![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iJqfs10_464/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board January 14, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
E
E
G
H
I
I
E
A
Father
in
heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
tasks
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy.
In
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
we
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
only
use
our
best
judgment
and
skills,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter.
This
place
before
us
and
always
act
in
accordance
with
what
is
in
the
best
interests
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
and
our
fellow
citizens.
This
we
pray,
amen.
D
E
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
E
E
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument.
First
by
the
city,
and
then
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
J
E
And
I'd
like
to
remind
anybody,
that's
participating
on
zoom
that
we'll
swear
you
in.
If
you
decide
to
testify,
there's
one
agenda
changed
since
our
folks
are
here.
We're
gonna
move
you
to
the
first
of
the
line,
so
we'll
hear
case
number,
eight.
First,
okay,
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
It's
case
number.
K
E
F
K
K
20-800-677-802
francis
drive
for
katherine
bauer
estate-
it's
a
repeat
violation
case
previously
repeat
violator
for
case
number
18-800-791
in
violation
of
8-40
and
8-52
and
for
case
number,
zero.
Seven,
eight
in
violation
of
822,
8-40
and
8-52
exhibit
wanted.
Are
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
notice,
violations
and
notice
of
hearings.
K
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
are
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
and
in
this
case
also
emailed
to
mr
anthony
bower
who's,
the
son
of
the
deceased
catherine
bower,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
K
Okay,
so
the
we
have
had
contact
with
the
the
owner
by
email.
The
initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
november
5th
of
2020.
We
we
received
a
complaint
and
verified
that
the
grass
was
over
20
inches.
I
did
knock
on
the
door
because
the
owner
stated
there
might
be
a
squatter
inside.
I
did
not
see
any
evidence
of
a
squatter
and
I
did
speak
with
a
neighbor
next
door
who
said
that
they
had
not
seen
anyone
living
inside.
I
do
have
a
picture
up
on
the
screen.
K
Let
me
know
that
the
on
the
7th
that
the
property
was
in
compliance
november
7th.
So
that
is
the
date
that
I
put
it
in
in
compliance
on
december
31st,
the
sign
was
posted
in
the
yard
and
the
outfit
of
david
of
posting
was
signed,
so
the
property
for
the
city's
records
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
on
november
5th
and
was
complied
on
november.
7Th,
and
that
concludes
the
city's
testimony.
E
J
I
guess
my
main
question
is:
is
there
anywhere
specific
that
we
can
go
to
to
have
help
with
the
property,
because
that's
been
a
huge
problem,
finding
someone
reliable
down
here
with
me
being
up
there?
Do
you
have
a
company
or
some
place
that
you
recommend
that
we
use
to
make
sure
the
property
is
in
compliance
as
we
are
not
there
and
what
we've
done
obviously
hasn't
worked.
J
Okay,
we've
had
a
significant
amount
of
trouble.
E
J
Okay,
the
property
was
again
in
disrepair.
We
had
been
paying
someone
to
mow
the
lawn
and
take
care
of
the
property.
Obviously
they
weren't
we
got
the
notice.
My
brother
did
make
contact
with
beth,
letting
her
know.
We
were
having
trouble
finding
someone.
We
did
find
a
company
that
would
do
it
one
time
for
165
dollars,
one
time
and
you
can
see
how
much
lawn
there
is
to
maintain.
J
J
So
this
way,
I'm
hoping
that
having
someone
face
to
face
signing
a
contract
with
them
to
take
care
of
this
property.
We
will
not
be
back
here
again
because
it's
a
hardship
for
me
to
come
down
or
my
brother
to
come
down
financially
we're
not
well
off
by
any
means,
and
it's
it's
just
hard
to
manage
it
from
a
thousand
miles
away,
but
hopefully
later
today
I
will
be
able
to
post
it
for
sale
as
well
and
hopefully
we'll
get
the
property
looking
better
and
staying
better
after
a
face-to-face
meeting
with
a
lawn
care,
professional.
K
K
I
think
I
pretty
much
have
said
everything
I
will
say
that
the
previous
fines
that
they
did
have
were
paid
by
the
by
the
family
and
they've
always
been
very
responsive
when
they
have
been
notified.
B
B
B
F
Roll
call
please,
mr
stammis.
Yes,
mr
perfudio.
M
A
Yes,
ma'am,
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
the
property
was
in
violation
for
two
days
of
the
cited
code,
section
8-52
and
it's
some
find
the
property
owner
25
a
day
times
both
days
for
a
total
of
fifty
dollars.
In
addition,
the
board
has
awarded
the
city,
its
prosecution
cost
of
sixty
five
dollars.
A
There
will
be
an
order
entered,
it
will
be
ordered
in
it
will
be
entered
in
approximately
the
next
ten
days
and
it'll
be
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listening
to
property
appraisers
records,
I
understand
that
you
are
also
getting
them
by
email
and
we'll
have
the
city
send
them
to
you
by
email
too,
so
you
get
them
immediately.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
what
happened
today
after
the
hearing,
please
contact
the
code
enforcement
department
and
specifically,
ms
hughes
after
today's
hearing.
A
E
K
0-800396
four:
three:
eight,
nine,
four:
five:
four:
u
s:
highway,
19
north
for
the
roman
and
pinellas
corporation,
and
I
apologize.
My
name
is
beth
hughes.
I'm
the
city
code
inspector
certified
by
the
florida
association
of
code
enforcement
exhibit
one
or
all
the
photos
exhibit.
Two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings.
K
Exhibit
three:
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign?
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice,
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
K
We
we
did
initially
have
contact
with
the
owner
by
phone
calls
and
emails,
mostly
from
the
daughter
of
the
owner.
Actually,
let
me
pull
up
the
pictures
for.
K
K
The
initial
inspection
was
that
the
business
is
closed
and
appears
use
has
been
changed
to
a
salvage
yard.
There
are
old
appliances
dumped
on
the
property
as
well
as
three
vehicles
with
no
expired
tags,
as
well
as
one
boat
on
a
trailer.
The
grass
was
overgrown
and
needs
to
be
maintained
and
there
was
trash
and
debris.
So.
On
august,
11th
of
2020,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed.
K
K
So
this
was
some
of
the
the
items
we
had
the
cars
we
had:
the
appliances,
here's
another
car
and
some
of
the
debris
a
boat
on
a
trailer.
K
So
I'm
going
to
move
forward,
because
these
are
some
of
the
newer
pictures.
So
on
october
15th
there
was
a
re-inspection.
The
reason
there
was
so
much
time
in
between
when
the
notice
was
sent
to
the
re-inspection
is
we
were
having
contact
by
the
property
owner.
They
had
made
a
significant
difference
and
they
were
attempting
to
get
the
property
into
compliance.
K
15Th,
trash
and
debris
was
still
on
the
property,
so
we
sent
a
final
notice
of
violation
on
september
21st
and
did
not
receive
any
return
mail
back
either
signed
or
returned,
so
the
property
was
still
in
the
same
condition,
so
we
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
to
the
property
owner,
but
when
I
did
the
reinspection
right
before
the
code
board
hearing
this
started
to
happen
to
the
building,
it
started
to
fall
apart.
K
The
overhang
pretty
much
had
a
large
amount,
pretty
much
fall
into
the
driveway
area
or
the
drive-through
area.
So
we
changed
our
mind
of
taking
it
to
code
board
at
that
time
and
we
sent
an
amended
notice
of
violation
on
november
11th.
In
order
to
add
the
new
violations
for
the
exterior
of
the
building.
K
K
So
on
12,
8
2020,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
we
did
get
the
green
card
return
signed
by
the
property
owner
on
1231.
The
sign
was
posted,
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
was
signed
so
on
yesterday
on
january
13th.
For
the
final
inspection,
there
was
really
no
change
in
the
property.
There
was
still
some
debris
out
back.
The
building
is
still
in
a
dilapidated
condition
and
starting
to
fall
apart.
Here's
a
few
more
pictures.
K
You
can
see
that
the
whole
overhang
has
just
fallen
the
fascia
anyway,
and
it's
starting
to
get
overgrown
again.
I
think
that's
it.
However,
when
I
was
doing
the
inspection
I'd,
there
were
some
subcontractors
that
were
in
the
building.
K
I
did
give
them
my
card
and
asked
because
they
stated
that
the
there
is
someone,
that's
looking
to
purchase
the
property
and
get
it
back
into
compliance
and
start
up
another
business
inside.
K
So
I
did
give
him
my
card
and
asked
that
to
get
it
to
the
person
that
intends
to
purchase
the
property
and
contact
us
so
so
I
am
looking
to
ask
for
the
code
board
members
to
find
the
property,
in
violation
of
8-22
accumulation,
of
trash
8-40,
for
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
8-52
for
nuisance
prohibitions,
6-1,
which
adopts
the
2018
international
property
maintenance
code
and
the
international
property
maintenance
code
of
304.1,
which
is
the
general
exterior
of
this
structure.
C
D
N
N
C
K
Yes,
so
there
was
reinspection
on
september,
8th,
which
is
missing
from
the
narrative,
and
that
would
have
been
the
inspection
before
that,
and
let
me
read
that
narrative
to
you
you're,
absolutely
right:
two
vehicles
still
on
property
as
well
as
appliances,
trash
and
debris.
K
Oh,
and
actually
in
that
reinspection
there
is
a
storage
container
in
the
back
that
initially
we
thought
may
not
be
permitted,
but
planning
and
zoning
did
say
that
that
was
a
permitted
use.
So
we
didn't
make
them
remove
that,
so
it
was
still
in
violation
when
the
next
notice
was
sent.
Okay,.
K
This
is
not
a
repeat
violator
case,
okay,
but
yes,
it
basically
was
the
initial
inspection
where
we
verified,
a
violation
was
on
august
4th
and
it
is
still
not
in
compliance
as
of
today.
Okay,
thank
you.
You're
welcome,.
P
K
My
guess
is
that
they're,
either
being
and
the
initial
owner
when
we
were
getting
contact
had
suggested
that
they
may
be
being
foreclosed
upon,
because
I
don't
know
that
I
didn't
bring
it
up,
but
that
was
just
something
that
she
had
mentioned
might
happen.
K
I
suspect
that
it's
either
going
to
be
sold
and
that's
why
I
am
anxious
to
go
ahead
and
contact
the
person,
that's
interested,
so
that
we
can
find
out
more
information
and
hopefully
get
it
into
compliance
as
soon
as
possible.
But
I
didn't
want
to
stop
the
case
at
this
point,
just
in
case
that
sale
doesn't
go
through.
I
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
get
it
established,
or
you
know,
hopefully
found
in
violation
with
a
deadline
and
move
the
case
forward.
K
O
Them
I
noticed
that
on
some
of
it,
where
there
was
an
oven,
there's
some
structural
damage
to
the
drive
drive
under
port
things
like
that,
like
it's
like
an
airtight
hazard
for
kids
and
everything.
So
I
understand
there's
a
lot
of
moving.
E
O
O
Into
your
mind,
I
was
speaking
to
like
the
airtight
containers,
such
as
the
oven
that
was
in
the
picture.
Yeah,
and
this
failing
structure
are
two
major
points
that
I
think
that
I
I
understand,
people
follow
hard
times
and
there's
other
extenuating
circumstances,
selling
property.
But
those
are
two
hard
points
that
I
think
that
we
should
drive
that
need
to
be
fixed.
O
Structure
that
structure
is
at
least
taped
off
or
something
so
people
can't
get
underneath
it.
If
it
falls,
we
don't
you
know
a
real
disaster
here.
K
O
K
P
C
M
L
G
M
Yep
I'd,
like
my
emotion,
I
move
that
the
respondents
shall
have
until
let's
see
25.
F
M
Yeah
is
my
math
off
okay,
okay!
Well,
I
moved
the
respondents
I'll
have
until
18
february
to
bring
the
property
in
compliance
with
code
sections
c
code,
822,
8-40,
8-52
and
6-1
and
impc
304.1,
or
suffer
fine
of
a
hundred
dollars
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of
said
code.
Second,.
M
G
G
D
K
K
20-800640
for
1606
seabreeze
drive
for
cheyenne
p,
kotha
parcel
number
zero.
Three,
two,
seven
one,
five,
seven,
nine
three,
four:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
zero
exhibit
one
are
all
photos
exhibit
two
is
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
violation
and
notice
of
hearings.
Exhibit
three:
are
the
administration
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign?
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
K
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
N
N
K
So
this
honestly,
this
picture
isn't
very
good.
The
let
me
go
down
to
the
third
picture.
There's
really
been
absolutely
no
change.
There
are
signs
on
the
property
that
are
just
hand
written
for
sale
signs,
as
you
can
see
that
any
this
parcel
is
over
10
000
square
feet.
Therefore,
it's
supposed
to
be
cleared
30
feet
from
the
road
and
15
feet
from
any
improved
property
and
from
the
beginning
of
the
case
till
now,
there's
really
been
no
no
change.
K
K
K
K
So
yes
ma'am,
so
any
vacant
land
that's
never
had
any,
has
never
been
cleared.
They
have
to
have
30
feet
from
the
right-of-way.
The
street
cleared
and
15
feet
from
any
improved
property.
So
if
there's
a
basically
a
house
next
door,
it
has
to
be
15
feet
from
the
property
line
from
that
house
and
30
feet
from
the
road.
Okay.
Thank
you.
You're
welcome,.
K
I
don't
believe
it
has.
You
can
tell
that
the
just
a
couple
feet
of
the
right-of-way
has
been,
I
guess
cut
off
and
on
even
the
right-of-way
is
overgrown,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
over
the
12
inches
in
height,
and
it's
mainly
the
undergrowth
it's
not
like.
They
have
to
clear
out
every
single
tree.
It's
just
the
the
undergrowth
is
supposed
to
be
back
30
feet
and
15
feet
from
the
improved
properties.
E
K
I
don't
believe
so
now
there
are
wetlands
and
the
one
thing.
Obviously,
if
the
wetlands
are
closer
than
the
30
feet,
we
would
not
require
that
section
to
be
cleared
and-
and
you
know
from
the
street,
I
can't
tell
really
how
far
back
it
goes,
but
but
even
the
right
of
way
is
overgrown
at
this
point.
Thank
you.
You're
welcome.
K
Where's
north
to
the
north
of
it
and
there's
a
house
to
the
south
of
it.
Thank.
N
C
E
Do
I
hear
a
second
thank
you,
mr
robinson,
excuse
me:
would
you
like
to
call
for
a
vote
please
bobby.
G
L
G
G
D
M
Until
13
february
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
code
city
code,
section
8-52
or
suffer
a
fine
of
25
per
day
for
each
day
there
after
the
respondent,
remains
in
violation
of
said
code
sections.
Second,.
K
Man:
okay,
my
name
is
beth
beth
hughes,
I'm
the
city
code
inspector
certified
by
the
florida
association
of
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
number.
K
20-800642
address
is
1615,
seabreeze
drive
for
erc
capital.
Excuse
me:
erc
homes,
capital,
llc,
parcel
number,
zero,
three,
two,
seven
one,
five,
seven,
nine
three,
four:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
two
zero
exhibit
one
is
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
or
all
the
notices
to
complete
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit.
Three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign?
K
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
records
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
in
first-class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
K
Okay,
so
I'm
putting
the
pictures
up
so
this
property-
and
I
apologize
that
from
this
picture.
In
fact,
several
of
the
pictures,
this
again
is
a
parcel
that
is
over
ten
thousand
square
feet
it.
The
pictures
that
I
took,
unfortunately
don't
show
that
it
is
not
cleared.
K
Not
the
undergrowth
is
not
cut
next
to
the
improved
parcel
and
it's
not
cleared
30
feet
from
the
road
and,
as
you
can
see
from
this
parcel,
it
isn't
in
the
wetlands
area,
so
it
should
be
cleared.
K
And
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
last,
so
it's
only
a
few
feet
from
the
road
that
the
undergrowth
has
cleared
and
again
I
apologize,
but
I
will
testify
to
the
fact
that
the
the
growth
next
to
the
improved
parcel
is
definitely
not
cleared
the
15
feet.
That's
required.
K
The
areas
that
they
have
been
cutting
have
been
cut
like
right.
You
know
the
couple
of
feet.
The
three
feet
from
the
road
has
been
cut,
but
I
do
not
know
if
they
they
have
not
contacted
us
in
any
way,
so
that
I
can
explain
the
3015
rule,
which
is
also
was
on
their
notices,
so
they
it
was
on
the
notices
that
were
mailed
to
them,
explaining
the
3015..
K
So
on
10
19
2020
received
phone
complaint
and
verified.
It
was
overgrown
on
10,
19
2020,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed.
K
K
It
was
still
overgrown
and
not
cleared
the
30
from
the
right
of
way
and
15
from
the
improved
property
on
december
18th
of
2020,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
again.
For
some
reason.
The
us
tracking
only
shows
that
it's
in
tracking,
but
we
again
we've
received
no
first
class
mail,
has
not
come
back
either.
K
A
So
that
is
another
basis
of
good
service
on
the
property
owner,
whether
or
not
that
they've
responded.
Obviously
it
would
be
best
if
we
had
some
type
of
green
card
back
or
a
signature,
or
something
like
that.
That
would
reflect
it,
but
under
the
the
city
has
followed
the
law
with
regard
to
the
notice
requirements.
K
And
also,
let
me
double
check,
but
I
believe
not
only
is
it
being
sent
to
the
I'm
looking
in
the
to
the
property
owner,
but
has
been
being
sent
certified
in
first-class
mail
to
the
registered
agent.
K
K
M
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section
8-52
of
the
city
code
of
ordinance
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
was
in
force
in
effect,
and
the
respondents
was
respondent
was
in
violation
thereof.
M
C
C
M
M
K
K
20-800-00684
for
1639
seabreeze
drive
under
desiree,
valencia
exhibit
one
includes
all
photographs
exhibit
two
or
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit.
Three
are
the
administration
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
code
board.
K
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
pinellas,
county
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank
you
bobby
you'll.
N
K
I'll
go
ahead
and
leave
this
picture
up.
This,
basically,
is
the
reason
that
the
property
is
going
before
the
board.
I
just
happen
to,
because
we've
had
so
many
cases
out
on
sea
breeze.
I
noticed
this
pad
had
been
newly
newly
poured
one
of
the
days
I
was
out
there,
so
the
initial
inspection,
the
case
was
started
by
myself.
The
initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
november
6
2020.
K
I
did
double
check
with
the
building
permit
to
ensure
that
no
permit
had
been
submitted,
which
I
didn't
think
it
had
been
because
you
can't
pour
concrete
in
the
right
of
way.
They
did
confirm
that
that
was
correct
and
they
did
not
have
any
permit
applications.
K
K
K
So
I'm
asking
the
code
board
members
to
find
this
property
in
violation
of
city
code
6-1,
which
adopts
the
florida
building
code
and
for
the
florida
building
permit
code
of
105.1
for
permits
required
and,
lastly,
for
the
city
code
130.00
for
the
right
of
way.
And
that
concludes
my
testimony.
K
The
concrete
pad
was
poured
in
the
right-of-way
property
owners
are
not
supposed
to
put
any
kind
of
improvements
or
or
any
structure
into
the
right-of-way,
because
that's
reserved
for
the
city
for
any
road
improvements,
utility
easements
that
are
required.
K
Yes,
it
literally
is
adjacent
to
the
road.
Goes
all
the
way
to
the
street
the
edge
of
the
street.
Yes,
ma'am.
P
C
C
K
G
G
K
Be
this,
this
isn't
the
first
code
case.
We
just
did
a
code
case
for
this
property
last
month
for
the
trash
cans
being
in
violation
and
actually
during
one
of
the
times.
I
was
on
this
on
that
property.
It
wasn't
violent
in
compliance
for
one
day,
so
I
did
do
an
affidavit
of
compliance,
but
because
there
is
a
history
and
there
is
continued
to
be
no
contact,
I
would
say
75
a
day.
K
K
Only
because
there's
another
case
similar
to
it
on
the
street,
I
who
that
that
property
owner
is
doing
what
they
need
to
do
to
get
it
permitted.
K
But
there
are
issues
because
they're
septic
so
they're
having
to
do
a
lot
of
things
other
than
what
you
would
normally
need
to
do
to
prove
that
there's
no
problem
having
the
pad
with
the
septic
out
there.
So
I
honestly
don't
have
a
very
good
educated
guess
on
how
much
time,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
person
has
already
taken
at
least
30
or
40
days,
and
they
are
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
be
doing.
C
K
D
O
P
F
C
F
All
right,
mr
stamis.
O
G
E
L
K
K
20-800-00708
it's
for
816,
north
jasmine
avenue,
joseph
bohr
iv
exhibit
one
are
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three.
Are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
the
copy
of
the
sign
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board?
K
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
pinellas,
county
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
K
Yep,
okay,
so
we
have
not
had
any
contact
with
the
owner.
This
actually
picture
is
better
than
what
it
looks
like
now.
There's
been
no
improvement
and
it
has
continued
to
get
worse.
The
initial
inspection
conducted
on
november
24th
2020
the
trash
and
debris
were
on
the
property
not
being
stored
properly
in
the
garbage
cans,
which
did
not
have
lids
and
were
overflowing
on
november
24th.
K
I
did
leave
a
door
hanger
with
my
name
and
number
and
what
the
issue
was
with
the
trash
and
debris
on
twelve
one,
twenty
twenty
I
did
a
reinspection,
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris
was
still
in
the
front
yard.
The
car
seat
was
still
from
sitting
in
the
driveway
on
december,
2nd,
I
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed
and
it
was
returned
unclaimed.
K
K
Yesterday,
a
final
inspection
was
conducted
and
again
there's
actually
more
trash
than
what's
showing
in
that
picture.
Now,
there's
nothing
has
changed
as
far
as
any
kind
of
cleanup.
It's
still
not
in
compliance.
K
When
the
day
I
went
to
put
a
door
hanger
on
the
door,
there
was
an
ashtray
with
cigarette
butts
in
it.
So
I'm
assuming
someone
lives
there.
I've
never
seen
a
car
there,
but
the
times
that
I'm
there
it's
very
possible
it's
while
they're
at
work
and
there's
been
additional
trash.
So
that's
a
good
question.
I
don't
know
if
it's
additional
trash
from
someone
else
or
if
it's
their
additional
trash,
but
underneath
that
those
porch
steps,
it's
pretty
well
full
of
garbage.
Now
do
you
think
maybe
squatters
have
been
here.
K
M
F
G
G
M
M
G
G
E
A
R
A
E
K
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case:
number,
zero,
zero,
nine
one,
it's
a
repeat
violator
for
case
number,
one:
nine
dash,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
four
three:
five
in
violation
of
eight
dash,
twenty
two:
four:
zero
dot:
zero,
zero
and
three
six
dot
zero.
Three-
and
I
apologize.
K
If
I
said
this
already,
it's
for
1313
gulf
view,
woods
lane
for
faith,
sedaris
exhibit
one
are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
or
all
the
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case
summary
previous
board
orders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Are
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
and
also
part
of
exhibit
three
which
I
forgot
to
mention?
K
K
Welcome
so
we
have
had
contact
with
multiple
people,
the
tenant,
which
is
one
of
ms
sedaris's
sons
and
also
the
gentleman
that's
on
the
phone
today,
which
is
another
one
of
her
sons.
The
initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
november
12
2020.
K
on,
and
let
me
show
you
the
initial
pictures.
So
this
is
showing
where
you
see
the
pavers
on
the
right
and
some
items
being
stored
by
the
the
garage
door.
K
Just
a
different
angle,
debris
over
by
the
side
of
the
the
yard
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
stop
there
for
now.
Okay,
so
again,
the
initial
inspection
was
on
november
12th
on
november
19th,
the
repeat,
violation
notice
was
mailed.
On
november
19th,
another
re-inspection
was
conducted,
the
debris
was
in
the
front,
yard
had
been
removed,
however,
the
debris
of
the
pavers
trash
cans
are
still
on
both
sides
of
the
property.
The
east
side
has
a
large
pile
of
assorted
debris
next
to
the
grill.
K
On
december.
8Th
a
excuse
me
on
november
19th,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
for
the
new
violations
and
on
december
8
the
re-inspection
was
conducted.
K
K
L
K
K
All
of
the
new
violations
are
in
compliance
at
this
time
and
what
I
wanted
to
do
to
backtrack
was
just
to
let
you
know
that
when
I
had
when
I,
when
the
neighbor
had
asked
me
to
come
into
his
yard,
to
view
the
fence
that
had
fallen
down,
he
had
been
speaking
on
a
regular
basis
to
the
neighbor
and
had
not
been
getting
any
results.
He
basically
been
promised
that
he
would
take
care
of
it
and
other
than
cleaning
up
some
of
the
debris
in
the
front.
Nothing
had
really
occurred.
K
They
did
mention
that
there
was
another
son
and
that
they
had
his
contact
number.
So
I
asked
him
for
it
and
when
I
called
him
I
he
immediately
returned
my
phone
call.
He
was
not
aware
that
there
were
so
many
issues
going
on
the
property
owner
is
the
mother
of
faith,
and
he
he
has
indicated
from
the
beginning.
He
wants
to
be
a
good
neighbor.
He
was
not
aware
that
there
were
these
issues
as
he
does
not
live
there,
and
he
within
a
few
days
pretty
much
got
the
property
into
compliance.
K
So
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
he
as
soon
as
he
was
notified,
because
all
notices
are
actually
going
to
the
the
address
of
this
property
where
his
mother
is
not
living
at
this
time.
K
Repaired
all
the
violations
as
soon
as
he
was
notified
of
it.
So
basically,
what
I
am
asking
for
is
that
the
new
violation
only
because
the
brother
is
still
living
there
and
is
the
one
that
tends
to
have
the
problem
with
letting
debris
be
stored
externally
that
we
established
the
code
8-52
and
then
again
just
to
reiterate
the
repeat:
violation
of
defense
violation
was
the
initial
inspection
on
november
12th
and
was
complied
on
december
19th.
K
E
R
I
think
the
only
question
that
I
do
have
was,
after
my
conversation
with
mr
fennelly,
who
was
very
pleasant
by
the
way,
but
both
them
and
my
parents
moved
into
that
house
after
the
fence
was
erected.
It
was
apparent
where
it
seemed
apparent
that
the
fence
was
facing
outward
or
opposite
direction
reversed.
So
there
was
just
some
questions
that
we
had
with
regards
to
was
the
fence
mr
fenelli's,
or
was
it?
Was
it
actually
my
mother's
fence?
R
We
couldn't
establish
that,
but
either
way
it
didn't
really
matter.
I
mean
I
wanted
to
fix
the
fence.
It
should
have
never
been
in
that
condition,
so
I
let
him
know
either
way.
I
would
fix
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
established
as
to
whose
fence
it
is.
I
do
know
the
laws
changed
in
tarpon
springs,
as
I
understand
from
what
beth
introduced
to
me
back
in
2000,
I
believe,
was
maybe
2003,
but
the
question
is
is
again:
was
it
established
as
to
whose
fence
it
actually
is.
K
I
did
verify
that
there
was
a
fence
permit
in
the
system
for
both
addresses
and
the
fence
permit
under
this
address
was
prior
to
2003,
which
would
not
require
that
the
finished
side
be
facing
out.
So
I
I
personally
believe
it
is
the
fence,
because
there
is
a
fence
permit
for
that
property
address.
R
R
I
went
out
there
on
the
19th
to
assess
the
situation
purchase.
Whatever
material
was
required
to
repair
the
fence.
I
spoke
to
mr
finelli,
who
again
and
his
wife
allison,
who
were
very
pleasant.
Let
them
know
we're
going
to
take
care
of
it.
They.
Let
me
I
want
to
get
access
approval
to
get
access
on
their
property,
so
I
could
take
care
of
the
fence
situation
and
fix
it
properly.
So
we
don't
have
this
problem
again.
So
hopefully,
at
this
point
everything
has
been
resolved
and
we
went
far
beyond
that.
R
I
had
my
two
younger
boys.
Teenage
boys
is
with
me.
We
cleaned
up
the
entire
yard
front
and
back
removed.
All
debris
got
everything
out
of
you
know
any
kind
of
debris
that
would
be
observable.
It
has
been
removed
or
has
gone
from
the
road.
You
know
this
is
a
situation.
Unfortunately,
you
know,
we've
been
residents
of
tarpon
springs
since
1972..
R
I
I
currently
live
by
the
way.
I
did
not
give
my
address
if
you
need
that,
for
the
record
is
27766
green
willow
run,
that's
27766
green
willow
run
wesley
chapel
florida.
You
know
the
issue
here
is
I
have
an
85
year
old,
mother
who's,
a
widow
who
is
under
extreme
hardship?
Financially,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
good
neighbors
or
she's
good
neighbors.
R
She
has
been
living
at
my
house
for
a
short
period
of
time
until
she
may
be
able
to
return
to
her
home,
but
but
again,
either
which
way
we
want
to
make
sure
the
house
is
completely
in
compliance,
and
I
just
asked
the
board
to
be
aware
of
her
extreme
hardship
financially.
K
K
Sure
I
really
I
don't
have
any
anything
further
to
add.
As
far
as
the
the
violations,
as
mr
citrus
said,
he
was
very
responsive
immediately
as
soon
as
he
was
notified
and
I
believe
has
also
reached
out
to
the
neighbors
so
that
they
can
communicate
rather
than
hopefully
getting
us
involved
in
the
future.
Yes,
ma'am
and.
K
I
do
realizing
when
I
was
going
through
the
summary
when
I
was
reading
the
dates
the
the
history
was.
Initially,
the
notice
of
violation
for
the
debris
was
mailed,
the
repeat
violation
regarding
the
fence.
What
happened
later,
that
repeat:
violation
notice
was
mailed
on
november
19th.
That
was
the
date
that
the
inspection
occurred.
K
E
C
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
the
law
that
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
city
code,
8-52
city
code,
6-1
and
ipmc
code
304.13,
was
in
full
force
and
effect
and
at
the
time
of
notice
of
violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
codes.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
D
G
G
G
E
M
No,
I
don't
want
to
make
a
motion
because
I
have
concerns
about
the
facts
or
the
data.
I
should
say.
O
O
E
C
E
E
O
A
A
K
And
actually,
if
I
might
make
put
people's
ease
at
mind,
no,
no
okay,.
E
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
offer
an
alternative,
fining
amount,
but
we'll
need
to
vote
on
this
motion
before
we
can
do
that.
So
the
current
motion
is
for
a
fine
of
20
a
day
and
the
prosecution
costs
so
we're
unless
there's
further
discussion,
we're
going
to
vote
on
that.
If
that
is
upheld,
word
finished.
If
it
is
not
upheld,
we
can
revisit
the
amounts.
E
Would
you
like
to
let's
take
a
vote?
Please.
D
L
B
F
B
L
E
O
It
it
was
who's
talking,
okay,.
E
B
I
make
can,
I
just
say,
make
a
motion
to
change
that
to
one
dollar
a
day,
yeah
from
november
19th
to
december
19th?
Okay,
I
don't
know
how
much
that
is.
L
M
G
E
And
we
did
not
change
the
prosecution
cost
so
that
only
thing
that
was
changed
in
the
motion
was
the
fine
amount
for
those
that
sometimes
watch
our
meetings
and
think
we're
trying
to
be
mean
we're
trying
to
be
nice.
We
had
a
resident
who
complied,
who
was
did
everything
they
were
asked
and
we're
trying
to
reflect
that
in
our
findings.
Would
the
city
like
to
summarize
please.
A
A
There
was
also
a
motion
to
find
the
property
owner
in
violation
of
sections,
8-52,
6-1
and
ipmc
section
304.3.
A
A
There
will
be
an
order,
entered
it'll,
be
entered
within
about
the
next
10
days
and
provided
to
your
mother
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraisers
records.
If
you
have
any
questions
as
to
what
you
what
has
happened
today,
please
call
code
enforcement
staff
after
the
meeting
and
they'll
be
happy
to
answer
your
questions.
K
And
I
believe
that
he
was
planning
on
attending
so
just.
K
K
K
exhibit
one
are
all
the
photos
exhibit.
Two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
3.
Are
the
administration
documents
to
include
the
case
summary
previous
board
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
4
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
5
as
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
K
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
emailed
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice.
A
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
K
Okay,
so
basically
most
of
the
evidence
is
basically
in
september
when
he
went
to
code
board.
He
was
in
compliance.
The
listing
had
been
changed
to
a
minimum
of
six
weeks.
I
did
receive
a
complaint
regarding
it
being
used
as
a
short-term
rental
again,
and
you
can
see
this
first
exhibit
is
that
it
was
advertising
for
six
nights,
so
it
had
obviously
been
changed
back.
K
This
next
one
was
the
same
thing.
It
was
allowing
me
to
try
to
rent
for
six
days
on
a
different
website.
K
K
Okay,
so
on
december
14
2020,
the
initial
inspection-
I
confirmed,
short-term
rental
advertisement
lists
a
minimum
of
six
nights
on
december
14
2020,
the
notice
repeat,
violation
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
because
I
just
happened
to
remember
that
he
had
a
different
address
than
what
was
in
the
record.
I
did
mail
it
to
that
address
as
well,
and
the
mail
was
returned
unclaimed
on
1
12
21.
K
There
was
an
another
reins,
a
formal
reinspection.
I
had
checked
multiple
times
to
see.
If
the
property
had
come
into
compliance,
I
basically
put
the
property
into
compliance
as
of
january
8th
because
he
had
expressed
that
it
was
in
compliance,
but
he
wasn't
sure
what
date
had
been
changed,
the
benefit
of
the
doubt.
Basically,
I
knew
because
I
had
actually
checked
personally
and
tried
to
make
a
short-term
rental
on
january
7th.
I
knew
it
was
not
in
compliance
as
of
that
time.
K
G
G
A
I
I
haven't
been
able
to
see
the
presentation
because
I
was
on
the
phone
with
the
city
of
tarpon
springs,
letting
them
know
that
nobody
recognized
that
I
was
brave.
Wait
raised
my
hand,
so
I've
missed
the
presentation.
Can
we
start
all
over
again?
Please.
K
Okay,
so
to
summarize,
I
initially
received
the
complaint
and
did
a
inspection
and
verified
that
there
were
multiple
websites
allowing
short-term
rental
after
the
previous
case
had
been
changed
from
the
short-term
rental
to
42
night
minimum
when
I
verified.
K
That
was
when
we
mailed
out
the
repeat:
violation
notice
of
hearing
on
december
14th
that
was
mailed
to
the
address
of
record
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector,
as
well
as
to
your
address
in
pennsylvania
that
I
remembered
that
you
had
from
the
previous
case-
and
I
basically
put
that
as
of
where
we
were
finishing
up,
was
that
the
I
put
the
property
in
compliance
as
of
january
8th,
because
the
short-term
rental
had
been
changed
in
all
the
websites
that
I
was
able
to
find
as
of
that
date.
E
And
just
to
reiterate
the
case
number
since
mr
tumulum
might
not
have
been
on
the
I.
E
I
N
I
Okay,
I
don't
have
any
further
questions
right
now,
but
I
would
like
to
be
done.
K
C
K
I
Yes,
okay,
so
you
sent
notification
out
on
the
14th.
I
did
not
receive
notification
until
january
4th.
I
I
was
completely
unaware
you
mentioned
that
you
had
made
phone
calls
to
other
people
that
have
had
violations
it's
you
know
I've
been
sitting
through
this
for
an
hour
and
a
half,
I'm
the
only
one
on
seabreeze
drive
to
actually
show
up,
because
I
am
concerned-
and
I
want
to
do
the
right
thing,
but
I
didn't
receive
any
phone
call
when
I
received
what
I
received
in
the
mail
on
the
fourth,
I
contacted
you
on
the
fifth
and
the
issue
of
online
was
resolved
pretty
much
immediately
within
a
couple
of
days,
the
problem
being
that
you're
pulling
up
airbnb
vbro.
I
These
are
companies
that
I
have
no
contract
with.
I
don't
have
a
contract
with
any
of
them.
I
have
a
contract
with
a
company
called
evolve,
they're,
the
only
ones
I
deal
with.
Okay,
if
vbro
airbnb
expedia,
I
think,
was
one
of
the
ones
that
she
brought
up.
I
can't
control
what
any
of
these
people
do.
I
can
only
control
what
the
company
that
I
have
a
contract
with
does:
okay
and
to
be
fair,
they
did
they
changed
it.
They
changed
it
unbeknownst
to
me
and
I
had
them
change
it
back
immediately.
I
Okay,
as
far
as
the
out-of-state
cars
go,
my
brother
and
his
family
were
in
my
home.
I
have
a
right
to
allow
my
family
to
use
my
home.
The
fact
that
mrs
johnson
and
her
ignorance-
and
I
don't
use
that
term
lightly-
has
the
audacity
to
make
an
assumption
that
I'm
running
the
home.
Okay
is
outlandish.
Somebody
could
have
easily
just
knocked
on
that
door
asked
who
it
was
found
out.
I
You
didn't
even
check
evolve.
As
far
as
I
know,
and
if
I'm
mistaken
I
apologize,
but
if
it's
not
on
the
evolve
site,
I
can't
control
it.
If
it
is
on
valve,
I
can
control
it
and
I
can
change
it,
and
I
did
my
part
to
do
this.
Okay,
the
other
issue
I
have
with
the
way
this
complaint
was
handled
is
there
are
five
homes
that
are
rentals.
I
I
Okay,
then,
if
we're
only
dealing
with
my
property,
the
woman
that
has
turned
me
in
okay
only
selects
my
property
when
there's
five
homes,
and
you
only
pay
attention
to
her
when
it's
my
home.
Nobody
calls
me
and
says:
hey
pete.
There
may
be
an
issue,
so
instead
you
file
a
violation.
You
waste
everybody's
time
when
it
would've
been
easy
as
a
phone
call,
because
I'm
accessible
I'm
just
not
in
florida.
I
can't
be
in
florida
right
now,
I'd
love
to
be
in
florida.
I
I
don't
want
to
be
up
north
okay,
but
you're
you're,
saying
I'm
in
violation
when
I'm
not
in
violation.
There
was
an
issue
with
the
website.
I
will
give
you
that
that
issue's
been
resolved.
My
home
was
not
for
short-term
rental
and
you
can
go
on
any
of
the
websites
that
you
mentioned
and
check
the
calendar
and
the
only
thing
you'll
see
is
owner
occupancy.
You
won't
see
anything
else.
The
home's
not
been
rented,
and
that
was
part
of
the
problem
with
evolve
that
since
we
made
this
change,
nobody's
rented
the
house.
I
So
I
mean
we've
got
to
decide
how
things
are
going
to
be
handled.
If
it's
as
simple
as
an
out-of-state,
carbine
driveway,
we
can
file
a
lot
of
complaints
against
a
lot
of
people.
There's
a
hundred
vbr
homes
or
short-term
rental
homes
in
tarpon
springs
and
mine
is
the
one
that's
consistently
getting
picked
on,
which
I
don't
appreciate.
I
And
I
have
pictures
of
out-of-state
cars
in
their
driveway.
Should
I
turn
them
in
you
know
what
I
think
the
out-of-state
rentals
are
a
benefit
to
the
city
of
tarpon.
Springs.
We
add
income
to
tarpon
springs,
we
pay
our
taxes.
I
hope
that
house
that
hb
219
goes
through,
which
we
should
know
relatively
soon,
but
you
know
we'll
go
back
to
my.
I
E
O
O
I
I
One
was
expedia
and
the
other
was
euro,
and
just
so
you
guys
know,
beth
has
been
extremely
efficient
and
she
has
followed
through
on
everything
she
said
she
was
gonna
do
which
I
do
appreciate.
I
don't
want
the
tone
of
my
voice
to
come
across
as
I'm
not
appreciative
of
the
efforts
that
she
does
make
because
she's
doing
a
good
job
for
you
guys,
but
the
policies
are
a
little
bit
antiquated
and
I
don't
agree
with
them.
O
K
It's
really
not
a
question
for
him,
so
I
guess
my
only
question
for
you,
mr
tomilo
is
you're,
stating
that
the
only
people
that
have
been
in
your
home
or
your
family
from
georgia.
I
K
I
I
K
So
I'll
have
more
clarification
I'd
like
to
make
later,
but
I
don't
have
any
more
questions
for
mr
tamillo
right
now.
K
K
The
other
issue
honestly
and
I
did
double
check
this
with
planning
and
zoning
is
guests-
are
allowed
so
family.
Obviously
you
can
have
fun
family
come
visit
you
but
they're
not
supposed
to
visit
unless
you
actually
are
there.
The
code,
specifically
the
definition
under
family
visits
by
guests,
while
the
owner
is
occupying
the
unit,
shall
not
be
presumed
to
be
transient.
K
It's
in
the
it's
in
the
code,
that's
under
the
definition
of
family
and
being
that
it's
zone,
single
family.
That's
and
again,
I
double
checked
with
planning
and
zoning
to
make
sure
that
I
was
interpreting
that
correctly.
Would
everyone
know
that
I'm
not
going
to
say
that
they
would?
It
is
in
the
code,
the
you
know,
having
the
two
cars
from
missouri.
K
E
C
K
E
K
K
So
how
these
short-term
rentals,
just
to
mr
chaska,
I'm
able
to
clarify
this
now
right.
K
So
basically,
every
single
family
or
every
single
zone
in
tarpon
springs,
has
permitted
uses
and
conditional
uses.
So
when
we
bring
these
short-term
rental
cases
to
the
code
board
and
of
course
we
have
a
lot
of
these
cases
that
do
come
into
compliance
and
don't
come
before
the
board.
But
what
we're
looking
at
is
what
is
the
permitted
use
in
25.02,
so
we'll
go
to
the
code
and
we'll
look.
K
K
K
That
I
can't
testify
to,
I
don't
know
how
they
work.
I
know
that
I
deal
with
a
pro
a
lot
of
property
owners
for
this
same
issue.
This
is
not
an
uncommon
issue
that
comes
up,
and
typically
the
property
owner
is
the
one
that
contacts
the
websites
directly.
K
However,
his
advertisement
does
say:
it's
through
evolve,
so
he
may
be
subcontracting
this
advertisement
through
someone
else
that
handles
these
websites.
For
him.
I
don't
know
again
I'm
just
saying
that
it's
ultimately
the
property
owner's
responsibility
to.
K
I
believe
mr
tomelos
said
that
it
had
changed
back
and
he
he's
testifying
that
he
was
not
aware
that
it
had
changed.
Unfortunately,
for
me,
what
I
look
at
is:
is
it
less
than
42
days
or
not?
I
understand.
C
K
K
It
shows
that
it
totaled
166..
Let
me
see
if
that
was
the
prosecution
cost
or
if
it
was
in
compliance
prior
to.
K
K
B
O
I
have
a
more
of
a
question,
the
sorry
to
keep
this
going,
but
it
is
a
question
I'm
having
a
little
trouble
advertising
someone
advertises
home
on
airbnb
that
that's
enough
to
that's
enough
evidence
to
state
that
they're
that
that's
a
short-term
rental!
It's
not
it's
not
that
someone!
L
Ordinance
what
was
the
month
that
we
had
established
this
before
september
september?
This
is
just
september,
so
it's
possible
that
other
companies
could
have
been
under
the
impression
that
they
could
advertise.
Even
though.
E
E
O
That's
given
that
he
he
went
through
this
evolv
website
and
then
they
got
subbed
out.
So
it's
kind
of
out
of
iron.
The
person
is
in
control
of
their
own
home.
I
understand,
but
then
again,
if
someone
does
just
go
out
and
do
that
it
kind
of
feels
a
little
little
rocky.
So
I
I
if
I
can
be
clear,
that's
the
indecision
right.
B
B
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion.
It's
thank
you
vote
it
down.
If
you're
not
happy
with
it
fun,
it
was
in
violation
of
sections.
B
B
Start
2502,
I'm
on
the
wrong
thing
here.
Okay,
let
me
start
over.
The
respondent
was
in
violations
of
section
2502
of
the
tarpon
spring
city
code
from
december
14th,
until
january
8th
and
a
find
of
25
per
day
for
the
forget,
how
many
days
it
was
25
days
or
a
fine
of
it
comes
up
to
625
dollars.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
65
dollars
for
the
cost
it
occurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
O
Yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
believe
the
fine
should
be
that
much.
I
think
I'd
be
more
comfortable
with
removing
the
fine,
in
fact,
because
I
do
believe
his
testimony.
I
do
believe
that
it
was
out
of
his
control,
so
reducing
the
fines
down
to
zero.
I
would
I
would
I
would
pass
it.
He
hasn't
paid
my
opinion.
I
E
I
E
G
G
G
H
A
I'd
be
happy
to
so,
mr
melo.
The
code
enforcement
board
is
found
in
violation
of
section
25.02
for
25
days
from
december
14th
until
january,
the
8th
and
assess
the
25
a
day.
Fine.
In
addition
to
that,
the
city
has
been
awarded
its
prosecution
cost
of
65
dollars.
This
is
going
to
be
reduced
to
writing.
It'll
be
provided
to
you
well
it'll,
be
reduced
to
writing
in
the
next
10
days
and
be
provided
to
you
in
the
mail
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraiser.
A
E
E
Thank
you,
please
state
your
name
and
address
and
then
we'll
swear
you.
Q
In
we
have
a
jeremy
geller,
if
you
can
unmute
yourself.
S
Jeremy
geller
and
I've
been
talking
to
myself
on
mute,
I'm
representing
the
owner
and
property
manager.
My
address
is
150
east
palmetto
park,
road,
suite,
700,
boca,
raton
florida
33432.
E
Have
documentation
that
you
are
representing
this
property.
E
Okay,
thank
you
sufficient.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
you'll
be
sworn
in.
G
K
K
20-800-00736
1589
starlight
cove,
it's
a
repeat
violation
for
case
number
20-800176
that
was
found
previously
in
violation
for
8-22-8-48-52
again.
This
is
for
riverside
partners
limited
in
care
of
alliance
tax
advisors
exhibit
one
is
all
the
photos
exhibit
two
or
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation.
K
Thank
you
exhibit
two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three.
Are
the
administration
documents
to
include
the
case
summary
previous
code
board
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
K
I
don't
know
if
mr
geller
has
had
a
chance
to
review
any
of
the
documentation.
No
one
contacted
me
to
let
me
know
that
I
needed
to
email
them
to
anyone.
Yeah.
S
We
we
got
everything
from
our
the
when
you
mailed
it
out,
it
was
received.
We
received
it.
L
E
S
K
Okay,
great
thank
you,
brian
okay,
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
K
Okay,
so
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
or
excuse
me,
I
should
say
the
property
manager
mostly,
and
let
me
pull
up
the
photographs.
N
K
K
K
I
went
into
the
office
and
spoke
with
the
manager,
ms
fariba
carter.
She
was
aware
of
the
issues
and
stated
that
they
would
be
repaired
by
the
net
by
tomorrow
and
she
would
call
when
ready
for
re-inspection.
I
explained
the
trash
and
debris
was
a
repeat
violation
and
the
fines
started
as
of
that
day
and
the
fence
was
a
safety
issue
and
needed
to
be
corrected
as
soon
as
possible.
K
Ms
carter
stated
that
they
repair
things
daily
and
vandalism
occurs.
Every
night
she's.
K
So
basically,
she
wanted
to.
Let
us
know
that
she
continually
has
issues
with
vandalism,
which
makes
it
difficult
for
them
to
stay
in
compliance,
so
the
trash
violation
had
been
a
repeat
violation,
so
that
began
that
day
and
just
to
show
a
few
pictures
here,
you
can
see
where
there's
a
large
hole,
there's
several
missing
pickets.
K
This
is
the
trash
and
debris
by
one
of
the
by
the
compactor,
and
then
this
is
just
more
pictures
of
the
large
large
areas
in
the
fence
where
kids
could
crawl
through
here's
another
section
where
it
was
missing
and
they
have
because
they
do
have
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris.
They
have
added
a
dumpster
in
the
back
by
the
pool
and,
as
you
can
see
from
the
picture,
there
were
multiple
items
or
the
dumpster
was
full
and
there
was
a
lot
of
additional
items
around
it.
K
Okay,
so
on
december
15th,
the
notice
of
violation
for
the
pool
enclosure
issue,
the
fence
around
the
the
barrier
around
the
pool.
Excuse
me
was
mailed
and
the
repeat:
violation
for
the
trash
and
debris
was
mailed
and
there
the
green
card
was
returned
by
the
registered
agent
on
december
17th.
I
did
do
a
re-inspection.
K
The
pool
enclosure
had
not
been
repaired
satisfactorily.
There
was
some
repairs,
but
it
was.
There
were
still
sections
that
were
not
in
within
the
requirements
of
a
pool
barrier.
The
dumpster
by
the
pool
is
full
and
most
of
the
debris
around
it
was
removed,
but
there
were
still
a
few
other
items
now
on
this.
I,
the
the
manager
told
me
that
the
dumpster
was
going
to
be
emptied
that
day.
K
K
For
swimming
pool
enclosures,
I
did
find
that
this
is
really
more
considered
under
a
public
swimming
pool
and
that
those
barrier
requirements,
although
are
the
same
being
that
it
was
a
public
swimming
pool.
That's
the
reason
I
send
the
cynthia
mendon
notice,
a
violation
and
added
that
florida
building
code.
K
There
were
two
two
places
where
the
pickets
were
missing
and
that's
when
I
noticed
that
the
gap
between
the
ground
and
the
bottom
of
the
fence
was
also
more
than
the
four
inches
required.
So
in
other
words,
a
barrier.
The
fence
barrier
from
the
ground
to
the
bottom
of
the
fence,
can't
be
more
than
four
inches.
Just
like
the
gap
between
the
pickets
and
there
were
spots
where
it
was
much
more
than
that.
K
K
Most
of
the
pickets
have
been
repaired,
but
being
this
wasn't
a
repeat
violation,
I
did
want
to
still
do
the
last
reinspection
the
day
before
code
board,
just
to
make
sure,
because
there
had
been
so
many
inspections
where
it
wasn't
in
compliance
to
make
sure
that
it
was
in
compliance.
As
of
that
date,
on
december
31st,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed,
and
then
yesterday
I
did
a
final
inspection.
K
Part
of
the
fence
had
a
new
barrier
between
the
ground
and
the
bottom
and
I'll
show
you
those
pictures,
and
there
was
still
I've,
still
found
a
picket
that
was
broken.
I
basically
have
talked
to
the
property
manager
and
the
depart.
The
lady
from
the
department
of
health
has
also
told
them
the
same
thing
that
this
fence
we
feel,
is
just
not
adequate.
K
It's
a
safety
issue
and
that
it's
it's
surrounding
a
pool
if
it
can
be
vandalized
so
easily
that
you
literally
can
just
pull
the
pickets
out
it's
just
not
appropriate
and
that
they
need
to
look
at
putting
in
a
fence,
that's
more
secure
and
not
as
easily
damaged
and
that's
my
opinion.
I
can't
make
them
do
that,
so
I
still
did
not
put
the
property
in
compliance
for
that.
K
Yet
the,
and
just
if
you
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
right
now
that
the
repeat
violation
for
the
trash
and
debris
the
property
was
in
violation
from
december
15th,
and
I
did
put
it
into
compliance
as
of
december
16th.
So
it
was
only
for
one
day.
K
So
let
me
go
back
to
the
pictures,
so
I
did
multiple
inspections
of
the
fence
barrier
and
what
you
can
see
like.
Even
on
this
picture.
K
I
don't
know
if
you
can
tell,
but
you
see
where
the
hole
is
in
the
middle
and
then
there's
a
picket
to
a
left
and
another
picket
to
the
left.
You
can
see
where
it's
been
bent.
I
mean
I,
this
material
is,
is
very
flimsy.
It's
very
easily
bent-
and
I
believe
that
part
of
the
problem
with
all
this
vandalism
is
that
it's
just
so
easily
damaged
many
of
these
metal
pickets.
They
replace
with
the
same
size,
wood,
the
painted
white.
K
K
You
can
see
on
this
one
where
the
the
picket
has
just
been
pushed
out
and
I'm
not
pulling
on
these
pickets
when
I
go
look,
but
they
just
seems
like
they're
they're,
often
either
out
broken
or
in
disrepair.
K
The
other
thing
I
found
was
that
there
were
multiple
places
where
the
fence
would
tie
into
a
post
like
this
picture.
For
example,
they
have
made
changes
here
where
it
from
the
the
visual
picture.
I
know
it's
hard
to
see,
but
the
amount
of
space
from
the
last
picket
to
the
pole
was
more
than
the
four
inches
like
is
required
between
them
and
they
have
made
adjustments
to
that
here's
another
time
with
another
broken
picket.
K
K
Okay,
so
again
it's
my
opinion
that
until
they
actually
replace
the
fence
with
something
more
sturdy,
this
is
going
to
be
a
continued
problem
for
them
and
if
you
do
find
it
in
violation
today,
they
will
probably
be
a
repeat
violator
very
shortly,
thereafter
being
that
it
is
a
safety
issue.
I
know
my
supervisor
is
going
to
want
me
to
check
on
it
on
a
regular
basis.
K
So
basically,
my
request
is
that
they're
found
in
violation
of
city
code
6-1,
which
adopts
the
florida
building
code
and
international
property
maintenance
code
that
they're
found
in
violation
of
ipmc
303.2,
which
is
swimming
pool
and
closures
and
found
in
violation
of
florida
building
code,
64
e-9
for
public
swimming
pools
and
that
they're
found
as
a
repeat
violation
for
a
total
of
one
day
of
12
december
15th
to
a
compliance
date
of
december
16th
for
8-22
accumulation
of
trash
and
8-52
nuisance.
Prohibitions.
K
K
Okay,
so
yes,
so
the
original
violation
detail
I
had
was
for
swimming
pool
and
closure.
So
I
do
want
to
keep
that.
However,
when
I
determined
that
this
is
officially
a
public
pool,
I
added
that
violation
or
that
code
to
it,
because
that
code
is
specific
to
barriers,
around
pool
equipment
and
other
specific
public
pool
violations,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
to
it.
So,
yes,
I
would
like
to
keep
them
both.
Thank.
S
Okay,
so
I
guess
on
the
first
one,
ms
hughes,
if
you
could
explain,
you
know
how
this
qualifies
as
a
public
pool,
I'm
unfamiliar
with
that
code
section
and
I
didn't
see
it
attached
to
the
violation.
So
maybe
you
could
give
us
some
background
on
on
how
this
is
a
public
pool
or
how
it
qualifies.
D
K
N
E
E
K
Honestly,
I
thought
it
was
a
private
pool
and
when
I
found
the
definition
which
I
can't
find
now
here,
we
go
a
public
pool
or
spa
defined
as
one
that
is
open
to
the
public
generally,
whether
for
a
fee
or
free
of
charge,
one
open
to
members
of
an
organization
and
their
guests,
one
at
a
multi-unit
apartment,
building
apartment
complex,
which
is
what
this
is
residential,
real
estate,
development
or
other
multi-family
residential
area.
And
that's
why
I
added
the
public
pool.
K
So
I
never
took
away
the
private
one
too,
but
I
added
the
public
one
as
well,
because
of
that
definition
that
I
found.
S
Okay,
so
shouldn't
we
only
be
in
violation
of
one,
then
not
both.
I
guess
that
would
be
one
question.
Do
you
want
me
to
ask
all
my
questions
or
how
do
you
want
me
to
proceed.
E
S
Got
it
so
the
pool,
I
guess
we're
still
in
violation
as
of
today,
is
that
what
you
were
saying.
K
The
pool
enclosure-
I
never
actually
cited
the
issues
that
the
department
of
health
closed
the
pool
for
they
were
dealing
with
that.
The
only
thing
that
I
was
cited
for
was
for
the
for
the
enclosure
both
of
those
both
the
florida
building
code,
64
e9
and
the
ipmc
303.2
include
the
enclosure
as
part
of
that
ordinance.
S
S
Want
to
make
sure
that
gets
addressed,
so
I
want
to
know
says.
Thank
you,
okay.
The
next
question
I
had
was
just
back
to
the
trash
violations.
What
time
of
day
were
the
the
photos
taken?
When
was
that.
K
K
Yeah,
it's
got
the
date.
It
would
have
been
during
the
day.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
you're,
what
you're,
what
you're
trying
to
find
out
but.
K
S
All
right,
good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board
again
my
name
is
jeremy
geller.
S
Now
we
understand
that
you
know
there's
a
history
of
complaints
or
you
know,
violations
at
this
property,
but
since
we
took
over
management
about,
I
think
less
than
three
years
ago
now
we
have
received
minimal
complaints
and,
as
ms
you
said,
we
did
it
promptly
address
all
the
violations
and
I'll
discuss
that
response
our
response
shortly,
but
I
would
like
to
discuss
that
we
have
had
a
proven
track
record
of
working
with
the
city
and
making
both
substantial
life,
safety
and
capital
improvements
to
the
property
we've
spent
in
excess
of
over
233
thousand
dollars.
S
Since
we
came
on
the
scene,
like
I
said
less
than
three
years
ago,
and
many
of
that
and
much
of
that
money
was,
you
know,
per
the
request
of
the
fire
department
or
the
city
or
or
what
not
for
improvement.
So
we
do
take
this
very
seriously,
and
I
know
that
with
regards
to
the
pool
the
repairs
were
promptly
addressed,
and
I
know
my
director
of
facilities
was
out
there
and
I
think
he
installed
over
50
pickets.
He
made
sure
everything
was
less
than
three
and
a
half
inches.
S
He
used
special
self-tapping
screws
to
ensure
that
you
know
this
wouldn't
happen
again,
that
people
wouldn't
be
able
to
kick
them
out
or
or
whatnot.
Obviously,
that
doesn't
address
a
broken
one.
So
we'll
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
that.
You
know
he
also
did
a
lot
of
maintenance
while
there
you
know
just
because
he
was
there,
he
replaced
brackets
those
sorts
of
things.
You
know
fixed
the
door,
so
we
do
take
all
of
these
violations
seriously
and
we
did
act
promptly.
S
You
know
we
didn't
build
this
property,
we
bought
it.
So
this
was
the
existing
fence.
We
didn't
install
it.
I
would
imagine
it
was
to
code,
and
you
know
everything
over.
There
was
co'ed
properly,
but
I
can
talk
to
the
operations
department
about
you
know:
potential
replacements
or
whatnot.
I
do
know
that
you
know
we're
still
in
the
middle
of
covid
and
that
has
obviously
affected
everyone.
S
So
I
don't
know
how
you
know
how
possible
it
would
be,
but
it's
something
we
can
just
definitely
discuss
internally
and
then
with
regards
to
the
trash.
We
know
this
is
an
issue.
We've
been
working
hard
to
make
this
not
an
issue.
You
know
one
of
the
problems
that
we
find
is
overnight,
things
will
trash
will
be
dumped
and
then,
in
the
morning
we
were
there
to
pick
it
up,
but
that's
why
I
was
wondering
if
it
was,
you
know,
before
8
a.m,
when
our
maintenance
staff
gets
there.
S
You
know
the
other
problem
we've
had
too
recently
is:
there's
been
major
turnover
on
our
maintenance
staff.
We
don't
have
a
maintenance
director
we're
currently
using
temps
and
employees
from
sister
properties
we
have
in
the
area.
S
However,
I'm
happy
to
report
that
we
do
have
a
new
maintenance
manager
that
is
almost
higher
they're,
just
finishing
up
background
checks
and
hopefully,
once
he
gets
brought
on
board,
we'll
be
able
to
full
fill
out
the
maintenance
team
again
so
that
we
can
get
back
to
addressing
this
trash
issue
consistently
because
we're
aware
of
it
and-
and
we
do
you
know-
we
want
to
take
proper
steps
to
get
rid
of
this
issue.
S
We've
we've
actually
even
engaged
a
resident
who
lived
near
the
trash
compactor
to
alert
the
office
when
dumping
is
observed,
so
that
maintenance
can
address
it
asap.
We
also
have
a
security
company
that
does
you
know
third-party
security
provider
that
patrols
the
property
at
various
times
during
the
day,
and
we've
instructed
them
to
alert
the
office
of
any
if
any
dumping
is
observed,
and
also
to
issue
verbal
warnings
to
any
parties,
seen
dumping
and
then,
in
addition,
we
have,
we
have
sent
out.
S
I
think
that's
really
I
mean
we're,
you
know,
I
would
just
say
you
know
in
conclusion,
we're
really
here
to
to
help
and
to
make
this
a
better
property,
and
we
want
to
and
we're
doing
the
best
that
we
can
as
fast
as
we
can.
We've
definitely
faced
some
challenges
this
year.
I
think,
like
everyone
has,
but
I
think,
we're
coming
out
stronger
and
we
look
forward
to
continuing
to
address
these
issues
and
continuing
to
work
with
the
city
and
be
a
good
partner.
S
So
we
would
request
these
violations
be
dismissed
at
this
time
and
appreciate
your
consideration.
S
B
K
Would
so,
basically,
as
far
as
the
trash
and
debris,
I
do
have
a
lot
of,
I
do
understand
the
challenge
that
they
have
been
under.
I
really
do
and
the
reason
honestly,
that
I
put
it
in
comp
out
of
compliance
for
only
one
day,
even
though
it
technically
was
not
is
because
I
am
aware
of
the
issues
they're
having
the
new
debris
that
I
saw,
I
could
tell
was
new.
It
wasn't
that
they
had
not
cleaned
up
the
original.
K
If
I
wanted
to
be
technical
about
the
the
compliance
date,
it
really
would
not
have
been
out
of
compliance
for
only
one
day,
but
I
did.
I
did
understand
that
what
I
saw
this,
the
the
second
day
was
something
new.
When
I
went
back
again
to
see
that
it
was
actually
removed
promptly,
it
was
therefore
I
only
put
it
in
compliance
out
of
compliance.
Excuse
me
for
that
one
day,
as
far
as
the
swimming
pool
enclosure,
that
honestly
is
my
biggest
concern
in
that
it
is
not
a
sturdy
inc
barrier.
K
It
appears
to
me
that
they
do
try
to
make
repairs
quickly,
but
the
repairs
often
don't
last
long,
and
I
just
think
that
the
materials
are
gonna.
Ultimately,
I
I
would
recommend,
I
obviously
can't
say,
and
so
apparently
the
inspector
from
the
department
of
health
recommended
a
year
ago
that
they
replaced
that
barrier
with
something
more
sturdy.
K
I
did
take
a
picture
of
it
that
I
showed
I
can
pull
it
back
up
if
you
want
me
to,
but
it
was
not
in
compliance,
and
I
just
think
that
that
is
the
a
safety
issue
that
needs
to
be
taken
seriously,
where
it's
not
just
something
flimsy
enough
that
can
be
kicked
out
easily,
especially
if
they
are
having
issues
of
a
large
amount
of
vandalism.
K
S
Yeah
I'd
just
like
to
say
that
you
know
we
have
a
proven
track
record
of
working
with
the
city.
As
inspector
or
officer
hughes
said
you
know,
we
do
take
all
this
very
seriously
and
we
do
act
promptly
when
notified.
You
know
it
is
a
bit
of
an
uphill
battle,
especially
that
we've
been
fighting
lately,
especially
with
a
reduced
staff
like
I
said
so.
S
E
B
B
B
F
F
B
As
far
as
hit
do
you
think
you
could
get
this
taken
care
of
in
say,
30
days,
the
fence.
S
Yeah,
I'm
actually
my
director
of
facilities,
I
think
he's
actually
on
in.
Can
he
speak
quickly
because
he's
been
at
the
property
he
spent
multiple
times
it's
reinstalling,
pickets
and
screws
and
and
whatnot,
and
we've
done
a
lot
here
and
I'm
actually
getting
told
that
we
should
be
in
compliance
and
that
there
shouldn't
be
any
broken
pickets.
E
It
doesn't
really
matter
that
motion
has
passed.
We
are
on
to
our
second
motion,
which
is
in
regard
to
how
long
it
would
take
to
which
he
said
he
could.
They
could
probably
get
it.
It's
a
matter
of
keep
that
and
bearing
in
mind
that's
been
suggested
to
the
city
that
that
entire
fence
needs
to
be
sturdier,
but
if
it,
if
you
have
somebody
on
site,
that's
fixing
stuff
every
day,
are
you
comfortable
with
making
sure
that
it
can
be
in
compliance
daily.
S
I
mean,
without
speaking
with
the
staff.
I
don't
know
if
I
could
really
agree
to
that,
but
I
mean
that
has
been
our
track
record,
that
you
know
if
there's
something
we're
told
of
it,
we
fix
it
and
as
soon
as
we
see
it,
you
know
they're
they're
out
there
trying
to
get
it
fixed.
S
Craig,
who
is
my
director
of
facilities
management
did
say
he
could
meet
officer
hughes
there
on
monday
to
do
a
reinspection.
Would
that
work.
S
B
D
C
L
E
O
All
right,
14
14
days
is
january.
28Th.
L
F
G
G
C
That,
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
and
the
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
section
city,
code,
8-22
and
city
code,
8-52
of
the
top
and
springs
code
from
12
15
to
12
16
and
a
fine
of
fifty
dollars
per
day
for
a
total
of
fifty
dollars.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
dollars
in
prosecution
costs.
P
O
H
O
G
E
A
So,
mr
geller,
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
the
property
in
violation
of
section
6-1,
ipmc,
section
303.2
and
florida
building
code,
section
64e9
has
levied
or
has
given
the
property
owner
until
january
29th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
If
it's
not
in
compliance
by
that
date,
a
50
a
day
fine
will
be
issued.
A
A
There
will
be
an
order
entered
within
the
next
10
days,
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
list
of
the
property
appraisers
records.
If
you
don't
understand
what
happened
today,
you
have
the
opportunity
to
talk
to
code
enforcement
staff
after
the
hearing
to
to
get
your
questions
answered
there.
S
Oh
okay,
I
wasn't
speaking
I
I
didn't
know
if
you
guys
thought
I
was
speaking
yeah.
We
we
understand
and
we'll
we'll
work
on
the
fence
and
and
make
sure
we're
good.
There.
Q
D
K
K
K
Okay,
so
we
have
had
contact
with,
I
believe,
the
property
manager.
We
did
receive
an
email
that
they
would
schedule
a
cleanup,
but
I
have
not
heard
back
yet
from
them.
K
K
Fortunately,
the
body
was
sleeping
when
they
and
officer
gas
and
sergeant
mathis
and
officer
hollingsworth
basically
told
that
trespasser
to
leave
and
they
searched
the
immediate
area
for
additional
homeless
people.
Trespassing
and
discovered
the
homeless
camp
had
resumed
at
that
property.
Yet
again,
no
people
were
found,
but
there
was
a
large
amount
of
debris
and
basically
these
are
the
pictures.
K
K
The
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
david
of
posting
was
signed.
So
basically
the
property
was
found
to
be
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
on
1217
2020
and
is
still
not
in
compliance.
K
The
previous
fine
for
case
number
19-4
was
fifty
dollars
a
day
and
that
fine
has
been
paid.
The
previous
fine
for
case
19-788
was
a
hundred
dollars
a
day
and
that
fine
has
also
been
paid.
C
O
D
G
E
E
B
A
E
B
E
B
E
E
C
P
E
E
L
E
Is
there
anyone
on
the
zoom.
H
B
E
Significant
amount
of
money
bobby
if
you'll
call
roll
please.
Yes,
mr
stamis.
G
F
A
Have
the
can
I
can
I
just
go
ahead
and
summarize
this
in
case
mr
pfizer
didn't
hear
so
brandon
the
code
enforcement
board
has
reduced
the
fine
to
1883
dollars,
there'll
be
an
order,
entered
it'll,
be
provided
to
the
property
owner
and
copied
with
you
within
the
next
10
days.
The
order
will
be
entered.
If
you
have
any
questions,
you
can
contact
me
or
the
code
enforcement
officer
after
the
hearing.
E
K
No,
thank
you.
Oh
excuse
me.
Yes,
I'd
like
to
introduce
brian
who
is
the
new
city
code
enforcement
clerk
he's
been
with
the
police
dispatch
for
10
years,
so
he's
very
familiar
with
city
process,
and
I
just
would
like
to
welcome
him
aboard.