►
Description
St. Charles County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: April 15, 2020
A
A
A
Applications
for
resilience
will
be
heard
during
tonight's
meeting
and
will
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
The
Commissioner
will
then
make
a
recommendation
on
the
applications
which
will
be
submitted
to
the
st.
Charles
County
Council
for
their
final
decision.
The
individual
items
for
this
eating's
applications
are
scheduled
to
be
introduced
at
the
Monday
May
11th
2020
county
council
meeting
applications
for
preliminary
plats
heard
during
tonight's
meeting
will
also
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
During
the
meeting,
the
vote
on
preliminary
Platts
is
final.
A
Only
a
recommendation
for
denial
of
of
luminary
plat
will
be
heard
before
the
county
council.
The
following
documents
are
introduced
as
a
matter
of
record
for
this
evenings
public
hearing
and
regular
meeting
of
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
Those
documents
are
the
unified
development,
ordinance
of
st.
Charles
County,
including
zoning
maps
and
the
year
2030
master
plan
for
st.
Charles
County,
which
includes
the
year
2030
future
land-use
plan
map.
A
A
A
See
no
changes
are
in
auditions
to
the
agenda.
We
will
proceed
with
the
first
item,
which
is
a
rezoning
request.
The
location
is
61
71
highway,
V
application,
number
RZ,
20
Oh,
three
property
owners
are
Tully,
Investments
incorporated
the
current
zoning
is
a
agricultural
district,
was
floodway
and
pledged
way
fringe
overlay
districts
requested.
Zoning
is
riverfront
district
with
floodway
and
floodway
fringe
overlay
district.
The
2030
master
plan
recommends
agricultural
uses.
C
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Robert
Myers
I'm,
the
planning
zoning
division
director
in
this
first
case,
as
you
mentioned,
is
rezoning
request
at
61
71,
highway
V.
This
property
is
located
directly
north
of
the
city
of
st.
Charles
on
the
Mississippi
River,
and
it's
a
long-standing,
marina
I
think
they
believe
the
name
is
Polestar.
Make
sure.
That's
not
like
I've
got
that
right,
but
the
property
zoning
is
55
acres.
The
property
zoning
is
agricultural
district
with
floodway
floodway
fringe
overlay
districts.
There
are
other
marinas
located
nearby
one
to
the
north,
one
to
the
south.
C
Those
are
already
zoned
for
riverfront,
and
so
essentially,
this
long-standing
marina
is
looking
to
do
the
same
where
they
want
to
be
rezone
to
riverfront
to
allow
them
the
opportunity
to
have
ancillary
uses
to
their
existing
marina.
What
I
mean
by
that
is
in
the
a
agricultural
district?
Yes,
a
marina
is
allowed
by
right,
but
any
of
the
other
ancillary
accessory
uses
such
as
boat
brokerage
sells
and
storage
of
boats,
marine
gas
services
and
campgrounds.
C
Kenny
staff
reviewed
this
request
and
notice
that
the
master
plan
recommends
agricultural.
However,
the
marinas
to
the
north
and
south,
the
master
plan,
recommends
parks
and
open
space
uses,
and
we
believe
that
the
zoning
would
be
consistent
with
that
overall
pattern
of
land
uses
and
and
zoning
in
the
area.
So
we
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Zoning
Commission
recommend
approval
to
the
County
Council
any.
A
C
They
would
not
need
to
come
back
to
this
body
if
it
were
rezone
dat
riverfront
and
they
wanted
to
use
it
for
any
use.
That's
listed
as
by
right
in
that
district,
they
would
have
to
get
a
site
plan
from
county
staff.
They'd
have
to
get
land
disturbance,
permits
permits
from
the
Corps
of
Engineers,
and
so
there
would
be
a
number
of
reviews
that
we
would
do
at
administrative
Lea,
and
so
we
would
make
sure
that
they
would
conform,
that
the
development
work
informed
of
all
of
the
counties,
ordinances
and
requirements.
C
Let's
see,
there's
a
there's,
a
limited
ability
to
build
commercial
properties
that
are
not
elevated,
especially
ones
that
are
water-based.
So,
for
instance,
we
had
a
duck
club
recently
that
developed
it
was
commercial
and
they
drive
flood
proof,
everything
that
was
below
they
base
flood
elevation,
and
so
that
was
a
way
to
allow
the
development
go
forward
for
water
based
businesses.
So
there
are
limited
ways
for
commercial
businesses
to
build
without
having
to
elevate.
C
E
A
Any
any
comments
you
would
like
to
make.
Well,
first,
first
first,
let
me
you
need
to
rage.
Tell
me
promise
me
you're,
raising
your
right
hand,
I
have
to
swear
you
in.
Do
you
solemnly
swear
or
affirm
that
you
will
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
in
these
proceedings
on
the
pains
and
penalties
of
perjury
I.
E
If
you
have
something
in
you
every
time,
they
have
something
in
front
of
you:
yes,
a
site
plan
or
yes,
okay,
if
you
look
at
you
can
see
the
entrance
to
the
marina
uh-huh,
okay,
the
downstream
side
or,
if
you're,
looking
at
it
the
right
side,
that's
a
possible
possibility
of
campground
/rv
use
similar
to
what
is
it
North,
Shore
and
similar
to
what
is
it
for
Charles
and
I
have
a
an
indication?
I
would
like
to
put
a
boat
out
there.
E
I
have
a
boat
that
I
would
like
to
put
out
there
that
have
an
RV
I've
already
talked
to
people
with
Ameren
and
others
in
preparation.
But
I
will
like
to
see
what
you
know.
I
mean
I'm
just
going
along
with
your
recommendation.
That's
what
that
now.
If
you
know,
if
you
want
to
look
at
that
what
it
the
wooded
area
is
classified
wooded,
Rutland,
I,
think
there's
33
acres
of
that
there's
classified
wooded
wetland
and
I
would
have
to
mitigate
against
that
with
the
Corps
of
Engineers,
which
there
are
no
plans
to
do
whatsoever.
D
E
Well,
Ameren,
if
we
bring
a
Marin,
they
can't
given
me
a
drawing
already
of
seven
poles
with
a
step-down
transformer
and
the
standard
system.
I've
talked
to
and
reviewed
with
the
county,
with
a
licensed
electrician,
to
see
about
what
the
heights
are,
etc
and
make
sure
they're
out
of
the
harm's
way.
As
with
the
docks
as
with
the
dock,
should
we
have
currently
in
there
and
the
septic
are
not
the
septic
system,
but
the
black
water
are,
the
black
water
would
be
kept
in.
Holding
tank
and
removed.
E
D
A
B
F
A
F
A
Next
on
the
agenda
is
preliminary
plat
for
resub
division
of
Callaway
Valley
Platte,
one
tract
a
location
is
2977
highway,
F
application
number
pre-2001
property
owners
is
Robbie,
L,
Johnson,
revocable
living
trust,
surveyors,
landmark
surveying
company
property.
Zoning
is
a
agricultural
district.
Five
acre
minimum
lot
size
proposal.
Lots
are
three
parcel.
Size
is
forty
point.
Oh
five
acres.
The
location
is
on
the
northeast
terminus
of
Highway
F
and
Callaway
Ridge
Drive
Council
District,
the
located
in
Council
District,
two
staff.
C
Again,
this
is
a
request
for
a
subdivision
or
might
call
a
resale
division.
It's
highly
unusual
that
you'd
have
40
acres,
that's
already
in
an
existing
subdivision,
but
this
is
the
situation
that
we're
in
platted
many
years
ago,
the
Callaway
Valley
subdivision
included.
What's
called
this
lot,
a
which
is
40
acres
and
now
the
the
owner
is
requesting
that
it
be
subdivided
into
three
parcels
to
five
acre
parcel
on
Calloway,
Ridge,
Drive
and
then
the
remainder,
which
was
a
much
larger
area
of
around
30
acres
that
would
take
access
from
highway
f.
C
It
already
has
an
existing
driveway
to
highway
F.
The
MoDOT
is
already
allowed
access
from
highway
F,
and
so
this
is
the
plan.
Eventually,
those
forty
acres
will
have
three
homes
on
them:
two
of
the
Lots
on
Calloway
Ridge
and
the
third
taking
access
from
Iowa
F,
and
just
as
an
aside,
the
developer
has
been
working
with
the
homeowners
association
such
that
future
plans
are
to
take
that
remainder,
30
acres
out
of
the
subdivision,
so
it'll
no
longer
be
in
a
subdivision,
but
that's
a
whole
nother
process.
C
C
Let's
see
the
zoning
again,
it's
a
agricultural,
it
would
remain
agricultural,
there
would
be
a
subdivision
within
the
agricultural
zoning
district,
and
you
have
before
you
a
preliminary
plat
again
showing
those
two
five
acre
parcels
and
then
the
remainder
taking
access
from
highway
F.
So
it's
really
pretty
straightforward.
Sub
vision
in
a
lot
of
ways
and
County
staff
is
recommending
approval.
I
should
also
note
there's
no
proposed
improvements.
All
the
streets
are
in.
C
G
G
A
G
So
that's
it
here
is
that
the
average
law
in
calgary
valley
is
probably
about
seven
acres
of
unused
hard,
quads
and
the
benefit.
The
association
is,
though,
it'll
be
able
to
charge
additional
association
fees
and
it's
likely
to
be
developed
and
built
on,
whereas
before
having
had
it
on
the
market
for
years,
we
just
didn't
find
someone
that
wanted
to
spend
the
amount
of
money
necessary
by
the
whole
40
acres
and
though
the
2,400
square
foot
house.
G
D
A
C
Yes,
make
sure
I've
got
this
correct,
there's
a
letter
from
Fred
Weber
Inc
and
it's
signed
by
Douglas
weebly.
The
chairman
is
CEO
and
it
says
we're
in
receipt
of
a
letter
from
the
Commission
date
of
March
2nd
regarding
an
application
to
approval
of
a
preliminary
plant,
four
subdivision
for
approximately
40
acres.
As
you
may
know,
Fred
Weber
owns
inner
controls,
property
along
Highway,
F,
located
to
the
north
west,
west
and
south
of
such
proposed
subdivision,
as
shown
on
the
attached.
C
We
are
writing
the
letter
to
advise
the
Commission
that,
since
1992
FWI
has
conducted
surface
and/or,
underground
mining
and
surface,
crushing
screening
and
stockpiling
operations
on
the
property
shown
the
attached
map
and
that
such
operations
include
blasting
six
days
a
week
prior
to
FY
fwi
operating
the
property.
It
has
been
operated
as
a
quarry,
since
1954
FWI
intends
to
continue
such
operations
indefinitely
and
the
underground
mining
operations
are
currently
progressing.
C
Northward
there's
another
paragraph
included,
but
I
would
characterize
it
the
letter
as
putting
everyone
on
notice
that
this
is
the
activity
that
we
have
and
it's
been
going
on
for
decades
and
we're
continuing
in
the
future
on
this
activity.
Just
so,
everyone
won't
be
aware,
including
future
buyers.
C
C
Actually
it's
for
all
of
them.
That
saying
he's
highly
opposed
to
the
proposed
conduct
and
proposed
illegal
violations
of
the
st.
Charles
County
Council,
my
home
county,
and
how
it
proposed
to
hold
public
meetings
in
violation
of
chapter
610
in
its
entirety
of
the
revised
state
statues
of
Missouri.
No
authority
has
granted
to
the
council
in
Section
16
point
o
to
one
of
the
statute,
and
that
was
his
comment
for
all
three
okay.
A
D
H
G
She
never
had
an
issue
whether
the
foundation
was
in
great.
It's
everything
to
bother
her
I've
been
on
sector
during
the
day
for
this
forward
to
climb
over
the
years,
showing
it
and
never
felt
now,
I'm
never
heard
a
blast.
There's
the
blast
bender
where
they
went.
I
know
more
than
me,
but
it's
pretty
much
put
you
keep
what
you
get
there
and
that's
honest,
you're,
letting
everybody
know.
A
B
F
F
A
A
Property
owners
is
Donnell,
a
grünfeld
and
Darrell
Lea
grünfeld
Trust,
Clarence,
William,
Roth
trusts
and
Amanda
Verna
Roth
trust,
develop.
Rawls
company
engineering
is
company
in
st.
Charles
engineering,
the
property
zoning
is
r1
e,
/,
FF,
single-family
residential
district
7,000
square
feet.
Minimum
lot
size
with
floodway
fringe
overlay
district
proposed,
Lots
or
31
parcel
size
is
16
acres.
The
location
is
on
the
southeast
corner
of
the
intersection
of
upper
bottom
Road
injeong
Station
Road,
located
in
Council
District,
seven
staff.
C
This
application
is
a
polymer
e
plat
without
rezoning
what
I
mean
by
that
is
they're
not
requesting
any
modification
for
the
zoning
by
Wright
single-family
residential
land
uses
are
allowed
for
this
property
so
long
as
the
plat
conforms
to
all
the
county's
standards
for
the
subdivision
regulations,
I
should
say
so.
In
this
case
you
might
call
this
an
infill
project
in
that
multiple
parcels
would
be
assembled
and
then
redeveloped
as
a
single-family
subdivision
on
the
southeast
corner,
essentially
of
upper
bottom
Road
and
junk
Station
Road
not
far
south
from
the
city
of
st.
C
Peters,
31
Lots
would
be
involved.
The
property
drops
off
fairly
rapidly
from
Jeong
Station
Road
towards
the
back
side
of
it,
where
a
Creek
is
located
and
so
to
in
order
to
make
this
work
and
meet
all
of
the
county's
requirements
for
street
slope
and
other
requirements,
tree
preservation,
floodway
preservation,
etc.
C
The
development
is
what
I
would
call
essentially
clustered
towards
the
west
and
a
long
young
station
road
and
upper
bottom
Road
such
that
the
creek
back
behind
would
be
left
undeveloped,
so
in
that
developed
area
that
will
be
common
ground.
So
there's
floodway.
Excuse
me
floodway
fringe,
that's
located
in
that
common
ground
and
about
two
and
a
half
acres
of
trees
that
would
be
preserved
in
order
to
help
meet
the
tree
preservation
requirements
of
the
county
as
well
as
requirements
for
stream
bank
protection
from
the
top
of
the
bank.
It's
at
least
25
feet
back.
C
All
vegetation
has
to
be
preserved
so
that
back
portion
is
going
to
be
common
ground.
It's
going
to
be
owned
by
homeowners,
association
and
maintained
by
them.
I
would
also
note,
there's
a
number
of
retaining
walls
block
retaining
walls
throughout
this
development
that
would
help
make
it
all
work
and
again
in
terms
of
maximum
street
slope.
So
they're
not
too
steep.
C
There's
a
number
of
comments
from
neighbors
with
questions,
but
one
I'll
bring
up
is
has
to
do
with
drainage
and
I
would
say
that
this
property
is
going
to
sit
a
little
bit
lower
than
neighboring
property
to
the
south.
I
think
that's
Huntley,
Manor
yeah
only
a
Manor
Drive,
so
this
property
would
be
just
a
couple
of
feet
lower
than
those
Lots
to
the
south.
C
That
was
a
concern
that
was
brought
up
by
a
couple
of
homeowners
there
about
would
water
be
coming
onto
my
property,
but
it's
actually
an
NGO
town
back
down
towards
the
creek
within
this
property.
So
I
wanted
to
address
that
County
staff
reviewed
this,
including
the
highway
department.
One
of
the
questions
we
asked
was
we've
gone
back
and
forth
about.
What's
the
best
place
to
locate
a
street,
should
it
come
off
a
German
station
Road
or
upper
bottom
Road.
C
If
there
was
some
consideration,
some
serious
consideration
for
Jeng
station
Road,
but
eventually
because
of
sight,
distance
and
other
questions,
they
ended
up
going
with
taking
access
off
of
upper
bottom
Road.
You'll
also
note
there's
a
light
at
the
intersection
of
upper
bottom
and
Jenny
Station
Road,
so
at
peak
traffic
times
such
as
rush
hour,
that
does
backup
the
light
there.
The
cueing
of
vehicles
backs
up
to
that
light.
So
that
is
a
concern
at
rush
hour,
but
other
than
that.
The
highway
department
feels
like
that.
C
The
development
itself
doesn't
justify
doing
a
full-blown
traffic
study,
but
instead
they
need
to
provide
some
specifics
to
the
highway
department.
On
are
some
details
in
how
they're
gonna
be
managing
traffic,
but
they
don't
see
the
that
the
development
itself
doesn't
necessitate
doing
the
full-blown
traffic
study
in
advance
of
this
plan.
C
F
C
A
D
That
would
appear
to
be
with
the
additional
subdivision
there,
perhaps
just
an
over
over
overly
amount
of
traffic
that
could
be
making
left
turns
in
and
out
of
there.
Just
it
just
seems
to
me
it's
setting
up
a
scenario
where
you
could
have
some
confusions
with
drivers
coming
to
walk
there
as
to
what
the
proper
procedure
was.
So
basically
I
guess
in
terms
of
what's
what's
what's
gonna
be
done
in
terms
of
plane.
A
A
I
Well,
as
far
as
the
entrances
either
choice,
it
was
kind
of
the
lesser
of
two
evils.
Neither
one
of
them
works
wonderfully.
So
the
idea
of
doing
an
entrance
opposed
to
Rockford
way.
It
is
in
every
single
turn
it.
The
sight.
Distance
is
insufficient
at
that
location.
There's
a
third
lane,
so
traffic
is
usually
driving
a
little
faster,
at
least
that's
the
way
the
calculations
are
set
up
and
you
need
even
more
sight
distance
from
there
as
you
do
from
Young's.
I
But
if
we
were
to
put
the
entrance
cross
from
Rockler,
we
believe
that
the
increase
in
traffic
along
the
roadways
would
drive
down
up
the
bottom
anyway,
so
this
gets
them
off
the
rubber
bottom
out
of
that
queue
before
the
like.
It
is
a
traffic
problem,
but
we're
not
seeing
it
as
the
entrance
necessarily
is
it's
it's
just
simply
too
much
traffic
at
that
light.
Every
night
during
rush
hour.
D
B
A
I
Well,
our
maximum
street
percentage
is
8%,
so
no
lot
will
be
steeper
than
that.
They're
all
70
feet
wide
and-
and
we
are
directing
all
of
our
stormwater
into
storm
pipes
as
soon
as
possible,
into
a
system
underground
to
prevent
erosion
and
then
down
into
the
common
ground
area
into
a
detention
basin
where
it
will
find
for
a
period
of
hours.
G
A
C
Certainly,
we
received
communications
from
Bernard
Martin
Laurie,
new
shuang'er
Frank
boric
Betty
Hildebrandt
Donna
Maureen,
Curtis
Russ
and
Dottie
Freitag
Eunice,
Torretta,
Karen
and
Kevin
beer
and
Baker
John
and
Karen
Baker,
Leeson,
Lisa
and
Dave
Wozniak.
Wasn't
he
was
Nicky
sorry,
and
there
was.
We
also
have
communications
responding
to
these
communications.
C
C
Yes,
the
concerns.
In
summary,
there
were
some
concerns
from
homes
adjoining
directly
to
the
south.
Those
homes
on
Huntley
Manor
had
concerns
about
where
the
property
to
be
higher
or
lower
and
where
water
would
go,
how
far
the
closest
home
would
be
to
their
home,
which
I
could
answer
to
be
about
a
hundred
feet
at
the
closest
point,
as
best
I
can
tell
there
were
concerns
about
traffic,
certainly
on
additional
traffic
on
upward
bottom
Road.
C
I
A
H
H
Without
having
a
fully
fleshed
out,
develop
plan
that
we
can
get
out,
it
is
difficult
pinpointed,
obviously,
our
round
cost
or
development
cost
that
is
going
to
dictate
our
final
sit
s.
Cost
I
will
say
that
a
development
in
a
similar
area
with
with
a
similar
product
type,
it's
called
Bristol
Ridge,
it's
off
the
old
Friedan
roads
near
near
toll
bridge
Muni,
our
starting
price.
There
was
279
nine.
Well,
we
are
paying
roughly
twice
the
amount
or
the
raw
ground
that
site.
H
We
were
able
to
front
a
lot
it's
on
to
old
throat,
meaning
our
development
cost
was
low.
That
site
did
not
require
as
much
grading
not
anywhere
near
as
much
grading
as
this
site.
That
site
will
did
not
requires
much
height
work
as
this
site
to
say
that
again
we
can
never
I
would
never
put
in
public
record.
We
are
going
to
start
at
this
price
to
say
that
we
would
be
below
300
would
be
a
dream
on
our
part,
it
the
cost
of
ground.
H
H
It
there
is
always
a
concern
by
existing
homeowners
that
a
new
development
would
decrease
property
values
that
would
be
nearly
unfounded.
I,
don't
know
that
you
can
ever
point
to
a
place
where
new
construction
sells
for
less
than
existing
homes,
particularly
in
this
market
and
I
know.
We
are
going
through
some
changes
right
now.
We're
all
wondering
what
it's
going
to
be,
but
it
just
does
not
happen.
J
H
On
Saturday
morning,
I
did
have
a
zoom
meeting
with
the
adjoining
Huntley
manor
HOA
that
certain
people
with
that
I
provided
them
with
the
brochures
of
the
homes
that
we
would
today
offer
in
this
community.
They
are
very
or
both
to
the
adjoining
homes.
Now
again
at
Bristol,
rich
subdivision
that
I
mentioned
is
comparable
to
the
homes
and
only
now.
J
F
A
A
F
H
H
Don't
know
the
actual
square
footage
of
all
of
the
homes
in
huntly
man,
average
I,
don't
know
the
average
of
the
square
footage
of
the
homes
at
Huntley
manner.
To
give
you
a
comparison,
I
think
our
mr.
Ridge
community
again
would
be
the
best
comparison
and
we
have
homes
in
there,
starting
at
ranch
homes
at
1562
and
then
two
stories,
the
23rd
to
3,000
square
foot.
They
don't
know
what
the
purchasers
select.
H
C
Do
you
have
a
little
information,
a
question
about
lot
size,
so
Huntley
Manor,
the
rezoning
is
our
would
eat
single-family
residential,
that's
a
minimum
of
7,000
square
foot
lot
size
and
it's
the
same.
Zoning
for
several
miles
around
everything
is
all
solidly
our
when
he
single-family
residential.
Let
me
verify
that
7,000
is
correct.
I
believe
it
is
yes,
so
Huntley
manner
to
the.
Nor
would
that
be
the
east.
I
guess
I
just
did
a
little
quick
math
and
it
looks
like
the
lots
are
roughly
10,000
square
feet
to
17,000
square
feet.
C
A
D
D
A
D
A
C
A
D
C
What
I
was
thinking
is
a
my
understanding
is
the
traffic
and
study
is:
is
it's
more
involved
and
more
rigorous
than
traffic
analysis
and
I'm,
not
sure
which
it
would
be
warranted
here,
based
on
this
level
of
development,
but
I
think
the
highway
department
could
make
that
determination,
whether
it
should
be
traffic,
analysis
or
traffic
study.
So
what
I
was
taking?
C
D
A
B
A
Would
see
his
motion
to
have
the
highway
department
determined,
whether
there's
a
okay
traffic
study
or
analysis
and
then
whatever
they
determined,
would
then
be
at
the
expense
of
the
applicant?
Okay,
so
make
sure
I
have
this
one
more
time.
Mr.
BAE
and
this
paper
voted.
Yes,
is
that
correct,
correct.
B
D
A
A
A
C
A
B
B
A
D
A
A
C
Wanted
to
let
you
know
that,
there's
a
new
ordinance,
that's
been
passed
and
a
new
type
of
plant
that's
now
possible
when
five
plus
acre
lots
are
involved,
and
only
five
plus
acre
lots,
and
it's
called
a
minor
subdivision.
Plat
for
years
and
years
we've
had
a
one
size
fits
all
type
of
plat,
and
that
is
you
go
through
this
admittedly
rigorous
process,
but
that's
really
geared
toward
subdivisions
that
have
improvements
to
be
built.
If
you
characterize
zoning,
it's
about
land
use.
If
you
characterize
subdivision
regulations,
it's
about
improvements.
C
Well,
what
do
you
do
in
rural
areas
where
there's
no
public
improvements?
There's
hardly
any
improvements
frankly,
and
the
expectations
are
lower
in
rural
areas
for
improvements
like
do
really,
people
expect
curb
and
gutter,
or
even
paved
streets
necessarily
in
rural
areas.
So
again,
for
so
many
years,
we've
had
this
one-size-fits-all
subdivision
regulations.
C
Now
the
County
Council's
recently
passed
while
we're
calling
a
minor
subdivision
if
it
meets
certain
basic
requirements,
it's
not
going
if
they
won't
go
to
the
planning
Zoning
Commission,
but
they
were
to
be
approved
by
county
staff
and
but
they're,
including
things
like
it
has
to
be.
Five
plus
acre
lots:
all
Lots
must
front
on
either
a
public
street
private
street
or
some
sort
of
easement
and
where
the
easement
or
street
comes
out
on
the
main
roadway.
C
We
check
for
sight,
distance
and
safety
considerations
make
sure
that
emergency
communications
has
addressed
all
of
those
parcels
and
there's
a
few
other
very
basic
requirements
that
we
have.
But
we
think
this
will
be
helpful
because
when
the
subdivision
rules
were
changed
in
1999,
they
left
what
I'll
call
it
out.
Four
parcels
that
exist
in
1999.
They
said
any
parcel
exists
in
1999.
You
can
have
up
to.
You
can
create
two
parcels
from
that
less
than
ten
acres
and
you
don't
have
to
get
anything
from
the
county.
You
can
just
just
create
those
by
deed.
C
C
Even
so,
because
of
that
with
this
new
process
has
been
created
and
I
I've
really
looked
forward
to
using
this,
because
I
think
it
it'll
be
less
about
trying
to
hammer
a
square
peg
into
a
round
hole,
sometimes
in
in
rural
areas,
and
trying
to
force
these
five
plus
a
core
Lots
into
the
subdivision
standards.
So
those
are
that's
now
available.
I
want
to
let
you
know
that,
and
it's
called
the
minor
subdivision
process.