
your
presentation
too.
You
got
a
tough
parcel
here.
What
improvements
are
gonna
be
made
for
that
even
vehicle
mobility,
but
for
pedestrian
mobility
as
well.
E
E
This
is
a
kind
of
a
vicinity
map
which
shows
this
green
line
is
the
the
future
tracks.
Extension.
That's
going
to
go
up,
I
think
going
to
go
up,
400
west
branching
off
at
paxton,
or
something
like
that
from
200
west.
We
have
two
track
stations:
the
1300
station
and
the
two,
the
900
south
station,
so
good
good,
transit
access,
but
washington
dead
ends
right
here.
There's
a
parking
lot
here,
but
it
basically
does
it
in
this
little
light
gray
square.
E
So
this
is
a
this
is
a
problem
because
you
don't
have
any
through
traffic,
so
this
is
also
the
alley
that
was
spoken
of
earlier
and
then
the
the
other
project
that
was
reviewed
last
year.
269
brooklyn
is
located
right
on
on
brooklyn
and
buttside
alley,
so
here's
a
kind
of
a
more
detailed
site
plan.
E
The
our
our
hope
was
that
in
the
future
that
when,
when
this
right-of-way
is
developed,
it'll
become
similar
to
the
tracks
extension
that
goes
out
into
sugar
hospital.
I
think
from
the
central
station
and
it'll
be
developed
with
a
bike
and
pedestrian
pathway.
Landscaping.
E
E
People
coming
down
south
washington
would
actually
be
able
to
to
that's
right
would
actually
be
able
to
move
through
the
dead
end
at
south
washington
out
into
the
out
into
this
this
right
away,
and
we
provided
a
10
foot
setback
on
the
rear
yard,
which
we're
going
to
landscape
and
also
provide
a
walkway
along
there,
as
we
have
done
on
on
the
269
project,
in
hopes
that
as
these,
these
sites
that
are
south
of
us,
which
are
now
industrial
sites,
mostly
under
utilize.
E
Some
large
parking
lots
and
some
areas
that
are
being
used
as
as
industrial
storage,
that
we'll
build
build
a
pathway
along
here
which
will
allow
our
residents
to
come
out
of
this
out
of
our
lobby
here
and
and
transition
down
into
the
right
away
and
then
make
their
way
down
to
the
track
station
on
a
diagonal
basis.
E
Rather
than
having
to
come
way
out
to
brooklyn
and
walk
down
brooklyn
and
then
get
to
200
west
we're
also
hoping
that
I
know
this
part,
this
neighborhood
is
possibly
being
rezoned
and
we
hope
that
we
hope
that
we'll
build
in
some
provisions
for
mid-block
connectors
as
an
opportunity
for
a
connector
right
here
that
would
tie
us
back
into
200
west.
As
far
as
the
public
alley
is
concerned,
we
I,
I
don't,
think
we
ever
committed
to
providing
a
sidewalk
on
here.
E
I
think
what
I
thought
was
was
that
the
alley
itself
was
going
to
become
the
walkway,
because
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
go
anywhere.
We
we
have
some
residential
units
on
this
side
down
here
near
the
end
which
access
it
and
it
accesses
our
walkways
along
the
west
side.
But
our
garage
on
269
comes
in
from
brooklyn.
We
have
a.
We
have
an
entry
here,
but
it's
really
just
there
for
convenience.
E
It
won't
be
used,
and
so
we
were
thinking
that
this,
this
hollywood
might
might
even
have
you
know
bollards
on
it,
removable
wallets
or
something
like
that,
and
it
would
be
completely
converted
to
pedestrian
access.
So
so
it
in
fact
would
become
a
sidewalk.
It's
only
15
feet
wide,
but
it
would
provide
this
connection
back
to
the
to
the
right-of-way.
E
This
is
the
view
again
from
the
looking
up
there
right
away
and
kind
of
our
hopes
for
the
future
development
of
that
right
away
and
how
our
building
relates
to
that
and
our
lobby
again
here
is
a
is
a
way
of
providing
an
overview
of
the
connector
between
south
washington
and
the
right-of-way,
and
activate
that
dead-end
portion
of
south
washington,
which
is
a
an
attractive
nuisance.
E
You
know
we're
building,
essentially
workforce
housing
here
located
near
transit
resources.
Again,
it's
two
levels:
it's
actually,
I
think
nan
misto
is
spoke.
It's
287
units
not
278.,
predominantly
studios,
but
there
there's
a
25
one
batteries
in
30
25,
one
bedrooms,
30
one,
two
bedrooms,
145
vehicle
parking
spaces.
E
So
it's
roughly
at
the
rate
of
one
space
for
every
two
units
and
a
lot
of
secure
biking,
bike
storage,
we're
developing
new
sidewalk,
there's
no
sidewalk
now
on
south
washington,
so
we're
developing
that
with
a
park
strip
and
a
10
foot
setback
a
new
sidewalk.
We
have
a
bump
out
associated
with
our
lobby.
There'll
be
bike
parking
there.
We
hope
to
build
a
concrete
bench.
E
E
This
is
identifying
those
various
elements.
Here's
the
lobby.
The
lobby
has
a
kind
of
a
two
pieces.
It
has
a
clubhouse
at
the
back
and
then
a
large
open
space.
There's
a
two-story
open
space,
mostly
glass
along
the
washington
in
the
south,
into
the
building
facade
right
along
this
connector
back
to
the
right-of-way,
but
kind
of
a
shot
of
a
possible
aesthetic
for
the
lobby
live
trying
to
provide
good,
open
space
amenities.
We
have
balconies
on
most
of
the
units.
E
We
have
a
landscape
interior
courtyard,
which
is
is
not
for
common
use,
but
is
a
common
visual
element.
The
units
that
front
under
the
courtyard
will
be
able
to
look
onto
a
green
space,
so
we
also
have
a
developed
roof
with
raised,
raised,
gardens,
elevator
access
and
it
will
be
developed
with
you
know,
raised
roof
deck
and
screening.
In
order
to
you
know,
protect
people
from
the
wind
and
the
elements
we
we're
gonna
incorporate
murals
on
both
sides
of
the
building.
E
These
are
placeholders,
we'll
we'll
work
with
staff
to
arrive
at
an
appropriate
mural
for
both
both
facades.
This
essentially
screens
the
parking
area,
the
parking
area.
You
know
it's
very
difficult
on
these
brownfield
sites
to
go
down
because
of
the
the
contamination
issues
involved
and
we're
doing
a
lot
of
cleanup
on
the
site.
But
you
know
there's,
there's
always
a
potential
for
a
remedial
contamination,
and
so
it's
essentially
it's
a
capping,
the
site
with
a
concrete
slab,
and
so
we
wanted
to
avoid
going
down
in
the
cost
of
remediating.
E
E
I
think
of
this
one
mechanical
penthouse,
the
stair
penthouse
and
the
elevator
are
not
our
exceptions,
so
our
roof
is
only
about
eight
feet
above
the
height
limit
and
the
parapets
about
12
feet.
Mr.
E
This
is
this
is
the
balcony
extensions
that
that
are
required
under
the
plant
development
application
and
coaching
into
the
front
yard,
quick
views
of
some
of
our
unit
finishes
and
sorry.
This
is
this
is
a
the
other
view
of
the
project
from
the
right
away,
so
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you
for
considering
our
application.
A
Great,
thank
you,
mr
houser.
Commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
H
Actually,
can
you
like
expand
a
little
bit,
why
we
need
the
height.
E
Well,
first
of
all,
we
we
feel
like
the
height
is
appropriate.
I
mean
this
is
a
big
area.
It's
it's!
It's!
It
can
handle
this
kind
of
height.
You
know
it's
on
a
it's
on
a
right
away,
so
it
has
70
feet
of
open
space
permanently,
opens
open
space
in
front
of
it
on
this
side
and
the
street
on
the
other
side
is
66
feet
wide
and
you
know
we're
we've
done
in
our
specialty
is
urban
infill
projects
and
we
feel
like
there's
a
need
for
this
kind
of
housing.
E
You
know
this
is
workforce
housing.
It's
it
it's
at
relatively
low
low
rent
levels
because
of
the
unit
sizes
and
it's
in
a
transit
district.
Where
you
know,
there's
there'll
be
a
high
demand
for
this
and
it's
on
a
retail
corridor
with
a
lot
of
employment
opportunities,
and
so
we
feel
like
it's
important
to
you
know
to
you,
know,
get
some
density
in
here
and
and
really
build
momentum
for
a
pedestrian
pedestrian-oriented
experience
we
want
to.
We
want
to
see
this.
E
This
neighborhood
transformed
into
something
that,
where
there's
people
on
the
street,
you
know,
instead
of
it
being,
you
know,
vacant
at
night,
and
we
want
to
see
people
walking
to
the
track,
stops
and
and
walking
to
the
you
know
the
future
commercial
resources
in
the
neighborhood,
particularly
along
central
ninth,
you
can
see
how
that's
developing
now,
it's
it's
really
become.
A
dynamic
is
becoming
a
dynamic
neighborhood
and
we
want
to
contribute
to
that
and
we
feel
like
the
density
is
important.
E
We
need
to
bring
this
kind
of
density
in
order
to
in
order
to
create
these
vital
communities
and
one
of
the
great
things
about
this
neighborhood
that
I
love
is
200
west,
all
right.
It's
not
300
west,
which
is
so
difficult
to
navigate,
but
200
west
is
a
street
that
is
very
calm,
there's
not
a
lot
of
traffic
on
it.
E
It
has
a
tracks
line
on
it,
but
it's
it's
it's
a
street
that
is
really
ideal
for
pedestrian-oriented
activities,
and
we
want
to
see
more
of
that
develop
and
we
want
to
be
here
providing
the
the
you
know,
the
population
that
will
that
will
foster
that
kind
of
development.
H
E
Yeah,
you
know,
I
I'm
not
sure
that
that
we
see
the
the
long-term
demand
for
family
housing
in
a
multi-family
setting.
You
know
the
valley.
Has
the
the
front
has
a
you
know.
It
has
a.
It
has
a
very
robust
development
effort
in
the
single-family
home
area.
You
know-
and
that's
that's
fine.
You
know
it's
not
it's
not
what
we
do,
but
you
know
people
once
they
get
to
the
level
of
having
a
family.
E
They
they
start
to
want
to
move
into
the
town
home
environment
and
they
want
to
move
into
a
single
family,
home
environment,
and
our
hope
is
that
by
generating
studios
we
can
actually
relieve
some
of
the
pressure
on
multi,
larger
units
for
families
and
away
from
you
know,
households
where
you
have
two
or
three
single
adults,
sharing
a
a
three-bedroom
unit
or
something
like
that
and
they'll
they'll
move
into
these
units
because
they'll
have
their
own
their
own
space.
So
we
think
that
there's
going
to
be
a
long-term
need
for
this.
E
It
can
serve
an
older
population
as
the
population
ages
and
they
want
to
go
away
from.
You
know
they're
they're,
they're,
three
three
bedroom
home,
and
so
we
think
that
there's
going
to
be
a
long-range
demand
for
this
and
and
we're
excited
about
providing
it
and
we're
happy
to
you
know
to
to
own
it
and
to
manage
it.
You
know
into
the
future.
F
E
No
we've
actually
tucked
a
few
residential
units
in,
but
but
the
so
in
fact,
if
you
can
still
see
this
slide,
there
are
residential
units
on
the
adjoining
the
lobby
and
then
there's
another
residential
unit
stack
of
residential
units
out
here
at
the
the
kind
of
apex
of
the
building.
But
you
know
it's
it's
also.
It's
also.
E
You
know
if
you,
if
you
want
to
provide
the
parking,
we're
not
big
on
parking,
we've
done
projects
that
don't
have
any
parking,
but
you
know
investors
want
parking,
you
know
and
they
want
to
see
a
problem.
You
know
we
haven't
turned
the
corner
on
the
no
parking
building.
You
know
I
mean
I
think
we're
getting
there,
but
it's
it
hasn't
happened
yet.
So,
if
you
want
to
put
parking
in
and
you're
trying
to,
you
know
get
to
that
one
to
two
ratio.
We
can
actually
get
a
little
bit
below
that.
E
It's
hard
parking
takes
a
lot
of
space,
you
know,
and
this
we
did
our
best
here
to
to
fit
it
all
in
and
then
pack
in
some
some
active
uses
around
the
you
know
the
the
ends
of
the
building,
where
we
thought
it
was
important
to
have
them.
E
A
Okay,
we
will
move
on
to
the
public
comment
period.
It
looks
like
we
have
one
person
with
their
hand
raised.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
leftover
from
last
time,
but
john.
If
you
want
to
call
on
her
we'll
open
the
public
comments
section.
B
A
Q
I
did
yes
well
I'll,
probably
get
tired
with
me,
so
kelsey
moss,
again
yeah
so
funny
enough.
Q
This
is
like
a
few
blocks
from
where
I
live
now,
and
I
guess
I
do
have
comments
or
concerns
about
the
additional,
the
height
edition
or
request,
but
it
seems
like
for
an
additional
story
essentially
and
and
the
mechanics,
because
you
have
the
i19
ramp,
that's
right
there,
and
so
I
just
think
for
that'll
be
interesting,
because
when
you're
coming
off
that
ramp,
all
of
the
apartments
that
are
quite
tall
in
the
area
and
don't
really
fit
the
rest
of
the
the
neighborhood,
I
would
say
a
block
or
two
over
where
there's
more
single-family
homes.
Q
You
can
see
them
quite
clearly
from
from
the
you
know
on
and
off
ramp.
So
especially
if
they're
making
space
up
there,
I
I
would
get
concerned
about
having
that
be
so
high
and
also
just
it's
a
it's
transitioning
I
get
between
200,
west
and
300
west,
but
you
see
these
larger
apartments
getting
more
height
added
and
they
really
do
disrupt
the
historic
structures
that
are
already
there.
So
I
I'm
a
little
nervous
about
granting
additional
heights
to
the
building.
Q
For
that
that
reason
I
mean
I
love
that
it's
info,
I
think,
it'll
be
great
with
the
with
all
the
proposed
tracks
and
the
the
two
track
stations
that
are
already
kind
of
book
ending
it,
but
I
think
I
just
add
to
that
the
comments
that
have
been
said
I
mean
there
were
so
many
studios
in
this
apartment.
I
I
just
think
salt
lake
city
has
so
many
studios.
We
don't
need
more.
You
know
I'm
a
millennial.
Q
I
I
understand
wanting
to
live
on
your
own,
but
there
is
luckily
there
is
a
park
nearby
here,
but
having
a
small
space
and
just
a
tiny
balcony
in
a
in
a
quite
industrial
area.
Q
D
A
You
go
okay
there.
It
goes.
That
was
bizarre
because
it
didn't
show
up.
Okay,
any
other
written
comments
that
you've
received
amy
nope.
A
B
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
developer
for
addressing
the
issue
along
the
west
side
and
allowing
for
for
a
pathway.
C
I
I
have
to
say
I
actually
visited
this
site
today
in
my
10
project
tour,
but
self
tour
which
took
me
three
hours,
but
this
is
a
site
that
is
has
obviously
a
lot
of
industrial
remediation
to
do
in
order
for
this
project
to
go
forward.
I
think
it's
really
interesting
that
the
applicant
chose
to
put
the
the
front
so
to
speak,
the
lobby
on
the
far
southwest
corner.
C
F
F
A
Okay,
oh
we're
fighting
over
it.
I
like
it.
Okay,
we
have
a
first
or
a
motion
from
adrian
and
a
second
from
mike
any
discussions
to
the
motion.
Okay,
we'll
take
a
vote.
Andra
abstain,
okay,
maureen,
yes,
andreas.
D
A
Okay,
with
that,
we
have
six
yes
votes
and
one
abstention.
The
motion
passes.
You
are
clear
to
move
on
mr
houser.
Thank
you
for
your
presentation
tonight.
Let's
do
a
move
on
to
number
eight
item
on
our
agenda.
The
june
design
review
at
approximately
636
south
300
west
case
number
pln
pcm
2021-00503.
G
This
is
a
design
review
for
the
june
at
approximately
636
south
300
west.
I
will
try
to
go
ahead
and
keep
this
brief.
The
proposal
is
for
a
new
multi-family
building
on
the
west
side
of
300
west
between
600,
south
and
700.
Several
the
property
is
approximately
3
30
000
square
feet
and
is
zone
d2
downtown
support.
The
proposed
building
is
seven
stories.
G
Two
stories
of
podium
parking
with
a
hundred
spaces
with
active
uses,
wrapping
the
podium
parking
on
the
first
floor
and
then
the
upper
five
stories
are
residential
units
and
there
are
a
total
of
102
units
and
staff
is
recommending
approval.
With
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report,
the
design
review
request
is
required
for
the
requested
building
height
of
85
feet
in
the
d2
zoning
district
building
heights
above
65.
Feet
require
design,
review
and
120
feet
is
the
maximum
permitted
with
design
review.
This
is
a
rendering
of
the
front
facade.
G
There
is
a
storefront
glass
system
on
the
podium
floors
which
is
broken
up
in
the
center
with
a
landscape
wall.
Brick
is
the
primary
building
material
on
the
upper
floors.
The
65
feet
permitted
by
right
is
at
approximately,
where
the
brick
on
the
front
facade
ends
at
the
top
of
the
fourth
residential
floor.
G
As
detailed
in
the
key
considerations
of
the
staff
report,
the
proposal
meets
the
goals
and
policies
in
the
downtown
plan
and
plan
salt
lake.
There
is
a
mid-block
walkway
proposed
for
this
block
and
after
discussions
with
the
applicant
and
planning
staff,
it
was
determined
that
the
mid-block
walkway
would
be
better
located
on
the
property
to
the
south.
That
extends
across
the
full
block,
and
the
proposal
also
meets
the
design
review
and
underlying
d2
zoning
district
standards.
G
A
Okay,
it
looks
like
we
have
nick
meister
is
the
applicant
that
is
here.
S
Oh
yes,
good
evening,
jason
alaska
is
the
architect
on
this
project.
He's
president
as
well.
A
Oh,
I
see
jason
m
okay
yeah
all
right
who
will
be
doing
the
presentation.
S
So
we
don't
actually
have
a
formal
presentation
to
present,
but
we,
you
know
we're
gonna,
say
a
few.
A
few.
A
Will
you
both
have
ten
minutes
collectively
go
ahead.
S
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
sarah
for
that
introduction.
I
think
she
did
a
a
good
and
fair
job
of
summarizing
the
project
as
it
stands
today.
In
fact,
actually,
if,
if
you
could
allow
jason
to
share
his
screen,
he
does
have
some
supplementary
renderings
just
to
kind
of
give
additional
context
to
the
project.
S
Yeah,
so
we
are
representing
cw
urban
and
we're
excited
to
kind
of
present
this
additional
multi-family
project
for
downtown
the
june.
We're
excited
about
the
project.
We
spent
a
fair
bit
of
time
kind
of
digging
into
some
design
elements
trying
to
present
and
produce
a
product.
That's
a
little
bit
different
for
the
area.
The
existing
site
is
occupied
by
kind
of
a
you
know:
a
self-service
car
wash
it's
a
bit
dilapidated
and
a
pet
retail
store.
So
we
think
this
will
add
a
nice
compliment
to
this
community.
S
S
S
B
I
gave
you
the
I
will
give
that
to
jason
sorry,
I
miss
her
dude,
so
jason
you
should
be
able
to
present
now.
T
Okay,
nick,
I
felt,
like
you
had
more
to
say.
S
I
was
just
going
to
kind
of
wrap
up
kind
of
the
amenity
package,
so
in
addition
to
kind
of
the
gym
and
the
rooftop
or
the
court,
no
courtyard
deck
there.
You
know
this
also
has
the
benefit
of
being
next
to
r
r
barbecue.
So
you
get
some
nice
wafts
of
smoked
meat
if
they
do
choose
to
open
their
windows
and
then,
of
course,
you
know
views
of
the
city
and
especially
for
those
kind
of
upper
level
units
that
have
nice,
rooftop
decks
and
things.
S
So
I
think
you
know
in
the
interest
of
saving
time
on
this
long
agenda,
we
will
kind
of
wrap
it
up
there.
If
jason
has
any
additional
comments
from
a
design
perspective
that
he'd
like
to
share,
go
ahead,
jason.
T
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
design.
I
echo
what
nick
said.
It's,
and
actually
I
wanted
to
say
working
with
sarah-
has
been
really
great.
It's
pretty
easy
to
move
fast
on
some
of
these
designs
and
architects
are
always
a
bit
swamped
and
working
with
sarah.
She
helped
us
catch
some
of
what
at
first
seemed
like
restrictions
to
a
site
and
specific
zoning
requirements,
but
she
helped
us
develop
a
better
product.
T
I
think
in
the
end,
and
so
I
yeah
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
to
sarah,
it's
been
great
working
with
her
in
the
city.
We
kind
of
wanted
to
adopt
the
urban
vibe
of
the
city
as
the
city
kind
of
stretches
out
its
density
core,
its
dense
core
and
as
the
post
is
coming
in.
We
like
the
idea
of
sort
of
the
dense
city
garden,
brick
and
light
that
we're
going
to
try
and
exude
in
this
building.
T
One
of
the
big
moves
that
sarah
helped
us
kind
of
land
on
was
because
there
was
a
requirement
for
activated
ground
space.
We
thought
we
would
not
only
just
create
a
storefront
system,
but
do
something
that
can
interact
with
the
street
a
bit
more,
so
we're
we
want
to
integrate
some
translucent
storefront
panels
that
will
carry
light
nice
soft
ambient
light
onto
the
street
at
night
and
don't
freak
out
if
this
seems
a
bit
bright.
It's
kind
of
hard
to
expose
a
picture
correctly
when
you're
rendering
it
from
a
computer.
T
But
the
idea
is
have
a
soft
glow
at
night
that
speaks
to
the
street
and
then,
during
the
day
time.
That
light
obviously
reverses
into
that
lobby
area
and
and
some
of
that
parking
garage
on
the
second
level.
Again
we're
trying
to
use
high
quality
materials
on
the
front
facade,
that's
street,
facing
we're
gonna
use
full
masonry,
brick
and
metal
panel.
T
We're
also
trying
to
get
as
much
fenestration
into
the
building
as
possible,
while
making
it
still
affordable
for
the
developer
to
build
so
we're
using
some
pella
window
systems
and
we're
going
to
utilize
again,
some
frosted
glass
and
some
large
storefront
floor
to
almost
ceiling
height
glass,
so
that
the
the
residents
in
these
units
are
going
to
have
a
view
of
the
growing
city
in
front
of
them
and
one
of
one
of
the
things
it's
actually.
Maybe
I
need
like
a
another
rendering.
T
But
if
you
look
at
some
of
these
back
units
behind
the
front
facade,
there's
this
sloped
roof
and
what
we've
got
are
some
transom
windows.
So
all
of
the
units
on
the
top
floor
have
kind
of
some
clara
story,
light
coming
in
to
just
really
light
up
those
units
up
there
and
again
we're
using
large
glass
back
there.
T
I
think
this
is
a
cool
neighborhood
like
the
post
is
coming
in
up
north
and
that's
going
to
be
quite
dense.
This
site
that
we're
on
is
small
enough
that
we
are
a
little
bit
hard-pressed
to
get
some
amenities,
but
I
think
one
of
the
great
amenities
in
my
personal
opinion
of
any
apartment
is
just
the
city
that
it's
in,
if
you
can
create
an
inviting
enough
building
that
contributes
to
the
the
fabric
of
the
city
and
the
people
are
obviously
using
all
the
amenities
in
the
city.
T
I
think
that's
just
a
great
symbiosis
that
we're
trying
to
celebrate
here
that
atmosphere,
studio,
just
south
of
us
is
a
pretty
cool
company
and
they
kind
of
do
these.
They
kind
of
focus
on
like
company
branding
and
space
design
and
they're
also
doing
some
art
exhibits
and
things,
and
so
you
know
I'm
imagining
people
walking
to
and
from
such
a
spaces
as
that,
like
in
a
nice
cool
urban
environment.
Next
to
the
light,
I
just
think
it.
I
think
it's
a
good.
T
I
think
it's
a
good
design
and
I
guess
I
should
mention
the
unit
mix.
We've
got
a
102
units
and
20
studios
20
about
22
beds,
there's
one
three
bed
and
about
61
beds.
T
So
it's
one
bed
heavy.
I
think,
as
we
study
the
markets
and
we're
seeing
it's
a
tricky
mix,
you
know
I
we
would
like
to
see.
Obviously
anyone
living
downtown
who
wants
to
live
downtown
but
there's
obviously
an
influx
of
young
people
or
single
people,
or
maybe
career-minded
individuals,
or
maybe
young
new
families
who
are
looking
for
a
dent
who
basically
appreciate
the
dense
environment
of
the
city
and
are
willing
to
move
in
to
an
apartment.
T
They
aren't
looking
for
a
house
in
the
suburb
or
even
a
a
town
home
in
the
suburb
they're.
Looking
for
a
clean,
fresh
apartment
with
some
urban
vibes-
and
you
know
that's
close
to
all
of
the
amenities
of
the
city-
and
I
think
that's
what
we're
kind
of
providing
one
of
the
there
are
a
few
penthouses
in
this
project
and
that's
kind
of
why
we
wanted
to
ask
for
the
height
is
we
wanted
to?
T
All
in
all,
it's
been
a
great
experience
working
with
sarah
and
like
to
turn
the
time
back
over
to
you
all.
A
Okay,
thank
you
stop
that,
commissioner,
is
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
F
Go
ahead,
what
kinds
of
uses
are
you
anticipating
for
the
first
two
floors
on
the
street
facade.
T
T
One
of
the
zoning
requirements
is
that
you
can't
have
parking
within
25
feet
or
is
it
25
or
30
feet
of
the
actual
street
facade?
So
that's
where
we're
putting
our
entry
lobbies
and
our
lobby
and
leasing
office
and
we're
gonna
have
a
mail
and
parcel
room.
T
Also
that's
right
on
the
street,
and
that
sounds
silly
to
have
a
like,
like.
Maybe
a
male
and
parcel
room
isn't
super
sexy,
but
these
days
with
people
essentially
ordering
almost
80
percent
of
their
stuff
on
amazon
in
in
up
and
coming
apartments,
it's
kind
of
an
issue
of
having
boxes
stacking
around
in
the
wrong
places.
So
we
want
to
provide
kind
of
a
luxury
parcel
room
and
make
it
easy
for
the
delivery
people
that
come
in.
T
You
know
the
other
night
I
had
ordered
a
gift
from
my
niece
and
you
know:
amazon
doesn't
necessarily
hire
drivers
and
give
them
a
truck.
They
just
hire
almost
anyone
who
wants
almost
like
uber
drivers
and
making
it
easy
for
those
people
who
don't
necessarily
have
access
to
a
building
and
don't
need
want
to
climb
up
and
look
for.
You
know
unit
503,
just
giving
them
access
on
the
front.
So
that's
the
main
use
up
there
and
then,
like
nick
said,
there
are
some
amenities
on
the
the
third
level.
Q
T
We're
going
to
have
we
wanted
to
do
something
cool
for
the
residents
that
wasn't
just
a
lounge,
so
we're
going
to
do
a
kind
of
like
a
wework
space.
I'm
not
sure
if
you
guys
are
familiar
with
wework.
They
would
rent
out
individual
desks
to
people
we're
not
going
to
be
renting
out
desks,
but
we
want
to
create
like
a
environment
where
residents
can
come
down
and
stretch
out
of
it
and
do
some
office
work.
T
You
know
with
the
advent
advent
of
covid
it'd
be
nice
to
have
places
to
plug
in
all
your
peripherals
and
get
top
speed
internet
and
we're
gonna
provide
some
small
office
spaces
that
you
residents
can
share
and
reserve
and
do
their
zoom
calls
and
things
like
that,
and
then
then,
we'll
have
an
outdoor
patio
with
some
plantings
and
some
stuff
like
that.
So.
H
Quick
question:
jason
thanks
so
much
for
the
presentation.
This
does
look
like
a
beautiful
building
and
I'm
excited
to
hear
about
the
co-working
space,
because
I
you
know,
there's
definitely
a
need
for
that
for
these
young
folks
that
are
going
to
be
working
from
home.
What
is
the
precise
unit
mix
and
I
apologize?
I
I
saw
the
report.
There
was
studios,
one
bedrooms
and
two
bedrooms.
Can
you.
T
Be
more
specific
yeah,
so
it's
I
kind
of
rambled
off
them.
Let
me
just
jump
to
that
page
and
you
can.
T
Yeah,
let
me
zoom
in
here
this
is
the
precise
unit
mix.
Obviously,
there's
type
a
studios
type
a
two
beds,
but
if
you
want
to
look
through,
you
can
see
here's
the
count
just
next
to
it.
You
can
see
the
square
footage.
Essentially,
we've
got
20
studios,
we
have
about
64
one
bedrooms
and
we've
got
about.
T
A
All
right
with
that,
we
will
move
to
the
open
the
public
hearing.
I
don't
show
anybody
with
their
hands
up,
but
did
we
get
any
written
comments.
A
If
there
is
any
member
of
the
public
that
does
wish
to
speak,
please
go
ahead
and
click
that
hand
in
the
lower
right
hand
corner
of
your
screen
to
let
us
know
you
want
to
speak
okay,
going
going,
we
will
close
the
public
hearing,
seeing
that
there's
no
one
raising
their
hand
and
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
commission
for
a
discussion
on
this
item
and
eventually
a
motion.
A
C
C
Number
two
approval
for
the
specific
items
discussed
and
identified
in
the
staff
report.
All
other
applicable
zoning
regulations
and
requirements
from
their
city
department
still
apply
and
number
three.
The
involved
lot
shall
be
consolidated
through
the
lot
consolidation
process.
As
per
chapter
20.32
of
the
subdivisions
and
condominiums
orient
ordinances,.
A
D
F
A
A
Maybe
I'm
losing
the
ability
to
read
too
bar
establishment
conditional
use
at
approximately
1508
south
1500
east
case
number
pln
pcm
2021-00682.
L
Great.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
a
conditional
use
request
for
a
bar
establishment
at
approximately
1508
south
1500
east.
The
applicant
is
scott
evans.
He's
the
tenant
leasing,
the
property
he
intends
to
use
the
space
for
a
wine
bar
and
workspace.
The
property
is
located
in
the
neighborhood
commercial
zoning
district,
which
requires
a
conditional
use
approval
for
a
bar
establishment,
25
2500
excuse
me
square
feet
or
less
than
four
area.
This
project
is
before
the
planning
commission,
because
this
type
of
request
requires
approval
from
the
planning
commission.
L
The
project
is
located
within
the
15th
and
15th
neighborhood
business
district
within
an
existing
building.
The
proposed
project
includes
13
197
square
feet
of
interior
space
and
189
square
feet
of
exterior
exterior
patio
space
in
front
of
the
building.
The
site
includes
a
total
of
six
on
site
parking
spaces
and
the
projected
hours
of
operation
are
from
5
pm
to
12
a.m.
Seven
days
a
week
the
business
anticipates
having
three
employees
during
peak
hours
and
the
proposed
bar
has
a
total
of
approximately
47
seats.
L
This
shows
an
existing
photo
of
the
building
on
the
left
outlined
in
the
red
square,
and
then
this
rendering
provided
by
the
applicant
showing
the
least
space
as
viewed
from
1500
east
looking
west.
L
These
are
some
photos
of
the
surrounding
development.
Neighboring
uses
include
restaurant
uses,
bakery
bookstore
art
gallery
the
photo
on
the
bottom
right
hand.
Corner
shows
the
adjacent
residential
uses
to
the
west.
Those
are
separated
by
an
alley
in
mature
vegetation,
more
photos
of
the
surrounding
area.
L
And
staff
has
reviewed
the
project
for
compliance
with
the
standards
for
conditional
use,
staff's
analysis
and
findings
are
located
in
attachment
f
of
the
staff
report.
Additionally,
staff
has
reviewed
the
east
east
bench
master
plan
on
plan
salt
lake
and
finds
the
proposed
uses
supported
by
those
adopted
plans.
L
Those
supporting
goals
and
policy
statements
are
found
in
attachment
d
of
the
staff
report
and
again,
staff
is
recommending
approval
with
conditions,
one
condition
that
they
report
the
security
and
operations
plan
at
the
county
reporter's
office.
This
is
a
requirement
for
alcohol
related
uses
and
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions
or
comments
at
this
time.
The
applicant
scott
evans,
as
well
as
the
architect
team,
is
also
on
the
line.
If
there's
any
questions
for
them,.
D
D
Yes,
I
think
I'll
be
less
than
that.
I
appreciate
everyone
staying
staying
up
so
late
and
still
keeping
us
on
the
agenda,
so
we
can
discuss
this
project
today.
So
essentially,
I
think
the
the
staff
highlighted
everything
pretty
clearly
we're
a
really
small
project,
and
this
is
part
of
the
process
for
us
to
be
able
to
obtain
the
liquor
license.
So
we
could
open
for
business.
D
Just
part
of
the
information-
that's
not
all
not
on
that
report
is
that
I
am
you
know,
owner
of
pago
restaurant
group,
I
had
a
group
of
seven
restaurants
before
the
pandemic
went
down
to
two
I'm
just
kind
of
rebuilding
again,
but
one
of
them
was
the
east
liberty
tap
house,
which
was
the
first
bar
that
opened
up
with
the
same
restrictions,
which
is
the
conditional
use
permit
and
working
with
the
neighbors
and
the
community
and
parking
and
kind
of
going
through
this
process
as
well.
D
So
I
I
understand
the
process
and
I
live
in
15th
and
15th
and
own
a
business
across
the
street.
Think
a
restaurant-
and
I
was
currently
on
pago
on
9th
and
9th
in
pago
on
main
street,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
you
know
continue
to
be
an
active
part
of
the
community
and
add
value,
and
it's
just
a
neighborhood
walking
place
that
people
can
do
work
in
the
daytime
in
the
back
and
enjoy
adult
beverages
in
the
front.
And
it's
really
a
teeny
space.
D
The
average
seating
in
the
front
is
actually
20
seats,
there's
the
10
seat
flex
that
will
be
used
for
office
conference
in
the
daytime
and
additional
like
events
and
stuff
that
we
have
in
the
front.
So
it's
really
just
a
small
project.
We
want
to
be
a
part
of
the
community
that
I
live
in
two
blocks
away
and
have
a
business
across
the
street
and
want
to
have
a
minimum
impact
and
keep
my
my
friends
and
neighbors
and
colleagues
all
happy
in
the
15th
15th
district.
D
A
No,
no,
I
thank
you.
Commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
at
this
time?
A
L
Yeah,
so
we
did
actually
get
two
public
comments
into
the
zoning
or
into
the
planning
commons
email
related
to
this
item.
Okay,
I
will
read
those
at
this
time.
L
This
is
from
john
and
tanya
little
just
a
short
note
of
support
for
conditional
use,
pln
pcm
2021
00682
bar
establishment
at
1508,
south
1500
east
we've
lived
in
the
15th
and
15th
block
since
2003,
and
appreciate
how
the
community
gathering
space
brings
our
neighborhood
together.
Our
experience
with
the
applicant's
finca
restaurant
has
all
been
positive,
supporting
the
character
of
this
area.
We'd
ask
that
the
planning
commission
support
the
application.
Thank
you.
B
L
B
Okay,
I
would
like
to
see
that
my
comment
on
this
matter
is
a
community
member,
the
15th
15th
neighborhood.
My
name
is
elizabeth
brennan.
I
was
born
and
raised
in
sugar
house
and
recently
moved
to
the
15th
neighborhood
as
a
working
professional
in
my
30s,
I'm
in
full
support
of
scott
evans,
opening
a
bar
and
restaurant
concept
in
this
area.
I
trust
in
him
and
his
team
deliver
a
neighborhood
friendly
experience
to
the
community,
one
that
will
be
considered
open
to
its
surrounding
neighbors.
B
Given
the
rapid
development
growth
of
our
city,
I
believe
there's
an
increased
need
now
more
than
ever,
for
local
businesses
and
neighborhoods
that
are
walkable
and
provide
community
members
a
place
to
congregate
and
socialize
over
food
and
drinks.
This
improves
quality
of
life
for
residents,
as
well
as
maintaining
neighborhood
integrity
and
charm,
with
the
addition
of
the
new
bar
and
restaurant
concept
on
1508,
south
15th
east,
the
look
and
feel
industry
will
improve,
as
well
as
the
culture
and
cohesiveness
of
the
community.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I
still
see
no
hands
being
raised
so
with
that
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
for
discussion
and
or
motion.
B
A
D
A
All
right
that
motion
passes
unanimously,
I
happen
to
live
within
walking
distance,
so
I
appreciate
scott
being
around
good
luck,
mr
evans
and,
and
I'm
sure
I'll
see
you
around
there.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
We
will
we're
in
the
home
stretch
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
last
item
on
our
agenda
number
10,
which
is
modification
to
the
kensington
tower
design
review
at
approximately
89
east
200th
south
case
number,
pln
pcm
2019-007.
B
Yes-
and
I
I
think
this
should
move
rather
quickly,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
modification
of
the
design
review
for
the
kensington
tower
was
approved
in
2019,
as
some
of
you
may
know,
and
some
of
you
may
not
know
at
the
staff
level
at
the
administrative
level,
we
have
very
little
flexibility
as
to
what
we
can
approve
when
it
comes
to
modifications,
and
so
I
will
say
these
are
very
minor
in
nature.
B
B
All
right,
so
this
is
right
on
the
corner
of
second
south
and
state
street.
It
was
formerly
the
home
of
carl's
jr,
not
sad
to
see
that
go.
The
request
really
is
some
minor
modifications,
the
exterior
building
materials
on
the
south
and
west
facades,
some
modifications
to
the
setbacks
of
the
structure
on
the
south
and
east
side
and
a
minor
adjustment
in
height
staff.
B
Of
all
of
these
modifications-
and
I'm
going
to
breeze
through
these,
so
because
I
think
the
applicant
will
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
on
the
south
facade,
all
the
materials
are
basically
the
same,
except
there
were
some
photovoltaic
photovoltaic
fins
along
the
south
which
have
were
removed
along
the
west
on
a
portion
of
that
building
the
improved
material
material
was
glass,
fiber,
reinforced,
concrete
panels.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
replace
that
with
concrete
block.
B
As
this
facade
is
going
to
be
covered
up
by
adjacent
development,
you
can
kind
of
see
that
in
the
images
on
the
right
which
it
sounds
like
that
development
is
actually
coming
sooner
rather
than
later
on,
the
north
facade
some
window
slots
removed
in
order
to
meet
building
requirements
for
openings
at
close
to
the
property
line.
That
was
not
in
your
staff
report,
because
that
is
actually
something
one
of
the
few
things
we
can
improve.
B
Administratively
is
when
it's
related
to
code,
so
staff
would
recommend
approval
those
external
materials
we'll
move
on
to
setbacks.
There's
two
changes.
The
state
street
east
facade.
The
northeast
closed
corner
will
be
closer
to
the
required
setback
than
originally
approved.
I
think,
by
about
two
feet,
it
was
approved
with
a
setback
and
so
right
now
it'll
be
approximately
ten
foot
one
but
we'll
become
closer
to
the
actual
standard.
On
the
second
south
facade
the
ground
floor
is
going
to
stay
the
same,
but
the
building
itself
on
the
eighth
floor
will
be
set
back.
B
Approximately
16
feet
five
inches,
rather
than
the
approved
21
feet.
One
inch
that's
allowed
by
the
setbacks.
It's
just
that
it's
a
modification,
and
so
it
has
to
come
here
so
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
those
as
well.
The
last
one
is
building
height
corner
buildings
in
d1
are
required
to
have
be
a
minimum
of
100
feet
in
height.
B
N
A
Believe
he
has
a
presentation.
Okay
for
the
moment,
any
questions
from
commissioned
to
staff.
A
There's
in
the
the
current
design,
there's
that
small
around
towards
the
ground,
and
it's
got
like
that
green
spot
by
the
pedestrian
level.
What
is
that.
A
B
B
That
would
be
connected
to
the
proposed
building
next
door
which,
when
it's
ready
to
go
because
it's
a
mid
block
building
and
it's
way
over
100
feet.
You'll
you'll,
get
to
see
that
in
more
detail.
A
I
I
Thank
you.
As
john
mentioned,
we
were
in
front
of
you
more
than
two
years
ago
and,
as
you
can
imagine,
between
the
pandemic,
construction
cost
escalation
and,
quite
frankly,
engineering
and
design
challenges.
We
had
to
make
subtle
modifications
between
concept,
design
and
construction
documents.
I
We
actually
submitted
our
building
permit
this
summer
and
that
will
be
contingent.
Obviously,
on
your
approval
of
some
of
these
minor
modifications.
This
is
the
current
rendering
of
the
project
in
its
location.
It
kind
of
gives
you
a
sense
of
scale.
It's
context,
I
think
john
summarized
very
well.
I
know
there's
perhaps
confusing
that
we
had
to
pursue
a
building
height
increase
in
a
building
height
reduction,
and
this
is
the
list
of
the
modifications
that
we're
going
to
show
you
today
or
tonight.
I
The
building
height
reduction
is
really
applicable
to
this
part
back
here,
because
by
current
ordinance,
each
component
of
the
building
has
to
be
a
minimal
of
100
feet
and
we're
at
about
85
feet
right
here
which,
when
it
was
approved,
the
concept
design
level
was
83
feet.
These
are
the
joints
that
were
submitted
to
the
building
department
for
a
building
permit
and
you
can
see
depending
where
we're
really
measuring,
if
we're
measuring
from
second
south,
which
is
the
primary
facade
we're
at
85
feet.
I
If
we're
measuring
from
the
average
grade
along
the
west
elevation
with
81
feet,
the
approval
wasn't
very
specific,
where
that
was
measured
from
but
point
b,
we're
probably
going
more
towards
100
feet,
which
is
what
the
minimum
requirement
is,
and
it
was
primarily
driven
by
the
needs
to
accommodate
accessible
parking
as
well
as
trash
pickup
in
our
loading
dock
area
on
the
south
modification,
there
are
really
two
changes
and
jenna
I
apologize.
I
believe
I
forgot
to
list
one
of
them.
One
is
the
removal
of
the
photovoltaics.
I
We
have
every
intention
of
incorporating
those
into
the
project,
but
unfortunately,
between
the
initial
cost,
the
impact
that
has
on
the
on
the
curtain
world
itself
in
terms
of
its
strength
and
attachments,
as
well
as
limited
shelf
life.
If
you
want,
we,
the
project
made
a
decision
to
remove
those
from
the
south
assad,
the
only
other.
Oh,
I
may
miss
that
slight
modification
was
the
the
change
of
material
at
the
ground
level.
I
apologize.
I
I
thought
I
had
a
better
rendering
here,
but
I
could
pull
it
up
if
I
can
find
it
was
changing
the
signage
band
from
stone
to
a
metal
panel
and
that
signage
band
stretches
basically
along
state
street
and
and
second
south
as
well,
but
it's
a
very
small
portion
of
of
that
facade.
If
you
want
majority
of
it,
as
you
can
see,
it's
glass
moving
on
to
the
best
facade
modification
and
I
just
want
to
clarify,
watches.
I
I
Moving
on
to
the
north
facade
notification,
as
john
alluded
to
this,
and
apologize
john,
I
probably
should
be
referred
to
you
again
planner.
I
understand
we
had
to
reduce
the
amount
of
glazing
to
be
compliant
with
code
and
you
can
see
kind
of
what
those
current
renderings
look
like.
So
we
have
lost
that
glass
slot
on
the
north
facade,
but
we
have
maintained
the
windows
into
those
corner
units
that
facade
the
setback
reduction
was
pretty
minor.
I
These
are
the
plans
from
the
approval
from
2019.
The
major
difference
is
really
here
in
the
service
area.
You
can
see
that
we
have
quite
a
large
setback
back
here.
That's
now
quite
a
bit
smaller
and
that's
primarily,
driven
by
all
the
requirements
for
recycling
and
trash
pickup,
as
well
as
the
size
of
the
trucks
that
need
to
get
in
there,
and
now
they
sized
for
the
number
of
units
we
have.
So
that
was
there
are
some
minimal
changes
in
the
setback
exceptions,
but
we're
talking
inches,
not
feed.
I
You
can
see
that
we
had
to
pursue
a
setback
exception
here
as
well,
and
we
have
actually
slightly
reduced
that
in
the
final
plan,
so
that
that
fitness
studio
that
south
facade
on
level
eight
is
actually
now
co-planar
with
the
rest
of
the
building,
and
that
was
primarily
driven
by
the
program
and
the
size
of
the
humanities
spaces
that
we
needed
and
I
believe,
that's
all.
We
had.
C
Okay,
amir,
can
you
explain,
I
know,
I
know
everyone
knows
what
concrete
block
is,
but
what
is
gfrc.
I
C
I
A
Okay.
We
will
move
on
to
the
public
hearing.
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised.
Any
written
comments
received
nope
no.
C
Madam
chair
go
ahead,
please
findings
and
analysis
in
the
staff
report
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
requested
modifications
to
the
previously
approved
design
for
kensington
tower
located
at
approximately
89
east
200,
south
design
review
petition
pln
pcm
2019
00786,
as
proposed.
A
I
have
a
motion
from
brenda
and
a
second
from
mike.
I
did
hear
him
first,
let's
take
a
vote
andreas
I
will
vote
yes.
Thank
you
mike.
A
A
Yes,
maureen;
yes,
adrian,
yes,
andra,
yes,
brenda,
yes,
okay!
That
motion
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you,
amir
for
your
presentation
and
good
luck
in
getting
this
going.