![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qrDVBzDszxc/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Technical Review Committee September 29, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
D
Good
afternoon
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
This
is
the
a
special
meeting
at
the
technical
review
committee
for
september
29th
2021,
and
we
have
some
agenda
copies
of
the
agenda
in
the
back.
There
there's
one
item
on
the
agenda
today,
I'll
just
announce
that
this
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
to
have
all
the
departments,
other
review
development
review
items
in
the
city
to
meet
with
applicants
to
provide
a
coordinated
review
of
their
project.
D
D
D
That
is
something
that
we
have
not
had
a
response.
I
think
the
applicant
is
considering
that
that
item
number
four
post
development
eagle
management
plan
that
was
in
in
those
recommended
conditions,
we
have
not
had
a
response
to
that
same
with
the
wetland
enhancement
plan
analysis
that
was
requested
in
the
conditions
we
haven't
had
a
response
to
that
one,
and
we
also
had
requested
the
detailed
transportation
management
plan
and
that
analysis
has
also
not
been
received.
D
D
D
D
So
first
we
still
don't
have
the
additional
detail
with
regard
to
mitigation
of
wetland
impacts
and
understood
that
the
applicant
is
working
with
the
applicable
agencies
and
will
be
resolving
and
getting
to
a
point
where
they
will
be
pulling
permits
from
those
agencies.
D
First
is
mitigation
mitigation
on
the
same
side
of
the
of
the
excuse
me
of
the
development
number
two
would
be
mitigation
within
the
planning
area.
Boundary
and
number
three
would
be
mitigation
within
the
applicable
watershed,
as
identified
by
the
southwest
florida,
water
management
district.
So
just
a
narrative
confirmation
of
how
the
project
meets
those
or
that
requirement.
G
G
So
the
question
I
believe
I
understand
the
question
for
the
record:
I'm
cindy
terepani,
I'm
the
representative,
one
of
the
representatives
for
the
morgan
group,
who
is
the
applicant
and
just
so
you
know
we
do
have,
of
course,
morgan
group
representative,
here
today:
camille
salome,
the
client's
attorney
at
armstrong,
nathan,
lee
and
artie
cintron
from
kimberly
horn,
their
engineers
and
also
wes
rogers,
their
landscape,
architect
and
dylan
reeves,
who
isn't
with
biotech.
So
the
question.
G
To
answer
your
question,
we
are
going
to
be
mitigating
on-site
and
in
the
pdp
narrative
that
is
specifically
discussed
that
we
are
going
to
mitigate
on-site.
So
I'm
I
guess
I'm
kind
of
wondering.
How
is
it
do
you
want
it
in
some
other
document
I
mean.
Are
you?
Are
you
looking
for
something
besides
our
narrative,
to
confirm
this,
or
what
are
you
looking
for
to
meet
this
obligation.
D
At
some
point,
I
guess
we
we
will
get
confirmation
from
the
southwest
florida
water
management
district,
that
the
mitigation
on
site
is
acceptable,
so
this
could
be
a
condition
of
the
development.
But
at
some
point
I
don't
believe
I
guess
I
would
ask
you
if
you,
if
you
do,
have
that
conceptual
or
actual
approval
from
the
water
management
on
whether
the
on-site
mitigation
will.
I.
G
That
that
this
would
be
a
con
that
we
would
have
to
provide
that
confirmation
prior
to
building
permit
issuance,
that's
certainly
acceptable,
that's
about
when
we
would
would
get
it.
So,
if
that's,
what
you're
saying
that
this
will
be
a
requirement
to
show
prior
to
building
permits,
show
the
swift
mode
approval?
That's
no
works.
Fine.
With
that
condition,
I
think
what
we're.
E
I
think
what
we're
what
we're
honing
in
on
is.
We
have
a
priority
of
preference
for
in
the
policy,
so
right,
you're,
you're
telling
us
you
know,
verbally
and
in
writing-
that
it's
going
to
be
on
site
and.
H
E
E
G
You're
saying
so,
I'm
concerned
that
you're
concerned
are
you
saying
that
the
condition
in
the
final
development
plan
is
going
to
require
that
the
mitigation
be
only
on
site,
and
so,
if
that
onsite
is
not
allowed,
that
would
be
a
change
if.
E
I
think
if,
if
you're
not
100,
confident
that
that
is
going
to
be
approved
by
swift
mud,
then
we
need
to
know
that
so
that
we
can
make
the
proper
condition
and
make
sure
that
the
board's
aware
so
that,
after
the
fact,
we're
not
saying
oh
we're
going
to
pay
into
a
mitigation
bank
up
and
wherever.
So
that's
what
we're
trying
to
avoid.
Okay,.
G
D
Okay
and
then
the
next
comment
is
that
the
in
the
preliminary
plan
development
narrative,
it
was
stated
that
the
public
art
compliance
plan
would
be
confirmed
at
the
time
of
final
plan
development
submittal,
I
did
look.
I
I
couldn't
locate
whether
that
was
on
a
site
plan
or
in
a
narrative,
so
I
mean
that
could
probably
be
a
condition,
but
that's
probably
something
that
people
will
want
to
know
whether
you
plan
to
pay
into
the
fund
or
or
is
it
there
somewhere,
and
I
missed
it.
I.
G
G
G
Course
that,
even
though
it's
an
on-site
public
art
project
that
there's
a
public
art
committee
that
we'll
work
with
to
you,
know
review
and
approve
the
project.
So
we
understand
that.
D
Okay
and
then
the
applicant
has
stated
the
recreational
vehicle
parking
prohibited
on
site
that'll
be
a
condition
so
that
you've
already
stated
that
that
will
be
prohibited,
and
I
did
receive
approval
at
the
drainage
plan
from
burgess
and
naples.
So
I
will
send
you
that
memo
that
approves
the
drainage
plan.
D
E
G
G
Can
I
go
back
to
a
couple
if
you
don't
mind
so
on
the
pdp
conditions?
With
regard
to
the
plan
amendment?
That's
still
under
development,
we
understand
the
other
studies,
four
five,
seven
and
eight
to
be
submitted
that
we're
planning
to
submit
those
with
the
fdp
on
the
advisory
comments.
Number
three
we
and
we
are
we'll
be
resubmitting
that
with
the
ftp
with
regard
to
the
energy
efficiency,
I
just
want
to
be
clear
about
that
as
to
what
we
intend
to
submit.
G
So,
with
regard
to
the
energy
efficiency,
what
we
intend
to
submit
on
the
fdp-
and
I
guess
I'm
just
responding
to
make
sure
this
is
going
to
be
acceptable
to
the
city-
is
that
on
the
ftp
plans
themselves,
we'll
show
the
generalized
location
of
the
charging
stations
with
a
note
that
the
exact
location
may
change.
But
the
goal
is
to
have
one
station
right
near
each
parking
field
for
each
building
so
that
each
building
would
generally
have
a
station.
G
And
then
we
were
going
to
add
a
note
to
the
fdp
that
the
project
will
comply
with
the
bronze
level
of
the
ngbs,
so
that'll
be
on
the
plans
and
then
the
full
details
of
the
design.
All
the
construction
detail
about
the
ev
stations,
the
ngbs
and
the
solar
panels
on
the
clubhouse
would
be
provided
with
building
permit
submittal.
G
B
I
may
I
have
a
question
planning
question:
I'm
at
armstrong,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
law
firm
of
hillary
henderson,
located
at
600
cleveland
street
suite
800.,
and
it
has
to
do
with
the
timing
of
the
city's
adoption
of
its
new
private
property
rights
element
and
how
that
dovetails
with
the
fact
that
we'll
be
submitting
a
map
amendment
to
open
space
recreation.
E
Yes,
so
we
intend
to
have
the
property
rights.
The
draft
element
go
to
the
planning
and
zoning
board
this
month
in
october
october.
I'm
sorry,
okay
and
then
to
the
board
of
commissioners
in
in
november.
I
believe,
is
how
we've
advertised
it.
So
my
understanding
of
the
law
right
now
is
that
they
are.
They
are
referring
back
that
so
for
like
expedited
amendments
and
things
like
that
they're
kind
of
referring
us
back
to
our
own
attorneys
they're,
not
coming
in
and
saying
we
won't
take
a
land
use
map
amendment.
E
E
Is
we'll
have
it
adopted
and
we'll
submit
it
up
with
the
land
use
map
amendment,
at
least
through
first
reading,.
D
D
D
Okay,
anthony.
D
C
I
have
no
additional
comments,
other
than
initial
comments
that
were
presented
in
trc
meetings
in
august
18th
september,
2nd,
which
have
been
acknowledged
and
addressed.
Thank.
B
You
thanks
nothing
at
this
time,
then.
Okay,.
D
Okay-
and
I
I
did
note
that
you
had
looked
at
the
the
fire
hydrant
gave
me
some
comments
on
that,
and
it
looked
like
they.
They
did
add
the
extra
ones,
because
I
looked
at
that
too.
A
Right
as
far
as
up
to
this
point
until
the
final
plans,
the
actual
plans
are
submitted,
they've
acknowledged
and
complied
with.
What
I've
asked.
F
H
H
I
did
notice
that
on
page
l62,
where
it
says
tree
canopy
pruning
letter,
nine
or
number
nine
letter
g,
it
says
eight
feet
above
finished
grade
over
sidewalks.
It's
supposed
to
be
ten
feet
per
city
ordinance
and
over
roadways
is
fourteen.
Thank
you.
E
Have
to
kill
me,
it
would
be
the
at
least
a
week
later
so
sometime
later
that
that
next
week
we
haven't
nailed
down
the
the
date
and
time
we've
got
to
work
with
all
the
entities
to
nail
that
down
as
soon
as
we
nail
it
down,
we'll
get
it
out
to
you
and
post
it
for
the
public.
So.
G
I'm
just
I'm
just
thinking
of
the
efforts
that
all
of
us
will
be
doing
for
an
october
26
public
hearing
on
the
other
items.
Is
there
any
we're.
D
E
Get
the
dates
scheduled
so
if
you
get
it
in
early
great,
but
you
know
but,
like
I
said
we're,
we
need
to
give
the
trc
at
least
a
week,
so
it
would
probably
be
you
know,
eight
or
nine
days
after
that
deadline,
so
which
would
probably
be
a
thursday
or
friday.
You
know
of
that
following
week.
That's
what
we
would
be
looking
at
for
the
date
for
the
trc,
but
so
as
soon
as
we
nail
that
down
and
confirm
it
we'll
because
it
might,
I
don't
know
what
time
of
day
it'll
be
so.
Okay.