►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments June 27, 2018
Description
Description
A
C
D
B
C
C
C
E
F
C
G
D
E
B
H
G
I
C
J
About
the
marital
union,
well
put
America
I'm,
assessing
itself
on
site
at
base
your
eyes.
There's
berries
that
we're
asking
for
today.
I
just
want
to
make
clear
that
as
a
sales
consultant,
there
I'm
pretty
much
in
control
of
what
goes
on
what
gets
sold
and
what
Heights
they
go
on.
There's
clear
that
if
we
do,
if
we
are
granted
this
variance
today,
that's
not
going
to
burst
over
the
door
we're
going
to
come
bargin
variances!
This
is
a
one-time-only
shop.
D
J
C
K
H
H
L
A
A
question
that
shown
a
document
in
our
packet
that
sign
respectfully
Richard
see
every
project
manager
for
a
health
at
sea.
It
says
not
granting
the
baronet's
would
ultimately
result
in
construction
of
a
two-story
home
on
this
law
in
order
to
obtain
a
similar
square
footage,
a
two-story
home
would
block
any
pond
view
from
the
home
directly
across
the
street,
and
this
is
under
following
some
additional
information
be
considered
in
support.
A
H
Virus
under
contract
inspecting
a
certain
product,
we
would
change
that
yeah.
We
would
change
that
so
with
the
buyer.
That's
why
we're
fighting
for
that's.
Why
that's
why
we
dis
fight
with
previous
application,
because
they
desire
said
look.
This
is
too
much
for
us.
We
can't
handle
two
delays,
just
just
we
want
out
right.
So
this
isn't
it's
something
that
we
it's
your
question
of,
how
we
notice
is
it
gonna
happen
again
well
with
our
company?
What
happened
here
so.
H
M
M
O
O
O
O
G
C
J
D
P
F
P
P
I
oppose
any
nibbling
away
at
that
standard.
What
you
do
does
that
press
much
the
precedent
of
the
HAR
100,
a
zoning
in
Bay
Shore
Heights,
has
brought
along
at
least
one
more
request
for
rezoning
in
the
nearby
area,
which
has
been
improved
on
that
basis
of
precedent.
I
believe
granting
this
variance
and
any
others
will,
even
though
the
Meritage
people
may
not
come
back
to
you,
it
will
open
the
doors
for
other
variances
within
the
r108
selling
area.
I
applaud
the
staff
recommendation
and
I
urge
you
to
deny
this
request.
O
D
M
G
M
M
M
O
O
O
G
K
C
L
K
The
pond
is
designed
based
on
the
current
zoning
max
build-out,
and
none
of
the
houses
actually
fill
up
that
fool
envelope.
This
won't
even
fill
up
the
full
envelope,
even
though
we're
asking
for
an
encroachment.
It
won't,
that's
just
the
nature
of
it.
So
the
pond
is
good
for
max
build-out
of
all
building
footprints.
L
About
two
months
ago,
I
believe
in
April
it
was
I,
don't
know
who
the
gentleman
was,
that
was
representing
your
company
and
he
was
I,
asked
the
question
how
many
homes
are
built.
He
said
31
and
I
said
you
didn't
know
anything
about
the
square
footage
and
all
that
that
if
the
one
eyes
power
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
square
footage
of
the
house,
he
said
no,
no,
we
didn't
know
anything
about
it
after
31
homes
now
we're
getting
different
ideas
today,
including
the
house
that
was
built
by
mistake
due
to
the
cities.
L
K
Actually,
specifically,
why
I'm
here
reviewing
the
reviewing
the
first
hearing,
it
was
crystal
clear:
there
were
very
good
drainage
questions
being
asked
and
there
was
nobody
in
a
drainage
engineer,
capacity
that
had
anything
to
do
with
the
permitting
process
or
design
process.
That
was
here
to
answer
that
so
I'm
glad
I'm
glad
you're
asking
these
questions,
because
now
I'm
here
to
answer
for
you
that
we
have
a
Southwest,
Florida,
Water,
Management,
District
drainage,
permit,
we
have
a
drainage
permit
through
city
tarpon
springs
that
was
reviewed
through
your
third-party
drainage
engineer.
K
Brian
Anderson,
with
Icahn
be
coordinating
with
him
every
step
of
the
way,
and
these
ponds
are
designed
for
full
build-out
of
every
footprint
of
buildable
area
of
every
one
of
these
Lots
and
I.
Don't
think
a
single
one
has
actually
built
out
to
the
max
footprint
yet
so
that's
that's
specifically
why
this
extra
encroachment
even
on
this
lot,
isn't
even
building
out
the
full
footprint,
but
it's
a
very,
very
good
question
and
I'm
glad
you're
bringing
it
up
again.
So
we
can
answer
that
question.
G
L
K
So
to
answer
your
question
that
you
do
have
the
drainage
reports
and
they
were
produced
after
the
zoning
was
approved,
so
there
wasn't
a
design
before
zoning
it
needed
to
be
updated
after
zoning.
The
drainage
plan
was
designed
and
permitted
after
zoning
happened,
so
it
contemplated
the
current
zoning
and
you
definitely
have
those
reports.
Otherwise,
we
wouldn't
been
able
to
build
the
project.
I
D
G
K
It
doesn't
work,
but
we
wanted
to
show
you
that
we
did
the
due
diligence
and
we're
trying
to
make
it
work.
So
I
ran
out
to
my
car
and
got
my
computer
and
took
a
picture
of
it
and
scanned
it
into
AutoCAD
and
scaled
it
and
have
rotated
and
done
all
kinds
of
things
here
to
show
you
what
it
looks
like
if
the
building's
rotated
or
fill
and
eyes
moved.
You
do
not
know
how
to
show
this
to
you
over
there.
I
can
walk
it
around
now.
K
We
might
ask
further
question
what
we
initially
did
was
rotated
the
structure
if
you,
because
it
is
a
pie,
shaped
lot.
If
you
take
the
southeast
corner
of
the
building
and
rotate
it
clockwise,
what
happens?
Is
the
northwest
corner
of
the
building?
Forget
the
lanai?
The
northwest
corner
of
the
building
now
encroaches
into
the
setback.
How
much
10
feet
like
it
encroaches
as
much
as
long
an
eye
and
I
can
show
you
that
I've
got
that
here.
You
want
me
to
show
you
so
the
second
we
rotate
the
building.
K
We
now
put
the
physical
building
in
the
setback,
which
is
probably
worse
and
then
obviously
shifting
when
I,
left
and
right
doesn't
doesn't
change
its
level
of
encroachment,
and
then
you
mentioned
in
the
when
I
wrap
around
the
side
of
the
building.
And,
yes,
you
can
put
a
lanai
on
the
side
of
the
building.
I
just
don't
know,
with
a
lanai
on
the
side
of
the
building.
J
When
we
moved
in
lanai
to
the
side
of
the
house,
it
did
fit
and
we
wouldn't
need
a
variance,
but
now
you
put
that
lanai
on
the
side
of
the
house.
Now
it's
visible
from
the
street.
Now
it's
facing
the
the
house
next
door
directly.
It
becomes
a
more
of
inconvenience
for
everybody
uncomfortable
for
the
McIntyre's.
They
sit
in
their
lanai
and
look
at
the
house
right
next
door
instead
of
looking
out
behind
their
house.
J
M
I
I
The
at
least
according
to
the
plan,
all
the
houses
come
with
long
eyes
and
in
definitely
in
Florida,
we've
won
lanai,
just
a
just
a
you
know
to
be
able
to
stand
out
in
the
Sun
with
it
with
no
lanai
and
it's
all
about
outdoor
living
in
Florida,
so
alumni,
yeah
we'd
won,
definitely
won.
One
I
just
buy
chafers.
D
M
These
projects
brought
before
our
board
before,
where
you
know
this
lanai
is
part
of
the
setback,
because
it's
attached
and
a
permanent
structure
to
the
house,
there
are
other
route.
There
are
other
covering
options
on
a
porch
that
would
not
be
part
of
this
setback.
Am
I
right
on
this?
We've
we've
addressed
those
issues
before.
N
J
M
E
E
The
items
that
are
allowed
in
a
setback,
obviously
a
patio
less
than
30
inches
with
no
roof-
would
be
a
an
allowable
yard.
Encroachment
screen
enclosures
over
pools,
so
I
believe
the
city
has
allowed
something
with
the
roof
that
consists
of
a
screen,
because
you
can
have
drink
enclosures
over
pools
and
that
solves
a
problem.
It's
the
idea
that
this
is
under
the
hard
right
part
of
the
structure.
Now
you
can
have
separate
shelters
in
the
rear
yard
allowable.
You
know,
standards
if.
E
I'm
not
sure
when
you
say
if
it
is
that
the
porches
are
allowed
to
encourage
in
the
front
yard,
a
porch
is
something
it
can
be
under
a
hard
roof,
but
it's
open
and
there's
a
standard
for
how
open
it
is
to
make
sure
it's
a
porch
and
stays
a
porch
that
it's
not
enclosed.
Those
are
not
allowed
in
the
rear
yard
setback,
the
things
that
are
allowed
in
where
you're
it's
FXR
patios
decks,
balconies
to
a
certain
extent.
They
have
a
certain
amount
they
can
encroach.
L
M
E
E
M
J
C
L
The
mic:
yes
back
in
April,
that
question
came
up.
It's
exactly
the
point
staff
is
making
that
if
it's
a
permanent
roof,
it's
part
of
the
square
footage
of
the
house.
I
asked
the
question
and
the
gentleman
that
was
here
representing
your
company,
said
after
31
homes
that
were
built.
They
were
not
aware,
that's
the
case,
and
they
made
a
mistake.
Now
we
have
other
mistakes
today.
I
don't
understand
how
where
this
thing
is
going
back
and
forth
for
the
last
four
months,
so
it
was
an
issue
with
the
roof
and
so
on
so
forth.
E
The
other
thing,
maybe
for
the
board
to
consider
is
you
you
are
granting
a
variance
to
this
setback,
whether
it
ends
up
ultimately-
and
this
is
not
for
the
applicant-
there
have
been
instances
where
a
variance
was
granted.
Property
was
sold
and
not
a
porch
was
built,
but
in
addition
to
the
structure,
you
are
not
granting
a
variance
for
use
you're,
granting
a
variance
for
a
number
now,
just
as
we
go
through.
K
And
I'd
like
to
respond
to
the
question
from
earlier.
That
was
a
very
valid
question.
It
is
a
little
bit
confusing
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone
knows
we're
not
up
here
asking
for
a
second
variance.
What
happened
was
is
a
lot
was
approved
with
the
setback
encroachment
in
error?
These
guys
had
did
not
know
all
they
knew
was
they
submitted
plans.
K
C
E
Is
section
215
o
to
e
reads
in
the
highly
unusual
circumstance?
We're
number
one
the
property
owner
or
contractor
has
made
a
mistake
in
the
construction
of
a
structure,
and
it
would
be
economically
in
practice
able
to
correct
the
mistake.
The
time
it
was
discovered,
number
to
the
appropriate
building
permit
or
other
use
permit
had
been
issued
number
three.
Such
mistake
could
not
have
been
avoided
by
the
application
of
normal
construction
or
business
practices
and
number
four.
C
J
J
M
G
Whether
the
board
approves
it
or
not,
the
way
your
code
reads
when
you
can
put
conditions
in
granting
a
variance,
the
board
may
prescribe
conditions
necessary
to
protect
public
interest
and
to
ensure
compliance
with
applicants
and
a
comprehensive
plan
of
the
city.
So
it's
public
interest
and
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
code
so.
K
I
don't
know
if
this
works
I'm
just
throwing
ideas
out
there.
It
makes
sense
that
it's
very
difficult
to
apply
conditions
to
variances
that
keep
other
people
from
replying
for
those
same
variances.
However,
what
we
would
be
willing
to
do
if,
if
it
could
be
reviewed
quick
enough
is
we
can
always
submit
a
Bayshore
heights
site
plan
modification
with
whatever
condition
limiting
conditions
we
could
possibly
put
on
there
so
that
anybody
that
came
in
with
a
variance
or
anybody
that
came
in
with
any
request.
D
C
H
Is
this
one
case
we
proved
to
you
tonight
by
withdrawing
the
other
application
that
our
intent
is
not
to
get
this
to
where,
with
the
flood
doors
can
open,
and
everyone
comes
in
with
these
various
requests.
Our
intent
is
to
get
a
buyer
who's
under
contract
and
who
did
not
know
about
this
issue,
their
their
home
that
they're
looking
for
one.
B
L
M
M
A
K
O
A
H
And
I'd
you
know,
I
won't
want
to
speak
for
the
McIntyre's,
because
I
know
they've
been
through
a
lot
and
if
it
were
to
solve
things
they
may
have,
they
may
feel
differently,
but
I
don't
see
how
that
reducing
it
from
10
feet
to
8
feet
is
gonna.
Make
that
big
of
an
impact
I?
Don't
it's
it's
if
you're,
okay,
with
eight
cuts
again,
there's
no
issue
with
safety.
There's
no
issue
with
green
space.
H
H
C
O
L
A
N
C
Yes,
the
rules
allow
us
to
explain
our
votes
after
we
have
made
the
votes
and
my
only
concern.
One
of
my
concerns
is
that
henceforth,
there'll
be
other
people
in
the
subdivision,
not
the
developer,
who
are
also
going
to
be
asking
for
Lynn
eyes
and
we'll
have
to
deal
with
those,
as
the
case
comes
up
when
we
say
well,
we'll
have
the
argument
that.
L
C
But
this
is
what's
gonna
happen.
Perhaps
when
other
people
are
asking
for
Lynn
eyes
and
say:
well,
they
you've
got
it
a
lot
54.
How
about
on
some
other
Lots,
but
I,
understand
the
situation
and
I
developers
tried
as
hard
as
they
could
and
it's
relatively
an
innocuous
variance
and
I
voted
yes
and
I'll
stick
with
it.
So
you
have
two
years
to
start
construction.
D
C
O
Know
who's
on
there
right
now,
I
had
heard
from
someone.
My
wife
does
business
that
he
was
putting
an
application
forward
and
I
want
to
be
very
clear
about
the
possible
reuse,
Minh
and
I'm
only
an
alternate
there
could
be
people,
but
if
herbs
not
there,
then
I
would
be
an
alternate.
So
that's
why
I
would
like
to
know
if
they're
going
to
be
you.