►
From YouTube: House Finance Committee- April 27, 2021
Description
House Finance Committee- April 27, 2021
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
A
C
Seeing
none,
we
have
27
bills
remaining
on
the
calendar
that
we
began
yesterday.
We
will
not
be
doing
any
of
the
bills
that
just
came
out
of
subcommittee
immediately.
Prior
to
this,
we
will
only
be
dealing
with
the
bills
that
were
on
the
calendar
that
we
left
off
of
yesterday.
So
if
you're
here
for
something
that
just
came
out
of
sub
have
a
good
evening,
we
will
start
with
item
32
from
the
calendar
that
is
house
bill.
73
by
chairman
hurt.
A
House
bill
73
establishes
the
k-12
mental
health
trust
fund
act,
designates
trustees
to
oversee
the
fund.
Those
trustees
are
the
state
treasurer.
As
the
chair
comptroller,
the
secretary
of
state,
the
commissioner
of
finance
allows
the
trust
to
invest
the
funds
for
the
first
time
in
fiscal
year.
2122.
A
It
creates
two
accounts
for
the
funds
to
be
deposited
in.
Ninety
percent
of
the
investment
must
go
into
the
endowment
account
and
constitutes
the
principle
of
the
fund.
Ten
percent
would
be
placed
in
the
special
reserve
account.
The
fund
is
split.
This
way
to
ensure
a
portion
of
this
fund
is
liquid
for
use
and
distributions.
A
The
fund
is
allowed
to
accept
gifts,
contributions,
requests,
etc.
The
principle
of
the
fund
may
not
be
expended
for
any
purpose.
The
trustees
will
annually
determine
how
much
funding
can
be
allocated
for
expenditure
based
on
the
return,
and
the
funds
made
available
will
be
used
by
the
department
of
mental
health
in
consultation
with
the
department
of
education
and
must
be
expended
for
use
with
k-12
students.
A
C
You
chairman
hurt,
I
do
believe
we
have
an
amendment
and
that
that
amendment
might
make
the
bill
that
amendment
we
show
is
zero,
zero,
six,
seven,
five
seven
is
that
what
you're
showing
yes
ma'am,
so
we
have
questions
been
called
on
the
amendment
all
those
in
favor
of
amendment
zero,
zero,
six,
seven,
five,
seven,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes
have
it.
The
amendment
is
now
on
the
bill
and
chairman
hurt.
I
believe
you
explained
the
the
amendment.
C
A
C
A
C
C
Question
has
been
called
any
objection,
seeing
none.
We
are
voting
on
house
bill
556,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
You
guys
have
it,
and
that
is
really
an
important
bill
for
both
the
nurse
who
comes
in
for
our
state
budget.
So
thank
you.
Chairman
hicks
item
number
34
house
bill
555
also
by
chairman
hicks,.
F
C
Question
has
been
called
any
objection
to
the
question,
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
house
bill,
555,
moving
on
to
calendar
and
rules,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes
have
it
house
bill.
555
moves
on
the
next
item
on
our
calendar.
Number
35
is
house
bill,
123
by
chairman,
howell
chairman
how
long
you're
recognized
we
have
a
motion
and
we
have
a
second
chairman
howell.
Please
say.
A
C
C
Item
number
36
on
our
calendar
house
bill
952
that
has
been
requested
to
roll
to
first
calendar
of
2022.
So
without
objection
house
bill
952
rolls
first
calendar
2022.
item
number
37
is
house
bill.
90
chairman
powers,
chairman
powers,
you're
recognized.
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second.
B
However,
the
administration
sought
informal
review
of
the
2018
act
from
osm,
and
the
feedback
is
clear
in
order
for
tennessee
to
receive
privacy,
osm
must
determine
at
their
sole
discretion
that
one
our
program
is
at
least
as
stringent
as
federal
law
and
two
that
the
state
has
the
financial
capability
to
administer
and
operate
the
program.
This
bill
will
do
that
and
with
that,
madam
chair,
I
renew
my
motion.
C
C
C
You
guys
have
it.
The
amendment
is
attached
chairman
powers,
you're
recognized
on
the
amendment.
B
Thank
you
house,
bill
544
allows
a
business,
that's
been
on
the
interstate
logo
board
for
10
years
or
more
and
has
been
bumped
to
be
rolled
over
to
another
board
with
a
different
title.
If
there
is
a
vacancy,
it
will
not
allow
more
than
two
logos
to
be
added
onto
a
board
with
a
different
title,
and
with
that,
madam
chair,
I
renew
my
motion.
C
C
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
want
to
make
sure
you're
also
showing
the
amendment
6710
is
traveling.
G
Thank
you
by
way
of
explanation
sections
one
through
five
of
the
bill,
as
amended,
is
clean
up
language
for
a
bill.
That's
general
assembly
has
passed
already,
but
essentially
what
it
does
is
take
the
six
metro
health
departments
and
puts
them
under
the
authority
of
the
county
mayor.
It
does
not
change
their
responsibilities
of
a
health
department
nor
their
authority.
In
certain
circumstances,
it
also
puts
the
definition
of
quarantine
into
the
tennessee
code.
G
That
definition
exists
as
a
rule,
but
this
bill
moves
it
into
code,
section
six,
which
is
the
portion
for
which
this
bill
is
known,
is
known
as
the
pass
vaccine
passport
prohibition
bill
and
essentially
what
it
does
is
say
that
no
state
government
entity
that
does
to
include
counties
and
cities
may
require
that
a
private
business
require
proof
of
vaccination
against
covet
19
as
a
condition
of
entering
the
business
or
using
its
services.
G
C
H
H
It
came
to
you
and
so
did
shelby
county
have
any
okay.
H
Able
to
confer
with
shelby
county
in
terms
of
their
reaction
to
it
input
on
it,
or
did
you.
H
G
Issue
is
that
this
this
body,
the
general
assembly,
has
already
passed
a
piece
of
legislation
concerning
the
big
six
as
it
were.
This
bill
has
some
cleanup
language
in
it
that
basically
takes
the
six
metro
health
departments
and
puts
them
under
the
authority
of
the
county
mayor.
G
The
responsibilities
of
those
departments
are
unchanged
and
only
the
authority,
that
is
to
say
they.
They
must
now
report
to
the
county
mayor
as
an
advisory
function.
The
part
that
was
not
changed
is
that
the
county
health
director
still
has
the
duty
to
enforce
regulations
of
the
state
health
department.
H
Camper
yeah,
thank
you
ma'am
chair
and
you
did
not
get
rid
of
the
advisory
council.
C
Question
has
been
called
all
those
in
favor
of
house
bill
575,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
if
you'd
like
to
be
recorded
as
a
no,
please
see
the
clerk
house
bill,
575
has
received
the
majority
and
it
does
move
forward
to
calendar
and
rules.
Thank
you,
chairman
reagan.
Thank.
C
C
I
F
Thank
you,
chair
lady
members,
house
bill
773
will
be
amended
by
seven
four,
three,
nine.
It
does
a
couple
of
things.
It
will
rewrite
the
bill.
It
will
decrease
from
four
point.
Five
percent
to
the
four
point:
two
five
percent:
the
aviation
fuel
tax
rate
also
decreases
the
maximum
amount
of
sales
and
use
tax
due
from
a
person's
purchase,
use,
consumption
or
storage
of
aviation
fuel
from
10
000
or
10
million
500
to
8
million
500
in
fiscal
year,
2122
and
5
million
in
fiscal
year,
22,
23
and
subsequent
years.
F
C
C
C
D
Thank
you
chairman.
Thank
you,
chairman
hicks,
for
this
amendment.
I
I
I'm
not
a
huge
fan
of
this
process
whatsoever,
because
we
we
talk
a
lot
about
aviation
jet
fuel
and
we
talk
about
flowage
fees.
We
talk
about
a
lot
of
other
things,
but
what
this
in
fact
does
is
it.
It
cuts
the
diesel
tax,
but
it's,
but
what
it
does
is
impugns
our
our
hospitals.
D
The
reason
why
I'm
supportive
of
the
speaker's
amendment
here
is
because
what
it
does,
even
though
we're
giving
tax
credits
to
business
businesses
across
the
state,
it
actually
requires
that
the
general
assembly
fund,
the
cost
that
was
lost
to
the
general
fund
to
those
general
aviation
airports.
Had
we
done
this
a
long
time
ago,
we
wouldn't
be
doing
non-reoccurring
funding
every
year
for
infrastructure,
infrastructure
needs
and
aviation.
D
So
I
know
I
felt
necessary
to
say
why
my
tenor
had
changed
a
little
bit
regarding
this,
but
it's
because
we're
actually
spending
the
money,
we're
we're
we're
taking
the
money
and
giving
it
as
a
credit
to
an
entity,
but
we're
also
restoring
it,
so
it
doesn't
impugn
another
for
that.
Madam
speak,
madame
cheerleading,
thank
you.
C
It's
late
in
the
day
later,
camper.
H
H
That's
fuel
for
all
all
avionics
for
fuel
that
reduces
for
all
avionic
fuel.
Is
that
correct,
so
the
small
airports,
the
large
imports
everybody
will
get
their
reduction.
That.
H
I
David
chairman
and
two
chairman
williams
points
as
well.
I
wanted
to
highlight
that
really
where
we
need
to
be,
I
mean
there's
about
50
million
dollars
in
non-recurring
funds
that
are
in
the
budget
this
year,
for
our
our
transportation
equity
fund,
basically
we'll
just
say
for
the
the
small
airports
and
large
airports
alike.
That's
really
about
the
number
we
should
be.
I
I
mean
we
should
have
about
50
million
dollars,
recurring
funds,
we're
trying
to
move
some
things
around
here,
so
that
we
are
funding
those
airports
in
a
way
that
continue
to
support
economic
development
and
continue
to
support
that
part
of
the
infrastructure
of
our
state.
And
I
and
I've
fully
joined
chairman
williams
in
saying
the
reason
we
formed
this.
The
way
we
did
is
that
we
are
reducing
taxes
that
have
gone
into
that
fund
and
we
are
saying
that
here
and
hopefully
forever
forward.
We
will
always
do
that
and
go
beyond
would
be
my
hope.
I
We
can't
bind
a
future
legislature,
but
this
sets
up
also
a
reporting
equal
requirement
back
to
both
the
transportation
chairman
and
our
chairman
here
in
finance,
so
that
we
can
really
see
how
these
dollars
are
being
utilized
and
also
how
many
additional
dollars
are
needed
in
years
down
the
road
to
make
sure
we've
got
good,
safe
airports
and
that
that
part
of
our
infrastructure
is
still
robust.
So
I
did
just
want
to
highlight.
I
I
mean,
while
this
changes
around
some
of
the
structure,
the
basic
structure
that
came
through
sub
and
that
you've
heard
testimony
before
remains
the
same,
and
last
thing
I
will
say
on
this.
If
we
continue
to
marry
these
two
funds
together,
where
the
jet
fuel
taxes
are
what's
funding
the
infrastructure
for
our
airports,
our
airports
will
lose
out
in
the
end,
for
instance,
this
year
the
fund
only
brought
in
about
nine
million,
and
they
predict
that
it
it
will
top
out
at
somewhere
around
15
million.
That's
nowhere
near
what
the
needs
are.
I
So
this
is
a
much
better
method
on
doing
this,
instead
of
just
having
that
one
source
of
income
for
the
fund
and
on
something
that
really
is
part
of
our
infrastructure.
I
just
wonder
how
that
I
like
that.
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
C
C
B
You
chair,
lady
and
committee,
this
bill
deals
with
dual
enrollment
courses.
We
currently
through
our
lottery
funds.
We
pay
for
two
dealer
courses.
A
dual
enrollment
course
is
a
college
credit
taught
by
a
college,
professor,
a
college
course,
and
it's
for
our
high
school
students
we're
going
to
go
from
two
to
four.
That
way.
B
When
a
high
school
student
graduates
from
high
school
they'll
be
well
on
the
way
to
community
college
degree
and
or
even
in
a
four
year,
they
can
knock
out
one
semester
which
is
going
to
save
them
a
lot
of
money
them
and
their
family.
So
through
the
lottery
funds-
and
this
is
also
it
will
not
start
to
january
1
2022,
because
we
have
agreed
in
our
education
committee
not
to
bust
the
cap
on
our
lottery
funds.
But
this
fell
within
that
with
a
positive
recommendation.
So
with
that,
I
would
ask
for
approval.
C
C
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
bill,
all
things
in
good
time
representing
the
gillespie.
C
That's
drafting
code,
zero,
zero,
seven
one
five
two
is
that
the
amendment
that
is
correct.
All
right
we
are.
Would
you
like
to
explain.
C
All
right,
you've
heard
the
explanation
of
the
amendment
we're
voting
on
drafting
code,
zero,
zero,
seven
one,
five,
two,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
You
guys
have
it
drafting
code,
zero,
zero,
seven,
one!
Five
two
is
attached
to
the
bill
now,
chairman
bricken.
If
you
would
explain
house
bill
965
as
amended.
A
C
Representative
gillespie
has
called
the
question
on
the
bill
at
the
appropriate
time.
Is
there
any
objection
seeing
none?
We
are
voting
on
house
bill
965,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
You
guys
have
it
house
bill
965
moves
on
to
calendar
and
rules.
Thank
you,
chairman
bricken,.
C
C
B
C
A
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
bill
is
traveling
with
an
amendment
amendment
4554.
C
A
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
This
bill
authorizes
bingo
for
non-profit
annual
game
events
under
the
division
of
charitable
solicitations
and
gaming.
The
secretary
of
state
shall
promulgate
rules.
C
C
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you.
Committee
house,
bill.
1360,
seeks
to
change
the
current
amount.
A
county
clerk
can
retain
for
purposes
of
mailing
new
physical
license
plates
and
that
fee
would
be
from
four
dollars
to
five
dollars,
and
that
is
only
on
new
physical
license
plates.
This
bill
applies,
like
I
said,
to
new
license
plates
to
be
mailed
rather
than
picking
them
up
the
clerk's
office.
It
really
is
a
convenience
fee
that
will
be
added.
F
C
The
question
has
been
called
and
represented
mannis.
This
is
good
timing
to
bring
this
bill,
as
we
are
there's
money
in
the
budget
this
year
for
new
license
plates
and
many
people
might
choose
to
have
those
mailed
out
to
them
and
it
could
have
cost
our
county
clerks
a
significant
amount
of
money
without
the
spill.
So
thank
you.
C
H
C
F
You,
madam
chair,
thank
you
committee
members
house,
bill
944,
seeks
to
unify
the
code
by
deleting
tca
8-21-409
and
it
as
it
is
written.
It
only
applies
to
two
fee-based
court
systems
within
knoxville.
These
two
courts
are
the
only
ones
out
of
95
counties
to
have
a
different
fee
structure
and
9944
would
put
these
courts
in
line
with
the
rest
of
the
state.
It
also
would
have
a
positive
impact
on
court
fees
with
these
two
local
courts.
C
C
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair
house,
bill
811
allows
for
a
small
0.025
increase
on
the
fee
to
be
charged
on
sales
of
certain
items
in
the
portion
of
davidson
county
which
lie
within
the
tourist
development
zone
in
the
business
development
zone.
The
area
defines
the
downtown
tourism
zone
along
broadway.
G
Currently,
the
fee
is
set
at
0.025
percent
on
sales
of
certain
items,
including
prepared
food,
beer
and
clothing
items.
Currently,
the
funds
collected
from
this
fee
go
to
the
convention
visitors
center
corporation
and
are
dedicated
to
recruiting
large
events
and
bring
many
visitors
to
our
state.
G
Expenditures
of
these
funds
is
approved
by
board
that's
appointed
by
our
executive.
In
the
recent
pre-covered
years,
annual
amount
derived
from
the
fee
has
been
a
little
more
than
2.5
million
house
bill.
811
will
take
the
feet
of
0.05
percent,
which
the
cvc
will
spend
by
significantly
increasing
the
police
presence
in
the
downtown
area,
as
well
as
dramatically
increasing
efforts
to
keep
the
downtown
area
clean.
G
It's
no
secret
that
this
last
year
has
been
a
tremendous
hardship
to
the
city
of
nashville,
given
a
tornado
and
a
pandemic
to
our
business
and
also
the
christmas
day
bombing.
So
this
will
help
do
some
things
that
we
know.
C
But
I
commend
you
on
your
perseverance.
Are
there
any
questions
or
any
objection
to
calling
the
question
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
house
bill
811.,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
C
Please
see
the
clerk
if
you'd
like
to
be
recorded
as
a
now
that
the
eyes
are
a
majority
and
the
house
bill.
811
does
move
on
to
calendar
and
rules.
A
Thank
you,
madam
chair
lady
house,
bill
66
616
revises
the
conflict
of
interest
provision
in
the
county
financial
management
system
act
of
81..
It
does
this
by
amending
the
conflict
of
interest
provision
so
that
it
only
applies
to
county
employees
who
are
actually
involved
in
the
purchasing
process.
H
C
The
amendment
is
traveling
on
6
16,
so
chair,
lady
rutter
has
explained
her
bill.
Are
there
any
questions?
The
question
has
been
called
on
the
bill.
Any
objections
to
calling
the
question
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
house
bill
616.,
all
those
in
favor
of
house
bill
616,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
C
C
C
Thank
you
and
chair
lady
rudder.
If
you
would
explain
the
amendment.
A
A
C
All
right
you
have
heard
the
amendment
described.
Are
there
questions
on
the
amendment,
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
drafting
code
7240
all
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
You
guys
have
it.
Drafting
code
is
attached
and
now
we're
on
house
bill
622
as
amended
charlie
writer.
If
you
could
share
with
us
what
the
bill.
A
Does
overall,
yes,
ma'am?
Yes,
thank
you
so
much.
This
legislation
is
being
brought
by
the
tennessee
association
of
human
resource
agencies
in
response
to
the
comptroller's
2020
audit.
This
legislation
attempts
to
create
some
uniformity
while
allowing
the
local
government
leaders
to
tailor
their
boards
and
programs
to
serve
those
in
need
in
their
community.
C
C
Item
number
52
is
house
bill
772
by
chairman
russell
chairman
russell
you're,
recognized.
C
And
that
amendment
is
traveling
with
the
bill
you've
heard
the
explanation:
are
there
questions
of
the
sponsor,
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
house
bill?
Oh
I'm
sorry,
leader,
lamberth.
I
Chairman,
I
know
we're
going
at
a
rapid
pace
and
you're
doing
a
fantastic
job
of
leading
us
all
toward
the
finish
line
here.
I
did
want
to
just
highlight
for
members
if
there's
a
bill,
if
you've
got
volunteer,
fire
departments
in
your
district
representative
russell
has
has
really
fought
hard
for
the
for
their
volunteer
firefighters.
For
years
he
had
a
bill
on
this
subject
and
the
governor's
office
stepped
up
and
provided
about
five
million
dollars
in
funding
for
training
for
volunteer
firefighters.
I
So
if
you
want
to
help
your
volunteer
firefighters,
I
would
encourage
you
to
vote
for
this
bill
and,
if
you
wanted
to
sign
on
to
it,
I
know
he
and
I
would
both
certainly
appreciate
your
support,
and
I
know
you
volunteer.
Firefighters
would
because
it's
something
they've
asked
for
for
years,
it's
about
a
600
stipend
for
their
training.
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
C
Thank
you
later
lambert,
it
is.
I
know
I
have
a
lot
of
volunteer
firemen
in
my
district,
as
I'm
sure
most
of
us
do,
and
this
will
make
a
difference.
It'll
help
them
just
be
more
prepared
and
more
qualified
and
help
them
make
a
bigger
difference
in
their
community
and
hopefully
do
it
in
a
safe
way.
So
we
are
now
voting
on
house
bill
772,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
house
bill,
772
moves
on
to
calendar
and
rules.
A
You
church
you're
recognized
members.
We
have
a
high
turnover
rate
in
our
corrections
and
even
with
our
state
tdoc.
J
This
bill
is
brought
to
you
to
us
from
our.
J
And
it
basically
allows
them
to
enter.
C
C
If
you
would,
is
there
a
motion
on
the
amendment,
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
amendment?
If
you
would
please
let
us
know
what
that
amendment
does.
J
Yeah
deletes
replaces
all
the
language
after
the
enacting
clause,
such
as
the
only
substance
change
that
this
is
to
authorize
local
governments
participating
in
the
tcrs.
J
C
Guys
have
it,
the
amendment
is
attached
to
the
bill,
and
now
you
have
heard
the
description
of
the
bill
from
the
sponsor.
Are
there
further
questions
seeing
none
we're
voting
on
house
bill
171
as
amended
all
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
any
opposed
eyes.
Have
it
house
bill
171
moves
on
to
calendar
and
rules?
Thank.
A
J
You,
madam
chair
and
members,
remember,
is
what
this
resolution
does
simply
is
a
resolution
that
deals
with
making
sure
that
we
have
a
constitutional
amendment
that
deals
with
eliminating
the
concept
of
slavery
in
our
constitution,
and
this
really
stays
under
no
circumstances
is
anybody
in
the
state
considered
to
be
a
slave
and
it'll
be
a
constitutional
amendment
and
in
essence,
that's
what
it
really
does
with
that
explanation,
I
renew
my
motion.
C
We
have
we
have
some
questions,
I
believe
chairman
williams.
I
saw
your
hand
first.
D
Thank
you,
representative.
Townsend.
I
fully
support
your
idea
here.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
make
it
clear
what
the
constitution
is.
I
guess
the
question
that
I
had
for
you
is
is:
are
you
at
all
concerned
that
if
we
were
to
do
this,
it
would
require
us
to
provide
a
job
to
every
incarcerated.
J
Well,
obviously,
not
you
know,
that's
not
the
intent.
Obviously,
and
certainly
you
shouldn't,
if
you
don't
work,
obviously
there's
no
remuneration
of
money
that
someone
should
get
paid
for
something
they
don't
do,
but
no
that's
not
the
intent
that
has
no
bearing
on
what
we're
attempting
to
do
not
at
all.
I
think,
over
a
period
of
time.
I've
heard
some
of
that
nature,
but
that's
not
what
we're
attempting
to
do.
It's
simply
straightforward
that
human
beings
are
not
considered
to
be
anything
but
human
beings,
and
we
want
to
spell
it
out.
J
It
unfortunately,
has
been
left
in
our
our
sacred
darkness
for
a
very
long
time,
and
it
should
not
be-
and
this
just
simply
addresses
that,
but
nothing
else
at
all
is
this.
Attempting
to
address
never
has
been,
never
has
been
and
never
will
be.
As
if
I'm
doing
remember,
last
year
we
were
on
the
house
floor
and
the
senate
was
behind
the
senate,
got
way
behind
right,
already
passed
it
so
this
year
the
senate
beat
us
so
we're
trying
to
catch
up.
But
to
answer
your
question:
that's
not
the
intent
at
all.
D
D
I
recognize
that
you're
up
against
a
a
time
crunch
also,
and
so
because
this
needs
to
be
read
at
least
before
we
end,
and
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
if
there's
a
way
where
we
could
get
some
kind
of
ruling
as
to
whether
that
would
technically
be
an
unintended
consequence
or
not,
but
I
don't
know
how
we
could
do
that
so
I'll
leave
it
up
to
charlotte.
I
don't
know
if
legal,
I
don't
think
legal
can
answer
that
question
right
now,
though,
so.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
here,
but
I
believe
we
already
have
a
prohibition
against
slavery
in
our
constitution.
Is
that
not
correct.
C
J
Well,
we
do,
but
under
certain
circumstances
that
it
doesn't
seem
to
apply
okay,
and
that
would
mean
that
if
you
are
incarcerated
in
the
state
of
tennessee
that
it
does
not
apply
it
spells
it
out
that
you're
considered,
as
you
know,
indentured
so
to
speak.
So
it's
not
clearly
spelled
out.
No,
it's
not.
J
Ma'am
sheriff
you
don't
mind,
I'd
hate
to
go,
go
through
this,
but
I
mean
I'm
gonna
have
to
have
to
ask
you
for
a
roll
call
on
this.
A
C
C
C
C
C
D
Thank
you,
chair,
lady.
It's
my
understanding.
Now,
after
talking
to
the
bill
sponsor,
if,
when
I
asked
him
the
question,
the
very
first,
he
had
an
answer
to
the
question
that
he
inadvertently
forgot
to
share
with
the
with
the
body,
and
so
I'd
like
to
ask
the
member
again.
D
Are
you
at
all
concerned
about
us
having
to
pay
incarcerated
and
citizens
of
the
state
with
this,
and,
and
I
think
you
had
that
cleared
with
the
attorney
general's
office,
which
would
have
simply
answered
my
question.
I
think.
J
As
I
understand,
this
is
not
new.
This
came
up
a
few
days
ago
and
our
leader
faison,
and
we
went
to
the
attorney
general
to
figure
it
out.
I
was
told
by
him
that
that
is
not
an
issue.
I
even
went
before
the
speaker
talked
to
the
speaker
about
as
well.
It's
not
an
issue
at
all,
but
for
the
record
as
well
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
Obviously,
that's
not
the
intent
for
that
to
occur,
so
my
information
is
that
no,
it's
not
a
problem
at
all.
D
Chairman
williams,
thank
you.
I
think
it's
important
that
you
and
I
have
served
together
for
quite
a
period
of
time.
D
I
had
a
a
legitimate
question
absolutely
raised
and
and
the
when,
when
the
answer
is
not
given
directly
in
the
fashion
which
you
just
did
now,
it
one
could
infer
that
the
the
the
answer
was
meant
to
disparage
a
member,
and
I
don't
think
that's
the
case
here,
and
so
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you,
you
and
I
are
able
to
clear
that
up
because
because
of
our
discussion,
so
I
appreciate
the
member
and
I
appreciate
what
he's
trying
to
do
here
and,
as
I
said
originally,
I
fully
supported.
J
Concerned
well
taken.
I
would
never
do
that
yeah.
I
think
you
know
me
for,
as
you
said,
for
a
very
long
time
and
the
fact
of
it
is
things
get
at
the
end
fast
and
furious,
and
we've
been
around
for
a
long
time
and
it
happens
that
way
because
there's
so
many
things
happening
I
wanted
to
address
it
had
in
my
mind,
but
I
appreciate
you
circling
back
around
to
allow
me
an
opportunity
to
do
just
that.
I
appreciate
that
very
much.
C
The
question
has
been
called
without
objection:
ribs
and
shawl.
Would
you
mind
withdrawing
that
and
letting
representative
lynn.
K
Thank
you,
madam.
Madam
chairman,
I
completely
understand
you
know
your
reasoning
for
one
and
wanting
to
take
this
out
of
the
constitution.
If
I
may,
I
just
want
to
read
the
current
constitution.
Reads
that
slavery
and
involuntary
servitude,
except
as
punishment
for
a
crime
whereof,
the
party
shall
have
been
duly
convicted
or
forever
forever
prohibited
by
the
state
and
that's
the
way
the
current
constitution
reads.
K
C
J
J
All
of
us
know
that
if
you
don't
work,
you
don't
get
paid,
and
certainly,
if
you're
in
an
incarcerated
state,
logically
who's
going
to
pay
you
that's
that's
I
mean
that's
that's
far
out
to
me,
so
no,
it
doesn't
address
that.
What
we're
dealing
with
is
simply
what
we
stated
earlier,
that
any
human
being,
regardless
of
and
has
said
as
you
read
it,
that
you
accept
as
if
you
are
incarcerated,
we're
just
simply
saying
that
you're
still
a
human
being
but
you're
not.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
whether
you're
getting
paid
or
not.
J
We
dealt
with
it.
This
bill
has
been
up
for
three
years
to
get
it
properly
done.
We
dealt
with
it
where
we
had
a
couple
of
sheriffs
to
come
before
over
a
period
of
time
to
talk
about
the
ability
of
people
to
still
be
able
to
work
in
in
the
institution.
If
I
was
incarcerated
as
a
prisoner,
I
would
want
to
work.
You
know
just
to
learn
something
and
break
the
monotony
and
keep
out
of
trouble
and
all
that
stuff,
but
this
has
this
does
not
address
that.
None
of
that
has
changed.
K
Representative
lynn,
thank
you,
madam
chairman.
The
language
in
your
proposal
would
state
slavery
and
involuntary
servitude
are
forever
prohibited.
K
Nothing
in
this
section
shall
prohibit
an
inmate
from
working
when
the
inmate
has
been
duly
convicted
of
a
crime,
and
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
concerns
is
that
perhaps
this
could
be
used
by
an
inmate
to
sue
to
force
a
local
jail
or
a
state
prison
to
give
them
a
job.
K
You
know
we
have
work
programs,
but
there's
not
always
enough
thoughts
in
those
work
programs.
Unfortunately,
I
wish
there
were,
but
there's
not
always
enough
slots,
and
even
though
the
constitution
currently
says
that
they
don't
have
to
be
paid,
we
do
pay
them,
they
are
paid,
however,
they're
not
paid
minimum
wage
is.
Is
there
some
sort
of
a
desire
that,
when
inmates
are
working
in
a
work
program
that
they
be
paid
at
least
minimum
wage
or
is
does
this?
K
This
has
no
intent
that
they
be
paid
at
least
minimum
wage,
but
they
would
be
paid
as
they
currently
are.
Representing
towns.
J
Ma'am
chair,
thank
you
again
here
again
the
reason
that's
in
there
because
in
the
subcommittee
about
two
years
ago
it
came
up
that
we
did
not
want
the
emphasis
to
be
that
they,
you
know,
did
not
have
to
work
now.
We
have
a
flip
side
of
it.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
them
being
compensated
or
working.
The
intent
is
definitely
not
for
that
to
occur
for
the
record
again.
J
That
is
not
what
we're
attempting
to
do.
That
is
not
what
we
would
ever
attempt
to
do.
It's
simply
dealing
with
the
language
as
it
is
a
human
being
being
considered.
As
you
know,
a
slave,
that's
it.
Nothing
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
work
there.
I
mean
they
don't
have
to
be
paid,
we're
not
gonna
the
state.
Tennessee's,
not
gonna
pay
them
if
they
don't
work
and
we
know
that
they
don't
get
a
minimum
wage
has
nothing
to
do
with
that
at
all.
J
It
does
not
address
that
at
all,
and
this
is
the
reason
we
went
before
and
found
out
from
my
understanding
that
we're
okay,
we
don't
have
that
problem.
That's
that
is
not
a
concern
for
me.
I
would
be
the
first
one
to
address
it
if
it
was
because
that's
not
what
we're
attempting
to
do.
It's
not
a
labor
bill,
it's
not
a
salary
bill.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
that
at
all.
J
Never
has
come
up
very
shortly.
K
J
Well,
thank
you
for
that
as
well.
The
fact
of
it
is,
I
think
we
find
consensus
on
this
as
well
that
inmates
prisoners
or
people
who
are
run
to
file
a
law
and,
of
course
they
don't
have
favorite
person
status.
That's
not
going
to
happen,
and
I
don't
think,
and
you
can
we
can
sue.
You
know
if
I
call
a
cup
of
potato,
we
can
sue
and
argue
with
that.
That's
our
society,
that's
democracy,
it's
crazy,
but
that's
what
we
do.
Okay,
but,
logically
speaking,
people
that
are
on
the
courts.
J
So,
I
think
we're
cook
we're
fine
based
upon
what
I've
learned
from
some
of
the
leaders
that
that's
not
the
case.
I
don't
think
we
have
that
problem.
I
would
bet
you
know
anything.
I
had
that.
That's
not
going
to
be
a
challenge
for
us.
B
J
Well
now
the
intent
is
for
it
to
be
considered
you
or
anyone
in
this
state
that
is
run
to
follow
the
law
and
you
are
having
to
be
incarcerated
for
a
year
five
years,
15
or
20
years
that
you
are
still
at
that
point
considered
to
be
a
part
of
the
human
race
and
you're,
not
any
less
than
as
a
human
being
any
other
person,
and
that's
what
it
simply
does.
That's
the
only
thing
that
changes.
J
Nothing
else
has
nothing
to
do
with
your
work
status.
There's
nothing
else
to
do
with
what
what
may
occur
to
you
in
the
penal
system,
nothing
at
all
to
do
with
that.
Is
this
how
you
consider
as
a
human
being?
That's
it
nothing
else.
I
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
representatives
for
bringing
the
bill.
I
know
your
intentions
here
are
good
and
I
think
several
of
us
thought
this
was
going
to
be
on
the
next
calendar.
So
that's
why
there's
probably
a
little
more
questions
in
debate
today
we
were
waiting
on
an
answer
to
just
make
sure
that
the
wording
was
right,
and
so
I
know
that's
been
your
goal.
All
along
is
to
get
the
wording
right
and
it
it
basically
takes
what
appears
to
be
one
sentence
in
the
constitution
and
splitting
it
into
two.
I
When
you
do
that,
I
I
think
it
is
your
intent
and
if
you
can
put
on
the
record
today,
it's
not
your
intent
to
change
any
of
the
legal
precedent
or
any
of
the
cases
that
are
out
there
or
lawsuits
that
have
been
filed.
It
is
literally
to
just
make
clear
once
and
for
all
that
we
are
never
ever
ever
going
to
have
any
form
of
slavery
and
voluntary
servitude
in
this
state,
and
then
I
have
one
quick
follow-up
question:
is
that
your
intention
in
this
bill.
J
I
David
and
chairman-
and
I
I
know
it's
brought
up
a
couple
of
times-
I
will
say
that
as
a
policy
discussion,
I
think
it
is
a
good
idea
for
prisoners,
both
in
jails
or
prisons,
to
be
able
to
earn
a
wage,
and
there
are
many
programs
out
there
that
do
that.
We've
talked
around
that
issue,
but
it
actually
is
better
from
a
recidivism
standpoint
to
reduce
that
and
so
that
prisoners
can
work
at
a
good
job
while
they're
in
and
be
paid
a
reasonable
wage
for
that
work.
J
I
think
that
I
here
again,
I
would
concur,
and
you
know
you
tried
to
put
you
you
know
folks,
tell
you
they
had
the
best
wisdom
without
all
these
degrees,
phds,
bs's
and
ms's.
They
had
the
best
sense
in
the
world
because
they
had
a
lot
of
just
what
they
called
mother
with
good
common
sense.
The
fact
of
it
is,
is
that
yes,
you're
absolutely
right
if
you're
incarcerated,
I
mean
I
personally
would
want
to
go
out
and
work
and
do
something
and
work
the
energy
off
and
stay
out
of
trouble
plus.
J
D
Thank
you.
I
was
just
conversing
in
a
sidebar
conversation
with
my
favorite
minority
leader
here,
the
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
one
of
the
discus
things
we
said
and-
and
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
say
the
record
and
maybe
leader
lambert,
said
inmates,
inmates,
counties
or
state
are
not
even
though
they
may
receive
compensation,
are
not
considered
employees
in
either
case
entitled,
50
in
the
state
statute
or
in
federal
law.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
say
that
and
if
it's
intent,
it's
truly
what
and
I
believe
it
is.
D
What
he's
saying
the
confusion
is
really
about.
Is
this
an
employee
or
is
this
not
employee,
and
are
we
required
to
employ
folks
because
of
this,
and-
and
I
think,
based
on
that
that
that's
not
the
intended
sponsor,
nor
is
the
intent
of
this
legislation.
D
No,
I
will
say
that
I
was
able
to
look
at
the
language,
that's
currently
in
state
statute,
as
it
relates
to
this
this
topic,
or
this
subject
matter
and
the
proposed
language
which
this
revision
would
make
and
all,
but
it's
literally
all
the
same
words
in
a
different
distribution
of,
and
I
guess
if
you
could
help
me
and
that's
why
I
was
talking
to
the
leader,
camper
and
she's
she's,
doing
a
great
job
telling
me.
But
maybe
you
could
tell
me
this
word
re
reappropriation.
D
What
what
changes
about
it
in
your
mind
or-
and
I
think
that
speaks
to
the
intent.
So
what
is
the
hope
to
change
based
upon
reconfiguring
the
words?
Does
that
make
sense.
C
J
Good,
thank
you
ma'am
again,
ma'am
cheerleading.
Well,
when
you
say
reappropriation,
these
are
words
that,
hopefully,
don't
have
us
confused,
but,
as
I
shared
just
a
moment
ago,
what
it
does
it,
I
think
in
my
mind,
it
would
be
how
we
mentally
psychologically
look
at
human
beings
that
are
in
the
system.
We,
we
are
looking
at
people
that
they're
just
simply
human
beings.
J
It's
you
know
not
three
fifths,
not
slaves,
not
just
another,
even
though
they're
incarcerated
they've
done
some
bad
things.
Okay,
but
they're
still
human
beings,
and
this
simply
clears
that
up.
You
know
it
has
nothing
to
do
again
with
them
going
to
work
what
they're
paid?
No,
it's
not
the
bill,
that's
dealing
with
their
employment
or
what
you're
paying
per
hour
per
minute.
What
have
you
nothing?
I'm
not
interested
in
that
at
all.
D
C
C
E
C
E
E
C
E
Any
discussion,
if
not
we're
voting
on
house
bill,
181
to
send
it
to
calendar
and
rules
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
no
eyes
have
it
house
bill.
181
moves
to
calendar
and
rules.
Item
number
57
on
the
calendar
is
house
bill
496
by
chair
lady
hazelwood.
This
one.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
This
one
does
have
an
amendment.
E
E
C
This
just
makes
permanent
the
removal
of
the
cap
on
the
state
shares
sales,
state,
shared
sales,
tax
revenue
for
premier
type
tourist
resort,
municipalities.
I'm
sorry,
my
tongue
is
twisted.
This
only
impacts,
pigeon,
forge
and
gatlinburg,
and
this
proposal
would
divert
the
funds
above
the
cap
to
25,
to
the
state
25
to
the
municipalities
and
50
to
severe
county
for
educational
purposes.
E
E
C
And
the
amendment
does
make
the
bill.
This
is
just
establishes
a
child
care
task
force.
I
think,
we've
all.
We
were
probably
aware
of
the
issues
with
finding
quality
and
affordable
and
accessible
child
care
in
tennessee
prior
to
the
pandemic,
but
the
pandemic
really
exposed
the
need
for
that
to
even
greater
extent.
E
Questions
been
called
on
the
amendment.
We
are
voting
to
add
amendment
5871
to
house
bill
598,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
oppose
eyes
have
it.
The
amendment
has
been
added
to
the
bill.
Chair
lady
hazelwood
question's
been
called
on
the
bill,
we're
voting
on
sending
house
bill
598
to
calendar
and
rules,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
opposed
eyes.
Have
it
house
bill
598
goes
to
calendar
and
rules.