►
Description
House Finance, Ways, & Means Subcommittee- April 19, 2022- House Hearing Room 1
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
You
very
much
I'd
like
to
call
the
finance
ways
and
means
subcommittee
to
order
for
april
the
19th
2022
members,
any
announcements
or
personal
orders
before
you
begin
seeing
none.
We
have
various
calendars
before
us
today,
but
for
the
purposes
of
this
meeting-
and
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone
is
clear
for
the
purposes
of
this
committee-
we
will
only
be
taking
up
calendar
one.
So
if
you
do
not
have
a
bill
on
calendar
one,
it
will
be
taken
up
and
you're
on
the
other
calendars
you'll
actually
be
taken
up,
probably
around
2
30.
A
And
of
course,
if
you
haven't
already
noticed,
time
is
very
fluid
today,
so,
but
we
will
be
taking
up
those
bills.
So
let
me
just
go
back
so
we'll
have
right
now
subcommittee,
of
course,
we're
beginning
now
we'll
take
up
the
bills
on
calendar
one.
Once
we
finish
up,
we
will
actually
adjourn
and
then
we
will
come
back
as
far
as
budget
sub
is
concerned.
Around
2
30.
full
will
actually
meet
at
one
o'clock.
So
that's
the
tentative
schedule
and
again
those
times
could
could
be
a
little
bit
fluid.
A
So
just
bear
with
us
as
we
work
through
this
all
right,
so
we
will
yeah.
We
will
actually
recess
at
the
end
of
this
committee.
Sorry,
I
misspoke
there
and
said
adjourn
all
right.
Let's
get
started
members
we're
going
to
begin
with.
Item
number
one
item
number
one
on
our
calendar
is
going
to
be
house
bill
2040
by
chairman
whitson.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
committee
house,
bill
2040
as
a
man
that
creates
standards
for
electronic
monitoring
companies
operating
the
state
of
tennessee.
With
that,
mr
chairman,
I
renew
my
motion.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
chairman
whitson,
for
this
description
members.
You
heard
the
description
discussion
on
house
bill
2040.,
seeing
none
house
bill
2040
does
have
a
cost
associated
with
it,
so
we
will
have
to
place
it
behind
the
budget
considered
a
later
date.
Any
objection
seeing
none
buying
the
budget,
all
right.
That
brings
us
to
item
number.
Two
on
our
calendar
item
number
two
is
going
to
be
house
bill
637
by
chairman
howell,
there's
chairman
howell.
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
it
looks
like
you-
have
an
amendment
that
has
been
filed.
A
Drafting
code
zero,
one
one,
two
one
four!
Is
that
correct?
That's
what
I
have,
mr
chairman,
all
right!
You
have
a
motion.
The
second
looks
like
this
actually
rewrites
the
bill.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
get
this
put
on
in
the
proper
posture.
You
have
a
motion.
Second,
any
discussion
on
the
amendment.
Seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
the
amendment
zero
one,
one,
two
one,
four
on
two
house
bill,
637,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed,
no
the
eyes
have
it
we're
back
on
the
bill
as
amended.
You'll
recognize,
sir.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
committee.
I
think
we've
tried
our
best
to
talk
to
most
everyone
on
this
committee
about
the
situation.
This
bill
addresses
an
unfair
sales
tax
situation
that
currently
exists
with
respect
to
the
application
of,
what's
called
the
repossession
credit
that
is
found
in
tca
section
67-6-507.
D
Unlike
most
used
car
dealers,
the
average
used
car
dealer
in
tennessee
will
require
a
about
a
15
to
20
percent
down
payment
of
a
used
car
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
the
full
amount
of
the
sales
tax
has
to
be
paid.
I
believe,
within
30
days
to
the
state
of
tennessee,
that's
a
pretty
high
hurdle
for
most
low-income
low-middle-income
consumers,
who
are
looking
for
reliable
transportation
to
get
them
to
and
from
work
to
and
from
church
to
and
from
schools.
D
D
D
D
Another
auditor
comes
along
a
new
and
different
auditor
from
the
department
of
revenue,
or
he
may
have
been
a
contract
audit.
I'm
not
sure,
looked
at
the
situation
in
2015
and
said
no,
you
do
not
qualify
for
this
tax
credit
and
required
them
to
pay
a
2
million
reimbursement
and
requires
them
to
pay
since
2015
until
now
about
a
half
million
dollars
a
year
in
additional
taxes
that
they
were
not
required
to
pay
previously,
and
this
is
amounted
to
a
total
of
about
five
million
dollars
since
2009.
D
D
D
We
believe
the
company
was
qualified
according
to
the
code,
to
take
this
tax
credit
in
the
past.
We
believe
that
it
is
currently
qualified
to
take
this.
Take
this
tax
credit.
It
has
passed
the
senate
revenue
subcommittee
with
a
positive
recommendation,
and
I
understand
it's
on
the
senate
floor
today.
D
This
company
and
other
companies,
like
it
in
tennessee,
are
being
penalized
for
trying
to
help
people
to
get
into
a
good
used
car
at
a
reasonable
down
payment
price
and
paying
the
sales
tax
for
them
upfront
and
they
pay
it
back
monthly,
it's
generating
a
windfall
for
the
state.
It's
just
wrong
and
I
would
appreciate
the
committee's
approval
of
this
bill.
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
to
my
seat,
mate,
chairman
hal.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
know
you're
doing
this
work
for
your
constituency.
I
appreciate
that.
There's
always
a
fear
that
tax
policy
could
put
someone
out
of
business,
and
I
know
you
mentioned
these
folks
have
been
in
business
for
four
decades.
E
Is
there
frustration
or
potential
frustration
where
this
business
says
we're
done?
I'm
just
gonna
throw
up
our
hands
and
we're
gonna
quit
fighting
the
quit.
Fighting
the
system
and
and
retire
and
go
to
the
house
is.
Is
that
a
possibility
chairman
chairman
hal.
D
Well,
I
can't
speak
for
the
constituent.
I
can
tell
you
this:
the
owner
of
the
business,
I've
known
him
for
years
he's
been
a
an
outstanding
local
citizen.
He
is
past
retirement
age
and
that
could
be
a
distinct
possibility
and,
I
might
add
to
the
committee.
This
is
not
unlike
the
same
situation.
We
saw
a
couple
of
years
ago
with
the
jack
daniels
audit
situation.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
representative
hall.
All
right
further
discussion
on
house
bill,
637
seeing
done
house
bill.
637
does
have
a
cost
associated
with
it,
so
we
will
have
to
place
it
behind
the
budget
and
consider
it
a
later
date.
So
without
objection
house
bill
637
is
behind
the
budget.
Thank
you
all
right
members.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
three
out
of
number
three
on
our
calendar.
It's
gonna
be
house
bill
2762
by
chairman
doggett.
A
B
A
A
B
I
can
offer
that
as
well.
We
would
prefer
so.
Thank
you.
What
we're
doing
is
codifying
right
now.
The
current
pay
scale
that
the
public
defenders
conference
and
the
district
attorney
general's
conference
are
doing
as
of
today
we're
just
putting
that
in
code.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Chairman
dog
members,
you've
heard
the
description
discussion
on
house
bill
2762,
seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
house
bill,
2762,
moving
on
to
full
finance,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye,
all
those
posts
know
the
eyes.
Have
it
house
bill
2762
moves
to
full
finance.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
right.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
four
on
our
calendar
out
of
number
four
is
going
to
be
house
bill
2850
by
chairman
kumar.
You
have
a
motion
and
a
second.
You
are
recognized
for
a
brief
description.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
committee
hospital.
2850
does
have
an
amendment
zero
one,
six,
eight
three
eight!
I
don't
know
if
it's
traveling,
thank
you,
members
and
friends
since
passage
of
constitutional
carry.
We
do
not
require
people
to
take
a
gun
safety
course.
Let's
face
it,
some
people,
a
lot
of
people
would
benefit
from
it
and
they
do
really
need
it.
This
bill
incent
incentive
people
to
take
this
course
in
the
form
of
a
payment
from
the
state
of
tennessee
towards
the
gun
safety
course.
G
A
All
right,
thank
you,
chairman
kumar
members,
you
heard
the
description
of
house
bill
2850.
Any
discussion
on
house
bill
2850,
seeing
none.
There
is
a
cost
associated
with
house
bill
2850,
so
we
will
have
to
place
it
behind
the
budget
and
reconsider
it
at
a
later
date.
So
without
objection
house
bill
2850
goes
behind
the
budget.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
All
right
members,
thank
you
for
your
patience.
All
right.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
five
item.
Number
five
is
going
to
be
house
bill,
2143
we're
going
to
roll
this
to
the
hill.
So
without
objection
house,
bill,
2143
rolled
to
the
hill
brings
us
to
item
number
six
on
our
calendar
item
number
six
is
going
to
be
house
bill
2545
by
representative
alexander.
B
Once
it
was
amended,
it
took
the
physical
note
off.
So
that's
basically
what
it
does.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Members
you've
heard
the
description
on
house
bill
2545
any
discussion.
Seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
house
bill,
25
45
may
be
gone
to
full
finance.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed,
no
the
eyes
have
it
house
bill
2545
moves
to
full
finance.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Committee.
A
A
Yes,
sir,
and
that
drafting
code,
you
have
a
motion
to
second
that
drafting
code
is
zero.
One.
Seven
five,
two
three.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct
all
right!
You
have
a
motion
a
second,
since
this
does
rewrite
the
bill.
Let's
go
ahead
and
get
this
put
onto
the
bill
and
then
we'll
we'll
recognize
you
to
explain
your
bill
as
amended.
So
thank
you,
sir
members,
in
discussion
on
the
amendment
saying
number
now
voting
on
drafting
code
zero,
one,
seven,
five,
two
three
on
to
house
bill:
2283,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Last
august
security
cameras
showed
a
group
of
men
holding
down
a
22
year
old,
dallas
spirit.
During
an
altercation
on
broadway
and
whiskey
row
bar
he
became
unresponsive
and
later
died.
H
The
grand
jury
has
indicted
six
people
for
reckless
homicide.
Six
of
the
employees
working
as
security
guards
were
unlicensed.
This
bill
is
in
response
to
that
we're
bringing
these
security
guards
under
what
they
call
pso
propriety
security
organizations
where
you
can
go
and
each
organization
or
each
establishment
can
have
its
own
security
force.
This
will
allow
the
for
training
of
not
only
to
help
the
take
safe,
take
take
down
techniques,
but
also
how
to
de-escalate
certain
situations,
and
with
that
explanation,
mr
chairman,
I'm
prepared
to
take
questions.
A
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Does
this
mean
that
no
one
would
be
able
to
work
security
unless
they
were
licensed?
From
now
on,
like
you
were
saying
that
these
folks
were
working
security
at
a
bar,
I
guess
there
were
bouncers
or
something
like
that.
That's
correct.
Does
that
mean
that
no
one
at
all
would
be
able
to
work
security
say
as
a
bouncer
or
something
unless
they
were
licensed
or
working
for
a
licensed
security
agency.
H
You're
recognized
this
bill
only
pertains
if
you've
got
a
license
from
the
abc
or
a
beer
board.
So
it's
not
going
to
apply
to
organizations
such
as
you
know,
a
dock
worker
at
a
walmart.
This
will
this
only.
This
only
applies
to
if
there,
if
you
do,
have
a
license
with
the
abc
or
the
local
billboard.
I
H
You
either
have
to
work
for
a
licensed
security
company
or
you
have
to
work
under
one
of
these
psos
proprietary
security
organizations,
which
any
organization
or
any
establishment
can
create
their
own
pso,
but
they
it's
done
from
establishment
to
establishment
and,
yes,
they
would
have
to
be
licensed.
Representative
lynn,.
I
I
And
you
know
we
had
a
voluntary
program
where
convenience
stores
could
send
their
folks
for
training
and
they
sent
their
folks
for
training
on
you
know
underage
drinking
that
would
get
them
certain
credits.
I
H
Beck
they
have
to
be
representative,
they
have
to
be
licensed
already.
H
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
good
sponsor
is
a
business
that
employs
someone
in
this
type
of
role
already
or
any
of
their
employees.
Aren't
they
already
liable
for
what
those
employees
do
represented
back?
They.
H
Are
liable,
for
example,
whiskey
row
is
being
sued
for
wrongful
death
as
we
stand
here
today,
but
what
this
bill
aims
to
do
is
keep
the
patrons
safe
through
de-escalation
and
and
through
training,
to
help
these
security
guards
not
put
the
patrons
in
peril
such
as
this
situation,
where
they
sat
on
the
young
man
and
literally
suffocated
him
representative
todd.
F
H
Beck
chairman
todd,
you
would
certainly
think
so,
but
this
is
just
making
it
clear
that
in
the
training
that's
required
that
they
will
have
that
type
of
training.
But
I
agree
with
you.
If
I
was
running
a
business,
I
would
certainly
make
sure
that
the
the
security
guards
that
I
hired
were
trained
properly
on
de-escalation
and
helping
keep
peop
patrons
safe.
That's
only
good
business,
and
I
agree
with
you
there.
Unfortunately,
for
example,
this
particular
case
that
fell
through
the
cracks.
F
Representative
todd,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and,
as
you
said,
this
makes
it
clear
it.
It
actually
requires
it.
It
doesn't
just
make
it
clear.
I
think
it's
taken
a
good
idea
that
a
business
should
consider
to
implement
and
requiring
it
in
our
code,
and
I
think,
that's
to
me
crossing
the
line
of
something
that
we
probably
don't
need
to
really
do.
F
So
I
just
just
don't
see
this
see
it
as
a
good
idea
to
put
this
into
code
when
it's
more
of
a
common
sense,
practical
matter
that
they
should
be
doing
on
their
own
to
make
sure
their
liability
is
reduced
as
much
as
possible.
So
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thank.
A
A
J
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
committee.
This
bill
requires
the
division
of
tenncare
to
designate
continuous
glucose
monitors
as
a
diabetic
supplies
on
the
state
preferred
drug
list
formulary.
This
requires
ten
care
to
make
cgms
available
to
enrollees
with
diabetes,
who
are
insulin
dependent
if
medical
necessary,
basically
what
it
does.
It
allows
you
in
real
time
to
check
your
your
blood
sugar,
I'm
actually
wearing
one
right
now
and
it's
been
helping
me
out
so
and
I
look
at
my-
I
have
my
wife
listed
as
I
can
share
it.
J
So
if
something
happens
to
me,
she'll
be
alerted,
and
so
I
can
look
at
it.
So
my
blood
sugar
right
now
it's
a
little
high,
but
it's
at
138,
but
it
might
be
because
I
was
rushing
to
get
here,
but
what
it
does
it
allows
people
to
monitor
and
check
their
blood
sugar
on
a
regular
basis,
a
quick
story
about
a
month
ago.
J
I
wasn't
feeling
too
well,
and
I
didn't
know
why,
and
so
I
just
laid
down,
because
normally
I'm
pretty
in
tune
with
my
body,
but
my
wife
said:
have
you
checked
your
blood
sugar
and
I
did
and
my
blood
sugar
was
extremely
high,
but
sometimes
when
you
have
diabetes
and
your
blood
sugar,
it
gets
high.
You
don't
think
clearly
you
get
cloudy
and
normally
I'm
on
top
of
it,
but
it
didn't.
J
But
what
this
bill
would
do
would
lower
the
monitor
cost
from
about
1500
to
about
665
dollars
per
unit,
currently
10
care
contracts
with
managed
care
organizations
or
mcos
to
deliver
the
glucose
monitoring
for
insulin,
dependent
diabetics,
but
right
now
it's
done
as
a
doable
metal
is
done
through
a
doable
medical
medical
equipment
model,
which
is
you
have
to
go,
see
a
doctor
and
then
they
have
to
order
it
and
it
takes
about
a
month
to
get
it.
J
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
we
can
all
right
members
we're
on
item
number
11
house
bill
2456..
We
got
a
request
to
roll
this
one
spot
without
objection
so
move.
We
are
on
item
number
12
house
bill
2253
by
representative
sparks.
Do
I
have
a
motion?
A
second?
We
have
a
motion.
Second
you're
recognized
for
brief
description.
Yes,.
K
What
this
bill
does
requires
lea
is
to
classify
school
nurses
as
licensed
personnel
for
salary
purposes.
The
last
few
years
we've
it's
been
shown
that
how
critical
school
nurses
are.
K
There
was
a
study
conducted
by
in
2020
by
dolores
chairman,
doris
gresham
of
education
and
chairman
kumar,
that
only
a
third
of
our
nurses
in
tennessee
are
placed
on
a
certified
schedule
and
in
fact
the
study
also
reported
that
two-thirds
of
our
school
nurses
hold
an
rn
or
higher
level
of
education,
meaning
they
are
similarly
educated
as
our
cte
teachers
who
are
paid
the
same
as
other
certified
staff.
K
This
comes
to
fight
the
fact
that
school
districts
actually
see
receive
more
money
for
school
nurses
than
they
do.
Teachers,
school
nurses
are
paid
from
the
classroom
component
at
a
rate
of
75,
as
opposed
to
70
percent
of
the
districts
that
receive
they
receive
through
the
instructional
component
for
teachers.
K
Furthermore,
members
nurses
and
teachers
are
treated
exactly
the
same
as
the
state's
retirement
system
tcrs,
as
districts
are
required
to
contribute
the
same
amount
of
money
for
nurses
as
they
are
teachers.
But
that's
what
this
request
is.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Representative.
Sparks
members.
You've
heard
the
description
of
house
bill
2253
any
discussion
seeing
none.
There
is
a
cost
associated
with
house
bill
2253,
so
we
will
have
to
place
it
behind
the
budget
consider
at
a
later
date.
So
without
objection
house
bill
2253
will
go
behind
the
budget.
Yes,
sir,
all
right!
That
brings
us
back
to
item
number
11..
Item
number
11
again
is
house
bill
2456
by
representative
sparks.
Yes,
you
have
a
motion
a
second.
You
are
recognized
on
house
bill,
2456.
K
Yes,
chairman
and
committee
members,
if
I
can
give
you
a
little
brief
history
of
this
piece
of
legislation
about
three
years
ago,
I
was
kind
of
dealing
with
struggles
in
my
life
with
you've
heard
me.
Talk
about
my
sister.
That's
in
a
nursing
home
had
a
brain
tumor.
In
fact,
I
was
sitting
about
where
camper
is.
K
When
I
got
the
phone
call,
she
had
a
bad
fall
and
had
a
was
in
a
had
a
brain
bleed
and
was
in
a
coma
for
on
life
support
for
two
and
a
half
months
that
I
remembered
I
prayed
over,
believe
it
or
not.
She
came
to.
I
know
it
sounds
odd.
She
came
to
she
started
talking
and
now.
She's
in
a
nursing
home,
sadly
lost
everything
to
her
name
and
my
sister
worked
for
insurance
company.
That
was
what
was
wild.
K
I
was
really
disappointed
with
the
insurance
company
and
got
a
mother
and
a
nurse
at
home,
so
I'm
kind
of
seeing
struggles
in
our
lives
with
many
of
our
us
deal
with
with
family
members,
especially
when
you
start
getting
over
50.,
and
so
I
called
ralph
webber
here
that
owns
a
company
called
metabid
he's
a
healthcare
consultant,
and
I
just
said,
ralph,
what's
up
with
healthcare?
What's
going
on
with
healthcare,
and
I
said:
what
can
we
do
as
a
state
to
just
shed
more
transparency?
K
Just
add
free
market
principles
and
he
brought
up
reference-based
pricing.
Well,
I
didn't
know
what
reference-based
pricing
is.
Most
of
us
in
this
meeting
was
room
today,
don't
don't
know
what
respects
pricing
is,
but
I
think
reference-based
pricing
does
shed
some
light
and
full
transparency
on
healthcare.
K
If
you
look
at
products
and
services
in
this
world
economy,
I
don't
think
you'll
find
anything.
That's
more
jacked
up
and
messed
up
and
screwed
up
than
our
health
care
system,
whether
it's
pbms,
whether
it's
my
sister
that
lost
everything
to
her
name
or
other
areas
that
we've
all
dealt
with,
and
so
that's
what
led
to
the
legislation
that
legislation
led
to
a
summer
study.
The
pandemic
happened
so
that
kind
of
set
us
back
and
I'll.
Let
ralph
who's
on
the
list
to
testify.
K
A
All
right,
thank
you,
representative
sparks,
and
we
do
have
a
request
for
testimony
from
mr
ralph
weber,
so
members
without
objection,
we're
going
to
go
out
of
session
so
without
objection
we're
out
of
session,
and
we
will
ask
our
guests
to
please
come
up
to
the
podium
if
you'll
just
identify
yourself
give
us
a
brief
introduction.
You'll
have
three
minutes.
L
Okay,
it's
working
now
simply
the
the
bill
asks
that
the
state
health
plan
be
sent
to
tasser
study.
When
representative
sparks
introduced
house
bill
1366
in
2019,
he
requested
some
information
from
tn
finance.
L
What
we
got
from
tn
finance
was
the
build
charges
for
the
plan
year,
2018
covering
139
000
state
employees,
schools
and
higher
education,
employees,
total
of
280
000
people,
the
build
charges
were
2.7
billion
dollars
and
the
cost
of
the
plan
was
1.6
billion,
so
roughly
40
percent
less
than
the
bill
charges,
but
within
some
of
the
procedures
we
saw
a
huge
variance
in
pricing.
For
example,
ct
scan
of
the
abdomen.
The
average
price
was
635
dollars.
The
high
was
19
200.
L
for
a
colonoscopy.
The
average
was
1
212
dollars,
the
high
was
17
341
dollars
and
within
colonoscopy.
What
was
very
interesting
is
every
provider
that
was
over.
Ten
thousand
dollars
was
rated
two
to
three
stars
by
medicare
out
of
five
two
to
three
stars
on
quality,
whereas
everybody
under
5000
was
rated
five
stars,
so
the
less
you
paid
the
higher
the
quality,
so
they
were
paying
these
huge
charges
for
lower
quality
providers.
L
The
initial
bill
called
for
reference-based
pricing
to
pay
providers
at
whatever
medicare
pays.
The
providers,
plus
an
extra
75
percent
tn
finance,
said
that
we're
only
paying
providers
150
of
medicare
right
now,
so
they
put
a
fiscal
note
on
it.
So
the
bill
was
amended
to
reduce
the
cost
at
that
time.
In
2018,
tn
finance
said
that
they
paid
out
of
network
provider
six
percent
less
than
in-network
providers,
so
simply
changing
to
all.
Out-Of-Network
providers
would
have
saved
the
state
96
million
dollars
a
year,
so
there
was
definitely
a
need
to
to
have
further
study.
L
Chairman
martin
daniel
became
a
co-sponsor
of
the
bill
and
he
asked
for
some
more
data
on
the
spending
and
as
soon
as
he
as
soon
as
he
asked
for
that,
a
couple
of
lawsuits
were
filed
to
suppress
the
the
need
to
disclose
that
data.
L
L
When
we
looked
at
the
data
that
tn
finance
presented,
that
said,
they
paid
basically
what
medicare
paid
plus
fifty
percent.
I
said:
well,
let's
just
cap
it
at
that:
let's
not
have
somebody
being
paid
three
thousand
percent
more.
Why
should
anybody
be
paid
more
nineteen
thousand
dollars
for
ct
scan?
Some
of
the
providers
were
paid
more
than
they
billed
they
sent
in
a
bill
and
they
were
paid
more
than
they
built.
I
mean
sometimes
I'll
leave
a
tip
if
I
get
good
service,
but
I'm
not
going
to
pay
more
than
I'm
billed.
L
Final
statement
attorney
general:
I
understand,
didn't
audit
and
has
the
results
they
haven't
been
released.
Yet
I
think
the
tasser
study
will
take
that
into
account,
as
well
as
ask
for
some
more
data
on
spending
and
hopefully
will
save
the
state
definitely
more
than
100
million
a
year.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
webber,
and
before
you
leave
members
any
questions
or
comments
for
our
guests,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much
for
for
being
here.
I
actually
sat
on
the
insurance
committee
a
couple
years
ago
and
heard
your
testimony.
So
thank
you
again
for
being
here
in
your
time,
members
without
objection,
we're
going
to
go
back
into
session
without
objection,
we're
back
in
session,
and
we
are
back
on
the
bill
representing
sparks
any
follow-up.
Well,.
K
I
was
just
going
to
mention
we
did
send
a
letter
to
herbert
slattery
the
a.g,
requesting
the
findings
of
the
audit
that
we
paid
for.
I
think
this
committee
voted
for
that.
I
believe
it
maybe
it's
two
year
two
years
ago
the
audit
did
cost
us
some
money
to
get
implemented,
but
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
even
the
bible
talks
about
and
luke
talks
about.
Suppose
one
of
you
wants
to
build
a
tower.
K
Wouldn't
you
first
study
and
estimate
the
cost
to
see
if
you
have
enough
to
complete
it.
I
think
all
we're
doing
is
slowing
down
sharpening
our
axe
and
studying
this
and
if
taser
says,
look,
there's
nothing
to
this.
It
doesn't
help
transparency
I'll
leave
this
alone.
You
won't
hear
from
any
anymore.
K
I
think
something
positive
will
come
out
of
this.
The
leading
cause
of
bankruptcy
is
health
care
cost.
I
didn't
know
this
until
I
started
researching.
We
spend
more
money
on
health
care
than
any
other
country
on
the
face
of
the
earth
that
just
shocks
me.
You
know
because
we
should
have
efficiencies,
we've
led
the
world
and
military.
We
live
the
world
in
production
and
technology,
so
many
advancements,
but
in
healthcare
you
know
we
seem
to
drop
the
ball
and
I
often
think
of
my
sister.
You
know
she.
She
was
a
former
journalist.
K
A
M
Thank
you
chairman.
Thank
you,
representative,
sparks
very
important
subject
matter,
as
as
your
presenter
testified
and-
and
you
stated
earlier,
this
is
something
that
we've
been
studying.
Tasks
are
not
specific
to
this
data,
but
this
realm
have
have
been
for
a
while.
This
committee
is
tasked
with
sending
bills
for
tasks
or
study.
M
There
is
a
calendar
this
afternoon,
but
because
of
the
timing
and
that's
being
at
the
end
of
the
late
hour,
I
guess
you
could
say
around
and
third
hit
at
home
the
we're
not
able
to
refer
it
to
that
calendar
so
we're
having
to
transact
business
here,
but
of
those
four
bills
on
that
calendar.
M
We're
per
we're
only
supposed
to
take
two
and
send
us
tasser,
and
then
the
other
three
I've
met
with
the
other
members
and
advocated
to
them
saying
as
a
member
of
tasser,
I
will
communicate
with
dr
lippert
with
the
idea
that
we
would
study
these
for
that,
and
so,
as
as
you
and
I
discussed
earlier
today,
that's
kind
of
the
intent.
M
The
other
two
are
the
ones
that
the
committee
felt
like
that
they
wanted
to
study
in
tasser,
and
so
because
of
that
reason
we're
not
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
either
either
you
can
take
it
off
notice
and
I'll
advocate
with
dr
lippert
and
tasterd
as
a
member
of
tasser,
or
we
can
send
it
to
summer
study
and
vote
senate
summer
study
and
we
could
take
it
to
tasser.
M
K
K
If
we
come
back,
maybe
it's
not
100
million
worth
of
savings,
maybe
it's
5
million,
maybe
it's
a
million,
but
I
think
that
time
is
well
spent
for
us
to
study
the
cost,
I'm
at
the
mercy
of
the
chairman
and
and
the
members
of
this
body.
Remember
we
all
allocated
400
000.
If
I'm
mistaken,
to
conduct
audit
the
audit
is
in
the
ag's
office
we're
waiting
on
him
to
release
the
findings.
I
think
this
correlates
with
all
your
efforts
from
two
years
ago,
so
I'm
at
the
mercy
of
y'all,
chairman
williams,.
M
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
think
I
got
an
answer
out
of
that
representative
sparks
and
so
chairman
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
send
this
bill
to
summer
study.
Oh,
we
got
emotions
there.
A
second.
A
A
B
Thank
you,
chairman
hicks.
This
is
the
bill
that
would
change
the
grading
scale
in
tennessee
from
a
seven-point
scale,
to
a
10-point
scale
which
all
the
states
surrounding
us
have
in
most
of
the
other
states
in
the
united
states.
This
is
so
that
tennesseans
will
not
be
at
a
disadvantage
relative
to
applicants
from
other
states
when
they
apply
to
colleges
and
for
scholarships.
B
A
Right,
thank
you
for
this
description.
Representative
baum
members.
You've
heard
the
description
of
house
bill
324
any
discussion
hearing
nothing
seeing
none
the
bill
does
have
a
cost
associated
with
it,
so
we
will
have
to
place
it
behind
the
budget
and
consider
it
at
a
later
date.
So
without
objection
house
bill,
324
will
go
behind
the
budget.
A
item
number
14
is
house
bill,
2384,
that
is
by
leader
gant.
This
bill
was
previously
considered
in
place
behind
the
budget.
It
has
now
been
funded
in
the
administration
amendment
and
we
can
now
move
this
forward.
So
any
objection
to
reconsidering
our
action
on
house
bill
2384.,
seeing
none
house
bill
2384
is
back
before
us
all
right.
Let's
we
have
a
motion
and
second
house
bill.
2384
leader,
gantt
you're
recognized.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
I'll,
be
very
brief.
This
is
brought
by
our
treasurer
treasurer
lillard
authorizes
the
state
treasurer
to
develop
and
implement
and
administer
a
program
to
award
grants
to
local
governments
and
volunteer
fire
departments
to
fund
a
length
of
service
award
known
as
losapp
beginning
in
fiscal
year.
2324.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
leader,
gantt
members.
You've
heard
the
description
of
house
bill
2384
any
discussion
hearing,
none
we're
not
going
to
nope.
He
doesn't
want
to
run
the
amendment
all
right.
Any
discussion
hearing,
none
seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
sending
house
bill
2384
on
to
full
finance,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed.
No
the
eyes
have
it
we're
sending
house
bill
2384
to
full
finance.
A
All
right
that
brings
us
to
item
number
15.
item
number
15
on
our
calendar
is
going
to
be
house
bill
2609
by
chairman
hazelwood.
You
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
You
are
recognizing.
It
looks
like
there's
an
amendment
drafting
code,
zero,
one,
five,
six,
five,
six
that
rewrites
the
bill
is
that
correct
that.
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
second
on
the
amendment?
You
have
a
motion,
a
second,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
this
put
onto
the
bill.
Any
discussion
on
the
amendment
hearing,
none
seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
amendment
zero,
one,
five,
six,
five
to
house
bill,
2609,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed.
No
the
eyes
have
it
we're
back
on
the
bill
as
amended
you're
recognizing
chair
lady
hazelwood,.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
This
bill
just
basically
would
do
for
the
chad
lookouts
similar
to
what
we
did
for
the
knoxville
smokies
last
year.
If
and
when
the
lookout
stadium
is
built,
then
this
would
allow
the
lookouts
to
keep
the
sales
tax
from
within
the
stadium.
There
is
one
difference
in
this
amendment
that
I
think
makes
it
better,
and
that
is
that
the
county
would
still
continue
to
collect
the
portion
of
the
sales
tax
that's
generated
for
education
that
would
still
go
into
the
education
pool.
G
A
Right,
thank
you.
Chair
lady
hazelwood
members.
You've
heard
the
description
of
house
bill
2609
any
discussion,
seeing
none
we're
now
voting
on
house
bill,
2609,
moving
on
to
full
finance,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed.
No
the
eyes
have
it
house
bill
2609
news
to
full
finance
members.
That
brings
us.
A
That
brings
us
back
to
item
number
we're
going
to
go
to
item
number
10.
item
number
10
is
going
to
be
house
bill
2397
and
we
are
without
a
dejection,
we're
going
to
place
without
objection,
we're
going
to
place
house
bill
2397
behind
the
budget.
So
without
objection
sing
done
house
bill.
2397
goes
by
on
the
budget,
all
righty.
That
brings
us
to
item
number
five.
A
N
And
I
know
this
has
been
through
approximately
six
or
seven
weeks
of
committee
hearings
in
education,
the
better
part
six
months
on
working
with
tennesseans
from
mountain
city
to
memphis
and
lots
of
different
groups.
So
I
know
you
guys
have
read
this
and
know
this
thoroughly,
so
I'm
not
going
to
give
a
big
long
recitation
of
what
it
is,
but
it
is
a
change
from
the
bep
formula
to
new
funding
formula
that
is
student-centered
that
creates
a
base
funding
of
6860
per
student,
and
that
is
a
big
shift
from
what
we
do
now.
N
We
fund
classrooms,
we
fund
schools,
we
fund
systems,
but
we
don't
focus
on
funding
students
and,
as
part
of
that,
it
would
also
focus
on
weights,
above
and
beyond
that,
for
economically
disadvantaged
concentration
of
poverty
with
the
different
school
districts,
sparse
school
districts,
small
school
districts,
I
mean,
if
you're
in
a
sparse
school
district.
Quite
frankly,
it
costs
more
to
run
your
buses,
they
run
longer
distances.
I
mean
it's
just
if
you're
an
economically
disadvantaged
area,
those
children
need
additional
resources.
N
N
It's
a
significant
step
forward
and
it's
a
huge
amount
of
funds
that
are
taxpayer
funds,
and
so
part
of
this
is
more
accountability
than
we've
ever
had
at
the
state
level
to
ensure
that
these
funds
are
being
utilized
to
literally
leverage
for
our
children's
future
in
a
better
education.
Mr
chairman,
we
stand
for
questions.
A
O
Thank
you
chairman
and
apologize
for
the
late
filed
amendment,
and
my
understanding
is,
is
the
the
exact
same
amendment
is
in
the
senate,
and
so
with
that
I
would
draw
it.
A
E
Thank
you,
chairman
and
sponsor.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
do
have
a
question
that
may
get
into
some
of
the
minutia
of
it.
If
it's
all
right,
some
of
our
county
leaders
have
asked
some
questions
and
it
may
go
into
depth
on
on
a
county
level,
funding
in
in
schools
and
students
that
may
be
transitioning
from
one
county
to
the
next.
So
I
appreciate
your
your
indulgence.
E
N
E
N
E
E
Thank
you,
yes,
sir.
Thirdly,
if
a
student
leaves
a
local
school
system
to
attend
a
private
school,
does
any
of
the
state,
federal
or
or
local
match,
follow
that
student.
N
Nail
cert
would
not
under
this
bill
if
they
go
to
a
private
school
they've
left
the
school
system
and
again
there
is
some
lag
time
on
when
that
school
system
would
go
down
by
one
student,
because,
similarly
to
the
bep,
a
large
portion
of
the
ep
is
how
many
children
are
in
those
schools,
and
so
with
this
we're
funding,
children
and
children's
education,
and
so
it
it
would
eventually
reduce
that
district's
funding.
But
it
is
not
immediate.
Okay,.
E
N
Yes,
sir,
that
is
correct
and
again
you
know
they
all
have
to
build
a
base
budget,
and
so
that's
why
that
6860
number
is
very
important
and
over
time,
obviously,
in
this
new
formula,
which
is
why
the
implementation
of
this
and
it's
you
know
if
we're
able
to
pass
this
this
year.
This
gives
everybody.
You
know
six
eight
months
to
be
able
to
run
through
every
aspect
of
this
run.
Those
numbers
build
their
base
budgets
around
it
and
there
there's
approximately
500
million
dollars
for
cte
funding
in
this
budget.
N
That
is,
is
a
set
aside,
so
that
billion
dollars
that
an
additional
500
is
set
aside
for
next
year's
base
budget,
but
all
of
our
school
systems
will
have
an
opportunity
to
look
at
every
single
one
of
those
numbers
and
run
through
that.
What
we
didn't
want
to
do
is
exactly
the
questions
you're
asking,
which
are
right
on
point,
as
always,
is
to
pass
it
past
this
right
now,
and
it
goes
in
effect
july
1.,
my
school
district
and
yours
they're,
already
90
into
the
process
of
building
their
budget
for
this
year.
N
So
while
they
all
have
filed
lawsuits
saying
that
the
bep
is
not
sufficient
for
their
needs,
you
know
we
are
working
on
a
new
formula,
but
it
is
for
next
year
to
give
them
that
kind
of
lag
time.
E
I
do
want
to
offer
an
abstract
thought
as
as
we're
looking
at
at
the
funding,
and
I
understand
the
the
need
and
desire
of
of
funding
an
additional
funding
mechanism
for
folks
living
in
poverty,
children
living
in
poverty,
and
we're
certainly
going
to
do
that
and
that's
part
of
it,
but
at
some
point
in
time
as
we're
working
through
other
pieces
of
legislation,
the
tennessee
opportunity
act
some
of
our
tanf
funding
as
we're
looking
to
raise
all
families
out
of
poverty
eventually
and
and
help
our
working
families,
and
I'm
excited
about
the
opportunities
that
we're
going
to
have
with
the
opportunity
act
that
that
representative
terry
passed
last
year.
E
We've
been
working
on
for
the
last
calendar
year
at
some
point
in
time.
I
hope
that
we
can
get
to
the
point
10
years
from
now
15
years
from
now
20
years.
From
now
where
funding
students
in
poverty
is
not
something
that
we're
that
we're
doing,
that.
We're
rising
all
that
the
tide
is
rising
all
boats
and
we
don't
see
that
as
such
a
such
a
huge
funding
mechanism.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
say
that
chairman
and
members.
Thank
you.
P
P
But
if
we
look
at
you
know
these
transformative
changes
in
education,
we've
done
over
the
years,
it's
taken,
maybe
two
or
three
legislative
sessions
to
get
it
done,
because
it
is
major
it's
going
to
affect
our
kids
and
parents
and
teachers
for
years.
So
I'm
concerned
about
what
appears
to
be
a
rush
to
get
it
done.
Would
you
care
to
expound
on
that
talk
about
that?
You
know,
maybe
assure
the
people.
You
know
that
this
is
something
we
absolutely
have
to
get
done
now.
Why
can't
we
wait
till
next
year?
N
Later,
thank
you
so
much
for
that
question
because
I
mean
you
know
there.
There
have
been,
as
you
said,
committees
that
were
put
together
over
the
last
six
months,
but
I
mean
you
know
you
and
I've
been
here
quite
a
while,
and
I've
been
here
for
10
years
and
every
single
year.
This
comes
up
every
single
year.
It's
hey!
We
got
to
do
something
with
the
bep:
it's
not
working
all
right,
it's
not
fun
in
our
school
district
properly
I
mean
I've
heard
both
republicans
and
democrats
say.
Look.
N
The
bep
is
not
working
for
our
schools,
it's
not
working
for
our
kids,
and
so
I
I
personally
my
kids
at
this
point
are
in
middle
school
and
elementary
school.
The
whole
time
I've
been
here
they've
just
gotten
a
year
older
in
a
school
system
that
doesn't
have
a
funding
formula,
that's
working
well
for
them
and
again
that's
across
the
board.
I've
heard
from
everybody
that
they
don't
like
the
way
the
beep
works
and
I've
heard
many
people
say
they
don't
understand
the
mechanisms
within
the
bep.
N
I
will
say
that
just
takes
time
diving
into
it,
but
when
you
really
dive
into
it
it
does
not
fund
children
a
child's
education
in
the
way
it
should
so
that
they
get
what
they
need
to
succeed.
It
just
doesn't
it's
a
30
year
old
formula
that
doesn't
meet
today's
standards,
so
what
I
would
say
is
as
far
as
rushed
it
absolutely
has
not
been
rushed.
I
mean
this
has
been
years
in
the
making
it's
been
30
years
in
the
making,
quite
frankly,
but
specifically
specifically
since
last
year.
N
Coming
into
this
year,
I
mean,
after
we
passed
several
educational,
really
improvements
within
the
code.
The
question
came
down
to.
Okay,
we've
done
all
this
other
stuff
to
try
to
come
out
of
the
pandemic
and
make
sure
our
kids
bounce
back.
What
are
we
doing
about
the
base
funding?
Are
we
investing
enough
in
k-12
education
and
is
the
state?
Do
it
in
a
way
that's
going
to
achieve
better
outcomes?
That's
why
this
is
needed
right
now.
N
That's
why
we
cannot
wait
because
I've
heard
people
say:
let's
kick
and
you're
not
saying
this,
but
I've
heard
people
say:
let's
kick
the
can
down
the
road.
Let's
study
this
over
the
summer,
I've
got
emails,
y'all
got
an
emails
on
that.
Those
are
folks
that
are
not
willing
to
step
up
and
do
the
difficult
work
that
we
were
all
elected
to
do
we're
sitting
in
these
seats
right
now.
N
If
we
wait
a
year,
my
kids
went
one
more
year
in
the
public
school
system
without
a
funding
formula
that
will
genuinely
address
their
literacy
needs,
we'll
genuinely
look
at
those
kids
that
have
difficulty
in
school
because
of
their
both
home
life
and
and
how
they
came
into
the
school
system.
We
have
children
that
have
a
variety
of
learning
needs
that
we're
not
funding
right
now,
because
we've
got
the
bep
and
so
we're
stuck
in
that
outdated
model
where
this
can
spring
us
forward.
N
So
why
it's
needed
right
now
is
because
every
single
one
of
us
should
care
about
the
kids
that
are
in
school,
especially
those
parents
that
are
out
there
that
are
begging
for
a
better
model.
That's
going
to
focus
on
k-k-3
literacy,
that's
going
to
focus
on
cte.
We've
got
russell
roughly
70
of
our
kids,
that
are
that
are
not
going
to
go
on
and
finish
out
a
four-year
degree.
N
They
need
to
get
an
education,
that's
going
to
lead
to
a
career,
because
you've
only
got
25
to
30
of
the
jobs
out
there
that
require
a
four-year
degree.
If
you're
going
to
be
an
architect,
an
engineer,
a
doctor
or
a
lawyer,
if
you're
going
to
pursue
one
of
those
pathways,
absolutely
you
got
to
go
all
the
way
in
school.
But
for
kids,
like
my
nephew,
that's
graduating
high
school
in
the
next
few
weeks.
N
He
wants
to
be
a
lineman
and
he's
going
to
make
a
ton
of
money
doing
that.
That
is
a
highly
skilled
trade.
This
prepares
all
of
our
kids
for
whatever
pathway
they
want
to
go
into
in
a
way
the
bep
never
dreamed
of
because
they
didn't
think
of
it
30
years
ago.
So
the
reason
it's
needed
right
now
is
our
kids
can't
wait
any
longer.
P
Thank
you
for
their
response.
As
I
remember
the
conversation
around
bep,
it
was
more
that-
and
I
heard
it
every
year.
P
Similarly,
like
you
did,
it
was
really
more
that
we
weren't
fully
funding
it,
and
so
there's
this
thought
that
it
may
be
an
outdated
formula
and
it
may
be,
but
part
of
the
problem
was
we
weren't
fully
funding
it,
so
we
could
fully
fund
it
and
yield
some
of
the
very
results
that
you're
talking
about
and
we
could
have
been
yielding
those
results
over
the
years
if
we
had
fully
funded
the
formula
I'll
move
past
that
point,
but
you
also
mentioned
the
base
amount
and
it's
about
68,
almost
6900
and
the
bep
is,
is
funded.
P
It
takes
into
account
the
student,
the
teachers
and
nurses,
and
that
so
could
you
talk
more
about
this
based
formula
and
how
do
we
account
for
increases
over
the
years?
What
goes
into
keep
up
with
inflation
and
and
all
of
these
factors
that
could
affect
the
base
fund
basis,
funding
formula.
N
Hey,
mr
chairman,
and
thank
you,
madam
leader,
so
I
will
say
this:
if
you
know
and
we
have
fully
funded
the
bep,
I
mean
we've
had
that
conversation
every
single
year.
When
you
look
at
an
evaluation
of
what
fully
funding
the
bep
is,
it
all
depends
on
who's
doing
the
evaluation
right.
So
I
mean
you,
you've
got
folks
that,
evaluate
it
and
say:
hey
look.
N
Multiple
analysis
on
the
bep
have
said
if
we
put
a
billion
extra
dollars.
Okay.
So
if,
if
we
overfund
the
bep
okay,
it
is
a
massive
massive
tax
increase
on
our
local
governments.
Next
year
I
mean,
if
you
put
a
billion
dollars
into
the
current
bep
formula
at
those
matches
in
that
local
match
equation.
As
it
is
right
now,
it
will
be
a
massive
burden
on
our
local
governments.
N
The
tissa
program
changes
that,
and
it
makes
it
a
significantly
less
burden
on
our
local,
so
the
state
is
stepping
up
and
doing
much
more
and
our
local
districts
will
not
have
to
do
as
much
and
that's
a
good
thing,
at
least
in
my
mind,
and
so
when
we've
talked
about
fully
funding
the
bep
over
the
years.
That's
been
most
of
the
conversations
I've
heard
is
you
know
the
state
needs
to
step
up
more
and
not
require
as
much
of
the
locals.
N
Now
the
the
base
formula
of
six
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty
dollars
per
student
figured
in
most
of
what
you've
said
already
and
that's
how
it
came
to
the
base.
Now
they
tore
it
down
all
the
way
to
the
the
bare
bones
and
built
it
back
up
to
that
level,
but
we're
still
leaving
that
in
local
control.
If
a
local
government,
just
as
in
sumner
county,
our
school
systems
go
above
and
beyond,
if
they
want
to
have
smaller
class
sizes,
if
they
want
to
have
more
nurses,
if
they
want
to
have
more
guidance.
A
And
I
guess
to
expound
on
that.
Thank
you,
leader,
camper,
just
to
go
a
little
bit
further
talking
about
that.
This
has
been
rushed
in
six
months
and
the
bep
review
committee.
I'm
I'm
just
curious
and
this
may
be
for
chairman
wyatt.
Can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
how,
over
the
years,
what
the
bep
review
committee
has
always
recommended?
How
has
that
fitted
into
the
new
tsa
funding
formula?
A
F
F
F
We're
going
to
be
no
closer,
we've
got
we'll
have
a
turnover,
probably
20
or
more
represents.
We've
got
to
bring
the
conversation
get
started
again.
The
timing
is
right
now,
ever
since
the
26
committees
that
came
together
last
fall
and
brought
their
reports
to
us,
we've
been
working
intensely
on
this
since
january
three
hard
months,
I'm
into
my
fourth
notebook
of
changes
and
additions
and
listening
to
conversations,
and
so
the
timing
is
right.
Now,
I'm
back
with
your
question
on
the
bep
I
want
to
make
make
this
point.
F
F
We
have
11
000
teachers
hired
across
the
state
that
are
outside
the
bep
formula
of
what
we
do
so
every
year
we
send
education
committee
and
we
look
for
another
40
million
dollars
to
bring
the
ratio
of
nurses
from
from
one
in
3
000
down
to
one
to
seven.
Fifty
or
we
try
to
get
raises
to
teachers.
It
just
doesn't
work
so
this
formula.
The
reason
I
really
like
this
particular
formula
is
because
we
are
funding
based
upon
the
needs
of
the
students.
F
You
have
your
base,
you
have
your
weights,
you
have
direct
funding
and
so
a
school
district
that
is
really
sharp
is
going
to
take
this
and
they're
going
to
do
wonders
school
districts
that
don't
we
as
a
state
have
one
more
form
of
accountability.
That
accountability
is
now
the
funding
right
now.
Their
only
accountability
is
really
testing
through
this
end,
of
course,
the
state
test.
So
we
are
we're
collecting
data
and
we're
saying
oh
you're
only
doing
so
well,
because
your
students
are
only
doing
so
third
grade
proficiency
reading
only
one
in
three.
F
Now
we
can
say
we
are
funding
you
fully
based
upon
your
student
needs.
Why
are
you
not
doing
better?
So
there's
a
lot
of
advantages
there,
but
back
to
the
chairman's
question
we've
discussed
this
year
after
year
after
year
and
so
going
to
a
student-based
funding
formula.
In
my
opinion,
it's
just
something
that
fixes
so
many
problems.
It
will
not
start
until
2023
2024.,
so
whatever
we
implement
now
it's
got
a
whole
year
and
we
come
back
in
january.
We
see
something
that
that
needs
fixing.
We
can.
We
can
work
on
that.
Does
that
help.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
members.
Any
discussion.
If
you
want
to
be
recognized,
please
let
me
know
I
do
have
a
question:
let's,
let's
not
jump
too
far
ahead
in
fiscal
year,
24.,
let's
back
up
just
for
a
second
fiscal
year
23..
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
on
this
one.
So
the
monies
that
you
know
we
I've
heard
it
said
that
high
schools
are
going
to
be
getting
a
million
dollars.
Middle
schools
are
going
to
be
getting
500
a
thousand.
A
I
need
a
little
more
clarity
on
that
and
I
know
the
department's
sitting
out
there
waiting
patiently
and
for
our
questions
and
you
guys
have
been
doing
a
great
job,
but
I
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
call
them
up
because
I
I
really
would
like
to
get
a
little
more
clarity
on
that.
So
if
the
department
would
go
ahead
and
make
your
way
up,
I
hate
for
y'all
to
walk
all
the
way
over
here
and
then
not
get
to
say
anything
so.
A
A
Affairs
and
thank
you
all
for
being
here-
and
let
me
say
this
and
and
I'm
not
going
to
embarrass
her,
but
I
do
want
her
to
know
folks,
if
you
all
want
to
know
probably
the
most
leaned
on
person
in
your
school
district.
You
can
look
at
miss
mariandersky,
because
that
is
her.
You
think
your
phone
rings
a
lot.
I
can
assure
you
her
phone
rings
a
lot,
and
sometimes
it's
actually
me
calling.
So
it's
good
to
see
you
mary
ann,
thank
you
for
being
here.
A
So,
let's
just
open
that
up
and
commissioner,
if
you
want
to
take
a
stab
or
if
assistant
commissioner
piercy,
which
everyone
wants
to
take
a
stab
talk
us
through
the
million
dollars,
that's
going
to
high
schools
versus
the
500
000
is
supposed
to
be
going
to
middle
schools.
That's
still
to
me
just
still
a
little
a
little
bit
confusing.
C
Yes,
sir,
so
appreciate
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
make
sure
to
clarify
is
the
the
governor's
proposal
for
500
million
dollars
for
cte
programs
would
be
separate,
and
apart
from
tsa,
so
just
making
sure
that
that's
that's
a
one-time
fund
that
he
is
proposing
in
that
proposal,
it
would
include
one
million
dollars
for
every
high
school.
It
also
includes
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
every
middle
school
or
mixed
model
school.
C
Those
are
our
schools
that
are
maybe
six
to
twelve
eight
twelves
things
like
that,
and
then
we
have
a
few
schools,
just
a
small
handful
that
are
under
100
students.
It
does
allow
for
200
000
for
those
for
those
very,
very
small
schools.
The
purpose
of
that
is
for
the
one-time
cost
of
expanding
innovative
programs.
You
think
about
some
of
the
early
grants
that
we
did
under
the
federal
relief
funding.
C
We
were
able
to
fund
over
20
innovative
school
models
across
the
state,
they're
doing
incredible
things
across
the
state
in
all
different
types
of
sectors.
Some
are
doing
ag
tech,
some
are
doing
teaching
as
a
profession.
We've
got
forestry
in
the
southwest,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
and
so
this
essentially
was
looking
at
the
the
early
results
of
that
pilot
and
that
group
of
districts
that
are
working
on
innovative
school
models
and
then
saying
how
can
we
expand
and
reshape
and
rethink
the
opportunities
available
for
all
students
across
the
state?
C
The
reason
for
the
consistent
amount
for
every
high
school
and
every
middle
school
is
that
these
are
startup
one-time
expenses.
Over
a
period
of
time,
machinery
is
going
to
cost
the
same,
no
matter
how
many
students
go
to
your
school
building
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
equitable
access
and
opportunity
for
all
students,
whether
they
went
to
a
very
large
high
school
or
a
very
small
high
school,
that
every
school
would
have
the
opportunity
to
start
new
and
innovative
programs.
A
So
walk
me
through
how's,
a
middle
school
because
I
I
think
about
in
my
school
district
and
500
000,
and
and
so
what
is
the
expectation
like
for
for
my
school
districts,
it's
career
exploration,
that's
kind
of
what
what
we
would
be
focused
on
identifying
that
getting
them
prepared
to
go
into
the
high
school
high
school.
So
walk
me
through
because
four
years
I
don't
care
how
many
years
you
give
them
middle
schools.
What
what
is
still
the
expectation?
A
C
Sure
great
question,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
heard
over
the
last
specifically
12
months
in
particular,
especially
from
our
school
districts,
is
that
they
wanted
to
have
more
opportunities
for
exposure
and
access
in
those
middle
school
grades,
but
oftentimes
that
exposure
and
access
was
limited
both
because
of
financial
reasons
and
also
because
transportation
you
either
had
to
bring
high
school
students
and
teachers
to
the
middle
school
and
you
might
do
a
career,
fair
or
vice
versa.
C
Many
of
our
districts
are
actually
trying
to
think
about
building
five
and
six-year
pathways,
so
students
could
start
in
sixth
or
seventh
grade.
They
have
a
lot
of
their
pre-courses
that
they
can
do
in
middle
school
and
then
they
are
ready
to
really
dive
into
high-level
coursework,
starting
as
early
as
ninth
grade.
C
In
ninth,
what
we
have
seen
trend
wise
is
that,
once
you
enter
a
program
of
study,
if
you
like
it,
you
stay,
but
if
you
don't
you're
either
behind,
because
now
you
have
to
transfer
into
your
sophomore
year,
you
don't
get
four
full
years
of
that
coursework
or
you
kind
of
have
to
stick
with
something.
You
don't
like
you're,
not
going
to
enter
that.
So
this
is
really
about
a
bunch
of
middle
schools
who
haven't
had
the
funding
before
being
able
to
start
that
now,.
C
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
have
a
question
about
inflationary
costs.
Can
you
all
talk
about
how
we
plan
to
deal
with
the
inflationary
costs
like
right
now?
I
think
we
have
proposed
in
the
budget
a
teacher
increase
of
about
4.5,
and
we
know
inflation
is
at
about
8.5.
C
C
Okay,
great,
I
will.
I
will
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
that
would
be
under
test
and
then
we'll
turn
it
over
to
marianne
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
that
works
in
the
bep.
C
So
under
tisa
the
process
would
be
each
year,
as
you
all
think,
about
appropriations
and
how
how
much
you
would
want
to
put
additionally
into
public
education.
That
would
be
something
you
would
put
into
the
base.
The
base
then
allows
you
to
have
that
multiplier
effect
within
the
weights.
So,
for
example,
I
think
the
the
statistic
we
always
give
or
have
been
giving
has
been.
C
If
you
all
decided,
you
wanted
to
put
100
million
dollars
towards
teacher
salaries
or
100
million
dollars
in
the
base
as
a
that's
pretty
consistent
with
what
y'all
been
doing
over
the
last
several
years.
That
actually
leads
to
217
million
more
dollars
for
public
schools
because
of
how
much
the
weights
end
up
increasing.
C
So
it's
not
5
times
sixty
eight
sixty,
it
might
be
five
percent
times
sixty
nine
eighty,
so
you
get
a
much
larger
amount
of
investment
and
that
helps
to
account
for
a
lot
of
those
inflationary
components
within
a
formula
gas
prices
going
up
additional
raises
or
increases
for
other
staff.
Members.
P
Okay,
thank
you,
and
so,
when
you
said
we
put
in
the
budget
generally,
the
governor
is
recommending
to
us
a
number.
Are
you
putting
it
on
the
legislative
branch
to
decide
how
much
we
want
to
fund,
or
are
we
taking
that
power
away
from
the
governor
to
be
and
the
administration
to
offer
a
number
to
us
to
consider
explain
that.
C
C
G
We
get
the
inflationary
increase
percentages
from
sieber
the
center
for
business
and
economic
research
at
ut
knoxville
we
get
other
increases
from,
for
example,
benefits
administration
and
the
medical
insurance
premium
and
tcrs
on
the
retirement
contribution.
They
project
out
those
future
costs
and
we
incorporate
those.
E
Commissioner
and
your
team,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
the
time
that
has
been
spent
on
this
and
to
echo
what
chairman
hicks
had
said
earlier.
This
has
been
an
ongoing
process.
I've
had
potential
legislation
from
the
bep
review
committee
for
five
or
six
years,
and
now
it
is
being
funded
in
the
tisa
plan.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
Can
you
go
down
the
road
since
we've
got
you
in
front
of
us
now
of
some
of
the
historical
legislative
initiatives
that
we've
had
talking
about
school
nurses
talking
about
school
resource
officers?
C
Yes,
sir,
happy
too,
so
there's
a
couple
of
different
things.
I
would
direct
you
to,
I
think,
to
the
chairman's
point
earlier:
we've
had
a
bep
review
committee
and
pretty
consistent
recommendations
for
years
and
years
and
years
almost
exclusively,
and
you
can
go
back
to
the
first
one
I
believe
in
2004
and
it's
a
recommendation
get
to
get
to
the
national
ratio
for
nurses
and
counselors.
We've
seen
some
inclusion
with
rti
and
technology.
Those
have
been
some
of
the
big
repeaters
over
time,
as
well
as
teacher
salaries
legislatively.
C
I
think
we
see
the
same
thing
typically
any
kind
of
proposal
related
to
getting
that
counselor
or
nurse
ratio
to
what
the
national
recommendation
is.
We've
also
heard
more
recently,
of
course,
additional
conversation
around
technology
and
consistently
over
time,
certainly
about
making
sure
that
we
increase
educator
salaries
year
over
year
in
this
formula
in
thinking
about
some
of
those
additional
components.
C
When
you
look
at
the
base
of
6860,
it's
the
12th
highest
in
the
country,
the
second
highest
in
the
southeast,
it
is
125
million
dollars
more
than
those
same
components
currently
in
the
bep
and
that
doesn't
even
cover
the
weights
and
the
direct
funding
allocations.
So
it
does
allow
for
additional
funding
for
those
critical
positions
like
counselors
and
nurses
within
our
school
systems.
When
you
look
at
coordinated
school
health,
school
safety
and
family
resource
centers,
those
are
funded
outside
of
the
current
bep.
C
One
of
the
other
things
to
note
is
that
not
every
school
district
receives
that
funding.
We
have
a
number
of
school
districts
who
do
not
receive
funding
for
coordinated
school
health,
for
example,
by
bringing
it
into
the
formula.
It
ensures
that
every
district
gets
funding
for
those
critical
programs,
and
it
also
ensures
that
the
programmatic
requirements
within
statute
do
not
change
so
everything
that
was
already
programmatic,
programmatically
required,
maintains
within
within
current
code.
M
Thank
you.
I
just
had
to
go
back
to
the
cte
question.
A
moment
ago,
the
there
were
some
discussions
early
on
about
the
the
million
dollars
for
high
schools,
half
a
million
for
those
hybrid
models
or
straight
out
middle
schools.
I
guess
there
was
some
discussion
about
whether
the
locals
would
be
required
to
do
a
match
or
a
percentage
are.
M
Are
these
first
dollars
in
or
is
there
going
to
be
a
match
in
the
language
because
you
mentioned
earlier
about
grants,
and
so
obviously
I
don't
think
all
of
the
middle
schools
in
my
district
have
a
cte
program,
and
so,
which
is
why
I
understand
the
four
years,
but
if
you
could
talk
about
the
match,
if
there
is
one
what
those
responsibilities
will
be
for
the
local,
lea
that'd
be
great.
Commissioner,.
C
C
It
is
about
making
sure
that
there's
a
way
to
keep
the
program
sustainable
over
time,
so
helping
people
with
that
planning
if
t
surpassed
that
there's
some
nice
additional
funding
that
can
go
and
help
with
that
sustainability,
but
it
is
100
state
funded
that
ramp
up
is
because
we
know
that
it's
going
to
take
one
two
three
years
at
the
middle
school
level,
three
to
four
years
at
the
high
school
level,
to
both
plan,
establish
and
implement
a
full
program
that
can
then
be
sustainable
over
time.
Chairman.
M
Williams,
so
in
those
analysis
of
these
individual
programs,
your
department's
going
to
ensure
that
they're
not
making
reoccurring,
expense
commitments
without
with
any
of
this
million
half
a
million
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
number.
Is
that
correct.
C
Yes,
sir,
so
one
of
the
requirements
in
the
grant
application
is
that
they
have
a
fully
baked
sustainability
plan,
so
we
we
would
not
approve
the
application
or
disperse
any
funding
until
we
see
exactly
how
they
would
support
that
with
their
existing
funding
or
what
they
would
expect
their
existing
funding
to
be
recurring
over
time
with
zero
expectation
of
additional
funding.
For
that
particular
program.
M
C
Yes,
sir,
we
would
expect
that
the
majority
is
going
to
be
towards
equipment,
materials,
etc.
We
also
expect
many
of
our
districts
will
bring
additional
staffer
support
to
help
with
startup
costs
a
lot
of
times,
that
is
with
local
industry
and
business.
You
can,
you
can
bring
them
in
there's
for
contractors,
or
maybe
you
bring
in
if
you're
starting
a
welding
program
you
bring
in
folks
who
are
in
that
profession
within
the
local
community
to
help
advise
et
cetera
but
they're,
all
those
one-time,
startup
costs.
M
Chairman
wade,
one
final
question,
the
one
of
the
only
as
I
I
served
on
the
workforce,
one
of
the
18
committees.
It
was
fantastic
five
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
what
a
great
time
for
a
zoom
committee
meeting
but
anyways.
That
was
a
joke,
but
the
I
I
will
say
one
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
about
this.
A
little
bit
is:
we've
done
a
great
job.
M
We
heard
from
our
bill
sponsors
about
how
we're
funding
education
based
upon
not
ratios,
but
upon
kids,
the
big
challenge,
I
I
see
or
problem
that
might
be
with
cte
money
is.
I
have
three
high
schools
in
my
county
in
the
lea
in
my
county.
I
have
one
that
has
2
700
students
and
I
got
one
with
800
and
they
both
get
a
million
dollars
right.
The
other
one,
I
think,
is
around
400.
M
so
being
able
to
deliver
quality
cte
for
those
20
2500
odd
students
that
for
a
million
dollars,
seems
completely
different
than
in
upperman.
Where
you
know
we
we've
got
great
facilities
there,
but
there's
just
not
as
many
kids
or
not
as
many
users.
So,
what's
the
argument
behind
just
doing
a
lump
instead
of
doing
using
the
same
half
a
billion
dollars
is
what
that
is
per
child.
C
Yes,
sir,
so
it
really
is
about
those
initial
costs.
So
if
you
are
the
last
innovative
school
model
I
was
in
was
in
macon
county
in
jackson
county,
they
have
a
collaboration
that
they
are
doing.
C
So
knowing
that
the
majority
of
those
funds
are
going
to
be
going
to
those
one-time
expenses
that
are
going
to
cost
the
same,
no
matter
what
that
was
the
thinking
behind
it
versus
the
formula,
which
is
that
ongoing
sustainability.
And
that's
where
you
see
that
per
student
funding
which
really
drives
participation
in
those
programs.
So
this
is
really
about
the
the
cost
is
the
same,
no
matter
how
many
students
are
at
the
school.
O
Thank
you
chairman,
and
my
question
is,
is
maybe
a
little
bit
more
specific
as
it
relates
to
to
davidson
county.
My
understanding
is
under
the
new
funding
formula.
Davidson
county
will
get
roughly
50
million
dollars
in
in
in
new
funding.
Is
that
an
accurate
statement.
O
And,
and
and
if
we're
looking
at
currently
bp
funds
about
72,
I'm
I'm
seeing
tessa,
this
is
from
from
actually
from
your
department
is
going
to
generate
about
778
to
an
increase
of
48.8
million
dollars
is
what
what
I'm
seeing
so
a
little
bit
less
than
10.
C
Yes,
sir,
so
because
we
would
use
a
tax
or
seibert
combo,
the
percent
that
any
local
district
would
would
be
responsible
for
that
share
is
going
to
be
the
same
under
either
formula
it's
calculated
separately.
Now
the
total
amount
that
that
is
applied
to
is
different
under
the
bep.
It
is
every
dollar
within
the
formula
has
some
kind
of
local
share
that
is
either
a
70
30,
a
75
25
or
a
50
50
split,
and
that's
the
statewide
metro.
Nashville's
proportion
of
that
is
going
to
be
different
and
that's
fiscal
capacity.
C
That
is
the
bep
or
tsa.
It
is
agnostic
to
the
formula.
It
is
actually
one
of
the
requirements
that
is
outside
of
the
control.
Here,
it's
been,
it's
been
ruled
on
previously
under
tisa
one
of
the
benefits,
and
this
is
why
all
of
our
locals,
when
you
see
that
graph
of
how
much
they're
going
to
have
to
spend
under
the
bep
versus
how
much
under
tisa
it
is
less
under
tisa
for
every
district
in
the
state.
That
is
because
we
do
not
apply
a
local
share
for
every
component
of
tisa.
C
We
only
do
it
for
the
base
and
the
weights,
meaning
that
the
direct
funding
amounts
are
completely
funded
by
the
state
and
that's
why
that
local
bill
is
going
to
be
lower
again
for
every
district
in
the
state,
and
I
think
we've
projected
out
to
2030.
Other
organizations
have
projected
that
out
to
2035,
and
that
is
consistent
again.
Every
district
for
the
next
13
plus
years.
C
C
For
davidson,
county,
334
million
will
be
state
funded
of
the
overall
funding
of
7.78.
O
And
do
we
have
a
breakdown
of
what
that
that
increase
is
under
the
new
funding
formula
versus
bp.
C
O
Okay,
so
so
the
the
the
the
additional
48
million
dollars
that
will
be
generated
under
tessa
for
under
this
new
program.
What
what
percent
is
the
state
portion
versus
the
local
portion.
C
43
state,
so
it's
43
state
would
be
the
additional.
I
want
to
just
kind
of
separate
the
two
parts
of
your
question,
so
the
first
part
is
really
about
for
the
new
money.
How
much
is
going
to
be
state
versus
how
much
is
going
to
be
metro,
nashville
or
davidson
county?
So
that's
that
just
over
40
percent
is
going
to
be
state.
The
remainder
is
going
to
be
metro.
C
C
C
A
C
Yes,
sir,
so
it's
in
the
initial
year,
which
would
be
this
budget
year,
750
million
is
put
aside.
It
would
be
an
additional
just
over
250
million
in
implementation,
so
in
total
it's
1.05
billion
dollars
approximately
for
the
first
year
of
implementation,.
A
A
Ratios
are
still
incorporated
in
tisa,
because
you're
not
going
to
have
one
teacher
and
45
kindergarten
students,
so
those
ratios
are
still
there
we're
just
not
funding
based
on
those
ratios,
so
the
funding
again
will
follow
the
child,
but
again
those
ratios,
so
we're
not
totally
you
never
get
rid
of
the
ratios.
We're
just
not
funding
on
ratios,
so
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
clear
members
further
discussion.
Yes,
sir
representative
wendell
you're
recognized.
B
Mr
chairman,
would
I
be
out
of
order
if
I
introduced
the
rotc
for
the
university
of
tennessee
along
with
the
colonel
whitson?
Would
you
please
make
them
welcome
and
if
you
could
introduce
them,
I
hate
to
jump
out
of
line.
Please.
B
I'm
a
senior
at
ut,
knoxville,
studying
marketing
and
supply
chain
management-
hopefully
hopefully
stay
here
in
tennessee,
serving
in
the
national
guard
and
doing
adjunct
general.
So
a.g.
E
B
B
Mr
chairman,
with
your
permission,
they've
got
a
challenge
coin.
They
want
to
present
to
you,
but
they
may
they
enter
the
podium
and
present
that
to
you,
mr
chairman,
absolutely.
I
B
A
C
A
A
All
right,
we
are
any
further
discussion
seeing
none.
We
are
now
voting
on
house
bill,
2143,
moving
on
to
full
finance,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye,
all
those
opposed
know
the
eyes.
Have
it
house
bill
2143
will
move
to
full
finance
members.
Anyone
would
like
to
be
recorded
as
a
no,
please
make
sure
to
let
kara
know.
A
All
right
members
that
does
complete
our
business
for
today
so
do
we
have
any
further
business
coming
before
the
committee
that
that
completes
our
first
calendar
business.
We
will
be
back
and
later
today,
so
seeing
none,
we
will
stand
in
recess
until
2
p.m.
Today
and
we'll
we
will
be
back
here
in
house
hearing
room
1..
So
without
objection
we
stand
in
recess.