►
From YouTube: SunPy Developer Discussion
Description
0.6 beta
C
D
A
D
The
SC
I
come
on
doesn't
work
because
SC
I
only
worked
on
the
current
axis.
So
if
there
isn't,
the
current
axis
of
the
image
object
is
on
different
axes
to
the
current
axes
through
its
toys
out.
The
pram.
So
are
the
simplest
solution.
I
could
think
of
was
just
force
it
to
be
the
current
axis
always
and
then
this
SC
I
come
on
will
always
work.
A
D
D
So
if
you
created
the
axes
outside
of
py
plot
and
then
called
PLT
osci
py
plot
isn't
configured
with
the
current
state
of
your
blog,
probably
I
think
this
is
right
anyway,
just
like
yeah,
my
understanding
of
it
up,
I'm
merging
it,
putting
that
what
lie
did
fix
my
bug.
So
you
know
I
need
to
backport
that
yeah.
A
G
F
D
Binds
to
it,
okay
Oh
fix
that.
D
C
C
F
A
C
C
C
So
usually
the
mission
page,
then
the
instrument
page,
if
I
can
find,
if
its
header
reference,
if
I
could
find
it
or
user
guide
for
both
the
mission
and
the
instrument
and
sometimes
I'll,
add
one
thing
that,
like
you,
need
to
look
up
all
the
time
like,
for
example,
xrt.
You
almost
always
want
to
look
up
the
calibration
cables.
C
C
C
Yeah
I
did
not
I
did
not
address
that
in
the
comment.
Thank
you
in
the.
B
B
C
C
Yeah
there's
a
few
things.
Thank
you
are.
D
C
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
D
D
A
C
C
D
C
C
A
C
C
E
C
D
Yes,
you
could
override
it
dependent
on
the
flag
to
peak.
My
point
is:
do
we
want
the
peak
cover
bought?
The
keyword
argument
to
peak
is,
but
there's
a
keyword
I'll
do
to
peak
that
just
draws
an
image
without
without
any
acting
or
anything.
Oh
they
don't
know
anyone
that
to
return
a
web,
prettier
fired
version,
but.
C
I
mean
it's
not
pretty
fine,
it's
just
wrong,
it's
been
so
pretty
for
it.
It's
pretty
fine
in
that
it
brings
out
all
the
quiet
sun,
which
is
what
most
of
the
disk
is
very
it's
mostly
quiet
sun.
So
so
it
basically
makes
the
quiet
sun
look
pretty,
which
is
mostly
disk,
but
then
anywhere
where
you
have
any
kind
of
brightness
is
completely
clipped
and
therefore
like
garbage.
So
when
people
are
doing
any
kind
of
science
that
it
involves
that
those
areas
right
away,
the
first
thing
they
have
to
do
is
change.
C
A
D
C
D
D
F
Yeah,
you
look,
you
load
an
image
into
a
dl
like
it
looks
like
crap
to
start
off
with,
and
then
you
have
to
mock
it
on
with
it
to
exclude
and
masking
and
yeah
whatever
right,
but
I
think
it
may
be
worth
just
like
a
dog.
Just
a
small
couple.
Elaine
seem
like
intent
is
to
sure
all
the
data,
and
if
you
want
to
change
things,
then
look
up
Matt,
look
back
but
color
normalize
them
yeah.
That's.
F
F
C
F
0,
you
know
this
might
be
somewhere
like
in
the
0.6
documentation
that
maybe
one
of
the
like
a
place
to
put
the
purpose
and
to
have
some
pointers
to
how
to
handle
the
data
like
using
masteries
to
get
rid
of
excess
to
get
rid
of
right,
pickles
inside
bright
pixels
or
negative
pixels.
Things
like
that
so
made
a
link
in
the
dogs.
D
C
I
mean
thank
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
do.
The
only
thing
I
mean
that's.
Why
I
was
choosing
the
para
la
number.
You
know
such
that
it
looked
nice,
some
of
them
I
lean
on
you,
as
well
as
others
and
94,
and
looks
like
crap,
regardless
just
171
with
noise.
That's
the
most
important
ones.
Everyone,
I
would
say,
looks
nice.
It
looks
at
flat
compared
to
what
you're
used
to
on
the
window.
There's
nothing.
We
looked.
Oh.
H
Well,
I
need
to
take
a
closer
look,
a
little
thing,
but
I
like
the
concept
and
I,
should
find
a
lot
of
these
map.
Like
we
said,
I
mean
you're,
worried
about
people
looking
at
in
a
single.
You
know
somebody's
crap
look
at
these
crap
maps,
but
it
looked
crap
an
IDL,
too
whatta
ya,
a
map
in
your
idea.
The
first
thing
I
do
is
log
it
because
otherwise
you
can't
see
anything
right
then.
B
C
B
A
B
My
life
initial
opinion
on
the
under
concept
that
we're
talking
about
is
the
question
we
have
to
ask.
First
is
who
we
aiming
this
functionality
towards?
You
know
if,
if
it's
aiming
it
towards
people
who
were
trying
it
first
of
all
person
for
what
you're
science,
then
it's
not
quite
as
important
that
they
look
pretty
it's
important,
that
it
truly
reflects
the
data
as
best
as
possible?
Yes,
alright!
B
G
Oh,
why
isn't
this
looking
to
keep
visual
and
appealing
or
equally
helpful,
whereas
those
people
who
know
what
they
want
and
specifically
want
the
data
are
potentially
going
to
be
more
capable
of
figuring
out
what
they
need
to
do,
and
obviously,
especially
as
make
sure
it's
in
the
documentation,
but
I'd
say
the
smarter
people
who
actually
really
want
to
work
on
the
stuff.
They
are
going
to
be
capable
of
say.
Oh
right,.
C
Yeah
I
get
my
contention
would
be
that
the
people
that
don't
really
know
are
probably
less
likely
to
be.
You
know
in
some
time
I
mean
that's,
certainly
not
the
audience
that
we're
going
after
jerilee,
though
it
is
an
interesting
one
to
consider
you
know
if
we
do
make
it
super
easy
than
anyone
could
do
it,
but.
B
One
way
of
thinking
about
it
as
well
as
that,
if
people
just
want
a
couple,
pretty
pictures
and
why
they
go
ahead
of
you,
why
they're
going
through
this
on
climate
object,
Bryce,
truth
so
yeah.
If
the
some
pie
map
object
should
be
for
those
who
either
know
what
they
want,
who
are
trying
to
learn
what
they
were
rather
than
people
just
want
a
quick
in
for
a
quick,
pretty
picture
that
kind
of
what
he
knew.
He
was
all
about,
not
what
the
object
is
I,
let
my
feeling.
D
D
First,
if
we
say
you
can
change
it
make
it
look
different
in
that,
then,
as
Dan
said,
it's
for
people
who
are
wanting
to
learn
or
well
then,
who
are
just
I,
mean
you're
not
going
to
get
someone
from
the
telly.
He
wants
to
cut
a
picture
on
their
website
going
through,
for
some
map
object,
get
it
yeah.
I
know
that
would.
F
B
A
A
Okay,
so
I
guess
still
bring
this
back
around.
Would
you
feel
about
you
and
Steve
and
Stuart
about
getting
this
into
0.6
I.
E
A
D
D
D
H
D
C
Here
to
be
up
now,
yeah,
the
one
thing,
the
one
map
that
is
crap
is
the
xrt
maps
and,
to
be
honest,
I'm
not
sure
how
to
fix
those,
because
without
doing
something
that
I'm
unhappy
with,
which
is
messing
with
some
of
the
data,
are
masking
some
the
data,
because
they,
these
maps
have
some
particle
hits,
and
so
they
throw
everything
off
and.
C
I
actually
went
and
looked
at
the
code
for
the
xrt
code
to
see
whether
they
do
mask
their
data
by
getting
rid
of
values
they're
above
a
certain
place,
so
I
coated
that
in.
But
it
turns
out
that's
nowhere
near
what
you
need
to
be
it's
way
too
high.
So
the
only
way
to
get
rid
of
these
is
to
run
a
deist
biker
code,
and
you
do
not
want
to
know
what
they
do
to
despite
their
car,
always.
G
C
B
B
A
C
A
C
I'm
not
change
the
gamma
of
their
display.
We
do
not
need
to
do
it
inside
a
not
necessarily,
not
necessarily
he'll,
do
it.
They
could
still
access
that
I
mean
when
they
do.
I
am
show,
they
can
change
it.
You
know
they
can
set
it
as
their
own
has
their
own
matplotlib
value.
You
know
as
their
own
thing.
There's
no
reason
for
us
to
provide
it,
and
we
get.
You
know
it's
a
mad
potluck
thing
they
can
mess
with
it
right.
C
B
So
the
point
it
does
necessary
have
to
be
linear
or
whatever
to
do
that.
It's
just
looking
at
some
of
the
plots
just
looking
by
I.
It
can
be
hard
to
actually
appreciate
what
all
of
the
data
is
still
so
with
a
camera
or
something
else,
making
images
look,
maybe
a
little
prettier.
Although
pretty
isn't
the
point,
it's
so
that
I
can
actually
see
a
little
bit
of
detail
by
I.
B
But
again,
I
still
agree
with
you
that
it
all
the
data
can
be
all
the
data
should
be
represented,
but
maybe
change
the
gamut
would
be
a
way
that
you
could
have
all
the
data
there,
but
you
know
be
able
to
see
a
little
bit
more
detail
in
either
the
darker
patches
or
the
broader
patches
of
the
image.
Yes,.
A
C
A
A
D
D
B
D
C
A
D
C
We're
just
gonna
do
PR
on
my
hair,
then
yeah
yeah
great,
thank
you
well.
So
what
the
main
thing
is
is
the
answer
is
whether
we
want
to
spend
more
time
on
this,
get
in
20
point
6
or
whether
we
want
to
beg
off.
You
know
I
kind
of
feel
like
well
I'm,
of
course,
very
prejudice
and
bias
in
this
case,
but
I
feel
like
we
are
close
enough.
C
C
Think
the
biggest
issue
it
will
be
if
we
want
to
keep
arguing
about
what
the
like,
what
the
images
look
like
I
mean
a
critique
forever.
So
what
I
would
suggest
is
if
you
have
strong
feelings,
but
how
you
want
things
to
look,
then,
for
your
opinion
to
be
considered,
you
need
to
provide
an
actual
alternative.
C
So
you
know
I
have
no
choice.
What
is
it
horse
in
the
race
or
whatever
I
mean
this
is
just
if
you
want
to
make
them
look
different.
That's
fine
I!
My
main
contention
is
I.
Just
wanted
all
the
data
to
be
shown,
no
clipping,
that's
what
I
want
to
solve
and
then
making
them
look
as
nice
as
possible.
Well,
I
did
my
best
I'm
sure
it
could
be
done
better.
C
D
F
F
C
D
D
C
One
other
thing
I
want
to
tell
already
here,
is
I'm
working
on
iris
data,
updating
our
support
players,
data.
What.
C
C
C
C
B
D
G
B
F
C
C
C
Should
we
create
a
branch
and
just
we
can
do
people
if
they
have
some
time
can
just
start
putting
stuff
up
there?
That's
a
good
idea,
doc.
So
deep
yeah,
that's
only
branch.