►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board September 21, 2017
Description
Description
C
B
B
D
Father
send
down
your
blessings
on
this
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
board,
give
the
board
members
a
clear
sense
of
duty
and
lead
them
to
a
faithful
discharge
of
the
same
direct
them
in
their
deliberations
at
this
meeting,
so
that
all
things
may
be
done
to
the
glory
of
thy
name
and
the
welfare
of
the
people
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
This
we.
A
E
B
You
like
to
go
over
the
hearing
procedures
for
the
code
enforcement
board.
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed
or
statute
to
86.0.
B
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
B
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
Before
we
begin
the
public
hearings,
we
will
have
all
potential
witnesses
stand
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
E
B
And
again,
please
turn
off
cell
phones
off
the
first
item
on
the
agenda.
Today
we
have
a
case.
That's
been
moved
up.
It's
case
number
seventeen
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
five
one
listed
on
the
agenda
is
case.
Number
nine
we're
gonna.
Take
this
as
the
first
case,
it's
six
to
nine
tes
here
and
Katherine
Mohandas.
B
F
B
F
Originally,
the
first
exhibit
going
around
for
the
board
is
going
to
be
all
the
photographs,
including
my
initial
inspection.
The
re-inspection
in
my
signposting
exhibit
number
two
that's
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
and
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
are
any
administrative
Docs,
including
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
records
and
emails
between
myself
and
the
arborist
and
then
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign?
Initially,
my
inspection
started
on
July
25th
of
this
year.
F
I
had
gotten
a
complaint
about
an
adjoining
property.
So
in
the
process
I
noticed
this
property.
Initially
I
thought
the
house
appeared
to
be
vacant,
it
wasn't
I
knocked
on
the
door.
Nobody
was
there,
the
lot
was
overgrown.
There
was
trash
and
debris
on
the
property
and
trash
cans
at
the
dead
tree
next
to
the
driveway
I
received
and
had
some
email
conversation
with
the
arborist
regarding
the
dead
tree,
and
she
confirmed
that
the
tree
needed
to
be
removed
at
the
state
it
was
in.
F
On
August
26th
of
this
year,
I
went
out
and
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
The
trash
cans
had
been
moved
so
that
aspect
of
the
violation
is
no
longer
before
the
board
and
otherwise,
at
that
time
there
still
was
no
change.
The
tree
was
still
there
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
On
August
30th
that
we
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
September
8th
of
this
year,
the
sign
was
posted
and
a
daffodil.
F
My
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
September
19th
by
actually
major
trail
had
contact
with
Tomi
through
the
police
department
and
I
communicated
to
him
what
was
going
on.
Obviously,
we
had
the
storm
in
between
there,
so
there
was
some
damage
to
that
tree.
Some
of
the
branches
had
fallen,
broken
off,
but
the
trees
dead
and
it
was
on
the
neighboring
property.
I
have
left
mr.
Mahina
a
courtesy
notice
advising
him.
You
know
clean
that
up,
because
the
city
was
going
to
have
all
the
free
pickups.
F
So
if
he
just
got
a
curbside
and
right
now,
they've
suspended
any
requirements
for
permits
to
remove
any
trees
for
30
days
after
the
storm.
So
he
had
the
opportunity
to
go
and
get
that
cut
down.
Unfortunately,
didn't
have
any
prior
conversation
with
mr.
Mahina
until
pretty
much
yesterday
today
he's
in
the
he
advised
me.
He
was
in
the
process
trying
to
take
care
of
the
tree
so
but
unfortunately,
the
wheels
were
kind
of
already
turning
to
go
before
the
code
before
the
code
board.
F
At
this
point,
our
notice
of
our
notices
were
all
received
and
sent
to
the
property
owner
via
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
website
and
database,
and
at
this
point,
I
have
nothing
further
and
I
would
just
like
actually
I
do
I,
just
like
the
board
to
consider
violation.
City
could
48-52
and
130
302
130
302
is
specifically
for
the
dead
tree
and
the
requirement
to
have
it
removed
and
840
and
850
to
have
to
deal
with
the
cleanup
of
the
branches
and
such.
B
G
G
F
B
F
F
He
cleaned
up
everything
I
mean,
unfortunately,
that
that
still
kind
of
falls
a
little
bit
under
840
and
850
to
because
of
the
debris
from
the
tree.
So
I
couldn't
put
him
in
compliance.
He
mowed
the
yard,
all
of
that
was
taken
care
of,
but
because
the
branches
were
still
laying
there.
852
still
applies.
That
also
was
in
conjunction
with
his
yard,
but
he's
like
I
said
he's
taking
care
of
his
yard.
G
B
B
B
F
F
B
B
I
J
H
H
B
A
A
B
B
B
M
K
L
F
B
J
F
Thank
you,
austere
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
bed
enforcement
been
so
employed
since
2015
case
before
the
board
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
zero.
Five.
The
address
is
five
five:
three
Division
Street
property
owners
listed
as
joist
wedding.
Originally,
the
complaint
started
in
May
of
this
year
on
May
30th
exhibit
number
one
that's
going
before
the
board
or
all
of
my
photographs,
my
initial
inspection
of
miry
inspections.
F
Initially,
my
complaint
was
regarding
the
house
being
in
poor
condition,
the
yard
not
being
maintained
unlicensed
vehicles
and
so
forth.
You
and
trees
along
the
outside
edge.
This
property
is
kind
of
like
a
double
parcel.
The
house
is
on
one
parcel
and
then
north
of
it
is
more
or
less
a
vacant
lot.
So
it's
a
very
large,
but
it
is
parcel
together.
Some
of
the
photographs
that
you
see,
especially
of
the
palm
trees
along
the
sidewalk,
are
for
that
second
parcel.
That's
more
north
of
the
the
house
itself.
F
My
second
exhibit
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
my
Notice
of
Violation,
my
final
Notice
of
Violation,
the
notice
of
hearing
and
an
updated
notice
of
hearing,
because
we
had
a
we
had
a
date.
Change
exhibit
number
three
going
before
the
board
or
all
of
my
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary.
The
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails,
and
the
last
exhibit
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
submitted.
As
I
stated
earlier,
I
started
the
case
on
May
30th
of
this
year.
F
F
There
was
a
Corvette
with
no
tags
and
flat
tires
parked
on
the
south
side
of
the
house,
and
there
was
another
vehicle
I
think
it
was
a
white
Chrysler
park
around
back
behind
the
house
on
the
would
be
the
west
side
and
there
was
debris
on
the
property.
There
was
a
you
saw
it
in
one
of
the
pictures:
a
utility
trailer
full
of
trash
worked
on
the
property.
F
There
was
some
siding
and
things
like
that
missing
from
the
house,
and
it
was,
it
seemed
to
be
generally
in
disrepair
and
their
trash
cans
in
public
view
and
trash
and
debris
stored
out
on
the
front
porch.
We
initially
sent
our
Notice
of
Violation
on
May
31st
and
we
received
another
complaint
from
a
neighbor
on
June
13th
of
2017
On
June
28th.
F
We
received
this
certified
Notice
of
Violation
return
to
our
office
on
open
and
then
due
to
timing
with
code
board
stuff,
we
decided
to
send
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
this
year
and
it
was
mailed
first-class
return.
Receipt
requested
I
conducted
the
first
reinfection
on
August
1st
of
this
year,
and
there
pretty
much
was
no
change
at
all
at
that
time.
F
So
we
then
scheduled
it
for
code
board
and
sent
a
notice
hearing
which
was
mailed
August,
1st
first-class
and
certified
mail
conducted
another
inspection
on
the
fifth
I
know
there
had
been
some
conversation
between
Miss
wedeck
I
believe
in
barb
in
the
office
regarding
the
property
needing
an
extension.
So
there
was
some
time
added
to
otherwise.
Like
I
said,
this
was
a
make
age.
F
So
we're
now
addressing
it
now
on
August
of
this
year
we
did
receive
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
certified
green
card
and
was
signed
by
the
the
property
and
then
on
August
29th.
Both
the
initial
notice
you're
hearing,
an
updated
notice
of
hearing
were
returned
to
the
office
unclaimed
on
September
8,
that
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
and
entered
on
September
14th
and,
if
I
may
have
said
it
wrong.
September
8
was
when
the
sign
was
supposed
to
September
14th.
We
received
an
office
visit
from
the
owner.
Mr.
F
wedeck
I
wasn't
in
the
office
at
the
time
suppose
the
Berks
handled
it
I
conducted.
My
final
inspection
yesterday
and
I
noted
that
there
they're,
mostly
in
compliance
the
vehicles,
are
all
gone.
The
trailer
was
still
there.
It
is
removed.
Now,
as
of
yesterday,
the
trailer
was
still
there.
Obviously,
with
the
storm
they
actually
looked
like
they
got
a
lot
of
the
debris
cleaned
up.
There
was
some
fence
sections
on
the
north
side
that
aren't
intact
and
in
all
honesty,
I
can't
tell
you
if
they're
related
to
the
storm
or
not,
and
it's.
F
Know
the
like
I
said:
the
fence
still
has
some
issues:
I
can't
determine
whether
or
not
if
they
were
exacerbated
by
the
storm
or
not,
there's
still
some
siding
missing
from
the
house,
so
it
still
needs
to
get
some
work
done
on
it.
So
before
the
board
today
would
like
them
to
consider
a
violation
of
the
defense,
36.0
3,
the.
F
840
and
852,
as
I
stated,
they
complied
with
4000
the
inoperable
vehicles
so
they're,
not
on,
but
no
longer
before
the
board.
The
gentleman
is
stating
that
the
trailer
has
been
moved.
I
just
haven't
been
able
to
confirm
that
as
of
yesterday,
it
was
still
in
violation
of
4300,
but
if
it's
been
moved,
that's
easy
enough
to
take
care
of,
and
the
final
note
is
that
all
of
our
notices
were
sent
to
the
property
owner
of
record
by
the
Pinellas
County
Tax
Collector
database
and
mr.
F
B
K
F
F
K
F
Under
840
and
852,
and
then
it's
just
840
is
almost
like
it's
just
it's
a
general
nuisance
aspect
where,
if
your
house
isn't
taken
care
of
and
things
like
that,
it's
a
nuisance
aspect.
So
that's
what
a
forty
primarily
covers.
850
covers
of
tree
trimming
and
it
covers
a
lot
clearing
and
and
debris,
and
things
like
that.
Okay.
H
N
K
Depends
on
what
is
left
yeah
I
mean
it
depends
on.
What's
left
I
mean
we
went
down,
cut
the
trees
all
the
way
up
with
a
ten-foot
a-frame
ladder
as
high
as
I
could
reach.
So
if
it's
gotta
be
14
feet,
I
mean
that's
done.
I
did
the
siding
on
the.
What
side
is
that
facing
the
right
right
side
of
the
house?
That's
been
done
and.
B
O
B
K
Only
thing
that
would
be
the
fence:
we
had
about
eight
more
panels
and
six
posts
that
snapped
it's
getting
yeah
during
the
hurricane.
So
it's
a
matter
of
getting
the
supplies
once
I
get
supplies,
maybe
two
weeks
I
mean
I
work,
full-time,
so
I'm
doing
everything
after
five
six
o'clock
and
on
weekends,
okay,.
O
A
D
F
You
I
think
based
on
what
he's
saying
45
days,
especially
in
the
presence
of
storm,
and
you
know
trying
to
get
some
of
the
stuff
that
his
fence
did
have
additional
sections
from
my
initial.
So
he
is
suffering
a
little
bit
of
hurricane
damage
and
they
put
this
in
kind
of
a
unique
spot.
So
I
think
45
days
is
probably
reasonable.
As
far
as
the
city
spine
goes
$50
a
day
after
that.
B
I
P
C
B
A
B
K
B
B
F
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Torrance
pranks
code
enforcement
case
number
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
two
three,
the
property
address
is
974
Sunrise
Drive
listed
property
owner
owner
is
Gary
any
before
the
board
or
a
violation.
It
deals
with
fencing,
3603
and
permits
required
for
fencing.
105.1
exhibit
number
one
of
the
photographs.
Unfortunately,
I
don't
have
any
initial
photographs,
I,
don't
know
what
happened
to
him.
So
I
do
get
an
aftereffect.
Basically,
the
the
initial
complaint
was,
the
fence
was
installed
backwards.
F
It
was
a
neighbor
complained
and
I
believe
I
made
contact
with
the
gentleman
and
spoke
to
him
when
I
did
my
initial
inspection
around
June
first
going
before
the
board
is
exhibit
number
one
is
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
the
re-inspections
in
the
signposting
exhibit
number
two.
All
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
and
the
notice
of
hearing,
exhibit
number
three.
Are
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
record
and
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
Mr.
F
So,
as
I
stated
earlier
on,
June
1st
I
conducted
my
initial
inspection
based
on
a
neighbor
complained,
the
6-foot
wooden
fence
between
nine
seventy
four
976
sunrise
Drive
was
installed
backwards.
Basically,
the
city
code
says
I,
don't
know
of
a
better
way
of
saying
it,
but
the
ugly
side
of
a
fence
is
supposed
to
face
your
property
and
not
the
neighbor's
property.
So
that's
the
only
way.
F
F
At
that
time
the
fence
post
remained,
but
the
fence
panels
were
down,
so
most
of
the
posts
were
still
there
and
the
panels
were
stacked
up
against
the
house
at
the
time.
So
when
August
25th
still
technically
in
violation
because
they
either
got
to
remove
all
the
posts
or
on
August
25th
of
this
year,
certified
notice.
The
hearing
was
sent
first-class
and
certified
mailed
to
both
the
owner
and
the
tenant
and
occupant
on
September
6th.
F
The
certified
notice
of
hearing
green
card
and
receipt
were
received
in
the
office
signed
by
the
owner
of
the
property
on
September
8th,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
and
sent
in
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
yesterday,
it's
almost
80%
up
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
though
there
hasn't
been
a
permit
through
the
city
obtained.
So
apparently
he's
got
a
permit.
So
that's
a
moot
point
at
this.
Q
F
Had
contact
with
the
tenant
more
so
and
then
all
of
our
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
so
based
on
his
permit.
If
it's
a
valid
permit,
then
the
only
offense
that
we
have
is
just
the
finalization
of
the
fence,
which
is
city,
ordinance,
36.0
3,
and
we
would
be
taking
105.1
off
of
the
table.
Okay,.
R
The
only
thing
I
had
I
did
have
this
posted
on
my
window
of
the
Hollis
idea.
I,
guess
you
just
missed
it
there
I
didn't
I,
just
didn't
see
it
see
any
other
place
to
really
put
it,
but
I
just
left
to
it.
A
panels
on
the
ground.
Just
so
you'd
know
that
the
posts
were
out.
There
was
no
post
there.
I
did
have
about
80%
of
offense
complete
reversed,
which
really
was
a
problem
with
the
neighbor.
B
P
F
R
B
B
O
O
A
P
B
O
I
K
B
B
F
H
B
H
B
B
E
T
I've
looked
at
them
and
because
I
haven't
been
out
there
in
a
while
I
can't
tell
you
and
I
can
either
confirm
or
deny
that
it's
the
property
that
sounds
too
politically
correct,
I
just
haven't
been
out
there.
So
I
don't
know,
if
probably
as
I
know
we're
next
to
a
house.
We
have
two
Lots.
This
is
the
one
that
you.
B
T
B
F
Ready
Thank,
You
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
tarpon
springs
code
enforcement.
The
case
before
the
board
is
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three,
eight
zero:
this
is
a
vacant
lot.
It's
slightly
north
of
castle,
terrace
and
unis.
Unis
is
a
is
a
plaited
right
away.
That
is
not
paved
all
the
way
through.
It
comes
off
Sunset
Drive,
the
last
house
on
Eunice
is
655
units
Drive.
They
have
two
parcels
and
just
a
note
for
the
board.
F
F
T
F
So
so
going
before
the
board
or
my
photographs
to
include
all
the
inspections
and
the
signposting,
which
is
exhibit
number
one
exhibit
number
two
or
all
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
in
the
notice
of
hearing
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
records
and
officer
emails
or
exhibit
number
four
exhibit
number
I'm.
Sorry
exhibit
number
three
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
signed
copy?
F
Because
it's
over
ten
thousand
square
feet,
it
was
the
3015
rule.
They
needed
to
be
cut
back,
30
feet
from
castle
terrace
30
feet
from
the
platted
right
away,
which
is
Eunice
and
then
because
the
the
north
side
is
an
undeveloped
lot.
They
didn't
need
to
maintain
that
side.
The
western
side
is
an
enjoined
to
develop
property,
so
it
need
to
be
cut
back
15
feet.
They
did
do
some
significant
maintenance
on
it
and
they
cut
back
almost
everything,
almost
clearing
a
lot,
except
for
the
30
feet
from
the
right
away
on
Eunice
Drive.
F
So
now
the
whole
Lots
been
completely
mode.
That's
when
I
did
the
inspection
back
in
August.
It's
actually
grown
back
significantly
when
I
did
the
inspection
yesterday.
So
moving
through
on
June
24th
was
my
initial
inspection,
June
27th
I
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
first
class
and
return
receipt
requested
to
the
property
owner.
This
is
the
a'
dosis
and
angie.
Yes,
sorry
about
that.
F
July
25th
I
conducted
the
first
tree
inspection.
There
was
no
change,
and
at
that
time
we
were,
we
were
planning
on
putting
on
the
September
code
board
on
July
27th.
Also,
we
mailed
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
via
first-class
and
certified
mail
longest
26th
conducted
Orion
special.
This
is
when
I
noted.
The
lot
was
about
80%
cleared,
except
for
that
30
feet
from
the
right
away
and
since
they
had
cleared
the
whole
lot.
F
That
means
the
whole
lot
now
needs
to
be
cleared,
though
the
30
15
rule
is
now
off
the
table
because
they
did
clear
the
majorities
a
lot:
August
30th,
we
mailed
to
notice
a
hearing
first
class,
a
certified
mail,
I
posted
sign
on
September,
8th
and
then
on
September
20th.
They
conducted
a
another
final
inspection.
F
There
was,
like
I,
said
the
from
the
August
26th
visit
a
lot
had
grown
back,
but
you
could
still
see
where,
as
cleared
so
now,
unfortunately
they're
required
to
move
the
whole
lot
and
clear
the
whole
lot
and
then,
as
I
already
stated,
they're
joining
properties.
Unfortunately,
gonna
be
heard
next
month,
we
did
finally
have
some
contact
with
the
owner
or
I
guess
came
into
the
office.
I
didn't
meet
with
her
around
like
twelve.
It
also
should
be
noted
that
all
of
our
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
listed.
F
B
F
Before
the
board,
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider
violation
of
city
ordinance,
eight
dash
forty,
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
city
ordinance,
eight
dash
52,
which
is
the
nuisance,
prohibitions
that
require
lots
to
be
cleared
of
all
weeds
growth
and
undergrowth
and
be
maintained.
Moving
forward.
T
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
T
My
husband
usually
takes
care
of
these
things
and
I
thought
he
had
pretty
much
done
most
of
the
work
and
I
guess.
I
would
definitely
caught
him
officer
Katz
and
he
did
but
now
needs
to
be
redone.
My
husband
had
to
go
out
of
town.
He
left
right
before
mid-august.
He
was
supposed
to
be
back
Friday
this
past
Friday,
but
American
Airlines,
canceled,
I,
guess
because
of
the
earth
I
mean
god
forbade,
no
earthquake
a
hurricane
so
he's
flying
in
tonight.
T
Meanwhile,
I
did
get.
This
I
did
try
to
get
a
couple
of
people
to
go
out
there
and
look
at
it.
They
said
they
couldn't
do
it
at
that
time.
I
tried
to
get
my
lawn
guys
to
go
out
there.
They
said
they
didn't
have
the
equipment.
The
boat
was
needed,
they
needed
a
bush
hog
or
something
like
that.
I
know.
My
husband
was
in
the
process
before
he
left
to
rent
a
bush
hog
and
he
called
Pinellas
rentals
and
they
didn't
have
one
available.
T
So
he
left
I
got
this
now
I've
called
my
brother
was
trying
to
get
someone
who
knew
how
to
run
a
bush
hog.
Maybe
about
three
weeks
ago
and
she
had
a
job
and
she
was
good
to
try
and
do
it
right
after
that
long
story
short,
the
hurricane
came
yadda
yadda
yadda.
Now
I
can't
get
anybody
to
do
anything
because
they're
all
booked
for
three
weeks
out
so
I'm
gonna
leave
this
to
my
husband
when
he
gets
back
tonight.
This
is
his
job,
not.
I
T
T
I
have
I,
wouldn't
know
what
to
tell
you.
I
mean
I,
know
people
who
have
left
the
area
and
are
down
south
cleaning,
and
they
couldn't
even
tell
me
when
they're
coming
back
and
I
have
no
clue
if
the
equipment
will
be
there
rent.
If
that's
been
taken,
so
I,
don't
want
to
tell
you
you
know,
give
me
a
month.
Give
me
two
weeks.
Give
me
you
know
a
couple:
I,
don't
know:
I
hate,
you
know
officer.
F
B
O
E
F
I
O
A
A
B
B
What
I
would
suggest,
though,
if
you
find
out
because
of
the
situation
here
in
Tarpon
Springs
right
the
hurt
that
you're
having
problems
get
ahold
of
officer
Gaston,
and
you
know
let
him
know
what
your
efforts
are
and
I'm
sure
that
that
that
you
know
we
may
be
able
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
you
next.
Okay,.
T
I
B
U
U
U
F
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
three.
This
is
750
knees,
Lime
Street,
also
known
as
tarpon
wood
apartments,
the
apartment
complex
directly
to
the
north
of
the
police
station.
It's
owned
by
Lime,
Street
properties
incorporated,
and
the
lady
here
before
us
I
believe,
is
the
property
manager
for
her
promote
apartments.
Going
before
the
border,
a
number
of
exhibits,
the
first
set
of
photographs
were
taken:
June
29th,
the
following
set
of
photographs
were
taken:
June,
I'm,
sorry,
September
20th.
F
Yesterday,
that's
exhibit
number
one
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
a
final
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
are
my
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign?
The
posted
sign
I
began
mines.
F
The
the
case
June
29th
of
this
year
was
my
initial
inspection
was
called
in
by
a
major
troll
with
the
police
department,
the
grass
and
the
weeds
need
to
be
trimmed
or
removed
from
the
right
away
along
the
north,
south
and
west
sides.
Chain-Link
fence
is
broken
in
numerous
places
and
is
damaged
in
need
of
repair.
Some
of
the
railings
bent
across
the
top
there's
a
large
amount
of
trash
being
left
outside
of
the
dumpster
area,
especially
in
the
southwest
corner,
and
it
seems
to
be
a
frequent
occurrence
with
this
property.
F
At
the
time
there
were
two
vehicles:
I'm
not
going
to
discuss
those
because
they've
been
taken
care
of,
so
that
ordinance
violation
is
off
the
table.
There's
vines
growing
into
the
trees,
especially
along
the
north
side,
and
none
of
the
dumpsters
have
the
required
dumpster
enclosures,
with
the
exception
of
I.
Take
that
back.
F
One
of
the
dumpsters
on
the
southwest
side
of
the
property
does
have
a
dumpster
enclosure,
but
there's
two
one
on
the
northwest
side,
one
on
the
north
side
and
then
one
on
what
would
be
the
southeast
side
that
are
in
need
of
dumpster
enclosures.
So,
as
I
stated,
my
initial
inspection
was
on
June
29th.
We
mailed
out
to
notice
a
violation
of
your
first
class
and
certified
mail
to
the
New
York
office,
the
local
office
and
the
registered
agent
of
the
property
on
July
6.
F
The
the
Notice
of
Violation
green
card
addressed
to
the
office
and
tarpon
wood
lake
was
returned.
I
couldn't
tell
who
the
signature
was.
It
is
included
in
in
the
record,
though
July
7th
of
this
year,
the
Notice
of
Violation
green
card
greaser
returned
signed
by
a
Keeley
Thurston
July
17th,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
addressed
the
line
street
properties
was
returned,
returned
to
sender,
unopened,
July
18th,
the
certified
Notice
of
Violation
address.
The
Lime
Street
properties
was
also
returned
to
sender,
July
27th.
F
The
extension
was
requested
by
the
property
manager
and
granted
until
September
12th
I
did
conduct
a
rien
spectrin
on
August
8th.
They
were
at
that
time
because
it
was
already
scheduled.
They
were
still
not
in
compliance
and
we
decided
to
send
them
a
final
Notice
of
Violation.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
out
to
the
same
people
listed
earlier.
F
I
know
at
one
point
time
there
was
a
conversation
there
in
the
attempt
right
now
to
get
contractors
to
take
care
of
some
of
the
dumpster
enclosures
in
the
fence
and
some
of
the
landscaping
moving
on
August
28.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
to
the
New
York
office,
the
local
office
and
the
registered
agent
on
September
6th
turned
green
card
address
to
Lime.
F
Street
properties
was
signed,
but
again
the
signature
is
ineligible
or
I,
couldn't
read
it
sorry
and
September
8,
they
posted
the
property
and
then
on
September
18th,
a
mark
salgan
had
contacted
stating
stating
they
were
in
the
process
of
hiring
a
contractor
to
take
care
of
the
fences
he
didn't
make
any.
He
didn't
make
any
comment
about
the
dumpster
enclosures.
At
that
time,
on
September
19th
and
Notice
of
Violation
certified
mail
addressed
to
Lime,
Street
properties
was
returned
to
sender.
F
Unopened
and
same
thing
with
the
notice
of
hearing
was
a
return
to
Center
unable
to
forward
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
20th.
The
photographs
are
inside,
there's
still
trash
being
dumped
outside
the
dumpsters.
You
can
see
it
on
the
September
20th
pictures.
There's
numerous
pictures
of
the
fence
still
being
broken.
You
know
they're,
obviously
aware
of
that,
because
they
stated
they're
working
on
getting
a
fence
contractor
employing
permits
and.
I
F
You
look
through
the
photographs
and
you
see
vehicles.
Those
have
been
moved
so
they're
they're,
not
an
issue,
and
then
you
can
see
in
the
photographs,
especially
some
of
the
ones
taken
on
September
20th,
a
large
quantity
of
trees
and
undergrowth
that
were
growing
along
the
fence
line
still
need
to
be
taken
care
of
so.
S
S
U
As
he
said,
removed
those
vehicles
out
of
the
property,
we
got
our
landscaping
company
to
start
everything
as
far
as
weeds
and
grass
starting
next
week.
Everything
will
be
done.
The
fence
will
be
repaired.
I
have
here
a
proposal,
a
contract
as
far
as
the
sorry
fencing
to
build
a
fence
around
the
garbage.
We
just
need
30
more
days
because
that
big.
U
U
D
O
B
D
O
O
E
U
P
F
S
B
A
U
B
U
B
F
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
police
department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
zero
seven:
this
is
a
vacant
lot
between
640
and
644
Bayshore
Drive
property's
listed
owner
is
a
George
Carter.
There's
some
exhibits
that
are
going
to
be
going
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one.
Is
all
the
photographs
to
include
my
initial
inspection.
F
Rhian
spec
shion's
in
the
signposting
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
final
Notice
of
Violation,
and
a
notice
of
hearing
given
number
three
or
administrative
docks
to
include
case
summary,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
and
any
emails.
The
affidavit
of
posting
is
Exhibit
number.
Four
initial
inspection
was
on
July
7th
of
this
year.
I
was
conducting
an
inspection
in
the
neighborhood
and
neighboring
properties,
and
I
observed
a
violation.
The
trees
and
you'll
see
it
in
the
photograph
going
around
there's
a
large
tree
on
the
front
of
their
lot.
F
There's
a
pretty
substantial
branch.
That's
about
seven
feet
off
the
above
the
sidewalk
causing
a
problem.
It
needs
to
be
10
feet
above
the
sidewalk
at
the
time.
The
lot
needs
to
be
mowed.
It
was
heavily
overgrown,
a
mowed,
edged
and
trimmed
and
there's
another
large
tree
that
had
some
broken
limbs
that
needed
to
be
tended
to
and
then
there's
vines
all
over
suffocating
some
trees.
On
the
back
of
the
property
close
to
the
river
on
July
7th,
we
issue,
or
we
mailed,
to
notice
a
violation
for
your
first
class.
F
Certified
mail
on
July
14th
receive
the
green
card
signed
by
a
representative
of
the
oh
I'm,
sorry,
the
owner
on
July
25th
I
conducted
an
inspection.
The
trees
still
aren't
providing
the
required
clearance
that
big
tree
out
front
and
the
vines
are
still
suffocating
the
trees
in
the
rear
lot.
He
had
mowed
it
at
that
time
and
taking
care
of
some
of
the
branches
on
the
large
tree
on
July
27th.
We
then
mailed
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
August
2nd
of
this
year.
F
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
green
card
was
received
in
the
office
by
a
representative
of
the
owner.
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
August
26,
with
no
change
on
August
30th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
September
8,
the
sign
was
posted
or
the
codeword
hearing
and
on
September
8.
The
notice
of
hearing
green
card
was
received
in
the
office
for
by
the
owners
represent
representative
I
conducted
a
final
inspection.
Yesterday,
the
photographs
were
included,
the
largest
Restall,
not
trimmed
to
the
10-foot
clearance
above
the
sidewalk.
F
The
vines
are
still
suffocating
the
tree
in
the
back,
because
it's
actually
starting
to
die
and
then
again
the
lot
was
now
overgrown.
Again
there
wasn't
any
debris
or
anything
on
it
related
to
the
storm,
so
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
Only
the
certified
receipts
from
the
property
owners
representative
and
all
the
notices
were
sent
from
information
from
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
and
so
at
this
point,
I'd,
like
the
city
to
consider
violation
of
city
code,
eight
dash
40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
violation.
F
Eight
dash
52,
which
is
the
nuisance
prohibitions
with
deal
with
lot,
clearing
mowing
and
tree
clearances,
and
then
city
ordinance,
130,
302
deals
with
the
applicability
of
maintenance
of
trees,
vines
and
so
forth,
and
to
maintain
them
in
a
healthy
state.
The
vines
on
the
back
are
basically
killing
those
trees
off
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
O
B
O
K
K
F
H
P
B
E
B
F
You
and
I
do
have
some
exhibits
to
go
forward
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
enforcement
case
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four,
three
five,
the
property
in
question,
724,
North,
Avenue,
it's
a
listed
property
owner
of
a
rebecca
ford,
exhibit
number
one
going
around
or
all
the
photos
to
include
the
initial
inspection
and
the
signposting
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation.
A
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documents
to
include
my
case.
F
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors,
information
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
posted.
This
case
started
on
July
20th
after
we
received
the
complaint
through
the
city
about
a
visibility
issue
on
the
corner
of
mango
Street
and
North
Avenue
at
the
property
of
724
North
Avenue.
F
Basically,
a
visibility
triangle
issue:
there's
a
large
Bush
and
you'll
see
it
in
the
photographs
going
around
that
was
preventing
traffic
from
going
southbound
on
North
Avenue
to
be
able
to
see
traffic
eastbound
on
mango
street
I
actually
made
contact
with
one
of
the
female
residents.
It
was
not
Rebecca,
Ford
I
believe
it
was
her
granddaughter
advised
her
what
the
problem
was.
She
stated
they
would
take
care
of
it.
F
F
So
they
eventually
got
that
cleaned
up.
They
did
have
another
violation
of
another
tree
which
they
were
able
to
trim
and
take
care
of
ten
feet
above
the
sidewalk,
but,
as
I
stated,
that's
been
taken
care
of
so
moving
forward
after
I
talked
to
her
on
July
20th,
we
received
another
complaint.
Around
July
26th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
august
2nd
and,
like
I
said,
the
tree
on
mango
above
the
sidewalk
had
been
trimmed
back.
F
That
was
part
of
the
original
complaint
and
they
done
a
little
bit
of
trimming
on
the
large
Bush
on
the
corner,
but
unfortunately
it
still
wasn't
in
compliance
from
that
point
forward.
We
had
no
other
contact
with
them
via
in
person
or
via
email
on
July
25th.
We
mailed
notice
a
hearing,
first
class
and
certified
mail
on
September
6.
The
Nov
was
returned
to
the
office
unopened
on
September
8th.
They
posted
the
property
and
the
photographs
included
in
the
exhibits
on
September
20th.
F
Yesterday
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
the
bush
was
still
not
cut
back
now.
Unfortunately,
the
lawn
is
overgrown.
There's
some
tree
debris:
that's
not
related
to
the
hurricane,
although
I
didn't
bring
those
forward
before
the
board.
One
of
the
interesting
things
is,
it
almost
looks
like
the
house
is
abandoned.
It
doesn't
look
like
anybody's
living
in
it,
so
that
might
be
part
of
the
problem
and,
like
I
stated,
I've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
F
F
P
O
A
P
B
S
O
A
B
D
B
B
M
B
F
Officer
Steve
Gaston
city,
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
case
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
484.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
north
of
the
house
at
501,
Triplett
Street
property
owner
listed
as
a
Mary
Crockett.
Originally
this
case
started
August
5th
of
this
year
exhibit
number
one
of
the
photographs
going
around.
It
just
should
be
noted
that
the
first
number
of
them
dated
eight
five
were
the
initial
inspection.
The
last
two
photographs
dated
September
yeah
September
20th,
were
the
ones
I
obviously
took
yesterday.
So
there's
a
significant
difference.
F
As
she
stated,
the
vehicles
are
gone,
so
the
ordinance
of
40.00
is
not
going
to
be
before
the
board
today
if
it
was
still
included
notice.
The
only
thing
before
the
board
today
is
852,
so
I'll
discuss
that
exhibit
number
one
as
I
stated
or
all
the
photographs,
all
the
notices
are
exhibit
number
two,
including
the
notice
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
is
evan.
Umber
three
are
my
administrative
documents
and
exhibit
number
four?
F
When
I
noted
that
at
that
point
in
time
there
were
a
number
of
vehicles,
as
I
stated,
there
was
a
large
amount
of
debris
being
stored
on
the
property,
and
Dupre
is
defined
not
just
as
trash,
but
we
unused
equipment.
It
can
be
a
number
of
things.
It's
kind
of
a
broad
definition
of
what
debris
is,
and
then
the
lot
need
to
be
maintained.
Mowed
and
trimmed
I
did
have
some
conversation
with
a
young
man
out
in
front
of
the
house
that
day
and
unfortunately,
I
don't
know
what
his
name
was
and
I
don't
know.
F
F
And
when
nothing
was
done,
I
wasn't
sure
that
the
young
man
I
spoke
to
was
related
the
property.
So
we
went
ahead
and
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
on
the
August
7th
to
the
property
owner
listed
via
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
August
10th.
We
did
have
some
contact
with
one
of
the
representatives
of
the
property
on
August
26th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
at
that
time
the
the
vehicle
and
number
the
debris
was
still
there.
I
B
B
F
I
M
I
just
wanted
to
ask
when
you
put
on
the
paper
that
just
read
here
nuisance
is
that
just
that
the
area
need
to
be
clean,
because
that's
what
we
are
doing
every
afternoon
after
work,
we're
trying
to
clean
up
that
property,
but
there's
a
lot
of
bushes
and
stuff
from
the
hurricane
as
well
that
thrown
us
back.
But
we
are
trying
to
clean
the
property
and
bring
it
up
to
a
quarter.
So
I
wanted
to
know
what
is
the
other
nuisance?
What
you
consider
a
nuisance
from
this
whoever's
complaining.
F
W
W
F
W
W
V
F
M
F
M
W
I
V
C
F
F
You
can't
do
it
in
such
a
manner
that
would
kill
the
tree
or
significantly
damage
the
tree,
but
if
there's
branches
hanging
over
your
fence
or
something
like
that,
you're
allowed
to
trim
them,
then
beyond
that
the
only
other
thing
would
be
legally
to
seek
injunctive
relief
through
the
court
or
something
to
that
effect.
Mr.
C
M
S
M
E
S
V
F
P
E
B
P
B
P
O
B
M
V
V
H
This
meeting
is
broadcast
on
cable
station
like
every
time
for
twelve
thirteen
fifteen
times
a
month,
and
it's
it's
it's
a
really
good
way,
because
you're
right
this
can
be
really
intimidating
right,
and
so,
if
people
would
know
to
watch
that
they
could
see
that
you
know
we're
not
sitting
up
here
with
hatchets,
and
you
know
we
just
it's
it's
it's
quasi-judicial,
but
we're
willing
to
listen
and
find
out
and
I
appreciate
that
you
brought
that
up
and
that
you
guys
came
here
today.
Thank.
B
B
V
B
V
L
B
B
B
F
You
officer
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement.
The
case
before
the
board
is
currently
in
compliance.
So
it's
strictly
here
to
be
established
of
ordinances,
8
48-52,
the
case
number
17
8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
one
zero!
It's
a
vacant
lot
with
a
city
address
of
one
to
one:
seven
Castle
Terrace,
Peter
and
Maria
Castro
Yost's
are.
I
F
F
The
final,
the
final
photograph
to
to
be
considered
as
the
last
one,
which
was
dated
September
8th
I,
didn't
take
a
September
20th
one
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
the
property
was
in
compliance
on
September
8th
moving
forward,
the
exhibit
number
one
or
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
zipper
number
three
of
the
administrative
documents.
An
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign
on
July
7th
of
this
year.
F
I
conducted
my
initial
inspection
based
on
a
neighbor
complained.
Well,
that's
very
overgrown
and
needs
to
be
mowed
and
maintained.
On
same
date,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
first-class
certified
mail
on
July,
25th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
the
lot
had
been
somewhat
mode,
there's
still
a
large
amount
of
overgrowth
her
and
there
there
was
tree
and
landscaping
debris
towards
the
rear
of
the
property.
This
is
well
before
the
storm.
F
We
sent
the
notice
of
hearing
on
August
14th
of
this
year
and
we
had
changed
the
hearing
date
and
that's
the
reason
why
it
was
originally
gonna
go
in
August,
but
we
pushed
it
out
to
now.
On
August
21st
Maria
had
stated,
the
property
was
ready
for
inspection.
I
did
go
out
and
post
a
sign
on
9
8.
That's
when
that
photograph
was
taken
and
I
did
conduct
another
inspection
just
to
make
sure
it
hadn't
grown
up
or
anything
else
and
the
primary
reason.
F
There
was
no
photographs,
as
there
was
probably
about
two
8
foot
pipe
piles
of
debris,
stacked
right
in
front
of
it,
so
that
they
would
have
very
been
very
representative
of
the
property.
So
the
September
8th
photo
is
much
better
representation
of
how
it
is
now.
As
stated,
Marie
had
come
into
the
office
and
spoke
to
us
and
in
closing,
just
want
to
make
sure
the
board
understands
that
they
are
currently
in
compliance
and
I'm
strictly
asking
for
the
property
be
established
based
on
priors.
F
O
X
Time
I
believe
all
these
we're
hours,
but
one
of
those
was
a
tree
that
was
hit
by
lightning.
We
also
have
the
neighbor
on
the
back,
where
the
one
of
the
bunches
was.
He
throws.
Probably
it's
very
obvious.
There
is
bamboo
growing
on
his
land
and
bamboo
is
back
on
my
land.
I,
don't
know
what
to
do
with
that.
I
have
asked
help
and
they
told
me
that
if
I
haven't
seen
him
throwing
it
there,
they
cannot
do
anything.
X
The
only
thing
I
have
is
some
pictures
more
recent,
like
some
in
August
and
some
actually
right
after
we
cleaned
it
right
now.
It's
well
cleaned,
so
hopefully
I
heard
the
other
lady
talking
about
the
other
vacant
lot
on
Castle
Terrace
and
she
talked
about
the
boos
hug
yeah.
We
learned
about
that
too.
My
husband
had
to
rent
one
clean
it
and
now
it's
well
cleaned.
So
it's
very
easy
to
maintain.
X
B
F
B
O
B
J
J
B
D
Found
a
violation
of
sections
8-14,
8
52
you
as
the
property
owner,
need
to
make
sure
that
that
property
remains
in
compliance.
Should
it
falls
into
non-compliance
with
any
time
within
the
next
five
years.
It's
going
to
be
considered
a
repeat
violation
and
a
repeat:
violation
of
fine
begins
to
run
on
the
day
of
the
inspection.
There
will
be
no
compliance
time
and
you
could
be
fined
up
to
$500
a
day,
so
it's
very
important
to
keep
the
property
in
compliance.
Okay,.
X
F
The
exhibits
going
around
exhibit
number
one
or
the
photographs
of
the
inspection
and
signposting
exhibit
number
two
or
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation.
The
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
of
your
administrative
documents
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
case
started
out
on
August
1st,
when
I
conducted
my
initial
inspection
based
on
a
neighbor
complained.
I
was
actually
conducting
an
inspection
at
5:38,
West
cedar,
which
was
across
the
street
and
observed
the
property
here.
The
lot
was
extremely
overgrown.
F
F
F
We
sent
it
directly
to
code
board
and
send
a
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing,
at
the
same
time
due
to
the
frequency
of
their
violations
and
the
number
of
prior
violations
on
the
property
for
violations
of
a
tash,
48-52
and
130
302,
which
is
the
applicability
maintenance
of
trees,
which
includes
the
invasive
species
and
Brazilian
pepper
trees
that
need
to
be
removed
from
their
property
on
August
14th.
The
updated
notice
of
hearing
was
male
first
class
because
we
had
a
date
issue
on
it.
F
On
September
6
2017,
the
Notice
of
Violation
certified
mail
address
to
Stanley,
Demetrios
cavity
was
returned
unopened.
The
notice,
a
hearing
that
was
mailed
and
addressed
to
the
same
was
also
returned
unopened
on
September
8th
of
this
year.
I
posted
the
property
on
September
14th
that
conducted
a
reinfection,
and
there
was
no
change
on
September
18th,
the
owner
called,
and
to
update
the
status,
and
basically,
he
advised
he's
having
issues
with
landscaper
and
then
the
storm
added
to
it.
So
he's
trying
to
get
it
done
as
soon
as
possible.
F
When
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
on
September
20th,
there
was
still
no
change
and,
as
I
stated,
we
had
that
conversation
two
days
before
on
the
18th
with
the
owner.
It
should
be
noted
that
all
the
notices
were
sent
to
the
listed
property
owner
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
I
just
have
the
board.
F
F
F
B
H
B
H
H
B
F
H
O
A
B
F
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign?
This
was
related
to
a
couple
of
the
other
cases.
The
board's
already
heard
and
some
of
the
properties
in
the
area
I
received
a
complaint
about.
The
overgrown
lot
was
like
down
by
a
bicyclist
on
the
trail
at
that
point
in
time
on
August
5th
and
then
on.
F
August,
7th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
first-class
and
certified
to
the
owner
and
the
registered
agent
August
11th,
a
representative
of
the
owner,
called
to
advise
that
they're
they're
in
the
process
of
trying
to
develop
that
properties.
They're
I
think
they're
putting
some
apartments
on
there
they're
in
the
permit
process
and
going
through
all
the
boards
with
the
city.
It's
just
taking
time.
F
They
posted
the
property
and
I
had
some
contact
with
I
spoke
to
Nick
at
the
beginning,
but
I've
had
contact
with
somebody
in
his
office
prior
to
that
and
explained
the
situation
and
what
the
circumstances
were.
It
should
be
noted
that
all
the
notices
were
sent
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
website
and
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider
establishing
the
property
in
violation
of
city
codes,
a
48-52.
That's
all
I
have
okay.
B
Y
Pretty
straightforward:
there
was
some
overgrowth
on
the
property,
but
this
has
been
a
pretty
lengthy
delay.
No
lengthy
process
with
the
city
trying
to
get
the
permit
for
the
development,
and
it's
taken
longer
than
expected.
There's
been
some
problems
within
the
city.
Nonetheless,
we
got
it
taken
care
of
when
we
got
to
notice
and
I
think
it's
the
second
time
that
we
had
to
go
out
there
and
mow
it
and,
in
speaking
with
the
officer
earlier,
and
he
did
mention
now.
Y
I
was
a
little
taken
by
that
property,
because
there's
a
lot
of
properties
around
her
that
are
in
really
bad
bad
shape,
and
but
he
did
say
that
he's
gone
out
and
done
some
other
inspections
and
I
just
feel
that,
as
far
as
that
goes
that
it
should
be,
everyone
should
be
treated
equally
in
fairly
and
regards
to
that
sort
of
a
situation.
Ours
was
some
minor
overgrowth.
Some
of
them
are
there's
some
real
problems
in
that
area.
That
I
feel
should
be
addressed
by
the
city,
but
other
than
that.
Nothing
at
all,
sir
officer.
P
B
P
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations
section
8
14,
a
52
of
the
code
of
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
were
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
O
A
D
You
the
property
owner
today
me
holdings
LLC,
has
been
found
in
violation
of
city
code,
sections,
840
and
852.
You
were
now
in
compliance.
There
is
no
fine,
however,
should
the
property
be
cited
and
found
in
violation
again
of
those
two
code
sections
within
five
years.
The
date
of
the
order
will
be
considered
to
repeat
violation
and
be
subject
to
$500
a
day.
Fines
can.
D
Y
D
D
Y
D
Only
two
cases
that
came
up
today,
one
on
Castle,
Terrace
12:17.
In
your
case,
that
was
where
they
were
in
compliance
at
the
time
of
the
hearing,
so
there
are
violation
only
cases,
so
they
would
be
subjected
to
the
same
things.
Those
were
all
first
violations
just
like
yours.
They
were
subject
to
a
fine
if
they
didn't
bring
it
into
compliance.
You're
not
subject
to
a
fine
right
now,
so.
Y
B
I
H
B
Z
B
F
To
the
code
enforcement
board
exhibit
number
four
is
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
before
the
board.
Today
are
violations
of
city
code,
eight
40
and
eight
52
duty
of
maintenance
of
private
property
and
nuisance
prohibitions.
Initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
August,
based
on
a
neighbor
complained
of
being
a
lot.
It's
overgrown.
It
should
be
noted
for
the
record
that
the
lot
is
7,000
square
feet
based
on
the
property
of
pays
property.
Appraisers
website
is
showing
it
to
be
140
feet
deep
and
50
feet
wide.
F
So
it's
subject
of
the
requirements
to
completely
be
mowed
in
the
30
15
rule
does
not
apply
to
this
property.
The
law
had
vines
and
pepper
trees
on
it,
which
also
need
to
be
removed.
At
this
point
in
time,
I
can't
determine
from
my
final
inspection,
if
there's
still
any
remaining
pepper
trees,
so
I'm
not
gonna,
be
bringing
forth
the
130
302
violation.
This
the
840
and
852
on
August
15th,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
to
the
owner
and
agent
on
August
16th.
F
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
to
the
certified
owner
and
to
the
certified
mail
to
the
owner
in
the
agent
on
August
22nd
I
noticed
a
violation.
Certified
mail
addressed
to
care,
to
share,
incorporated
and
to
notice
a
violation.
Certified
mail
addressed
to
James
Warren
were
both
returned
signed
by
James
Warren
on
August
22nd,
a
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
addressed
to
James
Warren
has
returned
unsigned
on
August
22nd.
The
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
addressed
to
care
to
share
was
returned
signed
by
James
Warren
on
September
7th.
F
The
registered
agent
James
Warren
called
to
say,
as
property
was
ready
for
re-inspection
on
September,
8th
I
passed
by
posted
the
property
and
a
photograph
was
taken
on
September
14th.
We
received
a
number
of
letters
in
the
office
from
mr.
Warren,
his
son
and
some
acquaintances
and
then
on
September
20th.
They
conducted
a
final
inspection
yesterday
and
the
lot
still
hasn't
been
fully
maintained.
F
It
still
has
a
large
amount
of
undergrowth
towards
the
will
be
the
south
side
and
and
like
I
said,
I
couldn't
determine
if
there
were
still
pepper
trees
on
it
or
not,
because
he's
clearly
got
a
nope,
no
trespassing
sign
posted
on
his
property,
so
I
can't
go
on
to
it
to
observe
those,
so
I
won't
even
bring
those
before
the
board.
At
this
time.
It
should
be
noted
that
all
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
Tax
Collector
and
property
appraisers
database,
and
then
mr.
B
Z
F
I
believe
I
was
flagged
down,
while
I
was
sitting
on
a
property
on
the
north
I'm.
Sorry,
the
southeast
corner
of
distant
at
MLK
and
I,
don't
know
who
the
neighbor
was
that
they
just
looked
I've
seen
him
before,
but
I
couldn't
tell
you
what
his
name
was
and
just
complained
about
that
property
and
a
couple
other
properties,
one
of
them
being
the
property
that
we
were
sitting
on
just
to
the
south
of
us
that
the
city
ended
up
taking
over
and
we
had
to
remove
a
bunch
of
stuff
from
trash
and
debris
from
that.
W
I
F
Z
Z
F
F
J
Z
F
F
Z
Z
F
Z
So
if
you're,
looking
at
the
subject,
property
to
your
left,
would
be
mr.
Winthrop's
property
and
then
to
the
left
of
that
would
be
Duke,
Energy,
correct,
right
and
that
property
according
to
the
property
appraiser,
is
111
by
40.
Is
that
accurate?
Yes,
sir,
and
you
see
the
picture
attached
to
it?
Yes,
sir,
did
you
cite
them
for
the
that
grass
that's
in
excess
of
two
feet,
maybe
three
feet
tall.
Z
Z
F
I
can
certainly
leave
you
a
green
card.
I
can
leave
you
a
phone
call.
I
can
send
you
an
email
and
make
notice
of
a
violation
if
it's
not
taken
care
of,
they
would
be
subject
to
the
exact
same
things.
Everybody
else
is
a
notice
of
violation.
A
notice
of
hearing
and
I'd
be
standing
before
the
board
with
a
representative
from
Duke.
No.
Z
Z
F
Z
F
W
I
F
I
Q
$300
ticket
before
the
state's
throwing
it
up
because
I
testified
against
him,
but
homeless
man
I'm
glad
to
see
officer.
Tim
Burton
here,
cuz
I
made
a
complaint
on
this
man
ever
since
he
had
a
problem
with
me.
Now
he
has
a
lawyer
or
call
him
left
a
message
for
him,
my
Norma
in
Messiah,
and
guess
what
I
brought
that
piece
of
property
when
I
was
18
years
old
and
one
thing
about
that
piece
of
property
that
property
always
been
in
compliance
until.
Q
Q
Else,
my
little
trail
was
proved
that
he's
a
liar
now,
mr.
Douglas
Ellison
y'all
a
copy,
a
letter
stating
what
problem
this
man
held
with
me,
commissioner.
Sadly
he
sent
it
to
the
boy
to
y'all
every
last
one
of
y'all,
I'm
gonna,
say
one
more
thing
in
my
present
that
man
right
there
I'm
saying
it
real
nice
officer
in
the
front
of
my
son,
I
reach
to
shake
his
hand.
I
said
Steve,
let's
work,
this
thing,
God
call
I,
don't
do
hands
now,
if
very
near
in
the
future.
Q
If
y'all
see
this
man
keep
fighting
me,
then
chief,
you
shall
fire
him.
I
got
proof
by
the
way
the
State
Attorney's
Office,
told
me
I'm
a
very
detailed
person.
Chiefs
know:
Chiefs
got
an
open
door
policy.
This
time
chief
did
not
return.
My
call
I,
don't
know
she
won't
mean
to
help
get
rid
of
this
man,
but
I
will,
with
the
level
truck
I,
got
fines
from
this
man.
Q
You
know
this
guy
got
shot
in
the
head,
I
testified,
I'll
talk
to
the
chief
and
obvious
attempt
about
the
steep
guest
Steve
Goss
had
a
problem
with
bright
people.
He
beat
a
black
man,
not
called
the
teeth
on
his
mouth.
Beat
him
up.
I
am
a
state
witness
on
a
lot
of
stuff
against
an
objective.
He
no
rejection.
Rejection
on
that.
B
B
Q
Q
F
Z
Q
B
B
B
B
B
Q
Q
Q
Okay,
okay
back
there
I
need
old
trees
on
my
property
back
there.
This
man
telling
me
to
take
all
the
stuff
more
down
and
guess
what,
if
I'm
more
down
they
don't
have
no
vegetation,
no
beautiful
thing
they
ought
to
give
to
my
son.
That's
the
only
trees
I
have
in
the
back,
because
he
don't
like
me.
He
coming
up
with
this
stuff.
I
never
did
it
in
the
past.
Even
miss
Joan,
Crawford
mister
are
the
garden
on
next
door.
She
told
me
I
never
had
bid
that
before
I
said
no,
not
every
time.
Q
I
Q
Q
B
Let's
try
to
let's
try
to
deal
with
the
situation
that
had
all
right.
Let
me
just
before
we
lose
track
of
what's
going
on
officer,
guess
of
what
specifically
are
the
are
the
allegations
that
you
brought
forth
there?
What
what
what
needs
to
be
done
to,
at
least
in
in
the
city's
opinion,
to
bring
this
property
in
the
complaint,
the.
Z
Z
B
F
A
state
of
florida
statute
and,
and
also
just
for
the
record
and
if
it's
the
appropriate
time
you
can
advise
as
far
as
gopher
turtles
go
on
the
property
FWC
clearly
allows
you
to
mow
and
maintain
your
property.
What
it
is
is
it's
a
lot
clearing
if
you
go
in
and
possibly
disturb
those
holes,
but
they
specifically
state
in
the
statute
and
on
their
website
for
gopher
tortoises
that
you
can
mow
and
maintain
your
property.
F
So
the
the
presence
or
absence
of
gopher
turtles
make
no
difference
the
whether
or
not
you
have
to
mow
and
maintain
your
property.
So
just
wanted
that
for
the
board's
clarification
that
unless
he
goes
in
and
completely
scrapes
and
levels
the
land
which
we're
not
asking
him
to
do,
then
that's
the
only
issue
where
he
asked
to
have
FWC
come
out.
Do
the
Gopher
survey
find
out
exactly
where
the
tortoise
holes
are
and
then
they're
dealt
with
and
I?
Don't
believe
that's
been
done
in
this,
so
it's
just
a
guess
that
there's
gopher
turn.
W
B
Z
B
Z
F
B
Z
In
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
Tarpon,
here,
853
8
53,
which
are
the
exceptions,
I
believe
that
mr.
Warren
or
Reverend
Warren
has
an
argument
that
can
be
made
and
obviously
he
did
not
draft
this
code,
it's
drafted
by
the
city,
so
any
ambiguity
must
be
construed
in
the
favor
of
mr.
a
Reverend
Warren
in
this
case,
because
he
didn't
draft
it
section.
Z
A1
states
the
following-
and
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
brought
up
these
Lots.
You
have
Reverend
Warren's
lot
to
the
right.
Is
the
Pinellas
County
Community
Housing
Program
land
that
has
no
structures
on
it.
It's
an
empty
lot
to
the
left
of
Reverend.
Warren's
lot
is
Herman
Winthrop.
He
owns
that
undeveloped
to
the
left
of
that
lot.
Undeveloped
is
Duke
Energy,
who
gets
special
priority
from
the
city,
subsection
1
a1
of
853
States,
any
lands
which
are
over
10,000
square
feet
in
area
and
in
an
undeveloped
state
provided.
Z
However,
all
lands
within
30
feet
of
roadway
must
be
maintained
in
accordance
with
section
852,
a
and
provided
further
that
any
lands
adjacent
to
any
improved
property
on
the
side
or
rear
must
be
maintained.
To
a
depth
of
15
feet
on
the
side
or
rear,
whichever
is
adjacent
to
improve
property
in
accordance
with
section
852,
a
I
believe
he
has
a
valid
argument
that
when
you,
his
property,
7,000
square
feet
undeniable.
Z
However,
when
you
take
the
adjoining
properties
there
well
more
than
10,000
square
feet
and
they're
all
undeveloped.
That's
what's
key
here
and
based
on
that
he
can
have
the
3015
rule
apply
to
his
case
and
that's
what
I'm
asking
the
board
to
find
today,
based
on
its
in
excess
of
10,000
square
feet
area
and
that
particular
provision
doesn't
say
any
land
which
is
over
10,000
square
feet
in
area
and
in
an
undeveloped
state.
It
says
any
lands
which
are
over
10,000
square
feet,
so
I
believe
he
has
a
valid
argument.
Z
You
can
add
up
the
7,
the
7,
the
7
and
then
whatever
Duke
Energy
is,
which
is
a
hundred
and
eleven
by
140
you're
in
well
beyond
the
10,000
square
mark
required
and
therefore
he
should
not
be
found
in
violation
on
his
undeveloped
land,
and
this
makes
sense
and
I'll
tell
you
why?
Let's
assume
you
have
properties
that
are
undeveloped
and
the
3015
rule
applies.
Let's
assume
the
middle
property
cuts,
everything
down,
everything's
gone,
the
property's
next
to
him
would
technically
be
a
nuisance.
F
F
Z
F
To
the
board,
if
they
don't
already
know
it,
the
definition
of
undeveloped
according
to
our
city
code
is
property.
That's
never
been
mowed
in
its
entirety.
They
showed
a
picture
of
mr.
winters
property
which
was
mowed.
They
showed
a
picture
of
the
property
to
the
west,
which
was
mowed
so
theoretically,
they're
no
longer
undeveloped
property.
According
to
the
definition.
That's
one
issue
second
issue
that
I'd
like
to
ask
mr.
Warren.
If
possible.
Q
Mowed
it
like
always
in
the
last
30
years.
Okay,
my
trees
back
there
I
did
not
move
them
back.
Y'all
got
to
know
that
it's
not
wheezy.
There
was
my
trees
and
even
a
worse
as
cold
and
force
of
man
before
never
meet
me.
He
said,
okay,
even
mr.
oscillators
say:
okay
leave
the
tree
that
cut
the
grass.
Don't
treat
want
me
to
mow
about
trees
down
now.
This
is
my
argument
again.
That's
if,
if
I
moved
on
trees,
mr.
Q
winter,
all
stuff,
you
know
it's
a
slope
down
the
hill
y'all
know
why
it
stopped
up.
Call
all
the
people
saying
leap
off
the
property
and
stuff
up
the
city
soon
and
death
was
going
on,
and
the
man
later
told
me
before
ever
want
to
leave
some
vegetation.
She
said
your
trees,
okay,
it's
okay!
Until
this
man
one
day
knock
on
my
door,
he
knock
on
my
door
and
say
I'm
his
parole
enforcement.
Now
he
let
me
know
that
you
wanna
take
how
you
wanna.
Q
Take
it
personal
I,
said:
what'd,
you
mean
by
that
Steve
I'm
calling
enforcement
personnel.
He
said
outside
my
house
for
one
hour
goes
through
me.
I
was
doing
like
beans,
red
beans,
but
I
hold
my
integrity.
I'm
gonna
tell
you
right
now.
This
man
got
something
personal
against
me.
No,
no
I
miss
Pete
I
like
s
you
something
I
told
you.
We
don't
ask
my
god.
B
I'm
gonna
ask
the
attorney:
please.
Would
you
advise
your
client
I've
tried
to
explain
that
what
we're
really
here
to
do?
Okay,
this
isn't
this,
isn't
the
right
venue
for
any
complaint
of
the
nature
that
Reverend
Warren
is
bringing
he.
There
are
other
venues
that
he
can
that
he
can
use
it's
not
gonna.
B
Do
you
any
good,
Reverend,
there's,
no
matter
what
you
say,
we're
not
going
to
consider
that
that
that's
not
a
point
that
we
can
consider:
okay,
you're,
just
gonna
get
yourself
aggravated:
okay
and
and
I'm
not
making
I
have
no
idea
whether
what
you're
telling
me
you
know
it's
true
or
not,
and
I'm
not
gonna
rule
on
that
we're
only
dealing
with.
Did
you
mow
the
property,
your
position,
okay,.
B
Z
B
F
I
F
F
Q
Q
B
O
B
A
S
S
O
E
A
B
B
I
B
F
By
an
out
of
state
property
owners,
Irene
Chen
believe
she
lives
in
Maryland
exhibit
number
one
going
around
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
initial
inspection
and
signposting
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing,
exhibit
number
three
of
my
administrative
documents,
including
emails
from
the
property
owner
and
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
case
started
on
August
19th
of
this
year.
My
initial
inspection
based
on
a
neighbor
complained,
lots
overgrown
needs
to
be
maintained.
F
On
August
21st,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
and
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
September
1st
phone
call
from
the
owner.
We
received
that
it
was
ready
to
be
inspected
at
that
point
in
time.
We
also
explained
to
her
that
we
were
taking
it
before
the
board
to
be
established
on
September
8th.
They
posted
the
property
on
September
18th,
the
owner
called
and
stated
she
had
hired
a
landscaper
on
September
19th.
The
owner
submitted
an
email
which
is
part
of
exhibit
number
3
and
then
on
September
20th.
F
It
was
it
my
final.
My
posting
on
September
8
shows
the
property
was
in
compliance
on
that
day,
when
I
did
drive
by
and
check
it
on
the
20th,
they
was
still
in
compliance,
so
the
property
is
in
compliance.
At
this
point,
as
you
stated,
we
have
some
email
conversations
back
and
forth.
The
long
and
short
of
it
is
she's,
been
having
a
difficult
time
trying
to
maintain
the
landscaper.
One
of
the
bigger
issues
is
the
numerous
briars
we've
had
with
that
property
and
owner
on
maintaining
that
property.
B
B
B
P
B
O
S
B
D
B
O
A
I
D
B
Brings
us
to
our
next
case
at
17-8:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
five,
two
one:
it's
a
vacant
lot:
17:22
Grand,
Central,
Drive
I
worked
on
the
railroad
for
47
years
brand
central
I
worked
at
Grand
Central
Station
at
one
time.
Okay,
anybody
here
for
Grand,
Central,
Drive,
apparently
not
okay,
officer,
Gaston
and
I-
know
before
we
even
get
started
that
when
you
get
your
exhibits,
pass
to
us,
we're
gonna
make
them
a
part
of
the
record.
Thank.
F
F
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
two
one:
this
is
a
vacant
lot
city
address
a
17,
22
Grand
Central
Drive
parcel
number
one
zero,
two,
seven
one,
five
brief
one:
six:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
two
zero
property
owner
is
an
out-of-state
owner,
I
believe
in
Maryland,
again
or
Canada.
One
of
the
two
I
can't
remember:
Denise,
st.
Marie
I
want
the
board
to
consider
violation
of
city
code,
eight
48-52
duty
maintained
private
property
and
the
nuisance
prohibitions
are
dealing
with
a
lot
clearing
mowing
and
etc.
F
Exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs,
including
the
inspection,
Rhian,
spec,
shion's
and
signposting
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices,
including
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing,
exhibit
number
three,
an
administrative
Docs
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
August
19th,
my
initial
inspection.
F
The
one
case
you
just
heard
is
directly
across
the
street
from
this
case
at
17,
22
I
was
inspecting
the
one
on
the
south
side,
and
now
I
was
now
dealing
with
this
property.
On
the
north
side,
the
Lots
vacant,
it's
grossly
overgrown
I
had
priors
I
personally
had
two
priors
with
this
property
for
the
same
issue.
So
I
brought
it
before
to
be
established
before
the
board.
Now
it's
not
in
compliance
as
of
today,
so
it's
not
being
established.
F
We
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
and
a
notice
of
violation
on
August
21st,
be
a
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail
to
Denise
st.
marine.
The
sign
was
posted
on
September
8
on
September
19th.
We
received
certified
green
cards
for
both
the
a
no
H
and
the
Nov
in
the
office
and
on
September
20th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
there
was
no
change.
F
We
did
have
I
think
we
received
an
email
which
is
included
in
the
record,
which
basically
states
she's
having
issues
trying
to
find
a
landscaper.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
Tax
Collector
and
property
appraisers
database.
So
at
this
point,
I'd,
like
the
code
board
to
consider
a
violation
of
8,
40
and
8
52.
O
B
I
P
B
E
A
B
F
The
original
case
was
14
5
1
1
was
violation
codes,
8,
48
and
52,
and
the
code
board
heard
the
case
September
11th
of
2014
today's
case
is
17
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
4,
1
8
property
address
is
905
gains
way.
It's
a
structure.
It's
a
house.
It
is
owned
by
an
an
oil
we've
since
found
out
Anne's
been
deceased,
I,
don't
know
how
many
years,
but
it
hasn't
been
officially
turned
over
to
an
estate
or
anything.
So,
unfortunately,
it's
still
in
her
name
I
bring
before
the
board.
F
Another
8
48
52
case
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs,
including
the
initial
inspection
and
the
signposting
exhibit
number
2
or
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
notice
of
hearing
and
the
notice
I'm.
Sorry,
the
notice
of
hearing
for
a
repeat
violator
and
exhibit
number
3
of
my
administrative
documents
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costing
the
amount
of
one?
F
Forty
to
fifty
initially
my
case
started
on
July
14th
of
this
year,
stemmed
from
a
neighbor
complain
about
the
rear
yard.
Being
overgrown,
apparently
I've
since
found
out
that
neighbors
were
taking
care
of
the
front
yard
and
when
I
originally
had
put
it
in
compliance
last
year,
I
got
I
just
was
doing
a
drive-by
inspection
and
I
noticed
that
the
property
was
in
decent
shape
and
that's
when
we
found
out
that
the
neighbors
are
actually
taking
care
of
it.
Unfortunately,
they've
stopped.
F
So
at
that
time
they
have
a
chain-link
fence,
so
I
can
clearly
see
into
the
backyard
and
the
grass
was
probably
three
or
four
feet
high.
On
September
14th
we
made
us.
We
know
we
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
via
first-class
and
certified
mail
to
the
property
owner
which
is
listed
as
905
Gaines
way.
There's
no
other.
We
did
an
expansive
amount
of
research.
Barb
was
very
busy
trying
to
find
relatives
and.
F
She
ever
did
successfully
find
any
other
people
related
to
this
property.
So
unfortunately,
the
only
notices
went
to
the
known
deceased
person
at
her
house
that
she
no
longer
lives
in
so
conducted
a
inspection
on
August
7th
and,
as
noted,
it's
a
repeat
violation
case
that
began
on
July
14th
of
this
year.
The
notice
of
repeat
violator
was
mailed
on
August,
2nd,
first-class
certified
mail,
August,
14th,
I'm,
sorry,
August,
23rd
magically.
We
received
the
notice
of
hearing
repeat
violator,
certification,
notices,
unopened
and
unsigned
and
then
on
August
29th.
F
The
tax
collector
put
a
notice
in
that
said,
they're
going
to
be
selling
the
property
based
on
unpaid
taxes.
So
it's
up
in
the
air
September
8th
that
posted
the
property
and
we
completed
the
affidavit
of
costs
for
one
forty
to
fifty
and
as
of
September
twentieth.
The
property
is
still
not
in
compliance
and
as
I
stated,
all
the
notices
were
sent
to
the
listed
property
owner
and
after
some
diligent
research,
we
were
unable
to
come
up
with
any
family
members.
It's
not
technically
listed
as
an
estate.
F
F
As
I
one
thing
to
consider
is
we
did
state
that
it
is
being
sold
for
back
taxes,
I,
don't
know
the
date
of
that
auction
sale
that
may
play
into
the
board's
consideration.
I
mean
it
is
in
violation
as
of
September
14th.
So
if
we
may
have
a
resolution
you're
within
a
period
of
time,
once
the
ownership
changes
and
that
point,
the
fines
will
stop.
I
A
F
B
F
F
B
B
F
Don't
necessarily
know
if
this
is
gonna
sway
the
board
in
any
way,
but
this
is
one
of
my
cases.
I
intend
to
debate
because
of
the
nature
of
the
circumstances,
but
I
do
have
to
have
the
board
deal
with
the
violation
and
then
once
that
has
occurred,
I
can
start
abating
the
property
which
we
have
a
landscaping
company,
and
this
is
one
of
my
properties.
I
intend
to
abate,
keep
it
mowed,
keep
it
at
least,
and
it
would
put
it
into
compliance
once
the
city
does
that.
P
K
B
I
B
M
A
E
E
B
S
S
S
A
E
E
B
P
B
F
AA
You
can
see
the
progress
that
we've
had
as
it
got
held
up
with
a
hurricane
when
we
made
our
agreement
on
the
90
days
last
time,
I
figured
I
could
handle
that
and
I
feel
it
bit
off
more
than
I
could
chew,
because
when
I
got
in
there,
that
was
a
mess
in.
It
really
has
been
a
job,
and
the
stress
that
I've
had
worrying
about
this
$150
a
day
is
killing
me.
AA
So
let
me
read
this
to
you
guys
so
I,
don't
sound
like
a
starter,
an
idiot
up
here
with
the
help
of
friends,
there
was
great
progress,
I'm
trying
to
appeal
to
your
compassionate
side,
but
the
progress
will
continue.
However,
please
don't
set
me
up
for
failure
and
I
can't
afford
$150
per
day.
Please
set
me
up
with
a
90
day,
progress
plan
and
again
my
apologies
for
taking
so
long
to
complete
my
violations.
I
just
want
to
be
a
resident
that
you
can
be
proud
of
thanks,
Dave,
Lewis,
okay,.
B
F
I
F
A
AA
The
owner,
basically
dr.
Merritt,
is
attorney.
That
goes
to
the
court
for
the
Bucks
players
that
are
retired
and,
needless
to
say,
he's
pretty
well-off.
He
helped
me
buy
the
house
for
me
and
I
think
I've
been
there
going
on
11
years
and
I
got
a
stack
of
violations
from
the
board
or
code
enforcement
and
I'm
just
trying
to
get
on
track
to
where
I'm
not
getting
any
violations
or
getting
fined
$150
a
day,
because
I
just
I
couldn't
afford
that
and
I
can't
put
that
on
dr.
AA
Merritt
when
he
was
gracious
enough
to
buy
the
house
for
me
and
help
me
out
with
it,
but
needs
to
say
almost
everything
on
the
properties
almost
cleaned
up.
The
reason
that
the
tarp
has
stayed
up
is
the
leaks
from
the
roof
with
a
hurricane
and
everything
and
I
figure
in
another
30
days,
I
can
have
the
house
looking
tip-top
with
no
violations.
F
AA
A
I
H
E
O
H
H
I
AA
AA
H
AA
AA
F
AA
B
F
C
H
E
O
H
B
H
U
E
S
E
S
H
Here
to
make
a
motion,
I
will
but
I
think
that
we
are
supposed
to
enter
into
the
record
that
there's
nobody
in
the
audience
for
any
of
these
all
right,
I
move
a
ston,
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that
the
respondent
failed
to
timely
comply
with
this
board's
prior
order
within
the
time
prescribed
and
to
award
the
city.
One
hundred
and
sixty
three
dollars
for
the
costs
incurred
in
the
prosecution
of
this
case
target.
E
E
B
H
E
O
A
B
F
Read
this
to
you,
it
was
from
Michelle
she
studied.
The
case
was
heard
before
the
code
board
on
July
20th,
2017
and
subsequently
to
board
orders
for
issue
number
one
establishing
the
violation
of
city
code,
eight
dash
22
and
two,
a
finding
of
fact
board
order
here,
whereby
a
compliance
date
and
fine
amount
were
ordered
for
City
Code
Section,
eight,
forty
and
852
as
she
states
as
she
was
reviewing
the
minutes.
For
that
meeting,
she
questioned
why
two
orders
were
issued,
which
prompted
me
to
listen
to
the
audio
recording.
F
After
listening
to
the
audio
recording
officer,
gassen
had
removed
city
code
822,
since
it
was
in
compliance,
he
did
speak
to
establishing
the
violation.
However,
no
formal
action
was
taken
by
the
code
board.
Therefore,
I'm
requesting
the
code
board
take
action
to
quash
the
board
order,
establishing
the
violation
of
city
code,
eight
dash
22.
They.
E
B
Q
B
Don't
need
it
I'm,
not
a
hero,
but
next
month
will
be
my
last
meeting
and
then
you
can
elect
a
new
chairman
and
you
can
hopefully
get
through
these
cases.
A
lot
quicker.
I
know.
People
are
not
happy
that
it
takes
a
long
time,
but
I'd
like
to
point
out
the
fact
that
you
have
33
items
on
this
agenda,
and
there
are
my
four
years
there
were
times
when
there
were
only
three
or
four
items:
that's
not
it!
B
So
if
it
takes
a
long
time,
maybe
we
should
think
about
starting
earlier
in
the
day,
I
appreciate
everybody
I'll
be
back
here
next
month
and
then
we're
gonna
have
to
have
a
vote
next
month
to
determine
who's
gonna,
be
the
chairman
so
think
think
about
whether
you
want
to
do
that.
Okay
and
keep
that
in
mind.
So
thank.