►
From YouTube: W16 0mega WG: Capabilities approach presentation w/Manu
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
So
perfect,
then,
and
then
also
of
course,
those
sessions
where
we
then
have
prepared
that
yeah.
I
also
looked
at
that
with
we
have
more
advanced
announcement
or
maybe
even
really
set
schedule
when
you
want
to
present
those
back
to
the
focus
groups
and
back
to
bigger
groups
right
so
just
and
with
that
manu.
If
you
want
to
present
already,
we
can
get
started.
B
Sure,
if
someone
can
do
me
a
favor
of
opening
the
link
I
sent
on
the
omega
channel
and
sharing
that
on
their
screen.
A
On
it,
okay,
thank
you
one
second,.
C
B
Yes,
okay,
okay!
Well,
to
start
yes,
today,
I'm
gonna
be
talking
about
the
capability
approach
by
mrdsn
and
briefly,
the
capability
approach
is
a
normative
framework,
so
it's
qualitative
in
nature
and
it
deals
with
human
welfare
and
how
to
in
concentrates
on
on
ability
of
a
person.
B
Rather
than
than
their
mere
right
or
freedom
to
do
so,
but
the
actualization
of
of
that
opportunity-
and
it
was
first
conceptualize
as
an
alternative
to
the
growth
domestic
product
statistic
because
well
san
thought-
that
it
wasn't
quite,
it
was
just
an
aggregate
of
production,
but
but
it
didn't
take
into
account
the
the
flourishing
of
people
within
a
country
it
could.
B
There
were
instances
where
the
gdp
might
have
been
growing,
which
meant
the
industrial
sector
was
growing,
but
the
the
actual
capabilities
of
people
which
maybe
were
deprived
of
education
or
or
health,
so
that
the
country
could
focus
on
other
industrial
concepts
was
suffering,
so
he
he.
He
developed
this
framework
too,
as
an
alternative
to
to
gdp
and
yeah.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
yeah
so
some
context:
amar
jason,
indian
economist.
He
graduated
with
a
ban
economic
from
university
of
calcutta
in
india.
A
B
He
was
well
implied
that
he
he
would
have
four
years
of
freedom
to
study
anything
he
liked,
and
he
made
the
radical
decision
to
study
philosophy,
explaining
that
some
of
his
main
interests
in
economics
relate
quite
closely
to
to
philosophy,
for
example,
social
choice,
theory
and
mathematical
logic,
which
also
draws
the
moral
philosophy
and
also
on
the
study
of
inequality
and
deprivation.
B
So
we
can
see
the
the
capability
approach
as
as
being
rigorous
in
terms
of
especially
this
iteration,
which
I
found,
which
which
has
equations
and-
and
it
is
it's
a
way
to
quantify
it,
but
also
it's
very
normative
nature,
and
it
has
a
lot
of
philosophical
underpinnings
behind
it.
So
he's.
B
He's
he's
currently
teaching
at
harvard
he
actually,
he
actually
retired
and
then
came
back
he's
the
only
professor
in
harvard
to
have
done
so
I
think
they
asked
him
to
come
back
so
yeah.
A
B
Okay,
so
yeah,
when
we
speak
of
inequality,
we're
saying
that
there
isn't
a
lack
of
equality
of
what
right.
It's
it's
a
concept
that
it's
it's
it's
very
widespread
nowadays
rise
of
inequality,
but
but
in
quality
of
what
right,
inequality,
resources,
sure
utilities,
mostly
yeah,
but
percent.
B
One
of
the
reasons
for
this
is
because
top-down
development
is
always
going
to
trump
human
rights
in
favor
of
of
profit.
As
long
as
the
definition
of
terms
remain
held.
B
So
things
are
allowed
to
operate
implicitly
when
they
are
not
defined
or
when
they
are
very
vaguely
defined,
and
so
sen
tried
to
to
correct
this
by
creating
a
framework
that
would
enlighten
or
illuminate
on
on
the
actual
on
what
it
would
mean
for
someone
to
to
nourish
to
to
flourish
as
a
person
and,
and
so
the
concept
of
freedom
here
is
related
to
real
potentialities.
B
What
he
calls
the
capability
quote,
unquote
for
what
individuals
can
actually
do
or
be
by
using
the
resources
these
two.
These
are
the
two
things
that
are
important.
What
the
individual
can
actually
do
is
the
first
one
and
what
the
individual
can
actually
be
or
become
after
he
has
been
able
to
do
something,
and
so
the
overall
framework
is
is
related
to
the
reasons
why
they
value
those
potentialities
as
well.
B
So
it's
it's
objective
and
subjective
in
that
sense,
so
one
of
one
of
the
key
concepts
of
the
capability
approach
is
the
notion
of
substantive
freedom,
meaning
the
freedom
to
be
able
to
achieve
important
things
in
life,
and
here.
B
Substantive
is
used
to
con
contrast,
contrast
the
notion
of
negative
freedom,
which
we
understand
at
liberty.
So
it's
not
just
about
freedom
from
interference,
and
it's
not
about
freedom
from
the
state
right.
B
It's
it's
not
about
civil
and
political
liberties
alone,
but
it's
about
the
freedom
to
be
able
to
participate
in
society
and
to
pursue
your
own
goals,
and-
and
this
has
something
to
be
described
as
flourishing,
and
it
is
also
the
rejection
of
the
economic
model
of
individuals
acting
to
maximize
their
self-interest,
regardless
of
relationships
and
emotions,
which
is
what
I
mean
here
with
homo
economics
versus
homo
florere
is
just
not
for
poaching,
and
it's
an
interesting
distinction
that
again
it's
it.
B
It's
it's
something
that
we
take
for
granted
as
we're
always
acting
to
maximize
our
self-interest.
But
but
not
really.
We
there's
a
lot
of
other
variables
that
we
take
into
account,
and
sometimes
we
sacrifice
our
self-interest
in
order
to
preserve
our
relationships
and
to
augment
our
emotions
and
so
for
for
sand
development.
B
It's
a
process
of
expanding
freedoms
equally
for
all
people,
and
it
has
its
focus
on
human
ends
and
the
importance
of
respecting
the
people's
ability
to
pursue
and
to
realize
the
goal
that
they
value
so,
in
other
words
their
agency,
and
so
a
capability
is
what
you're
enabled
to
do
or
choose
and
to
be
or
achieve.
Given
your
own
characteristics,
the
people
around
you,
the
resources
and
services
that
you
can
draw
on
the
rights
that
you
can
access
and
the
institutions,
the
structures
and
legal
frameworks
of
society.
B
Yeah
next
slide.
Please.
B
And,
and
so
why
are
we
be
looking
at
the
capability
approach?
Well
for
one,
it
integrates
equality
and
human
rights
concerns,
and
here,
though,
the
freed
up
principles,
frida
are
it's
an
acronym
that
corresponds
to
fairness,
respect
equality,
dignity
and
autonomy.
B
B
It
takes
into
account
the
tools
that
you
have
at
your
at
your
disposal.
It
can
be,
you
know,
hospital
school,
public,
public
transportation,
but
also
how
how
playing
or
socializing
with
someone
makes
you
feel
and
and
if
you're
able
to
to
to
do
that,
if,
if
you
have
the
means
and
the
instruments
to
to
achieve
that,
subjective
outcome,
which
you
value
and,
and
so
it
reflects
the
quality
of
outcomes,
autonomy
and
process
through
this
and
and
yeah
next
slide.
B
So
this
is
one
type
of
equality
measurement
framework,
taking
a
look
at
inequality
by
seven
characteristics
by
gender,
ethnicity,
disability,
sexual
orientation,
age,
religion
or
belief
and
social
class.
B
The
inequality
of
substantive
freedom,
meaning
the
inequality
in
the
central
and
valuable
things
in
life
that
people
can
do
and
be
the
the
three
aspects
are
in
terms
of
outcomes,
process
and
autonomy,
and
I'm
gonna
go
over
these
more
in
an
example
later
on.
B
So
if
this
is
very
abstract
it,
it
there's,
there's
a
point
where
I
ground
this
into
an
example
and
and
ten
domains:
life,
physical
security,
health,
education,
standard
of
living,
productive
and
value
activities,
participation,
influence
and
voice,
individual
family
and
social
life,
identity,
expression
and
self-respect
and
legal
security.
B
So
all
these
things
are
incredibly
valuable,
but
the
the
the
ruling
or
the
dominating.
B
Paradigm
of
our
of
our
era
is
economic,
and
so
these
things
there
are
not
a
lot
of
frameworks
that
that
values
or,
or
that,
take
this
into
account.
So
we
take
a
look
at
how
much
people
makes
and
what's
like
the
minimum
rate
per
hour,
that
someone
can
can
gain
but,
as
as
things
become
more
constrained,
for
example,
right
now
with
with
the
with
the
quarantines
and
such
these
things,
life
and
and
health
and
participation,
influence
and
voice
social
life
expression.
B
These
things
are
are
not
being
protected
in
the
way
that,
for
example,
other
things
like
other
things
like
our
our
revenue
or
things
like
that
are
more
easily
quantified
or
more
widespread.
Are
you
know,
protected
or
preserved
by
people?
So
it's
important
that
that
that
these
that
these
things
be
taken
into
account,
especially
right
now
yeah,
so
for
the
practical
meaning
of
the
concept
of
capability
right,
and
this
is
where
it
gets
more
quantitative
right
like
what
does
the
concept
of
capability
mean
in
practice
right?
B
So
a
person's
capability
is,
is
a
set
of
available
functioning
vectors?
Okay.
So
what
is
the
functioning
vector
right?
A
function
vector
is,
is
just
a
combination
of
plural
of
several
functionings,
measured
at
different
magnitudes
of
achieved
levels.
Right,
that's
that's
a
mouthful
but,
for
example,
let's
say
let's
say
we
want
to
observe,
writing
and
moving
right.
So
you
may
have
been
doing
four
hours
of
writing
and
one
hour
of
moving.
That's
four
comma
one.
B
If
you
put
into
a
coordinate
before
the
pandemic,
when
you
have
to
drive
to
work
and
do
the
commute,
but
now
maybe
you're
doing
home
office
right,
so
you
may
be
doing
five
hours
of
writing
and
zero
hours
of
moving
so
five,
comma,
zero
and
and
so
again
this
is
for
us,
but
you
can
see
how
these
can
be
also
applied
to
someone
who
lives
in
a
community.
That's
that's
rural,
very
far
away
from
a
school
and
who
has
to
walk
several
hours
to
actually
start
writing
under
school
right.
B
So
maybe
someone
has
two
hours
of
writing
and
four
hours
of
of
of
of
walking
and
then,
when
actual
public
transportation
gets
implemented
into
a
community,
then
all
of
a
sudden
that
person
can
do
four
hours
of
riding
and
one
hour
of
moving.
Because
now
there's
a
bus
that
can
pick
that
person
up
and
take
take
that
person
to
school.
So
that's
how
we
start
seeing
how
the
the
functioning,
vector
or
or
a
person's
capability
as
a
set
of
available
functioning
vectors,
is
modified
by
the
instruments
that
they're
able
to
use
right.
B
So
a
functioning
vector
is
achievable
when
a
its
realization
is
not
prevented
by
by
interference
by
others.
That's
the
concept
of
negative
negative
freedom
that
I
that
I
mentioned
before
and
b
the
external
internal
conditions
and
means
necessary
to
realize
it
have
been
positively
provided.
B
So
when
both
of
these
notions
have
been
fulfilled,
then
the
capability
of
someone
at
a
certain
point
in
time
is
the
set
of
the
various
functioning
vectors
achievable
for
an
individual
by
changing
the
way
that
person
chooses
to
allocate
the
resources
and
the
utilization
ability
that
that
person
has
at
that
particular
time,
so
the
the
set
of
functioning
vectors
to
to
put
it.
In
plain
terms,
it
represents
the
real
freedom
of
a
person
in
terms
of
the
opportunity
that
that
person
has
to
achieve
functionings,
which
correspond
to
doings
and
beings
right.
B
The
the
things
I
mentioned
to
do,
which
implies
to
choose
something
and
to
be
which,
which
leads
to
achieve
something
and
so
yeah
the
the
the
set
of
function
vectors,
represents
the
real
freedom
as
the
opportunity
to
achieve
functionings
realized
by
like
the
two
means
of
resources
and
the
utilization
abilities
so
yeah
here
we
can
see
you
know
an
example
right
so
again
we
said
that
a
functioning
vector
combination,
several
functions,
measured
at
different
magnitudes
of
achieved
levels.
B
So
we
can.
We
can
look
right
now,
at
the
same
example,
writing
and
and
moving
so
like,
I
said
someone
spending,
long
hours
commuting
to
work,
achieve
or
achieve
six
units
of
both
writing
and
moving.
However,
let's
say
after
that
individuals
suffered
a
severe
spine
injury.
Then
the
figures
became
10
for
right
and
one
for
move
and
and
later
they
changed
towards.
B
They
changed
to
seven
for
writing
and
two
for
moving
after
special
transportation
service
say
an
ambulance
became
available,
and
so
in
this
example,
we
can
see
the
the
six
comma
six
point
actually
on
the
on
the
next
one
on
the
next
slide
or
the
previous
one
yeah.
Those
two
in
here
we
can
see
the
the
six
comma
six,
which
is
the
achieved
function
vector
and
the
evaluation
func,
the
evaluation
function
of
a
person
and
also
the
capability
set
on
the
left
and
then
on
the
right.
B
We
can
see
how
the
the
evolution
the
evaluation
function
changed,
because
that
person
became
injured
and
so
did
the
capability
set.
And
then,
if
we
and
again
this
this
might
seem
again,
these
coordinates
it's
just.
We
input
numbers
on
one
side
and
then
we
output
on
the
other.
So
it's
just
a
practical
way.
I
don't
want
you
guys
to
be
discouraged
by
operations,
but
I
mean
we.
B
We
are
a
very
engineering
intensive
community
and
if
we
want
to
apply
this
to
the
frameworks
and
the
things
that
we're
doing,
I
mean
we
have
to
deal
with
these
types
of
graphs
and
equations
and
and
so
yeah
inputting
the
hours
that
that
the
the
doings
and
the
beings
take
and
and
and
actually
graphing
them
is
helps
visualize
the
relationship
that
they
have
and
how
they
can
be
modified
by
by
different
sets
of
circumstances.
B
B
Slide
this
is
yeah,
so
this
is
the
the
yeah.
This
is
the
the
one
when,
where
seven
comma,
two,
when,
when
you
introduce
you,
know
special
transportation
service
and
if
you
that's
right
yeah,
so
this
is
a
fractional
structure
of
an
individual's
capability
right,
so
it
might
seem
convoluted,
but
it
really.
B
It
really
helps
us
re-examine
the
relationship
between
choice
and
opportunity
again
going
into
the
philosophy
of
it
right.
So
so
the
the
relation
between
choice
and
opportunity,
such
that
an
individual's
capability
and,
let's
say,
for
the
sake
of
clarity,
your
individual
capability
in
the
main
space
of
functionings,
your
individual
capabilities
produced
by
transforming
commodities
with
your
utilization
ability,
while
your
utilization
ability
is
produced
by
transforming
sub-functioning
vectors
with
your
production
function,
while
years
of
functioning
vectors
are
produced
by
transforming
commodities
by
your
general
basic
skills
and
so
on.
So
this
is
just
the
way.
B
This
is
the
way
in
which
it
it.
It
makes
it
easier
to
put
these
things
into
equations,
and
why
are
these
equations?
Because
we
we're
talking
about
having
putting
putting
our
our
doings
in
between
the
freedom
that
we
have
putting
that
into
a
system
of
equations,
so
that
we
can,
we
can
use
an
optimization
problem
to
say,
okay,
how
can
we
maximize
the
freedom
that
we
have?
It
would
be
okay.
B
How
can
we
maximize
the
doings
and
the
things
that
we
can
achieve
given
a
a
set
of
constraints,
and
by
doing
that
effectively,
we
can
start
framing
in
a
way
that's
more
quantitative
and
less
qualitative.
We
can
start
framing
our
demands
to
to
hey.
We
need
transportation
service,
we
need
health
services,
we
need
education,
we
need
paid
roads,
we
need
basic
food
supplies,
these
type
of
things
they
can
be
graphed
into
a
system
of
of
equations
and
and
then
optimized
and
yeah.
B
I
just
thought
it
was
it
was
it
just.
It
was
very
exciting
for
me
to
to
go
from
the
philosophy
more
into
the
economic
and
and
the
the
putting
it
into
an
equation,
yeah
and
yeah.
So
just
in
sum,
the
the
level
of
an
individual's
capability
is
is
really
constrained
by
by
their
total
resources
and
skills.
As
usual.
B
In
this
understood
in
economic
models,
but
instead
of
just
looking
at
a
commodity
function
or
utility
function,
we're
actually
looking
at
capabilities
now
we're
actually
creating
a
function
for
the
capabilities
that
we
have
right
and
and
also
by
contrasting
both
of
them.
We
can
see
how
there
are
various
intermediate
factors
between
the
capabilities
we
have
and
the
constraints
that
we
have,
and
so
yeah
next
slide.
A
Well,
one
question
just
a
very
short
one,
so
that
definitely
resonates,
but
also
it
resonated
with
something
that
I
just
had
in
my
hand
from
reductionism
to
creativity,
and
when
I
look
at
this
it's
you
know,
resources
and
skills
or
or
will
even
like
my
personal.
A
B
That
yeah,
I
I
know
that
I
know
that,
like
a
network
can
be,
I
know
that
a
network
and
the
relationships
that
exist
between
the
different
people,
which
are
kind
of
like
nodes
within
the
network.
I
know
that
it
can
be
symbolized
by
by
in
lineal
algebra
by
matrices
and
and
that
being
that
said,
I
know
that
you
can
take
a
look
at
oh
okay,
so
there's
there's
different
people
within
the
network,
and
and
how
can
we
get
from
this
person?
Who
has
maybe
this
skill
to
this
other.
A
B
B
It's
viable-
I
just
haven't
seen
in
in
from
what
I
read
with
san
explicitly,
that
he
has
mentioned
that.
But
I
mean
it's
it's
very
one
of
the
the
pros
and
and
if
we
go
to
to
the
next
slide,
these
are
the
the
current
applications
and
then
the
next
slide.
B
B
So
there
was
a
lot
of
subsequent
research
done
about
how
this
can
be
applied
and
it
has
been
adopted
by
a
lot
of
dependencies
like
governmental
entities,
so
I'm
sure
there's
a
way
to
frame
what
you're,
what
you're
saying
so
that
it
can
be
applied
to
us.
But
I
I
don't
know
like
I
I
haven't
come
across
it.
B
Yeah
and
and
so
yeah
to
to
summarize,
so
that
we
can
go
more
into
the
discussion
part
which
is
actually
the
the
exciting
part.
So
to
summarize
the
the
capability
approach,
what
it
does.
It
presents
a
novel
idea
and
some
analytical
tools
for
us
to
measure
the
the
value
of
freedom
and
to
evaluate
its
distribution.
I
mean
that's
for
me.
B
That's
amazing,
and
this
new
approach
captures
what
is
good
for
people
in
terms
of
capability
and
freedom,
and
by
doing
so,
it
makes
it
possible
to
introduce
ethical
perspectives
into
economics
again
and
to
to
quantify
this
model.
I
very
very
briefly
went
over
the
use
of
equations
and
not
even
I
just
graphed.
B
You
know
some
very
simple
points,
but
if
you
go
into
the
book
that
I
used
to
prepare
this
presentation,
it
goes
into
lagrangian
functions
which
serves
like
to
like
optimize
and
basically
determine
the
maxima
and
the
minimum
of
an
equation
which,
in
practical
terms,
can
be
okay.
What
is
the
maximum
amount
of
freedom
that
we
can
get
given
our
capabilities
and
given
the
doings
and
the
beings
and
the
functions
that
we
value
right.
B
It
goes
very
deep
into
like
the
actual
math
of
it,
and
I
didn't
want
to
bore
you
or-
or
you
know,
make
you
turn
off.
If
you
start
seeing,
you
know
very
complicated
situations,
but
but
basically
what
it
does
is.
It
derives
functioning
vectors
from
commodity
vectors,
converted
by
like
individual
utilization
abilities,
and
these
two
then
expand
the
opportunity
sets
of
community
commodity,
vectors
and
individuals,
utility
functions,
and
from
this
we
can
obtain
equations
where
individuals
maximize
their
evaluation
functions
and
with
their
opportunity
sets
of
functioning
vectors,
in
other
words
their
capabilities.
B
So,
given
the
skills
you
have
and
given
the
community,
you
can
access
there's
a
way
for
you
to
to
find
a
way
to
optimize
your
your
evaluation
function,
which
is
kind
of
like
the
the
things
that
you're
seeking
the
the
the
doings
and
the
beings
that
you're
trying
to
reach
at
and
and
so
it
it
it
helps.
You
know,
individuals
become
sort
of
super
rational
who
who,
by
by
quantifying
some
of
their
preferences,
they
can
choose
optimal
commodity
vectors
in
order
to
maximize
their
their
their
their
their
functionings.
B
Their
valuation
functions
constrained
by
by
sure
the
conditions
of
the
market
in
private
ownership,
commodity
prices,
individual
incomes
and
utilization
functions.
So
yeah,
that's
that's,
that's
pretty
much
it.
The.
B
It's
just,
how
can
we
discuss,
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
questions,
probably
several
ones.
A
Can
you
would
you
like
to
ask
a
few
questions?
One
second,
sorry
about
that.
D
D
Enhanced
the
you
know,
some
of
the
understandings
about
that.
A
A
No,
it
is
perfect
because
the
one
thing
that
we
are
struggling
with
is
we.
We
are
very
well
aware
that
there
are
qualitative
values
and
normative
things
that
actually
influence
our
decision
making,
but
we
cannot
or
we
assume
we
cannot
capture
them
or
we
assume
any
model
is
going
to
be
very
reduction.
A
So,
let's
just
not
capture
it
at
all,
but
that's
you
know
it's
similar,
like
no
governance
is
not
good
governance
right
so
similar
to
that,
I
do
believe
that
any
form
of
quantification
or
or
modeling
also
of
qualitative
values
at
the
very
least
helps
us
not
to
forget
them.
Even
if
we
at
the
end
come
up
and
say
that
wasn't
you
know
sufficient.
A
However,
if
you
thanks
a
lot
money
bring,
you
know
a
very
well
burst
nobel
prize
winning
model,
certainly
and
again,
because
it
really
resonated
a
lot
from
what
we
have
been
trying
to
do
in
token
engineering,
for
example,
in
invisible
economy
where
we
need
or
want
to
actually
have
contribution
metrics,
but
without
measuring
only
quantity
for
easily
quantifiable
things,
but
also
how
people
act
give
and
how
they
feel
when
they
act.
A
So
that
resonated
a
lot
and
when
you
say,
do
and
be
become,
have
you
come
across
in
the
works
also
about
motivation
like.
B
I
mean
he
has.
He
has
such
he
has
so
many
books
that
when
I'm
about
I
don't
want
to,
I
mean
he
has
probably
written
at
some
point.
He
has.
B
Has
captured
like
all
the
angles,
because
he
has,
I
think,
seven
or
eight
books,
one
of
the
books,
martha
newsbomb,
is
also
a
very
a
very
important
researcher
that
I
think
amari
hassan
co-wrote
co-authored
a
book
with
her,
and
she
also
has
some
books
of
her
own.
So
I'm
sure
all
these
things
about
about
justice,
about
freedom,
about
about
even
motivation
and
and
the
the
yeah
the
functionings
behind
it,
I'm
sure
at
some
point
they
have,
they
have
written
about
it.
B
It's
just
it's
just
a
matter
of
like
finding
it
and
and
applying
it
to
our
context.
What
I
really
want
to
bring
to
our
attention
is
the
fact
that
we're
doing
token
engineering
for
our
social,
economic
class
and-
and
this
is
like
we're
taking
we're
taking
the
framework
of
this-
is
for
for
for
the
development
sectors
or
for
people
at
the
bottom.
A
B
For
people
very
marginalized
and
we're
trying
to
apply
it,
we're
doing
the
inverse
right,
we're
taking
a
framework
that
was
applied
for
people
who
have
very
little
means
to
help
themselves
and
we're
trying
to
see
okay,
this
framework
was
developed
for
them.
How
can
we
use
the
extensive
amount
of
of
literature
on
the
subject
and
apply
it
to
us
and
at
the
same
time,
do
not
forget
that
the
token
engineer
that
we're
doing
we're
doing
for
our
specific
you
know
middle
to
middle
high
or
high
socioeconomic
class?
B
And
how
can
we
start
building
things
for
the
the
for
for
the
the
the
least
lucky
among
us?
You
know
if
the
time
is.
C
B
Or
if
the
time
is
later,
when
there's
more,
when
more
regular
infrastructure
has
been
created,
I
don't
think
the
time
is
ever
later,
because
I
think
things
are
quickly
regressing
and-
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
huge
there's,
a
huge
pool
of
of
labor
and
and
just
culture
and
and
just
human
dignity
and
and
willingness
to
to
to
flourish
from
from
people
who
who
have
not
had
the
opportunity
that
we've
had
and
and
at
the
very
least
we
can.
B
D
A
The
one
thing
that
resonated
a
lot
is
when
you
said
you
know
the
dysfunctioning
vectors
are
improved
or
modified
by
instruments
and,
basically,
when
we
think
about
coming
back
to,
let's
say
our
luxury
problems
of
coordination
in
these
digital
infrastructures
that
we're
building,
and
I
do
believe
that
we
will
see
definite
improvements
or
modifications
when
we,
for
example,
automate
many
things
or
in
token
engineering
commons,
for
example,
when
we
combine
source,
cred
and
praise
or
when
the
discord
boards
bots
are
basically
helping
in
in
you
know,
helping
with
recurring
tasks
and
reminders
and
so
on.
A
At
the
very
least,
that
reminded
me
of
you
know
the
token
engine
or
token
economies
or
communities
that
wants
to
adopt
token
or
create
their
token
economy,
that
this
type
of
thinking
might
also
help
them
to
see.
Okay,
you
know
what
is
what
are
our
functions
and
vectors
on
that
level
and
what
tooling
that
is
implemented
deployed
can
help
us
to
improve.
A
So
that
might
be
something
when
we
look
deeper
into,
and
that
might
be
very
useful,
something
like
a
capabilities,
a
readiness
or
you
know
just
giving
them
also
and
with
them
I
mean
really
groups
that
are
coming
new
to
this
domain
of
token
economies.
B
Basically,
but
I
wanted
to
first,
you
know,
discuss
it
here
in
omega,
see
see
where
it
comes
from
it.
I
think
they
they
have
their
the
way.
The
way
I
I
thought
about
it
was
okay,
maybe
for
like
v2
for
for
right
now
they
have
their
own
way
of
of
of
structuring
this
and
later
on.
If,
if
this
gains
traction
here
in
omega,
we
can
start,
you
know,
because
I
definitely
I
I
need
some
other
minds
to
to
start
tinkering.
B
So
I
wanted
to
bring
it
here
because
it's
informative,
it's
qualitative,
it
brings
ethics
into
the
mix,
and
so
it's
it's
precisely
the
the
within
the
mandate
of
omega
later
on.
We
can
give
it
to
other
working
groups.
A
The
the
one
working
group
that
we
can
also
as
soon
as
that's
more
contextualized,
the
token
engineering
tech
labs
with
sean
and
the
others.
You
know
we've
been
looking
into
how
we
can
combine,
and
I
can
imagine
that
they
also
pick
this
up,
especially
because
sean
and
others
from
long
tail
fintech
are
also
very
much
into
projects
and
supporting
projects
that
aren't
just
crypto
native.
A
But
actually
you
know
working
with
communities
that
aren't
digital
native,
even
right,
but
with
native
communities
and
on
many
different
things.
So
I
could
imagine
that
it
might
help
first
of
all,
tech
lab
might
would
possibly
be
interested
in
the
modeling
aspect
of
it
all.
And
secondly,
if
we
could
pull
this
off,
then
that
might
be
really
an
in
a
very
useful
model
that
people
can
plug
in
into
their
system
model.
A
So
a
couple
of
I
just
made
some
notes
like
practicality
of
it,
where
we
can
further
develop
it
and
where
we
could
test
it,
apply
it
in
token
economies
that
are
open
and
in
need
and
interested
definitely
yeah.
A
Our
super
collector
of
mental
models
and
his
he
then
synthesizes
merges
and
dispenses.
Then
them
then
when
when
and
where
needed,
contextualized
it's
so
super
cool.
C
No,
it's
just
something
very
delicate
like
where
I
feel
like
ethics
are
very
important
and
yeah.
If
we
somehow
test
it
and
see
it
works
like
I
would
love
to
see
it
implemented
around
dc.
C
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think,
maybe
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
hold
programmers
in
such
high
schemes-
they're
they're,
very
smart
people-
they're
very
competent,
but
in
the
context
of
of
what
I
explained
is
that
they
they
increase
our
our
functioning
vector
right
yeah.
They
create
the
tools
that
allow
us
to
optimize
the
functionings.
A
A
B
I
mean
it's,
it's
I
think
it's
again
it
it
can
get
really
messy.
But
when
you
just
understand
that
it's
it's
very
practical.
B
A
Super
cool
and
this
one
fractal
structure
again
that
also
resonated
a
lot.
I
understand
from
individuals,
I'm
really
inclined-
and
I
would
love
to
you
know,
go
further
and
then
figure
out.
If
I
find
something
like
where
it's.
B
B
The
book
is
titled
the
the
ethics
and
economics
of
the
capability
approach,
so.
B
B
I
knew
that
I
knew
the
the
I
I've
studied
since
then,
and
I
understood
that
for
it
to
be
applied,
it
needed
to
be
sort
of
like
universalized
into
a
system
of
equations
and
that
can
be
into
code
and
then
that
can
be
graphed
and
that
can
be
yeah
shown
and
and
and
turn
into
something
that
that
can
be
adapted
to
to
different
contexts.
So
yeah.
B
A
A
Defined
in
a
society,
for
example,
what
is
a
valued
activity
or
what
is
a
disabled
person
and
again
something
that
is
coming
up
for
me
very
recently.
Is
this
whole?
A
You
know
neurotypical
and
and
neuro
diverse
people,
and
basically
also
the
understanding
that
it's
you
know
from
years
and
years
or
decades
earlier
it
has
been
looked
at
as
yeah
disabling,
because
you
cannot
participate
in
social
norms
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
but
more
and
more,
and
especially
also
maybe
with
our
society
that
just
functions
differently,
that
all
of
a
sudden,
these
different
thinking
people
bring
very
different
values
and
functionings
to
the
society.
A
And
you
know
there
is
this
interchange
and
that's
something.
I
would
also
like
to
question
or
look
into
or
find
ways
to
open
this
up
a
little
bit,
but
did
you
find
something
or
somewhere
like
what
it
really
means?
You
know
in
relation?
Is
it
as
I
think
that
it's
in
relation
to
what
society
thinks?
What
is
you
know
functioning.
B
B
So
yeah
go
ahead.
D
D
One
of
the
most
influential
he
basically
invented
chemistry,
as
we
know
it
now,
and
he
he
almost
certainly.
D
Redefine
the
scientific
method
into
the
method
that
we
use
now,
and
he
did
all
of
that,
while
being
profoundly
on
the
autism
spectrum,
he's
one
of
the
primary
people.
If
you
want
to
read
about
neurodiversity
and
the
contributions
of
people
in
society,
about
that,
there's,
a
great
book
called
neurotroph
and
it's
a
it's
a
wonderful
book
and
in
it
he
is
included
as
one
of
these
people,
where
you
just
super,
obviously,
and
very
famously
autistic.
You
know
what
I
mean
like
like.
D
There
was
this
famous
story
where
he
well,
he
first
of
all
he's
born
into
a
famous
british
sort
of
like
royalty
or
whatever
you
know
they
have
a
whole.
A
D
And
they
just
give
those
people
a
lot
of
money
or
whatever,
and
so
in
the
1800s
he
his
dad.
You
know
got
him
interested
in
science
and
he
inherited.
You
know
the
family
estate
and
he
literally
turned
it
into
this.
Clapham
common
area
turned
it
into
like
a
mad
scientist
lab
like
and
and
one
time
he
ran
in.
There
was
a
very
upstairs
downstairs
kind
of
thing
like
if
you've
ever
seen
like
downton
abbey
or
whatever,
it's
very
much.
D
You
know
the
way
that
that
works,
and
so
anyway,
he
once
ran
into
one
of
his
servants
on
one
of
the
on
one
of
the
stairwells
and
he
had
his
entire
house
redesigned
so
that
that
would
never
happen
again.
D
So,
like
this
guy,
he
just
lived
in
a
building
by
himself
and
had
enough
money
and
servants
to
like
support
his
thing
and
basically
like
made
chemistry
he's
he
was.
He
was
basically
the
the
bridge
between
the
old
phlogiston
era
and
modern
chemistry
and
and
they
discovered
that
he
as
a
you
know,
neuro
diverse
person,
basically
yeah.
He
discovered
way
more
things
than
they
realized
same
thing
with
nikola
tesla.
D
For
example,
you
know
so
you
know,
there's
a
bunch
of
bunch
of
people
like
that,
and
I've
made
it
something
of
a
study
of
these
people
too.
You
know
there
are
other
people
not
only
who
have
autism,
but
people
had
spiritual
awakenings
or
both
so
yeah,
the
neurotribes,
the
legacy.