►
Description
House Appropriations Subcommittee- February 28, 2021- House Hearing Room 1
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Good
afternoon
like
to
call
to
order
the
house
finance
ways
and
means
appropriations
subcommittee,
the
members
of
this
committee
have
been
in
finance
hearings
thanks
to
chair
lady
hazelwood
all
day
so
they're
tearing
so
because
we're
not
going
to
transact
any
business
we're
going
to
suspend
with
calling
the
roll.
So
mr
gerard
gaino
and
his
staff
can
go
ahead
with
their
presentation,
and
then
they
can
catch
up
online
or
in
person
as
soon
as
they
walk
through
the
door.
A
So
we
are
going
to
suspend
with
call
on
the
roll
and
without
objection
we're
going
to
go
into
session
or
out
of
session
to
hear
from
revenue.
Today's
topic,
the
members,
have
gotten
some
information
regarding
fne
tax
to
their
emails
prior
to
today
that
that
information
was
to
better
help.
A
The
members
understand
the
fne
tax,
its
impact
on
the
state's
budget
and
how,
if
we
were
to
make
modifications
to
the
f
e
tax
in
the
future,
what
it
would
look
like
in
spite
of
what
we've
done
in
the
past,
the
members
will
also
have
on
their
email
with
some
information
or
notification
that,
after
mr
giaragano's
testimony
today
in
questions
that
we
would
also
hear
from
commissioner
branscomb
regarding
the
mega
site
progress
because
of
some
discussions
with
the
speaker
and
the
individual
of
some
members
outside
of
general
services
to
attend.
A
I'm
sorry,
not
revenue,
tdot,
environment,
concert,
environment
conservation,
economic
community
development
and
the
mega
site
authority
themselves.
So
you
guys
can
stay
tuned
you're
going
to
have
a
brief,
er
discussion
today
than
you
expected.
So
that
being
said,
mr
gergeno,
if
you
would
please,
for
the
record,
introduce
yourself
and
who's
with
you
today
and
you
may
begin.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman,
and
members
of
the
community,
really
appreciate
the
invitation
to
be
here
with
you
today
to
talk
about
franchise
and
excise
tax.
Here
at
the
table
with
me
is
jeff
biarki
he's
our
director
of
research
sort
of
helped
me
answer
questions
as
they
arise.
We
have
some
other
colleagues
from
the
department
here
with
us
in
the
audience
as
well.
B
Mr
chairman,
these
first
two
slides
are
going
to
look
familiar
because
I
I
included
them
in
the
sales
tax
presentation,
but
I
think
they're
relevant
here
as
well.
For
some
of
the
similar
reasons,
I
won't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
them
because
we've
talked
about
them
before,
but
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
in
connection
with
franchise
and
excise
tax
that
it
is
our
second
largest
tax
in
terms
of
the
revenues
collected
by
the
department
of
revenue
to
fund
the
budget
and
f
e
comes
in
at
about
19
percent.
B
This
is
just
a
snapshot.
I
shared
this
last
time
as
well.
In
fy,
21
corporate
franchise
and
excise
tax
collections
were
about
3.5
billion
dollars.
B
So
I
think
more
to
the
point:
what
is
what
is
f
a
tax
and
and
how
does
it
work?
In
short,
you
know,
starting
with
who
pays
franchise
and
excise
tax,
it's
imposed
upon
entities
that
essentially
offer
limited
liability
protection
to
their
owners.
B
You
file
on
one
return,
the
same
for
the
most
part,
the
same
entities
are
subject
to
both
taxes
and
they're,
essentially
administered
and
reported
together
as
f
and
e
tax
f
e
tax
collections.
What
do
they
fund?
They
generally
almost
exclusively
go
to
the
general
fund,
as
opposed.
We
talked
quite
a
bit
in
the
sales
tax
about
different
allocations,
but
with
fne,
the
the
actual
use
of
the
tax
is
much
more
straightforward.
It's
a
general
fund
to
tax.
B
Excise
tax
is
six
and
a
half
percent
of
tennessee
taxable
income
and
there's
a
lot
that
goes
into
that.
What
for
the
excise
tax
in
particular,
we
start
with
federal
taxable
income.
B
So
when
you
go
to
fill
out
your
tennessee
excise
tax
return,
which
is
in
essence,
a
it's,
a
it's
a
corporate
income
tax,
just
like
the
federal
corporate
income
tax,
when
you
go
to
fill
out
your
tennessee
excess
tax
return,
you
don't
start
from
square
one
you've
already
computed
federal
taxable
income
so
that
you
can
file
your
federal
corporate
tax
return
with
the
irs
and
that's
really
the
starting
point
for
your
tennessee
excess
tax
return.
So
you
take
your
federal
taxable
income.
You
bring
that
down.
B
Another
important
part
of
excise
tax
is
apportionment,
however,
and
this
would
be
a
factor
in
a
return
filed
by
a
company
doing
business
in
more
than
one
state
doing
business
in
tennessee
and
elsewhere.
That's
filing
returns
in
more
than
one
state
you
have.
There
has
to
be
a
methodology
for
how
much
of
their
total
income
is
attributed
to
their
tennessee
activities
and
is
subject
to
our
tax
versus
their
activities
and
and
the
in
the
taxes
imposed
by
other
states,
and
so
that's
what's
generally
referred
to
as
apportionment
and.
C
B
Applies
both
to
your
net
income
and
your
net
worth
for
franchise
tax
purposes
so,
and
that
can
be
almost
as
important
as
the
rate
I
mean
it's
it's.
B
For
example,
in
tennessee.
We
now
have
a.
We
generally
have
a
three
factor
formula,
but
sales
are
weighted
more
heavily
than
property
and
payroll,
and
then
for
manufacturers-
and
this
was
the
big
change
in
the
improve
act
for
manufacturers.
We
went
to
a
an
elective
single
sales
factor
which
means
in
computing
their
taxable
income,
a
portion
to
tennessee
versus
other
places.
If
they
do
business
in
multiple
states,
they
don't
look
at
property
and
payroll
at
all.
They're.
Only
looking
at
sales
and
that
can
be
advantageous
to
those
businesses,
so
we
could
talk
for
the
whole.
B
You
know
we
could
have
a
whole
session
on
apportionment.
I
don't
mean
to
go
down
a
rabbit
hole,
but
I
just
want
to
stress
sort
of
the
importance
of
how
you
determine
what
is
taxable
is
is
is
very
important
in,
in
conjunction
with
looking
at
the
rate
they're,
both
very
important
to
determining
the
actual
liability
of
a
given
company.
B
B
Real
quickly,
you
know,
usually
folks,
are
interested
in
a
comparison
of
rates.
This
is
a
map
from
the
tax
foundation
of
the
various
corporate
income
tax
rates.
So
our
what
would
be
our
tennessee
excise
tax.
We
have,
as
I
mentioned,
six
and
a
half
percent
rate
that
is
sort
of
middle
of
the
road
nationally.
It
is
in
the
top
tier
as
far
as
our
the
southeast
region,
but
again
the
method.
B
The
apportionment
formula
is
also
an
important
factor
in
in
final
liability
and
we're
also
competing
in
essence
with
states
that
have
income
taxes,
and
we
don't
so
they're
they're,
getting
a
large
percentage
of
their
total
mix
of
revenue
from
individual
income
tax,
which
we
do
not
have
so
that
has
to
be
taken
into
account
as
well.
B
B
A
large
percent
of
the
revenue
from
f
e
tax
comes
from
a
very
small
percentage
of
the
taxpayers,
so
40
percent
give
or
take
looking
at
tax
year,
19
40
percent
of
the
revenue
came
from
just
18
1
hundredths
of
the
taxpayer.
0.18
of
the
taxpayers,
74
of
the
revenue
came
from
fewer
than
2
percent
of
the
total
taxpayers,
and
in
contrast,
if
you
look
at
sort
of,
if
you
look
at
the
sort
of
the
bottom,
85
percent
of
taxpayers
account
for
only
4.5
percent
of
the
tax.
B
B
B
B
Another
issue
is
with
timing.
B
B
B
So
if
you
think
about
the
first
estimated
payment
again
for
taking
a
typical
calendar
year,
taxpayer,
if
you
think
about
the
first
estimated
payment
being
made
in
april
and
then
that
company
doesn't
file
its
return
until
not
this
november
but
next
november,
that's
a
total
of
19
months
over
which
their
sort
of
that
one
tax
year
plays
out
and
it
actually
crosses
over
three
state
fiscal
years
or
three
budget
years
from
the
time
they
make
their
first
estimated
payment
until
they
time
they
file
their
final
return
and
true
it
all
up
can
be
as
much
as
19
months
and
it
can
cross
as
much
as
three
state
fiscal
years
or
three
budget
years.
B
So
it
really
plays
out
over
time,
and
I
think
both
of
those
factors
as
well
as
others,
sort
of
lend
themselves
to
sort
of
the
volatility
that
we
talk
about
a
lot.
I
know
we
talk
about
that
a
lot
in
general,
but
most
of
that
or
the
biggest
part
of
that
the
biggest
factor
single
factor
is
franchise
and
excise
tax,
and
this
slide
is
we
call
it.
The
volatility
chart
we've
been
looking
at
this
and
using
this
for
a
while.
B
It's
a
there's
a
lot
on
this
chart,
but
in
essence,
what
you're
seeing
there
is:
the
relative
volatility
of
franchise
tax
sales
tax
versus
the
economy
as
a
whole.
If
you
look
at
those
two
lines
at
the
bottom
that
the
the
dash
is
that
those
represent
gdp
and
also
the
consumer
price
index,
so
proxies
for
the
economy
as
a
whole,
and
you
see
that
those
they
are
quite
low
in
terms
of
volatility
and
and
really
flat.
B
B
But
if
you
look
at
the
red
line
at
top-
that's
that's
f
e,
so
that's
showing
the
volatility
over
a
10-year
look-back
period,
the
average
volatility
and
franchise
and
excise
tax,
the
amount
by
which
it
changes
from
year
to
year-
and
I
think
what's
really
telling
about
this
slide-
is
you
know
one
that
it's
the
highest
in
volatility
compared
to
our
other
taxes
and
compared
to
the
economy
as
a
whole,
but
even
more
than
that,
the
the
fact
that
it's
increasing
in
volatility,
as
you
see
it,
going
up
as
it
moves
from
left
to
right,
particularly
from
around
2007.
B
That
curve
has
really
gotten
steeper.
So
it's
the
most
volatile
and
over
the
last
10
to
14
years,
it's
become
more
increasingly
volatile,
just
in
terms
of
the
percent
change
from
year
to
year,
and
so
finally,
mr
chairman,
this
is
a
a
bar
graph
that
sort
of
illustrates
that
going
back
to
2008,
there's
14
years
on
this
graph,
and
you
can
really
see
it's
hard
to
find
two
years.
That
look
the
same.
B
I
think
if
you
look
at
fy
10
and
11,
there
they're
pretty
close
to
the
same,
but
otherwise
it's
pretty
different
every
year
and
you
see
four
years
which
showed
you
know
significant
growth,
but
you
also
see
four
years
that
were
negative
growth.
Now,
as
you
pointed
out,
we
were
speaking
earlier.
One
of
those
years
was
a
rate
cut.
B
The
fy
18
year
was
was
affected
by
rate
cut,
but
the
other
years
were
not,
you
know,
and
you
can
see
so
you
can
just
see
some
really
big
growth
years
and
some
really
big
negative
growth
years
and
you
almost
start
to
see
you're
not
going
to
go
too
many
years
before
you
see
a
significant
change.
B
So,
mr
chairman,
those
are
sort
of
my
prepared
remarks.
We'd
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
thank.
A
You,
commissioner,
for
coming,
if
you
could
back
that
up
one
slide,
I
just
thought
I
would
ask
a
question
based
upon
this
slide
in
particularly,
but
I
can't
I
can't
see
when
it
translates
from
from
you
to
the
dashboard,
the
the
third
red
dip
there
is,
I
think,
the
most
memorable
period
of
services
service
that
I've
had
in
the
legislature.
I
think
this
was
the
year
that
f
e
taxes
were
under
collected
or
the
the
expectations
when
they
were
under
of
what
they
would
be
fell
short.
A
I
guess
the
question
one
of
the
questions
and
I've
I've
got
several,
so
I
apologize
was.
Was
that
because
the
estimates
were
we
were
overestimating
because
we're
realizing
those
or
did
the
actual
collections
themselves
fall
because
people,
because
of
the
single
factor
variant,
because
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
go
from
one
year
having
something
that's
extremely
volatile
to
three
years
later:
cutting
taxes
by
700
million
dollars.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
would,
I
would
say
I
mean
first
of
all,
you
know
the
the
two
dips
at
the
beginning,
eight
and
nine
obviously
was
the
result
of
a
recession.
14
was
really
out
of
the
blue
from
our
our
perspective
and
I
don't
think
it
was
estimated
differently.
I
mean,
I
think
it
was
a
typical
estimate
for
that
year.
B
There
were
some
factors
that
were
identified
and
discussed
at
the
time
with
some
changes
in
the
way
some
businesses
within
a
particular
industry
were
moved
around.
You
know,
and
that
sort
of
goes
to
my
other
point
about
a
few
businesses
can
really
impact
collections
if
they
change
what
they're
doing
or
if
they
or
if
their
profits,
you
know
unexpectedly
fall
off
or
that
sort
of
thing.
B
So
there
were
some
factors,
but
it's
certainly
that
were
identifiable,
but
it
certainly
didn't
explain
the
entire
picture
or
why
it
dropped
by
8.4
that
year,
and
you
know
in
terms
of
how
we
got
to
being
able
to
cut
taxes.
Obviously,
we
saw
a
couple
of
good
years
out
of
the
next
three.
B
The
fne
tax
is
subject
to
business
decisions
as
well
as
the
national
economy.
Again,
another
picture
is,
you
know,
sometimes
folks
rightly
think
about
how
tennessee
is
doing,
but
a
lot
of
the
money
comes
from
big
national
companies
and
it's
their
overall
profit
and
it
depends
on
how
they're
doing
how
companies
are
doing
nationally
that
drives
it
as
much
as
it
is
how
companies
in
specifically
in
tennessee,
are
doing.
B
I
don't
know
jeff
that
was
that
was
before
your
time.
I
don't
know.
If
you
have
anything,
you
would
add
to
that.
Okay,.
A
Just
another
follow-up:
one
of
the
comments
that
we
hear
from
industry
is
that
you
know
our
f
e
tax
rate
is
so
high
as
it's
one
of
the
top
five
of
the
highest
ones
in
the
united
states.
I
I'm
not
sure
when
you
take
into
consideration
all
taxation
as
it
relates
to.
That
is
the
case,
but
with
f
e
tax.
A
What
would
what
would
you
say
to
those
businesses
who
are
looking
to
tennessee
that
they
look
at
that
rate
as
a
really
as
a
reason
why
they
should
come
here
or
and
and
if,
if
we
were
going
to
well,
let
me
let
you
answer
that
question.
First,.
B
Yeah
a
few
things,
one
I'll
just
put
the
the
map
up
while
we're
here.
I
think
we
compare
favorably
a
lot
of
other
places
in
the
country
with
our
rate.
Also,
you
know
with
our
our
apportionment
methodology
is
important.
B
The
lack
of
an
income
tax
is,
you
know,
I
think,
very
important
and
what
makes
us
unique
from
a
lot
of
these
other
states.
A
lot
of
these
other
states
have
equal
or
higher
rates
and
an
income
tax.
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
know
if
I
should
say
this,
but
al.
Just
looking
at
the
alabama
has
the
same
corporate
excise
tax
rate,
but
also
has
an
income
tax.
B
For
example,
you
know,
and
then
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
we
do-
have
the
lowest
per
capita
rate
regardless
of
the
mix.
We
do
have
the
lowest
per
capita
sales
and
use
tax
rate
in
the
country,
as
we
talked
about
before,
and
now
without
an
individual
income
tax
with
less
burden
directly
on
the
individuals
we
do
have
a
we
get
a
larger.
B
B
We
have,
you
know
we
have
various
incentives,
such
as
the
industrial
machinery,
credit
for
manufacturers.
Of
course
we
have
a
favorable
apportionment
methodology
for
manufacturers,
specifically
for
that
industry.
I
think
it
makes
it
quite
competitive.
B
We
have
the
job
tax
credit
for
numerous
numerous
industries
and
I
think
the
overall
regulatory
and
business
environment
I
think,
is
well
documented
and
in
a
lot
of
ways,
maybe
outweighs
you
know
some
marginal
differences
in
the
in
the
tax
in
the
mix
of
taxes
right.
A
I'm
just
going
to
keep
asking
questions
if
members
want
to
be
on
the
list,
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
The
as
it
relates
to
overall
taxation,
when,
when
we
looked
at
doing
the
single
factor
back
in
2017,
I
guess
it
was
the
revision
during
the
improve
act.
One
of
the
things
that
still
surprised
me
based
upon
your
presentation
today,
is
that
15
of
these
rate
payers
of
f
e
tax
represent.
I
think
it
was
95
95
or
you
said
it
a
different
way.
A
A
B
So
that's
at
the
that's,
that's
the
85
at
the
at
the
pay
in
the
least
85
percent,
paying
the
least
at
the
top
end
of
of
the
actual
payers.
You
know
you
can
slice
it
in
different
ways.
I
have
a
table.
I'd
be
happy
to
share
with
you,
but
the
top
two
percent
of
payers
pay
and
that's
around
a
couple
of
thousand
taxpayers-
probably
pays
almost
75
percent
of
the
total
tax,
the
top
0.18
percent,
a
few
hundred
pay
40
of
the
total
tax.
A
Thank
you
with
that.
I
guess
the
challenge
is
is
with
the
volatility
chart
that
should
scare
anyone
based
upon
you
showed
earlier
and
with
so
few
number
of
rate
payers,
paying
85
percent
of
the
of
the
tax.
How
would
one
if
they
wanted
to
cut
taxes?
How
could
they
do
it
now
that
singles
factor
sales
valuation
is
different?
A
I
mean
I
mean
I
think
most
of
the
most
of
the
body
sees
that
if
we're
over
collecting
revenue
we'd
like
to
cut
taxes
somewhere,
the
the
question
is:
is
how
would
you
do
it
taking
into
consideration
that
volatility,
because
if
you,
if
you,
if
you
mess
up
the
change,
will
be
dramatic
more
so,
I
think
than
we
saw
in
2014.
B
Yeah
I
mean
there
are
things
we
can
do
to
look
at
how
the
changes-
let's
say,
if
you
want
to
change
a
rate
or
change
the
apportionment
methodology,
we
can
sort
of
as
a
hypothetical
apply
that
to
a
prior
year
and
come
up
with
a
pretty
good
number,
pretty
pretty
good,
pretty
reliable
number
in
terms
of
if
this
different
rate
or
this
different
apportionment
methodology
had
been
in
place
in,
say,
2019,
here's
what
the
impact,
here's
here's,
what
the
impact
would
have
been.
B
What
you
don't
know
is
is
2023
gonna,
be
the
same
as
2019.
I
mean
that's
right,
I
mean
those
years
could
look
quite
different
and
then
and
then,
if
you've
made
a
change.
On
top
of
that,
I
think
it's
what
you're
getting
at
mr
chairman,
if
you
make
a
change
on
top
of
that,
then
that
sort
of
maybe
could
compound
that
that
that
change
in
in
collections
well,
obviously,.
A
A
week
ago,
we
weren't
talking
about
a
a
an
oil
crisis
in
a
war
across
the
other
side
of
the
world,
either.
So
right,
maybe
now
it's
not
a
good
time
to
consider
any
change,
but
but
I
do
think
it's
important
for
us
as
we
continue
to
see
over
collections
and
and
to
look
at
this,
these
numbers
to
see
if
there's
a
way
that
might
be
better
going
forward
as
it
relates
to
taxation
policies
of
this
nature.
A
I
guess
when
you
look
at
75
percent
of
those
people,
if
you
were
to
change
it
if
they
represent,
I
think
I
don't
want
to
mess
up,
but
if
two
percent
of
those
taxpayers
represent
74
percent
of
the
f
e
tax,
my
question
is:
do
you
what
percentage
of
those
two
percent
use
the
new
factor
or
the
of
the
single
factor,
sales
or
the
apportionment
tax
under
the
three
criteria?
Would
you
say
they're
pretty
evenly
spread
out
or
most
of
that
two
percent
is
in
one
category
or
the
other.
B
That's
a
great
question
and
one
I'm
hesitant
to
guess
on
I
mean
I
think.
A
My
expectation
is
that
that
two
percent,
based
upon
the
over
collect
based
on
collections,
that
two
percent
is
probably
a
95
chance.
They're
all
doing
it
the
same
way
right
and
that
if
you
were
going
to
effectuate
some
change
in
revenue
based
upon
those
that
two
percent,
that
it
would
be
good
to
know
how
they're
calculating
f
and
e
tax
and
their
advanced
payments
or
their
projected
payments.
A
Well,
if
you
could
share
that
with
me,
it'd
be
great.
I
do
have
a
couple
questions
representative
shaw.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
apologize
to
you
and
to
our
company
for
being
just
a
minute
late
when
I
came
in
so
you
may
have
already
talked
about
this,
for
my
sake,
because
I
don't
know,
if
I
really
learned
how
is
f,
how
do
they
base
paying
f
and
e
tax
on
annual
sales?
What
can
you
talk
about
that
for
just
a
second.
B
Yes,
sir,
so
it's
two,
it's
actually
two
two
taxes,
franchise
tax
and
excise
tax
excise
tax
is
just
another
name
for
a
corporate
income
tax,
just
like
the
federal
corporate
income
tax,
and
so
that
would
be
on
your
net
income.
B
What
you
first
do
is
you
file
your
federal
corporate
income
tax
return
and
we're
only
talking
about
corporations,
llcs
and
limited
partnerships,
we're
not
talking
about
sole
proprietorships
or
general
partnerships,
we're
talking
about
entities
that
are
separate
from
their
ownership
right.
So
for
those
types
of
entities
they're
going
to
be
filing
a
corporate
income
tax
return
on
their
net
income,
you
bring
that
down
to
tennessee.
You
make
some
adjustments
that
are
specific
to
our
state
and
you
come
up
with
your
tennessee
net
corporate
income.
B
B
That's
excise
tax
franchise
tax
is
on
a
same
companies,
the
same
corporations
or
llc's
or
lps,
but
it's
on
their
net
worth
or
the
amount
of
property
they
have
in
the
state
and
that'll
give
you
a
figure.
How
much
is
my
the
net
worth
of
my
company
and
the
rate
is
0.25
or
25
cents
per
hundred
dollars
of
value?
Okay,.
D
A
couple
other
questions,
charlie
representative,
so
do
you
do
do
you
do?
Projections
like
blue
oval
is
coming?
Is
there
projection
as
to
what
kind
of
fne
taxes
they
will
pay,
or
can
you
do
that
in
advance?
B
Be
really
I
mean
that
would
be
difficult
to
do
and
there's
so
much
that
goes
into
it.
You
know,
a
major
corporation
is
a
complex.
You
know
and
and
depends
on
how
they're
structured
in
so
many
factors
you
know
we
would,
without
speaking
about
any
particular
company.
You
know
we.
We
could
look
at
what
information
we
have
based
on
their
current
structure
and
what
they
do
in
the
state,
but
that
might
not
tell
us
a
lot
about
what
they
do
in
the
state
in
the
future
right.
B
D
B
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
good
afternoon.
Gentlemen.
Thank
you
for
being
here
on
the.
If
you
could
go
back
to
the
the
map
with
the
fne
tax
charts,
you
know
just
glancing
at
it.
Tennessee,
as
you
said,
is
we're
sort
of
median,
particularly
in
southeastern
number
of
places
in
the
northeast
and
some
other
places
that
are
higher,
but
there's
one
like
glaring
exception,
north
carolina
2.5
percent.
C
Can
you
speak
to
their
income
tax,
their
tax
mix
in
north
carolina
and
just
I
know
they
have
an
income
tax,
for
I
think
I
know
that,
but
what
other
things
give
them
the
capability
of
having
such
a
low?
B
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair,
lady
hazelwood.
It's
probably
something
I
need
to
study
more
closely.
I
cannot
tell
you
offhand
their
exact
mix.
I
can't
confirm
they
do
have
an
income
tax.
B
B
C
I
think
would
be
an
interesting
case
study,
particularly
since
you
said
they've
stepped
that
down.
You
know
fairly
recently
to
see
how
that
impacted,
their
business,
growth
and
and
other
things,
and
if
they're,
you
know,
I'm
saying
the
goal
would
be
to
not
only
keep
yourself
whole
tax-wise
but
to
grow
your
tax
base
and
if,
if
they
were
successful
in
doing
that
with
the
lower
tax
rate,
that
would
be
interesting
and
then
just
another
sort
of
general
question.
C
When
you
talked
about
the
the
basis
for
the
the
taxes,
the
property,
the
sales
and
I've
already
forgotten.
The
third
piece
payroll
is
that
how
we
account
for
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
difference
in
taxation
for
a
company?
That's
actually
headquartered
in
tennessee,
but
doing
business.
C
B
Yeah
first
thing
to
be
clear:
on
not
every
company
apportions:
there
are
plenty
of
companies
that
operate
just
within
tennessee.
They
don't
really
extend
their
business
outside
the
state
and
they
don't
file
in
other
states,
and
so
they
don't
apportion
at
all.
You
know:
there's
it's
not
a
issue
for
them,
but
for
multi-state
companies
really
I
mean
it
really
comes
down
to
proportions.
B
You
know
it's
not
so
much
where
you're
headquartered
I
mean.
If
you
are
headquartered
here,
you
may
have
more
employees
here,
for
example,
on
the
other
hand,
you
may
be
a
you,
may
be
a
national
company
doing
business
in
50
states
and
your
headquarters.
Staff
that
you
put
here
may
be
a
really
really
small
number
compared
to
your
total
employees
right.
So
it
may
not
be
much
of
a
factor
at
all
to
move.
B
You
know
a
headquarters
staff
here
or
I
don't
mean
to
talk
in
extremes.
We
may
have
a
relatively
smaller
impact,
bringing
your
headquarters
here
if
the,
if
your
headquarters
in
terms
of
headcount
is
relatively
small
compared
to
all
your
employees
everywhere,
you
know,
so
it's
really
a
factor
of
how
much
of
your
payrolls
in
tennessee
versus
everywhere
and
your
property
and
your
sales,
and
it's
it's
really
highly
individualized,
depending
on
what
type
of
business
you
are.
B
B
B
So
if
your
customer's
out
of
state
you're
going
to
have
a
significantly
smaller
sales
factor
than
if
your
customers
in
state
and
just
it's
just
a
lot
of
different
factors
that
go
into
it,
you
know
I
don't.
I
don't
think
putting
your
headquarters
here
is
going
to
drive
that
so
much
as
just
your
overall,
you
know
business
structure
and
and
and
what
you
have
in
a
lot
of
different
states
for
your
business
as
a
whole,
as
opposed
to
just
your
your
headquarters.
C
Thank
you.
I
know
it's
just
one
of
the
things
you
know
you
always
think
about
just
like
any
business,
it's
easier
to
retain
a
customer
that
you
have
than
to
gain
one
that
you've
lost
and
the
more
sticky
factors
you
have
tying
a
customer
to
you,
the
better
off
you
are,
and
it
just
seems
if
you
have
a
headquarter,
a
company
headquartered
in
tennessee,
then
it's
more
difficult
for
them
to
you
know,
take
their
business
away
from
the
state
than
if
they
don't
so.
A
Thank
you,
chair,
lady,
just
as
a
follow-up,
so
an
idea
just
to
make
sure
I
understand
apportionment
would
mean
I
build
up
or
own
a
facility
that
distributes
products,
goods
and
services
inside
tennessee,
but
I
might
send
them
to
kentucky
north
carolina,
georgia
or
surrounding
states,
but
they're
able
to
apportion
a
portion
of
that
tax
into
the
other
states.
Is
that
what
you
mean.
B
Yeah,
it's
really
a
matter,
I
guess
may
as
an
analogy
sales
tax.
You
think
your
your.
Ultimately,
your
tax
liability
as
a
business
depends
on
how
much
is
taxable
the
base
and,
what's
the
rate
applied
to
that
base
right
for
sales
tax,
something
like
sales
tax,
pretty
straightforward.
The
base
is
what
you
pay
for,
whatever
you
bought.
You
know,
there's
not
a
lot
of
variation
in
that
it's
the
the
price
you
paid
for
the
goods
you
purchased,
it's
all
about
the
rate
right
for
fne.
B
It's
a
little
more
nuanced,
because
there's
a
lot
of
variation
in
how
you
arrive
at
how
much
is
subject
to
tax
and
that's
really
aside
from
the
rate
itself-
and
you
know-
that's-
that's
that's
partly
a
function
of
just
what
is
your
net
taxable
income?
B
Your
revenues
minus
your
expenses,
but
it's
also
for
those
multi-state
companies
that
do
business
in
in
more
than
one
state.
We
have
to
have
a
system
for
the
states
to
basically
divide
up
the
pie,
divide
up
the
income
and
how
much
is
taxable
in
tennessee
versus
you
know,
alabama
georgia
et
cetera,
and
that's
that's
apportionment,
we're
talking
about
apportioning
among
the
states
that
companies
total
net
income
and
there's
a
traditional
formula
of
prop
three
three
factors:
property,
payroll
and
sales.
Traditionally
it
was
equally
weighted.
B
You
know
several
years
couple
decades,
there's
been
more
and
more
sort
of
variation
in
that
standard.
That
original
standard
three
factor
formula
in
how
the
factors
are
weighted,
there's
been
a
trend
toward
putting
more
weight
on
sales
because
in
essence,
when
you
place
a
weight
on
property
and
payroll
you're
calculating
their,
how
much
is
subject
to
tax
based
on
property
and
payroll.
B
So
that's
why
the
states
have
an
incentive
to
place
more
weight
on
sales
and
less
weight
on
property
and
payroll,
and
that's
that's
the
trend
and
then
the
farthest
extension
of
that
is
to
place
100
of
the
weight
on
sales
and
disregard
property
and
payroll
together.
And
that's
what
we've
done
for
manufacturers.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner.
I
don't
have
any
more
questions
on
my
list,
but
as
the
cheerleader
asked
previously
about
the
study
about
north
carolina,
if
you
could
share
that
information
with
her
office,
if
you,
when
you
get
a
chance,
I
would
appreciate
it
also
the
information
we
discussed
about
the
two
percent
paying
the
74.
A
If
we
could
figure
out
what
the
the
strata
looks
like
or
or
or
the
different
types
there,
whether
there's
some
similarities
there,
I
think
the
key
going
forward.
If
we
know
74
of
of
the
tax
is
paid
by
two
percent
of
the
folks
and
they're
all
paying
the
same
way
to
me.
If
we
were
going
to
cut
taxes
for
a
group,
that'd
be
a
good
place
to
look
to
get
the
others
and
do
some
kind
of
change
that
the
others
could
conform
to.
A
It
seems
like
it
would
make
the
most
sense
to
do
that.
I
think
simplification
as
it
relates
to
the
tax
code
is
always
important
if
we
can
find
ways
to
do
that.
That
would
be
good,
but
we
appreciate
your
time
today
and
for
the
members
being
here.
Do
the
members
have
any
other
questions?
A
Seeing
none
we're
gonna
go
back
into
session.
Thank
you
guys
very
much
for
coming
as
a
reminder
to
the
members
next
week,
we'll
be
continuing
budget
hearings
through
this
time,
so
those
on
appropriations
subcommittee
will
have
not
have
a
reason
not
to
be
here
next
week,
but
anyways.
It's
good.
A
We
appreciate
that
and
then
the
following
week
we
will
have
a
discussion
on
the
seventh
about
new
market
tax
credit
and
community
enhancement
taxes
and
then
the
following
week
on
march
14th,
if
you
notice
there
was
no
mega
site
presentation
here
today
at
the
at
the
discussion
with
the
speaker
and
the
stakeholders,
we've
determined
to
make
that
a
a
day
all
and
of
its
own.
So
we'll
have
multiple
speakers
and
they'll
be
coming
on
march.
The
14th.