►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - June 20, 2018 - St. Charles County Government, MO
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
Applications
applications
heard
during
tonight's
meeting
will
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
The
Commission
will
then
make
a
recommendation
on
the
applications
which
will
be
submitted
to
the
st.
Charles
County
Council
for
their
final
decision.
The
individual
items
and
bills
for
this
evening's
applications
are
scheduled
to
be
introduced
at
the
Monday
July
9th
2018
county
council.
Meeting
applications
for
preliminary
plats
heard
during
tonight's
meeting
will
also
be
voted
on
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
During
the
meeting,
the
vote
on
preliminary
Platts
is
final.
B
Only
a
recommendation
for
denial
of
a
preliminary
plat
would
be
heard
before
the
county
council.
The
following
documents
are
introduced
as
a
matter
of
record
for
this
evenings
public
hearing
and
regular
meeting
of
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
Those
documents
are
the
unified
development
ordinance
of
st.
Charles
County,
including
zoning
maps.
The
year
2025
master
plan
for
the
st.
Charles
for
st.
Charles
County,
which
includes
the
year
2025
future
Land
Use
Plan
map
I,
see
we
have
a
quorum
to
have
a
motion
to
open
the
meeting,
make.
B
We
have
quite
a
few
revisions
to
the
agenda
as
it
was
posted
preliminary
plat
for
Wortman
Ridge
1639
deep
Road
was
withdrawn
prior
to
the
meeting,
so
that
was
not
part
of
tonight's
meeting.
We've
had
requests
for
three
items
to
be
continued
until
our
July
meeting.
First
as
a
preliminary
plat
for
tender,
wolf
timber,
wolf
farms,
Old
Colony
Road
chair,
would
entertain
a
motion
to
continue
this
item.
B
B
E
E
Name
is
Rebecca
Carson
I'm,
with
the
law
firm
of
Hamilton,
Weber
and
I'm
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Dardan
Prairie,
the
property
that
is
subject
of
this
application
for
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit
is
adjacent
to
and
surrounded
by.
Many
properties
that
are
part
of
Darden
Prairie.
The
city
of
dart
and
Prairie
is
opposed
to
the
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit
that
is
requested
tonight
in
this
application.
If
I
can
approach,
the
Commission
I've
got
some
documents
to
distribute.
E
So
you'll
find
in
these
packets
a
resolution
that
tonight
the
Board
of
Aldermen
is
considering
to
pass,
which
would
protest
and
oppose
the
requested
rezoning.
There
are
also
letters
voicing
the
city's
general
opposition
to
this
application,
including
one
letter
from
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission,
indicating
that,
on
their
meeting
on
June
13th,
they
unanimously
voted
to
oppose
the
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit.
E
As
indicated
by
the
resolution,
the
letters
before
you
in
the
staff
recommendation,
the
requested
rezoning
and
conditional
use
are
not
appropriate
for
this
location,
consistent
with
a
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
and
the
master
plan
of
the
county.
The
properties
that
surround
this
property
7800
highway
n
are
zoned
for
residential
light,
commercial
and
retail
uses.
E
The
city
is
currently
updating
its
Comprehensive
Plan
as
well,
and
it's
considering
rezoning
surrounding
properties
to
residential
as
well
no
property
and
the
vicinity
of
this
property
is
zoned
to
allow
an
outdoor,
vehicular
storage
facilities,
such
as
that
being
requested
under
the
conditional
use
permit
as
either
a
permitted
or
conditional
use
under
the
ordinances
of
dart
and
Prairie.
So
the
fact
that
this
is
not
allowed
under
the
zoning
under
any
of
the
surrounding
properties
indicates
that
it's
an
inconsistent
use
for
the
area.
E
An
outdoor,
vehicular
storage
facilities
such
as
this
one
would
represent
a
visual
blight
at
the
very
community
center
of
Darden
Prairie.
It
would
result
in
a
detrimental
impact
upon
the
enjoyment
and
value
of
the
surrounding
residential
school
and
church
property
uses.
Furthermore,
it
would
be
an
eyesore.
This
property
is
situated
at
the
entrance
to
the
city's
center
for
economic
development
and
I'm
afraid
it
may
deter
the
new
businesses.
E
The
city
hopes
to
draw
into
that
area,
and
some
the
requested
rezoning
in
use
is
unreasonable
and
inconsistent
with
the
character
of
the
area
will
have
a
detrimental
impact
on
the
residences,
Church
and
schools
surrounding
the
property,
its
value
and
enjoyment
thereof,
and
would
interfere
with
the
growth
plan
of
Darden
Prairie.
For
these
reasons,
the
city
of
Darden
Prairie
is
opposed
to
the
requested,
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit.
Thank
you
any.
B
F
Record
please:
my
name
is
Michelle
berry
and
I
live
at
305,
Abington
Court
addresses
O'fallon
Missouri
and
my
back
property
backs
up
to
rodents
and
everything.
She
said.
I
agree
with
everything
she
said,
I'm
concerned
about
the
value
of
the
property
I'm
concerned
about
the
noise
I'm
concerned
about
what
they're
going
to
do
to
the
property.
Where
they're
going
to
put
it.
Are
they
gonna
fence
it?
Are
they
going
to
enclose
it?
Are
they
going
to
be
open
24/7?
How
is
that
going
to
affect
me
in
my
property
value
as
well?
Thank.
B
What,
as
a
reminder,
anyone
who
comes
up
to
speak,
please
fill
out
one
of
our
speaker
cards
on
the
rail.
So
we
get
your
name
spelled
correctly.
Do
you
solemnly
declare
and
affirm
that
you
will
tell
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
and
these
proceedings
from
the
pains
and
penalties
of
perjury
idea.
G
G
Name
is
Michael:
Guevara
I
live
at
six
one:
four
calamar
court,
Oh
Fallon,
Missouri,
six,
three
one,
six,
three,
three,
six,
eight,
just
a
point
of
clarification:
councilman
chapter
405
with
unified
development,
ordinance
of
st.
Charles,
County
Missouri
zoning
regulations,
section
405,
one
to
zero.
Excuse
me,
1
to
5
and
1/3
zero.
The
c1
neighborhood,
which
we
have
the
zoning
far
right
now
in
that
area,
states
that
any
lawn
care
service
on
site
of
not
less
than
one
acre
and
all
lawn
care
materials
and
related
equipment.
G
Our
vehicles
are
required
to
be
stored
within
an
actuary
structure.
If
you
look
at
the
two
properties,
the
Rodden
property
and
the
adjacent
one
to
the
east,
they're
both
lawn
care,
our
landscaping
companies
and
ours
equipment
all
over
the
place
in
their
fields
all
over
their
property.
Nothing
is,
in
you
know
in
a
you,
know,
actuary
structure,
so
at
this
point,
I
feel
that
they've
already
paved
and
gravelled
a
lot
of
them.
Who
I
am
that
had
huge
pin
oaks
on
it?
G
They
took
all
those
down
put
gravel
in
the
drainage
onto
my
property,
because
I
back
up
to
their
property
in
Keystone
crossing
the
subdivision,
that's
adjacent
to
them.
The
runoff,
you
know
is
major.
Now
we
didn't
have
that
before,
even
when
they
paved
for
icd
mecco
conception,
Dardenne
Prairie,
all
their
runoff
goes
under
highway
end
and
over
to
the
drainage,
ditch
on
the
south
side
of
highway
m
and
then
down
through
those
fields
which
increased
the
water
flow
to
my
property.
G
So
I've
got
a
drainage,
ditch
now
running
through
my
property
that
I
didn't
have
when
I
moved
in
there.
It
was
supposed
to
be
a
small
Swale
according
to
burr
Kemper,
when
they
built
the
property
and
now
it's
a
ditch
and
it
gets.
You
know
anywhere
from
eight,
almost
two
feet
deep,
sometimes
when
we
get
a
good
rain
for
a
you
know,
a
day
or
a
day
and
a
half.
So
we're
opposed
to
this
rezoning
for
the
fact
that
they're
not
living
up
to
the
zoning
regulations
now
with
their
equipment.
G
The
the
we've
seen
them
over
the
last
18
years,
gravel
that
property
in
and
caused
more
runoff
in
the
area,
and
if
there's
traffic
in
and
out
of
there,
you
know
we,
we
have
no
idea
of
what
kind
of
eyesore
that's
going
to
create
back
there.
If
you
look
up
on
technology,
drive,
there's
a
storage
facility,
a
vehicle
storage
facility
up
there
and
there's
rusted
cars,
there's
cars
with
tarps
on
them
that
are
all
torn
up
and
it's
you
know
it's
gonna
definitely
decrease
the
property
value
of
the
surrounding
area.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
H
H
My
name
is
Lee
Forester
I'm
at
one-one-one,
Keystone,
Crossing,
Drive
and
O'fallon
633,
6
8,
so
I
just
wanted
to
also
say:
I
am
opposed
to
this
rezoning
I
have
been
a
living
at
one-one-one,
Keystone
Crossing
for
18
years.
Rodin's
has
always
had
the
common
ground
split
with
the
creek
running
behind
my
backyard
for
the
most
part.
Over
the
years
it's
been,
it's
been
quiet,
more
of
an
agricultural
setting,
it's
very
they're,
very
the
use
of
the
land
all
around
it's.
It's
been
very
good
for
raising
families
and
very
open
throughout
that
area.
H
However,
what
this
would
fail
to
preserve
all
that,
turning
it
into
a
parking
lot,
RV
RVs
sitting
around
car
storage,
etc.
Just
it's
not
what
the
Darden
area
was
meant
to
be
I
think
it
would
also
hurt
our
home
value
over
time
and,
as
the
gentleman
said
before
us
on
the
other
side
of
the
Keystone
Crossing
subdivision,
there
is
already
an
RV
storage
that
entry.
The
entry
way
is
from
Technology
Center
Drive
and
it's
unsightly
as
it
is,
and
it's
taken
him
almost
18
years
to
halfway
clean
that
up
to
where
it
looks
presentable.
H
But
it's
still
it's
still
not
what
it
should
be:
it's
not
and
then
across
from
highway
40.
On
the
other
side,
as
you
are
approaching,
Lake
st.
Louis,
they
have
just
put
in
a
storage
facility,
multi-level
storage
facility,
so
I
think
we
have
enough
storage
facilities
out
in
the
st.
Charles.
You
know
dart
and
prairie
area.
So
again,
I
would
just
oppose
this
rezoning.
B
Thank
you.
Anyone
else,
okay,
we
will
close
this
public
hearing
for
those
individuals
that
spoke.
Please
be
advised
that
if
this
is
brought
back
on
our
July
agenda,
then
we
would
hear
from
the
applicant
and
then
have
a
public
hearing
at
that
at
that
time.
So
if
the
applicant
requests
it
being
on
our
July
agenda,
then
we
would
have
the
applicants
peak
and
then
enough
second
public
hearing,
so
he
would
have
another
opportunity.
B
The
next
item
is
a
rezoning
and
contused
conditional
use
permit
request,
566
Highway
P
application
is
C.
You
are
18.
Oh
three,
the
applicant
is
joseph
and
paula
dams.
Danger
they've
requested
that
this
be
continued.
I'll
make
a
motion
to
continue
Paul's
in
favor,
say:
aye.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
regarding
this
application.
B
I
Smith
400
North
fifth
Street,
st.
Charles
Missouri,
six,
three,
three
zero
one
I'm
an
attorney
representing
Michael
and
Susan
Smith,
who
are
landowners
at
405,
James
Park
Drive
in
O'fallon,
Missouri,
6-3,
3-6
6-2,
are
opposed
to
the
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit
at
566
highway
P.
That
area
of
Highway
P
is
a
two-lane
highway.
It's
quite
busy.
It
has
speeds
of
50
miles
per
hour.
There's
concerns
about
how
the
traffic
flow
would
be
monitored,
with
again
putting
a
parking
lot
essentially
on
property.
I
There
is
concerned
again
with
developing
that
land
and
putting
parking
lot
depending
on
what
the
structure
would
be,
that
it
would
continue
to
add
to
the
flood
area
lighting
on
that
property.
There's
currently
lighting
at
Dames
Park
itself
and
when
those
lights
are
on
there's
James,
Park
subdivision,
which
is
right
there,
which
receives
that
lighting
as
well
as
another
subdivision.
That's
behind
it.
If
you
add
a
structure,
presumably
there
would
be
some
other
lighting,
that's
there
that
would
interfere
with
the
residents.
There's
concern
with
noise,
there's
already
some
residential
development.
That's
right!
I
There,
there's
bleachers
bar
there's
Jeremy's
on
P,
there's
noise
that
comes
with
that,
and
there's
concern
about
additional
noise
coming
from
people
entering
and
exiting
and
parking
things
on.
This
parking
lot.
That
area
as
well
as
mainly
a
park
along
with
some
subdivisions.
There's
concern
about
the
landscaping
of
the
area.
What
it
will
do
is
well
to
property
values.
It's
not
consistent
with
what
that
area
of
the
property
is
like.
There's
concern
about
security.
I
B
B
J
I
we
do
own
a
villa
in
dames
Park
and
we
are
very
close
to
highway
P
and
we
object
to
the
parking
lot
being
built
there.
Highway
P
is
very
narrow.
There's
no
shoulder
it's
two
lanes.
The
speed
goes
from
where
you
turn
off
highway,
M
on
to
P
from
fifty
to
sixty
miles
an
hour
and
there's
no
turn
lanes
and
I.
Just
can't
see
that
handling
that
kind
of
traffic
I
think
it
would
be
a
hazard
in
detrimental
to
our
property
values
and
that's
my
biggest
objections.
J
B
K
L
K
I've
lived
in
my
current
residence
on
highway
P,
since
March
of
2014
I
grew
up
in
the
neighborhood
right
beside
it
on
Capri,
so
I've
lived
on
this
Highway
a
right
off
a
highway
P
for
60
years.
I
can
tell
you
that
the
peace
and
quiet
that
I
enjoyed
through
growing
up
out
there
is
gone
and
mr.
settle
I.
Think
this
is
your
district
I'm
sure
you're
fairly,
what
familiar
with
highway,
P,
yeah
and
I
get.
What
Joey
wants
to
do?
K
Make
some
money
off
this,
but
anybody
that's
ever
driven
by
that
knows,
there's
been
a
decaying
barn
there
that
they
tore
down
a
few
years
ago,
but
there's
also
a
house
it's
very,
very
neglected
in
in
its
maintenance.
I
can't
imagine
them
putting
up
anything
that
would
it
would
receive
any
better
maintenance
than
what
we've
seen
through
the
years
in
this
house.
It's
been
a
rental
property
for
quite
some
time,
so
the
area
in
the
circle
is
where
they're
looking
to
build.
My
house
is
right
here
across
the
property
from
that
I.
K
Don't
know
if
y'all
have
looked
at
traffic
and
accident
reports,
but
I
can
tell
you
I've
called
EMS
three
dozen
times
in
the
14
years,
I've
lived
there.
You
need
to
look
at
accident
reports
for
this.
There
are
people
constantly
crashing
the
distance
from
a
blind
curve
which
it's
a
blind
curve
going
into
this
property
going.
Westbound
is
about
a
tenth
of
a
mile
at
fifty
miles
an
hour.
That's
a
seven
second
duration,
a
twenty
foot,
one
foot
truck
pulling
a
thirty
foot.
K
Trailer
is
not
going
to
take
seven
seconds
to
pull
out
of
that
and
go
to
O'fallon
they're
gonna.
Take
quite
a
bit
of
time.
Coming
from
the
other
side
is
about
600
feet
a
little
bit
longer,
but
in
either
case
it's
still
only
about
seven
seconds.
This
view
is
two-tenths
of
a
mile
from
the
property.
You
cannot
see
the
entrance
to
that
property.
K
Okay
in
fourteen
seconds
I'm
going
to
round
it,
I'm
gonna,
be
there
okay,
I'm
going
50-plus
miles
an
hour
and
I.
Don't
think
people
are.
If
you
drive
highway,
P
you'll
know
this
is
a
little
bit
closer.
You
still
can't
see
the
entrance
and
finally,
as
you
round
that
blind
corner
you're,
a
tenth
of
a
mile
from
the
property
and
you're
five
to
seven
seconds
from
hit,
somebody
is
pulling
out
pullin
up
a
50-foot
vehicle
between
trailer
and
vehicle
I.
K
K
K
The
area
that
you
see
right
here
is
all
the
the
nice
rectangle
has
all
being
put
under
roof
right
now.
You
guys
know
that
you
know
how
many
houses
they're
gonna,
put
in
there
they're
putting
over
600
houses
in
that
area
in
in
in
about
a
five
year
period
of
time.
So
when
I
moved
out,
there
was
there's.
K
Forty
four
population
is
not
going
to
slow
down
the
traffic
on
IO
ap
is
not
going
to
slow
down
the
amount
of
effort
that
it's
going
to
take
for
people
to
avoid
things
here,
there's
going
to
be
terrible
and
I
urge
you
guys
to
consider
location,
the
hazard
to
the
public
and
the
lack
of
maintenance
for
historical
and
the
property
exhibited
by
the
owner
of
the
property
on
its
current
structure
as
indicative
of
what
we
can
expect
from
them
in
the
future.
Then
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank.
B
M
M
B
N
Name
is
Arne
C,
acd,
Knopf
public
advocate
and
county
resident
and
I'm.
Also
a
resident
of
the
city
of
O'fallon,
as
I've
spoke
to
you
before
about
other
conditional
use
permits
involving
storage
of
boats.
Rvs
jet
skis
cars.
We
keep.
The
resounding
issue
keeps
coming
up
and
I
wish
staff
could
take
a
grip
of
it
and
somebody
would
start
to
do
something
and
formulate
policy.
It's
code
enforcement
code
enforcement
and
code
enforcement.
N
These
are
conditional
use
permits,
which
are
a
your
granting
that
obligation
to
vary
from
our
code
for
something
that's
not
allowable
in
the
zoning
code.
We
need
protections
in
st.
Charles
County
and
we
need
to
protect
the
rights
of
other
property
owners
in
the
communities
that
these
facilities
are
going
in.
I
understand
why
this
is
being
created.
N
We
need
insurance
and
responsibilities
and
I'm
kind
of
upset
with
the
staff
the
last
three
months,
the
staff
places
easy
and
minimum
conditions
not
putting
the
required
conditions
and,
according
to
state
law
nor
home
roll
County
charter,
you
people
in
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
meeting
can
add
and
go
above
and
beyond
with
the
planning
zoning
director.
Mr.
Myers
and
the
assistant
planning
director
recommend
as
the
bare
minimum
conditions,
maybe
they're,
trying
to
be
political,
maybe
they're,
trying
to
be
easy
to
get
along
with.
N
But
we
need
to
ensure
that
our
County
is
being
adhered
to
and
that
our
code
is
being
followed.
Now
I
took
this
measure
to
the
O'fallon
City
Council
and
the
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
Highway
P,
approximately
250
feet,
southeast
of
Park
Ridge
Drive,
which
is
an
under
carpet
parcel
adjacent
to
the
city
of
O'fallon
on
two
sides
within
the
immediate
proximity
of
Games
Park,
which,
if
you
know
where
that's
at
it's
a
very
large
park,
it
has
a
lot
of
flooding
issues.
There
are
a
number
of
accidents
which
has
been
testified.
N
The
City
Council
recently
two
months
ago
lowered
the
speed
limit.
Unfortunately,
in
the
Missouri
Department
of
Transportation
and
highways
has
not
acted
upon
that
ordinance
and
has
not
acted
upon
that
request
to
lowered
the
speed
limit.
There
needs
to
be
safety,
improvements
needed
it's,
it's
a
very
curvy
type
highway
and
it
hasn't
been
kept
up
with
the
times,
there's
a
number
of
residential
developments
and
that
part
of
north
of
Faolain
is
exploding.
N
If
you
look
at
the
community
development
building
permits
they're
off
the
charts
from
last
year
and
this
year,
it's
not
conducive
with
the
comprehensive
plan
of
st.
Charles
County
and
not
conducive
with
a
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city
of
O'fallon,
which
this
Commission
by
state
law
must
take
into
account.
There's
landscaping
issues,
there's
lighting
issues
and
there's
definitely
flooding
issues
which
almost
every
season,
except
for
this
year
highway
P,
is
not
flooded.
N
The
oaf
Island
City
Council
rightfully
has
a
substantial
interest
and
development
proposals
for
unincorporated
pockets
of
st.
charles
county,
which
are
jacent
to
property
and
no
filing,
since
such
developments
can
have
significant
and
broad
ranging
impacts
on
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
property
within
the
city
of
O'fallon.
The
proposed
rezoning
of
the
subject-
property
and
proposed
conditional
use
permit
now,
pending
in
st.
N
Charles
County
conflicts
with
those
important
goals
and
will
perpetuate
disharmony
in
confusion
and
impede
the
effective
efficient
service
by
inserting
an
awkward
and
ill-conceived
Lane
juice
and
site
plan
at
a
critical
location
along
Missouri
Highway
P,
the
O'fallon
City
Council
hereby
expresses
to
the
st.
Charles
County
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
into
the
st.
Charles
County
Council.
N
It's
opinion
that
the
proposed
rezoning
and
conditional
use
permit
applications
for
the
property
on
the
south
side
of
highway
P
approximately
250
feet
southeast
of
Park
Ridge
Drive
are
inappropriate
in
ill-conceived
and
should
be
but
denied
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
in
the
full
County
Council.
The
O'fallon
City
Council
further
asked
at
the
st.
Charles
County
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission,
and
the
st.
Charles
County
Council
to
cooperate
in
orderly
and
logical
development
of
property
and
delivery
of
public
services
by
supporting
and
facilitating
the
annexation
of
property
into
the
city
of
a
fowling.
N
And
that
brings
up
a
key
point
in
government
relations
and
affairs.
The
county
executive
has
a
full-time
assistant
director
of
administration
who
deals
with
intergovernmental
relations
that,
unfortunately,
in
the
dardan
Perry
case
in
this
case,
and
also
the
case
in
new
Mellie,
didn't
come
to
the
forefront
and
these
local
officials
and
local
communities
were
not
notified,
timely
to
participate
and
be
part
of
the
planning
process.
B
N
So
there
was
one
member
that
was
absent
due
to
her
husband
being
ill,
but
she
would
have
passed
it
and
would
have
been
in
10
to
0
vote
that
was
brought
down
here
to
the
office
of
County
Registrar
Brenda
as
Hinton,
and
it
was
filed
on
June
15
2018.
The
resolution
0
6/14
such
is
2
0,
1
8m
was
signed
by
Mayor
Bill
Hennessy
on.
So
we
have
that.
Okay,
we
have
that
information.
Can
you
please
ask
your
attorney
I'm
allowed
to
testify
and
make
a
record
here?
We
have.
B
N
On
June
14th
to
assigned
by
Mayor
Bill
Hennessy,
and
it
was
a
testa
tube
by
paint
pan
mile
Clemente,
the
city
clerk
and
official
five
by
the
city
attorney
Kevin
O'keefe.
For
those
reasons,
I
asked
if
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
members
fully
comply
with
the
monstrance
that
was
filed
in
the
resolution
passed
by
nine
out
of
the
ten
members
of
the
City
Council,
and
asked
that
you
denied
this
application.
N
C
B
O
D
B
P
6-2,
don't
agree
with
this
rezoning.
We've
been
residents
there
for
approximately
twenty
years.
If
you
know
the
area,
it's
very
residential
rural,
it's
got
a
very
nice
feel
to
it.
We
think
this
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
the
general
feel
of
the
place
and
we
think
it
will
have
a
negative
effect
both
on
our
quality
of
life
and
enjoying
our
area
of
where
we
live,
as
well
as
our
property
values.
We
think
it
would
end
up
being
an
eyesore
that
would
be
a
negative
to
to
the
area.
Furthermore,
you've
heard
the
concerns
about
flooding.
P
Those
are
very
real.
This
is
a
high
flood
area
and
surely
paving
this
additional
land
is
not
going
to
help
that,
but
rather
it's
going
to
hurt
that
you've
heard
the
the
concerns
about
traffic.
We
share
those
and
finally,
we
would
say
you
know
we're
not
really
interested
in
having
this
rezone
to
create
a
place
for
others
to
effectively
store
their
junk
in
our
backyard.
So
that's
not
something
we
want.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Anyone
else.
B
The
same
as
the
prior
see
you
are,
if
this
is
requested
to
come
back
on
our
agenda
in
July,
then
we
would.
The
procedure
would
be
to
hear
from
the
applicant
then
to
en
have
another
public
hearing
at
that
point,
so
you
may
keep
watching
for
the
July
agenda
to
see
if
this
comes
back
but
before
the
the
Commission.
B
Okay.
Thank
you
next
item.
We
get
to
the
agenda.
The
first
official
thing
on
our
agenda
is
preliminary
plat
for
the
Craig
Boshart
subdivision.
Five
to
eight
eight
vazhi
Station
Road
application
is
pyaari
18
national
six,
the
owner
is
claude,
a
bas,
Rutten
ACC,
Bosch
or
the
applicant
is
Craig
Boshart,
surveyors
landmark
surveying
company,
the
property
is
owned.
Our
single-family
residential
district
area
is
seven
acres.
The
number
of
Lots
is
to
the
location
is
on
the
east
side
of
Blasi
Station
Road,
approximately
1,300
feet
south
of
Susan
Avenue,
Council,
District,
six
staff,
all.
L
Right,
you
should
have
a
revised
copy
of
the
plant
that
was
distributed
this
evening.
Staff
has
reviewed
the
plant
they
have
met.
All
of
our
requirements
for
a
preliminary
plant
staff
is
recommending
approval.
However,
there
is
one
issue
you
remember
this.
This
parcel
came
up
for
rezoning
earlier
this
year.
It
was
approved
by
County
Council.
L
The
reason
that
they
have
to
file
a
plat
is
because
earlier
post
1999,
when
the
unified
development
ordinance
went
into
effect,
a
previous
property
was
split
off
to
the
south
of
this
property.
Consequently,
the
remainder
has
to
be
plaited
as
a
subdivision.
It
can
no
longer
be
split
by
a
simple
deed
and
survey.
So
that's
why
they
had
to
come
forward
with
a
preliminary
plat.
L
The
only
issue
that
we
have
that
we
have
that
we
do
have
to
ask
that
it
be
sent
on
to
County
Council,
for
approval
of
a
variance
is
county
ordinance,
section.
Four
one,
zero
point:
two
eight
zero
number
two
requires
that
all
plants
have
driveway
access
to
an
interior
subdivision
street,
so
this
plat
it
does
not
make
sense.
Conny,
County,
Highway
Department
has
reviewed
it.
L
They
agree
that
the
one
driveway
access
with
an
easement
to
the
parent
parcel
to
the
south
be
used
instead
of
creating
a
street
having
a
cul-de-sac
turn
around
or
something
like
that,
so
they
are
recommending
that
it
go
forward
with
this
easement,
as
shown
on
the
plat
it.
Basically,
it's
the
existing
driveway
with
easement
to
the
southern
parcel,
so
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
plat.
Q
B
Q
O
A
Q
Would
be
on
the
north
side
of
the
driveway
close
to
Blade
Station
Road,
we're
actually
looking
at
setting
it
back
off
the
road
80
feet,
and
then
there
would
be
the
appropriate
boundaries
40
feet
to
the
north
40
feet
to
the
driveway,
or
it's
actually
like
60
something
feet
to
the
property
line.
On
the
south
side,
it
would
be
well
above
the
500-year
floodplain.