![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/CrpIaoVznkI/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Planning And Zoning Board February 22, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'm
showing
seven
o'clock
or
we
should
we
get
started.
This
is
the
february
22nd
meeting
of
the
planning
and
zoning
board
for
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
A
A
All
right
item
number
two
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
minutes
of
the
january
25th
meeting.
Do
I
have
a
motion
I'll
move
to
accept
the
minutes.
A
E
We
have
a
roll
call.
Well,
there's
one
chain
there.
I
think
there
is
a
change
yeah.
If
you
look
at
the
end
of
the
that,
you
call
the
meeting
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
You
closed
the.
A
F
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
planning
and
zoning
board
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
F
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
confident
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
F
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
defined
against
the
applicant.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
which
should
disclose
any
exported
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening.
A
G
This
is
at
38
west
center
street
at
an
existing
residents
there,
and
this
is
in
the
residential
multi-family
zoning
district,
where
tourist
homes
are
allowable
as
a
conditional
use
the
property.
This
is
an
older
home.
It
was
built
in
1990
around
1919,
so
it
is
largely
conforming
with
the
code,
except
for
it
looks
like
the
western
setback
is
less
than
the
currently
required
seven
and
a
half
feet.
G
This
is
in
a
area
of
multi-family,
as
you
can
see,
it's
near
the
downtown,
it's
not
quite
in
the
transect
code.
It's
it's
very
close
to
this
city.
Special
area
planned
district,
the
properties
around
it
are
single-family
and
multi-family,
with
obviously
some
commercial
there's
office
across
the
street
running
on
orange
street.
So
it's
kind
of
a
mix
of
an
area
there.
G
So
the
proposed
use
does
seem
to
be
compatible
with
the
uses
in
the
surrounding
area.
You've
seen
these
short
these
tourist
homes
before
and
there
is
a
distance
requirement
of
1200
feet
to
the
nearest
tourist
home
that
is
in
the
that
is
applied
in
the
regular
euclidean
zonings,
not
in
the
special
area
plan.
G
This
home
is
proposed
on
west
center
street
right
here.
The
nearest
existing
tourist
home
that
is
not
in
the
special
area
plan,
is
over
on
spring
boulevard.
It's
about,
I
believe
it's
about
18,
yeah,
1845,
linear
feet
away,
and
then
there
is
one
a
little
over
200
feet
away
here
on
orange
street,
that
is
in
the
special
area
plan
that
those
districts
do
not
have
a
distance
requirement.
G
G
The
applicant
technically
meets
the
residential
multi-family
requirement
and
tourist
home
requirement
in
the
in
that
zoning.
The
use
is
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
This
property
is
a
contributing
structure
in
the
historic
district,
but
the
applicant's
not
proposing
any
alteration
of
the
structure.
G
G
Although
our
current
noise
ordinances
and
those
types
of
things
would
cover
any
any
impacts
that
any
residential
use
would
have
to
abide
by.
G
The
other
thing
is
in
the
euclidean
zoning
districts,
we're
kind
of
looking
at
that.
You
don't
get
that
you
have
a
balance
of
permanent
residence
and
these
short-term
rentals
or
tourist
homes.
So
that's
another
reason
for
the
distance
requirements,
so
it's
really
kind
of
applying
to
that
residential
multi-family
district.
But
it's
something
that
you
all
may
want
to
consider.
C
H
To
be
cautious
of
the
distance
on
there,
is
there
actually
a
like
something
in
place
about
the
distance?
Now.
G
That
is
a
requirement
for
tourist
homes.
There's
a
requirement
of
a
new
tourist
home
not
being
any
closer
than
1200
feet
from
an
existing
approved
tour
stove.
That's
in
the
definition
of
tourist
home.
H
E
I
do
have
one
question:
are
there
parts
within
the
city
limits
that
we
specifically
do
will
not
allow
a
tourist
home,
because,
if
we're
going
to
you
know
not
that
I
have
a
problem
with
this,
but
are
there
going
to
be
just
scattered
tourist
homes
all
over
the
city?
If
it
no
matter
what
what
the
zoning
is.
G
Yes,
most
of
the
city's
euclidean
zonings
do
not
allow
tourist
homes
at
all
residential
multifamily
is
one
of
I
think
two
or
three
that
allow
it
residential
office,
I
believe,
is
another
one.
Those
zonings
are
not
real
predominant
over
the
city.
A
lot
of
the
city
is
single-family
residential
zoning,
the
r-100
cr-70s,
none
of
those
allow
tourist
storms
at
all.
I
I
If
you
know
the
granting
these
these
zoning
changes
are,
I
think,
privileges.
Obviously,
like
mr
cascuda
said
you
know,
we
we
obviously
want
to
have
this
controlled.
We
don't
want
it
being
disruptive
to
to
neighborhoods
or
to
people
or
to
permanent
residents
once
this
is
granted.
If
there's
any
kind
of
abuse
of
this,
or
can
they
be
pulled,
can
this
or
or
is
it
once
it's
granted?
Is
that
it.
G
Correct,
I
I
think
they
are
okay.
F
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
remember
if
that
would
happen
yeah,
so
there
there
could
be,
and
I
can
look
at
the
code
real
quick,
but
there
may
be
a
grandfathering
provision,
but
once
the
use
is
abandoned,
then
they
would
have
to
come
back
before
the
board
in
order
to
apply
for
that
use
again
and
again,
if
there's
code
enforcement
issues
and
whatnot
there
are
mechanisms
in
the
code.
For
that
I
don't
know.
If
that
directly
answered
your
question.
F
F
A
How
is
parking
address
related
to
the
the
tourist
home
conditional
use?
To
I
mean,
do
we
require
we
require
a
a
space
per
bedroom
or
anything
like
that
or
is?
Is
there
any
requirement,
because
that's
in
in
some
past
cases,
I've
seen
parking
seems
to
be
a
big
concern
and
particularly
in
some
of
the
older
parts
of
town,
a
potential
problem?
If,
if
more
people
are
staying
in
the
residence
than
than
what
would
ordinarily
be
the
case
in
a
in
a
traditional
single-family
use,.
G
Yes,
there
is
no
special
requirement
for
parking
for
a
tourist
home,
so
the
two
spaces
per
single
family
is
what
the
staff
has
applied.
This
applicant-
I
didn't
put
it
in
the
slideshow
and
I
probably
should
have.
The
survey
shows
the
parking
area.
The
survey
that's
in
your
packet
and
there
is
parking
at
the
front
at
the
east
side
of
the
house
along
the
side.
G
D
A
Home
all
right,
if
there's
no
more
questions
for
the
applicant
or
for
the
staff,
would
the
applicant
like
to
make
a
presentation.
C
Hi,
I'm
mitch
berger,
I'm
the
applicant.
I
live
next
door
to
38
I'm
at
28
and
I
just
wanted
to
reassure
everybody
that
I'm
close
by
keeping
an
eye
on
the
house
making
sure
that
there's
no
more
people
using
the
house
than
you
know
for
the
number
of
sleeping
and
things
so
it's
gonna,
be.
I'm
gonna
have
a
good,
watchful
eye.
You
know
so
there's
not
gonna
be
any
any
shenanigans.
C
It
would
probably
be
six
if
the
house
would
sleep
six
comfortably
and
I
wouldn't
allow
any
more
than
that.
C
I'm
purchasing
the
house
now
renting
it
eventually.
My
parents,
you
know,
might
have
to
move
it
close
by.
So
I
thought
this
was
a
good
opportunity
to
rent
the
home.
Meanwhile,
until
that
time
comes.
C
D
Yeah
I'll
make
a
motion
approve
application.
21-1.
I
F
F
D
A
A
I
G
Let's
see
on
cedar
street,
and
this
is
the
location
as
you
can
see,
this
is
some
in
the
t4c
residential
high
district,
which
is
a
kind
of
a
pretty
busy
district
in
your
special
area
plan
as
far
as
residential
density.
But
what
we've
got
here
is
a
group
of
single-family
lots.
This
is
kind
of
an
infill
lot.
It's
it's
allocated
one
unit
because
of
its
size.
G
That's
that's
what
it's
allocated
and,
of
course,
it's
it's
kind
of
situated
between
the
commercial
there
on
alt-19
a
lot
of
drainage
infrastructure
over
here
that
belongs
to
the
city
and
was
part
of
the
live
oak
redevelopment
of
live
oak
street.
So
that's
kind
of
the
context
of
this
one.
G
This
is
a
fairly
small
lot,
5700
square
feet
and
again
it's
in
the
residential
high
district
and
this
property
will
be
required
to
comply
with
these
transact
code
standards
in
t4c
and
it
it
is.
Staff
is
comfortable
that
it
can
meet
those
standards
and
the
single
family
use
seems
to
be
appropriate
for
this
particular
parcel.
G
That's
the
it's
like
zoning,
it's
the
transect
of
the
special
area
plan
where
this
is
located.
It's
also
called
residential
high.
G
G
This
is
not
non-conforming,
because
it's
in
the
city
special
area
plan,
there
are
no
minimum
lot
sizes
in
the
in
the
special
area
plan.
Okay,.
A
G
A
A
H
A
A
I
I
E
A
A
Yes,
all
right
motion
carries
that
brings
us
to
item
number
six
application:
21-11
site
plan
approval
for
a
retail
building
at
1372
north
pinellas
avenue
in
the
highway
business
zoning
district.
This
one
may
appear
familiar
because
we
saw
it
a
year
or
so
ago.
Does
the
staff
have
a
presentation
for
us.
G
G
And
yes,
this
is
red
bank
investments,
looking
at
a
specialty
retail
store
up
at
dixie
highway
and
alternate
19th.
This
was
approved
by
the
board
of
commissioners
in
december
of
29
2019,
but
the
approval
has
expired,
so
the
applicant
has
had
to
come
back
through
the
process.
G
This
is
a
1250
square
foot,
building
a
specialty
retail
building
and
the
property
includes
weapon
preservation
and
mitigation
of
the
site.
The
yellow
outlines
the
property
lines.
The
only
difference
between
when
you
saw
this
last
and
now
is
the
dot
has
done.
Those
improvements
has
completed
those
improvements
up
on
this
area
of
alt
19,
with
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
the
road
there's
a
crosswalk
installed
just
south
of
this
site,
not
too
far
south.
G
In
fact,
the
resolution
presented
to
you
is
identical,
except
the
requirement
for
the
sidewalk
has
been
removed
because
it's
been
built
by
d.o.t,
so
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
site
plan
with
seven
conditions,
and
these
are
the
the
covering
this
subject
matter
that
you
see
here
on
the
slide,
which
is
compliance
with
the
code,
the
written
confirmation
on
access.
G
We
have
two
access
points,
one
on
alternate
19,
which
will
need
dot
connection
permit
and
one
on
dixie
highway,
which
is
a
county
road,
we'll
need
county
approval
and
then
the
driveway
grades
provision.
That's
just
something
that
we
want
to
keep
in
there
just
to
make
sure
that's
addressed
at
the
time
of
permitting.
G
One
item
with
this
is
that
the
flood
zone,
it
isn't
a
flood
zone,
but
the
flood
zone
will
be
changing
with
adopt
with
when
the
new
maps
are
adopted
that
keeps
getting
pushed
forward
and
hopefully,
they'll
be
adopted
this
year.
G
So
you
know
what
that
applicant
has
to
do
with
those
driveways
will
depend
on
if
he's
able
to
to
build
it.
Once
the
the
flood
zone
maps
are
adopted,
the
requirements
will
be
less
restrictive
on
this
property
a
little
bit
if
the
once
those
maps
go
into
effect
and
then
the
provision
of
the
traffic
control,
signage
on
site
matching
the
city's
some
design
specifications,
and
that's
it.
E
You
know
me,
yes,
I
do.
Obviously
I
wasn't
here
the
first
time
this
was
brought
up
the
wetland.
You
said
that
that
they've
been
mitigated
or
they
purchased
the
mitigation
bank
or
added
to
the
mitigation
bank.
How
were
they
mitigated.
G
G
Yes,
so
there
will
be
some
impacts
and
obviously
they,
if
they
weren't
going
to
impact
any
wetlands,
then
they
wouldn't
have
to
mitigate,
but
they
are
going
to
have
some
impacts
and
then
over
here
in
the
southeast
corner,
there
will
be
some
wetland
creation
to
mitigate
for
those
impacts.
G
Again,
the
applicant
may
be
able
to
expand
on
that,
but
I
would
say
that
the
mitigation
meets
the
water
management
sum
criteria,
which
is
a
combination
of
square
footage
and
wetland
quality.
So.
E
Okay,
yes,
I
have
another
question
when
you
said
with
regard
to
these,
the
new
zoning
maps
are,
they
are,
are
they
waiting
or
is
the
city
waiting
for
pinellas
county
to
adopt
those.
G
E
So
how
would
that
change?
How
would
that
change
the
you
know
if
the
applicant
decided
that
they
needed
to
start
construction,
do
we
know
how
that
would
change,
or
this
particular
if
we
approved
it.
G
This
this
particular
set
of
plans
is
approved
at
the
current
required
flood
elevation,
which
is
on
the
probably
on
the
introductory
sheet
here.
So
this
could
be
built
today,
as
approved
with
the
current
flood
maps.
I
believe
the
required
elevation
drops
by
like
one
foot
when
the
maps
change.
G
So
if
the
applicant,
you
know
doesn't
pull
a
building
per,
you
know
applies
for
a
building
permit
after
the
map
change,
then
they
could
wouldn't
have
to
fill
the
site
to
the
to
the
point
they
do
today
or
wouldn't
have
to
achieve
that
elevation
that
they
do
today.