►
From YouTube: House Commerce Committee- March 9, 2021
Description
House Commerce Committee- March 9, 2021
A
Good
morning,
everyone
it's
about
time
to
get
commercial
because
the
time
of
the
chime
says
10
30
as
far
as
my
we
guys
can
see.
So
we
are
gonna
open
up
today's
house,
full
commerce
committee,
I'm
kevin
vaughan
I'll,
be
your
host
today
now
in
session.
Before
we
get
mr
clerk,
will
you
or
madame
clerk?
Would
you
please
call
the
roll.
B
B
Chairman
faison,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
members,
I
don't
know
some
of
y'all
are
new,
doesn't
realize
this,
but
we
have
a
steam
member
of
the
tennessee
general
assembly
back
there
talking
to
representative
ryan
williams.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
that
is
former
senator
jim
tracy.
Welcome
back
to
the
best
side
of
the
tennessee
legislature,
jim.
A
C
Thank
you,
members
and
chairman
this
bill
will
allow
for
real
estate
brokers
and
realtors
to
pay
themselves
if
they
have
a
certain
type
of
corporation,
and
that's
really
all
it
does
it's
a
very
straightforward
bill,
but
that's
not
permitted.
It
has
certain
tax
consequences
now,
unless
we
change
the
law
to
their
benefit.
A
Thank
you
leader.
I
appreciate
this
bill
personally
because,
frankly,
it
addresses
the
way
that
my
business
runs
in
my
business
model.
So
what
this
does
is
this
clarifies
a
problem
that
I
didn't
even
know
I
had
so
that's
the
best
kind
of
problem
to
have
so
anyway.
Thank
you
for
bringing
this.
Do
we
have
any
questions
of
the
leader?
Yes,
chairman.
D
D
D
I
mean
franchise
fee
and
an
s
corporation
certainly
has
a
filing
fee
with
the
secretary
of
state,
so
I'm
just
again
kind
of
call
out
to
physical
review
a
surprise,
because
if
you
have
30
to
40
000
real
estate
agents
in
the
state
and
only
five
percent
form
an
llc,
you
know
you're
talking
about
significant
revenues
coming
in.
I'm
just
surprised
that
that's
not
called.
A
To
ease
your
concern
over
that
chairman
brickens,
I
I
might
add
that
while
there's
30
or
40
000
real
estate
agents,
those
are
affiliate
brokers.
You
only
have
there's
a
much
smaller
pool
of
what
they,
what
are
our
general
brokers
or
what
they
call
master
brokers
license
within
the
state.
So
that's
a
much
smaller
number.
What
this
is
going
to
do
is
this
will
allow
me
to
no
longer
township
realty
services
by
the
way
shout
out
to
all
the
hard
working
agents
at
township
back
in
collierville.
A
A
I
realize
there's
a
positive
physical
note,
but
I
don't
think
it's
it's
extraordinary
with
regards
to
that,
but
but
regardless
of
that,
while
you're,
while
you're
you're
making
a
point
here,
let
me
say
this
is
a
very
positive
piece
of
legislation
for
those
of
us
in
the
realty
community.
Let
me
clarify.
C
Resort
well
only
mr
chairman,
I
like
bringing
bills
that
you
like,
so
I'm
a
fan
of
doing
that
it
is
it.
It
specifically
says
a
broker,
philip
broker
or
other
person
licensed
by
the
real
estate
commission
may
receive
compensation
directly
to
a
business
entity
that
is
solely
owned.
So
in
a
way
both
of
you
are
right.
I
do
believe
that
chairman
vaughn's
point,
though
this
is
primarily
probably
going
to
be
used
by
master
brokers.
Is
I
mean
those
are
most
of
the
folks
that
are
going
to
utilize
it?
C
It's
open
a
little
broader,
so
you're
both
kind
of
right,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
what
chairman
vaughan
said:
that's
probably
the
folks
that
are
going
to
use
it
more
just
because
all
realtors
have
to
work
under
a
broker,
and
so
but
but
representative
bricken.
I
mean
I
can
see
your
scenario
potentially
being
included
within
this,
but
I
don't
necessarily
know
why
a
realtor
would
want
to
do
that.
A
A
Thank
you.
This
is
a
consolidation
bill
being
proposed
by
the
administration
that
deals
with
privatized,
a
lot
of
the
polygraph
commission
and
the
state
board
for
lysing
alarm
systems.
What
it's
going
to
do
is
it
will
take
those
from
being
programs
with
boards
and
put
them
into
a
single
commissioner
rand
program,
the
it's
just
an
effort
to
streamline
some
of
our
boards
and
agencies
and
with
that
I'll
open
it
up.
D
A
E
E
House
bill
54
comes
today
from
the
tennessee
underground
utility
damage
enforcement
board,
the
board,
charged
with
examining
data
regarding
underground
utility
damages
and
making
recommendations
to
the
general
assembly
to
update
the
law.
This
bill
represents
recommended
changes
to
the
law,
to
improve
safety,
reduce
damage
to
underground
utilities,
federal
rules
and
regulations.
E
A
A
A
F
F
A
F
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
further
questions
for
chairman
curcio,
seeing
none
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
house
bill
926
to
see
whether
or
not
we
want
to
send
it
to
calendar
and
rules.
All
those
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
have
one.
No,
please
let
your
no
be
recorded
with
the
clerk
and
with
that
you're
off
to
calendar
and
rules.
Thank.
A
G
G
This
course
will
train
these
professionals
to
recognize
potential
domestic
violence
and
how
to
share
resources
with
clients
they
believe
are
in
need
or
in
danger.
Nearly
half
of
all
crimes
in
tennessee
are
domestic
violence
related
and
tennessee
rates.
Ninth
in
the
nation
for
the
rate
that
men
kill
women,
I
served
as
foreman
of
the
williamson
county
grand
jury
for
years,
and
I
quickly
discovered
domestic
violence
does
not
discriminate
and
impacts.
Individuals,
regardless
of
race,
economic
status,
age
or
education
level.
G
Most
victims
of
domestic
violence
will
not
report
their
abuse
to
law
enforcement,
but
they
are
more
likely
to
tell
someone
they
trust
or
with
whom
they
have
a
long-standing
relationship.
Salon
professionals
see
their
clients
on
a
regular
and
routine
basis.
Even
during
this
pandemic.
Salon
professionals
who
typically
create
special
relationships
with
their
clients
and
hear
about
their
personal
lives,
are
in
the
perfect
position
to
identify
physical
signs
of
abuse.
G
A
G
Yes,
that
amendment
we
put
on
of-
I
have
1593
yes,
sir.
That's
it
right,
and
that
was
just
to
correct
a
a
technical
correction.
It
doesn't
really
rewrite
the
bill,
but
it
makes
the
bill
because
we
had
the
tennessee
coalition
to
end
domestic
violence
and
sexual
assault
listed
incorrectly
in
the
original
legislation.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
and
so
first
folks
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
that
amendment.
Voting
on
amendment,
one
all
those
in
favor
of
amendment,
one
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
hearing,
none
amendment
one
is
attached
to
house
bill
120
and
before
we
vote
on
this,
let's
say
I
understand
that
the
ladies
that
have
been
assisting
you
on
this
have
done
a
great
job
and
we
appreciate
y'all
bringing
this
this
to
to
the
focus
and
to
the
forefront-
and
we
appreciate
you
for
being
here
today
with
that.
A
H
H
I
I
don't
know
that
I
completely
get
other
than
it's
convenient.
I
don't
know
that
I
completely
get
having
hair
stylists.
Take
this
training,
there's
really
not
a
nexus
to
their
their
professional
craft
or
skill.
Having
you
know
the
licensure
that
they
go
through,
they
do
a
lot
of
continuing
education.
We
have,
we
probably
have
a
surplus
of
continuing
education
for
a
lot
of
these
registered
professionals
and
for
licensed
people,
a
certain
surplus
of
continuing
education,
and
so
I
completely
get
the
issue
it's
terrible.
H
H
I
wanted
to
say
that,
because
sometimes
we
just
go
down
weird
roads
and
I'm
not
saying
it
is
not
worthy.
I'm
not
saying
hey,
we
should
all.
Maybe
we
should
all
take
this
training
as
legislators.
Maybe
this
should
be
part
of
our
annual
or
bi-annual
training
that
we
do
this
as
legislators,
it's
just
using
the
force
of
law
to
force
people
to
go
through
the
training.
Even
if
there
may
be
a
good
outcome,
I
just
I
just
don't
get
it.
I
don't
see
the
nexus.
H
I
I
to
me.
It's
just
there's
no
nexus.
It's
kind
of
weird.
It
seems
like
it's
convenient
and
it
is
I
get
it
and
listen.
If
I
could,
if
I
had
the
the
the
gumption
and
the
the
ability
to
force
licensed
trades
to,
you
know,
take
continuing
education
and
something
I
wanted
them
to
take
continuing
education
in,
like
maybe
recognizing
signs
of
mental
illness
or
something
like
that
boy.
H
I
I'd
love
it,
but
they
do
really
don't
see
the
nexus,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
I'll
probably
vote
for
it
anyway,
but
I
just
I
don't
understand
other
than
you
know
being
able
to
just
get
it
done.
I
I
don't
understand
and
the
convenience
yes,
it's
probably
convenient.
I
don't
understand
why
we
would
do
this
with
these
licensed.
G
Thank
you
for
those
comments
chairman
and,
and
I
understand,
because
I
fought
to
reduce
the
training
requirements
for
locksmiths,
but
this
is
different.
Let
me
just
share
with
you
a
note
I
received
last
year
when
I
first
introduced
this
legislation
from
an
owner
of
a
salon
and
also
a
member
of
the
board
of
cosmetology
she
states
as
an
owner
of
two
schools
and
also
a
board
member.
G
I
feel
that
educating
my
students
on
what
to
look
for
if
they
have
a
client
that
is
being
abused
in
any
way
or
shape
or
form,
is
essential
in
today's
times,
because
of
this
epidemic
we
have
with
domestic
violence,
adding
one
hour
training
in
their
initial
course
of
1500
hours
to
the
warning.
Signs
of
abuse
would
be
no
problem
in
the
school.
It's
no
different
than
us
teaching
how
to
check
for
skin
cancer,
so
so
many
lives
could
be
saved.
Also
when
this
was
presented
to
the
board
of
cosmetology,
they
had
no
issues
with
this.
D
I
I
I
think
covet
proved
one
thing:
kids,
that
aren't
seen
by
doctors,
kids,
that
aren't
seen
by
schools,
abuse
was
not
reported
and
therefore
our
abuse
numbers
went
down,
but
trust
me
they
were
still
occurring
even
though
the
numbers
weren't
showing
they
were
occurring.
They
were
just
not
visible
and
when
we
have
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
be
seen
by
another
pair
of
eyes
and
another
pair
of
hands
that
could
possibly
help
a
woman
who's
crying
out
for
help.
Why
would
we
not
pass
this
bill.
G
J
G
No,
this
is
provided
free,
in
fact,
one
of
the
largest
companies
in
the
u.s
that
provides
supplies
and
services
to
cosmetologists
and
barbers
have
developed
this
also
free
for
the
license
holders,
but
also
there's
other
options
available,
if
approved
by
the
board.
They
could
take
it
in
person
online,
and
so
it's
free
at
no
cost
yeah.
J
J
You
know
the
grief
I
hear
from
her
all
the
time
a
lot
of
these
times.
These
stylists
are
almost
therapists
and
counselors
if
you
will
and
they
do
an
awesome
job
with
it.
I've
never
seen
where
this
needs
to
be
required.
I
can
understand
if
it's
highly
recommended,
I
kind
of
see
it
as
a
little
bit
of
a
government
overreach,
because
if
we're
going
to
go
here
or
we're
going
to
have
realtors
do
this,
are
we
going
to
have
locksmiths
do
this?
Who
else?
J
How
far
are
we
going
to
go
with
government
because
they're
very
stylish,
that's
1500
hours,
1500
hours
to
learn
to
cut
hair?
I
think
it's
overreach
and
I
tend
to
agree
with
my
colleague
from
from
wilson
county,
but
thank
you
for
bringing
awareness
to
to
a
serious
issue.
I
just
don't
know
if
we
need
to
mandate
this
on.
On
small
businesses
that
are
these
girls
and
stylists
are
struggling,
they
are
struggling,
so
just
want
to
make
my
piece.
Thank
you.
G
G
Why
do
we
need
it,
then,
for
education
to
be
aware
of?
Oh
I'm
sorry,
mr
chairman,
to
make
them
aware
there
is
a
problem
in
this
state
and
also
to
make
them
aware
to
look
for
the
signs
of
abuse
or
neglect,
and
they
can
refer
their
clients
who
they
develop,
a
relationship
with
to
the
appropriate
help.
It
may
save
a
life.
I
learned
his
form
of
the
grand
jury.
K
Powell,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
just
want
to
thank
the
sponsor
for
bringing
this
piece
of
legislation.
I
think
it's
important
and,
as
others
have
alluded
to
you
know,
cosmetologists
and
barbers
and
stylists
are
oftentimes
playing
many
roles.
Besides
just
making
us
look
good
and
keeping
us
well
kept,
they
you
know,
oftentimes,
are
therapists
and
hear
from
customers
all
different
types
of
stories
and
see
things.
K
So
I
mean
we're
talking
about
the
percent
of
their
total
time
to
spend
on
this
small
issue,
and
I
think
that
that's
a
small
amount
that
they
can
spend
just
to
help
in
a
situation
they
might
find
themselves
in
so
they're
more
knowledgeable
on
how
to
address
that,
because,
unlike
some
of
the
other
professions
that
were
referenced,
I
feel
like
that.
The
the
difference
here
is
that
the
amount
of
interaction
that
they
have
with
customers
on
a
weekly
monthly
basis,
and
so
I
think,
that's
important
in
a
lot
of
communities.
K
E
G
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
again
I
I
think
I
agree
with
my
friend
from
rutherford
county.
I
just
see
it
as
a
government
over
region
and
we
must
be
careful
where
we
stop
and
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
a
good
thing.
It's
it's
wonderful,
but
you
know
plumbers
and
electricians
go
into
homes,
they're
licensed.
H
We
could
require
them
to
have
training
on
mental
illness
on
the
signs
of
drug
addiction,
on
children
of
child
abuse,
on
many
different
things,
there's
many
different
professionals
who
we
could
require
similar
training.
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
a
good
thing.
I'm
not!
Please,
don't
think
I'm
a
terrible
person
for
that.
I
just
see
it
as
a
bit
of
government
overreach.
I
think
you
know
any
professional
organization
could
offer
this
training
and
certainly
people
could
take
it.
H
G
G
I
went
about
six
times
a
year
to
the
to
get
her
hair
done
and
now,
since
the
pandemic,
if
she's
watching
this,
I'm
gonna
get
in
trouble,
but
she's
letting
her
hair
go
grey
and
it
looks
great
okay.
So
but
again,
there's
that
shows
fancy
or
excuse
me,
adam
chairman.
I
know
I'm
dead
so
but
anyway,
but
that
shows
that
relationship
and
how
the
pandemic
is.
The
representative
has
said
that
this
pandemic
has
caused
a
problem
and
I'm
gonna
stop
right.
Now:
okay,.
L
L
L
This
is
a
resource
that
is
available
to
you,
so
the
stylist,
in
my
opinion,
would
want
to
be
in
a
position
to
help
and
assist
somebody
that
they
know
that's
been
a
part
of
their
life.
They've
watched
their
children
grow
up
now,
their
kids
are
coming
to
them
to
get
their
hair
done.
So
it's
a
relationship
thing
going
on
with
your
stylist,
your
barber
and
it's
okay
to
me:
have
them
do
25
minutes
or
an
hour
of
just
learning
about
resources
and
ways
that
we
can
help
our
community
and
the
people?
L
We
know,
I
don't
see
it
as
government
overreach.
I
see
this
opportunity
for
the
government
to
equip
its
citizens
to
make
a
difference,
and
I
see
this
bill
as
the
first
step
in
having
in
trying
to
make
that
difference.
So
I
commend
you
for
for
bringing
it
back.
I
commend
you,
for
you
know
getting
the
people
together
to
support
it
and
just
sticking
to
your
belief
that
this
is
going
to
help
somebody
because
it
is,
I
can
tell
you
it
is
there
is
a
relationship
you
have
with
your
cosmetologist.
L
The
member
said
they
lay
you
back
in
the
chair
and
there's
this
soothing
feeling
of
confidence
and
camaraderie
that
you
have
we've
experienced
in
the
military
that
that
camaraderie
goes
a
long
way
and
that's
how
they
feel
and
they
trust
them
that
if
they
know
of
a
resource-
and
they
tell
them
of
a
resource
that
person
just
might
go
because
it
was
somebody
that
they
knew
and
they
trusted
referred
them
and
that's
all
this
bill
is
doing
so
appreciate
you
bringing
it
look
forward
to
sponsor
signing
on.
If
I
can
and
thank
you,
mr
chair.
A
A
B
Thank
you,
chairman,
vaughn
and
committee
good
afternoon.
This
is
house
bill,
947
we're
looking
at
drafting
code
3403.
This
is
a
local
bill
for
hamilton
county
and
this
permits
an
annual
road
race
that
benefits
a
charitable
event.
It
also
permits
an
auction
of
antique
vehicles.
This
has
the
opportunity
for
the
motor
car
commission
to
review
this
request
and
permit
the
local
stroke
intervention
committee
to
have
a
charitable
event
and
raise
about
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
M
A
M
M
This
bill
would
allow
for
would
require
someone
to
if
they
pulled
their
building
permit,
to
build
their
own
home,
they
would
have
to
go
to
restaurant
deeds
and
say
as
a
building
that
they
were
the
building
permit
puller
in
this
case,
and
in
so
doing
it
would
stay
on
the
rest
of
our
deeds
until
four
years.
You
could
then,
after
four
years,
remove
that
affidavit
at
the
redshirt
deeds.
M
It
still
preserves
the
right.
If
you
build
your
own
home,
you
still
have
to
retain
ownership
of
that
home
by
state
statute
for
two
years.
This
is
to
keep
people
from
continuing
to
pull,
building
permits
without
being
a
licensed
contractor.
So
this
also
is
being
supported
by
the
banking
institutions
as
well
as
realtors,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
A
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
members
for
allow
me
to
ask
this
one
question.
I
I
was
telling
those
the
chairman.
I
had
a
question
about
this
bill,
so
you
you,
you
build
it
and
you
have
to
keep
it
in
your
possession,
for
you
said
two
years
before,
and
so
when
you
do
decide
to
sell
the
property
is,
are
there
any
disclosures
that
you
need
to
make
to
the
potential
buyer
of
the
property?
Could
you
explain
that
part
to
us.
M
Yes,
the
the
way
the
affidavit
system
works,
it's
it's
that
filed
at
the
registrar
of
deeds.
So
whenever
you
go
for
a
loan
closing
as
the
home
buyer
and
they
pull
any
liens
or
any
information
at
the
registrar
of
deeds,
office
it'll
be
there.
So
a
disclosure
wouldn't
be
necessary.
A
real
estate
agent
can
could
ask
the
homeowner,
but
does
the
statutory
require
the
homeowner
to
say
that
they're,
the
ones
that
built
it?
The
affidavit
would
replace
the
need
to
do
that.