►
From YouTube: Messaging for Web3 Bi-weekly
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
D
D
E
B
B
B
D
A
F
A
F
So
I
was
supposed
to
be
making
progress
on
a
spec
type
thing,
but
I
haven't
made
too
much
progress
on
that.
Instead,
I
submitted
some
little
article
pets
on
on
how
you
use
one
of
the
incentivisation
scheme
to
provide
meaningful
numbers
to
users
about
basically
which
relays
they
should
trust
on
which
ones
they
should
in
terms
of
not.
C
F
What
you
know
that
wasn't
really
surprising,
but
it
was
good
to
sort
of
athletes
it
in
tore
that
sector.
That
code
is
actually
there's
actually
kind
of
a
lot
of
code
there
it's
hard
to
maintain.
So
it
least
there's
an
there's
one
answer
to
that
question
so,
and
it's
a
bit
more
clear
than
the
weight
or
has
always
done
these
things
so
well,
not
only
stories
more
clear,
but
the
direction
of
induced
is
there
so
yeah?
F
F
E
E
Engine
and
we
are
interested
in
bility
and
availability
and
I-
think
there
is
something
you
are
talking
about
in
a
sense
of
messaging
as
well,
so
yeah
I'm
interested
to
listen
what
your
research
is
doing
in
the
sense
of
how
you
discover
what
route
is
available
and
observes
is
available
and
so
forth.
That's
like
a
very
short
description.
A
D
A
C
F
A
F
F
Right:
okay,
okay,
so
it
wasn't
so:
okay,
more
general,
okay,
discussion,
okay,
so
one
other
things
yet
to
do
a
15-minute
order
trying
to
make
some
more
progress
on
this
layering
document.
We
haven't
done
that
much
on
it.
However,
it
was
for
me
it
was
a
secondary
priority,
but
anyway
she's
putting
some
questions
into
it,
which,
during
start
answering
things
and
probably
some
of
the
questions
is
it
gets
to
higher
level
stuff
will
be
things
that
I
actually
don't
understand,
because
I've
been
thinking
about
like
the
data
same
problem
and
stuff
like
this.
A
A
This
tells
some
more
sort
of
mundane
engineering
issues
for
that,
but
it's
getting
there
and
then
in
terms
of
dealing
with
most
offline
device
and
so
I'm,
weird
but
sort
of
trying
to
find
a
path
where
it's
for
us
personally,
something
that's
useful
right
now,
but
then
moving
towards
using
swarm
for
that
we're
still
working
on
like
a
basically
what
I
would
look
like
in
that
sources
in
a
general
discussion
in
terms
of
how
to
use
things
like
feeds
and
so
on.
For
that
related
to
that
is
also
sort
of
this.
A
This
idea
of,
like
notes
or
adaptive
notes
where,
where
you
connect
to
network
directly,
which
is
something
that's
that
very
relevant
for
for
sort
of
us
in
terms
of
resources,
take
the
device
and
so
on,
so
so
we'll,
hopefully
look
sort
of
work
more
closely
on
developing
something
like
that.
I
think
that's
something!
I
would
be
generally
useful
if
you
had
to
swim,
like
notes
for
any
form
of
communication
where
you
want
to
use
something:
that's
warm
as
a
source
layer,
okay,.
F
G
E
G
G
Yeah
basically,
what
Oscar
mentions
now
was
the
guest.
The
salient
points
of
this.
So
at
the
summit,
I
did
a
presentation
of
some
thoughts
on
how
to
do
how
to
assist
some
thoughts
around
how
to
architecture
chat
functionality,
multi-user
chat
functionality
and
using
feeds
with
swarm
and
I
guess
for
the
adaptive
note
light
notes,
stuff,
there
is
actually
a
defined
or
will
very
shortly
be
a
defined
track
on
this
Oscar
right
could,
in
the
two
and
three
months
leading
forward
yes
well
pitch
are
had
together.
G
That's
that's
pretty
concrete
that
we
will
be
doing
this
right
and,
as
far
as
the
feed
stuff
goes
before,
the
summit
I
posted
some
thoughts
on
this
on
preliminary
thoughts
on
this
feed
stuff
on
the
Status
forum,
screen.I,
hats
or
and
Eric
I
think,
was
involved
in
discussing
this
further
and
I'll
try
to
coalesce
what
I
talked
about
nuts
and
the
summit
into
a
more
mature
form
of
that,
and
then
I
don't
know
Oscar.
Is
there
like
around?
G
G
A
Yeah,
exactly
yeah
I
think
so,
I
think
one
thing,
because
it's
like
different
status
of
attacking
after
the
same
problems
and
some
some
things
are
falling
on
someone
else,
but
for
when
it
comes
to
swarm
and
mix
it
and
so
on.
I
think
one
thing
we
haven't
talked
enough
about
this
in
terms
of
how
we
can
so,
if
how
it
would
what
do
we
look
like
to
leverage
them
together.
A
So
I
guess
this
goes
back
to
sort
of
the
general
problem
with
with
light
notes
and
so
on,
and
the
fact
that,
from
what
I
am
saying
most
of
tests
are
successful,
makes
it
the
science
and
and
the
actual
sort
of
things
in
roughly
in
production
or
at
least
close
to
it,
like
new
peaks
and
so
on.
There
varies
of
kind
of
provider
heavy
or
they
have
assumptions
on
high
availability
and
so
on,
and
and
it's
it
might
be,
a
question
of
having
like
a
service
network
kind
of
type
of
thing.
A
F
F
F
The
other
one
is
that,
but
that's
that's
just
some
assertion.
That's
not
like
that's
a
lot
of
things.
The
other
is
that
you
want
to
actually
measure
it,
which
is
the
thing
that
I
just
wrote
up
for
hot
cats.
That
I
said
that
didn't
need
to
happen
right
now,
but
so
that's
one
part
of
it.
The
problem
with
that
particular
measurement
strategy
is
it's
a
little
bit
slow,
but
it
gives
you
Japan.
F
Well,
it
depends
you
can
make
it
fast
it,
but
you
know
it
doesn't
tell
the
users
if
a
note
is
down
right
now,
but
maybe
there's
no
way
to
do
that.
So
you
know
maybe
we
could
just
sort
of
judge
based
on
you
know
gauge
reliability
and
then
from
there
somehow.
So
that's
what
that
was
sort
of
talking
about,
but
then
so
okay,
so
one
of
the
questions
is
you
tell
users
if
they're
not
use,
do
you
think
the
other
to
be
there?
I?
G
D
F
Problem
we
ran
into
this
a
lot
with
polkadot.
Is
that
we're
running
into
this
a
lot
of
coconut
it's
hard
to
train
her
to
prove
that
somebody?
It's
somebody's
off
line,
it's
very
hard
to
attribute
these
faults
over
time
with
some
statistics.
You
can
attribute
something
yes,
but
you
know
the
it's
hard,
but.
B
F
Yeah
I
mean
that's,
that's
not
the
the
more
speaking
specifically
to
the
to
the
idea
of
penalizing
people.
If
you
can
find
a
way
if
you
can
find
a
way
to
make
it
work
on
all
the
years.
It's
just
my
prejudice
was
to
not
look
that
way,
because
I
knew
it
was
hard
from.
You
know
all
of
the
stuff
that
we've
had
to
do
in
polkadot
like
how
do
you
prove
somebody's
online?
D
This
to
wait
this
one
waste
which
this,
if
you
really
want
to
go
into
this,
we
this
is
one-
is
that
basically
to
to
to
incentivize
message:
delivery
with
with
the
conditional
one.
So,
basically,
the
acknowledged
message
unlocks
the
payment
for
the
message
it's
wrong
way.
Well,
the
other
way
is
to
that
kind
of
thing.
The
online
availability
with
either
with
the
kind
of
stream
or
or
provable
provable
data
transmission,
both
of
these
are
are
detailed
in
the
in
the
in
the
network
paper.
D
You
guys
look
I'm,
not
sure
what
you
think,
but
I
think
this
is
little
bit
bit
advanced,
and
this
is
a
bit
further
down
the
line.
So
your
honor
I'm,
not
sure,
if
you
really
want
to
go
into
details
about
this
I,
would
be
really
happy
if
you
gave
feedback
work
on
those
parts
of
the
document.
If
you
guys
are
interested
in
these
bits,
nothing
sent
you
guys.
Messenger.
F
I'm
a
bit
look
at
stuff
at
some
point,
I
mean
okay,
so
so
one
of
the
things
that
are
similar
to
what
the
validity
lab
seems
there
were
you
pay
at
for
the
each
individual
message
and
someone
Robert
and
I
are
gonna.
Go
through
that
in
more
detail.
The
I
was
sort
of
hoping
to
not
need
that
all
the
time,
but
whatever.
F
A
A
Note
since
form
I,
don't
know
just
in
case
that
that
my
I'm
not
sure
that's
interesting
it
from
an
implementation
point
of
view
from
forward
three
or
something,
but
it's
sfii,
probably
gonna
have
the
first
call
in
two
days:
I
guess:
do
we
still
like
in
terms
of
mix
it
and
and
all
the
things
that
require
that
we
still
agree
that
those
of
the
first
step
Terrace
is
nailing
down
the
strings
packet
format?
Yes,.
F
A
F
They
hired
a
bunch
of
new
people
that
I
think
should
be
quite
easy
to
work
with,
but
I
haven't
really
had
as
much
interaction
with
them
as
I
would
have
lights
and
and
when
Robert
and
I
I
mean
Roberts
like
here
down
the
street,
we
have
them
to
practice.
We
just
need
to
get
on
it
instead
of
I
just
need
to
pull
some
myself
away
from
a
lot
more
and
that's
on
I'm.
Sorry,
no.
A
B
From
my
point
of
view,
I
think
it's
a
bit
on
structure
to
whole
wave
we're
going
forward.
I
don't
have
a
feeling.
We
have
like
a
to-do
list
and
milestones.
I
think
that
would
be
nice.
So
you
know
just
know
where
we
are
in
the
project,
because
at
the
moment
I
guess
everyone
is
working
on
bits
and
pieces.
Sure.
F
B
F
G
Actually
I'd,
like
a
stead,
I'd
like
to
ask
also
so
I've
read
through
most
of
the
literature,
that's
been
linked
to
I
mean
as
resources
for
these
web
3
comms
calls
mi
Impressionist
at
the
data
Sinclair
and
the
Big
Brother
protocol
is
kind
of
the
the
enclosure
around
the
theme
of
the
these
calls
and
the
development
forward,
but
I
can't
help,
but
thinking
that
I
there
is
still
some
things.
I
haven't
read
here,
so
it's
very
like
a
digest
of
all
I.
F
G
F
You
know
some
sort,
some
sort
of
transports
bottom,
some
notion
of
contacts,
some
you
know
messaging
level,
encryption
and
some
kind
of
data
Sinclair
that,
and
so,
when
you
say
when
I'm
sorry,
you
can
forget
the
word
you
use
because
it
didn't
you're
sort
of
in
one
ear
and
out
the
other.
But
if
you
talk
about
sort
of
the
API
most
90%
of
the
API
that
a
developer
should
see
in
the
end
should
be
this
data
Sinclair.
F
So
the
history
here
is
that,
when
certain
sort
of
in
classical
times
and
cypherpunks
went
out
to
try
and
built
these
mixed
nets-
and
things
like
this,
they
they
had
to
take
an
application
to
cater
to
and
all
they
only
speak
to
email
and
that's
even
what
happened
with
fencing
coach,
because
it
was
sort
of
the
thing
that
fit
and
the
the
point
of
the
data
Sinclair
is
to
make
more
applications
more
sort
of
modern
applications
fit
to
this
stuff.
Does
that.
G
Make
sense
that
totally
makes
sense,
so
does
that
mean
that
so
most
of
the
links
that
I've
seen
from
the
so
everything
you
mentioned
so
far,
I've
seen
like
mentioned
in
what
that
read,
but
all
of
those
resources
have
status
in
their
links.
Somehow
so
is
there
like?
Is
there
stuff
to
read
from
the
other
involved
organizations
here
as
well
that
that.
F
So
I
owe
everybody
more
information
on
the
occasion
has
okay,
there
are
two
people
with
fully
existing
mix
that
packet
formats,
there's
NIMH
has
the
one
they
inherited
from
the
parents
project,
which
is
called
Katzen
post,
and
the
only
real
problem
with
that
one
is
that
it
kind
of
sticks.
This
whole
scripting
language
of
the
package,
which
makes
things
nasty
on
a
few
levels
and
the.
F
The
other
one
is
the
one
from
validity,
labs,
they're,
the
hopper
protocol
and
that's
a
much
simpler.
That's
probably
guess
that's
what
was
the
opposite
direction
and
then
the
sort
of
the
noggin,
the
bacon,
where
one
from
us
has
the
difference,
is
that
it
has
one
extra
field
and
this
extra
field
lets
us
do
things
like
store
messages
in
the
mix
net
and
which
so,
but
this
storage
is
completely
resolved
and
way
below
any
thing
that
a
sinclair
guns.
So
it's
it's
purely
a
transport
things
when
the
person
is
offline.
F
A
You
have
much
insight
into
maybe
someone
from
hoppers
here
but
like
in
terms
of
how
they
look
at
their
response,
because
because
room
status,
point
of
view,
like
our
focus,
is
on
like
initially
on
making
something-
that's
useful
for
so
far
end
users,
which
means
sort
of
this
dating
stuff.
So
so
we
don't
currently
have
resources
for
doing
sort
of
mix.
That.
A
F
A
So
I
guess
the
question
is
like
in
terms
of
structure
because
I
agree,
that's
something
that's
useful
to
have
more
clear
in
terms
of
milestones
and
so
on.
So
do
we
imagine
that
that
sort
of
whole
thing
or
do
we,
you
want
to
keep
it
focused,
remix
and
stuff,
and
if
so
then
then
like
what
to
me
a
lot
of
it
depends
on
to
the
specific
I
guess:
implementation
team,
so
what
you
want
to
call
it
and
how
they
how
it
fits
into
their
roadmap.
B
G
A
Guess
it's
also
worth
mentioning
Marshall
but
Bill.
This
was
this
product
that
happened
with
at
the
hackathon,
where
Dean
from
stutters
and
then
a
bunch
of
other
people
from
other
project
chains
and
so
on.
They
were
working
on
so
if
proof
of
concept
for
for
mesh,
networking
and
and
offline
offline
messaging
and
so
on
and
by
offline
I
mean
without
internet
and
using
relays
and
so
on,
I'm.
A
With
that
type
of
thing
fits
in
because
they
kind
of
have
their,
they
have
their
own
sort
of
orientation
started
now
in
in
some
web
form
in
general,
like
there's
a
lot
of
these
are
purchased
and
so
on.
It's
a
matter
of
how
we
generally
sort
of
form
them.
So
it's
not
specific
to
one
product,
but
it's
more
like
an
open
set
of
standards.
Yes,.
B
A
F
Suspect
Harry
Harry
is
a
little
consumed
with
being
CEO,
CEO
or
whatever
at
the
moment.
Hopefully
he'll.
He,
it's
always
possible
he'll
decide
he
needs
to
be
doing
something
more
technical
and
how
he
feels
for
that
role
or
another
visit
for
Jonathan
its
anyway,
whatever
the
yes,
if
we
can
get
Harry
to
do
more
about.
That
would
be
great
because
he's
obviously
quite
good
at
that.
F
Yeah
yeah
I
agree
completely,
I
mean
I.
Think
what
we
need
to
do
is
we
sort
of
need
to
be
have
the
idea
that
we're
outputting
something
that's
kind
of
an
extremely
good
particular
piece
and
and
then
they
fit
together.
But
with
you
know,
obviously
it
has
to
be
whatever
glue
and
whatever.
But
if
we
can
build
particularly,
you
know
very
high-quality
individual
layers,
and
this
is
extremely
useful,
and
this
is
what
the
MLS
people
are
doing
and.
A
F
A
B
C
A
I
guess
in
terms
of
how,
because
I
do
you
think
that's
the
thing?
That's
maybe
less
clear
to
me,
sort
of
specifically
the
mix
that
layer
and
how
we
move
forwards
so
that
we
don't
end
up
with
three
separate
implementations
or
whatever
or
some
research
and
then
two
different
implementations
and
how
how
we
go
about
that
and
a
mouth
sauce
require
that
the
only
one
we
observe
isolate,
there's
a
simple
target
was
a
swings
packet
format,
and
maybe
it's
just
a
well
like
we'll
take
a
while,
and
we
so
take
one
separately
but
I.
F
A
F
Find
dropping
the
call
frequency
down
I
think
maybe
what
we
should
really
attempted
to
do
is
is
like
is.
Is
we
have
some
idea
that
sort
of
these
are
the
repose?
We
should
each
be
following
on
github
and-
and
we
should
actually
be
trying
to
you
know
like
I
I'm,
not
sure
like.
Maybe
we
should
have
a
reason
to
I
mean
yeah.
If
we
we
can
use,
let's
see
yeah
I'm,
trying
to
think
how
much
to
organize
this.
It's
time
no.
F
What
would
be
useful
I
guess
is
if
we
introduced
this.
Assuming
we're
happy
with
this
riot
channel
is
if
we
could
use
this
riot
channel
to
keep
make
sure
that
everybody
knows
what
github
repositories
actually
have
at
least
specs.
It's
not
code
that
they
should
be
followed
because,
like
I
mean
I,
might
you
know
I?
Would
you
know
I
meeting
is
a
meeting
in
to
know
it's
distracting
to
lots
of
people,
but
I,
really,
you
know
huge
numbers
of
things
on
github
all
the
time.
F
G
G
G
F
One
thing
we
could
do
is
we
could
put
like
some
common
bit
in
the
readme
x'
at
the
bottom
of
the
repos.
There
was
this
document
I
sent
last
time
at
the
time
before
about
this
very
thing
we
could
that's
somewhere
and
and
and
have
it
links
with
three
toes.
We
actually
think
you're
gonna
look
with
spec
repose
or
whatever
we
think
are
actually
going
to
develop
into
these
things.
We
could
put
something
much
smaller,
but
we
just
very
briefly
what
we
think
the
layering
is.
G
C
A
C
F
F
F
C
C
And
we
found
out
that
some
well
as
we
know
that
I
think
most
of
you
know
that
I'm
stupid
centralized
at
the
collect
the
service
and
we
create
a
list
of
all
available.
Trust
I
was
ever
in
power,
and
this
this
makes
the
problem
a
lot
easier
and
yes,
well,
if
you
want
to
do
the
complicity,
centralize
them,
then.
F
C
C
C
C
F
F
A
F
Is
more,
this
is
something
so
Robert
and
I
need
to
get
together
and
talk
about
both
packet
format
and
this
stuff
it
sounds
like
I,
haven't
quite
realized
that
they
were
running
into
the
same
some
of
the
same
problems
we
were,
but
this
is
fine,
yeah
well
I'll,
trying
it
together
with
Rob.
We
can
take
this
offline.
A
Good
some
some
other
like
this
is
what
we
have
to
figure
out
as
well,
because
each
product
had
they
have
your
own
sort
of
roadmap
and
so
on,
and
then
we
need
to
figure
out
like.
Where
do
we
want
to
have
consensus
and
coordination
and
I?
Guess
that's
where
these
types
of
milestones
or
like?
Maybe
that
motion
doesn't
make
sense,
I,
don't
know,
and
that's
the
I
think
that's
a
question
we
have
to
do.
Yes,.
F
Selves,
so
it
sounds
like
there's
some
general
problem
with
the
interface
to
the
p2p
that
I
haven't
understood.
So
I
come
from
this
new
net
background,
where
I
wasn't
also
doing
the
networking
stuff
idiot,
let
you
set
up
channels
between
nodes
and
whatever
it's
like
kind
of
almost
assumed.
The
p2p
was
the
same
sort
of
thing.
It
could
be.
The
in
fact,
like
p2p,
is
much
gossip
oriented.
C
F
C
F
C
A
F
C
A
A
B
What
are
all
the
bits
and
pieces
that
we
need
for
that
and
just
write
them
down,
and
then
everyone
can
say:
okay
I
want
to
help
here
there,
and
then
we
have
some.
The
thing
is
so
that
all
of
us
are
on
the
same
picture.
On
the
same,
you
know
on
the
same
page,
so
we
know
what
did
what
do
you
know
what
the
road
is
going
to
be
for
forgetting
there.
C
For
example,
one
on
one
goal
for
us
is
to
have
I,
won't
get
the
basic
command
and
to
what
it
was
assigned
to
actually.
But
our
long-term
goal
is
to
have
to
have
hopper
in
the
browser
such
that
you
can
click
on
now
report
and
have
some
where
you
can
chat
some
messages
to
play
around
with
that
code
and,
for
example,
people
can
help
us
creating
this
interface,
which
wraps
the
API
functions
and.
E
C
A
So
data
think
we're
almost
in
the
stage
where
you
could
swap
out
the
house,
but
privacy
layer,
so
so
not
not
almost
not
quite
but
like,
and
idea,
then,
is
that
you
could
spit,
but
I
couldn't
whisper
for
this
mix
and
proof
of
concept,
but
also
things
like
PS
and
there's.
A
book
that
says
we
are
at
will
have
a.
We
have
a
to
say.