![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2LNucrsQPnY/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board January 9, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
C
Blessings
on
the
taps
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom
or
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy.
In
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
we
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matters
that
is
placed
before
us
and
always
act
in
accordance
with
what
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
of
Turpan
Springs.
This
we
pray.
A
I'm
gonna
explain
the
procedures
of
the
way
the
meeting
works.
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
to
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
an
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida,
Statute,
280,
6.0
105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal
and
here's
the
procedure
of
the
board.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
violator
is
asked
able
to
ask
questions
in
any
specific
questions
regarding
the
testimony.
Secondly,
the
violator,
the
alleged
violator,
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
A
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
statement
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taking.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
and
take
a
full
reaction.
Before
we
begin,
public
hearings
will
have
all
potential
witnesses,
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
B
B
E
A
A
A
A
D
You
officer
Steve
Goss
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police,
Department
code
enforcement.
The
case
before
the
board
is
case:
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
zero,
six,
the
address
of
713
dodecanese
boulevard.
You
covered
the
ownership
of
it.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case
that
is
currently
in
compliance.
It
stems
from
two
prior
reviewed
by
our
two
prior
cases.
Those
case
numbers
are
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five,
three
for
the
same
city,
ordinances,
appendix
b,
chapter
six
that
case
was
established.
There
was
no
fines
associated
with
that
case.
D
The
second
case
is
a
nineteen,
I'm
sorry,
a
2018
case:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
three,
nine
six
same
city
ordinances,
outdoor
display.
At
that
time
they
were
fined
ten
dollars
per
day
that
fine
has
been
paid,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board.
All
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
All
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
previous
board:
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
D
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
the
after
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
was
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sample
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
D
You
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
and
the
tenant.
My
case
started
originally
on
November
8th
of
this
year,
I
was
working
an
off
duty
detail
down
on
the
Sponge
Docks
I
happen
to
notice
at
7:13
Dodecanese,
which
is
on
the
south
side
at
Dodecanese.
It's
a
retail
establishment
that
they
had
numerous
items
hanging
from
their
doors.
D
They
had
racks
with
displays
greater
than
36
inches
in
height
and
there
was
less
than
24
inches,
but
the
codes
actually
18
inches
of
clear
space
on
the
interior
of
the
doors,
which
is
a
violation
of
the
smart
code,
appendix
B
chapter
6
for
outdoor
displays
at
that
time,
on
November
12th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
their
hearing
was
mailed.
The
Korean
card
was
returned,
signed
by
the
property
owner
on
November
22nd
and
conducted
a
reinfection
at
the
request
of
the
tenants,
and
they
were
still
not
in
compliance.
D
They
were
still
displays
blocking
the
door
and
there
were
racks
above
3
feet
conducted
another
inspection
on
December,
2nd
and
it's
still
not
in
compliance
and
I
added
photos.
From
that
case
as
well,
we
had
conversation
with
them
in
the
office,
so
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
December
3rd,
which
is
where
they
were
in
compliance.
D
Originally,
this
case
was
supposed
to
go
last
month,
but
it
was
deferred
at
their
request,
so
we're
here
now:
I
posted
the
property
on
December,
22nd
27th
and
the
interesting
thing
is:
we
showed
them
out
of
compliance
from
November
8th
to
December
3rd,
the
thing
that
you
have
to
consider
as
they
close
every
night.
So
in
reality
it's
kind
of
like
everything's
taken
inside
and
the
business
is
closed.
So
on
the
occasions
that
I've
gone
by
during
the
day,
it's
been
a
violation
again.
So
it's
it's!
It's
an
interesting
scenario.
D
I
saw
it
three
times
out
of
violation
during
that
period,
so
I
just
want
the
board
to
be
aware
that
there
are
three
specific
dates
that
I
saw
it
out
of
compliance
in
that
time
period.
I
don't
work
at
night,
so
I
don't
see
it
at
night.
I
just
know
that
there's
no
business
as
open
at
11
o'clock
at
night.
So
just
for
the
board's
consideration.
D
There
are
three
days
where
I
saw
it
out
of
compliance,
and
you
can
see
that
in
the
photographs
and
then
I
put
it
in
compliance
on
the
third,
but
there
was
a
period
of
time
from
when
I
first
saw
it
in
November,
8th
and
when
we
were
when
I
finally
saw
it
during
daytime
hours
was
on
December
3rd
of
last
year.
So
I
just
want
you
guys
to
be
aware
of
that.
So
you
can
understand
it's
a
unique
situation
with
the
businesses
down
on
the
docks.
So
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point
in
time.
D
D
G
G
E
D
G
D
G
D
You
serious
Pacific
violation
text
in
the
letter
that
was
sent
that
stated
violation
text
under
appendix
B
Chapter
six
outdoor
D.
It
says
outdoor
display
violations
items
hung
from
doors
less
than
24
inches
from
clearance
from
the
doors
racks
with
displays
greater
than
36
inches
in
height.
That
was
the
actual
violation
cited.
D
C
D
All
right
so
I
can
answer
that
we
certain
codes.
We
have
to
adopt
other
things.
So
what
we
do
is
we
are
just
informing
the
violator
that,
in
order
for
me
to
use
the
smart
code,
there
was
an
ordinance
enacted
by
the
city
that
says:
hey
we're
gonna,
adopt
a
smart
code,
so
appendix
B
smart
code
adopted
it's,
it's
not
a
violation
per
se.
It's
more
procedural!
Just
saying
this
is
the
authority
I'm
using
to
site
under
appendix
B
chapter
six
of
the
smart
code?
Alright,.
G
Thank
you.
So
is
it
fair
to
say
then
you've,
given
the
alleged
violator,
the
actual
wording
of
our
and
only
part
of
the
alleged
violation,
the
part
referencing,
the
smart
code
does
not
give
the
specific
violation
just
a
generic
reference
to
Appendix
B
smart
code
adopted
without
telling
them
what
the
actual
violation
is,
because.
D
Of
the
adoption
of
the
smart
code
is
just
saying
on
the
previous
violation
that
I
have
the
violation
text.
Those
are
the
specifics
that
are
in
that
chapter
that
they
violated,
having
displays
over
36
inches
blocking
the
doorways
and
hanging
items
from
the
door.
That's
specifically
defined
in
the
smart
code,
chapter
6
opinion
all.
G
A
A
G
H
Is
Gloria
cuts
agai
on
the
businesses
in
the
two
stores?
That's
in
violation
here
and
I
appreciate
your
listening
to
me
because
at
one
time
I
was
out,
I
broke,
my
kneecap
and
some
of
the
stores
were
putting
out
things
when
I
wasn't
there
and
the
officer
brought
it
to
my
attention
and
we
went
into,
but
we
thought
we
went
into
code
the
very
next
day.
H
We
actually,
then
got
another
notice
saying
we
weren't
in
so
we
went
down
to
this
code
office
and
spoke
to
the
lady.
That
was
there
I
believe
she's
here,
and
she
explained
it
was
about
the
inside
of
the
store
which
we
didn't
know
we
last
time
there
was
any
questions,
the
racks
that
were
in
violation
this
time
were
in
the
same
place.
They
were
then
and
that
nobody
said
anything
about
them.
So
we
want
to
wear
that.
That
was
the
violation
that
they
were
talking
about.
The
inside
of
the
story
and
and
I
agree.
H
There
may
better
right
they've
been
about
an
inch
too
high,
we
sawed
it
off
and
made
it
be
in
compliance,
and
so
we
really
attempted
the
very
next
day
we
got
the
notice
to
be
in
compliance.
We
were
just
in
confusion
and
we
all
went
down
to
the
office
and
then
the
lady
tried
to
explain
about
this
code
that
he's
speaking
about
which
we
didn't
know
anything
about
that.
You
couldn't
have
this
rack
inside
the
store
where
it
was,
and
then
we
got
in
compliance
because
we
move
that
and
I
don't
know.
H
G
Disagree
I
believe
I'm
gonna
cite
the
board
some
legal
authorization
for
the
fact
that
if
there
is
selective
enforcement
of
this
ordinance,
you're
entitled
to
consider
that
some
people
on
the
Sponge
Docks,
for
example,
our
in
fact,
in
violation
of
the
same
code
and
have
not
been
cited,
and
we
think
that's
unfair
and
I-
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
We
have
pictures
which
my
client
can
bring
into
evidence
at
this
time
if
I
couldn't
thank.
A
I
C
Right
hold
on
a
second
hold
on
a
second
okay.
We
need
to
bring
it
back
to
what
we're
talking
about
here.
Today,
they've
made
a
statement.
There
was
an
objection
you
need
to
rule
on
the
objection.
He
objected
that
they're
talking
about
something-
that's
not
relevant
to
this
case.
If
you're,
sustaining
objection,
we're
gonna,
stop
any
further
testimony
objection.
G
G
G
G
No
I
have
a
little.
Did
you
give
them?
No?
Okay,
okay!
Yeah.
Could
you
give
this
to
mr.
Trask?
Please
the
record
is
Florida
d-o-t
versus
et
leg
and
company
a
case
from
the
fourth
District
1984
and
I
highlighted
this
one
section
for
the
board
to
look
at.
We
hold
that
were
whether
there
was
selective
enforcement
was
a
question
of
fact
to
be
determined
by
the
Trier
of
fact.
G
It's
our
position
that
we've
got
photographs
of
many
other
stores
of
the
sponge
dogs
that
have
been
operating
the
exact
same
way
and
the
officer
testified.
There's
nothing
pending
at
this
time
against
anybody
else
and
I
think
that
that
is
selective
enforcement.
It
bothers
me
that
some
people
are
being
treated
unfairly.
G
Police,
obviously
do
a
fine
job
and
I
have
no
problem
with
the
fact
that
he's
there
is
a
violation,
but
I
do
have
a
problem
with
the
fact
that
other
people
are
in
violation
and
they're
not
being
cited,
and
my
client
can
testify
both
of
them
they're
both
here
that
they've
seen
these
same
violations
for
months
or
years
without
a
citation
being
issued.
So
it's
our
position,
then
we
are
entitled
by
law
to
show
you.
This
is
in
fact
selective
enforcement.
C
D
Looking
in
this
case,
it
regards
City
versus
Lake
Wales,
it
deals
with
advertising,
which
is
a
well-known
fact
that
on-site
and
off-site
signs
became
a
Supreme
Court
issue.
We're
not
talking
about
signage,
we're
talking
about
the
smart
code
that
was
adopted
by
the
city
code
also
after
your
case,
there's
a
nother
outdoor
display
case
at
793
Dodecanese.
So
that
would
not
be
just
your
client.
That
is
a
second
business.
I
have
cited
upwards
of
about
eight
businesses
down
on
the
spongy
docks
for
the
same
violations.
D
D
Problem
and
I
would
object
to
those
because
they're
not
relevant,
because
we
dealt
with
the
case
on
November
8th
as
the
time
this
also
the
the
the
case
law
that
was
presented
as
I
stated
dealt
with
signs.
It's
not
I
would
object
that
it's
not
the
same
situation.
I
would
also
offer
most
of
this
code
boards
been
here
when
I
did
other
cases
of
outdoor
displays
on
the
Sponge
Docks,
so
I
think
that
kind
of
negates
the
selective
enforcement
argument.
As
far
as
that
goes,
this
particular
violator
is
a
repeat
violator.
D
So
that's
why
we're
here?
This
is
now
the
third
time
with
this,
with
this
violator.
So
again,
I
would
present
to
the
board
that
this
isn't
the
first
time
she's
been
here.
This
is
not
the
first
time.
I
present
an
outdoor
display
case,
and
this
case,
presented
by
counsel,
is
revolving
around
signage,
and
this
is
not
the
same
in
that
regards,
and
there
is
a
Supreme
Court
case
regarding
that
that,
where
most
of
us
are
well
aware
of
with.
G
C
So
we're
gonna
bring
it
back
then.
So
we're
still
talking
about
the
objection.
They're
talking
about
matters
that
the
city
believes
is
irrelevant.
They've
objected.
You
sustained
the
objection.
The
question
is:
is
after
this
additional
information,
are
you
still
sustaining
the
ejection?
Are
you
going
to
overrule
the
objection.
G
C
A
E
C
H
H
D
H
H
H
D
G
Mrs.
Kratz
ik
the
city's
documentation,
looking
at
exhibit
number
to
the
violation
text
outdoor
display
violations.
Your
where
that
right
items
hung
from
the
doors
I
knew
about
that
less
than
24
inches
of
clearance
from
the
doors
you
knew
about
that
we
racks
with
display
is
greater
than
36
inches
in
height,
nothing
in
there
about
18
inches
from
the
doors
correct,
and
you
took
care
of
all
these
problems
right
away.
The
next
day
the
want
the
four
that
are
listed
here.
Yes,.
C
C
G
B
J
Name
is
Joyce
Pappas
I
own
50%
of
the
building
that
Myrna
and
Gloria
REM
from
me.
The
very
first
shot
that
the
inspector
put
up
was
from
the
verse
first
violation
because
they
sent
it
to
me
and
then
it
was
confusing,
because
that
was
from
the
very
first
violation.
They
had
taken
everything
down
off
the
doors
and
then
they
said
no.
It
was
inside.
J
By
the
ordinance
that
they
had
it
didn't
mention
about
the
inside
and
then
later
I
talked
to
Beth
and
says:
oh
I
sent
you
the
wrong
picture.
Okay,
because
I
went
down
there
and
I
tried
to
solve
this
problem,
and
then
they
said
no.
That
was
the
wrong
picture,
that
it
was
a
violation
inside
the
building,
the
doorway.
D
D
Is
November
22nd,
so
the
original
violation
was
on
the
8th
came
back
out
on
the
22nd
took
this
photograph
showing
there
was
still
a
violation
occurring
and
as
I
the
reason
for
my
question
to
Gloria
was
we
had
met.
We
measured
this
pretty
yardstick
up.
We
actually
put
the
tape
up
to
show
where
these
were
so.
D
D
The
treatment
that
they're
alleging
discriminatory
in
some
way
shape
or
form
these
right
here.
This
is
just
our
system,
765
Dodecanese.
Let
me
make
this
see
if
I
can
make
it
fullscreen
or
at
least
show
you
a
p6
is
our
internal
code
for
appendix
6
of
a
smart
code
which
is
outdoor
display,
so
you
can
see
2018
765
Dodecanese
was
cited
for
it.
You
can
see
it
a
little
lower
on
793
twice
for
it
and
some
of
them
I
get
complaints
about
them
and
I,
don't
have
any
complaints
and
they
get
closed
out.
D
So
any
of
the
violations
that
they
are
alleging
that
they
took
pictures
of
today
yesterday
or
whatever
I
highly
encourage
for
them
to
contact
our
office
and
they'll
be
treated
exactly
the
same
way
else.
But
as
you
can
see,
there
are
other
businesses
on
the
docks.
Now,
there's
other
circumstances
to
make
the
board
aware
some
people
have
railings
and
patios,
so
now
they
can
have
displays
outside
their
store,
so
each
just
because
there
is
a
business
on
the
Sponge
Docks.
D
There
are
different
rules
applicable
to
the
two
where
it's
located
they're
set
back,
whether
they
have
railings,
whether
they're
on
the
corner,
etc,
etc.
So
each
one
has
to
be
taken
into
consideration,
and
these
and
I
two
years
ago,
in
2017
I,
went
and
visited
every
business.
This
packet
was
given
to
every
business,
a
matter
of
fact,
I
still
keep
copies
in
my
car,
because
I
still
have
to
go
down
there
and
periodically
remind
people.
So
this
isn't
a
selective
enforcement
thing.
D
G
If
the
city's
opened
the
door
to
bringing
up
other
alleged
violations,
I'd
like
to
have
the
opportunity
to
have
my
clients
explain
that
there
are
lots
of
factual
violations
that
have
not
been
cited
for
a
long
period
of
time,
but
I
don't
Fitz
going
to
make
any
difference
for
the
board.
I
would
ask
that
there's,
admittedly,
there's
been
a
lot
of
confusion,
a
part
of
my
clients,
several
of
the
Code
sections
concerning
the
smart
code
were
not
given
to
my
clients.
G
They
did
receive
the
other
citation
ordinance
violations
ordinances,
but
not
a
couple
of
them
were
not
in
the
backup
causing
them
considerable
confusion.
Once
they
found
out
what
the
alleged
violations
were.
In
fact,
they
fixed
it
the
next
day,
so
I'd
ask
for
a
minimum
fine
for
this
particular
situation.
Because
of
this
confusion
and
the
short
period
of
time
there
was
involved.
J
K
L
I
will
suggest
that
I
think
the
fine
is
a
tad
light.
I've
lived
in
this
beautiful
city
for
over
20
years,
I.
Remember
when
the
Sponge
Docks
was
the
Wild
West.
When
anything
went,
do
you
could
have
anything
on
the
sidewalk
you
as
a
tourist?
You
couldn't
even
get
down
the
sidewalk.
You
still
can't
some
places
today.
L
That's
what
they're
doing,
if
all
of
a
sudden
there's
a
fire
in
the
back
room
they
can't
get
out
either
tumors
can't
get
out
it's
difficult
enough
on
the
Sponge
Docks
on
a
crowded,
Saturday
or
Sunday
to
even
walk
down
the
street
I
sort
of
surprised
why
the
city
doesn't
close
the
street
on
certain
days
and
they
do
uncertain
big
holidays
anyway.
I
think
I've
had
my
say
about
these
ordinances.
L
L
C
Sure
so
mr.
Elliott
I
know
you
know
this
works,
but
I've
been
asked
to
summarize
the
case,
so
the
property
owner
has
been
found
in
violation
of
this
code,
section
that
has
been
cited
for
24
days
at
$10
a
day
and
the
code
enforcement
board
is
also
awarded
prosecution,
cost
of
$69.50.
According
to
my
math,
that's
300
$9.50
for
this
particular
violation.
The
order
will
be
issued
within
10
days
will
be
mailed
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
in
the
property
appraisers
address.
C
A
A
A
D
A
D
Is
another
repeat
violator
case
for
very
similar
violations
as
the
one
previous
the
case
before
the
board
is
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
zero,
seven,
it's
a
repeat
violator
from
case
18:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
nine
three
both
were
violations
of
appendix
b
chapter
six
of
the
smart
code
property
owner
at
seven.
Ninety
three
Dodecanese
Boulevard
is
listed
as
George
Hill,
Elias
I
believe
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
All
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
D
All
notices
of
hearing
and
notice
of
violations
exhibit
three
administrative
docks
case
summary
previous
borders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
is
exhibit
number
five.
All
my
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies,
though
it's
being
presented
at
the
board.
D
All
my
notices
are
mailed
as
a
property
owner
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
the
violations
and
noticin
earrings
or
cent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
D
As
with
the
previous
case,
this
started
on
November,
8th
working,
the
off
duty
detail,
observe
the
violations
we
have
that
contact
with
the
owner
and
the
tenant
has
stated
before
same
basic
violations.
Outdoor
display
violations
under
appendix
B
chapter
six
of
the
smart
code
racks
outside
the
business
over
thirty
six
inches
high
merchandise,
hung
from
the
door
and
less
than
twenty
four
inches
of
clearance
on
the
sides
of
doors.
Now
there
should
be
a
correction
to
that.
D
The
code
is
actually
18
inches
I
cited
in
both
the
other
cases,
twenty
four
inches,
but
it
has
to
be
18
inches.
But
in
this
case
it
was
right
in
the
door,
as
you
could
see,
from
the
photographs,
November
12th
repeat:
violator
notice,
the
hearing
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
returned
to
our
office
signed
November
22nd
conducted
a
reinfection.
D
I
was
still
not
in
compliance
that
there
was
still
displays
blocking
the
door
and
over
three
feet
in
height
December,
2nd
of
2019
I
inspected
it,
and
it's
still
not
in
compliance
I
added
photos
as
well.
We
did
a
deferral
again,
as
with
the
previous
case,
at
the
request
of
the
owner
and
on
December
3rd
Irene
SPECT
in
it,
and
it
was
in
compliance
during
daytime
hours
posted
the
property
on
December
22nd.
This
one
has
before
had
the
same
period
of
time:
November
8th
2019
to
December
3rd
2019
of
being
in
violation.
D
You
can
see
clearly
in
the
photographs
well
over
three
feet:
items
hanging
from
the
doors
and
inside
within
that
18
inches
inside
the
doorway.
Those
are
not
only
city
code
violations
are
also
violations,
Americans
with
Disability
Act
in
a
fire
code
and,
as
it
was
previously
stated
by
a
board
member
one
of
the
biggest
issues
with
that
is
egress
out
of
the
building
in
case
of
a
fire
you
get
tangled
up
in
the
merchandise.
So
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point
in
time.
A
A
A
G
A
K
And
the
testimony
and
the
evidence,
facts
presented
by
law
that
the
respondent
George
bilious
was
in
violation
of
outdoor
display
city
code,
a
P
P
B
chapter
six
of
the
tarpon
springs
city
code
from
November,
the
eighth
to
December
the
3rd,
a
fine
of
ten
dollars
a
day
for
24
days
or
240
dollars.
In
addition,
addition
I
moved
that
$69.50
for
the
cost
of
occurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
L
L
C
Go
ahead
and
summarize
in
mr.
Ellie,
this
is
the
same
as
the
last
case.
The
city
code
enforcement
board
has
found
a
violation
of
city
code.
Appendix
B
chapter
602
display
found
a
repeat
violation
from
November,
the
eighth
through
December
the
3rd,
and
had
fined
$10
a
day
for
those
24
days
and
also
awarded
the
city.
$69.50
of
prosecution
costs
will
be
reduced
to
order.
Let
me
issued
about
10
days
and
will
be
mailed
to
the
property
owner
at
the
property
address
listed
by
the
property
appraiser's
office.
A
A
E
M
A
M
E
A
E
N
D
Officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
19-8
is
zero.
Zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
four
three,
the
property
address
is
1310
East,
tarpon,
Avenue
Joseph
risotto
is
the
property
owner
listed
it
for
the
record.
There's
no
prior
cases
for
this
owner
exhibit
number
one
are
all
my
photographs.
D
Screenshots
exhibit
number
two
all
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
except
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
signer
exhibit
number
four.
All
the
evidence
and
exhibits
that
were
presented,
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
D
D
You
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
of
both
via
phone
calls
and
he's
made
an
office
visit
with
Beth
on
October
15th
of
this
year
in
contact
with
the
utility
department
and
verify
they
had
not
hooked
up
a
city
sewer.
The
original
case
we
found
was
a
2012
case
under
a
different
property
owner
Patricia
staff.
As
the
a
pH
or
Z
APF.
There
was
a
quick
claim.
Deed
done
was
completed,
we're
not
sure
the
circumstances
behind
the
quitclaim
deed,
possibly
by
our
heirs.
D
We
then
sent
out
a
new
Notice
of
Violation
to
the
current
property
owner
mr.
risottos
present
to
get
the
connection
to
the
city
store,
which
is
required
in
the
young
subdivision
under
city
ordinance,
20-22
on
October
15th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
signed
by
the
property
owner
on
December
17th
of
this
year
conducted
a
inspection.
Basically,
the
inspection.
We
don't
go
out
and
dig
up
anybody's
yard
or
anything
like
that.
We
just
confirmed
with
the
utilities.
D
Department
there's
been
a
connection
made
because
you
have
to
make
reparations
through
the
city
to
get
a
connection
to
the
city
so
where
you
have
to
get
permanent
things
like
that,
none
of
that
had
been
done
had
had
contact
with
the
property
owner.
He
stayed.
He
was
financially
unable
to
hook
up
to
the
sewer
system.
D
So
at
that
point
in
time
the
the
we
were
gonna
bring
it
to
the
code
board
to
kind
of
decide
deadline
and
to
take
those
facts
into
consideration
and
to
come
up
with
a
reasonable
timeframe
to
take
care
of
the
issue.
So
on
December
17th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
signed
by
the
property
owner
summer,
27th
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
hosting
On
January
8th.
They
conducted
the
final
inspection
which,
basically
again
as
a
paper
inspection.
When
you
look
in
the
system,
we
determined
there's.
D
D
D
Is
a
private
residence
if
you're
not
familiar
the
young
subdivision,
it's
the
area
south
to
tarpon,
Avenue,
east
of
us
19
north
of
Anderson
Park.
It's
that
group
of
subdivisions
over
there
behind
CVS
that
whole
subdivision
around
2010
I,
think
the
city
put
in
sewer
lines
and
I
want
to
say
probably
90%,
maybe
95%
of
that
subdivisions
finally
been
connected
to
city
sewer.
This
was
one
that
we're
going
through
cleaning
up
our
records,
realized
hadn't
been
connected,
determined.
D
M
I,
don't
have
really
any
issue
with
anything
officer.
Gassim
has
said
he
and
Miss
Hughes
have
been
very
very
nice
people
I
think
they
were
correct
to
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
I.
Imagine
all
the
folks
that
are
on
the
board
here,
because
you're
on
the
board
for
the
city
live
here.
I've
only
lived
here
since
about
2015,
but
I
try
to
be
a
good
citizen.
Now
I
have
owned
property
in
two
other
municipalities
in
Pinellas,
County
I,
owned
5635,
24th
Avenue
north
and
st.
M
Petersburg
I
owned
that
for
about
30
years,
I
also
owned
one
two,
three
four
five
wide
Lakers
road
and
Largo
I
never
dawned
on
me
when
I
had
those
houses
that
one
day
somebody
would
show
up
and
say
guess
what
you
don't
have
a
sewer.
So
we're
gonna
hit
you
with
a
bill
because
all
those
places
had
it
now
I
have
no
other
defense
here.
Other
than
a
I
am
poor.
I
cannot
afford
babe
I
went
down
and
tried
to
do
everything
that
you
folks,
suggested.
M
I
came
down
here
to
City
Hall
I
met
a
lady
named
Lanie,
Lane,
I,
guess
she's
very
Renee,
nice.
Lady
also
told
me
that
I
could
sign
up.
You
know
on
a
payment
plan
to
pay
the
$2,000
for
that
I'm
willing
to
do
that.
I
called
a
plumber
diploma
wants
like
seven
thousand
dollars
to
hook
me
up.
I
do
not
have
seven
thousand.
It
was
stupid
to
go
over
here
and
comply
with
her
and
get
the
deed.
If
I
can't
afford
the
plumber
now
I
have
been
ill
recently
and
I
want
you
to
know.
M
I
know,
I
know
I'm
under
oath
okay,
I
brought
my
medical
bills
that
I
have
had
to
pay
since
September
out
of
pocket,
I've
had
to
pay
three
thousand
and
ninety
seven
dollars
on
top
of
what
my
insurance
paid
I
did
not
bring
them,
but
I
probably
should
have
at
home.
I
have
another
three
thousand
and
eighty
seven
dollars
worth
of
bills.
Waiting
to
be
paid.
I
have
to
ask
myself
as
I
sit
here
in
front
of
my
neighbors.
Who
would
you
pay?
M
Would
you
pay
a
plumber,
or
would
you
pay
the
people
that
are
keeping
you
breathing
I'm,
opting
for
the
people
to
keep
me
breathing
and
I'm
not
trying
to
be
dramatic
here?
It's
just
the
situation
of
my
life
now.
The
reason
I
chose
to
come
here
is
just
first
I.
Don't
want
you
to
think
that
I'm
just
blowing
this
off
but
I,
don't
care
about
officer
gassim,
my
I!
Don't
care
about
you!
Folks!
I
can
only
come
here
and
try
to
defend
myself.
I
also
understand
something
that
mr.
M
Trask
may
know
as
an
attorney
and
that's
that
he
who
defends
himself
in
court
has
a
fool
for
a
client.
Well,
I
may
be
a
fool,
but
this
is
all
I
have
okay,
I
find
it
amazing
that
the
city
would
send
me
a
paper
that
says
if
I
don't
get
into
compliance
you're
going
to
charge
me
250
dollars
a
day.
Fine.
That
means
that
in
the
course
of
the
first
nine
days
of
the
month,
if
I
didn't
eat,
I
didn't
drink,
I
didn't
drive
by
car,
didn't
pay
for
the
homeowners
insurance
you'd.
M
Have
all
my
money.
Ain't
fair
to
me.
I
also
understand
from
talking
to
Miss
Hughes,
again
who's,
a
very
nice
lady
that
the
previous
owner
of
the
house,
you
have
a
lien
against
her
for
$118,000,
because
you've
been
billing.
Her
$50
a
day
and
the
woman
has
been
dead
since
2013
does
that's
that
to
me
just
seems
a
tad
punitive.
M
Now
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
according
to
Google
was
incorporated
in
1887.
My
house
was
built
in
1952
and
60
years
since
then
of
over
a
hundred
and
twenty
five
years.
It
took
you
that
long
to
decide
to
provide
sewage
which
most
of
the
municipalities
have
for
their
own
homeowners
seems
strange
to
me
that
you
get
punished
for
that
and
I
thought
I
needed
to
come
here
today
and
say
that
no
again
I
take
no
issue
at
all
with
officer
gassim,
but
I.
M
O
M
I
do
not
Harrod
this
property
from
masaf
who
owned
it
she's
the
lady
that
has
the
leaner
for
against
her
for
a
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
dollars,
I,
don't
think
she'll
be
paying
she's
at
the
Union
Cemetery
at
Pittsburgh.
She
was
my
significant
other
for
about
twenty
years
when
she
died.
She
left
me
the
house
it
actually.
Originally.
She
died
in
2013.
It
went
through
her
son
and
her
son
eventually
willed
it
over
to
me,
which
was
her
last
request.
M
M
No
I
did
not,
and
what's
amazing
here
is
I'd-
be
absolutely
truthful.
Okay,
I
guess
it
was
about
two
years
ago,
a
person
from
in
a
white
pickup
truck
from
the
city,
a
utility
department,
okay
came
by
my
house
and
I
saw
him
and
I
said
you
know
just
wandering
his
house
cooked
up
to
the
sewer
system
and
he
pointed
to
what
looked
like
a
piece
of
white
PCV
pipe
out
by
my
sidewalk
and
said:
yeah
you're
hooked
up
to
it.
So
I
always
assumed
that
my
house
was
on
the
sewer
system.
M
I
have
a
septic
tank
that
I
never
even
put
anything
into
because
I
didn't
think
I
needed.
It
didn't
think
it
was
there.
He
that
off-the-cuff
and
again
I'm
not
trying
to
point
the
finger
at
him.
I'm
just
telling
you
what
I
think
I
am
NOT
a
plumber.
I
am
NOT
a
municipal,
employee,
I,
wouldn't
know
the
difference.
I,
don't
know
a
hammer
from
a
screwdriver
to
be
truthful.
O
M
M
M
And
I
I
Got
News
for
you
in
the
time
I've
had
the
house.
Madam
I
can't
see
your
name
for
you,
but
you
missed
earlier,
but
I.
You
know
the
lady's
right
down
the
hallway
here
and
the
collection
Department
know
me:
I
pay
my
water
bill
here
in
person,
I
mean
I'm,
always
driving
around
the
city.
Okay,
I
stopped
in
and
just
pay.
It
saves
me
the
44
cents
a
month
on
the
stamp,
but.
O
O
M
O
D
The
other
issue,
I
would
also
point
out
is,
as
you
stated,
the
utility
bill
is
fairly
clear
about
your
consumption
and
usage.
You
guys
all
get
City
utility
bills,
you
know
what
they
look
like
other
than
that
you
know.
There's
I
know
a
couple.
I
know
at
least
one
person
sitting
at
this
board
that
had
to
get
a
mandatory
connection
to
the
city
sewer
because
they
happen
to
live
in
that
same
general
area.
So,
yes,
they
don't.
It
needs
to
be
done,
and
it's
for
obvious
reasons,
as
even
as
mr.
oizo
stated.
D
That's
probably
a
52
year
old,
septic
tank,
and
so
that's
kind
of
the
reason
why
the
city
cares
about
it
so
much.
We
can
all
imagine
that
52
year
old
septic
system
was
not
up
to
current
codes
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
the
reason
why
we're
here,
unfortunately,
he
got
caught
up
in
some
things
that
may
have
happened,
paperwork
wise
and
got
the
property
quick
claim
to
him
and
and
the
liens
were
never
discovered.
Otherwise,
we
may
have
been
able
to
handle
this
ahead
of
time.
M
M
Okay
and
I
explained
this
to
him
and
he
doing
what
mayor's
do
passed
it
off
to
city
manager
Icarus
why
he
was
still
the
city
manager
here.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
okay,
mr.
Lucas
called
me
one
day
while
I
was
at
the
hospital
okay
and
he
made
it
sound
like
this.
Was
you
know
no
promises?
We
can
just
make
this.
You
know
the
the
fine
and
everything
will
just
go
away
and
I
sent
him.
Another
letter
I
wrote
to
him,
which
I
brought
a
copy
off.
Okay,
thanking
him
for
his
concern
and
his
phone
call.
M
A
L
And
I
can't
discuss,
there's
doing
two
of
them
on
my
street
right
now
and
I
can
stop
and
ask
them.
Ask
them
how
much
they're
paying
but
they're
doing
the
same
thing,
because
the
houses
never
got
done
before
I
feel
real.
Sorry
for
this
gentleman
was
kind
of
inherited.
This
thing
he's
gonna
have
to
do
the
sort
he's
gonna
have
to
do
it.
There's
no
doubt
about
it.
A
K
H
A
P
L
K
M
I
was
meant
to
say
that
I
didn't
know,
I
couldn't
speak,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
is
I.
Have
another
plumber
coming
out
tomorrow
to
give
me
an
estimate
they're
supposed
to
be
there
between
1
and
4:30?
It's
not
that
I.
Don't
want
to
do
this.
I
just
can't
afford
to
do
this
and
I
don't
find
it
I
thought
you
know,
I
find
it
extraordinary
uncomfortable
to
have
to
come
here
and
say
all
this
about
myself.
M
M
A
A
K
F
L
C
A
N
D
Officer,
Steve
Gaston
city
interprets
Frank's
police
department
case
before
the
board
19-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
one
nine,
as
stated
two
vacant
lot.
Next
to
the
621
unis
parcel
number
one,
one,
two,
seven
one:
five,
eight
seven,
seven,
eight
six
zero
one:
nine
zero
one,
six
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
for
the
border,
all
my
photographs,
all
notices,
including
in
a
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
or
exhibit
to
exhibit
three
administrative
documents.
Case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
D
An
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
they
were
given
to
the
board
or
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
that,
based
on
the
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors,
determination
of
address
all
Notice
of
Violation
is
a
notice
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
D
D
The
lot
was
overgrown,
the
grass
so
burger
on
the
sidewalk
and
I
noted
at
that
time
that
there
were
two
large
large
piles
of
dirt
that
were
dumped
on
the
property,
so
I
checked
in
the
system
and
there
was
no
active
building
permits.
The
the
property
had
recently
changed
hands.
So
I
had
worked
cases
on
the
property
under
the
previous
owner
before
and
knew
there
was
no
dirt
on
the
property.
So
now
we
had
a
couple
piles
of
dirt,
so
it
raised
my
suspicions
on
October
4th
and
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
D
D
I
left
out
all
the
city
codes
that
had
to
do
with
fill
site
plans
building
permits.
We
did
find
out
partially
through
the
process
that
their
intent
is
to
build
a
house
on
the
property
they're
working
through
that
and
I.
Think
counsels
probably
can
explain
that
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
and
that's
why
he's
here?
They
they
are
actively
working
on
it,
but
they
had
some
issues.
D
I
mean
it's
happened
before
so
we
brought
to
code
board
and
council
and
I've
discussed
this
and
the
long
and
short
of
it
is.
They
just
need
some
time
and
that's
what
the
city's
position
is
as
well.
We
obviously
want
to
get
it
developed
and
and
taken
care
of,
and
and
that's
kind
of
why
we
didn't
go
down
the
road
of
for
the
specifics,
about
site
planning
for
filter
and
things
like
that,
and
we
left
a
very
generic
as
the
we
called
the
piles
of
dirt
debris.
So
that's
where.
A
F
D
F
D
Of
the
grass
has
been
mowed.
What
more
the
issue
is
now
is:
is
the
piles
of
dirt
and
the
building
materials
that
are
starting
to
kind
of
get
stored
out
there
in
the
absence
of
any
building
permits.
If
you
read
the
definition
of
debris,
it's
very
broad
and
it
talks
about
escaping
materials,
unused
materials,
and
that's
why
I
kind
of
left
it
that
way
by
going
down
codes
regarding
site
plans
and
things
like
that,
our
time
frame
has
changed
significantly.
D
So
this
leaves
it
a
little
bit
more
open
and,
as
it
turns
out,
they
are
actively
working
on
that
and
we've
had
the
attorneys
assurance
that
that
is
the
case
that
they
are
have
every
intent
to
give
a
building
permit
and
that's
what
the
city's
position
is
as
soon
as
they
get
the
building
permit,
then
they
would
be
in
compliance
of
those
things,
because
it's
now
no
longer
unused
material.
It's
now
used
material.
D
N
N
D
N
N
So
what
we
have
here
is
a
simple
miscommunication
lapse,
so
this
isn't
something
that
that
they
have
been
sitting
on
forever.
The
parcel
was
purchased
late,
August
from
the
neighbor
that
owned
it.
They
have
every
intention
to
build
a
house
for
Miss
young.
Miss
young
currently
lives
with
the
teller
eNOS.
They
are
probably
15
houses
over
on
Castle
Terrace.
It
connects
right
to
Eunice
I
understand
there
is
filled
dirt
there,
there's
I'm
not
going
to
dispute
that
where
it
came
from
was
the
neighbor
and
I
have
the
address.
N
N
On
margarita,
which
is
probably
I,
would
say
three
four
hundred
feet
away
and
that
permit
was
number
of
19
373.
It's
still
not
to
permit
for
a
pool.
So
that's
where
that
dirt
came
from
it
wasn't
anything
that
was
malicious
as
far
as
I'm
gonna
build
my
own
house
and
not
tell
the
city,
I
have
seen
plans
for
this
home.
In
fact,
they
were
sitting
on
her
desk
today,
they're
actively
trying
to
get
to
the
city
to
get
it
done.
They
were.
N
There
is
some
emails
and
I
there
are
in
the
record
on
exhibit
3
going
back
and
forth
where
mr.
teller
Eno
was
basically
see
seeing
miss
Beth
over
there
about
getting
a
variance,
perhaps
and
going
back
and
forth
with
the
architect
and
all
that
stuff
has
been
squared
away.
So
my
clients
are
just
asking
for
a
little
bit
of
time.
They
had
no
malicious
intent
and
they
apologized
for
it
getting
this
far.
A
A
A
N
So
from
my
my
understanding
is,
is
that
it
was
authorized
as
just
a
neighborly
good
thing
to
do
they
wanted.
They
didn't
have
a
place
based
on
their
positioning,
their
driveway.
They
didn't
want
to
stick
a
bunch
of
dirt
there,
so
my
clients
had
no
intention
of
actually
spreading
that
dirt
I
understand
that
they
were
going
to
return
it
back
to
him.
He
may
be
doing
papers.
I
haven't
reviewed
his
entire
permit,
but
that's
the
understanding.
Q
Q
N
Correct
they
were
going
back
and
forth
because
there
was
an
issue
with
I
believe
the
sizing
of
the
home,
based
on
the
setbacks.
They
had
some
meetings
with
the
city
and
are
firmly
trying
to
do
it,
but
they
only
purchases
about
less
than
100
days
ago,
and
they
do
have
site
plans
and
and
they're
ready
to
go
within
the
next
I
would
say
30
days
the
permit
will
be
sitting
in
the
city.
N
I'm,
unsure
I'm
not
briefed
on
that
matter,
sir,
but
she
does
want
to
build.
She
does
live
there.
Miss
young
lives
with
the
Tillery
knows,
and
she
wants
to
be
close
to
her
grandkids,
so
she's
going
to
build
there.
It's
not
something
she
bought
as
an
investment.
There's
a
zero
percent
chance
of
that.
A
D
Briefly,
I
mean,
as
I
stated,
and
you
know
the
information
given
by
the
by
counsel
regarding
the
dirt
they
get
their
building
permit
issued
by
the
city
and
unless
they're
using
it
for
fill,
which
would
be
allowed
in
their
building.
Permit
it's
going
to
have
to
go
anyway
in
order
to
prep
the
site
so
either
way.
The
building
permit
is
kind
of
the
crux
and
in
the
city's
position
is
once
that
building
permits
issued
within
a
period
of
time
and
whatever
we
decide
here.
D
N
N
F
B
L
K
F
B
K
A
E
C
A
D
N
So
just
a
point
of
clarification,
as
opposed
to
a
permit
if
the
city
determines,
for
whatever
reason
that
they're
backed
up
and
can't
get
this
done
for
90
days,
can
we
make
that
an
application,
meaning
that
the
client
is
a
firmly
taking
the
steps
and
made
an
application,
because
we
have
no
control
over
the
length
of
the
city?
Someone
could
be
terminated
too,
etc,
etc.
So,.
C
He
needs
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
whatever
way
it
takes
to
bring
into
compliance
such
as
removed
the
dirt
cut
the
grass
okay.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
permit.
He
is
suggesting
that
if
there's
a
building
permit
in
place,
maybe
that
we
could-
you
know
address
that
at
the
same
time,
but
that's
not
the
issue.
The
issue
is
the
violations
8-14
8.52,
so
they
can
remove
the
dirt
tomorrow
they
can
the
grass
tomorrow
you're
giving
them
so
far.
If
the
motion
is
March
the
10th
two
months
to
do
that,
yeah.
C
Say
is
is
giving
making
it
taking
a
position
that,
when
someone
files
an
application
that
they're
in
compliance
with
the
code,
even
in
a
permitting
situation
that
would
not
fly
because
they
could
file
an
application
that
is
completely
inappropriate.
They
come
into
compliance
and
then
nothing
ever
happens
with
it.
So
it's
the
actual
issuance
of
a
permit,
if
that
was
the
building
permit
violation.
But
that's
not
what
you've
got
here
so
I
would
focus
you
on
8.40
and
8.52
the
code
violations
that
are
being
cited,
which
is
the
dirt
and
the
grass
so.
L
F
A
A
Q
L
C
Mr.
Stephanie
Ben
your
property,
your
client,
the
property
owners
have
been
fired
in
violation
of
8
40,
nato's
52
of
the
city
code.
They
give
it
until
March
the
10th
to
come
into
compliance.
Should
your
clients
failed
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance
by
that
date,
$100
or
$500
a
day.
Fine
will
be
issued.
The
order
will
be
issued
within
10
days
and
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraisers
address.
If
you
have
any
questions
after
the
meeting,
please
feel
free
to
contact
code
enforcement
or
myself
I.
A
E
A
A
D
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
original
case
that
created
as
a
repeat
father
is
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Five.
Eighty
five
was
a
violation
of
a
number
of
city
codes,
8
48,
52,
6-1,
I,
PMC,
3
or
4
1,
3
3
or
4
1
3
sub
1
3,
o
4
1
3
sub
2.
At
that
time
there
were
no
fines.
They
complied
before
the
$25
a
day
fine
was
assessed.
D
Unfortunately,
the
prosecution
costs
in
that
case
have
not
been
paid
yet
the
case
before
the
board
is
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
seven
five,
the
property
address
is
100
north
ring
Avenue
and
the
listed
property
owner
is
Ingrid.
Jones
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
two
all
my
notice
is
including
my
notice
violation:
a
notice
of
hearing
seven
number
three
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary
previous
board,
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax.
D
Collector
records,
exhibit
number
four
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five.
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
alleged
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
at
the
board,
or
in
this
case
or
daughter,
all
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
and
hearings
are
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail.
A
D
Have
had
contact
with
the
owner
in
our
office
from
actually
the
owner's
daughter
who's
present.
The
case
started
on
to
December
11th
2019,
conducting
inspections
in
the
area
on
adjacent
properties
and
noticed
numerous
violations
on
this
one.
Trash
cans
were
in
public
view.
The
property
is
overgrown,
there's
trash
and
debris
on
the
property,
there's
mattress
old
rug,
old,
cushions,
etc.
On
December
12th
of
2019,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed,
no
green
cards
were
returned,
December
27th
sign
was
posted
in
affidavit
and
posting
was
signed.
D
I
also
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
December
27th
and
I
noted
it
was
in
compliance.
We
had
received
a
phone
call
from
the
office
owner
around
December
20th,
so
we
use
the
compliance
date
of
December
20th
2019
when
they
stated
it
was
ready
for
inspection.
The
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
of
December
11th
2019
in
Tilikum.
It
was
complied
on.
December
20th
for
my
math
shows
out
to
be
in
9
days
as
a
violation
of
city
codes,
8,
40
m
8,
50,
8,
22
and
8
16,
I.
R
R
A
D
P
C
B
E
A
C
Mrs.
Herman
Your
Mother
has
been
found
in
violation
of
code
sections,
8
4
t
+,
8
s
52
for
the
time
period
of
December
11th
through
December
20th
nine
days
and
have
been
fined
$50
a
day
for
each
day.
That
was
a
non-compliance.
The
code
enforcement
board
also
awarded
the
city
87
dollars
in
prosecution
costs.
An
order
will
be
entered
within
the
next
10
days.
It'll
be
sent
to
your
mother
at
the
address
listed
and
the
property
appraiser's
address
listings.
Do
you
have
any
questions?
A
A
D
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Durban,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
case
19
8
0,
0,
0,
0,
7
66.
This
is
a
vacant
lot.
North
of
the
address
721
north
I
knew
its
parcel
number
1827.
Sixteen
nine
one:
zero
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
zero
zero
eight
zero
property
owners
listed
as
Elizabeth
King,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
to
my
notices,
including
Notice
of
Hearing
and
notice
of
violations.
Seven
number
three
is
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
D
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board?
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail
amount
chairman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
A
D
Thank
you.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
via
phone
calls
case
started
on
October
25th
of
2019
I
was
conducting
an
area
checks,
I'm,
not
area
checks,
inspections
on
other
property
in
the
area
and
I
noted
that
it
seems
like
there
were
two
properties
I
believe
mr.
king
owns
two
of
them
right
there
on
North
Avenue.
This
particular
one
had
a
red
Camaro
parked
on
it,
and
it
I've
seen
it
there
numerous
times,
and
we
also
had
some
in
the
past
had
there
and
other
cars
being
there.
D
So
some
what
seemed
like
the
car,
the
part,
the
Lots
being
used
kind
of
as
a
parking
lot.
This
is
a
residential
he's
own
district
and
at
the
time
there
were
no.
The
vehicle
had
no
tags
on
it
when
I
first
inspected
it
later
on,
it
had
a
license
plate
attached
to
it,
which
was
the
red
car.
On
November
29th,
we
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation.
There
was
no
mail
returned
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
Chinon
November
22nd
in
2019.
D
The
red
Camaro
was
still
on
the
property,
I
checked
it
again
and
it
had
tags
on
the
vehicle,
which
was
a
juliet
victor
henry
alpha,
two
four
and
they
were
expired.
February
2019
and
November
25th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
signed
on
December
27th
of
2016,
opposed
to
the
property
and
completing
affidavit
of
posting
on
January
8th
that
conducted
a
final
inspection.
The
car
has
been
moved
and
it
was
currently
in
compliance,
but
I
brought
it
before
the
board
to
be
established
because,
as
I
stated
before,
it's
occurred
in
the
past.
D
What
I'm?
What
the
city
is
asking
to
be
established
for
that
property
or
violations
of
city
code
4000,
which
you
will
understand,
is
leaving
abandoned
vehicles
which
includes
unregistered
unlicensed
or
vehicles
that
are
inoperable
and
then
also
violation
of
city
code,
25.0
3,
which
is
the
zoning
which
deals
with
our
sixty
in
our
seventies
residential
areas.
Basically,
a
parking
lot
is
not
an
accepted
use
or
a
conditional
use
for
residential
property,
so
it
can't
be
used
as
such.
It
is
vacant
lot,
but
it
cannot
be
used
as
a
parking
lot.
D
A
I
Not
my
car,
it's
my
nephews
I
made
every
effort
for
him
to
move
it.
I
actually
called
and
asked.
If
what
could
I
do
to
actually
have
it
told
because
I've
been
told
over
between
him
and
my
sister
going
round
around
and
he's
not
telling
it
is
true,
there's
one
of
my
I.
Don't
know
why
they
think
my
property
is
a
parking
lot.
So
I
do
apologize.
I,
don't
have
anything
to
say,
he's
telling
the
truth.
It's
just
it's
just
family.
D
D
D
D
A
A
F
L
A
B
A
C
King
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
code,
section,
40,
point:
zero,
zero
and
twenty
five
point
zero.
Three.
There
is
no
fine.
There
are
no
prosecution
costs
that
have
been
established
if
the
proper,
the
property
will
be
deemed
a
repeat
violator
if
the
same
violations
occur
within
the
next
five-year
period
of
time
and
if
that
than
the
fines
have
the
opportunity
of
being
doubled
up
to
$500
a
day.
So
please
try
to
keep
the
property
into
compliance,
and
then
you
won't
have
to
worry
about
that.
C
A
A
S
D
D
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turin,
Springs
Police
Department
case
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
two
zero,
the
addresses
for
ten
Village,
Drive,
James
and
Elizabeth
seem
Simon's.
I
mean
Simon's
for
the
listed
property
owner
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs,
all
the
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
your
hearing,
or
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
except
number.
D
Four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
the
violations
and
notice
and
hearings
are
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail.
Madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence
once.
D
D
It
was
a
result
of
a
police
call.
The
narratives
attached
to
the
case.
In
summary
officer
Rondo's
had
gone
to
the
address
on
July
30
2019
reference,
Tarpon
Springs,
Police
Department
case
ts,
19,
one
eight
five,
one
two,
the
house
appears
to
be
a
hoarder
house
with
limited
egress
inability
to
get
out
of
the
house
house
is
very
unsanitary.
Trash
has
piled
up
all
over
the
house,
feces
and
urine,
or
president
house
sink
in
the
kitchen
is
unusable.
As
you
can
see.
In
the
photographs,
trash
has
not
been
cleaned
up
or
removed.
D
The
refrigerator
had
a
rotten
food
in
it.
At
the
time.
The
property
owners
handicapped,
daughter
also
lived
in
the
residence
and
his
bedridden
on
October
7th
I,
inspected
the
property
and
was
able
to
inspect
the
outside
these
photographs.
Ever
cluded
were
provided
by
officer
Rondo's
to
me.
I
inspected
the
property
in
yours,
numerous
outside
violations
as
well
yards
overgrown
front
and
rear
the
trees
were
blocking
the
sidewalk
in
the
stop
sign.
The
grass
was
over
growing.
The
sidewalk
and
trash
cans
are
in
view
on
October,
8th
2019
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
D
It
was
returned
unclaimed,
December,
2nd
I
conducted
a
read
inspection.
We
had
extended
at
30
days
at
the
request
by
office
visit.
It
was
still
not
in
compliance
at
that
time.
On
December
3rd,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed,
no
read,
no
mail
was
returned
to
our
office.
December
27th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
January,
8th
and
complied
majority
of
the
exterior
violations.
The
outside
of
the
house
had
been
taken.
D
Care
of
the
trash
cans
were
in
their
proper
place,
but
unfortunately
the
duty
to
maintain
private,
proper
use.
You
can
see
from
the
photographs
which
is
8
40
and
then
city
code,
6
1,
which
adopts
the
2018
version
of
the
International
property
maintenance
code,
also
known
as
IPM
C,
under
that
he
was
cited
for
general
interior
violations
under
IPM
c30
5.1
primary
issue.
With
305
point
1
states
that
the
interior
house
needs
to
be
kept
in
a
sanitary
condition.
D
The
next
one
is
IPM
c50
2.1,
which
is
the
required
facilities
and
a
dwelling
which
deals
with
your
ingress
or
egress,
getting
out
of
the
house
blocking
exits,
having
alleyways
access
points
and
things
like
that
and
I'm
sorry
that
one's
actually
covered
under
702
point
1
and
an
IPM
c30
9.1.
There
was
a
significant
pest
infestation
in
the
house
that
were
roaches
all
over
and
ants
and
such
so
that's
the
other
IPM
C
violation.
So
that's
what's
going
toward
the
only
to
not
up
for
consideration
and
I,
don't
know
if
your
paperwork
reflects
it.
D
A
F
E
A
F
P
S
In
I'm,
sorry,
okay
in
July,
the
police
were
called
our
house
by
me
because
my
wife,
who
is
81
years
old
and
suffering
from
she's,
just
not
gonna,
laid
there
anymore.
She
stole
our
van
and
she
doesn't
have
a
driver's
license.
I
been
hiding
my
keys
for
months
and
she
finally
dug
him
out
of
my
pants
pocket
and
she
left
so
I
didn't
know
where
she'd
gone
somewhere.
S
I
called
the
police
and
they
came
and
they
came
into
the
house
and
they
saw
the
disgusting
mess
that
you've
seen
my
wife
and
I
had
been
married
for
39
years.
She
has
been
a
semi
hoarder
most
of
the
time
we
built
our
house
in
1999
and
that's
when
it
really
started
getting
bad.
She
I,
and
we
would
argue-
and
that
was
our
big
argument
about
the
stuff
she
had
a
walk-in
closet
right
now.
She
hasn't
taken
anything
out
of
in
the
last
six
years,
but
I
couldn't
throw
anything
away
because
she's
a
hoarder.
S
We
have
a
daughter
who
is
44
years
old,
Heather,
she's
quadriplegic
just
said
developmentally
disabled
nonverbal.
She
knows
about
10
words
or
so
in
July
she
had
developed
a
bed
bed
sore
on
her
butt
pressure,
wound
and
I.
When
I
first
saw
it
I
rolled
her
over
and
I
saw
it
I
just
about
freaked.
It
was
about
them.
It
looked
like
he
could
put
three
silver
dollars
in
a
stack
and
I
changed
it
three
or
four
times
every
day,
and
where
did
it
come
from
took
her
to
the
emergency
room,
I'm.
S
I
understand
you're
living
right.
Well,
here's
why
I
haven't
fixed
it.
She
I
took
her
down
to
a
place
in
Clearwater
rehabilitation
place.
She
was
down
there
for
36
days.
I
was
down
there
with
her
every
day,
my
wife.
He
went
down,
maybe
twice
so.
Meanwhile,
she
was
sitting
at
home
and
making
a
mess
even
worse
than
it
was
before.
I
brought
her
home.
She
was
home
for
three
weeks
and
the
she
developed
another
sore.
S
Is
a
mess
you've
seen
the
pictures
I
mean,
but
I
haven't
been
able
to
do
a
thing
she's
over
in
the
Bayou
rehabilitation
center
she's
been
over
there
for
a
hundred
and
eleven
days,
I
go
over
there
every
morning
from
7:15
til
8:15
at
night,
emmalin
I
get
home
I,
don't
feel
like
cleaning
a
dang
thing.
So
that's
why
we
are
here.
My
brother
will
be
coming
down
in
about
three
weeks.
I'm
gonna
bring
her
home.
I've
got
the
pressure
mattress
for
her
bed,
three
or
four
days
before
she
gets
goes
home.
S
A
A
F
O
F
A
D
F
Move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
eight
46,
one
IP
MC,
3,
Oh,
5.1,
IP,
mc5,
Oh,
2.1,
IPM
c7,
or
to
that
one
of
the
code
of
the
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
enforced.
In
effect,
they
respond
in
violation
thereof,.
L
A
D
D
There
are
some
agencies
that
can
also
help
them
with
some
of
that
stuff,
but
I
think
it's
reasonable
45
days,
and
then
it
is
pretty
significant,
especially
there's
two
aspects.
One
I
need
to
be
contacted,
so
I
can
reenact
the
interior,
the
property
in
order
to
put
it
in
compliance,
want
to
make
sure
you
understand
that,
but
it
is
pretty
significant,
especially
bringing
his
daughter
back.
N
D
S
That
just
did
not
know
what
they
were
doing.
One
woman
checked
on
my
daughter
looked
at
her
chest
and
she
called
the
fire
department
to
have
a
look.
What
did
you
do
that,
for
she
says?
She's
got
feces
all
over
her
chest.
This
is
no
man,
those
are
skin
tags.
I
would
never
do
that.
To
my
daughter
there
were
not
human
feces
on
any
floor.
The
cats
had
barbed
they're
there
by
it
by
a
cat,
litter
box,
and
that
was
it.
There
was
no
human
feces
on.
K
F
C
F
B
A
C
Mr.
Simonds,
you,
you
and
your
wife
have
been
found,
a
violation
of
the
code
sections
that
were
cited
given
until
March
2nd
2020
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
that
time
frame
$100
a
day,
fine
will
be
assessed.
An
order
will
be
issued,
it'll
be
sent
to
you
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraisers
records
that
will
be
done
within
the
next
10
days.
Should
you
have
any
questions
about
what
you
need
to
do
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance?
C
S
S
Way
in
hell
that
I
can
get
it
done.
The
whole
house
in
45
days
now
I
can
get
Heather,
bedroom
and
I
can
get
the
kitchen
and
part
of
the
the
living
room,
but
there's
no
way
of
finishing
up
the
living
room,
getting
the
dining
room
and
the
master
bedroom
done
in
45
days.
So
just
I'll
start
writing
checks
now,
I!
Guess
that's
just
impossible.
Unless
one
of
you
folks
are
all
of
you
would
like
to
come
over
and
help.
O
C
S
S
C
C
R
A
D
For
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
police
department
code
enforcement
case
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
six
eight
addresses
seven
one
for
North
Avenue
property
owners.
A
list
is
Nicole
Lee,
Gracie,
Ellsworth,
Noel
Jones.
No
prior
cases
with
this
owner
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
7
number
three
is
my
administrative
documents,
including
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
said
before
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed.
D
D
We
have
had
only
a
phone
call
message
returned
with
no
contact
with
the
actual
property
owner.
This
is
on
North
North
Avenue,
it's
actually
across
the
street,
from
where
the
red
Camaro
car
was
parked.
On
October
25th
I
noticed
there
were
two
vehicles
with
no
tags
on
the
property,
and
then
there
were
two
vehicles
with
dealer
tags.
D
The
dealer
address
when
I
checked
in
son
biz
was
showing
that
address
714
North
Avenue,
which
is
a
residential
address,
the
tags,
paul-henri,
zero
five,
two
zebra
and
paul-henri
zero
five
five
zebra
our
boy
both
registered
to
West
Coast,
auto
credit
and
auto
sales
LLC
at
714,
North,
Avenue,
I,
checked
in
the
system.
There's
no
local
business
tax
received
for
the
address
for
any
business.
The
property's
owned
residential
and
cannot
be
used
as
a
car
sales
lot
parking
lot
or
operate
the
business
as
an
address
of
convenience.
D
Unless
an
L
BT
are
a
local
business,
tax
receipt
is
obtained
and
then
the
storage
of
work
vehicles
cannot
occur
on
the
property,
that's
more
or
less
what
occurs
and
they're
kind
of
obviously
doing
that
on
October
29th
2019,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
As
a
returned
unclaimed
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
November
25th.
There
was
no
change.
There
was
actually
more
vehicles
now
on
the
property,
with
no
tags,
I
had
a
violation
on
the
property
directly
north
of
it
that
property
owner
he
had
violations
in
his
back
yard.
D
He
invited
me
into
his
back
yard
and
I
noticed
that
there's
vehicles,
tucked
in
behind
the
building
that
I
couldn't
see
originally
from
the
street
I
on
November
25th
and
no
I'm.
Sorry,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
to
us
on
December
27th
I
posted
the
property
in
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed,
conducting
an
inspection
yesterday
there
is
no
change,
there's
still
numerous
unregistered
vehicles
on
the
property,
there's
no
local
business
tax
receipt
on
file-
and
there
again
was
two
cars
with
with
dealer
tags
on
them.
D
The
son
vis
record
was
still
showing
that
there
was
a
business
address,
714,
North,
Avenue,
the
city
code
violations
are
40.00
inoperable
vehicles,
vehicles
both
need
to
be
legally
registered
and
operable
the
lack
of
a
local
business
tax
received
for
operating
a
business
within
the
city
and
then
also
a
violation
of
city
code,
25.0
3,
which
are
the
zoning
requirements
under
our
seventy,
are
61
into
family
residential
zone
districts
and
not
being
allowed
to
have
a
car
dealership
parking
lot.
It's
basically,
it's
not
allowed
use.
D
I
took
more
photographs,
I
think
you
actually
took
him
from
July
or
yesterday,
and
they
were
basically
of
one
of
the
dealer
tags.
A
couple
of
vehicles
that
were
different
from
the
original
ones.
Like
I
said
all
of
the
evidence
leads
towards
the
car
dealerships
being
run
out
of
that
property.
With
that
being
said,
some
of
the
cars
that
end
up
across
the
street.
A
D
Her
property
were
related
to
this.
I
didn't
add
that
to
her
place,
she's
taking
care
of
it,
we're
helping
her
out
with
that,
but
there's
a
significant
number
of
vehicles
down
there
on
a
daily
basis,
I,
would
say
anywhere
between
8
to
10
and
numerous
different
ones,
all
the
time.
So
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
D
A
P
L
A
A
P
L
L
O
O
Q
A
A
N
F
A
D
All
the
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation,
noticing,
hearing
exhibit
number
three's
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first-class
mail.
A
B
D
D
D
It
says
that
conduct
conduct
specified
in
the
article
in
Chapter
four
of
this
code,
any
continuing
condition
or
use
of
premise
or
of
a
building
exteriors
of
land,
which
will
go
basically
to
the
fourth
one
which
says
essentially
interferes
with
the
comfortable
enjoyment
of
life
and
property
intends
to
depreciate
the
value
of
the
property,
and
then
it
also
talks
about
unlawfully,
interferes
with
obstructs
or
tends
to
obstruct
or
renders
dangerous
for
passage
any
public
or
private
street
highway,
sidewalk
stream,
ditch
or
drainage.
This
will
become
important
as
I
present.
D
The
rest
of
my
case
on
November
7th
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
returned,
signed
on
November
20th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
The
vehicle
is
still
blocking.
The
sidewalk
I
didn't
know
if
it
was
operable
at
the
time
it
hadn't
moved,
but
it
wasn't
on
jack
stands
anymore:
November
22nd,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
D
It
was
returned
signed
on
December,
27th,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
as
such
On
January,
8th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
was
still
in
compliance,
but
because
I
also
had
a
situation
where
I
cited
one
vehicle.
There
were
at
a
city
parking
ticket
under
florida,
state
statute,
316
1945,
which
says
you
can't
park
on
a
sidewalk
a
few
months
back
to
one
of
the
vehicles
there.
So
now
another
vehicles
parked
basically
in
the
same
place,
I
decided
to
bring
it
before
the
board.
D
So
we
don't
have
a
continuing
problem
with
this
and
basically
get
the
property
established
for
a
violation
of
the
two
city
codes,
which
is
a
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
As
I
stated,
that's
8
40,
which
encompasses
the
nuisance,
condition
of
interfering
or
F
structure,
tends
to
obstruct
a
sidewalk
and
then
40.00,
which
is
inoperable
vehicles.
Obviously
the
fact
that
it's
on
jack
stands
and
has
a
wheel
chock
behind
it.
Pretty
much
leads
to
the
conclusion
that
at
some
point
in
time
it
was
inoperable.
D
So
that's
what's
before
the
board,
as
I
stated
it's
currently
in
compliance,
there's
no
violations
when
inspected
as
of
yesterday
I
have
the
odd
feeling
that
there
probably
will
be
hopefully
not
in
the
future
and
that's
what
this
would
prevent.
So
that's
why
we're
here
and
in
the
city
at
this
point
has
nothing
further.
A
T
Generally,
we
concede
on
November
7th,
yet
the
vehicle
was
up
on
jack
stands.
We
had
an
incident
with
the
vehicle
belts,
had
fallen
off
and
jammed
mechanisms
we
had
up
on
jack
stands.
We
were
trying
to
repair
it
overnight
and
we
didn't
get
it
done.
We
stopped
working
doing
anything
at
nine
o'clock.
This
is
a
respect
for
the
neighbors
trundling,
a
jack
back
and
forth
rather
noisy.
You
know
bad
judgment
call
in
ours.
We
lifted
up
on
Jack's
tan.
It
just
happened,
be
unfortunate
circumstances.
The
officer
saw
it
up
in
there.
T
We
concede
it
was
up
there
and
you
know,
because
it
was
on
Jackson,
which
was
considered
an
inoperative.
It
did
walk
to
the
sidewalk
again.
That
was
the
nature
of
me
trying
to
get
the
vehicle
going.
It
was
my
only
means
of
transportation.
At
the
time
tried
to
get
it
together,
couldn't
get
it
together,
couldn't
get
it
off.
The
jack
stands
to
put
back
in
the
safe
condition
within
a
short
period
of
time.
We
were
able
to
get
the
vehicle
back
off.
T
The
jack
stands
and
moved
the
vehicle
over
to
the
position
to
where
the
vehicle
was
in.
The
center
of
the
driveway
now
I
preclude
this
with,
as
his
statement
was,
there
was
another
vehicle
that
was
in
there.
My
wife's
Tahoe
was
in
the
driveway.
We
had
been
notified,
hey
can't
block
the
sidewalk
we'd
had
a
couple
email
conversations
back
and
forth
with
the
officer.
The
last
conversation
was
hey
because
she's
handicapped,
because
we
got
a
service
dog
I,
have
an
autistic
son.
T
Putting
him
into
the
vehicle
out
on
the
street
just
didn't
seem
to
be
acceptable.
We
asked
we're
gonna
turn
the
vehicle,
we're
gonna
put
it
in
the
center
of
the
driveway
and
I
work
with
rules
and
regulations
from
the
FAA
and
I
understand.
There's
the
letter
of
the
law
and
Andres
the
spirit
of
the
law.
Letter
law
says:
don't
block
the
sidewalk
spirit
of
the
law
says
we
don't
block
the
sidewalk,
because
we
don't
want
people
walking
in
the
street.
We
don't
want
people
walking
on
Darry
up.
T
We
wanted
to
walk
where
it's
safe
to
walk.
We
felt
that
putting
the
vehicle
there
and
notifying
the
officer
hey
we're
gonna,
do
this
we're
gonna
have
it.
You
know
four
foot
clearance
around
there,
which
is
wider
than
the
sidewalk.
We
felt
that
that
was
the
the
resolution
to
it
and
that
was
back.
At
the
beginning.
We
had
sent
an
email
to
the
officer.
We
got
no
feedback
from
it
from
that
time.
T
Up
until
the
simple
November
we
had
concluded
that
as
long
as
we
kept
everything
in
there,
there
was
no
problem,
the
PT
Cruiser
we
considered.
You
know
it
was
just.
It
was
just
bad
timing.
It
was
a
bad
situation
that
was
our
you
know
my
bad.
We
left
it.
There
we've
removed
the
vehicle
over
to
the
center
of
the
driveway,
believing
that
that
was
going
to
be
the
the
fix
for
it
had
no
contact
with
the
officer
to
give
us
any
idea.
Otherwise,
up
until
January
gem,
sorry
January
6th.
T
We
felt
that
that
was
the
resolution,
but
then
the
officer
posted
it
again
and
it
was
like
okay,
obviously
there's
some
sort
of
problem.
We
went
ahead
and
turned
the
vehicle
so
that
didn't
block
the
driveway
anymore
I
called
up
the
following.
Actually,
we
had
an
incident
at
the
house
and
we
were
trying
to
decide
who
was.
There
was
an
incident
at
the
house
and
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
what
was
going
on.
We
had
called
code
enforcement
asking
questions.
T
If
the
you
know,
if
the
inspector
was
in
the
area,
she
assured
us
that
he
wasn't
and
at
that
time
I
also
talked
to
her
about
hey.
You
know
we
still
have
this
problem
and
she
went
through
and
she
checked
with
few
people
there
and
said:
no,
you
can't
be
on
the
sidewalk
at
all
and
then
she
brought
forth
a
comment
on
the
status
of
it
is
while
we
did
what
we
did
and
that
okay,
but
now
you're
putting
people
walking
into
basically
trespassing
onto
our
side
of
the
property
line.
T
Hadn't
considered
that
okay,
we're
good.
We
we
get
that,
so
our
resolution
will
be
parked
the
vehicle
as
the
as
the
Specter
had
found
it,
and
it
also
does
help
out
to
some
extent
with
keeping
the
wife
and
the
kids
out
of
the
street.
We
can
concede
to
that
until
such
time
with
we
can
remedy
another
problem
which
is
lack
of
parking
in
our
driveway.
R
T
Know
there
was
there
was
issues
we
needed
to
fix
when
our
vehicle,
when
my
wife's
Tahoe
was
was
sighted,
unfortunately
directly
across
the
street
neighbor's
house.
Their
vehicle
was
also
in
the
driveway
and
we're
talking
at
the
same
time,
and
this
is
why
I
bring
it
up,
because
I
noticed
that
you
said
hey,
it
only
has
to
be
pertinent.
T
At
that
time
my
son
went
out,
took
picture
of
the
Tahoe
with
detected
in
the
window
with
the
neighbor's
car
in
the
background,
and
there
was
an
inconsistency
in
there,
he
had
to
drive
past
it
did
we
live
in
a
cul-de-sac,
he
had
to
drive
past
it
and
not
notice
it
to
sight
our
vehicle.
We're
done
with
that.
Unless
you
have
other
questions,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
I
A
T
F
F
Move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations
section,
8
40
in
40.00
of
the
code
of
coordinates
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
were
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
notice
violation,
the
respondents
are
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
L
B
C
You
and
your
wife
have
been
found
in
violation
of
sections
eight
Tests,
forty
and
forty
point.
0
is
0.
There
is
no
fine
established
for
today,
nor
is
the
city
going
to
receive
prosecution
costs,
but
should
the
violations
occur
again
within
the
next
5
years,
you'll
be
deemed
to
be
a
repeat
violator
and
the
fine
will
be
instituted
at
a
following
code
enforcement
board
hearing
in
order
will
be
issued
within
the
next
10
days,
it'll
be
sent
to
you
at
the
address
listed
at
the
property
appraisers
records.
C
D
No.1
president,
thank
you
officer,
steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
police
department
code
enforcement
case
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
two
zero,
the
property
address
is
164
Seabreeze
Drive
listed
as
the
owner
Andrew
Heath,
exhibit
number
one
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
notice
of
violations.
Notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed.
D
B
D
Had
no
contact
with
the
owner,
the
case
started:
November
18th
initial
inspection
was
that
a
fence
was
installed
out
front
with
no
permit
on
file.
I
checked
the
Google
Streetview
in
January
2019.
There
was
no
offense
there,
so
I
took
a
sure.
There's
no
offense.
There
check
the
city.
There
was
no
permit
pulled
for
the
fence
that
appeared
sometime
between
January
and
when
I
took
the
pictures
and
November
another
marine
came.
The
Notice
of
Violation
was
male.
D
Green
card
was
returned,
signed
by
the
property
owner
on
December,
2nd
had
conducted
a
reinfection,
there's
still
no
permits
obtained
and
the
fence
was
still
there.
On
December
3rd,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
unclaimed
on
December,
27th,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
On
January
3rd
permit
number
20-12
was
applied
for
it,
hadn't
been
picked
up,
and
it's
also
pending
planning
and
zoning
approval,
so
they
have
at
least
started
the
process.
D
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
yesterday,
as
stated
permit
20-12
was
pulled,
but
it
had
not
been
signed
off
on
it
had
been
completed,
and
since
this
is
an
after-the-fact
one,
they
won't
be
in
compliance
until
either
they
remove
the
fence
or
the
city
actually
says
it's
okay
for
them
to
have
them
so
kind
of,
as
we
were
discussing
before
we're
actually
I
wasn't
discussing
with
mr.
Trask
was
saying.
This
is
a
building
permit
issue,
so
the
thing
about
it
is
is
for
a
fence.
D
In
order
for
this
one
to
be
considered
legal,
you
can
come
in
and
get
a
offense
permit,
basically
drawing
a
site
plan
on
a
napkin
and
they'll.
Give
you
one,
but
for
it
to
be
approved,
asked
to
be
signed
off
and
final
once
that
occurs,
then
it's
met
the
conditions
of
the
city's
requirements
of
obtaining
that
building,
permit
and
falling
through
the
whole
process.
D
So
the
violations
before
this
board
are
violation
6-1,
which
allows
me
to
adopt
the
27
team
version
of
the
Florida
Building
Code
and
then
under
the
Florida
Building
Code,
section
105
point
1
are
I'm.
Sorry
of
our
city
city
code
requires
you
to
obtain
a
permit
to
install
the
fence,
so
this
would
be
an
after-the-fact
permit
that
they
would
need
to
obtain
or,
as
I
stated
before,
to
be
in
compliance,
remove
the
fence
and
then
start
the
process
over
again
other
than
that.
The
city
has
nothing
further.
D
T
D
O
O
B
L
L
E
D
D
Would
think
so
because
they've
already
they've
gotten
through
at
least
a
process
where
they've
came
in
and
applied
for
the
permit
they
just
have
to
get
to
actually
45
days
might
be
more
reasonable
because
planning
and
zoning
is
involved,
and
they
only
have
hearings
like
once
a
month,
so
their
next
one
I
think
is
February
10th.
Something
like
that.
So
I
think
a
little
more
than
30
days
would
probably
be
reasonable.
Okay,.
O
L
A
C
C
L
L
I
move.
We
accept
the
affidavits
of
compliance
in
case
number,
one:
six:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
three;
seven
five
and
an
affidavit
of
compliance
in
case
number,
one:
seven:
eight
zeros
0:05,
three:
eight
and
a
half
a
day
of
a
compliance
in
case
1,
0-0,
2,
2,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
9,
6,
and
that's
all.
D
Different
ordinance,
what
happened
with
the
very
first
time
the
the
tree
case
was
didn't,
come
before
this
board,
because
the
city
manager
deemed
it
to
be
a
life
safety
issue.
So
we
were
able
to
abate
that
tree
and
take
care
of
it,
and
then
we
leaned
the
cost
on
the
property
owner.
They
had
another
case,
but
unfortunately,
I
was
still
kind
of
new
and
some
of
them
there
were
other
violations
with
that
property.
And
then
then
we
received
complaints
about
it.
D
L
D
Just
real
quick
before
he
goes
smack
the
gavel:
13:15
east
Boyer,
which
was
in
when
you
commented
on.
That's
really
old.
We
demolished
that
house
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
It
was
a
property,
we
started
a
foreclosure
process
on
the
property
owner
chose
to
sign
the
property
over
deed-in-lieu
to
the
city,
and
we
demolished
it
about
two
two
weeks
later,
so
that
is
now
a
vacant
lot
on
East
Boyer
that
the
city
owns.
So
it's
again
you
guys's
work
in
the
process.
Interestingly,.
K
D
North
gross
is
done.
That
was
a
significant
one
and
I
believe
mr.
Trask
we've
got
a
couple
of
others
that
were
currently
working
on
some
127
north
gross
is
still
he's
still
in
the
foreclosure
process.
We
did
an
abatement
because
part
of
the
building
had
actually
fallen
down.
I
think
we
can
discuss
that
right.
The
side
of
the
building
had
actually
fallen
off
and
it
was
a
life
safety
issue.
D
O
D
O
D
Dcf
was
involved
in
that
case,
okay,
so
it's
there's,
there's
kind
of
some
tandem
stuff
going
on
the
advantage
to
me
being
a
police
officer.
Is
the
officers?
Will
contact
me
for
things
that
they
just
can't
figure
out
they'll
go
down
their
Road
contacting
DCF
and
things
like
that
and
doing
that,
but
then
they're
like?
Is
there
anything
you
can
do
and
that's
how
I
get
involved
with
these
and
then
ultimate.