►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment October 24, 2018
Description
Description
A
A
C
D
E
Proceeding
where
the
Board
of
Adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
containing
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
E
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
E
E
A
You
I'd
like
to
recognize
one
of
our
distinguished
former
city
officials,
but
still
youthful
appearing
mayor
produce
is
here
in
the
audience
tonight.
Thank
you.
Welcome.
Okay.
We
have
three
items
on
the
agenda
tonight.
The
first
one
is
a
waiver
of
a
sidewalk
requirement
at
a
48
Riverside
Drive
application,
18
113.
This
is
property
across
from
the
tennis
courts
on
Riverside
Drive.
Let's
have
the
staff
report.
Please.
F
Yes,
Louis
urn
are
presenting
staff
comments
of
this
application
is
to
authorize
authorize
a
waiver
from
the
sidewalk
construction
requirements
of
section
130
2.00,
the
comprehensive
zoning
and
land
development
code.
The
property
is
located
at
848,
Riverside
Drive,
section
130
2.00
of
the
code
requires
sidewalks
construction
as
a
condition
for
the
issuance
of
a
certificate
of
occupancy.
F
You
may
recall
on
August
22nd
of
this
year
the
applicant
was
granted
a
variance
to
reduce
setbacks
for
the
construction
for
this
construction.
So
this
request
is
to
waive
the
sidewalk
waiver
waive
the
sidewalk
requirements.
Staff
has
reviewed
this
in
accordance
with
the
criteria
of
the
land
development
code.
Our
findings
are
that
it
does
meet
the
criteria.
F
The
primarily
reason
that
we're
recommending
approval
of
the
sidewalk
waiver
is
because
there
is
an
existing
sidewalk
waiver
across
the
street
at
Riverside
Park,
so
it
would
make
the
construction
of
a
sidewalk
in
front
of
this
property
unnecessary
and
given
that
it
is
just
for
a
better.
In
addition,
we
are
recommending
approval
and
I'd
be
glad
to
answer
any
of
your
questions.
Thank.
A
G
Helps
me
model
every
day
really.
This
is
just
what
mr.
Surya
had
said,
that
there
is
no
sidewalk
on
that
side
of
the
street,
and
so
that's
what
we're
asking
for
the
waiver
just
because
simply
this
is
just
a
bedroom
addition
and
the
sidewalk
would
really
go
to
nowhere
and
not
just
sound
negative.
So
that's
really
all
why
we're
asking
for
the
waiver.
We
do
appreciate
you
considering
it.
Thank.
A
H
Speak
I
know
one
day
sure
Drive
and
Thank
You.
Mr.
herb
I
will
pay
you
tomorrow.
I
would
just
like
to
say
on
Riverside
Drive.
All
of
that
should
be
exempt
because
of
the
traffic,
which
is
very
bad
and
all
the
curve,
and
there
are
no
sidewalks
going
all
the
way
further
down
or
when
you
turn
on
Riverside
forget
it
there's
nothing
and
you.
H
It
would
I
think
behoove
the
board
to
write
the
City
Commission
and
the
engineering
planning
department
to
that
effect,
because
I
would
not,
if
I
had
children
or
grandchildren
I
would
not
allow
them
on
a
sidewalk
on
Riverside.
It
is
a
speed,
trap
there
and
very,
very
dangerous,
and
what
she
is
doing
in
her
home
will
not
affect
a
sidewalk
there.
Thank.
A
A
F
A
B
F
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
variance
to
reduce
the
West
Side
setback
from
seven
and
a
half
feet
to
5
feet
and
the
east
side,
setback
from
7
and
a
half
feet
to
5
feet
to
construct
a
single-family
residence
on
a
non-conforming
lot
of
record.
It's
important
to
note.
The
subdivision
was
originally
planted
in
1920
prior
to
the
current
law,
with
requirements
of
the
code.
The
code
requires
in
the
zoning
district,
a
minimum
lot
width
of
60
feet,
and
the
existing
lot
is
only
50
feet.
F
So,
therefore,
based
on
that,
we
find
that
it
does
meet
the
first
criteria
that
the
variances
work
based
on
the
physical
surroundings,
for
the
conditions
of
the
site,
minimum
width
and
again
it's
not
a
condition
that
was
created
by
the
owner.
So
it
does
meet
those
criteria,
especially
and
the
other
criteria
in
the
code
and
based
on
these
findings
were
recommending
approval,
subject
to
the
two-year
expiration
date.
F
A
A
C
A
F
This
request
is
a
two-part
variance
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
20
feet
and
the
rear
yard
setback
from
30
feet
to
15
feet.
This
subdivision
was
plaited
in
1958,
so
it's
another
older
subdivision
prior
of
course
to
the
current
zoning
standards.
Although
the
subject
site
is
considered
a
corner
lot,
the
front
of
the
property
is
located
on
Lucille
Drive,
which
is
an
unapproved
right-of-way
that
so
there's
really
nothing
on
the
ground,
no
dirt,
and
certainly
not
a
paved
road,
but
it
is
a
planted
right-of-way.
F
The
city
has
no
plans
to
construct
Lucille
Drive
and
because
of
that,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
face
the
front
of
the
house
towards
the
other
frontage,
which
is
West
Bayshore
Drive,
and
because
of
that
it
does
create
a
situation
where
the
problem.
The
lot
is
now
it
doesn't
have
the
minimum
depth.
F
Well,
it's
it's
80
feet
of
depth,
which
is
fairly
shallow.
I
guess
would
be
the
word
and
again
this
was
a
condition
that
was
not
created
by
the
owner.
It
is
vacant
lot.
Staff
has
reviewed
it
inconsistent
with
the
criteria
for
variances
and
we
do
find,
based
on
the
unusual
configuration
of
the
lot
and
its
history,
that
it
doesn't
meet
the
criteria
based
on
that
we
are
recommending
approval,
subject
to
the
two-year
expiration.
A
J
F
J
F
E
D
E
K
F
J
A
H
F
I
A
A
Next
item
is
approval
or
our
September
26
minutes
and
I
have
a
comment
and
the
apology
of
sorts
I
think
it's
on
page
2,
you
know
it's.
My
sense
of
humor
is
not
very
good,
and
sometimes
you
can't
tell
whether
a
joking
or
being
serious
but
I
made
a
feeble
effort
at
self-deprecating
humor
and
we
vote
on
that.
I
E
C
A
B
K
The
board
had
requested
I
guess
some
training
or
review
of
basically
the
function
of
the
board
and
maybe
some
specific
areas.
What
we
thought
we
would
do
is
ask
you
to
review
the
training,
video,
that's
online
and
then
call
out
those
specific
questions,
areas
where
you
would
like
more
training
materials
or
something
so
that
staff
and
the
city
attorney
can
focus
on
those
areas
that
you
would
like
to
review
the
videos
about
an
hour.
K
Long
I
know
you
most
of
you
would
have
looked
at
it
when
you
became
board
members
and
it's
a
good
video
of
watch
the
whole
thing,
and
it
covers
a
lot
of
all
the
subjects.
I
think
that
you
would
want
to
look
at,
but
we
we
would
request
that.
Maybe
we
approach
it
that
way
and
I
just
wanted
to
get
your
feedback
on
if
you
think,
that's
a
way
to
approach
it.
Thank.
A
I
K
I
Cuz,
what
I
was
looking
for
more
so
than
this?
This
is
a
just
general
training,
but
in
Tarpon
Springs
we
have
some
very
unique
situations
that
come
up
and
those
were
the
things
that
I
was
looking
for
or
to
have
the
board
be
trained
in,
because
we
do
have
some
very
unique
situations
that
come
up
and
that's
where
I
was
gonna.
Go
with
it.
But
I'm
happy
to
review
this
and
then
come
back
with
questions,
because
we
have
had
enough
cases
come
through
where
we
could
bring
up
specific
situations.
I
A
H
Think
further
education
training
is
good,
but
do
remember,
as
you
go
through
this,
that
some
Lots
in
some
areas
have
grandfathered
in
there
are
lots
all
over
the
city
that
are
being
used
for
different
things
and
they
have
grandfathered
because
of
the
years
that
they've
been
in
use
and
that's
very
important,
because
when
it
comes
back
with
a
battle
in
front
of
the
Commission,
it
makes
it
very
difficult
and
it's
not
fair
to
the
citizen.
That's
all
I
had
to
say
thank
you.
Thank.
H
M
On
the
training
and
I
don't
know
if
I
speak
for
the
board
or
not,
but
I
think
when
we
were
talking
much
like
what
you
know
Michael
was
saying
was
that
when
I
was
Miss,
Turner
and
I
were
the
last
to
get
this
training
and
we
had
to
watch
it
before
this
was
kind
of
a
30,000
foot
view
of
how
to
behave
kind
of
and
how
to
have
an
actual
meeting.
How
to
how
to
do
it
and
I
think
with
mr.
M
eisenerz
comments,
and
my
confusion
was
some
of
the
things
that
might
require
some
of
the
the
setbacks
and
some
of
the
land
development
code,
things
that
just
get
thrown
in
front
of
us.
We
don't
necessarily
know
the
background,
the
history
of
what
that
you
know.
Pervis
had
a
great
deal
of
history.
With
this.
He
knew
about
a
sidewalk
waiver
variance.
I
had
no
clue
about
something
like
that.
So
there's
just
nuances
like
that
that
when
we
sit
here,
I,
don't
know
that
those
exist.
Would
that
be
fair.
I'm.
E
Gonna
chime
in
here,
as
far
as
an
herb,
does
have
a
lot
of
knowledge.
He's
been
a
member
of
this
community
for
a
very
long
time.
He
was
the
city
attorney
very
well-respected,
but
with
all
due
respect
when
he
says
those
types
of
things,
that's
not
evidence
and,
frankly
you're
not
to
consider
that
when
you're,
when
you're,
considering
the
application-
that's
before
you
so
if
you're
talking
about,
if
there
are
unique
situations
that
come
up,
maybe
I'd
like
to
hear
some
more
about
that
and
how
we
can.
D
E
So
with
all
due
respect,
if
you're
asking
for
training
on
that,
that's
not
something
that
you're
likely
to
receive
training
on
I
mean
you
can,
of
course
go
to
the
city
manager
and
ask,
but
there's
not
going
to
be
a
tarpon
springs
history!
101
to
get
you
caught
up
to
speed
on
that,
because
that's
not
necessary
in
determining
whether
or
not
a
variance
should
be
granted
or
not.
I.
M
Had
it
not
been
for
a
previous
meaning,
I
would
have.
I
would
have
looked
at
that
and
not
not
known
what
a
sidewalk
and
I'm
bringing
that
up.
Just
as
a
small
example
of
some
of
the
things
that
you
know.
Maybe
it's
part
of
the
findings
of
fact,
because
we're
supposed
to
look
at
competent
and
substantial
testimony
and
evidence
and
I
don't
know.
Maybe
it's
just
me,
but
the
some
of
the
verbage,
some
of
the
nuances,
some
of
the
things
that
come
forth
I
wouldn't
mind
having
a
little
bit
more
well-versed,
ness
or.
E
Are
you
asking
I
think
maybe
I
need
you
to
be
more
direct?
Are
you
asking
for,
like
with
with
regard
to
the
sidewalk
waiver
provision
in
the
land
development
those
well,
that
was
the
example
that
you
use
so
with
regard
to
that
sidewalk,
waiver
development
or
waiver
in
the
development
code,
are
you
seeking
to
get
a
clarification
on
what
things
mean?
I
guess
maybe
I
need
some
more
clarification.
Well,.
M
E
I
E
So
that
training
was
just
basically
a
more
in-depth
on
mr.
Yaakov
owns
video.
It
just
went
over
quasi-judicial
procedures-
the
sidewalk
waiver,
while
it's
not
the
same
criteria
as
a
variance,
it's
still
a
quasi-judicial
procedure,
but
if
you're
looking
for
training
and
what
a
quasi-judicial
procedure
is
and
what
you're,
given
the
individual
criteria
every
time
in
the
staff
report,
but
the
sidewalk
waiver
you're
still
given
the
criteria,
you
know
you're
just
still
doing
the
same
thing,
you're
applying
the
fact
that
the
evidence
that's
presented
to
the
criteria
and
thing
if
it
meets
all
the
prom.
E
So
I
am
happy
to
do
so.
Staff
approached
me
and
said
this
is
the
way
we'd
like
to
go
with
this
and
I
said:
that's
perfectly
fine
if
it
comes
to
it
at
the
end
that
that
that's
not
sufficient
and
you're.
Looking
for
more
as
far
as
positive
digital
training,
you
know
we'll
have
to
clear
it
with
with
Pether
and
with
the
city
manager,
but
and.
J
Perhaps
we
will
and
viewing
it
again
and
thinking
of
the
experiences
that
we've
had
look
at
it
through
a
different
lens
and
be
able
to
form
more
exacting
questions
and
areas
that
we
would
like
clarification
when
you
know
what
just
looking
at
today's
very
simple
agenda,
we
have,
you
know
a
waiver
and
we
have
a
waiver
in
two
variances,
so
we're
learning
as
we're
going
that
there's
the
difference
between
a
waiver
and
a
variance.
So
when
we
started
this,
you
know
your
or
so
ago,
it's
like
whoa
waiver
versus
variants.
J
L
I
think,
first
and
foremost
are
asked
to
use
logic
here,
going
back
to
the
sidewalks
on
Riverside
Drive.
If
you
look
at
the
house,
the
corner
house
and
sunset
road,
the
Riverside
Drive,
it
has
a
sidewalk
wrapped
around
it
and
stops.
It
doesn't
go
to
the
house
next
to
it
either
way
because
of
situations
like
that.
L
That's
why
we
end
up
Riverside
Drive,
not
needing
any
sidewalks
aside
from
traffic
or
anything
else,
there's
no
need
on
the
on
the
east
side
of
Riverside
Drive
sidewalk
because
of
an
aberration,
like
we
have
an
opponent
out,
and
we
have
had
situations
like
that
before.
So
when
we
have
this
type
of
problem,
we
just
have
to
use
logic
and
then
proceed
from
there,
no
matter
what
the
Commission
chooses
or
what
changes
you're
gonna
make.
We
still
have
to
see
what
logic.
I
L
What,
when
the
city
like
today
recommended
all
three
of
them
to
be
approved,
you
saw
there
was
no
no
one
spoke.
We
just
went
ahead
and
approved
all
three
of
them
only
when
they
want
us
to
deny
then
we're
getting.
No.
The
question
is
what
we're
trying
to
do
now
is
the
three
approvals
we
did
today.
They
will
do
it
because
the
city
said
yes
or
the
worse.
Was
there
any
reason
to
do
it?
Well,.
E
M
In
and
it
gets
hard
when
you're
trying
to
apply
specific
examples
when
I
apologize
for
just
using
that
Sidewalk,
that's
the
first
one
that
came
to
my
mind,
that
was
a
little
confusing
that
would
have
been
nice
to
know,
but,
and
we
we
sometimes
ask
but
I
remember
in
a
lot
of
meetings.
Can
you
reread
that
section?
So
we
can
learn
about
that.
However,
even
tonight
when
the
one
application
changed,
the
orientation
of
the
house
from
Lucille
today,
Shore
I
wasn't
voting,
but
I
was
just
like
well.
M
E
The
variance
first
that
back
they
still
have
to
go
through
permitting
and
see
if
it's
okay
for
their
site
plan
to
get
approved.
So
that's
not
your
job
here
and
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
and
I,
don't
presume
to
speak
for
the
building
development
department
or
or
or
Planning
and
Zoning,
but
a
lot
of
times,
applicants
are
told,
get
the
variance
first,
because
you
might
not
be
able
to
do
what
you
want
to
do.
You
got
to
get
the
variance
before
you
can
go
and
get
the
permit.
E
D
M
E
Well,
he's
not
asking
for
a
non-conforming
right,
so
here
and
again
it
my
job
is
to
direct
the
board
with
what
is
legal
and
what
is
not.
My
I
just
advise
you.
Obviously,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
guys
use
your
decision-making
tools.
I
hope
that
you
listen
to
the
advice
that
I
give
and
that
you
make
the
decision
based
on
the
criteria.
That's
in
the
code.
Again
it
doesn't
it's
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding.
You
are
sitting
like
a
judge.
E
You
are
not
a
judge,
but,
like
a
judge,
the
only
things
you're
allowed
to
consider
are
not
how
they
go
through
the
process.
It
might
be
nice
to
know
that
and
you
can
come
in
on
your
own
and
maybe
sit
down
with
someone
and
ask,
but
from
my
point
of
view,
the
only
thing
that
your
and
duties
allow
you
to
do.
There
are
several
things
this
board
can
do.
C
E
You're,
given
the
land
development
code
right
and
the
land
development
code
says,
your
setback
is
30
feet
and
they
come
and
they
say,
I
want
a
variance
from
that
setback.
You
don't
need
to
know
what
is
what
do
you
need
to
know
about
the
land
development
code?
The
land
development
code
says
30
feet,
they're,
saying
I
need
a
variance.
You
are
to
determine
whether
or
not
you
can
grant
them
the
variance
based
on
the
seven
criteria,
that's
in
the
code
and
if
they
don't
provide
you,
the
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
supports
that
variance.
E
M
I
recall
testimony
from
Heather
that
and
once
again
I'm
terrible
at
bringing
out
examples,
but
I
remember
testimony
from
Heather
saying:
oh
yeah.
The
parking
requirements
for
that
thing
is
outdated
in
the
current
land
development
code
and
needs
to
be
changed
and
and
we're
sitting
here
saying:
okay,
so
we're
gonna
stop
something
based
on
a
mistake
that
is
gonna
be
fixed,
maybe
sometime
in
the
future.
Maybe.
E
Is
going
to
change
in
the
future,
the
law
does
not
consider
that
relevant
and
competent
and
substantial
to
the
criteria
for
the
variance.
None
of
the
criteria
says
that
this
code
is
somehow
going
to
be
changed
at
some
point
in
the
future
of.
Maybe
so
you
can
consider
that.
That's
not
what
your
code
says.
Well,.
J
Maybe
because
you
know
that
there
is,
we
have
discussed
the
language
of
the
criteria
you
know
like
looking
at.
You
know
the
to
the
5,
the
7,
that
different
criteria
for
the
different
variants
is
that
far
before
it.
So
maybe
if
we
had
some
kind
of
work
session
to
really
pick
through
and
make
sure
we
do
have
a
very
strong
understanding
of
the
wording
of
the
criteria
for
the
variance
because
I
know
you
know
every
time
when
I
get
it
I
read
it
and
I.
Look.
You
know
like
on
this
one
for
our
first
application.
J
You
know
the
criteria
because
it
says
the
in
Atlanta
development
code.
It
must
meet
both
of
these,
so
I
read
them
carefully
to
see
if
it
meets
both
I
read
the
first
one.
Yes,
it
does
check.
I
read
the
second
one
check.
Yes,
it
did
if
it
didn't
I'm,
saying
whoa,
no
we're
not
doing
it.
So
maybe
we
need
some
exercises
and
making
sure
we
understand.
You
know
brushing
up
our
reading
comprehension.
Skills
I
mean.
E
S
of
the
training-
if
you
know
it
needs
to
be
with
Heather
if
it
needs
to
be
with
whomever
it
needs
to
get
cleared
with
the
city
manager
first
of
all,
but
whatever
you
guys
can
always
whether
or
not
you
would
like
to
speak
to
me.
I
don't
know,
but
you
guys
can
always
call
me
or
email
me
and
I'm
happy
to
sit
with
you
and
go
over
any
specific
application.
You
can
call
me
before
and
say:
hey
I
have
some
questions
on.
This
can't
call
each
other,
but
you
can
call
me.
J
J
K
J
M
That
was
discussed
about
in
that
meeting.
It's
like
okay,
we
need
some
more
training,
I
thought
it
was
more
understanding
of
the
nuances
and
how
everything
worked
together
as
a
as
a
function,
not
quasi-judicial
101,
where
you
read
it
first
and
you
do
this,
and
then
you
don't
talk
about
you
that
that
seemed
little.
I
M
I
That's
when
this
was
coming
about
and
that's
when
it
was
recommended
not
by
us
but
by
them,
to
do
training
through
staff
and
for
us
to
be
more
knowledgeable
of
what's
going
on,
so
that
we
don't
have
these
issues
so
I've
been
requesting
it
since
that
point,
and
just
never
got
it.
It
wasn't
that
I
wanted
to
go
through
this
one-hour
tutorial
again
and
see
if
I
remember
what
I
remembered
three
years
ago,
I'll,
let
you
do
the
river
well.
I
It
doesn't
make
sense
if
you're
going
to
if
I'm
gonna
call
you
one
on
one.
Then
yoga
and
I'm
gonna
bring
up
questions
and
you
go
Mike.
That's
a
good
question.
Let
me
answer
it
and
the
rest
of
us
don't
have
a
clue.
We
don't
have
to
be
discussing
it
amongst
ourselves,
but
if
we
had
a
meeting
where
we
all
are
on
the
same
page
of
the
question
that
Jackie
brings
up
well,
Mike
brings
up
or
her
brings
up.
We
then
all
become
a
stronger
boy.
Mr.
K
C
G
K
E
D
E
Because,
because
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
board-
and
this
is
not
done
in
this
board
or
in
this
community
under
the
law-
there
is
something
called
an
affected
party
status.
We
don't
ask
it
I,
don't
know
why
I
haven't
been
directed
to
do
it,
but
in
other
communities
and
under
the
law
there
is
what
it
like
I
said:
there's
what
it's
called
an
affected
party
status.
That
means
that
somebody
technically
in
quasi
judicial
proceedings,
there
is
no
public
comment.
You
do
it
here,
because
Tarpon
has
always
done
it.
Tarpon
wants
to
include
the
community.
E
Frankly,
it's
not
relevant
in
anything.
That's
said
by
the
public,
unless
they
are
an
affected
party
is
not
to
be
taken
as
evidence,
but
that's
not
how
this
board
has
functioned.
That's
not
how
this
community
has
functioned.
An
affected
party
is
someone
like
Miss
proto's.
When
she
said
I
live
near
this
person.
What
happens
that
this
property
will
affect
me,
and
it
affects
me
in
one
way
or
the
other,
be
there,
because
it's
geographically
close
or
I
have
a
some
sort
of
interest
in
this.
They
have
to
prove
that
they're
an
affected
party.
E
They
get
sworn
in,
they're
asked
questions
usually
by
the
city
attorney.
How
are
you
an
affected
party
and
once
they
establish
they're
an
effective
party,
then
they
can
testify
one
way
or
the
other,
but
that's
not
how
this
board
has
run.
That's
not
how
this
city
has
functioned,
and
that's
not
my
call.
So
when
you
say
why
do
we
ask
that
I,
don't
know
it
actually
doesn't
really
matter
unless
they're
an
affected
party?
It's
not
really
something
that
you
should
be
considering.
E
D
J
J
L
M
A
Reluctance,
let
me
just
say
this
and
hopefully
not
bring
up
any
further
discussion.
We've
done.
We've
had
a
lot
of
various
kinds
of
jurisdictional
issues
for
this
board
in
the
last
few
months.
One
thing
that
has
come
up
is
an
appeal
of
a
staff
decision,
which
we
also
can't
consider,
and
that's
let's
say
we're
talking
about.
A
What's
the
front
of
the
house
and
staff
says
this
is
the
front
of
your
house
and
the
owner
of
the
property
says
no,
they
can
appeal
that
decision
to
this
board
and
we
very
rarely
get
that
kind
of
issue,
but
it
has
come
up
if
I
could
just
stop
it
at
that
point,
be
ready
for
that
I'm.
The
other
issue
concerning
our
recommendations
to
the
City
Commission
last
month,
I
asked
if
we
could
get
a
report
we.
A
K
Some
of
those
and
yeah
didn't
I
didn't
bring
that
with
me,
but
my
recollection
is
that
there
were
items
that
did
go
up
to
the
city
manager.
They
were
reviewed
by
the
city
attorney
and
there
was
a
memo
which
I
do
have
and
I
don't
have
it
with
me.
No
that
was
written
by
the
city
attorney
looking
at
those
issues
and
the
city
manager
did
not
recommend
to
move
those
forward.
I
will
say
that
I
mean
we
are
embarking
on
just
beginning
to
embark
on
a
rewrite
of
the
land
development
code
this
year.
K
E
A
One
more
thing:
I
have
you
know
the
board
has
quarters
written
orders
after
each
of
our
items
and
I've
signed
some
I'd
like
for
the
board
to
see
them
there,
public
record
I'd
like
to
get
copies
of
those
to
the
board,
and
mr.
ribowsky
has
some
for
him
to
sign
for
his
signature,
because
I
was
not
present.
One
meeting,
there's
three
or
four
of
those
and
I'd
like
just
for
the
board
to
be
aware
in
case
there
are
any
comments
about
the
wording
of
the
order.