►
Description
House Department of Agencies Subcommittee House Hearing Room 3
A
A
C
E
E
D
We
have,
in
addition,
we
have
105
staff
wow.
We
do
all
the
dis,
we
don't
do
all
the
dispatch
and
call
taking
we're
a
centralized
9-1-1
center.
We
take
over
600
000
calls
a
year
emergency
and
non-emergency
and
we
are
a
centralized
dispatch.
So
we
have
all
of
the
employees
with
mou's
between
all
the
agencies
got.
E
D
D
F
G
D
At
that,
thank
you.
We
we
think
it
fits
us
very
well.
Some
districts
are
you
know,
I
I
make
a
statement.
Some
some
districts
have
more
cows
than
they
have
people,
and
so
it's
a
little
different,
there's
still
a
cost
of
business
to
do
it
that
way,
but
our
city
and
county
got
together
in
1986
and
formed
the
district
and
it
works
well
for
us.
So
thank
you
for
that.
Mr
brooke.
A
H
H
Service
chairman,
always
it
changes
from
50
to
75
000
the
amount
that
a
charitable
organization
can
raise
before
they
hit
the
higher
audit
threshold,
and
this
comes
directly
from
one
of
my
charitable
organizations,
and
many
in
your
districts
have
probably
had
this
same
issue
where,
if
they're
very
successful
and
they
raise
beyond
50
000,
it
cost
them
a
significant
amount
of
funds
to
do
that.
Higher
level
audit.
We
haven't
changed
this
in
several
years
and
so
changing
from
50
to
75.
000.
F
H
I
know
the
one
in
my
district
will.
I
have
not
asked
the
secretary
of
state's
office,
but
I
will
follow
up
with
them
and
try
to
get
that
information
on
how
many
go
above
the
50..
I
will
tell
you
that,
according
to
at
least
the
charity
that
reached
out
to
me,
a
good
number
of
them
will
stay
below
that
50
on
purpose,
so
they
kind
of
they
govern
themselves
back
so
that
they
don't
hit
it
because
apparently
these
can
cost
several
thousand
dollars
for
these
higher
end
audits.
G
H
E
E
E
That
is
correct.
One
two,
nine,
nine
three
members,
that
if
there's
no
objection
since
I
think
it's
just
a
technical
change,
is
that
correct?
It's
basically
a
typo!
Yes,
all
right!
If
we
will
can
we
let's
just
go
ahead
and
if
that's
quit,
yes,
we've
got
a
question
there
and
we'll
go
right
ahead
and,
and
let's
apply
that,
then
we
are
okay.
A
Basically,
what
this
this
bill
does
or
the
amendment
does,
it
creates
a
common
carrier
license
for
those
who
transport
alcohol
and
the
three
things
that
we're
really
trying
to
attack
on.
This
is
number
one.
It
ensures
compliance
and
it
also
ensures
that
we
get
tax
collection
on
it
and
the
main
thing
that
I'm
really
pushing
is
we
try
to
ensure
that
miners
alcohol
don't
get
in
the
hands
of
the
miners,
and
that's
that's
one
big
concern
that
I
have.
E
Good
good,
yes,
correct,
okay,
so
we
do
let's
go
ahead
and
get
a
motion
in
a
second
on
this,
this
amendment-
and
we
did,
though
I
think
didn't
you
rush,
okay,
chairman
breaking,
did
that
all
right,
so
all
right,
let's
we're
ready
to!
I
see
no
objections
to
the
call-in
question
on
this.
Let's
get
it
on
the
bill,
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye.
E
E
All
right
further
questions
to
chairman
host
call
any
objections.
Calling
the
question
we're
there.
Let's
vote
those
in
favor
of
house
bill
1688
as
amended.
Please
say:
aye
aye
those
opposed
likes
on
the
eyes.
Have
it
and
now
we
will
go
back
out
a
session.
I
guess
and
I'll
pass
the
gavel
over
to
you
back
to
you,
chairman.