►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board November 8, 2018
Description
Description
A
B
C
D
B
You
know
I
will
now
read
the
code
enforcement
board
hearing
procedure.
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
ministration
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
an
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
B
Florida
Statute,
two,
eight
six,
zero
one:
zero
five
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
who
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
the
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
the
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
B
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
Before
we
begin
the
public
hearings,
we
will
have
all
potential
witnesses.
Please
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
B
B
D
E
F
D
Let
me
just
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
just
so
that
you
know
we
understand,
what's
going
on
here
today,
under
your
rules
of
procedure
and
under
the
city's
code.
If
the
city
wants
to
move
forward
with
the
foreclosure
of
a
code
enforcement
lien,
they
have
to
get
permission
from
you
first
and
then
they'll
take
it
to
the
Commission
City
Commission,
to
get
permission
for
the
City
Commission
to
move
to
foreclose
this
property.
D
This
lien
evidently
has
been
in
existence
for
going
on
three
years,
and
there
are
some
specifics
as
to
the
reasons
why
the
city
wants
to
move
forward
as
a
matter
of
due
process.
They're
coming
to
you
for
that.
First
step
of
the
request
that
request
was
provided
to
the
daughter
of
the
deceased
owner
and
she
is
asking
for
continuance.
D
He
doesn't
say
there
were
when
she
wants
to
continue
to
or
what's
gonna
happen
if
the
continuance
is
granted
but
she's
just
not
available
to
be
here
today
and
I
guess
her
husband
is
here
on
her
behalf
to
speak
on
her
behalf.
So
you
got
two
issues
to
deal
with.
One
is
this:
do
you
want
to
continue
the
hearing,
and
if
so,
when
do
you
want
to
continue
it?
D
If
you
don't
want
to
continue
the
hearing,
then
you
need
to
determine
whether
or
not
that
you
want
to
authorize
the
city
to
begin
the
foreclosure
process
on
this.
This
property
I
mean
this
should
be
in
your
packet,
the
information
relative
to
the
property
itself
and
the
reason
why
the
city
is
moving
forward
and
believe
that's
a
letter
from
officer
Gaston
on
Police
Department.
D
F
G
Just
to
explain
the
address
business
Rebecca
Vera
Siebert
is
currently
a
student
at
Duke,
Divinity
School
and
didn't
receive
these
until
something
came
to
Ocala
in
the
last
two
weeks.
To
answer
your
question:
Rebecca
Vera
Siebert
would
like
a
continuance
for
the
purpose
of
obtaining
a
lawyer
to
represent
her
in
this
matter.
She's
been
talking
to
communicating
with
Miss
Taylor,
but
she
hasn't
been
able
to
reach
Miss
Taylor
recently,
I,
don't
know
quite
where
Miss
Taylor
is
right.
H
D
E
This
case
has
been
going
on
since
2016.
The
the
property
is
a
hazard.
It
was
actually
condemned
by
the
city,
there's
numerous
neighbors
that
are
frequently
complaining
about
this
property.
It's
structurally
unsound,
it's
dangerous
and
it's
a
hazard
and
that's
the
reason
why
the
city
wants
to
move
forward
with
the
foreclosure
and.
E
And
to
move
forward
with
the
case,
so
we
can
bring
this
property
into
compliance
and
basically
demolish
the
building
unless,
of
course,
they're
able
to
get
the
building
demolished
in
a
timely
manner.
That
would
bring
it
into
compliance,
which
would
solve
the
problem
as
far
as
compliancy
goes,
but
it
is,
it
is
probably
one
of
the
more
significantly
dangerous
properties
I
have
in
the
city
right
now
that
I'm
dealing
with.
E
Confirmed
today,
actually,
over
the
last
two
days,
it's
not
no
historic
district,
it
may
be
old,
but
it
does
not
qualify
under
the
US
Department
of
the
Interior
for
parks
as
a
historic
in
the
historic
district.
So
it's
not
protected
in
any
way
shape
or
form.
As
far
as
that
goes
like
I
said
it
just
may
be
old,
which
I
pretty
sure
it
is
old.
The
other
thing
just
for
the
board
to
kind
of
help
them
out
I
had
numerous
conversations
via
email
up
to
a
certain
point
with
the
daughter
of
the
mr.
E
Berry's
and
then
suddenly
she
quit
having
conversations
that
was
over
a
year
ago,
so
she
was
aware
of
the
situation
she
said
she
wanted
to
get
it
demolished
want
to
move
on,
but
then
she
just
kind
of
disappeared
off
the
face
of
the
earth,
for
lack
of
a
better
term
didn't
resurface
until
we
started
the
foreclosure
process,
so
you
know
I
think
it's
fairly
obvious.
What's
where
we're
at
now
so
and
that
property's
not
getting
any
better
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
think
even
one
of
the
neighbors
showed
up
to
complain
about
it.
G
If
I
could
speak
I'm,
confident
to
testify
on
certain
communications
between
B
receiver
and
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
as
I
was
personally
present,
this
Vera
Seibert
was
informed
that
her
house
was
part
of
the
historic
district
and
there
would
be
a
problem
in
destroying
it.
So
pharisee
Burt
has
communicated
and
tried
to
get
a
resolution
of
the
matter.
This
is
the
first
I've
heard
that
there's
a
definitive
statement
that
it's
not
now
for
those
of
you
familiar
with
Rose.
G
This
was
a
carriage
house
for
the
house
across
the
street,
which
I
believe
is
in
the
historic
district.
Again.
If
we
get
a
clear
signal
from
Tarpon
Springs
that
there's
no
issue
with
this
being
historic
district
house,
we
have
no
problem
taking
it
down
ourselves,
but
again,
we've
gotten
mixed
signals
and
I
am
testifying
on
my
own
knowledge.
As
far
as
that
goes
I
was
there.
I
G
I
G
F
But
those
steps
haven't
been
taken,
and
even
he
mentioned
this
is
three
years
now,
so
there's
been
no
application
to
HBV
or
preservation
or
demolition
and
they're
the
ones
that
would
approve
it
if
it
does
fall
into
the
historic
I'm,
not
an
expert,
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination
on
historic
properties.
I
go
by
a
basically
a
fancy.
Google
map-
and
it's
not
beyond
me
to
be
wrong
on
the
fancy
google
map
so
but.
F
E
F
F
G
D
Let
me
just
jump
in
it.
It
doesn't
have
any
relevance.
The
question
is:
is
the
property
in
compliance
or
not,
and
what
actions
are
gonna
be
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance?
Obviously,
the
property
owner
has
not
taken
any
action
in
the
last
three
years
they
need
to
if
they
believe
that
its
historic
they
need
to.
You,
have
an
application
before
the
Historic
Preservation
Board
and
address
the
issue
of
either
rehabbing
it
or
demolishing
it.
D
They've
done
neither
and
the
city
just
can't
sit
back
and
wait
to
have
them
decide
when
they're
gonna
go
ahead
and
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
It's
one
of
the
worst
properties
in
the
city,
as
the
officer
Gaston
has
already
explained
to
you,
and
nothing
is
being
done.
The
only
reason
that
the
city
moves
forward
of
Rico
to
foreclosed
properties
and
one
is
when
property
owner
is
not
taking
responsibility
for
the
property
and
that's
the
question
here
so
I
mean
if
you
wanted
to
move
forward
to
may
get
the
property
into
compliance.
D
There's
two
things
that
you
can
do.
You
can
grant
the
continuance
and
give
them
a
specific
period
of
time
to
apply
and
bring
the
property
go
through
that
historic
preservation
process,
or
you
can
give
the
city
the
authority
to
begin
the
foreclosure
process
so
either
way
there
needs
to
be
a
deadline.
It
can't
be
one
of
these
situations
where
it
just
sits
out
there.
The
property
is
not
being
maintained
and
it
is
dangerous
according
to
what
the
officer
have
said.
So
those
are
your
options
as
I
see
it
as
the
board's
attorney.
B
J
K
D
D
Or
I
move
to
grant
the
continuance
that's
been
requested
and
set
a
hearing
date
for
sometime
in
the
future,
though
those
are
your
options.
They've
already
been
found
in
violation
three
years
ago
of
those
Code
sections.
So
that's
what
what
the
request
is
here
in
officer
gaussians
letter.
So
we
need
to
maybe
reword
the
motion
to
reflect
you
want
to
that
they're
still
in
violation
and
and
authorize
the
foreclosure
or
still
in
violation
and
grant
the
continuance
or
date
certain
for
them
to
apply
to
the
HP
b
board.
I.
J
Moved
the
based
on
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
by
the
law
at
the
time,
the
the
alleged
violation,
sections,
eight,
forty
one,
thirty
three
point:
zero:
two
and
eight
fifty
two,
the
kodan
ordinances,
are
still
in
violation
and
force.
In
effect,
respondent
is
in
violation
thereof
and
I
request.
A
foreclosure.
H
C
D
So
if
I
can
just
wrap
it
up,
then
so
mr.
Dubourg,
the
the
code
enforcement
board,
has
authorized
the
request
to
foreclose
the
next
step
would
be
it
would
go
before
the
City
Commission
for
approval
for
request
to
foreclose.
You
have
the
opportunity
to
appear
at
that
Commission
hearing.
If
you
want
there
will
be
no
specific
notice
to
you,
so
make
sure
that
you
keep
aware
of
what's
going
on
on
the
agenda.
D
If
you
want
to
appear
and
discuss
that
at
the
Commission
meeting,
the
mayor
may
or
may
not
allow
you
to
speak
on
that
issue,
but
that's
the
next
step.
My
suggestion
to
you
is,
is
to
start
the
process
immediately
to
apply
to
the
Historic
Preservation
Board
to
either
obtain
that
demolition
permit
or
find
out.
If
you
need
to
rehab
it
and
start
the
rehab
process,
and
that
may
play
a
strong
point
in
the
direction
as
to
whether
or
not
the
City
Commission
is
going
to
authorize
the
foreclosure
I
have.
G
D
M
G
D
C
L
I'm
Shannon
brewer,
currently
employed
by
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
I'm,
an
is
a
certified
arborist
license
number
fl9,
2
2
1
a
I'm,
also
an
F
n
GL,
a
certified
horticulture
professional
license
number
F,
nine,
seven,
eight
four
zero
all
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
databases
all
Nov
Ana,
no
chiz
our
certified
return
receipt
and
first-class
mail.
L
July
24th
2018
Greg
Dobbins
and
is
a
certified
arborist
license
number
FL,
six
six
zero.
Nine,
a
also
employed
by
the
city
of
tarpon,
was
called
to
the
name
by
the
neighbor
to
the
east
because
of
a
dead
tree
was
leaning
over
the
property
line
towards
the
neighbor's
home
Greg
confirmed
that
there
were
two
dead
trees
and
they
were
hazardous.
He
sent
a
courtesy
letter
the
same
day,
August
15th
2018,
a
rien
spec
ssin
was
completed
by
me.
The
dead
pines
were
still
on
the
property,
causing
the
property
be
out
of
compliance.
L
The
Nov
was
mailed
the
same
day,
September
19th
every
inspection
occurred
at
that
time.
Additional
trees
were
dead.
An
amended
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
to
the
property
on
record
and
to
a
Miami
address
supplied
by
utility
billing.
The
next
day,
September
25th,
the
amended
Nov
2,
June,
SC
and
res
in
william
frito
at
1702.
Mexico
was
returned
to
the
office
missing
the
green
card
and
no
stamp
from
the
post
office,
stating
why
october
10th
the
re-inspection
occurred
again
and
the
dead
pines
had
not
been
removed.
L
The
center
pine
has
dropped
a
large
amount
of
bark
and
large
limbs,
and
they
were
observed
piled
up
against
the
fence.
The
property
was
still
out
of
compliance.
The
NIH
was
sent
October
22nd
certified
first-class
mail,
the
n
o
h9
to
post
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
October
22nd
the
finals,
but
inspection
was
conducted
November
7th.
Again
there
was
no
change
to
the
property
and
no
permits
had
been
obtained.
L
J
K
B
M
K
J
J
K
K
K
K
A
O
O
D
So
the
question
was
whether
or
not
you
have
an
illegal
objection
to
the
photographs
and
other
evidence
coming
in
to
evidence,
and
so
it's
either
a
yes
or
no,
and
if
it's
a
if
it's
a
yes,
you
have
an
objection,
need
to
state
your
legal
objection
like
it's
your
relevant
or
it's
hearsay
or
another
legal
objection.
Okay,.
O
D
O
O
D
C
E
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violators
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record.
It's
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
returner
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
Madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
their
as
evidence.
B
E
Started
July
24th
and
conducted
the
initial
inspection
at
131.
He
still
would
that's
the
address
of
the
property.
It's
it's
a
fenced-in
lot,
there's
no
structure
on
it
along
the
alleyway
east
of
Pinellas
Avenue
on
the
north
side
of
Oakwood,
so
you're
familiar
with
that
area.
There's
an
alley
and
there's
a
fenced-in
lot
on
the
east
side
of
that,
apparently,
is
a
lot
at
this
time
is
zone
t4b
previously
/,
Planning
and
Zoning
and
I
have
an
email
from
Patricia
who,
unfortunately,
couldn't
be
here.
E
She
was
here
the
last
time
on
the
other
property,
so
she
kind
of
explained
some
of
this
stuff
as
far
as
zoning,
because
that's
not
my
area
of
expertise
so
and
she
stated
a
previous
owning
was
general
business
on
the
outdoor
storage
is
allowed,
but
only
by
conditional
use.
What
that
basically
means
is.
The
lot
is
currently
full
of
a
combination
of
watercraft
personal
watercraft
cars.
There's
a
forklift
and
I
think
there
may
be
a
storage
container,
and
that
was
what
the
Nexus
of
the
complaint
was.
E
We
were
unsuccessful
of
finding
any
conditional
use
which
would
have
in
order
to
store
the
other
vehicles
and
things
like
that.
The
property
owners
would
have
had
to
have
gotten
a
conditional
use
for
the
property,
so
it's
being
used
outside
of
what
it's
allowed
to
be
used
for.
At
that
point
in
time,
I
it
appears
to
be
a
junkyard
or
a
salvage
yard,
which
requires
a
conditional
use
in
industrial
categories.
The
property
was
previously
is
owned,
commercial
and
none
of
our
commercial
categories
allowed
junkyards
or
salvage
yards.
E
Basically,
at
that
point
in
time,
you
said
notice
a
violation
on
July
25th
requesting
that
items
being
stored
in
the
lot,
which
are
non-conforming
or
contact
planning
and
zoning
and
obtain
contingent
on
conditional
use
for
the
property
regardless.
It's
not
necessarily
allowed
to
be
used
for
outdoor
storage,
July
29th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin,
and
there
was
no
change
on
October
9th
of
this
year.
Notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first
class
and
return
receipt.
E
I
posted
the
property
on
July,
29th,
November,
7th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
some
of
the
vehicles
that
were
that
brought
419
into
compliance
in
they're
owned
by
the
same
people.
They
brought
in
compliance,
but
they
move
some
of
those
vehicles
into
the
storage,
a
lot
at
131,
East
Oakwood.
So
there's
now
additional
vehicles
inside
that
fenced-in
area.
The
fenced-in
area
is
for
outdoor
storage
if
it
even
qualified,
as
it
requires
opaque
fencing,
it
doesn't
have
those
what's
before
the
board.
E
E
E
We
do
not
have
any
records
of
the
conditional
use,
as
we
discussed
there
was
probably
never
an
application
for
it.
That
may
be
why
the
business
tax
receipt
has
a
restriction
requiring
all
the
storage
to
be
on
the
Oakwood
property.
So
there's
a
business
tax
receipt
in
play
that
has
specific
conditions
on
it.
With
respect
to
the
Oakwood
Street
property,
the
storage
unit
or
area
is
restricted
to
waverunners
as
the
business
tax
receipt
states.
E
I
would
consider
this
to
obviously
include
the
forklift
needed
to
move
the
wave
runners
and
the
wave
runner
trailers
on
which
they
said.
Storage
of
automobiles
machinery,
scooters
and
other
items
we
discussed
was
not
included.
As
we
discussed,
you
could
apply
for
a
conditional
use
to
upgrade
the
storage
area,
to
include
these
items
and
to
meet
the
applicable
code
sections
once
you
complete
your
next
step
at
code
enforcement.
Let
me
know
what
you
want
to
do
next.
E
E
E
B
E
B
E
B
E
B
B
O
O
B
O
Understand
but
being
struck
does
not
put
tho
picked
up
on
it
and
this
angle
right
here
they
instruct
us
cut
off
the
angle,
so
they
could
see
through
it
to
make
right-hand
turn
well
actually
before
it
was
the
opposite
direction.
When
the
roadway
was
so,
our
fence
was
actually
cut
out
of
angle,
which
you
guys
went
out
and
he
staked
it,
which
I
proved
that
I
was
further
out,
and
then
you
guys
had
us
cut
our
angle
and
we
were
instructed
not
but
57
opaque
up.
E
F
N
About
one
and
it's
tied
to
the
other,
he
says
we're
not
here
for
that
one
which
doesn't
make
any
sense,
because
if
you
talk
about
one,
you
have
to
talk
about
the
other
I
just
don't
understand
the
other
thing
I
didn't
understand.
Was
we
kept
getting
letters
to
mark
waiting
which
I'm,
assuming
you
are
thinking?
This
is
mark
waiting
mark
wedeck
is
dead
and
has
been
dead
for
over
five
years.
An
officer
gassed
and
knew
that
and
I
do
not
understand
why
he
would
send
mail
the
mark
with
Mark
Twain.
P
N
N
We
have
had
them
continuously
consecutively.
The
city
has
accepted
our
money
or
the
renewals
every
year
without
saying
anything.
This
is
all
news
to
me
all
of
a
sudden,
I
think
there's
a
different
wording
on
the
new
license
this
year,
which
came
unexpectedly,
I,
don't
know
why
or
how
things
just
changed
without
notifying
us,
but
it
seems
like
that's
what
happens.
I
mean
we
didn't
get
a
letter.
We
didn't
get
a
phone
call.
I've
lived
in
Tarpon
for
38
years.
F
N
F
E
E
O
O
F
F
O
F
E
E
O
E
F
B
B
B
E
Yes,
actually,
we've
established
their
business
tax
license
says
that
that
property
can
only
be
used
for
a
specific
purpose.
It's
not
being
used
for
that
purpose
and
in
order
to
use
it
for
that
purpose,
they
must
obtain
a
conditional
use
and
that's
basically
what's
before
the
board
as
far
as
5700,
something
changed
between
2003
2011
and
currently
that
again.
F
F
Not
required
by
Planning
and
Zoning
that's
case
would
simply
be
that
offense
would
simply
be
put
right
into
compliance,
and
it
would
be
done
issue
as
far
as
the
business
tax
license
the
exact
same
thing
if
they
go
through
getting
conditional
use
to
get
it
clarified,
whatever
the
case
may
be,
then
they're
in
compliance.
The
issue
is
basically
a
paperwork
issue
and
what
the
property
use
is
about,
and
that's
what's
before
the
board.
B
D
D
What
those
works-
or
this
is
not
your
dog
and
pony
show
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
There
is
a
process
that
we
have
to
follow
and
so
we're
at
that
point
in
the
process
where
you
have
the
opportunity
to
summarize
your
testimony
for
anything
else
that
you
want
to
say,
and
then
the
board
is
gonna
close
the
public
hearing
and
decide
what
they're
gonna
do
so
anything
else
that
you
wanted
to
add.
O
The
only
thing
I
can
say
is
we
were
instructed
that
we
did
not
need,
but,
though
picked
up
in
2000
when
we
had
fence,
we
had
cut
it
at
an
angle,
so
they
could
see
through.
So
we
tie
those
two
things
they
wanted
it
at
an
angle,
so
they
could
see.
That's
why
they
said
don't
put,
though
Paik,
because
it
would
block
their
view.
Anyways
I
mean
we
were
instructed
when
we
got
the
fence.
Permit
that
we
couldn't
do
that,
I
mean
they
came
out
inspected
it.
O
We
actually
had
a
four
by
eight
sheet
of
advertising
on
it
and
we
had
cut
off
two
inches
off
the
bottom
of
it
originally
because
I
guess
the
square
footage
because
of
the
angle
they
miscalculated
when
they
cut
the
angle
that
we
should
were
not
allowed,
have
two
inches
on
bond.
We
had
but
two
inches
off,
I
guess
I.
J
Moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
of
facts
presented
by
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
two
zero,
nine
point:
zero,
zero
and
city
code;
five,
seven
point:
zero:
zero,
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
enforced.
In
effect,
respondent
was
in
violation.
There.
B
K
What
I
heard
I
think
this
particular
case
is
only
concerned
with
the
storing
of
vehicles
against
the
code.
He
was
just
mentioning
something
about
offense,
which
there's
nothing
to
do
with
this.
Am
I
analyzing
this
correct?
This
is
strictly
storing
the
vehicles
in
a
place
where
the
code
says
you
can
in.
D
M
K
E
J
Move
the
response
that
the
respondent
shall
have
until
December
the
8th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
and
code
sections
45
days.
Oh
I
mean
let
me
start
again:
I
move
that
the
respondent
shall
have
until
December
the
22nd
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
city
codes
to
zero.
Nine
point:
zero,
zero
and
five
seven
point:
zero
zero
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$25
per
day.
For
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of
said
code.
Second,.
K
I
I
J
D
Was
summer,
is
it
so?
The
code
enforcement
board
has
found
you
in
violation
of
sections
two
zero,
nine
point:
zero,
zero
and
fifty
seven
point:
zero
zero.
You
have
until
December
22nd
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
it
into
compliance
within
that
time
frame?
There
will
be
a
$25
a
day.
Fine,
if
you
don't
understand
what
has
happened
today,
feel
free
to
talk
to
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting
you
will
receive
the
order
in
the
mail
it
should
be
about
ten
days
within
the
next
ten
days.
D
O
Q
Q
M
D
M
D
D
B
E
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
code
enforcement.
The
case
is
15
2,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
6,
the
property
address
is
four
zero.
Eight
three
nine
US
Highway
19
known
as
the
lake
tarpon
Church
before
the
board
right
now
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two.
All
the
notices
to
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
as
well
as
associated
emails
and
affidavit.
E
Four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
that
be
exhibit
number
four,
not
affidavit
of
work.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
both
first
class
as
well
as
return
receipt
requested.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
first
off.
E
Let
me
try
to
get
you
guys
to
understand
why
this
is
a
2015
case.
Originally,
the
case
was
started
internally
by
the
building
department,
anthony
mustachio
when
he
was
the
building
inspector
here
started.
The
case
had
gone
through
a
process
in
November
of
2015
November
18
2015
asked
the
code
enforcement
department
to
send
a
Notice
of
Violation
for
section
section
6-1
and
which
is
our
city
ordinance
that
adopts
the
Florida
Building
Code.
At
that
time
it
was
the
2015
version
of
the
Building
Code.
E
He
stated
they're
currently
going
through
the
process
of
a
conditional
use
in
attending
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
next
month,
they're,
currently
working
on
it,
September
2nd
of
2016
/
Anthony
stated
that
he
will
have
to
discuss
the
case
with
Heather
and
Planning
and
Zoning
to
obtain
information
regarding
parking,
June
26th
of
2018
of
2018
after
Anthony
left.
We
found
files
and
cases,
and
that's
where
this
one
kind
of
resurfaced
so
we're
revisiting
it.
We
realized
it
was
still
a
violation,
so
spoke
with
Heather
and
Planning
and
Zoning
was
told.
E
M
E
Year
is
kind
of
my
process.
It
just
fell
to
the
wayside.
For
the
previous
two
years
we
mailed
out
the
Notice
of
Violation
June
26th
on
July
13th
of
this
year
and
spoke
to
Planning
and
Zoning.
There
was
no
permit
or
any
visit
from
the
owner
or
representatives.
At
that
time,
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
out
in
July
certified
and
first-class.
E
Unfortunately,
the
staples
through
my
date
so
stand
by
August
1st
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
no
permits
have
been
obtained,
no
one's
come
into
the
city
to
start
the
process.
At
that
point
in
time,
I
scheduled
it
for
hearing,
we
mailed
out
a
notice
of
hearing
first
class
and
return
receipt,
and
we
started
to
have
some
conversations
with
folks,
so
we
deferred
the
case
from
September's
code
board.
E
As
far
as
the
process
that's
been
going
on
with
Planning
and
Zoning
long
and
short
of
it.
We
reason
why
we're
here
is
there
still
a
functioning
parking
lot
in
violation
of
city
code?
There's
still
not
a
permit
been
issued
for
it
there's
still
not
a
site
plan.
That's
moved
forward.
The
last
conversation
I
had
via
email
through
Beth
was
that
reira
quested.
E
They
closed
off
the
parking
lot
and
then,
at
that
point
in
time
all
of
the
paperwork,
issues
Planning
and
Zoning,
and
everything
could
be
taken
care
of,
because
technically
they're
still
profiting
from
the
illegal
parking
lot
for
three
years,
and
the
city's
position
has
secured
the
parking
lot,
so
it
can't
be
used
until
permits
are
obtained.
It's
properly
taken
care
of
that
was
not
an
option.
Apparently
so
I
went
ahead
and
brought
it
before
the
code
board
to
basically
establish
a
definitive
timeline
to
get
this
process
taken
care
of
and
bring
this
property
into
compliance.
E
So
what's
before
the
board
at
this
time
is
a
violation
of
city
code.
6-1,
again
our
codes
been
updated
and
if
you
look
at
the
current
6-1,
it's
adopting
the
2017
Florida
Building
Code
in
the
2018
IBMC.
At
this
time
it
was
the
2015
because
the
case
did
originate
in
2015,
section
105
point
1
of
the
Florida
Building
Code
hasn't
changed
over
those
three
years,
and
it
basically
requires
that
any
work
being
done
requires
a
building
permit.
We
don't
have
a
building
permit.
E
E
E
To
do
any
kind
of
work
like
that
under
the
Florida
Building
Code,
you
have
to
get
a
building
permit,
there's
some
other
things
where
they
weren't
cited.
You'd
have
to
submit
a
site
plan.
You
have
things
like
that
and
they
just
weren't
cited
for
that.
It
was
a
very
simple
get
a
building
permit,
get
a
give
it
a
permit
issued
by
the
city
that
allow
you
to
do
the
work
that
you
did
or
that.
E
E
Q
Q
We
want
to
be
here
for
a
long
time
and
we'd
rather
not
make
neat
o'clock
news,
having
people
getting
hit
on
the
streets
because
the
business
that
brought
us
the
most
businesses,
mugs
and
jugs
and
it's
a
nighttime
entertainment
spot
and
and
when
the
fact
is
we
wanted
to
have
people
safer.
But
we
can't
have
them
parking
in
our
luck
because
it
just
didn't
fit
that
kind
of
a
crowd.
So
the
church
is
kind
enough
to
allow
us.
We
had
an
agreement.
Q
Q
The
lot
was
done.
The
way
we
thought
it
would
look
proper.
Nobody
from
the
city
was
harassing
us.
We
move
forward,
and
here
we
are
in
2018,
and
this
is
just
the
truth
and
my
son
who's
now
managing
the
property
I
was
over
the
plaza
about
except
right
before
September
I
said
Justin.
The
church
lot
doesn't
look
really
nice
to
me.
Q
On
the
other
side
and
and
and
cause
risk,
so
we
move
the
ropes
and
it's
interesting
that
you
found
the
file
because
I
thought,
because
we
decided
to
spend
more
money
and
clean
it
up
and
move
the
ropes
is
what
woke
everybody
up
to
say.
Oh
my
god,
this
has
never
been
resolved,
so
we're
here
to
basically
just
ask
if
we
could
have
and
we
have
been
working
with
Heather
and
Pat
and
the
reason
it's
been
delayed
since
September
is
we've
been
waiting
for
a
couple
answers
like
what
the
surface
should
be?
Q
Is
it
okay
to
be
shale?
So
we've
been
waiting
on
some
final
answers
now
that
we
Ray
the
flag
again
to
get
this
accomplished
and
we
just
got
those
answers.
Monday.
We
actually
were
hoping
for
a
few
clarifications,
but
then
we
realized
we
better
come
here
or
else
so
we're
here
admitting
that
we
should
have
done
what
we
should
have
done
in
2015.
But
if
we
could
have
90
more
days,
we
will
get
the
permit
and
get
the
details
laid
out.
Our
understanding
is,
we
need
to
get
a
permit.
Q
We
need
to
get
the
survey
done
and
with
a
site
plan
and
then
there's
just
a
few
things
we
have
to
get
accomplished,
but
we
really
ask
you:
please
don't
stop
barking
until
that
gets
done,
because
you
know,
quite
frankly,
there
hasn't
been
an
accident
reported
in
three
years.
I
think
it'd
be
a
real
shame
if
this
committee
closed
it
for
90
days
or
whatever,
and
an
accident
appears-
and
it
all
comes
back
to
that.
Q
B
B
J
Q
We're
just
trying
not
we're
trying
to
spend
as
little
funds
as
possible.
I'm,
not
you
know,
I'm,
not
prospering.
That's
not
one
comment.
I
said
I
agreed
with
almost
everything
not
prospering
from
this
I.
We
don't
have
to
spend
the
money
to
do
this.
We
could
let
her
buy
legally
park
all
over
the
streets,
so
we're
not
prospering
from
this
I,
don't
get
paid
by
anybody
to
do
this
I'm
and
we're
spending
our
funds
quite
honestly
to
keep
the
community
safer.
Q
B
B
B
J
K
K
J
E
B
J
K
D
Q
B
R
F
E
Officer
gasps
interpret
Springs
police-
this
is
a
repeat
value
later
case
from
September
I'm.
Sorry,
yes,
September
28th
through
this
year
to
October
6th
of
this
year
for
a
total
of
nine
days,
the
property
is
currently
in
compliance.
Now,
the
case
number
for
the
board
is
18.
Eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
ninety-one
the
property
address
is
eight
zero.
Two
Francis
Drive
and
Katherine
Bowers
estate
has
the
listed
as
a
property
owner.
All
the
photographs
include
the
inspections
or
exhibit
number
one
exhibit
number
two.
E
All
my
notices,
including
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
tip
number
three
is
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails.
Affidavit
number
four
or
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
in
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
E
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
all
notice.
The
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
return.
Receipt
certified
as
well
as
first-class
and,
madam
chairman.
Please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
This
case
started:
September
28th,
the
property
was
overgrown
and
not
being
maintained
on
that
same
date,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
the
hearing
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class
on
October
9th
the
property
was
Rhian
spected,
it
was
mowed
and
it's
in
compliance
as
it
is
today.
E
I
posted
the
property
sometime
in
October,
I,
think
October,
29th,
sorry,
I,
posted
the
property
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
We
did
get
the
mail
returned
on
claim,
but
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
of
the
email.
We
have
his
email
address
since
we
communicate
frequently
now
so
he
was
made
aware
I
think
via
email
about
the
property,
so
basically
what
they
were
repeat:
violator
for
eight
40
duty
maintained,
private
property
and
eight
50,
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
which
deals
specifically
with
mowing
and
upkeep
of
your
life
and
just
for
the
board.
E
It
was
established
under
case
17,
8
0,
0,
0
788.
For
these
same
two
violations
plus
another
one.
It
was
a
previous
repeat
violator
case
18,
8,
0,
0,
0,
3
36.
Under
that
case,
there
were
no
fines
done
for
that
repeat
violator
case.
So
now
this
is
the
third
one
they
have
a
very.
They
have
a
neighbor,
that's
very
concerned
with
this
property,
because
I've
had
numerous
cases
that
resulted
in
no
violations,
but
he
has
had
now.
This
will
be
the
second
repeat,
violator
case
for
this
property.
That's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
R
It's
it's
clear
that
this
was
overgrown.
There's
no
doubt
about
that.
I
live
in
Indiana
and
I
want
to
apologize
for
having
to
appear
before
you
yet
again.
With
this
property.
I
know
the
board
showed
extreme
forbearance
in
the
last
time.
This
property
was
before
you
and
I
appreciate
that
we
are
doing
our
best
to
maintain
the
property.
I
contacted
my
lawn
care
company
today
to
request
that
they
start
mowing
the
grass
on
a
regular
basis.
I
had
not
occurred
to
me
that
justified
the
tropical
climate.
R
The
grass
would
grow
quite
this
fast,
so
it
was
very
definitely
out
of
compliance
and
there's.
There's
no
question
about
that.
I
understand
the
neighbors
concerned
about
this
property.
It
has
a
long
history
with
the
tarpon
PD.
Fortunately,
the
the
people
that
that
caused
that
history,
my
mother,
she's
deceased
and
my
nephew-
is
now
I
a
guest
of
Pasco
County
and
hopefully
will
say
that
sometime
but
I'm
doing
all
that.
R
I
can,
at
this
point,
to
maintain
the
property
as
best
I
can
from
thirteen
hundred
miles
away,
but
I
have,
as
I
said,
I
have
taken
the
steps
to
make
sure
that
the
the
grassman
maintains
at
a
reasonable
level,
so
that
this
is
not
an
issue
going
forward.
As
soon
as
we
can
get
the
issues
solve
and
having
a
state-created.
It
is
my
intention
to
liquidate
this
property
so
that
it
is
no
longer
an
issue
for
the
city
of
Tarpon.
Springs
I
just
were
having
a
great
deal
of
difficulty.
H
R
B
F
B
R
At
this
time
there
was
a
possible
complain
about
someone
having
stayed
overnight
a
few
weeks
back.
Actually
it
was
the
the
date
that
we
received
the
notice
from
code
enforcement
and
I
contacted
the
Tarpan
PD
that
day
and
asked
them
to
go
out
and
they
searched
the
property
and
found
no
evidence
of
anybody
having
broken
in.
But
there's
clear
signs
that
they'd
mentioned
a
hole
turns
out
that
hole
was
caused
by
an
air
conditioner
that
had
been
stolen
from
the
proper.
B
B
J
Moved
it
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
of
facts
presented
by
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
sections
eight
48-52,
the
tarpon
springs
codes,
the
date
of
nine
twenty-eight,
eighteen
until
the
date
of
ten
six
eighteen
and
a
fine
of
$100
a
day
for
nine
days,
find
of
nine
hundred
dollars
total.
In
addition,
I
moved
that
the
city
be
awarded
$84
for
cost
incurred.
That
prosecuting
case.
J
Made
the
based
on
testimony
evidence
of
facts
presented
by
law,
that
respondent
was
in
violation
of
section
8
48-52
tarpon
springs
code
from
the
initial
date
of
9
28
18
until
the
compliance
date
of
10
6:18
and
a
fine
of
$50
per
day
for
nine
days,
I
find
a
total
of
four
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
$84
for
the
cost
incurred
process.
B
M
K
D
Sir,
the
property
owner
has
been
found
in
violation
of
those
two
code
section
they
test
48
to
52.
For
those
nine
days,
the
board
has
established
a
fine
of
$50
a
day
times
nine
days
until
the
Ford
and
$50
plus
84
dollars
and
costs
for
prosecuting
the
case.
Just
for
your
own
information,
the
code
enforcement
board
had
the
opportunity
to
find
up
to
$500
a
day
for
each
day
of
it,
and
so
that
is
quite
lenient,
so
the
order
will
be
coming
in
the
mail
within
the
next
ten
days.
Do
you
have
any
questions?
No.
R
B
P
C
E
Case
number
is
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five.
Eighty
nine,
the
property
address
is
314
East,
Harrison
Street,
miss
Williams
is
the
property
owner.
The
case
number
for
the
repeat
violator
case
was
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
two,
seventy
four,
which
is
a
violation
of
city
code,
eight
52
and
she
was
established
under
that
case-
number
exhibit
number
one
before
the
border.
With
my
photographed
in
my
inspection,
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
E
My
notice
is
including
notice
of
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
tip
number
three
administrative
docks
to
include
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
number
Five's
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented.
This
board,
all
notices
were
mailed.
E
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
the
notice
of
violations
who
knows
hearing
or
sent
blows
certified
returners
feet
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
Madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
Exhibit
2
News
evidence
as
evidence.
The
record.
Thank
you.
So
the
case
started
August
13th
of
this
year.
E
The
only
thing
the
board
is
hearing
is
just
the
repeat
violator.
Everything
else
was
in
compliance
that
I'm
going
to
talk
about,
but
I'll
give
you
the
background.
The
lot
was
overgrown.
There
was
foreign
operative
vehicles
and
other
debris
on
the
property.
There
was
some
pepper
trees
that
need
to
be
removed
and
some
vines
and
things
like
that
they
were
over
growing
the
property
there.
H
E
Name
change
in
October,
so
a
new
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
and
a
repeat
violator
notice.
A
hearing
were
sent
out
October
9th
after
the
clarification
of
the
naming
was
done,
taken
care
of
on
October
23rd
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
The
only
thing
that
remained
on
the
property
which
isn't
in
the
photograph
was
a
little
crash
nice
on
that
since
been
removed.
E
So
that's
not
before
the
board
anymore,
on
October
29th,
I
posted
the
property,
so
on
October
23rd
it
was
in
compliance,
but
she
had
contacted
our
office
on
October
22nd
to
state
that
it
was
in
compliance.
So
that's
the
reason
why,
october
9th
october
22nd
is
our
time
frame
of
14
days
conducted
the
final
inspection
for
the
Nissan
kind
of
conducted,
a
couple
of
them
I
conducted
one
yesterday,
and
it
was
still
there
and
then
went
back
by
and
today
and
it
was
gone
so
that
put
that
that
whole
thing.
E
Finally,
in
compliance,
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
and
we
did
get
all
of
our
paperwork
that
we
sent
via
certified
mail
return
to
us
signed.
So,
as
I
stated,
the
only
thing
that's
before
the
board
is
the
850
to
repeat
violator
and
I'm,
not
moving
to
ask
the
board
for
any
to
establish
on
any
of
the
other
violations.
So
just
consider
the
8:52
violation
for
the
14
days.
It
was
out
of
compliance,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
B
P
P
A
P
E
E
P
K
K
M
A
D
Okay,
so
mrs.
Williams
I'm,
just
gonna
summarize
the
city
decided
not
to
move
forward
on
one
thirty.
Three
point:
oh
two,
one!
Thirty,
three
point:
oh
three
are
40.00.
Those
are
all
in
compliance.
The
board,
however,
did
find
you
in
violation
of
city
code,
section
eight
52,
having
been
in
violation
from
October
the
9th
through
October
the
22nd.
The
board
has
ordered
a
fine
of
$20
a
day
for
those
14
days
to
be
paid.
In
addition
to
that,
the
city
has
been
awarded
its
prosecution
costs
of
91
dollars
and
50
cents.
D
There
will
be
an
order,
will
be
entered
within
the
next
10
days
and
will
be
mailed
to
you.
I'm
sure
that,
as
a
courtesy
they'll
send
it
to
you
at
the
address
at
3:20,
Harrison
Street,
so
that
you
get
it
directly.
If
you
don't
understand
what
happened
today,
feel
free
to
call
code
enforcement
Department
tomorrow
or
any
day
thereafter
and
they'll
be
able
to
explain
to
you
what
has
happened.
Thank
you.
B
D
A
E
Here:
Thank
You
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city,
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code,
Enforcement,
KC
team,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
eight
nine,
the
property
address
is
438
Athens
Street,
the
listed
property
owners,
Irene
Coolio
newest,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
of
my
notices,
including
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
tip
number
three
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
in
any
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
E
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
pays
prazer
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
E
Case
began
on
August
30th
of
this
year.
There
was
a
large
amount
of
trash
dumped
out
front,
there's
trash
and
debris
in
the
street,
there's
chickens
and
roosters
on
the
property
and
there's
no
permits
on
file.
The
business
is
no
longer
existing.
The
building
appears
vacant
trash
and
debris
were
in
the
rear
yard.
E
The
pilot
of
debris
out
front
the
metal
pipes
on
the
side,
and
there
was
still
debris
in
the
and
trash
in
the
rear
yard,
specifically
in
the
rear
yard.
There's
like
a
there
was
like
a
little
shed
and
it
had
some
large
piece
of
a
plumbing
fixture.
I,
don't
know
if
it
was
a
bath
tub
hot
tub,
shower
enclosure
or
something,
but
that
was
stacked
up
in
the
backyard.
E
I
was
able
to
see
the
backyard
because
the
person
that
lives
two
doors
to
the
west
also
owns
the
property
to
the
north
of
this.
So
he
allowed
me
to
go
in
the
back
and
I
was
able
to
see
the
violations
from
his
property,
as
you
guys
are
well
aware,
normally
I
see
it
from
the
right
away,
but
I
was
able
to
see
a
large
number
of
things
from
the
front,
but
this
is
the
back
yard.
I
was
able
to
see.
E
The
tall
item
was
above
the
six-foot
fence,
and
I
could
clearly
see
it
so
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
today,
as
I
stated
that
plumbing
Fisher
was
still
leaning
up
against
the
shed
in
the
rear,
and
it
wasn't
in
compliance.
We
got
a
phone
call
from
the
property
owner,
somehow
contacted
code
enforcement
and
they
requested
that
we
reenactor
they
contacted
the
office
because
they
believe
they
were
in
compliance.
E
E
If
you
had
trash
service,
but
their
utilities
have
been
cut
off
and
there's
a
utility
lien
on
the
property,
so
that
debris
is
not
gonna
be
picked
up
by
waste
management
on
today,
being
a
normal
trash
day
for
the
city,
so
I
confirmed
that
through
city
utilities,
that
there
is
no
active
utility
account.
So
it
is
trash
and
debris
that
won't
be
picked
up
by
the
garbage
company.
So
what's
before,
the
board
right
now
are
violations
of
8
20,
the
accumulation
of
trash,
a
40,
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
B
J
K
I
E
J
K
I
J
B
B
J
J
B
E
I
E
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
I'll
notice,
the
violations
and
notice
the
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
and,
madam
chairman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
E
E
E
I
believe
you
guys
can
probably
see
in
the
picture
I'm,
not
necessarily
a
building
engineer
but
I'm,
pretty
confident
that
that
shed
is
leaning
in
an
angle
that
the
only
reason
it's
still
in
the
state
that
it's
in
is
I
think
there's
a
fence
under
it
on
the
east
side
of
it,
which
also
encroaches
onto
the
neighboring
yard
of
438
Athens,
which
isn't
allowed
anyway,
so
that
sheds
in
pretty
bad
shape,
and
then
there
was
some
other
items
next
to
the
shed
that
need
to
be
disposed
of
shelving
unit.
So
on
and
so
forth.
E
Again,
this
property,
the
neighbor
now
one
door
to
the
West,
had
allowed
me
in
his
property
to
the
north,
which
I
could
clearly
see
the
back
yard
because
it's
only
a
like
a
four-foot
chain-link
fence.
So
those
photographs
were
taken
from
the
neighbor's
property
with
his
consent
on
October
17th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first
class
return,
receipt,
October
29,
they
posted
the
property
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Yesterday.
E
The
only
violations
that
remain
is
the
fence
still
needs
to
be
repaired
and
the
shed
is
still
there
there's
still
some
trash
and
debris
in
the
rear
yard.
We
did
get
back
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
return
to
our
office
signed
and
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
via
phone
calls.
What's
before.
The
board
at
this
time
is
8
22
accumulation
of
trash,
8
40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
E
Part
of
that
code
also
includes
having
a
dilapidated
structure,
which
the
shed
I
think
would
fairly
qualify
as
a
dilapidated
structure
and
850
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
dealing
with
cleaning
up
debris
and
maintaining
your
lot
also
I
cited
them
under
6
1
the
2017
floor,
Building
Code
in
the
2018
version
of
the
International
property
maintenance
code.
The
international
property
maintenance
code
also
addresses
under
3.30
2
point
7
accessory
structures,
which
the
shed
would
be
considered.
It
also
kind
of
encompasses
the
fence
as
well
that
it
has
to
be
maintained
in.
E
B
J
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence
of
facts
presented
by
law
that
at
the
time,
the
alleged
violation,
sections
822,
8000,
48-52,
6-1,
36.0,
3
and
I
PMC,
three
zero,
two
point:
seven
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
once
enforce
an
effect
and
respondent
was
in
violation
thereof.
Durkin.
B
K
B
E
B
J
H
H
D
Okay,
so
this
is
a
petition
to
reconsider
re
here,
and
let
me
just
read
that
rule
to
you,
because
you
don't
do
this
that
often
so
this
is
rule
five
section.
Three
that's
been
in
existence
since
1989,
any
aggrieved
party
may
petition
the
board
to
reconsider
or
rehear
any
board
order,
resulting
from
public
hearing.
This
petition
must
be
made
in
writing
and
filed
with
the
board
secretary
no
later
than
30
days
after
the
execution
of
the
order
and
prior
to
the
filing
of
any
appeal
upon
receipt
of
the
petition.
D
The
board
will
consider
whether
or
not
to
reconsider
or
rehear
the
case.
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
a
rehear
must
be
made
it
made
by
a
board
member
who
was
previously
voted
on
the
prevailing
side.
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
rehear
a
case
must
set
the
date
and
time
for
the
rehearing
the
rehearing
may
be
held
at
the
time
of
the
consideration
of
the
petition.
D
J
B
B
B
M
D
C
D
C
E
B
C
C
E
M
M
C
B
D
E
Thank
You
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement,
KC
team,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
nine
five
property
address
four
one:
nine
one:
eight
US
Highway
19.
This
is
right
on
the
corner
of
Live
Oak
and
us
19
B,
the
south
west
corner
a
little
bit
north
of
hydrologic.
It's
a
storage
lot,
property
owners,
BK,
Allison,
dourados
trust,
exhibit
number
one
before
the
board
or
photographs
exhibit
number
two
notices,
including
notes,
violation,
notice
appearing.
L
E
Number
three
administrative
documents
to
include
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy.
The
sign
is
exhibit
number
four.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
I'll
notice,
the
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
our
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
evidence.
B
E
Started
on
August
30th
of
this
year,
the
trees
are
overgrown
over
growing
the
sidewalk
I
believe
we
got
the
complaint
from
the
city
streets
and
sidewalks
division.
There's
numerous
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property.
There
is
a
certificate
of
occupancy
issued
for
the
property
and
there's
vines
growing
into
the
trees
and
fencing
causing
damage.
August
thirtieth,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first
class
on
September
26th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
there
was
no
change.
E
We
also
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
certified
in
first
class
on
November
on
September
26th
on
October
19th
I
conducted
another
inspection.
There
was
no
change,
and
now
the
trees
have
continued
to
grow
and
completely
block
the
sidewalk
on
October
19th.
The
notice
of
your
was
mailed
certified,
as
well
as
first-class
and
I
posted
the
property
on
October
29th
November,
7th
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
and
there
was
no
change
to
the
property.
All
the
mail
was
returned,
attempted,
but
not
known,
so
we've
got
no
correspondence
from
the
owner
whatsoever.
E
So,
what's
before
the
board
for
consideration
is
violation
of
city
codes.
8-4,
do
you
duty
maintain
private
property,
8
52,
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
which
specifically
deal
with
maintaining
your
lot
in
your
grass
130
302
applicability
and
maintenance
of
trees,
vines
and
noxious
plants?
130
303
are
the
tree
exemptions
and
what
that
basically
states
is.
If
you
have
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
you
have
to
assure
that
no
Brazilian,
pepper
trees
are
on
your
property
and
then
a
22
is
the
accumulation
of
trash.
E
As
I
stated,
there
is
some
trash
strewn
about
the
property
and
on
the
right
away.
The
pictures
significantly
depicted
this
this.
The
one
picture
that
really
shows
the
overgrowth
is
live
oak
is
the
street
on
your
left.
Us
19
s
in
front
of
you,
so
this
would
be
the
north
side
of
that
property
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
sidewalks
completely
obstructed,
and
it
does
continue
all
the
way
through
to
us.
19.
B
J
On
the
testimony
evidence
of
facts
presented
by
law
that
at
the
time,
the
alleged
violation,
sections
a
22,
8,
4,
0,
8
52
133
point
zero.
Two
one
three
three
point:
zero
three
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
enforcement
effect.
The
respondent
was
in
violation
there
turkin.
K
M
Q
E
As
I
stated,
we
started
this
back
in
August,
so
I
would
say
30
days
and
$100
a
day
to
motivate
them.
We've
had
no
priors,
we
have
had
a
couple
of
priors,
but
they
were
unrelated
to
this.
So
I
would
still
stick
with
the
30
days
and
$100
a
day
or
can't
I
want
to
get
that
sidewalk
cleared
off
as
soon
as
possible.
B
J
That
the
respondents
you
have
until
December
the
8th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
section
codes,
8,
22,
8,
48-52,
one
three,
three
point:
zero:
two
and
one
three
three
point:
zero
three
of
the
city
codes
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$100
a
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of.
K
A
B
B
E
You
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
701.
As
you
stated,
the
vacant
lot,
west
757
Bayshore
the
parcel
identifiers,
11
27,
1504,
eight,
seven,
eight,
zero,
zero,
two
zero
130
properties
owned
by
Patty
LLC,
exhibit
number
one
before
the
board
or
photographs
exhibit
number
two
notices:
a
violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
E
All
of
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
all
notice.
The
violations
are
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class.
Madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
E
August
30th
of
this
year,
I
got
numerous
complaints
about
Bayshore,
Bayshore,
Drive
being
overgrown.
There's
a
number
of
different
parcels
on
there.
The
first
photograph
go
before
the
board.
Just
kind
of
shows
you,
where
the
parcel
is
it's
a
parcel
measurement
wise.
They
came
up
using
the
largest
side,
which
was
99
feet
by
a
hundred,
puts
it
at
99
square
feet
or
99
thousand
ninety
nine
hundred
square
feet,
which,
according
to
our
city
code,
requires
that
the
lot
be
completely
cleared
maintained
that
way
it's
vacant
and
it's
overgrown.
E
As
you
can
see
in
the
photographs,
August
31st
I
mailed,
a
Notice
of
Violation
certified
in
first-class
September
26
conducted
a
reinfection
and
there
was
no
change.
We
gave
him
some
more
time
sent
out
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
on
September
28
irie
inspected
on
October
18th
still
not
been
maintained,
as
required
on
October
19th.
The
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first-class
on
September
October,
29th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
for
posting,
conducted
our
inspection.
Yesterday
there
was
no
change.
We
had
none
of
the
mail
returned.
E
We
have
had
phone
calls
in
the
office
from
mr.
Pollard
II
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
think
it
was
yesterday
or
the
day
before
he
stated
that
he
had
been
red-tagged
on
October
6th.
He
was
red
tagged
while
cutting
the
property,
and
that's
why
it's
on
compliance.
We
asked
him
to
provide
who
red
tagged
him,
which
would
have
been
basically
a
stop-work
order.
He
never
produced
any
of
that
information.
I
E
H
J
K
B
K
E
M
J
K
K
K
E
Thank
you,
18
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
206,
224,
tarpon
Avenue,
it's
Johnny's
restaurant
for
those
who
Miller
with
it
Lindy
ACOs
properties,
incorporated,
exhibit
number
one.
Her
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
My
notices,
notice,
violation,
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
emails,
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
is
exhibit
number
four.
E
All
the
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
mail
as
well
as
return
receipt
requested.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evident.
E
L
E
Out
a
Notice
of
Violation
on
September
4th
irie
inspected
on
October
31st,
and
it
was
postponed
from
October
10th
for
planning
and
zoning
because
they
did
come
in
and
start
the
process
of
dealing
with
Planning
and
Zoning
regarding
getting
permits.
What
they're
allowed,
what
they're
not
allowed
so
on
and
so
forth.
E
October
23rd,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
on
October
29th
I
posted
the
property
I
conduct
an
inspection
yesterday,
actually
I
was
working,
another
detail
and,
as
I
was
driving
home
on
the
6:00,
the
Eddas
Taco
Tuesday
signing
out.
So
that's
kind
of
the
little
blurry
cell
phone
picture.
That's
at
the
end,
which
I
confiscated
one
of
his
previous
flag
signs,
which
is
in
the
office
that
was
out.
He
was
specifically
told
not
to
post
it.
E
E
He
finished
the
application
process
today,
so
he
basically
just
needs
some
time
to
try
to
get
in
compliance
at
this
point
in
time,
he's
still
in
violation
of
the
city
codes,
which
is
city
code,
170
9.00,
which
is
requiring
permits
for
your
signs
city
code
181,
zero,
zero,
which
are
signed
specifically
prohibited
things
like
banners,
things
like
the
feather
signs,
they're
specifically
prohibited
in
our
city
code.
So
that's
that
violation
and
there's
certain
signs
that
need
to
be
removed.
E
Those
are
the
banners
which
is
city
code,
180,
4.00,
and
also
that
additional
little
structure
he
put
that
was
put
up
out
front
advertising
his
business.
So
those
are
the
three
violations
before
the
board
at
this
time,
as
I
stated
he's
not
in
compliance,
and
he
is
in
the
process
of
working
on
it
through
the
city
and
I
have
nothing
further
ma'am
or.
E
He
is
the
tenant,
it
is
his
business
and
he
was
also
mailed.
We
mail
the
notices
of
violations
and
everything
to
the
property
owner,
and
we
also,
if
we
know,
there's
a
tendency
we
will
send
to
the
tenants
as
well.
It's
his
business
he's
the
one
there
his
signs,
but
ultimately,
yes,
it
is
the
property
owner
that
is
subject
to
any
sanctions.
If
you
will.
B
B
J
To
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
effects
presented
by
law
that
at
the
time,
the
alleged
violation
sections
one,
seven,
nine
point:
zero
one
section,
one,
eight
one
point:
zero
zero
one,
eight
four
point:
zero
zero,
but
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
was
enforcing
effect.
Respondent
was
in
violation
thereof,.
K
K
B
E
B
J
Move
that
the
respondents
shall
have
until
January
the
7th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
section
codes.
One
seven,
nine
point:
zero
one
one.
Eighty
one
point:
zero
zero
one,
eighty
four
point:
zero
zero
or
so
for
a
fine
of
$100
per
day.
For
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of
that
code.
J
B
E
Number
eighteen:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero
722
423
s,
Harrison
Street,
Alisha
Miller,
exhibit
number
one
photograph
in
spec
shown.
Photographs
exhibit
number
two
before
the
board
or
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
administrative
dock
property.
Appraiser
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
by
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector.
All
notice
of
violations
and
nose
are
hearing
or
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
man.
E
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence
manager,
September
6th
of
this
year
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
The
complaint
was
regarding
a
vehicle,
that's
an
operative
or
at
expired
tags.
When
I
conducted
the
inspection.
There's
a
black
Ford
in
the
driveway
Florida
tag,
Henry
Frank,
Henry,
David,
nine
one.
The
tags
expired
in
2017.
At
that
time,
week
sent
a
courtesy
letter,
mailed
first
class
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
September
22nd,
the
vehicles
still
there
on
September
24th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
and
on
October
10th
conducted
another
inspection.
The
vehicle.
E
Still,
there
still
had
expired
tags
notice.
A
hearing
was
sent
on
October
11th
I
posted
the
property
on
October
29th
on
November
7th.
The
property
was
still
there.
She
had
some
debris
in
there
yard,
which
has
since
been
taken
care
of.
So
that's
no
longer
for
consideration.
That's
had
conversations
with
the
property
owner
and
she
was
here
earlier
and
she's
waiting
on
somebody
to
pick
the
car
up
and
she
was
hoping
it
would
have
been
done
by
now,
but
she
again
just
needed
a
little
bit
of
time.
E
So
as
of
right
now,
the
only
thing
that's
before
the
board
I'd
like
them
to
consider
is
the
4900,
which
is
the
parking
storage
of
abandoned
vehicles,
because
the
Ford
is
still
there.
8:40
and
852
I'd
like
to
not
have
considered
by
this
board,
because
they
do
appear
to
be
in
compliance
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
B
J
I
K
B
J
M
K
E
Thank
you
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three.
Seventy
fourteen
fifty
and
oleander
drive.
As
you
stated,
Helen
Panetta's
estate,
the
the
property
changed
some
ownership.
Previously.
It
was
also
related
some
other
cases
that
we've
had
exhibit
number
one
before
the
border.
The
photographs
of
my
inspection,
my
initial
inspection,
my
notices
are
sent.
Are
my
notices
or
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three
is
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
my
notices
are
mailed.
E
E
September
11th
of
this
year
was
my
initial
inspection.
It
was
called
in
by
a
neighbor
complained,
the
property's
not
being
maintained,
there's
a
fence
along
the
west
side
and
the
fence
is
installed
backwards.
City
code
requires
so
I
called
the
ugly
side,
but
it's
the
stringers.
The
stringers
are
required
to
be
facing
inward
towards
your
property,
not
towards
your
neighbor's
property.
Also,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photographs,
the
the
fence
is
having
some
issues
with
fallen
over,
there's
vines
growing
on
it
which
are
actually
causing
it.
E
Some
additional
issues,
the
pools
not
being
maintained,
the
filters
not
functioning,
and
the
reason
why
I
know
that
is
I
did
make
contact
with
the
tent
the
tenant,
and
she
did
allow
me
into
the
property
and
all
these
photographs
were
taken
after
she.
Let
me
into
the
property:
it's
not.
As
I
stated,
it's.
E
The
filter
is
not
functioning,
the
cover
of
the
pool
is
holding
water
and
it's
not
providing
any
necessary
safety
or
security.
There's
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
west
side
of
the
driveway
and
the
screen
was
broken
on
one
of
the
windows
on
the
east
side
of
the
house
on
September
14th
may
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
return
receipt
as
well
as
certified
on
October
23rd
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Admittedly,
I
have
been
able
to
get
ahold
of
the
tenant
again
to
get
in
the
back
yard.
E
So
I
really
can't
tell
you
if
anything
has
changed,
but
I
also
have
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
wanting
to
meet
me
there
and
let
me
into
the
backyard
so
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge.
Everything
that
was
occurring
in
the
backyard
is
still
in
violation
and
so
on.
October
23rd
I
conducted
the
rien
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
opted
to
send
it
to
code
board.
So
October
23rd,
the
notice
of
hearing,
was
mailed
October
29th
I
posted
the
property
on
an
October
I'm.
E
The
Brazilian
pepper
tree
had
been
trimmed,
but
it
was
still
there
and
the
code
requires
that
it's
removed
and
it's
not
allowed
to
regrow
ever
and
then,
as
I,
probably
skipped
over.
In
the
very
beginning,
there
was
a
Ford
in
the
driveway
with
expired
tags.
To
add
to
this
that
Ford,
with
expired
tags,
still
remained
in
the
driveway
on
November
7th,
and
we
confirmed
the
tags
through
DHS
M
V
being
expired
for
that
vehicle.
E
So
we
had
a
Notice
of
Violation
returned
to
us
attempted,
but
not
known,
which
basically
means
they
tried
to
serve
it,
but
they
had
no
zero
success
and
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
whatsoever
or
anybody
representing
the
estate
or
whatnot.
There
must
be
somebody
because
she
rents
it.
She
says
that
she's
as
a
landlord
she's
not
related
to
the
property
owner.
She
moved
in
a
little
while
back
because
I
had
a
previous
case.
There
and
I
had
talked
to
a
family
member
of
Helen
Panetta.
E
So
so,
what's
before
the
board,
at
this
time,
8
40
Judy
maintained
private
property,
8
52,
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
maintaining
your
yard
so
on
and
so
forth.
6
one
of
the
city
code,
which
adopts
the
2018
IPM
C
in
the
2017
building
code
under
IPM,
C,
3.30
3.1,
is
swimming
pools
and
spas,
etc
have
to
be
maintained
in
a
hygienic
condition.
Basically,
the
filters
have
to
work
and
you
gotta.
E
You
have
to
be
able
to
see
to
the
bottom
of
the
pool,
IPM,
C,
3
or
4
point
1
4
requires
that
during
certain
times
of
the
year,
we're
past
it
now,
but
at
the
time
of
the
violation
between
May
and
October.
If
you
have
a
functioning
window,
you're
required
to
have
function,
experience
on
the
window
according
to
IPM
C,
which
the
city
code
adopted
at
that
time
they
did
not
I
guess
technically.
E
We
could
say
that
since
we're
after
October
1st
they're
not
in,
they
would
be
in
compliance
because
they're
not
required
to
have
functioning
screens
now
the
tree
exemptions.
One
3303
requires
that
anybody
was
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
has
no
resilient
pepper
trees
on
their
property.
130
303
deals
with
the
vines
as
I
discussed
when
they
start
causing
damage
to
fences
and
associated
properties,
they're
becoming
an
issue
36.0
3
fences,
walls
and
hedges.
J
The
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
by
law
at
at
the
time
the
alleged
violation,
sections
eight
dash
48-52
6-1
ipm
c30
3.1,
IPM,
c30
4.1
for
city
code,
133,
point
zero,
two
one.
Thirty
three
point:
zero:
three:
thirty
six
point:
zero,
three
and
forty
point:
zero
at
zero,
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
enforce.
In
effect,
respondent
was
in
violation.
There.
K
E
J
That
the
respondent
shall
have
until
December
the
8th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
Code
sections,
8
48-52
6-1
by
PMC
three
zero,
three
point:
one
by
PMC:
three,
zero:
four
point:
one
for
city
code,
133,
point:
zero;
two
one!
Thirty,
three
point:
zero:
three:
thirty
six
point:
zero:
three:
four:
zero
point:
zero:
zero
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$100
a
day
for
each
day;
thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
to.
J
E
Case
summary
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
are
exhibit
number
three
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
the
notices
are
mailed
the
property
owner
record
based
on
Pinellas,
County,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
via
certified,
as
well
as
first
class
mail.
H
B
E
October
18th
is
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection.
I
was
inspecting
with
the
city
problem
with
the
stormwater.
It
was
actually
related
to
her
property,
but
over
on
the
Chesapeake
side
of
the
property.
While
I
was
speaking
to
Tina
in
the
street,
approximately
eight
ducks
and
four
chickens
came
trotting.
E
Property
walking
across
the
road
into
her
property
I
asked
her
if
she
had
a
permit
or
anything
like
that,
she
denied
ducks
are
not
permitted
to
be
kept
in
the
city
at
all
and
chickens.
You
can
have
for
as
long
as
you
have
a
permit
and
you
have
a
coop.
These
are
roaming
freely
and
she
would
kind
of
became
a
little
bit
uncooperative
so
on
October
23rd,
I
mailed,
her
a
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
on
October
29th
I
posted
the
property
I
conducted
the
inspection.
E
Yesterday,
the
I
put
her
in
compliance
because
I
did
not
see
the
chickens
or
the
ducks,
but
there
is
a
fenced-in
area
that
I
can't
see
through
she
does
have
coops
in
there.
She
was
in
her
earlier
and
stated
that
she
got
a
permit
for
the
coops,
but
I
didn't
cite
her
for
that,
so
it
was
strictly
what
I
cited
her
for
is
city
code.
E
4-3
doesn't
allow
you
to
have
far
man
when
you
have
residential
property
in
the
city
and
as
I
stated
earlier,
you
can
have
four
chickens,
no
roosters,
but
you
have
to
have
a
coop
in
a
city.
Permit
and
you
cannot
have
ducks
so
the
best
thing
I
can
say
at
this
point
in
time
is
she's
in
compliance,
because
I
did
not
see
the
doctor
the
chickens,
but
I
would
like
to
establish
her
because
in
case
the
ducks
and
chickens
show
back
up,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
B
J
M
K
K
K
B
E
You,
as
you
stated
repeat
violator
case
from
October
10th,
dr.
October
14th,
for
a
total
of
5
days.
The
previous
repeat,
violator
case
that
established
it
was
18
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
6,
2
3,
specifically
for
violation
of
city
code
4200.
At
that
point
in
time,
this
board
assessed
the
$50
per
day.
Fine,
for
that
violation
case.
Before
the
board
now
is
18
8
0,
0,
0,
0,
8
26,
the
property
address
is
316,
Bay,
Street,
Donna,
fat
ëletÃs
is
the
listed
owner,
exhibit
number
1
or
my
photographs
exhibit
number
2.
E
The
notice
of
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
3
or
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
5
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
my
notice.
For
me
all.
My
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings.
Our
senate
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
E
The
initial
inspection
was
on
october,
10th
I
was
actually
conducting
expect.
An
inspection
on
the
neighboring
property
and
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
boat
on
a
trailer
parked
in
the
right
away
out
front
he'd
been
previously
cited
for
the
same
violation
a
couple
of
times
and
on
October
11th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed,
an
October
29th
I
posted
the
property.
He'd
contacted
our
office
in
the
meantime,
and
I
put
him
in
compliance
on
October
14th.
E
J
J
B
F
J
J
D
J
B
E
You,
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
It
was
for
a
period
of
one
day.
The
case
that
it
was
established
under
was
17
8
0,
0,
0
0
4,
6
8.
It
was
a
repeat
violator,
another
time
and
under
18
8
0,
0,
0,
4
24
or
this
year
and
the
case
before
the
board
is
18.
8,
0,
0,
0,
0
835.
It's
a
vacant
lot
on
Cedar
Street,
Stanley
and
Demetrios
cavora
SAR,
the
property
owners
listed
just
for
the
board.
E
There's
been
numerous
briars
on
this
property,
all
the
way
back
to
2000,
but
within
the
last
five
years,
for
this
violation
easily
about
six
or
seven.
In
the
last
five
years,
I've
already
had
two
this
year,
one
last
year,
all
the
photographs
going
before
the
border.
My
inspections
is,
there
are
exhibit
number
one
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
seven
number
three
administrative
docks
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
emails
exhibit
number
four.
E
The
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
tip
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
man.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
E
As
I
stated
on
October
16th,
the
property
was
overgrown
baths
in
possession
of
his
email
address,
so
contacted
him,
and
he
was
able
to
rather
quickly
get
somebody
down
here
to
take
care
of
a
property.
He
was
previously
as
I
stated
established
by
the
board
in
2017.
The
last
case
that
was
before
this
board
I
don't
have
the
period
of
time,
but
he
was
fined
one
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
a
day,
and
that
was
earlier
this
year
for
the
same
violations.
E
So
moving
forward
on
October
16th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
the
hearing
was
mailed
first
class
and
return
receipt,
October
29th,
we
posted
the
property
and,
as
a
stated,
we
had
had
email
contact
with
the
owner.
None
of
the
mail
had
yet
been
returned,
so
for
that
one
day
the
property
was
in
violation
of
840
and
852,
and
that's
all
I
have.
B
J
K
E
You,
as
you
stated,
this
repeat,
violator
from
October
18th
to
October
28th
for
a
total
of
11
days.
The
case
that
established
this
property
was
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
401
for
violation
they
48-52,
which
are
the
same
codes
that
are
before
this
board.
This
is
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
forty
four
as
a
property
address
of
three
venetian
court.
E
Although
it's
a
vacant
lot
right
at
the
corner
of
Venetian
and
North
Spring
across
the
street,
from
the
Yacht
Club
property
owners,
mica
has
Mehra's
and
Kazmir
exhibit
number
one
or
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost?
All
the
notices
are
mailed.
E
C
E
Please
accept
these
into
the
record,
as
evidence
received.
A
neighbor
complained
on
October
18th
about
the
property
being
overgrown
and
trees
not
being
maintained
as
required.
The
trees
are
not
providing
14
feet
of
clearance
above
the
roadway
and
they're,
also
not
providing
ten
feet
of
clearance
above
the
sidewalk.
As
the
city
code
requires
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
on
October
19th
first-class
as
well
as
return
receipt,
October,
29th,
I've
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting,
the
repeat
violator
notice.
E
B
J
That,
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
facts
presented
by
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation,
sections
8-14,
8
52
of
this
tarpon
spring
city
code
from
10
18
2018
until
10
28
2018,
a
fine
of
$50
a
day
for
11
days,
their
total
fine
of
five
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
In
addition,
I
moved
that
the
city
be
awarded
$84
for
the
cost
incurred
in
prosecuting.
B
M
B
K
D
B
K
B
B
B
K
B
K
B
B
J
I
D
K
Yeah
I
can
do
those.
Thank
you,
I
move.
We
accept
the
affidavits
of
compliance
in
case
number,
one
four:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one;
six
six
and
in
case
one
eight,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
three
three
five
and
in
case
number,
one:
eight,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
five,
two
seven
and
in
case
number,
one:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three.
K
J
K
B
I
K
D
D
E
So
that's
the
reason
why
those
are
on
here.
We
just
started
doing
that
this
month.
You
guys
don't
like
it.
We
can
take
it
off
otherwise
they're
trying
to
give
you
more
nation.
The
other
thing
I
briefly
want
to
talk
to
you
guys
about,
as
I
finally
got
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
do
my
first
real
abatement.
Where
we
cleared
a
lot,
we
got
rid
of
the
mobile
home.
If
you
guys
remember
7:30
driftwood,
which
is
now
a
closed
case,
so
I
think
I
can
talk
about
it.
E
E
Think
most
of
the
whole
mobile
home
park
were
out
thanking
us
for
doing
it
so,
and
that's
largely
because
that
case
went
through
this
board,
so
I
appreciate
that
that's
all
I
have
tim
river
village
mobile
home
park,
river
village,
mobile
home
parks
live
oak.
You
know
where
the
trail
goes:
east
and
west
dist,
then
east
of
his
wife.
It's
that
little
mobile
home
that
borders
right
up
on
the
river
so
and
that
one
was
a.
It
was
significant.