►
Description
Watch the St. Charles County Planning and Zoning Commission meeting from June 19, 2019.
A
A
Applications
for
rezoning,
resulting
x',
held
during
tonight's
meeting
will
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
The
Commission
will
then
make
a
recommendation
on
the
applications
which
will
be
submitted
to
the
st.
Charles
County
Council
for
their
final
decision.
The
individual
items
and
bills
for
this
evenings
applications
are
scheduled
to
be
introduced
on
the
Monday
July
8
2019
County
Council.
Meeting
application
for
preliminary
subdivision
Platts
heard
during
tonight's
meeting
will
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
During
the
meeting.
The
vote
on
the
preliminary
plaques
is
final.
A
Only
a
recommendation
for
denial
of
a
preliminary
plat
will
be
heard
before
the
county
council.
The
following
documents
are
introduced
as
a
matter
of
record
for
this
evenings
public
hearing
and
regular
meeting
of
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
Those
documents
are
the
unified
development,
ordinance
of
st.
Charles
County,
including
zoning
maps
and
the
year
2030
master
plan
for
st.
Charles
County,
which
includes
the
year
2030
future
land-use
plan
map
I,
see
that
we
have
a
quorum.
Sir,
will
entertain
a
motion
to
open
the
meeting
so
moved.
Second.
B
C
A
A
Then
we'll
ask
the
applicant
to
come
forward
to
present
their
application,
and
if
the
Commission
has
any
questions
at
that
time,
and
then
we
will
open
this
up
for
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
regarding
the
application
can
come
forward
and
speak.
Then
we
will
close.
The
public
hearing
ask
the
applicant
to
come
back
and
answer
any
questions
that
the
Commission
may
have
and
then
Commission
will
consider
the
application
and
take
a
vote.
A
If
you
are
going
to
speak
this
evening,
we
asked
you
fill
out
one
of
the
little
cards
here
on
the
on
the
rail.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
get
your
name,
address,
etc,
correct
you
know
in
our
minutes.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
a
rezoning
request
located
at
nineteen.
Thirty
six
do
a
low
road
application
number
RZ
1905,
the
property
owner
is
James
James,
W,
Clements
and
Jill
bright
Clemens
living
trusts.
The
current
zoning
is
a
cultural
district.
The
requested
zoning
is
r22
family
residential
district.
A
The
2030
master
plan
recommends
low
distance
density
residential,
which
is
one
two
four
one,
two
four
dwellings
per
acre.
The
area
consists
of
one
point:
zero,
nine,
seven
acres.
The
location
is
on
the
north
side
of
2ll
Road,
approximately
430
feet.
East
of
charity,
drive
adjacent
to
the
City
of
Lake.
St.
Louis
is
located
in
Council
District,
two
staff.
D
Could
you
add
the
map
up?
Thank
you.
This
property,
as
I
mentioned,
is
located
at
the
bend
of
the
duello
Road,
as
it
continues
north
from
highway
in
I
have
a
better
picture
of
it.
The
proposal
for
dual
Road
is
to
continue
on
some
of
this
right-of-way,
as
already
been
purchase
to
continue
on
to
the
north
and
eventually
fade
back
into
duello
road
over
to
the
west
there.
This
property
is
located
right
at
the
corner
of
where
that
will
be
straightened.
The
right-of-way
has
already
been
purchased.
D
The
property
is
actually
both
of
these
parcels,
the
two
together
they're
1.07
acres,
and
they
are
requesting
the
are
to
zoning,
and
they
do
have
a
concept
plan
for
that.
For
that
reasoning,
basically,
they
would
be
putting
in
five
homes.
Four
of
them
would
be
attached
and
the
fifth
one
would
be
single-family
on
its
own.
They
are
all
still
considered
single-family
in
that
they
each
own
the
ground
around
them.
D
If
it
was
all
one
piece
of
ground
that
would
be
multifamily,
but
they
would
each
take
care
of
their
own
yards
and
just
have
the
zero
side.
Setback
adjacent
to
the
other
home
that
they're
attached
to
staff
did
look
at
the
property.
As
we
mentioned,
it
is
a
very
narrow
piece
of
ground.
It's
approximately
a
hundred
feet
wide
and
then
the
length
is
in
is
in
the
South
portion
of
the
property.
It's
a
little
over
400
square
400
linear
feet
north
to
south.
With
there
are
two
zoning.
D
There
is
a
special
kind
of
caveat
I'm,
not
sure
that
they
plan
to
use
this
or
not,
because
we
do
not
have
a
preliminary
plat
submitted
to
us.
We
only
have
this
concept
plan,
but
with
the
r2
zoning
we
do
have
a
portion
of
the
development
where
it
will
allow
a
private
street
to
go
in
with
just
a
pavement
width
of
24
feet,
and
that
would
also
include
their
right
of
way
their
private
right
away.
The
rest
of
it
can
be
devoted
to
the
development
of
homes.
D
I'm
not
sure
that
that,
like
I,
said
that
this
is
going
to
be
the
plat
that
they
will
be
submitting.
The
applicant
could
probably
speak
of
this,
but
what
you
can
see
is
something
similar
to
that
with
a
smaller
cul-de-sac.
It
does
have
to
end
in
a
cul-de-sac
when
it's
a
private
issue,
like
that
on
our
to
zoning
staff,
did
recommend
approval
of
this
request
due
to
the
use
of
the
ground
there.
D
D
C
D
D
D
A
D
E
D
D
A
F
F
F
We're
here
I'm
representing
the
applicant
James
Cummins
today,
and
yes,
okay.
This
is
our
presentation
just
an
overview
of
the
property.
Some
of
this
will
be
repetitive,
based
on
what
staff
already
mentioned,
but
you
can
see
where
it's
located
in
connection
with
dwell
the
road
it's
located
at
the
corner,
where
it
turns
west.
F
Think
a
slides
missing,
some
of
the
backup
you
can
see
where
the
yellow
highlighting
is
that
is
where
the
Dualla
Road
will
continue
and
as
a
result
of
that
continuance
of
dweller
road
north
to
take
out
that
sharp
turn
to
the
west
and
then
to
the
north
that
cut
this
piece
of
property
down
to
justice,
a
narrow
width
of
100
feet.
So
that
is
a
very
narrow
piece
of
property
there.
Our
client
is
trying
to
find
some
way
of
using
that
oh
I'm
going
backwards.
I
apologize.
Okay,
the
current
zoning
is
agricultural.
F
You
can
see
the
property
located
there
where
the
red
mark
is
it's
near,
it's
primarily
agricultural,
but
there
is
some
residential
there.
The
current
zoning,
which
is
agricultural,
requires
five
acres.
This
is
1.07
acres
for
development.
The
setbacks
that
are
required
are
50
feet
on
the
front
and
50
feet
on
the
rear.
So
with
the
depth
of
just
100
feet,
you
really
couldn't
build
anything
on
there
without
the
rezoning.
In
addition
to
that,
it
requires
103
defeat
wide
lot.
F
F
We
do
have
the
concept
plan.
It
is
again,
this
is
just
a
request
for
the
rezoning
to
the
r2,
and
this
is
just
a
concept
plan.
The
cul-de-sac
is
drawn
on
there
and
is
planned
so
that
we
would
have
a
adequate
turnaround
for
emergency
vehicles.
That's
the
reason
for
the
turnaround.
At
the
end,
another
safety
concern
that
we
are
hoping
to
take
care
of
is
that
by
adding
that
drive
in
the
rear,
we're
cutting
down
the
number
of
entrances
aren't
to
dwell,
arose
there
and
creating
a
back
entrance
to
the
properties.
They
are
all.
F
You
can't
really
see
it
there.
They
are
all
on
separate
Lots.
So
there
are
you
know.
Each
half
of
those
attached
residences
are
on
a
separate
lot.
There's
five
Lots
there
and
we
are
working
with
staff
to
you
know
to
create
the
correct
setbacks,
or
at
least
figure
out
the
best
way
to
fit
this
onto
the
property
that
one
change
that
will
be
made
on
the
plan
from
where
it
is
now
is
that
there
isn't
quite
the
25
feet
in
the
front
on
against
dweller
road,
which
would
be
a
frontage.
G
F
F
But
you
can't
see
it
all
right
anyway.
This
is
I'll,
show
you
here
here
we
are
and
then
dwell
on
elementary
is
proposed
for
down
here.
Is
there
and
then
Winstone
subdivision
is
not
only
to
the
west
of
the
property
is
also
to
the
east
of
the
property.
So
it
is
right
in
the
middle
of
that
residential
area.
E
F
F
H
H
E
F
F
F
Is
just
going
to
be
a
narrow
problem
up,
probably
a
private
drive
because
it
will
be
located
on
the
Lots.
That's
kind
of
the
plan
that
we're
working
with
now
with
along
with
staff,
and
so
it's
not.
It's
not
gonna
be
a
dedicated
road,
and
so
we
really
don't
think
it's
gonna
be
I
mean
it's
not
gonna
have
traffic,
it's
not
a
through
Street.
It's
just
those
four!
That's.
H
E
G
D
B
F
A
G
H
A
I
I
My
mailing
address
is
P,
o
box,
1535
Oh,
fine,
63,
366
I'm,
opposed
to
this
zoning
change
and
I'm
opposed
because
of
the
density
issue,
as
was
stated
by
staff
for
the
record,
only
one
to
four
dwellings
per
acre
now,
there's
some
discrepancy
that
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
the
Commission
in
the
public
record
staff
states
that
the
acreage
that
we're
talking
about
is
one
point:
zero,
nine,
seven
acres,
but
yet
the
applicant
just
testified
that
the
actual
acreages
one
point
zero
seven.
So
it's
even
a
smaller
lot!
I
I
It's
too
dense
number
one.
The
right
away.
New
dweller
road
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
work
in
agreement
out
with
this
property
owner.
So
there's
no
additional
cost
to
taxpayers
or
to
the
county.
The
second
issue
is
density.
The
five
homes
should
be
reduced
down
to
four
homes,
which
was
the
maximum
allowed
by
our
comprehensive
plan
and
by
our
two
zoning.
If
they
want
to
go
for
a
variance.
This
is
not
the
proper
board.
I
The
proper
board
for
variance
would
be
the
Board
of
Adjustment
to
see
if
they
qualify
for
a
hardship
under
the
state
statute
of
what
a
hardship
means
which
would
mean
that
they'd
have
to
prove
a
hardship
beyond
a
reasonable
doubt.
Number
three
I
have
some
concerns
with
the
private
road
of
only
24
feet.
I
have
problems
with
first
responders
a
ladder
truck
getting
in
there
properly
to
service
those
homes
and
ambulance
service
and,
finally,
I
don't
see
you
need
letters
on
file
from
the
window.
I
Fire
Protection,
District,
four
in
the
winter
School
District,
which
is
bursting
at
the
seams
to
see
if
they
can
take
on
additional
students
at
1211
turi,
which
I
understand,
is
at
capacity
I.
Also
don't
see
a
letter
from
public
water
district
number,
two
or
letter
on
file
from
public
or
Duquette
Creek
sanitary
district.
For
those
reasons,
I'm
opposed
to
this
because
the
density
issue,
thank
you
any.
A
B
B
Accommodate
the
five
Watts
I
putting
it,
you
know:
if
we're
gonna
have
standards
and
we
should
we
should
have
standards
and
that's
you
know,
that's
what
a
master
plan
does
so
I
think
it's
I
think
the
lot
is
too
small
for
for
five
dwellings,
I
think
for
fits
and
I
think
for
still
makes
it
a
very
viable
project.
I
think
it
gets
too
crowded
with
that
single-family
house
single-family
home
down
there
with
the
cul-de-sac.
G
A
B
D
G
C
Me
if
I
may,
let
me
go
back
to
your
question.
Specifically
mr.
clingy
hammer.
You
asked
what
they
have
to
wait
to
come
back,
so
this
would
be
a
recommendation
of
the
County
Council.
If
the
County
Council
approved
it,
and
there
would
be
our
two
zoning
and
then
they
would
have
to
abide
by
the
r2
zoning
regulations
in
terms
of
the
minimum
lot
size
and
the
maximum
density,
etc.
C
E
C
B
E
A
E
B
E
A
E
A
Next
on
these,
the
agenda
is
rezoning
request
our
z19.
Oh
six,
the
owners
are
Daniel
ladders,
Sidney
Krupa.
Sorry,
if
I
pronounced
that
wrong
and
Audrey
Bryant
existing
zoning
is
r1
a
single-family
residential
district
1
acre
minimum
lot
size
requested.
Zoning
is
r1c.
Single-Family
residential
district
15,000
square
foot
lot
size,
the
2030
master
plan
record.
It
recommends
low
distant
low
density,
residential,
wonderful
or
dwellings
per
acre.
D
All
right,
this
property
is
located
just
not
quite
in
the
middle
of
this
subdivision
right
here
at
this
location,
the
r1,
a
zoning
was
established
in
1973,
with
the
revised
zoning
order
going
into
effect.
At
that
time,
the
parcels
owned
to
the
middle
of
the
lane,
and
then
therefore
they
were
one
acre
before
that.
A
lot
of
these
parcels
were
already
divided.
This
is
considered
a
subdivision,
but
they
were
divided
when
the
agricultural
zoning
only
required
18,000
square
feet.
So
there
are
quite
a
few
Lots
that
are
already
divided.
D
The
zoning
that
they're
looking
for
is
our
1c,
which
is
what
is
located
right
across
the
street.
From
them
these
homes
were
redeveloped
or
the
property
was
redeveloped.
Several
two
or
three
Lots
were
were
made
into
one
receptor
vision
with
the
r1c
zoning
and
new
homes
were
built
on
those
Lots.
This
would
be
similar
to
that
they
did.
They
do
also
have
a
preliminary
plat.
D
D
Cows,
those
lots
go
as
low
as
5,300
square
feet.
This
would
not
be
anywhere
near
that
it
would
just
be
approximately
19,000
and
some
square
feet
per
lot,
but
it
is,
it
does
fit
into
the
density
of
the
area.
This
is
the
central
high
school
and
middle
school
I
believe
course
I'm
going
to
school
there,
too
I'm
not
sure
right
next
to
them,
but
with
this
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
rezoning.
A
A
D
Be
12
feet
there.
There
is
an
issue
that
we
are
still
working
with
on
the
preliminary
plat
and
does
need
to
be
addressed
and
they
do
have
a
water
course.
It
runs
along
the
eastern
and
southern
portion
of
the
property.
They
would
have
a
setback
from
that,
but
easements
they
would
meet
the
the
current
subdivision.
They
would
have
to
file
a
receptor
vision,
plat
and
they
would
have
to
meet
the
current
setback
front,
building
setback,
so
it
would
look
as
if
it
it
fit
right
into
the
subdivision.
So.
E
D
D
The
street
and
that's
what
reduced
this
this
subdivision,
originally
from
the
one
acre
I
mean
this
lot
from
the
one.
It's
currently
about
point
nine
acres,
so
that
right-of-way
has
already
been
purchased.
They
do
have
their
building
line
they're
set
and
they
do
have
to
meet
the
new
setbacks
that
would
be
required
under
the
r1c
sowing
catch.
It
thank.
E
A
J
Not
as
prepared
as
the
previous
rezoning
request,
so
what
we're
planning
to
do
is
subdivide
with
Audrey
Brian.
We
plan
to
build
a
small,
well,
not
small,
medium
sized
ranch
to
fit
in
with
the
houses
that
are
already
down
on
that
street
to
kind
of
fit
the
subdivision
field,
and
so
that's
and
we're
gonna
work
with.
Obviously,
we
haven't
gotten
that
far
to
work
with
the
waterway
to
make
sure
that
we're
the
correct
feet
away
and.
E
A
I
A
I
You
very
much
mr.
chairman,
my
name
is
Arne
C
ACV
Norfolk
advocate
and
resident
P,
o
box
1535
profilin
and
I'd
like
to
say
that
I'm,
a
proponent
and
I
would
urge
you
to
vote
unanimously
for
the
zoning
change.
This
is
acceptable
and
responsible
land
use.
The
density
in
this
case
is
perfect,
since
they're
going
well
and
above
the
minimum
requirement
of
the
15,000
square
foot
in
this
case,
you're
using
20,000
square
foot,
Lacs
and
I'm
all
about
the
spreading
out
the
density.
So
I
would
ask
that
you
approve
this.
I
A
letter
from
the
public
water
district
number
two
to
see
about
the
portability
or
possibility
of
public
water
service
here
and
a
letter
review
from
Duquette
Creek
sanitary
district
for
both
the
sanitary,
this
sanitary
district,
I'm,
sorry,
sanitary
sewer
and
also
the
surface
water
protection
issue
which
I
understand
this
neighborhood
floods
at
times
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
by
building
these
two
homes
that
there's
some
review
either
by
county
staff
or
by
Duquette
Creek.
Thank
you
thank.
A
A
A
E
E
A
Okay.
Next
on
the
agenda
is
preliminary
plat
for
the
resub
division
of
lot,
12
valley,
acres
located
at
1350
for
valley
lane,
the
application
is
number
pre-1900:
five
owner
developers,
daniel
daughter's
sydney,
Cupra
and
Audrey
Bryant
property,
surveyors
landmark
surveying
company
existing
zoning
is
r1
a
single-family
residential
district,
one
acre
at
minimum
lot
size
requested.
Zoning
is
r
1c
single-family
residential
district
15,000
square
foot
lot
size
proposal.
Lots
are
two
parcel
sizes:
1.01
acres.
A
A
A
C
So,
for
example,
as
a
last
week
about
90,000
acres
had
been,
it
was
inundated
in
st.
Charles
County
and
how
we
know
that
and
how
we
can
calculate.
That
is
that
we
have
better
tools.
We
have
the
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
is
providing
flood
inundation
mapping
and
we're
also
doing
our
own
assessments
and
mapping
and
we're
now
at
the
point
where
we
can
show
where
the
water
is
and
has
been
recently
and
even
the
depth
of
water,
which
is
interesting
and
so
we're
able
to.
C
With
this
depth
of
water,
we're
able
to
do
an
assessment
of
how
many
structures
are
talking
about
that
are
probably
likely
flooded,
and
so
the
numbers
that
we
are
coming
up
with
I
learned
today
that
our
inspectors
are
inspect
about
over
3,000
structures
in
unincorporated,
st.
Charles
County
in
West
Dalton.
That
includes
accessory
structures
as
well,
but
we're
doing
an
additional.
C
What
I'll
call
a
windshield
survey
determine
which
structures
are
in
which
categories
in
terms
of
damage
and
then
we're
following
up
with
working
specifically
with
property
owners
to
get
those
structures
back
either
repaired
or,
if
necessary,
torn
down
or
elevated,
as
the
case
may
be
in
1993,
the
flood
of
1993
as
I
understand
it
in
the
unincorporated
County
we
had
about
over
1,400
homes
that
were
in
the
path
of
water
and
not
elevated.
Today,
we're
down
to
about
280,
maybe
less
than
that.
A
C
Of
zoning
requirements
I
think
what
will
factor
into
that
more
isn't
just
in
terms
of
to
what
extent
is
damaged
when
people
apply
for
our
building
permits
and
if
it's
more
than
50%
damaged
there,
there
would
be
a
requirement
that
that
house
be
elevated
at
least
one
foot
above
the
base.
Flood
elevation
is
what's
called
a
base,
flood
elevation-
sometimes
they
refer
to
that
is
the
100-year
flood,
but
that's
not
quite
accurate,
because
it's
technically
just
so
in
any
one
year
is
or
one
percent
chance
of
flooding
to
that
to
that
level.
C
B
We're
getting
closer
to
the
cleanup
stage,
and
then
this
is
probably
outside
of
your
purview,
but
as
a
county
talking
about
bringing
in
dumpsters
or
anything
to
help
the
people
that
are
these
300
structures
that
that
have
water
soaked
personal
effects.
Are
we
gonna
do
anything
to
help
all
that
self
away?
I.
D
C
It
Thanks
also
I,
might
add
just
quickly.
The
last
I've
heard
was
there's
a
state
declaration
of
emergency.
The
governor's
declared
emergency
for
st.
Charles,
County
and
other
counties,
but
there
is
not
yet
a
federal
declaration
for
a
federal
disaster,
but
once
once
that
declaration
made
by
the
president,
then
that
would
allow
FEMA
to
come
in
and
provide
certain
assistance.
Then
they
can't
do
until
there's
the
that
federal
declaration.
Okay,.