►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board July 20, 2017
Description
Description
A
B
E
E
B
C
C
A
F
D
D
F
D
F
B
C
I
E
A
A
Okay,
all
right
folks,
are
we
pretty
much
ready?
You
haven't
seen
any
indication
from
the
fellow
that
videotaped
things
to
see.
Okay,
all
right
he's
hiding
hey,
ladies
and
gentlemen.
The
time
is
209
p.m.
there's
been
a
bit
of
a
delay
in
the
opening
of
the
code
enforcement
board
meeting
for
July
for
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
and
in
that
the
city
attorney,
unfortunately,
will
not
be
able
to
be
here
today.
A
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
we'll
try
to
go
through
some
of
the
preliminaries
and
try
to
hold
off
for
at
least
a
little
bit
of
time
to
see
if
and
when
the
attorney
makes
him
or
herself
available
and
then
we'll
have
to
make
a
ruling
as
to
whether
we're
going
to
proceed
or
not
and
most
likely
we
will
proceed,
but
for
right
now.
The
first
thing
I'd
like
to
do
is
have
a
roll
call
with
a
city
clerk.
Please
have
a
roll
call.
F
A
G
F
F
A
A
Like
to
go
over
the
hearing
procedures
for
the
code
enforcement
board,
it
is
the
intention
of
the
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare.
The
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida
statute
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
A
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits,
and
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
So
each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
A
Okay,
what
we're
going
to
do
now?
The
first
case
listed
is
17
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
0,
8
9,
it's
6,
1
5,
Pine
Street!
Is
there
anyone
here
representing
6
1
5
East
Pine
Street?
There
is
no
one
here
we're
going
to
take
a
10-minute
recess.
The
time
is
now
to
ten
will
stand
in
recess
until
to
20,
in
the
hopes
that
the
city
attorney
will
present
him
or
herself
so
that
we
have
wise
counsel
throughout
the
proceeding.
I
will
take
a
10-minute
recess.
Thank
you.
F
H
F
B
F
E
E
B
E
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
we'll
call
the
code
enforcement
board
back
into
session
again
for
the
record
I
appreciate
everybody's
patience,
I'm
sorry
for
the
delay
the
attorney
has
shown
up.
She
was
unfortunate
caught
up
in
traffic
and
once
again
ready
to
proceed.
We
called
the
first
case,
which
is
six
one:
five
East
Pine
Street
and
the
record
reflect
that
there
was
no
respondent
will
turn
to
the
inspector
and,
if
you'd
reintroduce
yourself
for
the
record,
you
can
begin
your
presentation
afternoon.
I
Thank
you,
I'm
officer,
Steve
gas
on
City
of
Tarpon
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
been
so
employed
for
two
years.
The
case
I
bring
before
you
now
is
case:
number
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
nine,
the
address
of
6:15
is
Pine
Street.
The
address
owner
on
record
is
ELISA
Collins.
I
A
E
I
You
on
so
On
February
16th
of
this
year,
I
found
a
number
of
violations
on
the
property.
There
was
a
shed
which
appeared
in
very
important,
dilapidated
condition
on
the
west
side
of
the
property.
One
thing
that
should
be
noted
about
this
property
does
have
a
single-family
home
and
it
has
an
adjoining
lot,
which
basically
would
look
like
two
Lots,
but
it's
been
combined
into
one
parcel.
So
it's
an
extremely
large
lot.
There
were
piles
of
wood
located
against
the
western
fence.
I
The
trees
were
low
over
the
sidewalk,
there
was
debris
being
stored
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
There
was
two
vehicles
at
that
time:
a
white
Toyota,
pickup
truck
and
a
scooter
which
appeared
inoperative.
The
scooter
tags
were
expired
over
two
years
ago
and
the
pickup
truck
at
that
time
had
a
left
front
flat
fire.
There
was
also
a
fence
that
was
in
very,
very
poor
condition
that
separated
part
of
that
Western,
fake
I
call
it
a
vacant
lot,
but
it
was
a
lot
that
didn't
obstruct
her
on
it.
I
F
I
I
You
can
see
those
items
behind
the
fence
that
are
still
clearly
visible
from
the
right
away,
so
moving
forward,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
sent
out
because
on
June
28th
that
conducted
that
Rhian
spec
ssin
and
they
still
were
not
in
compliance.
So
on
the
live
fifth
of
this
year,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail.
We
posted
the
property
on
July
10th
by
Officer
row
key
because
I
was
unavailable
at
the
time
and,
as
I
stated,
there
were
numerous
emails
between
the
owner.
I
I
I
I,
don't
like
emailed
her
back
and
forth
she's
out
of
town
at
the
moment
and
couldn't
that's
why
she's
not
here
he's
out
of
town
I
had
talked
to
the
son
as
I
stated
a
couple
months
ago,
when
I
talked
to
the
mother,
Lisa,
apparently
son
didn't
bother
to
pass
anything
on
to
her,
so
everything's
been
via
notice.
Her
emails,
she's
well
aware
of
everything
and,
like
I
said
she
did
get
a
significant
amount
work,
I've
work
done,
but
there's
still
a
significant
amount
of
work
left.
I.
I
D
I
Gave
her
four
months
originally
from
February
to
June
and
then
now
we're
here
on
July
20th,
so
she's
had
over
five
months
and
no
over
five
months
so
and
then
initially
she
asked
for
a
little
bit
more
time
and
I
told
her
that
I
would
present
that
to
the
board.
She
didn't
define
how
much
a
little
more
time
is
and
I
have
my
opinions
about
what
a
little
more
time
is.
But
does
that
answer
your
question
I
hope
they
don't
have
much
more
to
offer,
but.
I
B
A
H
F
B
A
H
A
I
There's
some
exhibits
going
around
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
initial
inspection
in
the
signposting,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
phaser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
that
may
have
occurred
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
And
mr.
chairman,
once
those
exhibits
make
arounded
like
the
request
they
be
entered
for
the
record.
Please,
okay,.
A
I
Case
started
on
April
11th
of
this
year.
My
initial
inspection
was
a
blue
Saturn
in
the
driveway
it
had
flat
tires.
The
car
appears
inoperable
and
the
car
had
been
subject
to
previous
code.
Complaints,
I
left
a
door
hanger
and
made
contact
with
the
owner
asked
about
the
car
either
made
legal
or
remove
it
within
ten
days.
Her
response
was
not
to
take
care
of
it,
but
she
was
going
to
drive
around
the
neighborhood
and
find
other
violation,
so
on
April
22nd
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
the
vehicles
still
there.
At
that
point.
I
In
time
we
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation
via
registered
and
certified
mail,
and
on
May
9
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Due
to
the
timing,
we
sent
her
another
final
Notice
of
Violation
via
certified
mail
return
receipt.
We
did
get
a
green
card
back
for
return
receipt
from
the
register
or
from
the
from
the
letters
we
sent
to
the
property
owner
on
November
I'm,
sorry,
May
24th,
we
did
get
a
Notice
of
Violation.
The
certified
envelope
was
returned
unopened
on
May
26,
a
letter
from
the
owner
requesting
a
two-week
extension.
I
Originally,
we
were
going
to
put
this
on
the
June
29th
Code
board,
but
we
had
clerical
errors,
so
it
didn't
happen.
So
she
got
her
extension.
As
you
requested.
A
May
27th
I
conducted
a
reinfection,
but
has
stated
we
extended
it
already
by
nature
of
the
fact
I'm
not
going
to
code
board
on
June
28th
was
my
next
inspection
almost
a
month
later,
there's
still
no
change
the
car
still
there
with
flat
tires
in
the
driveway.
At
that
point.
I
In
time,
on
July
thick,
we
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
first-class
certified
mail
on
November
I'm,
sorry,
July
10th.
We
posted
the
property
again.
This
was
supposed
to
by
officer
world
key
and
on
July
19th
I
conducted.
Another
inspection
included
the
final
photograph,
which
showed
that
the
vehicle
still
has
flat
tires
and
is
inoperable.
As
we
stated,
we
had
brief
contact
other
than
the
first
contact
I
had
and
other
than
a
request
for
an
extension
had
no
contact
after
that.
I
As
far
as
the
vehicle
goes
should
be
noted,
for
the
record,
though,
that
all
the
notices
were
sent
to
the
listed
owner
via
the
Pinellas
County
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
At
this
point
in
time,
I'd
like
to
have
the
board
find
a
violation
of
city
ordinance
4000
for
inoperable
via.
I
I
That
that
comes
and
goes
at,
that
at
that
property
that
stuff
out
front
comes
and
goes
at
that
property,
so
I'll
notice
them
and
it
disappears
and
it
reappears
and
it
disappears.
It's
like
a
revolving
door,
so
I
haven't
drilled
down
a
way
to
deal
directly
with
it
in
its
permanency.
So
if
there's
a
couple
of
pictures
that
may
show
none
of
it
being
there,
but.
F
B
A
H
I
Prior
case
that
I
referred
to
was
in
2015,
it
was
January
2015,
it
was
the
same
vehicle,
so
we've
dealt
with
this
vehicle
being
on
the
property
for
over
two
years
and
they
were
noticed
previously
what
they
ended
up
doing
previously.
They
aired
the
tires
up
to
turn
the
car
around,
so
I
couldn't
see
the
license
plate
so
obviously
I
can't
fry
it
up
on
their
property
to
see
the
license
plate.
So
so
again,
with
the
flat
tires
I
would
I
would
request
the
board
two
weeks
$50
a
day.
That's
reasonable.
K
A
K
B
I
L
I
F
B
B
A
B
A
A
Right
that
brings
us
to
the
third
case
on
our
docket
601
East,
dr.
Martin,
Luther
King
jr.
drive
it's
case
number
one
7
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
9
1.
Anyone
here
for
601
East,
dr.
Martin,
Luther,
King,
jr.
dry,
apparently
not
now
we'll
turn
to
You
officer
Gaston.
If
you're
ready
to
present
the
city's
position.
Yes,.
I
Sir,
thank
you
can
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Durban,
Springs
Police
Department
case
before
use
17-8
0,
0,
0,
0,
2
91.
The
address
is
601
is
dr.:
Martin
Luther,
King
Drive,
the
property
owner
listed
as
Anna
Ruth
Gorman
case
I,
bring
before
the
board
is
in
violation
of
city
code,
8,
22,
8,
52
and
4000
inoperable
vehicles.
There's
a
number
of
exhibits,
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
I've
taken
over
a
course
of
time,
including.
I
Exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs,
including
the
initial
inspection,
the
Rhian
spec
ssin
signposting
and
the
final
inspection
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
and
the
notice
caring
exhibit
number
three
of
the
administrative
docs
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
then
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
posted
and
mr.
chairman,
once
those
make
their
way
for
the
record,
I'd
like
to
be
entered
as.
A
I
Moving
forward,
my
initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
May
20th
of
this
year.
There
was
trash
and
debris
on
the
property,
including
furniture,
parts
of
a
fence,
wood
tires,
etc
and
notice.
I
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation
via
first-class
mail
and
certified
mail
on
June
5th
on
June
14th.
The
certified
envelope
was
returned
and
mark
refused
on
June
27th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
some
of
the
trash
was
cleaned
up
and
some
of
the
old
equipment
is
still
on
the
property
and
trash
is
still
on
the
north
side
of
the
house.
I
On
June
28th
of
this
year,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first
class
certified
mail
and
on
July
10th.
It
was
supposed
to
begin
by
officer
Rafi,
because
I
was
unavailable
on
July
19th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection.
Yesterday
there
was
still
some
debris
and
old
equipment
on
the
property.
There's
a
golf
cart
on
the
east
side
of
the
property
utility
trailers
and
we've
had
absolutely
no
contact
from
the
owner
whatsoever
or
anybody
representing
the
property.
I
The
last
pictures
are
probably
the
most
emotive
and
unfortunately
they're
the
most
puzzy,
so
I
apologize
for
my
photography,
skill
foot,
the
north
side
of
the
house,
which
is
a
awful
distance.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
was
just
basically
moved
for
the
north
side
of
the
house
and
tarp
4
foot
over
it.
That's
the
primary
amount
of
debris
that
I'm
talking
about
on
the
east
side
of
the
house
and
I,
don't
have
a
very
good
picture
of
it,
but
they
kind
of
moved.
I
I
I
I
I
F
F
B
I
C
A
H
A
E
A
I
Only
thing
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider
only
the
board
making
is
taking
on
the
time
in
the
pine.
There
was
a
prior
case
for
violation
840,
which
is
duty,
maintenance
of
private
property,
and
it
was
similar
circumstances.
While
I
was
the
inspector,
they
primarily
cleared
most
of
the
property
up
and
it
was
not
in
bad
shape,
but
that
occurred
in
2015
June
27th
of
2015.
I
So
we
carried
forward
about
two
years
in
this
case,
which
is
basically
the
same
problem,
a
little
more
a
little
more
of
an
issue,
and
now
we're
still
not
in
compliance
at
that
point.
So
it's
the
only
thing
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider,
but
otherwise
I'll
leave
the
time
frame
and
the
fine
up
for
the
board.
I
B
K
H
B
A
B
A
B
A
Hey
that
brings
us
to
our
next
case
case
number.
Four
on
today's
docket
17
8
0
0
0,
0,
9
8,
it's
3,
1,
8,
East,
Boyer,
okay!
Is
there
anyone
here?
Yes,
if
you,
gentlemen,
would
please
step
over
to
the
podium,
give
us
your
names
and
also
we're
going
to
hand
you
the
exhibits
that
will
be
made
a
part
of
the
record
and
we
would
ask
you
to
take
a
look
at
them
and
tell
us
if
you
have
any
objection
and
having
those
entered
into
the
record
as
exhibits.
Okay,.
L
A
I
Forgot
so
Thank
You
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
turbine
Springs,
Police
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
case
is
17:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
two
nine
eight
the
address
listed
is
318
East
Boyer,
it's
also
known
as
322
South
gross
Avenue.
Due
to
some
interesting
addressing
within
the
city.
The
property
is
owned
by
a
real
estate
company,
as
stated
out
of
California.
It's
an
LLC
the
case
before
the
board
is
for
one
violation,
which
is
3603
fences,
walls
and
hedges.
I
I'll
get
to
the
end,
and
apparently
this
has
been
fixed,
but
I
haven't
had
an
opportunity
inspected
yet,
but
moving
forward
with
the
case
exhibit
number
one
is
all
the
photographs
that
I've
taken,
including
the
initial
inspection
signposting
in
the
final
inspection,
exhibit
number
two
are
all
the
notices,
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector,
pronounced
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
was
posted.
I
The
initial
case
started
May
20th
of
this
year,
stemming
from
a
complaint
about
trash
on
the
property,
trash
cans
in
public
view
and
a
fence
in
poor
condition.
On
May
22nd
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
first-class
certified
mail
for
the
owner
and
the
registered
agent
June
2nd
of
this
year.
The
Notice
of
Violation
certified
green
card
was
signed
for
and
returned
conducted.
A
rien
spectrin
on
June
3rd
found
the
fence
still
hadn't
been
repaired.
The
trash
cans
are
still
in
public
view
inside
the
fence.
L
I
Asking
to
be
contacted
and
and
be
added
is
the
local
agent
and
local
contact
for
the
for
the
property
and
they've
been
in
contact
quite
a
bit
with
with
the
property
and
attempting
to
help
us
out
with
it.
When
Irene
spected
on
June
28,
the
fence
was
still
in
poor
condition.
They
were
still
trash
cans
loaded
with
trash
overflowing
in
the
public
view.
At
that
point
in
time,
weird,
the
code
board
on
July
5th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
male
first
class
certified
mail
on
July
10th.
I
The
sign
was
posted
by
officer
okie
and
then
on
yesterday
the
property
was
still
non-compliance,
but
the
only
thing
that
was
an
issue
yesterday
was
the
fence
the
the
trash
cans
in
public
view
upon
my
inspection
were
taken
care
of
so
I
put
them
in
compliance,
and
then
the
trash
on
the
property
seemed
to
been
cleaned
up.
I
met
with
the
gentleman
before
the
hearing.
They
have
some
pictures
showing
that
they
repaired
the
fence.
I
just
haven't,
had
an
opportunity
to
go
out
and
inspect
it,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
before
the
board.
I
A
Well,
let
me
ask
you
something
before
we
before
we
decide
that
we
either
have
to
go
on
with
this
case.
Would
it
do
any
good
if
we
took
a
short
recess
and
you
were
able
to
examine
the
photographs
that
these
gentlemen
are
purported
to
have
and
make
some
type
of
a
determination
based
on
what
you
see
in
the
photograph
I've.
I
A
J
I
My
is
that
as
a
possibility
yeah,
but
it
also
satisfied
you
mr.
chairman,
is
I
would
have
if
it
had
been
compliance,
I'd
be
bringing
before
you
to
be
established.
So
if
the
fence
had
been
fixed
day
last
week,
I
still
would
have
brought
this
case
to
be
established
for
any
future
violations
of
that
tent,
so
we're
still
basically
accomplishing
establishing
it.
Even
if
we
move
forward
as
as
all
right.
Okay.
A
Does
anybody
have
any
other
questions
for
Jimmy
when
I
asked
the
gentlemen
at
the
pody,
you
have
any
questions
for
officer
gasps,
nothing
to
thing.
Okay,
do
any
of
the
board
members?
Have
any
questions
go
out?
Forget,
okay,
any
I'm,
not
sure
which
of
you,
gentlemen,
would
care
to
do
it.
But
if
you'd
like
to
present
your
cited
your
response
to
the
charges,
you
may
proceed,
I'm.
L
Sure
I
would
just
like
the
board
to
know
that
the
property
was
sold
out
to
this
new
company
only
about
four
months
ago,
and
unfortunately,
we
had
inherited
and
I'm
going
to
say
this
straight
out
loud.
We
had
inherited
a
lot
of
issues
with
that
property
with
some
of
the
tenants
and
how
we
do
things
on
the
property
me
as
the
property
manager
that
was
hired
to
manage.
L
We
had
tried
for
the
past
couple
months
to
get
some
people
out
of
there
clean
it
up
the
way
that
we
need
to
clean
it
up
and
make
it
presentable
for
the
city
of
Seven
Springs
and
for
us
as
a
management
company
and
for
the
new
owner,
it's
been
very,
very
challenging.
We
have
boasted
our
own
notices.
There
have
talked
to
everybody
in
person.
We
had
tried
to
accomplish
the
relationship
to
get
everybody
to
comply,
including
the
fact
that
we
had
hired
somebody
to
completely
clean
out
the
trash
on
daily
basis
from
there
and
I.
L
L
The
new
argument
that
we
had
with
the
property
owner
that
we
had
our
own
maintenance
guy
move
into
one
of
the
units
on
the
property
that
was
taking
place
last
week.
We
will
be
completely
renovating
the
property
as
well
to
make
it
up-to-date
to
make
it
look
good
for
the
city
and
for
us,
however,
we
are
dealing
with
some
dangerous
challenges
with
eviction
we
were
targeted.
Both
of
us
guns
had
been
pointed
out
at
the
property
which
was
not
nice,
so
we
found
out
of
we.
We
have
children,
we
have
to
do
it.
L
You
know,
behind
the
scenes
a
little
bit,
we
had
hired
a
processor
and
we
are
in
the
transfer
victim
suite
of
the
unit.
That's
been
constant
issue
in
there.
It
might
not
happen
overnight.
We
might
contest
it.
We
have
officer
Steve
help
with
a
prior
case
that
we
using
that
to
force
the
eviction
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bloody
eviction.
Unfortunately,
with
the
way
that
be
not
cooperating
with
us
for
anything
that
we
had
tried
to
do
for
the
last
two
months,
we
will
keep
the
garbage
out
of
there
on
daily
basis.
L
M
L
Unfortunately,
that
the
two
of
the
guys
that
we
try
we
going
after
to
trying
to
affect
the
house
right
next
door
where
that
fence
joint,
if
their
grandfather,
prophecy
and
the
reason
they
live,
there
is
the
protection
of
the
family
around,
and
this
is
what
just
happened
time
yesterday.
Okay,
the
only
other
question.
I
L
I
M
M
M
I
M
Then,
just
with
the
shooting
last
week
they
shot
the
fence
up.
I
got
pictures
of
the
bold
going
through
the
poles
and
blowing
the
fence
down
I
mean
it's
I've
already
repaired.
It
three
times
can't
repair
the
backside,
because
the
guy
told
me
if
I
step
foot
on
this
property,
I'm
gonna
get
my
head
blown
off
right,
I,
don't
know
what
to
do
well.
A
B
A
K
A
I
Based
on
the
circumstances
that
they
brought
up
giving
them
30
days
because
I
sound
like
they're,
going
to
take
care
of
the
other
sections
of
fence
and
they
probably
need
a
police
escort
to
do
it
and
they're
dealing
with
the
eviction
and
a
reasonable
I'm
21
days
is
pretty
much
reasonable.
Do
an
eviction.
So
if
they
want
to
process
that
as
well,
they
should
be
able
to
get
that
done
within
a
month
and
then
I
would
go
with
$50
a
day
as
a
fine.
After
that,
okay.
A
B
A
M
A
Don't
think
anybody
either
in
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
or
with
the
police
officer,
or
anybody
that
has
heard
that
it's
been
in
the
room,
would
want
you
to
do
that.
So
you
just
take
it
easy
and
I
would
imagine
that
if
you
need
more
time,
you
know
please
work
with
officer.
Gaston
is
very
reasonable
and
often
we
believe
that
both
the
property
managers
and
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
and
the
police
department
all
have
the
same
goal
in
this
okay.
So
happy.
L
A
If
you
would
allow
me
to
go
on
to
the
next
case,
and
if
you
gentlemen,
need
to
discuss
things,
you
sure
thank
you.
You
think
you've
given
officer
Gaston
in
question,
a
call
about
your
questions
later,
okay
case
number,
five
on
the
docket
has
been
complied
with
case
number
six
is
listed
as
not
to
be
considered.
That
brings
us
to
case
number
seven,
which
is
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
three
one,
eight,
it's
four
one:
seven
Lincoln
Avenue
anyone
here,
four,
four:
one:
seven
Lincoln
Avenue,
okay,
mr.
Gordon.
C
A
N
I
Am
officer
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement
case
before
the
board
at
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
one,
a
property
in
question,
417,
Lincoln,
Avenue,
Alfred
and
Hazel
quarterman,
or
the
listed
property
owners.
The
violations
before
the
border
for
city
ordinance,
eight
40,
the
duty
maintained
private
property
52,
which
are
the
nuisance,
prohibitions
that
go
along
with
a
40
and
2500
3,
which
are
zoning,
use,
regulations
on
residential
property.
I
There's
a
number
of
exhibits,
I
present
to
the
board,
exhibit
number
1
or
all
the
photographs
that
were
taken
over
the
course
of
time.
For
this
case,
exhibit
number
2
are
all
the
notices,
including
the
notice,
violation
and
notice
appearing
exhibit
number
3
or
any
of
the
administrative
dock.
Space
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four,
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
posted
initially,
this
case
started
in
May
of
this
year.
I
May
27
was
a
vacant
residential
lot
being
used
for
the
storage
of
boats,
trailers
and
other
miscellaneous
equipment.
The
lot
also
needs
to
be
cleared,
mowed
edge
and
trimmed,
and
any
of
the
trash
there
was
a
number
of
trash
on
it
needed
to
be
cleaned
up
from
the
lot
as
well.
On
May
30th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
first
class
and
a
certif
and
certified
mail
on
June
5th.
The
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
by
the
code
offices
office
of
office
with
a
signature
on
it.
I
On
June,
27th
I
conducted
re-inspection
noted
that
it
impartial
II
cleaned
up
three
of
the
boats
and
two
trailers
still
remain
in
violation
of
8
52,
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
to
the
property
owners.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
out
on
June
28th
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
July
6
of
2017.
The
notice
of
hearing
certified
receipt
was
received
by
the
code
office
with
a
sponsor's
on.
I
To
July
10th,
the
property
was
supposed
to
begin
by
officer,
okie
and
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
yesterday
and
found
at
the
time
that
there's
three
boats
and
two
trailers
still
remain
on
the
property.
Mr.
quarterman
and
I
unsuccessfully
played
phone
tag.
We
never
had
an
opportunity
to
actually
get
with
each
other.
One
of
his
messages
alluded
to
he's
having
a
difficult
time
trying
to
find
somebody
to
take
these
boats
off
his
property,
and
we
discussed
this
at
the
beginning
of
code
board.
That
is
his
primary
hang
up.
I
Right
now
seems
to
be
can't
give
the
boats
away.
I
mean
he's
at
the
point
where
he's
tried
to
and
he's
been
unsuccessful.
So
at
this
point
the
property
is
still
in
violation
of
8
52
and
the
board
wants
to
consider
the
zoning
violation
but
I
think
852
kind
of
covers
the
old
and
operable
equipment
on
them
on
the
property
and
then
840
just
encompasses
the
nuisance.
I
Prohibitions
of
850,
as
is
noted,
I
sent
all
the
notices
or
we
send
all
the
notices
to
the
listed
property
owner
via
the
Pinellas,
County
property
phase
or
Frazer
and
tax
collectors
database.
And
apparently
it
worked
as
mr.
Portman
is
here
so
I
just
like
to
have
the
board
consider
the
violation
of
8
50
25
over
3
and
8
40,
or
the
violations
at
this
point
and
I
have
nothing
further.
At
this
time.
A
N
A
I
have
to
interrupt
you
just
for
a
moment.
Mr.
Foreman
right
now
you're
restricted
to
asking
questions.
We
after
you
finish
asking
your
questions.
All
right,
you
will
later
get
an
opportunity
to
present
your
side
of
the
case.
So
if
you
have
testimony
that
you
want
on
the
record,
we're
certainly
going
to
allow
you
to
testify,
but
right
now
this
is
what
they
call
an
interrogatory
phase
of
the
procedure,
so
right
now
you're
restricted
to
asking
questions.
A
N
A
N
Since
that
time,
I've
cream
active
involve
at
real
Cemetery
speaking
about
the
equipment
that
you
see
there.
The
truck
the
trailers
stuff
of
that
salt
is
really
that
of
rural
cemetery
and
I'll
use
that,
because
that
equipment
was
donated,
rural
cemetery
because
I
could
not
get
any
help
from
the
city
in
any
manner
whatsoever,
and,
as
you
know
now
that
Rural
Cemetery
is
a
state
historical
site.
N
N
So
when
I
look
at
and
we
talk
about
zoning
I
think
about
places
that
have
always
been
there
since
I
was
a
kid
sorry,
with
this
Mary
snow,
who
has
a
spec
shop
there,
the
two-story
building,
it's
your
favorite
painful
to
sell
Isis
across
the
street
from
that
because
of
what
is
known
as
the
rock.
It
was
a
place
where
people
sold
beer,
wine
and
often
snacks
the
same
building.
You
also
had
a
barber
shop.
N
This
is
owned
at
that
time
by
what
we
know
his
bubble
shop
shorty-
and
he
spoke
of
him
like
that,
because
it
was
a
very
short
man
we
did
cut
here.
Eventually,
it
went
into
the
hands
of
the
Dorset's,
the
doses
that
kept
that
for
quite
a
while,
the
property
where
you
have
the
main
stood
held
a
beautifully
there
on
the
corner
of
Lincoln
and
Lane.
N
You
had
a
pool
parlor
on
the
corner
of
set
foot
in
line
you
had
a
grocery
store,
which
was
named
the
banners
banners
grocery
also
on
the
other
side
of
the
street,
on
the
corner
of
Lincoln.
In
Lane,
you
had
a
grocer
there
named
Albritton
who
had
a
baboon
as
a
pet,
protecting
the
shop
across
the
street
where
he
kept
equipment.
N
Referring
to
the
pieces
located
on
Rose
and
Oakwood
I
had
that
done
at
a
cost
of
$500,
so
the
two-week
period
it
cost
me
a
total
of
fifteen
hundred
dollars
just
to
get
this
equipment
moved,
cheese
cut
and
everything
in
the
state
what
I've
done
for
so.
If
any
questions
that
we
ask
of
me,
I
gladly
ask
them
at
this
time.
I
don't
want
to
get
hysterical
up
here.
Thank
You.
C
N
Boats
are
there
because
this
was
donated
for
the
purpose
of
reason,
funds
for
the
cemetery,
but
because
of
the
non
roiling
items
I
myself
had
to
use
them
to
do.
The
repair
on
for
the
last
year
became
physically
unable
to
do
anything
is
so
fairly
walk
around,
but
I
was
in
concert
with
the
officers
they
about.
Give
me
two
boats
will
contact
us
several
people,
my
son
did,
who
was
also
put
allowed,
only
be
of
whatever
they
do
with
those
things.
N
N
Nobody
wants
to
bother
with
them
because
they
can't
find
a
place
to
put
and
I
had
tried
to
get
a
hold
of
officer
gas
and
asked
if
he
could
be
an
assistant
being
finding
someone
who
would
know
what
to
do
with
boats.
There's
no
longer
ones.
I
can't
just
drop
it
in
the
street,
because
that
would
be
a
violation
and
if
I
can't
find
anybody
to
help
me
get
rid
of
them,
then
what
do
you
do?
You
can't
set
up
a
fire?
F
B
N
B
D
D
I
Know
right
now,
mister
the
property
in
question
of
417
Lincoln
is
listed
as
single-family
residential.
The
only
business
parcel
left
is
where
the
ice
cream
shop
is
it's
it's
residential
business,
its
business
residential,
which
is
actually
I,
think
the
only
parcel
in
the
whole
city-
that's
actually
zoned-
is
as
business
residential.
Otherwise,
all
of
those
on
the
east
side
of
Lincoln,
going
north
from
Oakwood
are
residential
property,
single
family
they're,
not
multi-use.
So.
D
I
It's
all
of
the
above
its
residential
property
being
used
as
a
storage
lot,
which
is
not
an
acceptable
or
permitted
use,
and
then
you
fall
under
850,
which
basically
defines
all
of
that.
Especially
the
boats
is
debris
specifically
in
the
definition
in
851,
says:
unusable,
inoperable
equipment,
including
boats.
So
there's
two
separate
aspects:
there's
the
aspect,
that's
being
used
as
a
storage
lot,
even
by
mr.
quarterman
statements
for
the
cemetery
he's
using
it
as
a
commercial
storage.
Lot
for
equipment
for
I
know
the
cemeteries
somewhat
of
a
business.
I
If
you
will
it's
not
a
profits,
not
it's
not
a
residence,
so
I
mean
the
cemetery
is
not
so
they're,
storing
the
equipment
for
the
cemetery
on
a
residential
property
using
it
as
a
story
flaw.
That's
one
aspect:
that's
the
aspect
under
the
zoning
issue
and
then
the
specific
definition
under
851,
which
is
debris
which
defines
inoperable
equipment,
including
boats,
is
the
other
aspect.
So
directly
answer
your
question.
N
I
jump
in
with
that
I
will
not
back
away
from
assist
in
rural
cemetery
and
keeping
the
equipment
there.
It's
helped
us
beat
it
and
you
can't
get
it
anywhere
else,
and
what
are
you
supposed
to
do?
But
as
long
as
I
am
the
legitimate
owner
of
that
property,
the
truck
and
the
trailer
is
utilized
for
the
upkeep
of
real
cemetery
will
continue
to
be.
G
I
The
utility
trailers
didn't
have
anything
in
them,
then
they're,
okay,
to
be
stored
on
residential
property,
but
as
soon
as
they
become
used
to
store
equipment,
that's
where
they
become
a
violation.
So
if
the
truck
and
the
utility
trailers
are
there
and
the
trailers
are
empty,
it
is
not
a
violation
of
the
code.
Primarily
your
biggest
issue
right
now
are
the
boat.
N
A
When
we,
when
we
eventually
have
a
motion
in
this
case
and
eventually
go
on
step
that
we
we
make
that
basically
the
primary
thing
that
we
want
to,
we
want
to
center
on
and
not
make
the
issue
of
the
of
the
cemetery
equipment.
I
have
a
feeling
that
that
can
be
worked
out.
If
there's
equipment
on
these
trailers,
perhaps
they
as
you've
indicated
officer
gas
in
that
the
trailers
themselves,
if
they,
if
they
didn't,
have
any
equipment
on
them.
Okay,
I.
A
Just
think
that
that
you
know
we
want
to
do
the
right
thing
for
tarpon
springs,
that's
our
purpose,
and
sometimes
we
have
to.
We
have
to
consider
both
sides
of
an
issue
so
I'm,
just
pointing
out
to
my
fellow
board
members
that
that
certainly
mr.
Quartermaine's
made
his
position
clear
I
know
that
this
particular
cemeteries
is
of
historical
importance
and
has
been
a
part
of
tarpon
springs
in
the
history.
Tarpon
springs
and
a
big
portion
of
the
community
of
tarpon
springs
for
a
number
of
years.
A
What
I
want
to
do
is
I
would
just
advise
everybody
to
be
a
little
bit
tolerant.
If
this
is
my
suggestion,
as
far
as
how
we
handle
this
case,
so
that
we
can
resolve
it
with
them
in
the
best
possible
way
for
all
concern
and
I
would
just
ask
everybody
to
bear
that
in
mind.
As
you
ask
your
questions
and
later
as
you
as
you
think
of
the
best
way
to
handle
the
situation,
does
anybody
have
any
further
questions
for
mr.
quarterman?
D
It
became
more
recognizable
during
December
1917
when
the
land
was
actually
it
was
donated,
rose
cemetery
for
burial
because
of
the
I
guess,
conditions
that
you
might
say
at
that
time.
Other
requirements
for
burial
at
that
time
so
and
rose
cemetery
has
not
been
feared
for
life
site
a
via
site.
A
dia
is
cared
for
by
the
city
of
top
and
screen
with
all
of
our
taxpayer
dollars.
D
A
I
would
just
point
out
before
we
asked
for
any
motions.
I
would
just
point
out
that
today
is
a
very
interesting
day
and
that
we
had
a
previous
case.
That
was,
unlike
any
case,
that
I
had
seen
in
front
of
the
board,
where
we
had
a
possible
reason
for
not
getting
things
resolved
was
that
somebody
was
holding
a
gun
on
someone
okay.
Now
we
have
a
case
that
I
think
also
is
out
of
the
particularly
out
of
the
ordinary,
at
least
in
my
opinion,
so
can.
J
O
A
I
Property.
Nobody
questions
is
residential
property
I.
Don't
the
city
has
no
position
as
far
as
whatever
relationship
to
rose
cemetery,
we're
obviously
respectful
of
that.
But
the
issue
is:
there's
a
violation
on
residential
property.
What
the
purpose
of
that
violation
is
doesn't
mitigate
necessarily
the
circumstances
that
we're
here
for
I
completely
understand
those
and
those
may
be
able
to
be
dealt
with
outside
of
this.
I
Zoning
variance
is
simple
to
do,
but
it's
can
be
handled
outside
of
this
I
present
that
there's
own
residential,
it's
being
used
as
an
unacceptable
use
and
that
there's
equipment
being
stored
on
that
property,
I'm,
completely
respected,
respectable,
to
the
reasons
why
it
doesn't
mitigate
the
fact
that
it
is
occurring.
So
in
closing
my
statement
as
I
present
before
the
board
that
the
violations
occurring
I
understand,
all
the
mitigating
circumstances
does
not
change
necessarily
that
the
violation
is
occurring.
A
mr.
Foreman
is
the
violator
of
those
ordinances.
I
A
J
Course,
and
as
far
as
it
just
kind
of
goes
a
little
bit
with
what
officer
Gaston
said,
Officer
Gaston
here
represents
the
city
of
Turpan
Springs
in
the
city
of
Turpan
screen
Springs
has
a
discretion
to
bring
whatever
code
violations
it
chooses
to
bring
so
it's
up
to
the
city
to
work
with
the
property
owner
on
that.
The
position
of
this
board
is
just
to
determine,
based
on
the
facts
and
evidence
presented
to
it
today.
Whether
or
not
such
violation
existed
at
the
time
or
if
it
still
exists
as
of
today.
J
A
I,
don't
want
to
argue
with
you,
but
if,
in
fact,
that
their
violation
is
proven,
then
we
go
to
a
penalty
phase
in
the
penalty
phase
that
determines
how
much
time
and
what
might
the
daily
fee
be
actual
when
I
was
when
I
was
attempting
to
to
speak
on
this
subject,
I
actually
was
trying
to
direct
it
to
my
fellow
board
members
to
make
sure
that
they
understand,
okay,
that
that
is
something
that,
in
this
particular
case,
we
might
want
to
consider.
Okay,
we
have
a
historical
situation.
We
have
a
community
situation.
A
Okay,
there's
no
question
that
the
officer
is
doing
what
he's
required
to
do
and
there's
no
question
that
when
we
consider
was
it
was
their
violation
or
not.
We
consider
only
was
there
a
violation.
This
is
what
the
statute
reads,
and
this
is
what
was
it
violated,
but
then
we
do
have
a
phase
beyond
that,
where
we
have
a
certain
amount
of
judgment
for
we
set
what
the
penalty
might
be,
if,
in
fact,
that
it's
determined
that
it
was
proven
of.
J
A
I
certainly
appreciate
I'm
not
trying
to
argue
with
anyone
and
I'm
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
actually
hopefully
come
to
a
resolution
that
would
be
the
best
for
everybody
involved
there.
The
city
of
tarpon
springs
that
the
people
that
are
involved
with
this
cemetery,
the
city
and
what
we
have
to
do
for
our
fellow
residents.
This
particular
cases
I
think
for
all
of
us
that
have
sat
here
for
a
number
years.
A
Has
it's
unique
in
my
experience,
okay
and
I
haven't
ever
made
this
type
of
a
plea
before
and
I
was
actually
not
speaking
to
deny
the
officer
what
what
he
was
going
to
say
or
or
in
in
any
kind
of
argument.
We
would
you
care
to
say,
but
the
case
being
actually
pretty
clear-cut.
I
was
already
assuming
that
we
most
likely
will
end
up
in
the
penalty
phase,
and
that's
where
the
board
members
have
an
opportunity
to
use
a
certain
amount
of
discretion
of.
A
A
B
A
There,
a
second
okay,
okay,
is
there
any
need
for
discussion
and
I
hope
I
didn't
intimidate
anybody
by
speaking
as
much
as
I
have.
If
anybody
has
anything
and
comment
they'd
like
to
make,
please
go
right
ahead:
otherwise,
we'll
blast
for
vote.
Okay
when
I
had
quite
a
bit
of
discussion,
but
anybody
else
want
to
add
anything.
This
time.
A
Know
that
that
it's
going
to
do
any
good
to
separate
the
violations.
I
think
that,
where
this
case
may,
where
we
may
be
able
to
have
more
input
and
impact
is,
if
we
get
a
if
there
is
a
violation,
the
sub,
we
can
probably
be
a
little
bit
more
tolerant
and
considerate.
When
we
deal
with
the
with
the
second
motion,
which
would
come
if
in
fact,
we
have
a
finding
of
fault,
so
what
I'd
ask
for
is
a
roll
call
vote.
If
we
can
proceed.
E
I
I
do
believe
that
there
are
a
special
set
of
circumstances
here
and
I
believe
that
there
are
some
things
that
could
probably
be
done
to
help
mitigate
it.
So
for
that
reason,
I'd
ask
the
board
for
three
months
and
I
would
probably
go
with
$25
a
day
that
gives
him
an
opportunity
to
to
maybe
seek
zoning
issues
which,
if
the
property
zoning
is
changed
within
that
three
months,
or
at
least
that
process
begins
then
effectively
he's
in
compliant.
So
it
satisfies
the
board.
A
Just
to
summarize,
if,
in
fact,
the
board
were
to
hear
a
motion
giving
mr.
quarterman
90
days
to
your
belief,
that
that
would
give
him
an
opportunity,
hopefully
to
have
some
charity
or
some
organization,
take
the
boats
out
and,
in
the
meantime,
take
some
action
with
the
city
to
talk
about,
maybe
possibly
getting
rezone
door,
a
special
exception
kind
of
the
equipment
that
that
helps
people,
historical
and
cultural
icon.
Yeah
I.
A
K
C
A
C
C
B
Removal
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
going
to
be
a
bullet
devil's
advocate
here
and
I
appreciate
what
you
have
done,
and
you
know
please
don't
think
I'm
disrespecting
you
but
he's
very
passionate
about
this
particular
thing,
and
we
do
have
people
come
before
this
board
that
we
have
to
order
them
to
do
something
they
don't
like
that
are
just
as
fastness
about
it
and
I.
You
know.
B
I
worries
me
that
we're
going
to
say,
okay,
but
we're
having
substance
here
so
getting
a
tree
zoned
would
be
a
very
important
thing
to
do,
and
I
also
wonder
why
the
equipment
used.
Do
the
cemetery
couldn't
be
put
in
the
story.
You
know
I
mean
there
are
ways
to
get
around.
This
I
mean
the
boat
that
they
can't
get
the
charity
to
take
the
boats
away.
Then
you
call
a
tow
truck
and
have
them
take,
drag
them
to
a
landfill.
B
J
F
I
J
Quarterman,
this
Court
has
found
that
you
were
in
violation
of
the
three
Code
sections.
However
they've,
given
you
until
October
20th
of
to
set
2017
to
remedy
the
code
violations.
And
if
you
do
not
do
so
by
October,
22
2017,
you
will
suffer
a
$25
a
day.
Fine
until
such
time
as
you
come
into
compliance
with
the
code,
and
there
has
been
some
discussion
about
possible
rezoning
for
your
property
and
other
discussions
that
you
might
have
with
the
city
in
order
to
come
into
compliance.
N
A
Shirley
you're
right
mr.
quarterman,
you
do
what
you
have
to
do,
but
I
would
suggest
that
if
you
make
a
strong
attempt
to
get
rid
of
the
boats
and
also
make
a
strong
attempt
to
work
with
the
city
as
far
as
possibly
getting
a
rezoning
or
a
special
exception
that
may
preclude
you
from
having
to
go
into
a
more
aggressive
manner.
That's
just
a
suggestion.
You
do
what
you
have
to
do,
but
I
strongly
would
suggest
to
to
not
only
you
but
your
son's
that
that
you
take
advantage.
G
A
A
We
don't
have
to
struggle
over
this-
that
that's
my
suggestion,
but
I
certainly
would
not
tell
you
you
do
whatever
you
have
to
do
and
there's
certain
rights
that
you
have
as
I
read
out
in
the
instructions,
if
you're
not
satisfied
with
the
decision
of
the
of
the
board,
and
none
of
us
are
going
to
take
it
personal
I.
Assure
you
thanks,
I
appreciate
your
appreciate.
Your
efforts
and
we've
made
the
best
resolution
that
we've
ever
felt
that
we
can
thank.
So
let's
go
on
to
the
next
case.
Then
it's
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero!
A
I
K
A
K
F
K
L
I
Steve
Gaston
City
Tarpon
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
17
8
0,
0,
0,
0
3
7
is
a
vacant
lot
in
the
area
of
Lyman
Lincoln
parcel
numbers,
13
27,
1,
5,
6,
4,
1,
7,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
1
0,
it's
currently
owned
by
the
Pinellas
County
Community
Program
Land,
Trust,
aka,
community
or
Brite
Community,
Trust,
Incorporated
they're.
Also
the
register
agent.
It's
a
charitable
organization
in
Pinellas
County.
I
A
I
You
exhibit
number
1
or
all
the
photographs,
including
the
initial
inspection
signed
postings
in
the
final
inspection,
exhibit
number
2
are
all
the
notices,
including
the
notice
violation
of
the
Notice
of
Hearing,
exhibit
number
3
of
the
administrative
documentation
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
fours
affidavit
of
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
posted
this
property.
The
case
started
on
June
2nd
of
this
year.
I
On
my
initial
inspection,
while
I
was
conducting
inspections
in
the
area
noticed
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris,
that's
been
dumped
on
the
property
on
same
date,
June
2nd
of
2017,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
to
the
listed
property
owner
On
June
9th
of
this
year
that
Notice
of
Violation
the
certified
return
receipt
was
returned
to
the
code
office.
With
a
signature,
I
conducted
a
reinfection
of
the
property
on
June
28th
notice.
I
There
was
no
change
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
decided
to
send
a
notice
hearing
for
this
code
board
on
June
29th,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
first-class
certified
mail
on
July
6,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
return.
Receipt
was
returned
to
the
office
with
the
signature
on
July
10
this
year
the
property
was
posted
by
officer
roki
and
on
July
19th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
I
noted.
There
was
no
change.
The
trash
and
debris
stolen.
The
property
and
I
had
no
contact
from
the
owner.
I
I
All
of
the
notices
were
sent
to
the
listed
property
owner
view,
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
and
the
pictures
that
are
going
around
were
taken
back
in
June
and
then
at
the
posting,
and
then
I
took
one
more
on
the
19,
basically
showing
the
ongoing
problem
of
trash
being
dumped
in
those
areas
and
unfortunately
on
their
property,
so
I
bring
for
the
board
a
violation
of
8
22
and
8.
52
and
I
have
nothing
further.
At
this
time.
It.
A
I
Actually,
two
people
here,
you
know
they
had
no
argument
with
anything
they're
they're
trying
the
biggest
issue
they
have
is
because
there
are
501c.
Everything
takes
an
enormous
amount
of
time
and
everything
has
to
be
bid
it
out.
They
get
the
lowest
bidder
and
then
like
she
was
explaining
to
me
a
lot
of
times
those
critters
they
fall
through
when
they
actually
go
to
schedule
them.
So,
unfortunately,
it's
it's
difficult
for
them.
They,
they
have
probably
20
properties
in
the
city,
and
you
know
constantly
I
have
little
issues
and
they're
usually
very
responsive.
I
I
I
There
they
are
the
one
gentleman
that
was
here,
he's
the
person
charged
of
landscaping
and
they
again
because
this
is
a
bigger
project.
They
have
to
go
out
to
bid.
So
it
takes
them
time,
landscaping
just
mowing
trimming
edging
is
all
covered
and
and
they're
like
I
said
they
have
20
some-odd
properties
and
I.
Don't
really
bring
an
overturn
a
lot
before
you
guys
from
brightway
right.
A
F
K
A
E
A
I
Days
and
and
one
thing
about
this
case-
to
give
the
board
a
little
more
information,
the
priors
that
we
had
on
them
was
in
2011
and
they
were
not
the
owners
of
the
property
Oh.
So
the
time
they've
owned,
the
property
they've
had
no
no
violations
on
that
property
and,
as
I
stated
they're
dealing
they're
currently
in
the
process
of
trying
to
get
bids
to
clean
it
up.
So
it's
just
a
slow
process
for
them.
K
A
K
A
H
F
A
I
Views
mr.
chairman
officer,
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
twenty
two
property
is
at
forty,
nine
Riverside
Drive
and
it's
owned
by
Lisa
or
Jeffrey
Jennings.
They
do
live
in
the
city,
but
they
do
not
reside
in
this
property.
I
The
violation
before
the
board
is
for
the
conditional
or
permitted
use
under
single-family
residential
renter
rentals
less
than
six
weeks
25.0
to
this
properties
before
the
board
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance
and
actually
the
next
three
just
make
life
easy.
We
did
all
the
establish
for
tourist
homes
all
at
one
time
we're
in
the
groove
but
moving
forward.
The
photographs
include
a
photograph
of
the
property
which,
being
posted
and
I,
have.
L
I
I
Exhibit
number
one
of
the
photos
which
includes
a
signposting
it's
difficult
to
take
pictures
of
people
visiting
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices
that
were
sent,
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
was
sent
to
the
owner
address
and
we
also
did
send
one
to
49.
Riverside
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documentation
case,
summary
property
phrase
or
collector
records,
and
also
the
deed
transfer
to
the
current
owner
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
posted.
I
This
case
started
out
june
1st
of
this
year.
I
received
an
email
from
someone
in
planning
a
zoning
here
at
the
city,
advising
that
the
addresses
owned
are
100
and
is
being
used
as
a
vacation
home
rental
for
less
than
six
weeks.
At
a
time,
I
initially
had
visited
the
address
on
that
date
and
had
no
contact
with
anybody.
I
was
able
to
find
an
Airbnb
listing
that
clearly
allowed
me
to
schedule
a
stay
less
than
six
weeks.
I
Online
and
I
did
send
an
email
at
that
time
through
Airbnb
to
the
owner
under
a
pseudonym,
I
did
have
contact
with
the
occupants
on
June
3rd.
They
are
a
family
from
Texas.
They
advise
they
rented
the
property
from
June
2nd
to
June
7th.
At
that
point,
in
time
we
decided
to-
and
they
said,
they'd
schedule
it.
On
Airbnb
we
send
a
Notice
of
Violation
mail,
first
class
and
certified
mail
on
June
8th.
We
received
an
email
from
the
neighbor
they're
reporting.
I
A
different
family
was
inside
of
the
house
as
a
rental,
and
it
was
causing
some
issues
to
the
neighbors.
Kids
were
jumping
over
the
fences,
a
matter
of
fact,
I.
Think
one
of
the
neighbors
said
that
one
of
the
kids
from
the
rental
or
in
their
pool,
even
though
there's
a
pool
at
this
house,
I
conducted
a
Rhian,
spectrin
and
I,
found
that
the
listing
was
no
longer
in
line
at
that
time.
I
That's
generally,
all
I
really
have
I've
gone
by
a
couple
of
times
haven't
seen
any
other
cars
they're.
The
the
conversation
I
did.
Actually,
this
one
I
didn't
have
any
conversation
with
the
owner,
but,
like
I
said,
I
put
it
into
compliance
based
on
the
fact
that
I
was
no
longer
able
to
schedule
a
rental
for
less
than
six
weeks.
The
interesting
thing
about
the
owner
of
this
property:
it
is
not
owner
residing
in
this
property,
they
do
reside
in
the
city,
but
they
live
in
on
I,
believe
it's
gray,
wood
and
rolling
oats.
I
I
We
did
send
a
notice
of
hearing
on
July
5th
and
on
July
10th
officer,
rocky
posted
it
again
and
I
only
had
very
limited
contact
via
email
with
the
owner
and
that's
where
it
was
told
that
they
needed
to
take
it
down
for
six
weeks
and
they
did
comply
with
that
and
hence
I
stated
before
work
at
this
point.
I
believe
we're
in
compliance,
because
I
haven't
seen
any
other
rentals,
but
moving
forward
I'd
like
to
have
them
established
for
any
potential
future
violation
of
2502
and
I.
I
Think
we
established
at
the
last
code
board
a
definition
and
I
do
have
it,
which
is
contained
under
4100
213,
which
is
a
tourist
poem.
So
the
ordinance
is
permitted
uses
and
conditional
uses.
Tourist
home
is
not
a
permitted
use
or
conditional
use
under
2502,
which
affects
residential,
our
seventy
and
our
100th
own
district,
and
this
is
our
100
zone,
so
they're
basically
not
allowed
to
have
a
tourist
home,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point
so.
A
I
It
based
on
okay,
primarily
I,
can
tell
you
right
now,
I
know
about
20
and
fit,
but
we
have
appreciate
four
points
on
them.
Some
of
them
may
have
circumstances
affecting
so
until
I.
Get
a
complaint
at
that
point
in
time
is
when
we
begin
to
investigate
them.
I,
don't
troll
these.
If
I
get
a
complaint,
I
jump
online
I
have
multiple
different
emails
names
that
see
if
I
can
rent
it
out
and
and
see.
H
H
I'll
make
a
motion,
but
I
move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
exercising
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section,
25,
Dec,
Dec
25.0,
two
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
thief.
Tarpon
springs
was
enforced.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondent
were
in
violation
of
said
code
sections,
however
they're
now
in
compliance.
A
second.
E
A
I
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
turbine
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement,
the
case
before
the
board
is
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
one.
The
address
in
question
is
fourteen
eighteen,
Coburn
Drive
property
owner
listed
as
Ron
D
Frisch.
This
is
another
vacation
home
rental
that
I
request
the
board
to
establish
miss
Frisch.
Does
owner
occupy
this
property?
What
she
does
is
she
rents
out
a
downstairs
apartment
periodically,
but
she
lives
in
the
residence
as
her
permanent
resident.
I
I
A
I
Number
one
or
all
the
photographs
which
basically
the
front
of
the
house
with
a
sign
being
posted
in
the
yard,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices,
the
notice
violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
any
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
they
may
have
had
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
was
posted
on
June
27th.
This
case
started
out.
I
Initially,
I
responded
with
the
police
department
to
a
suicidal
subject
at
the
house
and
they
were
renting
the
lower
apartment.
We
asked
the
circumstances
and
she
advised
thought
we
were
rented
it
on
Airbnb,
so
I
got
online
and
found
out.
There
was
an
Airbnb
rental
for
this
property.
I
went
upstairs
made
contact
with
the
owner.
She
confirmed
that
she
was
renting
out
the
lower
apartment
on
a
short
term
rental
basis
less
than
six
weeks
at
that
point
in
time.
That's
when
the
case
started
advised
her.
I
She
was
no
longer
allowed
to
do
that,
based
on
our
city,
ordinance
informed
of
the
ordinance
we
did
mail,
her,
a
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
first-class
and
certified
mail
and
the
property
was
posted
by
officer
okie
on
July
10
I
conducted
another
inspection
which
in
basically
me
surfing
the
web
and
seeing
if
I
could
find
any
listings.
That
would
allow
me
to
scheduled
for
less
than
six
weeks.
I
All
of
the
notices
were
sent
to
the
owner
of
record
according
to
Pinellas
County
property
tax
collectors
database
and,
as
I
stated,
the
case
before
the
board
would
be
to
simply
establish
this
property
for
any
future
violations,
because
it
is
in
compliance
at
this
point
in
time,
and
that
would
be
a
violation
at
city
ordinance,
25.0,
to
which
a
single-family,
residential
rental
or
property
is
zoned,
single-family
residential.
All.
A
K
K
F
A
G
A
I
Am
officer
Steve,
Gaston,
city
of
turbine
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
division,
property
or
the
case
before
the
board
is
case,
number
17,
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
3,
3,
8
property
address
a
787,
Merlyn
sport,
property
owner
and
resident
as
the
Susan
Parker
I
bring
for
the
board
another
case
to
be
established
for
violation
of
city
code,
25.0,
vacation
home
rental
and
conditional
or
permitted
uses
I'm
going
to
present
before
the
board.
5
exhibit
that
I'd
like
to
be
pointing
to
evidence
for
the
record.
Please
all
right,
I'd.
I
Moving
forward
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
which
include
the
signposting
because
again
I
have
no
photographs
of
people.
Staying
there
exhibit
number
two
is
a
copy.
The
ad
for
rental
on
the
website,
I
believe
it
was
Airbnb,
exhibit
number
three:
are
all
my
notices,
Notice
of
Violation
notice,
appearing
tip
number
four,
the
administrative
dock
to
case
summary,
property,
appraiser,
tax,
collector
and
official
emails
officer,
emails,
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign,
as
exhibit
number
five.
I
This
case
started
out
on
June
27th,
based
on
a
neighbor
complained
about
people
renting
out
the
property,
as
I
stated,
I
included
the
Airbnb
listing
in
the
length
and
I
was
able
to
schedule
a
rental
for
less
than
six
weeks
on
the
property
property
is
owned,
single-family
residential
I
believe
it's
our
seventy,
which
falls
under
twenty
five.
Oh
two
is
the
conditional
permitted
uses.
Tourist
home
was
not
one
of
them.
I
I
actually
went
by
the
property
and
I
made
contact
with
Susan
who
Susan
Parker
and
she
lives
there.
She
periodically
rents
her
property
out
stays
at
her
boyfriend's
house,
while
other
people
are
staying
at
her
out.
I
have
I
heard
the
law
and
she
stated
she
would
be
taking
down
or
modifying
her
her
online
listings
for
her
property,
which
she
has
on
July
5th.
We
had
the
conversation
with
her
on
the
27th
on
July
5th,
we
sent
the
Notice
of
Violation
in
the
notice
of
hearing
via
certified
mail
in
first-class
mail
on
July
10th.
I
The
property
was
posted
by
off
to
Roky
and
then
on
July
19th
yesterday
did
some
web
surfing
and
couldn't
find
a
listing
for
the
property
any
longer.
Actually
I
did
find
a
listing,
but
I
was
unable
to
schedule
it
for
less
than
six
weeks.
It
was
basically
two
months
was
the
minimum
amount
of
time
I
could
list
it
for
and,
as
I
stated,
I
did
have
contact
with
the
owner.
I
She
was
very
respectful
and
understands
the
situation,
interestingly
enough,
just
for
the
board,
the
other
property
that
I
first
started
out
with
49
Riverside
Drive,
that
property
owner
happens
to
be
the
property
they
own,
the
property
next
door
that
they
bought
specifically
for
vacation
home
rental.
So
it's
two
places
right
next
door
to
each
other.
The
neighbors
are
very,
very
cognizant
of
both
of
these
addresses
and
frequently
fall
when
there's
people
staying
there.
K
H
A
I
Officer,
Steve
absent
City
turbine
Springs,
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
three
three:
this
is
what
was
used
to
be
known
as
the
Okakura
spark
at
hope
and
cross.
It
would
be
on
the
south
east
corner
of
hope
and
cross
directly
across
the
street.
From
that
we
used
to
call
the
old
flophouse.
Six
on
one
is
filter
across.
I
Used
to
call
the
old
flophouse,
it
was
the
Greek
truth
direct
center,
so
it's
nickname
was
the
flophouse
anybody's
been
around
long
and
it
probably
knows
it
as
the
flophouse.
So
this
is
the
what
used
to
be
the
old
part.
The
parcel
number
is
12
27
1
5
4
1
1
6
6
0
0
0,
0,
0,
1
0,
the
violations
before
the
border,
8
22
accumulation
of
trash,
8
42,
the
duty
of
maintained
private
property
and
8
52,
which
are
the
nuisance
prohibitions
under
8
40,
mr.
I
A
I
The
lot
is
overgrown,
especially
along
the
eastern
side.
There
are
trees,
overhanging,
the
roadway
on
the
north
and
the
south
side,
there's
trash
on
the
property,
and
at
this
point
in
time
we
sent
on
June
29th
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing,
because
my
intent
was
to
have
this
property
established,
regardless
of
its
a
compliance
state
due
to
the
number
of
priors
I've
had
on
it.
I
So,
on
July
5th,
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
certified
receipts
were
received
in
the
office
with
signatures
July
10th,
the
sign
was
posted
by
off
the
Roky
on
July
17th
we've
had
some
we've
had
quite
a
few
conversations.
We
have
fun
with
the
property
owners
husband,
it's
listed
as
scam
Latinas,
Sagan
newts,
the
CEO
in
IAS
I'm.
I
And
we
spoke
to
the
husband
he's
been
out
there
working
on
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
had
a
conversation
with
him
today
about
noon,
and
he
says
he's
all
done.
I
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
go
out
there
and
check,
but
this
is
another
case
the
regardless
of
its
compliance
status,
I'd
like
it
to
be
established
by
the
board
anyway.
So
if
it's
found
its
established
automatically
on
the
19th,
when
I
did
my
final
inspection
yesterday,
it
mowed
the
inside
cleaned
up
trash,
but
he
completely
forgot
about
the
edges.
I
So
the
right
away
along
the
southern
side,
which
is
on
Roosevelt,
was
still
grossly
overgrown
along
the
eastern
fence
line
where
the
residents
are
was
still
grossly
overgrown
and
in
between
all
the
pilings
needed
to
be
trimmed.
He
assured
me
that
he
had
all
of
that
done
today,
but
again,
as
I
stated,
I
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
go
out
inspected.
It
sounds
like
I
could
probably
go
out
there
after
tomorrow,
I'm
with
one
today
and.
F
I
Should
be
in
compliance
all
the
notices
were
mailed
via
certified
mail
through
the
property
owner
listed
via
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
and,
as
I
stated
at
this
time,
I'd
like
the
board
I
think
do
we
take
off
the
effect
as
even
on
my
reinfection.
To
be
honest,
mr.
chairman
I
would
like
the
board
only
to
consider
814
850
250
is
in
compliance
of
8
22.
My
apologies
that
just
occurred
yesterday.
A
C
C
C
A
H
H
A
A
K
A
H
A
E
K
A
I
You
mr.
chairman
case,
before
the
board:
well,
actually
I'm
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
tarpon
springs,
go
enforcement
case
before
the
board
of
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
eight
six
property
address
in
question:
456
feet:
Cypress
Street,
listed
owners
all
or
lane
Hobbes
case
before
the
boards
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance
at
this
time,
I
have
four
exhibits:
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider
as
evidence
all.
A
I
You
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs,
including
the
initial
inspection
in
the
posting
of
the
sign,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
a
my
notice.
As
my
Notice
of
Violation
I
notice,
appearing
exhibit
number
three
for
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary
property,
Fraser
and
tax
collectors
record.
Civet
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
the
case
before
the
board.
I
It
has
four
city
code
violations,
8-16
which
deal
with
the
free
collection
practices
or
how
you
store
your
trash
cans
and
when
they
can
be
out
and
what's
on
and
so
forth,
also
822,
which
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
8
40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
8
52.
The
nuisance.
Prohibitions
that
go
along
with
that
which
includes
storing
a
trash
and
debris
on
your
property
case
started
on
June
27th
of
this
year
from
a
neighbor
complained.
I
There
was
a
large
amount
of
garbage
in
the
front
yard,
tree
debris,
furniture,
contract,
construction,
debris
and
the
trash
cans
were
over
thrown
over
the
fence
and
public
view.
There's
a
short
3
foot
fence,
as
we
can
see
in
the
photographs
in
the
front
yard,
and
trash
cans
were
basically
just
possible
with
that,
then
on
June,
27th,
I,
mailed,
a
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing,
because
I
had
the
intent
to
establish
this
case
due
to
some
prior
violations
with
the
property
on
July
5th,
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice.
I
You're
hearing
certified
receipts
were
returned
to
the
code
office
with
signatures
on
July
7th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
the
property
was
in
compliance
at
that
time.
On
July
10th
officer,
okie
posted
the
notice
hearing
and
I
sign
in
the
yard
and
I
didn't
conduct
another
inspection
because
it
was
already
in
compliance
on
them
on
the
previous
one,
as
a
the
contact
with
the
owner
basically
consisted
when
they
notified
us
that
it
was
time
for
rien
spectrum
other
than
that
I
hadn't
had
any
contact
with
the
owner,
but
they
are
in
compliance.
I
A
K
K
A
F
F
A
I
You
mr.
experiment
officer,
Steve
bass
and
city
department,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
sixty
eight.
The
address
in
question
is
601
sugar,
Mill
Road,
the
listed
owners
peanut
Eddie.
This
is
a
repeat
violator,
and
hopefully
we
got
all
the
paperwork
various
times
if
it
does
include
it
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
at
the
end.
So
we'll
see
if
we
get
it
right
this
time,
I.
I
I
This
board
accepted
the
affidavit
of
compliance
on
Friday
February
3rd
of
2017.
She
was
out
of
compliance
for
a
period
of
time
and
currently
owes
the
city
$47,000
in
fines.
So
moving
for
this
case,
mr.
chairman,
is
violation
of
city
codes,
840
and
852,
which
are
the
same
ones.
On
the
previous
case,
which
established,
there's
a
repeat,
violator,
I
have
five
exhibits,
the
fifth
one
being
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
at
like
the
Board,
considers
evidence
and
placed
on
the
record.
A
I
You
June
24th
of
this
year
was
my
initial
inspection.
I
noted
the
lot
was
overgrown
front
and
front
and
rear.
We
sent
her
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing.
We
sent
that
notice
of
a
repeat
violator
at
that
point
in
time
via
first-class
mail,
On
June,
27th
property
was
posted
by
after
Roky
on
July
10th
and
on
July
19th
I
conducted
another
inspection,
the
property's
still
not
in
compliance.
I
It
probably
still
overgrown
attend
no
contact
from
the
owner
and
we
have
not
gotten
back
any
of
the
signed
certified
mail,
acknowledging
the
violation,
but
it
is
an
owner-occupied
house.
So
it's
not
a
vacant
residence.
She
actually
doesn't
live
there.
In
the
previous
cases,
I've
had
conversations
with
her
and
I've
seen
her
cars
come
and
go
so
I'm,
pretty
confident
she's
still
there,
all
the
notices
were
mailed.
The
Pinellas
County
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
Tax
Collector
and
property
appraisers
database
on
so
before.
I
The
board
I'd
like
them
to
once
again
establish
or
not
establish
her,
but
show
that
she's
ever
repeat
violator
and
accept
my
affidavit
of
prosecution,
cost
currently
of
100
$16.50.
For
the
board's
record,
she
was
previously
fined
$100
per
day
for
the
exact
same
violations
back
in
2015,
so
based
on
the
board.
Its
recommendation
and
mine
I
would
probably
recommend
at
least
that
it's
not
the
one
and
that's
my
case
and
I
present
to
you.
Mr.
chairman,
all.
I
I
A
Anybody
else
have
any
quest
I
do
as
the
chairman
I
want
to
make
sure.
Procedurally,
that
that
we
have
a
full
understanding,
so
we're
looking
at
this
case,
as
as
we
do
most
of
our
cases,
whether
there's
a
violation,
correct
all
right,
and
then
we
also
if,
in
fact
the
violation
is
established
in
the
present,
that's
an
assumption,
but
if,
in
fact
it's
established,
you
already
have
a
built-in,
you
already
have
a
built
in
prosecution
cost
of
one
hundred
and
sixteen
dollar.
Yes,.
A
I
The
the
date
they
have
to
notify
me
when
they're
in
compliance,
the
board,
just
basically
June
24th,
is
when
I
observe
the
violation,
whatever
fines.
This
board
dictates,
began
on
June
24th,
because
she
is
a
repeat
filing
I
say
if
the
board
in
fact
finds
there's
a
violation,
I
say
so
we're
just
really.
I
J
The
second
the
motion,
the
motion
for
repeat,
violations
with
a
fine
for
not
in
compliance
and
she's,
already
established
that
she's
been
in
violation.
This
is
a
repeat
offender.
The
motion
includes
your
determination
of
whether
they're
in
violation
and
what
the
what
the
fine
should
be,
plus
the
administrative,
alright.
A
H
H
A
K
H
A
I
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement.
The
case
before
the
board
is
a
repeat
violator
case,
similar
to
last
one
case:
number
17:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
zero
property
address
in
question;
425
Wayfarer
Court,
the
property
owners
are
and
no
seus
or
Maria
Pappa
phone
osseous,
this
violation
of
city
code,
8
40.
This
also
has
five
exhibits.
Mr.
chairman,
as
like
the
board
to
place
into
evidence
for
the
record,
all
right.
A
I
You
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
for
the
property
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices
in
the
notice
of
hearing
for
the
repeat,
violator
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documentation
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
exhibit
number
five
as
a
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost
in
the
amount
of
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents?
I
Initially,
this
repeat
violator
I
received
a
call
on
June
27th
and
found
the
property
be
in
violation
on
June
27th
of
city
ordinance.
Eight
dash
forty,
which
is
a
lot,
is
overgrown.
They
became
a
repeat
violator
in
2016
under
2016
K
16,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
six,
nine
on
August
19th
of
2016,
basically,
the
property,
the
front
rear
yard
need
to
be
mowed
maintained,
and
this
came
in
from
a
neighbor
complained
on
July
6th
of
2017.
I
The
notice
of
hearing
for
repeat
violator
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
to
the
New,
Jersey
and
tarpon
springs
addressed.
The
residents
address
up
in
New
Jersey
on
July
10th,
the
property
was
posted,
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
on
July
19th
and
saw
that
the
property
is
still
in
violation.
I
As
of
this
date
or
as
of
yesterday's
case,
and
we
have
received
no
communication
with
the
owner
or
any
other
certified
documents
returned
to
the
office,
all
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
and
for
the
board's
information.
The
previous
case,
which
was
heard
by
this
board
on
August
18th
of
2016,
for
violation,
8
40,
the
board,
recommended
to
find
a
$50
for
each
day,
the
violation,
continued
and
I
believe.
I
I
A
K
K
K
A
H
A
I
H
Yeah
I
have
the
right
motion
here:
I
move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that
the
respondents
failed
to
comply
with
this
board's
order
within
the
prescribed
time
and
to
award
the
city
one
hundred
and
seventy
eight
dollars
for
the
cost
incurred
in
prosecuting
this
case.
Any
second.
K
I
I
H
H
A
F
A
C
J
A
Okay,
that
takes
us
to
affidavits
a
compliant
to
take
I,
don't
see
any
listed
and
affidavits
to
be
provided,
I,
don't
see
any
listed
old
business
I
know
of
no
old
business.
Unless
anybody
on
the
board
has
any
old
business.
Okay,
there's
no
approval
of
minutes.
Any
public
comments,
apparently
very
little
if
any
public
present
at
the
time
or
the
staff
comment
to
anybody
care
to
say
anything:
okay,
apparently
no
board
or
staff
comments.
Let
the
record
indicate
that
the
time
is
4:40
p.m.
and
before
I
adjourn
I'd
like
to
1.
A
Thank
everybody
for
their
patience.
We
started
a
little
bit
late.
I
also
would
point
out.
We
had
a
couple
of
cases
that
were
out
of
the
ordinary
today
and
I
appreciate
everybody's
input
and
I
think
that
we
showed
today
that
we
could
work
together
to
the
betterment
of
Tarpon
Springs.
So
we
did
just
what
we're
supposed
to
build.
It
I
appreciate
it.
Let
the
record
indicate
the
time
is
441
p.m.
and
we're
adjourned.