►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments March 23, 2016
Description
City of Tarpon Springs Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting March 23, 2016
C
F
F
A
A
C
F
D
C
F
A
This
is
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding
where
the
Board
of
Adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
and
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
facts.
Findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
contain
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
A
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
A
Would
any
person
testifying
here
today
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
in
if
anyone
is
planning
on
speaking?
Are
you
planning
on
presenting
today?
Ok,
if
you
would
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
is
the
whole
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
being
so
sworn
I'd
like
to
address
the
first
application,
it's
a
little
bit
different
than
what
were
you
see,
application
number
15,
16
variants
to
increase
the
maximum
height
of
a
fence?
A
This
is
a
rehearing
request,
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
rehearing
request,
the
board,
and
this
is
a
two-step
process.
As
my
understanding,
this
is
the
first
time
or
in
a
very
long
time
that
a
rehearing
request
has
come
before
this
board.
The
first
step
is
that
the
board
is
going
to
hear
testimony
concerning
evidence
that
has
not
previously
been
considered
by
it.
A
It
will
be
noticed
and
presented,
and
then
you
will
determine
whether
or
not
to
grant
the
application
or
deny
the
application
at
another
meeting.
Just
today
on
this
rehearing
request,
all
you
are
to
do
is
to
consider
the
testimony
by
the
applicant
and
consider
whether
or
not
the
evidence
that
is
presented
is
new
and
has
not
yet
been
considered.
If
so,
you
graph
the
hearing
requests,
are
there
any
questions?
Yes,.
A
Can
ask
questions
of
the
applicant,
but
again
it
is
only
to
the
point
that
the
evidence
that
is,
that
there
is
additional
evidence
that
has
not
yet
been
considered.
So,
while
you
can
ask
questions,
the
question
should
only
be
two:
is
this
something
that's
been
considered
before?
Is
this
new
evidence
have
we
heard
this
before?
Those
are
the
only
questions
that
are
pertinent
to
the
rehearing
request.
A
If
it
has
to
do
with
whether
or
not
the
evidence
that
is
presented
is
new
or
if
it
is
something
that
was
presented
previously
group,
so
it's
not
towards
the
application
itself,
it's
just
whether
the
evidence
is
new
and
has
yet
to
be
considered
or
has
already
been
considered.
That's
the
only
determination
you
need
to
make
do
it.
Okay,
with
that
being
said,
we
can
have
the
applicant
present.
Yes,
the
new
users.
E
E
E
Also,
there
are
even
topography
of
the
mountain
slope
toward
the
myelin
easement
does
not
allow
construction
of
a
retaining
wall
in
order
to
place
a
forfeit
fans
on
the
same
topographical
height
as
the
main
house.
The
elevation
of
the
maximum
height
of
the
proposed
front
yard
fence
is
the
only
feasible
solution
due
to
the
specific
of
the
topography
or
the
front
yard
area
and
I
apologize.
But
I
did
want
you
to
look
at
the
pictures
that
I
may
just
recently.
So
if
you
don't
mind.
E
E
The
second
evidence
I
want
you
to
consider
was
basically
was
a
question
are
made
presented
to
me
during
our
last
meeting.
The
member
asked
me
how
the
neighbors
would
consider
this
structure
and
how
it
will
impact
the
entire
view
of
our
neighborhood.
We
have
only
if
I'm
correct,
like
nine
houses
on
the
outlet
and
well,
I
wasn't
sure,
really.
I
didn't
personally
talk
to
all
people,
so
they
didn't
come
to
the
last
meeting.
So
we
assumed
they
don't
mind.
E
This
is
a
petition
from
registration
subdivision
to.
There
are
planing
and
zone
department
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
and
it
states
that
the
abandoned
construction
like
heated
and
1400
a
mile
in
tarpon
springs
I
represent
the
danger
to
the
neighborhood,
the
unsafe
environment
forces.
The
owner
of
the
house,
like
edited
1401
tarpon,
springs
to
increase
the
height
of
the
front
yard
fence
from
Kofi
to
6
feet.
E
Neighborhood
residents
agree
the
location
and
the
overall
height
of
the
proposed
front
yard
fence
will
not
jeopardize
the
aesthetics
and
well-being
of
the
neighborhood
and,
in
fact,
will
beautify
the
entire
area
and
area
owner
of
every
house
in
our
neighborhood
signed.
This
petition
and
I
have
the
original
signatures
here.
E
Okay,
so
this
is
the
second
one
now
also
I
have
I
people
who
I
live
in
lake
next
to
my
house,
on
the
street
and
across
the
street,
in
the
very
close
proximity
to
the
abandoned
construction,
I
willing
to
come
to
the
next
meeting
and
present
their
evidence
of
unsafe
TM.
They
have
cameras
and
they
have
photos
and
they
know
what
is
going
on.
E
If
you
want
to
have
this
presentation-
and
the
last
thing
I
just
want
to
basically
I
point
out
that
I
I
did
have
the
permission
are
two
years
ago
on
the
same
adjustment,
but
of
board
to
increase
the
height
of
the
Ferranti
advance
from
40
to
6
feet
allocated
on
the
left
side
of
the
front
yard,
which
basically
the
same
area,
the
same
front
yard,
and
this
petition
to
use
a
oh
I
have
a
copy
of
it.
It
was
approved
so
I
wasn't
any
discussion.
E
G
E
G
G
G
G
A
Gonna
interrupt
both
of
you
now
I'd
say
this
is
the
questioning
has
to
do
with
the
actual
evidence
itself
and
right,
but
it
has
more
to
do
with
the
actual
evidence
in
support
of
the
application.
Not
whether
or
not
the
evidence
is
new
and
has
yet
to
be
considered.
So
those
are
I
would
ask
that
you
just
limit
your
questions
to
how
we
seen
this
before.
Have
we
not
seen
this
before
we.
A
A
E
E
H
H
E
E
H
E
E
A
D
F
A
There,
if
and
I
will
quote
from
the
ordinance
if
I,
if,
if
the
Board
finds
that
there
is
compelling
testimony
that
there's
new
evidence
to
be
presented,
then
the
board
is
required
to
grant
a
rehearing
based
on
a
vote.
So
it's
you
know
there
does
need
to
be
a
motion.
May
there
doesn't
need
to
be
about
taken,
but
if
there
is
enough
testimony
to
compel
that
there
is
new
evidence
that
has
yet
to
be
considered,
then
yes,
the
board
is
required
to
grant
every
hearing.
Okay.
D
A
The
board
again
that
the
only
question
you
are
to
answer
tonight
is
if
there
has
been
knew
it
has
been
testimony
presented
that
there's
new
evidence
that
you
have
not
considered
regarding
this
application,
not
the
merits
of
the
application,
not
whether
the
criteria
have
been
met.
None
of
that
is
to
be
considered
the
only
thing
to
be
considered
as
if
there
was
new
evidence
that
was
testimony
that
there
is
new
evidence
that
you
have
yet
to
see.
So,
if
you
have
not
seen
this
evidence
before,
then
you
are
bound
to
grant
a
rehearing.
G
E
G
E
F
A
H
G
E
F
C
Okay,
this
is
basically
a
two-part
variance
to
reduce
a
front
yard
setback
to
17
feet
and
20
feet
to
construct
a
replacement
home.
There
was
a
home
on
this
property.
Previously
it
was
vandalized,
I've,
broken
into
and
then
vandalized
and
burn
to
the
ground.
As
a
result,
what
was
left
of
the
home
had
to
be
under
our
public
are
under
our
building
code
had
to
be
removed.
C
You
second
here
anyway,
back
a
long
time
ago,
yeah
1925
they
actually
platted
in
roundabouts
that
were
planned
for
this
particular
roadway
that
never
materialized.
This
is
a
standard,
regular
residential
roadway,
very
similar
to
every
other
residential
roadway
in
the
city,
except
that
right-of-way
still
reserved
that
right
of
way
is
reserved
in
perpetuity
until
such
time
as
somebody
petitions,
the
city
to
ask
for
it
to
be
vacated
and
basically
what
the
city
does
in
that
process
is
vacate
their
rights
to
that
right
of
way.
So
the
applicant
in
this
case
had
two
options.
C
One
was
to
go
through
the
vacation
process
or
to
come
before
this
board
and
try
to
request
the
variance
the
vacation
process
for
is
a
little
bit
more
cumbersome
than
a
variance
and,
ultimately,
the
right
of
way
that
they're
going
to
actually
pin
japon
they're,
not
actually
going
to
be
in
the
right
of
way
they're
outside
of
that
right
of
way.
Really,
the
issue
is
that
right
of
way
puts
on
with
their
property
and
with
the
required
setbacks.
It's
the
setbacks
that
require
that.
Are
that
caused
this?
C
The
variance
the
need
for
the
variance,
so
really
a
variance
is
an
appropriate
tool
or
mechanism
in
this
case
to
ask
for
relief,
just
as
if
they
chose
to
do
a
vacation
they
could
they
could
go
through
that
process
as
well.
I
have
spoken
to
the
public
service
director
who
agrees
that
we
are
never
going
to
need
to
use
that
right
of
way.
So
that
being
the
case,
the
city
would
obviously
accept
a
vacation
more
than
likely.
C
The
board
would
probably
approve
a
vacation
of
this
right
of
way,
but
in
this,
in
this
particular
timeframe,
the
applicant
would
like
to
get
started
being
that
we're
getting
close
to
the
raining
season.
They
want
to
relate
to
get
their
house
rebuilt
they
like
to
be
able
to
enjoy
that
house.
So,
as
a
result,
they've
decided
to
come
through
the
variance
process.
It
very
is
a
minimal
variance.
It's
it's
not
going
to
change
the
character
of
the
community.
C
The
setbacks
are
being
imposed
on
that
property
are
setbacks
in
the
zoning
district
that
was
adopted
long
after
this
was
platted.
This
was
platted
in
a
time
we
didn't
have
land
development
codes.
We
didn't
have
setback
requirements,
so
the
original
house
wouldn't
have
met
these
criteria
anyway,
even
if
he
put
it
right
back
in
the
same
footprint
of
what
burn
wouldn't
meet
the
today's
setbacks.
It
wasn't
built
that
way
in
77.
As
a
result,
staff
is
recommending
approval.
The
applicant
does
have
that
encumbrance
them
on
the
property.
Here,
it's
something
unique.
C
It's
not
unique
to
only
this
lot
in
the
subdivision.
There
are
other
lots
that
have
this,
but
the
other
wats
that
are
already
I've
already
been
built
upon
so
they're
already
enjoying
a
reduced
setback
because
they
were
built
at
time
other
times
of
of
history
when
those
setbacks
were
different
or
didn't
exist
at
all.
That
being
the
case,
staff
has
no
concerns
or
comments.
D
J
J
We've
worked
with
a
couple
of
designers
and
architecture,
try
to
figure
out
how
we
could
make
a
house
fit
that
shape,
and
our
solution
was
to
step
backs
since
I
applied
for
this
I've
actually
had
one
another
proposal
by
a
builder
designer
gentleman
that
uses
even
less
of
that.
Space
and
I
brought
copies
of
its
they're,
basically
the
same
place,
but
it's
virtually
have
to
only
a
third
of
what
I'm
asking
and
the
first
one,
because
the
shape
of
the
house
has
changed.
I've
got
some
copies
of
this
is.
I
would
like
to
present.
C
C
Board
can't
the
board
can
recommend
approval
of
these
setbacks.
If
you,
the
setbacks
that
you
have
are
less
than
what
you're
requesting
here
when
the
when
your
actual
application
comes
forward,
that
is
not
going
to
impact
because
you're
actually
reducing
the
requests
that
you
have.
Obviously
we
should
have
that
information
ahead
of
time
of
the
meeting
be
preparing
an
application
according
to
what
the
request
is,
but
there
is
the
option
for
the
board
to
approve
the
the
request
that
they
have
here
and,
if
they're
deviating
from
that
request,
and
they
want
a
smaller
set
back.
C
So
it's
going
to
be
less
of
a
reduction,
then
in
that
case
there
it's
a
smaller
they're
asking
for
a
much
minimum,
a
much
more
smaller
thing.
So
we
can.
We
can
address
that
at
the
time
of
permitting,
however,
generally
being
that
there's
a
new
design
here,
you
would
defer
this
application
review,
that
new
information
and
and
make
your
make
your
determination,
I
mean.
Obviously
staffs
recommendation
is
probably
not
going
to
change.
There's
an
encumbrance
covers
in
all
this
property.
They
have
a
physical
limitation
on
the
property.
A
Know
as
far
as
the
variances
that
are
requested,
if
the
new
plans
are
asking
for
a
smaller
variance,
but
smaller
there
will
be
a
smaller
impact.
I
don't
see
that
that's
going
to
be
a
problem.
If
the
board
is
okay,
based
on
the
presentation
today,
if
the
board
feels
that
the
application
would
be
approved,
then
it
we
would
approve
it
as
is,
and
then
at
the
permitting
process,
with
the
plans
change
plans
would
get
revised
all
the
time
if
their
lesson
they
don't
exceed
I,
don't.
A
And
in
the
event
that
you've
got
another
designer,
a
planner
that
comes
in
and
you've
got
another
set
of
plans.
Of
course
you
would,
you
know,
depending
upon
what
the
variances
are,
but
the
board
can
consider
the
application,
as
is
without
the
new
plans,
and
then
you
know,
during
the
permitting
process,
you
would
would
bring
those
up
I.
C
J
Where
the
variance
one
was
requested,
it
was
17
feet
instead
of
25.
The
new
one
is
21
feet
so
on,
but
it's
to
the
left
five
or
ten
feet
I,
maybe
not
that
much
I'd
have
to
measure
it
with
my
I
brought
I
brought
my
roar
I'd
have
to
measure,
but
I
can
tell
you
exactly
how
far
it
actually
moves
to
the
left
and.
J
D
J
I
I
C
J
F
G
J
C
I
F
F
G
G
B
C
J
I
C
There's
a
process
and
there's
a
cost
associated
with
the
vacation
of
property.
We
do
have
to
notice.
We
do
have
a
public
hearing
cost
in
the
city.
The
city
doesn't
isn't
required
to
vacate
that
we
can
maintain
it
for
perpetuity,
it's
not
affecting
anybody,
but
if
a
property
owner
like
in
this
case
wanted
to
have
that
vacated,
we
wouldn't
certainly
oppose
it.
It's
something
that
we
don't
need
that
right
of
way,
but
we
don't
go
out
and
actually
give
back
right
of
way
just
because
we
don't
need
it.
I
C
C
This
case,
if
it
was
just
this
particular
wat,
that
was
impacted
that
might
be
appropriate,
but
you
have
multiple
wats
along
that
entire
roadway.
That
are
impacted,
and
so
you
only
have
one
Proctor
so
unless
that
property
owner
would
want
to
petition
for
that
vacation,
the
city
wouldn't
likely
take
on
that
additional.
That
additional
were
necessary
step
unless
it
was
something
that
we
felt
like
we
needed
to
protect
for
some
reason:
right:
okay,.
I
C
I
J
F
C
Okay,
this
is
basically
a
request
to
reduce
the
rear
set
back
to
12.5
feet
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
glass
room
last
sun
room.
This
is
actually
located
in
tarpon
key,
which
is
a
fairly
new
subdivision,
which
this
board
is
actually
intimately
familiar
with
being
that
they
asked
for
a
sidewalk
burien,
so
you
guys
have
seen
this
actual
plat
before
under
a
different
under
a
different
project.
C
That
being
the
case,
this
is
something
specific
to
the
lot
at
the
particular
time
the
applicant
is
seeking
this
additional
classroom
to
allow
for
them
their
enjoyment
of
their
yard.
They've
provided
some
evidence
about.
You
know
bugs
and
noise
and
things
they
are
adjacent
to
an
industrial
area,
tarpon
key
when
they
subdivided.
It
was
aware
of
the
fact
that
that
was
an
existing
industrial
area.
That
being
the
case,
there
is
noise
pollution
that
comes
from
those.
There
are
dust
and
things
that
are
kicked
up
from
those
industrial
processes
and
those
type
of
things.
C
So
the
applicant
has
basically
a
unique
situation
here,
there's
not
many
places
in
in
Tarpon
where
you
have
industrial
directly
next
to
residential.
This
is
kind
of
a
unique
situation
in
that
case,
however,
there
are
other
properties
in
this
area
that
are
residential.
This
is
not
the
only
the
only
residential
subdivision
in
the
area.
There
are
other
lots
that
are
impacted.
They
can.
The
conditions
are
not
self
created,
I
mean
the
applicant
bought
into
the
subdivision.
C
The
house
was
probably
already
built,
or
was
under
contract
to
be
built
when
they
bought
into
that
situation,
so
they
yeah.
They
knew
about
the
industrial
situation,
but
as
far
as
actually
knowing
what
kind
of
impacts
that
we're
actually
going
to
have
that's
something
that
you
can't
know
until
you
move
into
a
situation,
how
noisy
that
industrial
property
is
going
to
be
how
much
negative
impacts
or
pollution
or
dusts,
or
any
of
that
type
of
things
that
you're
going
to
have.
C
It
really
depends
all
you
really
have
to
live
there
to
have
that
understanding
in
appreciation
which
the
applicants
clearly
have
a
team.
Now
that
being
the
case,
the
applicants
already
have
reasonable
use
of
the
property.
If
you
want
to
define
the
legal
definition
of
reasonable
use,
because
they've
got
a
house,
however,
there
is
a
large
perimeter
fence
around
the
rear
of
around
the
entire
property.
It's
an
eight-foot
fence,
it's
the
subdivision
fence
to
separate
the
subdivision
from
the
industrial
and
other
properties
that
are
that
are
along
the
n
Quatro
Quatro.
C
That
being
the
case,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
this
classroom
from
the
road
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
this
classroom
from
the
internal
subdivision,
because
the
applicant
has
a
fence
in
their
rear
yard.
So
the
only
time
that
you're
going
to
see
this
is,
if
you
are
in
the
applicants,
backyard
and
I
hope
you're
there
by
their
by
their
request.
That
being
the
case,
while
staff
can't
support
the
application
simply
because
they're
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
minimal
request
in
the
fact.
It's
not
a
physical
hardship.
C
That's
causing
this
request.
It's
really
an
environmental
situation.
It's
a
stretch
for
me
to
look
at
that
and
say:
oh
yeah,
it's
fine!
However,
there
are
extenuating
circumstances.
It's
clearly
not
going
to
be
visible
from
the
street.
It's
clearly
going
to
impact
very
few
folks
and
there's
really
not
from
a
planning
perspective
real
concern
here
from
a
perspective
of
your
land
development
code.
It
doesn't
support
this
type
of
request.
Okay,
it
just
does
not.
Those
are
regular
lots.
Tarpon
key
was
subdivided
in
the
recent
past.
C
It
doesn't
have
things
like
right
of
ways
that
don't
belong
where
there
are
that
type
of
thing.
It
has
regular
shaped
lots
that
meet
the
zoning
criteria
for
that
district,
so
this
request
exceeds
my
authority
to
recommend
approval
so
as
such
I've
recommended
denial,
but
there
is
some
extenuating
factors
here
and
limitations
as
a
result
of
the
other
uses
in
the
in
the
mix
of
the
area.
So
with
that,
I
can
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
questions.
I
C
Lots
are
all
sub.
The
lots
are
all
subdivided
out.
There's
two
properties
side-by-side
that
are
actually
developed,
then
there's
a
whole
list
of
ones
that
are
just
basically
open
so
like
when
you
drive
into
the
subdivision.
You've
got
it's
hit
or
miss
houses
that
have
been
built,
they're
working
on
some
models
and
some
different
stuff
that
wasn't
actually
available.
When
these
guys
got
there
got
their
home
they're
doing
some
different
things
in
the
subdivision,
there's
actually
a
washout
not
very
far
down
from
them
for
concrete
right
now,
while
they're
doing
the
construction
piece.
C
Eventually,
all
this
will
be
individual
houses,
but
he's
got
a
fence
in
his
rear
yard.
That
goes
the
whole
primmer
the
rear
guard
and
connects
to
that
perimeter
back
fence,
so
even
with
the
neighbor,
when
they
are
developed,
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
unless
they're
elevated
above
so
if
one
of
the
models
that
they
have
in
their
do
have
two
stories
happens
to
be
built
on
that
property,
then
they
might
be
able
to
see
from
their
second
floor,
but
from
the
from
the
first
floor,
you're
not
going
to
see
anything.
C
C
So
they're
going
to
still
be
in
pretty
good
situation
again,
they're
also
a
little
bit
higher
up
where
they're
located
they're,
not
down
on
the
water
side,
so
they're
a
little
bit
higher
up
in
the
subdivision
because
of
where
they're
located
so
I,
don't
think
they're
going
to
have
any
drainage
concerns
and
there
is
a
drainage
area
like
ass
wailing
area
right
in
the
front
of
their
property.
So
if
there
was
water,
it
will
run
into
that
go
into
the
drains
retention
area
for
the
for
the
whole
subdivision,
cuz,
its
master
drained
all.
C
C
K
Basically,
what
she
said,
my
name
is
mike
barnes
and
my
wife
deanna.
We
bought
the
property,
we
bought
it
sight
unseen.
We
came
from
colorado
and
we
bought
it
off
the
internet,
and
I
we
knew
there
was
a
road
there
and
we
asked
the
Builder
about
the
road
and
he
said
of
course,
oh
it's
just
a
very
lightly
used
road.
It
won't
be
an
issue.
Well
that
was
wrong.
K
We
can't
even
open
the
sliding
glass
door
in
the
back
of
the
house
because
the
from
the
hours
of
about
six
in
the
morning
about
six
at
night,
it's
semi
trucks
and
garbage
trucks,
and
it's
industrial,
and
it's
just
and
it's
so
loud
and
we
were
hoping
if
we
could
just
get
a
little
extra
few
feet
to
build
the
sunroom,
it
would
help
block
lease
from
the
main
part
of
the
house.
The
neighbor
next
door
has
a
pool
that
goes
all
the
way
to
the
fence
line
and
the
vibration
from
the
trucks
is
so
bad.
K
It
keeps
cracking
the
pool
and
they've
had
issues
with
that.
That's
how
bad
the
traffic
is
behind
the
road,
so,
basically
we're
asking.
Maybe
you
can
throw
a
little
compassion
our
way
and
let
us
have
a
little
extra
feed
on
the
on
the
back.
We
have
an
eight-foot
fence
that
the
builder
it
was
originally
a
six-foot
fence.
The
noise
was
so
bad
that
they
said
they'd
raise
it
eight
feet,
so
they
took
the
whole
fence
down.
They
raised
it
to
eight
feet
which
helped
a
little
and
it's
certainly
private.
Back
there.
K
H
K
Going
to
have
a
just
going
to
have
a
pitch
roof,
the
Builder
said
to
be
a
pitched
roof
is
considered
this
we
contracted
to
Solara
industries.
So
it's
like
those
prefab.
They
do
the
fab
walls
on
site
on
the
in
the
warehouse
and
bring
it
out.
It's
a
4-foot
slab.
They
put
them
up
and
then
have
a
pitched
roof,
so
the
water
will
just
run
off
into
our
backyard.
We
have
a
perfectly
rectangular
lot
and
there's
no
view
whatsoever
other
than
offense
industrial
behind
us,
so
we're
not
blocking
anything,
we're
not
water
view
or
nothing.
K
H
C
Essentially,
what
happens
is
this
side
setback?
That's
why
we
have
side
setbacks
for
that
very
eventualities.
The
side
setback
will
overall
for
enough
green
stays
on
the
side
and
the
rear
to
accommodate
the
additional
storm
water
that
he'll
have
on
the
structure
that
would
normally
have
fallen
on
the
the
would
have
fallen
in
that
area,
so
there
there
should
be
no
impacts
for
runoff
for
that
type
of
thing,
especially
the
grading
of
this
of
the
subdivision
in
the
area
that
they're
at
it's
the
it's
the
highest
point
of
the
property.
C
Really,
when
you
go
out
there,
you
can
clearly
see
that,
as
you
drive
around
it
slightly
say
it
slightly
changes
the
grade,
but
it's
a
much
gentler
to
change
in
grade
there
than
some
of
the
other
subdivisions
we
have
like
up
in
Chesapeake
and
those
are
the
those
other
places
where
bad
variance
is
where
you
guys
have
seen
that
drastic
change
in
elevation.
You
don't
have
that
drastic
change
here,
so
the
water
will
probably
slow
down
when
it
comes
off
the
glass
room
and
then
be
able
to
be
percolated
right
into
the
into
the
soil.
F
G
G
C
Do
have
one
particular
staff
call
the
staff
comment
that
we
have
is
related
to
our
membership.
We
are
now
down
another
member,
so
Cindy.
If
you
are
interested
in
becoming
a
full-time,
regular
member,
please
let
me
know-
or
let
Irene
know,
because
we're
going
to
try
to
do
a
fill
that
position
not
at
the
next
board
meeting,
but
the
first
real
board
meeting
that
they
have
because
the
next
one
is
a
ceremonial
meeting
where
they
see
the
mayor-elect
in
the
Commissioner
left.
C
So
we're
going
to
try
to
fill
this
position,
provided
we
have
somebody
who's
interested.
So
if
you
would
like
to
be
a
regular
member
and
move
up
from
alternative
from
an
alternate
position,
we
can
request
that
there's
no
guarantee
that
you'll
get
it,
but
we
can
certainly
make
that
request.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
other
folks
have
actually
applied
or
not.
No
one's
actually
come
to
talk
to
me
about
this
bored
since
Mike
came
on
board.
Thank
you
were
the
last
one
who
who
called
me
about.
You
know
seating
on
this
board.
C
What
happens
that
type
of
things?
So?
Hopefully,
somebody
from
will
the
citizens
academy
has
applied
or
there's
somebody
who
was
on
the
waiting
list.
So
we'll
try
to
do
that
and
hopefully,
at
your
next
meeting
you
will
have
a
new
member
if
it's
possible
for
us
to
have
that
happen,
and
that
is
all
that
I
have
four
first-half
comments,
admit.
C
You'll
you'll
receive
minutes
as
a
result
of
our
staffing
situation,
Kim's
kind
of
been
pulled
away
to
do
some
other
things
that
she
probably
shouldn't
have
to
do,
but
she
has
recently
helped
me
to
do
that
being
that
case,
we'll
have
the
minutes
available
as
soon
as
we
possibly
can
we're
a
little
bit
behind
with
minutes
this
board
I
think
we
have
one
that
we
have
our
is
overdue.
So
we'll
try
to
get
that
to
you
on
the
next
on
the
next
meeting.