![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/riGjFw8Ia4M/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Sustainability Committee September 15, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
On
the
dots,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
Welcome
to
this
september,
15th
meeting
of
the
sustainability
committee
of
tarpon
springs
florida,
six
o'clock
p.m,
we'll
go
ahead
and
call
the
meeting
to
order.
Can
I
get
a
roll
call?
Please.
C
D
A
All
right
so
some
exciting
changes
to
our
agenda,
courtesy
of
robin
she's
added
in
some
time
frames
for
us.
So
we
will
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
the
minutes,
so
any
comments
or
additions.
If
to
the
july
15
2021
minutes.
E
D
F
F
D
A
Okay,
so
let's
go
back
and
do
that
then,
because
we
haven't
even
gone
on
yet
so
motion
to
approve
carol's
absence
is
excused,
I'm
so.
A
Okay,
all
in
favor
all
right
and
then
robin
will
be
voting.
Robin
singer
will
be
voting
tonight
in
absence
of
karen
very
good
all
right.
So
our
next
item
is
the
follow-up.
So
natalie
gas
from
the
city
of
dunedin
had
presented
us
with
some
questions
for
us
to
kind
of
ponder
and
think
about.
So
we
thought
that
that
would
be
good
to
bring
that
back
and
have
a
brief
conversation
about
that.
So
robin
would
you
please
lead
us
in
that
sure.
A
B
So,
in
terms
of
the
plan
time
length
length
of
the
plan,
we
recommend
10
years
with
a
major
revision
at
year,
5
and
a
yearly
update,
slash
progress
report
to
allow
for
that.
Adequate
reporting
feel
that
10
years
is
an
appropriate
time
period.
It's
not
too
far
reaching
it
allows
us
to
kind
of
update
as
the
sustainability
industry
is
always
changing
in
terms
of
whether
it
should
be
scientific
or
community
focused.
B
The
recommendation
is
to
make
it
more
community
focused
and
what
that
means
is
making
sure
that
it
is
understandable
to
the
lay
person
to
a
community
member
who
does
not
have
a
background
in
sustainability
that
they
would
be
able
to
pick
up
the
plan
and
follow
along
and
understand
what
they
are
reading
for.
What
aspect
of
the
community
we
are
focusing
on?
The
recommendation
is
city
operations.
B
That
should
be
the
main
focus
of
our
actions,
because
it
is
a
city
plan
and
city
operations
are
what
we
have
the
most
control
over
in
terms
of
how
many
actions
to
initiate
or
complete
each
year.
B
B
I
foresee
that
as
the
next
step
with
these
actions,
and
then
I
can
come
back
with
a
better
idea
of
how
many
actions
to
do
per
year
and
which
actions
in
which
years,
considering
that
many
of
these
actions
are
going
to
be
multi-year
actions,
the
project
lead
is
myself
we're
doing
this
plan
in-house,
as
you
know,
so
I'll
be
writing
the
plan
and
of
course,
as
you
already
know,
bringing
it
back
to
you
in
accordance
with
our
timeline.
E
And
I
find
it
interesting
that
we've
looked
at
the
dunedin
plan
and
the
dunedin
plan
created
was
created
by
using
two
other
sister
cities
plans,
orlando
and
largo,
and
that's
like
deja
vu,
if
all
over
again,
if
yogi
berra
was
in
the
room,
because
that's
where
this
committee
started
three
years
ago
next
month
by
looking
at
the
sustainability
plans
of
three
sister
cities-
sarasota
west
palm
beach
and
wait
for
it
largo
yeah,
so
I
went
back
and
looked
at
the
largo
plan
today
and
it's
pretty
sophisticated,
pretty
slick
stuff.
E
It's
it
holds
together
nicely
it's
a
cohesive
piece,
it's
very
easy
to
read.
I
think
it
would
be
easy
for
the
public
to
read
and
it
holds
together,
and
it
has
a
rationale
for
why
people
should
adopt
the
ideas
within
the
plan.
E
So,
like
I
said
it's
deja
vu
all
over
again,
we
might
want
to
look
at
the
largo
plan
as
we're
thinking
about
you
know,
finalizing
the
star
plan
that
we
have
and
think
about
you
know.
Maybe
we
could
incorporate
some
of
that
their
concepts
and
their
rationale,
for
why
do
you
have
a
plan?
Why
are
you
pushing
these
concepts?
B
Sure
yeah,
I
do
plan
to
reference
all
these
other
plans
as
I
go
through
this
process,
and
I've
been
over
the
past
several
months
reading,
so
many
dozens
of
plans
in
the
state
and
the
region
and
the
southeast
specifically,
so
I
do
definitely
plan
to
do
that
and
I
think
the
largo
plan
is
a
great
example,
because
it
is
local.
It
focuses
again
on
city
operations,
it
is
very
community
focused,
it
ticks
a
lot
of
boxes.
I
think
it's
a
great
example.
B
B
Yeah
I'd
be
happy
to
send
that
they
do
have
a
finished
plan.
They
also
have
a
separate
methodology
report
where
they
kind
of
detailed
all
of
the
steps
that
they
did
in
order
to
get
to
the
finished
product
like
they.
That
is
where
they
went
into
detail
about.
How
did
their
community
workshops
go
and
listening
sessions
and
so
forth?
So
yeah?
There
are
a
couple
separate
documents,
but
I
can
send
those
links
to
you
all.
A
I
think
that
this
sounds
good.
I
mean
we
had
already
talked
previously
about
some
of
this
like
the
time
frame,
and
we
had
talked
about
focusing
on
like
what
the
city
has
most
locus
of
control
over
and
then
also
like.
I
know
that
that's
a
big
point
for
you
is
making
it
community
focused
and
easy
to
read
and
accessible
to
the
community.
A
So
I
think
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
support
the
staff
recommendations,
with
also
the
caveat
that
you
made
paul
about
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we're
incorporating,
which
sounds
like
she's,
already
planning
on
doing
some
of
the
other
work
from
the
other
cities.
Yep.
C
All
the
of
all
the
plans
that
we
looked
at
when
we
first
started,
I
resonated
the
most
with
the
largo
plan
and
it
was
because
of
the
simplicity-
and
it
was
not
speaking
technologically
over
anyone's
heads,
and
it
was
just
really
it
had
some
definite
actions
that
were
easy
to
comprehend
and
easy
to
understand.
The
reasons
behind.
A
I
do
and
part
of
it
is
they
it's
like
published
almost
in
two
parts,
so
they
have
the
public
facing
version
that
that's
very
visual
and
easy
to
understand,
and
then
it
has
the
technical.
E
A
Okay,
all
right,
then,
let's
move
along
to
item
number
three,
which
is
the
discussion
of
the
sustainability
plan
framework
and
condensing
those
action
items
down
to
we're,
trying
to
get
it
down
to
50.
Ideally,
so,
hopefully
you
guys
came
some
ideas
with
how
we
can
consolidate
or
even
remove
some
of
these.
A
So
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
just
go
through
starting
at
the
beginning
and
work
our
way
through.
The
updates
that
robin
had
sent
out
everybody's
had
a
chance
to
look
at
those
now
right,
everybody
can
read
them
and
we
could
all
process.
Okay,.
C
So
it
seemed
to
me,
as
I
was
going
through
a
lot
of
this,
that
you
know
if
it
was
part
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Would
it
directly
have
to
relate
to
or
be
part
of
the
sustainability
plan?
And
I
don't
know
whether
there's
an
answer
to
that
right
away,
but
I
I
feel
like.
If
it
I
mean
we're,
we
have
an
advantage
that
that's
being
written
and
at
the
same
time,
that
we're
looking
at
this
and
as
much
as
can
be
right
away,
integrated
into
the
comprehensive
plan.
C
It
would
make
the
our
sustainability
plan
a
lot
more
focused
on
the
climate
component
and
natural
systems
and
green
infrastructure
is
that
is
that
correct,
or
am
I
assuming
yeah.
G
I
think
that
there,
the
opportunity
exists
to
cover
a
lot
of
this
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
some
of
it
already
is
covered
in
the
existing
comprehensive
plan.
G
There
are
areas
that
are
going
to
overlap
like
we
intend
to
have
like
view
the
comp
plan
through
a
sustainability
lens
and
things
like
environmental
planning
and
recreation
and
open
space,
and
things
like
that
are
components
of
the
plan
that
I
think
probably
need
to
be
addressed,
particularly
you
know
like
water
quality
and
things
like
that.
Those
kind
of
goals
can
be
in
both
plans,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
heavy
lifting
that
can
be
done
in
in
the
comp
plan,
and
you
can
focus
firmly
on
really
sustainability.
C
G
If
it
was,
I
think
you
know
if
we
were
had
a
lot
of
turtle,
nesting
grounds
or
things
like
that,
where
we
want
to
look
at
it
closer,
then
maybe,
yes,
we
include
that
in
our
comprehensive
plan,
but
that's
not
really.
I'm
not
hearing
that
that's
a
significant
concern
like.
C
G
A
D
Sounds
good,
so
will
we
know
if
they're,
like
carolyn,
just
said
that
these
this
was
already
in
there?
Will
we
be
advised
as
we
go
along,
which
ones
it's
like?
That's
covered,
that's
covered
or
something
like
that
yeah,
because
if
we're
questioning,
if
this,
should
this
be
there
or
not.
A
A
I'm
going
to
start
at
built
environment
I'm
starting
at
the
top,
so
that
first
one
is
looking
at
is
what
denise
just
mentioned:
adopting
a
light
policy
or
regulations
based
upon
a
local
assessment.
So
are
we
in
agreement
that
we
think
we
can
pull
that
one
out?
Yes,
okay,
so
robin
are
you
going
to
keep
really
good
notes
of
which
ones
we're
removing,
or
should
I
also
try
to
keep
some
notes.
B
A
B
B
A
Let's,
let's
start
and
then
actually
why
don't
we
start
with
what
you
guys
have
if
you
have
a
recommendation
for
dwindling
or
combining
or
whatever
it
is,
and
then
we
can
incorporate
that
in
okay.
So
then,
the
next
item
that
I'm
seeing
is
be2
community
water
systems.
There
was
nothing
in
that
we'd
taken
all
of
those
out.
So
then
it's
be
3
compact
and
complete
communities.
A
E
A
E
G
I
haven't
seen
it
well.
If
you
go
to
the
document
section
on
the
city's
website,
you
can
find
the
existing
water
supply
plans.
G
C
G
Things
like
storm
water,
wastewater,
natural
water
systems
and
drinking
water.
Those
are
all
covered
in
the
comp
plan
and
in
the
land
development
code.
Okay,.
E
H
I
I
think,
that's
something
that
we
would
most
likely
be
addressing
in
the
context
of
doing
our
vulnerability
assessment.
That's
getting
underway
now,
we've,
you
know,
we've
got
the
money
set
aside
for
that.
We've
got
a
scope
of
work.
We
know
that
that's
an
area
where
we
could,
you
know,
know
more
about
what's
going
on
with
our
critical
infrastructure
from
a
vulnerability
perspective,
and
so
we
will
have
a
you
know,
a
vulnerability
assessment
completed
that
looks
at
all
of
our
critical
infrastructure.
H
H
Many
of
these
programs
are
governed
by
other
state
agencies
and
they
have
very
stringent
reporting
requirements
to,
for
example,
to
show
that
we
will
commit
the
financial
resources
and
have
the
resources
in
place
to
have
a
sustainable
water
supply
within
the
10-year
planning
horizon,
and
that
dovetails
with
other
broader
planning
efforts
such
as
the
water
management,
district's,
regional
water
supply
plan
for
all
of
swift
mud.
H
So,
and
that
ties
in
not
what
just
not
with
us,
but
with
the
pinellas
county
and
tampa
bay,
water
and
all
the
regional
water
users
that
they
look
at
together,
collectively
to
make
sure
they're
trying.
H
I
guess
the
question
you
might
want
to
ask,
or
for
the
committee
to
consider
would
be
knowing
that
we
have.
You
know
10-year
capital
improvement
plans
for
the
wastewater
utility
that
we
just
that
we're
completing
you
know
other
state
required
studies.
What
would
be
the
value
of
including
that
information
in
the
sustainability
plan?
Would
that
would
including
those
items
in
the
sustainability
plan
further
those
efforts
or
would
it
be
republishing
other
data
that
already
exists
somewhere
else.
E
A
So
what
I
would,
let's,
what
I
I'm
gonna
recommend
that
we
do
is
if
you
feel
strongly
that
something
should
be
in
if
we've
had
a
conversation,
and
it
goes
for
a
bit,
then
we'll
just
put
it
to
a
vote
and-
and
consensus
is
going
to
be
the
name
of
the
game
for
tonight,
because
we've
got
to
get
through
this.
A
A
All
right
so
moving
on
to
be
three
compact
and
complete
communities.
The
only
thing
that
I
would
like
to
say
about
this
is
action,
seven,
which
is
maintain
a
design
review
board
or
similar
appointed
body
that
provides
comments
on
sustainability
implications
of
proposed
development
projects.
We
had
talked
about
robin
being
representing
sustainability
for
the
technical
review
committee.
So
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
tweak
this
language
to
keep
that.
B
So
I
have
started
participating
in
the
trc
we've
kind
of
discussed
internally,
I'm
kind
of
viewing
so
to
speak
right
now
for
the
next
few
months
and
then
we're
going
to
look
at
you
know
my
participation
in
it
and
maybe
come
up
with
something
like
a
list
of
suggested
sustainability
actions
that
developers
can
take
until
we
can
do
a
formal
land
development
code
update.
So
I
am
kind
of
starting
to
participate
in
the
trc.
B
Personally,
I
I
don't
think
so,
because
we've
already,
you
know,
had
those
conversations.
Okay,.
A
Then
I'm
ready
to
move
on
if
everybody
else
is
okay
for
the
next
one
is
before
housing,
affordability,
we've
got
implement
programs
to
preserve
and
maintain
existing
subsidized
and
unsubsidized,
affordable
rental,
housing
and
transit,
served
areas
compact
and
mixed
use,
areas
and
areas
with
rapidly
rising
housing
costs.
C
G
I
mean
yes,
it
is
part
of
the
comp
plan.
We
have
a
housing
element
and
obviously
housing
affordability
is
a
real
concern.
This
might
be
one
of
the
areas
where
I
would
say
it's
good
to
have
in
multiple
places
that
we're
committed
to
this.
So
it's
a
strongly
stated
policy,
but
I
could
really
go
either
way
because,
yes,
we
do
cover
it
in
the
comp
plan.
F
B
We're
talking
about
before
action,
seven
right!
Yes,
I
had
that
we
could
keep
that
one
as
it
is,
and
you
know
if
we,
if
we
needed
to,
we
could
combine
it
with
something
else.
G
Yeah,
I
I
kind
of
had
a
vision
of
you
know
the
sustainability
plan
focusing
on
how
all
of
these
things
are,
are
connected
and
interrelated,
like
needing
a
bicycle
master
plan
needing
compact
walkable
communities
needing
affordable
housing,
maybe
having
a
sustainable
community
building
kind
of
thing.
I
would.
I
was
just
workshopping
that
with
robin
so.
D
D
That's
a
large
part
of
what
they
do
as
far
as
subsidized
housing
and
they're
a
huge
I
mean
they
deal
with
hud,
and
you
know
that
that's
that's
their
deal.
It
seems
like
that's
out
of
our
purview,
to
implement
programs
about
subsidized
housing
for
sustainability.
I
think
it's
it's
a
worthy
thing
to
do,
but
I
don't
know
how
much
lot.
Realistically
we
can
say
we
want
to
have
affordable
rental
housing
and
how?
How
are
we
going
to
make
that
happen?
D
You
know
people
buy
and
sell
properties
and
and
that's
according
to
the
market
and
so
on,
and
I
don't
know
how
we
could
make
it
real.
So
I
mean
I
like
it
yeah,
but.
D
G
Well,
I
think
I
think
the
city
can,
I
think
we
can
implement
programs
and
code
changes,
and
things
like
that.
I
think
the
city
can
do
that
as
they
can
at
least
influence
that
there's.
You
know,
planning
tools
that
you
can
use
to
try
and
keep
housing
affordable,
and
one
of
the
main
ways
that
we
keep
housing
affordable
is
by
keeping
transportation,
affordable
and
other
components
of
our
built
environment,
affordable.
So
I
think
it's
it's
okay
to
say
that
that's
a
goal
of
the
city.
G
C
When
I
was
taking
notes,
that
was
one
that
I
omitted,
because
I
assumed
that
it
was
going
to
be
part
of
the
comp
plan
and
that
it
wasn't
something
that
really
directly
related
to
this
sustainability,
although
it
does
relate
to
the
sustainability
of
tarpon
as
a
whole,
but
I
think
that
that's
it.
You
know
the
fact
that
we're
able
to
integrate
as
much
as
we
can
into
the
comp
plan
we
can
enables
us
to
simplify
and
be
more
focused
on
on
climate
resilience.
G
C
E
A
Okay,
I'm
not
hearing
any
conversation
about
that.
So
be6
is
public
park
land.
We
have
action,
one
nine
and
ten
in
and
my
thoughts
are.
I
would
be
okay
with
either
trying
to
combine
nine
and
ten
with
one
or
or
removing
those.
E
G
We
do
have
a
recreation
and
open
space
element
in
the
comp
plan
that
we'll
be
working
closely
with
the
parks
department
on
I
did
kind
of
like
in
the
action
one
that
was
promoting
a
community-wide
network.
G
I,
like
I
like
that,
but
we
can
incorporate
that
in
the
comp
plan
as
well,
and
I
did
like
in
action
10
to
just
consistently
invest
sufficient
capital
and
operational
funding,
but
is.
C
E
B
C
D
B
A
Yeah
and
I'd
like
to
keep
one
in
because
because
what
you
mentioned,
creating
that,
like,
like
actual
plan
of
connecting
them
all
and
making
them
all
more
functional,
I
think
as
a
as
a
system,
instead
of
looking
at
it
individually.
So.
D
A
I'd
prefer
to
leave
them
separate.
Okay,
because
then
we
really
are
prioritizing.
The
funding
part
which
sounds
like
needs
to
happen.
So,
okay,
moving
on
then
transportation
choices.
Be7
we've
got
local
action,
one
two,
three,
eight
ten
and
eleven.
B
One
suggestion
is
to
remove
actions
2
and
11
and
to
recombine
like
actions
that
would
be
action,
one
three,
eight
and
ten,
because
a
lot
of
these
are
actually
encompassed
by
you
know
one
another.
Adopting
a
master
plan
will
inherently
include
the
subsequent
actions:
3
8
and
10.,
the
ada,
that's
a
federal
law.
B
So
that's
already
done
be7
action,
two
that
was
recently
accomplished
right.
G
B
Well,
I
said
that
10
could
be
included
into
one
action
along
with
1
3
and
8..
That's
the
community
public
bike
share
program.
I
don't
think
that's
a
part
of
is
that
a
part
of
the
comp
plan.
G
No,
I
mean
we
would
talk
about.
We
wouldn't
be
doing
an
in-depth
analysis
of
that
at
that
time,
but
I
I
think
we
will.
We
do
have
a
transportation
element.
It
will
be
focusing
on
everything,
but
you
know
bike
pad
walkability
public
transit.
Those
are
all
important
things
already
in
our
current
comp
plan,
so
that'll
carry
through
and
then
for
the
action
2.
We
did
recently
pass
a
vision,
zero,
complete
streets,
safe
streets
for
all
resolution,
so
you
can
check
that
box.
C
You
know
something
that
happened
continually
in
seattle,
but
it
was
driven
by
advocacy
groups
like
cascade
bicycle
club
was
raiding
the
roads
that
had
been
approved,
as
you
know,
as
safe
for
bicycles
or
pedestrians,
and
there
was
constantly
a
feedback
process.
You
know
of
writing
them
and
evaluating
them,
and
we,
I
was
part
of
that,
did
a
lot.
You
know
where
we
would
write
a
route
that
was
deemed
safe
to
get
from.
C
You
know,
point
a
to
point
b
and
whether
it
was
a
reality
you
know
or
what,
what
the
areas
that
could
be
improved
were-
and
I
think
that
that
you
know
we
could
see.
I
don't
know
whether
there's
bicycle
advocacy
groups
here,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
you
know
we
can
partner
with
people
that
might
be
able
to
help
with
that.
C
C
I
was
shocked.
You
know
we
used
to
have
a
lot
of
bike
share
programs
in
seattle
and
I
remember
when
they
first
installed
it
down
in
saint
pete,
but
everywhere
I
went
last
time
I
was
in
europe,
everyone
was
on
scooters
and
the
bikes
were
just
sitting
there.
So
that's
something
that's
kind
of
trending
right
now.
G
I'll,
let
you
know
I
was
actually
on
the
micro
mobility
subcommittee
with
ford
pinellas
and
we
are
looking
to
pass
a
micro
mobility
ordinance
at
some
time
in
the
near
future.
G
Once
we
get
policy
set
in
the
comp
plan
so
and
kind
of
the
way
the
scooters
have
been
working
is
you
need
to
have
an
ordinance
on
where
they're
allowed
and
stuff
like
that,
and
you
have
to
work
with
the
vendors?
It's
not
going
to
be
something
the
city
is
going
to
run
itself.
So
but
yeah
I
mean
it's,
it's
an
inaudible
inevitability.
G
So
we're
definitely,
I
think
so,
we'd
be
doing
a
transportation
element
in
the
comp
plan
and
we
currently
have
a
multi-modal
transportation
area
where
we
did
do
level
of
service
analysis
for
walking
and
biking
in
the
greater
downtown
area,
and
that
needs
to
be
updated.
As
part
of
the
comp
plan.
D
C
D
A
Need
a
plan
of
where
they're
safe
and
where
they're,
not
because
there
are
some
parts
of
our
city,
I
could
see
them
being
great
like
connecting
downtown
and
the
docks,
but
around
the
bayous.
I
could
see
that
being
a
complete
disaster,
yeah,
so,
okay,
all
right
so
so
sounds
like
we're,
combining
one
three,
eight
ten
removing
two
and
eleven
yes,
okay,
moving
on
to
climate
and
energy,
so
the
first
one
climate
adaptation,
we've
got
outcome,
one
and
then
we've
got
action,
10
and
then
there's
a
new
action
about
sea
walls.
D
Oh,
I
had
a
question
about
the
sea
walls.
When
we
get
is
it
time
for
questions
so
write
a
sea
wall
ordinance,
newly
installed
or
renovated
sea
walls
to
do
met
they're,
always
working
on
the
ones
down
at
craig
park?
Would
that
be
like
all
the
sea
walls
in
the
city?
Would
that
be,
or
is
that
private
sea
walls,
public
sea
walls?
I
don't
know
how
they
could
raise
the
sea
walls
at
craig
park.
B
So
the
idea
behind
that
is
that
it
would
for
basically
new
developments.
They
would
have
to
meet
an
elevated
standard
to
meet
with
current
flood
projections
as
far
as
craig
park,
I
think
they
did
just
receive
a
grant
to
raise
the
sea
walls
there.
So.
E
C
And
I
I
emailed
paul
smith,
maybe
earlier
this
week,
because
something
that
I
just
hadn't
even
heard
mentioned
when
we
were
talking
about
you
know
just
the
situation
with
whitcomb
value.
Is
you
know
that
it?
It
doesn't
seem
adequate
to
me
to
try
to
control
water
in
one
area
where
it's
going
to
spurt
out
somewhere
else.
C
You
know
why
are
we
not
consulting
with
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
for
when
levy
is
appropriate
because
there's
two
places
where
water
enters
the
bayous
from
the
anclote,
which
is
coming
from
the
gulf,
and
if
we
had
levees
there
it
would
keep
the
keep
the
views
for
the
residents.
C
A
D
E
E
This
can
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
seagrass
and
manatees
in
craig
park,
just
as
one
example
or
in
spring
bayou.
Just
as
one
example,
these
structures
are
commercially
available
or
they
can
be
manufactured
locally
and
they
are
bolt-on.
They
are
not
expensive,
they're,
not
difficult.
They
don't
have
to
be
incorporated
into
the
seawall
as
it's
being
constructed.
If
it's
a
brand
new
seawall,
they
are
bolt
on.
C
B
I
was
also
suggesting
to
combine
that
action.
The
sea
wall
ordinance
action
with
ce1
action
10..
I
did
get
another
comment
from
staff.
H
Perhaps
the
sea
walls
is
a
little
specific.
Maybe
we
could
talk
about
something
about
really.
What
we're
trying
to
get
at
here
is
we
want
to
incorporate
sea
level
rise
and
resiliency
into
future
building
plans.
So
perhaps
something
like
just
saying
that,
like
incorporating
sea
level
rise
or
incorporating
coastal
resiliency
into
the
code
to
develop
more
resilient
in
coastal
infrastructure
would
be
something
that
we
could
put
in
now
and
then
flesh
out
the
details
as
we
get
into
the
code
development
process.
E
H
That's
understandable,
but
also
that
could
get
us
into
other
sorts
of
things
like
besides
just
sea
walls.
You
know
when
you
talk
about
coastal
infrastructure,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
go
beyond
sea
walls
like
if,
in
the
future,
there
were
levees
or
other
sorts
of
like
hard
infrastructure
or
living
shorelines
or
storm
water
infrastructure
that
you
might
want
to
also
consider
hardening
as
it's
repaired
or
redeveloped
or
improved.
E
H
B
I
do
also
want
to
point
out
that-
and
I
probably
should
have
clarified
this
earlier-
this
is
not
going
to
be
the
final
wording
of
what's
in
the
plan,
so
this
wording
is
star's,
exact
wording
and
now
we're
at
this
point
where
we're
customizing
to
our
city.
So
this
language
is
subject
to
change
and
I
will
be
getting
more
specific
as
I'm
working
on
this.
E
This
is
a
specific
recommendation
of
the
sustainability
committee
that
we
have
a
seawall,
ordinance
and
you've.
You
know,
and
you
have
specific
language
in
a
new
action
and
I've
recommended
in
addition
to
the
new
action.
Why
not?
Why
not
conclude?
Why
not
include
this
in
in
the
body
of
the
sustainability
plan.
G
If
I
could
just
jump
in
here,
we
already
do
have
things
about
sea
walls
in
the
code
and
to
kind
of
match
up
the
two
ideas.
Could
we
just
include
the
language
that
we
would
revise
code
go
back
to
the
language,
so
improve
facilities
and
infrastructure
throughout
the
community
to
be
better
prepared
for
climate
change
threats,
something
like
that
through
revision
of
existing
or
creation
of
new
ordinances?
You
know.
E
F
E
F
F
Just
wanted
to
say
I
like
the
living
seashore
or
the
living
seawall
idea,
it
might
be
a
little
strict,
but
we've
got
to
start
making
changes
collectively.
It's
yeah
like
robin,
was
saying
like
that.
I
feel
like
just
kind
of
elaborating
on
improved
facilities
and
infrastructure
to
combat
climate
change.
A
Yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
wanting
to
be
broad
because
maybe
seawall
is
not
going
to
be
the
best
solution,
so
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
have
a
whole
tool
kit,
full
of
options
that
at
the
city's
disposal
for
addressing
being
more
resilient
and
addressing
climate
change
and
addressing
rising
sea
levels.
So
I
mean
I
don't
I
I
don't
mind
keeping
both
of
them
in
and
having
the
the
addition
of
the
living
sea
wall.
C
I
also
I
appreciate
that
robin
reeves
clarified
that
we
had
the
language
that
was
straight
out
of
the
star,
but
we
want
to
customize
it
for
our
own
use.
You
know
it
needs
to
be
our
own
work,
so
that's
what
we're
talking
about
and
we
can
change
it,
but
it
can,
you
know,
achieve
the
same
goals
and
I
think
that
we
shouldn't
limit
ourselves
just
using
one
means
of
water
control.
E
B
F
A
So,
actually,
let
me
make
a
note
okay,
so
the
next
one
is
greenhouse
gas
mitigation
and
there's
action
eight
and
a
new
action.
So
action,
eight,
it
look.
It
got
broader
than
the
original
statement.
I
think
right,
isn't
it
looking
at
the
intent
is
to
transition
the
city
towards
clean
energy
goals,
including
increasing
on-site,
renewable
energy
production,
increasing
electric
vehicles
and
alternative
fuels
and
then
creating
staff
incentives
to
encourage
the
use
of
alternative
modes
of
transportation
and
the
transition
to
electric
vehicles.
So
I
totally
support
that,
including
like
bikes.
A
If
we
can
help
support
staff
riding
to
work
on
a
bike
that
would
be
great
and
then
the
new
action
is
creating
incentives
to
encourage
the
community
to
utilize,
alternative
modes
of
transportation
and
low
emission
vehicles.
So
I'm
happy
with
both
of
those
all
right.
There
wasn't
anything
for
greening
the
energy
supply,
ce3,
ce4,
energy
efficiency.
A
We've
got
local
action,
2
adopter,
upgrade
building
codes
to
ensure
new
and
renovated
buildings
are
more
energy
efficient
and
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
We
good
with
that.
Yes,
yes,
okay,
next
one's
water
efficiency,
so
we've
got
action,
2,
a
dot,
plumbing
building
and
zoning
codes
that
promote
water,
efficient
practices
and
products
good
using
nods,
okay,
greenhouse
gas
and
resource
efficiency.
So
we've
got
outcome
one.
So
we
want
to
demonstrate
incremental
progress
towards
achieving
30
reduction
of
greenhouse
gas
80
by
2050
and
then
local
action,
5,
10
action,
1
and
action
3..
Any.
B
D
A
B
B
We
could
remove
it
because
we've
already
started.
Oh
doing.
D
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
it
sounds
like
we're
keeping
in
one
inventory
out
lo
the
outcome,
one
and
then
action
five.
Ten
and
one
did
you
or
I'm
sorry.
I
had
them
out
of
order,
but
yes,
sorry.
H
Along
these
lines,
if
I
may,
I
think
this
is
really
an
opportunity,
for
you
know
we're
focusing
our
list
of
action
items.
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
for
the
the
committee
to
focus
on
what
their
priorities
are
and
communicate
their
priorities
through
the
document
and
anything
that's
unique
to
sustainability
that
would
not
otherwise
occur
without
having
a
sustainability
program.
H
Been
doing
for
two
and
a
half
years,
certainly
certainly
so
that,
with
this
case,
I
think,
is
a
great
example
of
one
that
you
know.
The
sustainability
committee
led
this
initiative
to
do
the
greenhouse
gas
inventory.
It's
unique
to
sustainability,
it's
not
really
showing
up
in
other
documents
throughout
the
city.
So
to
me
that
would
be
something
you
would
definitely
want
to
include.
F
E
H
D
B
So
this
one
is
regulations
or
incentives,
and
you
know
part
one
prepare
for
future
climate
change
impacts,
that's
being
addressed
in
other
actions.
In
this
section,
renewable
energy
infrastructure
is
being
addressed
already
and
other
actions.
Energy
efficiency,
buildings
that
is
being
addressed
in
built
environment,
section
encourage
water,
efficient
buildings
and
landscaping.
Those
are
also
being
addressed
in
other
sections
and
the
waste
there's
a
separate
action
for
waste.
E
Robin
it
is
frustrating
to
me
to
learn
that
there
are
things
being
done
in
other
locations
that
we
did
not
know
about.
We
don't
have
the
wording
in
front
of
us.
We
didn't
have
the
wording
in
front
of
us
when
we
reviewed
it
this
time.
We
didn't
have
the
wording
in
front
of
it
when
we
reviewed
it
last
month
and
and
so
we
have
no
nothing
to
compare
to
and
and
having
carolyn
say
well,
you
could
have
looked
it
up
online
under
the
comprehensive
plan.
That's
not.
B
B
So
I
just
went
through
that.
The
climate
change
impacts
is
in
this
section,
climate
and
energy.
The
renewable
energy
infrastructure
there's
also
several
actions
related
to
that
energy
efficiency
buildings.
We
haven't
gotten
there,
yet
that's
in
built
environment
or
actually
we
did
pass
that
already
water
efficient
buildings,
that's
also
in
built
environment,
landscaping
that
will
be
in
natural
systems,
community
waste
reduction
targets.
That's
another
suggested
action
in
this
section.
E
You
sent
the
material
out
last
time.
I
you
know.
I
simply
said
that
I
could
not
read
it
because
it
was
too
small
and-
and
our
chairperson
gave
suggested
a
way
that
you
could
enlarge
it
so
that
it
would
be
easier
to
read
and
to
follow
if
this
material
appears
other
places
in
the
plan,
and
I'm
not
surprised.
If
it
does
trust
me,
it
would
have
been
nice
to
have
that
alongside
this,
so
that
we
could
compare
the
wording.
E
B
A
I
would
my
only
thought,
though,
is
is
what
this
is
specifically
talking
about
is
trying
to
offer
incentives,
so
I
almost
want
to
keep
it
in
because
then
it'll
help
us
to
try
to
identify
incentives
to
do
the
things
that
we're
asking
or
you
know
I
mean
it
like
it
requires
identifying
a
capital
source
to
provide
the
incentive.
If
we
want
to
do
that
like
whenever
we
pass
policy,
you
either
have
to
have
like
a
carrot
or
a
stick,
and
so
this
is
trying
to
create
that
carrot
to
people
you
know
to
have
people.
H
The
other
way
to
look
at
that
would
be
you
know,
one
other
suggestion
would
be
to
take
you
know.
At
the
other
day,
you
only
got
the
carrot
in
the
stick.
You
know
those
are
the
only
two
things
you
can
really
do
to
incentivize
community
behavior,
as
you,
you
know,
require
that
people
do
it
or
you
give
them
an
economic
driver
that
drives
them
to
do
that.
H
This
is
the
idea
of
using
those
two
strategies
which
we'll
have
to
employ
for
a
variety
of
other
things.
To
achieve
those
goals
and
giving
a
whole
laundry
list
of
different
programs,
we
would
apply
those
tools
to
which
are
really
the
only
tool
tools
of
local
government
right.
So
perhaps
you
just
include
the
words,
enforcement
and
incentives
in
some
of
those
other
areas.
Yep.
H
F
A
A
And
it
looks
like
for
ej1
business
and
retention
and
development.
There
was
nothing
that
was
kept
in.
Are
we
okay
with
that?
Yes,
all
right
green
market
development,
there
is
action,
one
amend
existing
local
economic
plans
and
strategies
to
focus
market
demand
for
green
jobs,
technology
products
and
services,
and
then
there's
action.
Seven
and
nine.
G
This
is
we
we
are
gonna
have
for
the
first
time,
we're
gonna
have
an
economic
development
element
in
our
comprehensive
plan,
but
I
think
these
are
very
sustainable.
These
are
the
kind
of
things.
A
Okay,
the
next
one
is
local
economy
and
there
wasn't
anything
in
there.
A
Next
one
is
ej4
quality
jobs
and
living
wages,
and
we
do
have
four
things
there
so
outcome
three
and
then
action.
Two
three
four
four.
B
Yes,
there
is
I'm
trying
to
find
which
I'll
slow
down
the
number
it
corresponds
to.
So
it
would
be
to
remove
the
action
income
that
it
was
previously
ej4
and
ej6
outcome.
3
combined
demonstrate
that
income
inequality
in
the
region
and
locally
is
decreasing
over
time
and
that
an
increasing
percentage
of
individuals
within
each
racial,
ethnic
and
gender
subgroup
have
obtained
a
high
quality,
post-secondary
educational
degree
or
credential
over
time.
B
So
yeah.
Our
recommendation
is
to
remove
this
action
for
a
couple
different
reasons
for
one
the
library
is
already
addressing
this.
They
have
some
programs
and
resources
of
this
nature
addressing
this
subject,
and
we
also
feel
it
might
be
a
repeat
of
efforts
of
various
local
organizations
in
our
county
and
city.
B
E
B
I'll
have
to
ask
them
about.
You
know
the
specifics
on
their
program.
H
I
think
one
other
reason
we
are
looking
at
this
one
a
little
bit
critically
is
it's
a
demonstration.
You
know
type
goal,
which
is
you
know,
monitor
data
and
report
back
on
it
and
to
me
when
we're
building
these
action
plans,
you
know
they're.
Really.
Each
action
should
do
one
of
two
things.
It
should
implement
something
that
creates
a
material
change
in
one
of
the
high
priorities
for
for
the
city
or
two.
It
should
provide
you,
the
information
you
need
to
implement
a
program
like
that.
H
That
would
make
something
actionable
and
this
one
to
us
it
didn't
really
quite
seem
to
be
supporting
any
of
the
other
goals
that
were
included
in
the
plan.
It
was
just
monitor
and
demonstrate.
So
it's
really
like
a
data
collection,
sort
of
exercise
about
income
inequality
which
that
data
already
exists.
It's
largely
not
collected
by
the
city,
so
it
seemed
kind
of
duplicative
of
other
economic
development
efforts
that
are
going
on
more
broadly,
that
it
doesn't
really
give
us
additional
tools
to
to
implement
other
programs
to
address
income
inequality.
C
It
seems
like
it's
human
resources
issues
I
mean
all
of
it.
You
know
so
I
I
don't
know
whether
it
belongs
in
the
plan
I
mean
is
that
this
is
for
the
city
at
large,
this
or
the
city
government,
and
that
was
not
clear
to
me
when
I
was
reading
it
does
anybody
else
have
clarity
on
that?
The
income
inequality?
C
You
know
it
says
that
in
the
region
and
it's
locally
but
and
we're
going
through
some
major
major
crises
right
now,
where
it's
growing
daily
because
of
inflationary
pressures,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
have
much
power
over
any
of
that
at
the
moment
and
the
dust
hasn't
even
begun
to
settle
because
it's
still
flying
around
you
know
if
that
makes
sense.
But
if
the
city,
the
policy
and
code
adjustment,
you
know
the
workplace
policies
for
all
local
government
employees,
I
mean
we
doesn't.
The
city
has
a
human
resources
department.
Correct
so
is
it?
C
A
H
I
think
this
one
is
a
community-wide
goal.
It
talks
about
regionally
and
locally
and
not
specifically
with
city
staff,
and
it
specifically
talks
about
like
encouraging
folks
and
tracking
the
percentages
of
different
demographics.
As
far
as
you
know,
achieving
post-secondary
education
yeah
that's
kind
of
beyond
the
purview
of
of
like
city
government.
You
know.
Obviously
you
know
we
want
to
have
an
educated
workforce,
but
that
this
does
seem
to
be
more
broadly
community
oriented
which
talking
about
our
overall
goal,
which
is
to
help
keep
our
plan
focused
on.
H
A
G
B
It
might
also
be
able
to
be
combined
with
ej4
action
for
about
ensuring
all
city
employees
are
at
a
living
wage
that
could
also
be
recombined
in
there.
F
C
A
Okay,
so
industry
development
there
were
never
any
and
then
the
last
is
workforce.
Readiness
outcome
three,
and
this
is
where
you
were
talking
about,
combining
it
anyway,.
F
C
Did
you
get
any
feedback
from
carol
on
the
arts
that
she
was
so
well.
A
B
Yep,
yes,
sorry,
I
have
that.
Yes,.
A
E
We
ready,
I
proposed
a
new
action
under
arts
and
culture.
I
don't
know
if
the
rest
of
the
committee
has
seen
it.
I
sent
it
to
robin
on
monday,
actually
sunday.
E
A
C
A
Okay
for
educational
opportunity,
moving
on
then
eac
3
looks
like
there
was
there,
isn't
anything
in
there.
A
Eac
for
historic
preservation,
there's
economic,
economic
impact
outcome
three
and
then
policy
action
four,
but
where
I
think
the
intent
is
to
shift
this
land
use
piece
over
to
built
environment
and
everybody's
supportive
of
that.
Yes,.
B
Okay,
we
did
have
another
recommendation
to
remove
eac
for
outcome.
Three
that
is
demonstrate
that
historic
preservation
efforts
had
a
positive,
measurable
impact
on
the
local
economy
that
is
kind
of
another
one.
That's
a
little
bit
difficult
to
track
and
implement.
How
do
you
exactly
implement
a
positive,
measurable
impact?
That's
kind
of
vague
wording
and
the
city
does
have
several
other
efforts
dedicated
to
historic
preservation,
such
as
just
passing
the
historic
preservation
and
resiliency
strategic
plan.
Is
that
what
it
was
called
action
plan
action
plan.
G
Also,
you
know
we
have.
The
cra
is
in
our
a
big
chunk
of
our
historic
district,
and
that's
the
only
way
that
you
really
can
quantify
that,
so
we're
already
doing
that
on
an
annual
basis.
Anyway,
okay,.
B
F
B
Yeah,
I
think,
I'm
I
might
have
some
recommendations
when
we
get
to
equity
and
empowerment.
Well,
actually,
I
could
say
them
now,
since
we're
on
that
page.
I
don't
know,
whichever
would
be
more
convenient.
A
Let
me
let's
just
finish
because
we've
got
the
aging
in
the
community.
It's
the
last
little
piece
on
that.
If
that's
okay,
so
aging
in
community,
it's
move
to
equity
and
empowerment,
let's
conduct
a
survey
of
aging
community
members
and
assess
how
they
feel
and
we
want
to
keep
that
in,
but
move.
D
D
A
B
B
That
would
be
provide
young
people
with
opportunities
to
participate
in
civic
activities.
That's
very
much
of
the
same
nature
as
provide
civic
education
programs
that
support
the
development
of
positive,
strong
youth
leaders,
with
a
particular
focus
on
engaging
individuals
from
low
income
and
or
minority
neighborhoods
yeah.
B
Okay,
yep
we
can.
We
can
combine
those,
that's
my
only
one
for
ee
one,
but
I
I
will
have
more
as
we
go
through.
A
Okay,
anybody
else
on
ee1
ee2
is
the
civil
and
human
rights,
and
we
learned
that
word
city
is
already
doing
most
of
that.
So
it's
not
in
ee,
three
environmental
justice
there's
outcome
one
and
action
two
and
then
it
says,
combine
ee
three
action.
Two
and
I've
cut
it
off,
because
I've
made
my
page
too
big.
B
B
Oh,
I
guess
I
might
have
missed
one
that
I'm
not
sure
which
one
I
belong
to
sorry
hold
on
a
second.
B
I
think
that
one
is
later:
okay,
sorry,
another
one
for
ee3.
B
B
So
you
know,
a
plan
naturally
leads
into
adopting
a
you
know,
additional
policy
or
taking
further
action.
So
I
feel
like
those
two
kind
of
could
fit
into
one
action.
A
A
B
Idea
right
that,
yes,.
B
Well,
I
did
have
one
for
ee5.
Sorry,
it's
getting
a
little
bit
tough
to
follow
along,
so
one
recommendation
here
is
to
remove
ee5
act
outcomes,
one
and
two
for
the
same
rationale
as
previously
with
that
language
of
demonstrate.
It's
we
have
to
think
about.
What
is
our
goal?
Are
we
just
data
tracking?
Are
we
taking
a
specific
action
and
additionally,
you
know:
are
there
other
organizations
who
are
better
suited
to
track
this
information.
D
D
Well,
the
juvenile
welfare
board
in
the
county
attracts
a
lot
of
this
as
well,
since
tarpon
springs
is
one
of
the
county's
poverty
zones.
So
a
lot
of
this
information
is
being
tracked
and
quantified
and
so
forth.
So
and
the
advent
health
is
also
starting
to
do
this,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
how
that
fits
in
with
us.
C
Yeah,
so
how?
How
can
we
express
that
we,
you
know,
are
going
to
partner
or
we're
looking
for
the
partnership
of.
C
C
B
C
B
We
don't
have
to
it's
just
a
thought
of
okay,
if
you'd
like
to
do
that.
Well,.
A
D
A
B
A
D
D
C
D
D
E
D
E
D
E
G
I
agree:
I
worked
on
the
health
and
all
policies
can't.
G
I
worked
in
the
health
and
all
policies
ordinance
and
I'm
sorry
resolution
for
my
former
employer,
and
I
agree
that
this
is
a
little
vague.
I
think
we
need
to
say
adopt
a
health
in
all
policies,
policy,
commitment
for
local
decision
making.
D
E
Read
the
whole
treatise
health
and
all
policies
now
completely
once
and
part
of
it,
two
or
three
times
and
the
the
treatise
that
we
were
given,
which
is
131
pages
and
158.
If
you
include
the
appendix,
is
a
california
publication.
E
E
E
E
Excuse
me.
Look
at
page
129.,
the
first
four
bullets.
E
Talk
about
a
farm
to
fork
program,
talk
about
locally
grown
produce,
talking
about
a
complete
streets,
bicycle
safety
program
and
talking
about
working
with
the
department
of
forestry
and
fire
protection
for
a
healthy
urban
forest.
Those
are
concepts
that
we
could
turn
into
proposed
actions
in
our
plan.
E
B
Think
I
sh
might
be
I'll
double
check.
Okay,.
A
Either
way,
if
I
may,
like
my
master's
degree,
is
in
public
health-
and
I
really
feel
like-
we
need
to
have
this
in
our
plan
because
to
me
it's
codifying
that
the
city
recognizes
that
the
policy
decisions
that
they
make
impact
the
human
health
of
the
residents
that
live
here.
So
to
me,
that's
the
intent
of
keeping
this
in.
So,
like
all
of
the
heat
issues
that
you
you
know
spoke
at
length
about
right,
that's
the
way
to
make
sure
that
it's
being
considered
and
that
we
are
whenever
we're
building
a
new
road.
A
A
I
don't
think
that
we
are
adopting
that.
I
think
that,
no
that's
not
I
I
mean,
maybe
I'm
misspeaking,
but
my
my
my
understanding
is
that
we
don't
have
a
health
and
all
policy
statement
or
a
health
and
all
policies
policy,
and
we
would
like
the
city
to
adopt
something
that
works
for
the
city
and
it's
not
written
yet,
and
there
may
be
something
that
you
would
want
to
help
write
because
of
your
expertise
and
understanding.
The
connection
between
you
know.
A
F
G
E
A
E
Because
I
want
it
absolutely
not,
and
if
you
remember,
I
included
suggestions
about
having
a
temporary
shelter
for
evacuation
shelter
now
before
we're
building
a
permanent
one.
I
also
talked
about
vector-borne
diseases
and
water-borne
diseases
too,
and
all
of
those
would
fall
under
health
in
all
policies.
Definitely.
A
Yeah,
but
I
definitely
think
the
city
needs
a
policy
that
we
don't
have,
that
would
address
all
of
these
things
and
that's
the
vehicle
in
our
our
action
plan
to
to
do
that
sure.
Okay,.
F
Also,
I
just
kind
of
thought
about
this,
but
maybe
this
kind
of
tangent,
but
maybe
a
climate
and
all
policy
commitment,
because
we
did
say
we
want
to
look
at
it
through
a
lens
of
sustainability,
just
kind
of
everything.
So
if
we're
going
to
do
one
for
health,
why
can't
we
do
unfair
climate
as
well?
So.
E
A
E
In
which
climate
is
impacting
human
health,
but
there
are
other
quote
minor
ways
in
way
in
which
climate
is
affecting
human
health,
like
the
you
know,
as
the
co2
level
in
the
air
rises,
the
amount
of
protein
that
is
produced
by
certain
fairly
important,
grains
and
and
other
food
sources
that
we
grow
is
reducing
relative
to
starch.
That's
considered
a
minor
change,
okay,
so
yeah.
There's
a
lot
of
that.
A
So
I'd
like
to
keep
them
separate
and
have
two
things
just
because
if
one
is
feasible
and
the
other's
not
like,
I
think
they
both
are,
but
just
like
an
insurance
policy.
B
G
B
G
It
affects
climate
for
larger
projects.
You'd
probably
want
to
do
a
larger
impact
assessment
for
health
and
all
policies.
I
know
there's
specific
methodology
for
doing
that,
and
I'm
certain
there's
got
to
be
something
out
there
for
climate
similar.
So
I
think
it'd
be
great
in
this
plan
to
put
that
out
as
something
that
we
should
do,
and
then
we'll
figure
out
how
to
do
it.
G
E
E
Yeah,
but
what
I
was
talking
about
last
month
is
that
I've
done
some
data
analysis
on
the
heat
wave.
We've
been
suffering
this
summer
and
compared
it
with
the
previous
five
years.
So
I've
looked
at
five
parameters
for
every
minute
of
every
day
for
92
days
per
year,
june
july
and
august
for
six
years.
That's
slightly
less
than
four
million
bits
of
data
and
the
conclusions.
The
findings
are
frightening.
E
And
so
that's
what
I,
those
were,
the
the
additional
documents
that
I
sent
to
robin
to
share
with
the
committee.
E
E
In
fact,
the
union
of
concerned
scientists
predicted
in
a
publication
four
years
ago
that
robin
sent
to
you
as
part
of
the
additional
materials
for
this
that
this
well.
Let
me
back
up
all
three
of
those
entities
and
others
have
predicted
that
this
part
of
the
country
is
going
to
suffer
increasing
heat
and
humidity.
The
southeastern
united
states
will
suffer
increasing
heat
and
humidity
moving
forward.
E
D
E
So
that
was
one
of
my
cutoff
points
in
one
parameter,
which
is
heat
index
and
the
other
four
parameters
were
time:
hygrometer
absolute
temperature
and
wet
bulb
globe
temperature
and
the
reason
for
wet
bulb
globe.
Temperature
is
because
that
is
the
best
measurement
of
the
impact
of
heat,
solar,
radiation,
humidity,
etc.
There
are
five
elements
on
human
physiology,
so
those
are
the
five
parameters
that
I've
followed,
and
what
I
found
is
that
this
is
the
hottest
year
in
the
past
six.
E
E
E
E
A
A
It
wasn't
that
many
okay,
fair
enough,
but
there
are
quite
a
few
so
and
to
me
it
is
addressed
in
the
the
health
and
all
policies,
but
I
would
be
fine
with
adding
in
a
specific
additional
component
that
addresses
heat
specifically
and
says,
like
we're,
gonna
look
at
the
infrastructure,
the
trees,
the
policy
like
all
of
those
things
to
specifically
target
heat,
because
we
think
that
it's
really
a
big
impact.
It's
to
have
a
huge
impact
on
the
city
good.
Does
everybody
else
agree
with
that?
I
agree
with
that.
C
A
It
has
implications,
I'm
sorry,
yeah
go
ahead.
No,
I
was
just
going.
Heat
has
implications
in
like
the
built
environment,
natural
systems,
human
health.
It
has
all
of
those
things,
so
maybe
we
put
it
here
but
understand
that
it's
going
to
to
your
point,
it's
going
to
really
the
way
that
you
reduce
those
concerns
is
through
a
lot
of
the
infrastructure.
That's
addressed
in
the
the
green
infrastructure.
Let.
E
E
Something
I
said
to
the
previous
board
of
commissioners:
was
ain't?
Nobody
going
to
be
shopping
in
tarpon
springs
when
the
heat
index
is
105.,
you
should
have
seen
ray
of
cyber's
face
when
I
said
that.
But
if
you
see
the
people-
and
you
see
the
reduction
in
the
number
of
people
downtown
in
days
like
that
yeah,
they
look
like
walking
zombies.
You
know.
A
B
So
there
is
an
action
that
was
added
under
natural
systems.
Regarding
heat,
I
would
suggest
adding
on
to
that
action
with
those
you
know,
individual
suggestions
as
one
large
action
relating
to
heat.
F
A
D
Let's
do
so
under
biodiversity
objective
ns.
What
is
this.
A
Okay,
so
we
are
in
health
management,
emergency
management
and
response
is
where
we
are,
it
was
just
hs3
and
there
are
none,
I'm
not
seeing
any
there.
A
A
Next
is
hs6
hazard
mitigation,
and
we
we
don't.
We
took
those
out.
C
Well,
one
thing:
I
had
a
note
on
sorry
to
backtrack:
no,
that's
good
skosh,
but
on
food
access
and
nutrition
have
we
ever
has
tarpon
ever
looked
at
edible
landscape
I
mean
is
part
of
the
plan.
You
know,
there's
such
a
thing
as
longevity
spinach.
It
grows
like
a
vine.
It
grows
in
shade.
It
grows
under
trees,
it's
totally
edible.
C
C
C
A
Like
that-
and
we
have
a
section-
I
think
that's
coming
up
about
natural
or
florida
natives
or
like
those
kind.
So
maybe
we
add
that
into
the
language
of
like
edible,
and
you
know
what
I
mean
in
addition.
A
D
D
I
mean
all
those
things
are
happening
all
the
time
and-
and
I
don't
know
about
trust,
building
initiatives
that
would
be
more
like
what
denise
and
I
were
talking
about
in
the
you
know
more
community
engagement,
local
community
and
gave
micro
engagement
of
community
members,
and
things
like
that.
D
So
I'd
say
some
of
it
is
some
of
it.
Isn't
it
sounds
wonderful,
but
I
I
don't
know
that
I
don't
know
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
develop
the
partnerships
with
the
schools,
and
I
mean
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
already
all
in
the
works
and
very
much
focused.
A
D
D
A
We've
got
action,
two
about
creating
an
infrastructure
plan,
a
green
infrastructure
plan
policy
action,
three,
which
is
adopt
local
design
criteria
and
looking
at
lead,
and
then
a
new
action
for
create
green
building
standards
and
sustainability.
Practices
for
city
facilities
also
looking
at
lead
action,
six
create
incentive
programs
and
then
a
new
action
of
conducting
an
assessment
of
the
coastal
areas
of
the
city
to
determine
suitable
application
of
living
shorelines,
in
addition
to
or
in
lieu
of
seawall
structures.
B
E
E
A
Well,
I'm
wondering,
though,
with
like
some
of
the
federal
funding
that's
coming.
If
there
aren't
going
to
be
because
there
is
like
rebates
and
things
for
like
appliances
that
are
you
know,
I
mean
that
are
already
in
the
inflation
reduction
act.
So
maybe
there
is
some
federal
funding
to
help
do
this,
so
I'd
like
to
keep
it
in
and
try
to
at
least
keep
the
kind
of
our
foot
in
the
door
of
that
being
an
option
to
look
for
ways
to
find
funding
to
incentivize.
D
A
Well,
this
this
that
that
I,
the
statement
I
was
just
making
that
robin
was
talking
about,
is
not
about
sea
walls.
It's
about
like
green
infrastructure
practices.
Okay,
so
it
could
be
a
whole
host
of
gotcha
like
cool
roofs,
and
there
may
be
money
to
do
that
kind
of
stuff.
Yes,
so
I
say
we
keep
it
in
and
maybe
even
tweak
it
so
that
we're
looking
at
like
trying
to
find.
C
D
B
Another
recommendation
is
to
combine
ns1
action
three
with
the
added
action
on
here.
That
would
be
three
adopt
local
design
criteria
and
associated
codes
that
require
proactive,
green
infrastructure
practices
for
new
developments
and
which
encourage
the
use
of
green
building
certification
programs
such
as
lead
with
conduct
an
assessment
of
the
coastal
areas
of
the
city.
Wait.
Actually
that's
the
wrong
action
with
the
other
action.
B
Sorry
ignore
that
part
with
create
green
building
standards
and
sustainability
practices
for
city
facilities,
require
new
city
facilities
to
meet
elevated
standards
and
encourage
the
use
of
green
building
certification
programs
such
as
leed.
These
are
two
very
similar
actions.
Looking
at
them
again,
I
do
think
we
could
combine
these.
D
A
A
B
A
E
A
E
F
A
A
All
right,
so
the
next
is
biodiversity
and
invasive
species,
and
we've
got
local
action.
We've
got
outcome,
two
habitat
conservation
and
connectivity,
no
net
loss
of
habitat,
and
then
we've
got
local
action,
two,
a
new
action
and
another
new
action.
B
I
I
did
have
a
recommendation
to
combine
two
items
here:
one
being
ns2
action,
two
adopter
enforce
an
ordinance
requiring
control
of
listed
priority
invasive
species
on
city
property
and
which
requires
all
local
government
owned
buildings
to
use
native
and
or
sustainable
site,
appropriate
species
and
landscaping
with
the
new
action
adopt
or
enforce
an
ordinance
requiring
control
of
list
priority.
Invasive
species
create
a
preferred
plant,
ordinance
and
private
landscaping.
D
B
Won't
read
the
whole
thing
for
the
sake
of
time,
but
you
know
I
thought
that
these
were
similar
enough
in
nature
that
they
could
be
combined.
A
And
then
is
this
where
we
would
incorporate
so
site
appropriate
species
and
landscaping
and
edible
plants.
G
A
So
we're
good
with
that
all
right.
The
next
is
natural
resource
protection,
so
we've
got
develop
a
plan
to
protect
and
restore
natural
resources.
That's
local
action,
one
through
conservation,
corridor,
connectivity
and
restoration,
and
then
we've
got
implement
action.
Seven
implement
local
and
market
based
financing
strategies
to
acquire
land
or
development,
easements
or
fund
restoration
and
maintenance
activities.
D
D
Well
they're
used,
I
mean
they're
a
thousand
less
now,
but
there
were
also
liatris,
which
is
a
florida
native
plant
that
is
on
the
on
the
decline
that
you
just
don't
see
much
anymore.
So
I
think
that
for
new
development,
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
an
assessment
of
endangered
plant
as
well
as
animal
species
threatened
and
have
some
some
way
to
preserve
that
on
site,
not
mitigate
it,
but
preserve
a
section
of
that
on
site
or
something
because
I
think
that's
something.
D
D
You
know
to
to
not
only
remove
invasive
species
but
to
be
proactive
in
maintaining
biodiversity
of
species
of
threatened
and
endangered
species,
but
also
yeah
to
promote
biodiversity
and
habitat,
because
what
what's
happening
now
is
as
you've
seen
even
the
one
out
by
rose
cemetery
that
there,
however
many
15
houses,
it's
just
all
all
that
habitat
is
gone
now,
you
know
and
to
me
it
seems
like
that's
part
of
a
developmental
as
long
as
paying
to
to
connect
for
the
city
infrastructure
that
that's
part
of
our
infrastructure.
D
C
C
You
know
against
the
principles
of
a
natural
landscape
and
one
one.
Other
item
was
that
when
I
was
in
safety
harbor
a
while
just
driving
along
bayshore
drive,
I
noticed
that
they
actually
had
signs
that
asked
people
not
to
fertilize
during
certain
periods.
I
know
that
it's
something
that
people
are
told,
but
I
mean,
if
there's
a
sign
signs
to
remind
them
that
the
runoff
from
the
pesticides
is
really
damaging
to
the
water,
and
I
don't
know
where
we
would
put
that
in
into
the
plan.
C
C
C
A
A
C
C
D
Monitor
that
plan
or
get
that
plan
in
writing
so
that
we
can
see
what
that
timeline
is
because
it's
like
yeah
I'll
get
to
it
I'll
get
to
it.
You
know-
maybe
maybe
not
you
know
if
we
could
see
how
that
you
know
how
they're
going
to
be
replacing
the
use
of
insecticide
with
hand
weeding
or
whatever
he
wants
to
do.
A
Okay,
so
we
are
now
on
natural
resource
protection,
so
we've
got
local
election.
One
is
the
plan
to
protect
and
restore
natural
resources
and
then
also
implement
local,
market-based
financing
strategies
to
acquire
property
we
want
to
keep
both
of
those
in.
I
really
think
that,
and
maybe
this
is
because
it's
you're
you're
modifying
it
in
the
comp
plan,
but
to
me
the
buffer.
A
The
shoreline
buffers
is
like
an
issue
that
I'm
willing
to
go
to
bat,
for
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
not
in
right
now,
because
it's
already
being
addressed
in
the
comp
plan
but,
like
I
think,
the
buffer
for
the
river
is
like
under
30
feet,
you're
looking
at
action
two,
I
am
looking
at
action
two
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
really
expanded
so
that
any
future
development
along
our
waterways
is
buffered.
G
A
G
F
G
We
would,
if
so,
when
we
would
do
that
would
be
when
we
make
the
code
adjustments
after
we
get
the
comp
plan.
So
if
that
comes
through
as
a
policy,
so
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is:
if
you
want
it
increased
beyond
no
net
zero
or
the
place
where
we
are
now,
then
maybe
you
should
include
it,
because
it's
not
a
policy
right
now.
Okay,.
F
C
G
A
D
B
I
was
initially
suggesting
combining
ns3
outcome:
three
and
ns5
action,
six
with
ns3
action
one,
but
let's
take
a
look
at
that,
because
that's
kind
of
okay,
I'll,
just
read
it:
okay,
so
ns3
outcome:
three
connectivity
increase
the
amount
of
natural
or
restored
areas
directly
connected
to
regional
natural
systems
in
order
to
improve
ecosystem
services.
B
Excuse
me
and
then
action
one
we
just
read
was
the
plan
development,
but
might
be
getting
a
little
confusing
there.
So
my
head
is
hurting
with.
D
D
A
F
B
Yeah
I'll
have
to
tally
it
up
later,
but
we're
on
a
good
track
because.
C
I
really
think
I
mean
just
generically
or
in
general
that
it's
that
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
right
now,
natural
environment
and
everything-
that's
included
in
that
and
is
like
the
meat
of
what
we're
about.
C
You
know
the
climate
change
issues,
the
health
and
the
natural
environment
protecting
it,
I
mean
so,
if
there's
anything
that
we
could
lose
from
other
areas
in
order
to
keep
all
of
these,
you
know
because
you
said
you
wanted
to
whittle
it
down
to
50
and
we
had
how
many
actions
when
we
started,
maybe
70
something
76
78,
78.
Okay,
so
it
doesn't
seem
like
we've,
we've
taken
out
20
items,
but
the
ones
that
I
feel.
B
B
Yeah
and
I
do
have
a
couple
more-
I've
got
maybe
maybe
two
more
suggestions.
Okay,
as
we
move
forward
just
sorry
for
some
clarity,
we
are
going
to
combine
an
s3
action,
two
and
action.
One
is
that
right.
A
B
Just
making
sure
okay
and
we
are
keeping
the
others
of
ns3
that
are
in
green,
correct,
okay,.
A
Okay,
moving
on
then
outdoor
air
quality.
We
don't
have
those
in
and
then.
E
The
addition,
the
the
outcome
achieved
can
consistent
good
status
was
added
by
this
committee
after
my
presentation
on
air
pollution
and
it
was
unanimous
vote.
I
think
these
two,
the
outcome
and
the
local
action
needs
to
stay
in
as
part
of
the
plan.
H
I
think
this
is
one
area
where
we
were
just
a
little
bit
concerned
about
the
implementability
of
this
at
the
city
level.
Air
quality
is
not
typically
regulated
by
the
city.
We're
a
very
you
know
we're
a
relatively
small,
you
know:
municipality
within
the
overall
context
of
pinellas
county
and
the
we
obviously
share
the
air
with
all
the
rest
of
the
folks
around
us.
So.
E
There
is
a
specific
polluter
just
across
the
river,
the
ankylo
power
plant,
which
is
burning.
It
used
to
burn
coal
until
very
recently
now
burns
natural
gas.
E
E
H
One
is
to
achieve
consistent
status
over
you
know,
a
natural
system
quality
that
we
don't
regulate,
which
is
different
than
what
you're
talking
about,
which
is
education
and
outreach,
and
the
second
one
was
to
conduct
a
study
to
evaluate
geographic
areas
so
that
that
was
one
we
kind
of
viewed
in
the
same
lens,
as
these
other
demonstrate
type
type
action
items
which
is
we're
going
to
do
another
study
to
develop
information
that
likely
doesn't
lead
us
to
any
to
implementing
any
changes,
because
we
don't
regulate
those
activities.
E
G
I'm
sorry
and
my
counter
argument
to
th
that
argument
is
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
locally
and
we've
already
got
them
in
the
plan.
You
know
if
we
transition
our
fleet.
If
we
get
more
people
walking
and
biking
if
we
increase
our
canopy
cover,
you
know
those
are
things
that
we
can
do
that
will
affect
their
quality,
that
we
actually
can
do.
You
know.
E
That's
true
here,
too,
there's
got
to
be
a
way
that
we
can
at
least
make
ourselves
make
our
city
aware
of
this
issue.
A
But
that
is
part
of
like
we
did
keep
in
environmental
justice,
so
I
think
that
that
speaks
to
it.
There.
B
F
A
B
B
Trying
to
move
quickly,
sorry,
I
think
I
had
to
remove
ns5
outcome.
One
demonstrate
that
the
amount
of
water
withdrawn
from
the
system
for
human
uses
does
not
exceed
the
amount
of
fresh
water
entering
the
system
through
precipitation,
river
flow
and
other
sources,
because
we're
already
doing
that
right.
H
B
E
B
And
then
I
also
had
to
remove
this
new
combined
action
to
an
action
eight,
for
the
same
reason
that
we're
already
doing
those
actions.
Okay,.
A
A
F
Taylor
go
ahead
for
the
working
lands,
I
was
thinking
add
like
fish,
because
we
don't
have
much
working
land,
but
we
have
you
know
big
fisheries,
so
that
right,
a
lot
of
fish
caught
here.
A
F
A
You
catch
that
robin
you
got
that
yes,
okay,
okay,
so
we're
gonna,
skip
ideas
and
topics
for
knowledge
and
nibbles
or
not
skip,
but
we're
going
to
move
it
to
the
october
meeting,
along
with
the
conversation
about
keep
panels
beautiful,
which
is
good
because
karen's
not
here.
B
I
do
want
to
just
make
one
comment
about
the
knowledge
of
nibbles.
I
found
out
recently
my
deadline
for
lining
up.
All
the
speakers
is
november
1st,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
I'll
be
able
to
wait
until.
D
B
A
D
D
C
A
A
You
with
a
fun
agenda
that
robin
comes
up
with
okay
public
comments,
seeing
none
staff
comments.
B
Hearing
none
robin,
I
mean
it's,
nothing,
really
that
can't
wait
till
next
time.
I
will
just
say
that
we
joined
onto
the
sun
solar
co-op
for
the
county,
but
I
can
talk
about
that
in
more
detail
at
our
next
meeting.
H
F
H
Just
got
delivered
today,
it
came
with
the
charger
inside
the
van
took
us
a
while
to
find
it,
but
it's
that's
gonna
be
going
into
service
shortly
and.
H
Be
going
to
the
environmental
management
program
in
utilities
which
does
fat,
soils
and
grease
and
industrial
pre-treatment?
Oh
cool.
H
And
yeah,
we
also
just
on
tuesday
night,
the
board
approved
phase
two
of
the
reverse
osmosis
solar
project
for
1.3
million
bucks.
It's
gonna
triple
the
amount
of
solar
capacity
we
have
at
the
ro
plant
and
bring
our
power
generation
from
about.
You
know
four
or
five
percent
on
an
annual
basis
up
to
around
15.
B
Yeah
there
are
some
some,
they
still
haven't
released
the
details,
but
it
appears
that
that
municipalities,
we
should
be
able
to
be
eligible
to
at
least
apply
for
that.
C
And
I'll
send
a
link
to
robin,
because
I
work
with
the
environmental
working
group
all
the
time
or
I
utilize
their
website
all
the
time
for
chemicals
that
are
in
skin
care
and
other
products.
But
I
just
noticed
this
week
that
they
have
a
tap
water
database
and
all
you
have
to
do
is
enter
your
zip
code.
In
order
to
find
out,
you
know
the
different
things
that
they've
discovered
in
the
water
of
your
area,
and
it's
really.
It
was
really
fascinating.
C
F
And
I
have
two
real
short
ones:
climate
null
policies,
maybe
also
sustainability
in
all
policies.
It
doesn't
you
know
we
can
think
about
that
later
and
then
I
will
send
robin
all
sorts
of
plant
stuff
that
I
mentioned
good.
That's.
E
It
the
living
shoreline
project
in
philippi
park
did
not
occur
at
the
last
schedule
because
of
inclement
weather
it's
been
postponed
to
october,
but
I
will
say
that
the
sign
that
robin
has
given
us
a
picture
of
that
demonstrates
that
you
know
the
importance
of
this
to
the
population
is
really
beautiful.
It's.