![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7w0rhRqLT5E/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board December 10, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
E
C
E
A
H
H
I
I
D
J
J
K
C
L
L
C
A
K
A
C
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
C
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
in
exhibits.
C
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument.
First
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
C
A
A
Nominations
and
I'd
like
to
just
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
on
talking
about.
As
you
know,
you
have
rules
of
procedure
that
are
adopted
in
the
late
80s
rule
1
section
3
of
your
rules
or
procedure
provides
that
nomination
of
officers
shall
be
made
from
the
floor
at
the
annual
organizational
meeting
in
december
of
each
year.
This
is
that
month
and
the
election
shall
be
held
immediately
thereafter.
A
So
what
we
need
to
do
today
is
is
that
we
need
to
take
nominations
from
the
floor
for
chair
for
the
next
year
and
then
once
that
is
completed,
then
we'll
need
to
do
it
for
vice
chair
for
this
coming
year.
N
Like
to
nominate,
I'm
probably
saying
wrong,
nominate
julie,
wade
to
stay
on
this
chairman.
F
A
A
J
G
O
there.
You
are
hi.
Q
Yes,
sir,
this
is
christopher
great,
so
I'm
calling
for
case
number
two
zero.
Eighty
thousand
four
six
two.
O
If
you
could
unmute
your
phone
and
are
you
here
for
this
case
no,
sir,
I'm
not
okay,
so
I
will
lower
your
hand
and
if
you
could
stay
on
the
line
and
raise
your
hand
when
your
case
number
is
called.
O
A
A
I
C
I
J
G
G
19-800674
for
508
athens,
street
llc,
all
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
G
G
We
have
had
some
contact
with
both
the
owner,
the
contractor
and
the
manager.
This
case
was
initially
started
on
september
23rd
of
2019,
and
was
the
inspection
was
conducted
by
officer
gaston
his
inspection
note
was
that
the
side
of
the
building
was
boarded
up.
The
front
doors
in
one
window
was
boarded
up,
parts
of
the
ceiling
were
falling
down
on
the
public,
sidewalk
vines
were
growing
into
the
building,
parts
of
the
building
were
falling
off
and
all
this
was
the
result
from
a
fire
and
the
interior
was
significantly
damaged
as
well.
G
G
So
he
had
me
send
a
final
notice
of
violation
and
the
green
guard
card
was
returned
which
most
of
our
green
cards
are
getting
returned
now
marked
cove
at
19.
Just
I
guess,
for
social
distancing,
a
re-inspection
was
conducted
on
october
12th
2020..
The
work
was
still
not
complete.
Permits
not
signed
off.
G
G
G
Due
to
the
fact
that
the
code
board
was
deferred
from
tropical
storm
etta,
a
deferral
notice
was
sent
on
november
12th
of
2020
on
november
25th,
the
sign
for
the
code
board
hearing
and
the
affidavit
was
again
posted
and
the
final
inspection,
as
of
yesterday
was
a
large
amount
of
progress
has
been
made.
One
window
was
still
boarded
and
the
workers
were
actively
working
on
the
structure.
B
G
Yes,
we,
after
gaston
being
that
he
started
this,
did
want
to
go
ahead
and
establish
for
everything.
It's
not.
Nothing
has
been
totally
completed
yet
it's
just
a
lot
of
progress
in
the
last
few
months
has
been
has
been
made.
Okay,.
G
The
I
didn't
explain
this.
Thank
you
for
asking
the
permit,
for
the
2019
didn't
include
everything,
so
what
they
ended
up
doing
was
having
to
close
that
permit
and
it
was
closed.
The
building
department
did
confirm
that
for
me
and
they
had
to
reopen
a
different
permit.
That
is
now
a
2020
permit.
G
That
is
for
everything
that
they
needed
to
submit.
I
believe
the
2019
permit
didn't
did
not
include
everything
that
it
needed
to
so,
rather
than
have
two
partial
permits:
they
they
encapsulated
it
all
into
the
one,
because
that
does
include
the
interior,
we're
not
making
that
part
of
the
code
case
so
that
they're
not
going
to
have
to
complete
all
of
that
officer
gaston's
goal
when
he
started.
This
was
just
to
get
the
exterior
completed
and
not
sit
vacant
and
in
a
dilapidated
condition.
C
And
just
a
general
statement
we
were
unable
to
meet
last
month
and
I
want
everyone
to
know
that
nothing
would
be
held
against
them
for
that.
No
additional
fines
are
created
because
of
that.
Actually
it
just
gave
you
extra
time
for
compliance,
but
we
appreciate
those
who
came
and
did
come
into
compliance
and
we
want
to
respect
the
importance
of
upkeep
in
our
city,
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
statement,
because
we
hadn't
talked
about
that.
But
nobody
gets
additionally
punished
because
we
couldn't
meet
correct.
G
Q
G
G
G
C
I
C
I
I
Yeah
just
wanted
to
identify
that
we
have
painted
the
outside
of
the
building.
The
broken
glass
on
the
door
has
been
replaced,
the
vines
have
been
removed,
the
building
exterior
has
been
cleaned
up,
loose
stucco
on
the
overhang
was
repaired,
the
boarded-up
window
and
the
north
door
and
the
front
have
been
blocked
in
and,
as
I
stated
there,
we're
obtaining
stone
tomorrow
morning
and
we'll
be
going
out
there
to
install
that
the
beginning
of
next
week
and
then
continuing
stucco
repair
on
the
front
of
the
building
and
touch-up
paint
will
follow.
I
G
K
C
H
L
L
C
N
For
what
did
I
make
fine?
Did
she
have.
G
Being
that
this
is
the
even
though
this
has
been
going
on
for
quite
a
long
time,
this
is
the
first
time
that
we've
actually
taken
them
to
to.
B
B
M
A
Ms
richards,
the
property
owner
of
zorba
zabikia
llc,
has
been
found
in
violation
of
the
cited
code
section
and
been
given
until
february
26
2021
to
bring
those
violations
into
compliance.
Should
they
fail
to
be
brought
into
compliance
by
that
date
there
will
be
a
25
a
day.
Fine.
Until
compliance
has
been
met,
there
will
be
a
board
order
entered.
It
will
be
ordered
within
the
next
10
days
and
mailed
to
zorba
zavika
llc
at
the
address
listed
with
the
property
appraiser
of
pinellas
county.
C
Thank
you
items
two
three
and
four
have
been
deferred.
We're
going
to
item
five
20-8
000
417..
The
address
is
41680
u.s
highway
19
north
alliance
group
of
tampa
bay,
llc.
C
G
G
20-800-417
for
41680
u.s,
highway
19
north
for
the
alliance
group
of
tampa
bay
exhibit
1
is
all
photos
exhibit
2
is
all
notices
to
include
the
novs
and
nohs
exhibit
3.
Is
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign?
G
G
C
G
G
K
G
And
this
is
the
they
pretty
much.
Unfortunately,
this
case
is
dragged
dragged
on
for
a
while
and
what
continues
to
happen
is
they
do
remove
the
debris
and
then
it
comes
right
back
one
of
the
reasons
they
were.
They
were
actually
cited
for
the
this
dumpster
enclosure
to
be
repaired,
so
if
it
were
to
be
repaired
and
they
were
to
have
the
doors
that
could
be
locked,
then
that
might
help
a
little
bit
with
the
dumping
issue.
G
G
And
there
was
still
trash
around
the
dumpster
area
on
october
12
2020,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
returned
again:
cobia,
19
and
tenant
vacant.
On
october
30th
of
2020,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
november.
11Th
was
the
initial
final
inspection
by
myself.
There
was
a
very
small
amount
of
debris
by
the
dumpster,
but
the
dumpster
enclosure
is
still
missing
doors.
G
G
Unfortunately,
they've
been
dumped
on
more
they've
got
a
tv,
the
enclosure
has
not
been
repaired
and
all
the
vegetative
debris
is
now
there,
and
so
the
the
violations
that
we
are
requesting
to
be
found
are
city
code
139.01
for
the
dumpster
screening
requirements,
8-22
for
the
accumulation
of
trash
city
code,
6-1
adopting
the
international
property.
G
G
G
G
In
order
to
make
the
repair
they
may
need
a
permit,
a
building
permit
so
for
the
dumpster
enclosure
only.
I
would
say
two
months
and
they're
just
going
to
have
to
continue
to
watch
the
accumulation
of
debris
in
that
area,
they're
going
to
end
up
being
a
repeat
violator,
so
I
would
say
honestly
anywhere
between
30
and
60
days.
The
only
reason
I'm
even
saying
60
days
is
because
of
the
dumpster
enclosure
being
repaired
might
require
a
permit
and
that's
it.
Otherwise.
I
would
honestly
10
days.
N
I
knew
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
city
code,
139,
.01,
8-22
city
code,
6-1-
no
take
that
just
the
two
right
yes,
ma'am,
okay
of
the
code
of
ordinances
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
was
in
force
and
effect.
The
respondents
were
in
violation
thereof,.
L
L
N
N
E
Second,
bobby
graffiti.
K
L
E
C
C
G
This
this
store
is
the
b-21
just
across
the
bridge.
G
G
G
We've
done,
multiple
inspections,
we've
gone
inside
to
try
to
find
a
manager
to
speak
with
them,
and
we
really
have
not
had
much
of
a
response.
I
finally
ended
up
opening
a
second
code
case
for
this
property
due
to
trash,
and
I
did
finally
get
an
email
contact
and
I
did
get
a
response
and
some
of
the
trash
around
the
dumpsters
was
removed.
G
I
did
ask
about
this
case,
in
particular,
on
the
storage
and
really
have
not
had
any
response
of
any
kind,
an
employee
inside
the
store.
When
I
initially
went
in
to
ask
about
it,
I
did
say
that
they
are
attempting
to
get
more
storage
containers
for
the
items,
but
I've
not
heard
anything
officially
from
a
manager
nor
an
owner,
and
it
really
has
not
changed
since
it
began.
J
L
L
G
They
have
not
told
me
anything
about
it.
I
believe
it's
for
a
shipping
business
that
they're
doing
that
they're
doing
more
shipping
than
they
are
their
shipping
business
exploded
during
covid
and-
and
I
believe
that
that
the
employees
at
the
register
told
me
that
and
that's
what
the
materials
for.
L
G
G
Okay,
so
exhibit
one
was
all
photos
that
we
just
went
over
exhibit
two
all
notices
to
include
then
notice,
a
violation.
The
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three.
Is
the
administrative
docs
documents
to
include
the
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
and
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
start
at
all
case.
This
is
case
number
two:
zero,
eight,
zero,
zero.
G
Exhibit
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
G
G
G
On
october
12th
of
2020,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
on
october
30th
of
2020,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
signed
on
november
11th
was
the
final
inspection
for
the
november
hearing,
and
there
was
a
large
amount
of
outdoor
storage
still
located
in
front
of
the
building
trash
and
debris
located
around
the
dumpster
on
november
12th
of
2020,
the
deferral
notice
was
mailed
and
returned
unclaimed
on
november
25th
of
2020.
The
sign
was
again
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
postings
signed
on
december
9
2020
was
the
final
inspection.
M
Yes,
so
these
people
just
aren't
aren't
listening
to
you
is
that
correct
I
mean
you've
tried.
M
G
G
If
we're
supposed
to
get
yes
we're
every
notice
that
we
send
except
a
courtesy
letter,
but
all
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
mail
and
first
class.
G
We
got
a
couple
back
unclaimed.
Yes,.
G
I
did
once
I'm
not
sure
who
I
know
officer.
Gaston
went
inside
and
attempted
to
speak
with
someone
there
is.
There
was
the
first
inspection
I
did
when
I
went
to
po
excuse
me
when
I
went
to
post
for
the
november
hearing.
G
There
was
a
bevy
of
activity
to
the
south
end
of
the
building
where
their
storage
is,
and
I
went
in
there
and
asked
to
speak
with
the
manager,
and
they
said
he
wasn't
there,
but
then
and
pointed
out
someone
in
the
parking
lot.
Who
would
be
the
best
person
to
speak
to
so
I
pointed
out
that
I
was
posting
the
sign
and
what
it
was
for
and
the
reason,
and
so
I
spoke
with
him
again.
L
They're
not
going
to
respond
to
10
a
day,
I'm
the
guy
that
would
hit
him,
I'm
pretty
big,
but
after
they
understood
they
have
30
days,
I'm
just
speaking,
but
then
whack
em.
They
got
the
money
it's
not
about.
They
can't
afford
it.
L
L
B
L
F
E
Mrs
jilliard,
yes,
miss
norfleet.
Yes,
mr
kramer,
yes,
mr
weeks.
L
F
L
C
C
F
C
C
C
R
C
Thank
you.
We
have
some
evidence
to
sure
I'll
bring
the
pictures.
R
G
So
this
picture
was
actually
taken
by
officer.
Gaston
excuse
me.
There
was
a
sorry
what
am
I
doing
so
initially
there
was
a
boat
in
the
yard
as
well,
but
that
was
removed
fairly
quickly,
and
then
there
were
just
the
main
thing
about.
The
case
was
just
vehicles
that
were
on
the
property
at
different
times
that
were
not
registered
or
tagged
or
possibly
inoperable
inoperable
are
being
worked
on
and
that's
pretty
much
what
the
photos.
K
J
G
So
my
name
is
beth
hughes,
I'm
the
city
code
inspector
certified
by
the
florida
association
of
code
enforcement.
This
is
case,
number
20-8004
for
1546,
big
bass,
drive
patricia
boggs
young
is
the
owner
exhibit
one
is
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three.
The
administration
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four.
G
The
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign,
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator,
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
G
G
And
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner,
miss
shelley
law
who's.
Here
today
I
she
was
not
aware.
I
don't
believe
that
this
case
even
existed
until,
unfortunately,
her
mom
had
passed
away,
and
she
came
here
for
that
and
found
out
that
I
believe
her
brother
had
been
signing
for
most
of
the
the
mail
and
most
of
the
vehicles
were
were
his
so
on
august,
11th
2020.
G
I
believe
most
of
the
vehicles
were
there
because
her
brother
lived
with
her
mother
and
they
were
on
the
property
by
his
doing
they
were
his
vehicles.
Thank
you.
On
august
11th
of
2020
officer,
gaston
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
He
received
a
call
from
an
anonymous
neighbor
via
detective
division
regarding
unregistered
cars.
At
the
address
upon
inspection,
there
were
five
vehicles
at
the
address:
a
red
toyota
suv
with
no
tag,
a
silver
hyundai
which
that
tag
did
not
belong
to
that
car.
G
He
spoke
to
the
property
owner's
son
j
law
and
advised
him
of
the
violations
and
the
fact
that
they
needed
to
be
corrected
in
10
days.
On
that
same
date,
he
left
a
door
hanger.
G
G
On
september
14th
of
2020,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
signed
by
j
law,
the
property
owner
passed
away
on
september
17th,
and
we
sent
a
deferral
because
the
daughter
had
just
arrived
the
day
before
the
hearing,
I
believe-
and
so
we
deferred
the
case.
For
that
reason,
on
september
22nd
the
deferral
notice
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
signed
by
shelley
law
on
october
30th,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
november.
11Th
was
the
final
inspection
before
the
november
hearing.
G
There
is
a
621
sticker
on
the
red
toyota,
so
it
was,
it
was
currently
tagged.
The
silver
hyundai
was
still
not
registered.
I
spoke
with
the
owner
of
the
hyundai
and
she
had
an
appointment
to
complete
it.
The
next
week
the
daughter
of
the
shelley
law
intends
to
attend
the
code
board
hearing
tomorrow.
G
This
is
just
the
note
I
put
in
the
case
and
verify
the
red
toyota
tag
was
current.
On
november
12
2020,
the
deferral
notice
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
signed
on
november
25th
2020.
The
sign
was
posted
in
the
affidavit
of
posting
signed
and
we
were
actually
called
by
miss
law
to
come.
Do
a
final
inspection
early
because
it
was
in
compliance,
and
I
did
verify
that
all
vehicles
on
the
property
on
december
7
2020
were
tagged
and
registered
and
were
in
compliance.
C
R
I
really
don't
I
apologize,
I
really
don't
have
anything
to
present.
I've
cut,
like
you
said,
come
into
a
compliance
and
spoke
to
you
a
couple
of
times.
The
only
thing
I
can
tell
you
is
I'm
in
the
process
of
moving
my
brother
out
of
the
house.
One
vehicle
will
be
there,
that's
it.
That's
the
key
of
that
you
saw
in
the
last
picture.
That's
me,
I'm
gonna
be
take
over
the
ownership
of
the
home,
so
all
else
will
and
it
is
in
complaints
as
of
today,
the
silver.
R
I
can't
remember
the
name
of
the
car
that
had
the
temp
tag
on
it
today.
She
got
a
permanent
tag
on
it.
So
that's
completely
in
compliance
as
well.
C
R
It's
actually
do
we
had
a
lady
bird
deed
set
up
and
it
actually
goes
into
mine,
my
brothers
and
my
sister's
name.
My
brother
and
myself
at
this
point,
reside
in
the
home.
My
sister
lives
in
texas,
I'm
in
the
process
of
buying
them
out
of
the
house.
R
So
it's
in
the
three
of
our
names
right
now,
but
it
will
just
be
in
mine
and
you're
going
to
be
living
on
the
property.
Yes,
ma'am,
okay
and
I
did
confirm
with
the
lawyer
that
the
lady
bird
did
go
through
and
with
the
county.
I
guess
it
is
an
effect
that
it's
in
our
names.
N
N
C
One
that
you
wanted
to
be
to
have
beth
is
that
the
proper
document
that
you
wanted.
C
K
L
E
C
A
Should
this
property
come
into
violation
again
within
the
next
five
years,
and
the
property
is
still
in
the
same
name.
That
would
be
considered
a
repeat
violation,
subject
to
higher
fines
up
to
500
a
day.
A
C
P
I'm
the
property
manager
for
500
north
walton
avenue.
I
am
under
the
understanding
that
the
property
owner
is
on
this
call
as
well.
I
believe
he
should
be
raising
his
hand
now.
A
P
A
A
L
L
I
C
Q
Christian,
it's
it's
christian
and
no,
I
don't.
G
G
So
this
first
couple
of
pages,
I'm
not
going
to
read
it
to
you,
but
it
basically
is
a
police
report
and
that's
how
this
case
came
about
sergeant
brock.
You,
let
me
know
about
a
call
that
they
had
for
a
underage
person,
renting
a
house
through
illegally
by
using
his
parents
information,
and
there
was
a
large
party
and
the
police
had
to
be
called
out.
G
So
I
researched
it
to
verify
that
it
was
in
fact
being
listed
as
an
airbnb,
and
that
is
when
I
did
find
the
listing
I'm
going
to
go
past
the
police
report-
and
these
are
just
the
pictures
that
from
the
party
from
the
police
report
and
again
the
this
was
through
no
fault
of
the
owner.
They
used
the
children,
used
the
wrong
or
their
parents
information.
G
And,
as
you
can
see,
it
showed
a
minimum
stay
of
two
nights
which
six
weeks
for
this,
for
where
this
property
is
zoned,
is
the
minimum
amount
it.
Let
me
try
to
rent
it
for
four
nights,
so
that's
just
showing
that
the
website
was
showing
that
you
could
rent
it
for
less
than
the
six
weeks
and
then
it
just
I.
This
is
the
picture
of
the.
G
Okay,
so
my
name
is
beth
hughes,
I'm
the
city
code
inspector
certified
by
the
florida
association
of
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
number
20-800462
for
500,
north
walton
avenue,
sun
state
property
of
tarpon
springs,
llc
exhibit
one
are
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three.
The
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four.
G
The
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
G
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
in
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank
you
bobby's
doing
that
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
recently
via
phone
call
and
some
emails
on
august.
20Th
2020
was
the
initial
inspection.
G
That
was
when
I
verified
that
there
was
a
short-term
rental
on
airbnb
and
that's
when
I
attached
the
police
report
with
the
documentation
that
was
being
used
as
the
airbnb.
Also
a
on
august
21st
and
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
signed,
but
the
signature
was
illegible.
G
On
september
25th,
the
re-inspection
was
conducted,
the
short-term
rental,
with
a
minimum
of
two
nights,
was
still
being
advertised,
so
we
were
sending
a
notice
of
hearing.
We
did
so
on
september.
25Th
of
2020
and
the
re
green
card
was
again
returned
signed
on
october
30th.
G
The
sign
was
posted,
an
affidavit
of
posting
signed
on
november
11th.
The
final
inspection
for
the
initial
hearing
was
conducted
and
there
was
still
advertising
a
minimum
of
two
night
rental.
On
november
12th
of
2020,
the
deferral
notice
was
mailed
and
no
green
cards
were
returned.
G
G
I
was
told
the
next
day
that
the
advertising
for
the
short-term
rental
had
been
corrected
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
all
of
the
reservations
on
the
three
different
sites
I
could
find.
I
actually
wouldn't
allow
you
to
make
a
reservation
of
any
kind.
Therefore,
I
did
put
it
into
compliance
so
we're
requesting
for
this
to
be
established
as
a
violation
of
the
planning
and
zoning
code,
25.0
for
a
single
family
resident
district.
C
Q
Okay,
I'd,
like
can,
I
refer
this
to
chris,
my
property
manager.
Q
P
Well
understood
yep,
so
once
we
received
the
notice
of
violation,
as
it
specified
on
213
tour
stone,
we
were
under
the
impression
that
it,
the
verbatim
states
transition
it
states
that
we'll
go
check.
Let
me
pull
it
up.
One
quick
second.
P
So
we
were
under
the
understanding
that
it
was
one
of
those
three
things
right,
so
it
would
be
more
than
six
weeks
where
it
would
be
for
permitted
right
to
be
able
to
utilize
the
property
as
a
rental.
The
other
one
was
gainfully
employed
by
the
community
and
the
third
one
was
a
student
currently
enrolled
in
a
school
located
within
the
community.
So
at
the
time
that
we
received
this
notice,
we
were
under
the
understanding
that
it
could
be
one
of
these
three
things.
P
Now
we
received
the
declaration
to
this
particular
code
law,
probably
around
two
days
ago.
Right,
so
what
we
were
doing,
we
were
under
the
understanding
that
we
were
following
the
code
law
as
it
pertains
specifically
to
the
notice
of
violation
that
we
received
until
we
received
clarification
again
two
days
ago,
that
it
was
it
just
needed
to
be
more
than
six
weeks,
and
at
that
point
just
like
beth
pointed
out,
we
took
it.
G
Basically,
we
did
finally
get
get
communication
over
the
last
few
days.
They
did
go
ahead
and
change
the
advertisements
where
you
are
unable
to
so
again.
Basically
we're
just
looking
to
go
ahead
and
establish
it.
Therefore,
if
it
does
happen
again,
then
it
would
be
a
repeat
violation.
Thank.
C
D
I
move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
section
25.02
of
the
city
code
was
in
full
force
and
effect
at
the
time
of
the
notice
of
violation.
The
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
code
section.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
L
F
L
L
N
H
A
A
There
will
be
an
or
there
is
no
fine
associated
with
it,
because
it's
now
in
compliance,
there
will
be
an
order
entered
within
the
next
10
days
and
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraiser's
office.
If
the
property
goes
into
violation
again
within
the
next
five
years
of
the
same
code
section,
it
will
be
deemed
a
repeat
violator.
Fines
would
start
immediately
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
per
day.
I
C
J
G
So,
just
to
go
through
the
pictures,
real
quick,
we
received
multiple
complaints
that
started
with
the
trash
cans,
probably
being
left
by
the
the
residents
of
the
airbnb
on
the
street
and
not
being
taken
in
and
being
put
out
on
the
wrong
day
and
being
left
out
for
days.
At
a
time
when
officer
gaston
did
the
initial
inspection,
he
noted
that
the
grass
was
overgrown
that
the
fence
was
in
need
of
repair,
basically,
the
here's,
a
picture
of
the
trash
cans
being
out
on
different
days.
G
This
last
picture
the
was
just
the
trash
cans
and
the
recycle
bins
that
were
left
out,
but
at
this
point
the
fence
had
been
repaired
and
the
yard
had
been
cut
and
those
are
the
main
exhibits.
The
only
thing
that
may
become
an
issue
later
in
this
case,
I'm
going
to
point
it
out,
while
the
picture
is
up
before
I
take
the
pictures
down.
G
These
there's
a
concrete
block
here
with
a
post
sticking
out
of
it.
This
was
part
of
the
debris
that
was
mentioned,
and
that's
really
the
only
thing.
That's
left
in
the
yard,
in
addition
to
this
block
next
to
the
garbage
cans
that
I
don't
know
if
it
was
a
old
mailbox
post
that
just
hasn't
been
completely
removed.
G
Those
are
the
only
two
things
that
are
left
there:
the
trash
cans
at
this
point,
the
recycle
bins,
are
out
of
public
view
as
of
today
and
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
stop
sharing
okay,
so
my
name
is
beth
hughes,
I'm
the
city
code
inspector
certified
by
the
florida
association
of
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
number.
G
20-800590
for
500
north
walton
avenue
for
sun
state
property
of
tarpon
springs,
llc
exhibit
one
are
all
photos
exhibit
two
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three.
The
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four,
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
all
notice.
The
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
since
the
record
is
evident.
Thank
you.
G
Okay
and
again
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
and
the
property
manager
as
well
in
our
three-way
phone
conversation.
We
had
a
couple
days
ago
on
october
1st
2020,
the
initial
inspection
wasn't
completed
by
officer
gasson.
The
property
was
over
grant
grown,
trash
cans
left
in
the
yard,
and
the
fence
was
in
poor
condition.
G
On
october
5th
of
2020,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
returned
signed
by
mark
kristen
on
october,
21st
was
the
re-inspection,
the
fence
had
been
repaired,
the
grass
had
been
cut,
the
trash
cans
are
empty,
but
in
public
view,
and
the
concrete
block
with
the
post
left
by
the
hou
post
was
still
there
by
the
house.
Not
in
compliance
on
october
21st
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
returned
signed
on
october
30th,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
signed
on
november
11.
G
G
Please,
on
november
12th
the
deferral
notice
was
mailed
and
no
green
cards
were
received
on
november
25th.
The
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
december.
9Th
was
the
final
inspection
so
again
where
the
city
is
standing
right
now
is
that
the
pre-collection
practices
8-16
is
in
compliance,
but
we
would
like
to
establish
it
for
that.
G
8-40.
The
duty
to
maintain
private
property
is
in
compliance.
The
fence
but
we'd
like
to
establish
it.
The
36.0
fences
wall
of
hedges
is
in
compliance,
but
we
would
like
to
establish
it
and
8-52
for
the
debris,
which
is
only
that
one
piece
of
concrete
with
the
post
is
the
only
thing:
that's
not
in
violation
or
excuse
me
not
in
compliance
right
now.
G
The
location
of
of
that
block
is
between
the
his
fence
and
between
the
fence
of
his
neighbor,
it's
closer
to
his
fence
than
the
neighbor.
It
appears
to
be
somewhat
like
the
debris
that
had
been
on
the
property,
so
I
had
requested
a
survey
if
he
had
one
so
we
could
see
if
it's
not
on
his
property,
we'll
comply
it
and
be
done
with
it.
If
so,
I
requested
a
survey,
he
did
tell
me
it
had
been
removed,
but
I
went
by
this
morning
and
it
is
still
there-
and
that
concludes
the
city's
presentation.
G
I'm
sorry
36.03
you're
right.
I
that
I
did
not
add
that.
H
G
I
didn't
add
that
I
apologize
because
it
had
come
into
compliance,
so
we
don't.
We
don't
need
to
establish
that
one.
I
apologize
just
the
three
of
them.
Just
the
three
8-16,
the
pre-collection
practices
they
they
did
repair
the
fence
right
away
the
reason
we're
requesting
to
establish
the
pre-con
collection
practices.
It
took
a
multiple
multiple
weeks
for
that
to
finally
come
into
compliance.
C
P
Understood
yep
so
we're
regarding
the
actual
grass
itself.
We
have
some
issues
with
the
landscape.
Folks
that
help
us
out
at
that
particular
property.
They
stopped
going
out
for
quite
some
time
due
to
over
19..
So
that
was
the
reason
for
the
delay.
Once
we
received
a
notice
from
beth,
as
she
explained
just
now,
we
went
to
compliance
quickly.
We
actually
have
the
property
on
a
two
week,
rotating
schedule
for
landscaping
and
yard
work.
P
The
trash
cans
are
out
in
the
back
of
the
house,
so
they
are
behind
the
fence.
We
were
under
the
understanding
they
could.
They
could
just
not
be
in
the
front
of
the
house.
That's
why
we
had
put
next
to
the
garage
once
clarification
was
made.
They
are
permanently
in
the
back
of
the
house
unless
we
actually
need
to
take
trash
out
on
traffic
regarding
the
block
itself,
based
on
exhibit
one
that
she
presented.
P
She
had
to
zoom
in
a
little
bit,
so
it
was
a
little
bit
of
confusion
here.
To
be
quite
honest,
once
once
we
received
that
picture,
we
believed
it
to
be
the
left-hand
side
block
next
to
the
trash
cans.
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
that
we
can
put
it
up
to
reference
it
if
need
be.
However,
we
we
sent
someone
out
to
go.
Take
a
look
at
the
concrete
slab
on
the
front
left
hand
side.
It
must
weigh
at
least
150
to
200
pounds.
P
We
were
able
to
take
the
lid,
but
the
other
part
seems
to
be
connected
somehow
to
the
to
the
ground.
So
we
were
looking
at
the
left-hand
side
block.
When
we
initially
received
this
picture.
We
had
not
seen
the
back
part
right,
which
was
not
very
clear.
We
sent
someone
out
since
that
is
also
pretty
heavy
concrete.
They
actually
took
it
today
right
so
that
I
actually
had
sent
over
some
pictures,
probably
a
couple
of
hours
ago.
P
That
is,
in
fact,
in
compliance,
you're
more
than
welcome
to
look
through
this,
but
again
as
we
go
through
this,
we
needless
to
say,
want
to
be
involuntary
compliance.
We
have
been
a
little
bit
back
and
forth
until
we
get
a
good
understanding
as
to
you
know
what
the
requirements
were.
But
but
I
think,
as
of
now,
we
are
in
full
compliance
based
on
the
open
items
that
we
have.
G
No,
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
I
do.
I
will
need
to,
of
course
verify
that
that
final
violation
is
in
compliance.
G
C
C
N
N
L
K
B
A
N
E
H
C
G
B
S
A
So,
mr
kristin,
the
sun
state
property
of
ts,
llc,
was
found
in
violation
of
section
8-16-8-40.
They
are
now
in
compliance
should
either
one
of
those
violations
reoccur
within
five
years,
they'll
be
deemed
repeat,
violations
and
subject
to
daily
fines
of
up
to
500
a
day.
As
for
section
8-52,
the
cut
enforcement
board
has
found
a
violation
of
that
section
as
well,
and
given
you
until
december
18
2020
to
come
into
compliance,
should
it
be
not
be
in
compliance
by
that
date
of
50
a
day.
Fine
will
be
assessed.
A
Based
upon
your
testimony
today,
I
think
city
staff,
ms
hughes,
that
will
be
inspecting
the
property,
determine
whether
it's
in
compliance
once
it's
in
compliance,
an
affidavit
of
compliance
will
be
issued
and
it'll
be
provided
to
you.
You
may
want
to
double
check
that
with
the
code
enforcement
department.
After
today's
hearing,
those
orders
will
be
reduced
to
writing
within
10
days
and
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
at
the
property
appraisers
records.
G
D
C
C
G
Okay,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen.
This
case
honestly
baffles
me
a
little
bit
only
because
it
is
only
for
pre-collection
practices
I
on.
I
think
this
is
the
first
time
I've
ever
had
one
of
these
go
to
code
board
just
for
this
issue,
but
literally
we
have
probably
about
seven
cases
on
this
street
and
to
turn
around
you
have
to
go
to
the
end
of
the
street.
So
every
time
I've
gone,
the
trash
cans
have
been
outside.
They
have
never
once
been
taken
in.
G
J
Trackpad,
I
am
okay,
thank
you,
we're
glad
it
happens
to
you,
okay,
so
the
first
one
was
the
initial
inspection.
This
was
the
second
one,
and
then
this
was
the
one.
As
of.
G
It's
on
mondays
and
thursdays
all
of
the
inspections.
I
double
checked
myself,
just
to
be
sure
we're
done
on
days
other
than
those
two
days,
and
I
also
checked
the
website
to
make
sure
that
that
area,
because
it
is
further
out
there
has
the
same
day
and
according
to
the
website,
all
trash
collection
for
tarpon
springs
is
monday
and.
G
G
20-800625
for
1639
sea
breeze
drive
for
desiree
rose,
valencia
exhibit
one
is
all
photographs
exhibit
two
or
all
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
administrative.
Three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
records,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation,
a
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank
you
bobby
dusso.
G
We
have
not
received
any
contact
with
the
owner
on
october.
13
2020
was
the
initial
inspection
and
we
noticed
that
the
trash
cans
were
left
curbside.
I
was
actually
in
a
training
day
with
officer
gaston
my
first
training
day.
I
believe-
and
we
were
there
on
that
street
for
a
different
purpose.
If
I
recall
and
the
trash
cans
were
were
left
curbside
and
we
did
receive
a
complaint
from
an
owner
on
that
street,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
returned
coveted
19..
G
On
october
23rd
a
re-inspection
was
conducted,
the
trash
cans
were
still
left
in
public
view.
On
october
23rd,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
again
honestly.
The
only
reason
as
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
That
quickly
was
because
I
had
been
down
that
street
on
multiple
occasions
multiple
days
of
the
week,
and
it
was
they
were
always
there.
So
that's
the
reason
why
I
sent
it
without
sending
a
final
notice.
First,
on
october
30th
2020,
the
sign
was
posted,
an
affidavit
of
posting
signed
on
november
11th.
G
G
19.
on
november
25th,
the
sign
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
december.
9Th
2020
was
the
final
inspection,
which
was
the
last
picture.
I
showed
you
where
the
trash
cans
were
still
on
the
street
with
trash
bags
around
them,
so
we
would
request
that
they
be
found
in
violation
of
8-16
city
code
8-16
for
pre-collection
practices,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
Anyone
have
questions.
M
M
K
F
A
L
L
M
C
A
Q
E
L
E
Mr
weeks,
yes,
mrs
archer,
yes,
miss
wade.
Yes,.
J
Okay,
I'm
actually
surprised
he's
not
here
we
postponed
it
purposely
to
let
him
be
in
attendance.
G
G
G
Where
there
was
some
vegetation,
overgrowth
and
debris
and
and
the
it
appeared
also
that
some
of
the
vegetation
removal
had
been
being
stored
inside
the
the
unfinished
structure
as
well.
G
G
G
That
was
the
case
for
the
structure.
He
had
been
being
charged
200
a
day,
totaling
fifty
six
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty
two
dollars
he
has
been
since
put
in
put
into
compliance.
G
The
structure
has
been
removed
and
he's
doing
a
fine
reduction
request
which
will
be
on
the
january
agenda
so
exhibit
one
are
all
photos
exhibit
two
or
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case
summary
the
previous
board
orders
and
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign?
Exhibit
five?
G
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board?
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
G
G
G
On
october,
6
of
2020,
a
re-inspection
was
conducted
and
the
property
still
had
overgrowth
near
the
structure
and
a
pile
of
debris
inside
what
would
be
the
garage
not
in
compliance
on
october
13th
of
2020,
and
this
was
again
was
in
my
first
or
second
training
day.
I
was
with
him
when
he
did
the
reinspection
on
october
13th
of
2020
and
did
put
the
property
into
compliance
at
that
time.
G
On
number
november
25th
of
2020
the
sign
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed,
so
the
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
initial
inspection,
which
is
on
september
28th
of
2020
until
put
into
compliance
as
of
october
12
2020.
That
was
when
we
were
told
it
was
in
compliance,
even
though
the
inspection
was
done
on
the
13th.
G
So
the
the
previous
case,
where
they
were
established
for
the
overgrowth.
J
G
D
A
A
D
A
3-40,
the
answer
is
yes,
I
just
don't
know
on
8-52
whether
it
was
within
five
years.
So,
for
example,
if
the
15
case
came
in
in
february
of
2015
and
this
case
came
in
in
october
of
2020,
it
would
be
outside
the
five-year
time
frame.
So
I
don't.
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question
because
we
haven't
heard
that
testimony
yet.
G
G
G
Okay,
this
is
going
to
be
interesting.
This
was
scheduled
for
them.
No,
I
think,
we're
okay.
Actually,
it
was
for
the
code
board
hearing
of
december
10th
of
2015.
G
december
10th,
yes,
and
they
were
found
to
be
in
the
initial
date
of
the
inspection
where
they
were
found
to
be
in
violation
was
on
september,
28th
of
2020.
A
C
M
M
M
M
M
C
The
house
was
the
house
built
up
across
the
property
line.
He
said
actually
had
to
tear
the
whole
thing
down
yeah
she
said
and
his
fines.
M
E
D
L
C
A
M
L
C
A
H
C
G
We
still
have
one
more
repeat
violator
case.
You
want
me
to
finish
that
first.
C
Okay,
we're
going
to
skip
to
item
24,
which
is
number
20-8.
C
G
Okay,
so
basically
it's
been
so
long.
I
have
to
refresh
my
memory.
So
basically
an
order
was
completed
under
one
name,
and
so,
let's
see.
G
The
order
was
vacated.
Excuse
me
before
it
was
updated
in
pinellas,
county
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector,
so
when
it
ended
up
going
to
code
board,
the
name
that
was
on
the
order
was
incorrect
and
that's
the
reason
we're
requesting
to
quash
it
because
it
had
been
changed
legally.
It
just
hadn't
been
updated
in
the
property
appraiser
website,
so
we
did
not
know
that.
C
A
Let
me
go
ahead
and
add
some
basic
information
to
you.
Hopefully,
it'll
make
a
little
bit
more
sense.
This
property
was
owned
by
michael
lacy.
The
property
was
in
foreclosure.
The
foreclosure
case
was
completed,
the
certificate
of
title,
giving
title
ownership
of
the
property.
The
foreclosure
case
was
given
to
the
bank
almost
immediately.
The
code
enforcement
department
began
a
case,
a
code
enforcement
case
against
the
bank,
while
that
code
enforcement
case
was
pending.
There
was
obviously
something
going
on
in
the
foreclosure
case
that
the
co
the
city
staff
was
not
aware
of.
A
Ultimately,
the
court
reversed
the
title
ownership
of
the
property
and
entered
an
order,
reversing
that
basically
vacating
the
certificate
of
title
once
that
order
was
entered.
It
basically
put
the
put
the
property
ownership
back
in
the
name
of
the
original
property
owner.
Mr
lacey,
because
of
the
fact
that
the
code
board
order
was
in
the
name
of
the
bank,
but
they
were
not
the
proper
owner
because
the
fire
owner
was
vacated,
it
means
nothing
it.
A
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
what
the
city
I'm
sorry
is
trying
to
do
is
to
clean
up
the
code
enforcement
case
by
vacating
the
order
that
was
entered
by
the
code
enforcement
board,
because
it
was
they
were
not
the
property
owners
at
the
time.
So
all
you
need
to
do
would
be
to
a
motion
to
grant
the
city's
motion
to
quash.
That
would
be
the
appropriate
motion
and
then
the
city
could,
of
course,
if
they
haven't
done
already
begin.
Another
code
enforcement
case
against
the
current
property
owner.
G
L
L
L
C
C
A
Really
they
don't
have
to
do
that.
It
would
obviously
be
the
smartest
thing
to
do
to
make
sure
that
when
you're
buying
a
property,
it
has
no
title
issues.
I'm
not
sure
whether
title
insurance
or
title
search
was
done
on
this
property,
but
any
any
lawyer
giving
advice
on
property
purchases
would
require
or
advise
a
title
search
be
done.
N
N
The
property
is
brought
into
compliance
through
proper,
permitting
process.
The
property
has
been
significantly
improved,
the
property
was
purchased
for
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
in
improvement
costs
were
approximately
fifteen
thousand
six
hundred.
As
a
result,
our
department
could
support
nothing
less
than
15
000.
I'd
like
to
request.
We
do
that
or
make
a
motion.
H
L
L
C
G
Just
a
couple
of
pictures
these
were
taken
by
officer
gaston
on
october,
7th.
G
G
20-800617
for
a
vacant
lot
across
from
762
bayshore
for
pilarity
llc
parcel
number
one,
one,
two,
seven
one:
five,
zero
four,
eight
seven,
eight
zero
zero,
two
zero
one,
three
zero
exhibit
one
are
all
photos,
exhibit
two
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
previous
board
orders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Are
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
five
or
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cross?
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
pinellas
county
property
appraiser
in
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
in
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
Okay,
we
did
have
contact
with
the
owner
honestly,
the
first
time
I
had
contact
with
him,
I
believe,
is
when
I
was
trying
to
find
a
number
to.
Let
him
know
that
the
november
hearing
had
been
deferred.
G
And
anyways
that
so
that
was
the
only
contact
I
had
with
him.
Excuse
me.
I
believe
I
had
a
phone
call
from
him
as
well
so
october,
7
2020
was
the
initial
inspection.
It
was
conducted
by
officer
gassen,
the
property
is
less
than
10
000
square
feet
and
overgrown
on
october
7,
2020,
a
repeat
violation
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
was
signed,
coveted
19.
G
G
G
So
to
clarify
what
I'm
talking
about,
we
actually
had
another
complaint
or
someone
asking
what
work
was
going
on
out
there
and
being
that
we
didn't
didn't
know
I
went,
I
went
out
there
to
take
a
look
discovered
that
it
was
actually
a
city
project
that
was
going
on
and
when
I
just
found
that
out,
I
also
realized,
because
I
didn't
do
the
initial
inspection.
I
wasn't
sure
that
this
was
a
actual
code
case.
A
M
M
M
9.50
I
moved
that
the.
M
D
C
L
E
C
J
A
Attorney
so
no,
the
answer
is
no.
Unless
he's
going
to
be
providing
testimony.
Mr
ortega,
are
you
going
to
be
providing
testimony.
A
G
Please,
okay!
So
basically,
this
is
just
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance.
G
G
The
problem,
which
I
believe
the
attorney
is
probably
going
to
discuss,
is
that
they're
having
an
issue
getting
the
eviction
completed.
So,
of
course,
until
that's
done,
they
can't
get
in
there
to
remove
the
debris
to
even
see
what
debris
is
still
remaining
behind
the
fenced
area.
G
So
for
right
now
there
still
are
items
that
I
believe
during
the
last
the
during
the
deadline-
inspection
well,
obviously,
for
us
to
put
non-compliance.
It
was
not
in
compliance
at
the
time
and
we
also
need
to
be
invited
on
the
property
when
it
is
in
compliance.
Just
to
see
that
all
the
items
that
were
behind
the
fence,
it
was
a
very,
very
large
amount
of
debris-
has
been
removed.
G
And
that
concludes
my
testimony.
S
Yes,
I
spoke
with
miss
hughes
and
and
she's
fully
aware,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
board
aware
of
the
eviction
case.
We
are
actively
pursuing
the
eviction.
We
did
send
out
a
motion
for
rid
of
possession
back
in
september
as
you're
aware
during
covid.
Some
judges
are
a
little
bit
adverse
to
evicting
tenants
on
the
property,
and
that
is
the
issue
here.
S
In
conjunction
with
the
property
manager,
we've
not
been
able
to
actually
make
contact
with
them
to
work
through
a
cash
for
keys
to
get
them
out
or
just
to
really
let
us
onto
the
property
to
fix
it.
But
my
client
is
actively
pursuing
the
eviction
and
as
soon
as
we
can
get
in
their
board,
we
will
remedy
the
property
as
quickly
as
possible.
E
E
A
Hearing,
I'm
sorry
so
this
would
be
whether
or
not
that
you're
going
to
accept
the
affidavit
of
compliance
or
not
to.
M
I
moved
it
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
by
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
sections,
8-28-48-52,
6-1
and
ipmc
code
505-1.
G
C
K
L
A
A
Once
the
property
has
been
brought
into
compliance,
you
need
to
contact
the
code
enforcement
staff,
they'll
they'll,
inspect
the
property
and
then
issue
that
affidavit
of
compliance.
Subsequent
to
that,
you
can
petition
the
code
enforcement
board
for
a
fine
reduction
pursuant
to
its
rules
of
procedure.
Rule
five
section
4
you
may
want
to
get
a
copy
of
those.
There
will
be
an
order
that
will
be
issued
by
the
cut
enforcement
board
within
the
next
10
days
and
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
at
the
property
appraiser's
office.
J
G
Yes,
no
ma'am.
It's
simply
the
only
reason
there's
no
prosecution
crosses
part
of
it
was
a
repeat
violation.
So
she'd
already
been
charged.
Those
costs
with
the
initial
case.
Otherwise
the
property
is
not
in
compliance
at
this
time.
For
the
city's
opinion.
E
L
L
A
A
Yeah
he
he's
he
included
that
in
his
motion
and.
A
A
G
No,
no,
I
meant
I
perhaps
shouldn't
have
added
it
to
the
agenda
she's,
not
in
compliance
with
any
of
them,
but
of
course
the
repeat:
violation
has
already
been
accruing
daily
fines,
so
that
doesn't
need
an
affidavit
of
non-compliance
that
was
established.
It
won't
need
anything
but
an
affidavit
of
compliance
when
that
comes
into
compliance.
Hopefully,
so
all
the
new
violations,
however,
did
get
a
deadline,
and
that's
what
those
are
not
in
compliance.
This
time.
K
G
C
G
C
D
I
moved
that
we
approved
the
minutes
of
october
8th
as
2020
as
printed.
C
I
had
a
question
on
that.
Was
that
the
section
of
minutes
where
mr
track
trask
came
back
and
made
a
few
alterations
we
went
to
or
was
that
the
set
before.