![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w6S4DA7lMk8/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board September 10, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
E
A
B
C
You,
our
father
in
heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
tasks
before
us,
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy.
In
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
we
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
that
is
placed
before
us
and
always
act
in
accordance
with
what
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
this
we
pray,
amen.
D
B
Thank
you
very
much,
I'm
going
to
read
that
hearing
procedure,
so
everybody
will
kind
of
understand
what
we're
doing
it's.
The
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
tarkin
springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarkin
springs.
B
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
B
B
B
F
Yeah
we
just
have,
let's
see
agenda
item
number.
Two
number
two
is
deferred.
B
D
Thankfully,
excuse
me
mark,
can
you
is
mr,
the
other
alternate
number
two,
mr
stammas
on.
A
B
B
B
D
F
Do
thank
you.
Thank
you
officer,
steve
gaston
city
of
tarpon
springs
police
department,
code
enforcement.
This
case
before
the
board
is
19-800-795.
The
property
address
is
445
east
martin
luther
king
drive
currently
owned
by
wells.
Fargo
bank
n.a
with
carrington
mortgage
loan
trust
underneath
of
it.
We
have
no
prior
case
for
this.
F
F
There's
a
little
back
history
with
this
property.
It's
it
has
been
the
source
of
numerous
complaints
for
the
neighbors.
The
property
went
all
the
way
through
code
board
back
in
2018,
but
we
had
to
quash
that
case
because
there
was
a
name
change
that
wasn't
recorded
until
after
code
board,
so
that
case
was
quashed.
We
reinitiate
a
reinitiation
of
a
foreclosure
proceeding
took
place
about
two
years
ago
and
it
finally
completed
so
legally.
There
was
no
one
to
notice,
as
the
original
property
owner
was
deceased.
F
So
as
of
april
2020,
wells
fargo
won
the
the
foreclosure
bid
on
this
property.
So
they
are
now
from
everything
we
can
tell
the
current
and
legal
property
owner
of
this
property,
so
we're
here
again
on
this
property,
so
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
We
have
had
some
contact
with
the
law:
firm
van
laa
and
tammy
calderon
from
the
attorney's
office,
barring
all
the
2018
things
the
case
restarted
november,
7th
of
2019
per
the
city
utility
department.
F
There
was
no
active
water
connection
and
at
the
time
there
were
people
living
in
the
house
on
december
4th
of
the
same
year.
The
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
to
the
tenant.
It
was
returned
signed
by
brenda
david
on
december
18th
of
2019.
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
by
checking
with
the
utilities
and
the
water
was
terminated
in
august
of
2019.
F
F
It
should
also
be
noted
and
I'll
show
you
the
pictures
if
you
haven't
seen
them.
There
was
a
lot
of
debris
on
the
property
and
I
have
not
been
asked
to
go
back
to
conduct
a
re-inspection
under
any
of
the
owners.
So
at
this
point
in
time
I
have
no
reason
to
believe
that
behind
the
fenced-in
area,
those
violations
still
do
not
exist,
so
those
were
prior
and
my
belief
is,
they
still
do
exist
on
may
19th
of
2020
conducted
another
reinspection,
as
I
noted
here
the
2018
case,
which
had
trash
and
debris.
F
We
finally
figured
out,
through
all
the
records
information
about
who
the
new
owner
was,
and
then
we
started
to
properly
notice
them
and
notice.
A
violation
was
sent
to
the
owner.
The
green
cards
were
returned
by
wells
fargo
and
ct
corporation
on
july,
13th
of
2020
an
email
was
sent
to
van
laa,
requesting
help
to
provide
a
notice
of
violation
to
their
client.
F
I
conducted
another
reinspection
on
july
16th
and
still
not
in
compliance
on
august
20th.
Another
reinspection
was
conducted
after
communication
with
the
attorney
trying
to
get
a
hold
of
the
property
owner.
We
tried
to
get
import
and
updated
information
and
there
were
no
changes
in
the
property
county
or
the
property
pinellas
county
property
appraiser,
and
at
that
point
we
decided
to
send
a
notice
of
hearing
to
the
owner
of
record
the
registered
agent
and
the
tenant
on
august
20th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
by
wells,
fargo
and
c-corp.
F
On
august
28th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
and
then
conducted
another
re-inspection
on
september.
9Th
the
final
inspection
nobody's
still
gone
back
to
invite
me
onto
the
property.
The
water
is
still
disconnected
it's
unknown
if
any
persons
are
still
living
in
the
house,
and
we
did
confirm
with
the
utility
department
that
the
water
was
still
turned
off
so
before
the
board.
F
At
this
point
in
time
is
a
violation
of
city
code
6-1,
which
adopted
the
2015
building
code,
because
it
was
an
older
case
and
then
under
that
ipmc
505.1,
which
requires
that
homes
be
connected
to
city
water
or
a
plumbing
system,
8-22
the
accumulation
of
trash,
and
if
you
haven't
seen
the
pictures
I'll
be
happy
to
put
them
on
the
screen.
F
F
So
this
was
the
property
pile
of
debris.
This
is
one
of
the
more
recent
pictures
of
this
year
and
going
back.
This
is
this
is
sorry
it's
sideways
inside
of
the
fenced
in
area
as
the
green
pool,
these
were
back
in
2018
and,
like
I
said,
I
haven't
been
able
to
go
back
inside
this
area
to
determine
if
this
exists
or
does
not
exist
any
longer.
F
F
And
the
next
one
will
probably
be
sideways
not
to
change
the
view
again,
hey
look
at
that.
So
this
is
the
inside
of
the
fenced
in
area.
Like
I
said,
I
haven't
been
back
there
to
be
able
to
reinspect
it,
so
I
have
no
information
that
this
doesn't
still
exist
but,
as
stated,
the
water
is
still
not
connected.
There
is
still
pile
of
debris
out
back
in
the
driveway
that
hasn't
been
cleaned
up.
So
that's
the
current
situation
and
unless
somebody
wants
to
see
something
else
in
this
I'll
stop
screen
sharing.
B
F
Banks
are
interesting;
they
won't
tell
us
any
of
that
information
they
they.
They
say
they
won't
go
on
it.
If
there's
somebody
in
there,
even
if
it's
a
squatter
type
situation,
we
I
haven't,
seen
anybody
recently,
but
you
know
knocking
on
the
door.
Nobody
answers.
So
I
mean
it
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
anything.
The
same
situation
applied
before
when
we
knew
people
were
living
there,
you'd
knock
on
the
door.
Nobody
would
answer
because
we're
still
the
police
so.
B
B
E
D
J
C
J
Let
me
re,
let
me
say
that
it's
250
dollars
anyway,.
B
E
E
D
E
B
F
Again,
steve
gaston
city
of
tarpon
springs
police
department,
code
enforcement
case
20-80092,
1000,
peninsula
avenue
property
is
another
bank
owned
property,
usa
federal
national
mortgage
association.
It
is
a
structure
and
you'll
see
the
pictures
we
have.
No
prior
cases
for
this
owner
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs
and
officer
photographs
that
were
taken
exhibit
number
two.
All
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
is
the
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property
appraiser
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four,
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
F
All
the
notices
were
made
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return
received
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair.
Please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
C
C
B
Is
there
anyone
that
would
like
to
present
their
side.
B
C
B
E
F
Yes,
the
only
contact
we've
had
and
it
wasn't
really
with
the
owner-
it's
with
the
resource
center
at
fannie
mae
that
helps
with
property
maintenance.
This
case
started
march
18th
of
2020.
the
property's
vacant.
It's
not
being
maintained
at
the
time
the
lawn
was
overgrown
on
march
18th
of
2020.
We
noticed
we
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
with
insufficient
address
for
fannie
mae
vacant
for
the
tenant.
F
It
was
not
in
compliance
now
there
was
a
pile
of
debris
out
front,
the
property's
not
being
maintained
during
that
period
of
time
graffiti
had
been
put
on
the
building
and
the
police
have
been
called
out
due
to
juveniles
being
out
there
damaging
the
property
and
putting
some
graffiti
on
it,
and
so
we
added
the
graffiti
violation
back
then,
on
june
3rd,
all
of
our
email
had
been
returned,
so
we
contacted
fannie
mae
actually
spoke
to
somebody.
F
She
gave
it
a
case
number
for
their
maintenance
people
and
their
records
show
that
they
do
not
own
the
property.
Although
the
pinellas
county
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
shows
fannie
mae,
is
the
owner
and
she's
referring
our
office
up
the
chain
and
hopefully
will
be
contacted
in
the
next
few
days,
which
I
don't
think
has
happened
as
of
yet
so
an
amended
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
on
june
3rd.
F
That
mail
was
returned
no
longer
at
this
address
conducted
a
re-inspection
on
july
16th,
still
not
in
compliance.
There
was
some
more
graffiti
added
and
the
debris
was
still
out
front
and
apparently
patrol's
been
having
problem
with
trespassers
getting
actually
into
the
house
itself
on.
F
We
had
a
phone
call
email
from
the
consumer
resource
center
about
a
fax
that
we'd
sent
them
an
information
that
they're
the
servicer
for
record
for
handling
and
they
were
going
to
provide
some
information
and
and
if
they
were
alluding
to
the
fact
that
bank
of
america
was
a
servicer
for
the
property,
but
they
wouldn't
give
us
any
more
information.
F
So
at
that
time,
on
july
16th,
the
final
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
it
was
returned.
No
longer
this
address
august
25th
conducted
another
reinspection.
F
There
was
no
change
to
the
prior
violations,
but
now
somebody
was
nice
enough
to
actually
dump
a
trailer
in
the
front
yard,
adding
to
the
debris
collection
on
august,
25th
sent
an
email
again
to
fannie
mae
resource
center
to
let
the
no
the
property
owner
know
it
changed
and
we
were
sending
a
notice
of
hearing
on
the
same
date
received
a
phone
call
from
the
servicer
which
was
safeguard
and
we
forwarded
all
the
information
to
them
as
well,
and
we
haven't
heard
back
from
anyone
since
then.
F
On
august,
we
sent
the
noh
that
green
card
was
returned
from
fannie
mae
headquarters
and
on
august
28th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
for
it
conducted
another
re-inspection
on
september
9th
of
this
year,
and
there
was
no
change.
F
The
violations
before
the
board
and
I'll
show
the
photographs
when
you
guys
are
ready,
8-40
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
8-52
nuisance
prohibitions,
which
includes
debris
and
then
6-1,
which
adopts
the
2018
version
of
the
international
property
maintenance
code
or
ipmc,
and
under
that
ipmc
code
302.9,
which
is
defacement
of
property,
deals
with
graffiti,
and
it's
the
responsibility
of
the
property
owner
to
cover
that
up
or
remove
it.
So
those
are
the
violations
before
the
board
and
if
it
pleases
the
board,
I
can
share
those
photographs.
F
Hopefully
nobody's
offended
by
the
language,
but
here's
some
of
the
graffiti
some
I'm
not
sure
what
that
is,
but
it's
graffiti
and
they
tore
out
the
screens
and
entered
the
building
around
the
back.
You
can
see
it's
not
being
maintained
back
there
same
thing
yards
overgrown,
all
the
screens
were
torn
out
and
then
inside
of
the
house
there
was
a
graffiti
done
holes
punched
in
the
wall.
Things
like
that.
C
Well,
we
need
to
get
the
property
owner
involved
and
they
have
done
that
by
way
of
the
records
that
they
received
from
the
property
appraisers
office.
So,
but
to
answer
your
question:
if
there
is
a
lien
on
the
property-
yes
it
it
has
to
be
addressed
before
the
property
would
be
sold
to
free
and
clear,
there's
always
a
marketable
title
issue.
So
anybody
that's
purchasing
it,
especially
a
new
homeowner.
They
would
want
to
make
sure
that
those
liens
are
addressed,
but
you
should
focus
on
you
know.
Is
there
a
violation
or
not?
J
C
E
E
B
J
B
I
C
B
D
B
C
F
F
We
have
no
prior
cases
for
this
address
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
and
any
screenshots
things
like
that.
All
the
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
are
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three
is
the
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four,
is
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
F
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair.
Please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
their
record
as
evidence.
F
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner,
mr
tamelo,
via
phone
calls
and
emails
kind
of
constant
contact.
This
case
started
back
may
18th
of
2020.
F
We
received
a
complaint
about
this
property
being
used
as
a
vacation,
rental
or
short-term
rental
tourist
rental,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
and
we
found
a
listing
on
airbnb
for
the
property
and
verified
that
it
was
a
short-term
rental
advertisement.
In
fact,
on
it
said
that
the
minimum
stay,
I
believe,
was
seven
day
or
three
nights.
There
was
one
of
them
listed
as
three
nights
due
to
covid.
F
F
I
guess
there
was
some
information
and
talk
with
planning
and
zoning
and
they
would
not
support
rezoning
the
property,
because
the
violation
before
the
board
is
essentially
the
zoning
code
based
on
the
type
of
property
that
it
is,
and
the
zoning
district
that
that
property
falls
into
on
july
31st.
F
Mr
tumelo
actually
asked
for
this
case
to
be
brought
before
the
code
board
to
be
heard.
I
informed
him
that
we
could
do
that,
but
I
have
to
naturally
let
it
progress
through
the
steps
which
includes
you
know,
doing
a
notice
of
hearing
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
on
august
5th
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
and
you
know
he
had
he
requested
to
be
added
to
this
hearing
and
the
advertisements
on
airbnb
had
not
been
changed
to
the
minimum
of
six
weeks.
They
were
still
being
listed
for
the
three
nights
days.
F
On
august
10th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
unclaimed
on
august
28th,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
and,
on
september,
2nd
conducted
another
reinspection,
the
airbnb
link,
which
is
in
here
it's
still
showing
a
minimum
of
three
night
stay
and
then,
on
september,
9th
of
this
year
we
verified
the
airbnb
link,
still
shows
a
minimum
of
a
three-night
stay
and
an
email
was
sent,
providing
all
the
zoom
information
to
mr
tamela
who's.
Obviously
here
so
he
got
that
information.
F
The
violations
before
the
board
are
city
code
25.02,
which
is
single
family
residential
district
and
using
the
property
as
a
tourist,
home
or
a
short-term
rental,
is
not
allowed
in
the
code,
and
it
is
not
permitted
nor
conditional
use.
So
as
of
right
now,
it's
still
being
advertised
for
that
purpose,
and
it
doesn't
seem
that
anybody
denies
that
it
is
a
short-term
rental
and
that's
what's
before
the
board.
At
this
point,
and
as
of
right
now,
the
city
has
nothing
further.
F
H
F
That's
a
state
statute
that
we
can
discuss
later.
There's
the
google
street
view
of
it.
This
was
obviously
older
when
it
was
being
constructed.
Mr
tamilla
did
do
a
fair
amount
of
work
on
the
property
it
it
had
previously
with
prior
owners
been
a
code
complaint
and
he
did
fix
it
up
and
then
unfortunately
started
to
rent
it
as
a
short-term
rental
in
violation
of
city
code.
So
you
want
me
to
keep
these
up
or
you
don't
they
stop
sharing.
B
B
Mr
pete,
do
you
have
any
questions?
You
will
get
a
chance
to
present
your
case
in
a
second,
but
do
you
have
any
direct
questions
for
officer
gaston.
H
Okay,
so
I
agree
that
a
code
exists.
My
biggest
issue
is
that
the
code
seems
to
be
enforced
very
sporadically
and
when
I
did
purchase
the
home
the
home
was
in
disrepair.
I
mean
it.
Hadn't
been
taken
care
of.
I
put
a
lot
of
money
into
that
home
and
before
I
purchased
it,
I
did
speak
to
the
people
at
the
building
department
to
make
sure
that
when
I
was
done
that
I
would
be
able
to
rent
it
out,
and
I
did
let
them
know
it
would
be
a
short-term
rental.
H
You
know
now
that
it's
there
I've
seen
the
code,
I'm
not
going
to
deny
that
it's
not
there,
but
I'm
adding
value
to
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
I'm
adding
value
to
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
The
people
that
do
come
spend
money
in
the
community.
The
home
is
no
longer
an
eyesore.
It's
well
maintained
well
taken
care
of
the
people
that
are
there
don't
cause
any
issues.
I
have
letters
that
beth
I'd
sent
him
to
her
today
from
three
of
the
neighbors
that
attest
to
that.
H
One
of
them
is
frank
perry
where,
when
there
were
issues
previously
that
officer
gaston
had
brought
up
frank,
was
very
adamant.
He
did
not
want
short-term
rentals
on
the
street.
He
wanted
everything
enforced.
I
respect
that
and
if
I
were
causing
a
problem
I
wouldn't
be
here,
but
the
issue
is:
is
that
you
do
have
a
code.
H
Unfortunately,
it
only
gets
enforced.
When
someone
feels
like
it,
I
don't
understand
how
that
works,
and
my
bigger
concern
is
that
I
have
put
money
into
the
home.
I
do
want
to
live
there
eventually,
I'm
not
in
a
position
where
I
can
do
that.
Currently
part
of
the
reason
that
everything
got
returned
was
because
I
let
everybody
know
in
my
emails,
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
thread
that
I'm
currently
in
pennsylvania,
I
was
willing
to
come
back
today
to
present
this
in
person
if
it
had
not
been
virtual.
H
H
I
understand
you
all
have
a
job
to
do,
but
what
I'm
asking
is
is
that
if
the
code's
not
going
to
be
enforced
across
the
board,
why
can't
we
allow
this
to
continue
because
there's
about
a
hundred
rental
homes
in
tarpon
that
currently
do
this
there's
another
one
on
the
street?
That's
been
doing
it
for
eight
years.
H
H
I
just
don't
understand
why
the
code
is
not
enforced
for
everyone
and
to
me
it
feels
like
I'm
being
singled
out
and
I've
gone
above
and
beyond,
to
make
sure
that
everything
I
do
between
construction
treatment
of
the
neighbors
code
compliancy
when
it
comes
to
construction.
Everything
is
above
board,
so
I'm
asking
for
your
assistance
and
the
bigger
thing
is
that
given
covid
right
now,
I'm
bringing
money
into
tarpon
springs
and
I
could
have
gone
and
gotten
a
hundred
letters
from
different
businesses.
I've
spoke
to
them
all.
They
were
willing
to
come
in
person.
F
H
B
Mr
camillo,
you
can
summarize
your
case,
but
we
got
your
the
gist
of
it.
So
if
it's
just
a
repetition
of
that,
I'm
not
sure
if
it
okay.
C
F
F
H
C
The
we
should
give
the
opportunity
to
summarize
officer
goffs
and
said
he
wanted
to
summarize
this
case
at
least.
C
F
Just
for
the
board's
information
in
general,
we
do
enforce
these
across
the
board.
This
board
has
heard
numerous
short-term
rental
violations
before,
but
our
department
is
complaint
driven.
So
when
we
do
get
complaints
and
there
was
a
complaint
about
this
property
again-
I
don't
necessarily
know
the
motives
or
whatever
behind
the
complaint,
but
obviously
it
was
a
legitimate
complaint.
F
The
original
complaint
alluded
to
a
police
complaint
being
out
there,
but
I
can't
verify
that,
but
that's
what
the
information
was
and
then
when
we
started
to
research
it
we
found
that
it
in
fact
was
a
valid
complaint
so
and,
as
mr
tumilo
knows,
he's
opened
numerous
violations
or
complaints
on
other
properties
for
doing
the
same
thing,
so
we
are
enforcing
it
as
we
always
do
so
as
far
as
it
being
selective
in
any
way
shape
or
form
it's
not.
He
was
treated
exactly
the
same
as
all
the
other
vacation
rentals
have
been
treated.
F
We
just
don't
actively
web
crawl
these
and
try
to
find
them.
That
takes
an
enormous
amount
of
resources,
and
it's
just
not
something
that
the
city
is
in
a
position
to
do
at
this
point.
So
beyond
that,
as
he
stated
he's
still
renting
it,
the
code
clearly
states
it's
not
a
permitted
or
conditional
use
for
the
property
and
as
such,
is
in
violation.
So
the
city
has
nothing
further.
C
Madam
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
mr
perfidio
a
question.
I
think
that
he
had
a
question
as
to
whether
or
not
he
needed
to
abstain
from
this,
and
I
just
wanted
to
give
him
the
opportunity
to
address
that
issue
before
the
board
goes
ahead
and
makes
a
motion
and
votes.
So.
Mr
finney,
did
you
have
a
question
about
possible
abstention.
E
Well,
I
live
on
the
street
and
I
do
know,
but
I
do
know
of
a
a
rental-
that's
on
a
vrbo,
but
it's
a
minimum.
I
think
it's
like
a
six
day
six
day
or
one
week
minimum
and
I
don't
know
what
the
rules
are
with
regards
to
short-term
rentals,
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
I
thought
it
was
six
days
or
seven
days
minimum
up,
but
so
mike
is
there
any
issues
with
me
voting
or
should
I
abstain
or.
C
You
do
not
have
a
conflict
under
what
we
call
the
size
of
the
class
test
because
it's
city-wide
and
you're
just
one
person
in
the
city,
okay,.
C
C
J
B
I
I
just
have
a
question
of
officer
gaston
based
on
this.
We've
agreed
that
there's
a
violation,
and
this
is
still
out
there
for
advertising.
Can
we
then
have
this
stop
immediately
and
not
have
a
grace
period?
C
I
think
that's
a
question
for
me,
since
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
has
been
closed,
the
answer
is,
is
that
you
need
to
give
a
reasonable
period
of
time
for
the
property
brought
into
compliance,
and
you
determine
what
that
reasonableness
is.
Obviously,
if
the
property
owner
can
take
it
down
in
a
day,
then
maybe
a
reasonable
period
of
time
would
be
a
day.
So
you
make
the
determination
what's
reasonable.
C
C
D
J
I
move
that
at
the
respondent
shall
have
until
october,
the
9th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
of
code
sections
25.02,
I'm
sorry
or
suffer
a
fine
of
50
a
day
for
each
day,
thereafter,
that
the
respondent
remain
in
violation
of
said
code.
E
E
D
C
Yes,
man,
I'm
sure
so,
mr
tomilo,
you
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
code,
section
25.02.
The
code
enforcement
board
has
ordered
that
you
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
october.
Ninth,
should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
october
nine
you're
going
to
be
assessed
a
fifty
dollar
a
day,
fine
for
every
day
that
you
continue
to
be
in
violation
of
section
25.02.
C
There
will
be
an
order
entered,
it
will
be
done
in
writing
and
will
be
sent
to
you
at
the
address
listed
at
the
property
appraisers
records
that
will
be
done
within
about
the
next
10
days.
Should
you
have
questions
as
to
what
you
need
to
do
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
feel
free
to
call
code
enforcement
after
the
meeting
to
discuss
the
issue.
B
A
F
F
F
Zero
1027158685001
four
zero.
There
were
numerous
prior
cases
on
this
property
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board.
Are
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
My
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
administrative
documents.
Case
summary
previous
board:
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
F
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
noticeable
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
both
first
class
as
well
as
return
receipt,
and
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
manager.
F
F
When
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection,
the
complaint
was
that
the
property
was
overgrown
at
that
time
it
was,
and
I
took
some
photographs
on
july,
24th
of
2020,
the
repeat,
violator
notice.
The
hearing
was
mailed.
There
was
no
mail
return
to
us
on
august,
25th
and
august
27th.
We
emailed
received
the
email
from
the
realtor
and
then
on
august
28th.
The
property
was
found
to
be
in
compliance
on
that
same
date.
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting.
F
B
J
J
B
E
B
B
I
B
B
We
do
have
some
minutes
to
approve
from
the
august
meeting.
I
hope
everyone's
had
a
chance
to
review
those.
Did
anyone
find
anything
where
they
needed
to
make
changes.