![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZtAQyV5CZA/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board June 12, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Just
thank
you
everybody
for
coming.
This
is
our
first
of
two
scheduled
workshops
for
our
comprehensive
Plan
update
review
and,
for
the
most
part,
I'm
going
to
turn
this
over
to
Catherine
Hartley
she's,
our
consultant
with
Benish,
formerly
Tyndall
Oliver.
Thank
you
so
with
that
this
should
just
I
think
up.
C
B
A
E
Okay,
so
here's
our
agenda
for
tonight
we'll
go
through
the
summary
of
all
the
public
Outreach
that
we
have
done,
which
has
been
significant
and
the
elements
we're
going
to
cover
tonight
are
future
land
use,
Transportation
housing
Coastal,
which
used
to
be
Coastal
and
conservation.
But
it's
been
broken
out
into
two
elements
and
then
Recreation
and
open
space
and
then
we'll,
like
I,
said
we'll
get
to
the
other
elements
next
week.
E
E
A
lot
of
it
was
left
over
from
Florida
statute
before
2011
there's
been
major
updates
to
Florida
statute
over
the
years,
and
so
the
biggest
things
that
we
have
done
other
than
just
clean
up
the
regulatory
language
we've
updated
all
of
your
maps
and
data.
Although
the
utilities
department
helped
us
significantly,
they
did
the
all
the
analysis,
because
your
water
and
sewer
has
been
significantly
upgraded
over
the
years.
E
E
There
was
a
lot
of
stuff
in
your
plan,
especially
the
future
land
use
element
that
had
what
were
actually
Land
Development
code
Provisions
in
them.
They
should
really
go
in
your
code
because,
when
they're
in
your
comprehensive
plan,
you
have
no
room
to
Grant
variances
or
take
into
account
certain
site,
there's
always
something
with
a
site
plan
that
you
have
to
okay.
This
didn't
quite
work.
E
If
it's
in
your
plan,
you
don't
have
that
room
to
maneuver,
so
those
things
are
going
to
get
moved
into
your
Land
Development
code,
again
any
outdated
policies,
again:
referencing
old
Florida
statute
and
the
Florida
Administrative
Code.
We
took
those
out
things
that
you've
completed.
Those
have
come
out,
for
instance,
when
we
get
to
your
water
sewer.
You've
had
a
major
revamping
of
those
things
and
now
have
your
own
water
supply
we'll
get
to
that
next
week.
Things
like
roads,
projects
that
you've
completed
those
were
all
taken
out
throughout
your
plan.
E
There
were
multiple
policies
that
were
repetitive
and
referred
back
to
each
other,
so
we
cleaned
that
up.
So
that's
only
referenced
once
and
things
were
reorganized
based
on
the
topic.
So
basically
it's
goals,
objectives
and
then
the
policies-
and
sometimes
the
policies
didn't
quite
go
with
the
objective
that
they
were
under.
So
those
got
moved
around
and
by
the
way
the
staff
did
a
great
job
with
the
table
that
they
gave
to
you.
E
E
E
And
then
we
met
separately
with
the
folks
that
worked
on
your
strategic
plan.
They
were
like
a
guiding
committee
when
we
were
doing
all
those
meetings
and
then,
of
course,
the
public
at
Large,
and
so
some
of
the
things
that
were
that
the
real
major
themes
that
came
out
of
that
Outreach,
one
of
the
biggest
things
was
hey.
We
want,
we
love
Community
Gardens,
and
we
want
to
see
more
of
that,
and
so
those
were
added
to
your
single
family
districts
because
they
weren't
permitted.
And
why
wouldn't
you
have
those
things?
E
There
was
great
support
for
different
neighborhood
plans
and
specific
plans,
so
US
19
actually
was
was
a
major
one
to
focus
on
that
corridor.
There
was
certainly
support
for
updating
your
code,
but
that's
a
Next
Step.
Once
this
is
adopted.
You
have
12
months
to
update
your
code
pursuant
to
Florida
statute,
so
that
will
be
done.
E
There
was
support
for
both
retaining
mobile
homes
and
making
sure
that
that
still
is
an
affordable,
housing
Supply,
but
also
coming
up
with
a
plan
for
a
replacement
when
that
time,
May
Come,
attainable
housing
is
certainly
an
issue
Statewide.
E
No
doubt
there's
just
such
a
shortage
of
housing
across
Tampa
Bay
and
prices
keep
going
up
and
you're.
You
know
the
folks
that
make
lower
than
the
average
the
median
income
and
the
region
are
having
the
the
hardest
time
so
support
for
that
was
important.
Ev
charging
was
the
thing
that
came
up,
of
course,
we're
trying
to
move
to
Electric
and
then
greater
standards
for
your
environmental
review
for
for
projects.
I
was
well
I'm
sure
you
know
the
projects
we're
talking
about
completing
your
site,
sidewalk
Network
came
up
the
most
in
the
transportation.
E
E
Another
thing
that
came
up
for
those
bike,
ped
improvements
was
specifically
to
connect
to
the
beaches
and
also
downtown
and
proximity
to
schools.
When
we
get
to
schools,
I
should
note
that
one
of
the
things
that
we
pointed
out
to
folks
was
that
there
is
an
opportunity
with
the
Florida
Department
of
Transportation,
to
apply
for
grants
that
has
that
those
connections
to
school
I
think
it's
a
two
mile
radius
so
think
about
that
in
the
future.
E
Some
of
the
facilities
that
came
up
as
important
during
the
recreation
under
that
topic-
restrooms
fountains,
you
know,
parks
in
general,
adding
Parks,
Trails
kayak
launches
those
those
all
came
up
and
then,
lastly,
under
the
conservation
and
Coastal
management,
improving
your
habitat
quality
and
quantity,
adding
new
parks
and
conservation,
land,
new
programs.
Those
came
up.
Those
aren't
necessarily
a
comprehensive
plan
issue,
but
we
did
want
to
share
that
with
you
increasing
your
tree
canopy.
That's
really
important.
E
E
So
to
oh
I,
don't
have
my
glasses
on
so
to
sum
up
the
residential
comments,
so
we
broke
those
out
by
a
residential
and
Commercial
accessory
dwelling
units
came
up
as
important,
adding
Town
Homes,
basically
what
we
call
missing
middle
housing.
So
it's
basically
anything
from
two
to
generally
12
units
on
one
parcel
and
that's
certainly
an
efficient,
more
efficient
use
of
land.
E
A
duplex
is
a
paired
Villa.
Sometimes
that's
the
public
hearing
term
for
duplexes.
For
some
reason,
the
term
duplex
has
a
negative
connotation
to
it,
but
you
can
see
throughout
the
region
how
they
don't
necessarily
have
to
be
what
people
think
that
means
three-story
apartment
buildings
that
certainly
came
up
and
then
under
the
commercial,
particularly
because
of
the
expensive
opening
of
brick
and
mortar
shop.
Having
like
opportunities
for
pop-up
retail
that
came
up
and
that's
a
good
idea.
E
You
get
to
test
your
market
and
then
perhaps
move
into
a
brick,
brick
and
mortar
store
corner
stores.
That
certainly
came
up
multiple
times
and
you
can
see
the
color
coding
small
footprint,
grocery
stores,
like
a
more
urban
I'm,
sure
you've
seen
some
of
the
more
urban
Publix's.
Certainly
in
the
region,
we
have
a
lot
of
those
in
Tampa,
actually
commercial
shopping,
centers.
E
Those
came
up,
although
less
important
accessory
commercials,
that's
kind
of
a
new
term
that
we
introduced
to
you
all
so
being
able
to
add
a
small
commercial
use
to
maybe
it
already
residential
use
is
a
nice
opportunity
again.
It
allows
the
person
to
test
the
market
before
going
into
an
independent
commercial
space,
mixed-use
buildings
that
certainly
came
up
as
important
too.
E
So
this
is
one
of
the
boards
that
we
presented
at
your
workshops
and
you
can
see
in
red.
Those
are
your
current
sidewalk
connections.
You
can
see
that
they're
pretty
good,
although
there
are
opportunities
to
fill
those
in
and
we've
shown
where
your
schools
are,
where
your
parks
are,
and
you
can
see
those
connections.
Can
everybody
see
that
map?
Okay?
Do
you
need
a
minute
to
take
a
look
at
it?
Yes,
okay.
E
So
let
me
get
through
these
comments
and
then
we'll
stop
and
do
the
strikeout
and
underline
and
then
I'm
going
to
go
sit
in
front
of
my
computer,
so
I
can
follow
along
again
filling
the
sidewalk
gaps
were
really
important,
crosswalks.
That
certainly
came
up
a
lot
too,
and
that
goes
along
with
safety.
The
overall
safety
comment,
adding
bike
lanes
and
trails,
especially
being
able
to
connect
to
the
Pinellas
trail
that
came
up
under
transportation.
E
E
Oh
I'm,
sorry
yeah
I
forgot
I
rearranged
the
slides
yeah,
so
these
were
the
infill
development
types
that
we
showed
the
public,
and
so
you
can
see
that
second
from
the
top,
where
we
call
it
the
perid
Villa,
that's
actually
a
duplex,
that's
a
couple
of
blocks
from
where
I
live
and
it
turned
out
beautifully
it
fit
in
with
the
historic,
Ybor
City
context.
You
can't
from
the
street,
like
I,
had
to
really
angle
up
to
get
that
backed
up
story.
If
you're
standing
right,
the
street,
you
don't
know
it's
a
three-story
building.
E
It
just
looks
like
one
of
the
shotgun
homes
that
are
typical
in
the
neighborhood,
something
that
folks
really
liked
was
The
Cottage,
Court
idea.
So
it's
still
single
family,
but
you
get
a
multi-family
number
in
there
and
sometimes
that
fits
in
better.
With
the
context
of
your
neighborhood
and
again,
Townhomes
came
up.
I
think
that's
an
example
from
here.
E
We
took
that
picture
here
and
then
another
missing
middle
housing
example
is
the
bottom
center
and
then
your
typical
garden
apartment,
but
a
mid-rise
version
of
that
I
think
that
was
probably
the
least
popular
of
the
things
that
we
showed
and
here's
some
examples
of
the
things
I
talked
about
a
minute
ago.
There's
the
pop-up
commercial,
which
can
be
as
minimal
as
somebody
riding
a
bike
around
and
selling
stuff.
E
And
then
the
accessory
commercial
is
the
second
to
the
right.
There
corner
store
doesn't
have
to
be
very
big.
It
could
be
just
convenience
things,
but
maybe
a
design
that
fits
into
the
neighborhood
live.
Work
opportunities
certainly
came
up
as
important
and
then
there's
your
small
footprint
grocery
store,
three-story
mixed
use
and
then
a
conventional
Shopping
Center.
E
Okay,
so
here's
the
some
of
the
the
highlights
of
the
data
updates.
We
did.
Your
2021
population
is
a
little
over
25
000..
One
of
the
things
that's
required
by
Florida
statute
is
projecting
your
population
out.
The
state
runs
those
numbers
for
us
so
that
we
don't
have
to
do
the
crazy
calculations
I
had
to
do
in
grad
school
I
hated
those
spreadsheets.
They
were
awful,
so
it's
only
till
2040..
It's
only.
You
know
it's
less
than
a
six
thousand
person.
You
know,
increase
I
realize
that
probably
sounds
a
lot
to
you.
E
It's
not
so
much
because
it's
it's
20
years
out,
almost
20
years
out
your
functional
population,
and
these
were
numbers
that
came
from
the
Water
Management
District,
because
they
are
in
charge
of
doing
water
planning
for
you,
and
this
was
incorporated
into
your
utilities
element.
So
it
includes
the
areas
where
you
have
utilities
outside
of
the
city
limits
where
those
connections
were
made.
It
includes
a
tourist
population
and
then,
obviously,
your
permanent
population.
E
The
demand
for
new
units
is
only
2500,
so
maybe
that
makes
you
feel
a
little
bit
better
about
the
almost
6
000
number
and
we
calculated
that
on
what
came
up
as
already
your
average
of
2.3
persons
per
household
you've
got
just
residential.
You've
got
274
Acres
of
vacant,
and
the
good
news
is
to
the
community,
which
I
think
gave
folks.
Some
comfort
at
the
workshops
was
that
you
don't
have
to
do
a
change
to
your
future
land
use
map
to
accommodate
that.
E
It's
really
more
design
things
that
you
desire,
like
missing
middle
housing.
If
you
want
to
incorporate
those
there's
so
the
schimberg
center
for
our
housing
studies
at
University
in
Florida
projects
out
your
needs
for
the
different
area,
meeting
incomes,
so
the
affordable
housing
and
you
can
see
63
for
30
Ami,
the
30
to
50
is
only
132.
Units
50
to
80
is
110.
E
E
B
Before
we
go
off
of
that,
thank
you
so
just
a
little
additive,
so
we
have
the
future
land
use
map
theoretical
units,
it's
about
halfway
down,
so
that's
based
on
when
you
run
the
math
on
our
existing
density
allowances
and
on
the
vacant
land
or
what
we
but
what's
interesting
is
that
you
know
a
lot
of
that
is
currently
underutilized.
This
includes
not
just
vacant
land.
It
includes
underutilized
Parcels
that
have
been
historically
developed
at
less
than
the
density.
That's
already
elect,
that's
allowed
there.
So
those
things
make
it.
B
You
know
somewhat
challenging,
but
things
like
accessory
dwelling
units
come
into
play
where
you
know
in
those
like
predominantly
single
family
areas
where
you
can
get
some
of
those
increases
and
meet
some
of
that
demand
without
trying
to
blow
out
your.
You
know
your
land,
your
zoning,
you
know
in
in
neighborhoods,
so.
E
G
E
B
B
We're
not
we're
not
growing
at
Leaps
and
Bounds
candidly.
If
you
know,
if
you
look
at
the
you
know
the
the
2007
time
frame,
you
know
when
that
comprehensive
plan
was
last
updated.
You
know
our
projections
were
about
what
they
were
now
projecting
for
another
20
years.
We're
just
you
know
we're
not
growing
rapidly,
so
not
compared
to
you
know
to
Pasco
and
Hillsborough.
So.
H
E
And
the
further
out
you
go
once
you
get
Beyond
10
years,
the
reliability
obviously
decreases,
and
that
has
to
be
adjusted.
Those
those
numbers
are
adjusted
every
year
by
by
the
University
of
Florida,
the
way
they
calculate
it
is
births,
deaths
in
migration
and
out
migration.
So
perhaps
that
number
seems
low
is
because
birth
rates
are
going
down.
Certainly.
I
So
I'm
looking
this
at
this
in
terms
of
what
needs
to
be
updated
and
will
be
need
to
be
updated
in
their
Land
Development
code
so
for
this
particular
set,
and
these
data
updates
I'm
looking
at
their
concurrency
management
section
where
it
talks
about
the
needs
and
capacity
for
new
development
as
it
relates
to
like
water
and
sewer.
So
are
we
going
to
have
to
take
these
and
then
make
sure
that
what
we
require
in
our
concurrency
management
system
matches
this
data,
or
is
that
not
coming
till
later?
No.
E
B
B
So
what
are
develop?
Yeah?
We
have
areas
of
of
the
city
that
don't
have
city
sewer
that
are
still
on
septic,
or
you
know
you
may
have
you
may
have
you
know
a
sewer
line
in
a
in
an
area
to
serve
an
area.
But
if
a
new
development
comes
in
those
new
flows
can't
be
handled
by
the
capacity
of
the
of
the
end,
and
we
just
we
have
a
lot
of
when
we
get
to
the
utilities
element.
B
We'll
talk
about
this
but-
and
we
just
have
a
lot
of
you
know-
we
have
a
lot
of
Aging
infrastructure,
so.
E
This
is
strictly
your
plant
capacity,
yeah
right,
and
so
when
a
new
development
comes
in,
you
may
have
to
upgrade
a
lift
station.
You
may
have
to
increase
your
pipe
size
and
that's
on
the
developer
to
do
so.
This
is
strictly
your
plant
which
we're
required
to
do
under
Florida
statute.
Then,
when
you
get
to
your
code,
you
can
okay
worry
about
that.
Other
stuff.
D
I
was
just
a
tad
concerned
with
the
the
usage.
You
know:
the
projected
growth
and
the
amount
of
available
land.
You
know
you
were
talking
about,
maybe
10
units
per
acre,
but
I'm
glad
that
Miss
Vinson
brought
up
the
fact
that
there's
a
lot
of
recapacitating
that
can
be
done
right
and
and
revitalizing
and
and
reusing
what
we
already
have.
So
that
was
that
was
and.
B
I
B
D
E
B
E
C
E
Okay,
so
the
staff
came
up
with
a
really
cool
kind
of
place-based
map
that
will
guide
any
decisions
that
you
have
in
the
future,
whether
it's
future
land
use
or
rezonings,
and
we'll
show
you
that
in
the
next
slide,
the
county-wide
rules,
which
also
governs
your
comprehensive
plan.
You
guys
are
a
little
bit
different
than
the
rest
of
the
state
that
you
have
an
overarching
land
use
and
transportation
board
so
to
speak,
and
then
county-wide
rules
to
follow.
E
So
you
all
have
to
update
your
plan
too,
and
that
was
one
of
the
I
call
the
three-legged
stool
of
this
of
this
plan.
So
some
of
your
future
land
use
categories
were
collapsed
and
sort
of
put
together
based
on
what
the
county-wide
rule
new
categories
are.
E
You
didn't
have
to
do
that,
but
it
makes
sense,
because
you
had
so
many
categories
and
we'll
get
to
that
in
a
second
we'll
show
you
where
those
were
put
together
and
again
duplicative
policies
were
removed,
and
you
should
see
those
in
the
notes
section
again
things
that
should
go
in
your
LDC
were
just
stricken
and
then
again
the
9j5
Florida
Administrative
Code
language
was
removed.
So
let's
get
to
that
cool
map
that
Ali
did
here.
B
We
go
and
if
you're
in
here
you
want
me
to
talk
through
this
a
little
bit
sure
you
can't
see
so
and
I
think
you
can
point.
So
what
we
were
trying
to
do
here
is
to
look
at
the
city
from
the
perspective
of
where
are
the
areas
that
really
are
stable,
neighborhoods
that
realistically
aren't
going
to
change
much
and
shouldn't.
B
Where
are
the
areas
that
we
think
are
transitional
where
we're
already
seeing
change
happen
or
where
we
have
conflicts
between
what
development
wants
to
go
there
versus
what
the
land
use
maps
allow?
We
wanted
to
recognize
the
existing
special
area
plan
with
with
for
the
downtown,
and
this
you
know
the
smart
code
area.
B
We
wanted
to
recognize
that
there
are.
There
are
areas
that
are
with
historical
development.
You
know
traditional
neighborhood,
you
know
Urban
patterns
that
we
want
to
maintain
that
provides
that
those
areas
that
are
you
know
a
little
more
livable,
walkable
Urban
downtown,
feel
we
wanted
to
certainly
recognize
the
working
Waterfront
areas
and
make
sure
that
you
know
those
were
captured
and
then
we've
got.
You
know
a
couple
of
special
designations.
B
You
know,
there's
a
there's.
A
pink
area
up
there,
that's
the
Stauffer
plant
that
is
restricted.
That
can
only
really
be
what
it
is
out
to
the
to
the
east.
We
have
a
large
area.
That's
you
know,
kind
of
that's
that
agriculture,
residential
estate
type
of
of
area
meshes
with
the
unincorporated
County
and
then
the
the
the
other
kind
of
large
area
and
we're
we're
still
working
on
this
map.
This
is
a
work
in
progress.
B
We
are
they're
going
to
help
us
finish,
cleaning
this
up.
If
this
aerial
area
that
we
call
environmental
Reserve,
that's
the
cross
hatch
area
and
what
that
really
is
meant
to
capture
are
kind
of
the
the
waterways
all
of
our
existing
preservation
lands,
areas
that
are
gonna
that
we
know
are
susceptible
to
sea
level
rise
for
the
Long
Haul.
So
we
you
know
air
in
areas
that
show
the
opportunity
arise.
If
we
can
do
an
environmental
lands
acquisition
things
that
perhaps
you
know
so
it's
it's
really.
You
know
an
area
to
you
know
it.
B
It
may
overlay
some
of
these
other
areas,
but
it's
really
to
kind
of
recognize
those
you
know
kind
of
that
big
swath
of
environmental
lands
along
the
river,
the
bayous
and
in
areas
of
that
nature,
so
that
that
this
map
is
still
a
work
in
progress,
but
what
we,
the
intent
of
this
for
the
Long
Haul,
was
to
you
know
kind
of
map.
These
areas,
we're
call
it
a
place-based
area
map
the
boundaries
between
these
areas,
kind
of
are
meant
to
overlap,
they're,
not
hard
and
fast.
B
B
Anything
that's
Place,
based
of
a
policy
that
we
can
tie
back
to
one
of
these
areas
so
that
we
know
how
to
apply
policies
in
the
plan
right
now,
you've
got
hundreds
of
policies
and
everything
applies
to
everything
and
it's
it's
really
hard
to
you
know
to
manage
and
interpret
so
the
long
term.
You
know
the
intent
with
this
is.
Hopefully
this
is
a
guiding
map.
It's
you
know,
and
so
that's
how
it's
set
up.
B
This
is
this
is
this
is
really
new
for
us,
but
so
I'm
interested
in
in
feedback
along
the
way
with
this
then
I,
don't
think
we
put
the
we
didn't
put
the
table
in
here
did
in
the
in
the
presentation.
I,
don't
think
we.
D
B
In
yeah,
it's
in
the
strike
the
underline
of
what
each
of
these
yeah
she
might
be
able
to
open
it
up
yeah
what
each
of
the
the
districts
are,
and
you
know
what
what
their
intent
is,
and
so
it's
really
it's
just
it's
really
that
it's
kind
of
an
intent
map.
B
So
that's
very
new
and
you'll
see
some
policies
associated
with
that.
You
know
in
the
in
the
plan.
So
that's-
and
this
is
a
you
know-
this
table
is
not
complete
right
now,
you'll
see
the
place-based
objectives
that
I
was
talking
about.
That
will
be
filled
in
later
from
whatever
wherever
we
land
toward
the
end
of
this
process
is
a
way
to
just
you
know,
kind
of
have
in
one
place,
okay,
so
in
that
neighborhood
Suburban,
which
was
most
of
that
kind
of
light,
yellow
color,
you
know
those
are
established
areas.
B
You
know
they're
they're
single
family.
There
is
some
support
for
very
moderate
changes
to
that.
Maybe
two
family,
you
know
accessory
dwellings
is
where
we
start
to
get
capture
some
of
that
density
that
we
need.
But
by
and
large
you
know,
large
scale
changes,
probably
not
going
to
happen
there.
The
neighborhood
traditional
is
just
that
it's
it's
kind
of
that
livable
walkable,
Urban,
downtown
area
so
anyway,
I
just
that.
That's
the
intent
behind
that
and
then,
if
we
want
to
switch
to
the
the
two,
the
the
future
land.
I
I
B
Correct
yeah,
that
was
the
intent.
You
know
kind
of
a
vision,
type
of
of
scenario.
This
is
the
the
future
land
use
the
existing
future
land
use
categories,
as
they're
proposed
to
be
Consolidated.
B
Do
we
have
a
a
cheat
sheet
for
the
Consolidated?
The
mat
the
yeah.
E
The
next,
what's
the
matter,
actually
kind
of
shows
how
those
yeah.
J
B
Yeah
there
we
go
so
we
talked
about
that
we
wanted
to
following
the
the
county-wide
plan.
We
wanted
to
consolidate
some
of
our
land
use
categories.
The
good
example
is
the
you
know.
We
had
commercial
General
that
we
had
residential
officer
retail.
We
had
some
other,
really
mixed
use
kind
of
commercial
areas
under
the
county-wide
plan
rules.
That's
all
retail
and
services.
Now,
so
we've
made
the
same
migration
or
recommended
to
make
the
same
migration,
keeping
our
densities
where
they,
where
they
were.
B
We
didn't
increase
anything
so
that
took
quite
a
bit
of
of
kind
of
word
ground,
truthing
to
make
sure
that
we
that
we
weren't
inadvertently
increasing
densities,
so
that
was
that
was
one.
B
That's
one
of
the
major
changes,
the
other
one
was
kind
of
the
migration
of
what
used
to
be
the
intentional
in
excuse
me,
the
institutional
future
land
use
map
category
to
public
semi-public
and
then
the
we
wanted
to
create
and
kind
of
re-establish
the
working,
waterfront,
Land
Use
category
is
that
have
just
kind
of
been
somewhat
lost
over
time,
and
you
know
our
old
records
reflect
them
with
mapping
and
things
like
that.
B
So
trying
to
re-establish
those
that
working
Waterfront
industrial
Waterfront
areas
to
make
sure
that
those
are
captured
and
the
uniqueness
of
those
was
captured.
So
so
what
you're
seeing
here?
These
are
the
areas
that
are
actually
affected
by
these
either
name
changes
or
consolidation,
and
you
unfortunately,
there's
some
of
that
gray
is
unincorporated
County,
so
that's
might
be
a
little
misleading
that
whole
north
south
river
is
not
changing.
B
G
So
there's
a
lot
of
strikeout
language
in
the
very
beginning
and
it
specifically
after
the
first
goal
and
the
objective
1.1
takes
out
cultural
heritage,
historic
resources,
tourist-oriented
economy,
and
it
basically
just
leaves
one
more
cultural
up
on
just
that.
One
goal-
and
my
fear
is
if
we
just
keep
striking
these
things
out
that
eventually
the
next
code
change
cultural
will
be
out
of
the
next
one,
and
then
cultural
won't
be
protected
at
all.
It
won't
be
in
a
goal
or
an
objective
and
I
don't
see
one's
a
goal,
the
objective
it's
not
redundant.
E
E
So
things
that
belong
in
your
historic
preservation
element
are
there
or
it
was
just
you
had
so
many
policies
that
were
in
every
single
element.
It's
like
oh
put
it
where
it's
supposed
to
go
same
thing
with
Coastal,
same
thing,
with
conservation
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
Transportation
stuff.
You
have
that
throughout
all
over.
G
The
place
historical,
we
don't
get
to
decide
that
I
mean
when
you
know
a
lot
of
times
when
things
are
duplicated.
People
want
it
out
of
one
area
so
that
they
can
control
how
it
comes
out
of
the
net.
The
next
element,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
protected
in.
I
Both
it's
going
to
be
in
your
comprehensive
plan
and
you
do
have
authority
over
your
comprehensive
plan.
The
Heritage
preservation
board
that
does
all
of
that
section
of
your
code
is
different
than
what
you're
doing
here
and
you
can't
regulate
the
way
that
they
do
in
their
code.
This
is
simply
to
make
sure
that
those
goals,
goals
and
policies
and
objectives
that
allow
them
to
do
their
job
are
covered
in
the
document
that
you're
going
to
enact.
F
E
H
J
E
F
E
B
Code,
there
was
a
lot
of
regulatory
language
that
was
put
in
back
in
2008
time
frame
that
was
very
Urban,
Design
oriented
and
the
intent
there
really
got
superseded
when
we
adopted
the
special
area
plan
and
the
smart
code,
because
that's
exactly
that
is
the
regulatory
language.
So
that's
some
of
the
instances
of
how
they've
been
addressed.
You
know
later
on
the
policy
that's
stricken
here.
1.1.5
is
another
good
example.
B
You
know
require
infill
development,
Redevelopment
new
development
to
take
into
natural
floodplain
functions.
Okay,
all
that's
been
moved
to
the
coastal
element,
so
you
know
by
all
means.
You
know
take
note
of
the
things
that
you're
that
you
see
that
you
are
raising
concerns,
because
if
we
haven't,
if,
if
we
have
removed
something
that
you
were
like
whoa
I
haven't
found
it
somewhere
else,
and
you
said
it
was
there,
then
we
need
to
address
that.
So.
B
G
So
we
just
later
on
down
the
table,
you
discussed
like
consolidating
some
of
these
zones.
Would
that
be?
For
example,
recently
we
had
the
Moses
Tucker
people
would
that
have
made.
Those
like
the
same
I
mean.
Is
this
going
to
make
it
just
easier
so
that
people
don't
have
to
change
the
code
to
just
come
in
and
get
approved,
because
that
would
surely
account
for
10
000,
more
people,
so.
G
E
Is
so
you've
got
two
levels
to
your
land
use?
You
have
the
future
land
use
map
which
guides
your
Land
Development
code
in
your
zoning.
Maps
they're
they're,
two
different
things:
okay
yeah.
So
this
is
this
is
not
sounding
okay
yeah,
but
you
will
update
your
zoning
code
to
be
consistent
with
your
plan
because.
G
B
Of
one
of
the
things
that
we
definitely
need
to
do,
we've
talked
about
this
at
the
staff
level.
Is
we
need
to
develop?
You
know,
you
know
a
list
of
things
that
absolutely
have
to
be
now
addressed
in
the
in
the
in
the
Land
Development
code,
and
that
becomes
an
immediate
work
plan.
You
know,
as
so
that
those
things
don't
get
lost.
B
You
know,
I
mean,
can
lead
to
your
question
about.
You
know
the
Moses
Tucker
could
that
have
eliminated
their
need
for
a
land
use
map.
Amendment,
probably
yes,
see.
I
It's
also
compliance
with
chapter
163
and
make
sure
that
your
documents
aren't
compliance.
When
you
pass
your
Land
Development
codes
a
lot
of
times
what
you'll
see
what
I
always
put
in
there
make
sure
is
in.
There
is
a
statement
that
says
you're
finding
that
the
Land
Development
code,
Amendment,
you
are
making-
is
consistent
with
this
document
right
and
consistent
with
the
policies,
the
goals
and
objectives
that
you're
enacting
for
your
community
and
that's
part
of
the
basis
of
how
you're
supposed
to
look
at
the
Land
Development
codes.
I
B
I
They
will
likely
deny
it
because
you
don't
want
to
increase
densities
in
their
future
land
use
categories,
because
a
lot
of
those
have
been
done
to
address
flood
map
and
flood
plain
issues
that
can
cause.
You
know
you
guys
just
were
talking
about
having
that
shelter
element
in
Your
Land
Development
code
as
a
review
criteria.
Well,
the
importance
for
that
is
making
sure
you
have
those
facilities
accessible,
making
sure
you
have
all
these
utilities.
All
this
infrastructure,
that's
going
to
meet
your
population
demands
and
growth
and
needs.
B
B
We
can
undo
that,
like
that,
right
now
we
were
trying
to
you,
know,
reduce
the
number
of
categories
and
follow
suit
with
the
county
web
plan
and
not
inadvertently
increase
residential
density
in
those
areas
so
like
retail
and
services
under
the
county-wide
plan
is
like
24
units
of
the
acre
and
ours.
It's
back
down
where
it
should
be
at.
B
E
E
B
E
That
was
so
many
months
ago
that
I
read
that,
but
so
typically
what
happens
with
local
governments
like
you-
and
this
is
all
over
the
state.
It's
a
it's.
A
I
worked
for
the
city
of
Fernandina
Beach
and
we
had
the
exact
same
issues
that
you
did
you
you
want.
You
sign
these
utility
agreements
right
for
extension
of
services
that
are
outside
the
city
limits
and
then,
if
you
have
language
that
says
once
you
become
contiguous,
you
have
to
Annex
in
because
that's
in
the
agreement.
E
So
and
again
you
can
look
at
the
they're
color
coded,
so
the
stuff
that
is
highlighted
in
yellow
are
things
that
are
existing
and
it
may
just
be
a
policy
renumber,
but
the
stuff
that's
highlighted
in
green
is
new
and
and
most
of
the
new
stuff
is
actually
related
to
the
community
engagement.
But
it
could
also
be
related
to
the
county-wide
rules.
E
And
you
know
just
to
make
another
point
on
your
land
use
categories.
You
don't
have
to
amend
your
zoning
map.
You
do
tend
to
have
like
a
table
that
corresponds,
so
your
zoning
can't
be
higher
than
your
future
land
use.
It
can
be
lower,
but
it
is
something
you
have
to
take
into
consideration
when
you
look
at
a
zoning
Amendment,
a
zoning
map
Amendment
your
Atlas
amendments.
E
B
If
that
stays
in
that
to
function,
and
it
does,
you
know
it
is
something
that
we
would
apply
when
we're
considering
annexations
as
well.
E
Policy
1.2.1
is
a
good
example
of
something
that
you
can
say.
Well,
we
did
that
you,
you
adopted
a
special
area
plan.
You
did
that
a
long
time
ago,
so
we're
recognizing
the
fact
that
that
has
been
done,
but
directing
you
to
to
look
at
that
from
time
to
time
to
periodically
review
it
and
perhaps
update
it.
H
J
B
Also,
if
you
recall,
when
we
updated
recently,
the
commercial
General
and
one
other
went
commercial
Limited,
we
switched
from
those
from
those
primary
and
secondary
uses
to
permitted
and
permitted
with
acreage
thresholds
that
has
been
carried
out
through
all
of
the
land
use
map
categories.
Now,
so
you
don't
have
this
kind
of
nebulous?
Well,
it's
permitted,
and
this
is
a
secondary.
What's
that
really
mean
so
we
again,
this
is
following
suit
with
the
county
web
plan
rules,
so
you
know
we
have.
B
B
Also,
if
you
scroll
to
the
far
right,
you'll
see,
we've
also
put
the
the
preliminary
place-based
area
relationship
so
where
you
know,
where
would
that
future
land
use
map
category
most
likely
be
looked
at
so
the
one
that
you're
on
the
first
one
is
the
residential,
very
low,
which
is
one
dwelling
unit
per
acre,
so
that
is
most
likely
going
to
be
Associated
under
that
agricultural
residential
estate
Place
based
map
category.
So
we
started
to
try
to
make
that
connection
between
the
place
based
map
and
these
future
land
use
map
categories.
B
And
then,
like
you,
said,
we've
we've
put
the
acreage
thresholds
in
following
suit
with,
with
mostly
with
the
county
line,
plan
rules,
but
also
here
locally,
where
we
know
things
like
in
our
commercial
land
use
categories
like
the
the
new
proposed
retailing
Services.
Putting
that
hard
stop
at
you
know
on
residential
at
five
units
or
five
acres,
anything
more
than
that.
You
need
to
change
the
land
use
on
that
to
a
straight
multi-family
or
something
like
that.
B
So
so
you'll
see
that
those
are
the
kind
of
the
big
changes
with
with
the
future
land
use,
and
we
tried
to
you
know
we
tried
to
update
the
categories.
You
know
descriptions
so
that
they
were
a
little
more
locally
descriptive,
I
mean,
frankly,
some
of
them
were
just
horrible,
so
so
we're
trying
to
be
a
little
more
thoughtful
about
what
they,
what
they
really
mean.
So.
H
B
E
So
back
to
the
question
you
all
had
like
about
10
minutes
ago,
once
you
get
to
policy
5.1.1,
a
lot
of
that
stuff
was
in
is
in
your
multimodal
transportation
district
now,
which
was
adopted
a
few
years
after
your
last
major
comp
plan
update.
So
that's
just
getting
cleaned
up.
You've
got
it
in
another
place
in
your
comprehensive
plan
that
we're
not
touching.
B
E
B
We
are
proposing
completely
getting
rid
of
that
and
just
basically
saying
you
will
not
impact
wetlands
period
so
yeah
we
don't
have
a
lot
left.
Let's
protect
what
we've
got.
That's
a
pretty
big
change
and
I'm
I'm
sure
that
we'll
get
some
pushback
on
that.
Maybe
at
some
point
in
time,
but
that's
a
you
know.
That
seems
to
be
where
you
know
the
public.
You
know
the
sentiment
is
and
we've
heard
from
people
and
so
that
that's
a
pretty
big
one.
E
B
You
know
again
about
you
know
how
we
treat
requests
for
how
we
treat
request
for
increases
in
density
in
the
coastal
Hazard
area,
and
it
really
should
be
the
exception.
You
know,
and
a
very
good
reason
for.
G
B
This
is
all
yeah.
This
is
all
the
stuff
that
really
is
in
the
special
area
plan.
Now
all
the
mixed-use
type
design
stuff.
That
was
a
lot
of
that.
Honestly.
All
of
that
old
language
came
straight
out
of
the
county-wide
plan
and
they've
even
taken
it
now,
they've
put
it,
they
took
it
out
of
their
rules
and
they
moved
it
to
their
strategies.
H
H
I
B
G
J
C
E
A
good,
so
here's
why
we
did
that,
but
we
can't.
E
So
here's
here's
how
it
works
most
affordable
housing
is
fulfilled
by
the
low
income
tax
credit
program.
So
a
developer
will
will
apply
for
that
money
to
the
Florida
Housing
Finance
Corporation,
and
they
have
very
specific
rules
regarding
how
those
are
scored
and
so
Pinellas
County
is
actually
competing
with
a
lot
of
other
counties
for
the
same
pot
of
money
right
so
you're
competing
with
Hillsboro
Palm
Beach
Orange.
E
A
lot
of
the
not
Miami-Dade
they've
got
their
own
pot
of
money,
but
in
any
event,
if
they
don't
meet
those
proximity
points,
they're
not
going
to
get
funded
and
there's
more
projects,
a
lot
more
projects
that
are
not
funded
than
are,
and
they
have
to
be
not
just
the
stop,
but
not
just
the
line.
But
the
stop
has
to
be
x
amount
of
feet
from
the
affordable
housing
project
that
they're
supporting
has
to
be
proximate
to
a
school,
a
grocery
store
a
pharmacy.
E
So
it's
a
very
rigorous
process
process,
and
so
now
you've
got
some
policy
language
that
supports
a
project.
That's
that's
going
to
come
in
that
they
may
ask
you
for
funding
for,
but
probably
not
probably
more
like
the
county,
because
you
don't
have
your
own
entitlement
programs
from
cdbg
or
the
for
ship
money,
you're,
not
there
yet
you're
that
money
comes
when
you
hit
a
population
of
50,
000
and
you're
not
going
to
get
there
anytime
soon.
So
you
won't
get
that
funding.
E
The
developer
will
but
you're
recognizing
the
process
that
they
have
to
go
through
proximity,
and
you
may
want
to
adjust
your
future
land
use
map
in
the
future,
because
we
did
write
in
some
language
about
you
doing
perhaps
a
future
plan
for
a
specific
plan
for
the
19
Corridor,
which
is
most
likely
where
those
projects
are
going
to
go.
I.
G
B
Well,
and-
and
a
lot
of
it's
already
is-
is
in
the
housing
element
as
well
right
so
but
realize
too,
you
know
an
objective
is
something
we
aspire
to
get
to,
so
we
should
be
trying
to
do
that.
It's
not
a
policy
that
says
do
this,
so
that's
that
there
is
a
you
know.
There's
a
there
is
a
difference
there.
You
know
what
we're
trying
to
say
is
that
you,
you
need
to
have
a
range
of
housing
opportunities.
B
B
B
So
we
have
in
our
Land
Development
code.
We
have
a
density
bonus
that
you
can
apply
for
usually
it's
through
a
conditional
use
process,
I
think
exclusively
a
conditional
use
process
for
us
where
you
can
apply
for
up
to
a
50
percent
density,
increase
for
specific,
affordable
housing
developments,
so
that
gets
you
to
22
units
to
the
acre
four
and
affordable,
and
it
has
to
be
a
certified,
affordable,
housing
project.
B
K
E
They
have
a
minimum
Target
that
they
have
to
reach
to
get
funding
so
generally
those
projects-
and
this
speaks
for
Statewide,
so
I'm
not
going
to
get
specific
for
you,
but
they're
generally
between
three
and
five
acres
and
they're
generally
between
50
and
150
units.
If
you
look,
if
you
any
of
those
applications
are
actually
publicly
accessible
on
the
Florida
Housing
Finance
corporation's
website,
and
so
you
can
look
at
all.
They
include
a
pro
forma.
E
We
will
get
to
that.
Okay.
Actually,
there
is
a
recent
bill
that
was
passed,
Senate,
Bill,
102
and
I've
I've
summarized
that
for
you,
you
don't
have
to
do
anything
yet,
but
in
true
fashion
of
the
legislature
at
preamps,
local
government.
So
every
year
there's
a
preemption
Bill,
and
this
is
a
preemption
bill.
It's
not
nearly
as
the
hero
as
the
original
draft
was.
It
certainly
got
watered
down
through
the
legislative
process,
but
there
is
some
preemption
for
you
all
and
we'll
get
to
that.
We'll
get
to
that
summary
at
the
end.
E
G
B
It
only
it
we
have,
we
still
have
policies
that
that
recognize
and
require
us
to
periodically
review
and
update
the
smart
code
for
its
continued
objectives
and
the
special
area
plan
that's
associated
with
it.
So
if
anything,
I
think
it
just
encourages
it
and
and
yeah.
B
B
B
12.
yeah.
You
know
it's
definitely
due
for
a
refresh
absolutely
and
actually
this
does
require
us
to
periodically
look
at
it
and
update
it.
So.
E
Here's
a
good
example
of
code
language
that
needs
to
go
policy
5.2.6.
All
mixed-use
centers
shall
have
a
maximum
build
to
line
of
15
feet
from
the
right-of-way.
Here's.
What,
because
that
is
put
in
your
comp
plan,
you
can't
vary
from
that
legally
and
what
happens
a
lot
of
times
is
that
you'll
find
when
someone
comes
through
with
a
site
plan?
It'll
have
an
easement
for
utilities.
Well,
what
do
you?
What
do
you
do
now?
E
B
E
Another
good
example
is
the
building
height
kind
of
the
Urban
Design
rule.
That
was
a
thing
in
the
late
90s
and
early
2000s
was
a
ratio
of
one
to
one
to
one
to
three.
So,
for
instance,
the
reason
why
it
doesn't
apply
here
is
because
you've
got
you've
got
right
away
like
19,
that's
wider
than
the
interstates,
and
what
you
don't
want,
a
building
to
be
250
feet
tall
or
150
feet.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
that
doesn't
make
sense.
B
E
Even
a
50
foot
wide
wide
street,
but
because
you
can
still
divide
that
by
three,
but
when
you
consider
the
width
of
American
roadways
be
the
best
Rule
and
again
it's
it's
code,
language.
It
shouldn't
be
in
your
plan.
B
There's
also
a
fair
amount
of
stuff
in
the
when
you're
in
the
like
a
six
point,
six
point
three
point:
four
and
things
about
job
growth
and
things
like
that.
That
really
would
be
better
suited
to
an
economic
development
element.
Should
we
if
we
had
one
well,
we
had
an
RFP
out
to
do
an
economic
development
strategy,
an
element.
It's
kind
of
it's
been
postponed
at
this
point,
but
my
understanding
is
that
you
know
we'll
come
full
circle
on
that
and
revisit
that.
So
so
some
of
that
is
really
Economic.
Development
language.
E
Here's
another
here's
another
good
example
protect
the
city's
remaining
industrial
designated
lands
from
incremental
land
use
amendments
to
non-industrial
uses.
What
does
incremental
mean,
if
you
don't
know
what
something
means
and
when
you
come
to
when
you
when
something
comes
to
you,
that's
a
future
land
use
map
Amendment
and
you
can't
tell
a
developer
or
the
city
commission
or
the
attorneys.
What
that
actually
means,
then
by
all
means,
take
it
out.
B
One
of
the
things
that
we
freely
admit
on
and
that's
one
of
the
intents
behind
that
place
based
map.
You
know
we
had
you-
know
the
US-19
Corridor
the
north
side
of
the
Anclote
River.
Those
areas
that
you
know
identified
as
transitional
and
what
that
really
means
to
to
us
is
there's
change
happening
and
we
keep
getting
land
use
map
amendments
to
change
things.
What
we,
what
we
really
want
to
do
is
we
need
a
corridor
plan
that
says
this
is
what's
going
to
happen.
B
That's
updated
for
reality
of
now
same
thing
with
the
north
side
of
the
river.
Where
we've
got
this
push
and
pull
between,
you
know
residential
and
Industrial,
and
it's
you
know
it's
morphing
its
way
together,
and
so
we,
those
are
those
are
areas
that
really
we
think
additional
planning
needs
to
take
place
before
we
start
allowing
things
to
continue
to
kind
of
right.
I
So
on
some
of
these
here,
where
you
have
on
this,
particularly
on
this
page
I'm,
looking
at
where
you
have
the
proposed
language
and
you're,
removing
these
things,
there's
no
comments
here
in
the
notes
kind
of
saying
why
we're
removing
them
I
see
what
you're
talking
about
with
the
one
where
you
talked
about
well,
this
doesn't
really
necessarily
mean
anything
in
terms
of
the
comp
plan
really.
I
Starting
here
right
around
where
she
was
talking
policy,
6.4.1,
6.4.2,
objective
6.5,
you
know
encouraged
mixed-use
development
patterns
where
appropriate,
to
reduce
commuting
costs
and
vehicle
miles
traveled.
Well,
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
had
talked
about
when
you
were
presenting
on
the
feedback
that
you
got
from
the
community
that
we
wanted
more
mixed
use,
development
or
the
community
wanted
more
mixed-use
development
and
also
the
the
reduction
in
commuting
costs.
I
So
having
those
available
bike
paths
and
and
walkable
paths
increased
in
the
city,
so
I'm
kind
of
curious
as
to
why
we're
deleting
that,
if
it's
something
that
was
sort.
E
I
Yeah
under
six
under
to
reduce
yeah
6.4.3,
okay
was
the
one
and
but
there's
like
a
couple
of
them
like
that.
So,
okay.
F
G
Are
the
words
that
we
can
use
to
make
our
decisions
over
this?
The
the
point
of
what
you're
saying
is:
what
does
that
mean
that
works
both
ways?
So
you
know
that's
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing
for
us
to
have
in
there,
because
I
don't
think
we
should
be.
We
just
struck
a
whole
bunch
of
policies
just
because
of
the
first
word
in
them,
and
now
we
have
no.
These
things
don't
even
exist
anymore.
In
this
new.
E
I
think
what
resolution
I
think
what
we
need
to
do,
that's
what
I
was
about
to
say.
We
probably
need
to
add
some
more
comments.
The
last
thing
you
all
want
to
do
is
fight
with
a
developer's
attorney
over
that
language.
Oh
my
gosh,
you
don't
want
to
do
this,
don't
you
don't
want
to
wind
up
in
court
over.
G
G
The
other
thing
is
in
court
a
lot,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
that's
something
that
we
should
just
strike
all
of
these
things,
because
one
word
doesn't
suit,
because
you're
thinking,
oh
yeah,
I'm,
an
attorney
too
I
can
interpret
words.
However,
I
would
like
to
do
so
and
that
helps
our
citizens
come
and
have
opinions
so
in
voice
their
opinions
on
on
things
that
are
coming
into
our
community.
So
I'm
going
to
give
them
that
opportunity
to
see
what
that
means.
I'm
going.
B
G
H
E
G
F
J
One
so
a
lot
of
this
was
repetitive
throughout
the
future.
Land
use
elements
so
goal
six
had
a
lot
of
policies
that
more
so
were
pertaining
to
goal
number
one.
So
we
took
a
lot
of
the
elements
within
this.
We
removed
a
specific
goal
and
we
added
all
the
policies
and
things
under
goal
one.
So
that's
why
it's
really
hard
to
look
at
a
strike
through
underline
like
this.
This
is
the
best
way
we
could
portray
it
to
you
guys
by
having
a
column
showing.
G
F
D
F
B
Take
your
words,
it's
stuff
that
we
are
required
to
do,
but
we
don't.
G
C
F
B
G
B
Just
we'll
take
care
I
can
tell
you
normal
course
of
business
when
you
are
amending
comprehensive
plans
and
doing
follow-on
legislative
things
that
are
things
that
need
to
happen
in
Your
Land
Development
code.
Is
those
amendments
take
place,
you're,
basically
amending
the
comp
plan
to
set
the
policy
for
what
should
be
happening
in
Your
Land
Development
code?
Let
us
I
under
I,
hear
your
concerns.
A
And
this
may
be
more
of
a
legal
question
really,
but
would
it
be
possible
to
at
the
time
of
adoption
of
the
plan
at
the
at
the
very
least,
also
adopt
a
I?
Don't
know
what
a
resolution
I
guess
that
so
that
so
that
we
and
the
boc
would
formally
adopt
it
at
that
point,
that
this
is
a
list
of
things
that
have
to
be
done.
Sure.
B
F
I
Both
both
Your
Land
Development
code
and
your
comprehensive
plan
are
adopted
via
ordinance,
so
they'll
go
through
all
the
formalities
that
you
have
to
go
through.
When
you
adopt
an
ordinance,
it
will
come
to
you
first,
you
will
make
a
recommendation
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners
and
then
it'll
go
before
the
Board
of
Commissioners
twice
for
both
of
them
and
ultimately
a
resolution
really
wouldn't
have
an
effect
in
terms
of
being
able
to
enforce
it,
because
you
can't
amend
anything
in
your
Land
Development
code
with
a
resolution,
but
the
Land
Development
code.
I
You
can
bring
both
ordinances
together
at
the
same
time
so
that
you're
enacting
them
concurrently
to
make
sure
the
changes
that
you're
you're
enacting.
Pursuant
to
your
comprehensive
plan,
changes
are
in
Your
Land
Development
code.
So
if
that's
what
you're
asking?
If
we
can
do
that
simultaneously?
Yes,
we
can
bring
both
ordinances
together.
So
you
have
a
good
comparison,
but
they
will
be
separate.
Public
hearings.
A
Right
but
I
think
that's,
that's.
That's
the
only
way,
I
see
to
be
100
sure
that
something
doesn't
get
left
out
and
something
might
get
left
out
in
in
theory
on
purpose.
If
if
there
was
somebody
in
in
the
process
somewhere
that
didn't
want
some
of
those
things
brought
into
the
code
of
ordinances,
they
might
remove
something
and,
and
then
they're
not
working
together.
So
I
have
to
go.
F
B
F
B
We'll
we'll
update
the
notes
section
try
to
make
that
more
complete,
so
I,
like
I,
said
I'm
I
feel
like
we're.
Probably
gonna
have
to
do
multiple
workshops.
You
know
this
was
our
first
one.
B
B
Read
a
clean
version
and
then
go
back,
and
you
know
where
you
you
know
and
see
if
the
see
see
where
you
feel
like
gaps
have
occurred.
If,
if
gaps
have
occurred,
if
you
really
think
that
we've
taken
out
policy
or
something
or
said
something
should
be
in
the
Land
Development
code
versus
in
the
comp
plan,
that's
the
stuff
I
really
want
to
be
able
to
focus
on
as
we
move
forward
because
I
know
I'm.
You
know
this
is
this
is
a
lot
of
change.
I
will
also
tell
you
it
is.
F
D
F
Did
The
Originals
here
the
changes
there
struck
through
over
here
if
we
just
had
some
draft
here's
here's
what
we
plan
on
proposing
language
on,
and
maybe
you
can
actually
categorize
these
as
saying
you
know
what
the
ones
that
we
know
are
just
the
laws
of
change,
we
got
to
change
them.
Then
we
have
to
have
something
for
that
where
it
gets
put
appropriately
in
the
Land
Development.
A
B
A
H
F
Sense
they
should
be
well.
What
will
it
be?
So
just
if
we
understood
that
that
striking
this
out
had
Merit
and
it
does
belong
over
here
in
the
Land
Development
code-
here's
what
the
language
should
look,
yeah
I'm
saying
you
have
to
actually
do
it,
but
at
least
say
that
the
Land
Development
code
should
at
least
address
it.
This
way.
F
For
I'm
asking
to
follow
your
process,
the
way
you've
done
it
you've
already
identified
that
these
need
to
be
changed
and
you're,
showing
it
completely
out,
and
some
you
did
add
some
language.
So
if
you're
striking
it
completely
out,
there's
nothing
that
says
how
you,
what
are
you
proposing
to
put
in
replace
of
that
language
in
the
LDC
and
and
I
would
say,
because
you've
made
a
very
good
comment.
It's
very
sensitive
time
sensitive
because
the
laws
have
changed.
So
you
might
want
to
look
and
say
which
ones
are
really
time
sensitive.
F
H
G
The
staff
is
doing
a
great
job.
My
concern
more
is
with
the
with
so
much
stuff,
based
on
the
original
initial
presentation
of
the
future
population.
I,
don't
like
seeing
things
removed
with
this
future
outlook
and
growth
of
the
city.
The
city
can
grow
as
it
is.
It
has
not
shown
that
we're
gonna
going
to
have
ten
thousand
more
people
in
17
years.
G
G
Computers-
it's
about
about
five
thousand
I'm,
not
talking
about
the
C
I'm,
seeing
you
know
this
presentation,
the
group
that's
hired
I'm,
just
saying
I,
don't
want
to
to
grow
tarpon
by
10,
000,
more
people.
We
can't
sustain
that
many
people
I
don't
want
to
be
removing
things
that
allows
that
it
makes
it
easier
for
people
to
come
in
like
that,
because
that's
not
sustainable
for
the
city
and
we're
supposed.
B
So
I
hear
exactly
what
you're
saying
and
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
not.
We
have
not
touched
the
future
land
use
in
terms
of
density,
so
to
to
do
anything
other
than
what's
already
in
in
on
the
maps
requires
coming
back
and
changing
something,
and
that's
why,
with
that
place
based
map
yeah,
that
was
what
that's
exactly
trying
to
get
to
what
you're
talking
about.
B
B
B
B
Can
vote
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
so?
What
we
can,
what
we
can
do?
Actually
you
just
hit
on
something
that
I've
okay,
we
can
identify
the
things
that
are
intended
to
change,
but
we
basically
keep
this
as
a
legacy
document
that
is,
in
effect
until
X
happens.
I
think
there's
a
way
that
we
can
legally
maneuver
that
yeah,
absolutely
yeah,
yeah
I
think
we
we
can
work
toward
that
end.
I
think
that's
a
great
way
to
that
holds
us
accountable
and.
F
I
That
make
sense,
yeah
I
see
what
you're
saying,
but
you
still
can
only
so.
If
you
have
something
that
will
be
enforced
upon
a
condition
and
that
condition
has
not
yet
been
met,
then
you
can
only
enforce
what's
existing
now.
Once
that
condition
happens,
then
the
new
provision
will
be
what's
in
existing
and
you
can't
enforce
the
old
one.
So
you're
still
having
that
you.
B
Know
which
law
applies?
If
we
have
some,
if
we
have
an
instance
where,
let's
say
the
place
based
Vision
map
indicates
X,
but
through
the
sum
of
or
something
that
should
be
amended
but
hasn't
been
done.
Yet
we
have
a
conflict.
Can
we
specify
like
what
supersedes
or
what
should
be
more
important?
Is
there
a
way
the.
I
Law
is
going
to
the
the
law
will
provide.
You
know,
because
if
you
allow
that
super
session
or
you
allow
quote
like
a
choice
of
laws,
then
you're
creating
ambiguities
that
are
that
are
going
to
view
constitutional
issues
with
our
challenge.
So
you
have
to
have
a
clear.
This
is
what
it's
going
to
be,
and
this
is
when
it
happens.
If
you're
having
something
that's
going
to
have
a
condition
conditional
enforcement
date,
you
know,
but
yeah
you
can't
have
well.
F
B
I
I
mean
a
Land
Development
code,
the
changes,
the
changes
I
mean
I,
I,
I'm
gonna,
say
anywhere
from
a
year
to
as
long
as
two
look,
how
long
it
took
us
to
get
through.
You
know
just
the
changes
that
we've
done.
You
know
over
the
last
18
months,
I
mean
they.
You
know
they
do
have
they
they
take
a
lot
take
on
a
life
of
their
own,
sometimes
but
I
think
the
other
thing
I
was
thinking
about
was
a
lot
of
times
in
under
the
old
comp
plan.
B
You
would
see
you
know,
amend
the
Land
Development
code
to
do
X,
Y
and
Z
within
you,
buy
2027.,
so
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
way
that
we
could
also
kind
of
couch
these
these.
These
changes
in
that
type
of
a
time
frame
that
gives
a
directive
either
way.
Let
I
I
see
where
we're
trying
to.
F
E
The
notes
need
to
indicate
where
stuff
got
moved
or
it's
already
covered,
because
I
think
that's
where
a
lot
of
the
confusion
is
that
we're
talking
about
right
now,
if
you're
talking
about
doing
some
things
concurrently
with
your
code,
update
I,
think
that's
fine,
but
you
do
need
to
cover
the
statutory
requirements
now
the
stuff.
That's
in
Florida
statute,
nine,
J5,
stuff,
that's
gone
things
in
the
county-wide
plan
that
you
need
to
incorporate
like
get
the
stuff
you
have
to
do
now,
I
agree
and
then
the
stuff
you
want
to
do.
E
F
I
We
can
specify
that
this
is
our
area.
Okay,
so
your
evaluation
and
appraisal
report
is
what
usually
will
cover
any
new
statutory
amendments
from
the
last
over
the
last
seven
years,
where
you
take
those
and
you
incorporate
them
in
and
there's
usually
some
really
good
easy
to
follow,
comprehensive
lists.
I'm
sure
you
know
those
can
be
provided
to
you
what
changed
from
the
last
time.
I
As
with
your
Your
Land
Development
code
regulations,
you
can
pass
those
prior
to
Second
reading
of
your
comprehensive
plan
coming
into
effect,
because
in
between
the
first
reading
with
the
Board
of
Commissioners
and
the
second
reading
of
the
Board
of
Commissioners
for
the
ordinance
on
the
comprehensive
plan,
it
has
to
go
for
a
state
and
and
jurisdictional
review
for
any
concurrent
and
neighboring
jurisdictions.
To
look
at
your
plan
to
say
yes
or
no.
This
is
okay.
This
meets
standards.
I
H
B
We're
in
the
notes,
column,
wherever
we've
got
a
blank,
we'll
make
sure,
even
if
it's
just
carried
down
from
above
we'll
make
sure
I
think
it's
you
know,
I
think
we've
I
think
we
did
hit
everything.
But
it's
not
it's
just
not
an
easy
table
to
read
when
when
you're
scrolling
through
it,
because
it
does
look
like
that,
there's
things
you
know
the
one:
the
policy
six,
you
know
move
objective
and
subsequent
policies
to
you
know
I
think
everywhere.
F
C
F
F
F
H
B
This
big
amorphous
thing
that
frankly,
never
really
amounted
to
much,
but
now
we're
trying
to
put
it
in
the
right
place,
not
lose
it
a
lot
of
it.
You
know
right,
please
put
it
in
the
right
place,
some
of
it
that
right
place
might
be
somewhere
else
completely
like
in
the
sustainability
plan,
which
some
of
our
things
are.
B
So
you
know,
we've
have
other
things
that
you
know
that
come
into
play,
stormwater
action
plan
we're
trying
to
incorporate
those
things
by
reference,
so
they're
an
equal
part
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
things
that
we
can
consider
as
necessary.
So
yeah
it
I
mean
some
of
it
does
look
like
my
gosh.
They
took
out,
like
you
know,
a.
B
E
H
E
B
Ultimately,
we
only
have
to
hit
the
box
once
not
four
times
in
in
three
different
iterations
and
a
little
bit
different
between
each
policy.
That's
what
we're
really
trying!
You
know
that
was
a
big
one
for
us
and
everything
seems
to
get
dumped
into
the
future
land
use
elements
because
it's
the
first
place
everybody
looks
so.
I
We'll
get
there
and
I
am
kind
of
I'm,
just
I'm,
looking
under
the
land
use
and
comprehensive,
comprehensive
planning
section
of
the
Florida
League
of
cities,
legislative
report
that
they
publish
and
how
they're
talking
about
like
increasing
the
required
planning
periods
from
five
to
ten
years
and
10
to
20
years?
Are
we
going
to
be
and
and
also
some
regulations
here
on
the
evaluation
and
Appraisal
reports?
I
B
Session
and
that's
we
have
a
slide
on
on
those
at
the
end
of
this.
Where
we
talk
about
them,
if
we,
you
know,
if
we
have
the
opportunity
to
go
ahead
and
incorporate
them
actually,
I
was
I'm,
always
a
little
hesitant
to
jump
right
in
as
soon
as
they
do
them,
because
then
they
come
back
and
they
they
do
a
glitch
bill.
B
You
know,
I
think
the
ones
that
the
ones
that
says
that
we
need
to
amend
great
some
of
them
were
just
purely
preemptive.
So
that's
the
you
know,
doesn't
matter
what
we
have
in
our
plan:
they're
just
going
to
tell
us
what
we
have
to
do
so.
Yeah.
G
I
If
that
may
not
be
a
bad
idea
for
them,
because
they
do
have
so
many
changes
that
are
required,
letting
them
just
to
make
sure
they're
in
compliance
with
their
ear
and
maybe
getting
it
out
as
timely
and
close
to
August
1st
as
possible,
doing
the
nuts
and
bolts
changes
first
and
then
coming
back
after
August
1st
with
an
interim
enter.
They,
they
you're
allowed
to
make
changes
in
between
your
ear
amendments.
H
C
H
B
B
E
So,
for
instance,
the
new
statue
that
says
you
have
to
extend
your
planning
period
out
to
20
years
right
on
the
cusp
of
that
we
don't
have
projection
numbers
from
shinberg
Center.
Okay,
to
do
population
projections
up
to
20
45.
those
those
will
be
put
out
within
the
next
few
months.
We
just
don't
have
them
yet
and
so
between
transmittal
and
adoption
you
can
make
those
adjustments
really
just
has
to
be
in
your
data
and
Analysis
yeah.
E
B
G
I
actually
had
a
question
not
pertaining
to
the
workshop.
Tomorrow's
meeting
I
became
aware
Merle.
You
probably
know
about
this-
that
we
can
I
guess
appoint
a
representative
to
discuss
I
guess
the
votes.
G
So
I
think,
because
they
came
before
the
board
twice
and
received
more
no
votes.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
board
is
aware
of
what
transpired
you
know
between
the
two
and
if
I
don't
know,
if
Merle
would
want
to.
I
B
I
So
yeah,
when
you
have
your
items
when
they
actually
come
forward-
and
you
know
that
they're
going
to
be
controversial
like
that
or
even
if
they
were
a
split
vote
on
your
board
and
you
wanted
to
designate
a
representative
I
think
it's
best
to
do
it
at
the
time
you
make
the
decision
on
the
application
that
way
too,
you
can
make
sure
the
person
who's
doing
it
remembers
to
take
their
notes
more
meticulously,
and
things
like
that.
G
B
I
don't
know
between
now
and
next
week
that
we
can
have
all
those
blanks
filled
in
100.
So
we'll
have
obviously
we'll
have
to
have
a
few
working
meetings
on
this,
but
maybe
just
step
through
kind
of
high
level
of
what
the
other
changes
are
on
these.
These
other
elements.
E
Okay,
you've
got
some
new
policies,
and
this
is
great:
it's
directing
the
city
to
do
a
multimodal
master
plan.
That's
going
to
because,
right
now
you
just
have
your
mmtd,
which
is
very
limited
in
scope
in
your
map.
This
is
doing.
This
is
going
to
do
a
city-wide
one,
that's
pretty
cool,
so
that's
some
new
policy
language
and
again
removed
LDC
language
clarified.
It
rearranged
the
mmtd
policies
to
go
under
the
objection
objectives
that
they
were
supposed
to
and
again
removed
specific
projects
that
you've
already
completed.
E
E
E
B
E
Are
the
specific
locations
where
those
have
occurred,
and
again
these
are
things
that
are
reported
so
not
neces?
If
something
if
a
project
has
gone,
not
reported,
which
is
the
discussion
we
had
with
Dunedin
today
same
thing
might
be
on
social
media.
If
it
wasn't
reported
to
the
police
or
the
highway
patrol,
then
it's
not
going
to
show
up
on
this
map.
C
E
E
F
E
F
C
C
F
E
E
Okay,
let's
go
through
the,
maybe
can
we
zoom
in
on
the
legend,
so
you
can
see
what
we're
talking
about
on
this
map.
So
the
solid
lines
are
exit
things
that
are
existing
and
then
the
dotted
lines
are
things
that
have
been
proposed
in
some
other
plan,
most
likely.
The
long-range
Transportation
plan
that
for
Pinellas.
F
G
F
E
That
so
what
I
stuck
in
here
was
actually
the
the
board
to
show
you
what
we
showed
the
community.
What
we
actually
have
done
four-year
plan
is
update
every
single
map
and
it's
labeled,
probably
more
clearly
than
this
is
because
this
was
just
supposed
to
be
a
demonstration
to
show
people
what's
what's
planned
for
the
future.
So,
let's
plan
on
giving
you
the
map
package
for.
B
E
Is
just
number
of
lanes
too
so
and
this
so
this
is
one
of
the
maps
that
you're
required
to
have
in
your
transportation
element
by
Statute.
So
this
is
basically
like
I.
Think
it'll
be
just
more
clear
for
you.
If
we
bring
the
entire
transportation
map
package
to
you,
and
you
can
see
things
specifically
labeled
versus
things
that
were
guiding
discussion
at
the
during
the
Outreach
with
everybody,
I
think
that'll
probably
be
clear
for
y'all.
C
E
H
F
B
I
see
okay.
E
A
lot
of
the
housing
element
again
came
from
other
parts
of
your
plan
and
then
just
like
all
the
other
elements
clean
up
the
language.
So
you
don't
have
three
ideas
in
one
sentence.
You
have
one
idea
per
sentence
policies
that
don't
apply
anymore
either
for
statutory
reasons
or
because
9j5
was
repealed.
Duplicative
policies.
There
was
a
lot
of
those
and
even
stuff
that
came
out
of
this
element
and
moved
to
where
it
was
supposed
to
go
more
like
most
likely,
the
future
land
use
element.
E
They're
not
necessarily
the
same
thing
as
the
thing
same
thing,
we're
going
to
repeat
this
over
and
over
again
code
language
was
deleted,
policies
were
combined
and
simplified
cleaned
up
the
language.
E
This
is
what
one
of
the
new
policies
this
is.
That's
good
requires
development
of
a
sustainability
action
plan
with
your
vulnerability
analysis.
What
you're
working
on
now
right
the
vulnerability
analysis,
so
the
the
thing
about
the
vulnerability
analysis,
any
future
money
that
you
get
from
the
state
will
be
dependent
on
you
having
done
that.
So
it's
all
about
the
cash
right.
E
Somebody
else's
cash,
the
state's
cash
in
this
in
this
case,
and
there's
a
lot
of
money
going
around
now
for
for
these
kinds
of
efforts,
so
any
kind
of
implementation
that
you
want
to
do
in
the
future,
mainly
with
with
the
roads,
storm
water,
those
kinds
of
facilities.
You
have
to
have
done
this
to
get
money
from
the
state.
So
this
is
a
big
deal.
A
big
change,
Catherine.
E
The
one
thing
that
gets
triggered
by
the
federal
government
is
when
a
an
Emergency
has
been
declared,
and
so
then
you've
got
mitigation,
grants
that
come
from
the
feds
to
the
state
and
then
down
to
you
all
and
that's
a
lot
of
the
the
money
that's
been
being
filtered
money
still
being
filtered
from
Hurricane
Irma.
So
you
will
see
in
the
future
Maria
and
Ian
coming
out
next,
so
there'll
be
mitigation.
Grants
that
you
all
can
apply
for.
E
I
So
one
of
my
questions
on
that
is
with
respect
to
the
CRS
system
and
participation
in
the
nfip
What
policies,
goals
and
objectives,
particularly
in
coastal
management,
that
we're
going
to
get
points
for
credit
for
in
order
to
increase
the
cities.
I
E
There
is,
when
you're
doing
your
CRS
report
some
some
points
that
are
awarded
if
you're
doing
things
like
Outreach,
making
sure
there's
stuff
on
your
website
and
things
in
your
comprehensive
plan.
The
biggest
points
come
through
things
like
updating
your
floodplain
management
ordinance
and
then
technical
amendments
to
the
building
code,
which
is
a
little
more
complicated
in
Pinellas
County,
because
you've
got
the
pcclb
to
coordinate
so
you've
got
a
county-wide
building
code,
whereas
other
places
don't
have
that
they've
got
their
own
building
code.
So
increasing
freeboard
is
a
good
one.
E
H
I
J
I
E
I
E
And
you
pretty
much
did
what
you
required
to
do
from
the
Peril
of
flood
okay,
stuff,
that
was
from
2015,
so
you
do
have
policies
that
were
already
in
your
plan
that
do
that
got
it.
E
H
G
H
B
No,
actually
that
that
what
we're
trying
to
basically
say
is
if
they
are
going
to
be
redeveloped,
they
have
to
be
redeveloped
as
affordable
housing
yeah.
So
we're
trying
to
remove
the
incentives
for
what
you
see
happening,
where
they
just
come
in
and
wipe
them
out
and
now
you've
got
another
typical
subdivision
and
mobile
home
parks
really
are
for
a
lot
of
people.
They're
kind
of
they're
they're,
naturally,
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing,
and
for
so,
if,
if
you
see
something
that
basically
looks
like
that,
we're
not
protecting
them.
Call
that
out,
because.
G
So
there
are,
they
are
on
the
water
go
into
that
area.
If
those
places
are
gone
like
that's,
not
no
one's,
that's
not
affordable.
It's
on
the
water,
that's
not
going
to
be
affordable,
housing!
That's
going
to
be
people
that
have
a
ton
of
money.
So
it
seems
like
this
we're
just
trying
to
eliminate
people
that
can
actual
affordable
housing
that
exists
today
to
make
sure
that
they'll
never
be
there
again
once
once
we
make
the
code
so
that
they
can't
exist
anymore.
G
H
B
Mobile
home
parks
aren't
a
land
use
category,
it's
a
zoning
category
and
historically,
what
has
happened
is
Chesapeake
Point's
a
great
example
at
some
point,
30
years
ago
somebody
put
five
units
to
the
acre
and
r100
Zoning
on
it
and
non-conformed
it.
They
have
no
protection
right
now.
G
E
I
think
we
said
that
that
was
identified
as
important
in
the
original
presentation.
E
E
I
I
E
Are
two
two
different
things
right
and
so
Coastal
High
Hazard
area
really
just
is
a
in
the
comp
plan,
because
there's
of
course,
in
the
Brilliance
of
our
legislators
again,
you've
got
two
terms
for
Coast
for
Coastal
Hazard
area
in
the
statute,
one
that's
under
the
building
code
and
the
floodplain
management,
which
is
completely
different
than
the
coastal
High
Hazard
area.
That's
category
one
inundation
like
the
possible
and
the
inundation
policies
are
what
are
to
meant
to
direct
you
for
adopting
changes
in
your
future
land
use
map.
E
J
E
J
E
A
Me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
just
from
a
practical
standpoint,
those
things
aren't
going
to
come
back
in
the
coastal
High
area.
High
Hazard
area
like
right
next
to
water
areas
where
they
are
because
they'd
have
to
build
them
up
so
high
in
the
air
challenge
to
I
mean,
and
you
would
have
to
have
stilt
mobile
homes
to
to
make
it
work.
That's
the
only
way
they
can
comply
with
flood
regulations.
B
And
they,
in
some
of
the
instances
that's
exactly
what's
occurring
throughout
the
county,
is
they're
being
replaced
with
they're
being
brought
to
be
to
minimum
base
flood
elevation
and
they're
being
replaced
with
a
HUD
compliant
wind
loaded
structure.
That's
almost
as
as
good
as
they
stick
built
house
under
the
Florida
building
code,
yeah,
it's
and
so
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
this
is
what
that
objective.
B
I
mean
one
recognize:
the
value
of
the
mobile
home
parks
as
providing
a
very
necessary
type
of
of
housing
for
the
community
and
two
you
know
again
allow
new
manufactured
home
developments
in
areas
where
supported
by
land,
use
density
and
outside
vulnerable
areas.
Right
now,
we
don't
have
any
place
that
you
can
do
a
mobile
home
park
by
right,
zilch.
None,
you
know:
incentivize
replacement
of
those
old
mobile
homes
with
HUD
compliant
units
compliant
wind
loaded
structures
is
what
that
that's,
what
that's
mean?
Hud
compliant.
B
D
No
I
think
just
the
definition
of
the
options
of
places
for
replacement
because,
like
you
said
right
now,
there's
no
area
that
would
allow
it
by
right.
So
you
want
that
option.
You
want
that
encouragement
to
relocate
it
so
you're
not
losing
the
affordability
unit,
count
and
there's
probability
or
possibility
for
places
to
reallocate
it.
So
I
think
that's
that's
important
that
that
is
provided
for
somehow
in
some
way
to
say
that
it
gets
there's
a
process
to
steer
it
to
an
appropriate
location,
equal
in
density
or
greater.
E
C
C
B
B
F
E
H
E
So
so
you
see
right
in
the
corner.
I
need
to
update
that.
So
you
can
see
it
better
right
in
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
you
can
see
what
the
feet
are,
the
one
on
the
right
right
down
on
the
bottom,
it's
kind
of
a
transparent
table.
We
need
to
fix
that,
so
you
can
see
it
better
right
hand,
corner,
keep
going,
see
it
low
intermediate
and
intermediate
high.
So
2040
is
it's
less
than
a
foot
20
80
1.3,
1.6
2.9.
It
looks
a
little
scarier
than
those
numbers
imply,
but
still.
B
E
So
this
for
growth
management
purposes
is
the
category
one
possible
inundation,
so
storm
surge,
storm
surge
map.
F
B
K
B
E
Know
it's
better
data.
Oh
I
mean
this
comes.
You
know
the
State
of
Florida
and
in
conjunction
with
Noah,
did
significant,
like
they
have
cooler
technology
and
and
got
more
specific
with
how
this
actually
works,
and
this
is
Nationwide.
Not
just
Florida,
but
Florida,
contributed
to
State
of
Florida
contributed
some
money
to
that.
H
E
Okay,
so
the
conservation.
This
is
where
your
Coastal
management
and
conservation
got
split
up,
split
apart,
so
some
things
stayed
in
coastal
management.
Some
things
got
moved
over
the
strikeout
and
underlying
notes.
E
Sections
should
should
capture
that
some
of
the
things
again
going
back
to
the
what
came
up
in
the
public
engagement
were
the
vegetative
and
habitat
communities
which
that's
part
of
your
future
land
use
map
series
package
that
you
should
have
maintaining
your
vegetation
and
then
the
Anclote
River
Water
Management
plan
came
up
the
use
of
fill
there's
an
example
of
the
policy
that
you
were
talking
about.
E
Restricting
restricting
the
use
of
fill
is
a
big
deal
and
that's
what
you
get
points
for
from
your
comp
plan
from
your
floodplain
management
regulations
and
then
technical
amendments
to
the
building
code,
which
I
think
you
said
you
already
did
for
the
coastal,
a
Zone
yeah.
The
concurrent.
E
And
then
several
policies
came
out
from
your
strategic
plan.
These
two
things
were
supposed
to
run
concurrently.
They
were
a
few
months
off
of
one
another,
but
those
those
policies
that
that
was
indicated
by
staff
is
very
important
to
incorporate.
Wasn't
it
and
your
sustainability.
E
Then
tree
canopy
came
up
a
lot
at
the
at
the
meeting
and
we've
got
your
tree
canopy
map
and
the
heat
Island
map
there
we
go
so
that's
a
board
that
we
presented
to
the
public.
So
it
shows
the.
E
You
know
what
was
interesting
when
we
were
looking
at
the
hot
spots
for
the
tree
canopy
and
the
heat
Maps.
They
kind
of
you
can
see
where
there
isn't
tree.
There's
heat
island
effect
and
it's
around
your
schools,
which
I
thought
really
fascinating,
but
those
were
your
biggest
gaps
in
your
tree
canopy.
We
should
have
mapped
the
schools
on
that
and
you
could
see.
We
thought
that
was
pretty
interesting,
wow
and
then,
of
course,
a
long
19.
You
don't
have
any
do
you
have
any.
E
19
so
there's
an
opportunity
and
of
course,
the
more
trees
you
have
it
helps
with
storm
water
runoff
and
it
helps
with
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
the
more
trees
you
have
are
good
and.
B
We
do
have
a
kind
of
a
major
project
going
on
right
now,
that's
being
led
by
our
City
Arborist
to
a
grant
and
Pat
can
explain
more
about
it.
What
it
is
than
I
can
that's
or
they're
mapping.
The
mates
are
basically
mapping
the
tree,
the
inventory
and
the
canopy
and
coverage
and
stuff
so
we'll
have
that
to
fall
back
on.
As
you
know,
we're
looking
at
the
Land
Development
code
and
where
we
need
to
strengthen
things
there
so.
K
B
Know
we're
where
you
could
see
these
policies
or
or
the
changes
in
the
Land
Development
code
going
would
be.
Where
do
you
have
you
know?
A
map
like
that
like
US
19,
is
a
good
example
where
they,
you
have
a
heat
severity,
and
you
know
issue
well
a
developer
coming
in
there.
You
may
have
your
regulations
set
up
so
that
the
priority
is
more
on.
You
know
you
have
to
reduce
your
parking
to
the
benefit
of
planning
some
additional
tree
for
future
canopy.
B
That's
the
kind
of
things
that
these
types
of
maps
will
give
us
to.
You
know
to
make
those
value
judgments
and
make
changes
to
the
Land
Development
code
down
the
line
once
we
have
all
the
data
from
from
that
study
that's
going
on,
but
that
you
know
using
these
type,
this
type
of
information
to
say:
okay,
hey
this
is
mapped.
We
have
we
had.
B
This
is
a
heat
Island
area,
your
first
preference
should
be
toward
you
know
some
sort
of
a
moderate
parking
reduction
from
you
know
because
they
usually
want
to
max
out
parking
on
US
19
more
than
they
need
you
need
to.
You
know
you
need
to
contribute
to
the
tree
canopy
so
or
preserve
tree
canopy.
If
you
can
excuse
me.
G
B
We
we
have
minimum
planting
requirements,
but
they're
not
specific
to
they
don't
like
home
in
on
an
area
like
19.
That
says
where
we've
got
an
urban
heat
island
effect
going
on.
It
doesn't
shift
the
emphasis
to
that.
To
you
know,
maybe
you
need
to
give
up
some
parking
or
something
like
that
to
the
benefit
of
future
tree
canopy.
We
kind
of
have
again
we
kind
of
have
a
one-size-fits-all
approach.
K
E
Sure,
well,
first
of
all
right
tree
right
place
and
then
which
actually
there's
a
really
cool
app.
That
was
done.
That's
done
by
the
Arbor
Day
Foundation,
and
it
will
tell
you
you
could
plug
in
your
own
address
and
it'll.
Tell
you
what
side
of
your
house
to
put
the
tree
on
based
on
the
soil
context
of
the
area.
What
the
right
tree
is
the
Arbor
Day
Foundation
did
a
nationwide
map.
It's
really.
E
An
area
of
opportunity
to
look
at
in
your
code
is
is
just
the
the
size
of
the
islands
that
you
require
developer
to
put
in
in
the
parking,
because
a
lot
of
those
aren't
big
enough
to
support
an
oak
tree.
They
just
aren't
they're
going
to
look
like
in
40
years,
they're
going
to
look
like
the
same
size
as
the
year
that
they
were
planted.
But
if
you
increase
that
island
and
they've
got
then
they've
got
room
to
grow
and
Thrive.
E
G
B
E
So
this
is
actually
an
element,
you
know
don't
even
have
to
have,
but
you
want
you
want
it
so
you're
keeping
it
same
thing
as
before
clarified
the
language,
remove
projects
that
are
complete,
anything,
that's
duplicative
or
move
to
a
different
element.
That
was
done.
The
one
cool
thing
that
we
did
and
suggested
at
the
public
engagement
was
in
the
future.
Taking
a
look.
E
What
you
have
now
on
your
plan
are
the
she
was
back
from
the
90s,
the
state
put
together
a
level
of
service
for
local
governments
to
look
out
for
the
original,
comprehensive
plans
that
were
done
in
the
90s.
That
said,
all
right,
you're
going
to
have
this
many
basketball
courts
per
capita
and
this
many
soccer
fields,
and
then
the
state
came
along
and
updated
their
stuff
and
said
you
know
what
this
is
really
meant
for:
Regional
Park
planning,
it's
not
appropriate,
and
it
says
in
the
plan.
E
E
So
you
can
see
where
your
gaps
are,
so
maybe
you
know
and
and
what
people
ask
for
and
what
actually
you
all
asked
for
when
we
came
to
you
last
time
was
why
don't
we
have
a
Parks
master
plan.
So
that's
a
policy
that's
been
put
in
here
and
looking
at
the
proximity
as
part
of
that
you
can,
it
could
be
a
pocket
park,
it
could
be
a
community
garden.
E
It
can
be
something
more
active
whatever,
but
that's
one
thing
that
you'll
be
looking
at
as
part
of
a
Parks
master
plan
and
thinking
about
proximity,
not
just
the
number
of
basketball
courts
per
thousand
people,
love
pickleball
and
want
that.
You
know.
H
G
E
I
B
And
what
we,
what
we've
set
up
now
is
we
kind
of
have
a
two-tier
structure
of
until
we
get
a
master
plan,
these
level
service
standards
will
still
apply,
and
then
we
have
a
policy
about
this
proximity.
We
kind
of
need
to
reconcile
those
a
little
bit
better.
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
I
was
looking
at
them
today
and
I'm
like
we
need
to
specify
a
preference
here.
You
know
or
an
order
of
operations,
but
we
definitely
want
to
be
able
to
incorporate
this
proximity
map.
B
So
when
a
developer
comes
in
and
they're,
if
they're
doing
an
apartment,
complex
or
something
and
they're,
you
know
outside
one
of
these
areas
where
there
isn't
proximity
to
one
of
these
Parks,
that's
within
walking
distance
or
whatever,
then
they
have
to
take
a
harder
look
at
what
they
are
providing
on
site
for
their
residents
so
using
it
in
in
that
manner.
But
it
reminds
me
it
brings
me
back
full
circle
to
our
previous
conversation
of
we
kind
of
set
up
that
frustration
until
this
is
done.
B
I
I
I
do
have
a
question
on
like
areas
where
you
can
do
this,
because
I
know
that
for
certain
kinds
of
infrastructure,
so
things
like
hospitals,
fire
departments,
police
departments,
your
city
and
town
halls,
you're
not
supposed
to
build
anything
new
like
that
in
some
of
those
Coastal
High
Hazard
areas
or
flood
flood
prone
areas,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
that
would
apply
to
things
like
Recreation
and
Parks.
So
it
does
not
apply
to
those.
E
B
B
B
You
know
on
the
just
looking
at
if
you
yeah
about
25
of
Tarpon
Springs
land
area
is
in
some
kind
of
and
I'm
not
talking
about.
The
water
bodies
is
in
some
type
of
either
preservation,
Recreation
open
space
or
is
publicly
acquired.
It
might
still
have
a
land
use.
B
Basically,
exactly
and
so
I
mean
it's,
it's
a
big
number,
it's
it's
up
there
and
that's,
including
the
County
Parks,
and
things
like
that
that
are
in
our
jurisdiction.
You.
H
H
A
B
A
In
a
in
a
previous
life,
I
did
Park
system
Master
plans
and,
and
the
only
one
that
I
can
actually
remember.
The
stats
on
was
was
Little,
Rock
Arkansas,
because
it
was
my
own
town
at
the
time
and
it
was
over
200
000
in
population
and
it
had
1800
Acres
of
parks,
and
it
was
considered
actually
to
be
pretty
well
served
at
the
time
by
looking
at
the
the
nrpa
standards
that
were
in
place
at
the
time.
So
so
we're
definitely
in
pretty
good
shape
on
acreage.
B
Talked
to
our
Parks
and
Recreation
advisory
committee
and
and
the
staff
about
that,
and
they
they
do.
You
know,
of
course
you
know
that
somebody
has
to
do
it
and
it's
got
to
be
funded
somewhere.
It
is
a
policy
in
the
rec
open
space
element,
because
you
know
we
can't
we
at
the
level
that
we're
trying
to
amend
we
couldn't
get
into
like
the
nitty-gritty
of
you
know
how
many
soccer
fields
do
we
need
at
this
point
it
just
wasn't
practical.
So
we've
kept
our
existing
level
of
service
standards
for
those
facilities
that
were
set.
B
You
know
25
30
years
ago,
probably
and
those
will
stay
in
place,
but
we're
recognizing
that
when
we
did
the
public
Outreach,
certain
things
came
up.
You
know
pickleball
and
things
like
that.
So
we're
trying
to
use
that
to
drive.
We
need
to
do
a
Parks
and
Recreation
master
plan
for
the
city,
and
it's
such
time
that
we
do
that.
Then
that
would
take
precedence
over
those
level
service
standards
as
to
how
or
we'll
come
back
and
update
the
comp
plan.
B
Public
services
that
falls
under
Parks
and
Rec
falls
under
Public
Service,
okay
public.
Well,
it's
actually
it's
split,
so
the
parks
themselves
are
maintained
by
public
works,
yeah,
the
facilities-based
stuff
and
Recreation
programming
and
stuff
like
that
is
part
of
public
services.
So
it's
kind
of
too.
K
H
H
K
Who
you
Public
Works
taking
care
of
it,
and
you
see
the
police
on
occasion
driving
through
checking
for
permits,
probably
to
launch,
and
but
that's
it
right,
I
mean.
Does
anybody
who's
responsible
for
policing
it?
It's.
K
The
police
say:
okay,
I
was
just
out
of
curiosity,
I
didn't
know
how
it
worked
when
out
of
curiosity,
because
I
remember,
I
and
I
even
put
something
on
Facebook
I
was
so
upset
about
it.
I
was
down
at
Sunset,
Beach
and
the
jet
skis
were
crazy
in
and
out,
and
the
launch
is
right
next
to
the
swimming
area,
and
that
particular
day
there
were
families
down
there
with
a
bunch
of
toddlers
in
the
water,
and
these
jet
skis
were
taking
off
like
bats
out
of
hell,
and
the
little
toddlers
were
falling
over.
I
I
Well
that
they're
I
know
they
have
one
launch
for
their
Marine
Patrol
unit
down
by
Indian,
Shores
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
their
other
launch
is,
but
they
will
Patrol
waters
for
for
things
like
that.
They
actually
just
released
on
on
their
Facebook
page,
a
public
video
about
water
safety,
operation
and
proper
speeds
of
boats
and
vessels
and
watercraft.
So
that
is
something
that's
on
their
radar
right
now
isn't.
I
I
I
B
Permit
from
our
public
works
department
to
utilize
any
city-owned
facility
for
conducting
business
like
they're,
not
supposed
to
you're,
not
supposed
to
hold
yoga
classes
out
on
the
beach
and
stuff
like
that.
So
does
it
happen,
of
course
you
know,
but
I
would
always,
and
some
you
see
something
like
that
going
on
I
mean
you
know,
call
call
the
next
on
a
weekend
is
tough,
but
you
know
call,
you
know,
call.
A
K
K
No
and
it's
yeah,
so
I
I
just
didn't
know
you
know
who
to
talk
to,
but
that's
sad
and
but
I'm,
bringing
that
up,
because
I
saw
in
the
materials
people
want
to
know
where
they
can
launch.
You
know
where
they
can
launch.
They
want
more
places
to
launch
and
kayaks,
for
example,
but
even
The
Kayaks
are
a
mess,
bless
them
I
mean
I
mean
it's.
It's
a
great
sport,
but
I
saw
a
little
old
man
in
a
kayak,
almost
hit
a
little
girl
and
he
was
panicking.
K
D
F
K
Yeah
but
no
I
had
I
had
this,
they
were
carrying
some
kind
of
a
boat
and
they
were
headed
over
to
the
beach
area.
Not
the
launch
and
my
husband
and
I
were
walking
up
and
I
said.
Oh
it's
that
way.
The
launch
is
over
there
and
he
said
he
had
his
family
with.
He
said
no
I
want
to
launch
over
there.
I
left
like
okay
sure
what
do
I
say.
B
E
E
So
local
governments
are
required
to
allow
affordable
housing
on,
and
this
was
actually
changed
from
last
year
because
it
used
to
read
residential
and
people
went
absolutely
bananas.
So
it
was
amended
to
read
commercial,
industrial
or
mixed
use,
and
it
has
to
be
a
rental
project.
So
that's
it's
not
a
for
sale
project
and
it
has
to
have
at
least
40,
affordable
units,
so
at
least
that
in
30
years,
so
at
least
that's
limiting
really
to
the
LIE
Tech
projects
and
you're
not
going
to
get
many
of
those.
E
The
problem
and
what's
making
planners
kind
of
freak
out
a
little
bit
is
that
it
doesn't
have
to
be
consistent
with
your
comp
plan
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
consistent
with
some
of
your
zoning
and
it
can't
go
to
a
board.
It
has
to
be
approved
by
staff,
which
you
know
really.
It
is
what
it
is
so
and
then
height.
E
This
is
a
bigger
deal
for
places
like
Tampa,
so
it
has
to
be
the
highest
the
highest
allowed
height
for
commercial
in
residential
project
within
a
mile
of
the
proposed
project
or
three
stories
that
Height's
not
so
much
of
an
issue
for
you.
This
is
a
huge
issue
for
Tampa,
because
they're
really
in
the
downtown
and
like
Channel
District,
it's
regulated
by
FAA
and
that's
it
so
they're
kind
of
freaking
out
a
little
bit
density
is
the
highest
allowed
in
your
comprehensive
plan.
Still
not
a
big
deal
for
you
all.
E
The
thing
that
we
all
were
talking
amongst
ourselves
last
week
was
the
the
working
waterfronts.
So
if
you
kind
of
wanted
to
keep
those
things
out
of
your
industrial
areas
that
are
along
the
Waterfront,
we
can
take
a
look
at
doing
some
kind
of
waterfronts
overlay
for
you
as
part
of
this
process,
and
that
might
give
you
some
comfort
there.
Although
I
still,
you
know
again,
the
light
tech
projects
have
to
be
within
x,
amount
of
transit
in
a
grocery
store
and
blah
blah
blah.
B
Pete,
but
some
of
the
some
of
the
the
height
issue
could
come
into
play
with
because
of
that
mild
distance.
So
it's
it's
correct.
What
I'm
unclear
about
is
so
on
US
19
for
certain
types
of
uses.
We
have
a
height
allowance
up
to
70
feet.
So
if
an
affordable
housing
project
is
within
one
mile
of
that,
HB
zoning,
you
know,
Highway
business
zoning
and
a
miles
quite
a
way
is
on
her
map.
B
B
We're
already
getting
phone
calls
on
certain
properties
so
and
I
and
I
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
Regina.
If
you
have
any
input
on
this
or
if
we've
already,
maybe
we've
even
already
talked
to
so
specifically
for
affordable
housing,
we
have
the
50
bonus
density
for
an
affordable
housing.
Do
we
automatically
have
to
you
know,
provide
that
so,
okay,
22
years
to
the
acre,
you
know
in
some
areas
the
70
foot
height
limit
and
you
know
have
at
it
I.
Don't
you
know.
So
it's
a.
We
have
some
properties
that
are
vulnerable.
E
E
Mean
you'd
have
to
have
at
least
four
acres
to
four
to
five
acres,
I
think
for
a
project
to
pencil
out
affordable,
like
the
market
rate.
Guys
aren't
going
to
do
it.
It
just
literally
doesn't
pencil
out
like
we
did
this
whole
density
bonus
thing
for
Hillsborough
County
and
literally
did
a
pro
forma
and
it
doesn't
pencil
out
for
the
market
rate
guys
it
just
doesn't
it's
the
four.
E
The
folks
that
do
just
affordable
is
where
this
is
and
I
think
that's
probably
who
this
was
lobbied
from
yeah,
because
you
can
tell
from
the
changes
that
were
made
from
last
year
to
this
year.
You
know
those
guys
were
probably
lobbying
hard
for
this.
There's
another
there's
one
more
slide
on
this.
E
It
says
you
have
to
consider
reduced
parking
there
we
go
with
the
with
the
hazy
language.
You
can
consider
something
I
thought
about
it
and
I
said
no,
it
just
says,
consider
and
then
what's
also
not
defined
is
located
with
one
half
mile
of
a
major
Transit
slot
puts
a
major
Trend
to
stop
it's
a
minor
Transit
stop
as
defined
in
Your
Land
Development
code.
So
you
would
have
to
put
you
would
have
to
put
that
in
your
LDC.
E
So
that's
something
to
think
about
more
fuzzy
language,
state
and
local
government
shall
provide
incentives
to
encourage
hate
that
word
cheerleader
like
who
knows,
encourage
private
sector
to
the
primary
delivery
vehicle
for
development,
affordable
housing.
Well,
that's
how
the
state
funding
Works
anyway,
and
it
encourages
you
again-
I
hate
that
word.
But
it
says
you
can
do
density
bonuses.
That's
one
of
your
incentives
that
you
can
do
what
you
already
do
you.
If
you
get
ship
money,
you're
required
to
have
a
list
of
surplus
properties,
that's
appropriate
for
affordable
housing.
E
You
all
don't
get
that
funding!
You
don't
qualify
yet
you
got
to
hit
50
000
people,
so
you
don't
have
to
really
worry
about
that,
but
it
is
an
incentive.
We
did
that
in
Bradenton
sold
it
below
market
and
actually
a
market
rate.
I
was
able
to
do
like
a
little
cotter's
Court
situation
and
sell
it
to
teachers
at
Manatee,
County
that
was
kind
of
cool,
flexible
zoning,
high
density
and
adus
that's
in
tiny
homes.
So
those
are
other
incentives
that
that
you
can
do
and
don't
have
to
do.
H
E
B
So
we've
talked
we've
hit
on
a
little
bit
of
you
know.
We've
spent
most
of
our
time,
I
think
on
future
land,
use,
I,
guess
I'm
just
going
to
defer
to
to
you
guys
right
now
as
to
how
y'all
do
y'all
want
to
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
the
other
elements
out
to
you
this
week,
we'll
reconvene
at
the
same
time
next
Monday.
B
Is
there
a
preferred
way
that
you
want
to
pick
this
apart?
You
know:
do
we
need
to
take
a
different
approach
in
terms
of
how
we
discuss
these
things,
I'm
I'm
sure
or
do
you
want
to?
Maybe
since
you'll
have
the
opportunity
between
now
and
then
to
do
maybe
a
deeper
dive,
you
know
read
the
read
the
clean
and
then
go
to
the
strike.
The
Wonderland
find
your
big
questions
and
like
what
happened
to
this.
B
Then
we
can,
you
know
so
I
think
I
think
we
can
get
there
we'll
put
some
thought
into
that
between
now
and
next
week
and
maybe
try
to
pull
one
as
an
example
and
write
what
what
that,
what
it
might
look
like
in
in
lieu
so
I
mean
I'm,
but
we've
got
I,
don't
know
how,
like
you
guys,
wanted
to
go
tonight.
I'm,
not
sure
what
your
tolerance
for
pain
is
so.
G
G
B
But
we'll
we'll
take
we'll
start
with
the
future
land
use
element,
since
that's
where
the
kind
of
the
rubber
meets
the
road
on
most
of
this
stuff
and
we'll
take
a
deeper
dive
this
week
on
where
those
things
are
we'll
try
to
fill
out
that
table
to
a
better
degree
and
and
and
then
somehow
we'll
identify
the
ones
that
we
think
either
should
be
adopt.
I
think
what
you're
saying
adopted
in
the
Land
Development
code
prior
to
or
did
you
get.
I
G
B
I
G
D
B
F
H
F
This
is
a
somewhat
related
question.
It's
coming
into
the
vacation
times
summer.
So
is
this
considered
like
the
Planning
and
Zoning,
where
we're
voting
on
something-
and
this
has
to
be-
you
have
to
be
in
person.
You
can't
call
in
for
correct.
I
F
I
They
there
was
a
an
executive
order
of
the
governor.