►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
B
Also
like
there
is
a
high
chance,
a
lot
of
the
people
meet
on
france
so
and
it's
maybe
we're
trying
to
sing
it
with
the
hat.
So
it's
super
cool.
A
Oh
cool
in
july
nice
last
night.
B
B
A
A
Yeah
sure,
let's
let's
have
a
have
a
round-
I
don't
know
if
everyone
had
a
chance
to
look
into
the
channel
today
I
will
share
the
agenda
there
and
then
yeah.
Let's
have
a.
A
B
C
Sorry,
my
internet
connection
today
is
really
bad,
but
I
feel
that
we
are
making
something
really
great,
that
we
have
been
working
for
this
so
long,
and
that
is
like
motivating
to
see
that
things
are
starting
to
like
take
shape
and
that
things
are
moving
and
as
always
like
every
time
you
move
in
one
direction,
you're
going
to
receive
like
a
feedback
and
ways
to
improve,
and
I
think
that
it's
also
good
that
we
are
getting
prepared
also
for
to
receive
feedback
and
to
incorporate
it
and
that
we
are
very
open
with
talking
almost
everything
and
I
feel
great
about
it
about
it.
A
Yeah
so,
as
I
mentioned,
I
just
returned
from
a
week
off
and
trying
to
get
get
a
grasp
on
all
of
what
was
happening
yeah.
So
basically
I
feel
how
do
I
feel
about
the
hatch
I
feel
curious,
maybe
a
bit
left
behind
in
a
sense
that
there
seems
to
be
so
many
things
happening
it's
hard
to
keep
up
if
you're,
basically
yeah.
If
you
have
yourself
a
full
month,
it's
hard
to
keep
track
yeah,
but
I
look
forward
to
catching
up
tomorrow
and
I'll
pass
it
to
chewie.
D
Yes,
thank
you
yeah.
I
I
agree.
It's
it's
been.
Definitely
a
highlight
topic
this
this
week.
Just
the
amount
of
of
information
and
events
going
on
it
is
very
exciting,
but
now
now
that
you
put
it
that
way,
I
I
do.
I
do
agree
that
we
probably
need
a
tool,
a
better
tool
to
keep
up
with
everything.
D
So
we're
working
on
on
kind
of
like
a
like
a
forum
post
of
weekly
updates
that,
with
with
this,
we
should
we
should
be
able
to
to
better
like
keep
keep
updated
with
everything.
That's
going
on,
it's
a
more
like
informal
method
than
the
blog
post,
but
hopefully
will
katie,
and
I
will
get
together
tomorrow
to
design
this
so
yeah.
That
should
be
that
should
be
able
to
help
during
these
exciting
but
immersive
times
like
we.
D
We
we
forget
about
like
the
the
amount
of
of
work,
that's
going
on
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to.
E
E
I
feel
good
about
the
hatch.
I
feel
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
tired,
like
I
just
feel
like.
I
need
to
work
better
on
my
energy.
You
know
like
at
some
moments
to
work
out
and
eat
better
and
all
of
these
things
that
give
you
extra
energy,
but
I
feel
really
good
about
the
direction
we're
taking
and
how
how
people
are
engaging,
and
there
is
a
really
good
feeling
about
yeah
on
youtubers
emerging,
and
it
feels
like
everyone,
understanding
of
happening
more
or
less
and
the
better.
E
I'm
not
sure
who
hasn't
gone
yet
I'll.
Try
sebastian.
F
Hi
folks
same
this
is
like
a
it's
a
marathon
and
it's
a
marathon
and
we're
running
like
a
sprint.
It's
overwhelming
yeah.
I
mean
research
group
with
balancer
with
it
takes
a
couple
hours
a
week,
follow-ups
of
course,
with
people
in
europe
and
in
south
america
yeah
it's
it's
overwhelming,
but
everything
is
so
positive.
It's
just
it's
an
avalanche
of
goodness
and
just
have
to
pick
something
to
to
make
it
progress.
I
was
just
no,
no,
no,
no
traction!
It
is
if
you
spread
yourself
too
thin.
F
G
Thanks
russell,
no,
I
didn't
I
didn't
go
yet
I
find
it
like.
You
have
different
feelings
and
we
all
have
different
feelings
about
the
work
we
are
doing
like
collectively
and
individually,
as
liby
said,
I
think
we
came
off
entering
this
community
in
this
kind
of
fatigue
like
this
over
information,
this
over
engineering,
everything-
and
I
think
this
is
like
connected
to
the
whole
realm
of
defy
media
information,
social
media.
So
we
have
to
be
very
aware.
G
I
am
myself,
I'm
just
super
tired
of
having
to
I
don't
know
like
also
sudden
insight
is
like
you
go
out
for
a
week,
and
maybe
you
get
up
with
with
the
whole
thing
and
you
and
you
say,
okay,
what
is
what
is
this
all
about?
What
are
we
trying
to
achieve
collectively
so
yeah?
I
think
it's
super
positive
to
to
get
this
dying,
but
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
well.
It's
me
I'm
super
aware
of
of
this
kind
of
fatigue.
G
H
Thanks
yeah:
well,
I'm
I'm
here
to
see
how
the
dynamic
that
we
have
currently
while
the
working
group
evolves
into
what
will
be
the
new
norm
after
the
hatch
and
I'm
just
here
to
see.
How
can
I
help
with
that
and
I
don't
know
who's
left
I'll
pass
it
to
whoever's
left.
I
That
be
me
yes,
I,
like
sebastian
avalanche
of
goodness,
that's
how
it
feels
it's
positive,
but
overwhelming
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that
back
to
your
ship.
A
Okay,
so
I
feel
like
I
always
need
an
extra
minute
to
arrive.
Why
don't?
I
share
my
screen
and
we
together
look
at
what
we
collected,
what
we
have
on
the
table
for
for
the
working
group
omega
and
yeah
manu.
A
Also,
you
reached
out,
I
think,
yesterday
or
the
other
day
that
you
were
interested
in
the
working
group
omega,
because
it
deals
with
with
the
ethics
and
ethical
side
of
it
right.
If
you
want
to
share
anything
with
the
group
with
respect
to
that
or
your
expectation
from
the
group,
that
would
be
something
we
can.
H
Yeah,
I'm
still
doing
the
research,
but
so
far
I
I'm
interested
in
a
theory
called
the
new
rhetoric,
which
is
a
type
of
rhetoric
that
goes
beyond
beyond
just
stylistic
patterns
and
just
trying
to
persuade,
and
it
goes
more
into
creating
a
pluralistic
point
of
view
where
there
are
different
truths
that
that
can
coexist
together.
So
I'm
I'm
being
how
that
can
be
applied
into
the
overall
process
that
we
have
and
the
sense
making
that
we're
involved
with
as
a
group.
But
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
want
to.
H
Go
into
it
more
in
depth,
without
without
doing
more
research
about
it,
but
it
it's.
I
mean
it's,
it's
very
promising.
It's
the
it's
the
norm
in
terms
of
of
theoretical
argumentation,
and
I
think
it's
it's
completely.
H
It
will
be
very,
very
useful
and
I'm
just
seeing
how
I
can
adapt
it
into
it.
A
Super
intriguing,
please
also
share,
even
if
you
have
not
completely
gone
through
it
yourself,
please
do
shares
or
other
people
who
might
be
interested
can
also
look
into,
and
maybe
take
you
up
on
that,
but
it
kind
of
is
exactly
the
point
where
we're
at
right.
We
are
acknowledging.
We
have
this,
these
diverse
perspectives
that
we
want
to
keep
and
nurture.
A
At
the
same
time,
we
hope
to
find
the
ethos
of
token
engineering
and
hope
to
find
that
it
starts
with
ethics
or
this
ethical
engineering,
and
these
are
super
big
questions
or
super
big
endeavors,
but
also
super
interesting,
at
least
for
the
ones
who
who
gather
here.
I
think
exactly
those
two
topics
have
crystallized.
Definitely
so
we
have
still
a
few
things
to
finish
up,
so
we
could
say:
okay,
we're
literally
done
exploring.
We
have
a
way
to
go,
it's
definitely
the
case,
but
we
should
still
have
a
right.
A
The
write
up
the
manifesto
of
this
working
group
have
a
short
description.
I
did
have
a
try
here
and
we
can
have
a
look
at
it
in
a
moment.
Then
we
have
the
manifesto
which
we
started
last
time
and
it's
basically
just
a
collection
of
of
basically
this
round.
We
had
last
two
weeks
ago.
A
It
was
again
in
a
tense
phase,
but
it
brought
up
something
that
also
letty
has
commented
on.
We
should
look
into
that
at
once
as
well
and
then
basically
writing
up
the
tech
proposals
for
the
two
initiatives
in
which
we
know
more
or
less
so,
I
think
more,
which
way
to
go
this
tea
consilience
project.
How
do
we
actually
bring
together
this
knowledge
and
then
what
we
dubbed?
Who
owned
tea
ethics?
A
Actually
it
complements
the
things
that
we
spoke
that
we
want
this.
We
can
have
a
participatory
research
that
something
an
anthropologist
actually
helped
us
with
that.
That
is
a
way
to
go,
and
then
we
found
the
book
it's
called,
who
owns
poverty?
That
applies,
that
type
of
participatory.
A
These
are
things
we
have
on
the
menu
today
and
if,
if
it's
okay,
let
me
just
share
so
does
anyone
want
to
add
something
to
it?
Or
is
it
good
that.
I
You
know
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt.
I
do
I
can,
I
add
something
or
just
ask
something
really
quickly.
So
this
is.
This
is
a
bit
off
topic,
but
since
I
don't
get
to
sync
with
you
very
often
it's
my
only
chance,
I'm
finishing
I'm
publishing
the
blog
like
right
now,
and
one
of
the
things
I
think
you
missed
out
on
shebnem
was
that
I'm
publishing
a
a
wish
list
for
the
working
groups,
and-
and
that
means,
if
there's
any
kind
of
contributors
that
you're
looking
for
for
omega,
like
as.
I
People
or
new
people
come
along.
What
do
you
have
anybody
that
you
that
I
can
add
to
your
to
to
omega?
You
know,
like
params,
asked
for
token
engineers
and
gravity
asked
for
psychologists.
This
kind
of
thing,
and
I
just
wanted
to
know
if.
A
A
Yes,
so
definitely
you
can
basically
funnel
all
token
engineers
also
here
as
well,
who
are
especially
interested
in
the
ethical
engineering
aspect,
yeah
and
especially
because,
basically
we
want
to
have
this
participatory
research
and
that's
what
I
wanted
to
talk
at
the
end
when
we
have
time.
But
how
does
that
look
like,
and
how
can
we
actually
either
prepare
in
the
working
group
sessions
that
we
have
the
flow
of
such
a
participatory
research
or
something
like
a
focus
group
where,
basically,
we
come
together
and
have
these
questions
that
we
are?
A
We
can
then
look
into
from
multiple
perspectives
and,
of
course,
in
dialogue,
so
definitely
token
engineers
and
basically,
if
you
say
basically.
G
A
So
one
thing
that
I
don't
know:
if
it's
going
to
be
better
or
not,
or
how
does
everyone
else
feel
about
it,
but
the
coordination
part
of
this
whole
stewarding,
the
working
group
I
feel
I'm
lacking
most
and
that
may
also
you
know
somehow
yeah
detriment
to
the
the
group
or
what
you're
outputting.
A
Yes,
that's
basically
it
like
finishing
up,
writing
stuff
or
or
at
the
very
least
getting
people
together
and
so
on.
Then
you
say:
okay,
we
wanted
to
work
on
the
manifesto,
but
then
in
in
those
two
weeks,
basically
life
happens.
H
I
can
do
that.
You
said
working
working
on
a
manifesto
and
grouping
people
together
so
that
their
ideas
are
expressed
through
there
is
that
right.
A
Yes,
so
exactly
like,
we
have
things
to
be
done
like
this
manifesto,
the
finishing
up
the
post,
like
the
quality
of
the
document
that
we
have,
that
they
are
done
and
it's
mostly
reminding
people
or
or
just
pinging,
basically
saying
hey.
We
wanted
to
actually
come
together
and
finish
this
up
right
before
the
next
meeting.
A
Let's
find
a
time
and
basically
yeah
someone
who
actually
doesn't
or
helps
us
not
to
get
lost
in
the
day-to-day
business
after
our
bi-weeklies.
G
Maybe
sorry
you
were
very
practical
with
regarding
only
the
manifesto,
as
we
have
been
like
exchanging
a
lot
of
things
during
these
months.
Maybe
we
can
just
get
some
days
till
next
week
and
we
work
asynchronously,
maybe
the
people
who
are
just
joining
today,
which
are
like
representative
from
the
channel
from
omega.
Maybe
we
can
just
open
the
manifesto
document,
let's
us
or
anyone
in
the
community
that
joined
this
document
would
like
the
goal
of
the
group,
I
think,
in
the
transparency
process.
G
A
Okay
cool,
so
basically
let
me
just
put
together
just
one
thing,
so
basically,
this
manifesto,
let's
have
a
look
into
it.
So
what
needs
to
go
in?
There
are
standards
and,
I
think,
yeah,
so
a
description
anyways!
That's
what
we're
getting
at
like
what
is
our
goal?
How
does
this
working
group
benefit
the
tea
community
etc?
So
these
are
things
we
can
work
on.
A
Asynchronously
just
really
work
on
the
documents,
but,
for
example,
if
manu
like,
if
you
think
about
it
and
maybe
check
at
the
end
of
the
week-
and
you
see-
or
anyone
really
who's
into
this
and
see
that
not
much
happened.
If,
if
one
could
just
ping
the
group
and
just
add
a
few
people,
and
that
would
I
think
that
that's
what
we're
needing
basically
someone
who
gives
the
beat
more
or
less
and
that
I'm
super
bad
at
this.
A
So
that's
why
I'm
good
at
content,
but
super
bad
at
coordination
and
keeping
people
together
more
or
less
so,
if
and
I
think
we're
working
as
incredibly
totally
fine
on
the
manifesto.
I
agree
with
that.
G
A
A
A
Specific
bit
so
wait
a
second.
So
let
me
add
this
description
over
here.
That
would
be
also
something
we
can
now
read
over
and
add
as
much
as
you
can
and
let
me
share
this
document.
So
if
I'm
understanding
you
rightly
that
basically
everyone
takes
five
or
ten
minutes
now
to
actually
go
through
it,
yeah
right,
sorry
in
the
omega
channel.
So
here
we
go
manifesto
at
ten
minutes
or
the
five
or
five
minutes.
Five.
A
A
G
With
it
get
lost
in
the
maze,
I
love
that
failure,
there's
something
just
put
on,
because
we're
just
saying
that
this
is
too
complex
as
a
result.
So
I
think
that's
the
the
main
failure
of
this
group
if,
if
we
just
add
complexity
to
the
whole
process,
which
is
ironically,
something
that
we
do
in
the
process.
But
yet
we
have
advantages
as.
G
G
E
G
G
F
G
A
A
Okay,
shall
we
shall
we
quickly
go
through
this?
I
had
some
comments
or
or
questions
while
I
was
still
typing.
Maybe
some
of
you
have
too
so.
A
G
Yes,
I
totally
forgot
that
I
made
that
comment
yesterday,
but,
yes,
I
think
I
it
was
inspired
by
your
words
or
everything
that
emerged
from
the
assessment,
which
is
the
specific
things
we
we
are
doing
collectively
and
we
cannot
over
engineer
in
any
other
way.
So
this
is
like
the
polarities
we
are
trying
to
integrate.
Also
in
the
theory
and
with
the
this
research
question
we
made
at
the
very
beginning,
how
do
we
go
about
specifying,
which
is
the
the
best
research
method?
Sometimes
it's
not
doable,
but
at
the
same
time,.
C
G
C
A
A
If
you
were
in
the
if
you
are
a
graviton
or
if
you
were
in
the
gravity
working
group
and
had
the
chance
to
make
that
learning
experience,
there
was
spiral,
dynamics
introduced,
and
that
is
basically
about
these
four
quadrants,
the
subjective
objective,
the
collective,
the
individual,
and
that
is
something
we
come
up
over
and
over
again
and
some
of
the
comments
or
some
of
the
things
described
here.
A
Even
ethics
right
there
are
ethical
dilemmas,
so
there
is
never
a
very
clear
answer
to
some
of
the
things
that
we
will
be
encountering
in
token
engineering
or
in
token
economies
as
participants,
especially
as
token
engineers
trying
to
do
your
best.
A
You
know
design
for
the
collective
good,
but
then
there
will
be
ethical
dilemmas
and
so
on.
So
how
do
we?
How
do
we
assess
these
situations
and
learning
about
that
again?
This
four
quadrants
came
up
and
also
we
can
reuse
this,
and
I
think
definitely
one
preparatory
work
would
be
to
explain
and
prepare
those
four
quadrants
what
it
means
with
respect
to
how
we
could
make
use
of
that
to
just
map.
A
A
Can
you,
how
can
you
share
the
the
results
somehow
anonymized
in
a
way
that
we
can?
Actually
everyone
has
a
chance
to
go
through
them.
A
Okay,
so
basically
they
have
answers
to
questions
that
we
thought
or
that
we
hope
to
frame
in
the
eye
and
the
environment
to
the
the
first
two
quadrants.
If
you
will
from
community
survey.
A
Survey,
if
you
can
share
those
a
everyone,
gets,
gets
an
idea
about
what
answers
were
there
at
the
same
time,
something
that
lydia
the
the
anthropologist
shared
with
us.
A
I
hope
she
will
be
joining
again
was
that
we
can,
or
we
should
keep
on
these
parts,
or
we
can
keep
on
this
participatory
sense,
making
style
that
there
are
focus
groups
etc
and
again
that
book
that
I
found
there
sharing
the
experience
of
having
gone
through
such
a
process
over
years
on
a
topic
as
as
vast
and
difficult
and
intricate
complex
as
poverty.
A
So
that
was
something
where
I
said:
okay,
oh
cool.
Finally,
at
the
very
least,
knowing
some
other
people
had
a
similar
experience
with
equally
difficult
topic
and
that
it's
possible
to
have
this
and
they
have
this
participatory.
So
that
would
be
something
I
would
definitely
love
to
put
into
a
format
that
and
then
share.
A
How
does
that
participatory,
conservatory
research
method?
Look
just
to
explain
it
better.
A
And
how
we
can
make
use
of
the
answers
that
we
have
already
this?
I
environment
perspectives,
then
the
the
answers
that
we
collected
here,
or
that
we
shared
collectively
in
a
sense
where
it's
more
about
the
we
and
the
system
in
which
we
operate,
and
I'm
more
than
happy
to
put
this
into
formats
into
a
document
or
into
this
who
owns
ethics
document
that
is
more
accessible
for
everyone
involved
and
on
which
we
could
build.
So
just
wanted
to
get
that.
E
A
Okay,
okay,
good
and
I'll
try
to
get
some
somewhat
anonymize
it
like
every
time
I
open
my
secret
every
time
I
open
an
excel
file.
I
feel
like
a
year
of
my
life
is
going
to
just
to
tell
you
my.
E
E
A
I
can
help
or
yeah,
or
we
can
so
shall
we
try
and
lock
that
in
that
we
have
a
sticky
note
session,
that
we
go
through
the
answers
and
just
say:
okay,
I
take
the
how
many
people
show
up
and
we
share,
but
I'm
also
happy
with
trying
and
getting
the
answers
out
of
the
excel
file.
Somehow
I
don't
mind
like
maybe
we
can.
E
C
E
A
A
So
this
one
yeah,
we
cannot
impose
ethics
on
anyone
agree,
but
at
the
same
time,
isn't
it
that
we
all
started
saying
it
is
important
because
we
are
basically
you
know,
especially
tokenizing,
it's
more
than
just
nudging.
G
Things,
I
think,
that's
a
very
good
point,
but
we
started
this
call
and
did
that
was
very
misleading.
I
think
for
nudging
the
the
whole
call
as
not
making
total
engineers
accountable
or
responsible
for
their
ethics,
and
I
totally
disagree
with
that.
I
think
we
can
have
accountable
people
for
their
ethics.
So
that's
why
law
exists,
natural
law
and
also
legal
laws.
So
I
I
I
hold
accountable
people
for
for
the
ethics,
so
we
cannot
impose
a
framework,
but
we
can
just
strive
for
forbid
for
better
sense
making
for
for
better
ethics.
G
F
D
F
You
you
have
to
be
more
considerate
and
then
at
the
larger
scale
you
there's
higher
order
laws.
So
it's
it's!
It's
not
so
black
white.
It's
like
it's
the
context
that
defines
how
you
apply
ethics,
not
the
ethics
themselves,
and
I
think
in
spiral
dynamics.
You
have
that
each
quadrant
has
a
bit
of
a
individual
side
and
more
of
a
closed
group
side.
So
you
could
have
like
a
working
group
where
you
have
certain
rules
that
would
apply
to
a
larger
group,
so
the
ethics
is
really
the
context.
Defines
the
ethics
like
just.
A
Yeah
yeah:
that's
there
isn't
just
one
and
one
perspective
on
to
anything
and
that's
why
I'm
also
mean
by
practical
support.
It's
really
okay.
I
understand
everyone
understand
the
importance
of
ethics,
but
also
that
it's
not
always
easy,
or
it's
not
always
visible
right,
and
also
that
there
are
issues
like
what
I
would
really
love
for
us
to
actually
set
that
goal.
Maybe
we
will
not
attain
it,
but
as
a
goal
that
we
really
take
on
it.
A
Not
just
you
know,
hold
the
finger
up
and
say
be
ethical,
but
also
have
this
practical
support
and
also
make
this
visible,
as
you
said,
like
context,
difficulties
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
F
A
Exactly
okay,
then
got
it
so
in
the
text
again,
please
we
can
make
it
asynchronously
into
more
fluent
more
readable
text
and
proof
definitely
goals
is
anything
that
came
up
here.
A
Context:
okay,
just
making
some
comments
from
the
discussion
that
we
have
and
feel
free
to
jump
in,
even
if
it's
just
adding
a
question
mark
somewhere.
G
Near-Term
mission
yeah.
I
think
it's
self-explanatory.
We're
trying
to
do
all
these
research
and
debates
to
expand
the
body
of
knowledge,
that
is
usable
for
the
whole
community,
and
we
are
trying
to
do
in
a
scientific
way
as
well
trying
to
integrate
all
these
quadrants
and
dynamic
spiral.
G
So
we
we
hope,
because,
because
that's
a
hope-
and
that
is
also
part
of
the
the
human
nature
to
to
be
of
use
to
the
whole
community
and
and
all
the
people
that
come
after
us
to
to
use
this
wiki
type
of
knowledge
and
to
expand
the
tsd
as
well.
G
A
A
Just
maybe
I
will
just
add
a
comment,
so
I
think
also
with
respect
to
olivia.
Maybe
you
can
add
more.
This
differentiation
we
had
with
near-term
was
also
that
we
wanted
to
have
focus,
especially
in
the
very
beginning.
C
A
That's
happening
exactly
so,
basically
we're
free
to
just
add,
as
we
did
here
in
general,
so
what
would
be
considered
success
versus
failure.
G
A
But
it
should
be
applicable
or
I
would
really
say.
A
So,
basically,
everywhere,
where
decisions
are
being
being
made
and
let's
see,
but
if
we
really
can
put
forward
something
that
is
also
practical,
that
people
can
can
read
and
basically
learn
and
more
or
less
know,
if
you're,
in
a
token
economy.
G
A
And
also
to
to
know
how
what
to
do
in
such
situations
etc.
So
one
thing
I
know
from
project
that
I've
been
involved.
It's
super
hard
because
everyone
is
trying
very
hard
and
everyone
is
in
the
same
boat
and
let's
make
something
we
can
collaborate
on
juan,
but.
A
Gravity
working
group
like
how
do
you
speak
up
right
if,
if
you
want
to
or
if
you
have
or
if
you
think
you
have
ethical
issues
with
how
a
project
is
going
effect,
etc,
how
do
you
start
a
conversation
that
isn't
just
going
to
end
up
or
escalate,
but
actually
enters
into
directly
into
a
into
a
positive
process?
A
A
G
A
A
So
I
think
that,
in
a
sense
as
in
code
of
ethics,
that
could
be
something
we
could
come
up
with
or
we
could
share
with
and
also,
I
think
when
gravitons
have
something
similar,
we
can
look
there
as
well.
Okay,
basically,
failure
get
lost
in
the
maze,
adding
complexity
goals,
not
understood.
G
Just
like
we
are
discussing
so
many
ethical
dimensions.
So,
let's
just
say
you
you
incentive
people
to
do
and
if
we
just
approve
things
and
then
you
come
up
with
a
different
debate.
So
what
like
this
intercomplexity
of
all
the
ethical
dimensions,
with
the
more
specific
practical
votes
from
params
and
philosophies
of
how
we
interact
in
this
community.
G
So
by
doing
this
work,
you
come
up
with
a
very
different
identity
of
what
you
are
and
what
you
are
doing
here.
So
maybe
you
just
have
a
grasp
that
some
things
are
not
really
important
in
your
life
and
you
can
just
say,
okay
bypass.