![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/U07yDd6-Fok/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board March 10, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Hear
you
try
again
it's
two
o'clock
on
march
10th
and
the
code
board
it
it's
in
code
enforcement
board
is
called
to
order.
D
D
E
Father
in
heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
tasks
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight
or
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy
and
our
decisions
with
impartiality.
We
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
that
is
placed
before
us
and
always
act
in
accordance
with
what
is
in
the
best
interest
for
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
and
its
fellow
citizens.
E
D
F
A
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
tarpon
springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
should
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
A
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument.
First
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken,
the
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action
before
we
begin.
C
G
A
G
Thank
you,
okay.
So
the
first
case
is
case
number
19-220.
G
For
420
hibiscus
street,
with
the
name
under
michael
menna,
senior
trustee
so
exhibit
one
exhibit
one
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
contains.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three
contains
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
G
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice.
The
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent,
return
received,
requested
and
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
evidence
as
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
Okay,
so
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
through
the
owner's
son,
mr
trujiano,
by
phone
call
and
email.
This
case
started
all
the
way
back
on
april
3rd
of
2019.
G
The
initial
inspection
actually
was
conducted
by
officer
gassen
and
his
inspection
note
reads
as
follows:
received
an
anonymous
walk-up
complaint
regarding
the
property
on
the
southeast
corner
of
pine
and
alternate
19
discovered.
They
were
consisted
of
different
parcels.
Buildings
have
metal
roofs
which
are
peeling
apart
holes
in
the
walls,
brazilian
pepper,
trees
on
property,
overgrown
grass
and
vegetation
windows
were
boarded
up.
G
They
did
pretty
much
explain
that
the
roof
did
need
to
have
repairs
and
that
they
did
need
to
be
completed
with
permits.
They
also
had
the
building
official.
Mr
powell
also
had
additional
suggestions
for
the
owner
of
different
possibilities
of
actually
demoing
these
roof
structure
and
putting
on
another
kind
of
building
another
kind
of
structure,
but
again,
all
with
the
appropriate
permits
on
december
10th
of
2021,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you're
not
with
this
case.
D
G
D
G
Problem:
okay,
so
on
december
10th
of
2021,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection.
This
case
had
been
placed
on
hold
to
allow
the
owner
to
focus
on
a
safety
issue
at
a
different
property.
That
case
had
been
since
closed
and
complied
the
roof
was
still
in
a
dilapidated
condition,
and
there
were
pepper
trees
still
present.
Therefore
we
can
we
decided
to
excuse
me.
G
G
They
did
have
a
different
case
which
getting
compliance
was
very
costly
for
the
property
owner.
The
lift
station
alone
that
they
were
required
to
install,
I
believe,
was
over
fifty
thousand
dollars.
G
Most
of
the
violations
have
been
brought
into
compliance
other
than
completing
the
roof,
and
that's
why
we
kind
of
put
the
case
on
hold
to
let
them
finish
an
issue
that
was
more
important
and
anyway.
So
at
this
point
we
decided
to
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
So
on
december
13th
of
2021,
we
sent
a
courtesy
letter
and
I
conducted
the
re-inspection
on
january
10th
of
2022.
G
I
didn't
see
any
permits
in
the
system
and
they
had
not
been.
We
at
this
point
had
not
been
contacted
again
by
the
owner,
even
though
we
had
previous
emails
and
phone
call
conversations.
I
also
took
new
pictures
at
that
time.
On
january
10th
of
2022
on
january
14th
of
2022,
a
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
per
the
usps
tracking.
It
was
delivered
on
february
4th
of
2022.
I
conducted
another
reinspection,
the
repairs
had
not
been
made
to
the
roof
and
I
did
not
see
a
permit
in
the
system.
G
On
february
7th
of
2022,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
received
signed
on
february
25th
of
2022.
The
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
march
9th.
Yesterday
of
2022,
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
and
again,
the
roof
had
not
been
repaired,
with
the
appropriate
permits.
G
G
Again,
the
roof.
You
know
everything's
peeling
back
they
had
pepper
trees
on
the
property.
Okay,
so
most
of
the
pepper
trees
on
the
property
had
been
removed.
They
had
removed
a
lot
of
the
mold
and
mildew
repainted
the
wall.
However,
the
roof
was
still
in
poor
condition.
G
G
And
this
is
on
the
when
the
gate
was
opened,
you
could
get
a
visual
through
the
to
the
gate,
and
that
was
what
it
looks
like
on
the
inside
of
the
property.
So
it's
pretty
much
the
same.
The
metal
is
just
in
disrepair.
G
Okay,
so
the
property
owner,
just
to
kind
of
summarize,
he
had
sent
an
email
that
he
was
not
going
to
be
able
to
attend
the
code
board
due
to
a
surgery.
He
does
have
a
timeline
in
place
and
he
is
in
your
email.
G
He
basically
is
saying
that
in
order
to
get
the
survey
completed,
it's
going
to
take
three
weeks
after
the
survey
is
when
it
would
go
to
the
engineer.
That's
going
to
take
another
two
weeks
in
order
for
it
to
be
reviewed
by
the
city.
He's
saying
that
that
would
take
another
five
weeks,
which
is
entirely
possible
in
that
it
can
take
up
to
30
days
for
a
permit
to
be
reviewed.
And
if
you
have
any
revisions,
then
it
can
take
time
to
complete
those
revisions.
G
G
I
honestly
don't
have
a
big
problem
with
the
request
for
the
deadline.
I
just
decided
that
I
wanted
a
deadline
to
be
established
where
there
is
no
more
delaying
this
project.
This
project
does
need
to
be
completed.
It
needs
to
be
finished.
I
wanted
a
solid
deadline,
you
know
I'll,
let
you
obviously
determine
whether
you
consider
that
reasonable
or
not
the
way
it's
broken
down.
I
don't
disagree
that
it
could
take
that
much
time
and
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
G
This
is
behind
qmar
on
north
pinellas.
Okay,
honestly,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
they
use
it
for,
but
I
do
believe
they
I
believe
qmr
is
using
it.
Okay,
that's
part
of
their
business.
A
G
Most
of
the
permits
that
the
building
department
requires
I've
seen
requires
a
survey,
but
I
I
can't
swear
that
he
would
need
it
for
this.
D
G
G
That
was
a
very
expensive.
You
know
you
can
determine
whether
it's
anyway,
he
had
a
very
large
expense
having
to
put
in
a
lift
station,
add
both
water
connections
and
sewer
connections
for
a
property
that
had
other
tenants
on
it
and
because
of
that
expense
he
requested
and
being
that
he
had
pretty
much
come
into
compliance
with
the
exception
of
the
roof.
He
had
requested
that
it
be
put
on
hold
officer.
Gaston
did
agree,
and
now
that
that
case
has
been
completed.
G
G
B
C
B
I
move
that
the
respondent
shall
have
until
23
september
2022
or
suffer
a
fine
of
500
per
day.
For
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
responder
remains
in
violation
of
said
code
sections.
It.
G
D
G
Exhibit
one
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
contains.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
three
contains
the
administration
administration
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
4,
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
to
the
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Madam
chair,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
G
Okay,
so
I'll
be
less
detailed,
since
the
facts
are
pretty
close
to
the
same,
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
by
phone
and
email
on
april
3rd
of
2019
officer,
gaston
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
Again
he
received
anonymous
walk-up
of
a
complaint
regarding
the
three
properties
buildings
have
metal,
roofs
which
are
peeling
apart
holes
in
the
walls,
brazilian
pepper,
trees
on
property,
overgrown
grass
and
other
vegetation
windows
boarded
up
mold
growing
on
the
walls
in
numerous
places,
wood
framing
around
the
roof
line
rotting
in
many
places
and
peeling.
G
G
G
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
and
the
roof
had
not
been
repaired.
On
january
14th
of
2022,
I
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
delivered.
On
february
4th
of
2022,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection,
no
repairs
had
been
made
in
the
to
the
roof
and
there
was
no
permit
in
the
system.
On
february
7th
of
2022,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
signed
on
february
25th
of
2022.
G
G
Okay,
so
the
pepper
trees
on
this
property
had
already
been
removed.
It's
again
the
roof.
All
the
graffiti
is
gone.
The
mold's
gone,
it's
been
painted
again,
it's
the
roof
that
goes
in
between
that
the
windows
are
no
longer
boarded
again,
just
focusing
on
the
roof,
and
this
is
the
parcel
that's
in
the
center.
G
So
I
would
like
to
find
the
property,
in
violation
of
city
code
8-40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
city
code,
6-1
that
adopts
the
building
code
and
international
property
maintenance
code,
I'm
going
to
skip
over
the
exterior
walls,
that
was
for
the
mold
and
mildew.
There
is
no
longer
mold
and
mildew
on
the
wall.
So
I'm
not
asking
to
find
that
one
in
violation.
G
In
property
appraiser,
that's
how
it's
listed,
the
most
southern
property
and
we
have
to
go
by
what's
in
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
has
an
address
of
420
hibiscus.
A
F
C
F
I
move
that
the
respondent
shall
shall
have
until
september
23
of
2022
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
or
suffer
a
fine
of
250
dollars
per
day
each
day
thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation.
Second,.
A
C
B
G
For
424
east
pine
street,
michael
mendes
senior
trustee,
exhibit
one
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
contains.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three
contains
all
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail.
Madam
chair,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
C
G
Okay,
so
again,
we've
had
contact
with
the
owner
by
phone
and
by
email
on
april
3rd
off
of
2019
officer,
gaston
conducted
the
initial
inspection,
and
his
note
is
as
follows:
received
an
anonymous
walk-up
complaint
regarding
the
property
on
the
southeast
corner
of
pine
and
alternate
19..
G
Buildings
have
metal
roofs
which
are
peeling
apart
holes
in
the
walls,
brazilian
pepper,
trees
on
property,
overgrown
grass
and
vegetation
windows
boarded
up
mold
growing
on
the
walls
in
numerous
places,
wood
framing
around
the
roof
riding
in
many
places
and
peeling.
Apart
graffiti
on
the
walls
on
april
5th
of
2019,
a
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
signed
on
june
11th
of
2021.
G
G
This
owner
had
a
safety
issue
in
another
location,
and
this
is
why
the
case
was
put
on
hold.
The
roof
is
still
in
disrepair,
pepper,
trees
were
present
and
graffiti
is
present
and
I'll
make
this
clear
at
one
time
the
graffiti
actually
was
all
gone,
but
when
I
did
do
the
reinspection
in
december
of
2021,
it
does
have
a
new
graffiti.
That's
on
there.
That
is
still
there.
G
On
june
11th,
I've
heard
me
already
to
explain
my
meeting
on
june
11th
on
december
13th
of
2021
a
courtesy
letter
was
mailed.
On
january
10th
of
2022,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection,
no
repairs
have
been
made
nor
the
permits
in
the
system.
There
is
one
pepper
tree
that
I
can
see
is
growing
on
the
northwest
corner,
and
there
is
graffiti
present
on
that
wall.
On
january
14th
of
2022,
the
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
delivered
for
the
usps
tracking
website.
G
On
february
4th
of
2022,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection,
no
repairs
had
been
made
to
the
roof
and
no
permits
were
in
the
system.
The
pepper
tree
was
still
there
and
there's
still
a
small
amount
of
graffiti
on
the
wall.
On
february
7th
of
2022,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned.
Signed
on
february
25th
of
2022,
the
sign
was
posted,
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
march
9th
of
2022.
I
did
conduct
the
final
inspection,
the
roof
had
not
been
repaired
and
the
pepper
tree
was
not
removed.
G
There
is
still
a
little
graffiti
present
and,
as
commented,
the
property
owner
did
send
the
email
stating
why
he
couldn't
be
present
due
to
a
surgery
and
gave
an
explanation
of
why
it
would
take
until
september
23rd
2022
to
gain
compliance
I'll,
go
ahead
and
pull
up.
The
pictures,
which
again
are
very
similar.
D
A
E
A
E
G
That's
okay,
you
ready
for
me
to
keep
on
okay.
So,
basically
again
the
roof
is
in
disrepair.
This
roof
is
actually
is
a
little
bit
separate.
This
is
the
northern
prop
the
most
northern
property,
and
there
is
a
separate
like
I
don't
know.
If
there
you,
I
don't
know
what
the
building's
being
used
for,
but
the
roof
is
in
disrepair
just
like
the
the
roof
over
the
other
sections.
G
G
It's
three
parcels
that
go
from
pine,
so
you
you
have
pine
and
alternate
19..
That's
what
that
property
was
then
there's
what's
considered
a
property
appraiser
of
vacant
land
no
address
to
it
right
below,
which
is
a
large
parcel
and
then
another
parcel
below
that
south
of
that
which
is
420
hibiscus.
So
all
three
parcels
are
all
connected,
but
the
structures.
G
So
one
of
the
structures-
and
I'm
sorry-
I
didn't-
have
just
a
they're
so
big,
it's
hard
to
get
just
one
big
picture,
but
so
the
initial
two
cases
it's
more
of
just
a
roof,
a
freestanding
roof
with
poles
on
the
inside,
almost
like
a
pole,
barn
type
structure,
whereas
that
last
one
is
more
of
just
a
structure
with
walls
and
a
roof.
That
is
that's
rotting
and
falling
apart.
G
Thank
you.
You're
welcome,
okay.
So
for
this
case
I
would
like
to
find
the
property
and
violation
of
city
code
8-40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
in
violation
of
city
code
6-1
that
adopts
the
florida
building
code
and
the
international
property
maintenance
code,
in
violation
of
the
international
property
maintenance
code,
304.7
for
the
roof,
in
violation
of
florida
building
code
105.1
for
permits
required
in
violation
of
133.03
tree
exemptions,
which
is
for
the
removal
of
the
pepper
tree
in
violation
of
international
property
maintenance
code,
debasement
of
property,
in
other
words
the
graffiti
and
actually.
G
A
F
F
B
F
I
move
that
the
respondent
shall
have
until
september
23rd
of
2022
to
bring
the
property
into
the
compliance
with
code,
section
city
code,
8-40,
city
code,
6-1,
2017.,
city
code,
ipmc,
304.7,
city
code,
105.1,
city
code,
133.03,
city
code,
ipmc
302.9
city
code
and
we're
not
doing
that
last
one
or
suffer
a
fine
of
250
per
day.
For
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of
the
city
code,
sections.
D
B
A
A
G
G
The
vacant
lot
in
east
lemon
owner
betty
nolan
parcel
number
one.
Two,
two
seven
one,
five,
two
seven
seven
zero
exhibit
1
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
2,
contains
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
3
contains
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
property
owned
are
exact,
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
D
G
Okay,
so
we
have
had
contact
mostly
with
the
owner's
representative
by
phone
email
and
in
person
by
the
representative,
josh
colossi.
So
on
january
21st
of
2022,
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection
preshanna
in
the
building
department.
They
had
an
expired
permit
with
comments
that
included
to
solder
seed
with
soil
for
part
of
the
permit
process
which
had
never
been
completed.
As
a
result,
there
was
a
silt
fence
that
was
still
on
the
property.
However,
it
was
in
disrepair
and
not
not
installed
correctly.
They
were
storing
equipment
and
building
materials
on
the
property.
G
On
january
21st
of
2022,
a
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
cards
were
returned
signed
on
february,
8th
of
2022,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection,
the
silt
fence
had
not
been
repaired
and
all
of
the
items
that
were
being
stored
were
still
present.
On
february
11th
of
2022,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
we
returned.
We
received
the
green
card
return
signed,
c19,
which
a
lot
of
them
are
stamped
that
these
days,
meaning
covet
19.
G
on
2023
of
2022,
the
owner
called
and
had
stated
they
were
ready
for
reinspection.
So
I
did
go
back
out.
The
silt
fence
was
still
not
installed
properly.
There
was
no
erosion
control
method
in
place
like
cedar
sod.
There
was
still
a
smaller
amount
of
debris
on
the
property,
but
there
was
still
debris
and
there
was
one
trailer
still
parked
on
the
alley
side
of
the
property.
G
G
G
The
only
thing
really
remaining
was
the
the
erosion
control
seed
had
been
put
down.
It's
not
sprouted,
yet
I
think
it.
It
literally
has
only
been
done
a
few
days
ago,
because
this
is
the
second
time
I've
had
a
case
for
the
exact
same
items.
I
am
as
I
is
the
reason
why
I
brought
it
to
code
board,
so
let
me
go
ahead
and
bring
up
the
pictures.
D
G
G
Piles
of
soil,
so
basically
they'd
gotten
to
the
point
where
they
only
had
the
one
trailer
in
the
back,
most
of
the
other
materials
were
removed.
G
This
was
the
silt
fence
that
was
not
installed
properly
properly
and
additionally,
the
soil
erosion
control
measures
in
the
alley
there
were
none.
There
was
no
silt
fence,
so
all
the
soil
going
that
direction.
There
was
not
a
silt
fence
up
and
they
had
materials
being
stored,
which
you
can
on
a
vacant
lot.
G
Being
that
the
the
permit's
been
pulled,
I'm
not
requesting
the
violation
of
6-1
or
105.1
for
the
permits
requires
permits
required
to
be
considered
in
that
they're,
really
not
in
violation
of
those,
because
they
no
longer
have
a
permit
that
they're
trying
to
obtain
or
one
that's
current.
But
what
I
am
asking
for.
The
code
board
members
to
find
is
the
property
in
violation
of
city
code
8-52
for
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
that
violation
is
complied.
G
G
A
B
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence,
facts
presented
and
law
that,
at
the
time
of
alleged
violation,
city
code,
five
dash,
I
believe
that
city
code
8-52,
was
in
full
force
in
effect,
and
at
the
time
of
the
notice
of
violation,
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
seg
code
section.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
B
F
D
B
D
D
D
A
B
D
B
A
G
G
For
43380
u.s,
highway
19
north
owner
is
robert,
a
sprinting
family
trust
with
robert
a
sprint
and
all
trustee
exhibit
1
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
2
contains
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
Some
hearings
exhibit
3
contains
the
administ
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
in
first-class
mail
and
madam
chair,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
G
Okay,
so
we
have
had
contact
with
the
registered
agent
by
email
on
february
3rd
of
2022.
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
No
clearly
marked
handicapped
spaces
were
delineate
delineated
in
the
parking
lot.
I
did
see
two
employees
at
that
time.
That
explained
they
were
resurfacing
the
parking
lot
and
that's
why
they
didn't
have
any
delineated.
G
On
february
4th
of
2022,
we
I
received
a
confirmation
from
the
deputy
building
official
keith
meade.
He
stated
that
there
is
a
requirement
for
the
parking
spaces
for
the
florida
accessibility
code
of
208.2
and
the
sign
signage
requirement
is
in
the
florida
statute,
553.5041
that
they
basically
need
delineated
parking
spaces
and
signs
posted
noting
that
they're
handicapped
parking
spaces
on
february
4th
of
2022,
I
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
not
yet
received.
G
The
united
states
postal
service
tracking
shows
that
it's
still
in
transit
on
february
22nd
of
2022,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection.
The
handicapped
spots
are
still
not
delineated,
nor
any
signs
are
posted.
G
G
And
that
basically
letting
him
know
that
if,
if
they
even
just
put
up
the
handicap
parking
signs,
while
they're
waiting
for
the
parking
lot
to
be
resurfaced,
that
I
would
defer
the
code
case
on
february
22nd
of
2022,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
signed
on
february
25th
of
2022,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
march
9th
of
2022.
I
conducted
the
final
inspection.
G
And
anyways
this
is
just
an
image
of
the
parking
lot.
This
is
the
area
where
the
you
can
tell
they
used
to
have
handicapped
parking,
but
now
it's
the
signs
are
white.
Every
time
I
went
there,
the
people
parking
in
the
spaces
that
had
once
been
for
handicapped
parking
were
not
handicapped
vehicles,
there's
no
sign
on
the
exterior
of
the
building
or
any
sign
on
a
post
showing
that
that's
what
they're.
F
I
move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
and
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section,
208.2
city
code,
6-1,
2017
and
city
code,
127.04
of
the
code
of
ordinances
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
was
in
force
and
effect.
The
respondents
were
in
violation
thereof.
Second,.
F
B
G
Said
they
were
resurfing,
it
resurfacing
it.
I
honestly
would
have
put
it
in
compliance.
If
they'd
taken
a
blue
can
of
spray
paint
and
put
up
the
signs
that
are
required,
something.
F
D
F
B
A
D
D
D
F
F
C
Made
well,
I
just
had
a
question
about
one
of
the
minutes
january
minutes.
When
we
made
a
motion,
I
think
it's
the
last
agenda
item
on
sea
breeze.
C
The
way
it's
written
here
it's
to
deny
the
petition,
but
I
thought
the
motion
was
to
accept
the
petition
to
reduce
them
and
that
two
of
us
voted
yes
and
everyone
else
voted.
No,
so
it
looks
to
me
like
it's
flip,
so
I
asked
bobby
just
to
check
it
and
she's
going
to
get
back
to
me
on
that
and
that
was
january.
13Th
meeting
correct.
A
C
B
E
A
E
No,
they
don't
need
to
be
sworn
in
for
public
comments,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
for
an
active
or
ongoing
case,
because
you
should
not
be
hearing
that
or
a
case
that
a
petition
for
reduction
of
fine
could
be
currently
posed.
I
assume
that
you're
here
for
tomilo
are
you
here
for
the
1673
seabreeze
case?
E
D
We're
at
747
sunset
drive
we're
talking
to
the
neighbor.
That's
east
of
that
address
at
743
sunset
drive.
E
Okay,
so
my
advice
to
you
is
since
it's
an
active
case,
mr
durso
has
not
been
afforded
the
opportunity
to
be
here
to
hear
this
testimony
that
it
would
not
be
appropriate
to
hear
anything
on
an
open
case.
There's
a
due
process
issue
because
he's
not
here,
and
so
that's
my
opinion
and
that's
my
advice
to
you
is
this:
do
not
allow
any
comment
on
an
open
case.
A
B
D
G
A
A
E
No,
we
don't
let
the
public
guide,
how
we
bring
cases
forward
before
the
code
enforcement
board.
That's
not
how
it
works.
So
my
advice
to
you
is
to
talk
to
miss
hughes
or
her
supervisor,
both
of
them
after
the
meeting,
and
they
can
give
you
some
ideas
as
to
what
they're
doing
that
you
may
not
be
aware
of,
and
maybe
can
move
the
case
along
a
little
bit
faster
depending
upon
what
they're
doing
behind
the
scenes
that
you
not
may
not
be
aware
of.
Okay,.
G
In
fact,
feel
free
to
give
our
office
a
call
and
we'll
schedule
a
meeting.
Okay
for
all
of
us.
A
B
E
I
I
I
can
tell
you
what
it
is.
There
were
a
number
of
cases.
It
was
five
cases
against
mr
charles
burroughs
for
a
number
of
addresses
within
the
city
on
triplet
on
distance
on
one
of
the
other
fruit
streets.
If
I
remember
correctly
so
there
was
thirty
three
thousand
dollars
in
fines.
E
There
was
an
offer
in
the
amount
of
fifteen
thousand
dollars
to
settle
those
fines,
those
that
settlement
offer
was
accepted
tuesday
night
I've
already
contacted
mr
burroughs
daughter
and
she's
in
the
process
of
you
know
providing
that
payment
just
so
that
you
also
know
there
are
two
other
outstanding
liens
that
were
not
addressed
tuesday
night.
One
is
for
a
property
on,
is
it
triplet
or
distant
on
distance
on
distant,
where
it's
going
to
require
a
building
to
be
completely
demolished?
E
There's
a
fine
of
about
a
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
pending
on
that
one
that
will
be
addressed
separately
and,
lastly,
there's
a
utility
lien
about
seventeen
thousand
dollars
that
has
not
been
paid
that
will
be
addressed
separately
and
while
I've
got
your
attention,
I
wanna.
Let
you
know
that
we've
been
successful
on
and
beth
doesn't
even
know
this,
because
I
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
her
about
it
before
the
meeting
we've
settled
another
matter,
the
river
edge
matter.
This
is
where
a
mobile
home
was
in.
E
The
city
was
very
interested
in
moving
forward
and
getting
something
done
with
that
vacant
lot,
because
it's
not
being
maintained
and
I've
negotiated
a
settlement
of
that
case,
where
they've
actually
conveyed
the
property
to
the
city,
and
that
was
received
a
couple
of
hours
ago
in
the
mail
and
so
we're
recording
that
deed
and
that
will
resolve
that
issue.
The
city
can
take
control
of
the
property
and
get
that
one
in
compliance
too.
E
D
E
Is
that
true,
there
are
a
number
of
cases
that
go
to
the
commission
when
we
get
settlement
offers,
I'm
not,
I
don't
remember
specifically,
which
one
that
was,
but
we
often
bring
settlement
offers
to
the
city
commission
for
consideration
once
you
lose
jurisdiction
of
the
case,
in
other
words,
30
days
after
the
order
is
entered
in
the,
and
there
is
no
appeal,
the
code
enforcement
board
loses
jurisdiction
of
the
case.
It
is
now
an
asset
of
the
city.
They
can
treat
that
asset
like
a
car
or
a
truck
that
they
own.
E
E
Well
then,
they
have
the
illegal
ability
to
do
that
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
come
into
consideration
that
you
may
not
necessarily
have
considered
when
the
fine
reduction
request
came
to
you
and
that's
because
of
the
lack
of
information,
sometimes
that
people
provide
to
you
when
they're
asking
for
their
fine
reduction.
We
look
at
a
lot
of
other
factors
when
it
comes
to
us
for
settlement
possibilities.
E
But
yes,
there
are
cases
that
came
to
this
board.
The
board
says
no
we're
not
going
to
reduce
it,
but
sometimes
the
commission
accepts
less
than
what
is
actually
due
and
and
again,
those
are
for
many
different
reasons.
Some
of
them
are
homesteaded
properties
where
we
wouldn't
ordinarily
be
able
to
collect
at
all,
even
though
there's
a
fine
on
it.
So.
B
C
E
Think
is
the
most
important
information
for
you
to
hear
for
you
to
make
a
decision,
and
sometimes
they
just
send
you
a
one
paragraph
statement:
saying:
hey
I'd
like
a
reduction.
Will
you
give
me
one
and,
and
that
doesn't
give
you
sufficient
enough
information,
because
you,
your
rule,
requires
you
to
find
one
of
two
things
that
there
is
some
undue
hardship.
E
In
other
words,
they
can't
pay
the
fine,
because
they
don't
have
the
money
and
then
they
prove
that
to
you
or
there's
something
that
happened
that
prevented
them
from
coming
into
compliance
timely
and
the
example
that
I
often
use
is
that
is,
is
that
they're
cited
for
not
getting
a
building
permit
for
their
fence
that
they
already
put
up?
But
because
the
fence
is
in
the
setback,
they
need
to
go
to
the
code,
the
board
of
adjustment
for
a
variance,
and
that
is
45
days
down
the
road.
And
it's
30
days
after
your
compliance
date.
E
Then
they
would
come
in
and
ask
for
your
saying.
Well,
I
couldn't
come
into
compliance
because
of
the
fact
that
the
board
of
adjustment
only
meets
once
a
month,
and
it
was
way
after
the
date
that
you
set.
So
that's
one
of
the
two
things
undue
hardship
or
something
preventing
them
from
coming
into
compliance
within
the
time
prescribed.
E
So
if
they
don't
provide
you
that
information
in
their
request,
then
you're
gonna
be
making
your
decision,
and
I've
told
you
this
many
many
times
make
your
decision
based
solely
upon
what
the
written
petition
says
and
you're
not
to
take
into
consideration
anything
else.
Why?
Because
that's
what
your
rule
says
right:
okay,.
B
But
then,
from
my
understanding
from
what
I'm
hearing-
and
maybe
I'm
mishearing
is
that
you
can
get
a
second
bite
at
the
apple.
If
you
this,
the
city
will
reach
out
and
say:
well,
you're
really
sure
you
meant
this
or
maybe
you
forgot
to
do
this
or
or
am
I
misinterpreting
entirely?
If
I
am,
I
apologize
yeah.
E
The
way
it
usually
works
is
when
someone
doesn't
get
what
they
want
at
the
code
enforcement
board,
or
maybe
it
sits
there
for
a
year
or
two
or
five
or
ten
years,
I'll
get
a
phone
call
or
the
city
will
get
a
phone
call
and
they
direct
them
all
to
me,
okay,
and
when
the
offers
come
in
when
they
say
look
we
need
to.
We
want
to
resolve
this.
E
We
we
tell
them
if
you
want
to
make
a
written
offer
of
settlement,
we'll
review
it
with
city
staff
and
the
city
manager
and
determine
whether
or
not
it's
something
that
the
staff
and
the
city
attorney's
office
can
support.
If
we
can
support
it,
then
we
bring
it
forward
to
the
commission
for
consideration.
E
Sometimes
they
don't
agree
with
us.
I
have
had
settlement
offers
come
to
the
commission
for
ten
thousand
dollars
and
they
agree
to
take
a
thousand
that's
their
prerogative.
They
have
the
ability
to
do
that
on
those
cases
where
we
don't
agree,
or
we
can't
support
the
the
the
settlement
offer,
we
tell
them
one
of
two
things.
E
This
is
what
we
can
support
and
they
decide
whether
they
want
to
make
that
offer
or
not,
or
we
tell
them
that
we
can't
support
any
offer
because
of
the
fact
that
it's
it's
just
a
case
that
should
not
have
happened.
There
are
too
many
factors
in
it
that
complicate
it
and
we
just
don't
think
it's
appropriate
to
to
settle
the
case.