►
Description
House Criminal Justice Committee - March 23, 2022 - House Hearing Room 2
B
A
You
very
much
members.
We
have
a
full
calendar
today,
but
before
we
get
started
any
personal
orders
representative
griffey,
you
recognized.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
It's
my
distinct
privilege
and
honor
to
have
a
number
of
the
stuart
county
high
school
seniors
here
with
us
today,
catherine
mcgee,
rayleigh,
gafford,
grace
estes,
ainsley,
elliott,
adam
falk,
eli,
beaugaard,
gavin
smith,
shannon
odell,
grace,
chaney,
allie
swimwell
and
both
the
bramletts
who
are
carly
bramlett
and
caitlin
brandt,
they're,
crackle,
jack
basketball
players
and
they're
all
from
stuart
county,
as
well
as
their
director
cal
mallory.
Would
you
all
please
stand
up,
so
we
can
give
you
a
round
of
applause.
If
you're
here.
A
A
Leonard
lambert
is
here
that's
his
personal
order.
Yes
excellent.
Well,
like
I
said
we
have
a
full
calendar.
A
couple
of
announcements
before
we
get
started
item
number
four,
which
is
house
bill.
1934
is
off
notice
without
objection
off
notice,.
A
D
Thank
you,
chairman
members
of
committee.
There
is
an
amendment
on
the
bill
barcode
zero
one,
six,
two,
seven
one.
I
believe
that
is
the
chairman's
amendment.
A
D
Yes,
chairman,
thank
you,
members
of
committee.
This
amendment
in
this
bill
creates
three
new
statutes,
that
of
especially
aggravated
rape,
especially
aggravated
rape
of
a
child
and
then
a
third
of
a
grave
torture,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
the
chairman
for
his
amendment.
The
amendment
clarified
some
issues
with
the
bill
that
hit
that
he
and
his
staff
found
and
clarified
that
there
would
not
be
any
double
jeopardy
if
you
were
charged
with
any
of
these
offenses,
you
could
not
be
charged
with
the
lesser
offenses
of
rape.
D
It
also
put
a
trigger
element
into
the
bill.
That
said
on
the
grave
torture
that
the
federal
court
would
have
to
rule
or
have
a
ruling
in
support
of
legislation
that
was
passed
or
new
ruling
and
support
of
kentucky
versus
louisiana.
D
So,
basically,
you
would
have
to
have
the
federal
courts
have
some
ruling
before
the
death
penalty.
Phase
of
the
grave
torture
would
take
effect,
but
for
the
first
two
offenses
especially
aggravated
rape
especially
aggravated
rape
of
a
child,
those
would
be
life
sentences
without
parole.
So
thank
you
for
that
chairman
also.
D
The
amendment
changed
the
date
of
especially
aggravated
rate
of
a
child
to
18
or
below,
and
I
appreciate
that
we've
created
somewhat
of
a
gap
for
our
13
to
8
year
old
18
year
olds,
with
aggravated
rape
aggravated
rape
is,
I
believe,
13
or
below.
D
A
Thank
you
for
the
explanation,
but,
more
importantly,
thank
you
for
bringing
the
bill
it's
very
important
and,
and
while
it
was
a
collaborative
effort,
but
I
I
commend
you
for
for
doing
this
work,
so
thank
you
for
your
work
on
it.
Any
questions
for
the
sponsor
of
the
amendment
question's
been
called
all
those
in
favor
of
attaching
amendment
coded
16271
to
house
bill.
2244,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
that
was
opposed.
A
D
A
E
This
bill
was
brought
to
me
by
our
we're
seeking
a
solution
to
a
problem
with
this
legislation.
Her
14
year
old
son
was
photographed
or
videoed.
While
he
was
using
the
restroom
at
a
local
high
school.
E
Of
course,
the
young
man
was
terribly
embarrassed,
but
because
of
the
way
our
current
unlawful
photography
law
was
written,
it
was
not
used
for
sexual
gratification.
So
when
she
sought
relief
through
the
courts,
there
was
no
relief
to
be
found.
So
that's
what
this
piece
of
legislation
does.
It
amends
the
current
unlawful
photography
law
by
amending
it
by
adding.
E
That
would
happen
if
a
person
was
knowingly
if
a
person
knowingly
photographed
are
caused
to
be
photographed.
An
individual
without
prior
effective
cons,
consent
of
the
individual
or
in
the
case
of
a
minor,
without
consent
of
that
minor's
parents
or
guardian.
That
of
the
photograph,
would
include
the
unclothed
intimate
area
of
the
individual
and
would
be
considered
offensive
or
embarrassing
to
the
individual
that
the
photograph
was
taken
for
the
purpose
of
offending
intimidating,
embarrassing,
ridiculing
or
harassing
the
victim
and
was
disseminated
by
the
defendant.
E
This
is
happening
all
too
often
in
our
school
systems
and
just
in
general,
with
a
lot
of
our
younger
people,
our
students.
E
It
happened
in
a
school
just
recently
where
a
young
man
was
just
photographed
coming
out
of
the
shower.
They
took
that
photograph
and
passed
it
out
among
the
school
kids.
It
was
just
a
photograph
on
a
phone,
but
it's
an
embarrassing
situation
and-
and
I
hope
that
you
will
support
my
legislation
to
give
a
little
teeth
to
thee
and
I'll,
give
a
little
support
to
the
legal
community
to
try
to
curtail
some
of
this
behavior
by
people
that
decide.
This
is
a
fun
thing
to
do.
A
Thank
you
vice
chairman
rudder,
it's
important
work
and
first
on
my
list,
I
have
chairman
halsey,
you
recognized.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
I'm
gonna
vote
for
your
bill
and
I
like
it.
I
just
had
one
question.
Yes,
on
social
media,
a
lot
of
times,
you
can
see
short
video
clips
or
pictures
of
what's
called
the
late
night
clientele
at
walmart.
Some
of
those
photographs
to
me
would
be
pretty
embarrassing.
I
didn't
know
if,
if
this
bill
would
make
that
illegal
in
that
setting-
and
I
just
wanted
your
opinion
on
it-
I'm
going
to
vote
for
the
bill,
but
that's
what
I
was
thinking
last.
E
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Just
a
quick
question.
I
said
you,
you
know
this
is
a
problem
in
high
schools.
How
is
did
how
would
this
bill
impact?
The
juvenile
offender
vice.
E
E
So
I
asked
that
question
and
that
would
depend
on
the
person
that
took
the
photographs
the
way
I
understood
it,
the
person
that
took
the
photographs
legal.
You
know
if
he'd
been
in
trouble
before
it
would
be
handled
in
the
juvenile
courts,
just
like
a
juvenile
coming
before
the
court
system
and
if
he
was
found
guilty
that
would
be
a
class
b
misdemeanor.
F
E
F
A
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
in
committee.
Yes,
sir,
this
bill
was
brought
to
me
by
a
constituent,
and
this
bill
increases
the
penalty
for
using
deadly
weapon
using
a
deadly
weapon
or
inflicting
serious
bodily
injury
on
an
officer.
It
takes
this
from
a
c
felony
to
a
b
felony
and
increases
the
senate's
range
from
3
to
15
years
to
8
to
30
years.
A
A
A
That
amendment
does
make
the
bill.
Is
that
correct,
but
it
adds
to
it.
Okay,
then,
if
you
could,
please
explain
your
amendment.
G
The
what
the
amendment
does-
and
it
was
coming
with
the
time
frame
that
images
would
be
held
any
image
collected
or
obtained
by
team-
is
through
the
use
of
a
drone
for
the
purpose
of
damage.
Assessment
may
be
retained
by
the
agency
for
no
longer
than
one
year
or
if
the
disaster
is
declared
a
major
disaster
by
the
president
of
the
united
states
for
the
retention
period
required
by
the
federal
emergency
management
agency
for
data
related
to
damage
assessment.
All
images
captured
for
any
other
purpose
must
be
deleted
within
15
business
days.
A
Members
you've
heard
the
explanation
and
I
have
been
advised
this
amendment
was
a
full
rewrite
so
not
to
contradict
you
there,
but
it
does
make
the
bill
so
you've
heard
the
explanation
of
the
amendment
which
makes
the
bill
any
questions
for
the
sponsor
questions
been
called
all
those
in
favor
of
attaching
amendment
coded
14658
to
house
bill.
2178,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
you
adopt.
G
Good
example
of
that
was
humphries
county
after
the
flooding
that
was
declared
a
presidential
disaster,
but
shortly
thereafter
our
constituents,
citizens
of
west
tennessee
were
hit
by
the
tornadoes
and,
of
course,
what
the
tornado
did
here
in
nashville
2010
flooding.
I
see
the
necessity
of
this
bill.
Mr
chairman,.
A
Members
you've
heard
the
explanation,
any
questions
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
of
sending.
Oh
I'm
sorry,
chairman
dixie
right
now.
F
Just
a
quick
question:
this
is
this
only
pertains
to
just
for
if
there
was
a
natural
disaster
that
they
have
the
ability
to
use
that
airspace
above
it.
It's
just
that
narrow
on
this.
F
G
Absolutely
and
what
we
found,
of
course
in
in
your
subcommittee,
many
of
the
members
spoke
about
being
on
the
fault
line
in
in
west
tennessee.
What
about
the
tornadoes
when
they
hit
here?
Of
course,
we
were
in
session
and
it
was
very
difficult
for
me
to
make
it
to
the
capitol.
Of
course,
we
took
that
week
off
to
get
roads
cleared
before
then,
and
even
when
the
floods
happened
in
in
my
district
in
humphreys
county,
I
went
to
visit
friends
and
family
in
in
waverly
and
looking
at
their
homes.
G
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Seeing
no
other
questions
we're
ready
to
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
sending
house
bill
2178
as
amended
to
finance,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
syria
to
finance.
Thank
you,
chairman
of
the
committee.
Thank
you,
sir.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
five
house
bill
2424
by
representative
sparks
sir.
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second
you're
recognized.
H
Yeah,
thank
you
chairman.
Thank
you
committee.
This
bill
2424
is
brought
to
you
to
me
by
mayor
bill
ketron,
our
county
commissioners,
pedestrian
david
gammon,
craig
harris
smyrna,
mayor
mayor,
esther,
reed
and
our
town
manager.
Brian
hercules
basically
increases
the
penalty
for
mitigating
criminal
littering
from
a
class
c
misdemeanor
punishable
a
fif
dollar
fine
to
a
class
b
misdemeanor
punishable
by
a
500
fine.
A
H
F
H
F
Okay,
this
accounts
for
any
littering
right.
So
that's
sure,
because
that's
a
problem
here
in
davidson
county.
You
know
people
have
a
lot
of
do
a
lot
of
remodeling
now
and
people
just
find
an
open
space.
They
just
throw
it
off
and
and
actually
one
time
I
actually
took
a
photograph
of
someone
doing
that
in
a
license
plate.
But
unfortunately
it's
a
slap
on
the
wrist,
it's
cheaper
to
pay
to
find
and
actually
go
to
the
dump
and
do
it
the.
H
F
A
We're
ready
to
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
sending
house
bill
2424
to
calendar
and
rules,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed,
sir.
You
had
to
calendar.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Sir
item
number
six
house
bill
2009
by
representative
gillespie.
I
see
him
here,
sir.
You
have
an
amendment
coded
one
four,
eight
two
eight.
I
believe
it
makes
the
bill
that
so
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
that
without
objection.
Members
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
get
this
amendment
on
the
bill
and
then
we'll
hear
the
description.
B
Amended
sir,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
committee.
What
this
bill
does
simply
is
if
you
are
convicted
of
aggravated
assault
and
you
do
that
crime,
while
firing
off
a
gun
from
a
moving
vehicle
or
from
a
vehicle,
it
would
just
escalate
that
to
the
next
felony
level.
Up
and
with
that,
I
welcome
any
questions.
A
Representative
gillespie,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
bringing
this.
I
know
this
is
something
that's
very
important
to
your
community,
something
that
you
know
if
anybody
who's
back
home
is
wondering
whether
or
not
you're
up
here
doing
the
people's
business.
You
absolutely
are
so
I
know
this
is.
This
is
something
that's
near
and
dear
to
your
heart
back
home.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
bill
and
I
appreciate
getting
to
meet
with
you
on
it.
Earlier
chairman
doggett,
I
have
you
on
my
list.
I
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I'm
not
sure
I
understood
your
question,
but
let
me
what
what
this
would
do
is
if
you
commit
aggravated
assault
and
you
were
convicted
of
the
same
offense
and
that
offense
was
while
you
were
shooting
a
gun
from
a
vehicle,
then
it
would
be
one
felony
level
did
that
answer
your
question
chairman
doggett.
A
Okay,
seeing
none
others
we're
ready
to
vote
all
those
in
favor
of
sending
house
bill.
2009
is
amended
to
finance,
please
signify
by
saying
aye.
That
was
opposed,
sir.
You
had
to
finance.
Thank
you,
sir.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
seven
house
bill
2257
by
representative
parkinson,
sir.
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
I
see
an
amendment
coded
one
three,
nine
one
three,
and
that
does
not
make
the
bill.
If
you
could
please
describe
that
amendment.
Yes,.
J
Sir,
mr
chairman,
when
I
first
had
the
bill
drafted,
it
had
littering
on
there
and
I
wanted
it
to
be
a
more
serious
form
of
littering
to
be
added
to
the
to
the
bill.
A
Members
you've
heard
the
explanation:
we're
ready
to
adopt
all
those
in
favor
of
attaching
amendment
code
13913
to
house
bill
2252,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
that
was
opposed
you
adopt
on
the
bill
as
amended.
Is
there
anything
you
wish
to
add?
Thank.
J
You
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
committee,
and
and
staff.
I
appreciate
your
indulgence
back
in
2015,
we
passed
the
neighborhood
protection
act,
which
allowed
neighborhood
associations
watch
groups
and
others
to
petition
a
judge
for
an
injunction
for
certain
crimes
that
were
targeted
within
the
boundaries
of
their
neighborhoods.
J
Some
of
those
crimes
include,
if
you
give
me
one
second,
I'm
sorry,
I
apologize
gang
activity,
drug
dealing,
theft,
vandalism,
prostitution,
rape,
burglary
and
what
what
we're
doing
is
adding
aggravated
criminal
littering
are
basically
dumping
into
as
one
of
those
crimes
that
are
part
of
the
list
of
crimes
that
can
be
petitioned
to
a
judge
by
the
organization
for
an
injunction
against
a
an
individual
who
has
been
convicted
three
times
of
doing
it
within
the
boundaries
of
that
organization.
I
A
A
You,
sir
next
up
item
number
eight
house
bill
1248
by
representative
thompson,
sir,
you
have
a
motion
and
a
second
I
see
an
amendment
coded
one,
six,
two,
seven
zero.
It
is
a
rewrite,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
that
on
the
bill.
All
those
in
favor
of
attaching
amendment
code
16270
to
house
bill
1248,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
you
adopt,
sir,
on
your
bills,
a.
K
This
minute
simply
makes
a
change
in
the
code
for
a
theft
of
a
firearm,
it's
known
currently
in
the
grading
system,
theft
of
far
between
2500
and
less
than
10
000
in
value
as
a
class
d
felony,
this
bill
adds
theft
of
a
firearm
from
a
law
enforcement
vehicle
is
a
class
d
felony
if
even
if
valued
below
2500-
and
it
was
like
other
offenses,
it
emphasizes
that
crimes
against
law
enforcement
are
especially
egregious
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
L
Mr
chairman-
and
this
is
really
on
the
new
amendment
so
mr
truman,
the
question
may
be
to
you:
instead
of
the
sponsor
either
one
I
don't
care,
what
is
the
definition
in
as
to
the
amendment
to
law
enforcement
vehicle?
Do
we
have
that
defined
somewhere.
L
Leader,
lambert
famous
sherman,
as
they
look
that
up,
I
mean
that,
just
as
the
members
give
a
description
of
the
bill
and
the
amendment
on
there,
that's
what
brought
that
to
mind.
Ordinarily,
I
know
mr
chairman
you're
not
a
big
fan
of
undefined
terms,
and
so
it
literally
made
me
think
about
that,
just
to
make
sure
we
do
have
a
definition
of
that
term.
If
we're
going
to
criminalize
this
at
a
higher
level,.
B
Fogerty
legal
services
there's
no
specific
definition
of
law
enforcement
vehicle
in
the
code,
there's
a
definition
of
marked
law
enforcement
vehicle.
So
it
would
just
be
the
ordinary
up
to
the
courts
to
determine
the
ordinary
meaning
of
that
term.
L
Recognized,
mr,
when
we
go
back
into
session
sorry,
yes,.
A
L
Mr
to
the
sponsor
the
bill,
and-
and
you
know
this
is
a
bill
that
I
support.
What
are
your
intentions
on
the
definition
of
law
enforcement
vehicle?
What
are
you
trying
to
get
at
here.
K
L
Leader
labyrinth,
so
the
the
definition
you
would
be
looking
for
here,
because
we
don't
have
an
enhancement
that
exists
in
the
code
like
this,
so
we're
trying
to
create
one
would
be.
Then,
if
I
may
rephrase
what
you
said
and
tell
me
if
this
is
right,
if
the
vehicle
is
owned
and
operated
by
law
enforcement
agencies,
so
in
other
words
the
law
enforcement,
she
owns
it,
it's
not
just
a
private
vehicle
from
some
individual,
it's
it's
owned
or
operated
by
the
law
enforcement
agency.
Is
that
your
intention?
L
That's
my
intention,
mr
and
I
hate
to
do
this
in
front
of
the
bill.
Well,
there
may
be
some
other
questions,
but
before
we
vote
on
this
phil,
if
you
can
come
back
to
me,
please
certainly.
A
And
I
want
to
clarify
too
because,
as
I'm
looking
in
dashboard,
I
do
see
my
my
name
at
the
top
of
this
amendment
and,
of
course
it
racked
my
brain.
The
purpose
of
the
amendment
was
to
fix
the
effective
date
this
bill
was
left
over
from
last
year,
so
I
apologize
that
I
had
a
blank
look
on
my
face
when
you
asked
me
about
my
amendment,
but
it
was,
it
was
an
effective
date
change.
Everything
else
was
the
same
so,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
line
of
questioning
next
is
representative
griffey.
C
You,
mr
chairman,
and
I
support
this
bill,
but
like
leader,
lambert
and
chairman
curcio,
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
we
define
that
term
because
someone
could
break
into
a
vehicle
and
not
realizing
it's
owned
by
the
city
or
county
or
whatever,
and
I
don't
think
I
think
we're
going
to
run
into
perhaps
constitutional
problems.
For
some
of
that,
I
had
no
knowledge
that
this
is
a
police
vehicle.
But
if
it's
obvious
from
markings
or
you
know
any
indicia
of
law
enforcement,
stuff's
locked
up,
they
got
a
radio.
C
They've
got
a
shotgun
in
it,
something
like
that
and
it's
stolen
from
that
vehicle,
that's
the
vehicle.
I
think
we
want
to
try
to
impose
this
enhancement
on
and
I
am
in
fully
in
support
of
this
enhancement.
So
maybe
we
ought
to
think
about
see
if
we
can
fix
this
language.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you.
Yes,.
A
Sir,
thank
you
and
I'll
remind
the
committee.
Just
just
so.
We
know
parliamentary,
where
we
are
this.
The
first
time
this
bill
has
been
calendared
in
this
committee,
so
lots
of
lots
of
time
and
opportunity
to
fix
something.
If
we
wanted
to
do
that,
so
leader
lambreth,
I
think
you
wanted
me
to
come
back
to
you
at
the
end.
L
Mr,
since
we
have
probably
several
more
weeks
in
this
committee,
I
would
make
a
motion
to
roll
this
one
week.
Let
the
sponsor
get
with
legal
and
get
a
definition
of
law
enforcement
vehicle
because
I
it
doesn't
sound
like
his
intention
is
you
know
the
private
vehicle
of
someone
who
works
in
law
enforcement
is
sitting
in
their
driveway
and
it
gets
broken
into
for
us
to
elevate
that
penalty.
Now
I
I
would
also
be
perfectly
fine
for
the
sponsor
to
consider
this.
L
I
mean
I
support
increasing
the
penalty
to
a
de-family,
regardless
of
whose
vehicle
it's
stolen.
Out
of
I
mean,
if
you
want
to
increase
the
penalty
of
stealing
a
firearm
out
of
a
vehicle
there's
almost
not,
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
get
to
a
point
where
that
would
be
too
high
for
me,
there's
only
one
reason
why
someone's
stealing
that
gun
and
that's
to
utilize
it
in
criminal
activity,
but
that's
up
to
the
sponsor
of
the
bill.
A
We
have
a
proper
motion
properly
seconded.
We
dispense
with
that
motion
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
to
roll
one
week,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
that
was
opposed,
sir.
We
roll
one
week.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
nine
house
bill
2097
by
leader
lamberth.
So
are
you
recognized,
sir?
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second.
I
see
no
amendments.
You
move
forward.
L
Thank
you
chairman.
I
mean
this
just
creates
the
rico
bill
for
tennessee
I
mean
this
is
similar
to
what
they
have
on
the
federal
level
and
in
other
states,
and
it
deals
with
organized
criminal
activity.
A
A
A
Second,
sir,
you
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
I
do
see
an
amendment
if
you
wish
to
move
that
coded
one.
Four,
nine,
six,
nine!
Yes,.
L
Famous
chairman-
and
the
amendment
makes
the
bill
this
just
cleans
up
something
from
last
year
that
I
don't
think
any
of
us
intended
to
do
and
again
I
will
say
clearly,
as
I've
said
before,
I
do
not
believe
that
we
extended
the
the
matrix
for
technical
violations
and
violations
in
the
misdemeanor
court.
I
mean
that
those
are
county
judges,
county
jails,
misdemeanor
offenses.
L
L
I
think
it's
a
very
weak
legal
argument
that
this
extended
into
misdemeanor
court,
but
this
would
clarify
to
make
it
crystal
clear
that
the
matrix
we
set
up
last
year
applies
to
felonies
and
nothing
changed
last
year
when
it
comes
to
misdemeanor
probation
violations,
that's
completely
up
to
the
judge.
They
can
do
whatever
they
want
to
again
within
the
other
laws
that
are
on
the
books.
The
other
issue
that
came
up-
and
this
came
from
a
judge
in
davidson
county
who
handles
these
cases
all
the
time.
L
L
So,
if
say
a
stalker,
a
rapist,
someone
who's,
burglar,
someone's
home,
is
ordered
to
have
no
contact
with
those
victims
under
the
current
law
that
we
passed
last
year.
That
would
be
considered
a
technical
violation
and
and
would
not
even
potentially
rise
to
the
level
of
a
probation
violation
to
get
back
in
front
of
the
judge.
I
consider
that
a
very
serious,
egregious
conduct,
if
someone
is
ordered
by
the
judge,
to
have
no
contact
with
the
victim
and
this
bill
would
just
preserve
that
again.
L
A
Members
you've
heard
the
explanation
we
are
on
the
amendment.
It's
coded
14969.,
all
those
in
favor
of
attaching
that
amendment
to
house
bill
2118,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
you
adopt
any
further
questions
for
the
sponsor
question's
been
called
all
those
in
favor
of
sending
house
bill
2118
as
amended
to
finance,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye,
as
opposed
sir,
you
head
to
finance
famous
chairman
members
of
the
committee.
Thank
you
very
much.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
12
house
bill
2020
by
chairman
duggan.
I
I
What
this
bill
would
seek
to
do
is
require
magistrates
to
set
the
defendant's
bail
and
amount
no
less
than
twice,
which
is
customarily
set
for
the
offense
charged
of
domestic
violence.
If
the
defendant
was
arrested
for
such
abuse
and
the
victim
was
strangled
or
attempted
to
be
strangled
or
if
the
victim
had
threats
made
against
their
lives,
we
passed
it
out
of
the
subcommittee
last
week.
Unfortunately,
mr
chairman,
it
did
not
make
it
through
the
senate
judiciary
committee
today,
and
so
with
that
as
awful
as
I
can
be.
A
A
That
takes
us
to
item
number
13
house
bill
2135
by
our
very
own
60
year
old
representative
back
sir
you're
recognized.
Thank
you,
sir.
You
have
a
motion
in
a
second
sir.
First.
M
What
my
bill
says
is
that,
as
a
condition
for
baal,
the
accused
must
carry
or
wear
a
global
positioning
monitor
gps
device
in
cases
where
the
defendant
was
arrested
for
a
crime
in
which
a
person
was
a
victim
of
a
of
domestic
abuse
and
the
alleged
offense
involves
strangulation
or
use
of
a
firearm.
A
A
A
We
have
a
second
and
representative
hardaway.
I
see
an
amendment
coded
one,
four,
three,
four
four:
do
you
wish
to
move
that
amendment?
Yes,
sir
representative
hardaway
moves
his
amendment.
It
has
been
properly
seconded,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
that
amendment
on
the
bill.
If
there's
no
objections
to
that,
all
those
in
favor
of
attaching
amendment
coded
1434
to
house
bill
1321,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
you
adopt
representative
hardaway,
you're
recognized.
Thank.
M
You
chairman
and
you've,
seen
this
bill
before
we
had
to
go
back
to
the
subcommittee
to
put
the
proper
amendment
on,
even
though
I
explained
this
amendment
when
the
wrong
amendment
was
on
the
bill,
as
amended
expands
the
offense
of
reckless
endangerment
to
include
an
act
of
community
terrorism
defines
community
terrorism
as
reckless
endangerment
that
is
committed
against
a
population
within
the
geographical
territory
by
members
of
a
criminal
gang
that
regularly
engages
in
gang-related
conduct
or
has
a
pattern
of
criminal
gang
activity
and
the
efficient
excuse
me.
M
A
C
Like
to
say
that,
thank
you,
representative
hardway
you've
took
your
mast
off.
We
can
see
you
and
hear.
A
A
A
second
thank
you
very
much
chairman
and
committee
members.
This
bill
would
enhance
the
penalty
for
the
offense
of
aggravated
burglary
from
a
class
c
felony
to
a
class
b
felony
and
if
the
burglaries
of
an
occupy,
if
the
burglar
is
of
an
occupied
habitation,
it
also
increases
the
penalty
for
especially
aggravated
burglary
from
a
class
b
felony
to
a
class,
a
felony
if
the
burglary
is
of
a
habitation.
A
This
came
out,
I
think
I
explained
in
subcommittee,
but
for
years,
leader
lamberth
and
I
and
others
we've
talked
about
the
especially
violent
act
of
breaking
into
someone's
home.
When
you
know
they
are
there,
it's
it's
one
thing:
when
there's
no
cars
in
the
driveway,
it's
the
middle
of
a
work
day,
it's
still
obviously
not
condoned,
but
but
not
as
violent
of
an
act.
When
you
know
there's
nobody
in
the
house,
you
come
in
in
the
night
and
you
know
folks:
are
there
you're
there
probably
to
kill
somebody
or
do
worse?
A
So
this
bill
is
an
acknowledgment
of
that.
On
top
of
that,
as
we
were
coming
into
session
in
january,
as
I
filed
this
legislation,
there
was
unfortunately
the
murder
of
that
young
man
at
rhodes,
college
we
heard
from
his
family
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
I
think
this
bill
speaks
to
that.
I
know
we
have
several
other
bills
dealing
with
truth
and
sentencing
that
encompass
this
offense,
but
we
felt
it
was
important
to
move
this
on
into
finance
and
then
make
that
part
of
the
discussion.
So
with
that,
I
would
seek
passage.
N
A
You,
mr
chairman
and
committee
members,
you've
heard
me
talk
about
this
in
subcommittee,
but
this
is
an
especially
personal
subject.
At
our
house,
a
young
man
named
joe
clyde
daniels,
was
murdered
by
his
parents.
This
young
man
was
a
student
of
my
wife's
and
she
taught
him
the
day
that
he
passed
away
and
unfortunately,
not
only
did
the
parents
commit
that
heinous
crime,
but
the
father
who's
now
been
convicted
refused
to
give
up
the
location
of
the
boy's
remains,
and
that
made
obviously
made
prosecuting
that
crime
very
difficult.
A
The
father
would
have
known
that
what
house
bill
2306
does
is.
It
requires
the
board
of
parole
to
consider
whether
an
offender
obstructed
or
continues
to
obstruct
the
ability
of
law
enforcement
to
recover
the
remains
of
a
victim
when
making
a
parole
determination
for
an
offender
convicted
of
homicide.
A
Unfortunately,
this
murderer
received
life
in
prison,
which
comes
with
a
51-year
parole
eligibility
in
tennessee,
and
so,
if
he
were
to
live
that
long,
then
the
parole
board
would
be
able
to
take
that
into
consideration
and
decide.
Maybe
they
should
just
keep
him
there
for
life
with
that,
I
would
seek
passage.
N
A
N
A
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
members.
This
is
an
effort
that
I
wish
I
could
have
had
the
opportunity
to
work
on
sooner.
To
be
honest
with
you,
but
we've
had
a
lot
of
effort
in
this
committee
over
the
last
couple
of
years
to
look
at
sorry,
I
got
distracted
there
to
look
at
how
we
notify
victims
in
this
state
when,
when
folks,
when
their
offenders
are
moving
through
the
criminal
justice
system,
to
make
sure
that
victims
are
continually
notified,
and
so
what
this
bill
does
is.
A
It
requires
the
tennessee
sheriff's
association
to
establish,
by
january
1st
2023
a
criminal
proceedings
notification
system
for
the
purpose
of
providing
timely
information
about
each
stage
of
the
criminal
process
to
interested
parties.
It
requires
that
the
information
the
system
be
available
24
hours
per
day
over
the
telephone,
internet
or
phone
and
allow
any
interested
party
who
registers
with
the
tsa
to
be
automatically
notified.
A
I
think
this
will
be
a
huge
step
forward
for
the
state
of
tennessee.
It
does
come
at
a
cost,
but
with
the
fiscal
note
which
I'll
be
addressing
in
finance
of
just
about
864
000,
really
a
drop
in
the
bucket
for
what
we
can
do
for
victims
in
the
state
to
make
sure
that
they
know
exactly
what's
going
on
the
status
of
their
case.
So
I
would
seek
passage-
and
I
hope
you
all
see
this
as
as
valuable
system
as
I
do.
C
A
John
carcio,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
As
I
understand
it
in
year,
one
there's
a
slightly
higher
cost.
It's
852
000,
that's
to
actually
build
out
the
software
and
get
the
system
up
and
running
so
in
that
initial
year,
because
this
doesn't
go
into
effect
until
2023
that
first
year
they
won't
be
able
to
send
out
any
notifications,
because
that
852
is
just
to
build
the
system
every
subsequent
year.
After
that,
the
766
7
goes
to
operating
this
call
center.
So
these
will
be
real
live
humans,
taking
calls
inputting
notifications
and
those
sorts
of
things.