►
From YouTube: House Government Operations Committee- April 12, 2021
Description
House Government Operations Committee- April 12, 2021
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
We
have
we
have
enough.
Okay
members,
we
have
some
unusual
timing
on
this.
The
first
two
bills-
I
don't
think
are
going
to
be
controversial,
so
we'll
run
through
those
fairly
quickly.
First
on
our
agenda
is
house
bill
347
by
speaker,
johnson
you're
recognized
sir.
What
do
I
hear
motion
in
a
second?
We
have
a
motion.
A
second,
please
explain
your
bill.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
house,
bill
347
is
introduced,
makes
it
confident
makes
confidential
certain
personal,
financial
and
residential
information
on
federal
law
enforcement
agents.
A
A
B
Sir,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
This
is
house
bill.
1195
is
my
insurance
transparency
bill.
Basically,
what
it
says
is
if
you're
in
a
pre-authorization
setting
and
your
doctor
or
your
insurance
carrier,
orders,
some
sort
of
mri
and
the
insurance
provider
asks
for
additional
information.
That
information
needs
to
be
copied
to
the
patient.
A
Thank
you,
mr
sponsor
and
members.
This
is
traveling
with
an
amendment.
This
committee
needs
no
action
on
that
amendment.
Do
we
have
questions
of
the
sponsor
on
his
bill
as
amended,
the
question
has
been
called
without
objection,
we're
voting
on
sending
house
bill
1195
to
calendar
and
rules,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
all
opposed,
nay
eyes.
Have
it
bill
moves
out
to
calendar
rules.
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
committee
item
number
three
on
our
agenda
house
bill
159
by
chairman
williams,
you're
a
recognized
serve
we'll,
have
a
motion.
A
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
and,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
the
committee
we
do
have
a
bit
of
a
unique
situation
with
this
bill.
A
A
E
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions
all
right.
The
ques
the
question's
been
called
on
the
amendment.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
representative
johnson,
did
you
have
a
question
before
before
we
vote
on
it
all
right,
since
we
have
an
objection
you
we
should
withdraw
your
question.
Questions
withdrawn,
mr
sponsor,
you
are
recognized
to
explain
house
amendment
6264
to
house
bill
159.
E
Thank
you,
chairman
members.
The
this
amendment
just
allows
for
the
house
and
senate
amendments
to
be
the
same.
So
that's
why
we
have
a
new
drafting
code,
but
it's
the
same
language
which
came
out
of
civil,
and
so
this
amendment
does
rewrite
the
bill.
It
does
have
the
same.
Local
senate
state
and
local
committees
did
some
re-enumerating
as
it
relates
to
it.
E
It's
been
said
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
this
bill
does
do.
Let
me
tell
you
what
it
does
not
do,
which
is
really
important.
This
bill
does
not
change
anything
in
regards
to
pacs
and
how
they
have
to
disclose
the
contributions
that
are
made
to
those
packs.
This
bill
does
not
change
anything
in
regards
to
what
is
currently
having
to
be
disclosed
with
any
50c
or
501c
organizations.
E
E
Those
people
were
referring
to
501c4
organizations
and
those
organizations
have
a
government
advocacy
side
which
requires
that
they
report
that
information,
the
government
advocacy
side,
will
still
have
to
disclose
all
those
same
information.
The
secretary
of
state,
as
it
would
require
with
any
other
governmental
agency
if
they
employ
a
government
advocate
or
lobbyist.
That
person
would
still
have
to
disclose
all
the
pertinent
information
if
they
contribute
to
a
pack
that
information
will
also
have
to
be
disclosed
and
open
to
the
public.
E
This
bill
only
clarifies
that
the
confidential
information,
such
as
home,
addresses
phone
numbers
etc
of
those
individuals
will
be
kept.
Confident
as
a
personal
example,
I
will
serve
on
the
state
board
of
habitat.
If
someone
gives
an
anonymous
contribution,
this
would
preserve
the
the
privacy
of
that
person
to
do
it
in
the
501c3,
though,
creates
a
class
b
misdemeanor.
If
that
information
is
released,
that's
the
amendment
that
came
out
of
civil,
both
in
our
in
the
house
and
in
the
senate,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
amendment
that
you
might
have.
A
Do
we
have
questions
on
the
amendment
as
explained
that
was
amendment
6264,
any
questions
seeing
none?
Is
there
an
objection
to
putting
the
amendment
on
the
bill,
seeing
none
we're
voting
to
put
amendment
number
6264
on
house
bill,
159
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
all
opposed,
nay
one.
If
you
wish
to
be
recorded,
the
amendment
is
on
the
bill.
The
eyes
have
it
now
we
have
an
untimely
filed
amendment
to
consider
on
this
bill.
A
E
E
This
bill
would
eliminate
their
concerns
as
it
relates
to
and
clarify
those
concerns
as
relate
to
that
securities
and
exchange
act.
That's
all
this
amendment
does
and
it's
untimely
filed,
because
I
just
found
out
about
it
two
hours
ago.
A
If
you
wish
to
be
recorded,
see
the
clerk.
The
amendment
is
on
the
bill.
Without
objection,
I'm
going
to
direct
legal
to
combine
these
two
amendments
into
one,
so
it
leaves
our
committee
as
one
one
amendment.
A
D
A
F
Explanation
before,
certainly
thank
you
very
much
as
amended
house
bill.
360
gives
the
tennessee
department
of
commerce
and
insurance
a
broad
perspective
on
how
insurance
plans
are
doing
in
covering
mental
health
care
issues
across
the
state
of
tennessee.
It's
especially
in
comparison
to
other
physical
health
care
insurance
plans
that
we
have
so
in
a
nutshell.
It's
a
reporting
mechanism
that
will
give
us
an
idea
how
we're
doing
in
terms
of
covering
folks
with
their
mental
health
care
insurance.
A
A
B
House
bill
750
is
a
bill
that
will
create
a
chronic
weight
management
task
force
there'll,
be
members
from
the
senate,
they'll
be
members
from
the
house
of
representatives
and
there
will
be
licensed
certified
endocrinologists
appointed
as
well,
and
the
purpose
of
this
bill
is
not
to
determine
whether
obesity
creates
health
problems.
We
know
that
what
this
is
intended
to
do
is
to
study
the
the
cost
effectiveness
of
actually
treating
obesity
itself
rather
than
the
subsequent
side
effects
that
come
from
it.
I'll
take
any
questions,
mr
chairman,.
A
A
A
G
Okay
members,
what
this
bill
does
it
does
give
clarity
language
to
how
the
state
board
may
grant
waivers
to
our
local
educational
agencies
when
it
comes
to
textbook
and
instruction
materials,
and
I
can
go
into
detail
about
that
back
in,
I
think
a
special
session
we
passed
a
bill
where
administration
bill,
where
common
core
could
not
be
used
in
our
tech,
textbooks
and
or
instruction
materials,
but
there
are
exceptions
when
it
does
line
up
with
the
tennessee
standards,
and
so
the
lea
may
want
to
ask
for
a
waiver
which
is
now
going
through
our
state
board,
and
so
basically,
this
changes
lines.
G
The
date
up
with
this
bill
and
the
bill
that
we
previously
passed,
and
this
statutory
change
gave
the
decision
on
these
waivers
to
the
board
rather
than
the
commissioner.
It
further
states
that
the
12-person
staff
on
the
state
board
of
education
may
and
that's
the
key
word-
may
receive
assistance
from
the
department
of
education,
which
has
the
subject
matter,
experts
on
staff
and
has
always
previously
done
this
work
as
a
result
of
the
word
may
being
used
in
the
statute
rather
than
the
word
shell.
G
It
created
a
staffing
issue:
the
department
education
already
moved
their
people
out
to
other
things.
So
what
this
says
is
both
this
legislation
and
administration
bill
on
common
core
line
instruction
materials,
redesignate
and
realign
the
same
sections
of
the
code,
but
have
conflicting
enactment
dates.
This
lines
it
up
in
order
to
pass
both
bills
without
the
provisions
of
each
bill,
adversely
affecting
the
other
certain
provisions
of
the
administration
bill
need
to
be
restated
in
this
bill,
and
that
amendment
makes
the
bill.
G
And,
lastly,
the
bill
fixes
that
problem
and
also
makes
clear
that
the
state
board
can
establish
specific
windows
of
time
when
leas
can
request
these
waivers.
This
allows
the
department
to
have
staffing
patterns
that
allow
for
the
necessary
bandwidth
to
be
dedicated
to
this
work,
and
that's
basically
what
this
bill
does
and
any
further
questions
I
have.
Our
state
board
represented
mr
james
here.
If
we
do
have
any
detailed
questions.
A
A
The
question
has
been
called:
we
are
voting
on
sending
house
bill
755
to
calendar
and
rules,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
all
opposed,
nay
eyes.
Have
it
bill
moves
out
to
calendar
and
rules.
A
A
Amendment
is
on
the
bill.
This
committee
needs
to
take
no
action
on
that.
Mr
sponsor
you're,
clear
to
explain
your
bill.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
committee
house,
bill
number
90
is
an
administration
bill.
Presently
the
office
of
surface
mining
regulates
surface
coal
mining
in
tennessee.
Tennessee
is
the
only
state
in
the
union
coal
that
mines
coal,
that
does
not
do
its
own
privacy.
So
in
2018
I
sponsored
the
promising
reclamation
act
directing
the
governor
to
pursue
state
oversight
of
the
surface
mining
control
and
reclamation
act
frequently
referred
to
as
primacy.
The
general
assembly
voted
to
adopt
the
act
now
published
as
chapter
public
chapter
839.
H
The
2018
act
laid
out
the
foundation
for
the
state
to
obtain
primacy
and
move
us
toward
establishing
a
state
rather
than
a
federal
surface
coal
mining
program.
Since
that
time,
however,
the
administration
sought
an
informal
review
of
the
2018
act
from
osm,
and
the
feedback
is
clear.
Changes
must
be
made
in
order
for
tennessee
to
receive
privacy
to
receive
privacy.
Our
program
must
be
at
least
osm
said.
H
Our
program
must
be
at
least
as
stringent
as
a
federal
law,
and
that
the
state
has
the
financial
capability
to
administrate
and
operate
the
program
to
advance
the
goal
of
the
2018
act.
This
bill
will
incorporate
the
feedback
received
from
osm
by
aligning
the
program
more
closely
with
the
federal
smackra.
They
call
it
statute.
H
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
So
I've
got
a
a
couple
of
questions
here.
Can
you
confirm
that
coal
production
in
tennessee
has
declined
91
between
2009
and
and
that
no
coal
was
produced
in
the
last
three
quarters
of
2020
when
this
decline
is
matching?
What
we've
seen
in
other
states
that
never
gave
up
the
smack
or
primacy?
I
H
Thank
you.
Yes,
there
actually
is
98
and
they're.
All
going
through,
we
still
have
to
our
department,
will
still
have
to
regulate
those
and
and
do
the
inspections
of
those.
I
think
they
do
them
quarterly,
but
they'll
still
have
to
do
those,
but
coal
mining
has
declined
in
some
states.
One
reason
coal
mining
has
declined
here.
H
We
don't
have
privacy,
we're
the
only
state
in
the
union
that
doesn't
a
couple
years
ago,
senator
jaeger
and
I
went
to
kentucky
and
we
went
to
the
capitol
there
and
met
with
their
department
of
environment
conservation
and
said:
how
are
you
able
to
get
out
a
permit
in
four
to
an
eight
to
12
months,
when
it's
taken
us
three
to
four
years
to
get
a
permit
in
the
state
of
tennessee
they're
mining,
a
lot
of
coal
in
kentucky?
We
want
to
do
the
same
thing
in
tennessee
and
our
whole.
H
Not
much
of
it
is
used
for
fuel.
A
lot
of
our
coal
is
used
for
electronics,
carbon
fiber,
solar
panels.
Other
things
like
that,
we
call
it.
The
blue
gm
scene.
I
Yes,
that's
true:
we
don't
use
that
coal
here
in
in
tennessee,
so
so
concern
is.
If
coal
companies
go
bankrupt,
is
tennessee
going
to
have
to
take
on
the
cost
of
cleaning
up
their
mine
sites,
because
who's
going
to
handle
reclamation,
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
coal
companies
go
under
and-
and
it
seems
odd
to
me
to
say
that
we've
got
98
open
permits,
but
yet
no
coal
is
being
mined,
but
somehow
this
would
make
a
difference.
Mr.
H
Yeah
these
are
older
permits,
and
there
again
we
we
don't
have
privacy
and
that's
one
reason
we're
not
doing
that.
We
do
have
tennessee
department
of
environment
conservation
here
with
us
to
answer
some
questions
that
she
may
have.
If,
mr
chairman,
could
we
go
out
of
session
for
a
few
moments
and
invite
them
up.
A
A
J
Yes,
sir,
thank
you,
chairman
blair,
beatty,
legislative,
legislative
liaison
with
the
department
of
environment
and
conservation,
and
I
apologize
representative
johnson.
Would
you
mind
repeating
your
question?
Please
ma'am.
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
It
kind
of
boils
down
to.
We
have
a
in
2018.
They
said
there
was
no
fiscal
note
with
this.
We've
got
a
revised
bill
that
indicates
that
it's
going
to
cost
us
close
to
a
million
dollars
per
year
does,
and
so
I'm
curious
with
the
industry
being
in
trouble
with
already
having
permits
out
there
and
no
coal
being
mined
and
then
the
last
three
quarters
of
2020
no
coal
being
mined.
I
It
seems,
like
our
taxpayers,
are
going
to
be
paying
for
something.
That's
not
going
to
yield
anything
and-
and
it
looks
like
predictions
are
20
of
the
cost-
is
all
that's
going
to
be
paid
by
what
is
mine.
J
Thank
you,
sir.
Yes
ma'am,
I
can't
speak
to
the
industry
of
coal
throughout
the
whole
country,
but
I
do
think
that,
as
chairman
pointed
out,
we're
the
only
state
right
now
of
those
that
are
mining
coal.
That
does
not
have
primacy
over
this
program,
and
I
think
that
that
might
be
reflective
of
why
we
don't
have
active
industry
right
now
and
why
we
haven't
seen
new
industry
in
the
past
few
years.
This
act
was
passed
so
that
we
could
encourage
new
companies
to
come
to
tennessee.
I
I
J
Well,
I
think
it'll
take
I'm
sorry
chairman.
I
think
it'll
take
a
few
years
before
we're
able
to
estimate
what
the
increase
or
decrease
whatever
the
change
might
be
to
the
severance
tax.
It's
going
to
take
a
couple
more
years
to
get
the
program
approved
and
established,
and
I
so
I
don't
know
exactly
what
how
fiscal
came
to
that
conclusion.
But
I
would
guess
that
maybe,
since
it's
still
a
few
years
out
before
we'll
have
the
program
in
place,
they
weren't
able
to
put
a
number
on
that.
If
that
makes
sense,.
I
Thank
you,
so
we're
going
to
go
through
a
couple
of
years
of
paying
that
you
know
nearly
a
million
plus
to
find
out
to
find
out.
If
any
of
this
is
actually
going
to
bear
fruit
in
in
an
industry
that
is
literally
dying
and
and
coal,
that
we
can't
even
use
in
tennessee.
J
I
A
A
A
A
Chairman
rudd,
your
bill
is
traveling
with
an
amendment
I
show
amendment
number
5537.
Is
that
correct,
sir?
We
also
have
a
proposed
amendment.
Amendment
number
6978.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
sir,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
amendment
and
representative
road.
Would
you
care
to
explain
what
this
amendment
does
to
your
bill.
K
Yes,
the
amendment
makes
no
subsidy
changes.
It's
a
technical
amendment,
the
department
of
health
and
the
district
attorney's
association
requested
this
and
they
rearranged.
The
health
department
wanted
a
rearrangement
of
the
bill,
not
the
content
of
it,
so
they
could
better
understand
how
to
implement
it.
They
separated
forms
from
rules,
and
we
got
that
in
different
sections
rather
than
before.
They
were
mixed,
so
it'd
be
easier
on
them
to
implement
and
they
could
implement
it
faster
and
then
the
attorney
general's
association
said
they
wanted
to
the
section
in
there
they
put
in.
K
They
said
the
they
wanted
to
clarify
that
these
facilities
still
had
still
had
to
comply
with
law
enforcement
and
criminal
investigations
if
they
had
a
judicially
approved
and
a
warrant
of
the
collection
of
any
evidence,
which
is
what
they
can
do
now.
They
just
wanted
that
clarified
this
bill
and
that's
what
the
amendment
does.
Sir.
A
Members
you've
heard
an
explanation
of
the
amendment
without
objection.
We're
going
to
put
the
amendment
on
the
bill
all
in
favor
of
adding
amendment
number
6978
to
house
bill
1181
indicate
by
saying
aye
aye
all
opposed,
nay.
The
amendment
is
on
the
bill
and
mr
sponsor,
I
think
that
amendment
basically
was
your
bill.
Am
I
correct,
but.
K
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
So
how
come
there
is
no
option
to
send
tissue
to
pathology.
Doctors
sometimes
need
to
do
that
when
it
comes
to
further
examination,
either
after
a
miscarriage
or
an
abortion,
but
there's
no
option
in
the
bill
to
send
tissue
to
pathology.
K
Mr
sponsor,
are
you
recognized,
thank
you
well
as
far
as
a
miscarriage
or
if
a
baby
is
removed
that
died
in
the
womb
or
had
to
be
removed
in
a
hospital?
That's
not
covered
here,
that's
already
in
law,
and
that
wouldn't
be
a
part
of
what
this
is.
This
is
an
elective
surgical.
Abortion
is
all
that
we're
covering
and
tissue.
It
does
not
prohibit
tissue.
It
just
says
that
the
aborted
baby
has
to
be
treated
with
dignity
and
either
cremated
or
buried.
A
Excuse
me:
let's
let
someone
who
hasn't
asked
a
question.
Ask
one
later
dixie
you
recognize
primary
chairman
dixie.
L
I
was
looking
at
this
and
I
have
a
question
when
my
one
of
my
friends
when
his
father
passed
away,
he
was
able
to
donate
his
body
to
science
to
a
university
to
study.
It
does
this.
How
does
this
build
impact
that
ability
for
the
mother
if
they
wanted
to
donate
the
fetus
to
to
science
or
to
a
university
for
further
study.
K
Mr
sponsor
you
in
the,
if,
in
the
in
the
event,
that
is
an
elective
surgical,
abortion
and
not
a
medical
health
reason,
you
would
not
be
able
to
do
that,
you
can,
you
can
bury
it
either
the
facility
can
bury
it.
The
mother,
the
parents
can
bury
it
and
that's
the
two
options.
Now,
if
it's
in
a
hospital,
if
it's
aborted
in
a
hospital
or
it's
a
dead
fetus
removed
from
the
from
the
womb
in
that
case,
that
it
could
be
chairman,
dixie.
L
I
think
that
we
should
allow
the
parents
to
be
able
to
make
that
decision
for
themselves.
I
don't
think
that's
a
decision
that
the
state
should
be
making
for
them,
how
if
they
wanted
to
donate
their
the
fetus
or
the
border,
the
boarded
fetus
to
science
or
to
a
university.
I
think
that
maybe
that
maybe
you
could
address
that
in
this
bill,
but
well
I
just
didn't
see
that
it
was
interesting.
You
confirmed
that
it
wasn't
addressed
in
that
bill,
but
that's
not.
K
I
Yes,
mr
chair,
thank
you.
Why
did
is
the
focus
only
on
fetuses
from
in
clinic
abortions
instead
of
every
fetus?
If
we're
talking
about
dignity
of
life
like
hospitals,
spontaneous
abortions,
miscarriages
ivf
and
medical
abortions,
this.
K
Response
are
you
recognized.
It
says
in
the
bill
very
clearly
that
hospitals,
hospitals
already
have
these
policies
in
place.
However,
it
says
in
the
bill
that
if
a
hospital
has
policies
that
are
in
place,
which
already
properly
displays
of
the
bodies
of
an
unborn
child,
that
if
they
they
must
follow
the
guidelines
of
in
the
policy
of
this
law,
if
they
don't,
then
this
law
would
kick
into
place
so
right
now,
hospitals
are
not
included
because
they
don't
perform
elective
abortions.
K
A
Representative
johnson,
please
last
follow-up.
I
It
seems
like
you're
you're,
setting
a
different
president
for
different
places
and
in
in
different
but
they're
all
you
know
the
same
under
the
as
the
way
you
see
it
and
there's
also
the
very
real
concern
of
forcing
a
victim
of
rape
to
bury
a
fetus.
K
It
doesn't
force
the
mother
to
bury
the
fetus
at
all.
It
says
if
the
mother
can
walk
out
of
the
clinic
and
then
the
clinic
the
facility
would
then
take
care
of
it,
and
there
is
a
very,
very
big
difference
in
the
the
difference
between
the
two
hospitals
who
are
forced
to
do
this
because
of
the
health
of
the
mother,
because
they
she
could
die
or
the
the
baby
has
already
died
and
the
womb
has
to
be
removed.
They
already
have
dignified
policies
in
place
that
deal
with
this.
K
When
you
talk
about
clinics
that
perform
elective
abortions,
they
have
no
policies
in
place.
They
have
no
laws.
In
tennessee
code,
we
have
code
tennessee
that
mandates
how
you
treat
dead
animals,
how
they're
to
be
disposed
of.
You
can't
just
throw
them
in
the
trash
they
have
to
be
cremated
or
buried,
but
we
don't
have
the
same
policies
in
place
for
a
human
being
and
that's
in
tennessee
code.
Now
we
don't
have
anything
in
tennessee
code
about
these.
K
K
The
way
it's
handled
now
throughout
the
country
and
and
facilities
here
is
that
babies
are
aborted
and
they're
disposed
of
in
one
of
three
ways:
they're,
either
thrown
in
the
bag,
with
medical
waste
and
thrown
out
with
the
trash
or
incinerated
they're,
ground
up
and
flushed
down
the
toilet
or
the
drain,
and
we
just
want-
and
you
can't
do-
that
legally
with
a
dog
or
a
cat,
a
pet
or
farm
animal.
There's
rules
in
place,
the
tea
deck
has
and
other
other
agencies
have
for
the
proper
disposal
of
animals.
I
Thank
you.
So
how
do
hospitals
do
that.
K
Again,
hospitals
have
policies
in
place
that
already
reflect
this
bill.
What
they
do
is
they
number
one?
They
turn
the
baby
over
to
the
mother,
who
wants
to
bury
it
or
they
if
the
mother
doesn't
want
to,
then
they
send
it
to
the
morgue
and
the
morgue
at
that
point,
as
any
unclaimed
body
is
either
buried
or
or
cremated.
A
The
questions
have
been
called
without
objection.
We
are
voting
on
sending
house
bill
1181
to
calhoun
or
primary
calendar
and
rules.
Yes,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
all
opposed,
nay.
If
you
wish
to
be
recorded
as
an
ac,
the
clerk
eyes
have
it
bill,
moves
out
to
calendar
and
rules.
Thank
you.
Mr
sponsor
item
number
nine
on
our
agenda
hospital
887
by
chairman
calfi.
A
A
That's,
sir
okay,
the
amendment
is
already
on
the
bill.
No
action
is
needed
in
this
committee.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
You
are
clear
to
explain
your
bill.
C
C
About
tying
up
the
boat
ramps
at
on
the
lakes
and
rivers
of
tennessee,
so
a
lot
of
people
like
to
do
this
activity
in
the
state
parks
and
and
the
natural
areas,
and
this
would
set
up
a
mechanism
which
will
have
to
be
come
back
through
here
on
on
rules
to
people
that
rent
but
not
limit
to
kayaks
pale
boards.
Canoes
rock
climbing
gear.
Any
of
those
things
that
people
would
use
in
a
natural
area
or
or
a
state
park.
C
And
then
the
department
of
conservation
environment
would
come
back
with
the
rules
and
we
would
approach
with
a
fee
schedule
and
all
that.
And
we
would
consider
those
at
that
time.
F
B
C
Notes
are
just
people
doing
it
for
commercial
operations.
Okay,.
A
D
A
A
This
bill
alleviates
the
situation
also
where
no
address
can
be
found
for
the
next
of
kin.
It
clarifies
that
medical
records
attached
to
the
position
for
conservatorship
are
confidential.
Currently,
that
is
not
the
case,
although
it
is
implied,
the
medical
records
may
be
retrieved
and
unsealed
by
an
attorney
representing
the
individual
under
conservatorship,
though,
this
also
clarifies
that
the
a
petitioner
is
responsible
for
the
cost
of
publication.
A
If
it's
required
simply
stated
with
the
amendment
that
covers
the
bill,
I
stand
ready
to
answer
questions.
D
Thank
you,
chairman
reagan.
Any
questions
comments
for
chairman
reagan
on
the
bill
as
a
minute,
the
question
has
been
called
all
those
in
favor
of
sending
house
bill
581
to
calendar
rules
signify
by
saying
aye
opposition,
nay,
bill
moves
up.
Mr
chairman,
chairman
reagan,
you
are
recognized
on
house
bill
271
the
bureau
of
ethics
and
campaign
finance.
Do
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second.
A
Reagan.
Thank
you,
mr
vice
chair.
This
is
a
basic
sunset
law
and
base.
What
it
does
is
extend
the
bureau
of
ethics
and
campaigns
to
june
30th
2027.,
and
there's
not
much
to
explain
beyond
that.
D
A
Sir,
thank
you,
mr
vice
chair.
Before
we
adjourn,
I
have
an
announcement.
Does
anybody
else
have
any
business
to
come
before
the
committee,
though,
seeing
none
a
reminder
that
the
joint
subcommittee
or
apparently
the
joint
committee
on
the
rules
will
be
meeting
on
april,
the
26th,
which
is
two
weeks
from
now.
We
will
meet
next
week
for
our
usual
house
committee
meeting
depending
on
what
bills
are
in
front
of
us.
If
we
have
no
other
business
to
come
before
us,
we'll
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
non-debatable
we're.